help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rourke, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rourke, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, A. H.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 4 1719-1727
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Characterization of the Cholecystokinin and Gastrin Genes from the Bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: Evolutionary Conservation of Primary and Secondary Sites of Gene Expression

Ian J. Rourke1, Jens F. Rehfeld2, Morten Møller and Anders H. Johnsen2

Department of Clinical Biochemistry (I.J.R., J.F.R., A.H.J.), Rigshospitalet, and Institute of Medical Anatomy (M.M.), Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: A. H. Johnsen, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, KB3011, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. E-mail: johnsen{at}rh.dk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The gastrin and cholecystokinin (CCK) genes, and the complementary DNAs they encode, have been isolated and sequenced from the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. The CCK gene promoter region possess the same four well characterized transcriptional control elements as the human CCK gene, namely an E-box, AP-1 binding site, Sp1 site, and TATA box. In contrast, no obvious regulatory motifs are conserved in the gastrin gene. Alignment of the bullfrog preprohormone sequences with other members of the CCK/gastrin peptide family showed that preproCCK has been conserved to a greater degree during evolution than preprogastrin. In mammalian species, gastrin gene expression is typically associated with the antrum, and CCK with the small intestine and brain. However numerous secondary sites of CCK/gastrin gene expression have also been found. RT-PCR showed a high degree of conservation of both primary and secondary sites of CCK/gastrin production between mammals and the bullfrog, with gastrin messenger RNA being detected in the antrum, duodenum, colon, pancreas, brain, and testes, whereas CCK mRNA was observed in the brain, lung, testes, and throughout the length of the small intestine. In situ hybridization using radiolabeled gene specific antisense oligonucleotides uncovered CCK and gastrin messenger RNA in distinct areas of the bullfrog central nervous system and pituitary gland. Notably, the gastrin gene was expressed in the pituitary gland and hypothalamus of the bullfrog, as previously seen in mammals. This highly preserved tissue expression pattern suggests that gastrin plays specific roles in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland that are distinct from those of CCK. Our findings show that in spite of the structural resemblance, bullfrog CCK and gastrin constitute independent neuroendocrine peptide systems.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GASTRIN AND cholecystokinin (CCK) are neuroendocrine peptides known for their production in the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system (1, 2). The peptides are synthesized as prohormones and subjected to numerous posttranslational modifications in the secretory pathway such as endoproteolytic cleavage at mono- and di-basic amino acid sites, C-terminal {alpha}-amidation, and tyrosyl sulfation (3). The biological activity of both CCK and gastrin relies on the same C-terminal tetrapeptide, Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2. As a consequence, it has been hypothesized that gastrin and CCK share a common evolutionary origin, perhaps via duplication of an ancestral gene (4, 5).

Immunochemical studies suggested gastrin and CCK diverged after the appearance of amphibians (4). However, more recent peptide work indicates that both gastrin and CCK were present as separate peptide systems before this stage in evolution (6, 7). In mammalian species, gastrin is readily distinguished from CCK by two means: 1) gastrin is synthesized in the antral mucosa and regulates gastric acid secretion; and 2) gastrin possesses a tyrosine residue at position six (counting from the C-terminus), whereas in CCK a tyrosine is situated in position seven (8). CCK and gastrin peptides have been purified from avian (9, 10), reptilian, and amphibian (6, 7) species, where the antral gastrin peptide contains a tyrosine in position seven and so is structurally more similar to mammalian CCK than mammalian gastrin. This is most pronounced in the bullfrog where gastrin-8 isolated from the antrum has only one amino acid difference to CCK-8 from the small intestine (6, 7). Hence, the classification of gastrin in nonmammalian vertebrates is based primarily on its antral expression (7).

To gain further insights into the evolution of the CCK/gastrin peptide family, we have identified the gastrin and CCK genes, as well as the complementary DNAs (cDNAs) they encode, from the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana. Analysis of gene structure, gene, and preprohormone sequences and expression patterns uncovered striking parallels when comparing CCK/gastrin in the bullfrog to their mammalian counterparts. Notably, this observation extends to secondary sites of CCK/gastrin production, where gastrin gene expression was found in the bullfrog central nervous system, pituitary gland, colon, duodenum, and testes, while CCK messenger RNA (mRNA) was detected in the lung and testes.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental animals
Adult R. catesbeiana were obtained through the Panum Institute Animal Facility (University of Copenhagen, Denmark). Animals were killed by decapitation; the appropriate tissues were removed and stored at -80 C for future use.

DNA and RNA preparation
Genomic DNA was isolated from R. catesbeiana small intestine using an SDS/proteinase K/phenol extraction procedure described by Sambrook et al. (11). Total RNA was purified from various tissues using a guanidinium thiocyanate method (12). mRNA was obtained utilizing the QuickPrep Micro system (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Oligonucleotides were constructed using an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) 392 DNA/RNA synthesizer.

Genomic library construction and screening
Approximately 500 µg of R. catesbeiana genomic DNA were partially digested with Sau 3AI (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim Germany) and size fractionated on a sucrose gradient (13). DNA fragments in the size range of 13–22 kb were selected and ligated into BamHI prepared arms of {lambda}GEM-11 (Promega). Recombinant phage DNA was assembled into phage particles using ’Gigapack III Gold’ packaging extracts (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). An estimated 1 x 106 individual phage clones were obtained. The R. catesbeiana genomic library was amplified (11) as 16 independent pools and stored at -80 C for further use.

Recombinant phages were mixed with the E. coli host strain KW251 and plated at a density of approximately 80,000 pfu on 24 x 24 cm Petri dishes. Phage DNA was transferred in duplicate to nitrocellulose membrane filters (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) as described by Sambrook et al. (11). The R. catesbeiana genomic library was screened for the bullfrog gastrin gene using degenerate oligonucleotide probes, whereas the CCK gene was pursued with both oligonucleotide and cDNA probes. Oligonucleotides were labeled with [{gamma}-32P]-ATP (Amersham) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia) as described by Sambrook et al. (11). Hybridizations were performed overnight at 60 C in 2 x Denhardt’s solution (0.04% each of polyvinylpyrrolidone, BSA, and Ficoll 400), 6 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mg/ml yeast transfer RNA (Boeh-ringer Mannheim) and 0.05% Na pyrophosphate. cDNA probes were radiolabeled with [{alpha}-32P]-dCTP by random primed synthesis using therediprime DNA labeling system (Amersham), and hybridizations were carried out overnight at 60 C in 5 x Denhardt’s solution, 5 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, 200 µg/ml denatured calf thymus DNA (Sigma) and 1 mM EDTA. For both oligonucleotide and cDNA probes, the filters were washed twice at room temperature in 2 x SSC/0.1% SDS followed by two 15 min washes in the same solution at 60 C. Filters were subjected to autoradiography at -80 C on x-ray film (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan) for varying lengths of time related to signal strength.

PCR
First-strand cDNA for PCR was synthesized from approximately 1 µg of mRNA or 5 µg of total RNA using the Moloney Murine Leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Pharmacia). The reaction was primed using the XSC-dT17 oligonucleotide (Table 1Go). All PCR-based procedures were performed in a final volume of 50 µl containing; 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), Taq DNA polymerase buffer (Promega), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dNTPs, 50 pmol of each primer and 100 ng of first-strand or double-stranded cDNA. PCRs were carried out on a Thermal Reactor (Hybaid) with the following standard cycling conditions: 95 C for 5 min, 64 C for 5 min (1 cycle); 95 C for 30 sec, 64 C for 45 sec, 72 C for 90 sec (30 cycles); 5 min at 72 C (1 cycle).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used in this study

 
For inverse PCR, approximately 1.5 µg of bullfrog genomic DNA was cleaved with the Taq I (Promega) restriction endonuclease for 1 h at 65 C, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (11). The digested DNA was circularized by ligation in a final volume of 200 µl in the presence of 100 µg/ml BSA, 1 x T4 DNA ligase buffer (Promega) and 10 U of T4 DNA ligase (Promega). Ligations were performed overnight at 16 C. The next morning the circularized DNA was subjected to phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation and resuspended in 10 µl of sterile water ready for PCR.

3' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) PCRs were primed with a sense gene specific primer (Table 1Go) and the XSC oligonucleotide (Table 1Go) designed from the XSC-dT17 oligonucleotide used to prime cDNA synthesis. Adapter ligated double-stranded cDNA for 5' RACE was produced using the Marathon cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech). 5' RACE was performed with two PCRs, the first used a gene specific primer (Table 1Go) and AP1 (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), the second contained 1 µl of the initial PCR, a nested gene specific oligonucleotide (Table 1Go) and AP2 (Clontech). For both 3' and 5'RACE experiments the annealing temperature of the PCRs was 57 C.

Analysis of isolated genomic DNA and cDNA sequences
Recombinant phage DNA clones were mapped by restriction endonuclease cleavage (performed using Promega enzymes), Southern blotting, and DNA hybridization using standard procedures (11). Fragments containing bullfrog CCK/gastrin sequences were subcloned into pBluescript SK+ or SK- (Stratagene). Products from 3' and 5' RACE, as well as inverse PCR, were cloned directly into the pMOSBlue T-vector (Amersham). Double-stranded plasmid DNA was routinely sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method with the Sequenase 2.0 DNA sequencing procedure (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). In some instances, DNA was sequenced using the ABI Prism Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA) and the reactions resolved on an ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). All DNA sequences reported here were confirmed by the sequencing of both DNA strands.

In situ hybridization
Bullfrog brains were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Na/K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 15 min and postfixed for 16 h. After cryoprotection in 20% sucrose for 2 days, the tissues were frozen on dry ice and cut into 15-µm thick coronal or sagittal cryostat sections and mounted on gelatinized glass slides. Four brains were used for in situ hybridization, and two others were counter stained with cresylviolet for neurohistology.

Five picomoles of antisense oligonucleotides specific for either the R. catesbeiana CCK or gastrin mRNA (Table 1Go) were 3' end radiolabeled via the incorporation of 35S-dATP by calf thymus terminal transferase (Boehringer Mannheim) during a 60-min incubation at 37 C. The reaction was stopped by the addition 10 volumes of TE Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA), followed by phenol/choloform extraction, ethanol precipitation (11), and the oligonucleotide pellet resuspended in 100 µl of TE buffer with 1 mM DTT. The specific activity of the resulting probes were approximately 1 x 1018 dpm/mol.

Before hybridization, frozen tissues were brought to room temperature, fixed for 5 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)), followed by two 1-min washes in PBS. The sections were then acetylated in 0.25% acetic anhydride diluted in 0.1 M trienthanolamine/0.9% NaCl for 10 min, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanols (70% (5 min), 80% (1 min), 95% (2 min), 100% (1 min)), delipidated in 100% choloform (5 min), partially rehydrated in 100% and 95% ethanol (1 min each), and allowed to dry.

For hybridization of the cryostat sections, 10 µl of the labeled probe were diluted in 1 ml of hybridization buffer (50% vol/vol formamide, 2 x SSC, 1.25 x Denhardt’s solution, 10% wt/vol dextran sulfate, 10 mM DTT, 500 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 250 µg/ml yeast transfer RNA). Each section was overlayed with 200 µl of the hybridization buffer containing the labeled probe, covered with parafilm and incubated overnight at 37 C in a humid chamber. The next morning, slides were washed four times at 55 C for 15 min in 1 x SSC, followed by a 30-min wash in 2 x SSC at room temperature, and finally rinsed by two washes in distilled water. The slides were then dried and either exposed to x-ray film (Kodak) for 3 weeks or dipped in Hypercoat LM-1 emulsion (Amersham) at 40 C and exposed for 6 weeks at 4 C. The emulsion-coated slides were developed in Amidol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 5 min and fixed in 30% thiosulphate. After developing of the emulsion-coated slides, the sections were counterstained with cresyl violet.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cloning of the R. catesbeiana gastrin gene and cDNA
Duplicate recombinant phage lifts of the R. catesbeiana genomic library were screened independently with two oligonucleotides, FGIN1 and FGIN2 (Table 1Go), designed against the bullfrog gastrin-47 peptide (6). After three rounds of screening, a single positive clone ({lambda}FGas12) containing a 13.1-kb insert was isolated. DNA from this recombinant phage was subjected to restriction enzyme mapping and Southern blotting and probed with radiolabeled FGIN1 and FGIN2 oligonucleotides. An approximate 1.3-kb ScaI fragment, which bound the FGIN1 probe and an 850-bp Sau3AI fragment detected by the FGIN2 oligonucleotide, were subcloned (Fig. 1AGo). Sequence analysis showed that together these two pieces of DNA encoded the entire bullfrog gastrin-47, including basic proteolytic cleavage sites and an {alpha}-amidation substrate (Fig. 1BGo). Consequently, these sequence data were used to clone the cDNA encoding bullfrog gastrin.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The R. catesbeiana gastrin gene. A, Simple restriction enzyme map of the genomic region encompassing the bullfrog gastrin gene. Exons are indicated by the solid rectangles. A number of restriction enzyme cleavage sites are indicated: A, ApaI; E, EcoRI; S, SacI; Sa, SalI; and X, XbaI. B, Nucleotide sequence of the R. catesbeiana gastrin gene. The three exon sequences are underlined, and the complete translation open reading frame encoding preprogastrin is provided.

 
An oligonucleotide primer designed from the open reading frame within the ScaI subclone encoding the N-terminus of bullfrog gastrin-47 (FGASE25', Table 1Go) and the XSC oligonucleotide were used in 3' RACE PCR experiments on first-strand cDNA synthesized from bullfrog antral mucosa. A single 400-bp product was recovered from the 3' RACE reaction and found to encompass the 3' end of the bullfrog gastrin cDNA (Fig. 1BGo). Similarly, 5' RACE PCR was conducted using two gastrin-specific oligonucleotides, FGASE33' and FGASE23' (Table 1Go). After two nested PCRs, a 210-bp fragment containing the 5' end of the bullfrog gastrin cDNA was uncovered (Fig. 1BGo). Together, the RACE clones encompass a 424-bp bullfrog mRNA encoding preprogastrin that is 102 amino acids in length. R. catesbeiana preprogastrin putatively contains a hydrophobic N-terminal signal sequence and all the necessary primary sequence requirements for the posttranslational production of bullfrog gastrin-47 (Fig. 1BGo).

The R. catesbeiana gastrin cDNA sequence was used to determine the structure of the gastrin gene, which included the subcloning of a 5.1-kb EcoRI/SacI fragment encoding the 5' untranslated exon (Fig. 1Go). Consequently, the bullfrog gastrin gene consists of three exons and two introns (Fig. 1AGo). The first exon is 28 bp in length, the second exon possessing the ATG translation start codon is 210 bp, whereas the third exon is 186 bp in length and contains the stop codon and AATAAA polyadenylation consensus sequence (Fig. 1Go).

Cloning of the R. catesbeiana cholecystokinin gene and cDNA
Two degenerate oligonucleotides designed from R. catesbeiana CCK-69 (7), FCIN1 and FCIN2 (Table 1Go), were used in RT-PCR on bullfrog brain first-strand cDNA to generate a 159-bp CCK cDNA fragment for genomic library screening. In the first instance, approximately half of the independent clones from the bullfrog genomic library were screened for the CCK gene. Following three rounds of screening, two phage clones were obtained ({lambda}FCCK6 and {lambda}FCCK7) from separate library pools; however, they were determined to contain the same 12.1 kb insert (Fig. 2AGo). A single 2-kb HindIII/SacI fragment was found to hybridize with the partial CCK cDNA probe. Subcloning and sequencing experiments revealed the HindIII/SacI fragment encoded the N-terminus, but not the C-terminus, of bullfrog CCK-69 (Fig. 2BGo).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The R. catesbeiana cholecystokinin gene. A, Simple restriction enzyme map of the genomic region encompassing the bullfrog CCK gene. Exons are indicated by solid rectangles. The region between the two arrows represents the overlap of phage clone {lambda}FCCKB1 with clones {lambda}FCCK6 and {lambda}FCCK7. Because exon 3 was cloned by inverse PCR, the unknown sequence between the end of phage clones {lambda}FCCK6/{lambda}FCCK7 and the PCR product is represented as two sloping parallel lines. A number of restriction enzyme cleavage sites are indicated: B, BamHI; H, HindIII; S, SacI; Sa, SalI; and X, XbaI. B, Nucleotide sequence of the R. catesbeiana CCK gene. The three exon sequences are underlined, and the complete translation open reading frame encoding preprocholecystokinin is provided. Putative regulatory motifs within the CCK promoter region are indicated, namely a TATA box, Sp1 site, AP-1 binding site, and two E-boxes.

 
3' RACE was performed on R. catesbeiana brain first-strand cDNA using the FCCKE35' CCK specific primer (Table 1Go) and the XSC oligonucleotide. The resulting 400-bp product was subcloned, sequenced, and found to contain the 3' end of the bullfrog CCK cDNA. In turn, two nested 5' RACE PCRs using the FCCKE33'I and FCCKE33'II oligonucleotides (Table 1Go) were performed to isolate a 690-bp fragment encompassing the 5' region of the R. catesbeiana CCK cDNA. In total, the bullfrog CCK mRNA was determined to be 693 nucleotides in length, encoding a 130 amino acid preproCCK molecule (Fig. 2BGo). This preprohormone possess an N-terminal hydrophobic signal sequence, as well as all the necessary primary sequence requirements for the posttranslational maturation of previously isolated bullfrog CCK-69 (Fig. 2BGo).

The entire bullfrog genomic library was rescreened with the FCCKE13' oligonucleotide (Table 1Go), designed from the 5' end of the R. catesbeiana CCK cDNA sequence. A single recombinant phage clone with a 13.2-kb insert was obtained ({lambda}FCCKB1), which includes 6.5 kb of the bullfrog genome present in clones {lambda}FCCK6 and {lambda}FCCK7 (Fig. 2AGo). A 701-bp BglII fragment was subcloned, sequenced, and found to code for the 5' end of the CCK gene (Fig. 2Go). However, despite numerous efforts using both oligonucleotide and cDNA probes, we were unable to obtain a genomic clone encoding the 3' end of the bullfrog CCK mRNA. To circumvent this problem, inverse PCR was performed using two oligonucleotides, FCCKE35'op and FCCKE33'op (Table 1Go), designed from the 3' region of the CCK cDNA sequence. The resulting 1.4-kb product was sequenced and found to encode the remainder of the bullfrog CCK cDNA sequence (Fig. 2BGo). Consequently, like the gastrin gene, the bullfrog CCK gene consists of three exons, 45, 251, and 394 bp in length, respectively. Long-range PCR using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Boehringer Mannheim) was performed in an attempt to characterize the length of intron 2 of the R. catesbeiana CCK gene. Unfortunately, these experiments were unsuccessful (data not shown), but this intron is clearly very large, exceeding 8.1 kb (Fig. 2AGo).

Comparison of R. catesbeiana CCK/gastrin preprohormone sequences to those from other species
Alignment of the bullfrog and human preprogastrin shows the most conserved region of this preprohormone surrounds the C-terminal bioactive region of the gastrin peptide (Fig. 3Go). Analysis of bullfrog and human CCK preprohormones shows a similar region of conservation; however, this homology extends throughout the C-terminal flanking peptide (Fig. 3Go). Comparison of bullfrog gastrin and CCK to those characterized from other species indicates that preproCCK sequences have been conserved to a greater degree than preprogastrin (Table 2Go). This is partly due to a shift in the locality of a tyrosine in gastrins from position 7 (from the C-terminus) in frog and chicken gastrin to position 6, typical of mammalian gastrins (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Alignment of bullfrog and human preprogastrin and preprocholecystokinin. Gaps introduced to gain maximum sequence alignment are represented by dots. The sequences of Rana catesbeiana CCK-69 and gastrin-47 are underlined. Alignments were performed using the Gap program (14). Identical amino acids (|), functionally conservative differences (:) and substitutions that could result from a single base change (.) are indicated.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Similarity of bullfrog gastrin and CCK preprohormone sequences to some other members of the CCK/gastrin family.

 
Expression of gastrin and CCK genes in the bullfrog
The sensitive procedure of RT-PCR was used to examine the expression patterns of the gastrin and CCK genes in R. catesbeiana. In each instance, primers flanking intron sequences were used to ensure that PCR products did not originate from contaminating DNA molecules (Table 1Go). In addition, degenerate oligonucleotides designed from a Xenopus laevis cytoplasmic actin cDNA, which give rise to a 500-bp R. catesbeiana product, were used to ensure equal quantities of starting material (data not shown). Following agarose gel electrophoresis, the PCR products were transferred to a Nytran membrane and hybridized with radiolabeled cDNA probes as described in Materials and Methods. Gastrin cDNA was detected from bullfrog antrum, duodenum, colon, pancreas, brain, and testes, but not from kidney, liver, lung, skin, or the distal two-thirds of the small intestine (Fig. 4AGo). In comparison, CCK expression was observed in the brain, lung, testes, and throughout the length of the small intestine (Fig. 4BGo).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RT-PCR analysis of gastrin (A) and CCK (B) gene expression in various bullfrog tissues. Lanes: 1) antral mucosa; 2) brain; 3) colon; 4) duodenum; 5) kidney; 6) large intestine; 7) liver; 8) lung; 9) pancreas; 10) skin; 11) small intestine (middle third); 12) small intestine (posterior third); and 13) testes.

 
Distribution of gastrin and CCK mRNA in the R. catesbeiana brain
The bullfrog possesses a large pituitary gland and a prominent optic tectum. A very strong production of gastrin mRNA was seen in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary gland (Fig. 5AGo), with moderate expression in the neural lobe. In addition, gastrin gene expression was detected in the brain stem and certain cells of the tuberal part of the hypothalamus. In contrast, CCK expression was predominantly found in the optic tectum and certain areas of the brain stem (Fig. 5BGo). In each instance, CCK and gastrin expression patterns in the brain and pituitary gland were confirmed by using two independent gene specific antisense oligonucleotides.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Expression of gastrin (A) and CCK (B) in the Rana catesbeiana brain and pituitary gland as detected with gene specific antisense oligonucleotide probes. A, Photomicrograph of an emulsion dipped autoradiograph showing a very strong gastrin mRNA signal in the intermediate lobe (bent arrows) of the anterior pituitary. No binding was observed with any of the two CCK-probes in this area of the brain. Other structures indicated are: in, infundibular part of the hypothalamus; dist, pars distalis of the anterior pituitary; and ner, pituitary neural lobe. Cresyl violet was used for counter staining. Bar = 0.5 mm. B, Autoradiograph showing CCK mRNA signals. The strongest CCK signal can be seen in the superficial and basal portions of the optic tectum (open triangles). The gastrin probes did not hybridize to neurons in this area. X-ray film. Bar = 0.5 mm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The R. catesbeiana gastrin and CCK genes, as well as the cDNAs they encode, have been successfully isolated and sequenced. Previously, the entire CCK and gastrin genes had only been characterized from a few mammalian species; mouse CCK (23), mouse gastrin (22), human gastrin (26), human CCK (27), and the rat CCK gene (25). In addition, the gene structure of chicken gastrin was recently reported (19). In each instance, the genes possess a 5' untranslated exon and two coding exons, which we have also observed with the bullfrog gastrin and CCK genes. Wu and co-workers (19) noted that exon 2 contained 5 nucleotides before the start codon in mammalian gastrin genes, whereas chicken gastrin and mammalian CCKs possessed two nucleotides in this position. Exon 2 of the bullfrog gastrin gene also has only two nucleotides before the ATG start codon, indicating that the existence of five bases at this site is a feature unique to mammalian gastrins. The only CCK/gastrin-like gene, isolated from a species more distantly related to mammals than amphibians, is cionin from the protochordate Ciona intestinalis (28, 29). It has been suggested that cionin is an ancestral form of CCK/gastrin (28); however, if this is true, the gene structure seems to have changed before the appearance of amphibians since the first exon of the cionin gene encodes 44 amino acids of preprocionin (29).

The proximal promoter region of the bullfrog gastrin and CCK genes were analysed for cis-acting regulatory sequences known to influence the expression of these genes in other species. Even though the transcriptional start sites of the bullfrog CCK and gastrin genes have not been determined experimentally, the 5' untranslated regions of both the RACE PCR products have lengths similar to other members of the CCK/gastrin family (22, 23, 25, 26, 27). Thus is appears that we have identified very close to the entire transcription product. The bullfrog gastrin promoter does not contain an obvious TATA element, which is also lacking in the chicken gastrin promoter (19), but present in mammalian gastrin genes (30). Putative purine-pyrimidine stretches and G/C rich regions, which possibly play a role in the regulation of chicken gastrin gene transcription (19), do not seem to be present in the bullfrog gastrin promoter region. Transgenic mice studies have already shown that significant differences exist in the specifities of the human and rat gastrin promoters (31), indicating considerable species variations in factors regulating gastrin gene expression. In contrast, the R. catesbeiana CCK gene possess at least four highly conserved regulatory motifs present in mammalian CCK genes, namely a TATA box, Sp1 site, AP-1 binding site (also known as a CRE/TRE binding element), and an E-box (32, 33). In fact, the order and spacing of these elements relative to the transcription start site in the bullfrog CCK gene is similar to the human CCK promoter region. Furthermore, the bullfrog CCK promoter contains a second E-box, in between the AP-1 and Sp1 sites, that is also present in the rat CCK promoter (32). Because no CCK-specific elements have been identified in the promoter region of the human CCK gene, it has been hypothesized that complex interactions may occur between the many transcription factors that bind the above motifs, resulting in the developmental- and cell-specific regulation of CCK gene transcription in humans (33). The obvious conserved nature of the Sp1 site, AP-1 site, and E-box DNA binding motifs between mammals and the bullfrog strongly suggests these elements play a crucial role in dictating CCK gene expression patterns in vertebrates.

The deduced preprohormones of both R. catesbeiana gastrin and CCK appear to contain all the necessary primary sequence requirements for the posttranslational maturation of gastrin-47 and CCK-69 previously isolated from this species (6, 7). These features include a hydrophobic N-terminal sequence for directing the prohormone through the secretory pathway, di-basic endoproteolytic cleavage sites, and immediately C-terminal to the bioactive peptide sequence a glycine residue, which acts as an amide donor. Comparison of the preprohormone sequences to some of their mammalian counterparts shows that preproCCK has been more conserved during evolution than preprogastrin. In both cases, the greatest degree of homology is around the C-terminus of the bioactive peptide sequence, although one other notable conserved region is the C-terminal flanking peptide of proCCK. This acidic region, which contains two tyrosine residues in bullfrog proCCK, is almost identical to that seen in human proCCK and is also similar to the C-terminal flanking peptide of preprocionin. Current evidence indicates that sulfation of the two tyrosine residues of proCCK is important for the correct sorting and processing of human CCK (34).

By several criteria, CCK has been more conserved during evolution than gastrin: 1) the position of a tyrosine residue in relation to the C-terminal end of the bioactive gastrin peptide sequence has changed from +7 to +6 in mammals; 2) the number of noncoding nucleotides in exon 2 differs between nonmammalian and mammalian gastrin genes, but not between the CCK genes; 3) proximal regulatory motifs of gastrin genes are less conserved than those seen in CCK genes; and 4) between bullfrog and mammalian sequences the preproCCKs show a higher degree of similarity than do the preprogastrins. Taken together, these features indicate that CCK is phylogentically older than gastrin. Parallels can be drawn to the neuropeptide Y (NPY)/peptide Y (PYY)/pancreatic polypeptide (PP) family. At the amino acid level, NPY is the most conserved and is believed to be the oldest member of this peptide family, whereas pancreatic polypeptide, which has only been found in tetrapods, shows much greater sequence variations than either NPY or PYY (35). However, sequences from several more species will be needed before it can be determined if the same relationship is valid for the CCK/gastrin family.

The tissue distribution of gastrin and CCK gene expression in the bullfrog was analyzed by RT-PCR. Typical to that seen in other species, CCK was expressed in the small intestine and brain, whereas gastrin production was found in the antral mucosa. However, bullfrog gastrin and CCK gene expression was detected in other tissues, which in mammals can be considered as secondary sites of gastrin/CCK production. Firstly, CCK expression was detected in the R. catesbeiana lung. Cholecystokinin mRNA has been observed in the lung of X. laevis (18) and small quantities of CCK peptide have been noted in mammalian lung tissue (36), although its biological significance is unknown. Both CCK and gastrin gene expression was found in the testes. Previously, CCK production has been shown in the peripheral regions of the seminiferous tubules of five mammalian species (37), as well as gastrin mRNA in the same tissue of humans (38). Consistent with peptide purification studies (7) gastrin mRNA was detected in the bullfrog duodenum, as found in mammalian species (39, 40). Furthermore, gastrin gene expression was observed in the colon of R. catesbeiana. The rat and sheep colon have been found to express both gastrin and CCK throughout development, with the highest concentrations of {alpha}-amidated gastrin being found in the fetus where it may act as a growth factor (39, 41). Lastly, bullfrog gastrin gene transcription was also detected in the pancreas. Again this parallels mammalian gastrin expression patterns (42, 43, 44), with the majority of gastrinomas being found in the pancreas (45).

Along with CCK, RT-PCR also detected gastrin expression in the R. catesbeiana brain. To further investigate the distribution of CCK and gastrin production in the bullfrog central nervous system and pituitary gland, in situ hybridization was performed with mRNA specific radiolabeled antisense oligonucleotides. Completely distinct areas of the bullfrog brain were found to express the two genes. In mammals, CCK is the most abundant neuropeptide in the brain with regards to both quantity and distribution (46, 47) and is involved in numerous functions including sleep, memory, and anxiety (for review, see Ref.2). Therefore, it was not surprising to find CCK gene expression in many areas of the bullfrog brain, present at the highest levels in the optic tectum and brain stem, a similar pattern to that observed in X. laevis (18). In contrast, the majority of bullfrog gastrin expression was detected in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary gland and the infundibular area of the hypothalamus. Gastrin peptides have been found in the pituitary gland of all mammalian species examined, with the intermediate and neural lobes containing the highest concentrations of {alpha}-amidated gastrin (48, 49). Furthermore, SI nuclease mapping of total RNA from porcine tissues detected gastrin mRNA in the pig pituitary (50). A small quantity of gastrin peptide has also been found in the porcine hypothalamus (48). Because the gastrointestinal G- and I-cells produce significantly greater quantities of gastrin than the CNS and pituitary, it is believed that the latter tissues would have little influence on circulating gastrin levels and thereby probably not affect gut function (51). Consequently, gastrin synthesized in the pituitary gland, and possibly the hypothalamic region, is more likely to be involved in local neurotransmitter activity (48). The occurrence of gastrin production in the pituitary gland and central nervous system of both amphibian and mammalian species suggests an important function of gastrin in these tissues that is probably separate from the role of CCK.

As noted above, the previous identification of two different peptides from distinct organs of R. catesbeiana strongly indicated the presence of two members of the CCK/gastrin family in amphibian species (6, 7). However, this information was overlooked in a recent review, where it was argued that amphibian species possess a single gene encoding a CCK-like peptide (52). Now the present study unequivocally shows that distinct gastrin and CCK genes exist in the bullfrog, R. catesbeiana. Consequently if the CCK/gastrin peptide family arose through a gene duplication, it appears that this event occurred before, or perhaps during, amphibian evolution. In fact, preliminary work in our laboratory has uncovered several CCK-like peptides in both the rainbow trout (Oncorhynkus mykiss) and the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) (53 and Johnsen et al., unpublished observations). Most interestingly, the expression patterns of gastrin and CCK genes appears highly conserved between the bullfrog and mammalian species, strongly suggesting widespread important roles for gastrin outside the antrum and for CCK beyond the small intestine and central nervous system.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Robert Eggert and Peter Nørhave for their skillful technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Present address: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, 3050, Australia. Supported by a Junior Investigator Fellowship from the Alfred Benzon Foundation. Back

2 Supported by grants from The Danish MRC, The Danish Biotechnology Program for Signal Peptide Research, The Velux Foundation, The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, and The Novo Nordisk Foundation. Back

Received October 7, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rehfeld JF, van Solinge WW 1994 The tumour biology of cholecystokinin and gastrin. Adv Cancer Res 63:295–346[Medline]
  2. Crawley JN, Corwin RL 1994 Biological actions of cholecystokinin. Peptides 15:731–755[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rehfeld JF, Bardram L, Cantor P, Hilsted L, Schwartz TW 1988 Cell-specific processing of procholecystokinin and progastrin. Biochimie 70:25–31[Medline]
  4. Larsson L-I, Rehfeld JF 1977 Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of gastrin and cholecystokinin. Nature 269:335–338[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Boel E, Vuust J, Norris F, Norris K, Wind A, Rehfeld JF, Marcker KA 1983 Molecular cloning of human gastrin cDNA: evidence for evolution of gastrin by gene duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2866–2869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Johnsen AH, Rehfeld JF 1992 Identification of cholecystokinin/gastrin peptides in frog and turtle: evidence that cholecystokinin is phylogenetically older than gastrin. Eur J Biochem 207:419–428[Medline]
  7. Johnsen AH 1994 Identification of cholecystokinin from frog and turtle. Divergence of cholecystokinin and gastrin occurred before the evolution of amphibia. Eur J Biochem 224:691–702[Medline]
  8. Johnsen AH, Rehfeld JF 1993 Phylogeny of gastrins. In: Walsh JH (ed) Gastrin. Raven Press, New York, pp 15–27
  9. Dimaline R, Young J, Gregory H 1986 Isolation from chicken antrum, and primary amino acid sequence of a novel 36-residue peptide of the gastrin/CCK family. FEBS Lett 205:318–322[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Fan Z-W, Eng J, Miedel M, Hulmes JD, Pan Y-CE, Yalow RS 1987 Cholecystokinin octapeptides purified from chinchilla and chicken brains. Brain Res Bull 18:757–760[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, ed 2. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, New York
  12. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla RL, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ 1979 Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:5294–5299[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Luthe DS 1983 A simple technique for the preparation and storage of sucrose gradients. Anal Biochem 135:230–232[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD 1970 A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48:443–453[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O 1984 A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12:387–395
  16. Gribskov M, Burgess RR 1986 Sigma factors from E. coli, B. subtilisphage SP01, and phage T4 are homologous proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 14:6745–6763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Monstein H-J, Thorup JU, Folkesson R, Johnsen AH, Rehfeld JF 1993 cDNA deduced procionin: structure and expression in protochordates resemble that of procholecystokinin in mammals. FEBS Lett 331:60–64[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Wechselberger C, Kreil G 1995 Structure of two cDNAs encoding cholecystokinin precursors from the brain of Xenopus laevis. J Mol Endocrinol 14:357–364[Abstract]
  19. Wu SV, Walsh JH, Campbell BJ, Dimaline R 1995 Molecular characterization and physiological regulation of a TATA-less gene encoding chicken gastrin. Eur J Biochem 230:439–446[Medline]
  20. Yoo OJ, Powell CT, Agarwal KL 1982 Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of full-length cDNA coding for porcine gastrin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:1049–1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gubler U, Chua AO, Hoffman BJ, Collier KJ, Eng J 1984 Cloned cDNA to cholecystokinin mRNA predicts an identical preprocholecystokinin in pig brain and gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4307–4310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Friis-Hansen L, Rourke IJ, Bundgaard JR, Rehfeld JF, Samuelson LC 1996 Molecular structure and genetic mapping of the mouse gastrin gene. FEBS Lett 386:128–132[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Vitale M, Vashishtha A, Linzer E, Powell DJ, Friedman JM 1990 Molecular cloning of the mouse CCK gene: expression in different brain regions and during cortical development. Nucleic Acids Res 19:169–177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fuller PJ, Stone DL, Brand SJ 1987 Molecular cloning and sequencing of a rat preprogastrin complementary deoxyribonucleic acid. Mol Endocrinol 1:306–311[Abstract]
  25. Deschenes RJ, Haun RS, Funckes CL, Dixon JE 1985 A gene encoding rat cholecystokinin: isolation, nucleotide sequence, and promoter activity. J Biol Chem 260:1280–1286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wiborg O, Berglund L, Boel E, Norris F, Norris K, Rehfeld JF, Marcker KA, Vuust J 1984 Structure of a human gastrin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1067–1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Takahashi Y, Fukushige S, Murotsu T, Matsubara K 1986 Structure of human cholecystokinin and its chromosomal location. Gene 50:353–360[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Johnsen AH, Rehfeld JF 1990 Cionin: a disulfotyrosyl hybrid of cholecysokinin and gastrin from the neural ganglion of the protochordate Ciona intestinalis. J Biol Chem 265:3054–3958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Monstein H-J 1995 Genomic structure of the gene encoding cionin - a cholecystokinin/gastrin-like peptide. Neuroreport 6:253–256[Medline]
  30. Bundgaard JR, Hansen TvO, Friis-Hansen L, Rourke IJ, van Solinge WW, Nielsen FC, Rehfeld JF 1995 A distal Sp1-element is necessary for maximal activity of the human gastrin gene promoter. FEBS Lett 369:225–228[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Wang TC, Brand SJ 1992 Function and regulation of gastrin in transgenic mice: a review. Yale J Biol Med 65:705–713[Medline]
  32. Haun RS, Dixon JE 1990 A transcriptional enhancer essential for the expression of the rat cholecystokinin gene contains a sequence identical to the -296 element of the human c-fos gene. J Biol Chem 265:15455–15463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Nielsen FC, Pedersen K, Hansen TvO, Rourke IJ, Rehfeld JF 1996 Transcriptional regulation of the human cholecystokinin gene: composite action of upstream stimulatory factor, Sp1, and members of the CREB/ATF-AP-1 family of transcription factors. DNA Cell Biol 15:53–63[Medline]
  34. Beinfeld MC 1994 Inhibition of procholecystokinin (CCK) sulfation by treatment with sodium chlorate alters its processing and decreases cellular content and secretion of CCK 8. Neuropeptides 26:195–200[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Larhammar D 1996 Evolution of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide. Regul Pept 62:1–11[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ghatei MA, Sheppard MN, O’Shaughnessy DJ, Adrian TE, Gregor GP, Polak JM, Bloom SR 1982 Regulatory peptides in the mammalian respitory tract. Endocrinology 3:1248–1254
  37. Persson H, Rehfeld JF, Ericsson A, Schalling M, Pelto-Huikko M, Hökfelt T 1989 Transient expression of the cholecystokinin gene in male germ cells and accumulation of the peptide in the acrosomal granule: possible role of cholecystokinin in fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6166–6170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Schalling M, Persson H, Pelto-Huikko M, Ødum L, Ekman P, Gottlieb C, Hökfelt T, Rehfeld JF 1990 Expression and localization of gastrin messenger RNA and peptide in spermatogenic cells. J Clin Invest 86:660–669
  39. Ciccotosto GD, Shulkes A 1996 Ontogeny of gastrin and cholecystokinin in the colon and duodenum of sheep. Regul Pept 62:97–105[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Larsson L-I, Rehfeld JF, Goltermann N 1977 Gastrin in the human fetus. Distribution and molecular forms of gastrin in the antro-pyloric gland area, duodenum and pancreas. Scand J Gastroenterol 12:869–872[Medline]
  41. Lüttichau HR, van Solinge WW, Nielsen FC, Rehfeld JF 1993 Developmental expression of the gastrin and cholecystokinin genes in rat colon. Gastroenterology 104:1092–1098[Medline]
  42. Larsson L-I, Rehfeld JF, Håkanson R, Sundler F 1976 Pancreatic gastrin in foetal and neonatal rats. Nature 262:609–610[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Bardram L, Hilsted L, Rehfeld JF 1990 Progastrin expression in mammalian pancreas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:298–302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Read M, Shulkes A 1993 Developmental expression of pancreatic gastrin and somatostatin in the sheep. Mol Cell Endocrinol 93:31–38[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Heitz PU, Kasper M, Polak JM, Kloppel G 1982 Pancreatic endocrine tumours. Hum Pathol 13:263–271[Medline]
  46. Rehfeld JF 1978 Immunochemical studies on cholecystokinin II. Distribution and molecular heterogeneity in the central nervous system and small intestine of man and hog. J Biol Chem 253:4022–4030[Free Full Text]
  47. Crawley JN 1985 Comparative distribution of cholecystokinin and other neuropeptides. Ann NY Acad Sci 448:1–8
  48. Rehfeld JF 1978 Localisation of gastrins to neuro- and adenohypophysis. Nature 271:771–773[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Rehfeld JF, Hansen HF, Larsson L-I, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Thorn NA 1984 Gastrin and cholecystokinin in pituitary neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1902–1905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Powell CT, Ney C, Aran P, Agarwal K 1985 A gastrin gene is expressed in both pituitary and antral mucosal tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 13:7299–7305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Rehfeld JF 1988 The expression of progastrin, procholecystokinin and their hormonal products in pituitary cells. J Mol Endocrinol 1:87–94[Medline]
  52. Dockray GJ, Varro A, Dimaline R 1996 Gastric endocrine cells: gene expression, processing, and targeting of active products. Physiol Rev 76:767–798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Jensen H, Johnsen AH 1995 Cholecystokinin (CCK) in the rainbow trout. Pharmacol Toxicol [Suppl IV] 76:85



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. R. Vigna
Evolution of the Cholecystokinin and Gastrin Peptides and Receptors
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2000; 40(2): 287 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. F. REHFELD
The New Biology of Gastrointestinal Hormones
Physiol Rev, October 1, 1998; 78(4): 1087 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. H. Johnsen, L. Jonson, I. J. Rourke, and J. F. Rehfeld
Elasmobranchs express separate cholecystokinin and gastrin genes
PNAS, September 16, 1997; 94(19): 10221 - 10226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rourke, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rourke, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, A. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals