help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 5 2056-2065
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Articles

Expression of Ryanodine Receptors in the Pituitary Gland: Evidence for a Role in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Signaling

Srividya Sundaresan, Jeffrey Weiss, Angela C. Bauer-Dantoin and J. Larry Jameson

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: J. Larry Jameson, M.D, Ph.D, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Tarry 15–703, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60611.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GnRH elicits secretion of LH and FSH from gonadotropes by activating an array of intracellular signals including the generation of inositol triphosphate and the release of intracellular calcium. Given the important role of calcium in the secretory responses to GnRH, we examined the expression and function of the ryanodine receptors, which are known to modulate calcium release from intracellular stores. Using RT-PCR analysis, we found that ryanodine receptor (RyR) types 2 and 3, but not type 1, are expressed in rat pituitaries. Pulses of GnRH were administered to perifused primary rat pituitary cells in the presence or absence of a ryanodine receptor antagonist, ruthenium red, to assess effects on GnRH-mediated LH secretion. Treatment with ruthenium red resulted in a 40% decrease in the spike phase of GnRH-induced LH release and a 35% reduction in the plateau phase. Ruthenium red also inhibited GnRH-mediated transcription of a transfected {alpha}-LUC reporter plasmid. RyR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression varied during the rat estrous cycle with maximal levels following increases of progesterone. The effects of gonadal steroids on pituitary RyR mRNA levels were examined directly in ovariectomized rats that were treated with estrogen (E), or estrogen and progesterone (P). In this paradigm, E decreased, whereas E + P increased RyR3 mRNA levels. These results indicate that RyR is expressed and hormonally regulated in the rat pituitary and suggest that it might play a role in mediating GnRH-induced gonadotropin synthesis and secretion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GnRH REGULATES the synthesis and secretion of the gonadotropins, LH and FSH. Upon binding to the G protein-coupled GnRH receptor in pituitary gonadotropes (1), GnRH activates multiple signaling pathways (2). Activation of phospholipase C leads to the formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol. Subsequently, IP3 causes the release of intracellular calcium, and diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C (PKC), resulting in multiple cellular responses to GnRH (3).

GnRH-mediated LH release from the pituitary is calcium-dependent (reviewed in Ref.4). LH secretion is biphasic and parallels changes in cytosolic calcium levels. The initial spike phase of LH release is dependent on intracellular calcium stores, whereas the later sustained phase appears to be primarily dependent on influx of extracellular calcium through the voltage-sensitive and -insensitive calcium channels (5, 6). In addition, increased intracellular calcium levels may also play a role in GnRH-stimulated gene transcription (7), which may involve activation of calcium-dependent isoforms of PKC or other calcium-dependent kinases.

The ryanodine and the IP3 receptors are Ca2+-permeable channels that are associated with intracellular organelles. Both types of receptors mediate the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and increase cytosolic Ca2+ in response to many different extracellular stimuli, including hormones and neurotransmitters (8, 9, 10). The RyR was initially described in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle (RyR1), and subsequently in cardiac muscle (RyR2), and brain (RyR3) (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Although several signaling pathways can activate the RyR, calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) is the primary mediator in most cell types (16). Recent evidence indicates that in addition to their ability to rapidly adapt to successive increases in the intracellular concentration of calcium, RyRs are also regulated by phosphorylation (17). Although there are no reports of RyR expression in the pituitary, the use of high doses of ryanodine to antagonize RyR function decreased GH releasing hexapeptide (GHRP)-stimulated calcium release (18). In addition, ruthenium red, a relatively selective RyR antagonist, has been shown to inhibit GnRH-mediated LH secretion (19). We hypothesized that the initial burst of GnRH-induced calcium release (3) might trigger CICR events involving the RyR in gonadotrope cells. In this report, we demonstrate that the RyR is expressed in the pituitary and performed functional studies to determine whether it might be involved in GnRH signaling.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vivo studies
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (180–220 g) were housed in groups of three to five animals per cage in a temperature-controlled room, with lights on from 0500–1900 h. Animals had free access to tap water and standard laboratory chow at all times. The estrous cycles of the animals used in RT-PCR studies were monitored daily through examination of vaginal cytology. Hormone levels in this group of animals (n = 3–4 time points) have been described previously (20).

Hormone replacements in an estrogen-induced gonadotropin surge model have been described previously (21). Briefly, animals were OVX bilaterally 10–12 days before the experiments. Three days before experiments, animals received either a blank or 17ß-estradiol-filled sc SILASTIC brand capsule (Dow Corning, Midland, MI; id, 0.062 in.; od, 0.125 in.; 5 mm in length). At 1130h on the morning of the experiments, rats received an injection of progesterone (P) (5 mg, sc) or an equivalent volume of sesame oil. At 1330 h, an ip injection of pentobarbital (40 mg/kg BW) or saline was administered. Anterior pituitary glands were removed at 1800 h on the day of experiments and frozen in liquid nitrogen. RyR3 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were then examined in the following groups of animals (n = 3/group): 1) ovariectomized (OVX) animals; 2) OVX E-primed animals; 3) OVX E-primed animals that were given an injection of pentobarbital to block GnRH neurosecretion; and 4) OVX E-primed animals that were given an injection of P on the morning of experiments.

RT-PCR analyses
RNA was isolated from anterior pituitary glands by centrifugation through cesium chloride or using Tri Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). In the cesium chloride protocol, individual pituitaries were homogenized in 2 ml of 4 M guanidine thiocyanate (GTC) that was overlaid on a 5.7 M cesium chloride cushion (22). After centrifugation at 36,000 rpm for 4 h at 25 C, the RNA pellet was solubilized in 0.1% SDS, and purified by ethanol precipitation. For extraction of RNA using Tri Reagent, individual pituitaries were homogenized in 1 ml of Tri Reagent and total cellular RNA was isolated from pituitary homogenates using the protocol of the supplier. RNA pellets were resuspended and treated with RQ1 deoxyribonuclease (1 U/mg RNA; Promega, Madison, WI) for 20 min at 37 C. Deoxyribonuclease was removed by phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol extraction (pH 5.2). Final RNA concentrations were determined by optical density at 260 nm, and integrity was verified by ethidium bromide staining of ribosomal 28S and 18S bands on an agarose gel.

RNA (1 µg) from each individual pituitary gland was converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) using 11.25 U of AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega) and random hexamers to prime the reaction. Control reactions were identical except for the omission of reverse transcriptase in one set of reactions to control for amplification of genomic DNA.

Oligonucleotide primers were used to amplify 480 bp of RyR1 and 430 bp of RyR2 and RyR3 cDNAs from RT products. The primers used for amplification of RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3 were based on the sequences for the corresponding receptors in the mouse (23): RyR1, 5'-GTTCCGG-TGCTGGGGACATG-3' and 5'-TGTGGGCTGTGATCTCCAGA-3'; RyR2, 5'-ACTGCTAAAGTGACCAACAG-3 and 5'-TTGCATCGCTGAAATCTAGT-3'; RyR3, 5'-GTTGCAAACCTGTGGAACTC-3' and 5'-CTACTGGGCTAAAGTCAAGG-3'. Primers for a similarly sized fragment (500 bp) of the rat ribosomal protein L19 (RPL19) cDNA were included to control for reaction efficiency and variations in mRNA concentration in the original RT reaction.

Before PCR amplification, 2, 4, 8, or 16 µl of each RT product were brought to a volume of 20 µl with RT diluent that contained concentrations of buffer, MgCl2 and dNTPs identical to those of the original RT reaction. Preliminary experiments indicated that these dilutions produced PCR products that were linear with respect to starting concentrations of RyR3 and RPL19 cDNAs. Preliminary assays were also conducted to determine the optimal number of cycles necessary for producing PCR products within the exponential phase of amplification. Based upon the results of these experiments, a two-step PCR was chosen for amplification of RyR3. For the first round of amplification, primers for RyR3 (20 pmol of each primer) were added to the diluted RT product along with 0.1 µl [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP (New England Nuclear Corp., Boston, MA), 1 x Taq polymerase buffer (Promega), 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), and the reaction was brought to a volume of 50 µl in distilled water. The reaction mix was overlaid with 75 µl mineral oil and amplified for six cycles in a programmable thermocycler (M. J. Research, Cambridge, MA). The amplification cycle consisted of denaturation at 94 C for 1 min, annealing at 55 C for 1 min, and extension at 72 C for 1 min. In a second round of amplification, primers for RPL19 (20 pmol of each primer) and 1.25 U Taq polymerase, in 50 µl of 1 x Taq polymerase buffer, were added to the product of the first round of amplification and amplified for another 26 cycles under the same conditions. An aliquot (25 µl) of each PCR reaction was subjected to electrophoresis through a 6% polyacrylamide gel, and bands were quantitated using a BAS1000 PhosphorImager (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Japan). Data at each timepoint or treatment group was calculated as the mean ratio of RyR3 to RPL19 mRNA for at least three successive dilutions. Group means were generated, and one-way ANOVA was used for estrous cycle measurements followed by post-hoc analyses using Fisher’s protected least significant difference test (Statview software, Berkeley, CA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Studies of LH secretion
Perifusion experiments were conducted as described previously (24). Perifused primary pituitary cells were stimulated with 10 min pulses of 10 nM GnRH every 20 min, either in the presence or absence of a ryanodine receptor antagonist, ruthenium red (10 µM). Column effluent was collected in 1 min fractions and assayed for rat LH (25). Secretory baselines were calculated as the mean hormone released in the four fractions preceding a pulse of GnRH. Secretory peaks and plateaus were calculated as hormone released in the first 6 and 8 fractions following a GnRH pulse, respectively, minus the preceding baseline. Perifusion experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Peak and plateau values from control, antagonist-treated, and washout groups were compared using Student’s t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Western blots
Anterior pituitary glands and heart tissue were isolated from male or female Sprague Dawley rats and homogenized in a solution (0.9 M NaCl, 50 mM Na-phosphate, 2.5 mM EDTA, 20 mM NaF, and 50 mM HEPES-Tris at pH 7.4; all from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) (NEHDPF solution) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 1 mM leupeptin and 1 mM antipain; all from Sigma). The homogenate was spun at 13,000 x g for 15 min at 4 C and the supernatant was centrifuged at 150,000 x g for 60 min at 4 C to isolate the microsomal fraction. The pellet was sonicated in 1% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethyl-ammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) in NEHDPF solution containing protease inhibitors. Cardiac and pituitary microsomal proteins (100 µg) were subjected to electrophoresis through a 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by electrophoretic transfer at 1.3 A for 60 min. The membrane was incubated with G43 polyclonal antibody (1:300 dilution; a gift from Dr. Kevin Campbell, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA) that recognizes the cardiac and brain isoforms of the ryanodine receptor. Following subsequent incubations with a secondary antibody (rabbit antigoat IgG at a dilution of 1:2000; Pierce Immunochemicals, Rockford, IL) and antirabbit horse radish peroxide-conjugated tertiary antibody (1:5000; Amersham Life Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL), detection was performed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham).

Transient expression studies
Primary pituitary cells were cultured and transfected as described previously (26). Cultures of primary pituitary cells were transfected with a reporter gene containing 846 bp of 5'-flanking sequence and 44 bp of exon 1 of the human glycoprotein {alpha}-gene linked to the luciferase gene in the plasmid pA3LUC (20 µg/well), by the calcium phosphate precipitation method (27, 28). Cells were exposed to the DNA precipitate in culture medium for 6 h at 37 C. After 24 h treatment without or with 10-8 M GnRH analog (Des-Gly10,[D-Ala6]GnRH ethylamide; Sigma; referred to as GnRH), in the presence or absence of ruthenium red (10 µM), cells were harvested and luciferase activity assays were performed as described before (26). The values are expressed as relative light units.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of RyR isoforms in the rat pituitary
RT-PCR analysis was performed to determine whether the mRNAs for the ryanodine receptor isoforms RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3 were expressed in the pituitary. RNA extracted from rat heart and skeletal muscle were used as positive controls for RyR2 and RyR3, respectively. RyR2 and RyR3 mRNAs were expressed in both male and female rat pituitaries, but RyR1 mRNA was absent or poorly expressed in this tissue (Fig. 1AGo). RyR2 and RyR3 were also expressed in {alpha}T3–1 cells (data not shown), a pituitary cell line that is derived from the gonadotrope lineage (29).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Ryanodine receptor expression in the pituitary. A, The expression of ryanodine receptor isoforms RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3 was assessed by RT-PCR using male and female rat pituitary RNA. Rat skeletal muscle and cardiac RNA were included as positive controls for RyR1 and RyR2, respectively. The arrow indicates the position of the amplified products. ± indicates presence or absence of reverse transcriptase in the RT reaction. B, Western blot analysis of RyR expression. Pituitary and cardiac (positive control) microsomal fractions were run on a 4% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with G43 polyclonal antibody (Fig. 1BGo). The arrow indicates the position of the ryanodine receptor band (mol mass, 560 kDa).

 
Immunoblots were performed on microsomal fractions isolated from rat pituitaries to determine whether RyR protein was produced (Fig. 1BGo). Cardiac microsomal protein was used as a positive control because the G43 antibody has been shown to recognize the cardiac isoform in addition to the brain isoform (11). A band corresponding to the ryanodine receptor (mol mass, ~560 kDa) was detected by the antibody in both the cardiac and pituitary microsomal fractions. A lower band (~200 kDa) was seen in both lanes and may represent a proteolytic fragment of the receptor that is still recognized by the antibody.

Effect of ruthenium red on GnRH-induced LH secretion
The role of the RyR in GnRH-induced LH release was analyzed using a perifusion system. Primary pituitary cells were treated with 10 min pulses of GnRH every 20 min, either in the presence or absence of ruthenium red (10 µM), an antagonist of the ryanodine receptor (9) (Fig. 2AGo). Media fractions were collected every minute throughout the experiment, to enable high resolution monitoring of LH secretion. In the initial phase of the experiment, cells received GnRH pulses alone. In the second phase, cells were treated with ruthenium red in addition to receiving GnRH pulses. In the final phase of the experiment, the antagonist was withdrawn to assess the ability of the cells to recover from antagonist treatment. GnRH treatment resulted in a biphasic pattern of LH release, consisting of a rapid spike phase followed by a sustained plateau phase. Treatment with ruthenium red resulted in a 40% decrease in the spike phase of GnRH-induced LH release. This effect of ruthenium red was reversed upon removal of the antagonist (the washout phase) (Fig. 2BGo). The plateau phase of LH release was decreased 35% in presence of ruthenium red, but this effect was not reversed after removal of the antagonist (Fig. 2BGo). The basal level of LH release was unchanged throughout the course of the experiment.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of ruthenium red on GnRH-mediated LH secretion. A, LH secretion from male rat pituitary cells was examined in a perifusion system. The initial control phase was followed by treatment with ruthenium red (indicated by the arrow) (10 µM) beginning at 125 min. GnRH (10 nM) pulses were administered every 20 min throughout the course of the experiment. In the last phase of the experiment, ruthenium red was withdrawn beginning at 245 min. The solid gray bars indicate administration of a GnRH pulse. Note that the scale of the X-axis is broken to accommodate changes in medium and to allow better graphic display of LH pulses. B, Quantitation of LH released in response to GnRH. Profile of LH secretion before, during, and after treatment with ruthenium red. Data shown are mean ± SEM, for four or six pulses per group.

 
Effect of ruthenium red on GnRH-induced {alpha}-LUC activity
The GnRH-responsive {alpha}-promoter was next used to determine the role of the RyR in GnRH-induced transcriptional activation (26). Primary pituitary cells were transfected with the -846{alpha}-LUC reporter gene and were treated with GnRH (10 nM) either in the presence or absence of ruthenium red (10 µM). Ruthenium red caused an 85% decrease in GnRH responsiveness (Fig. 3AGo). The activity of a control viral promoter, RSV-LUC, was not decreased by treatment with ruthenium red, indicating that the antagonist did not cause a nonspecific reduction in reporter gene expression (Fig. 3BGo).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of ruthenium red on GnRH-induced activation of {alpha}-LUC activity. Female primary pituitary cells were transfected with (A) -846{alpha}LUC (20 µg/well), or (B) RSV-LUC (5 µg/well) in the presence or absence of ruthenium red (10 µM) with or without 10 nM GnRH for 24 h. After treatments, cells were assayed for luciferase activity. Results are the mean ± SEM of triplicate transfections.

 
Hormonal regulation of RyR mRNA levels in vivo
Because GnRH responsiveness differs in male and female rats and varies in response to gonadal steroids (30), RyR3 mRNA expression was measured in pituitary RNA extracted from male and random cycling female rats by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 4Go, A and B). Females expressed 30% lower levels of RyR3 in the pituitary than males (Fig. 4CGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RT-PCR of RyR3 mRNA levels. A, Representative autoradiograph of PCR products generated with 2, 4, 8, and 16 µl RT product from male rat pituitary RNA. Primers were used to amplify a 430-bp fragment of RyR3 cDNA (bottom band) and a 500-bp fragment of RPL19 cDNA (top band) within the same PCR reaction. RyR3 was amplified for six cycles initially before the addition of RPL19 primers and amplification was continued for an additional 26 cycles. B, Quantitative results from a representative dilution curve of RyR3 and RPL19 cDNAs amplified from a given RT product. Both RyR3 and RPL19 cDNAs were amplified in a linear fashion with respect to starting concentrations of RT product. C, Comparison of RyR3 mRNA levels in male and female rat pituitaries. Data are represented as a ratio of expression of RyR3 to RPL19 (internal standard) and results shown are mean ± SEM for an n = 3 for each sex.

 
RT-PCR analysis was also performed on pituitary RNA isolated from cycling female rats at different stages of the estrous cycle. Levels of RyR3 mRNA expression were 90% higher on the morning of estrus (Est, 0900 h), and 65% higher on the midnight of proestrus (Pro 2400 h), compared with the morning of metestrus (Met 0900 h) (Fig. 5Go). Also, the levels on Est 0900 h were 60% higher than those on the morning of proestrus (Pro 0900 h). A similar pattern of pituitary RyR2 mRNA expression was observed across the estrous cycle (data not shown).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Changes in RyR3 mRNA expression and gonadal steroid levels during the rat estrous cycle. Quantitative measurements of RyR3 mRNA levels were performed at the indicated times of the estrous cycle. Data are represented as percentage change in RyR3 mRNA levels relative to those seen at Met 0900 h. Results shown are mean ± SEM for an n = 3 or 4 for each time point. *, P < 0.05 vs. levels at Met 0900 h. {Delta}, P < 0.05 vs. levels at Pro 0900 h. Serum progesterone and estradiol levels are shown for these animals, as previously reported (20).

 
Because the levels of RyR3 mRNA expression varied across the estrous cycle, the effects of sex steroids were assessed using a steroid replacement model in OVX rats, as described previously (21). In this model, E-priming of OVX rats results in an elevation in plasma LH levels which peaks by 1800 h on the afternoon of experiments. One group of E-primed rats was given P on the morning of experiments, and another group was given pentobarbital on the afternoon of experiments to block hypothalamic GnRH secretion. In each group, RyR3 mRNA levels were examined at 1800 h on the day of experiments. OVX rats that were E-primed expressed 50% lower levels of RyR3 mRNA in comparison with OVX rats. RyR3 mRNA expression was 2-fold higher in E-primed rats that were treated with P vs. control OVX rats, and 4-fold higher than levels in OVX E-primed rats (Fig. 6Go). Also, RyR3 mRNA expression was 1.8-fold higher in OVX E-primed animals that received pentobarbital relative to those that were given a control saline injection.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Hormonal control of RyR3 expression in vivo. RyR3 mRNA levels were measured in pituitaries isolated at 1800 h on the day of experiments from ovariectomized (OVX) animals, OVX E-primed animals, OVX E-primed animals treated with P, and OVX E-primed animals treated with pentobarbital (pento). Data are represented as percentage change in RyR3 mRNA levels vs. levels in control OVX animals. Results shown are mean ± SEM for an n = 3 or 4 for each group. *, P < 0.05 vs. levels in OVX E-primed animals treated with P. {Delta}, P < 0.05 vs. levels in OVX E-primed animals treated with pentobarbital.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GnRH responsiveness of the gonadotrope cell varies markedly in response to changes in the hormonal milieu. Exposure to pulsatile GnRH at the correct dose and frequency causes priming of gonadotrope secretory responses (31, 32). On the other hand, continuous exposure to GnRH causes desensitization (33). In addition to GnRH, gonadal steroids like estrogen and progesterone can alter gonadotrope sensitivity to GnRH (34, 35, 36). These hormonal effects on gonadotrope responsiveness have led to intensive investigation of intracellular signaling pathways that are activated by GnRH (2, 3, 37, 38, 39, 40). Among other effects, GnRH increases cytosolic calcium levels, induces calcium oscillations and results in the activation of PKC (4, 7, 32, 41, 42, 43). Both intracellular and extracellular calcium stores are essential to maintain secretory responses in gonadotropes (38, 44). The initial spike phase of GnRH-induced gonadotropin release is dependent upon mobilization of intracellular calcium, whereas the sustained plateau phase of secretion requires the influx of extracellular calcium. The major intracellular agonist-sensitive pool of calcium can be depleted by treatment with thapsigargin, which blocks the Ca2+-ATPase pump on the endoplasmic reticulum (45). This depletion results in loss of the spike phase of GnRH-induced secretion. Similarly, preventing extracellular calcium entry either by treating with nifedipine or by using calcium-free media, results in loss of the plateau phase. Because the IP3 receptor is expressed on the endoplasmic reticulum, and IP3 has been shown in other systems to mobilize calcium from the thapsigargin-sensitive pool, it is likely that IP3 mediates the initial release of intracellular calcium in response to activation of the G protein-coupled GnRH receptor.

We hypothesized that calcium released through the IP3 receptor might trigger the activation of the RyR, which has been shown to be responsive to calcium-induced calcium release mechanisms (16). Ruthenium red, a well-known inhibitor of the RyR, was used in the current experiments to block calcium release that is mediated by the RyR. Ruthenium red has been shown to bind to the RyR at sites that overlap domains that are also involved in calcium and calmodulin binding (46). Although it has been suggested that ruthenium red may have poor membrane permeability (47), it has been shown to displace more than half of 3H-ryanodine binding in competition experiments in intact cells, indicating that there is at least partial uptake of ruthenium red into the cells (48). Treatment with ruthenium red caused a reversible decrease in the spike phase and an irreversible decrease in the plateau phase of GnRH-induced LH secretion (Fig. 2Go), without measurably altering basal secretion levels. Inhibition of calcium release via the RyR likely accounts for the reduction in secretion during the spike phase. However, these observations need to be qualified by the possibility that ruthenium red might have other cellular targets in addition to the RyR. For this reason, it will be of interest to further explore the effects of other agents that act upon the ryanodine receptor. For example, caffeine stimulates the ryanodine receptor, and we have found that caffeine enhances GnRH-mediated LH secretion (data not shown). And, ryanodine itself functions initially as an agonist but acts as an antagonist at high doses and with prolonged exposure (49).

It is interesting to note that the reduction in the plateau height of LH secretion was not reversed upon removal of ruthenium red. This result indicates that calcium release during the spike and plateau phases are differentially regulated, or that there may be more than one site of action for ruthenium red. Recently, a functional coupling between the ryanodine receptor and L-type calcium channels has been demonstrated in neurons (50). Thus, it is possible that ruthenium red may exert additional effects on calcium signaling indirectly by inhibiting the ryanodine receptor. It is unlikely that ruthenium red exerted a toxic effect at the dose administered, since LH secretion was reversible upon removal of the antagonist.

An independent endpoint of GnRH action is the activation of gonadotropin gene expression. It has been proposed that in addition to the PKC (37, 41) and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways (51, 52), certain calcium-dependent kinases such as calcium-calmodulin kinase (CaM kinase) may also be activated by GnRH (52). The transcriptional effects of GnRH likely reflect the integration of signals transmitted through these different pathways (2, 40). We used the glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit promoter as a reporter gene for GnRH-induced transcriptional responses (26, 28, 53). Data from our transfection experiments indicate that treatment with ruthenium red leads to a marked reduction in the stimulation of the {alpha}-subunit gene promoter by GnRH. This effect could result from the inhibition of a calcium-dependent isoform of PKC or a calcium-calmodulin kinase, that may be essential for transcriptional induction (40, 42, 51, 52). As noted above, it remains possible that ruthenium red has effects on proteins other than the ryanodine receptor. The loss of {alpha}-LUC activity was not due to cell toxicity as the activity of a control viral promoter, RSV-LUC, was not decreased after antagonist treatment. Thus, the ryanodine receptor may play a role in GnRH-mediated transcription as well as LH secretion.

The RT-PCR studies show that the RyR2 and RyR3 mRNAs are expressed at levels that are comparable with those seen in control tissues (heart, muscle) (Fig. 1Go). The pituitary cell types that express the RyR remain to be established. The fact that both types of RyRs are expressed in {alpha}T3–1 cells is consistent with expression in gonadotrope cells (data not shown), but double-labeled immunohistological analyses will be required to definitively establish cell type expression.

We considered the possibility that RyR expression might vary during estrous cycle (Fig. 5Go). RyR3 mRNA levels declined between diestrus 0900 h and proestrus 0900 h, then increased gradually during the day of proestrus before reaching a peak at 0900 h on estrus. These changes in expression appeared to follow the changes in progesterone levels that occur during the estrous cycle, suggesting a possible role for progesterone in the regulation of RyR gene expression. Whether these cyclic changes in RyR mRNA are reflected at the protein level remains to be determined.

To further examine the roles of ovarian steroids in regulating RyR3 mRNA expression, a model of steroid replacement in ovariectomized rats was used (21). In this model, it is possible to study the effects of individual ovarian steroids in the absence of endogenous hormone production from the ovaries. The potential effects of GnRH on RyR3 mRNA expression were examined by using a pentobarbital block of hypothalamic neurosecretion. Estrogen priming alone suppressed RyR3 mRNA levels when compared with OVX rats, whereas additional treatment with progesterone caused a 2-fold increase over levels seen in OVX rats that were not given either estrogen or progesterone. These results are consistent with the idea that the preovulatory increase in progesterone mediates the rise in RyR3 mRNA expression seen on proestrus evening. A regulatory effect of progesterone on the pattern of cytosolic calcium signaling has been reported previously (54). A short-term progesterone treatment (3 h) increased cytosolic calcium signals in estrogen-treated gonadotropes from OVX animals, whereas prolonged exposure (48 h) decreased [Ca2+]i responses in these cells. These changes in cytosolic calcium levels paralleled the effects of estrogen and progesterone on GnRH-induced secretory responses (36, 55). The regulation of RyR mRNA levels by estrogen and progesterone observed in the current study provides one mechanism by which ovarian steroids may modulate the calcium signaling pathway in gonadotropes. Interestingly, pentobarbital treatment of OVX estrogen-primed rats caused an increase in RyR mRNA levels relative to those seen in OVX or OVX estrogen-primed rats. This effect suggests that, in addition to the suppression by estrogen, a surge in GnRH levels may also down-regulate RyR3 mRNA expression. The significance of the alterations in RyR3 mRNA levels across the estrous cycle requires further investigation. In addition, these studies of mRNA expression may not necessarily be paralleled by changes in RyR protein. Unfortunately, the large size of the RyR protein impairs transfer in Western blots, making it difficult to quantitate changes in protein levels. It will be of interest to determine whether blocking calcium release via the RyR in vivo will alter the nature of the gonadotropin surges.

In summary, our results demonstrate that the ryanodine receptor is expressed and hormonally regulated in the pituitary. In addition, the experiments employing ruthenium red suggest that it may play a functional role in mediating GnRH action. The mechanism by which RyR activity is regulated in gonadotropes remains to be addressed. For instance, the channel adaptation properties of the RyR have been shown to be regulated by PKA-phosphorylation in cardiac myocytes (17). In this system, phosphorylation by PKA is thought to increase the sensitivity of the RyR to a stimulus and to enhance RyR responsiveness to subsequent triggers. Whether such a phosphorylation mechanism may play a role in the activation-inactivation kinetics of the ryanodine and the IP3 receptors in gonadotropes is an intriguing possibility. These results also raise the possibility of the involvement of the RyR in secretory events stimulated by other agonists, which transduce their actions via G protein-coupled receptor systems.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Brigitte Mann and Stephanie Kluge for performing the LH RIAs, Dr. Srikantan Nagarajan for assistance with statistical analyses, and Dr. Kevin Campbell for the gift of the RyR antibody. We also thank Drs. Teresa Woodruff and Leslie Besecke for helpful suggestions.

Received November 15, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tsutsumi M, Zhou W, Millar RP, Mellon PL, Roberts JL, Flanagan CA 1992 Cloning and functional expression of a mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 6:1163–1169[Abstract]
  2. Horn F, Bilezikjian LM, Perrin MH, Bosma MM, Windle JJ, Huber KS, Blount AL, Hille B, Vale W, Mellon PL 1991 Intracellular responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in a clonal cell line of gonadotrope lineage. Mol Endocrinol 5:347–355[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Stojilkovic SS, Reinhardt J, Catt KJ 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: structure and signal transduction pathways. Endocr Rev 15:462–499[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ 1992 Calcium oscillations in anterior pituitary cells. Endocr Rev 13:256–280[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tasaka K, Stojilkovic SS, Izumi S-I, Catt KJ 1988 Biphasic activation of cytosolic free calcium and LH response by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 154:398–403[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hansen JR, McArdle CA, Conn PM 1987 Relative roles of calcium derived from intra- and extracellular sources in dynamic LH release from perifused pituitary cells. Mol Endocrinol 1:808–815[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Cesnjaj M, Catt KJ, Stojilkovic SS 1994 Coordinate actions of calcium and protein kinase-C in the expression of primary response genes in pituitary gonadotrophs. Endocrinology 135:692–701[Abstract]
  8. Ehrlich BE 1995 Functional properties of intracellular calcium release channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:304–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ehrlich BE, Kaftan E, Bezprozvannaya S, Bezprozvanny I 1994 The pharmacology of intracellular Ca2+ -release channels. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:145–149[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Sorrentino V, Volpe P 1993 Ryanodine receptors: how many, where and why? Trends Pharmacol Sci 14:98–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. McPherson PS, Campbell KP 1993 Characterization of the major brain form of the ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel. J Biol Chem 268:19785–19790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Marks AR, Tempst P, Hwang KS, Taubman MB, Inui M, Chadwick C, Fleischer S, Nadal-Girnard B 1989 Molecular cloning and characterization of the ryanodine receptor/junctional channel complex cDNA from skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:8683–8687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Otsu K, Willard HF, Khanna VK, Zorzato F, Green NM, MacLennan DH 1990 Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 265:13472–13483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. McPherson PS, Campbell KP 1990 Solubilization and biochemical characterization of the high affinity [3H]ryanodine receptor from rabbit brain membranes. J Biol Chem 265:18454–18460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hakamata Y, Nakai J, Takeshima H, Imoto K 1992 Primary structure and distribution of a novel ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel from rabbit brain. FEBS Lett 312:229–235[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Coronado R, Morrissette J, Sukhareva M, Vaughan D 1994 Structure and function of ryanodine receptors. Am J Physiol C1485–C1504
  17. Valdivia HH, Kaplan JH, Ellis-Davies GCR, Lederer WJ 1995 Rapid adaptation of cardiac ryanodine receptors: modulation by Mg2+ and phosphorylation. Science 267:1997–2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Herrington J, Hille B 1994 Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide elevates intracellular calcium in rat somatotropes by two mechanisms. Endocrinology 135:1100–1108[Abstract]
  19. Marian J, Conn PM 1979 Gonadotropin releasing hormone stimulation of cultured pituitary cells requires calcium. Mol Pharmacol 16:196–201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bauer-Dantoin AC, Hollenberg AN, Jameson JL 1993 Dynamic regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary gland during the rat estrous cycle. Endocrinology 133:1911–1914[Abstract]
  21. Bauer-Dantoin AC, Weiss J, Jameson JL 1995 Roles of estrogen, progesterone, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the control of pituitary GnRH receptor gene expression at the time of the preovulatory gonadotropin surges. Endocrinology 136:1014–1019[Abstract]
  22. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ 1979 Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:5294–5299[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Giannini G, Conti A, Mammarella S, Scrobogna M, Sorrentino V 1995 The ryanodine receptor/calcium channel genes are widely and differentially expressed in murine brain and peripheral tissues. J Cell Biol 128:893–904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Weiss J, Cote CR, Jameson JL, Crowley WF 1995 Homologous desensitization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion in vitro occurs within the duration of an endogenous GnRH pulse. Endocrinology 136:138–143[Abstract]
  25. Weiss J, Duca KA, Crowley W 1990 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced stimulation and desensitization of free {alpha}-subunit secretion mirrors luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in perifused rat pituitary cells. Endocrinology 127:2364–2371[Abstract]
  26. Colin IM, Bauer-Dantoin AC, Sundaresan S, Kopp P, Jameson JL 1996 Sexually dimorphic transcriptional responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone require chronic in vivo exposure to estradiol. Endocrinology 137:2300–2307[Abstract]
  27. Graham FL, van der Eb AJ 1973 Transformation of rat cells by DNA of human adenovirus 5. Virology 52:456–87[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Burrin JM, Jameson JL 1989 Regulation of transfected glycoprotein hormone alpha-gene expression in primary pituitary cell cultures. Mol Endocrinol 3:1643–1651[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Windle JJ, Weiner RI, Mellon PL 1990 Cell lines of the pituitary gonadotrope lineage derived by targeted oncogenesis in transgenic mice. Mol Endocrinol 4:597–603[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Fallest P, Hiatt E, Schwartz N 1989 Effects of gonadectomy on the in vitro and in vivo gonadotropin responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in male and female rats. Endocrinology 124:1370–1379[Abstract]
  31. Waring DW, Turgeon JL 1992 A pathway for luteinizing hormone releasing-hormone self potentiation: cross-talk with the progesterone receptor. Endocrinology 130:3275–3282[Abstract]
  32. Marshall JC, Kelch RP 1986 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: role of pulsatile secretion in the regulation of reproduction. N Engl J Med 315:1459–68[Medline]
  33. Belchetz P, Plant T, Hakai Y, Keough E, Knobil E 1978 Hypophysial responses to continuous and intermittent delivery of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Science 202:631–633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Clarke IJ, Cummins JT 1984 Direct pituitary effects of estrogen and progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in the ovariectomized ewe. Neuroendocrinology 39:267–74[Medline]
  35. Moenter SM, Caraty A, Karsch FJ 1990 The estradiol-induced surge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe. Endocrinology 127:1375–84[Abstract]
  36. Turgeon JL, Waring DL 1990 Rapid augmentation by progesterone of agonist-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion by cultured pituitary cells. Endocrinology 127:773–780[Abstract]
  37. Conn PM, Crowley WF 1991 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its analogues. N Engl J Med 324:93–103[Medline]
  38. Naor Z, Capponi AM, Rossier MF, Ayalon D, Limor R 1988 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced rise in cytosolic free Ca2+ levels: mobilization of cellular and extracellular Ca2+ pools and relationship to gonadotropin secretion. Mol Endocrinol 2:512–520[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Hille B, Tse A, Tse FW, Bosma MM 1995 Signaling mechanisms during the response of pituitary gonadotropes to GnRH. Res Prog Horm Res 50:75–95
  40. Kay TW, Chedrese PJ, Jameson JL 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone causes transcriptional stimulation followed by desensitization of the glycoprotein hormone alpha promoter in transfected alpha T3 gonadotrope cells. Endocrinology 134:568–573[Abstract]
  41. Huckle WR, Conn PM 1987 The relationship between gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone release and inositol phosphate production: studies with calcium antagonists and protein kinase C activators. Endocrinology 120:160–169[Abstract]
  42. Andrews WV, Maurer RA, Conn PM 1988 Stimulation of rat luteinizing hormone-beta messenger RNA levels by gonadotropin releasing hormone. Apparent role for protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 263:13755–61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Stojilkovic SS, Iida T, Merelli F, Torsello A, Krsmanovic LZ, Catt KJ 1991 Interactions between calcium and protein kinase C in the control of signaling and secretion in pituitary gonadotrophs. J Biol Chem 266:10377–10384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Chang JP, Stojilkovic SS, Graeter JS, Catt KJ 1988 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulates luteinizing hormone secretion by extracellular calcium-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endocrinology 123:87–97[Abstract]
  45. McArdle CA, Poch A 1992 Dependence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone release upon intracellular Ca2+ pools is revealed by desensitization and thapsigargin blockade. Endocrinology 130:3567–3574[Abstract]
  46. Chen SR, MacLennan DH 1994 Identification of calmodulin-, Ca(2+)-, and ruthenium red-binding domains in the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 269:22698–704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Davidson JS, Wakefield IK, King JA, Mulligan GP, Millar RP 1988 Dual pathways of calcium entry in spike and plateau phases of luteinizing hormone release from chicken pituitary cells: sequential activation of receptor-operated and voltage-sensitive calcium channels by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Mol Endocrinol 2:382–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Pessah IN, Nieberg PS, Wilson BW 1993 Ryanodine induces maturation of embryonic acetylcholinesterase forms in cultured quail myotubes. Life Sci 52:1279–1285[Medline]
  49. Thorn P, Gerasimenko O, Petersen OH 1994 Cyclic ADP-ribose regulation of ryanodine receptors involved in agonist evoked cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations in pancreatic acinar cells. EMBO J 13:2038–2043[Medline]
  50. Chavis P, Fagni L, Lansman JB, Bockaert J 1996 Functional coupling between ryanodine receptors and L-type calcium channels in neurons. Nature 382:719–722[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Sundaresan S, Colin IM, Pestell RG, Jameson JL 1996 Stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by gonadotropin-releasing hormone: evidence for the involvement of protein kinase C. Endocrinology 137:304–311[Abstract]
  52. Roberson MS, Misra-Press A, Laurance ME, Stork PJS, Maurer RA 1995 A role for mitogen-activated protein kinase in mediating activation of the glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Mol Cell Biol 15:3531–3539[Abstract]
  53. Kay TWH, Jameson JL 1992 Identification of a gonadotropin releasing hormone-responsive region in the glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit promoter. Mol Endocrinol 6:1767–1773[Abstract]
  54. Ortmann O, Stojilkovic SS, Cesnjaj M, Emons G, Catt KJ 1992 Modulation of cytoplasmic calcium signaling in rat pituitary gonadotrophs by estradiol and progesterone. Endocrinology 131:1565–1567[Abstract]
  55. Ortmann O, Wiese H, Knuppen R, Emons G 1989 Acute facilitatory action of progesterone on gonadotropin secretion of perifused rat pituitary cells. Acta Endocrinol 121:426–434



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. M. Soares, M. Thompson, and E. N. Chini
Role of the Second-Messenger Cyclic-Adenosine 5'-Diphosphate-Ribose on Adrenocorticotropin Secretion from Pituitary Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2186 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Yamamori, Y. Iwasaki, Y. Oki, M. Yoshida, M. Asai, M. Kambayashii, Y. Oiso, and N. Nakashima
Possible Involvement of Ryanodine Receptor-Mediated Intracellular Calcium Release in the Effect of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor on Adrenocorticotropin Secretion
Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 36 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
F. A. Antoni, A. A. Sosunov, A. Haunso, J. M. Paterson, and J. Simpson
Short-Term Plasticity of Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Signaling in Anterior Pituitary Corticotrope Cells: The Role of Adenylyl Cyclase Isotypes
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2003; 17(4): 692 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
B. S. Moonga, S. Li, J. Iqbal, R. Davidson, V. S. Shankar, P. J. R. Bevis, A. Inzerillo, E. Abe, C. L.-H. Huang, and M. Zaidi
Ca2+ influx through the osteoclastic plasma membrane ryanodine receptor
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): F921 - F932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. N.K. Yusufi, J. Cheng, M. A. Thompson, J. C. Burnett, and J. P. Grande
Differential Mechanisms of Ca2+ Release from Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Microsomes
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2002; 227(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. A. Khan, C. A. Lichtensteiger, O. Faroon, M. Mumtaz, D. J. Schaeffer, and L. G. Hansen
The Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Thyroid (HPT) Axis: A Target of Nonpersistent ortho-Substituted PCB Congeners
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2002; 65(1): 52 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. N. K. Yusufi, J. Cheng, M. A. Thompson, T. P. Dousa, G. M. Warner, H. J. Walker, and J. P. Grande
cADP-ribose/ryanodine channel/Ca2+-release signal transduction pathway in mesangial cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): F91 - F102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Tomic, T.-a. Koshimizu, D. Yuan, S. A. Andric, D. Zivadinovic, and S. S. Stojilkovic
Characterization of a Plasma Membrane Calcium Oscillator in Rat Pituitary Somatotrophs
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 1999; 274(50): 35693 - 35702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals