| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Articles |
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Colorado Health Science Center (R.A.J., V.D.S., J.M.D., D.F.G., W.M.W., E.C.R.), Denver, Colorado 80262; Sandoz Pharma (C.B., F.R.), Basel, Switzerland; and the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne (R.A.J.), Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. William M. Wood, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Campus Box B151, University of Colorado Health Science Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262. E-mail: Andy.James{at}btinternet.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit steady state messenger RNA
(mRNA) at the level of transcription (5). In humans as well as in mice, the protracted hypothyroid state is known to induce high levels of TSH secretion and pituitary enlargement due to hyperplasia of thyrotrope cells caused by the lack of negative feedback regulation by thyroid hormone (6). Treatment of hypothyroid patients with thyroid hormone not only corrects the symptoms of hypothyroidism, but also reverses the pituitary enlargement. The mechanism underlying the antiproliferative effect of thyroid hormone is unknown. However, the hypothalamic factor somatostatin decreases pituitary TSH secretion, and long acting analogs of somatostatin have been shown to not only decrease TSH secretion, but also cause tumor shrinkage when used to treat human pituitary thyrotropinomas (7, 8, 9). In fact, previous in vitro studies have shown that thyroid hormone and somatostatin acted synergistically to control TSH secretion. The cooperative effect of thyroid hormone and somatostatin was consistent with a thyroid hormone-induced increase in cell surface somatostatin receptors (10). To date, five specific subtypes of the somatostatin receptor, SSTR1-5,2 have been cloned, each of which has a characteristic, tissue-specific, pattern of expression (11). There is a high degree of homology between species for a given receptor subtype, suggesting a conservation of function. Expression of SSTR2 is highly correlated with the suppression of GH release from pituitary somatotrophs in both normal pituitary and rat pituitary tumor cell lines (12). Furthermore, SSTR2-specific analogs have been shown to have a controlling influence on the cell cycle, thereby exerting a potential antiproliferative effect (13). The contributions of other somatostatin receptor subtypes to the control of proliferation and secretion in other normal and neoplastic endocrine tissues are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to identify which somatostatin receptor subtypes are expressed in TtT-97 murine thyrotropic tumors and determine how they may be influenced by thyroid hormone, thus mediating decreases in TSH secretion and tumor size.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Northern blot analysis
Radiolabeled probes corresponding to the coding regions of each
somatostatin receptor subtype were prepared by nick translation (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) using [
-32P]deoxy-CTP.
The complementary DNAs (cDNAs) encoding mouse SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR3
were donated by Dr. Graeme Bell (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL).
Rat SSTR4 and SSTR5 cDNAs were provided by Dr. Michael Berelowitz
(State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY). The sequence for mouse
SSTR4 has recently become available (GenBank accession no. U26176) and
displays 93.8% homology to rat SSTR4; mouse SSTR5 has yet to be
cloned. Further comparison of the mouse/rat protein shows 98% homology
for SSTR1 and SSTR2 receptors and 93% homology for SSTR3,
respectively, indicating a high degree of conservation of amino acid
sequence between individual subtypes from closely related rodent
species (12).
Initial Northern blot analysis was performed, using total RNA from
hypothyroid tumors. Subsequent Northern blots were performed on two
representative tumors from each group using 10 µg polyadenylated
[poly(A)+] mRNA/lane separated on a 6% formaldehyde-1%
agarose gel with [
-32P]deoxy-CTP-labeled
HindIII DNA fragments as size standards. After adequate
separation of mRNA, the gel was washed in distilled water, then blotted
onto a 0.2-µm pore nylon membrane (Nytran, maximum strength,
Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) using downward transfer (Turboblot,
Schleicher and Schuell). After overnight transfer, the nylon membrane
was subjected to optimal UV cross-linking (FB-UVXL-1000, Fisher
Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Nylon membranes were prehybridized for
24 h at 42 C with a prehybridization mix containing sodium
pyrophosphate buffer (1 M NaCl, 10 mM sodium
phosphate, and 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate), 1% SDS, salmon sperm DNA
(0.25 mg/ml), 5 x Denhardts solution (0.1% each Ficoll,
polyvinylpyrrolidone, and BSA), and 50% formamide. Radiolabeled probes
were extracted with phenol-chloroform and purified by centrifugation
through a Sephadex G-50 column. For each probe, 7080 x
106 counts were boiled for 5 min with deproteinized salmon
sperm DNA (100 µl of 10 µg/µl) before addition to the nylon
membranes. Hybridization was carried out at 42 C overnight.
Posthybridization washes were performed with appropriate dilutions of
20 x SSC buffer (3 M sodium chloride and 0.3
M sodium citrate) as follows: 2 x SSC (standard
saline citrate) and 0.1% SDS (four washes, 5 min each, 42 C), followed
by 0.2 x SSC and 0.1% SDS (once, 20 min, 55 C). Nylon membranes
were allowed to air dry for 15 min before being exposed to Kodak
Biomax-MR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) at -70 C for up to 1
week. A single nylon membrane containing the poly(A)+ mRNA
extracted from two tumors derived from each group (baseline, control,
and thyroid hormone treated) was first probed with mouse (m) SSTR1,
then reprobed with rat (r) SSTR5. Preliminary Northern blots showed no
cross-reactivity of the mSSTR1-3 or rSSTR4 and rSSTR5 probes,
indicating high specificity of each probe for its designate receptor
subtype mRNA. After removal of SSTR probes with 0.1 x SSC and
0.5% SDS, (three washes, 20 min each, 65 C), a probe corresponding to
the coding region for mouse TSHß was similarly labeled and
hybridized. This was followed by a mouse ß-actin probe to confirm
equal loading of RNA samples.
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis
RT-PCR analyses were carried out by reverse transcription
(Superscript II, Life Technologies) of RQ1 deoxyribonuclease (Promega,
Madison, WI)-treated TtT-97 total RNA, as previously described (16).
Somatostatin receptor subtype-specific PCR was performed for 40 cycles
using primer pairs specific for SSTR1-5, respectively. Primers for
SSTR1 and SSTR2 were previously described (16). For SSTR4, the primers
HS48 (5'-ACCAACATCTACCTGCTCAACCTGG-3') and HS49
(5'-GCATAGTAGTCCAGGGGCTC-3') were used. For SSTR3, the mouse-specific
primers MS37 (5'-TTCTCAGGAGTGCCCCGGGGCATG-3') and MS38
(5'-CGATGTTGAGCAGATAGAAAGGCATCCA-3') were used, and for SSTR5, the
rodent-specific primers RS51 (5'-GTATTAGTGCCTGTGCTCTACCTGTTGG-3') and
RS52 (5'-ACACAGACGTGTAGGTGATGAAGGCTGC-3') were used. Positive controls
for each PCR analysis were obtained using cloned human or rodent
SSTR1-5 cDNAs, respectively, and mouse genomic DNA. The other cloned
human or rodent SSTR cDNA subtypes and a template minus (water) control
served as negative controls to ensure specific amplification.
Comparison was made to standard RT-PCR coamplification reactions using
ß-actin-specific primers to demonstrate mRNA integrity and to
relatively quantify the derived products (16).
Receptor autoradiography
Autoradiographic detection of somatostatin receptor protein was
carried out as described previously (17) on Cryostat sections of
snap-frozen TtT-97 tumor tissue. Briefly, tissue sections were mounted
on gelatin-coated glass slides and incubated at room temperature for
2 h in Tris-Cl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1% BSA, bacitracin (40
µg/ml), and MgCl2 (5 mM). The somatostatin
ligand concentration (125I-labeled [Tyr3]SMS
201995 or 125I-labeled
[Leu8,D-Trp22,Tyr25]SRIF-28)
ranged from 1030 pM. Nonspecific binding was determined
on adjacent slides by coincubation with an excess of either unlabeled
SMS 201995 or SRIF-28 (1 µM). Autoradiograms were
obtained by exposing the labeled sections to Hyperfilm ßmax
(Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) at 4 C for 1216 days.
Animal treatment
Animal studies using LAF1 mice were conducted in a humane manner
and were in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals. The protocols were approved by the committee on
animal care and use of the University of Colorado Health Sciences
Center (Denver, CO).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effect of T4 on steady state SSTR mRNA
levels
Analysis of poly(A)+ mRNA from tumors of
T4-treated animals showed by Northern blotting (Fig. 2
, upper panel) and confirmed by RT-PCR
(Table 1
) a consistent induction of SSTR1 and SSTR5 (RT-PCR shown in
Fig. 3
) message subtypes in TtT-97 tumors (n = 4)
by thyroid hormone. A small amount of SSTR2 message was detected in 2
of the 4 T4-treated tumors, but only after 45 PCR cycles
(Table 1
). The size of the transcripts encoding mSSTR1 [3.8 kilobases
(kb)] corresponded with that reported in the literature for mouse type
1 receptor mRNA, and the putative mSSTR5 mRNA (2.6 kb) was similar in
size to the rat homolog (12). Reprobing the same membrane with a TSHß
cDNA confirmed the profound down-regulation of TSHß mRNA by thyroid
hormone (Fig. 2
, middle panel).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second important finding in this study is that thyroid hormone supplementation of mice bearing the TtT-97 tumor resulted in the specific induction of SSTR1 and SSTR5 mRNA transcripts within the tumor. In addition, displaceable binding sites for somatostatin appeared on the cell surface of the thyrotropic tumor cells. As transcripts for SSTR1 and SSTR5 were demonstrated to go from undetectable to detectable levels by sensitive RT-PCR, this suggests a direct increase in transcriptional activity from these genes. Hinkle et al. (22) had previously shown a non-specific increase in 125I-labeled Tyr1 somatostatin-binding sites with T3 treatment of GH4C1 cells, although it was not known whether this was due to an alteration in receptor number or binding affinity, nor was it known at the time that different subtypes of somatostatin receptors existed. Also, observations in a somatotroph-derived cell might not reflect SSTR regulation in the thyrotrope. It is well documented that thyroid hormone supplementation reduces TSH secretion and reverses thyrotrope hyperplasia in primary hypothyroidism. Similarly, thyroid hormone supplementation of radiothyroidectomized mice bearing TtT-97 tumors causes tumor involution (3). This indicates that the TtT-97 model closely resembles the normal thyrotrope and is a useful surrogate, which now provides a mechanism for thyroid hormone regulation of the TSH-secreting cell by somatostatin receptor induction.
Somatostatin receptor subtype gene expression has recently been described in the thyrotropes of euthyroid animals. For example, in situ hybridization studies in the normal rat have suggested that 57% of TSH-secreting cells express SSTR5, and 37% express SSTR2 (23), although SSTR1 expression was not assessed. Other investigators using similar techniques, but a different strain of rat, concluded by colocalization studies that all five SSTR mRNA subtypes were to be found in relationship to thyrotropes, but that SSTR2 (18%) was the most predominant (24). The type 5 receptor is known to have a particularly high affinity for somatostatin-28 (25). In addition, preferential SRIF-28-binding sites have been previously demonstrated in association with thyrotropes in the normal rat pituitary (26). Our findings of a predominant induction of SSTR5 in the Tt-T97 tumor would concur with these studies and highlights the importance of this particular subtype to the thyrotrope. The expression of a small amount of SSTR1 receptor would also be consistent with previous observations; however, the absence of the SSTR2 receptor is at variance with findings in the normal rat pituitary gland (23, 24).
Regulation of somatostatin receptor subtype expression by other hormones has previously been reported; for example, estrogen administration increases SSTR numbers and increases the sensitivity of PRL inhibition by exogenous somatostatin in cultured rat pituitary cells (27). Glucocorticoids affect SSTR expression in GH4C1 cells (28, 29). Such changes in SSTR mRNA abundance have been shown to be due to increased transcriptional activity with no alteration in message stability (29), our findings for thyroid hormone induction of SSTR1 and SSTR5 in the TtT-97 tumor would be consistent with this. It is likely that somatostatin receptor induction by different hormones is both a cell- and subtype-specific effect, hence underscoring the importance of the TtT-97 tumor as the only currently available model that reflects physiological thyrotrope function.
The promoter regions for rat SSTR1 and SSTR4 and human SSTR2 and SSTR5 have recently been published (30, 31, 32, 33). Although little is yet known of their functional effects, consensus DNA-binding elements for a variety of transcription factors have been identified. Interestingly, the rat SSTR1 promoter has a consensus TRE between -97 and -81 downstream from a Pit-1 recognition site. The published human SSTR5 promoter sequence (33) does not contain any discernible consensus TRE sites. No murine SSTR promoter regions have yet been described. Thus, the molecular mechanisms responsible for positive thyroid hormone induction of the SSTR1 and SSTR5 genes in the TtT-97 tumor are unknown and will require further study.
The mechanism of the antiproliferative effects of somatostatin and its analogs are potentially diverse (34, 35). However, a direct growth inhibitory effect has been clearly demonstrated via specific cell surface receptors for somatostatin in a variety of neuroendocrine tumors (36). SSTR1 mRNA expression has been shown in many types of human pituitary tumors (37, 38, 39) and is also present in normal pituitary (40). In addition, transcripts for SSTR subtypes 1, 2, and 5 have been demonstrated by RT-PCR in a high proportion of human somatotroph, lactotroph, corticotroph, and nonfunctioning pituitary tumors (38). As somatostatin receptor expression in pituitary tumors is invariably correlated with a therapeutic response to somatostatin analogs, expression of SSTR1 and SSTR5, coincident with a marked reduction in TtT-97 tumor size, is likely to be of great functional significance.
Octreotide, although capable of binding rodent type 2 and 5 receptor, has a poor affinity for the human type 5 receptor and shows little, if any, action at the SSTR1 receptor. This would suggest that, at least in human thyrotrope tumors, the antiproliferative and antisecretory actions are imparted via a different complement of SSTR isoforms from that found in the TtT-97 murine model. This also strengthens the view that the TtT-97 thyrotropic lesion might reflect a more hyperplastic, rather than tumorous, phenotype with a correspondingly different expression of SSTR subtypes
In summary, this study clearly shows that the actively proliferating murine TtT-97 thyrotropic tumor has an absence of SSTR expression under conditions of profound hypothyroidism. Treatment with thyroid hormone causes a reduction in tumor size and a decrease in TSH secretion along with the specific induction of mRNA for SSTR1 and SSTR5 and the appearance of displaceable binding sites for somatostatin-28 on the surface of the tumor. As such, this model can be used to further study the specific mechanisms by which thyroid hormone is able to influence the somatostatinergic system and how this controls antisecretory and antiproliferative effects in thyrotropic cells, especially with respect to the type 5 somatostatin receptor.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 The IUPHAR nomenclature committee recently
suggested that the previously used format for the somatostatin receptor
subtypes, SSTR1-5, should be replaced with sst15. ![]()
Received August 7, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and thyrotropin ß-subunits in hypothyroidism and after
thyroxine administration. Endocrinology 112:187193[Medline]
and ß thyroid hormone receptors from thyrotrope cells: the mouse
pituitary-specific ß2 isoform differs at the amino terminus from the
corresponding species from rat pituitary tumor cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:10491061[Abstract]
-subunit-secreting mouse pituitary tumor: inhibition of growth
and secretion by combined treatment with thyroxine and bromocriptine.
Endocrinology 117:14181423[Abstract]
and thyrotropin ß-subunit messenger
ribonucleic acids by thyroid hormones. Endocrinology 116:873878[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. E. Nelson and M. A. Sheridan Insulin and growth hormone stimulate somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression by inducing transcription of SSTR mRNAs and by upregulating cell surface SSTRs Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R163 - R169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Woodmansee, J. M. Kerr, E. A. Tucker, J. R. Mitchell, D. J. Haakinson, D. F. Gordon, E. C. Ridgway, and W. M. Wood The Proliferative Status of Thyrotropes Is Dependent on Modulation of Specific Cell Cycle Regulators by Thyroid Hormone Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 272 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Hofland and S. W. J. Lamberts The Pathophysiological Consequences of Somatostatin Receptor Internalization and Resistance Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2003; 24(1): 28 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Petersenn, A. C. Rasch, C. Bohnke, and H. M. Schulte Identification of an Upstream Pituitary-Active Promoter of Human Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5 Endocrinology, July 1, 2002; 143(7): 2626 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Woodmansee, R. L. Mouser, D. F. Gordon, J. M. Dowding, W. M. Wood, and E. C. Ridgway Mutational Analysis of the Mouse Somatostatin Receptor Type 5 Gene Promoter Endocrinology, June 1, 2002; 143(6): 2268 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Spada and P. Beck-Peccoz Editorial: New Strategy to Solve the Etiopathogenetic Conundrum of Pituitary Adenomas Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 343 - 346. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Wood, V. D. Sarapura, J. M. Dowding, W. W. Woodmansee, D. J. Haakinson, D. F. Gordon, and E. C. Ridgway Early Gene Expression Changes Preceding Thyroid Hormone-Induced Involution of a Thyrotrope Tumor Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 347 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Brinkmeier, J. H. Stahl, D. F. Gordon, B. D. Ross, V. D. Sarapura, J. M. Dowding, S. K. Kendall, R. V. Lloyd, E. C. Ridgway, and S. A. Camper Thyroid Hormone-Responsive Pituitary Hyperplasia Independent of Somatostatin Receptor 2 Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2001; 15(12): 2129 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Gordon, W. W. Woodmansee, S. R. Lewis, R. A. James, W. M. Wood, and E. C. Ridgway Cloning of the Mouse Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5 Gene: Promoter Structure and Function Endocrinology, December 1, 1999; 140(12): 5598 - 5608. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. KHARE, U. KUMAR, R. SASI, L. PUEBLA, L. CALDERON, K. LEMSTROM, P. HAYRY, and A. Y. C. PATEL Differential regulation of somatostatin receptor types 1-5 in rat aorta after angioplasty FASEB J, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 387 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |