| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Articles |
Departments of Medicine, Immunology (G.D.J., A.R.B.) and Pathology (A.J.H.), University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom B15 2TH
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Paul M. Stewart, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom B15 2TH.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The immunopurified antibody recognized a single band of approximately 44 kDa in placenta, trophoblast, and distal colon. In kidney tissue, two bands of approximately 44 and 48 kDa were consistently observed. No signal was seen in decidua, adrenal, or liver. Immunoperoxidase studies on the mineralocorticoid target tissues, kidney, colon, and parotid gland indicated positive staining in epithelial cells known to express the MR: respectively, renal collecting ducts, surface and crypt colonic epithelial cells, and parotid duct epithelial cells. No staining was seen in these tissues in other sites. The intracellular localization of 11ßHSD2 in kidney and colon epithelial cells was addressed using confocal laser microscopy. Parallel measurements of 11ßHSD2 and nuclear propidium iodide fluorescence on sections scanned through an optical section of approximately 0.1 µm indicated significant 11ßHSD2 immunofluorescence in the nucleus.
In human kidney, colon, and salivary gland, 11ßHSD2 protects the MR from glucocorticoid excess in an autocrine fashion. Furthermore, within these tissues, 11ßHSD2, which had been considered to be a microsomal enzyme, is also found in the nucleus, suggesting that the interaction between the MR and aldosterone or cortisol is in part a nuclear event.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
11ßHSD2 messenger RNA and activity have been demonstrated in human kidney and colon (3, 15). In the colon, activity studies have suggested that 11ßHSD2 is expressed in the surface epithelial cells (16), the site of expression of the MR. Furthermore, in situ hybridization (15) and immunohistochemistry studies (17, 18) have confirmed the site of expression of 11ßHSD2 within the kidney to be the MR-expressing collecting ducts. However, there remains some debate as to whether other structures within the kidney express 11ßHSD2, such as the vasculature. In addition, although 11ßHSD2 has been considered to be a microsomal enzyme, earlier activity studies in kidney tissue did suggest the presence of 11ßHSD activity within a crude nuclear fraction (19, 20).
Using a sheep antiserum raised against human 11ßHSD2, we carried out immunohistochemical studies, including confocal microscopy and Western blot analyses, to characterize and more clearly define the localization of 11ßHSD2 within human mineralocorticoid target tissues.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synthesis of a human 11ßHSD2 antiserum
Using hydrophilicity profiles, two regions were selected
from the published amino acid sequence of the type 2 isoform of human
11ßHSD, amino acids 137160 and 334358. These sequences were
synthesized as eight-branched multiantigenic peptides and the two
multiantigenic peptides mixed with Freunds complete adjuvant and used
to immunize a single sheep. An IgG fraction was prepared from the
immune serum by ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion exchange
chromatography.
Immunoperoxidase method
Sections were dewaxed in xylene, washed, and then boiled
in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0, for 2 min. After cooling
at room temperature, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3%
hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 min. The sections were rinsed in
0.05 M Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6 (TBS), and incubated
with human 11ßHSD2 antiserum [1:100 dilution in 10% normal swine
serum in TBS (NSS/TBS)] for 60 min at room temperature. After washing
in TBS, a 1:25 dilution of an antidonkey sheep horseradish peroxidase
conjugate (Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) was applied to the sections
for 30 min. Sections were rinsed in TBS covered with 10 mg
3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride in 20 ml 0.1 M
Tris buffer, pH 8.2, with 20 µl hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. The
sections were washed in tap water, counterstained with hematoxylin,
dehydrated, and mounted.
Immunofluorescence and confocal laser microscopy
This was carried out on human kidney tissues. Paraffin
sections were processed as described above, incubated with a 1:25
dilution of the 11ßHSD2 antiserum in 10% NSS/TBS for 60 min, washed
in PBS for 10 min, and then incubated with a 1:25 dilution of an
antidonkey sheep fluorescent conjugate (Binding Site) for 30 min.
Sections were washed in PBS for 60 min and then counterstained with the
nuclear-specific propidium iodide (0.5 µg/ml) (21) and rinsed in PBS.
Sections were mounted in glycerol containing 1,4-diazabicyclo-(2.2.2)
octane and initially examined under a Zeiss Universal fluorescent
microscope as previously reported (22). A Bio-Rad 500 laser scanning
confocal system (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) attached to a Leitz SM-Lux
microscope (Leitz, Rockleigh, NJ) was used to analyze the sections
through an optical section of approximately 0.1 µm (in contrast to
the immunoperoxidase studies analyzed on the light microscope on 5-µm
sections) (23). The determination of nuclear vs. cytoplasmic
11ßHSD2 immunofluorescence within human kidney and colon was achieved
by simultaneous multichannel analysis on the dual labeled sections
(11ßHSD2 and propidium iodide) by merging and displacing the paired
images collected in the dual fluorescence mode, again through an
optical section of 0.1 µm. From a mean of 10 epithelial cells in any
given field, quantification of the 2 fluorescent labels was measured,
from which the relative nuclear area and nuclear fluorescent signal
could be calculated. Finally, by optical scanning of the section in the
z or vertical axis, determination of whether nuclear
staining was membrane or internal was made.
Controls
In each case negative controls were carried out with the primary
antiserum omitted, but in the presence of 10% NSS. Further extensive
control experiments were carried out using the immunizing 11ßHSD2
peptides. Peptide 1 (representing amino acids 137160 of 11ßHSD2;
11.0 mg/ml) and peptide 2 (amino acids 334358; 4.1 mg/ml) were
diluted with 10% NSS/TBS from 1:2 to 1:128,000 dilution and incubated
with the 11ßHSD2 antiserum (1:100 dilution with the diluted peptide)
at 4 C overnight. After centrifugation, the supernatants were taken and
used as the primary antiserum as described above.
Western blot analysis
Western analysis of proteins, prepared from homogenates of
intact term placenta, trophoblast, and decidua; adrenal; liver; colon;
and kidney, was performed by SDS-PAGE on discontinuous acrylamide gels.
After a series of preliminary experiments to optimize conditions, 15
µg sample protein were denatured at 95 C in 2% SDS, 10% glycerol,
62.5 mM Tris (pH 6.8), and 0.1% dithiothreitol and
electrophoresed at 200 mV through 4.5% stacking and 10% resolving
gels using a Mini-Protean II Western apparatus (Bio-Rad). After
electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to Immobilon P membranes
(Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), the membranes were blocked with 20%
nonfat milk in PBS-0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T) for 1 h, washed three
times in PBS-T, and incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of the human
11ßHSD2 antiserum in 0.05% PBS-T overnight at 4 C. After washing in
0.1% PBS-T, membranes were incubated with a 1:50,000 dilution of an
antisheep IgG peroxidase conjugate for 90 min at room temperature.
Protein bands were analyzed using the ECL detection system (Amersham
International, Aylesbury, UK) and exposed immediately to DuPont Cronex
x-ray film (Wilmington, DE) for 10 min. Western blot analysis was also
carried out on kidney and colon using antisera preincubated with a
1:64,000 dilution of peptide 1 mixed with a 1:16 dilution of peptide 2
(see below).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Salivary gland. Immunoreactivity was seen in the epithelium of
ducts in the parotid gland, with no detectable staining of glandular
acini, adipocytes, or connective tissues (Fig. 1d
).
The specificity of the antisera was confirmed by demonstrating the
absence of staining with omission of the antiserum in the presence of
normal sheep serum and also from the control studies with the
immunizing peptide. Thus, with peptide 1, dilutions of 1:2 to 1:64,000
added to the antisera showed no staining, whereas a 1:128,000 showed
some positivity over renal collecting ducts. With peptide 2, the
absence of staining was seen with dilutions of 1:2 to 1:16, but
positivity was restored when dilutions of 1:32 and less were used. The
negative controls depicted here used a 1:64,000 dilution of peptide 1
mixed with a 1:16 dilution of peptide 2 incubated with the antisera as
described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 1b
). Further
negative controls were carried out on human liver tissue that was
devoid of any immunoreactivity (data not shown). The antibody was
further characterized by Western blot analysis.
Western blot analysis of 11ßHSD2 in human mineralocorticoid
target tissues
A single band of approximately 44 kDa was observed in term
placenta and trophoblast and colon, but not in decidua, adrenal, or
liver. In renal tissue, a second band was seen of approximately 48 kDa
(Fig. 2a
). The significance of this is uncertain, but
has been a consistent finding in our Western blot analysis of human
renal tissue (both cortex and medulla). Both the 44- and 48-kDa bands
were eliminated in the presence of the absorbed antiserum (Fig. 2b
). No
additional bands were found in placenta or colon.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study we have addressed the immunolocalization of 11ßHSD2 in human mineralocorticoid target tissues, kidney, colon, and salivary gland (24, 25, 30) using a novel antihuman 11ßHSD2 antiserum raised in sheep. The antibody recognizes a protein of approximately 44 kDa in human kidney, colon, and placenta, but not in human adrenal, liver, or decidua. This finding is in keeping with a predicted Mr of 44.14 kDa for 11ßHSD2 and earlier reports on the expression of 11ßHSD2 messenger RNA in human tissues (3, 15). 11ßHSD2 immunoreactivity was observed only in cells known to express the MR, i.e. cells within renal collecting ducts (24, 31), surface and crypt epithelial cells within the colon (25), and ductal epithelial cells within the parotid gland (30), in keeping with the conclusion that 11ßHSD2 protects the MR in an autocrine fashion. Two recent reports, using differing 11ßHSD2 antisera, have described the immunolocalization of 11ßHSD2 within human kidney and colon (but not salivary gland) (17, 18), and there are differences from our data. Kro-zowski et al. (17) report immunostaining to vascular endothelial cells within the kidney (although not apparently the placenta), a finding that we are unable to reproduce. Although vascular staining was not seen in the study by Kyossev et al. (18), immunoreactivity was observed in the cortical ascending limb of the loop of Henle. We are confident that these tubular structures are negative in our study. The reasons for these discrepancies remain uncertain; whereas preimmune serum was used as a control in all three immunohistochemical studies, only our study used the more rigorous control of neutralizing the antiserum with the immunizing peptide.
The confocal laser microscopy presented here indicates that approximately 40% of the total immunostaining seen in renal collecting ducts and colonic epithelial cells is nuclear in origin. Furthermore, our data suggest that the enzyme is not associated with the nuclear membrane but has an intranuclear localization. 11ßHSD1 has been considered to be a microsomal enzyme (32), with data also suggesting that it is found on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (33). There is, however, some evidence for nuclear 11ßHSD in kidney tissue. One of the first studies describing renal 11ßHSD activity indicated significant nuclear activity (19), a finding that has been confirmed subsequently (20), albeit on crude subcellular preparations and before the description of the two distinct isoforms of 11ßHSD. While this work was in progress, a fluorescent microscopy study reported that 11ßHSD2 is exclusively localized to the cytoplasmic surface of the endoplasmic reticulum (34). This study, however, used a chimeric rabbit 11ßHSD2/green fluorescent protein fusion gene transfected into a nonmineralocorticoid target tissue, Chinese hamster ovary cells, and the significance of this work to our work on the human 11ßHSD2 in classical mineralocorticoid target tissues remains uncertain. Indeed, in view of the established role for 11ßHSD in protecting the MR, these data raise questions concerning the mechanisms underlying MR specificity and the intracellular trafficking of the MR. For other members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily, such as the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors, this is well characterized; after the binding of ligand to the receptor in the cytosol and the dissociation of heat shock proteins, the activated receptor complex is translocated to the nucleus (reviewed in Ref.35). The intracellular localization of the MR, however, is still in some doubt. Although a predominantly cytosolic MR has been shown to translocate to the nucleus upon exposure to aldosterone in baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells (36), data from rabbit (37) and rat kidney (24) and pituitary cells (38) suggest both a nuclear and a cytosolic localization for the MR, independent of ligand, suggesting that the interaction of the MR with its ligand may in part be a nuclear event. The data presented here on human kidney would be in keeping with these data; in a given mineralocorticoid-responsive epithelial cell, 11ßHSD2 is ideally placed both inside and outside the nucleus to confer specificity upon the MR. It remains to be seen whether this pattern of subcellular localization of the enzyme extends to other tissues expressing the MR and 11ßHSD2, for example in the central nervous system (39), and if so, what factors in the structure of 11ßHSD determine this pattern of distribution. On this note, our Western blot analysis did reveal a second band of approximately 48 kDa in human kidney tissue homogenate, a band that was not observed in the study of Kyossev et al. (18), who carried out Western analysis on microsomal fractions. It seems unlikely, however, that this second band reflects a modified nuclear 11ßHSD2 protein, because it was absent in the colon, where our confocal laser studies also confirmed nuclear localization of 11ßHSD2.
In summary, we have developed a novel human 11ßHSD2 antiserum and have used this to confirm that MR specificity is effected at an autocrine level within human kidney, colon, and parotid. The observation that a significant proportion of cellular 11ßHSD2 is localized to the nuclear compartment suggests that the interaction between the MR and its ligand, be it cortisol or aldosterone, is a nuclear event and as such is more akin to the thyroid hormone receptor than to its closer relatives in the steroid-thyroid hormone receptor superfamily, the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Medical Research Council Senior Clinical Fellow. ![]()
Received August 19, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Kim, K. A. Temple, S. A. Jones, K. N. Meredith, J. L. Basko, and M. J. Brady Differential Modulation of 3T3-L1 Adipogenesis Mediated by 11beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase-1 Levels J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 11038 - 11046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. U Onyimba, N. Vijapurapu, S J. Curnow, P. Khosla, P. M Stewart, P. I Murray, E. A Walker, and S. Rauz Characterisation of the prereceptor regulation of glucocorticoids in the anterior segment of the rabbit eye. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 190(2): 483 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quinkler, D. Zehnder, J. Lepenies, M. D Petrelli, J. S Moore, S. V Hughes, P. Cockwell, M. Hewison, and P. M Stewart Expression of renal 11{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 is decreased in patients with impaired renal function Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chisaka, J. F. Johnstone, M. Premyslova, Z. Manduch, and J. R.G. Challis Effect of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines on Expression and Activity of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in Cultured Human Term Placental Trophoblast and Human Choriocarcinoma JEG-3 Cells Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2005; 12(5): 303 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Wagner, K. E. Finberg, S. Breton, V. Marshansky, D. Brown, and J. P. Geibel Renal Vacuolar H+-ATPase Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1263 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Norregaard, T. R. Uhrenholt, C. Bistrup, O. Skott, and B. L. Jensen Stimulation of 11-{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in rat colon but not in kidney by low dietary NaCl intake Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): F348 - F358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Alfaidy, S. Gupta, C. DeMarco, I. Caniggia, and J. R. G. Challis Oxygen Regulation of Placental 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 2: Physiological and Pathological Implications J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4797 - 4805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kataoka, A. Kudo, H. Hirano, H. Kawakami, T. Kawano, E. Higashihara, H. Tanaka, F. Delarue, J.-D. Sraer, T. Mune, et al. 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 Is Expressed in the Human Kidney Glomerulus J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 877 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. H. Zhang, X. Wang, J. T. Wang, N. A. Compagnone, S. H. Mellon, J. L. Olson, H. S. Tenenhouse, W. L. Miller, and A. A. Portale Dietary Phosphorus Transcriptionally Regulates 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-1{alpha}-Hydroxylase Gene Expression in the Proximal Renal Tubule Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rauz, E. A. Walker, C. H. L. Shackleton, M. Hewison, P. I. Murray, and P. M. Stewart Expression and Putative Role of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Isozymes within the Human Eye Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 2037 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korbonits, I. Bujalska, M. Shimojo, J. Nobes, S. Jordan, A. B. Grossman, and P. M. Stewart Expression of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Isoenzymes in the Human Pituitary: Induction of the Type 2 Enzyme in Corticotropinomas and Other Pituitary Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2728 - 2733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.M. Driver, M.D. Kilby, I. Bujalska, E.A. Walker, M. Hewison, and P.M. Stewart Expression of 11{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes and corticosteroid hormone receptors in primary cultures of human trophoblast and placental bed biopsies Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 357 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Pepe, M. G. Burch, and E. D. Albrecht Localization and Developmental Regulation of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase-1 and -2 in the Baboon Syncytiotrophoblast Endocrinology, January 1, 2001; 142(1): 68 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. ZEHNDER, R. BLAND, E. A. WALKER, A. R. BRADWELL, A. J. HOWIE, M. HEWISON, and P. M. STEWART Expression of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-1{alpha}-Hydroxylase in the Human Kidney J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 1999; 10(12): 2465 - 2473. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Odermatt, P. Arnold, A. Stauffer, B. M. Frey, and F. J. Frey The N-terminal Anchor Sequences of 11beta -Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases Determine Their Orientation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 1999; 274(40): 28762 - 28770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tetsuka, M. Milne, G.E. Simpson, and S.G. Hillier Expression of 11ß-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase, Glucocorticoid Receptor, and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Genes in Rat Ovary Biol Reprod, February 1, 1999; 60(2): 330 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Condon, C. Gosden, D. Gardener, P. Nickson, M. Hewison, A. J. Howie, and P. M. Stewart Expression of Type 2 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase and Corticosteroid Hormone Receptors in Early Human Fetal Life J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1998; 83(12): 4490 - 4497. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mazzocchi, G. P. Rossi, G. Neri, L. K. Malendowicz, G. Albertin, and G. G. Nussdorfer 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression and activity in the human adrenal cortex FASEB J, November 1, 1998; 12(14): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Sheppard, K. Khoo, Z. S. Krozowski, and K. X. Z. Li Steroid specificity of the putative DHB receptor: evidence that the receptor is not 11beta HSD Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 1998; 275(1): E124 - E131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Naray-Fejes-Toth and G. Fejes-Toth Extranuclear Localization of Endogenous 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase-2 in Aldosterone Target Cells Endocrinology, June 1, 1998; 139(6): 2955 - 2959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Ricketts, J. M. Verhaeg, I. Bujalska, A. J. Howie, W. E. Rainey, and P. M. Stewart Immunohistochemical Localization of Type 1 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Human Tissues J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 1998; 83(4): 1325 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. H.M. van Uum, A. R.M.M. Hermus, P. Smits, T. Thien, and J. W.M. Lenders The role of 11{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the pathogenesis of hypertension Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1998; 38(1): 16 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Smith, L. A. Salamonsen, P. A. Komesaroff, K. X. Z. Li, K. M. Myles, M. Lawrence, and Z. Krozowski 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type II in the Human Endometrium: Localization and Activity during the Menstrual Cycle J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1997; 82(12): 4252 - 4257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hirasawa, H. Sasano, K.-i. Takahashi, K. Fukushima, T. Suzuki, N. Hiwatashi, T. Toyota, Z. S. Krozowski, and H. Nagura Colocalization of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type II and Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Human Epithelia J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1997; 82(11): 3859 - 3863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||