help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shan, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shan, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 3 1259-1266
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Articles

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Androgen Effects on Androgen Receptor Expression in Developing Leydig and Sertoli Cells1

Li-Xin Shan, C. Wayne Bardin and Matthew P. Hardy

Center for Biomedical Research, The Population Council, New York, New York 10021

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Matthew P. Hardy, The Population Council, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: hardy{at}popcbr.rockefeller.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Leydig and Sertoli cells are both targets of androgen action in the testis. Androgen exerts contrasting effects on the two cell types: partially inhibiting steroidogenesis in adult Leydig cell and stimulating adult Sertoli cell functions required to support spermatogenesis. The developmental changes in the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of androgen receptor (AR) also differ between Leydig and Sertoli cells, with Leydig cell AR mRNA being highest on day 35 postpartum, whereas Sertoli cell AR mRNA levels are highest on day 90. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the concentrations of AR in Leydig and Sertoli cells are differentially regulated during development using quantitative immunostaining. AR protein levels were measured in rat testes after hormonal treatments at three developmental stages: on days 21, 35, and 90 postpartum. At each age, five groups of animals were treated for 4 days with: 1) vehicle; 2) LHRH antagonist (NalGlu, 0.3 mg/kg BW·day) to suppress endogenous levels of androgen that accompany inhibition of LH and FSH secretion; 3) NalGlu + LH (0.2 mg/kg BW·day); 4) NalGlu + testosterone (T, at 7.5 mg/kg BW·day); and 5) NalGlu + MENT (a potent synthetic androgen, 7{alpha}-methyl-19-nortestosterone, 0.7 mg/kg BW·day). AR protein was visualized by immunohistochemistry and measured by computer-assisted image analysis in Leydig and Sertoli cells using frozen sections of testes. After NalGlu treatment, AR levels in Leydig cells declined sharply to 42% and 31% of vehicle control (P < 0.01) in the 21 and 35 days postpartum age groups, respectively, but in 90-day-old rats there was no change. AR levels were partially maintained by exogenous LH, and completely maintained by exogenous androgen treatments in Leydig cells from 21- and 35-day-old rats, whereas in Leydig cells from 90-day-old rats, AR levels were unaffected in all treatment groups. In contrast, after NalGlu treatment, the AR concentration in Sertoli cells from 90-day-old rats were reduced to 32% of control (P < 0.01). Moreover, in Sertoli cells from 90-day-old rats, AR levels were partially maintained by LH and completely maintained by androgens. A similar trend was observed on day 35. On day 21, however, AR levels in immature Sertoli cells were unaffected in all treatment groups. These results indicate that androgen maximally stimulates AR levels in immature Leydig cells but is without significant effect in adult Leydig cells. In contrast, AR levels in Sertoli cells are more sensitive to androgen regulation in adult compared with immature animals. These findings indicate that there are distinct mechanisms controlling AR concentrations in Leydig and Sertoli cells during the development of the testis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TESTOSTERONE produced by Leydig cells has paracrine effects on Sertoli cells that are critical for maintenance of spermatogenesis throughout adulthood. Leydig cell androgens also have autocrine effects in prepubertal rats that influence early Leydig cell function and differentiation (1). Androgen inhibits testosterone production by adult Leydig cells (2) but facilitates their pubertal differentiation (3). This points to an age-dependent change in the sensitivity of the Leydig cell to androgen and is consistent with a role for androgens in early Leydig cell differentiation (3, 4).

The postnatal differentiation of Leydig cells is a continuous process that may be subdivided into three stages (progenitor, immature, adult) based on the structural and functional properties of differentiating Leydig cells (5). In the present study, androgen receptor (AR) levels were measured in Leydig cells of these three developmental stages: on day 21 postpartum, when Leydig cells exist as mesenchymal-like progenitors (6); on day 35 when they are still immature, producing low amounts of testosterone (7, 8, 9, 10); on day 90 when they are fully functional in the sexually mature rat (11, 12). LH is required throughout Leydig cell differentiation but is not the only stimulus involved in the conversion of Leydig cell progenitors into immature Leydig cells. Our previous studies showed that androgen in combination with LH stimulated testosterone production by Leydig cell progenitors in vitro (3, 13), and androgen stimulates messenger RNA (mRNA) levels for both AR and LH receptors within these cells in vivo (14). This suggests that differentiating Leydig cells possess AR and are sensitive to androgen action, a hypothesis supported by studies showing deficient steroidogenesis in Leydig cell from rats (15) and mice (16) with testicular feminization (androgen resistance).

Androgens are believed to exert their effects on spermatogenesis indirectly (17), primarily through Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells (18). Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies have shown that AR is present in Sertoli cells, peritubular myoid cells (19, 20, 21, 22, 23) in seminiferous tubules, and possibly in germ cells (22).

In an earlier study of androgen action, testosterone replacement maintained levels of androgen receptor mRNA, assessed by Northern blot in Leydig cell progenitors purified from 21-day-old rats that were treated with an LHRH antagonist to suppress gonadal function (14). The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of androgen on AR levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells during puberty and adulthood, to determine whether sensitivity to androgen action is developmentally regulated. Using an antiserum that was raised against an AR synthetic peptide, AR protein was detected in the nuclei of testicular cells that are known to express AR but was not detected in germ cells. The findings suggest that Leydig and Sertoli cells maintain AR levels differently, which is consistent with contrasting roles for androgen in the regulation of these two cell types: facilitation of Leydig cell differentiation prepubertally and support of Sertoli cell function post-pubertally.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals
Chemicals and solvents were of reagent grade. The LHRH antagonist [Ac-D2Nal1,4C1DPhe2,D3Pal3,Arg5,DGlu6 (anisole adduct),DAla10]-GnRH (abbreviated as NalGlu), kindly provided by Dr. Jean Rivier (Salk Institute, San Diego, CA), was dissolved in 8% mannitol. This antagonist has been shown to suppress serum testosterone to 3–6% of control level (24, 25). Ovine LH was generously supplied by the NIH (oLH-26 AFP-5551B, NIH, Bethesda, MD). Mannitol and testosterone (T) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). 7{alpha}-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) was custom synthesized. T or MENT was dissolved in cottonseed oil containing 5% ethanol. Doses of T were selected to maintain testis weight in NalGlu treated animals, based on the results of a previous study (14).

Animals and hormonal treatments
Male Sprague-Dawley rats, purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA), were randomly distributed into five groups with n = 3 per group.

Group 1, control. Animals were treated with vehicle, receiving a daily ip injection of 8% mannitol and an sc daily injection of cottonseed oil containing 5% ethanol.

Group 2, LHRH antagonist. NalGlu was administrated to animals by daily ip injection at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg BW (24, 25) and also received the sc vehicle.

Group 3, NalGlu + LH. Animals received a daily ip injection of NalGlu and 0.2 mg LH/kg BW plus the sc vehicle. This dose of LH has been shown to fully stimulate Leydig cells in vivo (14).

Group 4, NalGlu + T. Animals received a daily NalGlu injection plus T (7.5 mg/kg BW) by daily sc injection.

Group 5, NalGlu + MENT. Animals received a daily injection of NalGlu plus MENT (0.7 mg/kg BW) by sc injection.

The treatments began on days 17, 31, and 86 postpartum, and the animals were killed by asphyxiation with CO2 on days 21, 35, and 90, respectively. The animal procedure was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Rockefeller University (no. 91200R1).

Antibody against AR peptide
The rabbit polyclonal antibody against a synthetic AR N-terminal peptide (residues 14–32) and preimmune serum were described previously (26). The anti-AR peptide antibody recognizes the 110-kDa AR protein from isolated Leydig cells, testis, and other tissues after denaturation in SDS (4). This antibody also recognizes the insoluble, denatured AR produced by AR complementary DNA transfected Sf9 insect cells after solubilization in SDS (26), and the denatured AR in formalin fixed tissue sections.

In the present study, a series of preliminary experiments were performed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the antiserum in AR immunohistochemical detection. The dilution of antiserum was examined over a range from 1:200 to 1:2000; 1:500 was selected as the optimal concentration for AR immunohistochemical detection in that the background level in unlabeled cytoplasmic areas was low in proportion to specific localization in nuclei. Specificity of the antiserum was demonstrated by showing that preadsorption of the antibody against a 10-fold excess of the AR peptide reduced the staining to undetectable levels. The preimmune serum also did not produce a positive signal.

Immunohistochemical staining and image analysis
Tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 C. Eight micron-thick frozen sections were cut in a cryostat (Hacker Instruments Inc., Fairfield, NJ). To avoid possible interexperimental variation in staining intensity, the testicular sections from all of the treatment groups at each age were mounted on one slide for simultaneous immunohistochemical detection. The sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 12 min at 25 C, followed by washes in PBS (pH 7.4), and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min. After overnight incubation at 4 C with the primary antibody, followed by 30 min in solutions of biotinylated secondary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin, respectively, the colored product was developed by staining in a chromogen solution that contained 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole using a kit (Histostain-SP, catalog no. AEC 95–6143, Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA). Sections of spleen, prostate, and testis from a 35-day-old rat were mounted on one slide and monitored in the microscope during incubation with the chromogen, and a nuclear signal was apparent in prostate and testis after 2 min but did not increase further after 6 min even in prostate epithelium, which contained the highest nuclear AR concentrations. Therefore, the incubation was stopped at 4 min.

Stained testicular section areas were first recorded at 100 times magnification using a Nikon Optiphot-2 microscope (Nikon, Inc., Melville, NY) equipped with a Dage MTI video camera (CCD 72, Michigan City, IN). The video images were then digitized using a frame grabber (Quick Capture, Data Translation, Inc., Marlboro, MA) and displayed on a Sun IPC work station (Mountain View, CA). The stained nuclear areas of labeled Leydig and Sertoli cells were traced. The integrated pixel intensity was determined for the traced areas using image analysis software (Image-Pro, Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). The intensities were normalized for possible changes in nuclear size by dividing the integrated pixel intensity by the nuclear area (which equaled the average number of pixels per unit of traced nuclear area). Intensities of the background were determined for each group by tracing an unlabeled area adjacent to the labeled cells. The background was subtracted from the values obtained for the labeled cells, and the adjusted values are referred to as the relative signal intensities (RSI) providing a measure of nuclear AR concentration.

Statistics
The treatment protocol was repeated three times: three replications x three rats per group x five groups equalled a total of 45 rats in each of the three age groups for the study. One testis from one rat per group was randomly selected from each of the three replications, and used for image analysis (on 15 rats per age group). For each cell type, four cells were measured in a randomly observed field and the four measurements were then averaged. This was performed three times, resulting in three averaged measures per testis. Three such averaged measures were obtained for each of three testes from all five groups, to calculate the final mean ± SE, with n = 9 RSI observations/group. The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (27). Significant differences between groups were identified by the Tukey test using the rank-transformed data (28). Differences were regarded as significant at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue specificity of AR immunostaining
A positive control (rat ventral prostate) and negative control (spleen) were screened for AR immunohistochemical detection. The antiserum against AR peptide stained nuclei of the epithelial cells of ventral prostate (Fig. 1AGo), in which AR is known to be abundant (29). Testicular cells were identified on the basis on nuclear shape and histological location a described in a previous study (5). In the testicular interstitial areas, AR protein was detected in the nuclei of spindle-shaped Leydig cell progenitors on day 21 (Fig. 1BGo), immature Leydig cells on day 35 (Fig. 1CGo), and adult Leydig cells on day 90 (Fig. 1DGo). The nuclear AR was also detected in pericytes (vascular smooth muscle cells, 21, 22, 30), peritubular myoid cells (Fig. 1CGo), and Sertoli cells but was not observed in germ cells (Fig. 1DGo). Spleen (Fig. 1FGo) had a negligible signal of AR, consistent with its lack of AR protein (20, 31). No signal was detected in control sections that were incubated with preimmune serum (prostate, Fig. 1EGo; testis, Fig. 1GGo), or with preabsorbed antiserum (testis, Fig. 1HGo).



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Specificity of AR immunohistochemical staining and the developmental trends of AR levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells. Eight micron-thick frozen sections cut from 35-day-old rat ventral prostate (A), spleen (F), and testes from 21- (B), 35- (C), and 90-day-old rats (D) were mounted on the same slide for simultaneous AR immunohistochemical assay. Nuclear AR signals were detected, using an antiserum directed against AR N-terminal peptide, in prostatic epithelial cells (EC), Leydig cell progenitors (PLC), immature Leydig cells (ILC), adult Leydig cells (ALC), Sertoli cells (SC), peritubular myoid cells (PM), and pericytes (PE). An AR signal was not detected in spleen cells. No staining was detected with preimmune serum in prostate (E) and 90-day-old rat testis (G), or with preabsorbed antiserum in 90-day-old rat testis (H). In adult rat testes (D), the nuclear AR signal reached its greatest intensity during stages VII and VIII. The developmental AR levels (B, C, and D) in Leydig and Sertoli cells from three replicate experiments were subjected to image analysis and the results are summarized in Table 1Go. Magnification, x 430.

 
The frequency distributions of the RSI on spleen, Leydig and prostate epithelial cells in tissues obtained on day 35 are presented in Fig. 2Go. The frequency distributions of AR RSI were plotted for 36 cells from each tissue. The RSI of prostate epithelial cells was 1.5 times higher than immature Leydig cells (mean ± SE: 20.9 ± 1.0 vs. 13.9 ± 0.7, respectively). In contrast, the RSI of spleen was 1.2 ± 0.1, a value not different from 1, which would be expected if the nuclear signal did not differ from the signal seen in the adjacent unlabeled cytoplasm.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RSI frequency distributions for AR in rat spleen, immature Leydig cells and prostate. Staining intensities in 35-day-old rat prostate epithelial cells, Leydig cells and spleen (shown in Fig. 1AGo, C, and F) were subjected to image analysis. Frequency distributions of AR RSI were plotted for a total of 36 cells measured per cell type. The locations of the means and magnitudes of the standard errors are shown above each distribution ({vdash}x{dashv}). The three distributions were significantly different from one another at P < 0.001.

 
Development of AR levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells
To evaluate AR levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells of 21-, 35-, and 90-day-old rats (Fig. 1Go, B–D), the AR signal intensities were measured by image analysis after simultaneous immunohistochemical assay on a single slide and the results are summarized in Table 1Go. The RSI of AR was intermediate in Leydig cell progenitors on day 21 at 10.1 ± 0.3, highest in immature Leydig cells on day 35 at 15.4 ± 0.8, and lowest in adult Leydig cells on day 90 at 8.0 ± 0.7. The reverse trend was seen in Sertoli cells, where the RSI of AR was lowest on day 21 at 7.8 ± 0.5, intermediate on day 35 at 8.9 ± 0.3, and highest on day 90 at 14.3 ± 1.1. The above results indicate that, in Leydig cells, AR is highest during puberty, whereas AR is highest in adult Sertoli cells at stages VII and VIII on day 90.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Developmental changes in RSI of AR protein in rat Leydig and Sertoli cells

 
AR expression in Sertoli cells was demonstrably stage dependent (21, 22) in adult animals. Results shown in Fig. 3Go and Table 2Go indicated that the nuclear AR signal was first evident in Sertoli cells at stages IV and V at 8.5 ± 0.5, increased progressively and reached its greatest intensity at 14.3 ± 1.1 during stages VII and VIII, then declined with barely detectable at 1.6 ± 0.2 during stages X and XI, and was negligible (0.8 ± 0.1) at stage XII. The AR staining was predominantly localized in the basal region of the seminiferous epithelium at stages VII and VIII, the staining was localized to the nuclei of cells that bordered the basal lamina and had nuclear profiles extending between the large pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 3Go), consistent with localization in Sertoli cells.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Stage dependence of adult Sertoli cell AR staining on day 90 postpartum. The section was stained with antibody against AR N-terminal peptide, and the stages of the seminiferous epithelium were identified (55, 56). The nuclear AR signal was first evident in Sertoli cells at stage IV, increased progressively, and reached its greatest intensity during stages VII and VIII. The stage-dependent relative signal intensities for AR in Sertoli cells measured by image analysis were summarized in Table 2Go. Sertoli cells (arrowheads); peritubular myoid cell (arrows). Magnification, x 430.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Stage dependence of Sertoli cell AR relative signal intensities on day 90

 
Hormonal control of AR protein levels in developing Leydig cells
The effects of hormonal manipulation on Leydig cell AR signal levels were examined at three ages (Fig. 4Go) and summarized in Table 3Go. On days 21 and 35, NalGlu treatment reduced RSI of AR levels in progenitor (Fig. 4Go, A2) and immature Leydig cells (Fig. 4Go, B2) to 42% and 31% of control, respectively. LH (Fig. 4Go, A3 and B3) partially maintained AR, whereas T- (Fig. 4Go, A4 and B4) and MENT- (Fig. 4Go, A5 and B5) treated rats had complete maintenance in both 21 and 35 day age groups. On day 90, however, the AR RSI in adult Leydig cells was not significantly influenced by any of the hormonal treatments (Fig. 4Go, C1–C5).



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of hormonal treatments on AR levels in developing Leydig (arrows) and Sertoli cells (arrowheads). Eight micron-thick frozen sections were prepared from 21- (A1–5), 35- (B1–5), and 90-day-old rat (C1–5) testes respectively. In each age group, the five experimental sections were mounted on the same slide, and the slides of three age groups were simultaneously processed for AR immunohistochemical staining. The controls were treated with vehicle (A1, B1, and C1). After four daily injections of NalGlu, AR signals declined dramatically in Leydig cell progenitors (A2) and immature Leydig cells (B2), whereas no change was seen in adult Leydig cells (C2). In contrast, NalGlu treatment reduced AR signal intensity in adult Sertoli cells (C2), and there was no change in 21-day-old rats (A2). LH partially maintained AR levels in Leydig cells of prepubertal rats (A3 and B3), and adult Sertoli cells (C3). T and MENT both maintained normal AR levels in Leydig cells of prepubertal rats (A4, B4, and A5, B5), and adult Sertoli cells (C4 and C5). The data from image analysis of three replicate experiments are summarized in Tables 3Go and 4Go. Magnification, x 430.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hormonal regulation of AR RSI in Leydig cell progenitors (day 21), immature Leydig cells (day 35), and adult Leydig cells (day 90)

 
Hormonal control of AR protein levels in developing Sertoli cells
The effects of hormonal manipulation on AR signal levels were examined in developing Sertoli cells (Fig. 4Go), and are summarized in Table 4Go. Hormonal treatment had no effect on RSI of AR levels in immature Sertoli cells on day 21. In contrast, on days 35 (Fig. 4Go, B2) and 90 (Fig. 4Go, C2), NalGlu treatment decreased AR RSI in Sertoli cells to 41%, and 32% of control, respectively. LH (Fig. 4Go, B3, and C3) partially maintained AR RSI in both 35-and 90-day-old animals, whereas, in T- and MENT-treated groups, the maintenance of AR was complete (Fig. 4Go, B4 and C4; B5 and C5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Hormonal regulation of Sertoli cell AR RSI in 21, 35, and 90 day-old rat testes

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, the effects of androgen on concentrations of androgen receptor in Leydig and Sertoli cells were investigated in prepubertal (day 21), pubertal (day 35), and adult rats (day 90) by quantitative immunohistochemistry. AR immunoreactivity was observed in Leydig and Sertoli cells at all three ages, and there were developmental differences in staining intensity. The AR levels were estimated by measuring the RSI of AR positive cells following procedures that were similar to previous studies of AR protein levels in Sertoli cells (21), and AR mRNA levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells (23). AR RSI was intermediate in Leydig cell progenitors on day 21, highest in immature Leydig cells on day 35, and lowest in adult Leydig cells on day 90. Similar results were obtained by measuring AR protein in highly purified fractions of Leydig cells, which have negligible contamination with other testicular cell types including macrophages (4). Therefore, trends in AR RSI of Leydig cells were most likely caused by changes in AR concentration, which are specific to this testicular cell type. Furthermore, contrasting data were obtained for Sertoli cell AR RSI, which progressively increased and was highest during adulthood. The present results on Sertoli cell AR RSI, and earlier studies of AR binding activity in Sertoli cells (32, 33), support the hypothesis that the developmental peak in androgen action on Sertoli cells occurs during adulthood (34).

Functional activity in Sertoli cells varies depending on the stage of the seminiferous epithelial cycle (35, 36). AR expression in Sertoli cells from 90-day-old rats peaked at stages VII and VIII, which mirrored the pattern of AR mRNA level examined by in situ hybridization (23), consistent with the highest AR protein concentration in isolated seminiferous tubules of stages VII and VIII (37). Interestingly, the stage-dependent expression of Sertoli cell AR occurs at a time when endogenous testosterone is thought to reach its maximal concentration in stages VII and VIII tubules (35). This suggests that the requirement for androgen action is maximal during stages VII and VIII (21), when androgen stimulation of protein secretion by seminiferous tubules peaks (38).

The hypothesis that Leydig and Sertoli cells respond differently to androgen regulation during development was tested by measuring the effects of androgen on AR levels in Leydig cell progenitors on day 21, immature Leydig cells on day 35, and adult Leydig cells on day 90 postpartum, with Sertoli cells comparatively analyzed at each of these ages. The LHRH antagonist, NalGlu, was used to suppress endogenous secretion of both LH and androgen (39, 40). Administration of LHRH antagonists reduces seminiferous tubule diameter in rats (41), and decreases cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Leydig cells. These effects are caused by suppression of the circulating levels of LH to 2% of control, which in turn suppresses T production to less than 6% of control (24, 25). NalGlu treatment lowered AR levels in progenitor and immature Leydig cells, and in adult Sertoli cells. Treatment with NalGlu plus LH maintained AR levels in these cells, probably by stimulating endogenous biosynthesis of testosterone (42, 43).

The present results showed that treatment with NalGlu plus T or MENT completely prevented the suppression of AR levels seen in rats treated with NalGlu alone. Considering the difference in dose, MENT was more effective than T, consistent with the higher potency of MENT in restoring ventral prostate mass and maintaining sex behavior in castrated rats and other species (44, 45). The affinity of MENT for AR is higher compared with T (46), explaining its biological potency in influencing Leydig and Sertoli cells at doses that are 10-fold lower than testosterone (Tables 3Go and 4Go). These results suggests that MENT may act on testicular cells without 5{alpha}-reduction as it does on muscle, where this androgen also has a 10-fold greater effect with respect to T (47).

Leydig cells, in contrast to Sertoli cells, were most sensitive to androgen regulation in pubertal animals. Previous studies have shown that Leydig cells are a target for the steroids they produce (3). Androgen in combination with LH has been shown to increase testosterone production by Leydig cell progenitors after 3 days in vitro (3), and treatment with androgen in vivo increases steady-state mRNA levels for AR and LH receptor in Leydig cell progenitors (14). The higher levels of AR in immature Leydig cells and the heightened sensitivity of these cells to androgen regulation suggests that low level prepubertal production of androgen by Leydig cell progenitors acts within these cells, stimulating their differentiation into immature Leydig cells. This was consistent with earlier studies showing that: AR levels were low in adult Leydig cells (4) and were not influenced by androgen treatment. The results of the present study indicate that the significance of androgen action for Leydig cell function probably changes during development. In contrast to progenitor and immature Leydig cells, adult Leydig cells are targets of testosterone negative feedback inhibition of testosterone biosynthesis, which is exerted primarily at the level of 3ß-HSD activities (48) and P450–17{alpha} (2).

The highest RSI of AR immunoreactivity in adult Sertoli cells at stages VII and VIII reflects the critical role of androgen in spermatogenesis. According to a recent report (49), both T and DHT increase adult testis size and can completely maintain fertility in hpg mice (which are genetically deficient in LHRH), probably by maintaining intracellular calcium in Sertoli cells (50). The role of androgen by itself in maintaining testicular function may be unique to the adult rodent because FSH, in addition to androgen, is necessary for spermatogenesis in immature rodents and adult humans (51). The lower AR RSI and relative insensitivity to androgen regulation of immature compared with adult Sertoli cells imply that the former are less sensitive to androgen than the latter (52). AR expression was unchanged by androgen treatment of immature Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells isolated from 15-day-old rats (53), whereas, in adult rats, the total testicular amount of AR was reduced after deprivation of T caused by chemical destruction of Leydig cells (54).

In summary, the developmental trends for androgen regulation of AR levels in Leydig and Sertoli cells were defined. In Leydig cells on day 35, AR levels were highest and most stimulated by androgen. These findings support the hypothesis that androgen has an important role in Leydig cell differentiation. In Sertoli cells, androgen stimulated AR levels most effectively on day 90 which probably reflects the requirement for androgen in spermatogenesis.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Olli Jänne for help with the design of the AR N-terminal peptide and production of the anti-AR antibody; Ms. Chantal Manon Sottas for skilled technical assistance; Drs. James Catterall, Dianne Hardy, and Barry Zirkin for critical comments on the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by The Population Council and NIH Grant R29 HD-32588 (M.P.H). Back

Received October 3, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Shan LX, Gao HB, Hardy MP 1996 Hormonal regulation of the differentiation of Leydig cells from mesenchymal-like progenitors during puberty. In: Desjardins C (ed) Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Testicular Cells. Springer-Verlag Press, Serono Symposia USA, Norwell, MA, pp 263–275
  2. Hales DB, Sha L, Payne AH 1987 Testosterone inhibits cAMP-induced de novo synthesis of Leydig cell cytochrome P-450 by an androgen receptor-mediated mechanism. J Biol Chem 262:11200–11206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hardy MP, Kelce WR, Klinefelter GR, Ewing LL 1990 Differentiation of Leydig cell precursors in vitro: a role for androgen. Endocrinology 127:488–490[Abstract]
  4. Shan LX, Hardy MP 1992 Developmental changes in levels of luteinizing hormone receptor and androgen receptor in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 131:1107–1114[Abstract]
  5. Hardy MP, Zirkin BR, Ewing LL 1989 Kinetic studies on the development of the adult population of Leydig cells in testes of the pubertal. Endocrinology 124:762–770[Abstract]
  6. Narbaitz R, Adler R 1967 Submicroscopical aspects in the differentiation of rat fetal Leydig cells. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Latinoam 17:286–291
  7. Cochran RC, Schuetz AW, Ewing LL 1979 Age-related changes in conversion of 5{alpha}-androstane-3{alpha},17ß-diol and 5{alpha}-androstane-3ß,17ß-diol by rat testicular cells in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 57:143–147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Corpéchot C, Baulieu E-E, Robel P 1981 Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and androstanediols in plasma, testes and prostates of rats during development. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 96:127–135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chubb C, Ewing LL 1981 Steroid secretion by sexually immature rat and rabbit testes perfused in vitro. Endocrinology 109:1999–2003[Medline]
  10. Chase DJ, Dixon GEK, Payne AH 1982 Development of Leydig cell function. In: Muldoon TG, Mahesh VB, Perez-Ballester B (eds) Recent Advances in Fertility Research. Liss, New York, vol 112:209–219
  11. Shan LX, Phillips DM, Bardin CW, Hardy MP 1993 Differential regulation of steroidogenic enzymes during differentiation optimizes testosterone production by adult rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 133:2277–2283[Abstract]
  12. Murono EP 1989 Maturational changes in steroidogenic enzyme activities metabolizing testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in two populations of testicular interstitial cells. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 121:477–483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hardy MP, Gelber SJ, Zhou Z, Penning TM, Ricigliano JW, Ganjam VK, Nonneman D, Ewing LL 1991 Hormonal control of Leydig cell differentiation. Ann NY Acad Sci 637:152–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Shan LX, Hardy DO, Catterall JF, Hardy MP 1995 Effects of luteinizing hormone and androgen on steady state levels of mRNA for LH receptors, androgen receptors, and steroidogenic enzymes in rat Leydig cell progenitors in vivo. Endocrinology 136:1686–1693[Abstract]
  15. Purvis K, Calandra R, Naess O, Attramadal A, Torjesen PA, Hansson V 1977 Do androgens increase Leydig cell sensitivity to luteinizing hormone? Nature 265:169–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Murphy L, O’Shaughnessy PJ 1991 Testicular steroidogenesis in the testicular feminized (Tfm) mouse: loss of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase activity. J Endocrinol 131:443–449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chen H, Chandrashekar V, Zirkin BR 1994 Can spermatogenesis be maintained quantitatively in intact adult rats with exogenously administered dihydrotestosterone? J Androl 15:132–138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roberts KP, Zirkin BR 1991 Androgen regulation of spermatogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 637:90–106[Medline]
  19. Sar M, Lubahn DB, French FS, Wilson EM 1990 Immunohistochemical localization of the androgen receptor in rat and human tissues. Endocrinology 127:3180–3186[Abstract]
  20. Takeda H, Mutchnik CS, Nakamoto T, Chang C 1990 Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors with mono- and polyclonal antibodies to androgen receptor. J Endocrinol 126:17–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Sharpe RM, Saunders PTK 1994 Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors in the rat testis: evidence for stage-dependent expression and regulation by androgens. Endocrinology 135:1227–1234[Abstract]
  22. Vornberger W, Prins G, Musto NA, Suarez-Quian CA 1994 Androgen receptor distribution in rat testis: new implications for androgen regulation of spermatogenesis. Endocrinology 134:2307–2316[Abstract]
  23. Shan LX, Zhu LJ, Bardin CW, Hardy MP 1995 Quantitative analysis of androgen receptor mRNA in developing Leydig cells and Sertoli cells by in situ hybridization. Endocrinology 136:3856–3862[Abstract]
  24. Sundaram K, Didolkar AK, Keizer-Zucker A, Dejesus W, River J, Vale W, Bardin CW 1990 A 90-day subcutaneous toxicity and fertility study of a LHRH antagonist in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 14:734–744[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Misro MM, Ganguly A, Das RP 1993 Is testosterone essential for maintenance of normal morphology in immature rat Leydig cells? Int J Androl 16:221–226[Medline]
  26. Xie YB, Sui YP, Shan LX, Palvimo JJ, Phillips DM, Jänne OA 1992 Expression of androgen receptor in insect cells: purification of the receptor and renaturation of its steroid- and DNA-binding functions. J Biol Chem 267:4939–4948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zar JH 1984 Biostatistical Analysis, ed 2. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  28. Conover WJ, Iman RL 1981 Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–133[CrossRef]
  29. Shan LX, Rodriguez MC, Jänne OA 1990 Regulation of androgen receptor protein and mRNA concentrations by androgens in rat ventral prostate and seminal vesicles and in human hepatoma cells. Mol Endocrinol 4:1636–1646[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Bergh A, Damber JE 1992 Immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptors on testicular blood vessels. Int J Androl 15:425–434[Medline]
  31. Young WJ, Roecker EB, Weindruch R, Chang C 1994 Quantitation of androgen receptor mRNA by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Endocr J 2:321–329
  32. Buzek SW, Sanborn BM 1988 Increase in testicular androgen receptor during sexual maturation in the rat. Biol Reprod 39:39–49[Abstract]
  33. Buzek SW, Caston LA, Sanborn BM 1987 Evidence for age-dependent changes in Sertoli cell androgen receptor concentration. J Androl 8:83–90[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Steinberger E, Steinberger A 1972 Testis: basic and clinical aspects. In: Balin H, Glasser S (eds) Reproductive Biology. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 144–267
  35. Parvinen M 1982 Regulation of the seminiferous epithelium. Endocr Rev 3:404–417[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Toppari J, Vihko KK, Rasanen KGE, Eerola E, Parvinen M 1986 Regulation of stages VI and VIII of the rat seminiferous epithelial cycle in vitro. J Endocrinol 108:417–422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Isomaa V, Parvinen M, Jänne OA, Bardin CW 1985 Nuclear androgen receptors in different stages of the seminiferous epithelial cycle and the interstitial tissue of rat testis. Endocrinology 116:132–137[Abstract]
  38. Sharpe RM, Millar M, McKinnell C 1993 Relative roles of testosterone and the germ cell complement in determining stage-dependent changes in protein secretion by isolated rat seminiferous tubules. Int J Androl 16:71–81[Medline]
  39. Rea MA, Marshall GR, Weinbauer GF, Nieschlag E 1986 Testosterone maintains pituitary and serum FSH and spermatogenesis in GnRH antagonist suppressed rats. J Endocrinol 108:101–107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Weinbauer GF, Surmann FJ, Bint AF, Shah GV, Vickery BH, Nieschlag E 1984 Reversible inhibition of testicular function by a gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Fertil Steril 42:906–914[Medline]
  41. Sinha Hikim AP, Swerdloff RS 1994 Time course of recovery of spermatogenesis and Leydig cell function after cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment in the adult rat. Endocrinology 134:1627–1634[Abstract]
  42. Purvis K, Hansson V 1978 Hormonal regulation of Leydig cell function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 12:123–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Pakarinen P, Vihko KK, Voutilainen R, Huhtaniemi IT 1990 Differential response of luteinizing hormone receptor and steroidogenic enzyme gene expression to human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation in the neonatal and adult rat testis. Endocrinology 127:2469–2474[Abstract]
  44. Kumar N, Shan LX, Hardy MP, Bardin CW, Sundaram K 1995 Mechanism of androgen-induced thymolysis in rat. Endocrinology 136:4887–4893[Abstract]
  45. Morali G, Lemus AE, Munguia R, Arteaga M, Perez-Palacios G, Sundaram K, Kumar N, Bardin CW 1993 Induction of male sexual behavior in the rat by 7{alpha}-methyl-19-nortestosterone, an androgen that does not undergo 5{alpha}-reduction. Biol Reprod 49:577–581[Abstract]
  46. Agarwal AK, Monder C 1988 In vitro metabolism of 7{alpha}-methyl-19-nortestosterone by rat liver, prostate, and epididymis. Endocrinology 123:2187–2193[Abstract]
  47. Kumar N, Didolkar AK, Monder C, Bardin CW, Sundaram K 1992 The biological activity of 7{alpha}-methyl-19-nortestosterone is not amplified in male reproductive tract as is that of testosterone. Endocrinology 130:3677–3683[Abstract]
  48. Stalvey JR, Clavey SM 1992 Evidence that testosterone regulates Leydig cell 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-isomerase activity by a trans-acting factor distal to the androgen receptor. J Androl 13:93–99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Singh J, O’Neill C, Handelsman DJ 1995 Induction of spermatogenesis by androgens in gonadotropin-deficient (hpg) mice. Endocrinology 136:5311–5321[Abstract]
  50. Gorczynska E, Handelsman DJ 1995 Androgens rapidly increase the cytosolic calcium concentration in Sertoli cells. Endocrinology 136:2052–2059[Abstract]
  51. Zirkin BR, Awoniyi C, Griswold MD, Russell LD, Sharpe R 1994 Is FSH required for adult spermatogenesis? J Androl 14:273–276
  52. Diamond DA, Barrack ER 1984 The relationship of androgen receptor levels to androgen responsiveness in the Dunning R3327 rat prostate tumor sublines. J Urol 132:821–827[Medline]
  53. Blok LJ, Themmen AP, Peters AH, Trapman J, Baarends WM, Hoogerbrugge JA 1992 Transcriptional regulation of androgen receptor gene expression is Sertoli cells and other cell types. Mol Cell Endocrinol 88:153–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Blok LJ, Bartlett JM, Bolt-De Vries J, Themmen AP, Brinkmann AO, Weinbauer GF, Nieschlag E, Grootegood JA 1992 Effect of testosterone deprivation on expression of the androgen receptor in rat prostate, epididymis and testis. Int J Androl 15:182–198[Medline]
  55. Leblond CP, Clermont Y 1952 Definition of the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 55:548–572
  56. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED 1990 Staging for laboratory species. In: Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL, 286 p



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
H. H. N. Yan, D. D. Mruk, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Blood-testis barrier dynamics are regulated by testosterone and cytokines via their differential effects on the kinetics of protein endocytosis and recycling in Sertoli cells
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1945 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. S. Rocha, M. S. Bonkowski, L. R. Franca, and A. Bartke
Mild Calorie Restriction Does Not Affect Testosterone Levels and Testicular Gene Expression in Mutant Mice
Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2007; 232(8): 1050 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R.-S. Wang, S. Yeh, L.-M. Chen, H.-Y. Lin, C. Zhang, J. Ni, C.-C. Wu, P. A. di Sant'Agnese, K. L. deMesy-Bentley, C.-R. Tzeng, et al.
Androgen Receptor in Sertoli Cell Is Essential for Germ Cell Nursery and Junctional Complex Formation in Mouse Testes
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5624 - 5633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
T. F. M. Mikkila, J. Toppari, and J. Paranko
Effects of Neonatal Exposure to 4-Tert-Octylphenol, Diethylstilbestrol, and Flutamide on Steroidogenesis in Infantile Rat Testis
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2006; 91(2): 456 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Q. Zhou, J. E. Shima, R. Nie, P. J. Friel, and M. D. Griswold
Androgen-Regulated Transcripts in the Neonatal Mouse Testis as Determined Through Microarray Analysis
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 1010 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Chang, Y.-T. Chen, S.-D. Yeh, Q. Xu, R.-S. Wang, F. Guillou, H. Lardy, and S. Yeh
Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and hypotestosteronemia in male mice lacking the androgen receptor in Sertoli cells
PNAS, May 4, 2004; 101(18): 6876 - 6881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. Xu, A. R. Beyer, W. H. Walker, and E. A. McGee
Developmental and Stage-Specific Expression of Smad2 and Smad3 in Rat Testis
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 192 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.M. Luetjens, J. Gromoll, M. Engelhardt, S. von Eckardstein, M. Bergmann, E. Nieschlag, and M. Simoni
Manifestation of Y-chromosomal deletions in the human testis: a morphometrical and immunohistochemical evaluation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2258 - 2266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. R. Latendresse, A. R. Warbrittion, H. Jonassen, and D. M. Creasy
Fixation of Testes and Eyes Using a Modified Davidson's Fluid: Comparison with Bouin's Fluid and Conventional Davidson's Fluid
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2002; 30(4): 524 - 533.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Maiti, M. L. Meistrich, G. Wilson, G. Shetty, M. Marcelli, M. J. McPhaul, P. L. Morris, and M. F. Wilkinson
Irradiation Selectively Inhibits Expression from the Androgen-Dependent Pem Homeobox Gene Promoter in Sertoli Cells
Endocrinology, April 1, 2001; 142(4): 1567 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L.-J. Zhu, M. P. Hardy, I. V. Inigo, I. Huhtaniemi, C. W. Bardin, and A. J. Moo-Young
Effects of Androgen on Androgen Receptor Expression in Rat Testicular and Epididymal Cells: A Quantitative Immunohistochemical Study
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2000; 63(2): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. F. S. Huang, M.-T. Li, W. Giglio, R. Anesetti, J. E. Ottenweller, and L. M. Pogach
The Detrimental Effects of Spinal Cord Injury on Spermatogenesis in the Rat Is Partially Reversed by Testosterone, but Enhanced by Follicle- Stimulating Hormone
Endocrinology, March 1, 1999; 140(3): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shan, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shan, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology