help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tönshoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaskel, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tönshoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaskel, F. J.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 3 938-946
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Articles

Decreased Hepatic Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I and Increased IGF Binding Protein-1 and -2 Gene Expression in Experimental Uremia

Burkhard Tönshoff1, David R. Powell2, Dongling Zhao, Susan K. Durham, Michael E. Coleman, Horacio M. Domené, Werner F. Blum, Robert C. Baxter, Leon C. Moore and Frederick J. Kaskel

Department of Pediatrics and Physiology, State University of New York at Stony Brook (B.T., D.Z., L.C.M., F.J.K.), Stony Brook, New York 11794; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine Houston (D.R.P., S.K.D., M.E.C.), Texas 77030; Diabetes Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, National Institutes of Health (H.M.D.), Bethesda, Maryland 20892; University Children’s Hospital, Gießen 35385 (W.F.B.), Germany; and Kolling Institute of Medical Research (R.C.B.), St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Burkhard Tönshoff, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children’s Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 150, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: Burkhard-Toenshoff{at}krzmail.krz.uni-heidelberg.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The imbalance between normal insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and markedly increased IGF binding protein (IGFBP) plasma levels plays a pathogenic role for growth retardation and catabolism in children with chronic renal failure. To investigate the mechanism of these alterations, experiments were performed in an experimental model of uremia in rats (5/6 nephrectomy) and in pair-fed and ad libitum-fed sham-operated controls. Using a specific solution hybridization/RNase protection assay, we observed a marked reduction of hepatic IGF-I messenger RNA (mRNA) abundance at steady state in uremic animals (37 ± 5% of control) compared both with pair-fed (65 ± 10%) and ad libitum-fed controls (100 ± 11%) (P < 0.001). Reduced IGF-I gene expression was clearly organ-specific; it was most pronounced in liver (significant vs.. pair-fed controls) and lung and muscle tissue (significant vs.. ad libitum-fed controls); no change was observed in kidney and heart tissue. To determine a potential mechanism of reduced hepatic IGF-I gene expression in uremia, the hepatic GH receptor gene expression in the same experimental animals was analyzed by specific solution hybridization/RNase protection assay. Uremic animals had a 20–30% reduction of hepatic GH receptor mRNA abundance compared with controls. Hepatic GHBP expression in uremia was decreased in parallel. Despite the reduction of hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance, plasma IGF-I levels in uremia were not different from ad libitum-fed controls. This discrepancy is explained by an increased concentration of IGFBPs in uremic plasma. By RIA, plasma IGFBP-1 levels in uremia were increased 4-fold; by Western immunoblot, plasma IGFBP-2 levels were increased 7-fold and plasma IGFBP-4 levels were increased 2-fold compared with both control groups. Intact IGFBP-3 (Mr, ~48 kDa) and low molecular IGFBP-3 fragments were not significantly different among the three groups. By Northern blot analysis, hepatic IGFBP-1 mRNA levels in uremia were 2-fold higher than in controls. IGFBP-2 mRNA abundance in liver tissue was increased 4-fold, whereas in kidney there was a significant reduction of IGFBP-2 mRNA (30% of control). IGFBP-4 mRNA was increased by 50% in kidney but not in liver. Plasma insulin and corticosterone levels were not different among the groups. Our study shows that hepatic IGF-I gene expression was specifically reduced in uremia, partially as the consequence of a reduced hepatic GH receptor gene expression. One of the mechanisms contributing to increased IGFBP levels in uremia is increased hepatic gene expression of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2. The imbalance between reduced hepatic IGF-I production and increased hepatic IGFBP-1 and -2 production is likely to play a pathogenic role for catabolism and growth failure in CRF.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DIMINISHED LINEAR growth and reduced tissue anabolism in children with chronic renal failure (CRF) in the presence of normal or elevated circulating GH levels indicates a relative insensitivity to the action of GH on target tissues (1). Recently, we and others (2, 3) identified a decrease in hepatic GH receptor gene expression as one of the molecular alterations that accounts for the partial hyporesponsiveness to the growth-stimulating and anabolic effects of GH in uremia. One theoretical consequence of a reduced hepatic GH receptor expression is a decreased production of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), a GH-dependent polypeptide hormone with strong anabolic and mitogenic properties.

IGF-I partially mediates the effect of GH on longitudinal growth by both an endocrine and autocrine/paracrine mode of action (4). IGF-I in biological fluids is complexed to high-affinity IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), six of which have been identified. The IGFBPs regulate the actions of IGF-I by prolonging its half-life, directing its distribution, and modulating the interaction of IGF-I with its receptor (5). Each of the IGFBPs exhibits differential regulatory mechanisms involving developmental, hormonal, and nutritional status.

Under clinical conditions, circulating IGF-I levels are normal in preterminal CRF and slightly decreased in end-stage renal disease (6, 7, 8, 9). In contrast, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and low molecular weight IGFBP-3 fragments are increased in CRF serum in relation to the degree of renal dysfunction (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). The biological action of IGF-I is mediated via the type I IGF receptor. Because IGFBPs bind IGFs with affinities similar or higher to those of the type 1 IGF receptor, the excess of unsaturated high-affinity IGFBPs in CRF serum has the ability to inhibit IGF action on target tissues by competing with the type 1 IGF receptor for IGF binding (6, 7, 13). Indeed, increased IGFBP levels in CRF have been identified as inhibitors of IGF bioactivity both in vitro (7) and in vivo (8).

Little is known about the production rates of IGF-I and IGFBPs in CRF. In a previous investigation (14) we suggested that the constellation of increased IGFBP over normal IGFs indicates a reduced IGF-I secretion rate in CRF, because under normal conditions an increased IGF-binding capacity would be expected to be immediately saturated by IGFs produced in the liver. This hypothesis was therefore tested in the present study by analysis of hepatic IGF-I gene expression in a rat model of experimental uremia. Liver tissue was examined because this tissue is the major source of circulating IGF-I (15). For comparison, IGF-I gene expression was examined in other tissues where it exerts mainly an autocrine/paracrine mode of action. Because hepatic IGF-I gene expression is partially regulated by the GH receptor status, the abundance of GH receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in liver tissue was measured concomitantly.

Our previous analysis of plasma IGFBP levels in the setting of clinical CRF had also suggested that an increased IGFBP-2 production rate might contribute to elevated IGFBP levels in CRF plasma (8). To test this hypothesis we analyzed IGFBP-1, -2, -3, and -4 plasma levels in experimental uremia and the gene expression of IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 in liver and kidney because plasma levels of these IGFBPs were found to be elevated. We studied IGFBP gene expression in liver because this organ is a major site of production of these peptides (16, 17). Kidney was examined to see whether partial nephrectomy affected IGFBP gene expression in the same way in this tissue as in liver. To determine the relation of any changes to nutritional status, which is known to affect plasma levels and hepatic gene expression of IGF-I and IGFBPs (18), uremic animals were compared both with pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. Our study represents the first detailed analysis of hepatic IGF-I and IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 gene expression under the controlled conditions of experimental uremia.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental animals
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) were used for the experiment. One week before the study, the animals were kept in single cages at constant room temperature (24 C) and humidity (79%) on a 12 h on/12 h off light cycle. The animals had free access to food (Laboratory Rodent Diet) and deionized water. The diet contained 4.25 kCal/g, 1.0% calcium, 0.61% phosphorus, 4.5 IU/g vitamin D, and 23.4% protein (wt/wt). The animals were randomly assigned to the experimental groups according to their body weight. Mean body weight at first stage nephrectomy was approximately 90 g and was not different among the experimental groups (Table 1Go). The animals were subjected to two-stage subtotal nephrectomy as described previously (19). Seven days after 2/3 nephrectomy of the left kidney, the contralateral kidney was removed resulting in a 5/6 nephrectomy. Control animals were sham operated (renal decapsulation). Uremic animals and ad libitum-fed controls had free access to food and water, whereas one of the control groups was pair-fed to the uremic group as described previously (19). Pair-feeding started after the first stage operation. The duration of uremia was 14 days. These studies were conducted in accord with the NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Weight, food intake, plasma biochemistry, and hormonal parameters in CRF rats and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed sham-operated controls

 
The measurements of body weight were performed in nonfasted animals in the morning. Blood was sampled by jugular catherization at the end of the experiment and the animals were killed. The tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 C. Plasma was frozen at -20 C for subsequent analysis.

Biochemical measurements
Plasma creatinine, urea, electrolytes, phosphate, glucose, uric acid, and total protein levels were measured by an autoanalyzer, adapted for rat plasma (Anilytics, Gaithersburg, MD). Plasma insulin (DPC, Los Angeles, CA) and corticosterone (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) were measured by specific RIAs. Plasma IGF-I was measured after acid-ethanol extraction as described previously (20), utilizing the high-affinity antibody of Breier, Gallaher, and Gluckman (21). Residual IGFBP in the extract was blocked by adding 25 ng recombinant IGF-II per tube. In addition, plasma IGF-I levels were measured by a novel RIA specific for rat IGF-I, following the recommendations of the manufacturer (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX). This assay uses a goat antirat IGF-I antibody that does not cross-react with human IGF-I (22). Plasma IGFBP-1 was measured with a RIA specific for rat IGFBP-1 (23).

RNA preparation
Total RNA was prepared from tissues of individual rats using a guanidine isothiocyante-LiCl precipitation technique (24). RNA concentrations were calculated on the basis of absorbance at 260 nm. The integrity of the RNA and the accuracy of the quantitation were confirmed by comparing the ethidium bromide stain of the 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA bands after size-separating 15 µg of total RNA by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.25% agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gels).

Antisense RNA probes
IGF-I. As a hybridization probe for the solution hybridization/RNase protection assays to determine IGF-I mRNA levels, a riboprobe vector was used, which was kindly provided by D. LeRoith (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Briefly, this construct contains a 376-bp IGF-I complementary DNA (cDNA) containing sequences encoding part of the A domain, the entire D and E domains (including the 52-bp insert present in some IGF-I mRNAs), and part of the 3'-untranslated region (25). Antisense RNAs generated from this linearized construction permit the simultaneous detection of IGF-I mRNAs without (IGF-Ia) and with (IGF-Ib) the 52-base insert (25). After ligation into the riboprobe vector pGEM-3 cut with BamHI and EcoRI this construct was linearized with HindIII and gel purified before synthesis of antisense RNA with T7 polymerase. Hybridization of IGF-I mRNAs containing the insert to the antisense RNA generates a band 376 bases in length (IGF-Ib transcript), whereas hybridization of IGF-I mRNAs lacking the insert to the antisense RNA results in bands 224 bases and 100 bases in length (IGF-Ia transcripts) (25).

GH receptor/GHBP. The rat GH receptor probe was transcribed from a 900-bp BglII fragment of a rat GH receptor cDNA corresponding to the region encoding the signal peptide, the extracellular domain, and the transmembrane domain, and a portion of the intracellular domain (26). This template was linearized with BamHI and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase to generate a 445-base antisense RNA probe. This probe produces two protected bands when hybridized to total liver RNA, a 439-base band corresponding to the GH receptor mRNA and a 298-base band corresponding to the alternatively spliced mRNA which, in the rat, encodes the GH-binding protein (GHBP) (27).

Solution hybridization RNase protection assay
Antisense RNA probes were labeled with [32P]uridine triphosphate, using the Riboprobe Gemini System (Promega, Madison, WI). Hybridizations were performed as described previously (28). Briefly, 20-µg aliquots of total RNA were hybridized with 200,000 cpm probe at 45 C for 16 h. As an internal control for potential losses during the processing of the samples, equal amounts (~8000 cpm) of a 32P end-labeled AviII-digested pGEM-4Z DNA (1.7 and 1.0 kilobase in size) were added to each RNA sample before ethanol precipitation. As a reference RNA for accurate quantitation of RNA levels, a commercially available pT7 RNA 18S antisense control template was used, which contains a 82-bp fragment of a highly conserved region of the 18S ribosomal gene (Ambion, Austin, TX). After RNase digestion, protected probe bands were denatured and resolved on 8% polyacrylamide-8 M urea gels. Autoradiography was performed at -80 C using Kodak X-AR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and two intensifying screens. Autoradiographic densities of these protected bands were quantified using a LKB laser densitometer in the two-dimensional scan mode to obtain a densitometric value for the entire autoradiographic band. The arbitrary densitometric value obtained for each IGF-Ia transcript (224-bp band) was corrected with the respective intensity of the pGEM-4Z and 18S RNA band as internal standards and expressed as percentage of ad libitum-fed controls. For GH receptor/GHBP mRNA levels, the protected bands were quantified with a PhosphorImager apparatus using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) as previously described (29).

IGFBP Northern blot analysis
Individual samples of 20 µg total RNA per lane were size-fractionated on a 1% agarose gel as described previously (30). The RNA was transferred to a GeneScreen nylon membrane (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA), cross-linked to the membrane by exposure to 120,000 µJ UV irradiation (254 nM), and incubated at 80 C for 2 h Prehybridization and hybridization of the RNA to 32P-labeled cDNAs were performed according to standard procedures (31). The cDNA probes used included full-length probes for rat IGFBP-1 (32) and rat IGFBP-2 (33) kindly provided by Matthew Rechler and Guck Ooi (NIH, Bethesda, MD), a 444-bp probe from the coding region of rat IGFBP-4 (34), kindly provided by Shunichi Shimasaki (Whittier Institute, La Jolla, CA), and a 324-bp probe from murine glyceraldelyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Ambion, Austin, TX) as an internal standard. These probes were labeled with [32P]uridine triphosphate by random priming using the Pharmacia Ready to Go kit (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Filters were subsequently exposed to x-ray films at -70 C (Kodak X-omat AR) with intensifying screens. Signal intensities were quantified using a Betascope model 603 blot analyzer (Betagen, Waltham, MA). Values were expressed as percentage of GAPDH expression.

Western immunoblot analysis
Western immunoblot analysis was performed after electrophoresis of 2 µl serum on 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred overnight onto nitrocellulose. Nitrocellulose sheets were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated for 1 h with rabbit antibovine IGFBP-2 antiserum and rabbit antihuman IGFBP-4 antibody, which also detect rat IGFBP-2 and -4 specifically (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY; 1:2000 dilution). Subsequently, nitrocellulose sheets were washed vigorously in 0.5% Tween 20, incubated with goat antirabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 1 h, washed again, and exposed to enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL) for 1 min and to x-ray film for 10 sec to 5 min. All procedures were carried out at room temperature. Specific bands were quantified by laser densitometry (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA). To obtain semiquantitative data for statistical analysis, the density of the IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 band in each lane was expressed as percentage of the density of the respective band of ad libitum-fed control plasma processed in parallel on each gel. Each gel was run with three plasma samples from uremic animals, three pair-fed control samples, and three ad libitum-fed control samples.

The Western immunoblot for determination of plasma IGFBP-3 was performed as follows. Three microliters rat plasma were separated under reducing conditions (100 mM dithiothreitol) by SDS-PAGE using a 7.5–15% linear gradient gel. Proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) using a Trans-Blot SD apparatus (Bio-Rad Labs., Richmond, CA) and then blocked for 3 h at 4 C in 3% BSA. Filters were incubated at 4 C overnight in a 1:250 final dilution of rat IGFBP-3 antibody (kindly provided by Shunichi Shimazaki, Whittier Institute,) and then incubated for 2 h with antirabbit biotinylated IgG (Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA). Blots were incubated with Vectastain ABC-AP Reagent, and antigen-antibody interactions were then detected by the alkaline phosphatase method using Alkaline Phosphatase Substrate Kit IV reagents (BCIP/NBT kit) following the instructions of the manufacturer (Vector Labs.). The sizes of the IGFBP-3 forms were different from usual because dithiothreitol was used to enhance the ability of the proteins to be recognized by this antibody, which was originally raised using a synthetic IGFBP-3 peptide.

[125I]IGF ligand blotting
[125I]IGF ligand blotting was performed as described previously (12). Briefly, plasma was electrophoresed on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions. Separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (0.45-µm pore size) using a Biotrans semidry electrophoretic transfer unit (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) and Towbin buffer (25 mM Tris/192 mM glycine/20% methanol). Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked in succession with 3% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma), 1% BSA (Sigma), and 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) in Tris-saline, pH 7.4, and then incubated overnight with approximately 2 x 106 cpm [125I]IGF-II. After washing and drying, filters were exposed to film for 48 h.

Statistical analysis
Values are given as mean ± SEM. Data were examined for normal and non-Gaussian distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test. For comparison among normally distributed groups, one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise multiple comparisons (Student-Newman-Keuls method) was used. For nonnormally distributed data, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by an all pairwise multiple comparison (Dunn’s method) was used. Correlations between variables were assessed using univariate linear regression analysis. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Uremic animals had significantly higher plasma creatinine and urea levels than pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls (Table 1Go). Uremia in this experiment was relatively mild and was not associated with metabolic acidosis, as estimated by whole blood pH and bicarbonate levels (Table 1Go). Uremic animals showed a significant growth retardation because the overall weight gain in uremic animals during the observation period of 14 days was significantly lower than in ad libitum-fed controls (Table 1Go). Spontaneous food intake in uremic animals was approximately 76% of that of ad libitum-fed controls. Accordingly, the food conversion ratio (i.e. weight gain per food intake) was significantly lower in uremia than in ad libitum-fed controls (Table 1Go). Plasma potassium levels were slightly higher in uremia and plasma insulin and corticosterone levels were not different among the groups (Table 1Go). Also plasma sodium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, glucose, uric acid, and total protein levels were not different (results not shown).

Figure 1Go shows a representative solution hybridization/RNase protection assay of rat liver RNA from uremic rats and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. Hybridization of total liver RNA with the 376-base antisense RNA probe generated bands of 100 bases and 224 bases in length corresponding to the IGF-Ia mRNA and low abundance bands of 376 bases in length corresponding to IGF-Ib mRNA. These results are in accordance with the first description of this RNA probe (25). In uremic animals, there was a marked reduction of the IGF-Ia and IGF-Ib transcripts compared with pair-fed controls, and to an even higher extent compared with ad libitum-fed controls. The mean hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance (IGF-Ia transcript) was reduced by 70% compared with ad libitum-fed controls and by 50% compared with pair-fed controls (Fig. 2Go). This difference indicates that the reduction of hepatic IGF-I expression in uremia is only partially due to the slightly reduced food intake, but also is caused by alterations that are specific for the uremic milieu. Reduced IGF-I expression in uremia was clearly organ-specific and mainly found in liver (significant vs. pair-fed controls) and lung and muscle tissue (significant vs. ad libitum-fed controls); there was no change in kidney and heart (Fig. 2Go). Plasma IGF-I levels in CRF were not different from ad libitum-fed controls despite the reduction of hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance. In pair-fed rats, however, the reduction of hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance led to a corresponding decrease of plasma IGF-I peptide levels (Fig. 3AGo). The use of a RIA specific for rat IGF-I gave a similar pattern of plasma IGF-I levels; however, absolute levels were approximately 40% higher than measured by the human-specific RIA (Fig. 3AGo). When individual plasma levels were compared, there was a tight linear correlation between the two assay results (Fig. 3BGo).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A solution hybridization/RNase protection assay was performed using an IGF-I antisense RNA probe as described in Materials and Methods. Twenty micrograms of liver total RNA from uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls were used in this assay. Autoradiogram represents 24 h exposure at -70 C with two intensifying screens. A 32P-labeled HINf I digest of {phi}X174 DNA was used to indicate size of protected bands. Native IGF-I antisense RNA probe was diluted 1:100 (native probe) and as a control undiluted probe was digested with RNases.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Tissue specific IGF-I mRNA abundance (IGF-Ia transcripts) in experimental uremia, quantified by solution hybridization/RNase protection assay. IGF-I mRNA levels in liver, lung, muscle, kidney, and heart tissue of uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls were analyzed by solution hybridization/RNase protection assays. Protected bands were quantified by laser densitometry in two-dimensional scan mode and expressed as a percentage of ad libitum-fed control group. Each bar represents mean ± SEM of eight animals. *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed control; #, significant vs. pair-fed control.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Comparison of mean (A) and individual (B) plasma IGF-I levels in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls quantified by a human-specific and rat-specific RIA. There was a tight linear correlation between two assays (r = 0.93, P < 0.0001). *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed control; #, significant vs. pair-fed control.

 
To determine a potential mechanism of reduced IGF-I gene expression in uremia, we analyzed the GH receptor gene expression in the same experimental animals by solution hybridization/RNase protection assay. Uremic animals had a 20–30% reduction of hepatic GH receptor and GHBP mRNA abundance compared with controls (Fig. 4Go). The reduced food intake of pair-fed animals did not significantly influence hepatic GH receptor mRNA abundance. Compared with the relative reduction of hepatic IGF-I gene expression in uremia, the decrease of hepatic GH receptor gene expression in uremic animals was less pronounced.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Hepatic GH-receptor (GH-R) (closed bars) and GHBP mRNA (hatched bars) levels in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. Twenty micrograms of liver total RNA samples were analyzed by solution hybridization/RNase protection assays. Protected bands were quantified by scanning in a PhosphorImager apparatus with ImageQuant software. Each bar represents mean ± SEM of eight animals. *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed control; #, significant vs. pair-fed control.

 
Next, we analyzed plasma IGFBP levels in the three experimental groups. Plasma IGFBP-2, -3, and -4 levels were studied by Western immunoblot. In uremic plasma, IGFBP-2 levels (Fig. 5AGo) and IGFBP-4 levels (Fig. 5BGo) were clearly elevated compared with both control groups. Quantification of the autoradiographic bands with laser densitometry showed a 7-fold increase of plasma IGFBP-2 (Fig. 6BGo) and a 2-fold increase of IGFBP-4 levels in uremic animals (Fig. 6CGo). Mean plasma IGFBP-1 levels by RIA were increased 4-fold in uremia compared with both control groups (Fig. 6AGo). The slightly reduced food intake in pair-fed animals did not significantly influence plasma IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 levels. Figure 7Go shows an immunoblot of IGFBP-3 in uremic plasma. Intact IGFBP-3 (Mr, ~48 kDa) and low molecular IGFBP-3 fragments were comparable among the three groups. We also examined intact IGFBP-3 by [125I] IGF-II ligand blotting. Intact IGFBP-3 was comparable between uremic animals and pair-fed controls and slightly higher in ad libitum-fed controls (Fig. 8Go), which can be attributed most likely to the higher food intake of ad libitum-fed controls (18).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Representative Western immunoblot of plasma IGFBP-2 (A) and plasma IGBP-4 (B) in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Plasma IGFBP-1 (A), IGFBP-2 (B), and IGFBP-4 (C) levels in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. IGFBP-1 was measured by RIA. IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 were measured by Western immunoblotting; data are mean ± SEM values from scanning densitometry, expressed as percentage of ad libitum-fed controls; n = 9 in each group. *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed controls and pair-fed controls.

 


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Representative Western immunoblot of plasma IGFBP-3 in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. Intact IGFBP-3 (Mr, ~48 kDa) and low molecular IGFBP-3 fragments were comparable among the three groups.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Representative 125I-labeled IGF-II ligand blot of plasma IGFBP-3 in uremic animals and pair-fed and ad libitum-fed controls. Intact IGFBP-3 was comparable between uremic animals and pair-fed controls and slightly higher in ad libitum-fed controls.

 
In an attempt to determine whether IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 levels were increased in CRF due to increased gene expression, we examined IGFBP-1 and -2 mRNA levels in rat liver and kidney. Liver was studied because most circulating IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 is thought to originate in liver; kidney was studied to see whether partial nephrectomy affected IGFBP levels in the same way in this tissue as in liver. Uremia led to an approximately 2-fold increase of hepatic IGFBP-1 mRNA abundance (Figs. 9Go and 10AGo) and a 4-fold increase of hepatic IGFBP-2 mRNA abundance (Figs. 9Go and 10BGo). The mild malnutrition in pair-fed animals did not have a significant influence on the expression of these two IGFBPs. In contrast to liver tissue, there was a significant reduction (30% of ad libitum-fed control) of IGFBP-2 expression in kidney in CRF animals (Figs. 11Go and 10BGo). Hence, the increase of IGFBP-2 mRNA in uremia is organ-specific. The signal for IGFBP-1 in kidney was too low to be detected by Northern analysis. IGFBP-4 mRNA in uremia was increased 1.5-fold in kidney, but not in liver tissue (Figs. 12Go and 13AGo). The reduced food intake in pair-fed animals was associated with a significant decrease of IGFBP-4 in liver but not in kidney (Figs. 12Go and 13BGo).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Representative Northern analysis of steady state IGFBP-1 mRNA (upper panel) and IGFBP-2 mRNA (middle panel) in rat liver from ad libitum-fed controls, pair-fed controls, and uremic animals. Expression of GAPDH mRNA as an internal control is shown in lower panel.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Quantification of IGFBP-1 mRNA in liver (A) and IGFBP-2 mRNA in liver and kidney (B) quantified by Northern blot analysis; n = 9 in each group. Values are expressed as percent of GAPDH expression. *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed controls and pair-fed controls.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Representative Northern analysis of steady state IGFBP-2 mRNA in rat kidney from ad libitum-fed controls, pair-fed controls, and uremic animals. Expression of GAPDH mRNA as an internal control is shown in lower panel.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Representative Northern analysis of steady state IGFBP-4 mRNA in rat liver (upper panel) and rat kidney (lower panel) from ad libitum-fed controls, pair-fed controls, and uremic animals.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. Quantification of IGFBP-4 mRNA in liver (A) and kidney (B), quantified by Northern blot analysis; n = 9 in each group. Values are expressed as percent of GAPDH expression. *, Significant vs. ad libitum-fed control; #, significant vs. pair-fed control.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clinical and experimental CRF is characterized by an insensitivity to the action of GH in GH target tissues (1) and by an imbalance between normal IGF-I and markedly increased IGFBP plasma levels (13). The present study sought to determine possible molecular mechanisms of these alterations. We demonstrate for the first time a significant decrease of hepatic IGF-I gene expression in experimental uremia compared with pair-fed controls. This alteration was specific for the uremic metabolic milieu and independent of the mild malnutrition in experimental CRF because it was observed in comparison to pair-fed sham-operated control animals with the same nutritional intake. A previous report had not found a significant change of hepatic IGF-I gene expression in experimental uremia compared with pair-fed controls (2). This difference may be due to the assay procedure, because in contrast to the former study (2), we used the solution hybridization RNase protection assay in our laboratory with two internal standards for accurate quantitation of RNA levels. The difference in IGF-I gene expression between ad libitum-fed and pair-fed controls in the present study can be attributed to mild malnutrition in the latter group because hepatic IGF-I gene expression is highly sensitive to a reduction in food intake (18). IGF-I gene expression in experimental uremia was specifically decreased in liver, whereas the decline in lung and muscle tissue was not significantly different from pair-fed animals; no change at all was observed in kidney and heart tissue. The liver is the major source of circulating IGF-I, whereas locally produced IGF-I in other organs acts in a paracrine/autocrine manner for tissue growth and regeneration. Although not all body tissues in the present study were examined for local IGF-I production, our data suggest that experimental uremia affects primarily the production of circulating IGF-I via the liver.

We also attempted to determine the mechanism of decreased steady state IGF-I mRNA abundance in liver tissue in experimental CRF. Circulating GH levels in this animal model are not decreased but rather increased compared with pair-fed controls and are normal compared with ad libitum-fed controls (35). Hence, reduced hepatic IGF-I gene expression in experimental CRF cannot be attributed to GH deficiency. More likely, a reduced hepatic GH receptor gene expression in experimental uremia appears to play a role. In the present study, we analyzed hepatic GH receptor gene expression in the same experimental animals that were used for analysis of IGF-I gene expression. There was a significant reduction of hepatic GH receptor mRNA at steady state in experimental CRF compared with pair-fed controls, confirming our previous observation (3). However, this decline was less pronounced than the respective decrease in hepatic IGF-I gene expression. This finding may suggest that a postreceptor defect that either impedes transmission of the GH signal or synthesis of IGF-I may also contribute to reduced hepatic IGF-I gene expression in experimental CRF. However, altered GH receptor mRNA levels may not accurately reflect membrane GH receptor binding capacity under all experimental conditions. GH binding studies using hepatic membranes from the different experimental groups will be necessary to more definitively state that GH receptor expression does not fully account for the decrease in IGF-I expression. Our observation adds further evidence to the concept of GH insensitivity in the uremic state. It is noteworthy that hepatic IGF-I gene expression is also down-regulated in a rat model of chronic metabolic acidosis (36). However, this alteration is not likely to play a pathogenic role in the experimental model of relatively mild CRF used in this study, because blood pH and bicarbonate levels were unchanged.

In a previous report, we had observed increased circulating GHBP levels in experimental uremia (3). In an attempt to determine a potential mechanism of this alteration, we analyzed hepatic GHBP mRNA expression in the present study with a specific solution hybridization/RNase protection assay that could differentiate between the GH receptor mRNA and the alternatively spliced mRNA that, in the rat, encodes the GHBP (26). Liver was examined, because this tissue is thought to be the major source of circulating GHBP (37). Hepatic GHBP mRNA was reduced to a comparable extent in experimental CRF as the respective GH receptor mRNA. Thus these data indicate that increased circulating GHBP levels in experimental CRF are not the result of increased hepatic production, but rather a consequence of reduced clearance.

As expected, the reduction in hepatic IGF-I gene expression in pair-fed animals in our study led to a similar decline in circulating IGF-I peptide levels. In experimental uremia, however, the even more pronounced decline of hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance was not converted into a reduction of circulating IGF-I levels (Fig. 3Go). The pattern of reduced hepatic IGF-I gene expression and normal total IGF-I peptide levels is unique for CRF. This discrepancy can be explained by the marked increase of IGFBP levels in CRF plasma that most likely increase IGF-I half-life, and thereby lead to normal total IGF-I levels despite a reduced hepatic IGF-I production rate. The finding that circulating immunoreactive IGF-I levels were not reduced in experimental CRF is in agreement with studies in clinical CRF (6, 7, 8). However, IGF bioactivity in CRF plasma is impaired as a consequence of increased IGF binding capacity (7).

The present study also provides the first detailed analysis of plasma IGFBPs and respective hepatic IGFBP expression in experimental uremia. As observed in the setting of clinical CRF, IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 plasma levels were elevated in uremic animals. Intact IGFBP-3 (Mr, ~48K) and low molecular mass IGFBP-3 fragments were comparable among the three groups. The difference to the findings in clinical CRF, in which plasma levels of low molecular IGFBP-3 fragments are elevated (7, 12), may be due to the mild degree of CRF in our experimental model. Theoretically, increased IGFBP levels in CRF plasma could result from reduced elimination by the diseased kidneys, reduced transcapillary movement, an increased production rate, or a combination of these factors. In our study, hepatic gene expression of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 was clearly elevated in experimental uremia compared with both control groups. This alteration was tissue-specific, because IGFBP-2 gene expression in kidney tissue was reduced in CRF. Provided that stimulated gene expression reflects increased protein production, this novel finding indicates that increased hepatic production contributes to elevated IGFBP-1 and -2 serum levels in CRF plasma. In addition, an increase of renal IGFBP-4 mRNA abundance in uremia might contribute to elevated IGFBP-4 plasma levels.

The mechanism for increased IGFBP-1 mRNA in liver in experimental uremia is not known. Studies in hypophysectomized rats (38) or primary cultures of hepatocytes (39) indicate that GH is a potent inhibitor of IGFBP-1 synthesis. Furthermore, insulin is a negative regulator of IGFBP-1 in humans (40) and rats (41). Although GH and insulin plasma levels are not decreased in experimental uremia (Table 1Go) (35), evidence exists for insensitivity to their action in CRF (1, 42). GH and insulin regulate IGFBP-1 production at the levels of mRNA abundance (43, 44), and resistance to their action should increase IGFBP-1 mRNA levels, as occurs in liver of uremic rats. Treatment of CRF children with pharmacological doses of exogenous GH is associated with an increase of GH and insulin levels (45) and a decrease of IGFBP-1 levels (46). Thus, abnormalities in GH and insulin action may participate in IGFBP-1 regulation in CRF. However, glucocorticoids also regulate IGFBP-1 levels at the level of transcription and, thus, mRNA abundance (44). Our data showing that corticosterone levels are not different among the groups suggest that glucocorticoids are not the mechanism for high IGFBP-1 levels in experimental uremia.

IGFBP-2 mRNA levels in liver in experimental uremia were even more stimulated in the present study. In contrast to liver, kidney IGFBP-2 mRNA decreased slightly. Similar discrepancies between hepatic and renal IGFBP-2 gene expression have been observed in hypophysectomized (47), fasted (48), and diabetic rats (49). These findings support the concept of differential organ-specific regulation of IGFBP-2 in response to hormonal and nutritional changes and in chronic disease states. The specific metabolic signal responsible for the marked increase of hepatic IGFBP-2 gene expression remains to be elucidated. Because IGFBP-2 mRNA levels in liver are elevated in diabetic (49) and hypophysectomized rats (47), it has been suggested that insulin and GH are involved in the long-term regulation of hepatic IGFBP-2 gene expression. An insensitivity to the action of GH and insulin in uremic rats might therefore contribute to increased hepatic IGFBP-2 gene expression.

We report a moderate (~50%) increase of renal IGFBP-4 mRNA in experimental CRF, whereas hepatic IGFBP-4 gene expression was not clearly altered. The mechanism for this change is not known. Hepatic IGFBP-4 mRNA was also not modified in spontaneously diabetic (50) or hypophysectomized rats (51), indicating that insulin and GH are not predominant regulators of IGFBP-4 gene expression in liver.

In summary, our data demonstrate pronounced alterations of the IGF/IGFBP-axis in an experimental model of uremia. Hepatic IGF-I gene expression was specifically reduced in uremia, partially as the consequence of a reduced hepatic GH receptor gene expression. In view of normal or elevated circulating GH levels in experimental uremia, these data add further evidence to the concept of GH insensitivity in the uremic state. Despite the reduced hepatic IGF-I production rate, the IGF-I peptide levels are normal in uremic plasma as a consequence of a marked increase of IGFBP levels. One of the mechanisms contributing to increased IGFBP levels in uremia is increased hepatic gene expression of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2. The imbalance between reduced hepatic IGF-I production and increased hepatic IGFBP-1 and -2 production is likely to play a pathogenic role for catabolism and growth failure in CRF.


    Acknowledgments
 
The excellent technical assistance of Diane Beaudoin and Aija Birzgalis is gratefully acknowledged. We thank M.C. Gelato, R.A. Forst, and J.F. Bruno for valuable technical advice and C.H. Lang for determination of insulin and corticosterone levels.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by a Feodor Lynen research grant from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, from Genentech Incorporated, South San Francisco, and from the National Kidney Foundation, New York State Affiliate. Back

2 Supported by NIH Grant DK-38773. Back

Received August 13, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tönshoff B, Mehls O 1995 Growth retardation in children with chronic renal insufficiency: current aspects of pathophysiology and treatment. J Nephrol 8:133–142
  2. Chan W, Valerie KC, Chan JCM 1993 Expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 in uremic rats: growth hormone resistance and nutritional intake. Kidney Int 43:790–795[Medline]
  3. Tönshoff B, Edén S, Weiser E, Carlsson B, Robinson ICAF, Blum WF, Mehls O 1994 Reduced hepatic growth hormone (GH) receptor gene expression and increased plasma GH binding protein in experimental uremia. Kidney Int 45:1085–1092[Medline]
  4. Ohlsson C, Isgaard J, Törnell J, Nilsson A, Isaksson OGP, Lindahl A 1993 Endocrine regulation of longitudinal bone growth. Acta Paediatr [Suppl]391:33–40
  5. Clemmons DR 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins: roles in regulating IGF physiology. J Dev Physiol 15:105–110[Medline]
  6. Powell DR, Rosenfeld R, Sperry J, Baker B, Hintz R 1987 Serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF-2 and unsaturated somatomedin carrier proteins in children with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 10:287–292[Medline]
  7. Blum WF, Ranke MB, Kietzmann K, Tönshoff B, Mehls O 1991 Growth hormone resistance and inhibition of somatomedin activity by excess of insulin-like growth factor binding protein in uremia. Pediatr Nephrol 5:539–544[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Tönshoff B, Blum WF, Wingen A, Mehls O 1995 Serum insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 in children with chronic renal failure: relationship to height and glomerular filtration rate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2684–2691[Abstract]
  9. Tönshoff B, Blum WF, Mehls O 1996 Serum insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding protein-1, -2 and -3 in children with end-stage renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol 10:269–274[Medline]
  10. Lee PDK, Hintz RL, Sperry JB, Baxter RC, Powell DR 1989 IGF binding proteins in growth-retarded children with chronic renal failure. Pediatr Res 26:308–315[Medline]
  11. Liu F, Powell DR, Hintz RL 1990 Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in human serum from patients with chronic renal failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:620–628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Powell DR, Liu F, Baker B, Lee PDK, Belsha CW, Brewer ED, Hintz RL 1993 Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in chronic renal failure serum. Pediatr Res 33:136–143[Medline]
  13. Tönshoff B, Blum WF, Mehls O 1996 Insulin-like growth factors (IGF) and IGF binding proteins in children with chronic renal failure. Prog Growth Factor Res 6:481–491
  14. Blum WF 1991 Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins in chronic renal failure: evidence for reduced secretion of IGFs. Acta Paediatr Scand [Suppl]379:24–31
  15. Roberts, Jr, CT, Brown AL, Graham DE, Seelig S, Berry S, Gabbay KH, Rechler MM 1986 Growth hormone regulates the abundance of insulin-like growth factor I mRNA in adult rat liver. J Biol Chem 261:10025–10028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Shimasaki S, Koba A, Mercado M, Shimonaka M, Ling N 1989 Complementary DNA structure of the high molecular weight rat insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGF-BP3) and tissue distribution of its mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165:907–912[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Shimasaki S, Shimonaka M, Zhang HP, Ling N 1991 Identification of five different insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs) from adult rat serum and molecular cloning of a novel IGFBP-5 in rat and human. J Biol Chem 266:10646–10653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Thissen JP, Ketelslegers JM, Underwood LE 1994 Nutritional regulation of the insulin-like growth factors. Endocr Rev 15:80–101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Mehls O, Ritz E, Hunziker EB, Eggli P, Heinrich U, Zapf J 1988 Improvement of growth and food utilization by human recombinant growth hormone in uraemia. Kidney Int 33:45–52[Medline]
  20. Blum WF, Breier BH 1994 Radioimmunoassays for IGFs and IGFBPs. Growth Regul 4[Suppl 1]:11–19
  21. Breier BH, Gallaher BW, Gluckman PD 1991 Radioimmunoassay for insulin-like growth factor-I: solutions to some potential problems and pitfalls. J Endocrinol 128:347–357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lee PDK, Baker BK, Liu F, Kwan EYW, Hintz RL 1996 A homologeous radioimmunoassay for rat insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-): implications for studies of human IGF-I physiology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2002–2005[Abstract]
  23. Lewitt MS, Saunders H, Phyual JL, Baxter RC 1994 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in rat serum. Diabetes 43:232–239[Abstract]
  24. Cathala G, Savouret J-F, Mendez B, West BL, Karin M, Martial JA, Baxter JD 1983 Laboratory methods: a method for isolation of intact translationally active ribonucleic acid. DNA 2:329–335[Medline]
  25. Lowe, Jr, WL, Lasky SL, LeRoith D, Roberts, Jr, CT 1988 Distribution and regulation of rat insulin-like growth factor I messenger ribonucleic acids encoding alternative carboxyterminal E-peptides: evidence for differential processing and regulation in liver. Mol Endocrinol 2:528–535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mathews LS, Engberg B, Norstedt G 1989 Regulation of rat growth hormone receptor gene expression. J Biol Chem 264:9905–9910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Domene HM, Krishnamurthi K, Eshet R, Gilad I, Laron Z, Koch I, Stannard B, Cassorla F, Roberts CT, LeRoith D 1993 Growth hormone (GH) stimulates insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I-binding protein-3, but not GH receptor gene expression in livers of juvenile rats. Endocrinology 133:675–682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Adamo ML, Ben-Hur H, Roberts, Jr, CT, LeRoith D 1991 Regulation of start site usage in the leader exons of the rat insulin-like growth factor-I gene by development, fasting, and diabetes. Mol Endocrinol 5:1677–1686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shemer J, Adamo ML, Roberts, Jr, CT, LeRoith D 1992 Tissue-specific transcription start site usage in the leader exons of the rat insulin-like growth factor-I gene: evidence for differential regulation in the developing kidney. Endocrinology 101:2793–2799
  30. Coleman ME, Russel L, Etherton TD 1994 Porcine somatotropin (pST) increases IGF-I mRNA abundance in liver and subcutaneous adipose tissue but not in skeletal muscle of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 72:918–924[Abstract]
  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  32. Orlowski CC, Ooi GT, Brown DR, Yang YW, Tseng LY, Rechler MM 1991 Insulin rapidly inhibits insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 gene expression in H4-II-E rat hepatoma cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:1180–1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Brown AL, Chiariotti L, Orlowski CC, Mehlman T, Burgess WH, Ackerman EJ, Bruni CB, Rechler MM 1989 Nucleotide sequence and expression of a cDNA clone encoding a fetal rat binding protein for insulin-like growth factors. J Biol Chem 264:5148–5154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Shimazaki S, Uchiyama F, Shimonaka M, Ling N 1990 Molecular cloning of the cDNAs encoding a novel insulin-like growth factor-binding protein from rat and human. Mol Endocrinol 4:1451–1458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Metzger DL, Kerrigan JR, Krieg RJ, Chan JCM, Rogol AD 1993 Alterations in the neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion in the uremic rat. Kidney Int 43:1042–1048[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Challa A, Chan W, Krieg, Jr, RJ, Thabet MA, Liu F, Hintz RL, Chan JCM 1993 Effect of metabolic acidosis on the expression of insulin-like growth factor and growth hormone receptor. Kidney Int 44:1224–1227[Medline]
  37. Carlsson B, Billig H, Rymo L, Isaksson OGP 1990 Expression of the growth hormone binding protein messenger RNA in the liver and extrahepatic tissues in the rat: co-expression with the growth hormone receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 73:R1–R6
  38. Seneviratne C, Luo J, Murphy LJ 1990 Transcriptional regulation of rat insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 expression by growth hormone. Mol Endocrinol 4:1199–1204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Thissen JP, Pucilowska JB, Underwood LE 1994 Differential regulation of IGF-I and IGFBP-1 mRNAs by amino acid availability and growth hormone in rat hepatocyte primary culture. Endocrinology 134:1570–1576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Suikkari AM, Koivisto VA, Rutanen EM, Yki-Järvinen H, Karonen SL, Seppälä M 1988 Insulin regulates the serum levels of low molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:266–272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ooi GT, Orlowski CC, Brown AL, Becker RE, Unterman TG, Rechler MM 1990 Different tissue distribution and hormonal regulation of messenger RNAs encoding rat insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins-1 and -2. Mol Endocrinol 4:321–328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mak RHK, De Fronzo RA 1992 Glucose and insulin metabolism in uremia. Nephron 61:377–382[Medline]
  43. Lee PDK, Conover CA, Powell DR 1993 Regulation and function of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 204:4–29[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Suwanichkul A, Allander SV, Morris SL, Powell DR 1994 Glucocorticoids and insulin regulate expression of the human gene for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 through proximal promoter elements. J Biol Chem 269:30835–30841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Tönshoff B, Heinrich U, Mehls O 1991 How safe is the treatment of uremic children with recombinant human growth hormone? Pediatr Nephrol 5:454–460[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Hokken-Koelega ACS, Stijnen T, De Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF, Wit JM, Wolff ED, De Jong MCJW, Donckerwolcke RA, Abbad NCB, Bot A, Blum WF, Drop SLS 1991 Placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial of growth hormone treatment in prepubertal children with chronic renal failure. Lancet 338:585–590[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Margot JB, Binkert C, Mary JL, Landwehr J, Heinrich G, Schwander J 1989 A low molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein from rat: cDNA cloning and tissue distribution of its messenger RNA. Mol Endocrinol 3:1053–1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Tseng LYH, Ooi GT, Brown AT, Straus DS, Rechler MM 1992 Transcription of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 gene is increased in neonatal and fasted adult rat liver. Mol Endocrinol 6:1195–1201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Ooi GT, Tseng LYH, Rechler MM 1992 Posttranscriptional regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 mRNA in diabetic liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:1031–1037[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Luo J, Murphy LJ 1992 Differential expression of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in spontaneously diabetic rats. J Mol Endocrinol 8:155–163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Peter MA, Winterhalter KH, Kiefer MC, Zapf J Tissue specific expression and regulation of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) in the rat in vivo. Program of the 2nd International Workshop on Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Proteins, Opio, France, 1992, p 42A (Abstract)



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
K. Motoyama, Y. Nakai, T. Miyashita, Y. Fukui, M. Morita, K. Sanmiya, H. Sakakibara, I. Matsumoto, K. Abe, T. Yakabe, et al.
Isolation stress for 30 days alters hepatic gene expression profiles, especially with reference to lipid metabolism in mice
Physiol Genomics, April 10, 2009; 37(2): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. Gigante, S. Rubattu, R. Stanzione, A. Lombardi, A. Baldi, F. Baldi, and M. Volpe
Contribution of Genetic Factors to Renal Lesions in the Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 702 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pediatr. Rev.Home page
J. C. M. Chan, D. M. Williams, and K. S. Roth
Kidney Failure in Infants and Children
Pediatr. Rev., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 47 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
V. ROELFSEMA and R. G. CLARK
The Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis: Its Manipulation for the Benefit of Growth Disorders in Renal Failure
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2001; 12(6): 1297 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Dubaquie, D. L. Mortensen, A. Intintoli, D. A. Hogue, G. Nakamura, P. Rancatore, P. Lester, M. D. Sadick, E. Filvaroff, P. J. Fielder, et al.
Binding Protein-3-Selective Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Variants: Engineering, Biodistributions, and Clearance
Endocrinology, January 1, 2001; 142(1): 165 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Guerra, A. Leri, X. Wang, N. Finato, C. Di Loreto, C. A. Beltrami, J. Kajstura, and P. Anversa
Myocyte Death in the Failing Human Heart Is Gender Dependent
Circ. Res., October 29, 1999; 85(9): 856 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. Jain, D. W. Golde, R. Bailey, and M. E. Geffner
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Resistance
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 1998; 19(5): 625 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Haffner, W. F. Blum, U. Heinrich, O. Mehls, and B. Tonshoff
Impaired Postprandial Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 in Children with Chronic Renal Failure
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 2832 - 2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. R. Powell, F. Liu, B. K. Baker, R. L. Hintz, S. K. Durham, E. D. Brewer, J. W. Frane, B. Tonshoff, O. Mehls, A.-M. Wingen, et al.
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-6 Levels Are Elevated in Serum of Children with Chronic Renal Failure: A Report of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 2978 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tönshoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaskel, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tönshoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaskel, F. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals