help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, M. J.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 9 3956-3966
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Axons Target the Median Eminence: In Vitro Evidence for Diffusible Chemoattractive Signals from the Mediobasal Hypothalamus1

Marie-Christine Rogers, Ann-Judith Silverman and Marie J. Gibson

Fishberg Center for Neurobiology and Division of Endocrinology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (M.C.R., M.J.G.), New York, New York 10029; and the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (A.-J.S.), New York, New York 10032

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Marie J. Gibson, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Box 1055, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, New York 10029. E-mail: MGIBSON{at}SMTPLINK.MSSM.EDU


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The projection of GnRH neurons to the median eminence of the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) is established early in development and is also seen when preoptic area-derived GnRH cell-containing grafts are placed in the third ventricle of hypogonadal mice. To further study the factors directing GnRH axonal targeting, we cultivated embryonic or postnatal day 1 preoptic area with a coexplant on collagen- and laminin-coated membranes in insert chambers. After 7 days of culture, GnRH-immunoreactive fibers extended significantly farther and in greater number onto the sector of membrane facing a MBH coexplant than in the opposite sector, but not toward coexplants of control tissue. Moreover, such effects were specific, as outgrowth of a general axonal population, immunoreactive for growth-associated protein 43 was not influenced by the presence of the MBH. Preferential GnRH outgrowth toward the MBH was established early and was maintained during 10 days of culture. The importance of substrate-derived guidance was also assessed with confocal microscopy. GnRH axons consistently traveled in the company of growth-associated protein 43-labeled axons, but only erratic associations were seen between GnRH and glial processes extending on the membrane. We suggest that although employing an axonal substrate, GnRH axons follow a diffusible chemoattractive signal(s) secreted by the MBH.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GnRH PEPTIDE acts via projections to the median eminence to stimulate pituitary gonadotropin production and release (1). Located on the ventral aspect of the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH), the median eminence constitutes one of the specific targets for GnRH neurons. First detected by in situ hybridization histochemistry and immunocytochemistry between embryonic day 10.75 (E10.75) and E11.5 in the olfactory pit and the vomeronasal organ of the mouse (2, 3), GnRH cells migrate into the brain via the nasal septum. The majority of GnRH cells reach the basal forebrain, including the septal/preoptic area (POA), by E14.5, and GnRH terminals are evident in the median eminence by this time (4). Despite their dispersed distribution, 50–75% of the total of approximately 800 GnRH neurons in the adult brain innervate the median eminence (5, 6).

GnRH cells within embryonic or neonatal septal/POA grafts placed in the third ventricle of adult hypogonadal mice (hpg) also innervate the median eminence. The hpg mouse has a deletion of two exons in the GnRH gene and does not synthesize the peptide (7). Its reproductive organs, therefore, remain undeveloped, and the mice are infertile. Only when GnRH cells in the grafts innervate the host median eminence do the mice undergo reproductive development (8), including ovulation and pregnancy (9, 10).

Several lines of evidence using the model of a normal POA graft into the central nervous system of the adult hpg mouse suggest that the MBH or the median eminence itself plays a critical role in GnRH axonal targeting to the portal capillaries. When the graft is placed within the third ventricle, GnRH axons ramify within the graft and exit into the central nervous system of the host when they reach the MBH or the median eminence (11). If grafts are placed into the lateral ventricle, GnRH neurons survive, but the axons that enter the host brain, following nearby fiber tracts, do not reach the median eminence (12). The location of the graft in the proximity of the MBH seems to be critical for proper targeting. The importance of this region in providing cues to GnRH axons was emphasized by experiments in which embryonic MBH was cografted with POA in the third ventricle. GnRH terminals robustly innervated the median eminence within the cograft as well as the adult host median eminence (13). These latter experiments also suggested that the cues for inducing axonal targeting were either similar between the adult and embryonic median eminence or had overlapping functions.

A cellular compartment within the MBH may form an attractive surface for GnRH axons. Many of the GnRH axons exiting from the graft arch through the arcuate nucleus to terminate in the median eminence, mimicking a normal pathway (11). However, despite selective destruction of the majority of arcuate nucleus neurons of the hpg host by neonatal treatment with monosodium glutamate, grafted GnRH neurons formed functional connections with the host median eminence, suggesting a limited role for this neuronal population (14). Graft-derived GnRH axons were often associated with glial channels and/or glial processes in this region, but the degree of reactive gliosis induced by the graft procedure might make this association fortuitous rather than instructive (15). It thus appears that direct surface interactions of GnRH axons with cells in the MBH are unlikely to be the only factor involved in targeting.

In recent years it has become clear that chemoattractants participate in axonal guidance in many systems (16). To test the hypothesis that GnRH axonal outgrowth to the median eminence is regulated by diffusible substances from the target region, we established cocultures of embryonic POA, containing GnRH neurons, with embryonic MBH, containing the median eminence. The explants grew on the porous membrane surface of insert chambers. This organotypic culture system is used for studies of axonal targeting in other systems and is suitable for the study of chemotropic diffusible factors (17, 18, 19).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Organotypic culture in insert chamber preparation
Tissue explants were cultivated on the surface of the porous membranes of insert culture chambers (0.4-µm pore diameter and 12-mm diameter; cyclopore polyethylene terephthalate transparent membrane with 0.8 x 106 pores/cm2; Falcon/Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ). In preliminary experiments, membranes were coated with rat tail collagen (type I; 3 mg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) in 0.2% acetic acid. As laminin has been demonstrated to promote the extension of growth cones and axonal elongation of developing neurons (20), laminin (100 µg/ml; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) was added to the collagen substrate coating the insert chamber membranes. Under these conditions, GnRH axonal outgrowth exiting the POA explant was enhanced (21). Therefore, in the present study all data are derived from the experiments with collagen/laminin-coated membranes.

The tissue explants were fed through the porous membrane by the underlying medium. In all experiments the medium used was DMEM and Ham’s nutrient mix F-12 with L-glutamine and 15 mM HEPES without phenol, supplemented with putrescine (10-4 M), sodium selenite (0.02 µg/ml), and apotransferrin (100 µg/ml; all medium ingredients obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). The coated insert chamber membrane was washed with 200 µl medium before use.

Dissections
Embryos of gestational age E15 or newborn pups of either sex were used in these experiments as indicated in the text. In previous in vivo studies, the sex of the donor had no effect on successful targeting of GnRH neurons in recipients (11). For embryos, time-mated normal female mice (C3H/HeH x 101H) were killed by cervical dislocation on gestational day 15. The day the vaginal plug was found was designated E0, and staging was confirmed (22). The uterus was removed and placed immediately into a sterile petri dish on ice. Newborn pups were collected less than 24 h after delivery (this stage was defined as postnatal day 1, or P1) and placed on ice for anesthesia. The embryo (or the pup) was decapitated, and the head was placed on a sterile stage under a binocular dissection microscope. When P1 pups were used, the head was rinsed with a solution of 70% ethanol before dissection to assure sterility. The skull was removed, and the brain inverted on the stage so that the ventral surface of the brain faced up. The POA was dissected under sterile conditions as described previously (8). Using a separate set of instruments, the MBH, including the median eminence, was dissected as a midline strip of tissue from the ventral surface of the brain caudal to the POA. We cannot exclude the possibility that remnants of the pars tuberalis were present in MBH explants. However, our earlier in vivo studies with hypophysectomized hypogonadal host mice showed that the presence of the pituitary is not necessary for targeting of grafted GnRH cell outgrowth to the median eminence (13). Cervical spinal cord (SC) or cerebellar cortex (CE) were also dissected in some experiments. All procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.

Tissue explants were placed immediately on the collagen- and laminin-coated surface of the insert chamber membrane. In the case of the POA explant, the block of tissue was sectioned at the midline after placement in the chamber and applied flat on the surface of the membrane. All explants were kept moist by the addition of 10–20 µl medium above the membrane. The chambers were then placed in wells of 12-well plates containing 1 ml of the same medium. In all experiments, the medium was not changed, and care was taken to leave the cultures undisturbed until the time of fixation.

Experimental design of single POA cultures and cocultures
The POA explant was either cultivated alone or with other brain regions placed on the membrane adjacent to the POA. Using E15 tissue, the following explant partners were established: POA alone or POA with MBH, SC, or CE. In experiments using P1 tissue, the POA explant was cultivated only with MBH. In the majority of experiments, explants were cultured for 7 days at 37 C in 5% CO2 and 100% humidity and then fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 h. For a time-course analysis, E15 coexplants of POA and MBH were fixed after 1, 4, 7, or 10 days of culture. All fixed cultures were kept at 4 C in phosphate buffer (PB; 0.1 M; pH 7.3) with 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) until they were processed by immunocytochemistry.

Some cultures were counterstained with a solution of 1% of cresyl violet in 20% ethanol solution. The staining was differentiated with a rinse in water, followed by a brief rinse in a solution of acidified 90% ethanol.

Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was performed directly on membranes after cutting them out of the chamber. To detect GnRH neurons and processes, SW1 antiserum (23) was used at a dilution of 1:2500 in PB containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (TX100; Sigma), 1% normal goat serum (Life Technologies) or 3% normal donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) for 4 days at 4 C. The biotinylated antirabbit secondary antiserum [1:200, made in goat (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), or 1:200, made in donkey (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories)] in the same diluent was applied overnight for increased penetration of the explants. Explants were then incubated in an avidin-biotin solution (Vector Laboratories) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase for 2 h. The chromogen was 1 mg/ml 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma), and H2O2 was generated by the oxidation of glucose by glucose oxidase (Sigma). There were no differences in GnRH labeling or background staining with the two different secondary antibodies.

In a group of cultures double label immunocytochemistry was performed to visualize GnRH and growth-associated protein-43 (GAP-43). The visualization of GnRH in this case was performed using SW1 with a secondary antirabbit antiserum directly conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:200, made in donkey; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). The cultures were then rinsed overnight, treated with 3% normal donkey serum in PB with 0.1% TX100, incubated in the GAP-43 antibody at a dilution of 1:1000 (mouse monoclonal antibody, clone 91E12; Boehringer Mannheim) in PB containing 3% normal donkey serum and 0.1% TX100 for 4–6 days. The cultures were incubated subsequently in antimouse biotinylated secondary antiserum (1:200, made in donkey; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), and the sites of antibody binding were visualized with Texas Red-conjugated avidin D (Vector Laboratories).

Double labeling was also performed to characterize the possible interactions between GnRH and glial processes or cells. Glial cells were identified by using antiserum against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin, or S-100. GnRH was visualized with the anti-GnRH mouse monoclonal antibody (no. 19304, QED Advanced Research Technologies, San Diego, CA) at a dilution of 1:5000 in 0.2% TX100 and 3% normal donkey serum in PB for 4 days at 4 C. The cultures were incubated overnight in biotinylated antimouse secondary antiserum (1:200, made in donkey; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) followed by Texas Red-streptavidin. The labeling of glial markers was performed with rabbit anti-GFAP (24) at a dilution of 1:1000, rabbit antivimentin (gift from Dr. Wang) at a dilution of 1:1000, or rabbit anti-S100 (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) at a dilution of 1:2000. Visualization of the glial marker labeling was carried out with the use of an antirabbit antiserum conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate. All glial marker antisera were prepared in 0.1% TX100 and 3% normal donkey serum.

After immunocytochemistry, the tissue was washed, mounted directly onto glass slides, and immediately coverslipped with Gelmount (Biomedia, Foster City, CA). The cultures were observed and photographed under brightfield or fluorescent optics as appropriate. In certain cases, observation of double labeled cultures was performed first with epifluorescence, then with a Leica inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Lasertechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), using an argon/krypton laser as its light source. For these studies the objective x40 was used with a pinhole of 40 that allowed confocal sections of 0.5 µm.

Quantitative analysis of the cultures
GnRH axonal outgrowth was assessed in the cocultures of POA-MBH, POA-SC, and POA-CE and in cultures of POA alone. Cultures were not considered for quantitative analysis if the explants were fused or torn, if the location of the MBH or control tissue could not be determined, or if there were less than 50 GnRH-immunoreactive (GnRH-ir) cell bodies in the POA. Only GnRH-ir fibers terminating in a growth cone were considered.

GnRH axons extending on the surface of the membrane from the POA explant were counted in two sectors. Sector I is the region of membrane facing the cocultivated explant, and sector II is the region of membrane away from the cocultivated explant (Fig. 1Go). A few GnRH cell bodies were detected within the MBH coexplants, similar to previous findings in vivo (Wu, T. J., and A.-J. Silverman, unpublished observations). The occasional GnRH axons that extended out of the MBH were not included in the quantitative analyses. In cultures of POA alone, GnRH axons extending from the entire circumference of the POA were counted. All values were expressed as the mean ± SEM. When homogeneity of variances was not achieved, the appropriate transformation of the data were applied (25). The numbers of GnRH axons in sectors I and II were then compared between POA-MBH cocultures and control cultures, and similarly at each time point of the time course, with a two-way ANOVA. When P < 0.05, Newman-Keuls t test with Duncan’s correction was used for post-hoc comparisons.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Drawing of a POA-MBH coculture showing the different sectors where the GnRH axons and the cell bodies are counted. The GnRH cell bodies and fibers are represented in black. The sectors are delineated by a vertical line. The GnRH axons were counted if they extended onto the membrane in sector I facing the cocultivated explant or in sector II away from it. The GnRH cell bodies were counted within the POA explant in the corresponding sectors. Scale bar = 400 µm.

 
The maximum extent reached by GnRH axonal outgrowth from the POA explant was also assessed. The three longest extending GnRH axons from the POA explant were measured in each sector with the help of a micrometer grid inserted in the eye piece of the light microscope as described by Lumsden and Davies (26). The measurements were defined as follows. The zero reference bar of the grid was placed tangentially to the interface between the POA explant and membrane. The maximum distance reached on the membrane by the growth cone of the three farthest extending GnRH axons was measured regardless of the winding path of the axon. These three lengths were averaged for sector I and sector II. Due to the nature of the data, the maximum axonal extent was analyzed using nonparametric tests; Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to compare multiple groups. Comparisons between sectors I and II were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

For cell counts the POA was divided into two analogous regions, so that counts could be compared between the half facing the coexplant (side I) and the half facing away (side II; Fig. 1Go).

Analysis for trophic effects on GnRH cell survival was performed by counting the number of GnRH cell bodies in the POA in the presence or absence of the MBH coexplant and in the presence of control tissue coexplants. Possible trophic effects on GnRH axonal outgrowth were assessed by adding the GnRH axonal outgrowth in sectors I and II (which corresponds to the total outgrowth) in the presence and absence of the coexplants. Comparisons among groups were performed using one-way ANOVA or t test as appropriate.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Observations of the organotypic cultures in insert chambers
The explants derived from either E15 or P1 tissue survived well in culture; the tissue showed no signs of necrosis or floating cells. Immunocytochemistry with the SW1 antiserum provided good labeling of GnRH cells despite the thickness of the whole mount preparation (Fig. 2AGo), and GnRH fibers, occasionally extending over very long distances (up to 1800 µm), could be followed on the surface of the chamber membrane as they exited the explants (Fig. 2BGo). Most of these terminated in growth cones (Fig. 2Go, B and C). Preabsorption of the antiserum with 10 µg GnRH peptide eliminated reaction product in cells and fibers. All quantitative analyses were performed using the SW1 antibody.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, High power micrograph showing GnRH-ir cell bodies within the POA explant in a 7-day POA-MBH coculture. The orientation of the GnRH cell bodies depicted here is very similar to that seen in vivo. B, GnRH axons with growth cones (arrows) exit the POA and extend onto the surface of the membrane in the direction of the MBH (empty arrow). The MBH itself is not shown. Scale bar = 100 µm in A and B. C, Three examples of GnRH axons terminated by growth cones extending onto the membrane. Scale bar = 50 µm.

 
The orientation and morphology of the GnRH cells in cultures appeared similar to those seen in vivo at the same stage of development (Fig. 2AGo). GnRH processes ramified extensively within the entire POA explant, and numerous growth cones were visible therein.

Survival of the GnRH neurons in culture
After 1 day of culture, the E15-derived POA region (n = 13) contained 281 ± 24 GnRH cells. During the first 7 days in vitro this number declined moderately [day 4, 240 ± 16 cells (n = 21); day 7, 197 ± 14 cells (n = 21)] and then stabilized after an additional 3 days (day 10, 216 ± 11; n = 32). In some cultures, as many as 410 GnRH neurons could still be detected at 7 days. The normal mouse brain contains approximately 800 GnRH neurons scattered in the basal forebrain, primarily in the region of the diagonal band, POA, and hypothalamus (2).

For the 7-day cultures used in most experiments, the presence of a cograft did not alter the number of surviving GnRH neurons (see Table 1Go). In addition, there was no difference among the cultures in the number of GnRH cell bodies within the POA in the region facing toward or away from any of the cocultures under any condition tested. MBH-derived trophic factors were implicated in studies by Daikoku using both organ cultures and transplantation in vivo (27). The number of GnRH neurons derived from rat early embryonic olfactory placode or vomeronasal organ was higher in the presence of the MBH in culture or in animals with transplants. In contrast, in our study the presence of the cocultivated MBH explant did not influence either the survival or distribution of GnRH cell bodies in the POA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of GnRH cells in POA explants

 
Effect of the coexplants on GnRH axonal outgrowth
The effect of coexplants on GnRH axonal outgrowth was assessed by counting axons in the sectors of membrane facing and away from the coexplant. For E15 cultures, the presence of a MBH coexplant significantly altered the location of GnRH outgrowth, such that GnRH axons were higher in number in sector I, facing the MBH, than in sector II, facing away from the MBH (P < 0.01; Fig. 3AGo). This effect was not seen with SC or CE coexplants. GnRH axonal outgrowth toward the MBH was significantly greater than that toward the CE (P < 0.05; Fig. 3AGo). GnRH axons also extended significantly farther from the POA on the membrane in the sector facing the MBH (P < 0.001; Fig. 3BGo) than opposite it. This effect was not observed with the control tissues. Indeed, the GnRH axons extended farther in the sector away from the CE (P < 0.02; Fig. 3BGo). For P1 tissue (n = 28), the number of GnRH axons growing in sector I (64.8 ± 6.8) was also significantly greater than that in sector II (38.3 ± 5.2) in POA-MBH cocultures (P < 0.01).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. GnRH axonal outgrowth and extent on the membrane in E15 cocultures after 7 days in culture. A, The number of GnRH axons was greater in sector I (toward the explant; ••, P < 0.01) only for the POA/MBH pairs. In addition, the number of immunoreactive axons on sector I of the membrane was greater for this combination than for the POA/CE pair (a, P < 0.05). B, GnRH axons extended over longer distances from the POA on the membrane sector facing the MBH coexplant (••, P < 0.001). The other coexplants either had no effect on the extent of GnRH outgrowth in sector I (facing SC) or increased the length of the GnRH extent in sector II (opposite the CE; •, P < 0.02).

 
As the distance separating the coexplants might influence GnRH axonal outgrowth, a correlation analysis was performed between the interexplant distance and the number of GnRH axons in sector I. The amount of GnRH axonal outgrowth into sector I was not correlated with the distance separating the POA and MBH explants (P > 0.5).

To assess whether the MBH was providing trophic support for GnRH axons, we counted the total number of GnRH axons extending out of the POA explants grown alone or with the MBH in E15 cultures. The total number of GnRH axons on the membrane did not differ between the groups [POA alone, 42.2 ± 8.9 (n = 12); POA-MBH, 50.4 ± 4.5 (n = 48)].

Effect of time on GnRH axonal outgrowth
One possible explanation for differential GnRH axonal outgrowth toward the MBH after 7-day cultures is that the target provides support for the axons that project nearby. Under such conditions, GnRH axons would initially grow equally in all directions, but only those extending toward the target would be maintained. To assess this possibility, we performed a time-course analysis of GnRH axonal outgrowth in the presence of a MBH coexplant using E15 tissue.

The total number of GnRH fibers increased steadily between days 1–10 of culture (Fig. 4AGo). The preferential location of GnRH fibers in sector I reached significance on day 4 (P < 0.01) and was maintained until day 10 (P < 0.05). The extent of GnRH axonal outgrowth on the membrane from the POA explant was significantly longer facing the MBH explant than opposite from it as early as day 4 and at every later time point (P < 0.001; Fig. 4BGo).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Time course of GnRH axonal outgrowth and extent from the POA explant in POA/MBH cocultures. A, The number of GnRH axons in sector I increased over time, with those on day 7 more numerous than those on days 1 and 4 (++, P < 0.01) and those on day 10 more numerous than those on days 7, 4, and 1 ({diamond}, P < 0.05). The number of axons in sector I was significantly greater than that in sector II on days 4 (••, P < 0.01), 7 (•, P < 0.05), and 10 (•, P < 0.05). B, The extent of GnRH axonal outgrowth from the POA on the membrane was longer in sector I, facing the MBH, than in sector II, facing away from the MBH, on days 4, 7, and 10 of culture (••, P < 0.001).

 
General axonal outgrowth
GAP-43, expressed in elongating axons, is used as a marker for general axonal elongation in dynamic systems (28). Therefore, labeling for GAP-43 was used to assess general axonal outgrowth in POA-MBH cocultures (n = 60). Overall axonal outgrowth was robust and qualitatively did not show any preferential distribution (Fig. 5Go, A and B).



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Low power micrograph showing GAP-43-immunolabeled axons extending on the membrane in POA and MBH cocultures in the direction of the MBH coexplant (A) and away from the MBH coexplant (B). C, High magnification of GAP-43-labeled axons extending on the membrane. A and B: scale bar = 200 µm; C: scale bar = 100 µm.

 
Associations between GnRH axons and GAP-43-ir axons
The GAP-43-ir axons extended onto the membrane over long distances from both the POA and the coexplants and formed a dense network (Fig. 5CGo), with numerous growth cones. GnRH axons grew over comparatively shorter distances from the POA onto the membrane and were invariably found in the company of GAP-43 axons. Observations using confocal microscopy confirmed that when associations between GnRH and GAP-43 axons were observed, GnRH axons traveled on top of GAP-43 axons (Fig. 6AGo), such that some GnRH fibers followed a bundle of GAP-43 axons (Fig. 6BGo), and others traveled on the surface of a network of GAP-43 fibers (Fig. 6CGo). Every GnRH axon observed with confocal microscopy was consistently found in the same confocal plane (estimated to be 0.5 µm) as GAP-43 axons.



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. A–C, Three confocal micrographs of double labeled POA and MBH cocultures, showing GAP-43 in red and GnRH in green. GnRH axons (arrows) consistently extended on the membrane along GAP-43-ir axons, whether traveling alone (A), within a bundle of GAP-43-ir axons (B), or extended on the surface of a network of GAP-43-ir axons (C). Scale bar = 20 µm. D–I, Confocal micrographs of POA and MBH cocultures double labeled for glial elements (green) and GnRH axons (red). Notice the absence of alignment of a short GnRH axon (arrow) with GFAP-ir processes (arrowhead) extending on the membrane along the borders of the POA explant (star; D) and further on the membrane (E). F, Similarly, GnRH axons (arrows) did not align on vimentin-ir glial cells (arrowhead) even when vimentin-ir elements were more scarce on the membrane in regions further away from the POA explant (G). H, A GnRH axon (arrow), extending from the POA explant (star), grew in close proximity to a S-100-ir astrocyte (arrowhead) without making contact, whereas another GnRH axon (arrow) extended onto the membrane without the presence of S-100-ir astrocytes (I). Scale bar = 20 µm. J, GnRH axons (arrows) project to a region of the MBH coexplant that resembles the median eminence, as defined by the palisade arrangement of vimentin-ir tanycytes (green). GnRH terminals (red) are found in this zone. Scale bar = 20 µm for J and K. K, Confocal micrograph of GnRH axons (red, arrows) coursing along GFAP-ir processes (green) within a structure resembling the OVLT within the POA explant.

 
Lack of association between GnRH axons and glial elements
GnRH axons are seen close to tanycyte processes spanning the MBH in vivo and also appear to travel within glial channels to the median eminence (29). For these reasons Kozlowski and Coates suggested that glial processes may guide GnRH fibers toward the median eminence. To determine whether GnRH axons required a glia surface for extension in vitro, we performed double labeling immunocytochemistry for GnRH and one of three markers of astroglia, vimentin (n = 11), GFAP (n = 3), and S-100 (n = 5), in cocultures of POA and MBH using P1 tissue. As observed with confocal microscopy, no consistent association was found regardless of the sector examined. GFAP-ir cells and processes remained confined to the borders of the explants (Fig. 6DGo), such that GnRH axons extending onto the membrane were not found in close proximity to GFAP-ir cellular elements (Fig. 6EGo). Vimentin-ir cells and processes extended further onto the membrane (Fig. 6FGo), but GnRH axons were not associated with them either and did not align along vimentin-ir elements. Occasionally, a GnRH axon would cross over a vimentin-ir process or cell, but such an occurrence seemed fortuitous. Most GnRH axons grew past the extent of the vimentin processes on the membrane and were then found unaccompanied (Fig. 6GGo). S-100 antibody-labeled small astrocytes sparsely scattered on the membrane around the explants, with processes confined to the immediate surroundings of the cell bodies. GnRH axons did not contact S-100-labeled cells (Fig. 6Go, H and I).

Presence of other cellular elements on the membrane surrounding the explants
A cresyl violet counterstain as well as direct observation with phase contrast microscopy revealed the presence of cells of globular or spindle-like shape on the membrane. These cells did not extend on the entire surface of the membrane, but remained confined in the region of membrane surrounding the explants. Only erratic associations of GnRH axons with such elements were observed (results not shown).

Presence of the median eminence within the MBH explant
The median eminence was visible in most of the MBH explants dissected from P1-derived tissue after 7 days in culture. In single labeled experiments, GnRH axons concentrated in one region within the MBH (not shown). In cultures double labeled for GnRH and glial-specific antibodies, tanycytes, the specialized ependymal cells of the MBH were identified by their intermediate filaments, vimentin or GFAP. Tanycytes formed the characteristic arched palisade arrangement seen in vivo. GnRH axons terminated among them (Fig. 6JGo).

Intrinsic effects of the POA region on GnRH axonal outgrowth
Within the majority of POA explants, regardless of the coexplant, GnRH fibers tended to form dense, highly branched plexi. The ependymal lining derived from the third ventricle was often visible, and GnRH fibers were abundant in this region. The morphological appearance of this area resembled the organosum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT), a circumventricular organ located at the anterior tip of the third ventricle that receives an abundant GnRH innervation in the normal animal (30). Within the POA explant, tanycytes, immunoreactive for vimentin or GFAP, were detected (Fig. 6KGo), and GnRH axons were seen closely associated with these processes. Occasionally some POA explants separated into two pieces of tissue. When this happened, numerous GnRH terminals were seen crossing between the two segments.

It is possible that the POA explant itself possesses some attractive properties, influencing GnRH outgrowth. To assess this hypothesis, cultures were performed in which the POA was intentionally dissected into two halves and placed separately on the surface of the membrane. The number of GnRH axons extending between the two pieces of POA was significantly higher than the number of GnRH terminals extending away from the pieces of POA (49.7 ± 5.8 and 31.8 ± 4.3; n = 24; P < 0.05).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Several mechanisms may act in concert to assure the correct projection of GnRH axons to the median eminence, including factors associated with the neuronal and/or glial substrate as well as diffusible substances that exert chemotaxic or chemotrophic effects. The present studies, using stringent in vitro conditions, support the hypothesis that a major factor involved in GnRH targeting during development and after transplantation is due to a diffusible chemoattractant substance originating from the region of the median eminence. In the organotypic cultures, direct cell to cell interactions with glia were not required for increased directional outgrowth of GnRH axons, whereas observations with GAP-43 double labeling suggested the importance of an axonal substrate.

The MBH, dissected to contain the median eminence, exerted an action on GnRH axons that resulted in both longer and greater numbers of GnRH axons growing on the membrane region facing the MBH explant. This result was not the consequence of an uneven distribution of GnRH cell bodies within the explant, nor was it a nonspecific effect exerted on all axonal outgrowth, as axons labeled with GAP-43 did not show such directionality. This preference for GnRH outgrowth toward an explant was specific to the MBH, in that neither spinal cord nor cerebellum attracted GnRH axons.

Diffusible factors have been previously described to have chemoattractant actions involved in the guidance of axons (16, 31). For example, cortical axons, which form collaterals that grow toward the basilar pons, follow a diffusible signal originating from their target, as demonstrated with organotypic cultures in three-dimensional collagen gel matrexes (32). Similarly, visual cortical axons project directly in culture to their appropriate thalamic target (33). Trigeminal neurons project to peripheral targets using a similar mechanism, although the molecular nature of the signal is not yet known (26, 34). The floor plate of the spinal cord secretes diffusible factors that orient the outgrowth of commissural axons within collagen gel matrexes (35). This latter observation has led to the identification and isolation of netrins, expressed by floor plate cells. Netrins form a family of factors involved in the guidance of commissural axons of the spinal cord (36). They are homologous to a protein related to laminin involved in similar action in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (37). Studies of UNC-6, the nematode netrin, show that it is structurally closely related to laminin and might interact with it to promote the establishment of diffusible gradients involved in axonal guidance (38). However, netrin is unlikely to be involved in the guidance of GnRH axons, as there was an absence of directional outgrowth of GnRH axons toward the spinal cord in our control experiments. In addition, the expression of netrin is not confined to the region of the median eminence, but extends along the ventral midline of the embryo.

The fact that more and longer axons were present in sector I vs. sector II from days 4–10 suggests that a concentration gradient between the MBH and the POA was established early and was maintained (39). In studies attempting to demonstrate that outgrowth follows a concentration gradient established by the release of a diffusible target-derived substance, one consideration is the distance separating the target from the innervating source. In our culture conditions, the distance separating the POA and the coexplants did not affect GnRH axonal outgrowth. In a study of sensory fiber targeting, Lumsden and Davies (26) showed that trigeminal ganglion explants could be placed one behind the other in collagen gel cushions, and that both would still extend axons in the direction of the target. The researchers interpreted this to indicate the maintenance of a gradient of diffusible factor(s) past the boundaries of the first ganglion. This gradient directed axonal outgrowth from the most distal ganglion regardless of the distance. Similar to Lumsden’s experiment, GnRH axons in the present study adopted their pattern of preferential outgrowth whether they were close to or distant from the MBH explant, suggesting that a concentration gradient was the important factor influencing GnRH outgrowth and challenging the purely trophic hypothesis, where the more distant the target the less effective the outgrowth.

Unfortunately, we cannot perform an experiment similar to that conducted by Lumsden and Davies, as the POA itself has attractive properties. In vivo, there are abundant GnRH axonal projections to the OVLT, which is located close to the majority of the GnRH cell bodies (30). The presence of an intrinsic target such as the OVLT would account for the abundant projection of GnRH terminals within the explant and in between two separated pieces of POA. As the POA possesses a target for GnRH projections in culture, it is less surprising that so few GnRH axons succeeded in extending out of the explant in the direction of the MBH. This observation emphasizes the power of the median eminence as a target, as axons exiting the POA have to overcome an intrinsic attraction.

The persistence of a mediobasal hypothalamic effect on GnRH outgrowth after 10 days of culture suggests that the factors involved were synthesized by this brain region rather than simply associated with the tissue at the time of explantation. Blood-borne factors present at the time of dissection would probably be destroyed over this extensive time course. In turn, this supports our hypothesis that the diffusible signal is at least partly acting via a chemotaxic mechanism. One would expect that a neurotrophic substance diffusing throughout the undisturbed culture dish over 10 days would lead to a decline in the ratio of sector I vs. sector II and disappearance of significant differences between the two sectors. Further, the directionality rather than the total amount of GnRH axons growing out on the membrane was influenced by the presence of the MBH. The progressive increase in GnRH outgrowth facing the MBH in time-course experiments, with the outgrowth in the opposite sector always remaining lower, as well as the absence of influence of the MBH on the total number of axons exiting the POA suggest that mechanisms other than preferential maintenance of axons close to the target are involved.

Although there appear to be chemoattractant factors for GnRH axons from the median eminence/MBH, little else is yet known about these materials. Circumventricular organs, such as the median eminence and the OVLT, may be attractive for GnRH axons because of their special nature, which includes the presence of tanycytes, specialized ependymal cells lining the walls of the third ventricle, and fenestrated endothelial cells (40, 41). The secretion(s) of these endothelial cells might reach the nervous tissue to direct axonal outgrowth. Endothelial cells have been shown to release many substances, including endothelins, which seem to have an important physiological role in regulating neuropeptide secretion (42). Tanycytes may also release diffusible trophic or tropic factors, including insulin-like growth factor I (43) and transforming growth factor-{alpha} (44).

Alternative possibilities have been suggested to explain the specificity of an axonal projection to its target. On-going communication between axons and their target was hypothesized to regulate the secretion of chemotropic factors in the developing spinal cord. For example, substance P, secreted by some commissural terminals, increases the release of chemoattractants from the floor plate (45). However, the secretion of the GnRH peptide by GnRH axons is not necessary for proper targeting to the median eminence; axons originating from cell bodies containing the defective GnRH gene of hypogonadal mice, unable to synthesize the peptide, nevertheless reach the median eminence (46).

The extent of GnRH outgrowth from the POA explant was longer on the side away from the cerebellum explant. These findings suggest that the cerebellum may have some repulsive activity on GnRH outgrowth. Although diffusible substances such as netrins have been shown to have chemoattractive actions on developing commissural axons in the embryonic spinal cord (36), it was recently demonstrated that the same proteins can have a chemorepellent activity toward other sets of axons, such as the trochlear motor axons (47). Other examples suggesting the presence of chemorepulsive factors include the repulsion of olfactory bulb axons by the septum (48), the inhibitory effect of connectin, expressed by muscles, on motoneuron growth cones (49), and the family of semaphorins, which may be either transmembrane or secreted repellent molecules (50). Chemoattraction and chemorepulsion appear to act in concert to assure the proper guidance of axons to their target over long distances by creating inhibitory and attractive territories along axonal projection pathways.

In addition to following a concentration gradient of diffusible signals, GnRH axons may also need a specific substrate for proper guidance. The absence of association between GnRH axons extending on the membrane with glial elements suggests that the signals guiding GnRH axonal outgrowth toward the MBH are not provided by a direct cell to cell interaction with the surrounding glial environment. The interactions of neurons with glial elements during development to provide substrate-bound guidance to specific axonal projections have been widely documented (51, 52, 53). In our study, despite the presence of tanycytes in the preparation, we did not find consistent interactions of growing GnRH axons with these glial elements on the membrane. In contrast, a close association existed between GnRH- and GAP-43-positive axons extending on the membrane. GAP-43 labels most if not all growing axons, and this association may provide a facilitative substrate. Our experiments, which require fixing and immunocytochemistry staining, do not allow us to study whether GnRH axons dynamically follow some other elongating axons.

The precise nature of the guidance mechanism of the GnRH axons is still unknown. The present experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that the MBH provides signals to guide the GnRH axons to their target, the median eminence. These in vitro studies as well as the prior in vivo transplantation experiments clearly show that the MBH produces a diffusible factor whose most potent effect is to act as a chemoattractant.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. T. J. Wu, whose initial collagen gel studies provided a basis for this work. Many thanks to Shubha Shastry and Chad Rabinowitz, who provided valuable assistance with the organotypic cultures, and to Kate Bock-Rosa for excellent technical support. We are grateful to Dr. Susan Wray for the generous gift of SW1 anti-GnRH antiserum.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grant NS-20335. Back

Received April 15, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Silverman AJ, Livne I, Witkin JW 1994 The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (ed) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, pp 1683–1709
  2. Wray S, Grant P, Gainer H 1989 Evidence that cells expressing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone mRNA in the mouse are derived from progenitor cells in the olfactory placode. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8132–8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schwanzel-Fukuda M, Pfaff DW 1989 Origin of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons. Nature 338:161–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Livne I, Gibson MJ, Silverman AJ 1993 Biochemical differentiation and intercellular interactions of migratory gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) cells in the mouse. Dev Biol 159:643–656[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Merchenthaler I, Setalo G, Csontos C, Petrusz P, Flerko B, Negro Vilar A 1989 Combined retrograde tracing and immunocytochemical identification of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone- and somatostatin-containing neurons projecting to the median eminence of the rat. Endocrinology 125:2812–2821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Silverman AJ, Jhamandas J, Renaud LP 1987 Localization of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons that project to the median eminence. J Neurosci 7:2312–2319[Abstract]
  7. Mason AJ, Hayflick JS, Zoeller RT, Young WS, Phillips HS, Nikolics K, Seeburg PH 1986 A deletion truncating the gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene is responsible for hypogonadism in the hpg mouse. Science 234:1366–1371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Krieger DT, Perlow MJ, Gibson MJ, Davies TF, Zimmerman EA, Ferin M, Charlton HM 1982 Brain grafts reverse hypogonadism of gonadotropin releasing hormone deficiency. Nature 298:468–471[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gibson MJ, Charlton HM, Perlow MJ, Zimmerman EA, Davies TF, Krieger DT 1984 Preoptic area brain grafts in hypogonadal (hpg) female mice abolish effects of congenital hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) deficiency. Endocrinology 114:1938–1940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gibson MJ, Krieger DT, Charlton HM, Zimmerman EA, Silverman AJ, Perlow MJ 1984 Mating and pregnancy can occur in genetically hypogonadal mice with preoptic area brain grafts. Science 225:949–951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Silverman AJ, Zimmerman EA, Gibson MJ, Perlow MJ, Charlton HM, Kokoris GJ, Krieger DT 1985 Implantation of normal fetal preoptic area into hypogonadal mutant mice: temporal relationships of the growth of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons and the development of the pituitary/testicular axis. Neuroscience 16:69–84[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kokoris GJ, Silverman AJ, Zimmerman EA, Perlow MJ, Gibson MJ 1987 Implantation of fetal preoptic area into the lateral ventricle of adult hypogonadal mutant mice: the pattern of gonadotropin-releasing hormone axonal outgrowth into the host brain. Neuroscience 22:159–167[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Saitoh Y, Gibson MJ, Silverman AJ 1992 Targeting of gonadotropin-releasing hormone axons from preoptic area grafts to the median eminence. J Neurosci Res 33:379–391[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Silverman RC, Gibson MJ, Charlton HM, Silverman AJ 1990 Are neurons of the arcuate nucleus necessary for pathfinding by GnRH fibers arising from third ventricular grafts? Exp Neurol 109:204–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Silverman RC, Gibson MJ, Silverman AJ 1991 Relationship of glia to GnRH axonal outgrowth from third ventricular grafts in hpg hosts. Exp Neurol 114:259–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goodman CS 1996 Mechanisms and molecules that control growth cone guidance. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:341–377[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Yamamoto N, Kurotani T, Toyama K 1989 Neural connections between the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in vitro. Science 245:192–194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Muller D, Buchs PA, Stoppini L 1993 Time course of synaptic development in hippocampal organotypic cultures. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 71:93–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Erzurumlu RS, Jhaveri S, Takahashi H, McKay RD 1993 Target-derived influences on axon growth modes in cultures of trigeminal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:7235–7239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lander AD 1987 Molecules that make axons grow. Mol Neurobiol 1:213–245[Medline]
  21. Rogers MC, Silverman AJ, Gibson MJ GnRH terminals project toward the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) in an organotypic culture system: role of collagen, and laminin as permissive substrates. 77th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Washington DC, 1995, p 75 (Abstract)
  22. Schambra UB, Lauder JM, Silver J 1992 Atlas of the Prenatal Mouse Brain. Academic Press, San Diego
  23. Wray S, Gahwiler BH, Gainer H 1988 Slice cultures of LHRH neurons in the presence and absence of brainstem and pituitary. Peptides 9:1151–1175[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Dahl D, Grossi M, Bignami A 1984 Masking of epitopes in tissue sections. A study of glial fibrillary acidic (GFA) protein with antisera and monoclonal antibodies. Histochemistry 81:525–531[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kirk RE 1968 Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont
  26. Lumsden AG, Davies AM 1983 Earliest sensory nerve fibres are guided to peripheral targets by attractants other than nerve growth factor. Nature 306:786–788[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Daikoku S, Daikoku-Ishido H, Okamura Y, Chikamori-Aoyama M, Yokote R 1991 Further evidence of the presence of rat embryonic hypothalamic factors that induce the differentiation of gonadotrophic hormone- releasing hormone-containing secretory neurons. Anat Rec 230:539–550[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Goslin K, Schreyer DJ, Skene JH, Banker G 1988 Development of neuronal polarity: GAP-43 distinguishes axonal from dendritic growth cones. Nature 336:672–674[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Kozlowski GP, Coates PW 1985 Ependymoneuronal specializations between LHRH fibers and cells of the cerebroventricular system. Cell Tissue Res 242:301–311[Medline]
  30. King JC, Tobet SA, Snavely FL, Arimura AA 1982 LHRH immunopositive cells and their projections to the median eminence and organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis. J Comp Neurol 209:287–300[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Davies AM 1994 Neural development. Chemoattractants for navigating axons. Curr Biol 4:1142–1145[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. O’Leary D, Heffner CD, Kutka L, Lopez Mascaraque L, Missias A, Reinoso BS 1991 A target-derived chemoattractant controls the development of the corticopontine projection by a novel mechanism of axon targeting. Development [Suppl 2], 123–130
  33. Bolz J, Novak N, Gotz M, Bonhoeffer T 1990 Formation of target-specific neuronal projections in organotypic slice cultures from rat visual cortex. Nature 346:359–362[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Lumsden AG, Davies AM 1986 Chemotropic effect of specific target epithelium in the developing mammalian nervous system. Nature 323:538–539[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Tessier-Lavigne M, Placzek M, Lumsden AG, Dodd J, Jessell TM 1988 Chemotropic guidance of developing axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Nature 336:775–778[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Kennedy TE, Serafini T, de la Torre JR, Tessier-Lavigne M 1994 Netrins are diffusible chemotropic factors for commissural axons in the embryonic spinal cord. Cell 78:425–435[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Serafini T, Kennedy TE, Galko MJ, Mirzayan C, Jessell TM, Tessier-Lavigne M 1994 The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6. Cell 78:409–424[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Ishii N, Wadsworth WG, Stern BD, Culotti JG, Hedgecock EM 1992 UNC-6, a laminin-related protein, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Neuron 9:873–881[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Molnar Z, Blakemore C 1995 How do thalamic axons find their way to the cortex? Trends Neurosci 18:389–397[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Broadwell RD, Balin BJ, Salcman M, Kaplan RS 1983 Brain-blood barrier? Yes and no. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:7352–7356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Goldstein GW 1988 Endothelial cell-astrocyte interactions. A cellular model of the blood-brain barrier. Ann NY Acad Sci 529:31–39[Medline]
  42. Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ 1992 Neuroendocrine actions of endothelins. Trends Pharm Sci 13:385–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Duenas M, Luquin S, Chowen JA, Torres Aleman I, Naftolin F, Garcia Segura LM 1994 Gonadal hormone regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I-like immunoreactivity in hypothalamic astroglia of developing and adult rats. Neuroendocrinology 59:528–538[Medline]
  44. Ma YJ, Berg-von der Emde K, Moholt-Siebert M, Hill DF, Ojeda SR 1994 Region-specific regulation of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) gene expression in astrocytes of the neuroendocrine brain. J Neurosci 14:5644–5651[Abstract]
  45. De Felipe C, Pinnock RD, Hunt SP 1995 Modulation of chemotropism in the developing spinal cord by substance P. Science 267:899–902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Livne I, Gibson MJ, Silverman AJ 1993 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the hypogonadal mouse elaborate normal projections despite their biosynthetic deficiency. Neurosci Lett 151:229–233[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Colamarino SA, Tessier-Lavigne M 1995 The axonal chemoattractant netrin-1 is also a chemorepellent for trochlear motor axons. Cell 81:621–629[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Pini A 1993 Chemorepulsion of axons in the developing mammalian central nervous system. Science 261:95–98[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Nose A, Takeichi M, Goodman CS 1994 Ectopic expression of connectin reveals a repulsive function during growth cone guidance and synapse formation. Neuron 13:525–539[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Messersmith EK, Leonardo ED, Shatz CJ, Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS, Kolodkin AL 1995 Semaphorin III can function as a selective chemorepellent to pattern sensory projections in the spinal cord. Neuron 14:949–959[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Silver J 1993 Glia-neuron interactions at the midline of the developing mammalian brain and spinal cord. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 1:227–236[Medline]
  52. Marcus RC, Blazeski R, Godement P, Mason CA 1995 Retinal axon divergence in the optic chiasm: uncrossed axons diverge from crossed axons within a midline glial specialization. J Neurosci 15:3716–3729[Abstract]
  53. Wu DY, Jhaveri S, Schneider GE 1995 Glial environment in the developing superior colliculus of hamsters in relation to the timing of retinal axon ingrowth. J Comp Neurol 358:206–218[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. A. Schwarting, T. R. Henion, J. D. Nugent, B. Caplan, and S. Tobet
Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 12) and chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4 are required for migration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons to the forebrain.
J. Neurosci., June 21, 2006; 26(25): 6834 - 6840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. C. Gill and P.-S. Tsai
Expression of a Dominant Negative FGF Receptor in Developing GNRH1 Neurons Disrupts Axon Outgrowth and Targeting to the Median Eminence
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2006; 74(3): 463 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Charlton
Neural transplantation in hypogonadal (hpg) mice - physiology and neurobiology
Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. A. Schwarting, C. Kostek, E. P. Bless, N. Ahmad, and S. A. Tobet
Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) Regulates the Migration of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Neurons to the Basal Forebrain
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 911 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. Gibson, L. Ingraham, and A. Dobrjansky
Soluble Factors Guide Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Axonal Targeting to the Median Eminence
Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3065 - 3071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. P. Bless, W. A. Westaway, G. A. Schwarting, and S. A. Tobet
Effects of {gamma}-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Manipulation on Migrating Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons through the Entire Migratory Route in Vivo and in Vitro
Endocrinology, March 1, 2000; 141(3): 1254 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. S. Deiner and D. W. Sretavan
Altered Midline Axon Pathways and Ectopic Neurons in the Developing Hypothalamus of Netrin-1- and DCC-Deficient Mice
J. Neurosci., November 15, 1999; 19(22): 9900 - 9912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals