help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giraud, A.
Right arrow Articles by Franc, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giraud, A.
Right arrow Articles by Franc, J.-L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*THYROGLOBULIN
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 6 2325-2332
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Binding and Internalization of Thyroglobulin: Selectivity, pH Dependence, and Lack of Tissue Specificity

Annie Giraud, Sandrine Siffroi, Jeanne Lanet and Jean-Louis Franc

INSERM U-38, Faculté de Médecine, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Annie Giraud, INSERM U-38, Faculté de Médecine, 27 boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France. E-mail: inserm38{at}newsup.univ-mrs.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Thyroglobulin (Tg), the precursor of thyroid hormones, follows a unique secretion, storage, and recapture pathway. The first steps of recapture were studied by investigating the binding of 125I-labeled Tg on the apical surface of inside-out follicles and its internalization. The selectivity of the process was assessed by using molecules other than Tg and/or nonthyroid cells.

Tg binding to the apical surface of thyroid inside-out follicles is selective relative to the binding of other molecules. It increases sharply over pH 8.0 and occurs through specific sites of moderately high affinity (Kd = ~200 nM; 2 x 104 sites/cells). At pH < 8.0 it occurs through numerous sites of very low affinity considered nonspecific. Endocytosis, although weak under our conditions, increases at pH 8.0 concomitantly with binding. Over pH 8.2, however, some inhibition occurs.

Surprisingly, Tg binding and endocytosis are not tissue specific, as they showed the same properties on thyroid inside-out follicles and Madin-Darby canine kidney or Chinese hamster ovary cells. Thus, a selective uptake of Tg mediates its recapture by thyroid cells. This selectivity is an intrinsic Tg property, not dependent on the thyrocyte apical surface, as it was observed with Madin-Darby canine kidney and Chinese hamster ovary cells. Given the pH effect observed, we suggest that Tg binding is a regulated phenomenon and that, through luminal pH control, it can vary from a basal level at neutral pH to a stimulated level over pH 8.0.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THYROGLOBULIN (Tg) is a large glycoprotein (660 kDa) produced by thyroid epithelial cells. It is the precursor and storage form of thyroid hormones, T3 and T4. Along its exocytic pathway, Tg undergoes posttranslational modifications, including iodination and coupling of certain iodinated tyrosyl residues to form thyroid hormones. It is secreted into and stocked in the follicular lumen (the central lumen surrounded by the epithelial cells). Hormonal secretion into the circulatory system requires the endocytosis of Tg and its transport to the lysosomes, in which hydrolysis allows the release of thyroid hormones. However, the way by which Tg is taken back from the lumen into thyroid cells is still a matter of controversy. An N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) receptor recognizing an asialo agalacto Tg exists in thyroid plasma membranes (1). This receptor binds Tg at acidic pH, and it was shown that in addition to GlcNAc, peptide determinants were involved in the binding reaction (2). The receptor, however, is involved not in Tg endocytosis but, rather, in the recycling of internalized GlcNAc bearing immature Tg from the acidic compartment to the follicular lumen via the Golgi apparatus (3). As far as endocytosis is concerned, although some previous experiments led to the conclusion that apical endocytosis does not exhibit selectivity for Tg (4), other experiments are in agreement with a coated pit-mediated process (5) and with Tg uptake via low affinity sites (6). These apparent discrepancies prompted us to compare the binding of Tg and other molecules on the apical surface of epithelial thyroid cells and on the surface of epithelial and nonepithelial cells other than thyrocytes. The aim of these experiments was to determine whether some specific process was at work. In fact, relative to the binding of other molecules, binding of Tg was selective, but this binding was not tissue specific; thyrocytes are not the only target cells for selective Tg binding. To further characterize Tg binding on cell surfaces, we studied some of its properties, i.e. affinity, charge, and pH dependence.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
IgG, ovomucoid, BSA, culture media, and amphotericin B were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Penicillin and streptomycin were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Fetal bovine serum and protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (complete) were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim SA (Meylan, France). Na125I was obtained from Amersham (Les Ulis, France). Aquasil (water-soluble siliconizing fluid) and sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(p-maleimidophenyl) butyrate (S-SMPB) were obtained from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, IL).

Cell culture
Porcine thyroid cells were isolated from thyroid glands by discontinuous trypsin-EGTA treatment (7). Inside-out follicles were obtained as described previously (8, 9); freshly isolated cells were suspended in DMEM containing antibiotics and fungizone and supplemented with 10% FBS (106 cells/ml). The cells were cultured as unstirred suspension in polystyrene dishes not treated for tissue culture coated with 1% agarose. They were maintained at 36 C in a water-saturated, 95% air-5% CO2 atmosphere. The medium was changed every 5–6 days by centrifuging the cells and resuspending them in an equivalent volume of fresh medium. After 5–8 days, inside-out follicles began to appear in the cultures, along with aggregates (9). After 10–12 days, most of the aggregates had evolved to form inside-out follicles (8), and the cultures were considered ready for use. Twenty-four hours before each experiment, 10-4 M (Bu)2cAMP was added to the culture medium.

Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (growth medium) on petri dishes (10-cm diameter) treated for tissue culture. After reaching confluence, the cells were resuspended by incubation in 1 ml/dish 0.25% trypsin and 0.2 g/liter EDTA in PBS (~10 min at 37 C). After a 10-fold dilution in growth medium, the suspended cells were seeded on petri dishes (10-cm diameter) not treated for tissue culture, coated with 1% agarose. The MDCK cells grown for several days in unstirred suspensions formed large aggregates and occasionally follicle-like structures.

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were handled as MDCK cells, except that the growth medium was Ham’s F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics. When grown in unstirred suspensions, they remained free or associated in small loose aggregates.

Preparation of modified BSA
Polyglucosamine and T4 were coupled to BSA with the hetero-bifunctional cross-linking reagent S-SMPB using a three-step procedure described previously (10) for m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, another N-hydroxysuccinimide ester used for coupling.

Briefly, in step 1, S-SMPB reacts by its ester group with primary amino groups of polyglucosamine or T4. Step 2 consists of a reduction of disulfide bonds in BSA by sodium borohydride. In step 3, S-SMPB-T4 or S-SMPB-(GlcNH2)n is coupled to reduced BSA; the cross-linker reacts by its maleimide group with aliphatic thiols (e.g. SH of reduced BSA). The molar ratio used for the coupling reaction was: BSA, 1; S-SMPB, 25; and (GlcNH2)n or T4, 30. (GlcNAc)n-BSA was obtained by acetylation of (GlcNH2)n-BSA with acetic anhydride.

The coupling of T4 was checked by coupling [125I]T4, whereas (GlcNAc)n coupling was checked by wheat-germ agglutinin affinity chromatography of (GlcNAc)n-BSA.

(GlcNH2)n was prepared by partial hydrolysis of chitosan by hydrochloric acid and then by charcoal retention of the (GlcNAc)n molecules liberated by hydrolysis (11). The monomeric forms were extracted from charcoal by 5% ethanol and were discarded. The polymeric forms were then extracted by 60% ethanol and purified on a DE 52 (OH form) column, Whatman Scientific Limited (Maidstone, UK).

Iodination of proteins
The molecules to be labeled [porcine Tg prepared as described previously (12), IgG, and occasionally ovomucoid or modified BSA] were iodinated with 125I by the chloramine-T method. Briefly, 4 µl (0.4 µCi) Na125I and 5 µl chloramine-T (1 mg/ml in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) were added to 15 x 10-12 moles (in 10 µl) of the protein to be iodinated. After 1-min exposure to chloramine-T at room temperature, 10 µl sodium metabisulfite (1 mg/ml in the same phosphate buffer) were added, and the reaction mixture volume was increased to 1 ml by adding PBS containing 0.1% BSA. Excess reagents were removed by passage over a PD 10 (Sephadex G-25) column. The specific radioactivity obtained was about 20–40 x 106 cpm/µg (~10–20 µCi/µg).

Binding and endocytosis experiments
The suspended follicles (thyroid cells) or aggregates (CHO and MDCK cells) were washed in Eagle’s Spinner salt solution and resuspended in DMEM without bicarbonate but with 20 mM HEPES containing 3% BSA and made 5 mM Ca2+ and 3 mM Mg2+. This medium will be referred to as binding medium. Depending on the experiments, the pH varied from 7.2–8.5. In some experiments (see Results), the binding medium was supplemented with molecules to test their effects (unlabeled Tg and dextran sulfate). The follicle suspensions generally contained 0.5–2.0 x 106 cells/ml (determined by DNA evaluation). Occasionally, higher cell concentrations (up to 10 x 106 cells/ml) were used with MDCK or CHO only. Binding and endocytosis experiments were performed at 36 C under gentle agitation in 25-ml or 100-ml siliconized flasks containing, respectively, 2.5 and 10 ml cell suspension.

Incubations started by the addition of labeled protein (7.6 x 10-14 moles/ml and 0.3 µCi/ml). At the end of the incubation, samples (1 ml) were collected in 5-ml test tubes. The cells were centrifuged (200 x g, 5 min) and washed twice in 2 ml ice-cold binding medium. They were then suspended in 1 ml of the same ice-cold medium, transferred to clean tubes, and centrifuged again. The supernatant was discarded, and pronase treatment of the pellet allowed separation of internalized and cell surface-associated ligand. The pellet was then suspended in 1 ml 2 µg/ml pronase in PBS, pH 8.2, or in 1 ml 5 µg/ml pronase in PBS, pH 7.4, depending on the pH used in the experiments. Occasionally, with the higher cell concentrations, 7 and 15 µg/ml pronase were used at pH 8.2 and 7.4, respectively. After 5 min at 36 C, protease inhibitors were added, and the cell suspension was cooled on ice. Under these conditions no cell lysis was observed, and the cells remained impermeable to erythrosine. Cells were collected by centrifugation and then washed in PBS. We considered that once pooled, the last two supernatants of centrifugation contained the surface-associated labeled ligand, whereas the final pellet contained the internalized ligand. After counting the supernatants and pellets, we used the pellets for DNA determination.

Nonspecific cell-associated ligand was determined by taking samples immediately after starting the incubation (time zero) and was subtracted from the data presented. When binding alone was to be studied (without internalization) incubations were performed at 4 C, and cellular ATP was depleted by the addition of 2 mM NaF and 10 mM NaN3, as described by Schmid and Carter (13). For apparent binding constant determination, labeled Tg (75 pM) was incubated in the presence of increasing amounts of cold Tg. At the end of the incubation, cell surface-associated ligand was recovered as described above. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of an excess of unlabeled Tg (30 mg/ml; 45 µM; a concentration leading to maximum inhibition of labeled Tg binding). The binding data were analyzed with the Ligand program (14).

DNA was determined using the fluorimetric method described by Labarca and Paigen (15).

Preparation for electron microscopy
Inverted follicles were fixed in 3.75% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature, rinsed twice in same buffer containing 0.25 M saccharose, and postfixed in 1% OsO4. After dehydration in graded acetone, follicles were embedded in araldite. Sections were obtained with a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Leica, Paris, France), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with a JEOL 1220 electron microscope (JEOL France, Roissy, France).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Monitoring of inside-out follicles
In optic microscopy, inside-out follicles appeared as hollow spheres (Fig. 1AGo). This polarity was verified by electron microscopy. The apical surface of thyroid cells, characterized by microvilli, faces the culture medium (Fig. 1BGo). Another indicator of correctly inverted polarity, the (Bu)2cAMP-induced swelling of follicles suggesting water transport from culture medium toward lumen, was regularly observed.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Inside-out follicles formed by porcine thyroid epithelial cells in culture. A, Phase contrast; bar = 80 µM. B, Section of inside out follicle. L, Lumen; M, medium; MV, microvilli. Bar = 2 µM. C, Light micrograph of an inside-out follicle in Indian ink (verification of follicle tightness). Bar = 80 µM.

 
Before use, the tightness of inside-out follicles was checked by a test of Indian ink exclusion (16). Inside-out follicles resuspended at 4 C in culture medium were impermeable to the tracer (Fig. 1CGo), which indicates a good tightness of the epithelial cell wall and accessibility limited to the part of the cell membrane facing the culture medium (apical membrane).

Binding and internalization of Tg and IgG
Time-course experiments were performed with inside-out follicles (Fig. 2Go). Measurements of total cell-associated 125I-labeled Tg and IgG showed that there was more cell-associated Tg than IgG. This was clear at pH 7.2 (Fig. 2AGo) and was even more pronounced at pH 8.2 (Fig. 2BGo). In fact, raising the pH from 7.2 to 8.2 enhanced the amount of cell-associated Tg, whereas the amount of cell-associated IgG remained the same. Other molecules, i.e. ovomucoid and modified albumins to which cross-linked GlcNAc or T4, or cross-linker alone was added behaved like IgG and did not bind to the cells as Tg did (data not shown). To discriminate between surface-associated label and internalized label, we treated cells with pronase (see Materials and Methods). At pH 7.4, the cell surface association and internalization of 125I-labeled Tg were more efficient than IgG binding and internalization (Fig. 2CGo). At pH 8.1, the binding of Tg was strongly enhanced relative to that at pH 7.4, whereas only a moderate, if any, enhancement of internalization was observed. IgG binding and internalization were still very low and comparable to those observed at pH 7.4 (Fig. 2DGo). Light microscopic controls showed that after 60–90 min of incubation at 37 C, follicles were still intact whatever the pH from 7–8.3.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time course for binding and internalization of [125I]Tg and [125I]IgG by thyroid inside-out follicles. A, Total cell-associated label at pH 7.2. B, Total cell-associated label at pH 8.2. C, Cell surface-associated label (solid line, closed symbols) and internalized label (dotted line, open symbols) at pH 7.4. D, Cell surface-associated label (solid line, closed symbols) and internalized label (dotted line, open symbols) at pH 8.1. • and {circ}, [125I]Tg; {blacktriangleup} and {triangleup}, [125I]IgG. This figure illustrates representative experiments in which duplicate samples were assayed for surface-bound and internalized radioactivity as described in Materials and Methods. Duplicate samples are connected by a vertical bar.

 
To determine whether the preferential binding and subsequent internalization of Tg observed were dependent on a tissue-specific receptor(s), we performed the same time-course experiments with MDCK cells (Fig. 3Go, A and B) or CHO cells (Fig. 3Go, C and D). With the two cell lines, at both pH 7.4 (Fig. 3Go, A and C) and pH 8.2 (Fig. 3Go, B and D), we observed preferential Tg binding and internalization comparable to that previously seen with inside-out follicles, and we found an enhancement of Tg binding at pH 8.2.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Time course for binding and internalization of [125I]Tg and [125I]IgG by MDCK and CHO cells. A, MDCK cells, pH 7.4. B, MDCK cells, pH 8.2. C, CHO cells, pH 7.4. D, CHO cells, pH 8.2. Solid line and closed symbols, Surface-associated label. Dotted line and open symbols, Internalized label. • and {circ}, [125I]Tg; {blacktriangleup} and {triangleup}, [125I]IgG. This figure illustrates representative experiments in which duplicate samples were assayed for surface-bound and internalized radioactivity as described in Materials and Methods. Duplicate samples are connected by a vertical bar.

 
Effect of pH
Binding and internalization of 125I-labeled Tg and IgG by inside-out follicles were allowed to occur at different pH. After 90-min incubation at 36 C and pronase treatment, cell surface-associated label and internalized label were measured. Figure 4AGo shows a strong dependence on pH: a sharp increase in surface-associated label occurred at pH 7.9/8.0, followed by a slow decrease as the pH rose. Internalization was also affected by the pH changes, but to a lesser extent. After reaching a maximum around pH 8.0, it decreased to its pH 7.4 value as the pH kept rising. We observed no effect of pH on IgG binding and internalization (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of pH on binding and internalization of [125I]Tg. Binding and internalization were assessed after 90-min incubation at 36 C. A, inside-out follicles. B, MDCK cells. C, CHO cells. —- and •, Surface-associated label; - - - and {circ}, internalized label. This figure illustrates representative experiments in which duplicate samples were assayed for surface-bound and internalized radioactivity as described in Materials and Methods. Duplicate samples are connected by a vertical bar.

 
As shown in Fig. 4Go, B (MDCK) and C (CHO), Tg binding on nonthyroid cells was also dependent on pH. IgG binding on nonthyroid cells was not pH dependent (not shown).

Effect of dextran sulfate
The effect of pH on [125I]Tg binding prompted us to study the effect of negatively charged molecules used as potential binding inhibitors. Binding and internalization of [125I]Tg were performed without or with dextran sulfate (150 µg/ml) added to the culture medium.

At pH 8.2, Tg binding to inside-out follicles was strongly inhibited by dextran sulfate, whereas IgG binding was not. Internalization of Tg was also inhibited, but to a lesser extent (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of dextran sulfate on binding and internalization of [125I]Tg and [125I]IgG. Binding and internalization were assessed after 90-min incubation at 36 C. The dextran sulfate (DS) concentration was 150 µg/ml. A, Inside-out follicles, pH 7.4. B, Inside-out follicles, pH 8.1. C, MDCK cells, pH 7.4. D, MDCK cells, pH 8.2. E, CHO cells, pH 7.4. F, CHO cells, pH 8.2. Open bars, Internalized protein; hatched bars, surface-associated protein. This figure illustrates representative experiments in which duplicate samples were assayed for surface-bound and internalized radioactivity as described in Materials and Methods. Duplicate samples are underlined.

 
At pH 7.4, Tg binding was inhibited in some experiments, although to a lesser extent than at pH 8.2 (Fig. 5AGo), but in other experiments, we found no inhibition (not shown); with cells from four different primocultures we twice observed an inhibition of binding and twice observed no effect. Internalization was slightly or not inhibited in three of four cases and was clearly inhibited in one case. In fact, we found difficult to obtain clear reproducible results when working at pH 7.4.

At pH 8.2, Tg binding to MDCK (Fig. 5DGo) or to CHO (Fig. 5FGo) was strongly inhibited by dextran sulfate. Internalization was also inhibited, but less.

At pH 7.4, Tg binding to MDCK (Fig. 5CGo) or to CHO (Fig. 5EGo) was slightly or not inhibited in most cases (four of five). However, at this pH, we are still confronted with a dispersion of results that was difficult to overcome. Internalization was inhibited to various extents in all experiments.

Binding of 125I-labeled Tg: apparent binding constants and number of receptor sites
Bound [125I]Tg was determined after overnight incubation at 4 C in the presence of NaF and NaN3 (see Materials and Methods) or after 2-h incubation at 4 C (long enough to reach steady state in these conditions).

At pH 8.1, two sets of sites were found on inside-out follicles. One set (~2 x 104 sites/cell) bound Tg with moderately high affinity (Kd = ~200 nM). The other set (>106 sites/cell) bound Tg with low affinity (~30 µM; Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Competitive binding between labeled and unlabeled Tg. A, Surface-associated 125I label was determined at pH 8.2 after 2-h incubation at 4 C in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled Tg. B, Scatchard plot for specific binding. Once Kd and binding capacity (Bmax) were determined by the Ligand program, the number of binding sites per cell (see Results) was calculated after DNA determination, assuming 105 cells/µg DNA for thyroid cells, 0.86 x 105/µg DNA for CHO cells, and 0.43 x 105/µg DNA for MDCK cells.

 
A pH 7.4, we were unable to obtain experimental data accurate enough to be used to determine affinity constants by Scatchard transformation. An estimation suggests the presence of a single set of sites of low affinity (>106 sites/cell; Kd = ~10 µM) whose apparent constants are close to those of the low affinity sites found at pH 8.1.

MDCK and CHO cells exhibited the same two sets of sites at pH 8.1 (Kd = ~200–400 nM and 4–6 x 104 sites/cell for the first; Kd = ~60–120 µM and 2–3 x 106 sites/cell for the second; data not shown).

At pH 7.4, we again observed only low affinity binding whose constants could not be correctly determined by Scatchard transformation due to the dispersion of the experimental points.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results presented here show that [125I]Tg binding to the apical surface of cultured thyroid cells occurs through low and moderately high affinity sites, the latter appearing at pH values over 8.0. This binding is selective toward Tg (IgG binding is lower than Tg binding) and is not tissue specific; the binding characteristics and the binding selectivity of Tg observed with thyroid cells were also observed with MDCK cells and CHO cells. Our observations are in agreement with those of Lemansky and Herzog (6), who reported the existence of low affinity binding sites mediating apical Tg uptake. However, the specificity studies presented here (binding of molecules other than Tg, binding of Tg on nonthyroid cells) as well as the effect of pH enable us to further describe the mechanisms involved. In contrast with our present findings, Kostroch et al. (4) reported that Tg apical endocytosis by thyroid cells was not selective. However, they recently described a selective binding and endocytosis of Tg at the basolateral membrane (17), which agrees with what we observed for binding at pH 7.4 on the apical side of thyroid cells and on MDCK or CHO cells.

As our first aim was to study Tg binding to thyroid apical membranes, we needed cells whose apical side was accessible. We chose suspensions of inside-out follicles rather than monolayers of cells on culture dishes or on culture plate inserts, to suppress the high nonspecific binding of Tg on cell supports. Although (Bu)2cAMP is not necessary to maintain the follicular structure, it was added 24 h before each experiment on inside-out follicles to stimulate thyroid cell metabolism and any synthesis of putative binding sites. CHO and MDCK cells were also used as cell suspensions to prevent nonspecific binding.

At equal molar concentrations, IgG binding to inside-out follicles is lower than Tg binding. Similarly, the binding of ovomucoid or of modified BSA (i.e. BSA bearing T4 or GlcNAc) is lower than Tg binding (not shown).

Tg binding also differs from IgG binding in its striking enhancement at basic pH; binding increases sharply at pH 8.0, whereas IgG binding remains unchanged. The possible significance of this finding (physiological phenomenon or mere artifact) will be discussed later. As the pH dependence of binding suggested the implication of some charges, polyanions such as dextran sulfate (see Results) or fucosan (not shown) were introduced in the binding medium; both inhibited the pH-dependent binding of Tg (the binding at pH 7.4 was only slightly inhibited). In contrast, IgG binding was not inhibited. We do not yet know whether the negative charges involved in Tg binding are borne by Tg or by the cell surfaces. Anionic charges are involved in the binding of ligands to macrophage scavenger receptors (18), but are not involved in the nonspecific binding of advanced glycosylation end products to macrophages (19). All known ligands of macrophage scavenger receptors are polyanionic molecules or macromolecular complexes, but the exact determinant(s) that confers binding ability has not been identified (18).

To further characterize Tg binding, we determined the apparent binding constants of Tg on inside-out follicles. As shown in Results, at pH 8.1 Tg binds to cell surfaces through two sets of sites: one of moderately high affinity (Kd = ~200 nM) and one of low affinity (Kd = ~30 µM). At pH 7.4, despite experimental difficulties, the results suggest the presence of low affinity sites only. The low affinity binding observed at pH 7.4 and 8.1 can hardly be considered specific, and we think that only the moderately high affinity binding found over pH 8.0 is specific.

Surprisingly, when the experiments performed on inside-out follicles were reproduced on mammalian cell lines, we found that Tg binding to MDCK and CHO cell surfaces was also selective and had the same properties (affinity, pH dependence, and anion competition) as Tg binding to apical surfaces. Tg binding is not tissue specific. Its selectivity probably depends on intrinsic Tg properties. In this context, the selective Tg binding and endocytosis at the basolateral side described recently by Gire et al. (17) are in agreement with our observations.

Some tentatives, not shown here, to purify a Tg receptor by affinity chromatography on Tg-Sepharose of solubilized thyroid membranes or by cross-linking of Tg to cell surfaces and immunoprecipitation provided several proteins (including Tg itself) with no obvious enrichment for any of them. Indeed, these results may only reflect the difficulties encountered when attempting to purify a receptor that displays such a moderate affinity toward its ligand, but they may also reflect the fact that different molecules act as Tg ligands. The moderate affinity of the specific binding sites is comparable to that observed for lectin binding to human erythrocytes (20) and human lymphocytes (21) and to that observed for maleylated albumin binding to scavenger receptors of rat sinusoidal cells (22). In all of these cases a single molecule is able to bind different ligands that share a common binding determinant (sugar in the case of lectin, and polyanion in the case of scavenger receptor). We suggest that at pH 8, Tg undergoes charge and/or conformation modifications that transform it into a multiligand molecule. If so, it is likely that the different Tg ligands share a common binding determinant. A confirmation of this hypothesis will have to await identification of this determinant and identification of the Tg parts involved in the binding.

Shifrin and Kohn (23) studied the binding, on purified thyroid membranes, of bovine Tg whose lysine or tyrosine residues had been chemically modified. They found that removal of the positive charges of lysine increased binding, whereas modification of the phenolic hydroxyl groups of tyrosine residues by O-acetylation inhibited it in a reversible way. If we assume that porcine Tg behaves in the same way, some of our results could be explained by a change in the ionization of lysine ({epsilon} NH2) or tyrosine (phenolic OH) residues at pH 8.0. Indeed the pK values of free lysine and tyrosine are higher than 8.0, but the pK of an amino acid included in a macromolecule changes under the influence of its environment.

Besides, pH 8.0 is rather high relative to the more neutral seric or cytoplasmic pH values. The pH limits inside the follicle are not yet fully established. To our knowledge, the only determination in thyroid compartments (extracellular fluid, follicular cells, and luminal fluid) was performed by Chow et al. (24) on turtle thyroid glands. They found values of 7.66, 7.26, and 7.32, respectively, for the three compartments considered. Interestingly, they showed that TSH increases the pH values of cells (up to 7.70) and lumen (up to 7.54), but not that of extracellular fluid. TSH-induced luminal pH augmentation is likely to occur in other species as well as turtles. In fact, an apical, amiloride-sensitive sodium uptake system, probably an amiloride-sensitive Na+/H+ exchanger, present on porcine thyroid cells (25) would be a likely candidate (among others) for the role of follicular pH regulator.

Under our experimental conditions (low concentrations of labeled Tg), endocytosis was weak, yet it was related to the amount of bound Tg (except at the highest pH tested, which may reflect some hindrance in vesicle formation). This is not surprising because a minimum Tg concentration is required to induce efficient endocytosis (Chabaud, O., unpublished observations). However, even with the high follicular Tg concentrations found in vivo (up to 250 mg/ml for rat thyroid) (26), fluid phase endocytosis is probably not the predominant mechanism in Tg uptake (6); adsorptive pinocytosis must contribute actively to Tg internalization.

In conclusion, Tg binds in a preferential way to cell membranes, not exclusively to thyroid cell membranes, through nonspecific binding sites and through specific ones that appeared at pH 8.0. Tg could be seen as a binding molecule able to recognize different membrane proteins. In view of the different results (ours and others) discussed above, we propose that in an unstimulated thyroid, Tg binds to apical surfaces through numerous nonspecific binding sites, whereas under TSH stimulation, specific binding sites appeared consecutive to a modification of Tg charge and/or conformation due to a rise in pH. Although the above hypothesis fits with most of the experimental data (ours and others), far more experimental studies are needed for it to be validated.

Whether regulation of the luminal pH exists and is involved in the binding of Tg is currently under investigation. In addition, binding assays of chemically modified Tg and tentative inhibition of the binding of normal and chemically modified Tg by polyanions and polycations will be required to specify the molecular mechanisms involved.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank M. Fraterno and P. Vial (Centre de Microscopie Électronique, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France) for transmission electron microscopy technical assistance, and Maryse Guantini and Edith de Saint Leger for typing the manuscript.

Received September 26, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Miquelis R, Alquier C, Monsigny M 1987 The N-acetyl glucosamine-specific receptor of the thyroid. Binding characteristics, partial characterization and potential role. J Biol Chem 262:15291–15298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mziant H, Bastiani P, Balivet T, Papandreou MJ, Fert V, Erragragui K, Blanck O, Miquelis R 1996 Carbohydrate and protein determinants are involved in thyroglobulin recognition by FRTL 5 cells. Endocrinology 137:1370–1377[Abstract]
  3. Miquelis R, Courageot J, Jacq A, Blanck O, Perrin C, Bastiani P 1993 Intracellular routing of GlcNAc-bearing molecules in thyrocytes: selective recycling through the Golgi apparatus. J Cell Biol 123:1695–1706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kostrouch Z, Bernier-Valentin F, Munari-Silem Y, Rajas F, Rabilloud R, Rousset B 1993 Thyroglobulin molecules internalized by thyrocytes are sorted in early endosomes and partially recycled back to the follicular lumen. Endocrinology 132:2645–2653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bernier-Valentin F, Kostrouch Z, Rabilloud R, Rousset B 1991 Analysis of the thyroglobulin internalization process using in vitro reconstituted thyroid follicles: evidence for a coated vesicle-dependent endocytic pathway. Endocrinology 129:2194–2201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lemansky P, Herzog V 1992 Endocytosis of thyroglobulin is not mediated by mannose-6-phosphate receptors in thyrocytes. Evidence for low affinity-binding sites operating in the uptake of thyroglobulin. Eur J Biochem 209:111–119[Medline]
  7. Chambard M, Gabrion J, Mauchamp J 1981 Influence of collagen gel on the orientation of epithelial cell polarity: follicle formation from isolated thyroid cells and from preformed monolayers. J Cell Biol 91:157–166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mauchamp J, Margotat A, Chambard M, Charrier B, Rémy L, Michel-Béchet M 1979 Polarity of three-dimensional structures derived from isolated hog thyroid cells in primary culture. Cell Tissue Res 204:417–430[Medline]
  9. Espanet H, Alquier C, Mauchamp J 1992 Polarity reversal of inside-out thyroid follicles cultured on the surface of a reconstituted basement membrane matrix. Exp Cell Res 200:473–480[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kitagawa T, Kawasaki T, Munechika H 1982 Enzyme immunoassay of blasticidin S with high sensitivity: a new and convenient method for preparation of immunogenic (hapten-protein) conjugates. J Biochem 92:585–590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rupley JA 1964 The hydrolysis of chitin by concentrated hydrochloric acid, and the preparation of low-molecular-weight substrates for lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 83:245–255[Medline]
  12. Marriq C, Rolland M, Lissitzky S 1977 Polypeptide chains of 19 S thyroglobulin from several mammalian species and of porcine 27 S iodoprotein. Eur J Biochem 79:143–149[Medline]
  13. Schmid SL, Carter LL 1990 ATP is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis in intact cells. J Cell Biol 111:2307–2318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Munson PJ, Rodbard D 1980 LIGAND: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal Biochem 107:220–239[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Labarca C, Paigen K 1980 A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 102:344–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Herzog V, Miller F 1981 Structural and functional polarity of inside-out follicles prepared from pig thyroid gland. Eur J Cell Biol 24:74–84[Medline]
  17. Gire V, Kostrouch Z, Bernier-Valentin F, Rabilloud R, Munari-Silem Y, Rousset B 1996 Endocytosis of albumin and thyroglobulin at the basolateral membrane of thyrocytes organized in follicles. Endocrinology 137:522–532[Abstract]
  18. Krieger M, Herz J 1994 Structures and functions of multiligand lipoprotein receptors: macrophage scavenger receptors and LDL receptor-related proteins (LRP). Annu Rev Biochem 63:601–637[Medline]
  19. Shaw M, Crabbe JC 1994 Non-specific binding of advanced-glycosylation end-products to macrophage outweighs specific receptor-mediated interactions. Biochem J 304:121–129
  20. Kawaguchi T, Matsumoto I, Osawa T 1974 Studies on competitive binding of lectins to human erythrocytes. Biochemistry 13:3169–3173[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kawaguchi T, Osawa T 1976 Elucidation of lectin receptors by quantitative inhibition of lectin binding to human erythrocytes and lymphocytes. Biochemistry 21:4581–4586
  22. Takata K, Horiuchi S, Morino Y 1989 Scavenger receptor-mediated recognition of maleylated albumin and its relation to subsequent endocytotic degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 984:273–280[Medline]
  23. Shifrin S, Kohn LD 1981 Binding of thyroglobulin to bovine thyroid membranes. Role of specific amino acids in receptor recognition. J Biol Chem 256:10600–10605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Chow SY, Yen-Chow YC, Woodbury DM 1983 Effects of thyrotropin, acetazolamide, 4-acetamido-4'-isothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid, perchlorate, ouabain and furosemide on pH and HCO3- concentrations in cells and luminal fluid of turtle thyroid as calculated from the distribution of [14C]di-methyloxazolidine-2,4-dione. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 225:17–23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gérard C, Gabrion J, Verrier B, Reggio H, Mauchamp J 1985 Localization of the Na+/K+-ATPase and of an amiloride sensitive Na+ uptake on thyroid epithelial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 38:134–141[Medline]
  26. Hayden LJ, Shagrin JM, Young JA 1970 Micropuncture investigation of the anion content of colloid from single rat thyroid follicles. Pflugers Arch 321:173–186[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. Wangemann, H.-M. Kim, S. Billings, K. Nakaya, X. Li, R. Singh, D. S. Sharlin, D. Forrest, D. C. Marcus, and P. Fong
Developmental delays consistent with cochlear hypothyroidism contribute to failure to develop hearing in mice lacking Slc26a4/pendrin expression
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1435 - F1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
U. Haberkorn and A. Altmann
Imaging Techniques for Gene Therapy: SPECT, PET, and MRI
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2001; 14(5): 383 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Marino and R. T. McCluskey
Role of thyroglobulin endocytic pathways in the control of thyroid hormone release
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): C1295 - C1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Marino, G. Zheng, L. Chiovato, A. Pinchera, D. Brown, D. Andrews, and R. T. McCluskey
Role of Megalin (gp330) in Transcytosis of Thyroglobulin by Thyroid Cells. A NOVEL FUNCTION IN THE CONTROL OF THYROID HORMONE RELEASE
J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2000; 275(10): 7125 - 7137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Marino, J. A. Friedlander, R. T. McCluskey, and D. Andrews
Identification of a Heparin-binding Region of Rat Thyroglobulin Involved in Megalin Binding
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 30377 - 30386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Marino, G. Zheng, and R. T. McCluskey
Megalin (gp330) Is an Endocytic Receptor for Thyroglobulin on Cultured Fisher Rat Thyroid Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 1999; 274(18): 12898 - 12904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giraud, A.
Right arrow Articles by Franc, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giraud, A.
Right arrow Articles by Franc, J.-L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*THYROGLOBULIN


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals