| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Neurobiology & Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jon E. Levine, Ph.D., Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, 2153 North Campus Drive, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208. E-mail: jlevine{at}nwu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six NPY receptor subtypes have been described (Y1-Y6), based on both
their rank-order affinities for NPY receptor agonists (Table 1
) and, more recently, on the cloning and
characterization of five of the receptor subtypes (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Previous
pharmacological evidence has suggested that the receptor subtype that
mediates LHRH release is either the Y1 or a Y1 -like receptor (19, 20);
however, the receptor subtype mediating NPYs effects at the pituitary
is completely unknown, its elucidation delayed by the unavailability,
until recently, of subtype-specific antagonists.
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exp 1
From 09002000 h on the day of proestrus, hourly 0.25 ml blood
samples were taken from the animals. Samples were centrifuged and the
plasma stored at -20 C for subsequent RIA. At 1230 h, animals
received pentobarbital (40 mg/kg BW) ip to block endogenous peptide
release from the hypothalamus. At half-hour intervals from 13001700
h, animals received iv pulses of LHRH (15 ng/pulse) and either saline
or one of six NPY agonists (2.2 nmol/pulse): NPY, Peptide YY (PYY), rat
pancreatic polypeptide (rPP), human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP),
[Leu31Pro34] NPY or NPY (1336) (all
peptides from Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA). It does not seem to
be the case that significant differences in clearance of NPY receptor
agonists occur, given their similar metabolic fate via processing by
the membrane peptidases dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase P, and
endopeptidase 24.11 (25). Both LHRH and NPY were administered in a
pulsatile manner to roughly mimic the endogenous secretory profiles of
the peptides (26, 27). Estrous vaginal cytology was confirmed on the
day after the experiment.
Exp 2
On the day of proestrus, hourly 0.25 ml blood samples were taken
from 13002100 h and centrifuged; plasma was stored at -20 C until LH
RIA. Every 15 min from 14001800 h, animals received iv pulses of
BIBP3226 (Peninsula Laboratories), 50 µg/pulse or saline vehicle. The
time period of drug delivery was chosen so as to correspond as closely
as possible with the priming of the pituitary to the actions of LHRH,
and thus to the presumed window of activity of NPYs actions at the
pituitary gonadotrope. The frequency of the drug delivery was chosen
due to the short half-life of BIBP3226 in vivo (1545 min).
The dose of BIBP3226 used in this experiment is based on effective
doses used in the original in vivo characterization of the
antagonist (24, 28). Estrous vaginal cytology was confirmed on the day
after the experiment.
Exp 3
From 09002000 h on proestrus, hourly 0.25 ml blood samples
were taken through the catheter and centrifuged. The plasma was stored
at -20 C until LH RIA. Animals received 40 mg/kg BW pentobarbital ip
at 1230 h to block hypothalamic peptide secretion. BIBP3226 (50
µg) or vehicle was administered iv at 15-min intervals from
13001700 h; during the same time period, LHRH (15 ng/pulse) either
alone, or concomitantly with NPY (10 µg/pulse), was administered at
half-hour intervals. On the following day, estrous vaginal cytology was
confirmed.
RIAs
LH levels in plasma samples were determined by RIA, using assay
materials generously provided by the NIDDK. The standard used in the
assay was LH RP-3. The sensitivity of the LH RIA was 20 pg/tube, and
the intrassay coefficient of variation was less than 6%. The
interassay coefficient of variation at 0.18 ng/tube was 9%.
Statistical analysis
Plasma LH levels for each experimental group were calculated in
all experiments as the mean amount of LH released for each hourly time
point as well as for the average amount of LH released from 15002000
h. Standard errors were calculated for each experimental group and
either a Students t test or a one-way ANOVA followed by a
Neuman-Keuls post-hoc analysis was used to determine differences
between LH surge levels in experimental groups. In all studies, results
were considered significant if P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of pulsatile administration of LHRH and NPY agonists in
pentobarbital-treated rats. Rats in all treatment groups showed LH
surges. LHRH alone (n = 6) elevated basal plasma LH levels to a
mean peak value of 7.7 ng/ml; total LH released during and after LHRH
administration was 27.6 ng/ml. NPY (P < 0.05; n =
5), PYY (P < 0.001; n = 5), and
[Leu31Pro34]NPY (P < 0.001;
n = 6) all significantly potentiated the LHRH-induced LH surge
vs. animals treated with LHRH alone, both in terms of peak
surge levels (Fig. 1
) and total LH released during and
after peptide administration (Fig. 2
). In addition,
[Leu31Pro34]NPY (P < 0.01)
and PYY (P < 0.01) showed significantly greater
facilitation than NPY. NPY (1336) (n = 5), rPP (n = 6) and
hPP (n = 5) did not significantly augment total LH release in
comparison with the control. Thus, the rank order potency of the
peptides used in this experiment was found to be: PYY =
[Leu31Pro34]NPY > NPY >>
hPP = rPP = NPY(1336).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NPY Y1 receptor belongs to a family of G protein-coupled receptors
that have distinctive ligand-binding characteristics. Y1 (10), Y2 (11, 12), Y4 (13, 14), Y5 (15), and most recently Y6 (16, 18) receptors have
been cloned and expressed in mammalian cells, and their signature
NPY-agonist binding properties have been determined. In agreement with
the results using the specific Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226, we
determined that the pharmacological profile of the pituitary receptor
that mediates NPYs actions on LHRH-induced LH secretion matches most
closely with that of the Y1 receptor (Table 1
). A Y2 receptor can be
ruled out based on two factors: the C-terminal fragment [NPY(1336)]
did not significantly augment LHRH-induced LH release, and the
substituted peptide, [Leu31Pro34]NPY, has no
activity at Y2 receptors but was a strong agonist in this experiment.
The pharmacologically defined Y3 receptor does not bind PYY, while PYY
was a strong agonist in this study. The profile bears no resemblance to
a Y4 receptor, in which both rPP and hPP are strong agonists and PYY is
not an agonist. The profile of the newly discovered Y5 receptor is in
many respects similar to that of a Y1, the primary difference being
that hPP is a very weak agonist at Y1 receptors but a good agonist at
Y5 receptors (15). Because in this experiment LH release in hPP-treated
animals did not differ significantly from that in animals receiving no
agonist, we conclude that the likely candidate for mediation of NPYs
effects on LHRH-induced LH release is a Y1 receptor. The newly
discovered Y6 receptor is not found in rats (16, 17).
The Y1 receptor is also implicated in the second experiment, in which
administration of the highly potent and selective NPY Y1 antagonist,
BIBP3226, severely attenuated the endogenous LH surge on the afternoon
of proestrus. This compound has no antagonistic activity at any other
known receptor subtype (15, 24, 29). In addition to attenuating the
surge, BIBP3226 produced a delay of approximately 2 h in the onset
of the surge (Fig. 3
); indeed, onset occurred in treated animals at
approximately the time of termination of treatment. These and other
experiments (data not shown) in which administration of BIBP3226 after
surge onset had no effect on surge development or peak LH values
provide clues to the timing of NPYs involvement in the priming of
gonadotropes to LHRH action. We cannot say from these experiments that
NPY Y1 receptor stimulation must occur during the 2 h preceding
the surge; nevertheless, NPY actions are without effect in the absence
of LHRH stimulation, and the effects of NPY are thought to be mediated
in part via up-regulated receptor binding (30, 31), possibly via an
unmasking of a cryptic pool of receptors (30). Because these events
must occur before LHRH receptor stimulation, it would seem likely that
the neurosecretion of NPY and activation of Y1 receptors occurs during
the hours or minutes leading up to the initial ascent of LH on the
afternoon of proestrus.
In previous work, the involvement of NPY Y1 receptors in the stimulation of LHRH release was suggested on the basis of in vivo administration of several peptide agonists (20). These tests predated the further characterization of NPY receptor subtypes and their respective pharmacologies, and the involvement of Y1 receptors remains to be confirmed by blockade of the hypothalamic actions of NPY with BIBP3226. Nevertheless, the possible actions of BIBP3226 on LHRH release, as opposed to LHRH-induced LH secretion, were in need of consideration. Due to the calculated mol wt of BIBP3226 (MW 491.3), it is not expected that the systematically administered antagonist could cross the blood-brain barrier and reach central structures other than circumventricular organs such as the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis or the median eminence. Therefore, in our second experiment, BIBP3226 may have blocked receptors located in the median eminence as well as the anterior pituitary, both known sites of NPY modulation or stimulation of LHRH effects. Our third experiment was conducted to isolate the effect of the drug to the pituitary level; because hypothalamic peptide release is blocked in the pentobarbital-treated rat, any BIBP3226 binding to median eminence NPY receptors would be without effect on LH levels. The fact that LH levels in BIBP3226-treated rats from Exp 2 and 3 are very similar suggests that the effect seen in Exp 2 is largely, if not entirely, due to occupation of pituitary Y1 receptors. The belief that these Y1 receptors are located within the gonadotrope itself is suggested by the recent finding that Y1 receptor mRNA is expressed predominantly within this pituitary cell type (32).
This data corresponds well with recent work indicating that Y1 receptor gene expression in the anterior pituitary is subject to dynamic regulation during the estrous cycle, with acutely increased expression following the proestrous LH surge (33). This pattern is highly consistent with the involvement of the Y1 receptor in mediation of proestrous pituitary events. The possibility of a heterogeneity of receptors being involved in NPYs facilitation cannot be ruled out; the involvement of another subtype could be masked in this study. However, given that the Y1-specific antagonist, BIBP3226, attenuates endogenous LH surges to the same extent that the nonsubtype specific antagonist, PYX2, does (34), it is probable that it is the Y1 receptor that is primarily or wholly responsible for the facilitation of the LHRH-induced LH surge. Th similarity of LH levels in animals from Exp 3 treated with BIBP3226 with those in animals treated with LHRH alone confirms this idea.
NPY is without effect on LH release in the absence of LHRH (3, 34); its action is to amplify the LH-releasing activity of LHRH. These data confirm that NPY strongly facilitates the action of LHRH. Furthermore, the failure of BIBP3226 to completely block the LH surge confirms that subphysiological surges do occur in the absence of NPY. It is possible that a higher dose of antagonist would have resulted in complete blockade of the LH surge; however, this is unlikely, especially given the data from this and previous (3) PB-block experiments in which blocked rats treated with LHRH alone show a very similar, subphysiological, LH surge. Immunoneutralization of NPY (4) results in a similar LH profile. These data, taken together, confirm NPYs role as an amplifier and not releasing factor.
In summary, we have shown that the binding of NPY to Y1-receptors at the pituitary gonadotrope is a necessary event for the full elaboration of the proestrous LH surge. Current work in the lab is focused on signaling pathways through which NPYs facilitation may be carried out. Given that NPYs pituitary-level facilitation only occurs under steroidal conditions in which LH surges are generated (23), we are also investigating possible mechanisms by which steroids regulate the patency of NPYs signaling pathways to produce amplified LH surges.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 17, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Hill, J. H. Urban, M. Xu, and J. E. Levine Estrogen Induces Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 Receptor Gene Expression and Responsiveness to NPY in Gonadotrope-Enriched Pituitary Cell Cultures Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2283 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Mills, R. K. Sohn, and P. E Micevych Estrogen-Induced {micro}-Opioid Receptor Internalization in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Is Mediated via Neuropeptide Y-Y1 Receptor Activation in the Arcuate Nucleus of Female Rats J. Neurosci., January 28, 2004; 24(4): 947 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Turi, Z. Liposits, S. M. Moenter, C. Fekete, and E. Hrabovszky Origin of Neuropeptide Y-Containing Afferents to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons in Male Mice Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4967 - 4974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hill and J. E. Levine Abnormal Response of the Neuropeptide Y-Deficient Mouse Reproductive Axis to Food Deprivation But Not Lactation Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1780 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Campbell, K. L. Grove, and M. S. Smith Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons Coexpress Orexin 1 Receptor Immunoreactivity and Receive Direct Contacts by Orexin Fibers Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1542 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sandowski, N. Raver, E. E. Gussakovsky, S. Shochat, O. Dym, O. Livnah, M. Rubinstein, R. Krishna, and A. Gertler Subcloning, Expression, Purification, and Characterization of Recombinant Human Leptin-binding Domain J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46304 - 46309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Xu, J. H. Urban, J. W. Hill, and J. E. Levine Regulation of Hypothalamic Neuropeptide Y Y1 Receptor Gene Expression during the Estrous Cycle: Role of Progesterone Receptors Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3319 - 3327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Kramer, R. Krishnamurthy, P. J. Mitchell, and S. Wray Transcription Factor Activator Protein-2 Is Required for Continued Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Expression in the Forebrain of Developing Mice Endocrinology, May 1, 2000; 141(5): 1823 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Lebrethon, E. Vandersmissen, A. Gerard, A. S. Parent, J. L. Junien, and J. P. Bourguignon In Vitro Stimulation of the Prepubertal Rat Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator by Leptin and Neuropeptide Y through Distinct Mechanisms Endocrinology, April 1, 2000; 141(4): 1464 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Cerda-Reverter, L. A. Sorbera, M. Carrillo, and S. Zanuy Energetic dependence of NPY-induced LH secretion in a teleost fish (Dicentrarchus labrax) Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 1999; 277(6): R1627 - R1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Jain, S. Pu, P. S. Kalra, and S. P. Kalra Evidence that Stimulation of Two Modalities of Pituitary Luteinizing Hormone Release in Ovarian Steroid-Primed Ovariectomized Rats May Involve Neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y4 Receptors Endocrinology, November 1, 1999; 140(11): 5171 - 5177. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, P. Chen, and M. S. Smith Morphological Evidence for Direct Interaction between Arcuate Nucleus Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Neurons and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons and the Possible Involvement of NPY Y1 Receptors Endocrinology, November 1, 1999; 140(11): 5382 - 5390. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Leupen and J. E. Levine Role of Protein Kinase C in Facilitation of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)-Releasing Hormone-Induced LH Surges by Neuropeptide Y Endocrinology, August 1, 1999; 140(8): 3682 - 3687. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Evans Modulation of Gonadotropin Levels by Peptides Acting at the Anterior Pituitary Gland Endocr. Rev., February 1, 1999; 20(1): 46 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |