help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by White, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by White, A.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 3 1130-1136
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Articles

Purification and Characterization of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 Phosphoform Found in Normal Plasma1

Melissa Westwood, J Martin Gibson and Anne White

Endocrine Sciences Group, Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Melissa Westwood, Endocrine Sciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom. E-mail: mwestwoo{at}fs2.scg.man.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our previous work has shown that, in the normal circulation, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) is present as a single highly phosphorylated species. In this study, we have purified this previously uncharacterized isoform of IGFBP-1 to determine its ligand-binding affinity and the potential significance of highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1. Immunoaffinity chromatography was used to isolate IGFBP-1 from normal human plasma and from human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell medium as an alternative source of the IGFBP-1 phosphoform in the circulation. The affinity of this highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 was compared with that of nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 and recombinant human (rh) IGFBP-3 by equilibrium binding to IGF-I and IGF-II.

Anion-exchange (IEX) HPLC, nondenaturing electrophoresis, alkaline phosphatase treatment, and ligand-binding studies indicated that the highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 from HepG2 cells was comparable with IGFBP-1 from plasma. In binding to IGF-I, the plasma phosphoform of IGFBP-1 was found to have a higher affinity (2.3 ± 1.1 x 1010 M-1) than nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 (2.5 ± 1.7 x 109 M-1, P < 0.002). However, when binding to IGF-II, phosphorylation had no affect on the affinity of IGFBP-1 (3.6 ± 2 x 109 M-1vs. 1.8 ± 3 x 109 M-1, P not significant). Therefore, in the circulation, IGF-I has a considerably higher affinity than IGF-II for IGFBP-1 (P < 0.02). The affinity of phosphorylated IGFBP-1 from plasma (2.3 ± 1.1 x 1010 M-1) also was significantly higher than the affinity of IGFBP-3 for IGF-I (5.6 ± 4.2 x 109 M-1, P < 0.005).

These data suggest that the highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 in the normal circulation will preferentially bind IGF-I rather than IGF-II, whereas in pregnancy, the affinity of IGFBP-1 for IGF-I will be reduced because of the appearance of non- and lesser-phosphorylated forms. This lends support to the theory that changes in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation may influence the modulatory effects of IGFBP-1 on IGF bioavailability.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE INSULIN-LIKE growth factors (IGF-I and -II) are present in extracellular fluids bound to specific, high affinity, binding proteins (IGFBPs) that modulate their activity at the cellular level (1, 2). One of these binding proteins, IGFBP-1, has been shown to both inhibit and potentiate the actions of IGF-I (3, 4, 5). These seemingly discrepant findings may be explained by the existence of several IGFBP-1 isoforms (5). Phosphorylated IGFBP-1 variants, as well as the unmodified peptide, have been identified in amniotic fluid (AF) (6), a commonly used source of IGFBP-1, and in other biological fluids and tissues (7, 8). These variants have been found to augment the effects of IGF-I on porcine smooth muscle cells (4, 6), whereas more highly phosphorylated isoforms, isolated from human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell conditioned medium (CM), did not (6). In vivo studies of wound healing, performed both in rats (9, 10) and humans (11), reflect in vitro findings; nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 enhances IGF-I-stimulated wound repair, whereas phosphorylated IGFBP-1 is inhibitory of IGF trophic actions.

We have shown that in the normal adult human circulation, IGFBP-1 is present as a single, highly phosphorylated species; this phosphoform is not found in AF (12). However, circulating IGFBP-1 phosphorylation status can be altered, and this is particularly evident during pregnancy, when non- and lesser-phosphorylated variants increase markedly in the maternal circulation (12). Phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 has been reported to increase affinity for ligand (6); thus, changes in the phosphorylation status of IGFBP-1 may influence the ability of IGF to interact with its cell surface receptors.

In adult human serum, IGFBP-3 is thought to be saturated with IGF-I or -II, forming the 150 kDa complex with the acid-labile glycoprotein (13, 14). In contrast, the low-molecular mass-binding proteins, which form the 40–50 kDa complex, are thought to be unsaturated. Evidence for this comes from cross-linking of iodinated IGF-I to serum, which demonstrates binding to these species but not to IGFBP-3 (15). In addition, gel filtration chromatography of serum from humans injected with radiolabeled IGF-I shows that the labeled IGF-I is initially present in the 40–50 kDa complex (16). This has led some investigators to question the functional importance of IGFBP-1 in terms of regulating IGF bioavailability and actions.

The aim of this study was to determine the significance of changes to IGFBP-1 phosphorylation status by comparing the ligand-binding affinities of the normal circulating phosphoform with those of nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1. Because circulating IGFBP-1 is mainly derived from the liver, we investigated the possibility of using a liver cell line (Hep G2 cells) as a source of the phosphorylated isoform of IGFBP-1 found in plasma. In addition, the affinity of the previously uncharacterized plasma phosphoform of IGFBP-1 was compared with that of IGFBP-3, the main IGF carrier in the circulation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sources of IGFBP-1
IGFBP-1 was purified from two sources: plasma and the CM of a human hepatocyte carcinoma cell line (Hep G2). Plasma was obtained from healthy female volunteers who were taking a combined oral contraceptive pill; we have shown previously that circulating IGFBP-1 is elevated in such subjects, but the phosphorylation status of the IGFBP-1 is unchanged, because only the single, highly phosphorylated isoform is present (17). The origin of circulating IGFBP-1 is the liver, and therefore, the Hep G2 cells were investigated as a potential source of the circulating phosphoform.

Culture of Hep G2 cells
Hep G2 cells (85011430, passage number 90) obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (Porton Down, Salisbury, UK) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% nonessential amino acids, 0.04 mM L-glutamine, and 1 mM pyruvate. Biochemical analysis and RIA (see below) of the growth medium indicated that bovine IGFBP-1 does not cross-react with the antibodies used in this study. The cells were grown in 5% carbon dioxide at 37 C until confluent, at which point the medium was harvested and the cells passaged 1:4 after trypsinization.

Immunoaffinity chromatography
Immunoaffinity chromatography was used to isolate IGFBP-1 from normal plasma (NP) or Hep G2-CM. Monoclonal antibody (MAb) 6303 (a generous gift of Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland), which recognizes all IGFBP-1 variants (12), was coupled to Sephacryl S-300 (11) at 1 mg/ml to form the immunoaffinity matrix. A 10-ml column was equilibrated for 24 h at 4 C by the application of PBS/0.25% BSA/0.1% Tween 20 at a flow rate of 5 ml/h.

Next, 250 ml plasma or 500 ml Hep G2 CM was recirculated through the column for 72 h at a flow rate of 3.75 ml/h, the column was washed with 100 ml Tris buffer, pH 8.0 (50 mM Tris/0.5 M NaCl/0.1% Tween 20), and the bound peptide was eluted by application of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Then, 10 x 1-ml fractions were collected into tubes containing 200 µl 1 M Tris pH 9.0 and analyzed for IGFBP-1 by RIA (see below). Fractions containing more than 100 µg/l IGFBP-1 were pooled and concentrated by centrifugation through Centricon 10 filters (Amicon, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, UK). The particular IGFBP-1 isoforms contained within the concentrate were assessed by n-octyl glucoside (n-OG) electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting with 125I-IGF-I (see below).

HPLC
One hundred microliters of concentrate obtained from the 6303 immunoaffinity column or 1 µg rhIGFBP-1 (kindly donated by Amgen, Boulder, Co) dissolved in 0.02 M Tris/0.1 M NaCl/2% isopropanol, (pH 9.5) were applied to a 4.6 x 150 mm Hema Mono Q column (Alltech, Camforth, UK). Sample was eluted isocratically for 5 min with 0.02 M Tris/0.1 M NaCl/20% isopropanol followed by a linear gradient to 0.02 M Tris/0.3 M NaCl/20% isopropanol over 20 min. The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min, and absorbance was monitored at 220 nm. Then, 50 x 30s fractions were collected and analyzed for IGFBP-1 by RIA and n-OG electrophoresis/Western ligand blot (see below).

IGFBP-1 RIA
IGFBP-1 levels in the fractions from the immunoaffinity and IEX columns were determined using our previously reported RIAs, RIA 6303 and RIA 6305 (12). The assays use rhIGFBP-1 (a kind gift of Dr. L. Fryklund, Pharmacia, Stockholm, Sweden), for standards (1–250 µg/l) and radiolabel, and either MAb 6303 or 6305 (generously provided by Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland). RIA 6303 recognizes all isoforms of IGFBP-1, including the phosphoform characteristic of NP, whereas MAb 6305 does not recognize the circulating phosphoform, and therefore, the 6305 RIA only detects the non- and lesser-phosphorylated isoforms (12).

Biochemical characterization of IGFBP-1 isoforms
The IGFBP-1 isoforms in the NP, Hep G2 CM, and the fractions from the immunoaffinity and IEX columns were characterized by immunoprecipitation, n-OG electrophoresis, and Western ligand blotting, as previously described (6, 12). Samples were incubated at 4 C overnight with 250 µl MAb 6303 or 6305 (1:1000 dilution). Precipitating antibody (250 µl antimouse coated cellulose suspension (Sac-Cel; IDS, Tyne and Wear, Boldon, UK) was then added and incubated for 1 h at 37 C. Bound antibody was separated by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min. The precipitated proteins were washed (x3) by the addition of 1 ml PBS/0.25% BSA/0.1% tween 20 and centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 min before resuspending in 100 µl gel loading buffer [170 mM Tris.HPO4 pH 5.5/90 mM n-OG (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK)/40% glycerol/0.008% bromophenol blue]. All samples were boiled for 5 min before loading onto a stacking gel of 4% acrylamide, which, like the resolving gel (15% acrylamide), contained the nonionic detergent n-OG at 20 mM. The gels were run at a constant voltage of 175V for approximately 6 h. After transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes, the proteins were incubated with 150,000 cpm/ml 125I-IGF-I for 4 h at 25 C, washed, and visualized by autoradiography (5 days exposure).

Treatment of purified plasma and Hep G2 phosphoform with alkaline phosphatase
The highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isoform, obtained from IEX HPLC of plasma and Hep G2 CM, was incubated with 1 U calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) for 2 h at 37 C. Samples were then subjected to immunoprecipitation and Western ligand blotting, as described above.

Assay of IGFBP binding to IGFs
Ligand-binding assays were performed with 125I IGF-I or -II in the presence of unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II to determine the relative affinities of rhIGFBP-1, the highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isoform, purified from plasma and Hep G2 CM and rhIGFBP-3 (recombinant IGFBP-3 was used in these studies because Sommer et al. (18) and Mukku et al. (19) have shown that posttranslational modifications do not affect its affinity for ligand.). The concentration yielding 25% specific binding was first determined for each IGFBP preparation from dilution curves established with 125I IGF-I or -II.

125I-labeled rhIGF-I (18, 500 cpm; specific activity 185 µCi/µg) or 125I-rhIGF-II (25,000 cpm; specific activity 255 µCi/µg) was incubated with 10 µg/liter IGFBP-1or 1 µg/liter IGFBP-3 in the presence of unlabeled IGF-I or -II (final concentration 0–40 ng/ml). The reactions were performed in triplicate overnight at 4 C in 0.25 ml 0.1 M HEPES/44 mM NaH2PO4/0.01% Triton X-100/0.25% BSA/0.02% sodium azide, pH 6.0). Bound label was separated from free by adding 250 µl 1% human {gamma}-globulin and 500 µl 25% polyethylene glycol (Mr 8000; Sigma) and centrifugation at 1000 x g for 15 min. The pellet was washed with 1 ml 6.25% polyethylene glycol and the final pellet counted in a {gamma} spectrometer. Nonspecific binding was determined by measuring the amount of 125I-IGF-I/-II that could be precipitated in the presence of 1.0 µg/l unlabeled IGF.

To confirm the effect of phosphorylation on the affinity of IGFBP-1 for IGF, the dephosphorylated plasma phosphoform was subjected to ligand-binding assays, as described above.

Statistical analysis
The Simfit program (20), kindly provided by Dr. W. G. Bardsley, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, was used to analyze the ligand-binding data, and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data was used to compare the mean affinities of the various IGFBP preparations for their ligands.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of IGFBP-1 isoforms in Hep G2-CM
Because the highly phosphorylated circulating form of IGFBP-1 is of hepatic origin, human hepatoma (Hep G2) cells were investigated as a potential source of the NP phosphoform. CM from HepG2 cells (HepG2 CM) was immunoprecipitated with either MAb 6303 or 6305 and then analyzed by n-OG electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting (Fig. 1Go). Only MAb 6303 recognizes all IGFBP-1 variants. MAb 6305 does not detect the isoform found in the circulation (lane 4), and this highly phosphorylated form of IGFBP-1 was not present in AF (lane 2). Hep G2 cells do produce the IGFBP-1 phosphoform found in the normal circulation; however, multiple lesser-phosphorylated isoforms and nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 also were present (lane 5).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Characterization of IGFBP-1 isoforms present in AF, NP, and HepG2-CM. Samples were immunoprecipitated with MAb 6303 or MAb 6305 and subjected to n-OG electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting with 125I-IGF-I.

 
Purification of IGFBP-1 isoforms
Immunoaffinity chromatography was used to isolate IGFBP-1 from Hep G2 CM; separation of the different phosphoforms then was achieved by IEX HPLC. The resulting chromatogram is shown in Fig. 2AGo. The upper line represents the elution profile and the lower line, a fitted baseline used for calculation of peaks. A species (peak a) with identical retention time to rh (nonphosphorylated) IGFBP-1 (Fig. 2BGo) was apparent, and in addition, the IGFBP-1 prepared from Hep G2 CM separated into several other discrete peaks (peaks b–e) with increased retention times, suggesting the separation of variantly phosphorylated isoforms.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. IEX HPLC of (A) IGFBP-1 purified from HepG2 CM and (B) rhIGFBP-1. The upper line represents the elution profile and the lower line represents a fitted baseline for calculation of peaks.

 
The fractions collected from IEX chromatography of both rhIGFBP-1 and IGFBP-1 purified from HepG2 CM were analyzed by RIA 6303 and RIA 6305, and the results are shown in Fig. 3Go. All fractions corresponding to chromatographic peaks contained IGFBP-1. With rhIGFBP-1, both assays measured approximately the same level of IGFBP-1 in each of the fractions (Fig. 3AGo); however, this was not true for the fractions obtained from IEX-chromatographic analysis of IGFBP-1 purified from HepG2 CM. Unlike RIA 6303, RIA 6305 failed to detect any IGFBP-1 in the fraction corresponding to the peak e, suggesting that this fraction contained the circulating IGFBP-1 phosphoform; because this is the most highly phosphorylated variant of IGFBP-1, this species would be expected to have the greatest retention time. To support this data, an aliquot of the IGFBP-1 purified from plasma by immunoaffinity chromatography also was analyzed by IEX HPLC (Fig. 3CGo). A single peak of immunoreactivity, which coincided with peak e in the Hep G2 chromatogram, was observed when the fractions were analyzed with RIA 6303; however, as anticipated, RIA 6305 did not detect any IGFBP-1 in any of the fractions.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. IGFBP-1 in fractions collected from IEX-HPLC of (A) rhIGFBP-1, (B) IGFBP-1 purified from HepG2 CM, and (C) IGFBP-1 purified from plasma. Comparison of levels measured by RIAs 6303 (•) and 6305 ({circ}).

 
Characterization of IGFBP-1 isoforms in fractions from IEX-HPLC of HepG2 CM
To provide further evidence that IEX HPLC had separated the isoform corresponding to the plasma phosphoform from the other variants in the Hep G2-derived IGFBP-1, the fractions corresponding to the peaks were immunoprecipitated by MAb 6303 and analyzed by n-OG electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting (Fig. 4Go). The phosphoform characteristic of NP was found in the fractions, coinciding with the immunoreactivity peak (peak e) detected by RIA 6303 but not RIA 6305.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Characterization of IGFBP-1 isoforms contained in fractions obtained from IEX-HPLC of IGFBP-1 purified from HepG2 CM. Each fraction was immunoprecipitated by MAb 6303 and the precipitates analyzed by n-OG electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting with 125I-IGF-I. Unpurified Hep G2 medium and human NP are shown for comparison.

 
Figure 5Go shows that the phosphoform purified from Hep G2 comigrates with the phosphoform purified from plasma and that both the Hep G2-derived and the plasma-derived IGFBP-1 are recognized by MAb 6303 but not by MAb 6305. To confirm that the Hep G2- and plasma-derived IGFBP-1 were phosphorylated, both isoforms were incubated with alkaline phosphatase for 2 h at 37 C. With the Hep G2-derived IGFBP-1, this resulted in the appearance of an isoform that comigrated with nonphosphorylated rhIGBP-1 and could be detected by MAb 6305 and MAb 6303. Although a 2-h incubation was insufficient for the complete dephosphorylation of the plasma-derived IGFBP-1, alkaline phosphatase did produce an isoform that comigrated with rhIGFBP-1 and was detected by MAb 6305.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Dephosphorylation of the highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isoform isolated from Hep G2 CM and human plasma. Samples were immunoprecipitated with MAb 6303 or MAb 6305 and subjected to n-OG electrophoresis and Western ligand blotting with 125I-IGF-I. Nonphosphorylated rhIGFBP-1 (lane 1), AF (lane 2), and NP (MAb 6303; lane 3) were included as controls. The purified Hep G2 phosphoform was immunoprecipitated with MAb 6303 and MAb 6305 in the absence (lanes 4 & 5, respectively) and presence (lanes 6 & 7, respectively) of alkaline phosphatase. Lanes 8 and 9 show the immunoprecipitation of the phosphoform purified from plasma with MAbs 6303 and 6305, respectively. Lanes 10 and 11 are the result of immunoprecipitation after treatment with alkaline phosphatase.

 
Ligand-binding affinities of IGFBP-1 isoforms
To determine the effect of phosphorylation on IGFBP-1 binding of IGF, equilibrium binding studies were performed. Nonspecific binding constituted less than 25% of bound radiolabel in the absence of unlabeled IGF and less than 18% of the total amount of radiolabel added to each tube. Scatchard plots obtained for all isoforms of IGFBP-1 were linear, indicating the presence of a single binding site.

IGF-I. Figure 6Go shows the Scatchard analysis of IGF-I binding to rhIGFBP-1 and the phosphoform isolated from NP (before and after treatment with alkaline phosphatase). The mean (n = 5) affinity constant of rhIGFBP-1 was 2.5 ± 1.7 x 109 M-1 (Table 1Go), which is in accordance with previous reports (6). However, the affinity of the highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isolated from plasma was significantly greater at 2.3 ± 1.1 x 1010 M-1 (n = 5; P < 0.002), as was that of the highly phosphorylated isoform purified from HepG2 CM (P < 0.007; Table 1Go). There was no statistical difference between the affinity of the plasma- and Hep G2-derived phosphoforms for IGF-I, though the range in affinities determined for the latter isoform (1.3 x 1010 M-1 to 5.8 x 1011 M-1) resulted in a mean of 1.6 ± 2.8 x 1011 M-1. Dephosphorylation of the phosphorylated IGFBP-1 from plasma with alkaline phosphatase, though incomplete, resulted in a significant decrease in the affinity for IGF-I (2.3 ± 1.1 x 1010 M-1 to 5.4 ± 1.1 x 109 M-1; P < 0.004).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Scatchard analysis of IGF-I binding to three forms of IGFBP-1: nonphosphorylated rhIGFBP-1 ({blacktriangleup}), IGFBP-1 purified from plasma (•), and dephosphorylated plasma IGFBP-1 ({blacksquare}). The slopes of the first order regression lines obtained from five experiments were used to determine mean Ka values.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of the mean (± SD) binding affinities of phosphorylated plasma-derived IGFBP-1 (before and after dephosphorylation with alkaline phosphatase), phosphorylated Hep G2-derived IGFBP-1, nonphosphorylated recombinant human (rh)IGFBP-1, and rhIGFBP-3 for IGF-I and -II

 
IGF-II. The Scatchard analysis of IGF-II binding to rhIGFBP-1 and the highly-phosphorylated IGFBP-1 purified from plasma is shown in Fig. 7Go. The mean (n = 5) affinity constant of rhIGFBP-1 for IGF-II was 1.8 ± 3.0 x 109 M-1, which was not significantly different from the affinity constant for IGF-I (Table 1Go). The affinity constant of the highly phosphorylated isoform derived from plasma and Hep G2 medium (3.6 ± 2.0 x 109 M-1 and 5.7 ± 6.3 x 109 M-1, respectively) was no different from that of rhIGFBP-1. Hence, phosphorylation does not seem to affect the affinity of circulating IGFBP-1 for IGF-II. Therefore, the circulating phosphoform has a significantly higher affinity (P < 0.02) for IGF-I than for IGF-II (Table 1Go).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Scatchard analysis of IGF-II binding to two forms of IGFBP-1: nonphosphorylated rhIGFBP-1({blacktriangleup}) and IGFBP-1 purified from plasma (•). The slopes of the first order regression lines obtained from five experiments were used to determine mean Ka values.

 
Ligand-binding affinity of rhIGFBP-3
The affinity of rh (nonglycosylated) IGFBP-3 for IGF-I and -II was in accordance with previous reports (11, 12). IGFBP-3 had a slightly higher affinity for IGF-II than IGF-I (1.8 ± 2.3 x 1010 M-1 vs. 5.6 ± 4.2 x 109 M-1; Table 1Go), though this was not significant. However, there was a significant difference between the affinity of IGFBP-3 and the circulating isoform of IGFBP-1 for IGF-I; IGFBP-1 had a 4-fold higher affinity (P < 0.005) than IGFBP-3, the main IGF carrier in the circulation, though for IGF-II, the affinity of IGFBP-3 was no different from that of the highly phosphorylated isoform of IGFBP-1.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have reported that, in the normal circulation, IGFBP-1 is present as a single highly phosphorylated species. In this study, we have purified this previously uncharacterized isoform of IGFBP-1 to determine its ligand-binding affinity and the functional significance of IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. Circulating IGFBP-1 is produced by the liver, and therefore, human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells also were investigated as a source of the plasma phosphoform of IGFBP-1. The plasma form of IGFBP-1 is produced by Hep G2 cells; however, unlike the liver, these cells also produce non- and lesser-phosphorylated variants. This may be a result of altered intracellular kinase pathways or extracellular dephosphorylation of the highly phosphorylated isoform. Nevertheless, by using a combination of immunoaffinity chromatography and IEX HPLC, we were able to purify the individual IGFBP-1 isoforms to homogeneity for use in ligand-binding assays. The most highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isoform, produced by Hep G2 cells coeluted from IEX HPLC with plasma IGFBP-1, had identical mobility in the n-OG electrophoresis system and had a similar affinity for both IGF-I and IGF-II as plasma-derived IGFBP-1. Therefore, we conclude that Hep G2 cells provide an alternative and more accessible source of the circulating isoform of IGFBP-1.

The affinity of the plasma phosphoform for IGF-I was much greater than that reported for the phosphoforms present in AF (6) and was approximately 10-fold greater than nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 seen in maternal plasma during pregnancy (12); thus, phosphorylation does increase the affinity for IGF-I, as anticipated from other studies (6). Dephosphorylation of IGFBP-1 during pregnancy may result in IGF peptides, particularly IGF-I, being liberated from or more weakly bound to this altered circulating IGFBP-1, leading to increased IGF bioavailability for placental and fetal growth.

The affinity of the highly phosphorylated form of IGFBP-1 for IGF-I was also significantly higher than the affinity of IGFBP-3, the main carrier of IGF in the circulation. It is thought that the 150-kDa complex of IGFBP-3, IGF-I, or -II and the acid-labile glycoprotein (13, 14) is saturated with IGFs and serves as their endocrine storage site. In this form, the half-life of the IGF peptides is increased (16), and their access is limited to extravascular spaces (21) because the 150-kDa complex does not readily cross the capillary barrier. The IGF bound to the IGFBP-1 and -2 in the 40- to 50-kDa complex has a serum half-life of 20–30 min (16) because the complex can leave the vascular compartment (22); thereby its IGF may reach and interact with tissue receptors. We and others (23, 24, 25) have observed marked variations in IGFBP-1 levels throughout the day. Some investigators (26, 27, 28) have suggested that such fluctuations in plasma IGFBP-1 levels, particularly in response to insulin, imply a role for IGFBP-1 in glucose homeostasis. However, the significance of this has been questioned (29) because the concentration of IGFBP-1 in normal adult serum is reported to be approximately 10-fold lower than IGFBP-2 and around 100-fold less than that of IGFBP-3 (29); thus, fluctuations of IGFBP-1 occur on top of a high IGFBP background. The current findings indicate that the NP phosphoform of IGFBP-1 has a slightly higher affinity for IGF-I than IGFBP-3 and, indeed, than any of the other IGFBPs (30); this suggests that circulating IGFBP-1 could be fully saturated with IGFs and supports a role for IGFBP-1 in modifying IGF bioavailability and contributing to glucose counterregulation.

In general, the IGFBPs are thought to inhibit IGF actions (31) by preventing or attenuating IGF interaction with their cell surface receptors, which have a lower affinity for IGF (6.7 x 108 M-1; 32). Enhancement of IGF action has been observed with IGFBP-1, -3, and -5. It is thought that this is facilitated by posttranslational modifications of the IGFBPs leading to altered IGF affinities. Association of IGFBP-3 with the cell surface (33) and binding of IGFBP-5 to the extracellular matrix (34) significantly lowers their affinities for IGFs, as compared with the soluble forms of these IGFBPs, therefore favoring IGF/receptor interactions. Similarly, proteolytic cleavage of IGFBP-3 (35, 36) and IGFBP-5 (37) lowers IGF affinities. IGFBP-2 (38) and -4 (39) also are susceptible, though the exact roles of these proteases in controlling the distribution of the IGFs in serum has not been determined. To date, no such protease has been described for IGFBP-1; we and others (12, 31) have suggested that changes in phosphorylation status may represent the mechanism by which IGFs are released by IGFBP-1. This hypothesis is supported by our finding that the normal circulating form of IGFBP-1 has a 10-fold higher affinity for IGF-I than the nonphosphorylated IGFBP-1 that appears during pregnancy. Whether change in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation status (for example, at the cell surface of IGF target tissues) represents a more generalized mechanism for controlling tissue IGF bioavailability remains to be determined, the analogy being that tissue IGFBP-3 proteolytic activity is reported to be 8-fold higher than in serum (40).

All IGFBPs bind both IGF-I and -II with high specific affinity, and Rechler (30) has suggested that the affinity constants of the six IGFBPs are similar for IGF-I and IGF-II, with the exception of IGFBP-6, which has a 20- to 70-fold higher affinity for IGF-II, and that variations of some affinity constants found in the literature may be caused by different temperatures at which Ka values were determined. In the present study, the binding affinity of the plasma form of IGFBP-1 for IGF-I and IGF-II was determined under the same conditions, and phosphorylation was found to affect only the affinity of IGFBP-1 for IGF-I. Although the explanation for this phenomenon is not clear, it may involve different binding sites for IGF-I and -II on IGFBP-1, as has been suggested recently for IGFBP-2 (41). These findings may also explain why Kratz et al. (42) were able to show enhanced proliferative response to IGF-I, but not IGF-II, in the presence of nonphosphorylated (recombinant) IGFBP-1 in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Scatchard plots obtained by Roghani et al. (43) also imply two classes of binding site for IGF-I and IGF-II, one of high and one of low affinity, though this is likely to be because their IGFBP-1 preparation was purified from AF and would have contained several different isoforms of IGFBP-1. Our Scatchard data gives linear plots, which would suggest that, when using a homogenous preparation of IGFBP-1, the binding of IGF-I or -II is at a single site.

In summary, we have purified the highly phosphorylated form of IGFBP-1 found in the normal circulation and have shown that this species has a significantly higher affinity for IGF-I in comparison with the nonphosphorylated isoform that appears under some physiological and pathological conditions. These data suggest that normally, IGFBP-1 in the circulation would be inhibitory of IGF actions; however, changes in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation status may permit increased IGF, particularly IGF-I, bioavailability.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the Salford Royal Hospitals Trust. Back

Received May 23, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sara VR, Hall K 1990 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins. Physiol Rev 70:591–614[Free Full Text]
  2. Rosenfeld EG, Lamson G, Pham H, OH Y, Conover C, De Leon DD, Donovan SM, Ocrant I, Giudice L 1990 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Recent Prog Horm Res 46:99–163
  3. Liu L, Brinkman A, Blot C, Harel L 1991 IGFBP-1, an insulin-like growth factor binding protein is a cell growth inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 174:673–679[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Elgin RG, Busby WH, Clemmons DR 1987 An IGFBP enhances the biologic response to IGF-I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3254–3258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Busby WH, Klapper DG, Clemmons DR 1988 Purification of a 31 000-dalton insulin-like growth factor binding protein from amniotic fluid. J Biol Chem 263:14203–14210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Jones JI, D’Ercole AJ, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR 1991 Phosphorylation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-1 in cell culture and in vivo: effects on affinity for IGF-I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7481–7485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Frost RA, Tseng L 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 is phosphorylated by cultured human endometrial cells and multiple protein kinases in vitro. J Biol Chem 266:18082–18088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Koistinen R, Angervo M, Leinonen P, Hakala T, Seppala M 1993 Phosphorylation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 increases in human amniotic fluid and decidua from early to late pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta 215:189–199[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Jyung RW, Mustoe TA, Busby WH, Clemmons DR 1994 Increased wound-breaking strength induced by insulin-like growth factor I in combination with insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Surgery 115:233–239[Medline]
  10. Tsuboi R, Shi C-M, Sato C, Cox GN, Ogawa H 1995 Co-administration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein-1 stimulates wound healing in animal models. J Invest Dermatol 104:199–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kratz G, Lake M, Gidlund M 1994 Insulin-like growth factor-I and -II and their role in the re-epithelialisation of wounds; interactions with insulin-like growth factor binding protein type 1. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 28:107–112[Medline]
  12. Westwood M, Gibson JM, Davies AJ, Young RJ, White A 1994 The phosphorylation pattern of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in normal plasma is different from that in amniotic fluid and changes during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1735–1741[Abstract]
  13. Martin JL, Baxter RC 1986 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein from human plasma. Purification and characterization. J Biol Chem 261:8754–8760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Baxter RC, Martin JL 1989 Structure of the Mr 140,000 growth hormone dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex: determination by reconstitution and affinity labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6898–6902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. McCusker RH, Campion DR, Clemmons DR 1988 The ontogeny and regulation of a 31,000 Mr insulin-like growth factor/somatomedin (IGF) binding protein in fetal porcine plasma and sera. Endocrinology 122:2071–2079[Abstract]
  16. Guler H-P, Zapf J, Schmid C, Froesch ER 1989 Insulin-like growth factors I and II in healthy man: estimations of half-lives and production rates. Acta Endocrinol 121:753–758
  17. Westwood M, Gibson JM, Williams AC, Clayton PE, Hamberg O, Flyvbjerg A, White A 1995 Hormonal regulation of circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 phosphorylation status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3520–3527[Abstract]
  18. Sommer A, Spratt SK, Tatsuno GP, Tressel T, Lee R, Maack CA 1993 Properties of glycosylated and non-glycosylated human recombinant IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). Growth Regul 1:46–49
  19. Mukku VR, Chu H, Baxter R 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein, IGFBP-3 is secreted as a phosphoprotein. 2nd International Symposium on IGFs/Somatomedins, San Francisco CA, p 237
  20. Bardsley WG, Bukhari NAJ, Ferguson MWJ, Cachaza JA, Burguillo FJ 1995 Evaluation of model discrimination, parameter estimation and goodness of fit in nonlinear regression problems by test statistics distributions. Comput Chem 19:75–84
  21. Binoux M, Hossenlopp P 1988 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF binding proteins: comparison of human serum and lymph. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:509–514[Abstract]
  22. Bar RS, Clemmons DR, Boes M, Busby WH, Booth BA, Dake BL, Sandra A 1990 Transcapillary permeability and subendothelial distribution of endothelial and amniotic fluid insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the rat heart. Endocrinology 127:1078–1086[Abstract]
  23. Gibson JM, Westwood M, Crosby SR, Gordon C, Holly JMP, Fraser W, Anderson C, White A, Young RJ 1995 Choice of treatment affects plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) in non insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:1369–1375[Abstract]
  24. Yeoh SI, Baxter RC 1988 Metabolic regulation of the growth hormone independent IGFBP in human plasma. Acta Endocrinol 119:465–473
  25. Holly JMP, Biddlecombe RA, Dunger DB, Edge JA, Amiel SA, Howell R, Chard T, Rees LH, Wass JAH 1988 Circadian variation of GH-independent IGF binding protein in diabetes mellitus and its relationship to insulin. A new role for insulin? Clin Endocrinol 29:667–675[Medline]
  26. Lee PDK, Conover CA, Powell DR 1993 Regulation and function of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 204:4–29[Abstract]
  27. Holly JMP 1991 The physiological role of IGFBP-1. Acta Endocrinol [Suppl 2] 124:55–62
  28. Lewitt MS, Baxter RC 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1: a role in glucose counter regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 79:C147–C152
  29. Zapf J 1995 Physiological role of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Eur J Endocrinol 132:645–654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rechler MM 1993 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Vitam Horm 47:1–114[Medline]
  31. Jones JI, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Steele-Perkins G, Turner J, Edman JC, Hari J, Pierce SB, Stover C, Rutter WJ, Roth RA 1988 Expression and characterization of a functional human insulin-like growth factor I receptor. J Biol Chem 263:11486–11492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. McCusker RH, Camacho-Hubner C, Bayne ML, Cascieri MA, Clemmons DR 1990 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to human fibroblasts and glioblastoma cells: the modulating effect of cell released IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs). J Cell Physiol 144:244–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Jones JI, Gockerman A, Busby WHJ, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR 1993 Extracellular matrix contains insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5: potentiation of the effects of IGF-I. J Cell Biol 121:679–687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Guidice LC, Farrell EM, Pham H, Lamson G, Rosenfeld RG 1990 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in maternal serum throughout gestation and in the puerperium: effects of a pregnancy-associated serum protease activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:806–816[Abstract]
  36. Davies SC, Wass AH, Ross RJM, Cotterill AM, Buchanan CR, Coulson VJ, Holly JMP 1991 The induction of a specific protease for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in the circulation during severe illness. J Endocrinol 130:469–473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Andress DL, Loop SM, Zapf J, Keifer MC 1993 Carboxytruncated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 stimulates mitogenesis in osteoblast cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 195:25–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Pucilowska JB, Davenport ML, Kabir I, Clemmons DR, Thissen JP, Butler T, Underwood LE 1993 The effect of dietary protein supplementation on insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins in children with shigellosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1516–1521[Abstract]
  39. Conover CA, Kiefer MC, Zapf J 1993 Posttranslational regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 in normal and transformed human fibroblasts. Insulin-like growth factor dependence and biological studies. J Clin Invest 91:1129–1137
  40. Lalou C, Binoux M 1993 Evidence that limited proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) occurs in the normal state outside of the bloodstream. Regul Pept 48:179–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Han VKM, Coulter C, Hayatsu J, Nygard K, Tanswell B 1995 Structure-function relationship of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs). 3rd International Symposium on Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Proteins, Tuebingen Germany (Abstract)
  42. Kratz G, Lake M, Ljungstrom K, Forsberg G, Haegerstrand A, Gidlund M 1992 Effect of recombinant IGF binding protein-1 on primary cultures of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts: selective enhancement of IGF-I but not IGF-II induced cell proliferation. Exp Cell Res 202:381–385[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Roghani M, Lassarre C, Zapf J, Povoa G, Binoux M 1991 Two insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins are responsible for the selective affinity for IGF-II of cerebrospinal fluid binding proteins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:658–666[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. J. Cobb, B. Liu, K.-W. Lee, and P. Cohen
Phosphorylation by DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Is Critical for Apoptosis Induction by Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3.
Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10878 - 10884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. E. Murphy, R. Smith, W. B. Giles, and V. L. Clifton
Endocrine Regulation of Human Fetal Growth: The Role of the Mother, Placenta, and Fetus
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 141 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Kabir-Salmani, Y. Shimizu, K. Sakai, and M. Iwashita
Posttranslational modifications of decidual IGFBP-1 by steroid hormones in vitro
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 11(9): 667 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J.-G. Scharf, F. Dombrowski, R. Novosyadlyy, C. Eisenbach, I. Demori, B. Kubler, and T. Braulke
Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-Binding Protein-1 Is Highly Induced during Acute Carbon Tetrachloride Liver Injury and Potentiates the IGF-I-Stimulated Activation of Rat Hepatic Stellate Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3463 - 3472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Kajantie, C. H. D. Fall, M. Seppala, R. Koistinen, L. Dunkel, H. Yliharsila, C. Osmond, S. Andersson, D. J. P. Barker, T. Forsen, et al.
Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-I and IGF-Binding Protein-1 in Elderly People: Relationships with Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Body Composition, Size at Birth, and Childhood Growth
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 1059 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. Marshman, K. A. Green, D. J. Flint, A. White, C. H. Streuli, and M. Westwood
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells
J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2003; 116(4): 675 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. H. Heald, K.W. Siddals, W. Fraser, W. Taylor, K. Kaushal, J. Morris, R. J. Young, A. White, and J. M. Gibson
Low Circulating Levels of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) Are Closely Associated With the Presence of Macrovascular Disease and Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, August 1, 2002; 51(8): 2629 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Kajantie, L. Dunkel, E.-M. Rutanen, M. Seppala, R. Koistinen, A. Sarnesto, and S. Andersson
IGF-I, IGF Binding Protein (IGFBP)-3, Phosphoisoforms of IGFBP-1, and Postnatal Growth in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2171 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Westwood, J. D. Aplin, I. A. Collinge, A. Gill, A. White, and J. M. Gibson
alpha 2-Macroglobulin: a New Component in the Insulin-like Growth Factor/Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 Axis
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 41668 - 41674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Bajoria, M. J. Gibson, S. Ward, S. R. Sooranna, J. P. Neilson, and M. Westwood
Placental Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis in Monochorionic Twins with Chronic Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 3150 - 3156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Westwood, J.M. Gibson, S. R. Sooranna, S. Ward, J. P. Neilson, and R. Bajoria
Genes or placenta as modulator of fetal growth: evidence from the insulin-like growth factor axis in twins with discordant growth
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 387 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J.M. Gibson, J.D. Aplin, A. White, and M. Westwood
Regulation of IGF bioavailability in pregnancy
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
K. Sakai, A. J. D'Ercole, L. J. Murphy, and D. R. Clemmons
Physiological Differences in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) Phosphorylation in IGFBP-1 Transgenic Mice
Diabetes, January 1, 2001; 50(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. Hwa, Y. Oh, and R. G. Rosenfeld
The Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein (IGFBP) Superfamily
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1999; 20(6): 761 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. H. Aguiar-Oliveira, M. S. Gill, E. S. de, A. Barretto, M. R. S. Alcântara, F. Miraki-Moud, C. A. Menezes, A. H. O. Souza, C. E. Martinelli, F. A. Pereira, et al.
Effect of Severe Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency due to a Mutation in the GH-Releasing Hormone Receptor on Insulin-Like Growth Factors (IGFs), IGF-Binding Proteins, and Ternary Complex Formation Throughout Life
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1999; 84(11): 4118 - 4126.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D.-S. Suh and M. M. Rechler
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 and the Glucocorticoid Receptor Synergistically Activate Transcription of the Rat Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 1997; 11(12): 1822 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Frystyk, T. Grofte, C. Skjarbak, and H. Orskov
The Effect of Oral Glucose on Serum Free Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and -II in Healthy Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 3124 - 3127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sakai, W. H. Busby Jr., J. B. Clarke, and D. R. Clemmons
Tissue Transglutaminase Facilitates the Polymerization of Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and Leads to Loss of IGFBP-1's Ability to Inhibit Insulin-like Growth Factor-I-stimulated Protein Synthesis
J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2001; 276(12): 8740 - 8745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend