help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 9 3811-3818
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Characterization of Truncated Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-2 in Human Milk1

P. Jean Ho and Robert C. Baxter

Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. P. Jean Ho, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia. E-mail: robaxter{at}med.usyd.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Truncated forms of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) have been purified from human milk and shown to retain partial IGF-binding activity. By affinity chromatography on agarose-IGF-I and HPLC, truncated IGFBP-2 of apparent Mr 14,000–16,000 resolved into two peaks. Both peaks bound radioiodinated IGF-II on ligand blotting. Within both peaks, two sequences were identified, starting at Gly169 and Lys181 of hIGFBP-2 (predicted Mr, 13,786 and 12,502, respectively, if both extend to Gln289). Mass spectrometry of a fraction predominantly containing Gly169 peptides yielded two major species, 13,840 and 13,425 Mr. Prolonged incubation of radioiodinated recombinant human (rh) IGFBP-2 with human milk failed to reveal any degradation, suggesting the formation of the fragments within the mammary gland. By solution binding assay, truncated IGFBP-2 showed less than 10% binding of [125I]IGF-I and 25% binding of [125I]IGF-II at pH 7.0 compared with rhIGFBP-2. No binding activity was seen at pH 4.0, in contrast to intact IGFBP-2, which showed peak binding from pH 4.0 to at least pH 9.0. The IGF-II association constant for truncated IGFBP-2 (6.5 nM-1) was 10-fold lower than that for intact IGFBP-2 (58 nM-1). Des(1–6)-IGF-II was totally inactive in displacing IGF-II tracer from the IGFBP-2 fragment, but displaced tracer from rhIGFBP-2 with 10% the activity of IGF-II. Thus, the amino-terminal hexapeptide of IGF-II is required for interaction with the carboxy-terminal domain of IGFBP-2. The presence of active IGFBP-2 fragments in milk suggests a role for milk IGFBP-2 in modifying IGF activity in the neonatal gut.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE INSULIN-LIKE growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) are structurally homologous proteins found ubiquitously throughout the body. Their major actions of stimulating cell proliferation and differentiation are mediated largely via the type I IGF receptor (1). In addition, IGF-II binds to the type II IGF receptor, also known as the IGF-II/cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor (2). At high doses and in selected tissues, IGF-I can also elicit insulin-like effects via the insulin receptor (3).

In 1984 we first reported the presence of immunoreactive IGF-I together with IGF-binding activity in human milk (4). Both IGF-I and IGF-II have subsequently been reported in the milk of many species (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), and IGF-I is present at considerably higher concentrations in colostrum than in mature milk (4, 6, 8, 11). Insulin and type I and type II IGF receptors are all present in the gastrointestinal epithelium (12, 13), and recent studies suggest that milk-borne IGFs may have a role in stimulating neonatal gut growth (14, 15, 16), although IGF-I was used at very high concentrations in these studies.

The IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) are a family of six structurally related proteins that bind IGF-I and IGF-II specifically and modify IGF-mediated effects at both tissue and cellular levels (17, 18). IGFBP-1 through -3 have been reported in milk (7, 19). In particular, total immunoreactive IGFBP-2 levels in human milk can be 10 times higher than those in maternal serum (20). The biological role of IGFBP-2 in the gut is unclear. Whether it protects luminal IGFs from digestion or has a role in neonatal gut growth has not been investigated.

In the course of purifying IGFBP-2 from human milk, we identified several related peptides with molecular masses lower than that of the intact protein. In this paper we describe the purification and binding properties of truncated forms of IGFBP-2 from human milk.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Milk samples
The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee. Expressed breast milk was obtained from eight women 4–6 days after normal term delivery and from a woman between 39–51 days after delivery at 28 wk gestation, in two separate preparations. Milk samples were stored at -20 C until required. Upon thawing, samples were gauze-filtered to reduce solid content, pooled, then centrifuged at 16,300 x g at 4 C for 30 min (J2 centrifuge, Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). The lipid layer was discarded, and the aqueous layer was collected for further purification.

IGF-I affinity chromatography
Pooled skim milk (790 and 900 ml in two separate preparations) was pumped at 0.5 ml/min through a 2.5 x 5-cm Sephadex G-15 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) guard column and then onto a 1 x 10-cm agarose-IGF-I affinity column. This column contained 8 mg recombinant human IGF-I (donated by Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) that had been coupled to activated agarose (Affi-Gel 10, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Before loading the milk, the column was prewashed with 25 ml 0.5 M acetic acid, pH 3.0, followed by 75 ml 0.5 M acetic acid and 1 M NaCl, pH 3.0, then equilibrated with 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, and 0.2 g/liter sodium azide, pH 6.5. After loading the sample, the column was washed with 100 ml equilibration buffer. Bound protein was eluted with 0.5 M acetic acid, pH 3.0, at 0.5 ml/min, and 1-ml fractions were collected in siliconized glass tubes. The concentration of IGFBP-2 in flow-through and eluted fractions was monitored using a previously described IGFBP-2 RIA (21). The antibody used in the assay, raised against rhIGFBP-2, had less than 0.1% cross-reactivity with hIGFBP-1 and -3 and rhIGFBP-4 and -5 and had approximately 0.6% cross-reactivity with hIGFBP-6 (21).

HPLC
Fractions eluted from the IGF-I affinity column containing maximal IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity were further purified by reverse phase HPLC on a C18 column (RP-318, Bio-Rad) eluted with a 15–60% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at 1.5 ml/min over 30 min. These elution conditions were adjusted for further purification (see Results).

Peptides and radioactive tracers
rhIGFBP-2 was donated by Sandoz (Basel, Switzerland) and was radioiodinated as previously described (21). Radioiodination of protein A (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), IGF-I (donated by Kabi, Stockholm, Sweden), and IGF-II (donated by Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) was performed by reacting 5 µg pure protein with 1 mCi Na125I and 10 µg chloramine-T in a final volume of 70 µl 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, for 20 sec at 22 C. The reaction was stopped with 10 µl 5 mg/ml sodium metabisulfite. The iodinated protein was separated from unreacted Na125I by size chromatography in a 1 x 30-cm column of Sephadex G-100 (for protein A) or Sephadex G-50 (for IGF-I and IGF-II). Fractions of 1 ml were collected, and the peak fractions of radioiodinated protein, as measured by {gamma}-counting, were pooled for use. The column buffers used were 50 mM sodium phosphate and 2.5 g/liter BSA (Sigma), pH 6.5, for protein A tracer; 50 mM sodium phosphate and 0.5 g/liter BSA, pH 6.5, for IGF-I tracer; and 25 mM HEPES and 2.0 g/liter BSA, pH 7.0, for IGF-II tracer.

SDS-PAGE
HPLC fractions with IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity were lyophilized. The dried samples were reconstituted in Laemmli sample buffer (22) and subjected to nonreducing 12% SDS-PAGE at 100 V overnight. Molecular mass standards of 14–97 kDa (Bio-Rad) were used. The gels were equilibrated with 25 mM Tris (BDH, Poole, UK), 192 mM glycine (Ajax, Auburn, Australia), and 20% methanol for 30 min at 22 C, then transferred to Hybond-C Extra nitrocellulose (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK) at 250 mA over 2 h using a semidry electrophoretic transfer unit (Multiphor II Novablot, Pharmacia Biotech, Bromma, Sweden). The nitrocellulose membrane was blocked with 10 g/liter BSA in 10 mM Tris and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, for 4 h at 37 C.

IGFBP-2 immunoblotting
Electroblotted nitrocellulose membrane was incubated with rhIGFBP-2 antiserum (as used for the RIA) diluted to 1:1000 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris and 150 mM NaCl) containing 10 g/liter BSA, pH 6.5, overnight at 22 C. The nitrocellulose membrane was washed four times with TBS, pH 6.5; once in TBS containing 0.5 g/liter Nonidet P-40 (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA), pH 6.5; then three times in TBS, pH 6.5. The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated with biotinylated donkey antirabbit Ig (Amersham) in TBS containing 10 g/liter BSA and 0.5 g/liter Nonidet P-40, pH 7.5, for 1 h at 37 C, washed as before, then incubated with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) at a final dilution of 0.5 U/ml in TBS containing 10 g/liter BSA and 0.5 g/liter Nonidet P-40, pH 7.5, for 30 min at 37 C; and washed again as before. Bands were developed using a bromochloroindolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium substrate system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 22 C in the dark in 50 ml TBS, pH 9.5, containing 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4 M nitro blue tetrazolium (Sigma; added as 16.5 mg predissolved in 200 µl dimethylformamide), and 0.38 M bromochloroindolyl phosphate (Sigma; added as 8.25 mg predissolved in 200 µl dimethylformamide). As soon as the desired band intensity developed, the reaction was stopped using 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5.

Alternatively, after incubation with rhIGFBP-2 antiserum, IGFBP-2-immunoreactive bands were visualized using radioiodinated protein A. The nitrocellulose membrane was washed three times in TBS, pH 6.5, containing 0.5 g/liter Nonidet P-40, once in TBS without Nonidet P-40, and twice in TBS with Nonidet P-40, then incubated with radioiodinated protein A (2.5 x 106 cpm) diluted in 50 ml TBS containing 10 g/liter BSA, pH 6.5, for 2 h at 22 C. The blots were washed again as before and dried at 22 C. Radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography of the dried blots using Hyperfilm MP autoradiographic film (Amersham) for 3 h at -80 C.

Ligand blotting
Electroblotted nitrocellulose membrane was washed three times in TBS, pH 6.5, containing 0.5 g/liter Nonidet P-40, once in TBS, and twice in TBS with Nonidet P-40, then incubated with radioiodinated rhIGF-II (1 x 106 cpm) diluted in 50 ml TBS containing 10 g/liter BSA, pH 6.5, overnight at 22 C or for 3 days at 4 C, washed again as described above, dried at 22 C, and subjected to autoradiography as described above.

[125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II binding assays
These binding assays were performed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, 0.1 g/liter Triton X-100, 1 g/liter gelatin, and 0.2 g/liter sodium azide, pH 6.5. Incubations consisted of standard or sample (50 µl), buffer (150 µl), and [125I]IGF-I or [125I]IGF-II (10,000 cpm in 100 µl). After 2 h at 22 C, 2 µl anti-IGFBP-2 Ig previously purified from rabbit antihuman IGFBP-2 antiserum on a column of protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma) was added in 25 µl buffer. After an additional hour at 22 C, 8 µl goat antirabbit Ig in 25 µl buffer were added. After another hour at 22 C, bound radioactivity was precipitated by adding 1 ml cold 6 g/100 ml polyethylene glycol 6000 (BDH, Kilsyth, Australia) in 0.15 M NaCl, waiting 15 min, then centrifuging for 20 min at 4,200 rpm at 2 C in a J6 centrifuge (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). Supernatants were decanted, and radioactivity in the pellet was measured by {gamma}-counting.

Competitive binding curves and pH dependence
These were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM Tris, 50 mM acetic acid, 0.1 g/liter Triton X-100, 1 g/liter gelatin, and 0.2 g/liter sodium azide, adjusted to the specified pH. Incubations consisted of intact rhIGFBP-2 or truncated human milk IGFBP-2, [125I]IGF-II (10000 cpm), and unlabeled rhIGF in a total volume of 300 µl. After 2 h at 22 C, 2 µl protein A affinity-purified IGFBP-2 antiserum in 25 µl buffer were added. Further steps were the same as those in the [125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II binding assays described above. Des(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)-IGF-II used in the competitive binding curves was obtained from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia).

Other protein analyses
The amino-terminal sequences of the HPLC fractions with IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity were determined by Dr. M. I. Tyler (Deakin Research, CSIRO, Ryde, Australia) using Edman degradation. Electrospray mass spectrometry was performed by Dr. A. Kortt (CSIRO Division of Biomolecular Engineering, Parkville, Australia).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The dilution curve of skim milk used as starting material was parallel to that of rhIGFBP-2 standard in the IGFBP-2 RIA used in this study (result not shown). The IGFBP-2 concentrations in the starting material were 1.13 and 2.39 µg/ml in two separate preparations. The IGF-I affinity column approached saturation with immunoreactive IGFBP-2 when approximately 800 ml skim milk had been run through it at 0.5 ml/min. After the column had been washed, bound proteins that were eluted with 0.5 M acetic acid, pH 3.0, at 0.5 ml/min yielded the elution profile of IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity, as shown in Fig. 1aGo.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Purification of human milk IGFBP-2 fragments: IGF-I affinity chromatography and HPLC. a, Elution profile of IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity from IGF-I affinity column. Human skim milk (~800 ml) was pumped at 0.5 ml/min onto an agarose-IGF-I affinity column. Bound protein was eluted using 0.5 M acetic acid, pH 3, at 0.5 ml/min. Fractions of 1 ml were assayed by IGFBP-2 RIA. b, Absorbance profile at 280 nm of reverse phase HPLC fractionation of human milk IGFBP-2. The IGF-I affinity column eluant containing peak IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity was purified by reverse phase HPLC on a C18 column eluted with a 15–60% CH3CN gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 30 min at 1.5 ml/min. Fractions of 1 ml were collected. Peaks A and B, as indicated, were subjected to further analysis. c, IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity of peak fractions from HPLC of human milk. The fractions from panel b were assayed for IGFBP-2 by RIA. Most of the IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity RIA was detected in peak B, which contained substantially less protein than peak A.

 
The fractions eluted from the IGF-I affinity column containing the peak concentrations of IGFBP-2 were further purified by reverse phase HPLC on a C18 column eluted with a 15–60% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 30 min at 1.5 ml/min, producing the absorbance profile at 280 nm shown in Fig. 1bGo. A major split peak (peak A) was eluted at 15–16 min, and a smaller single peak (peak B) was eluted at 16–17 min. Substantially greater IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity was detected in peak B than in peak A (Fig. 1cGo). Peak A was further purified by elution with a 15–32.4% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 15 min, then isocratically at 32.4% acetonitrile at 1.5 ml/min, allowing resolution into peaks A-1 and A-2. Fractions corresponding to these peaks were run separately with a 15–33.6% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 15 min, then isocratically at 33.6% acetonitrile (Fig. 2Go). Peaks A-1 and A-2 each gave a single peak of absorbance at 280 nm in the approximate ratio of 3:2. Table 1Go summarizes the stepwise recoveries of IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity during the course of purification.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Purification of truncated IGFBP-2 from human milk. Peak A (Fig. 1bGo) was further purified by elution with a 15–32.4% CH3CN gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 15 min, then isocratically at 1.5 ml/min, allowing separation of peak A-1 (left) and peak A-2 (right), which are shown reanalyzed separately with a 15–33.6% CH3CN gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 15 min, then isocratically.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Purification of intact and truncated IGFBP-2 from human milk

 
Figure 3Go shows the composite results of SDS-PAGE of the starting material and IGFBP-2 peptides purified from it from two separate preparations. On immunoblotting using antiserum to rhIGFBP-2, skim milk showed a band at 34 kDa, similar to that obtained using intact rhIGFBP-2 (Fig. 3aGo, lane 1), as well as bands at 24 and 14–16 kDa (Fig. 3aGo, lane 2). On ligand blot, only the 34-kDa band was detected (Fig. 3bGo, lane 2). On immunoblot, peak A was detected principally as two bands between 14–16 kDa (Fig. 3aGo, lane 3). There were also several faint bands between 16–30 kDa that were more obvious in another preparation on immunoblot, but were not seen on IGF-II ligand blot (result not shown). Both major bands at 14–16 kDa were also detected by IGF-II ligand blotting (Fig. 3bGo, lane 3). Peak A had a separate band at 19 kDa and a faint band at 24 kDa as found by ligand blot, but neither was detected by immunoblot. These two bands were not further identified, as they were not immunologically related to IGFBP-2. Peak A-1 was detected as a single band at about 15 kDa by immunoblot (Fig. 3aGo, lane 5). Peak A-2 was detected as a band of slightly lower molecular mass (Fig. 3aGo, lane 6). Both peaks A-1 and A-2 were visualized on ligand blotting using radioiodinated IGF-II (Fig. 3bGo, lanes 5 and 6, respectively). Peak B mainly had material at 24 kDa, which was detected on both immuno- and ligand blotting (Fig. 3aGo, lane 4, and Fig. 3bGo, lane 4), and a smaller amount of 34-kDa intact IGFBP-2, which was only visible on the immunoblot in one experiment (Fig. 3aGo, lane 4), but was also weakly visible by ligand blot in another preparation (data not shown).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE of human milk IGFBP-2 (composite results form several experiments). Samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. Amounts loaded are expressed as nanograms of immunoreactive IGFBP-2. Molecular mass standards (in kilodaltons) are indicated by arrows. Lane 1, rhIGFBP-2, 100 ng; lane 2, skim milk (a, 12 ng; b, 100 ng); lane 3, peak A (a, 18 ng; b, 195 ng); lane 4, peak B (a, 100 ng; b, 1910 ng); lane 5, peak A-1 (a, 2.5 ng; b, 100 ng); lane 6, peak A-2 (a, 4.5 ng; b, 180 ng). a, Electroblotted nitrocellulose membranes were immunoblotted with IGFBP-2 antiserum and visualized using radioiodinated protein A and autoradiography or by a biotin-streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase method. Note the intense immunoreactivity of peak A despite relatively low reactivity in RIA (Fig. 1cGo). b, Electroblotted nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with radioiodinated IGF-II, and bands were detected by autoradiography.

 
To determine whether these fragments could be generated in milk by proteolysis subsequent to lactation, [125I]IGFBP-2 tracer (100,000 cpm) was incubated for up to 28 h at 37 C with 100 µl freshly collected skim milk. Comparison of the radiolabeled IGFBP-2 by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography before and after incubation failed to reveal any IGFBP-2 degradation during the incubation (data not shown). This suggests that the smaller IGFBP-2 forms are generated within the mammary gland.

The amino-terminal sequences of peaks A-1, A-2, and B are shown in Fig. 4Go. Peak B yielded two amino-terminal sequences in equal amounts: one identical to IGFBP-2, and the other identical to des(1, 2, 3)-IGFBP-2 (23). It is not known whether the intact or truncated terminal corresponds to the 24- or 34-kDa component or both. Peak A-1 contained approximately 94% of an amino-terminal sequence starting at Gly169 of hIGFBP-2 (sequence a) and 6% of a sequence starting at Lys181 (sequence b), whereas peak A-2 consisted of a mixture of approximately 71% sequence a and 29% sequence b. The predicted molecular masses of sequences a and b of peaks A-1 and A-2 were 13,786 and 12,502 Da, respectively, if both sequences extended to Gln289 of the hIGFBP-2 sequence and all six cysteine residues were disulfide bonded. All sequences were confirmed in two separate preparations. Mass spectrometry of peak A-1 material yielded two major species of 13,840 and 13,425 Da, respectively. No species was detected at 12,502 Da, the predicted molecular mass of sequence b in peak A-1.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Amino-terminal sequences of IGFBP-2-related proteins isolated from human milk. Peak A and B material from HPLC were sequenced by Edman degradation. X designates residues not determined, assumed to be cysteine; * indicates the predicted mass if sequences extend to Gln289.

 
Peak B was quantitated by RIA, and its IGF-binding activity was determined in a solution binding assay in which bound complexes are immunoprecipitated with IGFBP-2 antiserum. In this assay, peak B had 30–40% of the [125I]IGF-I-binding activity of rhIGFBP-2 and 40–45% of the [125I]IGF-II-binding activity of rhIGFBP-2 (result not shown). Figure 5aGo shows the quantitation of peaks A-1 and A-2 using the IGFBP-2 RIA. Peak A-1 had minimal [125I]IGF-I-binding activity and weak [125I]IGF-II-binding activity, whereas peak A-2 had approximately 25% of the binding activity for [125I]IGF-II and less than 10% of that for [125I]IGF-I compared with rhIGFBP-2 (Fig. 5Go, b and c).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. [125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II binding to intact and truncated IGFBP-2 in human milk. a, Dilution curves of peaks A-1 and A-2 in the IGFBP-2 RIA showing parallelism with rhIGFBP-2 standard. Peak A-1 had 0.5% IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity, and peak A-2 had 0.9% IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity. Peptide masses refer to dry weight. b and c, rhIGFBP-2 (0.05–10 ng), peak A-1 (0.025–4.9 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA), and peak A-2 (0.043–8.6 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA) were incubated with 10,000 cpm [125I]IGF-I (b) or [125I]IGF-II cpm (c) for 2 h at 22 C. Bound radioactivity was immunoprecipitated with protein A affinity-purified IGFBP-2 antiserum and measured by {gamma}-counting. •, rhIGFBP-2; {blacktriangleup}, peak A-1; {blacktriangledown}, peak A-2.

 
A comparison of the IGF-II-binding activity of intact rhIGF-BP-2 with that of peaks A-1 and A-2 at varying pH values revealed quite distinct binding profiles (Fig. 6Go). Binding of [125I]IGF-II by rhIGFBP-2 was negligible at pH 3.0, but rose sharply between pH 3.5 and pH 4.5, and remained at a plateau level between pH 4.5 and pH 9.0. A similar profile was seen for [125I]IGF-I (result not shown). In one experiment, there was a peak of binding activity for both [125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II by rhIGFBP-2 at pH 4.0 that declined to a plateau of binding between pH 6.0 and pH 9.0 (result not shown). In contrast, peaks A-1 and A-2 were devoid of any [125I]IGF-II-binding activity at pH 4.0, and both displayed maximal binding for [125I]IGF-II in the physiological pH range. The pH dependence of [125I]IGF-I binding by peaks A-1 and A-2 was similar to that of [125I]IGF-II binding (results not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. The effect of pH on [125I] IGF-II binding by intact and truncated IGFBP-2. rhIGFBP-2 (1 ng), peak A-1 (1.2 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA), and peak A-2 (2.2 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA) were assayed for [125I]IGF-II binding following the same method as that described in Fig. 5Go. •, rhIGFBP-2; {blacktriangleup}, peak A-1; {blacktriangledown}, peak A-2.

 
Figure 7aGo compares the results of competitive binding between [125I]IGF-II and unlabeled IGF-II for rhIGFBP-2 at pH 4.5 and 7.0 (Fig. 7aGo). Scatchard analyses indicated 3- to 4-fold higher binding affinity at pH 4.5 (Ka = 2.1 ± 1.5 x 1011 M-1; mean ± SD; n = 2) than at pH 7.0 (Ka = 5.8 ± 2.7 x 1010 M-1; n = 2). The binding activities of peaks A-1 and A-2 were also compared (Fig. 7bGo) at pH 7.0 only, since binding was negligible at pH 4.5. Scatchard analysis showed that the IGFBP-2 fragment preparations had similar binding affinities, 1 order of magnitude lower than that of intact IGFBP-2 [4.5 ± 2.8 x 109 M-1 (n = 3) for peak A-1 and 6.5 ± 4.5 x 109 M-1 (n = 3) for peak A-2].



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Competitive binding studies using IGFBP-2 at pH 4.5 and 7.0 and carboxy-terminal IGFBP-2 fragments at pH 7.0. Incubations were performed for 2 h at 22 C and contained rhIGFBP-2 (0.75 ng; a), peak A-1 (500 ng rhIGFBP-2 by RIA; b), or peak A-2 (200 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA; b) along with [125I]IGF-II (10,000 cpm) and increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-II in a total volume of 300 µl. Separation was performed by immunoprecipitation as described in Fig. 5Go, b and c. •, rhIGFBP-2 at pH 4.5; {circ}, rhIGFBP-2 at pH 7.0; {blacktriangleup}, peak A-1 at pH 7.0; {blacktriangledown}, peak A-2 at pH 7.0.

 
Des(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)-IGF-II is an analog of IGF-II reported to have greatly decreased binding to IGFBP-2 (24). We used it in conjunction with peak A-2 to investigate which portions of the IGF-II and IGFBP-2 molecules were involved in the interaction with each other. As shown in Fig. 8aGo, des(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)-IGF-II displaced IGF-II tracer from intact rhIGFBP-2 in a nonparallel manner, showing approximately 10% the activity of IGF-II. In contrast, des(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)-IGF-II was totally inactive in displacing IGF-II tracer from the peak A-2 IGFBP-2 preparation, indicating that the amino-terminal hexapeptide of IGF-II, although clearly involved in the binding to intact IGFBP-2, is an absolute requirement for binding to the carboxy-terminal IGFBP-2 peptides.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Comparison of IGF-II or des(1–3)-IGF-II binding to intact rhIGFBP-2 and carboxy-terminal IGFBP-2 fragment. Incubations were performed for 2 h at 22 C and contained rhIGFBP-2 (75 ng; a) or peak A-2 (200 ng IGFBP-2 by RIA; b), [125I]IGF-II (10,000 cpm), and increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-II or unlabeled des(1–3)-IGF-II in a total volume of 300 µl. Separation was performed by immunoprecipitation as described in Fig. 5Go, b and c. •, rhIGFBP-2, unlabeled IGF-II; {circ}, rhIGFBP-2, unlabeled des(1–3)-IGF-II; {blacktriangledown}, A-2, unlabeled IGF-II; {triangledown}, A-2, unlabeled des(1–3)-IGF-II.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The presence of IGF-I- and IGF-binding activity in human milk has been recognized for over a decade (4). IGF-I concentrations are reported to range from 1.5 µg/liter (0.2 nM) (25) to 2.5 nM (26). The former concentration is more likely to be accurate, because it was determined after acid chromatography to remove IGFBPs, whereas the latter was determined after acid-ethanol extraction, a method that does not fully remove the low molecular mass IGFBPs that might interfere in IGF-I RIAs. IGF-II levels 2- to 10-fold higher than those of IGF-I have also been detected in human milk (7, 25). The great majority of milk IGF-I has been reported to be in protein-bound forms (4), not unexpectedly because quantitative assays for IGFBP-2 indicate concentrations around 2000 µg/liter or 60 nM (20, 27), a considerable molar excess over that of total IGFs.

IGFBP-2 appears to be by far the predominant IGFBP in human milk, as detected by ligand blot in this and previous studies (11, 25). At present, its biological significance in this fluid is not well understood. The principal origin of IGFBP-2 in milk is not known. In goats, plasma IGFBP-2 appears to account for a very small proportion of milk-borne IGFBP-2, suggesting that most of the IGFBP-2 in milk is synthesized in the mammary gland (28). The present study shows that apart from intact IGFBP-2, several truncated forms of the binding protein are also present in human milk. The failure to detect any proteolysis of IGFBP-2 tracer after incubation with milk suggests that the fragments are generated before secretion from the mammary gland. A report of proteolysis of IGFBP-2 to fragments of 14 and 22 kDa by porcine vascular smooth muscle cells (29) suggests that smooth muscle cells within mammary gland ducts may be involved in the formation of the IGFBP-2 fragments secreted in human milk. These fragments include amino-terminal peptides of approximately 24 kDa and carboxy-terminal peptides of approximately 14 kDa, which retain partial IGF-binding activity. One sequence identified in a 24-kDa peptide, which was not further characterized, represents des(1, 2, 3)-IGFBP-2, i.e. an amino-terminal truncation of three residues. Interestingly, an IGFBP-2 sequence representing truncation of the amino-terminal tripeptide was also reported for the rat protein isolated and sequenced from BRL-3A rat liver-derived cells (30). The functional consequence of this truncation, if any, remains to be determined.

Proteolysed fragments of other IGFBPs appear to have variable effects on IGF-I bioactivity. Potentiation of IGF-I bioactivity in some studies has suggested a gradual release of IGF-I from truncated IGFBPs with lowered IGF-I binding affinities or other mechanisms independent of IGF-I binding (31, 32). A 22-kDa IGFBP-5 fragment was found to have lost any effect on IGF-I-stimulated cell growth (33). More recently, a 16-kDa IGFBP-3 fragment was reported to inhibit IGF-I bioactivity to a similar extent as intact IGFBP-3 despite a total lack of IGF-I affinity (34).

Minor IGF-binding bands detected in peak A-1 and A-2 material at approximately 24 kDa by ligand blotting were not detected by IGFBP-2 immunoblot under conditions where the bands of approximately 14 kDa were intensely visible. Although, after more prolonged exposure, the 24-kDa bands did become faintly visible by immunoblot, it is clear that the IGFBP-2 immunoreactivity in the fragment preparations is virtually exclusively attributable to the peptides of approximately 14 kDa. As the IGF binding assays in solution depend on immunoprecipitation of bound complexes with the same IGFBP-2 antiserum, we conclude that only these major immunoreactive species contribute to detectable IGF-binding activity.

Mass spectrometry of a preparation that predominantly contained a peptide with a sequence beginning at Gly169 revealed species of 13,840 and 13,425 Da. The former value is close to the predicted size of 13,786 Da for IGFBP-2-(169–289), i.e. a fragment extending to the carboxy-terminal Gln residue, whereas the latter value suggests a species with a deletion or truncation of three or four residues. Based on the amino-terminal sequencing result, a fragment corresponding to IGFBP-2-(181–289), i.e. extending from Lys181 to the carboxy-terminus, with a predicted molecular mass of 12,502 Da was expected to be present at much lower abundance, but was not detected by mass spectrometry. Insufficient peak A-2 material was available for a similar analysis of this preparation. Interestingly, the peptide commencing at Lys181, which was relatively more abundant in peak A-2 than in peak A-1, appeared to have higher IGF-binding activity, as more IGF binding was detected in the peak A-2 preparation. This activity differs from that of intact IGFBP-2 in having a narrower pH optimum (unlike IGFBP-2, it shows no binding at pH 4–4.5), a reduction in IGF-II binding, and a considerable decrease in IGF-I binding. The lack of binding in the acidic pH range suggests that amino-terminal residues of IGFBP-2 must be responsible for this relatively high affinity IGF binding to the intact protein, whereas the optimal binding activity observed near neutral pH values suggests that the carboxy-terminal fragments may be active in biological fluids.

The binding affinities of the carboxy-terminal fragments for IGF-II, although 10-fold lower than that of intact IGFBP-2, are 7- to 20-fold higher than the binding affinities of the type I IGF receptor for IGF-I and IGF-II (35). Thus, the IGFBP-2 fragments could potentially compete with the type I IGF receptor for IGF-I and IGF-II. Although any IGF-IGFBP-2-fragment complexes would be expected to dissociate in the acidic conditions of the stomach, it is possible that they may reassociate in the small intestine where the pH is higher. There is also evidence that intragastric pH is near neutrality in the newborn, and gastric acid secretion may take weeks to mature (36). It is thus possible that milk-borne IGFBP-2 and its fragments may retain some IGF-binding activity in the stomach of young infants.

The milk peptides identified in this study resemble an IGFBP-2 peptide identified in culture medium conditioned by the rat liver-derived cell line, BRL-3A (37). This peptide had a sequence identical to that of a rat IGFBP-2 peptide commencing at Met148 of the mature protein, equivalent to Met166 of hIGFBP-2 (23, 38, 39), indicating a maximal size of 14 kDa if it extends to the carboxy-terminal Gln270. However, its apparent size on nonreduced electrophoretic analysis was reported to be greater than 20 kDa, suggesting possible dimerization and perhaps also accounting for the minor component of apparent molecular mass 24 kDa seen with prolonged exposure in some of our electrophoretograms. Like the milk IGFBP-2 fragments, the rat peptide retained significant IGF-I and IGF-II binding, although with a reported apparent affinity loss of 5- to 15-fold (37). In contrast, IGFBP-2 has been shown to be proteolyzed to fragments of 14 and 22 kDa in porcine vascular smooth muscle cells; IGF binding to these peptides was not observed by ligand blot analysis of unconcentrated cultured medium (40).

This study provides novel information about interacting domains of IGF-II and IGFBP-2. Although the importance of amino-terminal residues of IGF-I and IGF-II interacting with IGFBP-2 and other IGFBPs is well recognized (24, 41, 42, 43), the binding determinants on the IGFBPs are not well delineated. We observed that whereas des(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)-IGF-II shows a somewhat decreased binding to intact IGFBP-2, its binding to the carboxy-terminal IGFBP-2 peptide is unmeasurably low. This indicates that the amino-terminal hexapeptide of IGF-II is essential for interaction with the carboxy-terminal domain of IGFBP-2. Given the considerable structural conservation among the members of the IGFBP family, this observation suggests that, as a generalization, amino-terminal B domain residues of the IGFs are likely to interact with the carboxy-terminal domains of the IGFBPs.

In summary, we have described naturally occurring carboxy-terminal peptides derived from IGFBP-2 that retain considerable affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II at neutral pH, although they have lost the pH 4 binding activity observed for intact IGFBP-2. IGF-II binding to the truncated IGFBP-2 shows an absolute requirement for the amino-terminal IGF hexapeptide, indicating that these IGF residues interact with the IGFBP-2 carboxy-terminal domain. The presence of biologically active, low molecular mass IGF-binding species in milk may represent a means by which the growth and function of the neonatal gut could be regulated. Whereas intact IGFBP-2 inhibits IGF-I-stimulated growth of intestinal epithelial cells (44), the effect of amino-terminal truncation of the binding protein remains to be determined.


    Footnotes
 
1 Presented in part at the 76th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Anaheim, CA, 1994. Back

Received March 18, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. LeRoith D, Werner H, Beitner-Johnson D, Roberts CT 1995 Molecular and cellular aspects of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Endocr Rev 16:143–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Roth RA 1988 Structure of the receptor for insulin-like growth factor II: the puzzle amplified. Science 239:1269–1271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ballard FJ, Walton PE, Dunshea FR, Francis GL, Tomas FM 1994 Does IGF-I ever act through the insulin receptor? In: Baxter RC, Gluckman PD, Rosenfeld RG (eds) The Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Regulatory Proteins. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 131–138
  4. Baxter RC, Zaltsman Z, Turtle JR 1984 Immunoreactive somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I and its binding protein in human milk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 58:955–959[Abstract]
  5. Francis GL, Read LC, Ballard FJ, Bagley CJ, Upton FM, Gravestock PM, Wallace JC 1986 Purification and partial sequence analysis of insulin-like growth factor-I from bovine colostrum. Biochem J 233:207–213[Medline]
  6. Donovan SM, Hintz RL, Wilson DM, Rosenfeld RG 1991 Insulin-like growth factors I and II and their binding proteins in rat milk. Pediatr Res 29:50–55
  7. Breier BH, Milsom SR, Blum WF, Schwander J, Gallaher BW, Gluckman PD 1993 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in plasma and milk after growth hormone-stimulated galactopoiesis in normally lactating women. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 129:427–435[Medline]
  8. Donovan SM, McNeil LK, Jimenez-Flores R, Odle J 1994 Insulin-like growth factors and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in porcine serum and milk throughout lactation. Pediatr Res 36:159–168[Medline]
  9. Hess-Dudan F, Vacher PY, Bruckmaier RM, Weishaupt MA, Burger D, Blum JW 1994 Immunoreactive insulin-like growth factor I and insulin in blood plasma and milk of mares and in blood plasma of foals. Equine Vet J 26:134–139[Medline]
  10. Ballard FJ, Grbovac S, Nicholas KR, Owens PC, Read LC 1995 Differential changes in the milk concentrations of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I during lactation in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii. Gen Comp Endocrinol 98:262–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Suikkari AM 1989 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and its low molecular weight binding protein in human milk. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 30:19–25[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Fernandez-Moreno MD, Serrano-Rios M, Prieto JC 1987 Identification of insulin receptors in epithelial cells from duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, colon and rectum in the rat. Diabete Metab 13:135–139[Medline]
  13. Laburthe M, Rouyer-Fessard C, Gammeltoff S 1988 Receptors for insulin-like growth factors I and II in rat intestinal epithelium. Am J Physiol 254:G457–G462
  14. Zumkeller W 1992 Relationship between insulin-like growth factor-I and -II and IGF-binding proteins in milk and the gastrointestinal tract: growth and development of the gut. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 15:357–369[Medline]
  15. Xu RJ, Mellor DJ, Birtles MJ, Breier BH, Gluckman PD 1994 Effects of oral IGF-I or IGF-II on digestive organ growth in newborn piglets. Biol Neonate 66:280–287[Medline]
  16. Burrin DG, Wester TJ, Davis TA, Amick S, Heath JP 1996 Orally adminisitered IGF-I increases intestinal mucosal growth in formula-fed neonatal pigs. Am J Physiol 270:R1085–R1091
  17. Baxter RC 1997 Molecular aspects of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Adv Mol Cell Endocrinol 1:123–159
  18. Jones JI, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Eriksson U, Duc G, Froesch ER, Zapf J 1993 Insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II and IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) in human colostrum/transitory milk during the first week postpartum: comparison with neonatal and maternal serum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 196:267–273[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Schwander J, Mary JL 1993 The RIA for IGFBP-2 in man–a meagre catch? Growth Regul 3:104–108[Medline]
  21. Ho PJ, Baxter RC 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 in patients with prostate carcinoma and benign prostate hyperplasia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:145–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Binkert C, Landwehr J, Mary J-L, Schwander J, Heinrich G 1989 Cloning, sequence analysis and expression of a cDNA encoding a novel insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP-2). EMBO J 8:2497–2502[Medline]
  24. Francis GL, Aplin SE, McNeil KA, Milner SJ, Forbes BE, Ross M, Ballard FJ, Wallace JC 1994 Molecular interactions of IGF-I and IGF-II with their binding proteins and receptors. In: Baxter RC, Gluckman PD, Rosenfeld RG (eds) The Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Regulatory Proteins. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 57–66
  25. Donovan SM, Hintz RL, Rosenfeld RG 1991 Insulin-like growth factors I and II and their binding proteins in human milk: effect of heat treatment on IGF and IGF binding protein stability. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 13:242–253[Medline]
  26. Corps AN, Brown KD, Rees LH, Carr J, Prosser CG 1988 The insulin-like growth factor I content in human milk increases between early and full lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:25–29[Abstract]
  27. Blum WF, Horn N, Kratzsch J, Jørgensen JOL, Juul A, Teale D, Mohnike K, Ranke MB 1993 Clinical studies of IGFBP-2 by radioimmunoassay. Growth Regul 3:100–104[Medline]
  28. Prosser CG, Schwander J 1996 Influence of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 on plasma clearance and transfer of insulin-like growth factors-I and -II from plasma into mammary-derived lymph and milk of goats. J Endocrinol 150:121–127[Abstract]
  29. Cohick WS, Gockerman A, Clemmons DR 1995 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-2 synthesis and degradation by platelet-derived growth factor and the IGFs is enhanced by serum deprivation in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Physiol 164:187–196[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Mottola C, MacDonald RG, Brackett JL, Mole JE, Anderson JK, Czech MP 1986 Purification and amino-terminal sequence of an insulin-like growth factor-binding protein secreted by rat liver BRL-3A cells. J Biol Chem 261:11180–11188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Andress DL, Birnbaum RS 1992 Human osteoblast-derived insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 stimulates osteoblast mitogenesis and potentiates IGF action. J Biol Chem 267:22467–22472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Conover C 1992 Potentiation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) action by IGF-binding protein-3: studies of underlying mechanism. Endocrinology 130:3191–3199[Abstract]
  33. Jones JI, Gockerman A, Busby WHJ, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR 1993 Extracellular matrix contains insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5: potentiation of the effects of IGF-I. J Cell Biol 121:679–687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lalou C, Lassarre C, Binoux M 1996 A proteolytic fragment of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 that fails to bind IGFs inhibits the mitogenic effects of IGF-I and insulin. Endocrinology 137:3206–3212[Abstract]
  35. LeRoith D, McGuinness M, Shemer J, Stannard B, Lanau F, Faria TN, Kato H, Werner H, Adamo M, Roberts CT 1992 Insulin-like growth factors. Biol Signals 1:173–181[Medline]
  36. Britton JR, Koldovsky O 1989 Development of luminal protein digestion: implications for biologically active dietary polypeptides. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 9:144–162[Medline]
  37. Wang J-F, Hampton B, Mehlman T, Burgess WH, Rechler MM 1988 Isolation of a biologically active fragment from the carboxy terminus of the fetal rat binding protein for insulin-like growth factors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 157:718–726[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Brown AL, Chiariotti L, Orlowski CC, Mehlman T, Burgess WH, Ackerman EJ, Bruni CB, Rechler MM 1989 Nucleotide sequence and expression of a cDNA clone encoding a fetal rat binding protein for insulin-like growth factors. J Biol Chem 264:5148–5154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Margot JB, Binkert C, Mary J-L, Landwehr J, Heinrich G, Schwander J 1989 A low molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein from rat: cDNA cloning and tissue distribution of its messenger RNA. Mol Endocrinol 3:1053–1060[Abstract]
  40. Cohick WS, Gockerman A, Clemmons DR 1993 Vascular smooth muscle cells synthesize two forms of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins which are regulated differently by the insulin-like growth factors. J Cell Physiol 157:52–60[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Baxter RC, Bayne ML, Cascieri MA 1992 Structural determinants of binary and ternary complex formation between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3. J Biol Chem 267:60–65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Clemmons DR, Dehoff ML, Busby WH, Bayne ML, Cascieri MA 1992 Competition for binding to insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-2, 3, 4, and 6 by the IGFs and IGF analogs. Endocrinology 131:890–895[Abstract]
  43. Bach LA, Hsieh S, Sakano K, Fujiwara H, Perdue JF, Rechler MM 1993 Binding of mutants of human insulin-like growth factor II to insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 1–6. J Biol Chem 268:9246–9254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Park JHY, McCusker RH, Vanderhoof JA, Mohammadpour H, Harty RF, MacDonald RG 1992 Secretion of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) and IGF-binding protein-2 by intestinal epithelial (IEC-6) cells: implications for autocrine growth regulation. Endocrinology 131:1359–1368[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Kiepe, A. Van Der Pas, S. Ciarmatori, L. Standker, B. Schutt, A. Hoeflich, U. Hugel, J. Oh, and B. Tonshoff
Defined Carboxy-Terminal Fragments of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-2 Exert Similar Mitogenic Activity on Cultured Rat Growth Plate Chondrocytes as IGF-I
Endocrinology, October 1, 2008; 149(10): 4901 - 4911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. M. Kibbey, M. J. Jameson, E. M. Eaton, and S. A. Rosenzweig
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-2: Contributions of the C-Terminal Domain to Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Binding
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 833 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. J. Allan, E. Tonner, M. Szymanowska, J. H. Shand, S. M. Kelly, K. Phillips, R. A. Clegg, I. F. Gow, J. Beattie, and D. J. Flint
Cumulative Mutagenesis of the Basic Residues in the 201-218 Region of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-Binding Protein-5 Results in Progressive Loss of Both IGF-I Binding and Inhibition of IGF-I Biological Action
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. C. Russo, B. S. Schutt, E. Andaloro, S. I. Ymer, A. Hoeflich, M. B. Ranke, L. A. Bach, and G. A. Werther
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-2 Binding to Extracellular Matrix Plays a Critical Role in Neuroblastoma Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion
Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4445 - 4455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Yan, B. E. Forbes, K. A. McNeil, R. C. Baxter, and S. M. Firth
Role of N- and C-terminal Residues of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-binding Protein-3 in Regulating IGF Complex Formation and Receptor Activation
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53232 - 53240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. J Headey, K. S Leeding, R. S Norton, and L. A Bach
Contributions of the N- and C-terminal domains of IGF binding protein-6 to IGF binding
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 33(2): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. D. Payet, X.-H. Wang, R. C. Baxter, and S. M. Firth
Amino- and Carboxyl-Terminal Fragments of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-3 Cooperate to Bind IGFs with High Affinity and Inhibit IGF Receptor Interactions
Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 2797 - 2806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Shand, J. Beattie, H. Song, K. Phillips, S. M. Kelly, D. J. Flint, and G. J. Allan
Specific Amino Acid Substitutions Determine the Differential Contribution of the N- and C-terminal Domains of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-binding Protein-5 in Binding IGF-I
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17859 - 17866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. Firth and R. C. Baxter
Cellular Actions of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 824 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
D. R. Clemmons
Use of Mutagenesis to Probe IGF-Binding Protein Structure/Function Relationships
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 800 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. KIEPE, D. L. ANDRESS, S. MOHAN, L. STANDKER, T. ULINSKI, R. HIMMELE, O. MEHLS, and B. TONSHOFF
Intact IGF-Binding Protein-4 and -5 and Their Respective Fragments Isolated from Chronic Renal Failure Serum Differentially Modulate IGF-I Actions in Cultured Growth Plate Chondrocytes
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2001; 12(11): 2400 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. K. Buckway, E. M. Wilson, M. Ahlsen, P. Bang, Y. Oh, and R. G. Rosenfeld
Mutation of Three Critical Amino Acids of the N-Terminal Domain of IGF-Binding Protein-3 Essential for High Affinity IGF Binding
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4943 - 4950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. R. Devi, D.-H. Yang, R. G. Rosenfeld, and Y. Oh
Differential Effects of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-Binding Protein-3 and Its Proteolytic Fragments on Ligand Binding, Cell Surface Association, and IGF-I Receptor Signaling
Endocrinology, November 1, 2000; 141(11): 4171 - 4179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. C. Baxter
Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2000; 278(6): E967 - E976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. Hwa, Y. Oh, and R. G. Rosenfeld
The Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein (IGFBP) Superfamily
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1999; 20(6): 761 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. C. Russo, G. Rekaris, N. L. Baker, L. A. Bach, and G. A. Werther
Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Induces Proteolysis of Secreted and Cell Membrane-Associated Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-2 in Human Neuroblastoma Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 1999; 140(7): 3082 - 3090.
[Abstract] [Full Text]