help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, P. G.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 3 1164-1171
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Differential Changes in Inhibin A, Activin A, and Total {alpha}-Subunit Levels in Granulosa and Thecal Layers of Developing Preovulatory Follicles in the Chicken1

T. M. Lovell, R. T. Gladwell, F. J. Cunningham, N. P. Groome and P. G. Knight

School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading (T.M.L., R.T.G., F.J.C., P.G.K.), Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom RG6 6AJ; and the School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University (N.P.G.), Oxford, United Kingdom OX3 OBP

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. P. G. Knight, School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom RG6 6AJ.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Accumulating evidence implicates inhibins and activins as endocrine and local regulators of follicular development in mammals, and it was recently confirmed that inhibin/activin {alpha} and ßA genes are also expressed in the avian ovary. To investigate the potential involvement of these proteins in the chicken ovary, thecal and granulosa layers of the four largest follicles (F1–F4) and the most recent post-ovulatory follicle were collected from hens (10/group) killed 4, 12, and 20 h before the expected time of F1 ovulation. Inhibin A and activin A concentrations of tissue extracts (expressed per mg DNA) were measured using validated two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; total immunoreactive inhibin {alpha}-subunit (ir-{alpha}) was also measured by heterologous RIA (Monash assay). Inhibin A and ir-{alpha} were largely confined to the granulosa layer, whereas activin A was much more abundant in the thecal layer. Granulosa inhibin A contents were similar in F4 and F3, but increased approximately 40-fold from F3–F1 (P < 0.0001). As such, the F1 granulosa layer was by far the richest source of inhibin A in the chicken ovary, but contained very little activin A. Total ir-{alpha} in granulosa was much more abundant than inhibin A and increased only 3-fold from F4–F1 (P < 0.001). Activin A in both granulosa and theca showed little variation between F1 and F4 follicles (by ANOVA, P > 0.05). The inhibin A content of F1 granulosa was maximal 12 h before ovulation and had fallen approximately 6-fold (P < 0.0001) within 8 h, suggesting an inhibitory effect of the preovulatory LH surge on the F1 capacity to synthesize inhibin A. Inhibin A, activin A, and ir-{alpha} were all less in the postovulatory follicle compared with F1 before ovulation (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, application of the present two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to the chicken ovary revealed 1) divergent tissue distribution of inhibin A and activin A within preovulatory follicles, and 2) differential regulation of granulosa cell production of inhibin A and activin A dimers during preovulatory follicular development. These findings of dynamic changes in inhibin A, activin A, and total ir-{alpha} support the hypothesis that these proteins subserve regulatory roles during preovulatory follicular development in the hen.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE FUNCTIONAL left ovary of the laying hen contains six to nine large yolk-filled follicles (F1–F9) arranged in a distinct size hierarchy. Ovulation of the largest (F1) follicle occurs at intervals of 24–28 h; after ovulation, succeeding follicles each move up one place in the hierarchy, and an additional follicle is recruited from the population of small white follicles. Characteristically, once follicles are committed to the rapidly growing preovulatory hierarchy, the incidence of atresia is very low (1, 2). The ovulated egg spends approximately 24 h in the reproductive tract before oviposition, and the well established relationship between oviposition and ovulation allows the time of ovulation to be precisely determined by recording oviposition times (3). The ordered progression of follicles through the hierarchy allows their stages of development to be identified with a considerable degree of precision, conferring a distinct advantage over comparable follicular maturation studies in mammals.

Inhibins and activins are dimeric glycoproteins first identified in gonadal fluids of pigs and cows from their ability to suppress (inhibin) or stimulate (activin) pituitary FSH secretion (4, 5). Both molecules have also been implicated as local autocrine/paracrine regulators of folliculogenesis in several mammalian species (6, 7, 8). Two isoforms of inhibin (A and B) and three isoforms of activin (A, B, and AB) are expressed in the ovaries of most mammalian species examined. Inhibins A and B consist of a common {alpha}-subunit linked through a disulfide bond(s) to one of two alternate ß-subunits, termed ßA and ßB, respectively. Activins A, B, and AB are disulfide-linked dimers of two inhibin ß-subunits (ßAßA, ßBßB, and ßAßB dimers, respectively) (4). Recently, the genes for inhibin {alpha}-subunit (9) and inhibin/activin ßA-subunit (10) have been cloned in the chicken, and Northern blot hybridization has revealed differential expression of {alpha}- and ßA-subunit messenger RNAs (mRNAs) during preovulatory follicle development (11).

In the hen, as in mammals, the ovary is the primary source of immunoreactive (ir) inhibin (12). Experiments in laying hens involving selective follicle removal have shown that preovulatory follicles are the major source of ir-inhibin in the ovary (13, 14). Removal of such follicles leads to a rise in plasma FSH levels, suggesting a possible endocrine role of inhibin in FSH regulation in the chicken (13). However, caution is necessary in interpreting published data on ir-inhibin in both chicken and mammalian species, as it is now generally accepted that the inhibin RIAs used in the majority of these studies have limited specificity (15, 16, 17). This is due to the fact that they cross-react extensively with free {alpha}-subunit forms that are synthesized in excess by granulosa cells and have been identified in follicular fluid and peripheral blood (15, 16, 18). Quantitation of inhibin/activin subunit mRNAs (11) is a valuable approach but does not reveal the extent to which the respective gene products are assembled into inhibin or activin dimers or remain as {alpha}- and ß-subunit monomers.

In the last few years, several groups have developed sensitive and specific two-site immunometric assays for the measurement of different isoforms of inhibin (19, 20, 21, 22, 23) and activin (24, 25). The inhibin A and activin A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed in our laboratories were designed for use in mammalian species, particularly human. However, given the considerable homology between chicken and mammal in the regions of the {alpha}- and ßA-subunits targeted by the R1 (human {alpha}C1–26) and E4 (human ßA82–114) antibodies used in these assays, we considered it likely that they would also be applicable to the chicken and thereby provide a means of investigating the potential roles of inhibin A and activin A during follicular maturation in this species.

In this study we report the validation and application of these two-site ELISAs for the measurement of inhibin A and activin A in chicken ovary. To investigate the potential involvement of these proteins in preovulatory follicular development and to discover their regional distribution within the ovary, thecal and granulosa layers of the four largest follicles (F1–F4) and the most recent postovulatory follicle (POF) were collected at known times during the ovulatory cycle and assayed for inhibin A and activin A. To facilitate comparison with previous published data on ir-inhibin in the chicken ovary (12, 13, 14, 26, 27, 28, 29), samples were also assayed using the conventional {alpha}-subunit directed inhibin RIA (26) used in these earlier studies.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental animals
Laying hens (ISA Brown) toward the end of their first year of laying were caged individually and maintained under a standard photoschedule of 16 h of light, 8 h of darkness, with food and water freely available. Ovipositions were recorded at 30-min intervals for hens showing regular sequences of more than six eggs per clutch and used to predict the timing of ovulation.

Experimental design
Hens (n = 10/group) were killed by cervical dislocation 4, 12, or 20 h before the expected time of ovulation of a midsequence egg. The four largest preovulatory follicles (F1–F4) of the ovarian hierarchy were removed, and thecal and granulosa layers were separated (30), washed in saline [0.75% (wt/vol) NaCl], and frozen at -20 C. The most recent POF was also removed and frozen at -20 C. Granulosa tissue samples were homogenized on ice in 0.5 ml buffer A [PBS containing 1% (wt/vol) BSA and 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium azide] using an Ultra-Turrax T8 homogenizer (IKA, Staufen, Germany). Homogenates were centrifuged at 3500 x g for 15 min, and the supernatant was stored at -20 C until further analysis. Thecal and POF tissue samples were homogenized similarly in 2.0 ml buffer A. A 20-µl aliquot of each granulosa and thecal homogenate was removed before centrifugation for DNA estimation using the fluorometric assay described by Labarca and Paigen (31). Extract supernatants were subsequently assayed for inhibin A, activin A, and total {alpha}-subunit, and results were expressed on a per mg DNA basis.

Tissue samples for assay validation
Samples of granulosa and thecal tissue from F1–F4 follicles were obtained at random times during the ovulatory cycle and prepared as described above. Pooled tissue extracts were prepared and used for assay validation tests. These included parallelism tests and recovery experiments in which known amounts of inhibin A and activin A were added to aliquots of homogenized samples before the centrifugation step. In addition, on several occasions tissue pellets remaining after centrifugation of nonspiked tissue homogenates were resuspended in fresh extraction buffer and subjected to a secondary extraction. The amounts of inhibin A and activin A detected in these secondary extracts represented only 3–8% of the corresponding amounts detected in primary extracts, indicating that the routine extraction procedure used was relatively efficient. For assay, extracts were diluted with sample buffer A as follows: inhibin A assay: 1:2 to 1:128 for granulosa, undiluted to 1:4 for theca; and activin A assay: undiluted to 1:16 for theca and undiluted to 1:2 for granulosa.

Immunoassays
Inhibin A and activin A were determined using recently developed two-site ELISAs that employ monoclonal antibodies raised against synthetic peptide fragments of the human {alpha}- and ßA-subunits (21, 24). Both assays were validated for use in the domestic fowl as described in Results. Total {alpha}-subunit levels were measured using a heterologous RIA employing a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against purified bovine inhibin (32) that has been validated previously for use in the domestic fowl (26). Recombinant human activin A and 32-kDa bovine inhibin A were used as assay standards. Activin A was generously provided by Genentech (San Francisco, CA), and 32-kDa bovine inhibin was isolated from bovine follicular fluid in this laboratory as reported previously (33). The detection limit of the activin A ELISA was 10 pg/well. The same 32-kDa bovine inhibin preparation was used as the standard in the inhibin A ELISA and total {alpha} RIA, and respective detection limits were 3 pg/well and 100 pg/tube.

Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) gel permeation chromatography
Granulosa layers from the F1 follicle were obtained at random times during the hen ovulatory cycle, and a tissue extract was prepared as described above (n = 20 pooled granulosa layers). A sample (100 µl) was applied to a FPLC column (Superose 12, Pharmacia, Milton Keynes, UK) that was equilibrated and eluted with PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% (wt/vol) Polypep (Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, Dorset, UK) and 0.05% (wt/vol) sodium azide at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Eluant was collected in 0.5-ml fractions for inhibin A ELISA, and total {alpha} RIA. To calibrate the column the retention times of the following marker proteins were determined: {alpha}2-macroglobulin (void volume), 750 kDa; apoferritin, 450 kDa; alcohol dehydrogenase, 150 kDa; BSA, 66 kDa; and recombinant human activin, 25 kDa.

Statistical analysis
Confirmation of parallelism between assay standard and test sample dilution curves was made using linear regression analysis of transformed data. The log-log transformation was used to linearize the ELISA dose-response curves. Comparison of the slopes (±95% confidence intervals) of the regression lines for standards and test samples indicated no significant departure from parallelism. This analysis was not possible in the case of activin A levels in the granulosa because only the first two dilutions of each gave responses above the detection limit. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the recovery experiment data. One-way ANOVA of log-transformed data was used in conjunction with post-hoc Fisher’s protected least significant difference (PLSD) test to determine whether concentrations of inhibin A, activin A and total {alpha} subunit differed between different follicle groups. Post-hoc tests were only performed when the ANOVA yielded a significant F ratio. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Unless stated otherwise, values are the mean ± SEM


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Validation of inhibin A and activin A assays for ovary extracts
Serial dilutions of pooled thecal and granulosa samples gave response curves in both inhibin A and activin A ELISAs that were parallel to the respective standard curve (Fig. 1Go, a and b). The recovery (y) of known amounts of exogenous inhibin A standard (x) added to representative tissue homogenates before centrifugation was linear and was described by the following regression equations: y = 0.93x - 0.15 (r = 0.999; n = 6) for granulosa homogenates and y = 0.93x + 1.26 (r = 0.987; n = 6) for thecal homogenates. Similarly, the recovery (x) of known amounts of activin A standard (y) was linear and was described by the following regression equations: y = 1.02x + 1.07 (r = 0.999; n = 6) for granulosa homogenates and y = 0.94x + 3.65 (r = 0.994; n = 6) for thecal homogenates. Additional recovery tests were performed in which known amounts of inhibin A and activin A standard were spiked into randomly selected extracts after centrifugation. The mean recovery of inhibin A was 98.3 ± 1.7% for granulosa (n = 8) and 100.7 ± 1.9% for theca (n = 8). Activin A recovery values were 100.3 ± 2.0 for granulosa (n = 8) and 101.8 ± 2.0% for theca (n = 8). The cross-reactivities of a range of related substances in the inhibin A and activin A ELISA have been reported previously (21, 24) and were shown to be acceptably low. In particular, bovine free {alpha}-subunit showed minimal (<0.3%) cross-reaction in the inhibin A ELISA. Mean intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for the inhibin A ELISA determined using pooled laying hen plasma were 5.0% and 7.0%, respectively. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for the activin A ELISA determined using a pooled bovine follicular fluid were 3.9% and 6.9%, respectively.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative dose-response curves in the two-site ELISA for inhibin A (a) and activin A (b), showing parallelism between the respective standard ({triangleup}) and serial dilutions of pooled chicken granulosa ({circ} and •) and thecal ({blacksquare} and {square}) extracts. Values are the means of duplicate determinations.

 
FPLC fractionation of hen granulosa extract
Figure 2Go shows the distribution of inhibin A and total {alpha}-subunit in pooled chicken granulosa tissue extract fractionated by FPLC gel permeation chromatography under nondissociating conditions. The FPLC profile for inhibin A differed markedly from that of total ir-{alpha}, confirming that chicken free {alpha} forms detected by the RIA do not cross-react in the inhibin A ELISA. Inhibin A eluted as a single major peak with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 100 kDa, in contrast to total {alpha}-subunit, where two major peaks of immunoreactivity were found in fractions corresponding to molecular masses of about 30 and 60 kDa. Activin A levels in granulosa extract were too low to permit chromatographic analysis.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Profile of inhibin A (•) and total {alpha}-subunit ({circ}) immunoreactivity after chromatography of pooled chicken F1 granulosa extract on a Superose-12 gel permeation FPLC column eluted with PBS containing 0.1% (wt/vol) Polypep and 0.05% (wt/vol) sodium azide (pH 7.3). The elution positions of the following proteins are indicated: {alpha}2-macroglobulin ({alpha}2M; 750 kDa), apoferritin (APO; 450 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH; 150 kDa), BSA (66 kDa), and recombinant human activin (ACT; 25 kDa).

 
Inhibin A, total {alpha}-subunit, and activin A in F1–F4 follicles
Tissue concentrations (nanograms per mg DNA) of inhibin A, total {alpha}-subunit, and activin A in the granulosa and thecal layers of F1–F4 follicles recovered at different times during the ovulatory cycle are shown in Figs. 3Go and 4Go. Concentrations of inhibin A and total {alpha}-subunit were substantially higher in granulosa than in thecal tissue at all times during the cycle and at all positions within the follicular hierarchy. In contrast, concentrations of activin A were much higher in thecal than in granulosa tissue in each follicle analyzed. Total {alpha}-subunit in granulosa tissue was present in marked excess over inhibin A, being approximately 570-fold higher in F4 granulosa, and falling to about 30-fold in F1 granulosa. Total {alpha}-subunit in thecal tissue was present in an approximately 15-fold excess over inhibin A.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Inhibin A, activin A, and total {alpha}-subunit (nanograms per mg DNA) in the granulosa layer of the four largest preovulatory follicles (F1–F4). Follicles were removed from hens at 8-h intervals during the 24-h ovulatory cycle: 4, 12, and 20 h before the expected time of ovulation of the F1 follicle. For ease of presentation, each successive follicle is shown to be 24 h more mature than its predecessor. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10), and means without a common letter are significantly (P < 0.05) different (by ANOVA and Fishers PLSD test).

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Inhibin A, activin A, and total {alpha}-subunit (nanograms per mg DNA) in the thecal layer of the four largest preovulatory follicles (F1–F4). Follicles were removed from hens at 8-h intervals during the 24-h ovulatory cycle: 4, 12, and 20 h before the expected time of ovulation of the F1 follicle. For ease of presentation, each successive follicle is shown to be 24 h more mature than its predecessor. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10), and means without a common letter are significantly (P < 0.05) different (by ANOVA and Fishers PLSD test).

 
Inhibin A was present at significantly higher levels in the F1 granulosa compared with that in F2–F4 (Fig. 3Go). The mean concentration increased only about 2-fold from F4–F2, but showed a further approximately 20-fold increase from F2–F1. When the follicle was in the F1 position, the level of inhibin A in the granulosa was maximal 12 h before the expected time of ovulation (43.2 ng/mg DNA), declining significantly over the following 8-h period (7.3 ng/mg DNA). Inhibin A levels in the thecal layer increased about 3-fold from F4–F1 (71.4–195.9 pg/mg DNA), although values were much lower than those in the granulosa layer in all cases (Fig. 4Go).

Mean concentrations of total ir-{alpha} in granulosa layers increased about 3-fold from F4–F1 (Fig. 3Go). In each case maximal levels were observed in hens killed 12 h before the expected time of ovulation, peaking in the F1 follicle (1070 ng/mg DNA). In contrast to the approximately 6-fold decline in inhibin A, total ir-{alpha} level in the F1 granulosa did not fall significantly between -12 and -4 h relative to the expected time of ovulation. Total ir-{alpha} levels in the theca were at least 100-fold lower than those in the corresponding granulosa layer. In each case (F1–F4) levels were maximal 4 h after the expected time of ovulation.

Mean concentrations of activin A in granulosa and thecal layers are presented in Figs. 3cGo and 4cGo, respectively. Overall, activin A concentrations were about 35-fold higher in theca (~780 pg/mg DNA) than in granulosa (~22 pg/mg DNA) tissue. There were no significant differences between F1–F4 follicles in the activin A content of either thecal or granulosa layers.

F1 follicle/POF transition
After ovulation of the F1 follicle, the remaining tissue becomes the POF, and the F2 moves up the hierarchy to become the new F1 follicle. Figure 5Go shows data for this transition period plotted relative to the predicted time of ovulation. The most recent POF contained significantly lower inhibin A, activin A, and total ir-{alpha} levels compared with the preovulatory F1 follicle. There were no significant changes in inhibin A, activin A, and total ir-{alpha} levels in the POF at 4, 12, and 20 h after the expected time of F1 follicle ovulation.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Inhibin A, activin A, and total {alpha}-subunit (nanograms per mg DNA) in the thecal () and granulosa ({square}) layers of the largest preovulatory follicle (F1) and in the most recent POF ({blacksquare}). Follicles were removed from hens at 8-h intervals during the 24-h ovulatory cycle and are plotted relative to the expected time of ovulation. Values are the means ± SEM (n = 10), and means without a common letter are significantly (P < 0.05) different (by ANOVA and Fishers PLSD test).

 
Relationship among inhibin A, total {alpha}, and activin A in individual follicles
Considering all 120 preovulatory follicles analyzed, inhibin A concentrations in the granulosa layer were significantly correlated with total ir-{alpha} (r = 0.45; P < 0.0001) and activin A (r = 0.26; P < 0.01) in the granulosa layer. However, there was no significant relationship between activin A and total ir-{alpha} in granulosa tissue (r = 0.17; P = 0.07). In the thecal layer, inhibin A was significantly correlated with total ir-{alpha} (r = 0.33; P < 0.001), but not with activin A (r = 0.09; P = 0.32). Likewise, thecal activin A was not correlated with thecal total ir-{alpha} (r = 0.06; P = 0.55).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To our knowledge this is the first study to quantitate inhibin A and activin A dimers in ovarian follicles of the chicken. Our main findings were: 1) inhibin A was much more abundant than activin A in the granulosa layer; 2) in the granulosa layer, inhibin A showed a progressive approximately 40-fold increase from F4–F1, whereas activin A did not vary significantly; 3) in the thecal layer, activin A was much more abundant than inhibin A, but showed little variation between F4–F1; 4) total ir-{alpha} was present in a large (15- to 900-fold) excess over inhibin A; and 5) inhibin A, activin A, and total ir-{alpha} levels in the POF were appreciably lower than those in the F1 follicle.

To facilitate comparison of our inhibin A ELISA data with results from previous studies of ir-inhibin in the chicken ovary (12, 13, 14), we also assayed each sample using the same heterologous RIA (Monash assay) as that used by these investigators. In common with most other inhibin RIAs, the Monash assay cross-reacts extensively with free {alpha}-subunit forms (17, 33) and is no longer considered satisfactory for quantitating dimeric inhibins because {alpha}-subunit is synthesized in excess by mammalian granulosa cells but lacks inhibin-like biological activity (15, 16, 18). Our results indicate that total ir-{alpha} is indeed much more abundant than inhibin A in both granulosa (~570-fold in F4 falling to ~30-fold in F1) and thecal (~15-fold higher) layers of chicken follicles. These findings accord well with the recent data of Chen and Johnson (11), who estimated that the ratio of {alpha}- to ßA-subunit mRNA expressed in chicken granulosa layers ranged from 70:1 in F5 follicles to 7:1 in F1 follicles. Recent preliminary studies (our unpublished data) have shown that total ir-{alpha} is more abundant than inhibin A in chicken granulosa cell-conditioned culture medium (F1, ~21-fold; F2, ~37-fold) and in peripheral hen plasma (~5-fold), consistent with these observations and confirming that both free {alpha}-subunit and inhibin A dimer are secreted by the chicken ovarian follicle. Moreover, granulosa cells from F1 follicles secreted 2-fold more inhibin A than cells from F2 follicles during a 24-h incubation period in preliminary culture experiments. Analysis of data for all 120 follicles examined in the present study showed only a moderate (although statistically significant) degree of correlation between inhibin A measured by ELISA and total ir-{alpha} levels measured by RIA in granulosa (r = 0.45) and thecal layers (r = 0.33).

Taken together with our chromatographic evidence that inhibin A immunoreactivity and total ir-{alpha} in F1 granulosa extract are distinct molecular entities, these observations firmly indicate that, as in mammals, the ovary of the chicken produces a marked excess of free {alpha}-subunit. These results also highlight the need to reappraise earlier studies of ir-inhibin secretion in vivo (13, 14, 26, 28, 29) and in vitro (12, 27), as the Monash assay used would grossly overestimate the amount of inhibin dimer present and would be relatively insensitive to changes in (much lower) levels of "authentic" inhibin dimer. The finding of two major chromatographic peaks of total ir-{alpha} in granulosa extracts is consistent with differential posttranslational processing of the full-length {alpha}-subunit precursor molecule, as is known to occur in mammalian granulosa cells (4, 5, 8). However, the apparent molecular masses of these two major peaks (~60 and ~30 kDa) are substantially greater than the predicted values for the chicken inhibin {alpha} precursor (~31 kDa) and mature ({alpha}C) polypeptide (13 kDa) reported by Wang and Johnson (9), and posttranslational glycosylation would not fully account for this size discrepancy. The apparent molecular mass of the single peak of inhibin A identified (~100 kDa) is similar to a major peak observed previously in human follicular fluid and serum (21) and could either represent unprocessed {alpha}-ßA dimer or mature, fully processed {alpha}-ßA dimer (~30 kDa) associated with binding protein(s) (e.g. follistatin). Further detailed fractionation studies will be required to establish the molecular identity of these immunoreactive inhibin forms in the chicken. No correlation was found between activin A and total ir-{alpha} levels in either the thecal (r = 0.06; P = 0.55) or granulosa (r = 0.17; P = 0.07) layers of preovulatory follicles, suggesting independent regulation of {alpha}- and ßA-subunit production. In support of this, it was recently reported that expression of mRNA for inhibin {alpha}-subunit in chicken granulosa decreases during follicular development, whereas that of inhibin/activin ßA-subunit mRNA increases dramatically (11).

One of our most striking findings was that the F1 follicle displayed a greatly enhanced capacity to produce dimeric inhibin A over other members of the hierarchy in the absence of any appreciable change in activin A. The concentration of inhibin A in the granulosa layer increased slightly (~2-fold) from F4–F2, but showed an additional approximately 20-fold increase from F2–F1. This observation contradicts an earlier report (12) that the concentration of ir-inhibin in granulosa layers decreases 2- to 3-fold from F4–F1, but is consistent with other evidence (34, 35) that the F1 follicle secretes more bioactive inhibin than smaller follicles. This discrepancy can largely be accounted for by cross-reactivity of the Monash RIA used by Vanmontfort et al. (12) with free inhibin {alpha}-subunit, as discussed above. However, the fact that we observed a modest (~2- to 3-fold) increase from F4–F1 in total ir-{alpha} measured using the same RIA is more difficult to account for. One possible explanation could be that Vanmontfort et al. (12) expressed their granulosa layer inhibin concentrations on a per mg protein basis, whereas we expressed our data on a per mg DNA basis because we were concerned about possible contamination of granulosa tissue with residual yolk that could lead to overestimation of tissue protein.

Our finding that the F1 granulosa layer is by far the richest source of inhibin A in the chicken ovary is in excellent accordance with the recent report of Chen and Johnson (11), who observed a dramatic enhancement of ßA mRNA expression in the F1 granulosa and predicted that this tissue would prove to be the primary source of inhibin A and activin A dimers in the hen. Surprisingly, however, the activin A concentration in the F1 granulosa layer remains low (~900-fold lower than inhibin A) despite this markedly increased expression of ßA mRNA. Given that information is currently lacking on the intracellular regulatory signals that allow differential posttranslational processing of inhibin/activin subunits leading to assembly of their respective dimers, the F2–F1 granulosa cell transition in the hen may prove to be a valuable in vivo model for cell biologists addressing this issue.

After ovulation, the remaining F1 tissue (comprising both thecal and granulosa layers) is referred to as the POF. The early POF appears to be endocrinologically active, producing steroids (36) and high levels of PGF (37) and a relaxin-like peptide (38). The POF has been implicated in the control of oviposition, as its removal delays oviposition of the egg derived from it, whereas administration of POF extract can promote premature oviposition (39). Inhibin A and total ir-{alpha} levels in the POF fell dramatically within 4 h of ovulation of the F1 follicle, indicating an abrupt cessation of biosynthesis, which contrasts with the greatly increased production of PGF (37) and relaxin-like peptide (38) in the early POF. Activin A only fell by about 50%, raising the possibility that the POF continues to express ßA-subunit to permit de novo activin A synthesis. Alternatively, this may simply reflect a longer half-life of activin A compared with that of inhibin A or total ir-{alpha}. Further studies are required to determine whether the maintained activin A content of the POF has any physiological importance.

Hens were killed at three different times during the 24- to 26-h ovulatory cycle to enable a comparison of successive follicles of the hierarchy at an early, mid, and late stage of their development. For each position in the follicular hierarchy (i.e. F1–F4), total ir-{alpha} levels in granulosa increased from the early to midstage, whereas total ir-{alpha} levels in theca showed the reverse trend. Whether this divergent pattern has any physiological relevance remains to be investigated, but it should be emphasized that total ir-{alpha} levels in the thecal layer were always substantially (60- to 300-fold) lower than total ir-{alpha} levels in the corresponding granulosa layer. These fairly rapid (<8 h) fluctuations in follicular total ir-{alpha} levels presumably reflect changes in {alpha}-subunit mRNA expression in response to cyclic changes in systemic and/or intraovarian regulatory factors. Regulatory factors known to modulate inhibin {alpha}-subunit mRNA expression in the mammalian gonad include FSH, LH, activin, transforming growth factor-ß, epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor I, estrogen, and androgen (40), and it is likely that at least some of these also inhibin {alpha}-subunit expression in the chicken ovary. Inhibin A levels in the F1 granulosa were maximal 12 h before the expected time of ovulation, showing an abrupt 6-fold decline over the following 8-h period. In contrast, total ir-{alpha} levels in the F1 granulosa were maintained over the same 8-h period. As the preovulatory surge of LH occurs about 6 h before ovulation in the hen (41), we hypothesized that the LH surge promotes an abrupt cessation of inhibin A synthesis without a corresponding reduction in total ir-{alpha} synthesis by selectively blocking the expression of ßA-subunit. Direct support for this hypothesis was recently provided by Chen and Johnson (42), who reported that LH negatively regulates the expression of ßA-subunit mRNA, but not that of {alpha}-subunit in the F1 granulosa of the hen.

The present study revealed that activin A predominates in the thecal layer of the preovulatory follicles of the hen, consistent with the recently reported detection of ßA mRNA expression in this compartment (10). However, despite the exposure of follicles to preovulatory surges of LH at approximately 24-h intervals, concentrations showed little variation (both within and between different follicle positions) in either the thecal or granulosa layer. In the granulosa, activin A was present at much lower levels than inhibin A, and such a low level of synthesis may be less affected than inhibin A by reduction in ßA-subunit expression. Such observations provide further evidence for differential regulation of inhibin/activin dimer assembly from {alpha}- and ßA-subunits.

In mammals, inhibins and activins have been shown to modulate LH-induced androgen production by thecal cells (43, 44). Activin has also be shown to up-regulate FSH receptor expression (45), enhance FSH-induced aromatase activity/estrogen production (46, 47), and promote functional differentiation of granulosa cells (48). Receptors for activin have been identified on mammalian granulosa cells, thecal cells, and oocytes (49). It remains to be established whether inhibin and activin have comparable effects in the ovary of the hen, although Rombauts et al. (27) recently reported that inhibin and activin have antagonistic effects on androgen production by primary cultures of ovarian and testicular cells derived from chicken embryos. It should be noted that the steroidogenic activity of chicken ovarian follicles differs markedly from that of their mammalian counterparts, and that progesterone, rather than estradiol, is the principal follicular steroid involved in the generation of the preovulatory LH surge (1, 2). The granulosa layer of large yolk-filled follicles contains much more progesterone and much less androgen and estrogen than the thecal layer (50). The capacity of granulosa cells to produce progesterone increases as the follicle progresses through the hierarchy, and the F1 granulosa layer is considered to be the main source of the circulating progesterone that triggers the LH surge. The dramatic increase in inhibin A production by F1 granulosa cells may be an important factor in the acquisition of a fully mature and ovulable status. The capacity of thecal cells to convert granulosa-derived progesterone into androgen is lost when the follicle assumes the F1 position (2, 49), and it is conceivable that this could reflect an inhibitory paracrine action of granulosa-derived inhibin A. Clearly, further investigations are required to evaluate these possibilities.

It has been shown that follicular FSH receptor-binding activity (51) and mRNA levels (52) decrease as the follicle progresses through the hierarchy to the F1 stage. Although there is no indication from the present findings that activin A has a regulatory role in large (F4–F1) preovulatory follicles, the possibility should be explored that activin A may play a role in the maintenance of healthy follicles at an earlier stage of development, as chicken FSH receptor mRNA is lower in postselection atretic follicles in comparison with normal 3- to 5-mm prehierachical follicles (52).

In conclusion, the present study has shown that differential changes in inhibin A, total ir-{alpha}, and activin A production occur during preovulatory follicular development in the hen, with the F2–F1 transition being associated with a selective 20-fold increase in granulosa content of inhibin A. These observations support the view that these proteins subserve functional roles in the chicken ovary, but further in vivo and in vitro experiments are now needed to identify these putative roles.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank S. Webb and S. A. Feist for skilled technical assistance, and Dr. J. P. Mather (Genentech) for supplying recombinant human activin A.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of Great Britain. Back

Received July 31, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bahr JM, Johnson AL 1984 Regulation of the follicular hierarchy and ovulation. J Exp Zool 232:495–500[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Etches RJ 1990 The ovulatory cycle of the hen. Crit Rev Poult Biol 2:293–318
  3. Warren DC, Scott HM 1935 The time factor in egg formation. Poult Sci 14:195–207
  4. Ying S-Y 1988 Inhibin, activin and follistatin: gonadal proteins modulate the secretion of follicle stimulating hormone. Endocr Rev 9:267–293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. de Jong FH 1988 Inhibin. Physiol Rev 68:555–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Findlay JK 1993 An update on the roles of inhibin, activin and follistatin as local regulators of folliculogenesis. Biol Reprod 48:15–23[Abstract]
  7. Woodruff TK, Mather JP 1995 Inhibin, activin and the female reproductive axis. Annu Rev Physiol 57:219–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Knight PG 1996 Roles of inhibins, activins, and follistatins in the female reproductive system. Front Neuroendocrinol 17:476–509[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Wang S-Y, Johnson PA 1993 Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning and sequence analysis of the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin from chicken ovarian granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 49:453–458[Abstract]
  10. Chen C-C, Johnson PA 1996 Molecular cloning of inhibin/activin ßA-subunit complementary deoxyribonucleic acid and expression of inhibin/activin {alpha}- and ßA-subunits in the domestic hen. Biol Reprod 54:429–435[Abstract]
  11. Chen C-C, Johnson PA 1996 Expression of inhibin {alpha} and inhibin/activin ßA subunits in the granulosa layer of the large preovulatory follicles of the hen. Biol Reprod 55:450–454[Abstract]
  12. Vanmontfort D, Rombauts L, Decuypere E, Verhoeven G 1992 Source of immunoreactive inhibin in the chicken ovary. Biol Reprod 47:977–983[Abstract]
  13. Johnson PA, Brooks C, Wang S-Y, Chen C-C 1993 Plasma concentrations of immunoreactive inhibin and gonadotropins following removal of ovarian follicles in the domestic hen. Biol Reprod 49:1026–1031[Abstract]
  14. Johnson PA, Wang S-Y, Brooks C 1993 Characterization of a source and levels of plasma immunoreactive inhibin during the ovulatory cycle of the domestic hen. Biol Reprod 48:262–267[Abstract]
  15. Sugino K, Nakamura T, Takio K, Titani K, Miyamoto K, Hasengawa Y, Igarashi M, Sugino H 1989 Inhibin alpha-subunit monomer is present in bovine follicular fluid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159:1323–1329[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Robertson DM, Giacometti M, Foulds LM, Lahnstein J, Goss NH, Hearn MTW, de Kretser DM 1989 Isolation of inhibin {alpha}-subunit precursor proteins from bovine follicular fluid. Endocrinology 125:2141–2149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Schneyer AL, Mason AJ, Burton LE, Ziegner JR, Crowley WF 1990 Immunoreactive inhibin {alpha} subunit in human serum: implications for radioimmunoassay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1209–1212
  18. Knight PG, Beard AJ, Wrathall JHM, Castillo RJ 1989 Evidence that the bovine ovary secretes large amounts of monomeric inhibin {alpha}-subunit and its isolation from bovine follicular fluid. J Mol Endocrinol 2:189–200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Knight PG, Groome NP, Beard AJ 1991 Development of a two-site immunoradiometric assay for dimeric inhibin using antibodies against chemically synthesized fragments of the {alpha} and ß subunits. J Endocrinol 129:R9–R12
  20. Groome N 1991 Ultrasensitive two-site assays for inhibin-A and activin-A using monoclonal antibodies raised to synthetic peptides. J Immunol Methods 145:65–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Muttukrishna S, Fowler PA, Groome NP, Mitchell GG, Robertson WR, Knight PG 1994 Serum concentrations of dimeric inhibin during the spontaneous human menstrual cycle and after treatment with exogenous gonadotrophin. Hum Reprod 9:1634–1642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Knight PG, Muttukrishna S 1994 Measurement of dimeric inhibin using a modified two-site immunoradiometric assay specific for oxidized (Met O) inhibin. J Endocrinol 141:417–425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Groome N, Illingworth P, O’Brien M, Pai R, Rodgers FE, Mather J, McNeilly A 1996 Measurement of dimeric inhibin B throughout the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1401–1405[Abstract]
  24. Knight PG, Muttukrishna S, Groome NP 1996 Development and application of a two-site enzyme immunoassay for the determination of ‘total’ activin-A concentrations in serum and follicular fluid. J Endocrinol 148:267–279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Evans LW, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG, Groome NP 1997 Development, validation and application of a two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for activin-AB. J Endocrinol 153:221–230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rombauts L, Vanmontfort D, Verhoeven G, Decuypere E 1992 Immunoreactive inhibin in plasma, amniotic fluid, and gonadal tissue of male and female chick embryos. Biol Reprod 46:1211–1216[Abstract]
  27. Rombauts L, Vanmontfort D, Decuypere E, Verhoeven G 1996 Inhibin and activin have antagonistic paracrine effects on gonadal steroidogenesis during the development of the chicken embryo. Biol Reprod 54:1229–1237[Abstract]
  28. Vanmontfort D, Berghman LR, Rombauts L, Verhoeven G, Decuypere E 1994 Changes in immunoreactive inhibin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and progesterone in plasma after short-term food deprivation and during the ovulatory cycle of the hen. Gen Comp Endocrinol 95:117–124[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Vanmontfort D, Berghman LR, Rombauts L, Verhoeven G, Decuypere E 1995 Developmental changes in immunoreactive inhibin and FSH in plasma of chickens from hatch to sexual maturity. Br Poult Sci 36:779–790[Medline]
  30. Gilbert AB, Evans AJ, Perry MM, Davidson MH 1977 A method for separating granulosa cells, the basal lamina and the theca of the preovulatory ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). J Reprod Fertil 50:179–181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Labarca C, Paigen K 1980 A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 102:344–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Robertson DM, Tsonis CG, McLachlan RI, Handelsman DJ, Leask R, Baird DT, McNeilly AS, Hayward S, Healy DL, Findlay JK, Burger HG, de Kretser DM 1988 Comparison of inhibin immunological and in vitro biological activities in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:438–443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Knight PG 1991 Identification and purification of inhibin and inhibin-related proteins. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 43:111–123[Medline]
  34. Akashiba H, Taya K, Sasamoto S 1988 Secretion of inhibin by chicken granulosa cells in vitro. Poult Sci 67:1625–1631[Medline]
  35. Tsonis CG, Quigg H, Lee VWK, Leversha L, Trounson AO, Findlay JK 1988 Inhibin in individual ovine follicles in relation to diameter and atresia. J Reprod Fertil 67:83–90[CrossRef]
  36. Huang ES-R, Nalbandov AV 1979 Steroidogensis of chicken granulosa and theca cells: in vitro incubation system. Biol Reprod 20:442–453[Abstract]
  37. Day SL, Nalbandov AV 1977 Presence of prostaglandin F (PGF) in hen follicles and its physiological role in ovulation and oviposition. Biol Reprod 16:486–494
  38. Brackett KH, Fields PA, Dubois W, Chang S-MT, Mather FB, Fields MJ 1997 Relaxin: an ovarian hormone in an avian species (Gallus domesticus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 105:155–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Tanaka K, Nakada T 1974 Participation of the ovarian follicle in control of time of oviposition in the domestic fowl. Poult Sci 53:2120–2125[Medline]
  40. Mayo KE 1994 Inhibin and activin: molecular aspects of regulation and function. Trends Endocrinol Metab 5:407–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Furr BJA, Bonney RC, England RJ, Cunningham FJ 1973 Luteinizing hormone and progesterone in peripheral blood during the ovulatory cycle of the hen. J Endocrinol 57:159–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Chen C-C, Johnson PA 1996 LH decreases mRNA for the inhibin/activin ßA-subunit in the largest preovulatory follicle of the hen. Biol Reprod [Suppl 1] 54:157 (Abstract 403)
  43. Hillier SG 1991 Regulatory functions for inhibin and activin in human ovaries. J Endocrinol 131:171–175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wrathall JHM, Knight PG 1995 Effect of inhibin-related peptides and oestradiol on androstenedione and progesterone secretion by bovine theca cells in vitro. J Endocrinol 145:491–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hasegawa Y, Miyamoto K, Abe Y, Nakamura T, Sugino H, Eto Y, Shibai H, Iwamura M 1989 Induction of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor by erythroid differentiation factor on rat granulosa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 156:668–674
  46. Hutchinson LA, Findlay JK, de Vos FL, Robertson DM 1987 Effects of bovine inhibin, transforming growth factor ß and bovine activin-A on granulosa cell differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 146:1405–1412[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Miro F, Smyth CD, Hillier SG 1991 Developmental-related effects of recombinant activin on steroid synthesis in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 129:3388–3394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Li R, Phillips DM, Mather JP 1995 Activin promotes ovarian follicle development in vitro. Endocrinology 136:849–856[Abstract]
  49. Mathews L 1994 Activin receptors and cellular signalling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocr Rev 15:310–325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Etches RJ, Duke CE 1984 Progesterone, androstenedione and oestradiol content of theca and granulosa tissue of the four largest ovarian follicles during the ovulatory cycle of the hen (Gallus domesticus). J Endocrinol 103:71–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ritzhaupt LK, Bahr JM 1987 A decrease in FSH receptors of granulosa cells during follicular maturation in the domestic hen. J Endocrinol 115:303–310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. You S, Bridgham JT, Foster DN, Johnson AL 1996 Characterization of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor (cFSH-R) complementary deoxyribonucleic acid, and expression of cFSH-R messenger ribonucleic acid in the ovary. Biol Reprod 55:1055–1062[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. L Al-Musawi, R. T Gladwell, and P. G Knight
Bone morphogenetic protein-6 enhances gonadotrophin-dependent progesterone and inhibin secretion and expression of mRNA transcripts encoding gonadotrophin receptors and inhibin/activin subunits in chicken granulosa cells
Reproduction, August 1, 2007; 134(2): 293 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. M Lovell, S. L Al-Musawi, R. T Gladwell, and P. G Knight
Gonadotrophins modulate hormone secretion and steady-state mRNA levels for activin receptors (type I, IIA, IIB) and inhibin co-receptor (betaglycan) in granulosa and theca cells from chicken prehierarchical and preovulatory follicles
Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1159 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. B. Hoffman, A. P. Benson, V. L. Christensen, B. D. Fairchild, and A. J. Davis
Follicular Development and Expression of the Messenger Ribonucleic Acid for the Inhibin/Activin Subunits in Two Genetic Lines of Turkey Hens that Differ in Total Egg Production
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 944 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T M Lovell, P G Knight, and R T Gladwell
Differential expression of mRNAs encoding the putative inhibin co-receptor (betaglycan) and activin type-I and type-II receptors in preovulatory and prehierarchical follicles of the laying hen ovary
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 188(2): 241 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T M Lovell, P G Knight, and R T Gladwell
Variation in pituitary expression of mRNAs encoding the putative inhibin co-receptor (betaglycan) and type-I and type-II activin receptors during the chicken ovulatory cycle
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 186(3): 447 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. A. Sweeney and P. A. Johnson
Messenger RNA and Protein Expression Analysis of Betaglycan in the Pituitary and Ovary of the Domestic Hen
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 172 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. K. Schuster, B. Schmierer, A. Shkumatava, and K. Kuchler
Activin A and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Control Tight Junctions in Avian Granulosa Cells by Regulating Occludin Expression
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1493 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. E. Drummond, M. T. Le, J.-F. Ethier, M. Dyson, and J. K. Findlay
Expression and Localization of Activin Receptors, Smads, and {beta}glycan to the Postnatal Rat Ovary
Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1423 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. J. Davis, C. F. Brooks, and P. A. Johnson
Activin A and Gonadotropin Regulation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Messenger RNA in Avian Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1352 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. J. Davis, C. F. Brooks, and P. A. Johnson
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Regulation of Inhibin {{alpha}}- and {beta}B-Subunit and Follistatin Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Cultured Avian Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. M. Lovell, P. G. Knight, N. P. Groome, and R. T. Gladwell
Changes in Plasma Inhibin A Levels During Sexual Maturation in the Female Chicken and the Effects of Active Immunization Against Inhibin {{alpha}}-Subunit on Reproductive Hormone Profiles and Ovarian Function
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 188 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. M. Lovell, P. G. Knight, N. P. Groome, and R. T. Gladwell
Measurement of Dimeric Inhibins and Effects of Active Immunization Against Inhibin {alpha}-Subunit on Plasma Hormones and Testis Morphology in the Developing Cockerel
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 213 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, P. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals