help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masarachia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duong, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masarachia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duong, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PARATHYROID HORMONE
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 3 1401-1410
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Histomorphometric Evidence for Echistatin Inhibition of Bone Resorption in Mice with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Patricia Masarachia, Michiko Yamamoto1, Chih-Tai Leu, Gideon Rodan and Le Duong

Department of Bone Biology and Osteoporosis Research, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Patricia Masarachia, Department of Bone Biology and Osteoporosis Research, Merck Research Laboratories, Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486. E-mail: patricia_masarachia{at}merck.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Echistatin, an RGD-containing peptide, was shown to inhibit the acute calcemic response to exogenous PTH or PTH-related protein (PTH-rP) in thyroparathyroidectomized rats, suggesting that echistatin inhibits bone resorption. In this study: 1) we present histological evidence for echistatin inhibition of bone resorption in mice with secondary hyperparathyroidism, and show that 2) echistatin binds to osteoclasts in vivo, 3) increases osteoclast number, and 4) does not detectably alter osteoclast morphology. Infusion of echistatin (30 µg/kg·min) for 3 days prevented the 2.6-fold increase in tibial cancellous bone turnover and the 36% loss in bone volume, produced by a low calcium diet. At the light microscopy level, echistatin immunolocalized to osteoclasts and megakaryocytes. Echistatin treatment increased osteoclast-covered bone surface by about 50%. At the ultrastructural level, these osteoclasts appeared normal, and the fraction of cells containing ruffled borders and clear zones was similar to controls. Echistatin was found on the basolateral membrane and in intracellular vesicles of actively resorbing osteoclasts. Weak labeling was found in the ruffled border, and no immunoreactivity was detected at the clear zone/bone surface interface. These findings provide histological evidence for echistatin binding to osteoclasts and for inhibition of bone resorption in vivo, through reduced osteoclast efficacy, without apparent changes in osteoclast morphology.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OSTEOCLASTIC bone resorption involves attachment of osteoclast precursors to the bone surface, their differentiation into mature osteoclasts, formation of a sealing zone (clear zone) surrounding a resorption lacuna, and, following resorption, migration to a new site (1, 2, 3). Integrins are suggested to play a role in several of these steps, including osteoclast activation (4).

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane glycoproteins that mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Ligand binding to integrins initiates signal transduction pathways involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements associated with cell activation, adhesion, and motility as well as growth and differentiation (5, 6). Several integrins recognize the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) moiety in extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as fibronectin or vitronectin (7).

The vitronectin receptor {alpha}vß3 is the predominant integrin expressed in osteoclasts (8, 9, 10). Additional integrins present in osteoclasts include {alpha}vß1, {alpha}2ß1, {alpha}3ß1 and {alpha}5ß1 (11, 12, 13, 14). RGD peptides, {alpha}vß3 antibodies, an RGD peptide mimetic and echistatin, a member of the RGD-containing disintegrin family, were shown to inhibit bone resorption, osteoclast formation, attachment, and spreading in vitro (9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). In vivo, anti-ß3 antibodies, echistatin, and another disintegrin, kistrin, inhibited calcium mobilization, presumably via inhibition of bone resorption (20, 21, 22). Recently, a synthetic RGD peptide mimetic, ß-[2[[5-[(aminoiminomethyl)amino]-1-oxopentyl]amino]-1-oxoethyl]amino-3-pyridinepropanoic acid, bistrifluoracetate, also inhibited calcium mobilization in parathyroidectomized rats and the loss of bone density in ovariectomized rats (19).

None of these studies have provided direct histological evidence for inhibition of bone resorption. The mode of action of integrin ligands is also not fully known. The objectives of this study were to: 1) examine, using histomorphometry, if echistatin can protect against bone loss caused by secondary hyperparathyroidism (2°HPT); 2) determine whether echistatin localizes to osteoclasts in vivo; and 3) examine, using electron microscopy, if there are morphological changes in osteoclasts caused by echistatin treatment. We found that echistatin localizes to osteoclasts in vivo, inhibits cancellous bone turnover, reduces bone loss, increases osteoclast number, and does not detectably alter osteoclast morphology.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Dose range finding for echistatin inhibition of the calcemic response in mice
All experiments were conducted in compliance with U.S. Department of Agriculture regulation under protocols approved by the institutional review board.

Infusion of echistatin in thyroparathyroidectomized (TPTX’d) mice, as previously described in rats (20), was used to determine the effective dose that inhibits the acute calcemic response to exogenous PTH. Briefly, male BALB/C mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY), 9 weeks old, averaging 20 g, were TPTX’d and were placed the next day on a low calcium diet (calcium, < 0.01%; phosphorus, 0.4%; ICN Biochemicals, Cleveland, OH). Two days following TPTX, mice were infused for 6 h with bovine PTH (bPTH (1–34) amide (Bachem, King of Prussia, PA) at 0.006 nmol/mouse·h via an sc implanted osmotic minipump (Alzet 1003D, Alza Corp., Palo Alto, CA) either with echistatin (6 or 30 µg/kg·min doses) in the test groups (n = 7 and 10, respectively) or with vehicle in the control group (n = 10). Serum calcium measurements were made from blood samples drawn from the tail vein at four time points: 1) before TPTX (baseline); 2) 24 h after TPTX; 3) before PTH infusion; and 4) at the end of PTH infusion. Serum calcium measurements were performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry using a Perkin-Elmer model 2380 AA spectrophotometer (Foster City, CA). As shown in Fig. 1Go, 30 µg/kg·min was determined to be an effective dose of echistatin. At the end of PTH infusion, animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation. Serum echistatin levels were obtained by an 125I-echistatin competitive receptor binding assay (23). Briefly, cell extracts (25 µg) prepared from HEK 293 cells overexpressing {alpha}vß3 were incubated with 30 pM 125I-echistatin in a binding buffer consisting of 100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2/MgCl2, pH 7.8, in the presence of serial dilutions of tested serum. The integrin bound echistatin was separated from the unbound by filtration through a Skatron Cell Harvester (Skatron 11021, Sterling, VA) onto filters preequilibrated with 1.5% polyethyleneamine. Filters were washed in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM CaCl2/MgCl2, pH 7.8 and counted in a Packard Auto Gamma 5650 Counter (Meriden, CT). Serum levels, estimated by using an echistatin displacement curve, averaged at time the mice were euthanized, 77.8 ± 70.4 and 152.2 ± 98.0 nM, for the 6 and 30 µg/kg·min dosages, respectively.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dose-dependent inhibition of calcemic response to PTH by echistatin. The effective dose of echistatin that inhibited the acute calcemic response to exogenous PTH was determined as described in Materials and Methods.

 
Effect of echistatin on bone resorption in mice with 2°HPT
Male BALB/C mice were divided into three groups: 1) calcium deficient diet infused with echistatin at 30 µg/kg·min, (Ca(-)/echistatin, n = 6), 2) calcium deficient diet infused with saline (Ca(-)/veh, n = 6); and 3) normal commercial diet (Rodent Laboratory Chow 5001, Ralston-Purina, St. Louis, MO) (controls, n = 8). After 3 days, serum levels of calcium and echistatin were determined in blood collected by cardiac puncture. Immediately after blood withdrawal, animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation.

Serum echistatin values at the time the mice were euthanized ranged between 63 and 160 nM, with a mean value of 112 ± 31 nM (mean ±SD). Because echistatin half-life in the circulation is very short (t1/2 = 5 min, unpublished observations), small changes in the infusion/delivery rates from the minipumps just before sampling, possibly due to animal movement, can cause variations in serum echistatin concentrations. However, these variations may even out over time, as judged by the efficacy of the drug among animals, assessed by histology.

Femurs and tibiae were dissected free and denuded of soft tissue. Bone ash weights/mm were measured in isolated femurs as described previously (24). Tibiae were processed in methyl methacrylate for histomorphometric analysis (25). Measurements were made in an area spanning between 0.5 and 2.5 mm below the growth plate using a BioQuant IV image analysis system (BioQuant, Nashville, TN). The complete secondary spongiosa and half of the primary spongiosa in one section from each tibia/animal were measured. Section depth was matched for each bone for the maximum area of analysis. Data were collected without knowledge of group allocation, and measurements were repeated and confirmed by a second independent observer. The following parameters were measured: trabecular bone volume (TB/BV, %), expressed as the percentage area of trabecular bone; osteoid surface, expressed as percentage of trabecular surface (OS/BS, %); multinucleated osteoclast surface, expressed as percent of trabecular surface (OcS/BS, %); mean osteoclast length, measured as the length in contact with the bone surface; osteoclast number per mm of trabecular bone surface (Oc#/TbS, #/mm); osteoclast number per mm2 trabecular area (Oc#/TbA, #/mm2); and osteoclast number per mm2 tissue area (OC#/TsA, #/mm2). Total trabecular thickness (TTB.Th, µm), total trabecular number (TTB.N, #/mm), and total trabecular spacing (TTB.Sp, µm) were derived from primary measurements of areas and perimeters according to Parfitt et al. (26). Means and SD were computed for each variable for each treatment group. Differences between treatment groups were tested by one-way ANOVA using the statistical package Statview (Macintosh, Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA).

Electron microscopy
Mice were treated with echistatin as described above and tissues were isolated for light and electron microscopy. As described above, mice were divided into three groups: controls (n = 4), Ca(-)/veh (n = 9) and Ca(-)/ echistatin (n = 5). At the end of infusion, animals were deeply anaesthetized with 0.08 mg/g ketamine and 0.004 mg/g xylazine, bled through the tail vein for serum echistatin assay, and perfused through the heart with 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3. Echistatin serum levels at the time the mice were euthanized ranged from 170 to 750 nM and averaged 341 ± 195 nM. One tibia was processed in methyl methacrylate for histomorphometry. For electron microscopy, the contralateral distal femurs and proximal tibiae from some animals were immersed overnight in the same perfusate fixative at 4 C. Bones were postfixed in 1% OsO4 and 1.5% potassium ferricyanide, en bloc stained in uranyl acetate, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in Epon through propylene oxide. Thin sections (0.1 µm), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, were photographed in a Phillips CM12 electron microscope (Mahwah, NJ). Profiles of osteoclasts were photographed in an area of cancellous bone in the distal femur extending from the lower edge of the growth plate to approximately 1.0 mm below and extending for a width of approximately 0.5 mm, which included both primary and secondary spongiosa. Profiles of osteoclasts were categorized into three groups: 1) polarized osteoclasts with a ruffled border and clear zones; 2) osteoclasts with clear zone or clear zone-like areas only [profiles in this category may belong to active osteoclasts whose clear zone only is in the plane of section or to osteoclasts in the process of migrating (27)]; and 3) nonpolarized profiles lacking specialized attachment or resorption structures. These cells were identified as osteoclasts if mitochondria were abundant and had densely staining matrix; cytoplasmic ground substance stained darker than other cells and rough endoplasmic reticulum was of medium length. Examples of each group are shown in Fig. 2Go.



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Osteoclast morphological categories. To determine the effects of echistatin on osteoclast polarity, osteoclast profiles were grouped into three morphological categories: active osteoclasts with ruffled border and clear zones; osteoclasts with clear zone or clear zone-like area only; and osteoclasts with no polarity. A, An actively resorbing osteoclast with multiple nuclei, ruffled border (small arrows), and clear zones (large arrows) from a mouse on a calcium deficient diet treated with echistatin. B, High magnification of osteoclast ruffled border (RB) and clear zone four endocortical osteoclasts is predominant on basolateral surfaces (arrows); B, high magnification microgragh of an osteoclast with echistatin labeling at apical surface (arrow); and C, osteoclast with distinct echistatin labeling on basolateral surfaces (arrow) and weaker labeling at apical surface (arrowhead). D, Echistatin immunolabeling of megakaryocytes (arrows) in the bone marrow; note the absence of labeling in osteoblasts (arrowheads) and walls of blood vessel (*). E, Negative control, with primary antibody deleted. Osteoclasts are indicated by arrows. Bar, 20 µm in A, D, E; 10 µm in B and C.

 
A minimum sample size of 40 osteoclasts per animal was found to give representative proportions of the three types of cells that would not change significantly as the sample size increased. Osteoclast profiles in one section per animal were photographed, and the number of osteoclasts per section ranged between 42 and 89 cells. By photographing the total population of osteoclasts in a single 0.5 mm2 section per animal, a given osteoclast was described only once. Osteoclast profiles were identified and photographed within an area spanning between the trabecular bone surface and up to 50 µm into the marrow. Data were generated from a total of 149 cells from three animals for the control group; 184 cells from three animals for the Ca(-)/veh group; and 286 cells from four animals, for the Ca(-)/echistatin group as summarized in Table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Ultrastructural comparison of osteoclast profiles in mice on normal diet (control), mice on low calcium diet alone (Ca(-)/veh) and in mice on low calcium diet infused for 3 days with 30 µg/kg/min echistatin (Ca(-)/Echi)

 
The number of osteoclasts in each category were expressed as a percent of the total number of osteoclast profiles examined per animal. These percentages were grouped to generate the means ± SD. Differences between groups were tested by one-way ANOVA.

The number of nuclei within each osteoclast profile were counted and the mean ± SD per group was calculated. Differences between groups were tested by one-way ANOVA.

Immunohistochemical localization of echistatin in mice with 2°HPT
In a third study, the same treatment protocol was used to generate tissue for immunohistochemistry at the light and electron microscopy levels, except that perfusion was with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Serum echistatin values at the time the mice were euthanized ranged from 93 nM to 150 nM and averaged 122 ± 28.5 nM. Femurs and tibiae were dissected free of soft tissue and immersion fixed for 4 h at 4 C and then washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer overnight. Bones were decalcified in 4.13% (wt/vol) ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) and 5% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), pH 7.2, for 3 weeks. Decalcified bones were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series. The right femur and tibia were infiltrated and embedded in LR White (The London Resin Co., Ltd., Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) under vacuum at 50 C overnight. Contralateral bones were processed and embedded in paraffin.

LR White sections for light microscopy immunolabeling were cut at 0.3 µm with a diamond Histoknife (Diatome, Electron Microscopy Sciences) on a Reichert-Jung Utracut E (Vienna, Austria; M.O.C., Inc., Valley Cottage, NY). Thin LR White sections (0.1 µm) for EM-immunolabeling were mounted on 200 mesh nickel grids.

Electron microscopy immunogold labeling
Grids containing bone sections were floated, in vapor-saturated chambers, on drops of blocking solution consisting of 10% normal goat serum, 2% BSA, and 0.05% Tween-20 in Primary Antibody Diluent (BioMeda, Foster City, CA), for 15 min at room temperature. Grids were then incubated overnight at 4 C or for 2 h at 37 C with rabbit antiechistatin antibody diluted 1:100 in Primary Antibody Diluent with 0.5% BSA, 0.05% Tween-20. Grids were washed in 0.05 M Tris, 2% NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 8.2, and then incubated in goat antirabbit IgG conjugated to 10 or 20 nm gold (BioCell; Goldmark Biologicals, Phillipsburg, NJ) for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were rinsed in buffer (3x, 2 min each) and then in deionized water (4x, 1 min each). Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and photographed in a Phillips CM 12 electron microscope (Mahwah, NJ).

Negative controls included sections that were incubated with nonspecific rabbit serum instead of primary antibody or with secondary antibodies alone. Sections from nonechistatin treated animals were also processed. The labeling profile observed in negative controls was considered to be nonspecific.

Peroxidase immunolabeling of paraffin embedded bone sections
Using capillary gap technology described in detail previously (28), 4-µm sections were deparaffinized, and blocked for endogenous peroxidase with 1% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. After washing in dH2O (3x, 2 min) and 1x Automation buffer (Biomeda Corp., Foster City, CA) (3x, 2 min each), sections were blocked with 10% normal goat serum, 4% BSA, and 1% Tween-20 in Primary Antibody Diluting Buffer (Biomeda Corp., Foster City, CA) for 20 min, followed by incubation overnight at 4 C in antiechistatin antiserum (1:500 dilution) diluted in blocking solution. After washing for 20 min in 1x Automation Buffer, sections were next incubated in biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing in 1x Automation buffer, sections were incubated for 30 min in diluted avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC kit, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), washed in Tris-buffered saline-Tween 20, and incubated in 0.05% (wt/vol) diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), 0.001% H2O2 in 0.05 M Tris buffer, pH 7.6 for 10 min. After washing in dH2O, sections were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin no.1 (Sigma) for 1.5 min, washed, dehydrated, and sealed with Permount before being examined by light microscopy.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Echistatin inhibits PTH-induced bone resorption in vivo
The dosing of echistatin to be used in the 2°HPT model was determined by establishing a dose which blocked the calcemic response to exogenous PTH in TPTX’d mice. Following successful TPTX, baseline serum calcium levels dropped within 24 h to less than 7 mg/dl and were increased by PTH infusion. As shown in Fig. 1Go, the calcemic response to exogenous PTH was completely blocked by 30 µg/kg·min echistatin.

After infusion of 30 µg/kg·min echistatin for 3 days into mice with 2°HPT, histomorphometric measurements in the corresponding groups yielded similar values in the two experiments. Results from the pooled analysis (N = 11–15 animals per group) are shown in Tables 1Go and 2Go. Compared with mice fed a normal diet, mice with 2°HPT had 36% lower trabecular bone volume (BV/TV, Table 1Go). Trabecular bone volume of echistatin treated animals was similar to that in normal controls and significantly higher than in calcium deficient mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Bone histomorphometric measurements for mice on normal diet (control), mice on low calcium diet (Ca(-)/veh), and mice on low calcium diet infused for 3 days with echistatin at 30 µg/kg/·min (Ca(-)/Echi)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Bone histomorphometric measurements of osteoid, osteoclast surface and number, for mice on normal diet (control), mice on low calcium diet (Ca(-)/veh), and mice on low calcium diet infused for three days with echistatin at 30 µg/kg/·min (Ca(-)/Echi)

 
As shown in Table 1Go, trabeculae were significantly thicker, more numerous, and more closely spaced in both control and echistatin treated animals as compared with mice on a calcium deficient diet. Thus, the changes in cancellous bone architecture caused by a calcium deficient diet were prevented by echistatin infusion.

Femoral ash weight/length (mg/mm) were 1.70 ± 0.05 for the control group, 1.51 ± 0.06 for the Ca(-)/veh group, and 1.64 ± 0.04 for the Ca(-)/echistatin group. The 11% decrease in ash weight/mm in the Ca(-)/veh group relative to the control group was statistically significant. Ash weight/mm in the echistatin treated group was 9% higher than in the Ca(-)/veh group. This difference was not statistically significant.

Although serum calcium was lowest in the echistatin group, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups at the time the mice were euthanized (control, 8.10 ± 0.22 mg/dl; Ca(-)/veh, 7.91 ± 0.21 mg/dl; and Ca(-)/echistatin, 7.85 ± 0.10 mg/dl).

Echistatin inhibits cancellous bone turnover and increases osteoclast surface in mice with 2°HPT
Histomorphometric measurements of bone formation surfaces (osteoid), percent osteoclast surface and osteoclast related parameters are shown in Table 2Go. Percent osteoid surface increased in Ca(-)/veh animals to 9.4% compared with 3.6% in controls and was maintained at 3.2% in Ca(-)/echistatin animals. Thus, the increase in cancellous bone turnover induced by a calcium deficient diet was inhibited by echistatin.

The percent osteoclast surface was 5.5% in echistatin treated animals, vs. 3.6% in controls (P < 0.05), and 3.9% in Ca(-)/veh animals. Osteoclast number per tissue area (Oc#/TsA) was highest in echistatin treated animals. Increases were significant compared with Ca(-)/veh animals. There was also a trend for an increase in osteoclast number per trabecular surface and trabecular area in echistatin treated animals, about 1.6 times greater than in normal controls.

The mean length of contact with the bone surface for individual osteoclasts was 23.7 ± 2.5 µm for controls, 24.4 ± 11.0 µm for Ca(-)/veh animals, and 25.6 ± 7.0 µm for echistatin-treated animals, with no significant differences between groups. Because echistatin treatment did not reduce the number or size of osteoclasts on the bone surface, we proceeded to analyze osteoclast ultrastructure.

Osteoclast ultrastructure in echistatin treated mice appears normal
Ultrastructural analysis of osteoclasts at the bone surface in echistatin treated animals and control animals is shown in Table 3Go. ANOVA of osteoclast profiles showed that the fraction of cells with each of the following characteristics was not statistically different between groups: 1) cells with ruffled border and clear zone (36–48%); 2) cells with clear zone or clear zone-like attachment area only; and 3) cells without apparent polarity (30–37%). Examples of each type are illustrated in Fig. 2Go. The ultrastructural data thus show that echistatin, at levels that cause inhibition of bone resorption, does not produce detectable changes in osteoclast morphology.

On the average only one nucleus per osteoclast was detected at the ultrastructural level, and there were no differences between groups: values were 1.02 ± 0.31 nuclei per osteoclast for normal controls; 0.83 ± 0.14 for Ca(-)/veh mice, and 1.01 ± 0.18 Ca(-)/echistatin mice. The presence of multinucleation was not a requirement for identification of osteoclasts at the ultrastructural level.

Localization of echistatin in the bones of treated mice
At the light microscopy level, in either paraffin or LR White sections, echistatin was detected specifically in osteoclasts and megakarocytes (Fig. 3Go). Echistatin labeling in osteoclasts was concentrated on basolateral surfaces, particularly the basolateral microvilli, and to a lesser extent on apical surfaces. Echistatin was not observed in other cell types. No cells associated with capillary walls and no marrow cells other than megakaryocytes were labeled.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Light level immunoperoxidase localization of echistatin in mouse femur. Mice on calcium deficient diet were infused with echistatin (30 µg/kg·min) for 3 days. Paraffin sections were immunoperoxidase labeled for echistatin using an antiechistatin rabbit polyclonal antibody. A–C, Examples of osteoclasts stained for echistatin. Osteoclasts are the only bone cells that significantly labeled for echistatin: A, labeling of (CZ) from mouse on calcium deficient diet. C, Osteoclast attached to bone by a clear zone-like area (arrowhead) without an apparent ruffled border, from a mouse on calcium deficient diet. D, Higher magnification of organelle free attachment area in (C) that may belong to an active osteoclast whose clear zone alone is in the plane of section or to a migrating osteoclast not polarized yet for secretion. E, Nonpolarized, unattached osteoclast from mouse on calcium deficient diet and echistatin treated. Bar, 5 µm in A, C, and E; 1 µm in B and D.

 
At the EM level, echistatin immunolabeling was also detected in megakaryocytes, on the platelet demarcation membranes (data not shown) and in osteoclasts. As shown in Fig. 4Go, echistatin label in osteoclasts was observed on the basolateral membrane, in structures resembling coated pits (Fig. 4BGo, arrowhead) and in large vesicles with matrices of varying electron densities located in the basolateral cytoplasm of the osteoclast. Additionally, echistatin label was observed concentrated in small granules above the ruffled border and the clear zone and at low levels in the ruffled border membranes (Fig. 4AGo). A few grains were detected in the clear zone membrane at the bone interface but not significantly above background (Fig 4DGo). On the other hand echistatin was clearly detected at the lateral edge of the clear zone (Fig. 4AGo, large arrowhead). At the EM level, a few endothelial cells and fibroblast-like cells near the osteoclasts were labeled with antiechistatin antibody (data not shown).



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Ultrastructural immunogold localization of echistatin in osteoclasts of mouse femur. LR White thin sections of distal femur from mice on a calcium deficient diet and treated with echistatin (30 µg/kg·min) for 3 days were incubated with echistatin antiserum at 37 C, washed, and then incubated with goat antimouse IgG conjugated to colloidal gold. A, Osteoclast profile at low magnification showing echistatin label (black dots) distributed on basolateral membrane (small arrows) as well as in the cytosol above the ruffled border (RB) and clear zone (CZ); small arrowheads indicate some larger dense vesicles labeled with gold. There is weak echistatin labeling within the RB. There is no labeling (above background levels) at the clear zone membrane at the bone (BO) interface. Large arrowhead points to a small collection of grains at the outside edge of the clear zone (to the left is a clear zone belonging to an another osteoclast). B, High magnification micrograph of immuno gold label for echistatin on basolateral surface of osteoclast (arrows). Note echistatin label inside a coated pit (arrowhead). C, Gold immunolabel is concentrated in large electron dense vesicles (arrows) in basolateral region of osteoclast and less concentrated over a pale vesicle (arrowhead). D, High magnification micrograph of osteoclast CZ and BO interface showing a few detectable gold grains at the clear zone membrane (arrows). E, Osteoclast from negative control in which primary antibody was deleted. Osteoclast basolateral membrane is indicated by arrowhead, ruffled border by RB, clear zone by CZ, and bone surface by BO. Arrows indicate nonspecific gold grains. Bar, 1 µm in A, C, D, E; 0.5 µm in B.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous in vivo observations have shown that echistatin, kistrin, or anti-ß3 antibodies inhibited the parathyroidectomized response to exogenous PTH or PTHrP (20, 21, 22) indicating indirectly that integrins play a rate-limiting role in bone resorption. Recently, Engleman et al. (19) demonstrated that a synthetic RGD peptide mimetic not only inhibited calcium mobilization in a calcemic rat model but also preserved bone density in an ovariectomized rat model.

The present study provides histomorphometric evidence for echistatin inhibition of bone resorption, by measuring cancellous bone volume and other parameters in mice with 2°HPT. In this model, increased resorption, in response to a rise in endogenous PTH levels, resulted in 36% reduction in cancellous bone volume and an 11% reduction in ash weight/mm. The architecture of the cancellous bone also changed: trabecular thickness and number were reduced and trabecular spacing increased. In addition, the rate of bone turnover increased, as indicated by a 2.6-fold increase in percent osteoid surface. These changes were all prevented by echistatin treatment, consistent with echistatin inhibition of bone resorption.

The ash weight/mm in the echi-treated group had an intermediate value between the calcium deficient and replete groups. The serum calcium level in echi treated animals was slightly lower than in the calcium replete controls. The explanation for these observations is as follows. During calcium deficiency, serum calcium is maintained by bone resorption. Cancellous bone, having a higher turnover rate compared with cortical bone, was more susceptible to increased resorption and the inhibitory effect of echistatin was, therefore, easier seen in cancellous bone. However, 80% of the ash weight represents cortical bone, which is also a major PTH target. Changes in both ash weight and serum calcium levels thus most likely reflect PTH effects on cortical bone which was only partially protected by echistatin treatment. Circulating levels of PTH in mice were not measured because appropriate antibodies are not available (to our knowledge).

Disintegrins, such as echistatin, bind to several RGD dependent integrins, including the fibrinogen receptor, {alpha}IIbß3, the vitronectin receptor {alpha}vß3 and the fibronectin receptor {alpha}5ß1. The predominant target of echistatin in bone has been suggested to be {alpha}vß3, the integrin expressed abundantly in osteoclasts (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 29, 30, 31).

In vivo at the resolution level of this study, echistatin was localized predominantly to megakaryocytes, osteoclasts and no other bone or bone marrow cells. In osteoclasts, at the ultrastructural level, echistatin was localized to the basolateral membrane and intracellular vesicles, and the edge of the clear zone. Some grains were present in the clear zone membrane adjacent to the bone interface but not significantly above background and the seal of the clear zone did not appear to be morphologically disrupted (Fig. 4DGo).

Echistatin was also occasionally detected on fibroblast-like cells usually associated with osteoclasts and on a few blood vessel endothelial cells, probably by binding to {alpha}vß3. Although, {alpha}vß3 is one of the major integrins expressed by isolated vascular endothelial cells (32, 33), in vivo it was detected rarely in endothelial cells in mature blood vessels. However, its expression was reported to be highly elevated during neovascularization (34, 35).

Echistatin binding to megakaryocytes is consistent with the abundance of {alpha}IIbß3 in these cells (36, 37, 38), although {alpha}vß3 is also present at much lower levels (38, 39). This localization raises the possibility of megakaryocyte or stromal cell involvement in the effect of echistatin on bone resorption. This in vivo study does not exclude such effects, but the localization of echistatin to osteoclasts and the previously reported in vitro effects on isolated osteoclasts (15) would favor a direct effect on osteoclasts.

The identity of intracellular vesicles that contain echistatin has not been established. They could be endosomal vesicles involved in integrin endocytosis, following ligand binding. The recent work by Salo et al. (40) demonstrates a transcytosolic flow of bone resorption products from the apical surface to the basolateral surface of the resorbing osteoclast, that could include integrins and their ligands.

Although this study clearly demonstrates that echistatin inhibited bone resorption in vivo, its mode of action requires further study. The increase in osteoclast number is consistent with lower osteoclast efficiency that leads to feedback driven osteoclast recruitment and suggests that echistatin did not reduce osteoclast formation or attachment to bone. Ultrastructural examination provided no morphological explanation for the lower osteoclast efficiency. There was no flattening of the ruffled border observed in the inactive osteoclasts of osteopetrotic src (-/-) mice (41) or bisphosphonate-treated rats (42), and in 150–200 osteoclasts examined in each treatment group the fraction of cells with ruffled border or clear zone was similar. In vitro {alpha}vß3 antibodies or RGD containing peptides cause osteoclast retraction and detachment (8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48). However, much higher concentrations of echistatin were required to block osteoclast attachment than to reduce osteoclast activity, suggesting additional effects (15).

There is ample evidence for an active role of {alpha}vß3 in the migration of many cell types (49, 50, 51, 52, 53). One possibility is impaired osteoclast migration which could increase the number and decrease the relative efficiency of osteoclasts on the bone surface. Further studies will test this assumption.

The increase in osteoclast number also raises the question of osteoclast life span. It has been shown that osteoclasts undergo apoptosis and that the interaction of {alpha}vß3 with its natural ligands in other cell types prevents apoptosis (3, 54). RGD compounds and integrin blocking antibodies have been shown to induce apoptosis in angiogenic endothelial cells and in melanoma tumor cells (55, 56, 57, 58). In this study no apparent apoptotic osteoclasts were detected by EM criteria in osteoclast population sizes ranging from 149 to 286, which could have been too small.

The findings presented here are obviously valid for the model used. We have also completed a 4-week study in ovariectomized rats treated with echistatin and observed an increase in osteoclast number (58a). The effect of other agents could be different. In an in vivo study showing maintenance of bone mineral density by an RGD peptide mimetic (19) in ovariectomized rats, osteoclast number decreased after 6 weeks of treatment. These findings suggest a different mechanism, related possibly to the different compound, animal model, or duration of treatment.

In conclusion, this study presents direct evidence at the bone level that echistatin inhibits bone resorption in a 2°HPT model and that echistatin binds to osteoclasts in vivo. We have also provided the first in vivo observations on osteoclast morphology at the EM level following echistatin treatment, which show no detectable effects on ultrastructure or polarity. Echistatin may interfere with subtle aspects of integrin mediated signal transduction (6, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63) important for osteoclastic activity or migration. Regardless of mechanism, direct evidence for echistatin inhibition of bone resorption in vivo makes integrin ligands attractive candidates for the treatment of diseases associated with increased bone resorption.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Raffaella Balena for her helpful advice and Michael Gentile, Angelo Markatos, and Greg Seedor for their generous assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Present address: The Third Department of Internal Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3–2, Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan. Back

Received June 9, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Teitelbaum SL 1993 Bone remodeling and the osteoclast. J Bone Miner Res 8:S523–S525
  2. Vaananen HK 1993 Mechanism of bone turnover. Ann Med 25:353–359[Medline]
  3. Roodman GD 1996 Advances in bone biology: the osteoclast. Endocr Rev 17:308–332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Horton MA, Rodan GA 1995 Integrins as therapeutic targets in bone disease. In: Horton MA (ed) Adhesion Receptors as Therapeutic Targets. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 223–245
  5. Hynes RO 1987 Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors. Cell 48:549–554[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hynes RO 1992 Integrins: versatility, modulation and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69:11–25[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD 1987 New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 238:491–497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Davies J, Warwick J, Totty N, Philp R, Horton M 1989 The osteoclast functional antigen, implicated in the regulation of bone resorption, is biochemically related to the vitronectin receptor. J Cell Biol 109:1817–1826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Horton MA, Taylor JL, Arnett TR, Helfrich MH 1991 Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides and the anti-vitronectin receptor antibody 23C6 inhibit cell spreading and dentine resorption by osteoclasts. Exp Cell Res 195:368–375[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Helfrich MH, Nesbitt SA, Horton MA 1992 Integrins on rat osteoclasts: characterization of two monoclonal antibodies (F4 and F11) to rat ß3. J Bone Miner Res 7:345–351[Medline]
  11. Zambonin-Zallone A, Teti A, Grano M, Ruinacci A, Abbadini M, Gaboli M, Marchisio PC 1989 Immunocytochemical distribution of extracellular matrix receptors in human osteoclasts: a ß3 integrin is colocalized with vinculin and talin in the podosome of osteoclastoma giant cells. Exp Cell Res 182:645–652[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Nesbitt S, Nesbit A, Helfrich M, Horton MA 1993 Biochemical characterization of human osteoclast integrins: osteoclasts express {alpha}vß3, {alpha}2ß1 and {alpha}vß1 integrins. J Biol Chem 268:16737–16745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hughes DE, Salter DM, Dedhar S, Simpson R 1993 Integrin expression in human bone. J Bone Miner Res 8:527–533[Medline]
  14. Grano M, Zigrino P, Colucci S, Zambonin G, Trusolin L, Serra M, Baldini N, Teti A, Marchisio PC, Zambonin Zallone A 1994 Adhesion properties and integrin expression of cultured human osteoclast-like cells. Exp Cell Res 212:209–218[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Sato M, Sardana M, Grasser W, Garsky V, Murray J, Gould R 1990 Echistatin is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption in culture. J Cell Biol 111:1713–1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sato M, Garsky V, Majeska R, Einhorn T, Murray J, Tashjian Jr A, Gould R 1994 Structure-activity studies of the s-echistatin inhibition of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 9:1441–1449[Medline]
  17. Lakkakorpi R, Horton MA, Helfrich MH, Karhukorpi KE, Vaananen HK 1991 Vitronectin receptor has a role in bone resorption but does not mediate tight sealing zone attachment of osteoclasts to the bone surface. J Cell Biol 115:1179–1186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Nakamura I, Gailit J, Sasaki T 1996 Osteoclast integrin {alpha}vß3 is present in the clear zone and contributes to cellular polarization. Cell Tissue Res 286:507–515[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Engleman VW, Nickols GA, Ross FP, Horton MA, Griggs DW, Settle SL, Ruminski PG, Teitelbaum SL 1997 A peptidomimetic antagonist of the {alpha}vß3 integrin inhibits bone resorption in vitro and prevents osteoporosis in vivo. J Clin Invest 99:2284–2292[Medline]
  20. Fisher JE, Caulfield MP, Sato M, Quartuccio HA, Gould RJ, Garsky VM, Rodan GA, Rosenblatt M 1993 Inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption in vivo by echistatin, and "arginyl-glycyl-aspartyl" (RGD)-containing protein. Endocrinology 132:1411–1413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Crippes BA, Engleman WW, Settle SL, Delarco J, Ornberg RL, Helfrich MH, Horton MA, Nickols GA 1996 Antibody to ß3 integrin inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in the thryoparathyroidectomized rat. Endocrinology 37:918–924
  22. King KL, D’Anza J, Bodary S, Pitti R, Siegel M, Lazarus RA, Dennis MS, Hammonds Jr RG, Kukreja SC 1994 Effects of kistrin on bone resorption in vitro and serum calcium in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 9:381–387[Medline]
  23. Rodan SB, Leu CT, Duong LT, Golub E, Rodan GA Characterization of echistatin binding to human {alpha}vß3 integrin. Program of the 16th Annual Meeting of The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Kansas City, MO, 1994, p S247 (Abstract)
  24. Seedor JG, Quartuccio HA, Thompson DD 991 The bisphosphonate alendronate (MK-217) inhibits bone loss due to ovariectomy in rats. J Bone Miner Res 6:339–346
  25. Baron R, Vignery A, Neff L, Silverglate A, Santa Maria A 1983 Processing of undecalcified bone specimens for bone histomorphometry. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 13–35
  26. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR 1987 Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2:595–610[Medline]
  27. Domon T, Wakita M 1991 The three-dimensional structure of the clear zone of a cultured osteoclast. J Electron Microsc 40:34–40[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Frank J, Balena R, Masarachia P, Seedor JG, Cartwright M 1993 The effects of three different demineralization agents on osteopontin localization in adult rat bone using immunohistochemistry. Histochemistry 99:295–301[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Lakkakorpi PT, Helfrich MH, Horton MA, Vaananen HK 1993 Spatial organization of microfilaments and vitronectin receptor, alpha-v-beta-3, in osteoclasts - a study using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Cell Sci 104:663–670[Abstract]
  30. Simon K, Nutt EM, Rodan GA, Duong LT 1995 Interactions of {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}vß5 integrins with extracellular matrix components control cell attachment and migration. Program of the 17th Annual Meeting of The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Baltimore, MD, p S164 (Abstract)
  31. Pfaff M, McLane MA, Beviglia L, Niewiarowski S, Timpl R 1994 Comparison of disintegrins with limited variation in the RGD loop in their binding to purified integrins alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 and in cell adhesion inhibition. Cell Adhes Commun 2:491–501[Medline]
  32. Albeida SM, Daise M, Levine EM, Buck CA 1989 Identification and characterization of cell-substrate adhesion receptors on cultured human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 83:1992–2002
  33. Cheresh DA 1987 Human endothelial cells synthesize and express and Arg-Gly-Asp-directed adhesion receptor involved in attachment to fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6471–6475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Brooks PC, Clark RAF, Cheresh DA 1994 Requirement of vascular integrin {alpha}vß3 for angiogenesis. Science 264:569–571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Drake CJ, Cheresh DA, Little CD 1995 An antagonist of integrin alpha(V) beta(3) prevents maturation of blood-vessels during embryonic neovascularization. J Cell Sci 108:2655–2661[Abstract]
  36. Dennis MS, Henzel WJ, Pitti RM, Lipari MT, Napier MA, Deisher TA, Bunting S, Lazarus RA 1989 Platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa protein antagonists from snake venoms: evidence for a family of platelet-aggregation inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2471–2475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gould RJ, Polokoff MA, Friedman PA, Huang TF, Holt JC, Cook J, Niewiarowski S 1990 Disintegrins: a family of integrin inhibitor proteins from viper venoms. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 195:168–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Kieffer N, Phillips DR 1990 Platelet membrane glycoproteins: functions in cellular interactions. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:329–357[CrossRef]
  39. Coller BS, Seligsohn U, West SM, Scudder LE, Norton KJ 1991 Platelet fibringen and vitronectin in Glanzmann thrombasthenia: evidence consistent with specific roles for glycoprotein IIb/IIa and {alpha}vß3 integrins in platelet protein trafficking. Blood 78:2603–2610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Salo J, Lehenkari P, Mulari M, Metsikko K, Vaananen HK 1997 Removal of osteoclast bone resorption products by transcytosis. Science 276:270–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Boyce BF, Yoneda T, Lowe C, Soriano P, Mundy G 1992 Requirement of pp60-src expression for osteoclasts to form ruffled borders and resorb bone in mice. J Clin Invest 90:1622–1627
  42. Sato M, Grasser W, Endo N, Akins R, Simmons H, Thompson DD, Golub E, Rodan G 1991 Bisphosphonate action: alendronate localization in rat bone and effects on osteoclast ultrastructure. J Clin Invest 88:2095–2105
  43. Chambers TJ, Fuller K, Darby JA, Pringel JAS, Horton MA 1986 Monoclonal antibodies against osteoclasts inhibit bone resorption in vitro. Bone Miner 1:127–135[Medline]
  44. Horton MA, Dorey EL, Nesbitt SA, Samanen J, Ali FE, Stadel J, Nichols A, Greig R, Helfrich MH 1993 Modulation of vitronectin receptor-mediated osteoclast adhesion by arg-gly-asp peptide analogs: a structure-function analysis. J Bone Miner Res 8:239–247[Medline]
  45. Helfrich MH, Nesbitt SA, Dorey EL, Horton MA 1992 Rat osteoclasts adhere to a wide range of RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptide-containing proteins, including the bone sialoproteins and fibronectin, via a ß3 integrin. J Bone Miner Res 7:335–343[Medline]
  46. Ross FP, Chappel J, Alvarez JI, Sander D, Butler WT, Farach Carson MC, Mintz KA, Robey PG, Teitelbaum SL, Cheresh D 1993 Interactions between the bone matrix proteins osteopontin and bone sialoprotein and the osteoclast integrin alpha v beta 3 potentiate bone resorption. J Biol Chem 268:9901–9907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Flores ME, Norgard M, Heinegard D, Reinholt FP, Andersson G 1992 RGD-directed attachment of isolated rat osteoclasts to osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and fibronectin. Exp Cell Res 201:526–530[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Gronowicz GA, Derome ME l 1994 Synthetic peptide containing Arg-Gly-Asp inhibits bone formation and resorption in a mineralizing organ culture system of fetal rat parietal bones. J Bone Miner 9:193–201
  49. Huttenlocher A, Sandborg RR, Horwitz AF 1995 Adhesion in cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7:697–706[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Lawson MA, Maxfield FR 1995 Ca2+ and calcineurin-dependent recycling of an integrin to the front of migrating neutrophils. Nature 377:75–79[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Delannet M, Martin F, Bossy B, Cheresh DA, Reichardt LF, Duband JL 1994 Specific roles of the alpha-v-beta-1, alpha-v-beta-3 and alpha-v-beta-5 integrins in avian neural crest cell-adhesion and migration on vitronectin. Development 120:2687–2702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Jones JI, Prevette T, Gockerman A, Clemmons DR 1996 Ligand occupancy of the {alpha}vß3 integrin is necessary for smooth muscle cells to migrate in response to insulin-like growth factor I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2482–2487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Filardo EJ, Brooks PC, Deming SL, Damsky C, Cheresh DA 1995 Requirement of the NPXY motif in the integrin beta-3 subunit cytoplasmic tail for melanoma cell-migration in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biol 130:441–450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Hughes DE, Wright KR, Mundy GR, Boyce BF 1995 Association of osteoclast apoptosis with loss of adhesion. J Bone Miner Res 10:S326 (Abstract)
  55. Ruoslahti E, Reed JC 1994 Anchorage dependence, integrins, and apoptosis. Cell 77:477–478[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Bates RC, Lincz LF, Burns GF 1995 Involvement of integrins in cell survival. Cancer Metastasis Rev 14:191–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Stromblad S, Cheresh DA 1996 Integrins, angiogenesis and vascular cell survival. Chem Biol 3:881–885[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Varner JA, Cheresh DA 1996 Tumor angiogenesis and the role of vascular cell integrin alpha v beta 3. Important Adv Oncol 69–87
  59. Yamamoto M, Fisher JE, Gentile M, Seedor JG, Leu C-T, Rodan S, Rodan GA 1998 The integrin ligand echistatin prevents bone loss in ovariectomized mice and rats. Endocrinology 139:1411–1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Miyauchi A, Alvarez J, Greenfield EM, Teti A, Grano M, Colucci S, Zambonin-Zallone A, Ross FP, Tietelbaum SL, Cheresh D, Hruska KA 1993 Binding of osteopontin to the osteoclast integrin alpha-v-beta-3. Osteoporosis Int 3:S132–S135
  61. Zimolo Z, Wesolowski G, Tanaka H, Hyman JL, Hoyer JR, Rodan GA 1994 Soluble {alpha}vß3-integrin ligands raise [Ca2+]i in rat osteoclasts and mouse-derived osteoclast-like cells. Am J Physiol 266:C376–C381
  62. Paniccia R, Zani B, Colucci S, Teti A 1993 Modulation of integrin expression by calcitonin (CT) and elevated extracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o) in human osteoclast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 8:S145
  63. Shankar G, Davison I, Helfrich MH, Mason WT, Horton MA 1993 Integrin receptor-mediated mobilisation of intranuclear calcium in rat osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 105:61–68[Abstract]
  64. Hruska KA, Rolnick F, Huskey M, Alvarez U, Cheresh D 1995 Engagement of the osteoclast integrin {alpha}vß3 by osteopontin stimulates phosphatidylinositol 3-hydroxyl kinase activity. Endocrinology 136:2984–2992[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Wilson, C. Peters, P. Saftig, and D. Bromme
Cathepsin K Activity-dependent Regulation of Osteoclast Actin Ring Formation and Bone Resorption
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2009; 284(4): 2584 - 2592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. O'Brien, R. L. Jilka, Q. Fu, S. Stewart, R. S. Weinstein, and S. C. Manolagas
IL-6 is not required for parathyroid hormone stimulation of RANKL expression, osteoclast formation, and bone loss in mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2005; 289(5): E784 - E793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
C. Dolce, A. Vakani, L. Archer, J.A. Morris-Wiman, and L.S. Holliday
Effects of Echistatin and an RGD Peptide on Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 2003; 82(9): 682 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
H. Vaananen, H Zhao, M Mulari, and J. Halleen
The cell biology of osteoclast function
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2000; 113(3): 377 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
I Nakamura, M. Pilkington, P. Lakkakorpi, L Lipfert, S. Sims, S. Dixon, G. Rodan, and L. Duong
Role of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin in osteoclast migration and formation of the sealing zone
J. Cell Sci., January 11, 1999; 112(22): 3985 - 3993.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Nakamura, H. Tanaka, G. A. Rodan, and L. T. Duong
Echistatin Inhibits the Migration of Murine Prefusion Osteoclasts and the Formation of Multinucleated Osteoclast-Like Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 1998; 139(12): 5182 - 5193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Yamamoto, J. E. Fisher, M. Gentile, J. G. Seedor, C.-T. Leu, S. B. Rodan, and G. A. Rodan
The Integrin Ligand Echistatin Prevents Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Mice and Rats
Endocrinology, March 1, 1998; 139(3): 1411 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. T. Duong, I. Nakamura, P. T. Lakkakorpi, L. Lipfert, A. J. Bett, and G. A. Rodan
Inhibition of Osteoclast Function by Adenovirus Expressing Antisense Protein-tyrosine Kinase 2
J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2001; 276(10): 7484 - 7492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masarachia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duong, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masarachia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duong, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PARATHYROID HORMONE


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals