help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Höhne-Zell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Höhne-Zell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, C.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 12 5518-5526
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Functional Importance of Synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 during Exocytosis of Histamine by Rat Gastric Enterochromaffin-Like Cells1

Barbara Höhne-Zell, Angela Galler, Wolfgang Schepp, Manfred Gratzl and Christian Prinz

Anatomisches Institut der Technischen Universität München (B.H.-Z., M.G.), 80802 Munich; and II Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München (A.G., W.S., C.P.), 81675 Munich, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Dr. Manfred Gratzl, Anatomisches Institut der Technischen Universität München, Biedersteiner Strasse 29, 80802 Munich, Germany. E-mail: gratzl{at}lrz.tu-muenchen.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells release histamine upon stimulation with gastrin in a calcium-dependent manner. The intracellular mechanisms and proteins mediating exocytosis of histamine-containing vesicles in ECL cells have not been determined yet. We used immunocytochemistry to show the localization of SNAP-25 (synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa) and synaptobrevin VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein) in ECL cells of the rat gastric mucosa and in isolated, highly enriched ECL cells, which were identified with an antibody directed against the marker enzyme histidine decarboxylase. Immunoblots of isolated ECL cells demonstrated the presence of SNAP-25, synaptobrevin, synaptophysin, synaptotagmin, and syntaxin. Histamine release from isolated ECL cells permeabilized with 8 µM digitonin (2 min) was stimulated approximately 2.5-fold upon exposure to calcium (30 µM; 10-min incubation). Preincubation with 1 µM tetanus toxin light chain for 15 min attenuated calcium-induced histamine release by 40–50% and almost completely cleaved synaptobrevin. Botulinum neurotoxin A (100 nM) totally blocked calcium-induced histamine release and cleaved SNAP-25. We conclude that synaptobrevin, synaptophysin, synaptotagmin, SNAP-25, and syntaxin are present in gastric ECL cells. Inhibition of histamine secretion by clostridial neurotoxins associated with the cleavage of synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 implicates the functional importance of these proteins in the docking and fusion of histamine vesicles.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENTEROCHROMAFFIN-LIKE (ECL) cells are histamine-producing cells in the gastric mucosa that integrate neuronal and hormonal signals and thereby control gastric acid secretion. They are responsible for histamine release during food-stimulated and at least in part during neurally induced acid secretion (1, 2, 3). The antral hormone gastrin is the major stimulant of histamine secretion from ECL cells. Upon exposure to food, gastrin is released into the systemic circulation and binds to cholecystokinin B receptors on ECL cells, inducing an intracellular calcium signal that finally triggers histamine secretion (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).

Electron microscopic evaluation of gastric ECL cells revealed characteristic cytoplasmic vesicles containing a small electron-dense core surrounded by a translucent halo (for references, see Ref.1). Recent reports suggest that histamine is taken up into vesicles by a specific monoamine transporter driven by a proton gradient (6, 7). Therefore, ECL cells display similarity to chromaffin cells of the adrenal gland or to neurons. In all of these cell types, amines or neurotransmitters are accumulated in cytoplasmic vesicles by transporters dependent on the establishment of a proton gradient across the vesicular membrane by V-type adenosine triphosphatases (8).

We have previously established a model to study histamine secretion in vitro using highly enriched ECL cells in primary culture (4, 5, 9). Histamine secretion was stimulated by gastrin in the presence of extracellular calcium. Calcium entry across the plasmalemma was of critical importance for histamine secretion after receptor and postreceptor activation (5). However, the intracellular mechanisms resulting in fusion of histamine vesicles with the plasma membrane after calcium entry have not been defined.

On the other hand, the calcium-dependent intracellular secretory apparatus of neurons and endocrine cells has been analyzed in detail by numerous recent investigations. According to current models, docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles or endocrine secretory vesicles are mediated by three membrane-bound SNARE [soluble NSF (N-ethylmaleimide sensitive fusion protein) attachment protein receptor] proteins, termed syntaxin, synaptobrevin, and SNAP-25. As cleavage of SNARE proteins by clostridial neurotoxins results in blockade of exocytosis by neurons or endocrine cells, the SNARE proteins are regarded as key players in exocytosis (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). In addition to the SNARE proteins, vesicular membrane proteins such as synaptotagmin and synaptophysin, have been suggested to participate in the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles in neurons (20, 21).

We attempted to examine the presence of SNARE proteins and vesicular synaptotagmin and synaptophysin in ECL cells. It was our aim to obtain straightforward evidence for the neuroendocrine nature of these cells. In fact, we have identified five of these proteins in ECL cells by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry characterizing ECL cells as a neuroendocrine cell type. Moreover, we have functionally related the expression of two of these proteins to histamine secretion by specific cleavage and blockade of exocytosis by clostridial neurotoxins. Our data establish that these proteins are functionally involved in exocytosis, and that ECL cells display a great similarity to neurons and endocrine cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
All substances were of analytical grade and were purchased from the indicated suppliers: pronase E (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany); Nycodenz (Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY); BSA (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany); Matrigel and Cell-Tak (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany); FBS (Life Technologies, Eggenstein, Germany); and dithiothreitol, acridine orange, trypan blue, DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium, gentamicin, hydrocortisone, rat gastrin-17, insulin, transferrin, and sodium selenite (Sigma Chemical Co., Munich, Germany). The polyvinlychloride membrane containing the ionophor ETH 129 for the Ca2+-selective minielectrode was purchased from Fluka (Neu-Ulm, Germany).

Monoclonal antibodies directed against synaptobrevin II (Cl. 69.1) and synaptotagmin I (Cl. 41.1) and a polyclonal antibody (rabbit) directed against synaptophysin were provided by Reinhard Jahn (New Haven, CT), and a polyclonal antibody against histidine-decarboxylase (rabbit) was supplied by Tsutomu Chiba (Kobe, Japan). Monoclonal SNAP-25 antibody (SMI81) and monoclonal antisyntaxin antibody (Cl. HPC-1) were purchased from Sternberger Monoclonals (Baltimore, MD) and Sigma, respectively. Peroxidase-labeled, biotinylated, Cy3-labeled, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled antimouse (or antirabbit) IgG antibodies were obtained from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany). Tetanus toxin light (TeTxL) chain was a gift from Ulrich Weller (Mainz, Germany), and botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) was supplied by Bibhuti R. DasGupta (Madison, WI) and Clifford C. Shone (Porton Down, Salisbury, UK).

Isolation and cultivation of ECL cells
Mucosal cells from the stomachs of fed female Sprague-Dawley rats (total of 53 preparations; n = 5 rats/experiment; 180–200 g BW; Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were isolated by pronase E digestion (1.3 mg/ml) using the everted sac technique (described in detail in Refs. 4 and 5). The resulting mucosal cell preparation was fractionated by counterflow elutriation using the JE 6B rotor (Beckman Instruments, Glenrothes, UK) run in a J2–21M/E Beckman centrifuge. The original methods (4) and modifications (5) were described previously. Briefly, 108 mucosal cells were loaded into a standard chamber at a flow rate of 16 ml/min and a rotor velocity of 2300 rpm. Small cells (diameter, <10 µm) were collected at 2000 rpm and a flow rate of 22–23 ml/min. For further purification, 7 ml of this cell fraction were overlaid above two different layers of Nycodenz [supplemented with 1.2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 10 mg/ml BSA] diluted 1:1 or 1:2 with 140 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 11 mM D-glucose, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mg/ml BSA, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. After centrifugation for 8 min at 210 x g, the cells were collected from the interface between the top and second layers of the density gradient. The fraction contained more than 95% ECL cells determined by acridine orange uptake and immunostaining for histidine decarboxylase (HDC). Cell viability (trypan blue exclusion) exceeded 95%. The average cell yield from 5 rats in 60 experiments was 3.5 x 105 ECL cells.

Immunohistochemistry of rat gastric mucosa
Rat stomach was fixed by immersion in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, for 2 days at 4 C, subsequently washed for 12 h in PBS, pH 7.4, supplemented with 6.8% (wt/vol) sucrose and embedded in paraffin. Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, incubated for 30 min with 10% methanol and 0.3% H2O2 in PBS, and heated in 10 mM citrate (pH 6) three times for 5 min each time in a microwave oven. Then the sections were washed with PBS, incubated with 10% (vol/vol) goat serum in PBS for 30 min, and incubated overnight at 4 C with anti-HDC (1:1000) in 2% (vol/vol) goat serum in PBS. After washing with PBS, the slides were incubated with biotinylated antirabbit secondary antibodies [1:500 in 2% (vol/vol) goat serum PBS] for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS, avidin-labeled peroxidase (Vectastain, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and detection by diaminobenzidene were employed.

For colocalization studies immunostaining was performed on thin sections. Tissue was fixed as described above, dehydrated for 1 h at 4 C in 100% acetone, and embedded in polyacrylate (Technovit 8100, Heraues-Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Serial sections (1 µm) were placed on Poly-Prep slides (Sigma), dried for 2 h, and incubated for 10 min at 37 C with 0.1% (wt/vol) trypsin in 0.1% (wt/vol) CaCl2. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked as described above, followed by incubation with 10% (vol/vol) goat serum in PBS for 30 min. Serial sections were incubated overnight at 4 C with anti-SNAP-25 (1:200), antisynaptobrevin II Cl. 69.1 (1:200), and anti-HDC (1:2000) in 2% goat serum in PBS. After washing with PBS, the slides were incubated with biotinylated antimouse or antirabbit secondary antibodies (1:500 in 2% goat serum PBS) for 2 h. Immune complexes were visualized with avidin labeled peroxidase and diaminobenzidene (see above).

Immunocytochemistry of isolated and cultured ECL cells
Purified cells (4 x 104) were placed on sterile glass coverslips, each coated with Cell-Tak (diluted 1:2 with 0.5 M NaHCO3) and cultured at 37 C for 48 h in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) BSA, 5% (vol/vol) FBS (Life Technologies, Paisley, Scotland), 5 mg/liter insulin, 5 mg/liter transferrin, 5 g/liter sodium selenite, 10 nM hydrocortisone, 1 pM gastrin, and 50 mg/liter gentamicin sulfate. After culture, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed for 20 min in 3.7% formalin, washed twice in PBS, and blocked in 10% (vol/vol) goat serum in PBS for 30 min before incubation first with anti-SNAP-25, antisynaptobrevin, or anti-HDC antibody (all diluted 1:1000 in 2% goat serum in PBS) overnight at 4 C. After washing twice in PBS, cells were incubated with Cy3 (1:500)- or FITC (1:100)-conjugated antimouse and antirabbit secondary antibodies. Slides were examined with an Axioplan fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with suitable filters (excitation/emission, 546/590 or 450–490/520). Controls were treated identically without addition of the first antibody and did not show any staining (n = 3).

Histamine release from ECL cells after short term culture, permeabilization, and incubation with neurotoxins
Purified ECL cells were placed on culture wells (4 x 104 cells/well) coated with Matrigel at a 1:5 dilution and cultured at 37 C for 48 h in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 supplemented with 5% FBS (see above). The culture medium was removed and replaced by DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium without FBS but supplemented with 0.2% BSA for 3 h at 37 C to remove the influence of growth factors. The medium was removed, and ECL cells were permeabilized with 8 µM digitonin (in 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide) in potassium glutamate medium (150 mM potassium glutamate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5.7 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM Mg2+-ATP, and 10 mM 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.2) for 2 min at 30 C. This treatment permeabilized 85–95% of the cells, as determined by trypan blue uptake. The medium was then renewed without or with TeTxL containing 0.1% BSA or with or without BoNT/A containing 20 mM DTT, followed by incubation for 15 min at 30 C. Histamine secretion by ECL cells was determined by incubation with potassium glutamate buffer without (control) or with 10–100 µM free Ca2+ at 30 C for 10 min. This interval was found to be optimal for the histamine release experiments. Free Ca2+ concentrations in potassium glutamate buffer were calculated and monitored with a Ca2+-selective minielectrode (22). Histamine was measured in the supernatant and in cell lysates. Cells were lysed with 3% acetic acid, boiled for 2 min, and stored at -20 C. Histamine was measured in all samples by RIA using a commercial kit (Dianova).

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting
Samples (8 µg protein/lane) of purified ECL cells were separated on 12.5% gels by SDS-PAGE (23) and blotted onto nitrocellulose (24). Binding of monoclonal antisynaptobrevin II antibody (Cl. 69.1; diluted1:5,000) (25), monoclonal antisynaptotagmin I antibody (Cl. 41.1; diluted 1:2,000) (26), monoclonal anti-SNAP-25 antibody (1:2,000, SMI81, Sternberger Monoclonals, Baltimore, MD), monoclonal antisyntaxin-1 antibody (1:2,000; Cl. HPC-1; Sigma Immunochemicals, Deisenhofen, Germany), and polyclonal rabbit anti-synaptophysin antibody (1:70,000) was detected by peroxidase-labeled antimouse (or antirabbit) IgG antibodies (1:3,000; Dianova) and the enhanced chemiluminescence method (Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Identification of ECL cells in the gastric mucosa by immunostaining for HDC
We first identified ECL cells in the intact gastric mucosa with an antibody directed against the histamine-synthesizing enzyme, HDC. This enzyme can be used as a marker for ECL cells in the stomach of the rat, because in this species, mast cells are absent in the epithelium, and other endocrine cells do not contain HDC (1). Figure 1Go shows that small ECL cells in the basal part of the gastric glands are labeled, demonstrating the specificity of the antibody. Controls performed in the absence of the first antibody did not show any staining.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunostaining of rat gastric mucosa for HDC. ECL cells, immunostained with an antibody directed against the marker enzyme HDC, are present in the basal part of the gastric mucosa. The paraffin section was counterstained with hematoxylin to show details of the gastric mucosa. Magnification, x320.

 
Colocalization of HDC with SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin/VAMP in ECL cells
ECL cells were identified in the gastric mucosa by immunocytochemistry using a specific antibody directed against HDC (Fig. 2Go). In consecutive thin sections, antibodies directed against SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin were applied. As shown in Fig. 2Go, immunolabeled ECL cells (B and D) contained HDC as well as the characteristic neuronal and endocrine marker proteins SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin/VAMP (A and C). Other adjacent mucosal cells did not show any staining. No staining was observed when sections were incubated with the secondary antimouse or antirabbit antibodies without addition of the primary antibody (E and F).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. SNAP-25, synaptobrevin, and HDC are present within the same gastric mucosa cells. The distributions of SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin were compared with that of the marker enzyme HDC in consecutive thin sections of the rat gastric mucosa, which served as a source of the ECL cells to be further analyzed. Immunocytochemistry (avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method) revealed that the HDC-positive cells (arrows) shown in B and D neighboring unstained mucosal cells (stars) were also stained with antibodies directed against SNAP-25 (A) and synaptobrevin (C). In controls (omission of first antibody), no staining was observed (E and F). Magnification, x780.

 
Colocalization of HDC with SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin in isolated ECL cells
Isolated cultured ECL cells were fixed and labeled with the HDC antiserum described above. The simultaneous presence of SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin/VAMP in the same ECL cells was shown directly by immunocytochemistry. Antibodies directed against HDC or the SNARE proteins synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 bound to the cellular antigens were visualized with Cy3- or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (antimouse or antirabbit). In Fig. 3Go, AB double immunostaining of purified ECL cells for SNAP-25 and HDC is shown. Figure 3Go, C and D, shows colocalization for synaptobrevin and HDC. In control cells that were treated identically except that the first antibody was omitted, no staining was observed. In all cell preparations, more than 95% of the cells were labeled with HDC and SNAP-25 or synaptobrevin/VAMP, corresponding to the degree of enrichment. Similar values were obtained with antibodies directed against synaptotagmin I and synaptophysin (data not shown). Despite the low amounts of ECL cells present in the gastric mucosa (see Fig. 1Go), the present method of purification yielded a small, but highly enriched, preparation of ECL cells, which has already successfully been used in previous studies to investigate histamine release (4, 5). Subsequently, we attempted to analyze SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin/VAMP and related proteins by immunoblotting. In addition, we used the cell preparations (~3.5 x 105 highly purified ECL cells were isolated from five rats) for functional studies to investigate whether two of the detected proteins are involved in the exocytosis of histamine.



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Colocalization of SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin with HDC in isolated ECL cells shown by double immunofluorescence. Simultaneous presence of SNAP-25 and HDC in isolated and cultivated ECL cells (A and B) and of synaptobrevin/VAMP and HDC (C and D). Antibodies bound to the cellular antigens were visualized with Cy3- or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (antimouse or antirabbit). Labeling shows that both SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin are present in ECL cells, identified with an antibody directed against HDC. In controls (omission of first antibody), no staining was observed. Magnification, x700.

 
Immunoblotting
ECL cell homogenates were prepared from isolated, enriched, and 48-h cultured cells. The presence of proteins characteristic of the exocytotic apparatus found in neurons and endocrine cells was analyzed by immunoblotting. Figure 4Go, A and B, shows the results of two single experiments. Figure 4CGo gives an overview of all the proteins observed during our experiments. The proteins were detected by specific antibody binding and by the established size determined by comparison with marker proteins indicated on the left. All immunoblots showed specific single bands. Synaptobrevin corresponded to 18 kDa, SNAP-25 to 25 kDa, syntaxin to 35 kDa, synaptophysin to 38 kDa, and synaptotagmin to 65 kDa, values obtained previously in SDS gels.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Presence of neuroendocrine marker proteins in ECL cells shown by immunoblotting. Immunoblots revealed the presence of SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin in purified rat gastric ECL cells (A and B). The positions of the mol wt standards used are indicated on the left. On the right, all neuroendocrine marker proteins identified in the cells, including syntaxin, synaptophysin, and synaptotagmin, are shown (C). Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (antimouse or antirabbit) and the enhanced chemiluminescence method. All antibodies tested produced single bands with the expected mol wt, as indicated in C.

 
Histamine release from permeabilized ECL cells triggered by Ca2+
Isolated ECL cells were placed on well plates and cultured for 48 h. After short term culture, the medium was replaced, and permeabilization of ECL cells was performed with digitonin to gain access to the cytoplasm of ECL cells. In this model of permeabilized ECL cells we found that addition of Ca2+ was an effective stimulant of histamine release. In preliminary experiments (n = 10), we defined the optimal amounts of digitonin and the periods of incubation. Short (2-min) exposure of ECL cells with 8 µM digitonin was found to be the optimal procedure rendering the cells permeable to both Ca2+ and clostridial neurotoxins (see below). Figure 5Go shows histamine secretion by the permeabilized ECL cells after 15-min exposure to increasing concentrations of free Ca2+. The concentrations tested were 0, 10, 30, and 100 µM free Ca2+. The free Ca2+ concentrations were calculated and controlled with a Ca2+-selective minielectrode (22). Basal release (no Ca2+ added) in the different experiments was stimulated approximately 2.5-fold by 30 µM free Ca2+. As shown in Fig. 5Go, Ca2+ concentrations above 30 µM did not further enhance histamine release (n = 5 independent experiments). Therefore, this calcium concentration was used for stimulation of the cells in the experiments described below.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Micromolar free Ca2+ induces histamine release by digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells. Purified and cultivated ECL cells were permeabilized with digitonin (8 µM; 2 min) followed by incubation with an intracellular surrogate medium containing no Ca2+ (clear column) or 10, 30, or 100 µM free Ca2+ (filled column). Note that no further release of histamine was elicited between 30 and 100 µM free Ca2+. Each point represents the mean (±SEM) of three wells from one of three independent experiments. P < 0.05 for value obtained with 30–100 µM calcium vs. basal release.

 
Effect of TeTxL
Isolated ECL cells were placed on well plates and cultured for 48 h. After short term culture, the medium was replaced, and permeabilization of ECL cells was performed by short exposure (2 min) to 8 µM digitonin. Permeabilized ECL cells were preincubated for 15 min with the indicated TeTxL concentrations or vehicle. Histamine release was stimulated subsequently by 30 µM free Ca2+ during 10 min of incubation. Cells that were incubated in the absence of Ca2+ showed basal release. Preincubation of permeabilized ECL cells with 1 µM TeTxL resulted in a pronounced inhibition of Ca2+-induced histamine secretion, indicating that the secretory apparatus of ECL cells was susceptible to tetanus toxin (Fig. 6AGo). Inactivation of TeTxL by boiling abolished the attenuating effect of TeTxL on histamine release (n = 5 experiments).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. A, Ca2+-induced histamine release from digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells is inhibited by TeTxL. Permeabilized ECL cells were preincubated for 15 min at 30 C without (control) or with TeTxL (1 µM) in potassium glutamate buffer for 15 min at 30 C, followed by stimulation with potassium glutamate buffer without (clear column) or with 30 µM free Ca2+ (filled column) for 10 min at 30 C. Histamine released into the supernatant was measured and is given as a percentage of the total histamine in the cells. Note that TeTxL inhibits histamine release about 50% compared with that by control cells. Boiling inactivates TeTxL (right). Each point represents the mean (±SEM) of three wells from one of three independent experiments. P < 0.05 for stimulated vs. basal and for TeTxL vs. stimulated. B, Synaptobrevin is specifically cleaved by TeTxL in digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells. Permeabilized ECL cells were preincubated for 15 min at 30 C with 500 nM or 1 M TeTxL in potassium glutamate buffer. Subsequently, sample buffer was added, followed by immunoblotting. The synaptobrevin-immunoreactive band decreased as a result of cleavage by TeTxL, whereas SNAP-25 and syntaxin remained unchanged.

 
When permeabilized ECL cells were treated with TeTxL and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, the amounts of SNAP-25 and syntaxin were unchanged by 0.5 or 1 µM TeTxL (Fig. 6BGo, bands at the bottom). In contrast, the amounts of synaptobrevin were greatly decreased in cells incubated with TeTxL (Fig. 6BGo, top). Thus, it may be concluded that inhibition of exocytosis by TeTxL is associated with specific cleavage of synaptobrevin within gastric ECL cells.

Effect of BoNT/A
We also examined the effect of BoNT/A on permeabilized ECL cells. Again, purified and cultured ECL cells were permeabilized by 2-min exposure to 8 µM digitonin. Subsequently, cells were incubated with or without 100 nM BoNT/A for 15 min. Histamine release of permeabilized ECL cells was elicited by 30 µM free Ca2+ during a 10-min incubation period. This effect was almost completely inhibited by 100 nM BoNT/A (Fig. 7AGo; n = 3 experiments).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. A, Ca2+-induced histamine release by digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells is inhibited by BoNT/A. Permeabilized ECL cells were preincubated for 15 min at 30 C without (control) or with 100 nM BoNT/A in potassium glutamate buffer, followed by stimulation with potassium glutamate buffer without (clear column) or with 30 µM free Ca2+ (filled column) for 10 min at 30 C. Histamine released into the supernatant was measured and is given as a percentage of the total histamine in the cells. Note that BoNT/A inhibits histamine release almost completely compared with the control value. Each point represents the mean (±SEM) of three wells from one of three independent experiments. P < 0.05 for stimulated vs. basal and for BoNT/A vs. stimulated. B, SNAP-25 is specifically cleaved by BoNT/A in digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells. Digitonin-permeabilized ECL cells were incubated for 15 min at 30 C with 100 or 500 nM BoNT/A potassium glutamate buffer. Immunoblotting revealed that the SNAP-25-immunoreactive band observed in the control is cleaved into a smaller product, which is also detected by antibody against SNAP-25. The immunoblot was also analyzed by densitometry, followed by fitting the curve obtained with two Gaussian curves (top). Other proteins, such as synaptobrevin and syntaxin, were not altered.

 
Coincidentally, cellular SNAP-25 was cleaved by 100 and 500 nM BoNT/A (Fig. 7BGo, see bands at the top and densitometric evaluation), whereas syntaxin and synaptobrevin remained intact (Fig. 7BGo, bands at the bottom), indicating the specificity of our experiments.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Gastric histamine is an effective stimulus of acid secretion and binds to specific histamine H2 receptors on parietal cells. In vitro studies using isolated, highly enriched ECL cells from the rat gastric corpus demonstrated that the cellular source of histamine during gastrin-stimulated acid secretion is the ECL cells in the gastric fundus and that histamine secretion elicited by gastrin depends largely on intracellular calcium signaling (4, 5).

Calcium entry across the plasma membrane is of critical importance for histamine secretion. In the present study, addition of molar concentrations of free calcium to permeablized ECL cells was found to elicit histamine release. These data prove that calcium by itself triggers exocytosis in ECL cells, similar to observations in adrenal chromaffin and other endocrine cells and in neurons. Previous studies have shown that isolated ECL cells typically exhibit a membrane potential of about -50 mV and have voltage-gated K+ and Ca2+ channels (9, 27) similar to neurons and chromaffin cells of the adrenal gland. An average cytoplasmic calcium concentration of about 250 nM was determined in stimulated single ECL cells after gastrin stimulation (5). In contrast to these experiments, a concentration of 10–30 µM calcium was necessary to stimulate exocytosis of histamine vesicles in permeabilized cells. This observation may indicate that calcium influx into intact ECL cells elicited by gastrin actually yields calcium concentrations about 100 times higher in the subplasmalemmal space than in the overall cell body. Similar conclusions have been drawn from observations in nerve terminals and adrenal chromaffin cells (28, 29).

Although it is generally accepted that docking and fusion of secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane depend on the presence of intracellular calcium, proteins participating in exocytosis have been identified in neurons and a few endocrine cell types (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). SNAP-25, synaptobrevin, and syntaxin are regarded as key proteins of the exocytosis apparatus and were initially thought to be unique to neurons and endocrine cells. These SNARE proteins have also been detected in various other cell types, including muscle cells and adipocytes. The distribution of characteristic subtypes of the SNARE proteins, however, exhibits a tissue-specific pattern (for references, see Refs. 30–34).

Proteins of the exocytosis apparatus of ECL cells are not only of special interest to delineate the relation of this cell type to the endocrine system, but are also of pharmacological interest in attempts to block histamine secretion. Here we show that ECL cells of the gastric mucosa, which are characterized by the presence of the marker enzyme HDC, also contain synaptobrevin and SNAP-25. Moreover, both SNARE proteins were colocalized in isolated and highly purified ECL cells by simultaneous immunostaining for HDC. Finally, immunoblotting revealed synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 in the isolated ECL cells and, in addition, syntaxin, which strongly suggests the presence of these proteins within ECL cells. The antibodies used for immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting were specific for SNAP-25, syntaxin-1, and synaptobrevin II (VAMP-2), subtypes of these proteins present preferentially in neurons and endocrine cells. Therefore, our results obtained by double immunostaining and immunoblotting clearly show that the SNARE proteins SNAP-25, synaptobrevin II (VAMP-2), and syntaxin-1 are present in ECL cells. In a recent study, SNAP-25, syntaxin-1, and VAMP-2 have been detected in populations of gastric mucosal cells (35). Specifically, VAMP-2 was colocalized with isolated tubovesicular membranes of gastric parietal cells. In the present study, cells neighboring ECL cells in the mucosal sections did not show VAMP-2 staining. As we did not characterize these cells with appropriate antibodies, it is possible that these cells represent chief cells rather than parietal cells, which are both present in the basal part of gastric glands. An alternative explanation for the lack of immunostaining for VAMP-2 in adjacent cells may be due to the low abundance of VAMP-2 in parietal cells compared with that in ECL cells or in masking of VAMP-2 by formation of complexes with other components of the exocytosis apparatus preventing binding with the antibody.

According to a current model, the SNARE proteins synaptobrevin, syntaxin, and SNAP-25 first form a heterotrimeric complex. Binding of soluble {alpha}-SNAP and N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein to the docking complex and ATP hydrolysis by N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein cause disassembly of the SNARE complex, which is followed by exocytosis (36, 37). It appears likely that syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and VAMP-2 also form a complex in ECL cells. However, due to the low abundance of ECL cells in the gastric mucosa and the small number of highly purified ECL cells obtained during isolation, we were unable to study the formation of a protein complex in ECL cells by immunoprecipitation.

Syntaxins are SNARE proteins that constitute a large family of proteins differentially expressed in several mammalian cells (38). Syntaxin-1 is expressed in neurons and adrenal chromaffin cells, where it is located in both the plasma membrane and the membrane of secretory vesicles (18, 39, 40). A role for syntaxin-1 in synaptic vesicle docking and fusion is suggested by its association with calcium channels and the SNARE proteins (41, 42). The simultaneous presence of syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and VAMP-2 in ECL cells may indicate that the mechanism of exocytosis in ECL cells closely resembles that of the adrenal chromaffin cells and neurons.

Furthermore, we identified two vesicle-associated proteins in ECL cells that have been previously implicated in exocytosis by neurons and endocrine cells. Synaptotagmin I is a 65-kDa integral membrane protein present in synaptic vesicles and endocrine secretory vesicles and has been identified as a vesicular Ca2+ receptor (26, 43). The antibody used in this study selectively detected synaptotagmin I but no other isoforms of this protein, which have a wide distribution in nonneuronal cell types (44, 45). Therefore, synaptotagmin I can be regarded as a marker for neuronal and endocrine cells. Synaptophysin, a 38-kDa protein found typically in synaptic vesicles, was also detected in ECL cells. The protein exhibits structural homology to gap junction proteins and participates in pore formation during exocytosis (46). The association of synaptophysin with the complex of SNARE proteins occurs via its specific association with the SNARE protein synaptobrevin/VAMP (25, 47, 48). Again, synaptophysin represents the neuronal form of the pantophysin family with other members present in a wide variety of cells (49). The presence of synaptotagmin I and synaptophysin in ECL cells directly underlines the neuroendocrine nature of this cell type.

Permeabilized ECL cells were attacked by clostridial neurotoxins. In general, intact endocrine cells, unlike neurons, are not susceptible to clostridial neurotoxins such as tetanus and BoNT/A. However, after permeabilization, exocytosis of endocrine cells can be blocked by the neurotoxins. This effect is caused by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 within endocrine cells by the neurotoxins (13, 14, 18, 19, 50). Thus, the same SNARE proteins are specifically attacked by clostridial neurotoxins in endocrine cells and neurons (for references, see Refs. 20 and 21). Using clostridial neurotoxins, we found that in rat gastric ECL cells, two of the neuroendocrine marker proteins, synaptobrevin II/VAMP-2 and SNAP-25, are functionally involved in histamine release. Tetanus toxin inhibited histamine secretion by only 50%, whereas BoNT/A completely blocked histamine secretion. These results are in contrast to those in chromaffin cells of the adrenal gland, where catecholamine secretion is only partially blocked by BoNT/A, although the extent of protein cleavage with 100 nM BoNT/A was identical in both preparations (18). The exact reason for this difference is unknown. However, it may be speculated that functional and inactive pools of synaptobrevins and SNAP-25 exist in ECL cells. These forms could display different susceptibilities to the neurotoxins, as previously reported to occur during complex formation (51, 52).

Our present results show that histamine is released from permeabilized ECL cells upon stimulation with calcium, similar to previous studies using chromaffin cells (for references, see Refs. 13, 18, and 50). As the process of histamine release from permeabilized ECL cells was mediated by proteins previously reported to participate in exocytosis, it can be concluded that 1) histamine in ECL cells is released from membrane-bound structures and not from the cytoplasm; and 2) that histamine-containing vesicles undergo exocytosis upon stimulation with micromolar concentrations of Ca2+. Thus, although ultrastructural evidence for the localization of histamine within cytoplasmic vesicles of ECL cells remains to be presented (1), it is very likely that it is released from vesicles, as is known to be the case for neurotransmitters and hormones. Interestingly, basal histamine secretion was higher in permeabilized ECL cells than in intact cells (4) and, in addition, varied significantly among several sets of experiments. One possible explanation for this phenomenon may be the unusually high numbers of docked and peripheral secretory vesicles that we observed by electron microscopy in ECL cells. Therefore, addition of digitonin to the ECL cells not only permeabilizes the plasma membrane, but diffuses in various extents deeper into the cell, and the detergent may hit docked vesicles (diameter, ~300 nm). The differences in basal release may reflect differences in the range of digitonin diffusion in the cortex of the ECL cells that cannot be exactly controlled at present.

Recent observations suggest the presence of the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 VMAT2 in ECL cells, which may serve as a transporter for histamine into the storage organelles (6, 7). Furthermore, histamine secretion is inhibited by bafilomycin (4, 5), suggesting that a proton gradient across the vesicular membrane generated by V-type adenosine triphosphatases (8) may exist in ECL cells. Both transports may act together during the uptake of histamine by cytoplasmatic vesicles, which is a common feature of amine and neurotransmitter uptake by vesicles of endocrine cells and neurons.

In summary, our data provide convincing evidence that the exocytotic apparatus for histamine secretion in ECL cells shares many properties with neurons and endocrine cells. Now, with these additional criteria met, little doubt remains about the neuroendocrine nature of ECL cells. Moreover, functional analysis of the proteins involved in exocytosis demonstrates that SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin II are cleaved by neurotoxins and mediate histamine release, which is of considerable pharmacological interest.


    Acknowledgments
 
This publication contains work performed by Angela Galler for the fulfillment of her M.D. thesis at the Technical University of Munich. We thank Reinhard Jahn (New Haven, CT) and Tsutomu Chiba (Kobe, Japan) for antibodies, and Ulrich Weller (Mainz, Germany), Bibhuti R. DasGupta (Madison, WI), and Clifford C. Shone (Porton Down, Salisbury, UK) for providing neurotoxins for this study. We are grateful to Barbara Zschiesche and Andreas Mauermayer for expert technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant Pr 411/2–1,2 and Sonderforschungsbereich 391), Fonds der Chemischen Industrie, and Volkswagen-Stiftung. Back

Received May 27, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hakanson R, Chen D, Sundler F 1994 The ECL cells. In: Alpers DH, Christensen J, Jacobson ED, Walsh JH (eds) Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 3 ed. Raven Press, New York, pp 1171–1184
  2. Lloyd KC, Debas HT 1994 Peripheral regulation of gastric acid secretion. In: Alpers DH, Christensen J, Jacobson ED, Walsh JH (eds) Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 3 ed. Raven Press, New York, pp 1185–1126
  3. Hersey SJ, Sachs G 1995 Gastric acid secretion. Physiol Rev 75:155–189[Free Full Text]
  4. Prinz C, Kajimura M, Scott DR, Mercier F, Helander HF, Sachs G 1993 Histamine secretion from rat enterochromaffin-like cells. Gastroenterology 105:449–461[Medline]
  5. Prinz C, Scott DR, Hurwitz D, Helander HF, Sachs G 1994 Gastrin effects on isolated rat enterochromaffin-like cells in primary culture. Am J Physiol 267:G663–G675
  6. Dimaline R, Struthers J 1995 Characterisation of a vesicular monoamine transporter VAMT2 from rat gastric corpus. Gastroenterology 108:962 (Abstract)
  7. De Giorgio R, Su D, Peter D, Edwards NC, Brecha N, Sternini C 1995 Vesicular monoamine transporter expression in enteric neurons and ECL cells. Gastroenterology 108:962 (Abstract)
  8. Forgac M 1989 Structure and function of vacuolar class of ATP-driven proton pumps. Physiol Rev 69:765–796[Free Full Text]
  9. Loo DDF, Sachs G, Prinz C 1996 Potassium and chloride currents in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Am J Physiol 270:G739–G745
  10. Schiavo G, Poulain B, Rossetto O, Benfenati F, Tauc L, Montecucco C 1992 Tetanus toxin is a zinc protein and its inhibition of neurotransmitter release and protease activity depends on zinc. EMBO J 11:3577–3583[Medline]
  11. Schiavo G, Benfenati F, Poulain B, Rossetto O, de Laureto PP, DasGupta BR, Montecucco C 1992 Tetanus and botulinum-B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature 359:832–835[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Link E, Edelmann L, Chou JH, Binz T, Yamasaki S, Eisel U, Baumert M, Südhof TC, Niemann H, Jahn R 1992 Tetanus toxin action: inhibition of neurotransmitter release linked to synaptobrevin proteolysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:1017–1023[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Höhne-Zell B, Ecker A, Weller U, Gratzl M 1994 Synaptobrevin cleavage by the tetanus toxin light chain is linked to the inhibition of exocytosis in chromaffin cells. FEBS Lett 355:131–134[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Regazzi R, Wollheim CB, Lang J, Theler J-M, Rossetto O, Montecucco C, Sadoul K, Weller U, Palmer M, Thorens B 1995 VAMP-2 and cellubrevin are expressed in pancreatic-cells and are essential for Ca2+- but not for GTPyS-induced insulin secretion. EMBO J 14:2723–2730[Medline]
  15. Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Catsicas S, Polverino de Laureto P, DasGupta BR, Benfenati F, Montecucco C 1993 Identification of the nerve terminal targets of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, D, and E. J Biol Chem 268:23784–23787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Blasi J, Chapman ER, Yamasaki S, Binz T, Niemann H, Jahn R 1993 Botulinum neurotoxin C1 blocks neurotransmitter release by means of cleaving HPC-1/syntaxin. EMBO J 12:4821–4828[Medline]
  17. Williamson LC, Halpern JL, Montecucco C, Brown JE, Neale EA 1996 Clostridial neurotoxins and substrate proteolysis in intact neurons. Botulinum neurotoxin C acts on synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa. J Biol Chem 271:7694–7699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Höhne-Zell B, Gratzl M 1996 Adrenal chromaffin cells contain functionally different SNAP-25 monomers and SNAP-25/syntaxin heterodimers. FEBS Lett 394:109–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Sadoul K, Lang J, Montecucco C, Weller U, Catsicas S, Wollheim CB, Halban PA 1995 SNAP-25 is expressed in islets of Langerhans and is involved in insulin release. J Cell Biol 128:1019–1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Calakos N, Scheller RH 1996 Synaptic vesicle biogenesis, docking, and fusion: a molecular description. Physiol Rev 76:1–29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Südhof TC 1995 The synaptic vesicle cycle: a cascade of protein-protein interactions. Nature 375:645–653[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Föhr KJ, Warchol W, Gratzl M 1993 Calculation and control of free divalent cations in solutions used for membrane fusion studies. Methods Enzymol 221:149–157[Medline]
  23. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J 1979 Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4350–4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Edelmann L, Hanson PI, Chapman ER, Jahn R 1995 Synaptobrevin binding to synaptophysin: a potential mechanism for controlling the exocytotic fusion. EMBO J 14:224–231[Medline]
  26. Brose N, Petrenko AG, Südhof TC, Jahn R 1992 Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface. Science 256:1021–1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Choi GC, Bufler J, Schepp W, Franke C, Prinz C 1996 Whole-cell calcium currents in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Gastroenterology 110:1063 (Abstract)
  28. Smith SJ, Augustine GJ 1988 Calcium ions, active zones and synaptic transmitter release. Trends Neurosci 11:458–464[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Neher E, Zucker RS 1993 Multiple calcium-dependent processes related to secretion in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuron 10:21–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Oyler GA, Higgins GA, Hart RA, Battenberg E, Billingsley M, Bloom FE, Wilson MC 1989 The identification of a novel synaptosomal-associated protein, SNAP-25, differentially expressed by neuronal subpopulations. J Cell Biol 109:3039–3052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ravichandran V, Chawla A, Roche PA 1996 Identification of a novel syntaxin- and synaptobrevin/VAMP-binding protein, SNAP-23, expressed in non-neuronal tissues. J Biol Chem 271:13300–13303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Rossetto O, Gorza L, Schiavo G, Schiavo N, Scheller RH, Montecucco C 1996 VAMP/synaptobrevin isoforms 1 and 2 are widely and differentially expressed in nonneuronal tissues. J Cell Biol 132:167–179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cain CC, Trimble WS, Lienhard GE 1992 Members of the VAMP family of synaptic vesicle proteins are components of glucose transporter-containing vesicles from rat adipocytes. J Biol Chem 267:11681–11684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Volchuk A, Mitsumoto Y, He L, Liu Z, Habermann E, Trimble WS, Klip A 1994 Expression of vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP-2)/synaptobrevin II and cellubrevin in rat skeletal muscle and in a muscle cell line. Biochem J 304:139–145
  35. Peng X-R, Yao X, Chow D-C, Forte JG, Bennett MK 1997 Association of syntaxin 3 and vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) with H+/K+-ATPase-containing tubulovesicles in gastric parietal cells. Mol Biol Cell 8:399–407[Abstract]
  36. Söllner T, Bennett MK, Whiteheart SW, Scheller RH, Rothman JE 1993 A protein assembly-disassembly pathway in vitro that may correspond to sequential steps of synaptic vesicle docking, activation, and fusion. Cell 75:409–418[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Chamberlain LH, Roth D, Morgan A, Burgoyne D 1995 Distinct effects of {alpha}-SNAP, 14–3-3 proteins and calmodulin on priming and triggering of regulated exocytosis. J Cell Biol 130:1063–1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Bennett MK, Garcia-Arrarás JE, Elferink LA, Peterson K, Fleming AM, Hazuka CD, Scheller RH 1993 The syntaxin family of vesicular transport receptors. Cell 74:863–873[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Walch-Solimena C, Blasi J, Edelmann L, Chapman ER, Fischer von Mollard G, Jahn R 1995 The t-SNAREs syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25 are present on organelles that participate in synaptic vesicle recycling. J Cell Biol 128:637–645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Tagaya M, Toyonaga S, Takahashi M, Yamamoto G, Fujiwara T, Akagawa K, Moriyama Y, Mizushima S 1995 Syntaxin 1 (HPC-1) is associated with chromaffin granules. J Biol Chem 270:15930–15933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Yoshida A, Oho C, Omori A, Kuwahara R, Ito T, Takahashi M 1992 HPC-1 is associated with synaptotagmin and omega-conotoxin receptor. J Biol Chem 267:24925–24928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sheng Z-H, Rettig J, Takahashi M, Catterall WA 1994 Identification of a syntaxin-binding site on N-type calcium channels. Neuron 13:1303–1313[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Li C, Ullrich B, Zhang JZ, Anderson RGW, Brose N, Südhof TC 1995 Ca2+-dependent and -independent activities of neural and non-neural synaptotagmins. Nature 375:594–599[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Ullrich B, Li C, Zhang JZ, McMahon H, Anderson RGW, Geppert M, Südhof TC 1994 Functional properties of multiple synaptotagmins in brain. Neuron 13:1281–1291[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Kee Y, Scheller RH 1996 Localization of synaptotagmin-binding domains on syntaxin. J Neurosci 16:1975–1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Thomas L, Hartung K, Langosch D, Rehm H, Bamberg E, Franke WW, Betz H 1988 Identification of synaptophysin as a hexameric channel protein of the synaptic vesicle membrane. Science 242:1050–1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Calakos N, Scheller RH 1994 Vesicle-associated membrane protein and synaptophysin are associated on the synaptic vesicle. J Biol Chem 269:24534–24537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Washbourne P, Schiavo G, Montecucco C 1995 Vesicle-associated membrane protein-2 (synaptobrevin-2) forms a complex with synaptophysin. Biochem J 305:721–724
  49. Haass NK, Kartenbeck J, Leube RE 1996 Pantophysin is a ubiquitously expressed synaptophysin homologue and defines constitutive transport vesicles. J Cell Biol 134:731–746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Foran P, Lawrence GW, Shone CC, Foster KA, Dolly JO 1996 Botulinum neurotoxin C1 cleaves both syntaxin and SNAP-25 in intact and permeabilized chromaffin cells: correlation with its blockade of catecholamine release. Biochemistry 35:2630–2636[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Pellegrini LL, O’Connor VM, Betz H 1994 Fusion complex formation protects synaptobrevin against proteolysis by tetanus toxin light chain. FEBS Lett 353:319–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Pellegrini LL, O’Connor V, Lottspeich F, Betz H 1995 Clostridial neurotoxins compromise the stability of a low energy SNARE complex mediating NSF activation of synaptic vesicle fusion. EMBO J 14:4705–4713[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Zanner, M. Gratzl, and C. Prinz
Expression of the endocytic proteins dynamin and amphiphysin in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells
J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(11): 2369 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. D. Burgoyne and A. Morgan
Secretory Granule Exocytosis
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2003; 83(2): 581 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. ZANNER, M. GRATZL, and C. PRINZ
Circle of Life of Secretory Vesicles in Gastric Enterochromaffin-Like Cells
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2002; 971(1): 389 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. Gouraud, A. Laera, G. Calamita, M. Carmosino, G. Procino, O. Rossetto, R. Mannucci, W. Rosenthal, M. Svelto, and G. Valenti
Functional involvement of VAMP/synaptobrevin-2 in cAMP-stimulated aquaporin 2 translocation in renal collecting duct cells
J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2002; 115(18): 3667 - 3674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Gerhard, N. Neumayer, E. Presecan-Siedel, R. Zanner, E. Lengyel, T. Cramer, M. Hocker, and C. Prinz
Gastrin Induces Expression and Promoter Activity of the Vesicular Monoamine Transporter Subtype 2
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3663 - 3672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
D. Feng, R. Flaumenhaft, C. Bandeira–Melo, P. F. Weller, and A. M. Dvorak
Ultrastructural Localization of Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein(s) to Specialized Membrane Structures in Human Pericytes, Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells, Endothelial Cells, Neutrophils, and Eosinophils
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2001; 49(3): 293 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Graff, F. Castrop, M. Bauer, H. Höfler, and M. Gratzl
Expression of Vesicular Monoamine Transporters, Synaptosomal-associated Protein 25 and Syntaxin1: A Signature of Human Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(5): 2138 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Grosse, A. Bulling, C. Brucker, U. Berg, A. Amsterdam, A. Mayerhofer, and M. Gratzl
Synaptosome-Associated Protein of 25 Kilodaltons in Oocytes and Steroid-Producing Cells of Rat and Human Ovary: Molecular Analysis and Regulation by Gonadotropins
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2000; 63(2): 643 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
N. Zeng, C. Athmann, T. Kang, J. H. Walsh, and G. Sachs
Role of neuropeptide-sensitive L-type Ca2+ channels in histamine release in gastric enterochromaffin-like cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 1999; 277(6): G1268 - G1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. Prinz, R. Zanner, M. Gerhard, S. Mahr, N. Neumayer, B. Hohne-Zell, and M. Gratzl
The mechanism of histamine secretion from gastric enterochromaffin-like cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): C845 - C855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Banerjee, T. Shih, E. A. Alexander, and J. H. Schwartz
SNARE Proteins Regulate H+-ATPase Redistribution to the Apical Membrane in Rat Renal Inner Medullary Collecting Duct Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 1999; 274(37): 26518 - 26522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Flaumenhaft, K. Croce, E. Chen, B. Furie, and B. C. Furie
Proteins of the Exocytotic Core Complex Mediate Platelet alpha -Granule Secretion. ROLES OF VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN, SNAP-23, AND SYNTAXIN 4
J. Biol. Chem., January 22, 1999; 274(4): 2492 - 2501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Mahr, N. Neumayer, H. J. Kolb, W. Schepp, M. Classen, and C. Prinz
Growth Factor Effects on Apoptosis of Rat Gastric Enterochromaffin-Like Cells
Endocrinology, October 1, 1998; 139(10): 4380 - 4390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Zanner, G. Hapfelmeier, M. Gratzl, an