help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohleth, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bagnell, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohleth, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bagnell, C. A.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 9 3652-3658
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Relaxin Increases Insulin-Like Growth Factors (IGFs) and IGF-Binding Proteins of the Pig Uterus in Vivo1

Kathleen M. Ohleth, Judy A. Lenhart, Peter L. Ryan, Steve V. Radecki and Carol A. Bagnell

Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Carol A. Bagnell, Department of Animal Sciences, P.O. Box 231, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903. E-mail: bagnell{at}aesop.rutgers.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Relaxin promotes growth of reproductive tissues, including the uterus. Although we have evidence of a role for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in mediating relaxin-induced growth of porcine granulosa cells in vitro, the mechanism of action by which relaxin enhances uterine growth has not been identified. To investigate a role for the uterine insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in relaxin-induced uterine growth, we monitored the effects of relaxin on porcine IGFs and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) in vivo. The trophic effects of relaxin on the uterus were elicited by administering relaxin or saline to prepubertal gilts every 6 h for 54 h. Three hours after the last injection, uterine flushes, uteri, follicular fluid, and ovaries were collected. Estradiol was measured in plasma and follicular fluid to confirm the prepubertal status of each animal. Significantly higher concentrations of uterine lumen IGF-I (P < 0.05) and IGF-II (P < 0.01) were observed in animals treated with relaxin. However, relaxin administration did not affect uterine IGF-I and -II gene expression, as determined by a ribonuclease protection assay and Northern analysis, respectively. In uterine flushes, relaxin treatment increased an IGFBP doublet (33 and 34.5 kDa) and IGFBP-3. The uterine IGFBP doublet was identified as IGFBP-2 by immunoprecipitation. Plasma or follicular fluid IGFs and IGFBPs were unaffected by relaxin administration. In addition, relaxin did not influence IGF-I binding to its uterine receptor. This is the first study to demonstrate regulation of the pig uterine IGF system by relaxin. In conclusion, the data point to IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 as putative mediators of relaxin-induced uterine growth in the pig.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE GROWTH-PROMOTING effects of relaxin on the reproductive tract have been well documented. In the pig, relaxin stimulates uterine growth in prepubertal (1), pregnant (2, 3), and ovariectomized, steroid-treated immature animals (4). In the prepubertal animal, relaxin-induced increases in uterine protein and DNA content are indicative of uterine hyperplasia (1). Relaxin also enhances in vitro DNA synthesis and proliferation of granulosa and thecal cells from the porcine follicle (5, 6). Although little is known of the mechanism by which relaxin promotes growth of the reproductive tract, we identified a role for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in mediating the trophic effects of relaxin on porcine granulosa cells in vitro (7). Studies exploring a growth factor-mediated mechanism to explain the uterotropic effects of relaxin have not been reported in any species.

In the pig, the uterine IGF system is important for implantation and uterine and conceptus growth during pregnancy (8). IGF-I is present in the uterine flushes (UF) of pregnant, cyclic, and prepubertal animals (9, 10). In addition, IGF and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) messenger RNAs (mRNAs) are differentially expressed in the pig uterus during pregnancy and the estrous cycle (10, 11). Elevated levels of uterine IGF-I mRNA and protein indicate the importance of IGF-I in promoting uterine growth during early pregnancy (8, 10). Additionally, the significance of uterine IGF-II and IGFBP-2 and -3 in later pregnancy is supported by the prevalence of their mRNAs after implantation (10, 11).

Regulation of the uterine IGF system by steroids is well established. In sexually mature, ovariectomized pigs, estradiol and progesterone increase uterine IGF-I protein and mRNA and decrease IGF-II mRNA. Expression of uterine IGFBP-2 mRNA is dependent on the ratio of systemic estrogen and progesterone (10, 11). In the human endometrium, estradiol and progesterone increase IGFBP-2 and -3 secretion in vitro and gene expression in vivo (12). In addition to steroids, relaxin stimulates uterine IGFBP production. Basal and progesterone-induced IGFBP-1 secretion, gene expression and promoter activity are enhanced by relaxin in cultured human endometrial stromal cells (13, 14, 15). Relaxin also increases the secretion of IGFBP-1 and a 24-kDa IGFBP from human decidual cells in vitro (16).

The hypothesis that the pig uterine IGF system mediates relaxin-induced uterine growth was tested in the present study by monitoring the effects of relaxin on uterine IGFs and IGFBPs, independent of estradiol, in a prepubertal gilt model (1).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purified porcine relaxin (CM-A fraction; 3000 U/mg) was prepared at the Department of Biomedical Sciences (University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada) by extraction and purification from ovaries of pregnant sows using the method of Sherwood and O’Byrne (17). Purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, which revealed a single band at approximately 6.2 kDa. The biological activity of the relaxin preparation was ascertained by inhibition of spontaneous uterine motility in vitro (18), and immunoreactivity was verified by RIA (19). Rabbit antihuman IGF-I antibody (UB2–495) was donated by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (Baltimore, MD), and recombinant human IGF-I for RIA standards was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Polyclonal antihuman IGF-II antibody and standards were obtained from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia). [125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II were purchased from Amersham Corp. (Arlington Heights, IL), and [125I]Na iodide was obtained from New England Nuclear Research Products (Boston, MA). Antirabbit {gamma}-globulin and normal rabbit serum were obtained from Antibodies, Inc. (Davis, CA) and Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA), respectively. The vector used to transcribe a riboprobe that protects 210 bp in exons 1 and 3 of the IGF-I gene, the class 1 probe as described by Weller et al. (20), was a gift from Dr. R. S. Gilmour (AFRC Babraham Institute, Cambridge, MA). A rat IGF-II complementary DNA (cDNA) clone (21) was provided by Dr. M. M. Rechler (NIH, Bethesda, MD). The RPA II kit, 18S ribosomal RNA template, Century RNA Markers, and ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease were purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX). Polyclonal antihuman IGFBP-1 and anti-bovine IGFBP-2 antisera were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY), and protein A-Sepharose was purchased from Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ). Human amniotic fluid was donated by Dr. L. Sciorra (Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ). Monotyrosylated relaxin was a gift from Dr. R. V. Anthony (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO), and the rabbit anti-porcine relaxin antibody (P5) was a gift from Dr. D. G. Porter (University of Guelph). 17ß-Estradiol antibody and [2,4,6,7-3H]estradiol were obtained from ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA) and Amersham Corp. (Arlington Heights, IL), respectively. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise specified.

Animal model and sample collection
Prepubertal (~115-day-old) Yorkshire-Landrace gilts (Swine Unit of the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) were injected im with 0.5 mg porcine relaxin or saline every 6 h for 54 h (1). Plasma was collected 1) from all animals before and after the entire 54-h treatment regimen and 2) hourly during one 6-h treatment period from an indwelling jugular catheter of one control and one relaxin-treated animal. Three hours after the last injection, animals were killed by exsanguination after stunning. This animal experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Rutgers University animal care advisory committee. Uteri were removed, separated from the cervices, trimmed of fat, and weighed. Each uterine horn was flushed with 20 ml PBS to obtain UF, which were collected on ice and stored at -20 C. Uterine horns were then cut into 1-cm pieces, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C. Ovaries were weighed, and follicular fluid (FF) was aspirated from morphologically healthy follicles. Protein in uterine and ovarian tissue homogenates (22) and UF was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). To determine whether relaxin alters IGF-I receptor binding, uterine membrane fractions were isolated and processed as described by Hofig et al. (23), and the percentage of maximum binding of IGF-I to its receptor was assessed in receptor-ligand binding experiments.

RIAs
Before measuring IGFs by RIA, IGFBPs were removed by Sep-Pak (Millipore Corp., Milford, MA) extraction (24) with modifications (7). To validate this extraction procedure, preliminary experiments were performed in which IGFBPs were removed from 2- and 4-ml aliquots of the same sample. When the IGF values were compared between these samples, there was twice as much IGF-I from the 4-ml aliquot as in the 2-ml aliquot, as would be expected if the extraction method removed the majority of the IGFBPs from the samples. Lee et al. (24) report that this method removes approximately 80% of the binding proteins from serum samples. In addition, we determined an IGF recovery of 75% using this method to extract IGF-I from culture medium (7).

Although IGF-I was measured as previously described (7), IGF-II was detected with an IGF-II antibody (GroPep; final concentration, 1:7,500) incubated with [125I]IGF-II (15,000 cpm/tube) overnight at 4 C. Antibody-antigen complexes were precipitated by conventional double-antibody methods. All samples for IGF-II were measured in a single RIA. Interassay variation was 7.2 ± 2.8% for IGF-I, and intraassay variation was 4.2 ± 0.3% and 5.8 ± 0.3% for IGF-I and IGF-II, respectively. The minimum detection limits for the IGF-I and IGF-II assays were 5 and 80 pg/tube, respectively. Monotyrosylated relaxin was iodinated with Iodogen according to the method of Hall et al. (4) and was used in one assay to measure relaxin in plasma, FF, and UF according to the method of Afele et al. (25) with modifications. Samples were serially diluted in 0.05 M barbitone buffer containing 0.5% BSA and incubated with a polyclonal relaxin antibody (P5; final concentration, 1:30,000) overnight at 4 C. [125I]Relaxin (12,000 cpm) was added for an additional 48 h at 4 C. Bound and free hormone were separated by conventional double-antibody procedures. Intraassay variation was 7.2 ± 1.1%, and assay sensitivity was 22 pg/ml. 17ß-Estradiol was measured after extraction from plasma and UF with an ethyl acetate-hexane mixture and was determined in FF without extraction (26). Intra- and interassay variations were 4.5 ± 1.0% and 14.9 ± 0.1%, respectively, and assay sensitivity was 1.73 pg/ml.

Ligand blotting and immunoprecipitation
Ligand blotting was performed to monitor IGFBPs in UF, FF, and plasma as previously described (7). Equal volumes of fluids were examined to obtain a measure of IGFBP concentrations in the UF, FF, and plasma. Before ligand blotting, UF were concentrated 4-fold with Centriprep-10 devices (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Densitometry was used to quantify IGFBP levels for statistical analysis. The identity of an IGFBP doublet (33 and 34.5 kDa) in the UF was determined by immunoprecipitation. Protein A-Sepharose (50 µl) was preincubated with 50 µl concentrated UF in 450 µl immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 MgCl2 mM, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton-X, 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin) for 30 min at 4 C. The supernatant was subsequently incubated with an IGFBP-1 or -2 antibody for 2 h at 4 C, after which protein A-Sepharose (40 µl) was added and incubated overnight at 4 C. Sepharose beads were washed twice with immunoprecipitation buffer, and loading buffer was added to the beads. After boiling, the beads were pelleted, and the supernatant was subjected to ligand blotting. Human amniotic fluid and porcine FF, which contain IGFBP-1 and -2, respectively (27), were used as positive controls to check IGFBP antibody specificity. Dephosphorylation experiments were performed to determine whether the presence of the doublet was the result of IGFBP phosphorylation. Before ligand blotting, immunoprecipitated UF were incubated with alkaline phosphatase (15 U; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) for 3 h at 37 C in the presence or absence of alkaline phosphatase inhibitors (28).

Ribonuclease protection assay and Northern analysis
Total RNA was isolated from uterine tissue as previously described (22). The quantity and purity of the RNA were assessed spectrophotometrically. Expression of IGF-I mRNA was monitored using a ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) with a riboprobe complementary to 210 bp in exons 1 and 3 of the IGF-I gene (class 1) (20). An 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) probe was used to correct for equal loading. The RNA probes were transcribed using the Gemini System from Promega (Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s directions. The reaction consisted of 1 x transcription buffer (40 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5; 30 mM MgCl2; 10 mM spermidine; 10 mM NaCl); 50 mM dithiothreitol; 40 U RNAsin; 500 µM each of ATP, CTP, and GTP; 6 µM UTP; 1 µg linearized plasmid template; 50 µCi [32P]UTP (800 µCi/nmol); and 20 U T7 polymerase and was incubated for 1 h at 37 C. As 18S rRNA is expressed much higher relative to IGF-I RNA, an 18S rRNA probe of lower specific activity was synthesized with 0.5 µCi [32P]UTP and 500 µM cold UTP in the above reaction. Subsequently, riboprobes were treated with ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease (1 U) for 15 min at 37 C and purified on an 8 M urea-5% polyacrylamide gel.

The RPA was performed with the RPA II kit according to the manufacturer’s directions. Specifically, total RNA (10 µg) was coprecipitated with 32P-labeled IGF-I (50,000 cpm; 5 x 108 cpm/µg) and 18S rRNA (150,000 cpm; 5 x 105 cpm/µg) probes and dissolved in hybridization solution. The RNA was heat denatured and hybridized at 45 C for 18 h. Ribonuclease (1:50) was added to digest unprotected RNA for 30 min at 20 C. After heat denaturing, hybridized fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on an 8 M urea-5% polyacrylamide gel at 275 V for 2.5–3 h, and gels were exposed to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL). RNA markers (100–500 bp) were used to determine the size (base pairs) of the protected fragments. To validate the assay, the IGF-I and 18S rRNA probes were hybridized with increasing amounts (2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 µg) of pig liver RNA. For Northern analysis, uterine RNAs were fractionated on a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel and transferred to nylon membranes. IGF-II mRNA was detected with a 32P-labeled IGF-II rat cDNA probe (21) using prehybridization, hybridization, and low stringency wash techniques as described by Straus and Takemoto (29). Pig liver from 15-day-old animals and placenta were used as positive controls for IGF-II mRNA.

Statistics
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of samples from control and relaxin-treated gilts using at least three animals per group. Student’s t test was used to analyze the data with the StatView 4.5 program (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). P <= 0.05 was accepted as significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of animal model
To confirm the prepubertal status of the gilts and rule out the possibility that systemic or local estradiol was contributing to any effects observed, 17ß-estradiol was monitored. In the plasma of all animals before and after the treatment regimen, estradiol was undetectable. In FF, estradiol levels from control and relaxin-treated gilts were similar and averaged 1.18 ± 0.42 and 0.51 ± 0.10 ng/ml, respectively. Estradiol was undetectable in UF. To further characterize the model, systemic and local levels of relaxin were monitored. In hourly samples taken over one 6-h period after relaxin injection, plasma relaxin peaked at 19.9 ng/ml by 1 h postinjection and declined to 3.4 ng/ml by 6 h after injection. The mean plasma relaxin level was 10.3 ± 0.4 ng/ml in experimental animals at the end of the 54-h treatment period (3 h after the last injection), whereas relaxin was undetectable in the plasma of control gilts before, during, or after the treatment period. In FF, relaxin averaged 8.8 ± 0.3 ng/ml in treated animals and was not detected in control gilts. In UF, relaxin averaged 65.4 ± 4.8 pg/ml in relaxin-treated pigs and was below the sensitivity (22 pg/ml) of the assay in control gilts.

To verify the uterotropic effects of relaxin in this model, uterine wet weight, length, and protein were measured and were significantly higher in relaxin-treated gilts than those in control animals (P < 0.05; Table 1Go). UF of relaxin-treated animals also had significantly higher protein concentration and content than those of control animals (Table 1Go). Despite uterine growth, changes in ovarian wet weight or protein content with relaxin administration were not evident (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of relaxin on uterine and ovarian weight and protein in prepubertal gilts

 
Effects of relaxin on IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGF-I receptor binding
UF collected from relaxin-treated animals contained significantly higher amounts of IGF-I (P < 0.05) and IGF-II (P < 0.01) than those from controls (Fig. 1AGo). These increases in uterine lumen concentrations of IGF-I and IGF-II were 2.5- and 8-fold above control, respectively. Relaxin did not alter IGF-I gene expression in the uterus, as shown by RPA (Fig. 1BGo). Validation of the RPA was demonstrated by a linear increase in IGF-I and 18S ribosomal mRNAs when increasing amounts of pig liver RNA were hybridized with the IGF-I and 18S rRNA probes (Fig. 1CGo). Unprotected complementary RNA probes for IGF-I and 18S rRNA were 270 and 116 bp, respectively, whereas the protected fragments were 210 and 80 bp, respectively. Northern analysis detected two IGF-II transcripts (3.6 and 1.8 kb), which were not influenced by relaxin treatment (data not shown). Plasma IGF-I and -II concentrations did not differ when relaxin-treated animals were compared with control animals or when IGF levels were compared before and after relaxin administration within a treatment group (Fig. 2Go). In addition, FF concentrations of IGF-I (control, 47.2 ± 5.9; relaxin-treated, 43.3 ± 4.2 ng/ml) or IGF-II (control, 139.2 ± 32.9; relaxin-treated, 123.2 ± 33.7 ng/ml) were not affected by relaxin administration. Furthermore, relaxin did not influence the percent maximum binding of IGF-I to the uterine IGF receptor (control, 19.73 ± 0.97%; relaxin-treated, 18.10 ± 1.18%).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of relaxin treatment on uterine luminal IGF protein and uterine IGF-I gene expression. A, IGF-I and -II were measured in the UF of control (C) and relaxin-treated (R) prepubertal gilts by RIA, after IGFBP removal. The asterisks indicate significant differences between control and relaxin-treated animals (P < 0.05). B, Total RNA from uteri of control and relaxin-treated gilts was monitored for IGF-I mRNA by RPA as described in Materials and Methods. 32P-Labeled riboprobes complementary to IGF-I and 18S ribosomal RNA were hybridized with each RNA sample. Lane 1, RNA markers; lane 2, yeast RNA (- RNase digestion); lane 3, yeast RNA (+ RNase digestion); lanes 4–8, uterine RNA from control animals; lanes 9–12: uterine RNA from relaxin-treated animals. C, Increasing amounts of pig liver RNA hybridized with IGF-I and 18S ribosomal RNA probes. Lanes 1–5 are 2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 µg RNA, respectively.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plasma IGFs before and after relaxin administration in vivo. Plasma was collected from control and relaxin-treated animals before and after the treatment period. IGF concentrations were compared 1) between control and relaxin-treated animals and 2) before and after relaxin administration within treatment groups.

 
Effect of relaxin on IGFBP secretion
The UF of animals treated with relaxin had significantly (P < 0.01) higher amounts of an IGFBP doublet (33 and 34.5 kDa) and IGFBP-3 (39 and 42 kDa) than that of controls (Fig. 3AGo), as demonstrated by ligand blotting and densitometry. Plasma and FF IGFBPs were unaffected by relaxin treatment (data not shown). Figure 3BGo illustrates the IGFBP profiles of representative FF, UF, and plasma samples. The 33-kDa band in the FF and plasma lanes represents IGFBP-2, as previously described in FF and plasma (24, 29). The bottom band of the relaxin-stimulated doublet (33 kDa) in the UF migrated similarly to IGFBP-2 in FF and plasma (Fig. 3BGo). Immunoprecipitation experiments, using a specific IGFBP-2 antibody, identified the doublet in the UF from control and relaxin-treated gilts as IGFBP-2 (Fig. 4Go). Although IGFBP-2 was immunoprecipitated as a doublet in the UF (Fig. 4Go, lanes 3 and 5; 33 and 34.5 kDa), the antibody precipitated a single band of IGFBP-2 from FF (Fig. 4Go, lane 1; 33 kDa). No IGFBPs were precipitated when normal rabbit serum was substituted for the specific IGFBP antibodies (Fig. 4Go, lanes 2, 4, and 6). Although the IGFBP-1 antibody immunoprecipitated IGFBP-1 from amniotic fluid, there was no evidence for immunoreactive IGFBP-1 in either FF or UF (data not shown). Dephosphorylation of the immunoprecipitated UF with alkaline phosphatase did not reduce the IGFBP-2 doublet to a single band (data not shown), indicating that uterine IGFBP-2 was not a doublet due to phosphorylation.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of relaxin treatment on porcine uterine luminal IGFBPs. A, UF from control and relaxin-treated animals were concentrated and subjected to ligand blotting as described in Materials and Methods. B, FF, UF, and plasma (P) were subjected to ligand blotting to illustrate their respective IGFBP profiles.

 


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. IGFBP-2 immunoprecipitation of porcine UF. UF from control (C) and relaxin-treated (R) animals were immunoprecipitated with an IGFBP-2 antibody and subjected to ligand blotting as described in Materials and Methods. FF (+) was used as a positive control for porcine IGFBP-2. Samples were immunoprecipitated with a specific IGFBP-2 antibody (lanes 1, 3, and 5) or with normal rabbit serum (lanes 2, 4, and 6).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The relaxin-induced increases in uterine weight and protein content observed here and first reported by Hall et al. (1) were associated with a significant enhancement of uterine luminal concentrations of IGFs and IGFBPs. In previous studies from our laboratory, a similar relationship between relaxin-induced granulosa cell growth in vitro and ovarian IGF-I was reported (7). The data presented here support and extend those in vitro studies by showing in vivo that the uterotropic effects of relaxin are linked with an increase not only in IGF, but also in IGFBP, levels in the porcine uterus.

Paracrine changes in the IGF system are pivotal in stimulating uterine growth during pregnancy in the pig (10, 11, 12). The concept that uterine growth is dependent upon stimulation of local growth factors is supported by several reports. For example, it has been suggested that growth factors mediate the trophic actions of estrogens on the uterus, as estrogen stimulates uterine production of IGFs (9, 30, 31) and their binding proteins (32). Likewise, we propose that the growth-promoting effects of relaxin on the uterus are mediated by local IGFs and IGFBPs. In addition to enhancing uterine growth in early pregnancy, uterine IGF-I is critical for implantation (8, 9, 10, 11). Therefore, factors that regulate uterine IGF-I will also impact on implantation and conceptus growth. For instance, conceptus-derived estrogens are reported to stimulate uterine IGF-I production and thus indirectly facilitate implantation (8, 9). Similarly, local production of relaxin by the pig endometrium around the time of implantation (33) together with the relaxin-induced increase in IGF-I secretion presented here support a role for relaxin in conceptus growth and in creating a suitable uterine environment for the establishment of pregnancy. In humans, relaxin may also be important around the time of implantation because it is detected in the plasma of women during the periimplantation period (34). In addition, relaxin alters the ultrastructure of human endometrial stromal cells during the progestin-induced differentiation that occurs with decidualization (35).

Given that estradiol has potent uterotropic effects in the pig and stimulates the uterine IGF system (9), it was important to rule out the possibility that endogenous estradiol was contributing to the observed effects of relaxin. Estradiol was not detected systemically, and FF estradiol levels in both control and relaxin-treated prepubertal gilts were at least an order of magnitude lower than those in cyclic animals (10–500 ng/ml) (36). These data suggest that the effects of relaxin on uterine growth and the IGF system reported here are independent of endogenous estradiol. This is consistent with the work of Hall et al. (4), who found that although estradiol enhanced the uterotropic effects of relaxin in the pig, it is not required for relaxin to promote growth of the uterus.

Whereas the effects of relaxin on IGFBP production in human endometrial and decidual cells are well documented (13, 14, 15, 16), the present report is the first to demonstrate an effect of relaxin on porcine uterine IGFBPs. The idea that IGFBPs modulate IGF activity in the uterus is supported by the fact that endometrial IGFBP-2 and -3 mRNAs are abundant when IGF-II mRNA levels are high at mid- to late pregnancy (10, 11). A similar temporal relationship between increased levels of IGF-II and IGFBP-2 are also found during pregnancy in human amniotic fluid (37). The evidence for regulation of uterine IGF-II and IGFBPs by relaxin reported here together with the high uterine IGF-II and IGFBP mRNA levels after implantation (10, 11) suggest coordinate actions of relaxin and the IGF system on uterine growth as pregnancy progresses. In addition, IGFBP-2 can act directly on uterine cells by binding to the cell membrane via its Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) site (8, 11). In this fashion, IGFBP-2 can also potentiate IGF activity (reviewed in 38 .

In addition to the relaxin-induced increase in uterine IGFBP-2, we identified this IGFBP as a doublet in the UF by immunoprecipitation. This is the first report of IGFBP-2 as a doublet in the pig, as it is reported as a single band in porcine FF and plasma (24, 27). One possibility for the existence of an IGFBP-2 doublet is that the upper IGFBP-2 band (34.5 kDa) is a phosphorylated form of IGFBP-2. Phosphorylation of some of the IGFBPs, including IGFBP-2, has been reported (reviewed in 39 . However, our dephosphorylation experiments did not reduce the doublet to a single IGFBP-2 band, as would be expected if the binding protein was phosphorylated. In addition, glycosylation of IGFBP-2 is unlikely, as the IGFBP-2 cDNA sequence does not indicate any glycosylation sites on this binding protein (40). Furthermore, the appearance of the IGFBP-2 doublet in relaxin-treated animals cannot be explained by relaxin treatment because IGFBP-2 appears as a doublet in control animals. As the IGFBP-2 doublet is not a result of phosphorylation, as shown here, or glycosylation the reason for its presence is unknown. The absence of IGFBP-1 protein in the UF, as shown by immunoprecipitation experiments, is supported by the lack of IGFBP-1 transcript in the porcine endometrium (11).

Although we were able to demonstrate an increase in IGF-I and -II protein in the UF of relaxin-treated, prepubertal gilts, a simultaneous increase in uterine IGF-I and -II mRNA was not observed. A similar observation with IGF-I was made by Simmen et al. (9) in the unilaterally pregnant pig, when gravid and nongravid uterine horns were compared. Although gravid horns had higher IGF-I in UF than nongravid horns, there was no difference in endometrial IGF-I mRNA between the two horns. In contrast, steroidal regulation of IGF-I gene expression in the porcine uterus was highly correlated with IGF-I protein in UF of mature, ovariectomized gilts (9). The explanation for this difference in hormonal regulation of IGF-I secretion and mRNA in these animal models is not clear. However, the data presented here and for the unilaterally pregnant pig show that IGF-I secretion can be stimulated independent of IGF-I gene expression. The relaxin-induced enhancement of IGF protein in the absence of an increase in IGF-I and -II mRNA is probably due to translational regulation of IGF synthesis and/or an increase in IGF secretion by relaxin. Although storage of IGFs in secretory vesicles of the endometrial glandular epithelium has yet to be demonstrated, Geisert et al. (41) shows an exocytosis of these vesicles during early pregnancy. Secretory activity of the pig endometrium is stimulated by progesterone and conceptus-derived estrogens (41, 42, 43). Similarly, we found relaxin to significantly increase uterine lumen protein, indicating that relaxin also enhances the secretory activity of the porcine uterus. It is also possible that high levels of IGFBP-2 in the uterine lumen of relaxin-treated animals acted as a reservoir for the IGFs, extending the half-life of the protein during relaxin administration, resulting in higher IGF-I and -II concentrations in the UF of relaxin-treated gilts.

Given the influence of relaxin on uterine IGF-I and IGFBPs reported here, we were interested in determining whether relaxin had any influence on the uterine IGF-I receptor in this animal model. In the periimplantation pig uterus, Hofig et al. (23) found that relaxin did not interact with the uterine IGF-I receptor, however, an effect of relaxin on IGF-I binding to its receptor in the uterus has not been reported. The data presented here indicate that relaxin administration in vivo does not alter the percent maximum binding of IGF-I to its uterine receptor. Therefore, the interaction of relaxin and the IGF system in the porcine uterus involves IGFs and IGFBPs, and not the IGF-I receptor.

The data presented indicate that the effects of relaxin on the uterine IGF system were local and independent of the endocrine IGF system, as relaxin did not affect systemic IGFs and IGFBPs. Local uterine production of IGFs and their binding proteins has been well documented in the pig (8, 9, 10, 11). IGF transcripts are hormonally regulated and differentially expressed in the porcine endometrium and myometrium during the cycle and pregnancy (10, 11). Although IGF proteins have not been localized in the pig endometrium to a particular cell type, it is likely that IGFs are synthesized by the luminal epithelial cells and then secreted into the uterine lumen. This is supported by the presence of IGF-II mRNA in the endometrial glandular and epithelial cells in the pig uterus at midpregnancy (11). In addition, IGFBP-2 protein has been localized to both glandular and luminal epithelial cells of the porcine endometrium (11). The possibility that the increase in uterine IGFs and IGFBPs is due to diffusion from the plasma through the uterine epithelial lining to the uterine lumen is unlikely for several reasons. First, the percentage of plasma proteins that transfer to the uterine lumen is low (~7%) (44). Secondly, when electrophoresis or chromatography patterns of uterine fluid proteins are compared with those of serum or plasma of rats, humans, and pigs, strikingly different protein profiles are observed (44, 45). Thirdly, the idea of a blood-uterine lumen barrier has been proposed (46). In our study, this barrier is clearly illustrated by the fact that relaxin concentrations in the plasma ranged from 3.4–19.9 ng/ml, whereas those in the UF were only 65 pg/ml. In contrast, in FF, which actively exchanges substances with the blood, the relaxin concentration was 8.8 ng/ml, comparable to that in plasma. If a large amount of plasma proteins diffused from the plasma to the uterine lumen, a much higher concentration of relaxin would be expected in the uterine lumen.

Previously, we reported that relaxin stimulates granulosa cell IGF-I secretion in vitro (7). However, an effect of relaxin on the ovarian IGF system in vivo was not evident here. This was reflected in the absence of ovarian growth after relaxin administration in vivo in the face of a dramatic growth-promoting effect of relaxin on the uterus. We suspect that the lack of an in vivo effect of relaxin on the ovary in this prepubertal gilt model may be due to the high levels of relaxin achieved as a result of relaxin treatment. Although the circulating relaxin level was similar to that reported by Hall et al. (4), the systemic and local concentrations of relaxin measured here were 10-fold higher than those reported during the cycle (47, 48), when follicular growth occurs. In fact, plasma and follicular relaxin levels in the treated gilts were closer to those reported in pregnancy (47, 49), when the ovary is relatively quiescent. Furthermore, at higher concentrations in vitro, relaxin is less effective in promoting growth of porcine thecal cells (6) and inhibits growth of MCF-7 mammary cancer cells (50). Thus, the high local and systemic relaxin levels attained in this in vivo model, as in pregnancy, would not be expected to promote follicular growth or stimulate the ovarian IGF system. On the other hand, the uterus, during pregnancy and in the present study, is highly sensitive to the growth-promoting effects of relaxin. Collectively, these data suggest that the trophic effects of relaxin are tissue specific and concentration dependent and may be contingent upon the reproductive status of the animal.

In summary, the present study is the first to demonstrate an effect of relaxin on the porcine uterine IGF system in vivo. In granulosa cells in vitro, we established that the trophic effects of relaxin were dependent at least in part on IGF-I, as IGF-I immunoneutralization blocked relaxin-induced DNA synthesis (7). Although the relaxin-induced increases in uterine IGFs and IGFBPs suggest that the uterotropic effects of relaxin are mediated indirectly by the uterine IGF system, relaxin may also promote uterine growth independent of the IGF system. Recently, it has been suggested that relaxin elicits its uterine growth effects through specific relaxin-binding sites localized in the uterus by Min et al. (2). Therefore, future studies are needed to determine whether relaxin stimulates uterine growth directly through the relaxin receptor or by enhancing the production of other uterine growth factors.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Drs. Edward Zambraski and Patricia Schoknecht, and Ms. Sylvie Ebner for their assistance with animal surgery; the farm employees at the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station; Ms. Heather Billings for assistance with the estradiol RIA; Dr. R. S. Gilmour for the IGF-I clone; Dr. M. M. Rechler for the rat IGF-II cDNA clone; Dr. R. V. Anthony for the monotyrosylated relaxin; Dr. D. G. Porter for the porcine relaxin antibody; and Dr. L. Sciorra for the human amniotic fluid.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by USDA Grant 93–37203-8979 and New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication No. D-06125–1-97 (to C.A.B.). Back

Received January 27, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hall JA, Cantley TC, Day BN, Anthony RV 1990 Uterotrophic actions of relaxin in prepubertal gilts. Biol Reprod 42:769–774[Abstract]
  2. Min G, Hartzog MG, Jennings RL, Winn RJ, Sherwood OD 1997 Evidence that endogenous relaxin promotes growth of the vagina and uterus during pregnancy in gilts. Endocrinology 138:560–565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Galvin JM, Anthony RV, Day BN 1991 Effects of purified porcine relaxin on the uterus of gilts during early pregnancy. Anim Reprod Sci 26:293–301
  4. Hall JA, Cantley TC, Galvin JM, Day BN, Anthony RV 1992 Influence of steroids on relaxin-induced uterine growth in ovariectomized gilts. Endocrinology 130:3159–3166[Abstract]
  5. Zhang Q, Bagnell CA 1993 Relaxin stimulation of porcine granulosa cell deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in vitro: interactions with insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology 132:1643–1650[Abstract]
  6. Zhang Q, Bagnell CA 1994 Trophic actions of relaxin on porcine theca cells: interactions with insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I in vitro. Endocr J 2:349–355
  7. Ohleth KM, Bagnell CA 1995 Relaxin-induced deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in porcine granulosa cells is mediated by insulin-like growth factor-I. Biol Reprod 53:1286–1292[Abstract]
  8. Simmen RCM, Green ML, Simmen FA 1995 IGF system in periimplantation uterus and embryonic development. In: Dey SK (ed) Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 185–204
  9. Simmen RCM, Simmen FA, Hofig A, Farmer SJ, Bazer FW 1990 Hormonal regulation of insulin-like growth factor gene expression in the pig uterus. Endocrinology 127:2166–2174[Abstract]
  10. Simmen FA, Simmen RCM, Geisert RD, Martina-Botte F, Bazer FW, Terqui M 1992 Differential expression, during the estrous cycle and pre- and postimplantation conceptus development, of messenger ribonucleic acids encoding components of the pig uterine insulin-like growth factor system. Endocrinology 130:1547–1556[Abstract]
  11. Song S, Lee CY, Green ML, Chung CS, Simmen RCM, Simmen FA 1996 The unique endometrial expression and genomic organization of the porcine IGFBP-2 gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 120:193–202[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Giudice LC, Milkowsky DA, Lamson G, Rosenfeld RG, Irwin JC 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in human endometrium: steroid dependent messenger ribonucleic acid expression and protein synthesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:779–787[Abstract]
  13. Bell SC, Jackson JA, Ashmore J, Zhu HH, Tseng L 1991 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein synthesis and secretion by progestin and relaxin in long term cultures of human endometrial stromal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1014–1024[Abstract]
  14. Tseng L, Gao J-G, Chen R, Zhu HH, Mazella J, Powell DR 1992 Effect of progestin, antiprogestin, and relaxin on the accumulation of prolactin and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 messenger ribonucleic acid in human endometrial stromal cells. Biol Reprod 47:441–450[Abstract]
  15. Gao J-G, Mazella J, Tseng L 1994 Activation of the IGFBP-1 gene promoter by progestin and relaxin in primary cultures of endometrial stromal cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 104:39–46[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Thrailkill KM, Clemmons DR, Busby WH, Handwerger S 1990 Differential regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein secretion from human decidual cells by IGF-I, insulin and relaxin. J Clin Invest 86:878–883
  17. Sherwood OD, O’Byrne EM 1974 Purification and characterization of porcine relaxin. Arch Biochem Biophys 160:185–196[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Wiqvist N, Paul KG 1958 Inhibition of spontaneous uterine motility in vitro as a biological assay of relaxin. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 29:135–146[Medline]
  19. Porter DG, Ryan PL, Norman L 1992 Lack of effect of oxytocin output from the porcine neural lobe in vitro or in lactating sows in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 96:251–260[Abstract]
  20. Weller PA, Dickson MC, Huskisson NS, Dauncey MJ, Buttery PJ, Gilmour RS 1993 The porcine insulin-like growth factor gene: characterization and expression of alternate transcription sites. J Mol Endocrinol 11:201–211[Abstract]
  21. Whitfield HJ, Bruni CB, Frunzio R, Terrell JE, Nissley SP, Rechler MM 1984 Isolation of a cDNA clone encoding rat insulin-like factor-II precursor. Nature 312:277–280[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Ryan PL, Valentine AF, Bagnell CA 1996 Expression of epithelial cadherin in the developing and adult pig ovary. Biol Reprod 55:1091–1097[Abstract]
  23. Hofig A, Michel FJ, Simmen FA, Simmen RCM 1991 Constitutive expression of uterine receptors for insulin-like growth factor-I during the peri-implantation period in the pig. Biol Reprod 45:533–539[Abstract]
  24. Lee C-Y, Bazer FW, Etherton TD, Simmen FA 1991 Ontogeny of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) and IGF-binding proteins in porcine serum during fetal and postnatal development. Endocrinology 128:2336–2344[Abstract]
  25. Afele S, Bryant-Greenwood GD, Chamley WA, Dax EM 1979 Plasma relaxin immunoreactivity in the pig at parturition and during nuzzling and suckling. J Reprod Fertil 56:451–457[Abstract]
  26. Billings HJ, Katz LK 1997 Progesterone facilitation and inhibition of estradiol-induced sexual behavior in the female goat. Horm Behav 31:47–53[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Mondschein JS, Etherton TD, Hammond JM 1991 Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins of porcine ovarian follicular fluid. Biol Reprod 44:315–320[Abstract]
  28. Granot I, Dekel N 1994 Phosphorylation and expression of connexin-43 ovarian gap junction protein are regulated by luteinizing hormone. J Biol Chem 269:30502–30509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Straus DS, Takemoto CD 1988 Amino acid limitation negatively regulates insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA levels and E-domain peptide secretion at a post-transcriptional step in BRL-3A rat liver cells. J Biol Chem 263:18404–18410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Murphy LJ, Ghahary A 1990 Uterine insulin-like growth factor: regulation of its expression and its role in estrogen-induced uterine proliferation. Endocr Rev 11:443–453[Medline]
  31. Sahlin L, Norstedt G, Eriksson H 1994 Estrogen regulation of the estrogen receptor and insulinlike growth factor-I in the rat uterus: a potential coupling between effects of estrogen and IGF-I. Steroids 59:421–430[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Irwin JC, de las Fuentas L, Dsupin BA, Giudice LC 1993 Insulin-like growth factor regulation of human endometrial stromal cell function: coordinate effects on insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, cell proliferation and prolactin secretion. Regul Pept 48:65–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Knox RV, Zhang Z, Day BN, Anthony RV 1994 Identification of relaxin gene expression and protein localization in uterine endometrium during early pregnancy in the pig. Endocrinology 135:2517–2525[Abstract]
  34. Stewart DR, Celniker AC, Taylor CA Jr, Cragun JR, Overstreet JW, Lasley BL 1990 Relaxin in the peri-implantation period. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1771–1773[Abstract]
  35. Lane B, Oxyberry W, Mazella J, Tseng L 1994 Decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells in vitro: effects of progestin and relaxin on the ultrastructure of endometrial stromal cells in culture. Hum Reprod 9:259–266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Howard HJ, Ford JJ 1992 Relationships among concentrations of steroids, inhibin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and IGF-binding proteins during follicular development in weaned sows. Biol Reprod 47:193–201[Abstract]
  37. Chard T, Blum WF, Brunjes J, Campbell DJ, Wathen NC 1994 Levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 and insulin-like growth factor-II in maternal serum, amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid at 9–20 weeks of pregnancy. J Endocrinol 142:379–383[Abstract]
  38. Jones JI, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Clemmons DR 1993 IGF binding proteins and their functions. Mol Reprod Dev 35:368–375[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Rechler MM 1993 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Vitam Horm 47:1–114[Medline]
  41. Geisert RD, Renegar RH, Thatcher WW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW 1982 Establishment of pregnancy in the pig. I. Interrelationships between preimplantation development of the pig blastocyst and uterine endometrial secretions. Biol Reprod 27:925–939[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Knight JW, Bazer FW, Wallace HD, Wilcox CJ 1974 Dose response relationship between exogenous progesterone and estradiol and porcine uterine protein secretions. J Anim Sci 39:747–751
  43. Simmen RCM, Simmen FA 1990 Regulation of uterine and conceptus secretory activity in the pig. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 40:279–292[Medline]
  44. Mac Laughlin DT, Santoro NF, Bauer HH, Lawrence D, Richardson GS 1986 Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of endometrial protein in human uterine fluids: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Biol Reprod 34:579–585[Abstract]
  45. Surani MAH 1977 Qualitative and quantitative examination of the proteins of rat uterine luminal fluid during pro-estrus and pregnancy and comparison with those of serum. J Reprod Fertil 50:281–287[Abstract]
  46. McRae AC 1988 The blood-uterine lumen barrier and exchange between extracellular fluids. J Reprod Fertil 82:857–873[Abstract]
  47. Bryant-Greenwood GD, Jeffrey R, Ralph MM, Seamark RF 1980 Relaxin production by the porcine Graafian follicle in vitro. Biol Reprod 23:792–800[Abstract]
  48. Kotwica G, Dusza L, Ciereszko R, Okrasa R, Schams D 1991 Evidence for relaxin and progesterone synchronous secretion on day 13 to 17 of the oestrous cycle in sows. Exp Clin Endocrinol 98:3–8[Medline]
  49. Sherwood OD, Crnekovic VE 1975 Radioimmunoassay of plasma relaxin levels throughout pregnancy and at parturition in the pig. Endocrinology 97:834–837[Abstract]
  50. Bigazzi M, Brandi ML, Bani G, Bani Sacchi T 1992 Relaxin influences the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer 70:639–643[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
W. Yan, P. L Ryan, F. F Bartol, and C. A Bagnell
Uterotrophic effects of relaxin related to age and estrogen receptor activation in neonatal pigs.
Reproduction, May 1, 2006; 131(5): 943 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
C. A. BAGNELL, W. YAN, A. A. WILEY, and F. F. BARTOL
Effects of Relaxin on Neonatal Porcine Uterine Growth and Development
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., May 1, 2005; 1041(1): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
O. D. Sherwood
Relaxin's Physiological Roles and Other Diverse Actions
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 205 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Lenhart, P. L. Ryan, K. M. Ohleth, S. S. Palmer, and C. A. Bagnell
Relaxin Increases Secretion of Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and -2 during Uterine and Cervical Growth and Remodeling in the Pig
Endocrinology, January 1, 2002; 143(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Lenhart, P. L. Ryan, K. M. Ohleth, S. S. Palmer, and C. A. Bagnell
Relaxin Increases Secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 during Uterine and Cervical Growth and Remodeling in the Pig
Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 3941 - 3949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. A. Lenhart, P. L. Ryan, K. M. Ohleth, and C. A. Bagnell
Expression of Connexin-26, -32, and -43 Gap Junction Proteins in the Porcine Cervix and Uterus During Pregnancy and Relaxin-Induced Growth
Biol Reprod, December 1, 1999; 61(6): 1452 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
T. Klonisch, R. Ivell, M. Balvers, S. Kliesch, B. Fischer, M. Bergmann, and K. Steger
Expression of relaxin-like factor is down-regulated in human testicular Leydig cell neoplasia
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 5(2): 104 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohleth, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bagnell, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohleth, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bagnell, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals