Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 3 1215-1223
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society
Characterization of a Low Affinity Thyroid Hormone Receptor Binding Site within the Rat GLUT4 Gene Promoter
Christopher J. Torrance,
Stephen J. Usala,
Jeffrey E. Pessin and
G. Lynis Dohm
Departments of Biochemistry (C.J.T., G.L.D.) and Medicine (S.J.U.),
East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina
27858; and the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of
Iowa (J.E.P.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Christopher J. Torrance, Ph.D., Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated that thyroid hormone
(T3) stimulates insulin-responsive glucose
transporter (GLUT4) transcription and protein expression in rat
skeletal muscle. The aim of the present study was to define a putative
thyroid hormone response element (TRE) within the rat GLUT4 promoter
and thus perhaps determine whether T3 acts
directly to augment skeletal muscle GLUT4 transcription. To this end,
electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed to analyze
thyroid hormone receptor (TR) binding to a previously characterized
281-bp T3-responsive region of the rat GLUT4
promoter. Indeed, within this region, a TR-binding site of the standard
DR+4 TRE variety was located between bases -457/-426 and was shown to
posses a specific affinity for in vitro translated TRs.
Interestingly, however, the GLUT4 TR-binding site demonstrated a
significantly lower affinity compared to a consensus DR+4 TRE, and only
bound TRs appreciatively in the form of high affinity heterodimers, in
this case with the cis-retinoic acid receptor.
In conclusion, these data demonstrated the presence of a specific
TR-binding site within a T3-responsive region of
the rat GLUT4 promoter and thus support the supposition that thyroid
hormone acts directly to stimulate GLUT4 transcription in rat skeletal
muscle. Moreover, characterization of a novel TR-binding site with low
affinity suggests an additional mechanism by which the intrinsic
activity and responsiveness of thyroid hormone regulated genes may be
modulated.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
THE ENTRY of glucose into mammalian cells
is mediated by a family of tissue-specific plasma membrane transport
proteins (GLUT1 through 4), the process of which represents the
rate-limiting step in glucose metabolism (1, 2). In tissues that
express the insulin-responsive glucose transporter isoform (GLUT4),
i.e. skeletal muscle, adipose, and heart, the uptake of
glucose is also largely dependent upon insulin (3). In normal
individuals, insulin-mediated glucose disposal functions largely to
normalize circulating plasma glucose levels after a meal, approximately
85% of which occurs within skeletal muscle (4). However, defects in
this process result in persistent hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia,
and represent the ultimate cause of insulin resistance in
noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (3).
The molecular defect in glucose disposal leading to NIDDM has been
suggested to reside within the insulin signaling pathway (5, 6, 7),
although cause and effect have not been established in this disease.
Nevertheless, elucidating positive regulators of GLUT4 as well as their
mechanism(s) of action are of considerable interest as a possible
treatment in NIDDM. Overexpression of GLUT4 in transgenic diabetic mice
has been shown to be highly effective in ameliorating postprandial
hyperglycemia, primarily by stimulating basal (noninsulin-mediated)
glucose disposal (8). Previous studies from our laboratory (9) and that
of Weinstein et al. (10) have demonstrated that thyroid
hormone (T3) stimulates basal and, to some
extent, insulin-mediated glucose uptake in rat skeletal muscle. The
mechanism for this stimulatory effect of T3 was
determined to be due predominantly to an induction of GLUT4 protein
expression (9, 10). In the preceding manuscript, GLUT4 induction by
T3 was further defined to be primarily via
transcriptional induction in red muscle, and a separate translational
and/or posttranslational mechanism in white muscle fiber types (11).
Moreover, in a previous study, constructs containing various regions of
the GLUT4 upstream of a reporter gene, when transfected into C2C12
myotubes and treated with T3, isolated a 281-bp
region responsive to thyroid hormone (12). However, further experiments
are required to determine whether T3 acts
directly on GLUT4 transcription and whether transcriptional induction
of skeletal muscle GLUT4 by T3 or a previously
suggested (11) muscle-selective T3-receptor
agonist represents a viable therapeutic strategy in NIDDM.
The effects of T3 on gene transcription are
mediated directly via a family of nuclear receptor/transcription
factors: c-erbA
1, -ß1, and -ß2 (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These
thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) bind to specific thyroid hormone
response elements (TREs) consisting of hexameric half-sites
[consensus: AGGT(C/A)A], orientated in singlet or multiplex
configurations within the promoter regions of target genes. A limited
number of TREs have been elucidated; many consist of directly repeated
half-sites separated by 4 bp (DR+4) (13), whereas, an everted half-site
TRE separated by 6 bp (F2) has been reported to function as a silencer
in the chick lysozyme promoter (20, 21). TRs bind with high affinity to
their cognate DNA elements in both the presence and absence of
T3; however, TRs only function to stimulate (on
positive TREs) or repress (on negative TREs) gene transcription in
response to binding thyroid hormone (13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19). In contrast,
unoccupied TRs on positive TREs (e.g. DR+4 elements)
actively repress basal transcription (22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27).
TRs bind to composite TREs as monomers; however, cooperative
interactions favor the formation of homodimers. Moreover, TRs interact
with coregulatory proteins or thyroid hormone auxiliary proteins
in vivo, some of which have been characterized
[e.g. the cis-retinoic acid receptors (RXRs)]
(28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34). TR/RXR heterodimers demonstrate higher binding affinities
than TR homodimers, are favored in the presence of
T3, and produce larger increases in
T3-induced gene expression (13, 14, 32, 33).
Indeed, heterodimers are considered to be the primary complexes
mediating T3-regulated gene expression in
vivo.
The aim of the present study was to determine and characterize a
putative TRE within the rat GLUT4 promoter and thus perhaps establish
whether T3 acts directly to stimulate GLUT4
transcription. Sequential electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
analyses using a previously described 281-bp
T3-responsive region of the GLUT4 promoter (12)
identified a TR-binding site, orientated in the classical DR+4 motif,
between bases -450 and -434. However, in contrast to other
established TREs, the GLUT4 TR-binding element demonstrated a
significantly lower affinity, and as a likely consequence only bound
TRs appreciatively in the presence of RXR. Therefore, these data are
also suggestive of an additional level of complexity that may govern
the inducibility and responsiveness of
T3-regulated genes.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Plasmids and reticulocyte lysate-synthesized receptors
The previously described human complementary DNA clones
for c-erbAß1 and c-erbA
1 in pCMV (35) and
for RXR
and retinoic acid receptor
(RAR
) complementary DNAs
in pSKXR31 (36) were used to program TNT T7-coupled reticulocyte
lysates (Promega, Madison, WI). Unlabeled and
[35S]methionine-labeled receptors were synthesized in
parallel using in vitro translation reactions, and the
protein concentrations were determined from trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable counts according to the manufacturers instructions.
The synthesis of the human
1 (h
1) TR, however, is not as
efficient as those for ß1 and RXR
and thus could not be used in
sufficient amounts to give optimal results in EMSAs. In some
experiments purified chick
1 TR was used to visualize
1 complexes
more readily. This receptor was the gift of Dr. H. Samuels (New York
University Medical Center, New York, NY). The isolation procedure for
chick
1 has been described previously (37) and was used here in
approximately equimolar ratios with hRXR
.
A plasmid containing a 281-bp EcoNI-BstXI
fragment of the GLUT4 promoter (bases -517 to -238), which accounts
for full thyroid hormone responsiveness of 2212 bp from the
transcriptional start site of GLUT4, was obtained from Dr. J. Pessin
(University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). Various double stranded DNA
oligomers spanning this region were also designed to further localize
the putative GLUT4 TRE. These were synthesized at the East Carolina
University School of Medicine DNA-Core Facility.
Antibodies
The N-terminal polyclonal antibody specific for rat ß1
(rß1PAb, amino acids 6292 in rat ß1) and the C-terminal
1/ß
cross-specific polyclonal antibody (r
1/ßPAb, amino acids 447461
and 393407 in rat ß1 and
1, respectively) were provided by Drs.
J. Oppenheimer and H. Schwartz (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN). The hRXR
polyclonal antibody (RXR
PAb) was the generous gift
of Dr. R. Evans (The Salk Institute, San Diego, CA).
Isolation and extraction of nuclei from rat skeletal muscle
Nuclei were isolated from rat skeletal muscle in the presence of
protease inhibitors (0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mM EDTA)
by the previously described method of Neufer et al. (38).
Approximately 500 µg purified rat muscle nuclei were extracted using
100 µl cold (4 C) M4 extraction buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH
7.8), 0.4 M KCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 20%
glycerol] for 30 min (plus protease inhibitors), and the nuclear
debris and DNA were pelleted at 12,000 rpm in a microfuge for 15 min.
Nuclear extracts were assayed for protein concentration by the method
of Bradford (39) and were used either immediately for analysis or
stored at -80 C until required.
EMSAs
EMSAs were performed as previously described (40). Briefly,
approximately 100 ng (60,000 cpm) of a 32P-labeled double
stranded DNA oligomer were incubated with either 1 µl (10 fmol)
reticulocyte lysate synthesized receptor (1 µl hß1 and/or hRXR
)
or 5 µg nuclear extract for 30 min at room temperature in a total
volume of 20 µl reaction buffer [25 mM Tris (pH 7.8),
0.5 mM EDTA, 88 mM KCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 150 µg/ml poly(dI·dC)-poly(dI·dC), 0.05% Triton
X-100, and 12.5 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA]. For supershift
experiments, 1 µl polyclonal antisera was incubated with in
vitro translated receptors for 30 min at room temperature before
addition of the DNA oligomer. Reaction mixtures were subjected to
electrophoresis on a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel at 4 C and 40
mA (200 V) for approximately 2.5 h, and the dried gels were
exposed with intensifying screens to x-ray film for 1648 h at -80
C.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Identification of TR-binding site within a
T3-responsive region of the GLUT4 promoter
To identify a putative TRE within the rat GLUT4 promoter, a series
of electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed using a
281-bp fragment of the rat GLUT4 promoter (Fig. 1
),
previously delineated in transient transfection studies to be
T3 responsive (12). EMSA using this fragment was
sufficient to first establish the presence of a TR-binding site within
the GLUT4 promoter. The binding of reticulocyte lysate-synthesized
1
and ß1 TR/RXR
heterodimers to this 281-bp fragment is shown in the
four left lanes of Fig. 2
(complex
composition confirmed in Fig. 6
). In addition, complexes were formed
using rat skeletal muscle nuclear extracts, in particular one that
migrates closely with the human in vitro translated
1/RXR
heterodimer (Fig. 2
, left lanes 4 and 2,
respectively) and one highly abundant species with very low mobility.
The lesser degree of h
1 TR binding to the GLUT4 sequence as well as
other TREs used throughout this report is due to the lower efficiency
of the in vitro translation reaction for h
1, such that
equimolar ratios with hß1 and RXR
could not be used in this
assay.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Sequence of the previously described 281-bp
thyroid hormone-responsive region of the GLUT4 promoter.
Arrows show the putative TRE half-sites (consensus
AGGT(C/A)A). MyoD, Consensus sequence for myogenic differentiation
factor (MyoD); MEF-2, consensus sequence for MEF-2; AlwN1, cleavage
site for restriction enzyme AlwN1. Dotted lines indicate
the sequences included in double stranded DNA oligomers synthesized to
determine the position of a putative GLUT4 TRE.
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. EMSA to determine the identity and binding
specificity of TR complexes formed on the GLUT4 TRE. Lanes 16, EMSA
supershift experiment using TR isoform-specific antibodies to determine
the composition of TR/GLUT4 TRE complexes. Lane 1, Purified chick 1
and hRXR ; lane 2, purified chick 1, hRXR , and 1 polyclonal
antibody; purified chick 1, hRXR , and RXR polyclonal antibody;
lane 4, hß1, hRXR , and ß1 polyclonal antibody; hß1, hRXR ,
and RXR polyclonal antibody. Lanes 712, EMSA with competing DNA to
determine the binding specificity of the GLUT4 TRE for TRs: lane 7,
purified chick 1 and hRXR ; lane 8, purified chick 1, hRXR ,
and a 200-fold excess of cold F2 TRE; lane 9, purified chick 1,
hRXR , and a 200-fold excess of a cold mutant (non-TR binding) TRE
(M2); lanes 1012, same as for lanes 79, except using in
vitro translated ß1 TR and RXR .
|
|
Using two AlwN1 restriction fragments of the 281-bp promoter sequence,
the GLUT4 TR-binding element was further localized to the 5'-fragment
(Fig. 2
). In addition, consistent with the presence of a MyoD and/or
myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF-2) consensus binding site within the
5'-restriction fragment (Fig. 1
), both the full-length and 5'-AlwNI
sequences bound low mobility complex produced with muscle nuclear
extracts (left and right four lanes of Fig. 2
, respectively). Based on these data, three oligomers were synthesized to
span the 5'-AlwN1 restriction fragment: oligo 1 (bases -526/-485),
oligo 2 (bases -491/-452), and oligo 3 (bases -460/-418) (Fig. 1
),
to further define the position of the GLUT4 TRE as well as establish
the putative binding of MyoD and/or MEF activities within this thyroid
hormone-responsive region of the GLUT4 promoter. Specifically, oligo 1
encompassed the three upstream putative TRE sequences, oligo 2 covered
the MyoD and MEF consensus binding sites, and oligo 3 spanned the
remaining near-consensus TRE sequence within this AlwN1 restriction
fragment (Fig. 1
). Oligo 3 was not synthesized to cover the residual
downstream sequences in the 5'-AlwN1 fragment, because this region is
simply composed of a stretch of AC microsatellite dinucleotide repeats
and thus is highly unlikely to contain a specific TR-binding
element.
The bindings of in vitro translated TRs and skeletal muscle
nuclear extracts to oligo 1 and a previously characterized TRE (the
chicken lysozyme F2 TRE) (20, 21) were compared in Fig. 3
. These data clearly demonstrated that bases
-526/-485 of the GLUT4 promoter do not contain a TR-binding element,
although the putative TRE half-sites within this region (highlighted in
Fig. 1
) are close to the consensus AGGT(C/A)A. The experiment shown in
Fig. 4
, left panel, directly compared the
binding of TRs and skeletal muscle nuclear extracts to oligos 2 and 3.
Consistent with the respective putative consensus elements within these
oligos (Fig. 1
), binding of in vitro translated TRs was
localized to oligo 3 (bases -460/-418), whereas the postulated MEF-2
and/or MyoD binding complex was defined within oligo 2. Moreover,
competition of the oligo 2 binding species with a large excess of an
unlabeled MEF-2, but not a MyoD consensus binding site, confirmed this
DNA-binding species to be composed solely of MEF-2 (Fig. 4
, right
panel).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. EMSA using TRs, MEF-2A, and skeletal muscle
nuclear extracts with oligomers spanning sequences -491/-452 (oligo
2) and -460/-418 (oligo 3) of the thyroid hormone-responsive GLUT4
promoter region. Lanes 1 and 5, Reticulocyte lysate control; lanes 2
and 6, purified chick 1 TR and RXR ; lanes 3 and 7, hß1TR and
RXR ; lanes 4 and 8, 15 µg skeletal muscle nuclear extract; lane 9,
0.1 µg nuclear extract (NE); lane 10, 0.1 µg NE and a 200-fold
excess of a MEF-2 consensus DNA-binding element; lane 11, 0.1 µg NE
and a 1000-fold excess of MEF-2 DNA; lane 12, 0.1 µg NE and a
200-fold excess of a MyoD consensus DNA-binding element; lane 13, 0.1
µg NE and a 1000-fold excess of MyoD DNA.
|
|
In summary, these data clearly demonstrated the presence of a
TR-binding site within the GLUT4 promoter, the position of which was
determined to be within bases -460/-418. However, two overlapping
near-consensus DR+4 TRE sequences could equally be envisaged to be
present within this region (Fig. 1
, solid and dashed arrows,
and Fig. 5
, top panel). Therefore, to further
define the boundaries and orientation of the GLUT4 TRE, two additional
oligomers were synthesized with mutations designed to abrogate TR
binding dependent upon which sequence represented the true TR-binding
site (Fig. 5
). Mutations within the 5'- to 3'-orientated putative TRE
were shown to abolish TR binding, whereas mutations within the
oppositely orientated sequence did not (Fig. 5
). Therefore, these data
unambiguously established the location of the GLUT4 TR-binding site
between bases -457/-426, composed in a classical DR+4 arrangement
orientated in the 5' to 3' direction.
Characterization of the GLUT4 TR-binding site
A series of experiments was performed to characterize in detail
the specificity, affinity, and identity of TR complexes able to form on
this newly distinguished TR-binding site. Supershift experiments (Fig. 6
, lanes 16) first demonstrated that the TR complexes
formed using in vitro translated TRs and hRXR
on the
GLUT4 TRE were composed of TR/RXR
heterodimers. Moreover, the
successful competition of these species with a large excess of an
unlabeled oligo containing the F2 TRE, but not with a mutated
(non-TR-binding) version of this element (M2; Fig. 6
, lanes 712),
demonstrated the specificity of the GLUT 4 sequence for TRs.
All EMSA experiments described thus far were performed for the most
part by coincubating in vitro translated TRs with hRXR
,
principally with the intent of visualizing the maximum possible number
of TR/TRE interactions. However, only a single species has consistently
been observed in these assays, i.e. DNA binding was unable
to be demonstrated by TRs in the absence of hRXR. These data,
therefore, suggest that binding of TRs to the GLUT4 TRE may be
dependent upon heterodimerization. Hence, the GLUT4 TRE was next
compared to a canonical DR+4 TRE sequence composed of perfect consensus
half-sites to determine the relative ability of these sequences to bind
TRs (Fig. 7
; both elements labeled to identical specific activities).
Complexes on both elements demonstrated the characteristic downshift of
heterodimeric TR/TRE complexes and dissociation of TR homodimers in the
presence of T3 (Fig. 7
).
However, TR binding to the GLUT4 TRE was overall considerably lower,
and as a likely consequence, homodimer and even monomeric binding
evident for ß1 TRs on the canonical DR+4 element, was not detectable
on the GLUT4 TR-binding site.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. EMSA comparing the relative affinity and TR
complexes formed on the GLUT4 TRE with a canonical DR+4 TRE sequence.
GLUT4 and DR+4 TREs were labeled to an identical specific activity, and
equal counts were used for EMSA analysis. Lane 1 and 9, Purified 1
TR; lanes 2 and 10, purified 1 TR and T3
(1 x 10-7 M); lanes 3 and 11, hß1;
lanes 4 and 12, hß1 and T3; lanes 5 and 13,
purified 1 and RXR ; lanes 6 and 14, purified 1, RXR , and
T3; lanes 7 and 15, hß1 and RXR ; lanes 8 and
17, hß1, RXR , and T3.
|
|
This phenomenon was next studied in more detail, initially by comparing
a titration curve for the binding of increasing amounts of in
vitro translated ß1 TR with a constant concentration of RXR
to the GLUT4 and canonical DR+4 TR-binding sites. The results of this
experiment (Fig. 8
) demonstrated that unlike the
canonical DR+4, only at the highest ß1TR concentration was TR
homodimer marginally apparent on the GLUT4 TRE.
With regard to a potential mechanism for this observation, as the
binding affinity/specificity of TRs is presumably determined by the DNA
sequence of the binding site, a final experiment was performed using a
series of oligos synthesized with single base substitutions to
determine a crucial base or sequence dictating the lower affinity and
perhaps putative heterodimer-selective binding of the GLUT4 TR-binding
element (Fig. 9
). Specifically, these mutations were
designed to replace nonconsensus half-site bases with consensus
nucleotides. In addition, various substitutions were introduced within
the intervening and flanking regions of the GLUT 4 TR-binding element,
e.g. mutant oligo 7 was synthesized, replacing all the
intervening and flanking bases with those present in the canonical DR+4
TRE.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9. EMSA using a series of GLUT4 TRE mutants to
determine a putative base(s) imparting specificity for TR/RXR
heterodimers. The sequences of GLUT4 TRE mutants
(italic, mutated base) and EMSA using the GLUT4 TRE and
GLUT4 TRE mutants 17 (lanes 18, respectively) are shown. Lane 9,
Canonical DR+4 TRE.
|
|
The results of the binding of in vitro translated ß1 and
ß1+RXR
receptors to these mutant GLUT4 TREs are shown in Fig. 9
.
Interestingly, bases within the intervening and/or flanking sequences
were also shown to be crucial for TR binding; in particular intervening
bases 2 and 3. In contrast, the mutations in oligo 5 and oligo 6 (which
converts the first base of the 3'-TRE half-site to the consensus)
apparently imparted an additional affinity to these sequences, the
degree of which and perhaps complex formation on would seem to be
comparable with those of the canonical DR+4 TRE. Therefore, in
combination with the previous titration experiment, these data suggest
that it is the overall lower affinity of the GLUT4 sequence that
accounts for the visualization of only the more avid heterodimer in
these experiments, i.e. a quantitative, rather than
qualitative, phenomenon. This conclusion would also be supported by the
reduced binding and formation of only heterodimer observed by mutant 7,
wherein all the flanking and intervening bases were substituted with
those from the canonical TR-binding element.
In conclusion, these data demonstrated that the newly identified GLUT4
TRE has a specific affinity for TRs. However, in contrast to other
established TREs, GLUT4 TRE was shown to have a much lower affinity,
and this property appears to be responsible for the observation that
only high affinity TR/heterodimeric receptors bind appreciatively on
this TRE. Moreover, combined with the results of a previous study that
demonstrated this region of the GLUT4 promoter to confer thyroid
hormone responsiveness in transfection studies (12), these data
indicate that the effects of T3 on GLUT 4
transcription are likely to be mediated directly by this TR-binding
element. However, formal proof of this hypothesis requires additional
functional analyses using mutations within this TR-binding element.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The primary aim of this study was to analyze the binding of TRs
and nuclear extracts to a previously identified thyroid
hormone-responsive region of the GLUT4 promoter (12) and thus perhaps
determine whether thyroid hormone acts directly to stimulate GLUT4
transcription in rat skeletal muscle (11). Indeed, consistent with this
hypothesis, a series of EMSA analyses clearly demonstrated the presence
of a specific DR+4 TR-binding site between bases -457/-426 of the
GLUT4 promoter fragment. However, given the similar deviations from the
consensus [AGGT(C/A)A] of this confirmed TR-binding site and the
other three putative TRE half-sites located further upstream, it is not
immediately clear why the latter sequences did not also display
TR-binding activity. Conceivably, the second and third half-sites of
the latter tandem sequence can be discounted due to their nonoptimal
separation distance (3 bp). However, the first and second elements form
an apparently viable DR+4 element. Nevertheless, this can probably be
explained by the fact that neither of these half-sites contains a
consensus thymine [AGGT(C/A)A] at the fourth position.
The exquisite specificity of base sequences directing protein-DNA
interaction(s) was similarly demonstrated in the mutation experiment,
which revealed that intervening and flanking sequences surrounding the
GLUT4 half-sites were also crucial for mediating TR binding. Indeed, we
may have been fortunate in that the mutations introduced within the
intervening and flanking regions to discern the orientation of the
GLUT4 TRE did not also abrogate TR binding. However, none of the
mutations analyzed in Fig. 9
directly altered the
propensity of the GLUT4 TRE to bind heterodimers. Moreover, certain
substitutions (in particular the conversion of the first base in the 3'
half-site to the consensus adenine; mutant oligo 6) that enhanced the
affinity of the GLUT4 TRE, resulted in binding properties similar to
those of the canonical DR+4 TRE. Of note, increased binding to the
mutation oligo 6 would be consistent with the fact that TRs in
heterodimeric complexes are considered to bind this particular
half-site. In contrast, mutant oligo 7, in which all bases other than
those within the GLUT4 TRE half-sites were replaced with the
corresponding sequences in the canonical DR+4, demonstrated properties
comparable to those of the wild-type GLUT4 TRE. These data, therefore,
suggest that the apparent heterodimer specificity observed for the
GLUT4 TR-binding site is simply a function of the overall lower
affinity of the half-sites within this element. Indeed, the titration
experiment demonstrated the GLUT4 sequence to be equally deficient in
binding both homodimers and heterodimers compared to a canonical DR+4
TR-binding element (estimated to be approximately 5-fold from
densitometric scanning).
Finally, characterization of a low affinity TR-binding site has a
number of implications for thyroid hormone-regulated genes, the first
of which would presumably be the inducibility of responsive genes.
Indeed, the degree of transcriptional induction observed for the GLUT4
gene (
2.5 under chronic hyperthyroid vs. hypothyroid
conditions) (11) compared to genes containing high affinity TRE(s)
(e.g. malic enzyme; transcription stimulated 3- to 4-fold in
the liver of euthyroid rats) (43) is consistent with this hypothesis.
Secondly, as 1) TRs bind DNA in the presence and absence of thyroid
hormone, 2) unoccupied TRs actively repress basal transcription, and 3)
heterodimers demonstrate higher affinities over homodimers and are
favored in the presence of T3 (13), a low
affinity TRE would have special relevance for thyroid hormone-regulated
genes. For example, one can speculate that although a low affinity TRE
would not illicit as large a T3 induction
compared to a high affinity TRE, by the same token, in the absence of
T3 a low affinity TRE would not be subjected to
such a great degree of basal repression.
A previous study suggested a criterion by which different combinations
of weak and strong artificial TRE half-sites modulate TR complex
formation and T3 responsiveness of thyroid
hormone-regulated genes (44). In this classification, the GLUT4 TRE
presumably falls into the category of either a weak/weak (w/w) or, more
likely from the high affinity imparted to the mutant 6, a strong/weak
half-site composition. Interestingly, consistent with our observations,
both of these previously described TREs were weakly
T3 responsive (44). Moreover, distinct from all
other TRE combinations, these elements were also dependent upon RXR to
mediate T3 induction in transfection assays.
Unfortunately, however, the basal repression properties of a w/w or
strong/weak TRE were not investigated in this study (44).
Interestingly, both the half-site sequences, the immediately flanking
bases, and three of the four intervening sequences of the GLUT4 TRE are
absolutely conserved among humans, mice, and rats (Fig. 10
). Their
conservation would, therefore, further suggest the probable
functionality of this low affinity TRE as well as the importance of
sequences other than those within the TR half-sites for mediating TR
binding. Indeed, one can envisage that during the evolution of genes,
the properties of promoter regulatory elements, e.g.
affinity, may be similarly selected so that they compliment the
function of the particular gene product, i.e. for a TRE; a
low affinity TRE(s) may predominate in genes that need to be
constitutively expressed, but under certain conditions need to be
up-regulated to some extent, e.g. GLUT4 (11). In contrast, a
higher affinity TREs would be highly responsive to thyroid hormone, but
would also be subjected to a greater degree of active repression by
unoccupied heterodimers and/or homodimers. Such a TRE would, therefore,
be highly sensitive to changes in T3
status/availability and may be advantageous for imparting high
inducibility on, for instance, temporally expressed genes.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10. Evolutionary conservation of the GLUT4 TRE.
Comparison of the base sequences within the GLUT4 promoter region
containing the GLUT4 TRE in mice, rats, and humans.
|
|
In conclusion, these studies demonstrated the presence of a specific
TR-binding element within a region of the GLUT4 promoter previously
found to impart T3 responsiveness (12). These
data, therefore, corroborate the supposition that the effects of
T3 on GLUT4 transcription are direct. However,
formal demonstration of this hypothesis must await proof of
nonfunctionality in transient transfection assays of mutants within the
GLUT4 TR-binding site. Nevertheless, the GLUT4 TR-binding element was
also shown to possess a significantly lower affinity than a
conventional DR+4 TR-binding element and only bound TRs significantly
in combination with RXR. These data, therefore, suggest another
mechanism by which the intrinsic basal activity and
T3 responsiveness of thyroid hormone-regulated
genes may be modulated.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We express our gratitude to Dr. James deVente for his extremely
helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.
Received July 1, 1996.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Fink RI, Wallace P, Brechtel G, Olefsky JM 1992 Evidence that glucose transport is rate limiting for in
vivo glucose uptake. Metabolism 41:897902[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ren JM, Marshall BA, Gulve EA, Gao J, Johnson DW,
Holloszy JO, Mueckler M 1993 Evidence from transgenic mice that
glucose transport is rate limiting for glycogen deposition and
glycolysis in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 268:1611316115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mueckler M 1994 The molecular biology of glucose
transport: relevance to insulin resistance and non-insulin dependent
diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 7:130141
-
DeFronzo RA, Ferranninni E, Sato Y, Felig P, Wahren
J 1981 Synergistic interaction between exercise and insulin on
peripheral glucose uptake. J Clin Invest 68:14681474
-
Azavedo Jr JL, Carey JO, Pories WJ, Morris PG, Dohm
GL 1995 Hypoxia stimulates glucose transport in insulin-resistant
human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 44:695698[Abstract]
-
Carey JO, Azevedo Jr JL, Morris PG, Pories WJ, Dohm
GL 1995 Okadaic acid, vanadate, and phenylarsine oxide stimulate
2-deoxyglucose transport in insulin-resistant human skeletal muscle.
Diabetes 44:682688[Abstract]
-
Goodyear LJ, Giorgino F, Sherman LA, Carey JO, Smith
RJ, Dohm GL 1995 Insulin receptor phosphorylation, insulin
receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation, and phosphoinositol 3-kinase are
decreased in intact skeletal muscle strips from obese subjects. J
Clin Invest 95:21952204
-
Lui M, Gibbs EM, McCoid SC, Milici AJ, Stukenbrok HA,
McPherson RK, Treadway JL, Pessin JE 1993 Transgenic mice
expressing the human GLUT4/muscle-fat facilitative glucose transporter
protein exhibit efficient glycemic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1134611350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Casla A, Rovira A, Wells JA, Dohm GL 1990 Increased glucose transporter (GLUT4) protein expression in
hyperthyroidism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:182188[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Weinstein SP, OBoyle E, Haber RS 1994 Thyroid
hormone increases basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport in
skeletal muscle. Diabetes 43:11851189[Abstract]
-
Torrance CJ, deVente JE, Jones JP, Dohm GL 1997 Effects of thyroid hormone on GLUT4 glucose transporter gene expression
and NIDDM in rats. Endocrinology 138:12041214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Richardson JM, Pessin JE 1993 Identification of a
skeletal muscle-specific regulatory domain in the rat GLUT4/muscle-fat
gene. J Biol Chem 268:2102121027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Glass CK 1994 Differential recognition of target
genes by nuclear receptor monomers, dimers, and heterodimers. Endocr
Rev 15:391407[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Schwartz HL, Strait KA, Oppenheimer JH 1993 Molecular mechanisms of thyroid hormone action: a physiological
perspective. Clin Lab Med 13:543561[Medline]
-
Shepard AR, Eberhardt NL 1993 Molecular mechanisms
of thyroid hormone action. Clin Lab Med 13:531541[Medline]
-
Weinberger C, Thompson CC, Ong ES, Lebo R, Gruol DJ,
Evans RM 1986 The c-erbA gene encodes a thyroid hormone
receptor. Nature 324:641646[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Umesono K, Murakami KK, Thompson CC, Evans RM 1991 Direct repeats as selective response elements for the thyroid hormone,
retinoic acid, and vitamin D3 receptors. Cell 65:12551266[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lazar MA 1993 Thyroid hormone receptors: multiple
forms, multiple possibilities. Endocr Rev 14:184188[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Samuels HH, Forman BM, Horowitz ZD, Ye Z 1988 Regulation of gene expression by thyroid hormone. J Clin Invest 81:957967
-
Baniahmad A, Steiner C, Koehne AC, Renkawitz R 1990 Modular structure of a chicken lysozyme silencer: involvement of an
unusual thyroid hormone receptor binding site. Cell 61:505514[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Baniahmad A, Tsai SY, OMalley BW, Tsai M J 1992 Kindred S thyroid hormone receptor is an active and constitutive
silencer and repressor for thyroid hormone and retinoic acid responses.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1063310637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brent GA, Dunn MK, Harney JW, Gulick T, Larsen PR, Moore
DD 1989 Thyroid hormone aporeceptor represses
T3-inducible promoters and blocks activity of the
retinoic acid receptor. New Biol 1:329336[Medline]
-
Graupner G, Wills KN, Tzukerman M, Zhang X-k, Pfahl
M 1989 Dual regulatory role for thyroid hormone receptors allows
control of retinoic acid receptor activity. Nature 340:653656[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Zhang XK, Wills KN, Graupner G, Tzukerman M, Hermann T,
Pfahl M 1991 Ligand-binding domain of thyroid hormone receptors
modulates DNA binding and determines bifunctional roles. New Biol 3:169181[Medline]
-
Yen PM, Wilcox EC, Hayashi Y, Refetoff S, Chin WW 1995 Studies on the repression of basal transcription (silencing) by
artificial and natural human thyroid hormone receptor-ß mutants.
Endocrinology 136:28452851[Abstract]
-
Hollenberg AN, Monden T, Wondisford FE 1995 Ligand-independent and -dependent functions of thyroid hormone receptor
isoforms depend upon their distinct amino termini. J Biol Chem 270:1427414280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Horlein AJ, Naar AM, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Gloss B,
Kurokawa R, Ryan A, Kamel Y, Soderstrom M, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG 1995 Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor is
mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature 377:397403[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Darling DS, Beebe JS, Burnside J, Winslow ER, Chin
WW 1991 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine(T3)
receptor-auxiliary protein (TRAP) binds DNA and forms heterodimers with
the T3 receptor. Mol Endocrinol 5:7384[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hsu JH, Zavacki AM, Harney JW, Brent GA 1995 Retinoid X receptor (RXR) differentially augments thyroid hormone
response in cell lines as a function of the response element and
endogenous RXR content. Endocrinology 136:421430[Abstract]
-
Kliewer SA, Umesono K, Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM 1992 Retinoid X receptor interacts with nuclear receptors in retionic
acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signaling. Nature 355:446449[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kurokawa R, Yu VC, Naar A, Kyakumoto S, Han Z, Silverman
S, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK 1993 Differential orientations of the
DNA binding domain and carboxy-terminal dimerization interface regulate
binding site selection by nuclear receptor heterodimers. Genes Dev 7:14231435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murray MB, Towle HC 1989 Identification of nuclear
factors that enhance binding of the thyroid hormone receptor to a
thyroid hormone response element. Mol Endocrinol 3:14321442
-
Rosen ED, ODonnell AL, Koenig RJ 1992 Ligand-dependent synergy of thyroid hormone and retinoid X receptors.
J Biol Chem 267:2201022013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhang SK, Hoffmann B, Tran BPV, Graupner G, Pfahl M 1992 Retinoid X receptor is an auxiliary protein for thyroid hormone
and retinoic acid receptors. Nature 355:441445[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Geffner ME, Su F, Ross NS, Hershman JM, Van Dop C,
Menke J, Hao EH, Stanzak RK, Eaton T, Samuels HH, Usala SJ 1993 An
arginine to histidine mutation in codon 311 of the c-erbAb
gene results in a mutant receptor which does not mediate a dominant
negative phenotype. J Clin Invest 91:538546
-
Manglesdorf DJ, Ong ES, Dyck JA, Evans RM 1990 A
nuclear receptor that identifies a novel retinoic acid response
pathway. Nature 345:224229[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Au-Fliegner M, Helmer E, Casanova J, Raaka BM, Samuels
HH 1993 The conserved ninth C-terminal heptad in thyroid hormone
and retinoic acid receptors mediates diverse responses by affecting
heterodimer but not homodimer formation. Mol Cell Biol 13:57255737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Neufer PD, Dohm GL 1993 Exercise induces a
transient increase in transcription of the GLUT4 gene in skeletal
muscle. Am J Physiol 265:C1597C1603
-
Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for
the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the
principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248254[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hao E, Menke JB, Smith AM, Jones C, Geffner ME, Hershman
JM, Wuerth JP, Samuels HH, Ways DK, Usala SJ 1994 Divergent
dimerization properties of mutant ß1 thyroid hormone receptors are
associated with different dominant negative activities. Mol Endocrinol 8:841851[Abstract]
-
Deleted in proof
-
Falcone M, Miyamoto T, Fierro-Renoy F, Macchia E,
DeGroot LJ 1992 Antipeptide polyclonal antibodies specifically
recognize each human thyroid hormone receptor isoform. Endocrinology 131:24192429[Abstract]
-
Dozin B, Magnuson MA, Nikodem VM 1986 Thyroid
hormone regulation of malic enzyme synthesis. J Biol Chem 261:1029010292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Force WR, Tillman JB, Sprung CN, Spindler SR 1993 Homodimer and heterodimer DNA binding and transcriptional
responsiveness to triiodothyronine (T3) and
cis-retinoic acid are determined by the number and order of
high affinity half-sites in a T3 response
element. J Biol Chem 269:88638870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. de Lange, R. Senese, F. Cioffi, M. Moreno, A. Lombardi, E. Silvestri, F. Goglia, and A. Lanni
Rapid Activation by 3,5,3'-L-Triiodothyronine of Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase/Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase and Akt/Protein Kinase B Signaling Pathways: Relation to Changes in Fuel Metabolism and Myosin Heavy-Chain Protein Content in Rat Gastrocnemius Muscle in Vivo
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2008;
149(12):
6462 - 6470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Karnieli and M. Armoni
Transcriptional regulation of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter GLUT4 gene: from physiology to pathology
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
July 1, 2008;
295(1):
E38 - E45.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Malo, W. Zhang, F. Alkhoury, P. Pushpakaran, M. A. Abedrapo, M. Mozumder, E. Fleming, A. Siddique, J. W. Henderson, and R. A. Hodin
Thyroid Hormone Positively Regulates the Enterocyte Differentiation Marker Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase Gene via an Atypical Response Element
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2004;
18(8):
1941 - 1962.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Moreno, A. L. Serrano, T. Santalucia, A. Guma, C. Canto, N. J. Brand, M. Palacin, S. Schiaffino, and A. Zorzano
Differential Regulation of the Muscle-specific GLUT4 Enhancer in Regenerating and Adult Skeletal Muscle
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
40557 - 40564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Schroder-van der Elst, D. van der Heide, J. Kastelijn, B. Rousset, and M. Jesus Obregon
The Expression of the Sodium/Iodide Symporter Is Up-Regulated in the Thyroid of Fetuses of Iodine-Deficient Rats
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2001;
142(9):
3736 - 3741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Santalucia, K. R. Boheler, N. J. Brand, U. Sahye, C. Fandos, F. Vinals, J. Ferre, X. Testar, M. Palacin, and A. Zorzano
Factors Involved in GLUT-1 Glucose Transporter Gene Transcription in Cardiac Muscle
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 18, 1999;
274(25):
17626 - 17634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|