help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ling, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pipeleers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ling, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pipeleers, D.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 2 491-495
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Differential Expression of Rat Insulin I and II Messenger Ribonucleic Acid after Prolonged Exposure of Islet ß-Cells to Elevated Glucose Levels1

Zhidong Ling, Harry Heimberg, André Foriers, Frans Schuit and Daniel Pipeleers

Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. D. Pipeleers, Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Prolonged exposure of rat islet ß-cells to 10 mmol/liter glucose has been previously shown to activate more cells into a glucose-responsive state (>90%) than has exposure to 6 mmol/liter glucose (50%). The present study demonstrates that this recruitment of more activated cells results in 4- to 6-fold higher levels of proinsulin I and proinsulin II messenger RNA (mRNA). However, only the rate of proinsulin I synthesis is increased. Failure to increase the rate of proinsulin II synthesis in the glucose-activated cells results in cellular depletion of the insulin II isoform, which can be responsible for degranulation of ß-cells cultured at 10 mmol/liter glucose. Higher glucose levels (20 mmol/liter) during culture did not correct this dissociation between the stimulated insulin I formation and the nonstimulated insulin II formation. On the contrary, the rise from 10 to 20 mmol/liter glucose resulted in a 2-fold reduction in the levels of proinsulin II mRNA, but not of proinsulin I mRNA; this process further increased the ratio of insulin I over insulin II to 5-fold higher values than those in freshly isolated ß-cells. The present data suggest that an elevated insulin I over insulin II ratio in pancreatic tissue is a marker for a prolonged exposure to elevated glucose levels. The increased ratio in this condition results from a transcriptional and/or a posttranscriptional failure in elevating insulin II formation while insulin I production is stimulated in the glucose-activated ß-cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BOTH ACUTE and chronic elevations in the glucose concentration stimulate the rate of insulin biosynthesis. Acute stimulation is achieved at the translational level (1), whereas the chronic effect enhances the formation and/or stability of preproinsulin messenger RNA (mRNA) (2, 3, 4). Rodent ß-cells synthesize two different insulins that are encoded by two nonallelic genes with more than 90% homology (5, 6, 7, 8). The primary translation products, preproinsulin I and II, differ by three amino acids in the preregion, two in the C peptides, and two in the B chain (6, 8). The conversion products insulin I and II are usually stored in unequal amounts. The ratio of the cellular contents in insulin I over insulin II fluctuates between 1 and 2 in a basal fed or fasting state, but increases 2- to 4-fold during pregnancy, excessive GH secretion, or chronic hyperglycemia (5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). This variation was taken as evidence for an independent regulation of the two genes, whereby the insulin I gene is preferentially expressed under stimulatory conditions (10). The use of purified rat ß-cells allowed us to assess their direct acute and chronic regulation by glucose without interference of other cell types that can influence the glucose response of islet ß-cells in vitro (15). It was thus shown that the glucose concentration in the culture medium dose-dependently increases the percentage of islet ß-cells that are glucose responsive (16); when the cells were chronically exposed to excessively high glucose levels (20 mmol/liter), they reached a sustained state of activation, during which they exhibited a glucose hypersensitivity rather than a glucose toxicity or glucose desensitization (16). In the present study, we have examined whether these in vitro conditions of stimulation also lead to an increased ratio of the cellular insulin I over insulin II content and whether this results from differences at the transcriptional or translational level; the results may indicate cellular markers for the state of activation in the ß-cell population.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation and culture of purified B cells
Pancreatic islets were isolated from adult Wistar rats and dissociated into single cells using calcium-free medium supplemented with trypsin and deoxyribonuclease (17). Purified ß-cells were collected after autofluorescence-activated sorting of dissociated cells (17). Single ß-cells were reaggregated for 3 h in a rotatory shaking incubator (37 C; Braun, Melsugen, Germany) (15) and then statically cultured for 9 days (37 C; 95% air/5% CO2) in serum-free Ham’s F-10 medium at 6, 10, or 20 mmol/liter glucose (16). Media were recovered on days 5 and 9 and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC.

Pulse-chase labeling
After 9 days of culture, ß-cell aggregates were collected from the petri dishes and washed in Earle’s HEPES medium (EH; composition given in Ref.16). In the first series of experiments, 5 x 104 cells were labeled for 2 h with L-[3,5-3H]tyrosine (TRK 200, Amersham, Aylesbury, UK; 50 Ci/mmol/liter) in 200 µl EH supplemented with 10 mmol/liter glucose and 1% (wt/vol) BSA (fraction V, RIA grade, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) (18). Under this condition, insulin synthesis is maximally stimulated by glucose (16). At the end of this incubation, the cells were washed in EH with 1 mmol/liter tyrosine and then extracted in 1 ml acetic acid (2 mol containing 0.25% BSA) (18). In the second series of experiments, 105 cells were labeled for 20 min at 5 or 20 mmol/liter glucose using 50 µCi L-[3,5-3H]tyrosine (TRK 200, Amersham; 50 Ci/mmol/liter) alone or in combination with 50 µCi [35S]methionine (Amersham; >1000 Ci/mmol/liter). At the end of this 20-min incubation, the cells were washed in medium with 1 mmol/liter tyrosine and 1 mmol/liter methionine. One sample (5 x 104 cells) was taken for extraction in 2 M acetic acid-0.25% BSA, and the rest (5 x 104 cells) was further incubated for 150 min in 200 µl medium with 1 mmol/liter tyrosine and 2.5 mmol/liter glucose (chase). At the end of this chase period, cells and medium were collected and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC.

Reverse phase HPLC
Cell extracts and media were injected into a Millipore Waters HPLC system (Millipore Waters, Milford, MA) consisting of a µBondapack C18 column (30 x 0.46 cm; 10 µm). The mobile phase was buffer-acetonitrile (70.6:29.4, vol/vol) with 0.1 M phosphoric acid and 0.05 M ethanolamine as buffer, pH 2.3. Twenty minutes after injection, the acetonitrile concentration was linearly increased from 29.4% to 32.4% over 15 min and then kept constant at 32.4% for the last 15 min of the run. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Samples of 200 µl were counted in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman, Palo Alto, CA); another 200 µl of sample were assayed for insulin (17).

Figure 1Go shows a representative HPLC elution profile of a ß-cell extract after 2-h labeling with [3H]tyrosine. The three major radioactive peaks were immunoprecipitable with antiinsulin serum. The first two peaks contained the majority of the cellular hormone as detected by RIA (Fig. 1Go). When the cells were pulse labeled for 20 min with [3H]tyrosine and [35S]methionine, which is not incorporated in insulin I, all radioactivity eluted in the third peak (data not shown), suggesting that the latter contains both proinsulin I and proinsulin II. After a 150-min chase period, the 3H radioactivity was recovered in both the first and the second peaks, whereas 35S radioactivity was only measured in the second peak (data not shown), indicating that insulin I elutes in the first peak, and insulin II elutes in the second. An insulin standard was recovered for more than 90% in the eluate.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. RP-HPLC elution profile of newly synthesized proteins (top) and insulin immunoreactivity (bottom) in extracts of rat ß-cells after 2-h incubation at 10 mmol/liter glucose with [3H]tyrosine. No insulin immunoreactivity was detectable in the RIA of the proinsulin peak, as this fraction contains only 2% of the total cellular insulin content, and only 20% of proinsulin is picked by the present insulin assay.

 
Analysis of mRNA in ß-cells
Insulin II complementary DNA (cDNA) was provided in a pGEM vector (19), whereas insulin I cDNA was subcloned in this vector. Insulin I and insulin II sense strand RNAs were in vitro transcribed starting from the T7 promoter after linearization of the construct with HindIII. Run-off transcripts were blotted and hybridized with 5'-radiolabeled oligonucleotides. The sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes were complementary to the sequence of codon 17–23, numbered according to the start codon: insulin I, 5'-GGGCAGGCTTGGGCTCCC; and insulin II, 5'-GGGCAGGGCG-GGGCTCCC (6). Specific hybridization was achieved by overnight incubation at 50 C in the presence of 4.5 x 106 µCi/µg probe (0.13 x 10-12 µg probe/ml) and stringent washing in 3 M tetramethylammoniumchloride for 30 min at 57.5 C (Fig. 2Go). RNA was extracted and blotted as previously described (20), and membranes were probed for insulin I and insulin II. During the insulin I hybridization, a membrane strip containing islet RNA was reprobed with insulin II to directly compare signal intensities from the subsequent hybridizations. Signal intensities on autoradiographs were measured on an Ultroscan XL densitometer (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Data were derived from the integrated area under the curve and related to the signals of ß-actin.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Dot blot of insulin I and II cDNA and RNA. Plasmid DNA of pGEM1-insulin I and pGEM1-insulin II as well as run-on transcripts from these plasmids were dot-blotted on a nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P-radiolabeled sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes as described in Materials and Methods.

 
Data expression
Results were expressed as the mean ± SEM, and statistical significance of differences was calculated by ANOVA and Student’s t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Insulin I and insulin II contents in rat ß-cells
In freshly isolated rat ß-cells, 57% of insulin was identified as insulin I, and 43% was identified as insulin II, leading to a ratio of 1.4 (Table 1Go). Culture increased this ratio with 5-fold higher values when the medium contained 20 mmol/liter glucose (Table 1Go). For each of the tested glucose concentrations, the insulin content of cultured cells was lower than that of freshly isolated cells (Table 1Go). The decrease occurred to a greater extent for insulin II than for insulin I. After culture with 20 mmol/liter glucose, the cellular insulin I and insulin II contents were, respectively, 3- and 16-fold lower than those in freshly isolated cells (Table 1Go). The medium that was collected during the culture period contained both insulin I and II in a ratio (1.9) not significantly different from that in freshly isolated cells, indicating that the higher ratio in 20 mmol/liter cultured cells is not the result of a preferential release of insulin II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Insulin I and insulin II contents of cultured ß-cells

 
Biosynthesis of insulin I and insulin II by cultured ß-cells
At the end of the 9-day culture period, ß-cells cultured at 10 or 20 mmol/liter glucose exhibited 2- to 3-fold higher maximal rates of proinsulin synthesis than 6 mmol/liter cultured cells, but their rates of proinsulin conversion were comparable (Table 2Go). This higher biosynthetic activity at maximal glucose stimulation was restricted to the production of insulin I, leading to a higher ratio of newly formed insulin I over insulin II (Table 2Go). After culture at 20 mmol/liter glucose, the capacity for insulin II production was comparable to that after culture at 6 mmol/liter glucose (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Insulin I and insulin II biosynthesis in cultured ß-cells

 
Pulse labeling with [35S]methionine, which is only incorporated in proinsulin II, indicated that the cells cultured in 20 mmol/liter glucose did not exhibit a higher rate of proinsulin II synthesis than those cultured in 6 mmol/liter glucose at either intermediate (5 mmol/liter) or maximal (20 mmol/liter) glucose stimulation (Fig. 3Go). On the other hand, their total proinsulin synthesis, as expressed by [3H]tyrosine labeling, was markedly higher at both glucose concentrations (Fig. 3Go); these higher rates are thus entirely attributable to a higher production of proinsulin I.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Reverse phase HPLC elution profiles of ß-cell extracts prepared after 9-day culture with 6 or 20 mmol/liter glucose and after a 20-min incubation with [3H]tyrosine and [35S]methionine at 5 mmol/liter (solid line) or 20 mmol/liter glucose (dotted line). The respective 3H and 35S radioactivities are plotted on the top (PROINS. I+II) and bottom (PROINS. II).

 
A pulse-chase experiment makes it unlikely that the dissociation between the higher insulin I production and the unaffected insulin II production (Table 2Go) was caused by a delay in proinsulin II conversion. After 20-min pulse labeling at 20 mmol/liter glucose, ß-cells were chased for 150 min at 2.5 mmol/liter glucose. In both 6 and 20 mmol/liter cultured cells, all newly formed proinsulin was converted at the end of the chase period. The ratio of newly formed insulin I over insulin II was again more than 2-fold higher in the cells cultured at 20 mmol/liter glucose (data not shown).

Relative amounts of insulin I and insulin II mRNA in cultured ß-cells
After culture at 10 or 20 mmol/liter glucose, 2-fold higher amounts of RNA were extracted from the cells than at 6 mmol/liter glucose (data not shown). From similar amounts of RNA, the three preparations were then compared for their relative abundance in insulin I and insulin II mRNA, using ß-actin mRNA as an internal standard. In cells cultured in 10 and 20 mmol/liter glucose, the signal intensity of proinsulin I mRNA was 2- to 3-fold higher than that in cells cultured in 6 mmol/liter glucose. As these preparations were analyzed at a 2-fold higher dilution than the 6 mmol/liter cultured cells, it is concluded that they contain 4- or 6-fold more proinsulin I mRNA than the 6 mmol/liter cultured cells. The signal for proinsulin II mRNA was also 2-fold higher in 10 mmol/liter glucose cultured cells than in 20 mmol/liter cultured cells (Fig. 4Go). These data result in a ratio of proinsulin I mRNA over proinsulin II mRNA that is comparable in 6 and 10 mmol/liter cultured ß-cells (~1), but 3-fold elevated in 20 mmol/liter cultured cells.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Analysis of mRNA from ß-cells cultured for 9 days in 6, 10, or 20 mmol/liter glucose. Blots were hybridized with oligonucleotide probes specific for insulin I or insulin II as well as with a cDNA probe specific for ß-actin. Blots shown on top are representative for three independent experiments. The intensity of the autoradiographic signals was scanned on a laser densitometer and normalized for ß-actin mRNA. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three independent measurements and are expressed as a function of the values measured in cells cultured with 6 mmol/liter glucose.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vitro studies of purified ß-cells have indicated that the glucose levels to which ß-cells are chronically exposed determine the percentage of cells that can rapidly respond to acute variations in glucose concentration (16). Culture at 10 mmol/liter glucose recruits virtually all rat ß-cells to such a responsive state (16). Total glucose-induced insulin synthesis thus becomes 2- to 3-fold higher than that in ß-cell preparations that are cultured at 6 mmol/liter glucose, a condition that activates only 50% of the cells (15). Activation of more ß-cells also leads to a 4- to 6-fold higher content in proinsulin mRNA, which reflects the response of a greater number of cells to the well known stimulatory effects of glucose on proinsulin mRNA formation (2, 3, 4, 21, 22, 23, 24). The degree of stimulation was comparable for both proinsulin isoforms. However, despite this rise in the level of mRNA for both isoforms, only insulin I was synthesized at higher rates; the formation of insulin II occurred at similar rates in cells cultured in 10 and 6 mmol/liter glucose. Failure to increase the rate of insulin II synthesis to the same extent as that of insulin I explains the difference in isoform content between cultured and freshly isolated ß-cells. We have previously observed that culture at 10 mmol/liter glucose reduces the cellular insulin content by 40–50% compared with that of freshly isolated cells (16). It now appears that this reduction is almost entirely due to a decrease in the cellular insulin II content, probably as a result of a failure of the glucose-activated cells to increase insulin II formation during culture. Analysis of the insulin isoforms in the culture medium excluded that preferential release of insulin II was responsible for the disproportionally low cellular insulin II content. We have not studied whether higher degradation of insulin II accounts in part for its lower cellular content.

When the rat ß-cells were chronically exposed to excessively high glucose levels (20 mmol/liter), their proinsulin mRNA levels were also markedly higher than after culture in 6 mmol/liter glucose, but this effect was less pronounced for the proinsulin II isoform. The content of proinsulin I mRNA was comparable to that in cells cultured in 10 mmol/liter glucose, suggesting that it reflects the number of activated cells, which in both culture conditions was nearly 100% (16). On the other hand, the cellular content of proinsulin II mRNA was 2- to 3-fold lower than that after 10 mmol/liter glucose culture, indicating that culture with 20 mmol/liter glucose was associated with an inhibitory effect at the level of proinsulin II mRNA formation or with decreased mRNA stability. The ratio of newly synthesized insulin I over insulin II was more than 2-fold higher than that after 6 mmol/liter glucose culture. This explains the higher ratio of insulin I over insulin II in the cellular hormone store. This store is markedly decreased after culture at 20 mmol/liter glucose, during which the rates of hormone synthesis are inadequate to compensate for its increased release rates (18); furthermore, as shown by the present data, the 20 mmol/liter glucose-cultured cells failed to raise the rates of insulin II synthesis as they did for insulin I synthesis, leading to near depletion of the cellular insulin II store (>15-fold lower than that in freshly isolated ß-cells).

A previous study had shown that chronically elevated glucose levels impaired insulin gene transcription in the HIT-T15 ß cell line (25). The present work demonstrates that this culture condition inhibits the expression of insulin II in normal rat ß-cells at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. It is not yet known whether it also influences the rates of intracellular degradation of one or both insulin isoforms (12). Although a chronic excess of intracellular glucose might be responsible for processes that suppress the expression of insulin II, it is conceivable that the elevated extracellular insulin levels that occur in this condition have caused this inhibitory effect, as they also suppress other ß-cell functions (26, 27).

The present findings indicate that shifts in the functional heterogeneity of the rat ß-cell population will also influence the absolute amounts of proinsulin mRNA. A prolonged glucose stimulation keeps an increased percentage of ß-cells in an activated state, even during subsequent culture at reduced glucose levels (6 mmol/liter for up to 24 h; our unpublished observations). This phenomenon is responsible for a higher total transcriptional activity, in particular for glucose-inducible genes such as preproinsulin I and II. This higher mRNA content for both hormone isoforms is associated with an increased production of insulin I, but not of insulin II. Activation of more cells is thus responsible for more hormone synthesis, but only of the insulin I isoform. Exposure to excessively high glucose levels does not eliminate this dissociation; in fact, it results in statistically significant increases in the ratio of insulin I over insulin II in terms of both their respective mRNA content as well as their peptide content. It can be concluded that rat ß-cells exhibit a differential regulation of the biosynthesis of two insulin isoforms at the level of both transcription and translation. This differential regulation became apparent during prolonged in vitro stimulation by glucose, leading to an increased ratio of insulin I over insulin II content at excessively high glucose levels. The degree to which this duality is expressed may vary with other regulatory factors. It is, therefore, conceivable that prolonged exposure to high glucose leads to different ratios of insulin I over insulin II content in purified ß-cells compared with those in isolated islets and/or intact pancreatic tissue. However, similar variations in the pancreatic content of both isoforms were observed after prolonged in vivo activation of the ß-cell population (9, 10); the present in vitro observations may thus be representative of conditions of sustained ß-cell stimulation rather than of a glucose-specific effect. According to the present data, the dissociation between insulin I and insulin II is the result of an impaired stimulation of insulin II production rather than a preferential stimulation of insulin I synthesis. It has yet to be examined whether chronically activated ß-cells become resistant to the stimulatory effects of glucose on proinsulin II gene transcription and/or translation.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Erik Quartier for expert technical assistance, and Nadine Van Slycke for secretarial support.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (3.0057.94 and G3.3132.91), the Flemish Community (Concert Action, GOA 92/97–1807), and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International. Back

Received August 18, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Itoh N, Okamoto H 1980 Translational control of proinsulin synthesis by glucose. Nature 283:100–102[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Giddings SJ, Chirgwin J, Permutt MA 1982 Effect of glucose on proinsulin messenger RNA in rats in vivo. Diabetes 31:624–629[Abstract]
  3. Nielsen DA, Welsh M, Casadaban MJ, Steiner DF 1985 Control of insulin gene expression in pancreatic ß-cells and in an insulin-producing cell line, RIN-5F cells. I. Effects of glucose and cyclic AMP on the transcription of insulin mRNA. J Biol Chem 260:13585–13589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Welsh M, Nielsen DA, Mackrell AJ, Steiner DF 1985 Control of insulin gene expression in pancreatic ß-cells and in an insulin-producing cell line, RIN-5F cells. II. Regulation of insulin mRNA stability. J Biol Chem 260:13590–13594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Clark JL, Steiner DF 1969 Insulin biosynthesis in the rat: demonstration of two proinsulins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 62:278–285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lomedico P, Rosenthal N, Efstratiadis A, Gilbert W, Kolodner R, Tizard R 1979 The structure and evolution of the two nonallelic rat prepraoinsulin genes. Cell 18:545–558[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ullrich A, Shine J, Chirgwin J, Pictet R, Tischer E, Rutter WJ, Goodman HM 1978 Rat insulin genes: construction of plasmids containing the coding sequences. Science 196:1313–1319
  8. Villa-Komaroff L, Efstratiadis A, Broome S, Lomedico P, Tizard R, Naber SP, Chick WL, Gilbert W 1978 A bacterial clone synthesizing proinsulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3727–3731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kakita K, O’Connell K, Permutt MA 1982 Pancreatic content of insulins I and II in laboratory rodents. Analysis by immunoelectrphoresis. Diabetes 31:841–845[Medline]
  10. Kakita K, Giddings S, Permutt MA 1982 Biosynthesis of rat insulin I and II: evidence for differential expression of the two genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2803–2807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gishizky ML, Grodsky GM 1987 Differential kinetics of rat insulin I and II processing in rat islets of Langerhans. FEBS Lett 223:227–231[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rhodes CJ, Halban PA 1988 The intracellular handling of insulin-related peptides in isolated pancreatic islets. Evidence for differential rates of degradation of insulin and C-peptides. Biochem J 251:23–30[Medline]
  13. Wang SY, Rowe JW 1988 Age-related impairment in the short-term regulation of insulin biosynthesis by glucose in rat pancreatic islets. Endocrinology 123:1008[Abstract]
  14. Rhodes CJ, Lucas CA, Halban PA 1987 Glucose stimulates the biosynthesis of rat I and II insulin to an equal extent in isolated pancreatic islets. FEBS Lett 215:179–182[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Pipeleers DG, Schuit FC, In’t Veld PA, Maes E, Hooghe-Peters E, Van De Winkel M, Gepts W 1985 Interplay of nutrients and hormones in the regulation of insulin release. Endocrinology 117:824–833[Abstract]
  16. Ling Z, Kiekens R, Mahler T, Schuit FC, Pipeleers-Marichal M, Sener A, Klöppel G, Malaisse WJ, Pipeleers DG 1996 Effects of chronicaly elevated glucose levels on the functional properties of rat pancreatic beta cells. Diabetes 45:1774–1782[Abstract]
  17. Pipeleers DG, In’t Veld PA, Van De Winkel M, Maes E, Schuit FC, Gepts W 1985 A new in vitro model for the study of pancreatic A and ß cells. Endocrinology 117:806–816[Abstract]
  18. Schuit FC, Kiekens R, Pipeleers DG 1991 Measuring the balance between insulin synthesis and insulin release. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 178:1182–1187[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Giddings SJ, Carnaghi L 1989 Rat insulin II gene expressin by extraplacental membranes. A non-pancreatic source for fetal insulin. J Biol Chem 264:9462–9469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Heimberg H, De Vos A, Vandercammen A, Van Schaftingen E, Pipeleers D, Schuit F 1993 Heterogeneity in glucose sensitivity among pancreatic ß-cells is correlated to differences in glucose phosphorylation rather than glucose transport. EMBO J 12:2873–2879[Medline]
  21. German MS, Moss LG, Rutter WJ 1990 Regulation of insulin gene expression by glucose and calcium in transfected primary islet cultures. J Biol Chem 265:22063–22066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Efrat S, Surana M, Fleischer N 1991 Glucose induces insulin gene transcription in a murine pancreatic ß-cell line. J Biol Chem 266:11141–11143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. German MS, Wang J 1994 The insulin gene contains multiple transcriptional elements that respond to glucose. Mol. Cell Biol 14:4067–4075
  24. Melloul D, Cerasi E 1994 Transcription of the insulin gene: towards defining the glucose sensitive cis-element and trans-acting factors. Diabetologia [Suppl 2] 37:S3–10
  25. Robertson RP, Olson LK, Zhang HJ 1994 Differentiating glucose toxicity from glucose desensitization: a new message from the insulin gene. Diabetes 43:1085–1089[Abstract]
  26. Van Schravendijk C, Heylen L, Van den Brande JL, Pipeleers D 1990 Direct effect of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I on the secretory activity of rat pancreatic Beta cells. Diabetologia 33:649–653[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Koranyi L, James DE, Kraegen EW, Permutt MA 1992 Feedback inhibition of insulin gene expression by insulin. J Clin Invest 89:432–436



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
L. Van Lommel, K. Janssens, R. Quintens, K. Tsukamoto, D. Vander Mierde, K. Lemaire, C. Denef, J.-C. Jonas, G. Martens, D. Pipeleers, et al.
Probe-Independent and Direct Quantification of Insulin mRNA and Growth Hormone mRNA in Enriched Cell Preparations
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3214 - 3220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
F. Schuit, D. Flamez, A. De Vos, and D. Pipeleers
Glucose-Regulated Gene Expression Maintaining the Glucose-Responsive State of {beta}-Cells
Diabetes, December 1, 2002; 51(90003): S326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. Ritz-Laser, P. Meda, I. Constant, N. Klages, A. Charollais, A. Morales, C. Magnan, A. Ktorza, and J. Philippe
Glucose-Induced Preproinsulin Gene Expression Is Inhibited by the Free Fatty Acid Palmitate
Endocrinology, September 1, 1999; 140(9): 4005 - 4014.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ling, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pipeleers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ling, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pipeleers, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals