help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guivarc’h, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guivarc’h, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernier, P.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 10 4213-4221
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Alternative Splicing of the D2 Dopamine Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Is Modulated by Activated Sex Steroid Receptors in the MMQ Prolactin Cell Line1

Dominique Guivarc’h, Jean-Didier Vincent and Philippe Vernier

Institut Alfred Fessard, UPR2212, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Philippe Vernier, Institut Alfred Fessard, UPR2212, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France. E-mail: vernier{at}iaf.cnrs-gif.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The two isoforms of the D2 dopamine receptor are generated by alternative splicing of the exon 6 of the premessenger RNA (pre-mRNA), changing the length of the third cytoplasmic loop involved in the coupling to G proteins. In the MMQ PRL cell line, sex steroid hormones modulated the proportion of the two D2 receptor isoforms. Under controlled culture conditions, 17ß-estradiol (E2) strongly favored the production of the long isoform of D2 mRNA over the short one, whereas both isoforms were equally abundant when culture medium was hormone depleted. In the presence of progesterone (P), E2 action was inhibited, and equal amounts of each D2 receptor isoform were produced in the cells. Hormone treatments never modified either the total amount of D2 receptor mRNA and D2 receptor binding sites or D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Specific antagonists demonstrated that the activity of each hormone depended on their nuclear receptors. Inhibitors of gene transcription or translation also showed that their activity required protein synthesis. The expression of the short D2 receptor isoform was never prominent, even at the single cell level. Analysis of the intron sequence flanking alternative exon 6 showed that only the upstream intron presented two sequence tracts known to be targets for splicing factors. Taken together, these results provide converging evidence for a physiologically relevant mechanism by which sex steroid receptors could regulate the expression of a splicing factor favoring the production of the long dopamine D2 receptor isoform.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE DOPAMINE D2 receptor mediates many of the modulatory effects that dopamine exerts in the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as in the anterior and intermediate part of the pituitary gland of mammals. In particular, the D2 receptor promotes cell hyperpolarization and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by activating pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (Gi and Go heterotrimeric proteins) (1, 2), which lead in the pituitary gland to a strong inhibition of PRL secretion exerted by dopamine on lactotroph cells.

The characteristic structural features of the D2 receptor show it to be a seven-transmembrane segment protein exhibiting a long third intracellular loop and a short intracellular C-terminus. These peptide stretches determine the efficiency and affinity of receptor-G protein coupling (3). In mammals, the length of the third cytoplasmic loop can be modified by alternative splicing of the premessenger RNA (pre-mRNA). The sixth exon of the D2 receptor gene codes for 29 amino acids and may or may not be included in the mature transcript (4, 5, 6), leading to the expression of either a long isoform (D2a) or a short isoform (D2b; nomenclature according to IUPHAR recommendations) (7).

The two D2 receptor isoforms are found in different proportions in dopamine target areas (4, 8, 9). The long isoform is predominant in the striatum and the pituitary gland of male rats, whereas it is no more abundant than the short isoform in the substantia nigra or the olfactory tubercle. This observation suggested that a tissue-specific factor could modulate the pre-mRNA splicing. In addition, it was observed that changes in the physiological concentrations of sex steroid hormones [estradiol, progesterone (P), or testosterone (T)] were able to modify the proportion of the two D2 receptor isoforms. Such an effect was observed first in primary cultures of PRL cells, where the relative amounts of each isoform were modified depending on the presence or absence of estradiol in the culture medium (10). It was then demonstrated that sex steroid hormones were able to modulate D2 receptor mRNA splicing in vivo by acting via their specific receptors in different regions of the male rat brain (11). For example, in the pituitary gland of male rats, the splicing of the D2 receptor mRNA was only affected by T acting via the androgen receptor, whereas in the olfactory tubercle, the relative proportions of the two isoforms of the D2 receptor were affected by estrogen receptors activated by T aromatized to estradiol.

To be able to properly analyze the molecular mechanisms regulating D2 receptor splicing, we chose to use MMQ cells, a PRL-secreting cell line isolated from an anterior pituitary tumor induced by estrogen in a female rat (12). These cells are exquisitely sensitive to sex steroid hormones, they possess a functional D2 receptor (12, 13), and they express exclusively the long isoform of this receptor when they are cultured with calf or horse serum (14). In the work presented here, the effects of steroid hormones on the expression of the two D2 receptor isoforms were studied by using a combination of receptor antagonists and inhibitors of protein expression. It was shown that estradiol and P were able to modify the proportion of each of the D2 receptor mRNA isoforms by acting via their intracellular receptors. This effect required protein synthesis, probably by modulating the expression of a splicing factor.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture and treatment
Cells were usually grown and maintained in suspension in a culture medium (N) containing RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 7.5% horse serum, 2.5% FCS, 1 mM glutamine, and 2 g/liter Na2CO3 in a humidified incubator at 37 C with 5% CO2 as previously described (12) (referred to as basal conditions). To study the effects of sex steroid hormones, the horse and fetal calf sera were hormone depleted by a double treatment with charcoal-Dextran T-70 (100:0.1) at 56 C for 30 min, and the pH indicator, phenol red, reported by Berthois et al. (15) to have a weak estrogenic action on cells, was omitted from the medium. These hormone-depleted sera (O, referred to as control conditions) were used in the same proportions as those described for basal culture conditions. The amount of sex steroid hormones in the culture serum was assayed by RIA before and after treatment with charcoal-dextran. All experiments and assays were performed at least in triplicate.

Time-course experiments were performed to analyze the genomic effects of sex steroid hormones by treating the cells with 10-8 M 17ß-estradiol (E2), P, or T for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The different inhibitors of translation (cycloheximide) or transcription (actinomycin D and {alpha}-amanitin; 10-6 M for each) were added in the different conditions of steroid treatment for 24 h.

To analyze the contribution of sex steroid receptors, we used antagonists [antiestrogen, RU 58668 (16); antiprogestin, RU 486; antiandrogen, RU 56187 (17)] provided by Roussel-UCLAF (Romainville, France). They were added to the different sex steroid treatments at a concentration of 10-10 M (chosen as to provide the highest receptor specificity for the hormone concentration we used) for 48 h before cells were harvested and processed for the various assays. After the incubation, each cell sample was collected individually, and cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 xg for 5 min and stored at -80 C until RNA extraction.

RNA extraction, Northern blot, and semiquantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA from each sample was extracted by the guanidium-phenol acid method (18). To analyze the modulation of D2 receptor expression after the steroid hormone treatments, Northern blots were performed. Briefly, 10 µg total RNA were run on a denaturing 1% agarose gel, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with 32P-labeled D2 complementary DNA (cDNA) or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA as control.

RT-PCR was performed essentially as described previously (11). Three micrograms of each sample were denatured at 90 C for 5 min with oligo(deoxythymidine)15 (0.5 mg/ml) and random primer (0.5 mg/ml) and kept on ice. Then, first strand buffer, dithiothreitol (10 mM), deoxy-NTP (0.5 mM), RNAsin (40 U/µl), and Superscript 200 U (Life Technologies) were added in a 50-µl final volume, and the reaction proceeded at 42 C for 1 h. The enzyme was inactivated by heating at 70 C for 10 min. The relative amounts of the two isoforms of the rat dopamine D2 receptor were measured by a semiquantitative PCR procedure. Oligonucleotides corresponding to upstream (CCTTCATCGTC-ACTCTGCTGG) and downstream (CTCCATTTCCAGCTCCTGAG) sequences of the spliced exon of the D2 receptor mRNA were 32P labeled by phosphorylation with polynucleotide kinase and used as primers for the Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). The linearity and reproducibility of the PCR reaction were optimized and carefully checked over a large range of cycle numbers (n = 15–45) with different amounts of cDNA. Tests were also performed with various proportions of in vitro transcribed RNA corresponding to the two D2 receptor cDNA isoforms cloned in the pBluescript vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) to ensure that no bias would favor the amplification of one isoform over the other. PCR reactions were carried out for every sample and for five different numbers of cycles (20, 25, 30, 35, and 40). Quantification of the radioactive PCR products was performed by separating the DNA fragments on a 10% polyacrylamide gel (29:1) and directly counting the radioactivity from the dried gel with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Statistical significance of the differences for the ratio D2a/D2b measured in the different groups was assessed by ANOVA (Scheffé’s test, StatView II, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).

PCR for estrogen, androgen, and P receptors
The presence of various sex steroid receptors was analyzed by RT-PCR using RNA from cells cultured for 48 h in the different conditions described above. Primers used for the estrogen receptor were: upstream oligonucleotide, -GTCTGGTCCTGTGAAGGCTGCA-; and downstream oligonucleotide, -ACCAGGCACACTCCAGAAGGTG-; those used for the androgen receptor were: upstream oligonucleotide, -TTACTTCCCACCCCAGAAGACC-; and downstream oligonucleotide, -GCAAATACCATCAGTCCCATCC-; and those used for the P receptor were: upstream oligonucleotide, -TATGGCTTTGATTCCTTACCTC-; and downstream oligonucleotide, -GCAAAATATAGCATCTGTCCAC-. All of the oligonucleotides were individually 32P labeled by phosphorylation with polynucleotide kinase and used as primers for the Taq polymerase (Promega) for 25 cycles. The radioactive PCR products were analyzed on polyacrylamide gels as described above.

Western blot of estrogen receptor
Cells treated for 48 h in the different conditions with or without sex steroid hormones were lysed in buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 5 mM EDTA, 1% aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM Pefabloc SC, Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany] for 15 min at 4 C. Cell lysates were centrifuged for 20 min at 4 C and 14,000 x g, and proteins from the supernatants were quantified by the Bradford technique (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Fifty micrograms of protein were loaded and run on 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, incubated with estrogen receptor antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), and revealed by chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

Single cell PCR
To answer the question of whether individual MMQ cells possess only one of the two isoforms or both of them, single cell PCR was performed in normal serum (N) and hormone-depleted (O) conditions. Cytoplasm of each cell was collected using a patch-clamp pipette; expelled in 7 µl water containing 5 µM random primers, 20 U/µl RNAsin, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM deoxy-NTP, and first strand buffer; immediately boiled at 95 C for 2 min for denaturation; and kept on ice. Reverse transcriptase (100 U; Superscript, Life Technologies) was added, and the 10-µl reaction was incubated at 42 C for 1 h. PCR was then performed in a 20-µl reaction mix for 30 cycles using the same radiolabeled D2 primers and PCR conditions as previously described. PCR products were analyzed on polyacrylamide gels as described above.

Cloning and sequencing of introns flanking exon 6
The D2a PCR product was used as a 32P-labeled probe to screen a rat genomic library constructed in {lambda}EMBL3 (generously given by Gert Scherrer) as described previously (19). Four hybridizing clones were isolated and purified, and corresponding DNA was sequenced with Sequenase (U.S. Biochemical-Amersham, Cleveland, OH) using the upstream and downstream oligonucleotides used for PCR of the alternative exon (see above). Three clones were shown to possess exons 5 and 7 and therefore the corresponding intervening sequences. Cloned DNAs were digested with EcoRI and subcloned in pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene). Each construct encompassing the whole length of introns flanking the alternative exon 6 was sequenced with internal oligonucleotides (Genome Express, Grenoble, France).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Modulation of the splicing of D2 receptor pre-mRNA by sex steroid hormones
When the MMQ PRL cell line was grown under basal conditions (see Materials and Methods), only the long isoform of the D2 receptor mRNA was detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR, as previously described (14). To analyze the effects of sex steroid hormones on the splicing mechanisms of the D2 receptor mRNA, the MMQ cells were cultured in hormone-depleted serum. The concentrations of the different steroid hormones assayed in the serum currently used for cell cultures were close to the highest physiological values (E2, 48 pg/ml; P, 0.3 ng/ml; T, <0.05 ng/ml; cortisol, 81 ng/ml). Charcoal treatment reduced hormone amounts to undetectable levels. Figure 1Go shows the time course of the sex steroid effect on the ratio of the two D2 receptor isoforms (D2a/D2b) measured in MMQ cells. When cells were cultured in hormone-depleted serum (control conditions; see Materials and Methods) the amount of the long isoform of the D2 receptor mRNA decreased but still predominated to give a D2a/D2b ratio close to 8. Addition of E2 or T at 10-8 M maintained the predominance of the long isoform in amounts about 30-fold greater than those of the short isoform. In sharp contrast, treatment with both E2 and P (10-8 M each) markedly decreased the D2a/D2b ratio to a value close to 1. All of these effects reached a maximum 12 h after the start of hormonal treatments and remained stable up to 48 h.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time course of the effects of sex steroid hormones on the ratio of the two D2 receptor isoforms. The ratio of the two isoforms was quantified by semiquantitative RT-PCR (see Materials and Methods) in MMQ cells in different conditions at different periods of time. The D2a/D2b ratios in the different conditions are presented: {square}, N medium; {blacktriangleup}, O or hormone-depleted serum condition; {circ}, E2 at 10-8 M in O medium; {diamondsuit}, E2 and P at 10-8 M in O medium; *, T at 10-8 M in O medium. Values significantly different from the basal condition are indicated by asterisks (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05). Steady state values for the D2a/D2b ratio were reached after 48 h.

 
To determine whether the D2 mRNA splicing was homogeneous in the whole cell population, we looked at the relative distribution of each isoform in individual cells by means of the single cell PCR technique. In all the tested experimental conditions and in every cell successfully analyzed, both isoforms were shown to be present. Moreover, as it was seen in large cell populations, the short isoform was never found to be predominant over the long one (Fig. 2Go). These results suggested that the basal or default splicing mechanism in MMQ cells led to the production of the long and the short isoforms of the D2 receptor pre-mRNA in approximately equivalent amounts.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Single cell PCR. Ten single cells PCR of 15 are presented. The cells were cultured in basal (N) or hormone-depleted (O) conditions for 24 h. The cytoplasm of each cell was collected individually and processed for PCR as described in Materials and Methods. PCR products were analyzed on a 10% polyacrylamide gel.

 
Then, Northern blot and ligand binding experiments were performed to determine the consequences of sex steroid treatments on the levels of either D2 receptor mRNA or D2 receptor-binding sites. As shown in Fig. 3Go and Table 1Go, none of these treatments significantly changed the amounts of D2 mRNA or the levels of D2 receptor-binding sites, as determined by binding capacity values. Similarly, the presence of hormones in the cell culture medium did not affect the affinity of the receptor for [3H]spiperone (Kd = 0.5 x 10-10 M). The functional consequences of the splicing were tested on the ability of the receptor to inhibit the activity of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase, but no significant changes were observed in any of the tested conditions.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of the dopamine D2 receptor mRNA in MMQ cells cultured in different hormonal conditions. Ten micrograms of total RNA were loaded on each lane, and Northern blotting was conducted as described in Materials and Methods. The two D2 receptor mRNA isoforms cannot be separated on such agarose gels, and the band corresponds to both transcripts. Representative examples of results obtained after 48 h in the different culture conditions are shown (two samples for each experimental condition). Lane 1, MMQ cells in basal culture medium; lane 2, cells in the hormone-depleted control condition; lane 3, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with E2 (10-8 M); lane 4, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with E2 and P (10-8 M each); lane 5, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with T (10-8 M). The upper and lower panels correspond, respectively, to D2 mRNA and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA, which was used as an internal standard. No modification of the total amount of D2 receptor mRNA was noticed in any of the different experimental conditions tested.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of treatment with sex steroid hormones on biochemical parameters of the D2 dopamine receptor

 
To summarize, estrogen and T modulate D2 mRNA splicing to favor the long isoform, whereas addition of P, although without effect by itself, antagonizes or reverses the E2 action, leading to the production of equal amounts of long and short isoforms (ratio D2a/D2b close to 1). The long delay (12 h) necessary for maximal hormone effect suggested that they act via specific nuclear receptors to modulate the expression of one or more protein factors that interfere with the splicing of the D2 pre-mRNA.

The actions of sex steroid hormones are receptor specific
To demonstrate the contribution of sex steroid receptors, we used three compounds that act as specific steroid receptor antagonists, namely RU 486, a classical P receptor inhibitor; RU 58668, a good estrogen receptor antagonist (16); and RU 56187, an androgen receptor antagonist (17). Accordingly, these compounds have been shown to block the regulatory effect of steroid hormones on the expression of target genes.

The effects of the different combinations of sex steroids and antagonists are summarized in Table 2Go. RU 58668, the estrogen antagonist, but not RU 56187, the androgen antagonist, blocked the effect of E2 or T on the splicing of D2 receptor mRNA. This suggests that T is probably aromatized to estradiol and acts via estrogen receptors. Under control conditions (hormone-depleted serum), the progestin receptor antagonist RU 486 had no effect on the ratio of the two D2 receptor transcripts, indicating that this receptor alone cannot influence the splicing mechanism. Under the same control conditions, the estrogen antagonist decreased the D2a/D2b ratio to a value close to 1. A similar result was obtained with the combined E2 plus P treatment, supporting the idea that the estrogen receptor is required to produce a high amount of the long D2 receptor isoform. Accordingly, when the MMQ cells were cultured in the presence of both E2 and P, the progestin receptor antagonist elicited an increase in the proportion of the long isoform, similar to that obtained with E2 treatment alone. With the same hormone treatment, the estrogen antagonist RU 58668 did not modify the ratio of D2 receptor isoforms, revealing that under these conditions, P is required to maintain a D2a/D2b ratio close to 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of sex steroid receptor antagonists on the ratio of the two D2 receptor isoforms (D2a/D2b)

 
As sex steroids are able to modify the expression of their own receptors, we also measured the levels of steroid receptor transcripts by RT-PCR to check whether this may have to be taken into account in our previous results. However, after 48 h of the various hormone treatments, the sex steroid receptor levels were clearly not affected (Fig. 4AGo). MMQ cells express androgen receptor transcripts at a much lower level than those of estrogen or P receptors, as expected for a PRL cell line derived from a female rat. In addition, as assessed by Western blots, estrogen receptor protein levels were not affected by any of the sex steroid treatments (Fig. 4BGo). Therefore, no change in steroid receptor expression needed to be taken into account in the interpretation of the effects of sex steroid hormones on the D2 receptor mRNA splicing observed in MMQ cells.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. PCR and Western blot of sex steroid receptor in MMQ cells cultured in different hormonal conditions. PCR and Western blot were performed as described in Materials and Methods. A, PCR products for each sex steroid receptor (AR, androgen receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, P receptor) were analyzed on polyacrylamide gel. B, Western blotting of estrogen receptor extracted from MMQ cells. Lane 1, MMQ cells in basal culture medium; lane 2, cells in the hormone-depleted control condition; lane 3, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with E2 (10-8 M); lane 4, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with E2 and P (10-8 M each); lane 5, cells cultured in the control condition and treated with T (10-8 M).

 
To summarize, the use of steroid receptor antagonists showed that E2 and T, both acting on estrogen receptors, modulate D2 receptor mRNA splicing in favor of the long isoform. The ligand-activated progestin receptor is a strong inhibitor of the estrogen receptor effect. In addition, in the absence of hormones, the estrogen receptor appeared to retain a significant basal activity, as it could be inhibited either by a specific receptor antagonist or by activation of the progestin receptor.

Regulation of the D2 mRNA splicing by sex steroids depends on the expression of splicing factors
As steroid receptors are transcription factors, gene expression inhibitors were used to investigate whether a transcription step was required for the effects of steroid hormones on the splicing of the D2 receptor to occur. The results are summarized in Fig. 5Go.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of transcription and translation inhibitors on the ratio of D2a and D2b receptor isoforms in cells treated with sex steroid hormones. The relative distributions of the long (D2a) and the short (D2b) isoforms of the dopamine D2 receptor mRNA were quantified by semiquantitative RT-PCR (see Materials and Methods). MMQ cells cultured in the different hormonal conditions and treated with cycloheximide (CHX; 10-6 M), actinomycin D (ActiD; 10-6 M), and {alpha}-amanitin (10-6 M): empty bars, hormone-depleted serum medium (O medium); dotted bars, E2 at 10-8 M in O medium; hatched bars, E2 and P at 10-8 M in O medium; and black-filled bars, T at 10-8 M in O medium.

 
Cycloheximide, a translation blocker, decreased the D2a/D2b ratio under control conditions (hormone-depleted serum). It also abolished the effects of E2 and T on D2 mRNA splicing. As this effect was similar to that produced by the combined treatment, E2 plus P, it suggested that inhibition of the expression of a specific protein may be responsible for the action of P on D2 mRNA splicing. The transcription inhibitors actinomycin D and {alpha}-amanitin produced similar results, implying that the action of the steroid hormones indeed involved transcription modulation.

At this point, evidence was accumulating to suggest that steroid-bound receptors were able to modulate the expression of one or several protein factors that could act as trans-regulators of the splicing of D2 receptor mRNA. Interestingly, none of the protein expression inhibitors used in these experiments changed the D2a/D2b ratio obtained by incubation of the cells with E2 and P together. In addition, neither this latter treatment nor protein expression inhibitors led to a D2a/D2b ratio below 1, suggesting that both long and short mature transcripts had equal chances of being produced in these experimental conditions. Therefore, the effect of E2 to favor the production of the long D2 receptor isoform must involve the transcriptional regulation of a given trans-acting splicing factor, whereas P seems to inhibit this effect at the same transcriptional level.

To gain new insights in the mechanisms of this unusual splicing phenomenon, we isolated from a rat genomic library introns 5 and 6 that flank the alternative exon 6 of the rat D2 receptor gene (see Materials and Methods) (19). Their sequences revealed that the rat intron 5 sequence bore two polypyrimidine-rich sequences, one 200 bp long and the other 60 bp long, as well as three putative lariat branch points, two of them flanking the longest polypyrimidine stretch. Such sequences were not found in intron 6, suggesting that the regulation of the mRNA splicing involves intron 5, as is to be expected knowing that only the maturation of long mRNA isoform is modulated.

When these sequences were compared with their published human homologs, it became apparent that human intron 5 exhibited only one of these pyrimidine stretches, and the lariat branch point upstream of this sequence was absent (Fig. 6Go). Otherwise, the sizes of introns 5 and 6 are identical in both species (954 and 1474 bp, respectively), and their sequences are strikingly conserved. Therefore, the differences in the number and type of regulatory intronic sequences between the rat and the human could be related to the fact that in the human, the short receptor isoform is generally found at a higher level than in rat, although here also it is never predominant (9).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Alignment of human and rat intron 5 sequences. Upstream exon 5 and downstream exon 6 are in boldface. Cryptic splicing sites are underlined. Putative lariat branch points are boxed. Polypyrimidine stretches are indicated by a dotted line. Note that the human exhibits only one branch point downstream from the polypyrimidine tract.

 
In conclusion, these data showed that sex steroid receptors, mainly estrogen receptor, regulate the splicing of the D2 receptor mRNA, probably by modulating the expression of a splicing factor that, in turn, may regulate the choice of the alternative splice site, leading to the preferential production of the long isoform over the short one.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this report we demonstrate that in the MMQ PRL cell line, the sex steroid hormones E2 and P regulate, via their specific nuclear receptors, the transcription of factors able to modify the choice of the D2 mRNA splice site during its maturation process.

In a previous series of experiments (11), we showed that in male rats T was able to regulate the ratio of the two isoforms of D2 receptor mRNA in vivo, particularly in the olfactory tubercle, where it occurred via estrogen receptors after aromatization of T to estradiol, and in the anterior pituitary gland, where it depended on androgen receptor activation. However, insights into the mechanisms by which these hormones are able to change the amount of the D2 receptor isoforms were difficult to obtain from such experiments. The MMQ cells appeared more suitable because they naturally express a small amount of the D2 receptor and are sensitive to sex steroids. This cell line originates from PRL cells cloned from the 7315a tumor induced by estrogen in a female rat (12). Estrogen receptors are the predominant form of sex steroid receptors in these cells, although transcripts for P and androgen receptors have also been observed. Contrasting with male rats, in which androgen receptors are responsible for hormone action on D2 mRNA splicing, all such effects can be attributed to the intervention of estrogen and P receptors in MMQ cells. The T effect we detected in these cells is probably not physiological and required its prior aromatization to estrogen, as the estrogen receptor antagonist, but not the androgen receptor antagonist, inhibited its effect.

The sex steroid receptor antagonists are compounds that were developed essentially for their antitumorigenic effects. As far as possible we have used compounds devoid of partial agonist activity. Under our experimental conditions, the antiestrogen RU 58668 inhibits the effects of E2 as well as T on D2 mRNA splicing. Interestingly, in hormone-depleted conditions where the D2a/D2b ratio is significantly lower than in the presence of E2, the antiestrogen compound is able to further decrease this ratio to 1. This suggests that either a small amount of E2 is still present in the culture medium despite the charcoal treatment, or that the estrogen receptor is active in the absence of estrogen. In the latter hypothesis, the antiestrogen RU 58668 would be acting as an inverse agonist in this system. The existence of a pool of constitutively active estrogen receptors has also been demonstrated by Tzuckerman et al. (20) by analyzing the activity of an estrogen response element in CV-1 cells. This basal activity could contribute to the predominance of the long D2 receptor isoform found in MMQ cells.

The strong antagonistic effect of P on E2 action is another functionally relevant observation made in our experiments. This blocking effect could be due to either the antagonism of estrogen receptor activity by P receptor or the strong inhibition of the estrogen receptor expression by P. We showed by PCR and Western blotting that none of the sex steroid treatments affected the amount of each steroid receptor transcript, including those of estrogen receptors. Therefore, the effect of P did not depend on the decrease in estrogen receptor expression. P, however, did act via its receptors, as the antiprogestin drug RU 486 blocked this effect when P was present in association with E2. In addition, as P completely blocked estradiol receptor activation, the antiestrogen compound was not able to modify the effect of E2 plus P. Such an antagonistic effect of the progestin receptor on estrogen receptor activity has also been demonstrated in 3T3 cells and depended on the direct transcription inhibition exerted by progestin receptors on an estrogen-responsive promoter (21). Whether the effect of P to inhibit the splicing of the long isoform depends on the direct interaction of the P receptor with the estradiol receptor via cis-acting regulatory elements will await identification of the corresponding splicing factors.

Different blockers of gene transcription and translation (respectively, {alpha}-amanitin, actinomycin D, and cycloheximide) were used to confirm that the actions of steroid receptors on D2 receptor mRNA splicing involved protein synthesis. Translation and transcription inhibitors produced exactly the same effects, indicating that transcription is probably the limiting step of steroid action. Two important observations resulted from the use of gene expression inhibitors. Firstly, they completely blocked the splicing modulation induced by E2 and T, but they did not modify the inhibitory effect of P on E2 treatment. This confirmed that P inhibition was probably maximal with regard to D2 mRNA splicing regulation, and that this effect probably involved modulation of the transcription of a splicing regulatory factor. Secondly, and supporting this latter hypothesis, gene expression inhibitors all tended to produce a D2a/D2b ratio close to 1, indicating that when a given splicing factor was not transcribed, the splicing mechanism of the D2 receptor mRNA produces equal amounts of each of the two mRNA isoforms. In addition, both mRNA isoforms were present in each D2 receptor-expressing cell (with a ratio always higher than or equal to 1), as shown by single cell PCR. The most parsimonious conclusion that can be drawn from these data is that the default mechanism of the D2 receptor mRNA splicing (in the absence of newly transcribed splicing factors) gives equal chance to maturation of the two mRNA isoforms and that the effect of sex steroid receptor activation will be to either favor (estrogen and androgen receptors) or inhibit (P receptor) the splicing mechanism by means of transcriptional regulation of a regulatory factor.

The alternative splicing of the D2 receptor pre-mRNA can be assimilated to a choice among the splice sites located upstream or downstream from exon 6. When the upstream site is chosen, the long isoform of the D2 receptor mRNA is obtained (provided that intron 6 is also removed), whereas the choice of the downstream site skips exon 6 and leads to the short isoform. Therefore, based on our results, the role of the splicing factor regulated by sex steroids will be to favor the choice of the first splice site over the other. In agreement with this statement, we observed that only intron 5 (the intron upstream exon 6) exhibits cis-regulatory sequences able to be used for such a regulated mechanism. Two polypyrimidine stretches are found near the 3'-splice site of intron 5 in the rat and only one is present in the human. Such sequences have been shown to bind different splicing-modulating proteins when they are located close to the lariat branch point (the consensus sequence of which is UNYURAY) or nearby the 3'-splice site (the consensus sequence of which is YnNYAG/G). These proteins will either block the lariat formation or will impair accessibility of the 3'-splice site, therefore favoring one splice site over the other (for reviews, see Refs. 22, 23, 24). As the short isoform is more highly expressed in the human than in the rat (the long isoform still being predominant) (9), the absence of one of the lariat branch points upstream from the polypyrimidine tract of intron 5 could be the reason for the higher expression of the short isoform in the human.

Regulation of the selection of intron splice sites implicates factors such as the U1 small ribonucleoprotein particles, which pairs via its RNA components to the 5'-splice site; the U2AF factor, which binds to polypyrimidine stretches at the 3'-splice site (25); and the SR proteins. Members of the SR protein family have been shown to regulate splice site selection and could be among the factors implicated in the hormone-induced splicing regulation (26, 27, 28), although their target sequences are not yet fully identified (28, 29, 30).

To summarize, it can now be postulated that in MMQ cells, as previously observed in vivo, modulation of D2 mRNA splicing by sex steroid hormones depends on nuclear receptor activation that, in turn, regulates the expression of one or more splicing factors that bind to the polypyrimidine stretch of the D2 receptor pre-mRNA. Whether splicing regulation depends on stimulation or inhibition of splicing factor expression is unknown. However, conclusive evidence now shows that estrogen receptor activation facilitates the retention of exon 6 and produces the long isoform. In contrast, progestin receptor antagonizes the effect of estrogen receptor on the expression of splicing factors. In this case as well as when gene expression inhibitors are used, the choice of the splice site upstream from exon 6 is not favored, and the spliceosome equally produces each of the two mRNA isoforms.

Alternative splicing modifies the expression program of a large number of genes, and generally, this phenomenon generates different protein products with clearly separable functions (31). In the case of the D2 receptor, the situation has not been so clear to date. The splicing of the D2 receptor was proposed to change the efficiency or affinity of receptor coupling to G proteins. Accordingly, Guiramand et al. (32) showed that the long isoform of the D2 receptor is preferentially able to activate Gi2 protein, whereas the short isoform could be more efficient for G protein activation in cells that do not express Gi2 (33). However, in MMQ cells, the significant modulations of D2 receptor splicing promoted by sex steroid hormones were not accompanied by detectable changes in receptor-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Obviously, this functional parameter does not recapitulate all the effects that dopamine D2 receptors can elicit in MMQ PRL cells. More importantly, the very low levels of D2 receptors and coupled G proteins that are detected in MMQ cells (13) do not allow easy detection of functional changes depending on D2 receptor splicing in this cell model.

Although this question remains to be more properly addressed, the regulation of D2 receptor mRNA splicing provides a mechanism of cross-talk between steroids and dopamine receptors. In cell systems such as PRL cells or olfactory regions of the brain, these interactions are clearly physiologically relevant. They should operate with changes in hormonal status that occur periodically in the animal’s life, when circulating hormones modulate dopamine transmission in neuronal and endocrine cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Lucy Kukstas-Vincent and Catherine Pasqualini for many helpful suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript, Sylvie Brailly for hormone assays, and Sophie Coudouel and Stéphane Père for their help with the experiments.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Paris XI, Institut Universitaire de France, the Direction de la Recherche des Etudes et Techniques (94-066), and European Economic Community Biomed 2 Grant CT96-0238. Back

Received March 12, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lledo PM, Homburger V, Bockaert J, Vincent J-D 1992 Differential G protein-mediated coupling of D2 dopamine receptors to K+ and Ca2+ currents in rat anterior pituitary cells. Neuron 8:455–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Lledo PM, Vernier P, Kukstas LA, Vincent J-D, Homburger V, Bockaert J 1994 Coupling of dopamine receptors to ionic channels in excitable tissues. In: Niznik HB (ed) Dopamine Receptors and Transporters. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 59–88
  3. Kobilka BK, Kobilka TS, Danil K, Regan JW, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1988 Chimeric {alpha}2-, ß2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. Science 240:1310–1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Giros B, Sokoloff P, Riou J-F, Emorine LJ, Schwartz J-C 1989 Alternative splicing directs the expression of two D2 dopamine receptor isoforms. Nature 342:923–926[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Dal Toso R, Sommer B, Ewert M, Herb A, Pritchett DB, Bach A, Shivers BD, Seeburg PH 1989 The dopamine D2 receptor: two molecular forms generated by alternative splicing. EMBO J 8:4025–4034[Medline]
  6. Strange P 1993 New insights into dopamine receptors in the central nervous system. Neurochem Int 22:223–236[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Vanhoutte PM, Humphrey PPA, Spedding M 1996 International union of pharmacology recommendations for nomenclature of new receptor subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 48:1–2[Medline]
  8. Montmayeur JP, Bausero P, Amlaiky N, Maroteaux L, Hen R, Borrelli E 1991 Differential expression of the mouse D2 dopamine receptor isoforms. FEBS Lett 278:239–243[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. O’Malley KL, Mack KJ, Gandelman K-Y, Todd RD 1990 Organization and expression of the rat D2A receptor gene: identification of alternative transcripts and a variant donor splice site. Biochemistry 29:1367–1371[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kukstas LA, Domec C, Bascles L, Bonnet J, Verrier D, Israel J-M, Vincent J-D 1991 Different expression of two dopaminergic D2 receptors, D2415 and D2444, in two types of lactotroph each characterised by their response to dopamine, and modification of expression by sex steroids. Endocrinology 129:1101–1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Guivarc’h D, Vernier P, Vincent J-D 1995 Sex steroid hormones change the differential distribution of the isoforms of the D2 dopamine receptor messenger RNA in the rat brain. Neuroscience 69:159–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Judd AM, Login IS, Kovacs K, Ross PC, Spangelo BL, Jarvis WD, MacLeod RM 1988 Characterization of the MMQ cell, a prolactin-secreting clonal cell line that is responsive to dopamine. Endocrinology 123:2341–2350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Forget H, Painson J-C, Drews RT, Lagacé G, Collu R 1993 MMQ cells: a model for evaluating the role of G proteins in the modulation of prolactin release. Mol Cell Endocrinol 93:125–133[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ventra C, Meucci O, Grimaldi M, Scorziello A, Porcellini A, Schettini G 1995 Absence of D-2S dopamine receptor in the prolactin-secreting MMQ pituitary clone: characterization of a wild D-2L receptor coupled to native transduction mechanisms. J Mol Endocrinol 14:375–389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Berthois Y, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS 1986 Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2496–2500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Van de Velde P, Nique F, Bouchoux F, Brémaud J, Hameau M-C, Lucas D, Moratille C, Viet S, Philiber D, Teutsch G 1994 RU 58668, a new pure antiestrogen inducing a regression of human mammary carcinoma implanted in nude mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:187–196[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Teutsch G, Goubet T, Battmann T, Bonfils A, Bouchoux F, Cerede E, Gofflo D, Gaillard-Kelly M, Philibert D 1994 Non-steroidal antiandrogens: synthesis and biological profile of high-affinity ligands for the androgen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:111–119[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  19. Valdenaire O, Vernier P, Maus M, Dumas Milne Edwards J-B, Mallet J 1994 Transcription of the rat dopamine-D2-receptor gene from two promoters. Eur J Biochem 220:577–584[Medline]
  20. Tzukerman M, Zhang X-K, Hermann T, Wills KN, Graupner G, Pfahl M 1990 The human estrogen receptor has transcriptional activator and repressor functions in the absence of ligand. New Biol 2:613–620[Medline]
  21. Kraus WL, Weis KE, Katzenellenbogen BS 1995 Inhibitory cross-talk between steroid hormone receptors: differential targeting of estrogen receptor in the repression of its transcriptional activity by agonist-and antagonist-occupied progestin receptors. Mol Cell Biol 15:1847–1857[Abstract]
  22. Balvay L, Libri D, Fiszman MY 1993 Pre-mRNA secondary structure and the regulation of the splicing. Bioessays 15:165–169[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Lamond AI 1993 The spliceosome. Bioessays 15:595–603[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. McKeown M 1992 Alternative mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Cell Biol 8:133–155[CrossRef]
  25. Ruskin B, Zamore PD, Green MR 1988 A factor, U2AF, is required for U2 snRNP binding and splicing complex assembly. Cell 52:207–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Chabot B 1996 Directing alternative splicing: cast and scenarios. Trends Genet 12:472–478[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Maniatis T 1991 Mechanisms of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Science 251:33–34[Free Full Text]
  28. Zahler AM, Neugebauer KM, Lane WS, Roth MB 1993 Distinct functions SR proteins in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Science 260:219–222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fu X-D, Mayeda M, Maniatis T, Krainer AR 1992 The general splicing factors SF2 and S35 have equivalent activities in vitro and both affect alternative splice site selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11224–11228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ge H, Manley JL 1990 A protein factor, ASF, controls cell specific alternative splicing of SV40 early pre-mRNA in vitro. Cell 62:25–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Smith CW, Patton JG, Nadal-Ginard B 1989) Alternative splicing in the control of gene expression. Annu Rev Genet 23:527–577
  32. Guiramand J, Montmayeur J-P, Ceraline J, Bhatia M, Borrelli E 1995 Alternative splicing of the dopamine D2 receptor directs specificity of coupling to G-proteins. J Biol Chem 270:7354–7358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Montmayeur J-P, Guiramand J, Borrelli E 1993 Preferential coupling between dopamine D2 receptors and G-proteins. Mol Endocrinol 7:161–170[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. V. Neto, E. d. O. Machado, R. M. Luque, G. F. Taboada, J. B. Marcondes, L. M. C. Chimelli, L. P. Quintella, P. Niemeyer Jr., D. P. de Carvalho, R. D. Kineman, et al.
Expression Analysis of Dopamine Receptor Subtypes in Normal Human Pituitaries, Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas and Somatotropinomas, and the Association between Dopamine and Somatostatin Receptors with Clinical Response to Octreotide-LAR in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1931 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao
Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Ben-Jonathan
Dopamine and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1: An Odd Couple in Growth Inhibition of the Lactotrophs
Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4177 - 4178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
H. Zhou, Y. Jiang, W. K W Ko, W. Li, and A. O L Wong
Paracrine regulation of growth hormone gene expression by gonadotrophin release in grass carp pituitary cells: functional implications, molecular mechanisms and signal transduction
J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 415 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
N. Y. Gevry, F. L. Lopes, S. Ledoux, and B. D. Murphy
Aberrant Intracellular Cholesterol Transport Disrupts Pituitary and Ovarian Function
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2004; 18(7): 1778 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. J. Gregory, J. Townsend, A. S. McNeilly, and D. J. Tortonese
Effects of Prolactin on the Luteinizing Hormone Response to Gonadotropin- Releasing Hormone in Primary Pituitary Cell Cultures During the Ovine Annual Reproductive Cycle
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1299 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Iaccarino, T. A. Samad, C. Mathis, H. Kercret, R. Picetti, and E. Borrelli
Control of lactotrop proliferation by dopamine: Essential role of signaling through D2 receptors and ERKs
PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14530 - 14535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. Fiorentini, N. Guerra, M. Facchetti, A. Finardi, L. Tiberio, L. Schiaffonati, P. Spano, and C. Missale
Nerve Growth Factor Regulates Dopamine D2 Receptor Expression in Prolactinoma Cell Lines via p75NGFR-Mediated Activation of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2002; 16(2): 353 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan and R. Hnasko
Dopamine as a Prolactin (PRL) Inhibitor
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 724 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Prou, W.-J. Gu, S. Le Crom, J.-D. Vincent, J. Salamero, and P. Vernier
Intracellular retention of the two isoforms of the D2 dopamine receptor promotes endoplasmic reticulum disruption
J. Cell Sci., January 10, 2001; 114(19): 3517 - 3527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Freeman, B. Kanyicska, A. Lerant, and G. Nagy
Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1523 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Pasqualini, D. Guivarc’h, Y. v. Boxberg, F. Nothias, J.-D. Vincent, and P. Vernier
Stage- and Region-Specific Expression of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Isoforms during Ontogeny of the Pituitary Gland
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2781 - 2789.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Hofmann, C. L. Lorson, S. Stamm, E. J. Androphy, and B. Wirth
Htra2-beta 1 stimulates an exonic splicing enhancer and can restore full-length SMN expression to survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2)
PNAS, August 15, 2000; 97(17): 9618 - 9623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. J. Davis, M. Gupta, S. M. Pogwizd, E. Bacha, V. Jeevanandam, and M. P. Gupta
Increased expression of alternatively spliced dominant-negative isoform of SRF in human failing hearts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): H1521 - H1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guivarc’h, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guivarc’h, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernier, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals