help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 1 204-212
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Cloning of Rabbit TR4 and Its Bone Cell-Specific Activity to Suppress Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Transactivation1

Hideyuki Harada, Yoshikazu Kuboi, Rika Miki, Chikara Honda, Shoichi Masushige, Masashi Nakatsuka, Yoshihiko Koga and Shigeaki Kato

Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Research Center (H.H., M.N., Y.Ko.), Kasugadenaka, Konohana-ku, Osaka, 554; Department of Agricultural Chemistry (Y.Ku., R.M., C.H., S.M.), Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 156; Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (S.K.), University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113; and CREST (S.K.), Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Shigeaki Kato, Ph.D., Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113, Japan. E-mail: uskato{at}hongo.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To clone a new nuclear receptor, we screened a rabbit heart complementary DNA (cDNA) library with degenerate oligonucleotide probes corresponding to the DNA-binding domain of nuclear receptors, which is highly conserved among receptors. One of the cDNA clones, clone 23, encodes a novel protein of 596 amino acids, and predicted molecular mass is 66 kDa. Homology search analysis identified this protein as rabbit TR4 (TR4–0). We also cloned the cDNA encoding a rabbit TR4 isoform (TR4–1), which lacks the putative C-terminal ligand-binding domain (350 amino acids) caused by a 23-bp exon deletion, which probably occurred during messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing. Northern blot analysis showed that TR4s are expressed with two kinds of mRNAs (9.0 kb and 2.8 kb), both of which are relatively abundant in brain, testis, and bone. RT-PCR analysis, using pairs of primers specific for each TR4, showed that both types of receptor express in various tissues. Furthermore, both are present in primary osteoblasts and bone marrow cells, though the mRNA levels of TR4–0 were much higher than those of TR4–1. A functional study, using a transient transfection assay, showed that both receptors suppressed retinoid X receptor (RXR)-retinoid acid receptor, RXR-TR, and RXR-VDR-mediated transactivation significantly in COS-1 and osteosarcoma cells (UMR-106, ROS17/2.8) and that TR4–0 was much more effective than TR4–1. Unexpectedly, we found that the TR4s effectively suppressed estrogen receptor-mediated transactivation in bone cells, but neither in kidney (COS-1) nor breast cancer cells (MCF-7, one of the major target cells of the estrogen action). Thus, the present study shows a novel property of the TR4 orphan receptor, acting as a bone cell-specific repressor in the estrogen receptor-mediated signaling pathway.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NUCLEAR receptors form a large superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors that regulate vertebrate development, differentiation, and homeostasis by transcriptional control of a set of target genes upon binding of lipophilic ligands, such as steroid/thyroid hormones, vitamins A and D, and eicosanoids (1, 2). In addition to the nuclear receptors for known ligands, this family also comprises a rapidly expanding subfamily of nuclear orphan receptors for which no ligands have been identified to date (3, 4). Based on functional and structural similarities, the nuclear receptors are divided into six functional domains, designated as regions A to F. The C-terminal E/F region contains both the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a ligand-dependent transcriptional activation function (AF-2). In the N-terminal A/B region, another transcriptional activation function (AF-1) exists, and its activity is constitutive without the LBD. Region C encompasses the DNA-binding domain (DBD), composed of two Zn-finger motifs that directly recognize and bind specific ligand response elements located in the target gene promoters. Among the functional domains, this C region is the most conserved within this superfamily (1, 2).

To identify a novel orphan receptor involved in lipid metabolism, we screened several complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries with conventional plaque-hybridization. Consequently, from a rabbit heart cDNA library, we isolated two types of cDNA clones encoding a rabbit nuclear receptor with marked similarity to TR2–11 (5), and a C-terminal truncated isoform. Meanwhile, further characterization of the clones reported on TR4 cDNA cloning [Chang et al. (6) and Hirose et al. (7)] and our clones identified them as rabbit homologues of TR4. TR4 is reported to repress transactivation function of retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers with retinoid acid receptor (RAR), thyroid hormone receptor (TR), and vitamin D receptor (VDR) as a negative modulator in retinoid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signaling cascades (8). Indeed we confirmed that the rabbit TR4s also exert negative activities on the RXR heterodimer-mediated transactivation in cell lines derived from both kidney and bone. Moreover, we found that estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated transactivation is suppressed by TR4s only in bone cells, but neither in kidney nor breast cancer cells. Thus, the present study indicates that TR4 functions as a bone cell-specific repressor in the estrogen signaling pathway, whereas its negative activity for retinoid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signaling cascades is independent of cell-types.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Molecular cloning and analysis of cDNA clones
Full-length rabbit TR4 was isolated from a lambda ZAP II rabbit heart cDNA library (Stratagene) using a plaque-hybridization technique with degenerated oligonucleotide (5'-GAA(G/A)AA(G/A)CC(C/T)TT(G/A)CA(G/A)CC(C/T)TC(G/A)CA-3') corresponding to the highly conserved DBD of nuclear receptors as a probe (9). Hybridization was performed at 42 C for 18 h in 6 x SSC (1 x SSC = 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 1 x Denhardt’s solution (= 0.02% polyvinyl pyrrolidone, 0.02% BSA, and 0.02% Ficoll 400), 0.1% SDS, 100 µg/ml denatured salmon-sperm DNA (ssDNA), and 2 x 106 cpm/ml of 5'-end labeled 32P probe. The most stringent washing condition was 4 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature. A number of positive clones were isolated and in vivo excised according to the instruction manual. DNA sequencing was performed using a DNA sequencer (ABI).

Animal care
A 10-week-old male Japanese white rabbit (Oriental Bioservice; Kyoto, Japan) was cared for according to the guidelines of the Committee on Animal Research of the Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Research Center.

RNA isolation and Northern blots
Total RNA was isolated by the AGPC method (10). Poly A(+) RNA was purified by using Dynabeads (DYNAL, Oslo, Norway), according to the instruction manual. Poly A(+) RNA (3 µg) was separated on a 1.1 M formaldehyde/1% agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N+; Amersham, Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) by capillary action in 20 x SSC. Membranes were cross-linked by UV light (Stratagene) and prehybridized at 42 C in 50% formamide, 5 x SSPE (1 x SSPE = 0.1 M sodium chloride, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, pH.7.0), 5 x Denhardt’s solution (1 x Denhardt’s = 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% BSA, 0.02% Ficoll 400), 1 mg/ml ssDNA, and 0.1% SDS for 4 h. Then, the filters were hybridized at 42 C for 18 h in 50% formamide, 5 x SSPE, 1 x Denhardt’s solution, 0.2 mg/ml ssDNA, and 1 x 106 cpm/ml specific cDNA probe. The filters were washed at room temperature for 15 min in 2 x SSPE, 0.03% sodium diphosphate (NaPPi), 0.1% SDS; then at 65 C for 15 min in 1 x SSPE, 0.03% NaPPi, 0.1% SDS; and finally at 65 C in 0.1 x SSPE, 0.03% NaPPi, 1% SDS. The filters were exposed to x-ray film at -80 C for 10 days with intensifying screens. The filters were dehybridized at 90 C for 15 min in 0.1 x SSPE, 0.1% SDS, and rehybridized with human ß-actin as an internal control (11).

RT-PCR
Total RNA was treated with deoxyribonulease to eliminate contaminating genomic DNA before the amount of RNA was measured by 260 nm UV A (12). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the Superscript preamplification system (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the instruction manual. PCR was performed using a 1/100 RT mix in 20 µl reaction medium with 1 µl RT mix solution, 0.5 µM forward and reverse primer, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 0.2 U AmpliTaq polymerase. After 1 min of preincubation at 94 C, amplification was performed for 35 cycles consisting of 20 sec of denaturating at 94 C, 30 sec of annealing at 60 C, and a 30-sec extension at 72 C. For human tissue, the expression of TR4 gene was examined by using Human quick screen cDNA library panel (Clonetech) as template. The list of primers is as follows: rabbit and rat TR4 (6), 5'-TTTGTGGCAGACAAAGATGGA-3' and 5'-GCCTTGGAATCCGTGGCCA-3'; human TR4 (6), 5'-TTTGTGGCAGACAAAGATGGA-3' and 5'-AGCCTTAGAATCCGTGGCCA-3'; mouse TR4 (13), 5'-TTTGTGGCAGACAAAGATGGA-3' and 5'-AGCCTTGGAATCCGCGGCCA-3'; rabbit and human ß-actin (14, 15), 5'-TGGAGAAGAGCTACGAGCTG-3' and 5'-ACTCGTCATACTCCTGCTTG-3'; rat ß-actin (16), 5'-TGGAGAAGAGCTATGAGCTG-3' and 5'-ACTCATCGTACTCCTGCTTG-3'; mouse ß-actin (17), 5'-CATCACTATTGGCAACGAGC-3' and 5'-AC-TCATCGTACTCCTGCTTG-3'.

Cell culture
Rat osteosarcoma UMR-106, monkey kidney COS-1, human breast cancer MCF-7 (obtained from Dainippon Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan), and rat osteosarcoma ROS 17/2.8 (Riken Cell Bank, Ibaraki, Japan) were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FCS. Rat preosteoblastic ROBC26 (a kind gift from Dr. Yamaguchi), mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 (a kind gift from Dr. Kumegawa), and mouse bone marrow ST2 (Riken Cell Bank) were maintained in [E0]-MEM containing 10% FCS. Primary cultured rat osteoblasts were isolated from 21-day fetal rat calvaria by the sequester collagenase digestion method according to Bellows et al. (18). Rat bone marrow stromal cells were isolated from 7-week-old male Wistar rats according to Maniatopoulos et al. (19) and subcultured after 7 days of primary culture. Both calvarial and stromal cells were maintained in {alpha}-MEM containing 10% FCS.

Transient transfection assay
Plasmids

Reporter genes
A series of pDR3–5GCAT reporter genes was constructed by inserting synthetic oligonucleotides, flanked by HindIII-XbaI sites, into the corresponding sites of pGCAT as described previously (20). The reporter gene of pVitEREGCAT was constructed as described (21).

Receptor expression vectors
The expression vectors for human ER, mouse RAR{alpha}, and RXR{alpha} have been described elsewhere (20, 21). The vectors for rat ERß (22) and rabbit TR4s were constructed by the insertion of cDNA into the EcoRI site of pSG5. A Kozak initiation sequence (5'-CCACC-3') was then introduced in front of the translation start site (5'-ATG-3') by subcloning the PCR product.

Cell transfection and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) assay.
UMR-106, COS-1, and MCF-7 cells were maintained in DMEM lacking phenol red and supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FCS. Cells were transfected at 40–70% confluence in 9-cm petri dishes with a total of 15 or 31.5 µg DNA by the calcium phosphate method (23). One microgram of a CAT reporter plasmid (DR3G, DR4G, DR5G, or VitEREG) was transfected with 500 ng each of the receptor expression vectors (unless otherwise stated). All assays were performed in the presence of 4.5 µg pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia), a ß-galactosidase expression vector used as an internal control to normalize variations in transfection efficiency. Bluescribe M13+ (Stratagene) was used as a carrier to adjust the total amount of DNA. After 24 h incubation with the calcium phosphate-precipitated DNA, the cells were washed with fresh medium and incubated for an additional 24 h with cognate ligands (all-trans retinoic acid and thyroid hormone at 1 µM, 1,25-(OH)2D3 at 100 nM, and 17ß-estradiol at 1 or 10 nM). Cell extracts were prepared by using reporter lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) and assayed for CAT after normalization for ß-galactosidase activity as described (21).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cloning of rabbit TR4 isoforms
To identify novel nuclear receptors, we screened cDNA clones from the cDNA libraries derived from various tissues by plaque hybridization with 24 mer degenerate primer corresponding to the DBD well conserved among nuclear receptors (9). After screening 4 x 105 independent clones from a rabbit heart cDNA library, 23 positive clones were obtained. Among them, cDNAs encoding rabbit homologues of RAR, TR were isolated, two of which looked to encode a new nuclear receptor and its C-terminal truncated isoform. One of these cDNA clones contains a 2.5-kb insert including the poly A tail, and its predicted amino acid number is 596 in total (Fig. 1AGo). The other cDNA is almost the same length, but has a 23-bp deletion in the putative LBD, giving rise to an isoform. A stop codon created by this 23-bp deletion lacks 350 amino acids at the C-terminal end in the putative LBD (Fig. 1BGo, see below).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cloning of rabbit TR4 isoforms. A, Comparison of TR4 amino acid sequences among species. Dashed lines indicate amino acid residues identical among species. B, TR4–1 is generated by alternative splicing. With primers specific to these two forms of TR4 (described in Materials and Methods), genomic PCRs were performed with human, rat, mouse, and rabbit genomic DNA. The PCR products were partially sequenced and described. Putative exon/intron junctions are indicated with arrowheads. Below the rabbit nucleotide sequence, part of TR4–1 amino acid sequence is described (*, stop codon). C, TR4–1 is conserved among species. RT-PCR analysis. One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed, and PCR was performed for 35 cycles with primers specific to these two forms of TR4 (TR4–0 as upper band and TR4–1 as lower band) as described in Materials and Methods. PCR products were resolved in 6.5% polyacrylamide gels and visualized with ethidium bromide. As an internal control, PCR analysis also was performed with ß-actin specific primers. Numbers indicate the size of PCR products. For human sample analysis, Human quick screen cDNA library panel (Clontech) was used as template.

 
While these rabbit receptors were being characterized, Chang’s group cloned a novel orphan receptor TR4 (6). This finding uncovered the fact that our clones are the rabbit homologue (hereafter designated as TR4–0) and a C-terminal truncated isoform of TR4 (TR4–1) (Fig. 1Go). Indeed, two proteins with 66 kDa and 33 kDa (which correspond to TR4–0 and TR4–1, respectively) were detected by Western blot analysis with specific antisera using the cell extracts of COS-1 cells transiently transfected with the expression vectors (data not shown).

TR4–1 is conserved among species.
Because the amino acid sequence of the wild-type of TR4 (TR4–0) is highly conserved among species (Fig. 1AGo), we examined whether this newly identified TR4–1 isoform is present in other species. RT-PCR analysis, using brain and muscle total cDNAs, was employed (Fig. 1CGo). In all species examined (human, rat, and mouse), the presence of two forms (TR4–0 as upper band and TR4–1 as lower band) of TR4 was detected. To clarify the molecular mechanism generating the TR4–1 isoform, genomic PCR analysis was performed with the same oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR. The sequences of the amplified products showed that TR4–1 is generated by the deletion of 23 bp in the exon during alternative splicing and that the newly identified junction completely matches the exon-intron rule (Fig. 1BGo). Interestingly, the genomic DNA sequences around this junction seem to be well conserved among species (Fig. 1BGo).

Tissue-specific expression pattern of TR4–0 and TR4–1
Tissue-specific expression was examined by Northern blot analysis using full-length TR4–0 cDNA as probe (Fig. 2AGo). As is the case in rat, human, and mouse (6, 7), two major messenger RMAs (mRNAs), approximately 9.0 kb and 2.8 kb, were expressed in a tissue-specific manner (and most abundantly in brain, testis, and bone). The generation of two transcripts may be caused by alternative splicing, alternative promoter usage, or usage of alternative poly A signals. Among these possibilities, Hirose et al. indicated that alternative usage of poly A signals existed in human TR4 mRNA (7).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Differential expression of TR4 in adult rabbit tissues. A, Northern blot analysis of TR4 gene expression. For Northern blot analysis, full-length cDNA probe of rabbit TR4 was hybridized to 3 µg poly A(+) RNA from each of the indicated adult tissues. B, RT-PCR analysis of TR4 isoform expression. One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed, and PCR was performed for 35 cycles with primers specific to these two forms of TR4 (TR4–0 as upper band and TR4–1 as lower band) as described in Fig. 1Go. Numbers indicate the size of PCR products. The sizes of DNA molecular markers used in this gel are 72, 118, 194, 234, 271, 281, 310, 603, 872, 1074, and 1353 bp.

 
The isoforms of nuclear receptors are often expressed in a tissue-specific manner; and among RAR and RXR isoforms, differences in expression pattern, as well as transactivation function, have been well described (24). Thus, we investigated whether the expression patterns differ in TR4–0 and TR4–1, by RT-PCR with pairs of primers to distinguish TR4–0 from TR4–1. When PCR was performed for over 35 cycles, the transcripts of both TR4–0 (upper band) and TR4–1 (lower band) were detected in several organs, in addition to the brain, testis, and bone (Fig. 2BGo), where TR4s were shown by Northern blot analysis to be expressed in abundance (Fig. 2AGo). However, only the expression of TR4–0 was detected at less than 30 cycles (data not shown), clearly suggesting that TR4–0 is expressed more than TR4–1.

Cell type-specific expression of TR4 isoforms in bone
Previous reports indicate that TR4 is an important regulator of suppressing transactivation function mediated by nuclear receptors such as RAR, RXR, TR, VDR (8). Because bone is a major target organ for many lipophlic hormones [including retinoid, thyroid hormone, vitamin D, and estrogen (25)], we examined whether TR4s modulate the actions of these hormones in bone cells.

RT-PCR, using total RNA to detect two isoforms, was performed in rabbit and rat whole bone, primary cultured rat osteoblasts, secondary cultured rat bone marrow cells, and various osteoblastic cell lines of rat and mouse origin (Fig. 3Go). Both TR4–0 and TR4–1 were expressed ubiquitously in the bone tissues and various cell lines, but the expression pattern and the ratios of two isoforms varied among cell lines, especially between bone marrow cells and other osteoblastic cell lines. It is likely that the expression pattern of TR4–0 and TR4–1 changes during differentiation, because ST2, one of the bone marrow stromal cell lines that exhibit immature osteoblastic phenotype, expresses TR4–0 and TR4–1 very similar to bone marrow cells (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Expression of TR4–0 and TR4–1 in bone tissue and various bone cells. RT-PCR to detect TR4 isoforms (TR4–0 as upper band and TR4–1 as lower band) was performed as described in Fig. 1Go.

 
TR4 isoforms, as a repressor in retinoid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signalings in bone
It is reported that TR4 acts as a repressor for RXR-RAR, RXR-TR, and RXR-VDR-mediated transactivation (8). Because TR4s are expressed in bone, their function is of interest if TR4 suppresses the transactivation of the RXR heterodimers in bone, as reported in other tissues (8). Moreover, because the C-terminal truncations (namely the LBD) in nuclear receptors convert into the dominant positive/negative receptors, in general (26), we addressed the possibility that TR4–1 acts in an opposite way to TR4–0.

We examined the function of both TR4 isoforms in cell lines derived from bone (UMR-106) and kidney (COS-1) by a transient transfection assay with the expression vectors of the indicated nuclear receptors. As shown in Fig. 4Go, rabbit TR4–0 displayed a strong repressive activity upon RXR-RAR, RXR-TR, and RXR-VDR-mediated transactivation, as reported previously in other cell lines (8). Likewise, TR4–1 also suppressed these transactivations, but required much more expression vector (Fig. 4Go), indicating that the C-terminus region of TR4 is, at least in part, involved in the repression of the RXR heterodimer-mediated transactivation in both cell lines.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. TR4s function as negative regulators for retinoid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signaling pathways. UMR-106 and COS-1 cells were transfected with a CAT reporter plasmid containing two directly repeated 5'-AGGTCA-3' motifs separated by 3/4/5 bp (DR3/4/5) and vectors expressing mouse RAR{alpha}, RXR{alpha}, chicken TR{alpha}, and rat VDR(0.5 µg). The transfected cells were maintained for 24 h in the absence (-) and presence (+) of 1,25-(OH)2D3 (100 nM), T3 (1 µM), or all-trans retinoic acid (1 µM); and CAT activities were normalized, relative to the ß-galactosidase activities expressed by pCH110 internal control vector. Numbers shown in the columns at the bottom of the graphs indicate the amount of the expression vectors for TR4. At least three independent experiments were performed with each reporter plasmid, and data were shown as mean ± SE and analyzed using the Student’s t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, compared with ligand-stimulated condition.

 
TR4 isoforms suppressed ER-mediated transactivation in a bone cell-specific way
Though neither TR4 isoform showed activity against ER-mediated transactivation in COS-1 cells, we unexpectedly found that they repressed ER{alpha}-mediated transactivation in the osteoblastic cell lines UMR-106 (Fig. 5Go) and ROS17/2.8 (data not shown). Similar repressive activity of TR4 isoforms also was observed against ligand-induced transactivation function of rat ERß, a recently identified ER (22) (Fig. 5BGo). To define whether this suppressive activity of TR4 is specific for only bone cells, we investigated the dose response effect of TR4 in MCF-7, derived from human breast, one of the major estrogen target organs (Fig. 6Go). A transient transfection assay demonstrated that TR4 effectively suppressed both ER{alpha} and ERß-mediated transactivation in UMR-106 in a dose-dependent manner but neither in COS-1 nor MCF-7 (Fig. 6AGo). Note that these results are not caused by the levels of endogenous TR4, because no significant difference was detected in the levels of the TR4 transcripts in these cells (Fig. 6BGo). Thus, these findings established that TR4 acts as a repressor in the estrogen signaling pathway in bone cells.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bone cell-specific suppression of ER-mediated transactivation by TR4 isoforms. UMR-106 and COS-1 cells were transfected with a CAT reporter plasmid containing xenopus vitellogenin estrogen-responsive element (ERE) and vectors expressing human ER{alpha} or rat ERß (0.5 µg). The TR4 expression vector (at the indicated amounts) was cotransfected. The transfected cells were maintained for 24 h in the absence (-) and presence (+) of 17ß-estradiol (1 nM), and CAT assays were performed as described in Fig. 4Go. A, representative results of CAT assay; B, values of three independent experiments. Data were shown as mean ± SE and analyzed as described in Fig. 4Go. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, compared with ligand-stimulated condition.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of TR4 amount on the suppression of ER-mediated transactivation in bone, kidney, and breast cell lines. A, Transient transfection assays. UMR-106, COS-1, and MCF-7 cells were transfected with the CAT reporter plasmid and vectors as described in Fig. 4Go, with different amount of TR4 expression vector. The transfected cells were maintained for 24 h in the absence (-) and presence (+) of 17ß-estradiol (10 nM), and CAT assays were performed as described in Fig. 4Go. The values of three independent experiments are shown. Data were shown as mean ± SE and analyzed as described in Fig. 4Go. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, compared with ligand-stimulated condition. B, RT-PCR analysis. Endogenous TR4 amount was examined by RT-PCR using 1 µg total RNA from each cell line as described in Fig. 1Go. For COS-1 cell, human TR4 and ß-actin PCR primers were used in this analysis.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we cloned rabbit TR4 cDNA from a heart cDNA library and studied its function, in terms of transactivation mediated by nuclear receptors. Based on the philogenic tree of the DBD in the members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, this orphan receptor is thought to belong to a COUP subfamily, which comprises TR2s and TR4s (27). Comparison with the amino acid sequences of human, rat, and mouse TR4s shows marked similarities among species and, hence, strongly suggests that TR4 has been conserved throughout evolution. Considering that TR4 is highly conserved between species, and that TR2 is present in primitive creatures such as the fly and sea urchin (28, 29), this TR2/TR4 subfamily is thought to be essential for life.

Previous reports showed that certain TR4 isoforms are generated by variations of the splicing in the exons encoding the N- and C-terminal receptor protein (30). We found a novel TR4 isoform, TR4–1, which is generated by differential splicing in one exon. TR4–1 lacks a part of the putative LBD at the C-terminal end. Moreover, we observed the expression of TR4–1 like TR4–0 in various tissues and in many bone cell lines and, therefore, identified it as a major isoform, though the mRNA levels of TR4–1 are much less than those of TR4–0.

Bone is one of the main target organs for various lipophilic hormones, including retinoids, thyroid hormones and vitamin D (25). For example, chronic administration of thyroid hormone and glucocorticoid induces osteoporosis, estrogen deficiency (normally seen in postmenopausal women), and shortage of vitamin D (causes rickets) in growing children (25). The gene expression of these nuclear receptors in bone has been observed by us (11, 23) and other groups (31, 32). Moreover, genetic mutations (deletion) in human and murine nuclear receptors for estrogen (33, 34), vitamin D (35), and retinoic acids (36) cause abnormalities in bone formation and bone metabolism (such as osteoporosis, rickets, and osteogenesis imperfecta, respectively). Although the subfamily of orphan receptors modulating the function of these receptors is rapidly expanding, there has been only a limited number of reports concerning the expression and functional analysis of orphan nuclear receptors in bone (37, 38). In the present study, we clearly showed that TR4s are expressed in a bone cell-specific manner and that they negatively modulate the estrogen signaling pathway, in addition to the retinoid, thyroid, and vitamin D signalings. In this respect, it is of interest whether other orphan receptors modulate these signaling pathways in a bone cell-specific way. TR4 was described to function as a repressor of RXR heterodimer-mediated transactivation (8).

We observed that TR4–0 and TR4–1 function as repressors for the retinoid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D signaling cascades, in agreement with previous reports in other cell lines (8). Furthermore, we unexpectedly found that TR4 suppresses ER-mediated transactivation in bone-derived cells but neither in kidney, breast cancer cells nor other cell lines (Figs. 5Go and 6Go). The molecular mechanism by which TR4 represses the action of these hormones is not yet fully defined, but several possible explanations are raised (26): 1) competitive DNA binding of TR4 with the receptor homodimer to the cognate target sequence; 2) titration; competition in heterodimeric formation among nuclear receptors; and 3) protein-protein interactions with other factors and ligands; some conformational change of the receptors, induced by the interaction with other factor(s), modifies the transactivation function of the receptors; and 4) interaction with corepressors. Silencing of the transactivation of ligand-unbound receptors results from association with corepressors like SMRT, N-CoR (39). More recently, orphan receptors were reported to directly associate with such corepressors (40). In the case of RXR-RAR, RXR-TR, and RXR-VDR-mediated transactivation, the repressive activities of TR4 seem to be, at least in part, caused by competitive DNA binding to each of the coganate target enhancer elements, given that Hirose et al. showed that TR4 homodimers can bind to all of the target elements for the RXR-heterodimers (8). Interestingly, they showed that TR4 does not bind a consensus ER target element, which was used also in this study, though we clearly observed that TR4 suppresses ER-mediated transactivation in bone cells. Because this repressive activity of TR4 was dose-dependent (Fig. 6Go), a possible squelching of ER cofactors is expected. Thus, these findings provoked us to examine the molecular mechanism by which TR4 exerts bone cell-specific suppressive activity, and this mechanism seems distinct from competitive DNA binding.

Recently, the usage of bone-selective estrogens as drugs for osteoporosis has received some attention (41). These compounds include substituted triphenylethylene antiestrogens, such as raloxifene, droloxifene, and centchroman (41). However, the mechanism by which these compounds show tissue-specific activities, i.e. agonistic activity in bone, and antagonistic activity in the main estrogen target organs (such as female reproductive organs) is not clear. It has been recently suggested that cofactors for ER are needed to activate the expression of the target genes for raloxifene; thus, the binding of this compound to ER may cause a conformational change in the ER different from that caused by estrogen binding (42). Taken together with the fact that in bone cells, TR4 acts as a repressor against ER, it will be interesting to examine whether TR4 directly associates with ER to form a heterodimer in bone cells, thereby modulating the ER function in a bone cell-specific manner.

In summary, we cloned the rabbit homologue of nuclear orphan receptor TR4 (TR4–0) and a major isoform (TR4–1), the latter missing 350 amino acids. Both isoforms seem to be conserved beyond species and are expressed in various tissues, including bone and cell lines, but with different expression patterns. In addition to repressing RXR-heterodimer-mediated transactivation, TR4 negatively regulates ER-mediated transactivation in a bone cell-specific way. Because bone is a major target organ for various lipophilic hormones, TR4 might significantly modulate the signaling cascades of lipophilic hormone-mediated nuclear receptors.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank P. Chambon and H. Gronemeyer for generous gifts of the receptor expression vectors. We also thank A. Yamaguchi and M. Kumegawa for bone cell lines.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported, in part, by a grant-in-aid for priority areas from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (to S.K.). Back

Received June 30, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schütz G, Umesono K, Blimberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P, Evans RM 1995 The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 83:835–839[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Evans RM 1988 The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily: transcriptional regulators of development and physiology. Science 240:889–895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM 1995 The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841–850[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Enmark E, Gustafsson J-Å 1996 Orphan nuclear receptors - the first eight years. Mol Endocrinol 10:1293–1307[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Chang C, Kokontis J 1988 Identification of new member of the steroid receptor super-family by cloning and sequence analysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 155:971–977[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Chang C, da Silva SL, Ideta R, Lee Y, Yeh S, Burbach JPH 1994 Human and rat TR4 orphan receptors specify a subclass of the steroid receptor superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6040–6044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hirose T, Fujimoto W, Yamaai T, Kim KH, Matsuura H, Jetten AM 1994 TAK1: molecular cloning and characterization of a new member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Mol Endocrinol 8:1667–1680[Abstract]
  8. Hirose T, Apfel R, Pfahl M, Jetten AM 1995 The orphan receptor TAK1 acts as a repressor of RAR-, RXR- and T3R-mediated signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 211:83–91[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Isseman I, Green S 1990 Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators. Nature 347:645–650[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  11. Harada H, Miki R, Masushige S, Kato S 1995 Gene expression of retinoic acid receptors, retinoid-X receptors, and cellular retinol-binding protein I in bone and its regulation by vitamin A. Endocrinology 136:5329–5335[Abstract]
  12. Tagashira S, Harada H, Katsumata T, Itoh N, Nakatsuka M 1997 Cloning of mouse FGF10 and up-regulation of its gene expression during wound healing. Gene 197:399–404[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hirose T, O’Brien DA, Jetten AM 1995 Cloning of the gene encoding the murine orphan receptor TAK1 and cell-type-specific expression in testis. Gene 163:239–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Harris DE, Warshaw DM, Periasamy M 1992 Nucleotide sequences of the rabbit {alpha}-smooth-muscle and ß-non-muscle actin mRNAs. Gene 112:265–266[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Nakajima-IIjima S, Hamada H, Reddy P, Kakunaga T 1985 Molecular structure of the human cytoplasmic ß-actin gene: interspecies homology of sequences in the introns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6133–6137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nudel U, Zakut R, Shani M, Neuman S, Levy Z, Yaffe D 1983 The nucleotide sequence of the rat cytoplasmic ß-actin gene. Nucleic Acids Res 11:1759–1771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tokunaga K, Taniguchi H, Yoda K, Shimizu M, Sakiyama S 1986 Nucleotide sequence of a full-length cDNA for mouse cytoskeletal ß-actin mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 14:2829[Free Full Text]
  18. Bellows CG, Aubin JE, Heersche JNM, Antosz ME 1986 Mineralized bone nodules formed in vitro from enzymatically released rat calvaria cell populations. Calcif Tissue Int 38:143–154[Medline]
  19. Maniatopoulos C, Sodek J, Melcher AH 1988 Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats. Cell Tissue Res 254:317–330[Medline]
  20. Kato S, Sasaki H, Suzawa M, Masushige S, Tora L, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H 1995 Widely spaced, directly repeated PuGGTCA elements act as promiscuous enhancers for different classes of nuclear receptors. Mol Cell Biol 15:5858–5867[Abstract]
  21. Kato S, Tora L, Yamauchi J, Masushige S, Bellard M, Chambon P 1992 A far upstream estrogen response element of the ovalbumin gene contains several half-palindromic 5'-TGACC-3' motifs acting synergistically. Cell 68:731–742[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kuiper GGJM, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J-Å 1996 Cloning of a novel estrogen receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5925–5930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sasaki H, Harada H, Handa Y, Morino H, Suzawa M, Shimpo E, Katsumata T, Masuhiro Y, Matsuda K, Ebihara K, Ono T, Masushige S, Kato S 1995 Transcriptional activity of a fluorinated vitamin D analog on VDR-RXR-mediated gene expression. Biochemistry 34:370–377[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Mangelsdorf DJ, Umesono K, Evans RM 1994 The retinoid receptors. In: Sporn MB, Roberts AB, Goodman DS (eds) The retinoids. New York, Raven Press, Ltd, pp 319–349
  25. Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA 1996 Principles of bone biology. New York, Academic Press
  26. Yen PM, Chin WW 1994 Molecular mechanisms of dominant negative activity by nuclear hormone receptors. Mol Endocrinol 8:1450–1454[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Laudet V, Hänni C, Coll J, Catzeflis F, Stéhelin D 1992 Evolution of the nuclear receptor gene superfamily. EMBO J 11:1003–1013[Medline]
  28. Thummel CS 1995 From embryogenesis to metamorphosis: the regulation and function of drosophila nuclear receptor superfamily members. Cell 83:871–877[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Chan S, Xu N, Niemeyer CC, Bone JR, Flytzanis CN 1992 SpCOUP-TF: a sea urchin member of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10568–10572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yoshikawa T, Makino S, Gao X-M, Xing G-Q, Chuang D-M, Detera-Wadleigh SD 1996 Splice variants of rat TR4 orphan receptor: differential expression of novel sequences in the 5'-untranslated region and C-terminal domain. Endocrinology 137:1562–1571[Abstract]
  31. Hoyland JA, Mee AP, Baird P, Braidman IP, Mawer EB, Freemont AJ 1997 Demonstration of estrogen receptor mRNA in bone using in situ reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Bone 20:87–92[Medline]
  32. Mee AP, Hoyland JA, Braidman IP, Freemont AJ, Davies M, Mawer EB 1996 Demonstrations of vitamin D receptor transcripts in actively resorbing osteoclasts in bone sections. Bone 18:295–299[Medline]
  33. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, Takahashi H, Cohen RM, Specker B, Williams TC, Lubahn DB, Korach KS 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med 331:1056–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Korach KS 1994 Insights from the study of animals lacking functional estrogen receptor. Science 266:1524–1527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, Takeda S, Sekine K, Yoshihara Y, Kawakami T, Arioka K, Sato H, Uchiyama Y, Masushige S, Fukamizu A, Matsumoto T, Kato S 1997 Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning. Nat Genet 16:391–395[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Lohnes D, Mark M, Mendelsohn C, Dolle P, Dierich A, Gorry P, Gansmuller A, Chambon P 1994 Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development: (I) Craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities in RAR double mutants. Development 120:2723–2748[Abstract]
  37. Greene ME, Blumberg B, McBride OW, Yi HF, Kronquist K, Kwan K, Hsieh L, Greene G, Nimer SD 1995 Isolation of the human peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma cDNA: expression in hematopoietic cells and chromosomal mapping. Gene Expr 4:281–299[Medline]
  38. Qiu Y, Krishnan V, Pereira FA, Tsai SY, Tsai M-J 1996 Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors and their regulation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 56:81–85[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Horwitz KB, Jackson TA, Bain DL, Richer JK, Takimoto GS, Tung L 1996 Nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Mol Endocrinol 10:1167–1177[Abstract]
  40. Downes M, Burke LJ, Bailey PJ, Muscat GEO 1996 Two receptor interaction domains in the corepressor, N-CoR/RIP13, are required for an efficient interaction with Rev-erbA{alpha} and RVR: physical association is dependent on the E region of the orphan receptors. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4379–4386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Evans GL, Turner RT 1995 Tissue-selective actions of estrogen analogs. Bone 17:181S–190S[CrossRef]
  42. Yang NN, Venugopalan M, Hardikar S, Glasebrook A 1996 Identification of an estrogen response element activated by metabolites of 17ß-estradiol and raloxifene. Science 273:1222–1225[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
N.-C. Liu, W.-J. Lin, E. Kim, L. L. Collins, H.-Y. Lin, I-C. Yu, J. D. Sparks, L.-M. Chen, Y.-F. Lee, and C. Chang
Loss of TR4 Orphan Nuclear Receptor Reduces Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Mediated Gluconeogenesis
Diabetes, December 1, 2007; 56(12): 2901 - 2909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
H. Escriva, N. D. Holland, H. Gronemeyer, V. Laudet, and L. Z. Holland
The retinoic acid signaling pathway regulates anterior/posterior patterning in the nerve cord and pharynx of amphioxus, a chordate lacking neural crest
Development, March 8, 2003; 129(12): 2905 - 2916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Yagishita, Y. Yamamoto, T. Yoshizawa, K. Sekine, Y. Uematsu, H. Murayama, Y. Nagai, W. Krezel, P. Chambon, T. Matsumoto, et al.
Aberrant Growth Plate Development in VDR/RXR{gamma} Double Null Mutant Mice
Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5332 - 5341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
N. P. Koritschoner, J. Madruga, S. Knespel, G. Blendinger, B. Anzinger, A. Otto, M. Zenke, and P. Bartunek
The Nuclear Orphan Receptor TR4 Promotes Proliferation of Myeloid Progenitor Cells
Cell Growth Differ., November 1, 2001; 12(11): 563 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. Giguère
Orphan Nuclear Receptors: From Gene to Function
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 1999; 20(5): 689 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Murayama, K.-i. Takeyama, S. Kitanaka, Y. Kodera, Y. Kawaguchi, T. Hosoya, and S. Kato
Positive and Negative Regulations of the Renal 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1{alpha}-Hydroxylase Gene by Parathyroid Hormone, Calcitonin, and 1{alpha},25(OH)2D3 in Intact Animals
Endocrinology, May 1, 1999; 140(5): 2224 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Harada, S. Tagashira, M. Fujiwara, S. Ogawa, T. Katsumata, A. Yamaguchi, T. Komori, and M. Nakatsuka
Cbfa1 Isoforms Exert Functional Differences in Osteoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 1999; 274(11): 6972 - 6978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals