help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. Z.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 6 2466-2473
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Extracellular Matrix Regulates Ovarian Hormone-Dependent Proliferation of Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells1

Jianwei Xie and Sandra Z. Haslam

Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sandra Z. Haslam, Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mammary stromal cells can modulate steroid hormone responsiveness both in vivo and in vitro. One of the mechanisms by which stromal cells can influence epithelial cell behavior is by modifying the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM). In this report, we have investigated the effects of five ECM molecules on control of epithelial cell proliferation by estrogen (E2) and progestin (R5020) under serum-free culture conditions. To assess the contribution of mammary gland differentiation in determining epithelial cell interactions with ECM, the behavior of mammary epithelial cells derived from nulliparous and pregnant mice was compared.

We report the novel finding that the proliferative responses of mammary epithelial cells to progestin is influenced by specific ECM molecules. However, the primary determinant of hormonal responsiveness is the developmental state of the gland from which the epithelial cells were derived. Nulliparous-derived epithelial cells, proliferated in response to R5020 only on fibronectin (FN) and collagen IV (Col IV). The more highly differentiated, pregnancy-derived epithelial cells were not responsive to E2 or R5020 on any ECM. To determine if steroid hormone receptors were targets of ECM-mediated effects, ER and PR levels were analyzed. In both nulliparous and pregnancy-derived cultures, PR binding levels were maintained at similar levels on all ECMs. However, ER levels were not maintained in nulliparous-derived cultures, and this may have contributed to the lack of a significant response to E2. Alternatively or in addition, E2-induced responses may require additional signals or growth factors that are provided by stromal cells in vivo or by serum supplementation in vitro.

These results demonstrate the ECM molecules, fibronectin and collagen IV, can modulate responsiveness of mammary epithelial cells to R5020 in vitro, and may be the mediators of stromal influences on hormone responsiveness in vivo. However, the specific effects of ECM and hormones are also determined by the developmental state of the mammary gland from which the cells are derived. Thus, mammary gland differentiation, ovarian hormones, and ECM composition may act in concert to determine the outcome of hormone treatment on cell proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
EPITHELIAL-STROMAL cell interactions play an important role in the hormonally regulated growth and development of the normal mouse mammary gland both in vivo and in vitro (1, 2, 3). One of the ways in which stromal cells can influence epithelial cell behavior is through their contribution to the molecular composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Most, if not all, ECM components of the basement membrane in the mammary gland come from the stromal cells (4). ECM molecules and their receptors (integrins) have been shown to play an important role in cell-cell interactions and in cell-ECM interactions by 1) transduction of cellular signals via integrin receptors; 2) mediating cell attachment and detachment; 3) induction of cell differentiation; and 4) influencing malignant cell migration and invasion (5, 6, 7). To date, most studies in the mammary gland have focused on the role of ECM in the induction and maintenance of lactational cell differentiation (8, 9). In vitro studies have demonstrated that lactogenic hormones are an absolute requirement for milk protein synthesis. More recently, it has been shown that ECM molecules and integrins coordinately regulate casein expression in the presence of lactogenic hormones (9, 10).

Although epithelial-stromal cell interactions are known to play an important role in ovarian hormone-regulated mammary cell growth both in vivo and in vitro, virtually nothing is known about the role of specific ECM molecules in this process. Thus, in the present study we have investigated the effects of several different ECM molecules (collagen I and IV, tenascin, laminin, and fibronectin) on epithelial cell attachment, growth, modulation of E2 and/or progestin (R5020) stimulation of cell proliferation and regulation of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) binding levels. To assess the role of differentiation in interactions with ECM molecules, the responses of mammary epithelial cells from mammary glands of nulliparous (predominance of less differentiated ductal epithelium with some alveolar buds) and pregnant (highly differentiated and extensive lobuloalveolar, secretory epithelium) mice were compared.

We report the novel finding that ECM molecules can modulate responsiveness of mammary epithelial cells to the proliferative effects of R5020 in vitro and thus may be the mediators of stromal influences on hormone responsiveness in vivo. However, the primary determinant of hormonal responsiveness is the developmental state of the gland from which the epithelial cells were derived. In the case of nulliparous-derived epithelial cells, proliferative responses to R5020 could be obtained with fibronectin (FN) and collagen IV (Col IV), but not on other ECM molecules. The more highly differentiated, pregnancy-derived epithelial cells were not responsive to ovarian hormones. Thus, as lactational differentiation proceeds the attenuation of hormonal responsiveness is also accompanied by altered influence of ECM molecules.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents and chemicals
Collagenase III and pronase were purchased from Cooper Biomedical (Freehold, NJ) and Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), respectively. Culture media phenol red-free DMEM/Ham’s nutrient mixture F12 (DME/F12) (1:1), HBSS, nonessential amino acids (NEAA), L-glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Mouse FN (>95% pure), Col IV (>95% pure) and human tenascin (TN, >99% pure) were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY), whereas mouse laminin (LN, >95% pure) and rat collagen I (Col I, >90% pure) were purchased from Becton Dickinson Labware (Bedford, MA). All other culture ingredients, peptides and hormones were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Cell culture
Nulliparous (10–12 weeks old) or pregnant (12–15 days) Balb/c mice from our own colony were the source of mammary tissues. Epithelial cells were obtained by enzymatic dissociation as previously described (11). Briefly, mammary tissues were minced and digested with 0.1% collagenase plus 0.01% pronase at 35 C for 2 h, and the fibroblasts were removed by centrifuging at 80 x g for 30 sec. The epithelial cells were washed and collected after Percoll gradient centrifugation. Cell viability was determined by exclusion of trypan blue and viability was about 95%. On day 0, freshly dissociated mammary epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105 cells/well and cultured in 96 well flat-bottomed plates in serum- and phenol red-free DME/F12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 0.3 mg/ml L-glutamine, 0.1 µg/ml insulin, 100 µg/ml penicillin and 50 µg/ml streptomycin and kept in 5% CO2 at 37 C. On day 1 (20 h after cell plating), the cultures received media with or without hormones, and then the media were changed every other day. E2 was used at 23 nM and the synthetic progestin, R5020 (promegestone, New England Nuclear Corp., Boston, MA) at 10 nM.

Treatment of culture dishes with ECM
The coating concentrations and conditions used for ECM molecules were based on the supplier’s instructions and our own titration for effects on mammary epithelial cell attachment and growth in basal media. TN, FN, LN, and Cols I and IV were tested at 0.625, 1.3, 3.25, 6.5 and 13 µg/cm2 and Poly-L-lysine (PL) was tested at 0.13, 1.3, 13 and 130 µg/cm2. The concentrations that provided good attachment (see Fig. 2Go) and minimal cell proliferation (see Fig. 3Go) in the absence of hormones or growth factors were chosen. One day before cell plating, ECM molecules were coated onto each culture well as follows: Col IV, Col I, FN and LN at 6.5 µg/cm2; human TN at 1.3 µg/cm2; PL at 130 µg/cm2. After 1 h incubation at room temperature, each well was rinsed with HBSS.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Attachment of mammary epithelial cells on various ECM. Nulliparous- ({square}) and pregnancy-derived ({blacksquare}) cells were plated at 1.4 x 105cells/well in 96-well plates on different ECM molecules as indicated. The percent cell attachment on each ECM for both pregnant and nulliparous cells was calculated by dividing the numbers of cells attached after 17 h by the numbers of cells plated x 100. Cell numbers were determined by MTT assay. Each value represents the M ± SEM. of triplicate values from three to four separate experiments. *, P < 0.01 that the numbers of nulliparous-derived cells attached on Col I and FN were greater than on other ECMs and that numbers of pregnancy-derived cells attached on Col I and FN were greater than on other ECMs except TN.

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. DNA synthesis on different ECM in basal media. Nulliparous-derived epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105 cells/well in 96-well plates on indicated ECM molecules. [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was determined at 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. Each value represents the M ± SEM of five replicate values.

 
Determination of cell number
A modified 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to determine cell number on day 0 and 1 (17 h) and a standard curve was generated as described previously (11).

[3H]-thymidine incorporation and DNA content
[3H]-thymidine incorporation was used to measure DNA synthesis of cell cultures with or without hormone treatments. Cells were incubated with 0.1 µCi/well (96-well plates) [3H]-thymidine (specific activity 50 Ci/mmol, ICN Pharmaceutical, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA). at 37 C for 6 h. This was followed by washing with HBSS, ice-cold 90% ethanol, 10% trichloroacetic acid, and 90% ethanol. After air-drying, the cells were dissolved with 1 M NH4OH/NaOH (pH 12.3) for 4–5 h and neutralized with 1 M KH2PO4. The radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. DNA content for each well was determined by a fluorometric assay using Hoescht 33258 as described by West et al. (12). Calf thymus DNA was used as a standard.

Immunocytochemical assay of ß-casein
For ease of handling, cells were cultured on ECM-coated glass coverslips. Frozen tissue sections (6 µm) from 10-day lactating and 10-week-old nulliparous mice were used as positive and negative controls for the presence of ß-casein, respectively. Cultured cells or tissue sections were fixed with methanol:acetone 1:1 at -20 C for 6 min. All other steps were carried out at room temp. The coverslips were rinsed with PBS (0.01 M pH 7.4), permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 90 sec and incubated in PBS 1%BSA for 1 h. Samples were then incubated with sheep antimouse ß-casein antiserum (1:160 dilution) (a generous gift of Dr. B. K. Vonderhaar, NCI) or normal sheep serum for 1 h. After three washes in PBS 0.1% BSA, the samples were incubated with secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antisheep IgG (Organon Teknika Co., Durham, NC) (1:1000 dilution) for 1 h. After three additional washes in PBS, 0.1% BSA the samples were reacted with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (0.05% in 0.003% H2O2) for 3 min followed by a brief rinse in distilled H2O. This step produced a dark brown reaction product in cells that contained ß-casein.

Steroid hormone binding assay
Ligand binding assay was used to determine estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) content as described previously (1). Briefly, cells were cultured in 96-well plates on different ECM in basal media for days indicated and then incubated with 10 nM [3H] estradiol (specific activity 142.0 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) with or without 100-fold excess unlabeled estradiol for 1 h at 37 C. To determine PR binding levels, cells were cultured in 96-well plates on different ECM in media with or without 23 nM E2 for the days indicated, and then incubated with 10 nM [3H]-R5020 (specific activity 84.8 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) plus 100-fold excess dexamethasone (to suppress R5020 binding to glucocorticoid binding sites) or 100-fold excess unlabeled R5020. The specific binding was calculated by subtracting nonspecific binding obtained in the presence of unlabeled R5020 from total binding obtained in the presence of unlabeled dexamethasone. DNA content was determined as described above.

Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM and statistical significance was determined using the Student t test or ANOVA as appropriate.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Morphology and attachment of mammary epithelial cells on different ECM
After enzymatic dissociation, the majority of epithelial cells existed as small organoids of aggregated cells. The morphologic appearance of the cultures were as follows: by 17–20 h after plating 50–60% of the organoids formed monolayers on Col I and FN, whereas only 30–40% of the organoids formed monolayers on TN, LN, and Col IV. In the latter case, the cells remained aggregated. However, by 2–3 days of culture almost all the epithelial cells had formed monolayers regardless of ECM composition. Representative culture morphologies at days 1 and 3 are shown in Fig. 1Go. To identify ECM specific effects, cells were also cultured on PL, a nonspecific attachment factor. In the case of PL, fewer of the organoids formed monolayers, even by day 3. The overall morphological appearance of pregnancy-derived cultures, except for the presence of intracellular lipid accumulation, was very similar to nulliparous cultures.



View larger version (204K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photomicrographs of nulliparous-derived mammary epithelial cells grown on different ECM. Cells were plated and cultured in 96-well plates coated with FN (a, b) or LN (c, d) and photographed after 1 (a, c) or 3 (b, d) days of culture. Note fewer organoids have formed monolayers after 1 day of culture on LN (c) vs. FN (a). However, by day 3 cells cultured on both ECM were identical in appearance (b, d). Magnification, x150.

 
One of the functions of ECM is to mediate cell attachment. In the present study, ECM effects on attachment were quantitated at 17 h after cell plating, before any significant proliferation had occurred (Fig. 2Go). In nulliparous-derived cultures, the highest attachment was obtained with Col I and FN (50–55%) followed by Col IV, LN, and TN (40–45%). The lowest attachment obtained was on PL (34%). In pregnancy-derived cultures, a similar pattern of attachment efficiency was observed.

Cell proliferation on different ECM in basal media
To assess the contribution of ECM molecules themselves to cell proliferation, DNA synthesis was determined in basal media, without added hormones. In nulliparous-derived cultures (Fig. 3Go), DNA synthesis was similar on all ECMs and PL, indicating that the various ECMs did not exhibit significant growth stimulating activity. Identical results were obtained with pregnancy-derived cultures (data not shown).

Effects of steroid hormones on cell proliferation in relation to ECM composition
To determine the peak time of proliferation, DNA synthesis was measured for nulliparous and pregnancy-derived cells on all ECM molecules at 24, 48, and 72 h after addition of hormones. For time course studies, epidermal growth factor (EGF) was included as a positive control to demonstrate the capacity of the cells to proliferate under the serum-free culture conditions that were used for these studies. Figure 4AGo shows that nulliparous-derived cells cultured on FN exhibit maximal proliferation in response to both R5020 and EGF at 48 h after treatment. Increased proliferation was also observed with E2 treatment. The small stimulatory effect of E2 seen at 24 h was not significantly different from the control, R5020 or E2 + R5020 treatment groups. Maximal proliferation in response to EGF also occurred at 48 h after treatment for pregnancy-derived cultures on FN (Fig. 4BGo) and on all other ECMs for both nulliparous and pregnancy-derived cultures (data not shown). Figure 5Go shows the effect of hormone treatment on DNA synthesis when nulliparous-derived cells were cultured on different ECMs. R5020 increased DNA synthesis by 50–60% on FN and Col IV. The increased DNA synthesis observed with R5020 on FN was significantly greater that that obtained with E2 or E2 + R5020. E2 also increased DNA synthesis on FN, although the increase was not statistically significant across experiments. In several individual experiments, the stimulation was significant as shown above (Fig. 4AGo), but a high degree of variability between experiments obscured the statistical significance of stimulatory effects when the values were averaged.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Time course of hormone-stimulated [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Nulliparous- (A) and pregnancy-derived (B) epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105 cells/well in 96-well plates on FN. Medium was changed on day 1 to control (no hormones, {square}), E2 (23 nM, ), R5020 (10 nM, {blacksquare}), E2 + R5020 (23 nM +10 nM, ) or EGF (5 ng/ml ). [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was determined at indicated times as described in Materials and Methods. Each value represents the M ± SEM of five replicates. *, P < 0.05–0.005 that hormone- and growth factor-treated groups are greater than the hormone-free control group.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of E2 and/or R5020 on DNA synthesis of nulliparous-derived cells on various ECM. Nulliparous-derived epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105cells/well in 96-well plates on indicated ECM molecules. Medium was changed on day 1 to control (no hormones), E2 (23 nM, {square}), R5020 (10 nM, {blacksquare}) or E2 + R5020 (23 nM+10 nM, ). [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was determined at 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. The percent increase was obtained by dividing the cpm 3 H-thymidine incorporated/mg DNA at day 3 in the presence of indicated hormones by the cpm 3H-thymidine incorporated/mg DNA at day 3 in control media x 100 for each ECM molecule; the controls were considered to be 100%. Each value represents the M ± SEM of triplicate values from three experiments. * P < 0.05–0.01 that hormone-treated groups are significantly greater than the hormone-free, control group for individual ECM molecules. ** P < 0.05 that on FN, the R5020 treatment group is greater than the control, E2 and E2 + R5020 treatment groups.

 
Using the same experimental protocol as described above, ECM effects on steroid hormone responsiveness were also measured in pregnancy-derived epithelial cultures (Fig. 6Go). Neither E2 nor R5020 was able to stimulate cell proliferation on any ECM molecules.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of E2 and/or R5020 on DNA synthesis of pregnancy-derived cells on various ECM. Pregnancy-derived epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105 cells/well in 96-well plates on indicated ECM molecules. Medium was changed on day 1 to control (no hormones), E2 (23 nM, {square}), R5020 (10 nM, {blacksquare}) or E2 + R5020 (23 nM+10 nM, ). 3H-thymidine incorporation into DNA was determined at 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. The percent increase was obtained by dividing the cpm 3H-thymidine incorporated/mg DNA at day 3 in the presence of indicated hormones by the cpm 3H-thymidine incorporated/mg DNA at day 3 in control media x 100 for each ECM molecule; the controls were considered to be 100%. Each value represents the M ± SEM of triplicate values from three experiments.

 
As mentioned above, one of the crucial roles of ECM molecules is to mediate cell attachment. To determine the specificity of the contribution of ECM molecules to modulating hormonal responsiveness beyond their effect on cell attachment, cells were also grown on PL, a nonspecific attachment factor. As can be seen in Figs. 5Go and 6Go, PL did not promote cell proliferation in nulliparous- or pregnancy-derived cultures with added hormones.

ECM molecules can interact with cells via binding to specific receptor molecules called integrins. Many integrins recognize the peptide sequence Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) in their ligands (FN, TN, and LN) and the RGD tripeptide by itself can in some instances initiate integrin-mediated cellular effects (13). Thus it was of interest to determine if integrin binding via RGD was involved in steroid hormone responsiveness that was observed with certain ECMs. Nulliparous-derived cells were plated on PL, a nonspecific attachment factor that did not promote steroid hormone responsiveness but promoted attachment under serum-free conditions. The cultures were then treated with various concentrations of RGD with or without R5020. The RGE (Arg-Gly-Glu) peptide that does not bind to integrins served as a control. Figure 7Go shows that RGD did not mediate R5020 effects on cells. Higher concentrations RGD and RGE had negative effect on cell growth (data not shown). The effect of RGD with and without R5020 was also tested on Col I, and no increase in DNA synthesis was observed (data not shown). To assure adequate access of the RGD peptide to the integrin binding sites on the cell surface, RGD was also added to freshly dissociated cells, before plating. Under this condition RGD did not inhibit cell attachment or increase DNA synthesis on either PL or Col I (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. The effect of integrin binding RGD tripeptide on progestin-dependent proliferation of nulliparous-derived epithelial cells. Nulliparous-derived epithelial cells were plated at 1.4 x 105 cells/well in 96-well plates on PL. Medium was changed on day 1 to RGE alone (0.05–5 nM, {square}) or in combination with R5020 (10 nM, {blacksquare}) or RGD alone (0.05–5 nM, {square}) or in combination with R5020 (10 nM, {blacksquare}). [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was determined at 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. Each value represents the M ± SEM of five replicate values from three experiments.

 
Steroid hormone receptor status
To determine whether the observed effects of R5020 on various ECM were related to steroid hormone receptor levels, ER and PR binding levels were measured. Because R5020 stimulated cell proliferation when nulliparous cells were grown on FN and Col IV but not when the cells were grown on Col I or LN, these four ECM molecules and PL were used to analyze ER and PR levels. ER and PR levels were determined by ligand binding assays on freshly dissociated cells and after 1 or 3 days of culture. In freshly dissociated cells, ER levels in both nulliparous and pregnancy-derived cells were similar, 4.3 ± 1.5 and 3.0 ± 1.0 fmol/µg DNA, respectively. In the case of nulliparous-derived cultures, by day 3, ER levels decreased significantly, to barely detectable levels on all ECMs except FN (Fig. 8Go). In contrast, ER levels were maintained on all ECMs in pregnancy-derived cultures.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. ER concentration of nulliparous- and pregnancy-derived epithelial cells during culture on various ECM. Nulliparous- (A) or pregnancy-derived epithelial (B) cells were plated at 1.4 x 105cells/well in 96-well plates on various ECM molecules as indicated. Cells were cultured in basal media and ER ligand-binding assays were performed after 1 ({square}) and 3 ({blacksquare}) days of culture. Each value represents the M ± SEM of duplicate determinations from three experiments. *, P = 0.05 that ER values in nulliparous-derived cultures at day 3 on FN are greater than other ECMs. **, P = 0.05–0.01 that ER values at day 3 are less than on day 1.

 
Quantitation of PR levels in pregnancy- and nulliparous-derived cells is shown in Fig. 9Go. In freshly dissociated cells, PR levels were 13.4 ± 2.5 and 5.3 ± 1.0 in nulliparous- and pregnancy-derived cells, respectively. PR levels in both pregnancy- and nulliparous-derived cells increased with time after plating, regardless of ECM composition. However, no increases in PR levels were observed after treatment with E2 on any ECM in either nulliparous- or pregnancy-derived cultures (Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. E2 regulation of PR binding levels of nulliparous- and pregnancy-derived cultures on various ECM. Nulliparous- (A) or pregnancy-derived epithelial (B) cells were plated at 1.4 x 105cells/well in 96-well plates on various ECM molecules as indicated. PR ligand-binding assays were carried out on day 1 for cells cultured in basal media ({square}). On day 1, additional cells were changed to control media without hormones ({blacksquare}) or to media containing 23 nM E2 () and assayed for PR binding 3 days later. Each value represents the M ± SEM of duplicate determinations from three to four experiments.

 
Casein expression in pregnancy-derived cultures
The reduced ability of R5020 to stimulate proliferation in the pregnancy-derived epithelial cultures was reminiscent of the refractoriness to steroid hormones that is observed during lactation in vivo (14). One possible explanation for the refractoriness observed herein, was that culturing the cells on ECMs was inducing a lactational state. To determine if this was the case, the cultured cells were tested for casein production by immunocytochemical analysis. As can be seen in Fig. 10Go, a very low number, only about 5–10%, of pregnancy-derived cells cultured on FN, TN, LN, or Col IV were positive for casein and there were no significant differences among the various ECMs. Thus, loss of steroid hormone responsiveness did not appear to be correlated with the extensive induction of a lactational phenotype.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Immunocytochemical analysis of casein production in pregnancy-derived mammary epithelial cells cultured on various ECM. Pregnancy-derived mammary epithelial cells cultured for 3–4 days on LN (a, b), Col IV (c, d), FN (e) or TN (f) were treated with anticasein antibody (a, c, e, f) or normal serum (b, d) as described in Materials and Methods. Magnification, x150.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we have shown for the first time that the proliferative effects of progestin on normal mammary epithelium can be influenced by specific ECM molecules in cell culture. Furthermore, because these studies were carried out in serum-free medium the potentially confounding effects of both known as well as unidentified growth factors/growth inhibitors and/or ECM molecules present in serum have been eliminated. Under serum-free culture conditions, both nulliparous- and pregnancy-derived cells were capable of proliferating as evidenced by their responses to EGF and/or R5020. However, responsiveness to ovarian hormones was first and foremost dependent upon the inherent state of mammary gland differentiation (i.e. predominance of less differentiated ductal epithelium with some alveolar buds in the nulliparous gland vs. highly differentiated and extensive lobuloalveolar, secretory mammary epithelium in the mammary gland of the pregnant mouse). Thus, within the framework of mammary gland differentiation, ECM molecules can modulate hormonal responsiveness to varying degrees.

In the case of the less differentiated, nulliparous-derived epithelium, we have found that FN and Col IV promoted a proliferative response to R5020, with the greatest stimulation observed on them at 48 h after hormone treatment. The fact that stromal cell-derived ECM molecules (FN and Col IV) promoted hormone responsiveness supports our previous findings both in vivo (15) and in vitro (1, 16) that mammary stromal cells can confer steroid hormone responsiveness on mammary epithelium. These results indicate that one underlying mechanism of the modulation of steroid hormone responsiveness in vivo and in vitro by mammary stroma may be mediated by ECM molecules.

It should be noted that in previous reports using ECMs such as Col I (17) or matrigel (18) for investigation of rodent mammary cells and steroid hormone regulation, the cells were kept in culture from 10 days to 4 weeks. According to Streuli and Bissell (19), mammary epithelial cells can begin to synthesize basement membrane or produce ECM components after 2 days in culture, depending on the culture substratum. Thus, from previous experiments, it is difficult to determine the actual source (exogenous vs. endogenous) of the ECM molecules that influenced the behavior of the cultured cells. In the present experiments, cells were cultured for only 3 or 4 days and R5020 stimulation was observed as soon as 24 h after treatment (Fig. 4Go). Thus, the stimulation of cell proliferation with R5020 observed herein was most likely mediated by the exogenously supplied FN or Col IV.

Integrin binding to ECM can initiate cellular responses and the tripeptide RGD sequence by itself can in some instances initiate integrin-mediated effects for FN, LN, or TN (13). While R5020 stimulated proliferation of cells cultured on FN, RGD plus R5020 failed to reproduce this proliferative effect. One explanation for this is that the integrins that bind to RGD may not be involved in mediating FN’s effect on the progestin response. While the RGD sequence has been identified as a key adhesive motif, larger fragments of FN possess synergistic regions that interact with RGD to influence cell functions (20). Thus other regions of the FN molecule may be involved in ECM-mediated progestin responses. It should also be noted that because the maximum purity of currently available ECM molecules is 95–99% we cannot completely rule out the possibility that some unidentified contaminating molecule(s) contributed to the progestin responsiveness that we observed. For example, previous studies using the ER positive, E2 responsive MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line have demonstrated that estrogenic effects such as regulation of PR levels in serum-free medium required the presence of a growth factor such as IGF-I (21). However, the low amount of proliferation that we observed in basal media on all ECMs tested (Fig. 3Go) indicates that there was not significant contamination of the ECMs with growth factors. Furthermore, initial studies on the combined effects of growth factors and steroid hormones on various ECMs in serum-free culture have not shown any positive interactions between either EGF or IGF-I and E2 or R5020 (Xie, J., and S. Z. Haslam, unpublished observations)

During puberty, between 3 and 6 weeks of age, ductal elongation is stimulated by estrogen. However, at this stage of development PR levels cannot be increased by estrogen. But by 7–10 weeks of age, after the ducts have grown to fill the limits of the stromal fat pad, both cell proliferation and PR levels are increased by estrogen. However, if the immature, pubertal mammary epithelium is transplanted to a mature mammary stroma, the full adult response to estrogen, including PR up-regulation, is precociously acquired (15). In the present studies, FN and Col IV mediated R5020 stimulation of epithelial cells, supporting our hypothesis that certain ECM produced by stromal cells may modulate steroid hormone responsiveness. Interestingly, culturing cells on all ECMs and PL increased PR levels during culture. However, only nulliparous cells cultured on FN and Col IV proliferated in response to progestin. These results suggest that the presence of PR is not sufficient to obtain a progestin response.

In general, estrogen alone had little or no stimulatory effect on cell proliferation or PR regulation. A stimulatory effect on cell proliferation could be obtained with E2 on FN in nulliparous-derived cultures. However, this response was not consistently observed. Furthermore, the synergistic effect of E2 plus progestin on cell proliferation that is observed in vivo (3) was not observed in culture. We considered the possibility that carryover of endogenous in vivo hormones might reduce the response to exogenous hormones in culture. However, ovariectomizing the mice to reduce endogenous levels of hormones before culture, or preculturing in the absence of hormones did not increase cell proliferation in response to E2 or R5020 (unpublished observations, Xie, J., and S. Z. Haslam). It is likely that a major contributing factor to the absence of E2-induced effects was the low levels of ER that were present after plating. Another explanation is that additional factors are needed to obtain a proliferative response to E2. Astrahantseff and Morris (22) have demonstrated that E2 stimulates proliferation of uterine cells only when they are cocultured with stromal cells. Furthermore, stromal cells need to be in direct contact with or reside very short distances from the epithelial cells. We have previously reported similar results with mammary cells cocultured with mammary fibroblasts on plastic in the presence of serum (16). Thus, E2-induced responses may require additional signals or growth factors that may be produced by stromal cells in vivo or that are provided by serum supplementation in vitro. In contrast, the proliferative effect of progestin may be mediated by ECM molecules (e.g. FN and Col IV) produced by stromal cells and does not require the presence of the stromal cells. Studies are in progress to investigate the interaction of steroid hormones, growth factors and ECM molecules in control of mammary epithelial cell proliferation under serum-free culture conditions.

We have previously shown that in vivo, as the mammary gland becomes progressively differentiated toward lactation, ovarian steroid hormone responsiveness is lost (14). This reduced responsiveness appears to be paralleled in vitro. We analyzed the pregnancy-derived cultures on various ECMs, for the production of the milk specific protein, ß-casein, but only small amounts were detectable. This was not surprising because the culture media were lacking in the lactogenic hormones, PRL and hydrocortisone. However, it appears that the extent of differentiation induced in vivo and exhibited by the pregnancy-derived cells in vitro, although it fell short of complete lactational differentiation, may have been sufficient to produce refractoriness to hormone responsiveness. Our studies also indicate that as lobulalveolar differentiation progresses, the influence of other ECM molecules on proliferative response to ovarian hormone responsiveness becomes attenuated. Hormonal regulation of lactational function in cell culture is strongly influenced by ECM composition, and laminin has been shown to play an important role in increasing casein gene expression (10). In this context, it is interesting to note that in the present studies, laminin had no significant effect on the proliferative response of nulli-parous- or pregnancy-derived cultures.

In summary, we have found that two stromal cell-derived ECM molecules, FN and Col IV, can specifically influence mammary epithelial cell proliferative response to progestin. However, the extent of the influence of ECM and hormones is predetermined by the developmental state of the mammary gland. These results support our previous observations that mammary stroma can modulate mammary epithelial cell hormone responsiveness in vivo and indicate that ECM molecules may mediate some stromal cell influences.

The loss of hormone responsiveness is a critical factor in the treatment of breast cancer. Advancing our understanding of the various mechanisms by which modulations in steroid hormone responsiveness is achieved in normal mammary epithelium may broaden the conceptual framework for understanding loss of hormone responsiveness in breast cancer. Identifying the role of mammary stroma in this process may lead to novel therapeutic strategies that focus on mammary stroma as a target.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported by NIH Grant R01 CA-40104. Back

Received December 26, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Haslam SZ, Levely ML 1985 Estrogen responsiveness of normal mouse mammary cells in primary cell culture: association of mammary fibroblasts with estrogenic regulation of progesterone receptors. Endocrinology 116:1835–1844[Abstract]
  2. Haslam SZ 1988 Acquisition of estrogen-dependent progesterone receptors by normal mouse mammary gland. Ontogeny of mammary progesterone receptors. J Steroid Biochem 31:9–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Wang S, Counterman LJ, Haslam SZ 1990 Progesterone action in normal mouse mammary gland. Endocrinology 127:2183–2189[Abstract]
  4. Keely PJ, Wu JE, Santoro SA 1995 The spatial and temporal expression of the {alpha} 50 ß 49 integrin and its ligands, collagen I, collagen IV, and laminin, suggest important roles in mouse mammary morphogenesis. Differentiation 59:1–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wicha MS, Lowrie G, Kohn E, Bagavandoss P, Mahn T 1982 Extracellular matrix promotes mammary epithelial growth and differentiation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:3213–3217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hynes RO 1992 Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69:11–25[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lin CQ, Bissell MJ 1993 Multi-faceted regulation of cell differentiation by extracellular matrix. FASEB J 7:737–743[Abstract]
  8. Schmidhauser C, Bissell MJ, Myers CA, Casperson GF 1990 Extracellular matrix and hormones transcriptionally regulate bovine ß-casein 5' sequences in stably transfected mouse mammary cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9118–9122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Streuli CH, Bailey N, Bissell MJ 1991 Control of mammary epithelial differentiation: basement membrane induces tissue-specific gene expression in the absence of cell-cell-interaction and morphological polarity. J Cell Biol 115:1383–1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Streuli CH, Schmidhauser C, Bailey N, Yurchenko P, Skubitz AP, Roskelley C, Bissell MJ 1995 Laminin mediates tissue-specific gene expression in mammary epithelia. J Cell Biol 129:591–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wang S, Haslam SZ 1994 Serum-free primary culture of normal mouse mammary epithelial and stromal cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 30A:859–866
  12. West DC, Sattar A, Kumar S 1985 A simplified in situ solubilization procedure for the determination of DNA and cell number in tissue cultured mammalian cells. Anal Biochem 147:289–295[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Symington BE 1995 Growth signaling through the alpha5beta1 fibronectin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 208:126–134[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Haslam SZ, Shyamala G 1980 Progesterone receptors in normal mammary gland: receptor modulations in relation to differentiation. J Cell Biol 86:730–737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Haslam SZ, Counterman LJ 1991 Mammary stroma modulates responsiveness of mammary epithelium in vivo in the mouse. Endocrinology 129:2017–2023[Abstract]
  16. Haslam SZ 1986 Mammary fibroblast influence on normal mouse mammary epithelial cell responses to estrogen in vitro. Cancer Res 46:310–316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Imagawa W, Tommoka Y, Hamamoto S, Nandi S 1985 Stimulation of mammary epithelial cell growth in vitro: interaction of epidermal growth factor and mammogenic hormones. Endocrinology 116:1514–1524[Abstract]
  18. Hahn HA, Ip MM 1990 Primary culture of normal rat mammary epithelial cells within a basement membrane matrix. I. Regulation of proliferation by hormones and growth factors. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 26:791–802[Medline]
  19. Streuli CH, Bissell MJ 1990 Expression of extracellular matrix components is regulated by substratum. J Cell Biol 110:1405–1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Potts JR, Campbell ID 1994 Fibronectin structure and assembly. Curr Opin Cell Biol 6:648–655[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Stewart AJ, Johnson MD, May FEB, Westley RB 1990 Role of insulin-like growth factors and the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in the estrogen-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 265:21172–21178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Astrahantseff KN, Morris JE 1994 Estradiol-17-ß stimulates proliferation of uterine epithelial cells cultured with stromal cells but not cultured separately. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 30A:769–776



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Roarty and R. Serra
Wnt5a is required for proper mammary gland development and TGF-{beta}-mediated inhibition of ductal growth
Development, November 1, 2007; 134(21): 3929 - 3939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
V. Novaro, C. D. Roskelley, and M. J. Bissell
Collagen-IV and laminin-1 regulate estrogen receptor {alpha} expression and function in mouse mammary epithelial cells
J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2003; 116(14): 2975 - 2986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H.-Z. Zhang, J. M. Bennett, K. T. Smith, N. Sunil, and S. Z. Haslam
Estrogen Mediates Mammary Epithelial Cell Proliferation in Serum-Free Culture Indirectly via Mammary Stroma-Derived Hepatocyte Growth Factor
Endocrinology, September 1, 2002; 143(9): 3427 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Sunil, J. M. Bennett, and S. Z. Haslam
Hepatocyte Growth Factor Is Required for Progestin-Induced Epithelial Cell Proliferation and Alveolar-Like Morphogenesis in Serum-Free Culture of Normal Mammary Epithelial Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2002; 143(8): 2953 - 2960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. L. Woodward, A. S. Mienaltowski, R. R. Modi, J. M. Bennett, and S. Z. Haslam
Fibronectin and the {{alpha}}5{beta}1 Integrin Are Under Developmental and Ovarian Steroid Regulation in the Normal Mouse Mammary Gland
Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 3214 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. L. Woodward, J. Xie, J. L. Fendrick, and S. Z. Haslam
Proliferation of Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells in Vitro: Interactions among Epidermal Growth Factor, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Ovarian Hormones, and Extracellular Matrix Proteins
Endocrinology, October 1, 2000; 141(10): 3578 - 3586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. L. Woodward, H. Lu, and S. Z. Haslam
Laminin Inhibits Estrogen Action in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2000; 141(8): 2814 - 2821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. L. Buchanan, T. Kurita, J. A. Taylor, D. B. Lubahn, G. R. Cunha, and P. S. Cooke
Role of Stromal and Epithelial Estrogen Receptors in Vaginal Epithelial Proliferation, Stratification, and Cornification
Endocrinology, October 1, 1998; 139(10): 4345 - 4352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. Z.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals