help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sladek, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sladek, C. D.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 5 2089-2097
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Articles

Gonadal Steroid Modulation of Vasopressin Secretion in Response to Osmotic Stimulation1

Kerry L. Swenson and Celia D. Sladek

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Illinois 60064

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Celia D. Sladek, Ph.D., Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, Illinois 60064. E-mail: sladekc{at}mis.finchcms.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As deficiencies in osmotic stimulation of vasopressin (VP) messenger RNA (mRNA) content in castrated rats have been reported, experiments were performed to determine whether castration altered osmotically stimulated VP release in vitro. Perifused explants of the hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system were obtained from sham and gonadectomized male rats. There were no significant differences in VP release stimulated by a ramp increase in the osmolality of the culture medium between the two groups. As testosterone was undetectable in the perifusion medium, the effect of addition of testosterone on osmotically stimulated VP release was evaluated. Testosterone (3 ng/ml) and its metabolites, estradiol (50 pg/ml) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 3 ng/ml), inhibited osmotically stimulated VP release in hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system explants. The osmotically induced increase in VP mRNA content was also inhibited by testosterone and estradiol, but not by DHT. Neither estradiol nor DHT affected stimulus-secretion coupling of hormone secretion, because they did not inhibit KCl (25 mM)-stimulated VP release. BSA conjugates of estradiol (200 nM) and DHT (10 mM) also inhibited osmotically stimulated VP release, and VP mRNA content was inhibited by BSA-estradiol, but not by BSA-DHT, suggesting nongenomic actions of the steroids. The differential effects of estradiol and DHT on VP mRNA imply distinct actions for these steroids, and the DHT mechanism uncouples regulation of VP release from VP mRNA content.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE RELEASE of vasopressin (VP) from secretory granules in nerve terminals of the posterior pituitary is stimulated by an increase in plasma osmolality (1, 2). Osmoreceptive neurons, located in the anterior hypothalamus (3), monitor the osmolality of extracellular fluid and activate the VP nerve cell bodies in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei, causing an increase in hormone secretion. The VP messenger RNA (mRNA) content in these nuclei also increases with osmotic stimulation (4, 5, 6). In rats, oxytocin (OT) release (7, 8, 9) and mRNA content (10) are stimulated by an increase in osmolality as well.

Evidence for modulation of these osmotic responses by gonadal steroids has been obtained from in vivo studies. In early studies, contradictory results were obtained relative to the effect of castration, hormone replacement, gender, and stage of the estrous cycle on plasma VP concentration (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). More recent studies examined the effects of gonadal steroids on osmotic stimulation of VP mRNA and reported that gonadectomy prevented the increase in hypothalamic VP mRNA in response to increased osmolality in both males and females, and administration of exogenous testosterone or the testosterone metabolite, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), but not estradiol, restored the osmotic response of VP mRNA in male rats (19, 20).

To determine whether these effects of the gonadal steroids reflect direct actions on the hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system (HNS) as opposed to actions on other organ systems that might secondarily impact this system, the effect of gonadal steroids was evaluated in vitro using HNS explants. In previous studies, HNS explants have been shown to respond to increases in the osmolality of the culture medium with both an increase in VP release and an increase in VP mRNA content (21, 22). In the current experiments, HNS explants were first used to determine whether castration would alter hyperosmolar-induced VP release in vitro. Second, HNS explants were used to study the effects of testosterone and its metabolites, estradiol and DHT, on VP and OT release and VP mRNA content. All three steroid hormones were found to inhibit the increase in VP and OT release in response to an increase in osmolality. Therefore, additional experiments were performed to determine whether estradiol and DHT would have an effect on another mode of VP stimulation, exposure to potassium chloride (KCl). KCl increases VP release by directly depolarizing the neural lobe of the pituitary, thus enabling us to determine whether estradiol and DHT are acting directly on the nerve terminals. Finally, to determine whether the inhibition of osmotically stimulated VP and OT release is a genomic or nongenomic event, similar perifusion studies were performed using estradiol or DHT conjugated with BSA. Genomic mechanisms of steroids involve DNA binding and regulation of gene transcription. This requires the hormone to diffuse across the cell membrane and bind to intracellular hormone receptors (23). Nongenomic effects of steroids involve actions at the plasma membrane (24, 25) and are extracellular events. As BSA is a large molecule, the bound hormone is unable to cross the cell membrane, thus limiting its actions to the extracellular environment (26, 27).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Explant preparation
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (125–149 g) were obtained from Zivic-Miller (Portersville, PA). In the first experiment only (castration experiment), gonadectomy or sham operations were performed by Zivic-Miller 2 weeks before explant preparation to allow hormone levels to reach equilibrium. Gonadectomy was confirmed by gross visual examination and testosterone measurement of trunk blood. In all other experiments, explants were obtained from intact unoperated animals.

After decapitation, HNS explants were prepared as described previously (28). The brain and pituitary were removed from the skull using a caudal approach with the pituitary stalk still intact. Under a dissecting microscope, the anterior pituitary was removed, and a hexagonal block of tissue was dissected by cutting rostral to the optic chiasm, lateral to either side of the median eminence, and undercutting at a depth of 1–2 mm. These explants included the magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic nucleus with their axonal projections extending through the median eminence and terminating in the neural lobe. The organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) was contained in the explant as well.

Perifusion conditions
The HNS explants were then placed in individual closed chambers (500 µl), which were positioned in a multiple microchamber unit (Endotronics, Minneapolis, MN) and perifused with F-12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 20% FCS, 1 mg/ml glucose, 50 µU/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 1 x 10-4 M bacitracin. Bacitracin was added to prevent hormone degradation (29). The final osmolality of the basal medium was approximately 300 mosmol/kg H2O. The medium was warmed to 37 C and aerated with 95% O2-5% CO2 before placement of the HNS explants in the chamber and for the duration of the experiment. Six explants were perifused simultaneously at a rate of approximately 2.4 ml/h. For 10 h, effluent from each chamber was collected at 20-min intervals with a fraction collector housed in a refrigerator (4 C).

In each experiment, all chambers were perifused with basal osmolality medium (300 mosmol/kg H2O) for the first 4 h to allow stabilization of hormone release. After this equilibration period, explants were either perifused with basal osmolality medium for the remaining 6 h, exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality or exposed to 25 mM KCl. For the explants receiving the osmotic ramp, the osmolality of the medium was increased at a rate of 5 mosmol/kg H2O·h by increasing the sodium chloride concentration. This was accomplished by the use of the Endotronics Automated Perifusion System (APS 10, Endotronics, Coon Rapids, MN) that allowed manipulation of the rate of rise in osmolality. In previous experiments, HNS explants were shown to respond similarly to increases in osmolality achieved with either NaCl or mannitol (22). At the end of the 10-h perifusion period, the VP concentration in the collected fractions was determined by RIA, the osmolality was monitored by microvapor pressure osmometry (Wescor, Buffalo, NY), and all explants were frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA extraction.

In the steroid-treated groups, immediately after dissection and throughout the perifusion period, explants were continuously maintained in medium supplemented with testosterone (3 ng/ml), 17ß-estradiol (50 pg/ml), or DHT (3 ng/ml; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) dissolved in ethanol or 3-carboxymethyloxime:BSA-estradiol (200 nM) or 3-carboxymethyloxime:BSA-DHT (10 µM; Steraloids, Wilton, NH) dissolved in 50 mM Tris at pH 8.5. The steroids were covalently bound to the BSA molecules, and concentrations were used such that they were equal to the molar concentrations of the respective nonconjugated steroids. BSA-estradiol contained 30 mol steroid:1 mol BSA, whereas BSA-DHT contained 35 mol steroid:1 mol BSA. In all experiments, comparable amounts of ethanol or Tris were added to the medium perifusing the nonsteroid-treated explants. The impact of the addition of steroids on the osmolality of the medium was not a concern, because the calculated increase of 3.6 nosmol/liter is 6 orders of magnitude below either detectable or physiologically relevant changes in osmolality. Similarly, the impact of the addition of BSA in the experiments with the conjugated steroids would be minimal due to the presence of 20% FBS in the medium. Both total and free testosterone were measured by RIA in the testosterone-supplemented medium as well as in the nonsupplemented medium. These values were compared to the plasma testosterone levels measured in trunk blood collected from the sham and castrated rats.

RIAs
VP and OT.
VP and OT concentrations in the perifusate fractions were determined by RIA as previously described (30, 31). The antisera used were generated in conjunction with Arnel Products (Brooklyn, NY) and were used at a final dilution of 1:100,000. The VP assay buffer was 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.6) with 1 mg/ml BSA and 1 mg/ml sodium azide. The OT assay buffer was 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.6) with 0.5 mg/ml BSA and 1 mg/ml sodium azide. In both assays, 100- and 50-µl aliquots of effluent medium from each 20-min fraction were brought to 400 µl with buffer and assayed. The standards and samples were incubated for 72 h at 4 C in the presence of the antiserum and tracer (5,000 cpm [125I]arginine VP or 2,500 cpm [125I]; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). Antibody-bound VP or OT was separated from free hormone with dextran-coated charcoal and counted. All samples from a given experiment were assayed simultaneously. The minimum sensitivity was 1.0 pg/tube for VP and 0.5 pg/tube for OT.

Testosterone.
Both total and free testosterone double antibody assay kits were obtained (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX) and used to assay plasma testosterone in duplicate from the trunk blood of decapitated castrated and noncastrated rats as well as from the medium used in the perifusion experiments. The minimum sensitivity of the assays were 0.1 ng/ml and 0.25 pg/ml for total and free testosterone, respectively.

RNA extraction and quantification
Explants were frozen in liquid nitrogen after each perifusion experiment. Total RNA was extracted from each explant using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) and assayed in the ribonuclease (RNase) protection assay using a 32P-labeled full-length VP complementary RNA probe (680 bp) synthesized (Promega Riboprotein System) from the pGEM 4-AVP8C construct provided by T. G. Sherman, Georgetown University (Washington DC). The radiolabeled probe was purified by nucleic acid purification cartridges (New England Nuclear Research Products). As the probe hybridizes to the full-length VP mRNA as well as the neurophysin-coding portion of OT mRNA that is homologous between VP and OT, both VP and OT mRNA could be measured simultaneously in the same assay (Fig. 1Go). Total RNA from each explant was used in the hybridization.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Autoradiogram from a representative RNase protection assay demonstrating the presence of distinct VP and OT mRNA bands in RNA extracted from individual explants. These samples represent some of the explants contributing to the data in Fig. 7BGo. Autoradiograms such as this were used to identify the relative positions of the VP and OT protected RNA fragments in the gel. The appropriate portion of the gel was then cut out and placed in scintillation vials for determination of 32P counts per min. F, Fresh (nonperifused explant); C, explants perifused with control (nonsteroid-supplemented) medium; D, explants perifused with DHT-supplemented medium.

 
Each hybridization contained 6.0 µl probe, 4.0 µl (5.0 mg/ml) yeast RNA, and 20 µl formazol containing the RNA extracted from a single HNS explant. Each sample was incubated at 80–90 C for 5 min and at 55–60 C for 17 h. The samples were incubated at 37 C with RNase A and RNase T1 in RNase digestion buffer, Solution Bx (Ambion, Austin, TX), for 30 min to digest the nonhybridized RNA. The reaction was then terminated by a 30-min incubation at 37 C with 10 µl 20% SDS and 10 µl 10 mg/ml proteinase K. Protected RNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated by ethanol. The RNA pellets were stored in 70% ethanol at -70 C until use.

The complementary RNA-mRNA pellet was washed and reconstituted in 8 µl 0.5 x Tris-borate-EDTA electrophoresis buffer. The fragments were fractionated on a 1.3% agarose gel with 0.5 x Tris-borate-EDTA for 55 min at 70 mA. The gel was dried, and direct contact autoradiography was performed by exposing the gel to Kodak X-Omat XAR5 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 24–48 h (Fig. 1Go). VP and OT mRNA were quantitated by determining counts per min in cut gel fragments containing the VP and OT mRNA bands. Quality control between assays was evaluated by including standard preparations of 0, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 pg sense VP mRNA generated from the cAVP8c plasmid with each experimental group of explants as well as control preparations of mRNA from hydrated and dehydrated rats and mRNA extracted from a nonperifused explant.

Statistical analysis
In the perifusion studies, basal hormone release was calculated for each explant as the mean hormone release during the fourth hour of the equilibration period (i.e. immediately before either the osmotic ramp was started or KCl was added). VP and OT release is expressed as a percentage of this basal value, and the basal release for each group is expressed as picograms per ml. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. After log10 transformation of the data, statistical significance was tested by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by simple main effect analysis. In some cases, when these analyses indicated statistical significance, subsequent ANOVA and post-hoc mean comparisons by Newman-Keuls test were performed to establish specific group differences at individual time points. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

VP and OT mRNA content were analyzed by normalizing the counts per min in the appropriate band to one of the quality control standards included in each gel to control for variations between hybridization assays. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed as described above without the repeated measures. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of castration on VP release
Sprague-Dawley rats underwent either gonadectomy or sham operation at Zivic-Miller 2 weeks before the experiment. HNS explants from these rats underwent perifusion as described previously. At 6 h, explants from each group either received a ramp increase in osmolality or were maintained on basal medium for the entire 10-h experiment. As demonstrated in Fig. 2AGo, both the sham explants and the castrated explants had a significant increase in VP release in response to the increase in osmolality compared to their basal groups. The osmotic responses did not significantly differ from each other.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Effect of castration on VP release. There was a significant increase in VP release in the osmotically stimulated, castrated explants compared to that in the unstimulated, castrated explants (by ANOVA: F = 6.3; P = 0.0150). This response was not significantly different from the increase in VP release seen in the stimulated sham-operated group. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: castrated control, 86 ± 57; castrated and osmotically stimulated, 45 ± 13; and sham osmotically stimulated, 32 ± 11. *, P < 0.05, castrated vs. castrated and osmotically stimulated. B, Testosterone concentration. The plasma testosterone concentration in the sham rats was 4.17 ± 1.20 ng/ml (n = 9), whereas testosterone in the gonadectomized rats (n = 11) and in the perifusion medium was undetectable.

 
Gonadectomy was confirmed by testosterone RIA of the trunk blood of both sham and castrated rats. Samples of the perifusion medium were also measured to determine whether the 20% FBS might be contributing testosterone. The sham rats had an average of 4.17 ± 1.20 ng/ml total testosterone. The testosterone in the castrated rats as well as the perifusion medium was undetectable (Fig. 2BGo).

Effect of testosterone on VP and OT
To determine whether the reason why similar responses were obtained in the explants from castrated and noncastrated rats was due to the absence of testosterone in the perifusion medium, the effect of adding testosterone to the medium was evaluated. Explants from intact, unoperated rats were either maintained in testosterone (3 ng/ml)-supplemented or nonsupplemented medium throughout the entire experiment. Explants were perifused with basal medium throughout or were exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality during the last 6 h of the perifusion. Hormone release was measured by RIA, and mRNA was quantitated by the RNase protection assay. As shown in Fig. 3AGo, testosterone completely inhibited the osmotically induced increase in VP release in response to the osmotic stimulus. In addition, the increase in VP mRNA normally observed with increased osmolality was not present in the testosterone-supplemented explants (Fig. 3BGo). Testosterone had the same effects on osmotically stimulated OT release and mRNA content (Fig. 4Go). As depicted in Fig. 5Go, total and free testosterone levels found in the medium were similar to the concentration measured in trunk blood collected from rats used as explant donors.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Effect of testosterone on VP release. VP release was significantly elevated in control explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality (by ANOVA: F = 5.3; P = 0.0369; *, P < 0.05, simple main effects). This increase in VP release was not observed in the presence of testosterone (Test.). This group was not significantly different from the unstimulated groups. Basal release (picograms per ml) was not significantly altered by the presence of testosterone (by ANOVA: F = 1.8; P = NS) and was as follows: control, 45 ± 19; control osmotically stimulated, 132 ± 31; testosterone, 93 ± 51; testosterone and osmotically stimulated, 161 ± 46. B, Effect of testosterone on VP mRNA content. The VP mRNA content was significantly higher in explants exposed to an increase in osmolality in the absence of testosterone (by ANOVA: F = 11.9; P = 0.0018; *, P < 0.05 vs. all other groups, by Newman-Keuls test). The increase was not demonstrated in the presence of testosterone.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, Effect of testosterone on OT release. OT release was significantly elevated in control explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality (by ANOVA: F = 9.1; P = 0.0077; *, P < 0.05, simple main effect). This increase in OT release was not observed in the presence of testosterone. This group was not significantly different from the unstimulated groups. Basal release (picograms per ml) was not significantly altered by the presence of testosterone (by ANOVA: F = 0.37; P = NS) and was as follows: control, 70 ± 24; control osmotically stimulated, 54 ± 22; testosterone, 94 ± 50; and testosterone and osmotically stimulated, 56 ± 17. B, Effect of testosterone on OT mRNA content. OT mRNA content was significantly higher in explants exposed to an increase in osmolality in the absence of testosterone (by ANOVA: F = 26.4; P = 0.0001; *, P < 0.05 vs. all other groups, by Newman-Keuls test). This increase was not demonstrated in the presence of testosterone.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. A, Total testosterone. The mean total testosterone concentration was similar in rat plasma (n = 9) and in the hormone-supplemented medium. B, Free testosterone. The mean free testosterone concentration in rat plasma (n = 9) was approximately half that in the supplemented medium. Testosterone in the nonsupplemented medium was virtually undetectable in both assays.

 
Effect of estradiol on VP and OT
To determine whether the effect of testosterone was due to aromatization to estradiol, explants were maintained in either estradiol-supplemented medium [50 pg/ml, peak level observed during rat proestrus (32)] or nonsupplemented medium throughout the experiment. These two groups were then further divided into groups that received basal medium for the entire 10 h or were exposed to the ramp increase in osmolality during the last 6 h of perifusion. Estradiol significantly inhibited both the osmotically induced increase in VP release (Fig. 6AGo) and mRNA content (Fig. 6BGo).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. A, Effect of estradiol on VP release. VP release was significantly elevated in explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality in the control group (by ANOVA: F = 7.5; P = 0.0108; *, P < 0.05, simple main effect). This increase in VP release was not observed in the presence of estradiol. Basal release (picograms per ml) was not significantly different between groups: control, 226 ± 73; control osmotically stimulated, 110 ± 45; estradiol, 185 ± 41; estradiol and osmotically stimulated, 96 ± 58. B, Effect of estradiol on VP mRNA. VP mRNA content was significantly higher in explants exposed to an increase in osmolality in the absence of estradiol (by ANOVA: F = 12.0; P = 0.0035; *, P < 0.05 vs. control and estradiol plus osmostically stimulated). This increase was not demonstrated in the presence of estradiol.

 
Effect of DHT on VP
To determine whether androgenic actions as well as estrogenic actions contributed to the effects of testosterone, experiments comparable to those described for estradiol were performed using medium supplemented with 3 ng/ml DHT. As observed with estradiol, DHT also inhibited VP release in response to the ramp increase in osmolality (Fig. 7AGo). However, in contrast to the effect of estradiol, although the osmotic stimulation of hormone release was attenuated, the osmotic stimulation of VP mRNA remained intact in the presence of DHT (Fig. 7BGo).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. A, Effect of DHT on VP release. VP release was significantly elevated in explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality in the control group (by ANOVA; F = 2.5; P = 0.0010; *, P < 0.05, simple main effect). This increase in VP release was not observed in the presence of DHT. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: control, 228 ± 153; control osmotically stimulated, 220 ± 32; DHT, 149 ± 49; DHT and osmotically stimulated, 179 ± 74. B, Effect of DHT on VP mRNA. VP mRNA content was significantly higher in the osmotically stimulated explants in both the absence and the presence of DHT compared to that in the basal groups (by ANOVA: F = 26.4; P = 0.0001; *, P < 0.01 vs. control and DHT).

 
Effects of estradiol and DHT on KCl-stimulated VP release
To determine whether the effects of the gonadal steroids on osmotically stimulated VP and OT release reflected disruption of stimulus secretion coupling at the axon terminal, their effects on K+-stimulated hormone release were evaluated. Potassium chloride directly depolarizes axon terminals, resulting in an increase in hormone release from the posterior pituitary. After the 4-h equilibration period, 25 mM KCl was added to the perifusion medium of explants maintained in either nonsupplemented medium or medium supplemented with estradiol (50 pg/ml) or DHT (3 ng/ml) throughout the entire experiment. Neither hormone significantly altered KCl-stimulated VP release (Fig. 8Go).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. A, Effect of estradiol on KCl-stimulated VP release. Estradiol had no significant effect on KCl-induced VP release. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: KCl, 32 ± 4; and KCl plus estradiol, 24 ± 7. B, Effect of DHT on KCl-stimulated VP release. There was no significant difference in VP release between the DHT-supplemented group and KCl alone. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: KCl, 19 ± 6; KCl plus DHT, 14 ± 2.

 
Effect of BSA-conjugated estradiol and DHT
To determine whether the inhibition of osmotically stimulated VP and OT release by estradiol and DHT reflected genomic or nongenomic actions of these steroids, the effect of estradiol or DHT covalently linked to BSA on osmotically stimulated hormone release was evaluated. The large size of the BSA molecule prevents the conjugated hormones from crossing the cell membrane, thus limiting them to nongenomic actions associated with binding to the cell membrane (26, 27). VP release was inhibited by both BSA-conjugated estradiol and DHT (Figs. 9AGo and 10AGo). The effects of the steroid conjugates on VP mRNA content also duplicated the effects of the unbound steroids on VP mRNA content. BSA-estradiol significantly inhibited the osmotically induced increase in VP mRNA (Fig. 9BGo). This inhibition was not seen with BSA-DHT (Fig. 10BGo). The effects of the conjugated hormones on OT mRNA content were similar to their effects on VP mRNA. There was no significant difference in the OT mRNA content of osmotically stimulated control and BSA-DHT explants. Although not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.08), there was a tendency for the OT mRNA in the BSA-estradiol explants to be lower than that in the control explants as was previously observed for VP mRNA (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. A, Effect of BSA-estradiol on osmotically stimulated VP release. VP release was significantly elevated in explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality in the control group (ANOVA F = 9.2, P = 0.0127). This increase in VP release was not observed in the presence of BSA-estradiol. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: osmotically stimulated, 22 ± 8; osmotically stimulated plus BSA-estradiol, 47 ± 11. B, Effect of BSA-estradiol on osmotically stimulated VP mRNA. VP mRNA content was significantly higher in the osmotically stimulated explants than in the groups treated with BSA-estradiol (by ANOVA: F = 6.1; P = 0.0327).

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. A, Effect of BSA-DHT on osmotically stimulated VP release. There was a significant rise in explants exposed to a ramp increase in osmolality in the control group (by ANOVA: F = 27.9; P = 0.0004). This increase in VP release was not observed in the presence of BSA-DHT. Basal release (picograms per ml) was as follows: osmotically stimulated, 16 ± 4; osmotically stimulated plus BSA-DHT, 34 ± 7. B, Effect of BSA-DHT on osmotically stimulated VP mRNA. There was no significant difference in VP mRNA between osmotically stimulated groups with and without BSA-DHT.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The VP mRNA content rises in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei in response to increasing osmolality (4, 5, 6). Previous studies by Crowley et al. demonstrated that in vivo, this rise in hypothalamic VP mRNA is prevented by gonadectomy (19). In the same study, it was demonstrated that administration of exogenous testosterone restored the normal osmotic response of VP. Preliminary studies were performed by this laboratory to determine whether castration would prevent the hyperosmolar-induced increase in VP in vitro as had been observed in vivo. However, similar results were not observed. In perifused HNS explants, there was no difference in VP release from explants obtained from gonadectomized or sham rats. Concern that the FBS may have been contributing testosterone to our medium led us to measure the amount of testosterone present. No testosterone was detectable in the medium.

Due to the absence of testosterone in our perifusion medium, the explants from both the sham and gonadectomized rats were exposed to "castrated" conditions during the 10 h of perifusion. This led to the hypothesis that the VP response to an increase in osmolality was actually attenuated in the explants from both castrated and intact rats. Therefore, similar perifusion studies were performed to determine whether the addition of testosterone to the medium affected VP release and/or VP mRNA content. Based on the study by Crowley et al. (19), a more robust VP response to increased osmolality in the testosterone-treated explants was expected. Surprisingly, testosterone completely inhibited the increase in both VP and OT release and mRNA in response to the osmotic stimulus. This did not appear to be a pharmacological effect due to a hyperphysiological concentration of free testosterone in the medium, as the concentration present in the medium was similar to that found in the plasma of rats used as explant donors. Also, since the basal rate of VP release was not significantly different in the absence and presence of testosterone, the inhibitory effect of the steroid probably did not reflect an effect on cell volume that inhibited osmoreceptor function.

As testosterone can be aromatized to estradiol or metabolized to DHT in the brain, testosterone’s inhibitory effect on hormone release may be mediated by either estrogenic or androgenic mechanisms. DHT binds to androgen receptors with a stronger affinity than testosterone and is androgen specific, as it cannot be further aromatized to estradiol. Therefore, the effects of estradiol and DHT on osmotically stimulated hormone release and mRNA were compared. Both estradiol and DHT inhibited osmotically stimulated VP and OT release, but the effects of these hormones on VP mRNA diverged. In the case of estradiol, both VP release and VP mRNA response to osmotic stimulation were inhibited. However, in the case of DHT, although secretion was inhibited, the osmotically induced rise in VP mRNA content was still present. This is an important observation, because it suggests that hormone release and mRNA content may be regulated independently. It is also important because it suggests that the inhibition of osmotic responses by estradiol and DHT may be through different mechanisms. Given the potential for both genomic and nongenomic actions of estradiol and DHT and the potential that these steroids might act either directly on the VP and OT neurons or on other neurons in the osmoregulatory pathway, both parallel and divergent effects are quite possible.

Steroid receptors have not been located in the magno-cellular neurons (33, 34, 35). Therefore, genomic effects of estradiol and DHT directly on the VP and OT neurons is unlikely. However, genomic effects may be possible elsewhere in the osmotic circuitry, for example, on osmosensitive neurons in the OVLT region or other neurons involved in transmitting osmotic information from the OVLT region to the supraoptic nucleus (3, 36). Autoradiographic studies have demonstrated binding of both estrogens (37) and androgens (38) to neuronal membranes in the supraoptic nucleus. Hence, these gonadal steroids may also be inhibiting hormone release and message through nongenomic actions directly on the magnocellular neurons or on other neurons in the osmotic circuit.

As DHT inhibited the release of VP but not the increase in mRNA content, KCl was used to evaluate whether DHT was exerting its effects at the neural lobe by inhibiting depolarization-secretion coupling in the nerve terminals. KCl did induce a large increase in hormone release, but this increase was not affected by the addition of either estradiol or DHT to the medium, indicating that neither estradiol nor DHT interrupts depolarization-secretion coupling. Therefore, their actions must interrupt mechanisms before this step in hormone release, e.g., action potential generation from the cell body or afferent signals that either transmit or influence hormone secretion in response to osmotic stimulation.

As binding of both estradiol and DHT to supraoptic neurons was reported (37, 38), the possibility that the inhibition of osmotic responses by estradiol and DHT reflected nongenomic actions was further evaluated in experiments with the BSA-conjugated steroids. When estradiol and DHT are conjugated to the large molecule, albumin, they are unable to cross the cell membrane, thus preventing activation of cytoplasmic receptors and subsequent genomic actions (26, 27). The conjugated forms of both estradiol and DHT duplicated the actions of the nonconjugated steroids. This evidence supports the hypothesis that the inhibitory actions of these steroids reflect nongenomic actions. It is unlikely that these effects are due either to the addition of BSA to the medium or to enzymatic degradation of the BSA:steroid conjugates, because the culture medium already contains substantial amounts of BSA contributed by the 20% FBS, and the medium contains bacitracin, which prevents enzymatic degradation of VP and OT (29).

There has been increasing evidence for nongenomic actions of steroids in the central nervous system (25). There is evidence for binding sites for androgens, estrogens, and progestins on brain membranes (39), including the supraoptic nucleus (37, 38) as mentioned previously. These steroids could act directly at the VP neuron to alter ion permeability. For example, estrogen was shown to directly inhibit the release of GnRH by opening potassium channels on the neurons (40). They might also exert direct nongenomic effects by altering the efficacy of other neurotransmitters that are important in VP release (i.e. {gamma}-aminobutyric acid and glutamate). Excitatory amino acids are important regulators of excitatory transmission in the central nervous system, and it has been reported that androgens alter N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor-mediated responses in hippocampal neurons (41, 42). This could be a potential mechanism for the inhibition of VP by DHT.

Androgens and estrogens could also inhibit VP secretion indirectly by affecting the release of other neurotransmitters that influence the activity of the magnocellular neurons. Lagrange et al. (40) also demonstrated that GnRH is secondarily inhibited by estradiol modulation of µ-opioids from projection neurons. Both estrogens (35) and androgens (43, 44, 45) have been reported to increase {gamma}-aminobutyric acidergic tone in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus and in the median eminence. It is thought that this may be a potential mechanism for the inhibition of LHRH by gonadal steroids.

The finding that both estradiol and DHT inhibited osmotically stimulated VP release raises the concern that this may be a nonspecific action of steroids in the explant. This concern is mitigated by the fact that estradiol and DHT had distinct effects on osmotic stimulation of VP mRNA with estradiol, but not DHT, inhibiting the osmotically induced increase in VP mRNA. Previous experiments evaluating the effect of corticosterone on VP release by HNS explants (46) also provide evidence of the specificity of these effects. Although corticosterone also inhibited osmotically stimulated VP release, this effect was reversed by RU-486, the glucocorticoid antagonist, suggesting that the effect is mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor through either genomic or nongenomic mechanisms (46).

In conclusion, this study provides evidence implicating nongenomic actions of estradiol and DHT in the osmotic regulation of VP and OT. The physiological significance of these findings remains to be determined, because in vivo, VP and OT release is responsive to osmotic stimulation in the presence of circulating estrogen and/or testosterone. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that in vivo there are multiple pathways providing osmoregulatory input to the VP and OT neurons (36), whereas in the explants only the osmoreceptive elements in the OVLT region and supraoptic nuclei are included. Furthermore, in vivo, the HNS receives a multitude of afferent pathways carrying information about other physiological parameters, e.g. blood pressure, blood volume, etc., and this information contributes to the regulation of neurohypophyseal hormone release in response to dehydration and other disturbances in fluid and electrolyte balance. Thus, the HNS explant model enables us to evaluate hypothalamic osmotic control mechanisms in isolation from the multitude of afferent pathways carrying information about other physiological parameters, and thereby provides the opportunity to elucidate influences of gonadal steroids on these specific regulatory mechanisms.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Hanna Sidorowicz and Jeffrey Hartleroad for their excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Drs. Charles McCormick, Darryl Peterson, Robert Rakowski, Hector Rasgado-Flores, Paul Sze, and Marina Wolf for their interest in this work and helpful suggestions.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grant RO1-NS-27975. Back

Received December 23, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Valtin H 1987 Physiological effects of vasopressin on the kidney. In: Gash DM, Boer GJ (ed) Vasopressin Principles and Properties. Plenum Press, New York, pp 369–387
  2. Verney EB 1947 The antidiuretic hormone and the factors which determine its release. Proc R Soc Lond 135:25–106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Johnson AK, Gross PM 1993 Sensory circumventricular organs and brain homeostatic pathways. FASEB J 7:678–686[Abstract]
  4. Burbach JPH, De Hoop MJ, Schmale H, Richter D, De Kloet ER, Ten Haaf JA, De Wied D 1984 Differential responses to osmotic stress of vasopressin-neurophysin mRNA in hypothalamic nuclei. Neuroendocrinology 39:582–584[Medline]
  5. Robinson AG, Fitzsimmons MD 1993 Vasopressin homeostasis: coordination of synthesis, storage and release. Regul Pept 45:223–230
  6. Zingg HH, Lefebvre D, Almazan G 1986 Regulation of vasopressin gene expression in rat hypothalamic neurons. J Biol Chem 261:12956–12959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stricker EM, Verbalis JG 1986 Interaction of osmotic and volume stimuli in regulation of neurohypophyseal secretion in rats. Am J Physiol 250:R267–R275
  8. Kadekaro M, Summy-Long JY, Harris JS, Terrell MS, Freeman S, Eisenberg HM 1992 Cerebral metabolic and vasopressin and oxytocin responses during progressive water deprivation in rats. Am J Physiol 262:R310–R317
  9. Brimble SJ, Dyball REJ, Forsling ML 1978 Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. J Physiol 278:69–78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. van Tol HHM, Voorhuis DTAM, Burbach JPH 1987 Oxytocin gene expression in discrete hypothalamic magnocellular cell groups is stimulated by prolonged salt loading. Endocrinology 120:71–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Crofton JT, Baer PG, Share L, Brooks DP 1985 Vasopressin release in male and female rats: effects of gonadectomy and treatment with gonadal steroid hormones. Endocrinology 117:1195–1200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Skowsky WR, Swan L, Smith P 1979 Effects of sex steroid hormones on arginine vasopressin in intact and castrated male and female rats. Endocrinology 104:105–108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Share L, Wang YX, Crofton JT 1995 Gender differences in the actions of vasopressin. In: Saito T, Kurokawa K, Yoshida S (ed) Neurohypophysis: Recent Progress of Vasopressin and Oxytocin Research. Elsevier, New York, pp 3–12
  14. Ota M, Crofton JT, Liu H, Festavan G, Share L 1994 Increased plasma osmolality stimulates peripheral and central vasopressin release in male and female rats. Am J Physiol 267:R923–R928
  15. Stone JD, Crofton JT, Share L 1992 Sex differences in central cholinergic and angiotensinergic control of vasopressin release. Am J Physiol 263:R1030–R1034
  16. Crofton JT, Ratliff DL, Brooks DP, Share L 1986 The metabolic clearance rate of and pressor responses to vasopressin in male and female rats. Endocrinology 118:1777–1781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Crofton JT, Share L, Brooks DP 1988 Pressor responsiveness to and secretion of vasopressin during the estrous cycle. Am J Physiol 255:R1041–R1048
  18. Toba K, Crofton JT, Inoue M, Share L 1991 Effects of vasopressin on arterial blood pressure and cardiac output in male and female rats. Am J Physiol 261:R1118–R1125
  19. Crowley RS, Amico JA 1993 Gonadal steroid modulation of oxytocin and vasopressin gene expression in the hypothalamus of the osmotically stimulated rat. Endocrinology 133:2711–2718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. O’Keefe JA, Crowley RS, Hrivnak P, Kim N, Amico JA 1995 Effect of testosterone and its metabolites upon the level of vasopressin messenger ribonucleic acid in the hypothalamus of the hyperosmotically stimulated male rat. Neuroendocrinology 61:405–411[Medline]
  21. Yagil C, Sladek DD 1990 Effect of extended exposure to hypertonicity on vasopressin messenger ribonucleic acid content in hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal explants. Endocrinology 127:1428–1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sladek CD, Knigge KM 1977 Osmotic control of vasopressin release by rat hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal explants in organ culture. Endocrinology 101:1834–1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Milgrom E 1990 Steroid hormones. In: Baulieu EE, Kelly PA (ed) Hormones: From Molecules to Disease. Hermann, New York, pp 387–442
  24. McEwen BS 1994 Steroid hormone actions on the brain: when is the genome involved? Horm Behav 28:396–405[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. McEwen BS 1991 Non-genomic and genomic effects of steroids on neural activity. Trends Pharmacol Sci 12:141–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Ke F-C, Ramirez VD 1990 Binding of progesterone to nerve cell membranes of rat brain using progesterone conjugated to 125I-bovine serum albumin as a ligand. J Neurochem 54:467–472[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ke F-C, Ramirez VD 1987 Membrane mechanism mediates progesterone stimulatory effect on LHRH release from superfused rat hypothalami in vitro. Neuroendocrinology 45:514–517[Medline]
  28. Sladek CD, Knigge KM 1977 Cholinergic stimulation of vasopressin release from the rat hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system in organ culture. Endocrinology 101:411–420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sladek CD, Armstrong WE 1987 Sladek CD, Blair ML, Chen YH, Rockhold RW 1986 Vasopressin and renin response to plasma volume loss in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol 250:H443–H452
  30. Sladek CD, Blair ML, Chen YH, Rockhold RW 1986 Vasopressin and renin response to plasma volume loss in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol 250:H443–H452
  31. Yagil C, Sladek CD 1990 Osmotic regulation of vasopressin and oxytocin release is rate sensitive in hypothalamoneurohypophysial explants. Am J Physiol 258:R492–R500
  32. Smith MS, Freeman ME, Neill JD 1975 The control of progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle and early pseudopregnancy in the rat: prolactin, gonadotropin and steroid levels associated with rescue of the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology 96:219–226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Axelson JF, Van Leeuwen FW 1990 Differential localization of estrogen receptors in various vasopressin synthesizing nuclei of rat brain. J Neuroendocrinol 2:209–216
  34. Zhou L, Blaustein JD, De Vries GJ 1994 Distribution of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in vasopressin- and oxytocin-immunoreactive neurons in the male rat brain. Endocrinology 134:2622–2627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Herbison AE 1994 Immunocytochemical evidence for oestrogen receptors within GABA neurones located in the perinuclear zone of the supraoptic nucleus and GABAA receptor 2/3 subunits on supraoptic oxytocin neurones. J Neuroendocrinol 6:5–11[Medline]
  36. Sladek CD, Armstrong WE 1985 Osmotic control of vasopressin release. Trends Neurosci 8:166–169
  37. Sar M, Stumpf WE 1981 Combined autoradiography and immunohistochemistry for simultaneous localization of radioactively labeled steroid hormones and antibodies in the brain. J Histochem Cytochem 29:161–166
  38. Sar M, Stumpf WE 1977 Distribution of androgen target cells in rat forebrain and pituitary after [3H]-dihydrotestosterone administration. J Steroid Biochem 8:1131–1135[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Towle A, Sze P 1983 Steroid binding to synaptic plasma membrane: differential binding of glucocorticoids and gonadal steroids. J Steroid Biochem 18:135–143[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Lagrange AH, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ 1995 Estradiol-17ß and µ-opioid peptides rapidly hyerpolarize GnRH neurons: a cellular mechanism of negative feedback? Endocrinology 136:2341–2344[Abstract]
  41. Pouliot WA, Handa RJ, Beck SG Androgen alters NMDA-mediated responses in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington DC, 1993, p 1774 (Abstract)
  42. Pouliot WA, Beck SG, Handa RJ, Chronic androgen treatment effects on the different NMDA subunit mRNAs expressed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego CA, 1995, p 144.7 (Abstract)
  43. Grattan DR, Selmanoff M 1993 Regional variation in {gamma}-aminobutyric acid turnover: effect of castration on {gamma}-aminobutyric acid turnover in microdissected brain regions of the male rat. J Neurochem 60:2254–2264[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Grattan DR, Selmanoff M 1994 Prolactin and testosterone-induced inhibition of LH secretion after orchidectomy: role of preoptic and tuberoinfundibular {gamma}-aminobutyric acidergic neurones. Endocrinology 143:165–174
  45. Grattan DK, Selmanoff M 1994 Castration-induced decrease in the activity of medial preoptic and tuberoinfundibular GABAergic neurons is prevented by testosterone. Neuroendocrinology 60:141–149[Medline]
  46. Papanek PE, Sladek CD, Raff H 1997 Corticosterone inhibition of osmotically stimulated vasopressin from hypothalamic-neurohypophyseal explants. Am J Physiol 272:R158–R162



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Somponpun, A. K. Johnson, T. Beltz, and C. D. Sladek
Estrogen receptor-{alpha} expression in osmosensitive elements of the lamina terminalis: regulation by hypertonicity
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): R661 - R669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Somponpun, A. K. Johnson, T. Beltz, and C. D. Sladek
Osmotic regulation of estrogen receptor-{beta} expression in magnocellular vasopressin neurons requires lamina terminalis
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): R465 - R473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Somponpun and C. D. Sladek
Osmotic Regulation of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} in Rat Vasopressin and Oxytocin Neurons
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 4261 - 4269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Somponpun and C. D. Sladek
Role of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} in Regulation of Vasopressin and Oxytocin Release in Vitro
Endocrinology, August 1, 2002; 143(8): 2899 - 2904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H C Christian and J F Morris
Rapid actions of 17{beta}-oestradiol on a subset of lactotrophs in the rat pituitary
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 557 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Morsette, H. Sidorowicz, and C. D. Sladek
Role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in vasopressin and oxytocin release
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): R452 - R458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Roesch, R. E. Blackburn-Munro, and J. G. Verbalis
Mineralocorticoid treatment attenuates activation of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic neurons by icv ANG II
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): R1853 - R1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Morsette, H. Sidorowicz, and C. D. Sladek
Role of non-NMDA receptors in vasopressin and oxytocin release from rat hypothalamo-neurohypophysial explants
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): R313 - R322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. C. Christian, N. J. Rolls, and J. F. Morris
Nongenomic Actions of Testosterone on a Subset of Lactotrophs in the Male Rat Pituitary
Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3111 - 3119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H. C. Christian and J.F. Morris
Rapid actions of 17{beta}-oestradiol on a subset of lactotrophs in the rat pituitary
J. Physiol., January 18, 2002; (2002) 200101294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sladek, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sladek, C. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals