help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jonathan, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jonathan, N. B.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 5 2128-2135
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Cell-Specific Induction of c-fos Expression in the Pituitary Gland by Estrogen1

Donald L. Allen, Natasha A. Mitchner, Thomas E. Uveges, Kenneth P. Nephew2, Sohaib Khan and Nira Ben- Jonathan

Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0521

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nira Ben-Jonathan, Department of Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 231 Bethesda Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0521.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Estrogens regulate many functions of pituitary lactotrophs, including PRL gene expression, release, storage, and cellular proliferation. The mechanism by which estrogens exert such a variety of functions is poorly understood. In the uterus, estrogens rapidly and transiently induce the expression of the immediate early genes c-fos and c-jun in specific cell types. The Fos/Jun proteins form the activating protein-1 (AP1) transcription factor that mediates ligand-activated cell proliferation, differentiation, and secretion. Here we used Fischer 344 (F344) rats that develop hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas in response to estrogens. The objectives were to: 1) determine whether estrogen induces c-fos expression in the pituitary gland and identify the responsive cells; 2) compare the dynamics of c-fos induction in the pituitary and uterus; and 3) examine the temporal relationship between c-fos expression and PRL release.

Ovariectomized F344 rats were injected with 1 µg estradiol and killed at different times thereafter. Pituitaries were subjected to in situ hybridization for c-fos and immunostaining for selected pituitary cells. Estradiol stimulated c-fos expression in lactotrophs and folliculo-stellate cells within the anterior lobe without affecting either the intermediate or neural lobes. In a second experiment, c-fos messenger RNA levels were measured by solution hybridization in anterior pituitaries and uteri from estradiol-treated rats. Trunk blood was analyzed for PRL by RIA. The estrogen-induced c-fos rise in the uterus was rapid, robust, and transient, whereas that in the anterior pituitary was delayed, lower, and sustained. The profile of serum PRL levels resembles that of c-fos induction in the anterior pituitary.

We conclude that: 1) both lactotrophs and folliculo-stellate cells increase c-fos expression in response to estrogens; 2) induction of c-fos expression may mediate some estrogenic effects on PRL synthesis and release and lactotroph proliferation in F344 rats; and 3) the atypical dynamics of c-fos induction in the pituitary could be due to indirect effects of estrogens on PRL-regulating factors within the hypothalamo-pituitary complex as well as to pituitary-specific estrogen receptor isoforms, coactivators, or repressors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE PITUITARY gland is a well established target tissue for estrogens. Estrogen receptors have been identified in 60–70% of cells within the anterior lobe (1), in the intermediate lobe (2), and in GH3 cells, a somatolactotroph cell line (3, 4). Many functions of lactotrophs are affected by estrogens. For example, estrogens increase the expression of PRL (5, 6), galanin (7), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (8) and suppress transforming growth factor-ß (9) in lactotrophs. Estrogens also increase the number of PRL-containing secretory granules (10, 11), induce transdifferentiation of somatolactotrophs into lactotrophs (12, 13), and stimulate lactotroph proliferation (9, 14).

The mechanism by which estrogens regulate such a variety of functions is poorly understood. In general, estrogens act by binding to intracellular receptors, causing them to undergo activation and dimerization. The estrogen-receptor complex binds to an estrogen response element (ERE) in target genes and modifies their transcription. An imperfect ERE sequence has been identified in the distal promoter region of the PRL gene (15), and substantial evidence indicates that estrogen directly stimulates PRL gene transcription (5, 16). However, PRL increases only 3- to 4-fold in response to estradiol in vitro (17, 18), whereas it often rises 10- to 20-fold after in vivo administration (19, 20). It is generally accepted that the direct action of estrogen on lactotrophs is augmented by altering hypothalamo-pituitary factors that affect the lactotrophs. These include hypothalamic dopamine (21, 22), PRL-regulating factor (PRF) from the intermediate lobe (23), and products of folliculo-stellate cells within the anterior lobe (24, 25).

The rat uterus has served as a model for studying the mechanism of action of estrogens. In this tissue, estrogens rapidly and transiently induce the expression of several immediate early genes, e.g. c-fos, c-myc, and c-jun, followed by activation of late genes associated with cell structure and metabolism (26). The product of c-fos is a nuclear protein that forms heterodimers with products of the jun gene family, generating the transcription factor, activating protein-1 (AP-1) (27). The induction of c-fos by estrogens is necessary, but insufficient, for mediating estrogen-induced cell proliferation in the uterus (28, 29). Further, although estrogen receptors are expressed in several uterine cell types, estrogens induce c-fos only in epithelia and glandular cells, but not in stroma or myometrium (28, 30).

Only limited information is available on the participation of c-fos as a mediator of lactotroph function. TRH (31, 32) and platelet-derived growth factor (31) induce c-fos gene expression in GH3 cells with a dynamics that parallels the rise in PRL messenger RNA (mRNA) levels. Prolonged treatment of male rats with estrogen increased the levels of PRL, c-myc, and c-fos mRNAs in the pituitary gland, an effect that was reversed by the dopaminergic agonist bromocriptine (33). Another group reported a rapid rise followed by a lower plateau in pituitary c-fos mRNA levels in response to estrogen treatment in vivo (34). Neither study identified which pituitary cells increase c-fos expression in response to estrogens.

The present experimental model was the estrogen-hypersensitive Fischer 344 (F344) female rat that develops hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas in response to estrogen (19, 35). The objectives were to 1) determine whether lactotrophs, folliculo-stellate cells, and/or intermediate lobe cells increase c-fos gene expression in response to estrogen; 2) compare the dynamics of c-fos induction by estrogens in the pituitary and uterus; and 3) examine the temporal relationship between the induction of c-fos expression and the rise in PRL release.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
All animal studies were performed under an institutionally approved protocol according to the USPHS Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. F344 rats (8–10 weeks old), ovariectomized (OVEX) 10–14 days before an experiment, were maintained on a 12-h light-dark schedule (lights on at 0700 h). Rats were injected sc with 1 µg estradiol or sesame oil vehicle and killed 0, 1, 2, 6, 24, or 48 h later; rats were killed between 1530–1700 h. Pituitary glands and uteri were removed and rapidly frozen. Trunk blood was centrifuged, and the serum was analyzed in duplicate for PRL using a rat PRL NIDDK RIA kit with RP-3 as a reference preparation and an assay sensitivity of 2.5 ng/ml.

In situ hybridization for c-fos
In situ hybridization was performed as we previously described (28). Briefly, frozen sections (10 µm) of pituitary glands and uteri were mounted on slides, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, and stored at -70 C. Before use, slides were treated with proteinase K (20 µg/ml) for 3 min (uterus) or 10 min (pituitary) and refixed. Slides were then treated with 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine for 10 min, washed, dehydrated, and air-dried. The rat c-fos complementary DNA (a gift from Dr. T. Curran, Roche Institute of Molecular Biology, Nutley, NJ) was cloned into a pBluescript II SK+ (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) vector. Sense and antisense 35S-labeled riboprobes were synthesized using the Promega riboprobe transcription kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The riboprobes were treated with deoxyribonuclease for 15 min, alkaline hydrolyzed to 100- to 200-base fragments, purified on a Sephadex G-50 column, ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in 0.2 M dithiothreitol (DTT).

The labeled probes (750,000 cpm) were heated in hybridization buffer [50% formamide, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 1 x Denhardt’s solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 0.5 mg/ml yeast transfer RNA] and added to the tissue sections. Slides were coverslipped and incubated at 55 C for 13–18 h. Coverslips were removed, and the sections were washed in 50% formamide, 2 x SCC (standard saline citrate), and 10 mM DTT at 65 C for 30 min and washed three times with buffer A (0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris, and 5 mM EDTA) for 10 min at 37 C. The slides were treated with 20 µg/ml ribonuclease A (RNase A) and 5–10 µg/ml RNase T1 for 30 min at 37 C and then washed with 1) buffer A for 15 min at 37 C; 2) 50% formamide, 2 x SCC, and 10 mM DTT at 65 C for 30 min; and 3) 2 x SCC, 1 mM DTT and 0.1 x SCC, 1 mM DTT. After dehydration and drying, slides were dipped in Kodak NTB2 emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY), stored at 4 C, and developed after 7–14 days.

Combined immunocytochemistry/in situ hybridization
Pituitary sections (10 µm) were mounted on slides and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde as described above. All buffers and antibodies were prepared in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated reagents. Sections were rehydrated and rinsed in PBS containing 0.5% Triton-X-100. Slides were treated with 0.5% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity, and then incubated with 2% normal goat serum for 1 h. After removal of excess serum, slides were incubated with the primary antibodies in a humid chamber at 4 C overnight. The rat PRL antibody (NIH IC-5) was used at 1:15,000 dilution, and the S-100 antibody (Eastern Acres Biologicals, Southbridge, MA) was used at a 1:500 dilution. The latter served as a marker for folliculo-stellate cells in the anterior lobe, marginal cells of the intermediate lobe, and pituicytes of the neural lobe (36). After rinsing, slides were incubated for 1 h with biotinylated secondary antibody and avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex reagents according to instructions using a peroxidase Vector kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Brown color was developed after the addition of diaminobenzidine for 5 min. After rinsing, slides were subjected to in situ hybridization as described above. After develop-ment of the photographic emulsion, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Solution hybridization/RNase protection assay for c-fos
Total RNA was isolated from anterior pituitaries and uteri using Tri-Reagent (MRC, Cincinnati, OH). The complementary RNA probes span 220 bp (nucleotides 68–287) for c-fos (37; gift from Dr. D. Autelitano, Baker Medical Research Institute, Prahran, Australia) and 111 bp (nucleotides 36–146) for cyclophilin (gift from Dr. J. Roberts, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY). The RNA samples (5 µg) were hybridized overnight at 45 C with the 32P-labeled probes in hybridization buffer (80% formamide, 0.4 M NaCl, 40 mM PIPES, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.7). The samples were then digested with RNase A (40 µg/ml) and RNase T1 (4100 U/ml) in digestion buffer (0.3 ml; 0.3 M NaCl and 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5). The hybrids were treated with proteinase K (10 mg/ml) and 10% SDS for 15 min at 37 C, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. Hybrids were resolved on nondenaturing 5% polyacrylamide gels.

Data analysis
Three separate pituitary sections from each time period (0 and 6 h) after estradiol injection immunostained for either PRL or S-100 and hybridized for c-fos were used. In each section, approximately 1000, 600, and 200 cells were counted within the anterior, intermediate, and neural lobes, respectively. PRL- or S-100-positive cells were enumerated, and the results were expressed as the percentage of each cell type of the total number of cells counted. A cell that contained seven or more silver grains was considered positive for c-fos. The percentage of c-fos-expressing lactotrophs was determined by dividing cells positive for both PRL and c-fos by the total number of lactotrophs. This was also performed for S-100-positive cells. In both the intermediate and neural lobes, the percentage of c-fos-positive, S-100-negative cells (designated "other" cells) was also calculated. Results were expressed as the mean ± SEM; differences between treatments were analyzed by Student’s t test.

For the solution hybridization, radiolabeled bands were quantitated using a PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The levels of c-fos mRNA were normalized to those of cyclophilin mRNA, and the results were expressed as fold stimulation over levels in control rats.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue localization of c-fos induction by estrogen in the pituitary gland and uterus
As revealed by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1Go), c-fos expression in control (oil-treated) rats was weak and diffuse in the anterior lobe, strong in the intermediate lobe, and undetectable in the neural lobe. The expression of c-fos in the anterior lobe increased within 2 h after estrogen treatment, rose further by 6 h, and remained elevated at 48 h. There was a tendency for a decrease in c-fos mRNA in the intermediate lobe 6 h after estradiol treatment, followed by a rebound. This pattern, however, was inconsistent. Throughout this time period, there was no induction of c-fos expression in the neural lobe. There was no specific binding of the c-fos sense probe within the pituitary glands of either control or estradiol-treated rats (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Localization of estrogen-induced c-fos expression in the pituitary gland by in situ hybridization. OVEX F344 rats were injected with 1 µg estradiol and killed at the designated times. Cryostat sections of the pituitary glands were hybridized with either antisense or sense c-fos riboprobe. Representative sections are shown. AL, Anterior lobe; IL, intermediate lobe; NL, neural lobe. Magnification, x20.

 
As the uterus is a well established target for estrogen, we also examined the expression of c-fos in response to estrogen in the uteri of the same rats. As shown in Fig. 2Go, c-fos expression was undetectable in the uteri of control rats. Within 2 h after estradiol treatment, c-fos expression increased markedly in the luminal and glandular epithelia, returning to control levels after 24 h. No specific binding of the c-fos sense probe was seen in uterine sections from either control or estradiol-treated rats.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Localization of estrogen-induced c-fos expression in the uterus. Cryostat sections of uteri were hybridized with either antisense or sense c-fos riboprobe (see Fig. 1Go for other details). Magnification, x100.

 
Induction of c-fos expression by estradiol within specific pituitary cell types
Lactotrophs and folliculo-stellate cells in the anterior pituitary as well as cells within the intermediate lobe were postulated as potential targets for the estrogenic action. Therefore, pituitary glands from control rats (0 h) and rats treated with estradiol (6 h) were subjected to combined immunocytochemistry for either PRL or S-100 and in situ hybridization for c-fos. Lactotrophs comprised 25% of the total anterior lobe cells. Cells positive for S-100 (folliculo-stellate cells) comprised 30% of the total cell number in the anterior lobe. As shown in Fig. 3AGo, both c-fos-positive (solid arrow) and negative (open arrow) folliculo-stellate cells were apparent. Within the intermediate lobe, S-100-positive cells (marginal cells) comprised 20% of the total cell number and were primarily localized in the periphery of the lobules (Fig. 3BGo). Within the neural lobe, S-100-positive cells (pituicytes) were diffusely distributed, accounting for over 80% of the total cell number (Fig. 3CGo); only occasional cells within the neural lobe were positive for c-fos. As expected, lactotrophs were undetectable in either the intermediate or neural lobes. Figure 3DGo demonstrates many clusters of c-fos-positive (solid arrow) and some c-fos-negative lactotrophs (open arrow) within the anterior lobe.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Combined immunocytochemistry for PRL (right panel) or S-100 (left panel) and in situ hybridization for c-fos in pituitary glands from OVEX F344 rats treated with 1 µg estradiol for 6 h (magnification, x20). Cellular details are shown in the insets (magnification, x400). A, c-fos-positive (solid arrow) and -negative (open arrow) folliculo-stellate cells within the anterior lobe; B, location of S-100-positive cells (marginal cells) in the periphery of lobules within the intermediate lobe; C, diffused distribution of S-100-positive cells (pituicytes) within the neural lobe; D, clusters of c-fos-positive lactotrophs (solid arrow) and a c-fos-negative lactotroph (open arrow) within the anterior lobe. See Materials and Methods for other details.

 
The percentage of c-fos-expressing lactotrophs increased 2.5-fold within 6 h of estradiol treatment (P < 0.001), whereas c-fos-expressing folliculo-stellate cells (S-100-positive) increased 80% (P < 0.001; Fig. 4Go, left panel). Estradiol did not alter the number of S-100-positive cells that also expressed c-fos in the intermediate lobe (Fig. 4Go, middle panel). The number of c-fos-positive cells in the intermediate lobe that were negative for S-100 ("other" cells) showed a 50% decrease, but this decline did not reach statistical significance. The number of c-fos-expressing cells in the neural lobe (Fig. 4Go, right panel) was low (10–15% of total cells) and was not altered by estradiol.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Estrogen-induced changes in the percentages of lactotrophs (PRL) and S-100-positive cells that express c-fos in the anterior (AL), intermediate (IL), and neural (NL) lobes of the pituitary. Cells in the IL and NL that were S-100-negative were designated "other." OVEX F344 rats were treated with 1 µg estradiol, and tissues were removed 0 and 6 h after treatment. See Materials and Methods for other details.

 
Comparison of the temporal induction of c-fos in the anterior pituitary and uterus
A solution hybridization/RNase protection assay was used to quantitate the estrogen-induced changes in c-fos mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary and uterus (Figs. 5Go and 6Go). In the anterior pituitary, the levels of c-fos mRNA in control rats were low and did not change within 1 h after estradiol treatment. This was followed by 3- and 5-fold rises at 2 and 24 h, respectively. Anterior pituitary c-fos mRNA levels were still elevated 48 h after estradiol treatment (Fig. 6Go, upper panel). The pattern of c-fos induction by estradiol in the uterus was very different. In control rats, uterine c-fos mRNA levels were low, increased over 7-fold within 1 h after estradiol treatment and were increased by over 20-fold at 2 h. The c-fos expression decreased rapidly at 6 h, returning to control levels by 24 h (Fig. 6Go, upper panel).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Time-dependent induction of c-fos expression in the anterior pituitary and uterus by estradiol. OVEX F344 rats were treated with 1 µg estradiol, and total RNA was extracted from anterior pituitaries and uteri at different times. The levels of c-fos and cyclophilin (cyclo) mRNAs were quantitated using a solution hybridization assay. Representative autoradiograms are shown.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Induction of c-fos expression in the anterior pituitary and uterus (upper panel) and serum PRL levels (lower panel) at different times after estradiol treatment. The c-fos mRNA levels were quantitated by solution hybridization, normalized to the levels of cyclophilin mRNA, and presented as the fold stimulation over control levels. Each value for c-fos expression is the mean ± SEM of three to five rats. Each value for serum PRL levels is the mean ± SEM of seven or eight rats.

 
Estrogen stimulation of serum PRL levels
Serum PRL levels were measured in the same rats used for the in situ hybridization and solution hybridization/RNase protection assays. As shown in Fig. 6Go (lower panel), serum PRL levels increased 2-fold within 2 h of estradiol treatment, rose 5-fold over control levels at 24 h, and remained elevated at 48 h. There was a marked similarity in the patterns of the estradiol-induced rise in c-fos expression in the anterior pituitary and serum PRL levels.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We report that estrogen stimulates the expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in lactotrophs and folliculo-stellate cells within the anterior pituitary. On the other hand, no significant alteration in c-fos expression was noted in either intermediate or neural lobes. Increased c-fos mRNA levels were first seen 2 h after estrogen treatment, reached maximal levels at 6 h, and remained elevated for 48 h. This profile differed markedly from that seen in the uterus, where estrogen induced a rapid and transient rise in c-fos expression. The dynamics of c-fos induction by estrogen in the anterior pituitary were similar to the rise in serum PRL levels. We postulate that Fos may mediate some of the increases in PRL gene expression, release, and lactotroph proliferation that are induced by estrogen in F344 rats.

Many growth-promoting agents rapidly increase c-fos expression, with the Fos protein forming part of the AP-1 complex that functions as a transcription factor. The main effects of estrogens on the reproductive tract are stimulation of cellular growth, differentiation, and secretion. The uterus, where estrogen elicits a dramatic growth response, has been extensively used to document hormone- and cell-specific rises in c-fos expression (28, 30, 38). In contrast, mitogenic effects of estrogens in the neuroendocrine axis are significantly less profound, except for the marked pituitary enlargement due to lactotroph proliferation that is unique to the estrogen-hypersensitive F344 rat (19, 35). Using the OVEX F344 rat as the experimental model, the combined immunocytochemistry/in situ hybridization clearly showed a significant increase in the number of c-fos-expressing lactotrophs within 6 h of estrogen treatment. Moreover, the profile of plasma PRL levels during this period paralleled the rise in c-fos induction by estrogen. As the rat PRL gene contains consensus AP-1 binding sites in both proximal and distal promoter regions (39), it is reasonable to suggest that c-fos expression mediates some of the PRL rise in response to estrogen. To distinguish between an association of c-fos with PRL secretion and lactotroph proliferation, the estrogenic effects in F344 and other strains of rats with restricted proliferative response should be compared.

In addition to lactotrophs, several cell types within the pituitary gland are potential targets for estrogens. We focused on folliculo-stellate cells for several reasons. These cells, which are devoid of classical secretory granules, have long projections that form junctional complexes with endocrine cells, primarily lactotrophs (40). Folliculo-stellate cells have been reported to both stimulate (25, 41) and inhibit (42) the lactotrophs. They also exhibit dramatic structural changes in response to estrogen in F344, but not Sprague-Dawley, rats (24). The present data show that folliculo-stellate cells respond to estrogen by increased c-fos expression. Whether this rise is associated with vascular reorganization and angiogenesis, which precede estrogen-induced prolactinoma formation in F344 rats (24), or with regulation of the lactotrophs (25, 41, 42) remains to be determined. In agreement with a previous report (40), we found that folliculo-stellate cells comprise as much as a third of all anterior pituitary cells. Future studies should examine whether folliculo-stellate cells express estrogen receptors, and whether their effect on lactotrophs is augmented by treatment with estrogens.

As indicated previously, the S-100 protein also serves as a marker for marginal cells of the intermediate lobe (36). We reported that the intermediate lobe contains a subpopulation of cells that produce PRF (43) and mediates the acute estrogen-induced rise in PRL (20). This was supported by a recent study showing marked increases in PRF activity in neurointermediate lobe cells harvested from estrogen-treated F344, but not Sprague-Dawley, rats (44). In the present investigation we noted high expression of c-fos in the intermediate lobe of control rats. This could be due to constitutive expression of c-fos or its induction by the stress of handling and injection, as previously reported (45). Although there was a tendency for a decrease, followed by an increase, in c-fos expression after estrogen treatment, this pattern was not consistent. Because of the minute size of the neurointermediate lobe, we could not reliably quantitate these changes using the solution hybridization assay. This issue will be revisited in subsequent investigations.

In the uterus, the induction of c-fos by estrogen is rapid, robust, and transient. Such a profile is typical of the response induced by growth factors in other tissues (27). The rapid rise is probably due to a direct action of estrogen on uterine epithelial cells and binding of the activated estrogen receptor to an ERE sequence located in the 3'-flanking region of the murine c-fos gene (46). Mutations in this sequence that abolish binding of the estrogen receptor blocked estrogen activation of c-fos (47). The rapid decline has been attributed to Fos protein repressing its own gene, interference by Fos with further activation of the c-fos promoter by the estrogen receptor, as well as the very short half-life of the c-fos mRNA transcript (27, 48).

In contrast to the uterus, the induction of c-fos by estradiol in the anterior pituitary was delayed, lower, and sustained. A combination of factors may account for this atypical response. For instance, there might be tissue-specific differences in estrogen receptor isoforms, coactivators, or repressors. It has been reported that estrogen down-regulates its receptors in the uterus but up-regulates them in the pituitary gland (49). Two estrogen receptor isoforms, named TERP-1 and TERP-2, which lack the A/B, DNA-binding domain, hinge, and a small portion of the hormone-binding domain, have been identified in the rat pituitary and may mediate some estrogenic action in this tissue (50). To date, pituitary-specific estrogen receptor coactivators or repressors have not been identified.

The delayed activation of c-fos expression in the pituitary gland raises the possibility that some of the estrogenic effects are indirect, secondary to stimulation of hypothalamic or posterior pituitary factors that affect the c-fos gene by an ERE-independent mechanism. Using cultured primary anterior pituitary cells as well as GH3 cells, we were unable to demonstrate induction of c-fos by estradiol, although TRH and bromocriptine elicited transient increases and decreases, respectively, in c-fos mRNA levels (Allen, D. L. and N. Ben-Jonathan, unpublished observations). This supports the argument for an indirect effect of estradiol, although optimization of the culture conditions for the lactotrophs (51) may reveal some direct effects of estradiol.

The sustained elevation of c-fos mRNA in response to estrogen in the pituitary gland may result from sequential activation of autocrine/paracrine factors (e.g. galanin and vasoactive intestinal peptide) by estrogen, which could continue to induce the c-fos gene or stabilize its transcript. In addition to ERE, several cis elements, such as a cAMP response element and a serum response element, have been mapped to the c-fos gene (52). In summary, more information is needed on the cellular distribution, structure, and signalling pathways of estrogen receptors within the pituitary gland before a functional relationship among estrogen, c-fos expression, PRL synthesis, and lactotroph proliferation is established.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Autelitano, Roberts and Curran for providing the c-fos and cyclophilin probes, and the NIDDK Hormone Distribution Program for the rat PRL RIA kit.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NSF Grant IBN94–09133, U.S. Army DAMD17–94-J-4452, and NIH Grant NS13243. Back

2 Present address: Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Myers Hall 152, Bloomington, Indiana 47405. Back

Received December 9, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Keefer DA, Stumpf WE, Petrusz P 1976 Quantitative autoradiographic assessment of 3H-estradiol uptake in immunocytochemically characterized pituitary cells. Cell Tissue Res 166:25–35[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Pelletier G, Liao N, Follea N, Govindan MV 1988 Distribution of estrogen receptors in the rat pituitary as studied by in situ hybridization. Mol Cell Endocrinol 56:29–33[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kilvik K, Furu K, Haug E, Gautvik KM 1985 The mechanism of 17ß-estradiol uptake into prolactin-producing rat pituitary cells (GH3 cells) in culture. Endocrinology 117:967–975[Abstract]
  4. Welshons WV, Lieberman ME, Gorski J 1984 Nuclear localization of unoccupied oestrogen receptors. Nature 307:747–749[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Shull JD, Gorski J 1984 Estrogen stimulates prolactin gene transcription by a mechanism independent of pituitary protein synthesis. Endocrinology 114:1550–1557[Abstract]
  6. Maurer RA, Kim KE, Day RN, Notides AC 1990 Regulation of prolactin gene expression by estradiol. In: Sato G, Stevens JL (eds) Molecular Endocrinology and Steroid Hormone Action. Liss, New York, pp 159–169
  7. Hyde JF, Engle MG, Maley BE 1991 Colocalization of galanin and prolactin within secretory granules of anterior pituitary cells in estrogen-treated Fischer 344 rats. Endocrinology 129:270–276[Abstract]
  8. Lam KSL, Srivastava G, Lechan RM, Lee T, Reichlin S 1990 Estrogen regulates the gene expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide in the anterior pituitary. Neuroendocrinology 52:417–421[Medline]
  9. Burns G, Sarkar DK 1993 Transforming growth factor-ß-like immunoreactivity in the pituitary gland of the rat: effect of estrogen. Endocrinology 133:1444–1449[Abstract]
  10. Kiino DR, Dannies PS 1982 Hormonal regulation of prolactin storage in a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells. Yale J Biol Med 55:409–420[Medline]
  11. Kiino DR, Dannies PS 1981 Insulin and 17ß-estradiol increase the intracellular prolactin content of GH4C1 cells. Endocrinology 109:1264–1269[Abstract]
  12. Boockfor FR, Hoeffler JP, Frawley LS 1986 Estradiol induces a shift in cultured cells that release prolactin or growth hormone. Am J Physiol 250:E103–E105
  13. Kineman RD, Faught WJ, Frawley LS 1992 Steroids can modulate transdifferentiation of prolactin and growth hormone in bovine pituitary cultures. Endocrinology 130:3289–3294[Abstract]
  14. Hashi A, Mazawa S, Chen S, Yamakawa K, Kato J, Arita J 1996 Estradiol-induced diurnal changes in lactotroph proliferation and their hypothalamic regulation in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 137:3246–3252[Abstract]
  15. Maurer RA, Notides AC 1987 Identification of an estrogen-responsive element from the 5'-flanking region of the rat prolactin gene. Mol Cell Biol 7:4247–4254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cullen KE, Klade MP, Seyfred MA 1993 Interaction between transcription regulatory regions of prolactin chromatin. Science 261:203–206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lieberman ME, Maurer RA, Gorski JA 1978 Estrogen control of prolactin synthesis in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:5946–5949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. West B, Dannies PS 1980 Effects of estradiol on prolactin production and dihydroergocryptine-induced inhibition of prolactin production in primary cultures of rat pituitary cells. Endocrinology 106:1108–1113[Medline]
  19. Burgett RA, Garris PA, Ben-Jonathan N 1990 Estradiol-induced prolactinomas: differential effects on dopamine in posterior pituitary and median eminence. Brain Res 531:143–147[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Murai I, Ben-Jonathan N 1990 Acute stimulation of prolactin release by estradiol: mediation by the posterior pituitary. Endocrinology 126:3179–3184[Abstract]
  21. Sar M 1984 Estradiol is concentrated in tyrosine hydroxylase-containing neurons of the hypothalamus. Science 223:938–940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Jones EE, Naftolin F 1990 Estrogen effects on the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic system in the female rat brain. Brain Res 510:84–91[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Ben-Jonathan N, Laudon M, Garris PA 1991 Novel aspects of posterior pituitary function: regulation of prolactin secretion. Front Neuroendocrinol 12:231–277
  24. Schechter J, Ahmad N, Weiner R 1988 Activation of anterior pituitary folliculo-stellate cells in the formation of estrogen-induced prolactin-secreting tumors. Neuroendocrinology 48:569–576[Medline]
  25. Lloyd RV, Mailloux J 1988 Analysis of S-100 protein positive folliculo-stellate cells in rat pituitary tissues. Am J Pathol 133:338–346[Abstract]
  26. Khan SA, Nephew KP, Wang H 1994 The jun protooncogene family in uterine growth and differentiation. In: Khan SA, Stancel GM (eds) Protooncogenes and Growth Factors in Steroid Hormone Induced Growth and Differentiation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 105–123
  27. Curran T 1996 Fos and Jun: intermediate transcription factors. In: Cohen P, Foulkes JG (eds) The Hormonal Control Regulation of Gene Transcription. Elsevier, New York, pp 295–308
  28. Nephew KP, Peters GA, Khan S 1995 Cellular localization of estradiol-induced c-fos messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat uterus: c-fos expression and uterine cell proliferation do not correlate strictly. Endocrinology 136:3007–3015[Abstract]
  29. Persico E, Scalona M, Cicatiello L, Sica V, Bresciani F, Weisz A 1990 Activation of ‘immediate-early’ genes by estrogen is not sufficient to achieve stimulation of DNA synthesis in rat uterus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:287–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Papa M, Mezzogiorno V, Bresciani F, Weisz A 1991 Estrogen induces c-fos expression specifically in the luminal and glandular epithelia of adult rat uterus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 175:480–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Bandyopadhyay SK, Bancroft C 1989 Calcium induction of the mRNAs for prolactin and c-fos is independent of protein kinase C activity. J Biol Chem 264:14216–14219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Carr FE, Fisher CU, Fein HG, Smallridge RC 1993 Thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulates c-jun and c-fos messenger ribonucleic acid levels: implications for calcium mobilization and protein kinase-C activation. Endocrinology 133:1700–1707[Abstract]
  33. Chernavsky AC, Valerani AV, Burdman JA 1993 Haloperidol and oestrogens induce c-myc and c-fos expression in the anterior pituitary gland of the rat. Neurol Res 15:339–343[Medline]
  34. Szijan I, Parma DL, Engel NI 1992 Expression of c-myc and c-fos protooncogenes in the anterior pituitary gland of the rat. Effect of estrogen. Horm Metab Res 24:154–157[Medline]
  35. Wiklund J, Wertz N, Gorski J 1981 A comparison of estrogen effects on uterine and pituitary growth and prolactin synthesis in Fischer 344 and Holtzman rats. Endocrinology 109:1700–1707[Medline]
  36. Cocchia D, Miani N 1980 Immunocytochemical localization of the brain-specific S-100 protein in the pituitary gland of adult rat. J Neurocytol 9:771–782[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Autelitano DJ, Sheppard KE 1993 Corticotrope responsiveness to glucocorticoids is modulated via rapid CRF-mediated induction of the proto-oncogene c-fos. Mol Cell Endocrinol 94:111–119[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Loose-Mitchell DS, Chiappetta C, Stancel GM 1988 Estrogen regulation of c-fos messenger ribonucleic acid. Mol Endocrinol 2:946–950[Abstract]
  39. Gourdji D, Laverriere JN 1994 The rat prolactin gene: a target for tissue-specific and hormone-dependent transcription factors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 100:133–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Morand I, Fonlupt P, Guerrier A, Trouillas J, Calle A, Remy C, Rousset B, Munari-Silem Y 1996 Cell-to-cell communication in the anterior piuitary: evidence for gap junction-mediated exchanges between endocrine cells and folliculostellate cells. Endocrinology 137:3356–3367[Abstract]
  41. Ishikawa H, Nogami H, Shirasawa N 1983 Novel clonal strains from adult rat anterior pituitary producing S-100 protein. Nature 303:711–713[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Allaerts W, Carmeliet P, Denef C 1996 New perspectives in the function of pituitary folliculo-stellate cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 71:73–81
  43. Steinmetz R, Liu J, Ben-Jonathan N 1993 Posterior pituitary cells: isolation of subpopulations producing prolactin releasing factor. Endocr J 1:373–379
  44. Steinmetz R, Brown NG, Allen DL, Bigsby RM, Ben-Jonathan N 1997 The environmental estrogen bisphenol A stimulates prolactin release in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology 138:1780–1786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kononen J, Honkaniemi J, Alho H, Koistinaho J, Iadarola M, Pelto-Huikko M 1992 Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat hypothalamic pituitary axis after immobilization stress. Endocrinology 130:3041–3047[Abstract]
  46. Hyder SM, Stancel GM, Nawaz Z, McDonnell DP, Loose-Mitchell DS 1992 Identification of the estrogen response element in the 3'-flanking region of the murine c-fos protooncogene. J Biol Chem 267:18047–18054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Weisz A, Rosales R 1990 Identification of an estrogen response element upstream of the human c-fos gene that binds the estrogen receptor and the AP-1 transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5097–5106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ambrosino C, Cicatiello L, Cobellis G, Addeo R, Sica V, Bresciani F, Weisz A 1993 Functional antagonism between the estrogen receptor and Fos in the regulation of c-fos protooncogene transcription. Mol Endocrinol 7:1472–1483[Abstract]
  49. Shupnik MA, Gordon MS, Chin WW 1989 Tissue specific regulation of rat estrogen receptor mRNAs. Mol Endocrinol 3:660–665[Abstract]
  50. Friend KE, Ang LE, Shupnik MA 1995 Estrogen regulates the expression of several different estrogen receptor mRNA isoforms in rat pituitary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4367–4371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Rhode PR, Gorski J 1991 Inhibitory effects of serum and stimulatory effects of estrogen on prolactin mRNA levels in GH3 rat pituitary tumor cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 82:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Karin M 1995 The regulation of AP-1 actvity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem 270:16483–16486[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. J. Clarke, V. A. Tobin, S. Pompolo, and A. Pereira
Effects of Changing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Frequency and Estrogen Treatment on Levels of Estradiol Receptor-{alpha} and Induction of Fos and Phosphorylated Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Binding Protein in Pituitary Gonadotropes: Studies in Hypothalamo-Pituitary Disconnected Ewes
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1128 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Oomizu, K. Chaturvedi, and D. K. Sarkar
Folliculostellate Cells Determine the Susceptibility of Lactotropes to Estradiol's Mitogenic Action
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1473 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. B. Speert, S. J. MCClennen, and A. F. Seasholtz
Sexually Dimorphic Expression of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone-Binding Protein in the Mouse Pituitary
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4730 - 4741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Candolfi, V. Zaldivar, A. De Laurentiis, G. Jaita, D. Pisera, and A. Seilicovich
TNF-{alpha} Induces Apoptosis of Lactotropes from Female Rats
Endocrinology, September 1, 2002; 143(9): 3611 - 3617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Fauquier, N. C. Guerineau, R. A. McKinney, K. Bauer, and P. Mollard
Folliculostellate cell network: A route for long-distance communication in the anterior pituitary
PNAS, June 28, 2001; (2001) 151339598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
X. Long, K. A. Burke, R. M. Bigsby, and K. P. Nephew
Effects of the Xenoestrogen Bisphenol A on Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the Rat
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2001; 226(5): 477 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Garcia, D. Lacasa, and Y. Giudicelli
Estradiol Stimulation of c-fos and c-jun Expressions and Activator Protein-1 Deoxyribonucleic Acid Binding Activity in Rat White Adipocyte
Endocrinology, August 1, 2000; 141(8): 2837 - 2846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
H. MORGAN, M. SMITH, Z. BURKE, and D. CARTER
The transactivation-competent carboxyl-terminal domain of AF-9 is expressed within a sexually dimorphic transcript in rat pituitary
FASEB J, June 1, 2000; 14(9): 1109 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Ying and D.-H. Lin
Estrogen-modulated Estrogen Receptor{middle dot}Pit-1 Protein Complex Formation and Prolactin Gene Activation Require Novel Protein Synthesis
J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2000; 275(20): 15407 - 15412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Hentges, N. Boyadjieva, and D. K. Sarkar
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}3 Stimulates Lactotrope Cell Growth by Increasing Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor from Folliculo-Stellate Cells
Endocrinology, March 1, 2000; 141(3): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. P. Nephew, X. Long, E. Osborne, K. A. Burke, A. Ahluwalia, and R. M. Bigsby
Effect of Estradiol on Estrogen Receptor Expression in Rat Uterine Cell Types
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2000; 62(1): 168 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. A. Mitchner, C. Garlick, R. W. Steinmetz, and N. Ben-Jonathan
Differential Regulation and Action of Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} in GH3 Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2651 - 2658.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.R. Malayer, J. Cheng, and V.M. Woods
Estrogen Responses in Bovine Fetal Uterine Cells Involve Pathways Directed by Both Estrogen Response Element and Activator Protein-1
Biol Reprod, May 1, 1999; 60(5): 1204 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. E. Wilson, R. H. Price Jr., and R. J. Handa
Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in the Pituitary Gland
Endocrinology, December 1, 1998; 139(12): 5151 - 5156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. A. Mitchner, C. Garlick, and N. Ben-Jonathan
Cellular Distribution and Gene Regulation of Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} in the Rat Pituitary Gland
Endocrinology, September 1, 1998; 139(9): 3976 - 3983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. Steinmetz, N. A. Mitchner, A. Grant, D. L. Allen, R. M. Bigsby, and N. Ben-Jonathan
The Xenoestrogen Bisphenol A Induces Growth, Differentiation, and c-fos Gene Expression in the Female Reproductive Tract
Endocrinology, June 1, 1998; 139(6): 2741 - 2747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T.-Y. Chun, D. Gregg, D. K. Sarkar, and J. Gorski
Differential regulation by estrogens of growth and prolactin synthesis in pituitary cells suggests that only a small pool of estrogen receptors is required for growth
PNAS, March 3, 1998; 95(5): 2325 - 2330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. Steinmetz, N. G. Brown, D. L. Allen, R. M. Bigsby, and N. Ben-Jonathan
The Environmental Estrogen Bisphenol A Stimulates Prolactin Release in Vitro and in Vivo
Endocrinology, May 1, 1997; 138(5): 1780 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Fauquier, N. C. Guerineau, R. A. McKinney, K. Bauer, and P. Mollard
Folliculostellate cell network: A route for long-distance communication in the anterior pituitary
PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8891 - 8896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow