| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center, West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, Department of Medicine and Brain Research Institute, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90073; Biomarkers and Prevention Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (F.C.), Rockville, Maryland 20850-3300
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Vicente Martínez, D.V.M., Ph.D., West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, Building 115, Room 203, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90073. E-mail: vmartine{at}ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-calcitonin gene-related peptide (
CGRP).
AM and
CGRP dose-dependently inhibited gastric emptying with ic
ED50 values of 120 and 100 pmol, respectively. Human
proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (150600 pmol, ic) and AM (150
pmol, iv) had no effect. The inhibitory actions of AM and
CGRP
(150 pmol, ic) were completely blocked by the CGRP antagonist, human
CGRP-(837) injected ic at 30 µg, but not at 15 µg. The CRF
antagonist,
[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C
MeLeu37]CRF-(1241)
(10 µg/rat) injected ic prevented ic rat/human CRF (150 pmol)-induced
53% inhibition of gastric emptying while not modifying the effect of
AM. The action of AM (150 pmol, ic) was abolished by bilateral
adrenalectomy or the ß-adrenergic blocker, propranolol (1 mg/kg, ip),
but was not altered by indomethacin (5 mg/kg, ip) or subdiaphragmatic
vagotomy. These results indicate that ic AM and
CGRP equipotently
inhibit gastric emptying through mechanisms similarly antagonized by a
high dose of CGRP-(837). The central AM action is mediated through
adrenal-dependent, ß-adrenergic pathways independently from
activation of central CRF receptors. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several peptides influence gastric motor function upon administration
into the brain through modulation of the autonomic nervous system
activity to the gastrointestinal tract (5, 6). In particular,
neuroanatomical and pharmacological studies using CRF receptor
antagonists such as
-helical CRF-(941),
[D-Phe12]CRF-(1241), or astressin
established the physiological relevance of brain CRF in mediating
stress-induced gastric stasis (7, 8, 9). A few studies indicate that
peptides related to the CGRP superfamily, namely
CGRP, calcitonin,
and amylin, inhibit gastric emptying upon central injection in rats
(10, 11, 12). The central action of AM to influence gut function has not
yet been explored. However, AM messenger RNA is expressed in the rat
brain (13), and AM immunoreactivity is localized in the hypothalamus
and medulla oblongata (13, 14). Specific binding sites for AM are
present in the hypothalamus and brainstem (15, 16). The AM receptor was
recently cloned from the rat lung complementary DNA (17).
Pharmacological characterization of rat AM and human CGRP receptors in
transfected cells and various tissue membranes, including brain
membranes, indicates that AM displays a highly specific recognition
over CGRP at the AM receptor and a cross-reactivity with the
CGRP1 receptor subtype (13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). Taken together, these
observations suggest a possible central action of AM on gastric motor
function.
Subsequent analysis of the AM precursor revealed that proteolytic cleavage and amidation of pro-AM results, in addition to AM, in a unique 20-residue peptide, termed proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide [PAMP, or pro-AM-(22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41)] (21). PAMP immunoreactivity was distributed similarly to that of AM (22). Specific binding sites for PAMP have been identified recently in various rat tissues, including the brain, although in distinct locations from AM binding sites (23). PAMP is structurally unrelated to the CGRP superfamily, does not stimulate cAMP (23), and displays a transient hypotensive effect when injected peripherally related to the inhibition of sympathetic neural transmission at nerve endings (24, 25).
Therefore, the present study was designed to examine in conscious rats
1) whether the novel peptide AM, which is related to the CGRP
superfamily, shares a similar central action as
CGRP to inhibit
gastric emptying upon intracisternal (ic) injection; 2) to test the
influence of ic injection of PAMP, the AM-gene related peptide, which
is structurally unrelated to the CGRP superfamily; 3) to establish
whether the inhibitory actions of
CGRP and AM are sensitive to the
antagonistic effect of ic injection of CGRP-(837); 4) to assess
whether AM action is secondary to activation of central CRF receptors;
and 5) to define the neurohumoral pathways involved in AM action.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drugs and treatments
Human AM and human PAMP (Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan) were
dissolved in distilled water to a 1.35 x 10-4
M solution. Ten-microliter aliquots of the stock solution
were stored at -70 C. Further dilutions were performed in 0.9%
sterile saline (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) before use. Rat
CGRP and human/rat CRF (Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide
Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) and the CGRP antagonist,
human CGRP-(837) (University of Quebec, Montreal, Canada), were
kept in powder form at -70 C and dissolved in sterile saline
immediately before the experiments. The CRF antagonist,
[D-Phe12]CRF-(1241)
([D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C
MeLeu37]CRF-(1241);
The Salk Institute) was kept in powder form at -70 C and dissolved in
distilled water (pH 7.0, warmed to 37 C) before use. Indomethacin
(Sigma) was dissolved in 1% sodium bicarbonate; propranolol
hydrochloride (Sigma) and phentolamine mesylate (Ciba Pharmaceutical
Co., Summit, NJ) were dissolved in saline.
Intracisternal injections were performed acutely under short enflurane anesthesia (23 min; 5.5% vapor concentration in O2; Ethrane-Anaquest, Madison, WI) by puncture of the occipital membrane with a 50-µl Hamilton syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV) in rats placed in ear bars of a stereotaxic equipment. The presence of cerebrospinal fluid in the Hamilton syringe upon aspiration before injection insured correctness of needle placement into the cisterna magna. After the injection, animals were returned to their home cages for the duration of the experiment. The total volume of ic injection was 10 µl either as a single injection or as two consecutive 5-µl injections. Intravenous injections were performed acutely under short enflurane anesthesia (5 min) by injection of 0.1 ml into the jugular vein. Intraperitoneal injections were performed in 0.5 ml. Unless otherwise stated, all doses represent dose per rat.
Measurement of gastric emptying
Gastric emptying was determined by the phenol red method, as
previously described (8). A suspension of continuously stirred 1.5%
methylcellulose (Sigma Chemical Co.) and phenol red (0.5%; Sigma
Chemical Co.) was given intragastrically (1.5 ml) to conscious rats.
After a 20-min period, rats were killed by CO2 inhalation.
The abdominal cavity was opened, the gastroesophageal junction and the
pylorus were clamped, and the stomach was removed, rinsed in 0.9%
saline, and placed in 100 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and homogenized
(Polytron, Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). The suspension was
allowed to settle for 1 h at room temperature, and 5 ml of the
supernatant were added to 0.5 ml of 20% trichloroacetic acid (wt/vol)
and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4 C for 20 min. The supernatant was
mixed with 4 ml of 0.5 N NaOH, and the absorbance of the
sample was read at 560 nm (Shimadzu UV-260, Cole Scientific, Moorpark,
CA). Phenol red recovered from animals killed immediately after
administration of the methylcellulose solution was used as the standard
(0% emptying). The percent emptying during the 20-min period was
calculated according to the following equation: gastric emptying (%) =
1 - (absorbance of test sample/absorbance of standard) x
100.
Experimental protocols
Effects of AM,
CGRP, or PAMP injected ic and AM injected
iv.
Rats were injected ic with saline, AM (30, 75, or 150 pmol),
CGRP (30, 75, or 150 pmol), or PAMP (150, 300, or 600 pmol). Other
groups were injected iv with either saline or AM (150 pmol). Ten
minutes later, the 20-min rate of gastric emptying was measured.
Effects of ic CGRP antagonist or CRF antagonist.
Rats were
injected ic with saline or CGRP-(837) (15 or 30 µg) and immediately
thereafter, with saline,
CGRP (150 pmol), or AM (150 pmol). In
another study, rats were injected ic with vehicle (distilled water, pH
7.0) or [D-Phe12]CRF-(1241) (10 µg) and
immediately thereafter with saline, CRF (150 pmol), or AM (150 pmol).
Ten minutes after the ic injections, the 20-min rate of gastric
emptying was measured.
Effects of indomethacin, vagotomy, adrenalectomy, and
adrenergic blockade.
The following pretreatments were performed:
indomethacin (5 mg/kg) or vehicle (1% sodium bicarbonate) injected ip
60 min before the experiments; propranolol (1 mg/kg), phentolamine (1
mg/kg), or saline injected ip 15 min before the experiments;
subdiaphragmatic vagotomy (achieved by a circular seromuscular myotomy
of the esophagus, about 2 cm from the gastroesophageal junction) or
sham operation (laparotomy and manipulation of the stomach); and
bilateral adrenalectomy or sham operation (laparotomy and manipulation
of abdominal viscera). Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and adrenalectomy were
performed 48 and 24 h before the experiments, respectively, in
fasted rats under ketamine hydrochloride (75 mg/kg, ip; Ketaset, Fort
Dodge Laboratories, Fort Dodge, IA) and xylazine (5 mg/kg, ip; Rompun,
Mobay Co., Shawnee, KS) anesthesia. All pretreated groups were
injected ic with either saline or AM (150 pmol), and 10 min later, the
20-min rate of gastric emptying was determined.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE.
Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA followed
by a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. When the effects of
two treatments and their reciprocal interaction was studied, data were
analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with replication. When the two-way ANOVA
revealed significant effects of the treatments, data were reanalyzed
using one-way ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple
comparison test to determine differences among groups.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The
mean effective dose (ED50), defined as the dose of peptide
that induced a 50% inhibition of gastric emptying compared with the
rate of emptying in vehicle-treated animals (taken as 0% inhibition),
was determined by nonlinear regression (Prism, version 2.0, GraphPad,
San Diego, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CGRP, or PAMP injected ic and AM injected iv
CGRP injected ic
induced a dose-dependent inhibition of gastric emptying, with
ED50 values of 120 pmol (95% confidence interval, 86167
pmol; r2 = 0.99) and 100 pmol (95% confidence interval,
65155 pmol; r2 = 0.979), respectively (Fig. 1
CGRP injected ic at 150 pmol inhibited gastric emptying by 5659%
compared with that in the vehicle group. By contrast, AM (150 pmol)
injected iv did not influence the rate of gastric emptying [vehicle,
44.8 ± 5.8% (n = 6); AM, 53.4 ± 8.6% (n = 6);
P > 0.05; data not shown]. The ic injection of
PAMP (150, 300, and 600 pmol) failed to produce significant changes in
gastric emptying (Fig. 1
|
CGRP and AM injected ic at 150 pmol inhibited gastric emptying
to 17.8 ± 5.5% and 18.6 ± 5.1%, respectively, compared
with 60.8 ± 8.9% in ic vehicle-treated rats (Fig. 2
CGRP- and AM-induced
inhibition of gastric emptying [CGRP-(837) plus CGRP, 28.5 ±
3.9% (n = 3); CGRP-(837) plus AM, 35.6 ± 8.0% (n =
3)], whereas at 30 µg, there was a complete reversal of the
CGRP
and AM inhibitory effect [CGRP-(837) plus CGRP, 67.9 ± 12.1%;
CGRP-(837) plus AM, 65.4 ± 12.2%; n = 4 for each group;
P < 0.05; Fig. 2
|
|
|
Bilateral adrenalectomy 24 h before the experiments completely
reversed the inhibitory effect of ic AM (150 pmol) compared with that
in sham-operated animals (percent gastric emptying: adrenalectomy plus
AM, 57.0 ± 6.6%; sham operation plus AM, 21.2 ± 2.2%;
n = 45; P < 0.05). Adrenalectomy produced a
small, but nonsignificant, rise in the rate of gastric emptying (Fig. 4
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These data also indicate that AM shares a similar central action to
influence gastric function as other peptides of the CGRP superfamily.
Rat calcitonin, rat
CGRP, and amylin administered into the lateral
brain ventricle (icv) inhibit gastric emptying of a nonnutrient meal in
conscious rats with ED50 values of 10, 100, and 600 pmol,
respectively (11, 12). Likewise, in the present study, rat
CGRP
injected into the cisterna magna delays gastric emptying, as previously
reported (10). Based on the similar ED50 for AM (120 pmol)
and
CGRP (100 pmol), both peptides appear to be equipotent to
suppress gastric emptying upon ic injection. The lack of effect of
human PAMP, the structurally unrelated product of the human AM gene
(24), when injected ic at doses up to 600 pmol shows the peptide
specificity of AM action. Although PAMP immunoreactivity and binding
sites are present in the brain (23, 24), its central biological actions
remain elusive.
CGRP-(837) injected ic blocked the inhibition of gastric emptying in
response to ic AM. The dose at which the complete reversal was observed
required a 60-fold molar excess of CGRP-(837) over that of AM,
whereas a 30-fold excess was subthreshold. The recent pharmacological
characterization of the cloned rat AM receptor in transfected cells
demonstrates the highly specific recognition of AM over CGRP at the AM
receptor and a weak antagonistic effect of AM by CGRP-(837) with a
Ki of 10-6 M (17). Likewise, rat
hypothalamic binding assays indicate that human AM
(10-10-10-8 M), unlike rat
CGRP-(837) (10-6 M), competes for labeled
AM binding sites (16). In addition to binding to its own receptor, AM
cross-reacts with the cloned dog CGRP-1 receptor subtype (18, 19). In
the rat hypothalamic binding assay, human AM competes for the labeled
rat
CGRP-binding sites with an order of potency showing rat
CGRP > CGRP-(837) > human AM (13, 16). Therefore, based on
the reversal by ic CGRP-(837), the present results would be
consistent with an AM action exerted at CGRP-binding sites sensitive to
competition by CGRP-(837). However, both rat
CGRP and human AM are
equipotent to inhibit gastric emptying and similarly sensitive to the
antagonistic action of CGRP-(837). Therefore, these observations are
difficult to reconcile with previously established affinities of AM,
CGRP, and CGRP-(837) on AM or CGRP-1 receptors (16, 27, 28). In
addition, the ratio of
CGRP/CGRP-(837) at which the reversal is
observed is higher than that reported for icv
CGRP to suppress food
intake or induce pressor responses (1:1 or 1:17, respectively) (28, 29). Different antagonistic potencies of CGRP-(837) in various
in vitro bioassays have been used to postulate the existence
of multiple CGRP receptor subtypes (28). In particular, membrane
studies in the rat nucleus accumbens revealed the existence of a unique
class of sites possessing high affinity binding for CGRP, amylin, and
salmon calcitonin, suggesting the existence of a CGRP receptor subtype
3 (30, 31). Based on these observations, it may be speculated that a
receptor subtype(s) with similar high affinity for human AM and rat
CGRP is involved. The pharmacological characterization of AM/CGRP
receptor subtypes involved would benefit from advances in the
development of more specific antagonists and the cloning of CGRP
receptor subtypes (32).
CGRP and CRF share a similar spectrum of central actions related to the inhibition of gastric acid secretion and food intake, protection against ethanol lesions, and increased sympathetic activity and mean arterial blood pressure (33, 34, 35, 36, 37). A physiological role of endogenous brain CRF to inhibit gastric emptying has been established under stress conditions in rats (7, 9). Neuroanatomical evidence also indicates that 35% of CRF neurons in specific brain areas receive direct input from CGRP nerve terminals (38), suggesting that activation of CGRP receptors may activate CRF neurons. However, ic injection of the CRF antagonist [D-Phe12]CRF-(1241) did not modify the 50% inhibition of gastric emptying induced by ic AM while blocking ic CRF-induced similar inhibition of gastric emptying, as previously reported (8). These results indicate that gastric stasis induced by ic AM is not mediated by central CRF receptors and is not secondary to a nonspecific stress-related effect. Likewise, although AM induces a sustained hypertensive effect upon central injection, these alterations do not play a role as the ic doses inhibiting gastric emptying are lower than those producing vascular changes (39, 40). For example, in rats, icv injection of AM at doses up to 176 pmol failed to induce any change in mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate, while inhibiting water intake (40) and gastric emptying (present study).
Adrenalectomy completely abolished and vagotomy tended to attenuate,
although not significantly, ic AM-induced gastric stasis. Likewise,
CGRP injected ic induced delayed gastric transit was completely
reversed by adrenalectomy and slightly attenuated by vagotomy (10).
Moreover, the central AM effect was blocked by propranolol, suggesting
an action mediated through adrenergic ß-receptors. Similar
ß-adrenergic mechanisms have been shown to mediate ic injection of
CGRP-induced decreased gastric motility (41). AM injected ic
stimulates abdominal sympathetic nerve activity, and icv injection of
CGRP increases catecholamine release (29, 33, 39). Taken together,
these findings indicate that AM injected ic inhibits gastric emptying
through sympathetic adrenal-dependent ß-adrenoreceptors, as
previously reported for ic injection of
CGRP (10, 41). By contrast,
CGRP injected icv was previously reported to inhibit gastric
emptying through vagal-dependent pathways, whereas noradrenergic
mechanisms were not involved (11). Such a difference may be related to
different brain areas (hypothalamic vs. brainstem) at which
CGRP or related peptides act upon icv compared with ic injection
(42). The exact brain sites involved in ic AM- and
CGRP-induced
inhibition of gastric emptying need to be established. Possible
responsive brainstem nuclei may include the area postrema/nucleus
tractus solitarius and/or the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis based on
the responsiveness of these sites to direct injection of AM and
CGRP
(43, 44) and their projections to influence sympathetic outflow (43, 45, 46).
Unlike ic injection of other peptides, such as interleukin-1ß (47),
AM action does not involve PG mechanisms. The vagal- and PG-independent
mechanism of action of ic AM to inhibit gastric emptying contrasts with
the cholinergic PG pathways mediating ic AM-induced gastric
cytoprotection against ethanol lesions in rats (48). Interestingly, in
these studies, the effect of ic AM was not blocked by ic CGRP-(837)
at 30 µg, suggesting modulation by distinct receptors resulting in
activation of different efferent pathways. Differences in the
peripheral neurohumoral pathways mediating motor- vs.
secretory-related events have been observed for several centrally
acting neuropeptides (10, 36). In particular, upon ic injection of
CGRP, the gastric motor alterations, as described above, depend
mainly on sympatho-adrenal components, whereas the secretory effects
are not mediated by the sympathetic nervous system (10, 36).
CGRP-(837) injected ic at a dose that prevented AM- or
CGRP-induced delayed gastric emptying did not alter basal rate of
gastric emptying in rats. Consistent with these findings, no agonist
action of CGRP-(837) was reported upon icv injection at doses up to
80 µg (28). These results suggest that endogenous AM and
CGRP do
not modulate the basal rate of gastric emptying in rats. Similar
observations have been reported for other centrally acting peptides
such as CRF, which does not play a role in basal but is involved in
stress-related alterations of gastric emptying (7, 8, 9). Therefore, these
data do not preclude a possible regulatory role of AM under
pathophysiological conditions. The elevation of circulating AM and gene
transcription by endotoxin (49) may be involved in endotoxin-induced
gastric stasis (50), as AM influences neuronal activity in the area
postrema (44), and humoral stimuli are conveyed via vascular channels
to the area postrema and part of the nucleus tractus solitarius (44, 51).
In summary, our study demonstrates for the first time that human AM
injected ic in picomole amounts, acts in the brain to inhibit gastric
emptying. By contrast, human PAMP, the structurally unrelated product
of the human AM gene, injected ic up to 4-fold higher doses had no
effect. Compared with
CGRP, AM injected ic displayed a similar
potency, sensitivity to the antagonistic action of CGRP-(837), and
sympathetic mediation through adrenal-dependent ß-adrenergic
mechanisms. The central action of AM is not secondary to activation of
the CRF receptor-induced increase in sympathetic outflow. These results
indicate that AM and
CGRP act via common mechanisms. The CGRP
receptor subtypes involved in the central actions of AM and
CGRP to
induce gastric stasis and the pathophysiological significance remain to
be established.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
CGRP, and the CRF
antagonist, and Dr. Serge St. Pierre (University of Quebec, Canada) for
the generous supply of the CGRP antagonist. Mr. P. Kirsh is
acknowledged for helping with the preparation of the manuscript. | Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 24, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. U. De Schepper, J. G. De Man, N. E. Ruyssers, A. Deiteren, L. Van Nassauw, J.-P. Timmermans, W. Martinet, A. G. Herman, P. A. Pelckmans, and B. Y. De Winter TRPV1 receptor signaling mediates afferent nerve sensitization during colitis-induced motility disorders in rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): G245 - G253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Czimmer, M. Million, and Y. Tache Urocortin 2 acts centrally to delay gastric emptying through sympathetic pathways while CRF and urocortin 1 inhibitory actions are vagal dependent in rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): G511 - G518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakanishi, H. Osada, M. Uenoyama, F. Kanazawa, N. Ohrui, Y. Masaki, T. Hayashi, Y. Kanatani, T. Ikeda, and T. Kawai Expressions of adrenomedullin mRNA and protein in rats with hypobaric hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2159 - H2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Hinson, S. Kapas, and D. M. Smith Adrenomedullin, a Multifunctional Regulatory Peptide Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2000; 21(2): 138 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martinez, S. V. Wu, and Y. Tache Intracisternal Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides to the Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Blocked Vagal-Dependent Stimulation of Gastric Emptying Induced by Acute Cold in Rats Endocrinology, September 1, 1998; 139(9): 3730 - 3735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kaneko, T. Mitsuma, H. Nagai, S. Mori, T. Iyo, K. Kusugami, and Y. Tache Central action of adrenomedullin to prevent ethanolinduced gastric injury through vagal pathways in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): R1783 - R1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Reidelberger, L. Kelsey, and D. Heimann Effects of amylin-related peptides on food intake, meal patterns, and gastric emptying in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1395 - R1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |