help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomerantz, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitelka, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomerantz, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitelka, V.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 3 922-931
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Nitric Oxide Is a Mediator of the Inhibitory Effect of Activated Macrophages on Production of Androgen by the Leydig Cell of the Mouse1

David K. Pomerantz and Vaclav Pitelka

Departments of Physiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. David K. Pomerantz, Department of Physiology, University of Western Ontario, Medical Sciences Building, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1. E-mail: dpomer{at}physiology.uwo.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We hypothesized that macrophage activation results in nitric oxide (NO) production and that this NO acts directly on Leydig cells (LC) to alter androgen synthesis. Both peritoneal macrophages and a murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) were activated in vitro by sequential exposure to interferon-{gamma} (50 U/ml) and then bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/ml) for 24 h each. At various times after initiation of activation, selected wells were harvested for identification of messenger RNA for inducible NO synthase by RT-PCR. Amplicons of the predicted 651-bp product were isolated, cloned, and sequenced to validate the PCR procedure. Such amplicons first appeared between 2–4 h after exposure to LPS, and staining increased in intensity for the rest of the study. Nitrite accumulation followed a similar time course. Similarly treated wells were washed after 24-h activation and cocultured with purified LC for a final 24-h incubation in the absence of interferon-{gamma} and LPS. Basal and LH-stimulated production of androgen was estimated by RIA. In some experiments the NO synthase inhibitor N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester or the NO scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (C-PTIO) was added during activation and coculture. Coculture of LC with quiescent macrophages altered neither basal nor LH-stimulated androgen production. Coculture with either type of activated macrophage did not alter basal, but significantly reduced (by 50%) LH-stimulated, androgen production. N{omega}-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and C-PTIO blocked the inhibitory effect. The NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine at concentrations greater than 10-5 M significantly inhibited LH-stimulated androgen production by purified LC (P < 0.01). The inhibitory effect of S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine was evident when exposure exceeded 4 h. Intermediates of steroidogenesis were added to elucidate the site of NO inhibition. The enzymatic inhibition occurred at least in part at 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17/20 lyase (P450c17). Enzyme inhibition was reversed by C-PTIO. Northern blot analysis indicated that accumulation of messenger RNA for P450c17 was not significantly altered. Therefore, activation of macrophages results in decreased androgen production by cocultured LC. The inhibition is mediated in part by macrophage-derived NO acting directly on the LC via inhibition of at least one of the P450 steroidogenic enzymes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN HUMANS, acute, chronic, and autoimmune diseases have been associated with low concentrations of testosterone in blood (1, 2, 3, 4). Because activation of macrophages occurs in many of these situations, it has been suggested that macrophage products might be involved in directly regulating Leydig cell (LC) function. The mechanism for such effects is poorly understood. Hales has summarized the published studies in which putative macrophage products were evaluated and noted that in most, but not all, reports, interleukin-1 and -2; interferon-{alpha}, -ß, and -{gamma} (IFN{alpha}, -ß, and -{gamma}); and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} inhibit androgen secretion (5). As macrophage function becomes better understood, it is clear that other products of this cell may also be candidates for modulators of testosterone secretion; nitric oxide (NO) is such a molecule.

NO is a simple and relatively unstable radical under physiological conditions. It has been characterized as a widely distributed, biologically produced molecule that can mediate intracellular and intercellular communication. NO acts as an endothelium-derived relaxation factor, as a neurotransmitter, and as an important molecule mediating the cytotoxic actions of the immune system. The molecule is synthesized from L-arginine in a reaction catalyzed by NO synthase (NOS), an enzyme that exists in several isoforms. Macrophages respond to activation by cytokines with increased synthesis of an inducible form of the enzyme (iNOS) that is neither calcium nor calmodulin dependent. The NO produced as a result of iNOS induction may mediate some of the tumoricidal or antimicrobial effects of macrophages (6, 7, 8).

Several recent reports have provided evidence that NO may directly influence gonadal steroidogenesis. Progesterone and estradiol secretion by human granulosa/luteal cells is inhibited by NO (9), as is secretion of progesterone by mouse MA10 tumor cells and testosterone secretion by rat LC (10). These studies raised the possibility that the inhibitory effect of macrophages on androgen secretion reported by others could be mediated by NO.

In this report, we established that in vitro activation of peritoneal macrophages or a macrophage cell line was associated with elevated steady state levels of messenger RNA (mRNA) for iNOS and nitrite accumulation. When such activated cells were cocultured with normal mouse LC, inhibition of androgen production occurred, and this effect was blocked by inhibition of iNOS activity or blockade of NO action. Finally, we have demonstrated that an NO donor can act directly on normal mouse LC to inhibit steroidogenesis at least in part by decreasing the activity of the enzyme 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17/20 lyase (P450c17).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
CD-1 mice were purchased from Canada Breeding Laboratories (St. Constant, Canada) and were 8–10 weeks of age when used in these experiments. The mice were housed individually in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a 12-h photoperiod. They received standard mouse chow and water ad libitum. At the appropriate times the mice were killed by asphyxiation in a CO2 chamber. All studies were approved by the University of Western Ontario animal care committee, and the animals were treated according to the guidelines set by the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Preparation of macrophages
Peritoneal macrophages were obtained from exudates elicited by ip injection of 1 ml sterile 4% Brewer’s thioglycolate medium (Difco, Detroit, MI). Animals were killed 3–5 days later, and using sterile procedures, cells were obtained by peritoneal lavage with calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution. After two washes with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 U penicillin and 100 µg streptomycin/ml (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), the cell suspension was allowed to adhere to plastic culture dishes for 1 h at 34 C. Nonadherent cells were discarded; adhered cells were lifted with a plastic scraper and resuspended in supplemented RPMI. Cell numbers were determined with a hemocytometer, and viability, assessed by trypan blue exclusion after 3 min, exceeded 95%. Purity was estimated by immunohistochemical identification of the cell surface marker F4/80 (11), and for the studies reported here, 70–80% of peritoneal cells were positive for this marker. The identities of the contaminating cells are not known, but they are assumed to be a mixture of lymphocytes and/or other migratory cells.

To use a pure macrophage preparation, the murine cell line RAW 264.7 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) was grown in the same supplemented RPMI 1640 described above with the addition of 10% FBS. Cells were passaged two or three times weekly and harvested for activation at various times after passage. The F4/80 marker was consistently present on more than 97% of the RAW cells.

The peritoneal or RAW cells were plated in serum-free RPMI in six-well tissue culture plates (Falcon, VWR Scientific, Toronto, Canada) at 5 x 105 viable cells/cm2. Twenty-four hours later, nonadherent cells were aspirated, and the remaining macrophages were primed with 50 U/ml recombinant murine IFN{gamma} (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) for 24 h. Macrophages were then activated by exposure to 100 ng/ml Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS; serotype 0111:B4, Sigma Chemical Co., Oakville, Canada). IFN{gamma} increases the rate of iNOS mRNA transcription in response to LPS (12). At various time intervals after activation, medium was collected, and Griess reagent was used to determine nitrite accumulation (13). The cells were then lifted from plates and sonicated briefly. The sonicate was centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 x g, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended 1 ml GTC buffer [4 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 1% ß-mercaptoethanol; Sigma], 20 µg E. coli ribosomal RNA (Boehringer Mannheim, Laval, Canada) in 5 µl were added, and total RNA was extracted (14). The RNA was reverse transcribed by resuspending 2 µg total RNA and 0.6 µg 3'-primer in diethylpyrocarbonate H2O (10 µl). The mixture was incubated for 10 min at 70 C, placed on ice for 4 min, and then centrifuged for 15 sec at 12,000 x g before the addition of 10 µl reverse transcriptase mix (1 µl RNA guard, 4 µl 5 x first strand buffer, 2 µl 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 2 µl 200 µM deoxy-NTPs, and 1 µl Superscript reverse transcriptase; Life Technologies) to each tube. Samples were incubated at 43 C for 90 min, followed by a 5-min incubation at 94 C. The upstream and downstream primer sequences were 5'-CAACAGGAACCTACCAGCTCA-3' and 5'-GATGTTGTAGCGCTGTGTGTCA-3', respectively. These sequences have been used by others (15) and produce a predicted product of 651 bp that has greater than 97% homology with the rat form of iNOS. PCR was conducted in a reaction mixture containing 1 U Taq DNA polymerase in a final volume of 50 µl, consisting of 5 µl 10 x PCR buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, and 500 mM KCl), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs (all reagents from Life Technologies), and 2 µM of each primer; 5-µl aliquots of complementary DNA (cDNA) were used. The mixture was overlaid with mineral oil and amplified by PCR for 40 cycles in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer/Cetus 480, Norwalk, CT), with each cycle consisting of denaturing temperature of 94 C for 1 min, reannealing of primers to target sequence at 55 C for 30 sec, and extension at 72 C for 1 min. PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) containing 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide. Lanes with a 100-bp DNA ladder (Life Technologies) served as a standard. Controls are described in Results.

The identities of the amplified transcripts were established by sequence analysis. The PCR product was directly ligated into the PCR 2.1 TA vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Clones of transformed cells were selected and grown overnight in Luria-Bertoni broth, and DNA was extracted using the FlexiPrep Kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Automated sequencing was provided by a commercial service at the University of Guelph (Guelph, Ontario, Canada).

Preparation of purified LC and androgen assay
Testes were aseptically removed, decapsulated, and minced with scissors. Dispersion of the tissue was carried out in medium 199 with Hanks’ salts (Life Technologies) containing 12 ng/ml deoxyribonuclease (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) by gentle swirling on a magnetic stirrer for 10 min at 37 C. The suspension was repeatedly triturated with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette for the first minute to break up large clumps, filtered through a double layer of nylon mesh (70 µm), and centrifuged at 400 x g at 4 C for 15 min. The cellular pellet was resuspended in 1–4 ml (depending on the number of testes processed) medium 199 with Hanks’ salts at pH 7.4 supplemented as follows: sodium bicarbonate: 0.7 g/liter; HEPES, 25 mM (Life Technologies); penicillin, 100 IU/ml; streptomycin, 100 µg/ml (Life Technologies); and BSA, 2 mg/ml (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Isosmotic, continuous density gradients of Percoll (Pharmacia) were prepared by a modification of the method reported by Browning et al. (16). Nine parts Percoll were mixed with 1 part (vol/vol) 10 x Hanks’ buffered medium 199 containing 20 mg/ml BSA. The pH was brought to 7.4 with 1 N HCl. Gradients were prepared by centrifuging 8.5 ml of this mixture in 15-ml tubes at 4 C for 1 h at 20,000 x g. One half milliliter of the suspension of testicular cells was layered onto each gradient and then centrifuged at 800 x g for 20 min at 4 C. The layer containing LC, a 2.0-ml band to whose center 1.062 g/ml density calibration beads migrate, was washed three times with medium, and the cells were resuspended in medium 199 with Earle’s salts supplemented with 2.2 g/liter sodium bicarbonate at the same pH and at the concentrations of insulin, penicillin, streptomycin, and BSA indicated above.

Cell viability was determined using trypan blue dye exclusion and constituted greater than 90% of the cells observed. Cells were stained for 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ßHSD) as a marker for steroidogenic cells according to the method described by Wiebe (17); etiocholanol was used as a substrate. The preparations were found to contain 95–99% 3ßHSD-positive cells. LC were incubated at 33–34 C in 24-well polystyrene culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) at a concentration of 10,000 viable, 3ßHSD-positive cells/0.5 ml·well. The incubations were carried out in 95% air and 5% CO2 in a water-saturated atmosphere, and treatments were replicated in four to six wells. After 20 h, LH or blank medium was added to the appropriate wells as described for the individual experiments, and 4 h later, the experiments were terminated. Medium was collected and centrifuged at 2000 x g at 4 C for 10 min; supernatant was aspirated and then stored at -20 C until assayed for androgen. The data are expressed as androgen accumulation per million LC/24 h.

An established RIA was used to determine androgen accumulation (18). The data are reported as androgen released per million LC during the final 4 h of incubation. The sensitivity of the assay was 2.9 pg/tube, and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.2% and 5.7%, respectively, for the experiments reported here.

Preparation of macrophages for coculture with LC
One million viable peritoneal macrophages or RAW cells were plated in serum-free RPMI in 24-well tissue culture plates. Adherence, priming, and activation were carried out as described above. After aspiration of the IFN/LPS-containing activation medium, 10,000 purified, viable, murine LC, prepared as described above, were added to each well. After a further 20 h, additional control medium or medium containing ovine LH (to achieve 200 pg NIDDK oLH-S26/ml) was added for the final 4 h of incubation. Medium was then aspirated, cells were removed by centrifugation, and the supernatants were frozen at -20 C until RIA for androgen. In several experiments the effect of inhibition of NO synthesis or scavenging of NO was evaluated. In each case, compounds were added to the culture wells at the same time as LPS and maintained for the duration of the experiment. The competitive inhibitor of NOS, N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; Sigma, Oakville, Canada) was used at a final concentration of 1 mM. This concentration effectively eliminates NO production in vitro (19). We also tested the effect of a NO scavenger, 2–4-(-carboxyphenyl-4,4,5,5,-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (C-PTIO; Precision Biochemicals, Vancouver, Canada). C-PTI0 (250 µM) was added to the appropriate wells at the same time as the LC. This concentration was arrived at after preliminary experiments in our laboratory and consideration of published data (20).

Site of action of NO on purified LC
To more directly address the contribution of NO to the inhibitory effects of macrophages on androgen production, we evaluated the effects of the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine (SNAP; Sigma, Oakville, Canada), at various concentrations (10-6–10-3 M) and for various lengths of time (4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h). In the remaining experiments, a technical variation was introduced. At the onset of the final 4-h incubation (except for incubations of 4-h duration), appropriate wells were sampled to determine the background androgen release that had occurred until that point in the experiment. LH-S26 or blank medium was then added to each remaining well to achieve the appropriate gonadotropin concentration. At the end of incubation, medium was again collected and stored until assay for androgen content. The background value was subtracted from the final value, and the data are reported as androgen released per million LC during the final 4 h of incubation.

Incubation with various saturating concentrations (21) of precursors of testosterone was employed to determine the site in the steroidogenic pathway of inhibition caused by SNAP. Cells were cultured for 20 h with or without SNAP, and then one of the following precursors was added for the final 4 h to achieve the concentrations indicated: 22R-hydroxycholesterol (5 µg/ml), pregnenolone, progesterone, 17{alpha}-hydroxypregnenolone, 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, androstenedione, and androstenediol (all at 500 ng/ml). Wells containing each precursor, but devoid of LC, provided medium that was used as a blank in the androgen assay.

To confirm that the SNAP effect we observed was primarily due to NO released into the medium, cells were cultured as described above with the addition of the NO scavenger used above. C-PTIO (250 µM) was added to the appropriate wells immediately before SNAP.

Extraction of total RNA and quantification of mRNA levels
To obtain information about the mechanism of the inhibitory effect of NO on the activities of selected steroidogenic enzymes, net accumulation of mRNA for 3ßHSD (as a noncytochrome P450 enzyme) and P450c17 (as a P450-associated enzyme) was assessed by Northern blot analysis. One million LC were incubated for 24 h with or without 10-4 M SNAP. During the final 4 h of the experiment, cells received control medium, or LH was added to achieve 200 pg/ml. Medium was then aspirated, and total RNA was extracted using the technique described above for macrophages. Five micrograms of total RNA from each treatment group were resuspended in 50% formamide, 2.2 M formaldehyde, 20 mM 3[N-morpholino]propane sulfonic acid (MOPS), 50 mM acetate, and 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.0, and subjected to electrophoresis in 1.1% agarose containing 2.2 M formaldehyde, 20 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium acetate, and 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.0. RNA was transferred to Hybond-N nylon membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) by overnight capillary blotting in 3 M NaCl and 0.3 M Na citrate, pH 7.0. The blots were cross-linked in a UVC 500 UV cross-linker (Hoefer, San Francisco, CA) at 120 mJ/cm2 and prehybridized for 30 min at 65 C in Church buffer [0.5 M Na2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (wt/vol) BSA, and 0.25 M SDS]. The blots were then hybridized overnight in hybridization buffer at 60 C with 106 cpm/ml 32P-labeled cDNA. DNA probes were radiolabeled with [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP using the Random Primer DNA labeling system (Life Technologies). After hybridization, the blots were washed in 0.04 M Na2PO4-0.1% SDS three times at 65 C for 15 min. Radioactivity was visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry.

Statistical analysis
All experiments reported here were repeated at least three times, and the data were pooled. If heterogeneity of variance was detected by Bartlett’s test, this was reduced by logarithmic transformation of the data before analysis. These data were then subjected to multifactor ANOVA, the Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons, and Student’s t test for comparing two means (22). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nitrite production and expression of iNOS mRNA
Activation of RAW 264.7 cells caused accumulation of nitrite in the culture medium (Fig. 1Go). ANOVA detected a significant (P < 0.01) interaction between time and activation state of the RAW cells, because quiescent cells did not cause increased nitrite accumulation, but, beginning 4 h after exposure to LPS, sensitized RAW cells produced increasing amounts of nitrite for the duration of the experiment. Similar data (not shown) were obtained from peritoneal macrophages. RT-PCR of mRNA obtained from similarly treated RAW cells produced an amplicon of the predicted size of approximately 650 bp (Fig. 2Go). This material was also present when RNA from quiescent cells was used, although the signal strength was weak. Isolation, cloning, and sequencing of this amplicon indicated a cDNA whose base sequence had 93.5% homology with the appropriate portion of iNOS cDNA reported by Xie et al. (23).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Nitrite accumulation in cultures of the RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line. Cells were left in a quiescent state or were sensitized with IFN{gamma} (50 U/ml) for 24 h, at which time LPS (100 ng/ml) was added, and IFN{gamma} was maintained. Medium was collected at the designated times after introduction of LPS. A significant (P < 0.01) increase in nitrite accumulation was detected from the activated cells from 4 h until termination of the experiment.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Electrophoretic resolution of RT-PCR products on 2% agarose-ethidium bromide gel. L, One hundred-base pair ladder; -ve, PCR without cDNA; +ve, RT-PCR of RNA from rat colon of animals treated in vivo with LPS; -ve RT, RT-PCR without RNA. Lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, RT-PCR of RNA from quiescent macrophages; lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 RT-PCR of RNA from activated RAW cells. Cells were sensitized and activated as described in Fig. 1Go. RNA was harvested at the designated times after introduction of LPS.

 
Macrophage coculture with LC
IFN{gamma} inhibits androgen production by mouse LC (24). For this reason, all of the data shown here were obtained from incubations in which macrophage-conditioned medium was replaced by fresh medium, without IFN/LPS, before the introduction of LC at the onset of the final 24-h incubation. Thus, any effects noted are due to macrophage activities that are maintained in vitro after removal of IFN/LPS.

In the absence of macrophages the basal accumulation of androgen was 0.31 ± 0.05 µg/million LC·24 h. Exposure to 200 pg LH/ml increased accumulation to 2.5 ± 0.4 µg/million cells (Fig. 3Go). When LC were cocultured with quiescent cells for 24 h, neither basal nor LH-stimulated androgen accumulation was altered. However, activation of macrophages produced a significant (P < 0.02) interaction because basal androgen release was unaltered by macrophage activation, whereas LH-stimulated androgen release was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of activation of peritoneal macrophages on androgen production by mouse LC in coculture. Macrophages were subjected to control conditions or the 48-h sensitization/activation sequence in Fig. 1Go. Fresh media and LC without IFN{gamma}/LPS were added and LH (to achieve 200 pg S26/ml) introduced 20 h later. Androgen accumulation was determined 4 h later. Quiescent macrophages had no effect on basal or LH-stimulated production of androgen, but activated macrophages caused a significant (P < 0.01) inhibition of LH-stimulated androgen production.

 
The effect of L-NAME on the ability of activated peritoneal macrophages to inhibit androgen production was evaluated. In the absence of macrophages, L-NAME itself had no effect on basal or LH-stimulated androgen production (0.31 ± 0.05 and 2.27 ± 0.45 µg/million cells, respectively). In the presence of L-NAME, multifactor ANOVA detected no interactions. This occurred because LH caused a significant (P < 0.001) increase in androgen release, the magnitude of which was not influenced by macrophage activation (Fig. 4Go). A final test of NO involvement in inhibition of androgen secretion used the NO scavenger C-PTIO. This compound itself had a modest, but statistically insignificant, inhibitory effect on basal and LH-stimulated androgen accumulation. As with L-NAME, the inhibitory effect of activated macrophages on androgen accumulation was completely reversed by scavenging NO with C-PTIO (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of inhibition of NOS activity with L-NAME (1 mM) on the ability of peritoneal macrophages to inhibit androgen production by LC in coculture. L-NAME was present in all culture wells for the duration of the experiment; otherwise, conditions were the same as in Fig. 3Go. L-NAME itself had no effect on steroidogenesis compared with the control treatment in Fig. 3Go, but completely blocked the inhibitory effect of macrophage activation.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of the NO scavenger C-PTIO (250 µM) on the ability of peritoneal macrophages to inhibit androgen production by LC in coculture. C-PTIO was present in all culture wells for the duration of the experiment; otherwise, conditions were the same as in Fig. 3Go. C-PTIO itself was without effect on steroidogenesis compared with the control treatment in Fig. 3Go, but completely blocked the inhibitory effect of macrophage activation.

 
The peritoneal preparation is contaminated by other cell types that might be potential sources of NO. Therefore, we used the RAW cell line and repeated the essential elements of the experiments shown in Figs. 3Go and 4Go; similar results were obtained. Quiescent RAW cells had no effect on basal or stimulated androgen production, whereas significant (P < 0.02) inhibition of androgen production occurred when the RAW cells were activated with sequential IFN/LPS before the addition of LC. This inhibition was prevented by inhibition of iNOS activity with L-NAME (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of activation of RAW 264.7 macrophages on androgen production by mouse LC in coculture. RAW cells were sensitized and activated in the same manner as in Figs. 3Go and 4Go. Quiescent RAW cells had no effect on basal or stimulated androgen production, but activated macrophages caused a significant (P < 0.01) inhibition of LH-stimulated androgen production that was eliminated by L-NAME (1 mM).

 
Site of action of NO on purified LC
During the final 4 h of a 24-h incubation in the absence of LH, androgen release was irregularly detected. For this reason the effect of SNAP on unstimulated androgen accumulation was investigated over the entire 24-h incubation. In this case androgen accumulation was 126 ± 16 ng/million cells·24 h in the absence of SNAP. Tukey-Kramer analysis established that increasing the concentration of SNAP from 10-6 to 10-4 M had no effect, but at 10-3 M SNAP, the production of androgen had decreased significantly to 23 ± 1 ng/million cells·24 h (P < 0.01). This same range of SNAP concentration was investigated in the presence of 500 ng/ml LH, and androgen accumulation during the final 4 h was calculated. This concentration of LH elicits a near-maximal response, and in the absence of SNAP, androgen production was 1.28 ± 0.16 µg/million LC·4 h. Tukey-Kramer analysis showed that concentrations of SNAP greater than 10-5 M significantly (P < 0.01) inhibited androgen production by purified LC. SNAP at 10-4 M reduced androgen production to 0.084 ± 0.036 µg/million LC·4 h, and 10-3 M abolished androgen production completely. The data from these experiments that established the effective concentrations of SNAP are not shown. The inhibitory effect could not be accounted for by cytotoxicity, because the percentage of viable cells, as determined by trypan blue dye exclusion at the end of the experiment, was not significantly different between the SNAP-treated cells (91%) and the controls (92%).

The effect of 10-4 M SNAP for 24 h on androgen production in response to various concentrations of LH is shown in Fig. 7Go. Multifactorial ANOVA detected significant interaction between LH concentration and SNAP treatment (P < 0.001); this was due to LH eliciting a concentration-dependent response (P < 0.001), which was completely blocked by SNAP at all concentrations of LH.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. The effect of 24-h incubation with control medium or 10-4 M SNAP on androgen production by purified LC in response to various concentrations of LH. LH was present for the final 4 h of incubation, and androgen accumulation for that 4-h period was determined. Multifactorial ANOVA detected significant (P < 0.001) interaction between LH concentration and SNAP treatment attributed to LH eliciting a concentration-dependent stimulation of androgen production (P < 0.001) that was completely blocked by SNAP at all concentrations of LH.

 
The latency to onset of the inhibitory effect of SNAP is illustrated in Fig. 8Go. Purified LC were incubated with or without SNAP (10-4 M) for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h. LH (100–1600 pg/ml) or blank medium was added the last 4 h of each incubation. Cells that did not receive SNAP showed an increase in androgen production that was dependent on the concentration of LH, and this was observed for all durations of incubation. The response to the maximal concentration of LH did not change during the entire experiment, and the response to 100 and 400 pg/ml LH actually increased (P < 0.01). Thus, there was no diminution of the LC capacity to produce androgen in response to LH during 24-h incubation under the conditions of this study. Separate 2 x 3 ANOVA was carried out on the data from each duration of incubation. At 4 h, there was no interaction between the LH concentration and the presence of SNAP (P > 0.3), indicating that the release of androgen in response to each concentration of LH was unaltered by exposure to SNAP for 4 h. However, exposure to SNAP for 8, 16, or 24 h caused significant (P < 0.001) interaction between the LH concentration and the presence of SNAP. This effect was attributed to inhibition of LH-stimulated androgen accumulation at all concentrations of LH. Although a low level of androgen production could be detected after 8-h exposure to SNAP, inhibition was complete at 16- and 24-h exposure.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Temporal pattern of development of the inhibitory effect of SNAP on androgen production by LC. Purified cells were incubated with or without SNAP (10-4 M) for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h. LH was added at three concentrations for the last 4 h: A, 100 pg/ml; B, 400 pg/ml; and C, 1600 pg/ml. Data represent androgen accumulation during the final 4 h of the experiment. Multifactorial ANOVA detected an inhibitory effect of SNAP that became significant (P < 0.001) between 4–8 h. The inhibition was evident for all concentrations of LH and was sustained for the duration of the experiment.

 
Various {Delta}4- or {Delta}5-precursors of testosterone were added to incubation wells for the final 4 h of 24-h incubations during which cells had been exposed to control medium or medium containing 10-4 M SNAP. Each data pair was evaluated by t test. It was found that androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, and androstenediol completely overcame the inhibition caused by SNAP (P < 0.01), whereas 22R-hydroxycholesterol, pregnenolone, progesterone, 17{alpha}-hydroxypregnenolone, and 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone did not (Figs. 9Go and 10Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. The effect of cholesterol and {Delta}4-precursors of testosterone on SNAP-induced inhibition of androgen production by LC. Purified cells were incubated with or without 10-4 M SNAP for 24 h. Precursors were added for the last 4 h, and androgen production for the final 4 h was determined. 22R, 22R-Hydroxycholesterol; PROG, progesterone; OH-PROG, 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone; A’DIONE, androstenedione. Each data pair was evaluated by t test and showed that 22R-hydroxycholesterol, progesterone, and 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone did not overcome the inhibition caused by SNAP (P < 0.01), whereas androstenedione completely overcame the inhibition.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. The effect of {Delta}5-precursors of testosterone on SNAP-induced inhibition of androgen production by LC. As in Fig. 9Go, purified cells were incubated with or without 10-4 M SNAP for 24 h. Precursors were added for the last 4 h. 22R, 22R-Hydroxycholesterol; PREG, pregnenolone; OH-PREG, 17{alpha}-hydroxypregnenolone; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; A’DIOL, androstenediol. Each data pair were evaluated by t test and showed that 22R-hydroxycholesterol, pregnenolone, and 17{alpha}-hydroxypregnenolone did not overcome the inhibition caused by SNAP (P < 0.01), whereas dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenediol completely overcame the inhibition.

 
To determine whether the effect of SNAP was mediated by NO release during incubation, purified LC were incubated with or without SNAP (10-4 M) and/or C-PTIO (250 µM) for 24 h. At 20 h, 22R-hydroxycholesterol, pregnenolone, or progesterone was added at the concentrations used above. Two-way ANOVA of the data for each of the precursors detected significant (P < 0.001) interaction in all cases. This was attributed to C-PTIO having no effect on androgen production, whereas SNAP had a highly significant inhibitory effect that was completely reversed, for all three precursors, by the presence of C-PTIO (Fig. 11Go).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. The effect of C-PTIO on SNAP-induced inhibition of androgen production by LC. Purified LC were incubated with or without 10-4 M SNAP and with or without C-PTIO (250 µM) for 24 h. Testosterone precursors, 22R-hydroxycholesterol, pregnenolone, and progesterone were added during the last 4 h. The abbreviations are the same as those used in Figs. 9Go and 10Go. Two by two ANOVA of the data for each precursor showed highly significant interaction (P < 0.001) between SNAP and C-PTIO for all three precursors. This was due to C-PTIO alone having no significant effect on androgen production, but being able to completely block the significant inhibition (P < 0.001) caused by SNAP.

 
Northern blot analysis did not detect any effect of SNAP on steady state levels of mRNA for 3ßHSD. Although there appeared to be decreased relative abundance of mRNA for P450c17, when the data from separate experiments were combined, this decrease was not statistically significant (Fig 12Go).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Relative abundance of mRNA for 3ßHSD and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17/20 lyase (C-17). Purified LC were incubated without (LC) or with 10-4 M SNAP (LC + SNAP) for 24 h, and LH (to achieve 200 pg/ml) was added for the last 4 h. Total cytoplasmic RNA was isolated and fractionated as described in Materials and Methods. RNA was transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized sequentially with actin, 3ßHSD, and C-17 cDNA probes. Only the hybridized regions of each blot are shown. SNAP had no effect on message for 3ßHSD, and the apparent change in C-17 message was not statistically significant.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NO has been proposed to play multiple roles in reproductive processes and is believed to be produced at several sites in the male reproductive tract (25). Although it has been established as a mediator of penile erection (26), evidence exists for a role for NO in the control of androgen synthesis (27, 28). Most recently, del Punta et al. (10) provided a convincing demonstration of an inhibitory effect of NO on steroidogenesis in MA-10 tumor cells and rat LC. Because NO is produced by activated macrophages, we sought to establish whether the known inhibitory effect of macrophages on steroidogenesis could be mediated by NO.

We found that activation of macrophages with IFN/LPS was associated with an increase in nitrite accumulation and a concomitant increase in the signal strength of a 651-bp amplicon produced by RT-PCR of iNOS mRNA. Isolation, cloning, and sequencing of this amplicon validated the RT-PCR procedure. Although our RT-PCR approach cannot be treated as a quantitative measure, the results are consistent with earlier data from Northern blot analysis in which steady state levels of iNOS mRNA increased between 2–4 h after activation of RAW cells, and the accumulation of message and nitrite remained elevated for at least 12 h (12). In addition, other studies have shown macrophage activation to be associated with a prolonged increase in NO production that is optimal between 24–48 h after activation with LPS (29).

Coculture of quiescent macrophages with LC had no effect on LH-stimulated androgen production. However, activation of either type of macrophage consistently caused inhibition of stimulated androgen production during the period of optimal NO production. There are unresolved inconsistencies in the existing literature concerning the in vitro effect of macrophages on androgen production by LC. NO is unstable in aqueous media and is probably dissipated from macrophage-conditioned medium. It is likely that NO exerts its biological effects near its site of production. Thus, only studies in which macrophages and LC were cocultured can be properly compared with our data. Our studies agree in part with those of Sun et al. (30), who also found no effect of coincubation with quiescent rat testicular macrophages on basal androgen secretion. However, in contrast to our findings, they observed inhibition of LH-stimulated steroidogenesis. A report of coculture of nontesticular macrophages and LC used LPS treatment of both cell types (31). No effect on basal secretion of androgen was noted, and LH-stimulated LC were not studied. The differences are probably due to significant variation in experimental design, such as duration of coculture and omission of IFN sensitization before LPS treatment.

Our studies are the first to directly demonstrate a role for NO in the inhibitory effect that cocultured macrophages exert on steroidogenesis in LC. We found that inhibition of iNOS activity with L-NAME completely reversed the inhibitory effect of activated cells without directly effecting the LC. Putative effects of NO have been studied by use of a binding compound such as glutathione or hemoglobin to reduce or block the observed effect. However, results are equivocal because such agents may actually serve as competitors with target molecules of NO or as NO carriers rather than scavengers (32). The availability of imidazolineoxyl N-oxide derivatives has provided an improved approach. C-PTIO is a potent and highly selective NO scavenger that has been used in vivo to inhibit hypotension and endotoxic shock induced by LPS and in vitro to prevent NO-induced vascular relaxation (20, 33, 34). We demonstrated here that C-PTIO completely prevented the inhibitory effect of activated peritoneal macrophages on androgen production. When considered with the data obtained with L-NAME, we conclude that NO release is involved in the mechanism(s) by which activated macrophages inhibit LH-stimulated androgen secretion.

Our coculture experiments cannot be used to eliminate other macrophage products from consideration as modulators of LC steroidogenesis, nor do they address whether the NO produced by macrophages acts directly on LC or has an autocrine effect, which, in turn, produces a cytokine directed at the LC. Previous workers have concluded that macrophage-derived interleukin-1{alpha}, -1ß, and -2; IFN{gamma}; and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} all are capable of inhibiting LH-stimulated androgen synthesis (see Ref. 5 for review). These reports include studies in which macrophage-conditioned medium and/or purified cytokines were used.

Therefore, we undertook an additional series of experiments using the NO donor SNAP and highly purified mouse LC. We demonstrated that NO can inhibit androgen production by an action directly on the LC. This assertion is supported by the finding that the NO donor SNAP caused significant inhibition of both basal and LH-stimulated production of androgen in purified LC cultures. The inhibitory effect of SNAP became significant between 4–8 h after application to the LC and remained complete at 16 and 24 h. It is unlikely that this inhibitory effect is the consequence of nonspecific toxicity, because functional viability remained after 24-h exposure to SNAP when several testosterone precursors were shown to overcome the inhibitory effect of SNAP on production of androgen. C-PTIO completely reversed the inhibitory effect of SNAP on LH-stimulated androgen production, but had no effect of its own. These data further support our contention that the inhibitory effect of SNAP on androgen production by the LC of the mouse is due to released NO and not to another by-product of SNAP breakdown. Other workers (10) were unable to detect inhibition of progesterone secretion by MA-10 cells when SNAP was applied at 10-4 M, and inhibition was about 50% of the control value with 10-3 M, whereas these two concentrations produced 94% and 100% inhibition, respectively, in our hands. A major difference in the two studies was their duration (3.5 vs. 24 h), suggesting an interaction between the duration of the incubation and the concentration of NO in the manifestation of the inhibitory effect. Our findings are more compatible with those of Van Voorhis et al. (9), who demonstrated that SNAP (10-3 M for 16 h) caused 80% and 90% reductions in progesterone and estradiol production, respectively, by cultured human granulosa/luteal cells. Furthermore, in those studies it was shown that native NO, SNAP, as well as an additional NO donor produced identical results.

Despite observing a biologic effect and preservation of cell viability, we cannot be certain whether the concentration of NO produced by 10-4 M SNAP in this study or those used in previous studies with other NO donors as well as SNAP at similar concentrations in a variety of experimental systems represent physiologically meaningful amounts for the interstitium of the testis. Rubbo et al. (35) used physical methods in vitro to estimate that the concentration of SNAP used here would produce a peak of 8 µM NO during a 30-min incubation. Although this concentration exceeds the amounts of NO thought to be present in normal tissue, it does approach values indirectly estimated for NO release by cytokine-activated nontesticular macrophages (36) and decidual mononuclear cells from sites of early embryo loss in the uterus of the mouse (37). If it is eventually found that transient or resident macrophages, the LC itself, or other testicular cells are sources of NO, it is possible that the local concentrations of NO achieved in our studies will fall within limits for the testicular interstitium. Further, the apparent increase in effectiveness of lower doses of SNAP after 24-h exposure may be taken to suggest that lower concentrations in vivo are effective only after a prolonged presence. Definitive resolution of this issue must await further study.

NO elicits many of its biological actions by reacting with Fe2+ heme proteins to form NO-heme complexes. This interaction with NO translates into activation for some enzymes, such as soluble guanylyl cyclase and cyclooxygenase, while for others, such as lipoxygenases, catalase, and peroxidase, NO binding has been shown to be inhibitory (38). Cytochrome P450-associated enzymes, which also contain Fe heme groups, catalyze several reactions in the synthesis of testosterone. Dehydroepiandrosterone, androstenedione, and androstenediol completely overcame the inhibitory effect of SNAP; thus, it appears that NO has a negligible effect on 3ßHSD and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activities in the LC of the adult mouse. The failure of 22R-hydroxycholesterol, pregnenolone, and progesterone and their 17{alpha}-derivatives to overcome the inhibitory effect of SNAP is consistent with inhibition of side-chain cleavage activity and/or P450c17 activity, both of which are cytochrome P450 enzymes. That side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 activity may be a site of action is supported by the observations that NO inhibited the secretion of progesterone by ovarian cells (9) and that NO inhibition of progesterone production could be overcome by pregnenolone, but not by 22R-hydroxycholesterol in MA-10 cells (10). More distal enzymes in the normal steroidogenic pathway of the LC were not studied. The latter data also suggest that transmitochondrial movement of cholesterol is not altered by NO. Our data suggest that the activity of P450c17 is also inhibited, because neither pregnenolone, progesterone, nor their 17{alpha}-derivatives had a significant effect on the inhibition of androgen synthesis caused by SNAP.

The mechanism by which NO exerts its inhibitory effect on P450 steroidogenic enzymes is not known. NO increases intracellular cGMP in many cells, presumably through the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase (6). This mechanism is not likely to account for our observations because a correlation between cGMP and NO effects on steroidogenesis in the testis and granulosa/luteal cells has not been found (9, 10, 28). Furthermore, increased intracellular cGMP in the mouse LC is associated with an increase in androgen production (39). Stradler et al. (40) demonstrated that SNAP not only bound to but also decreased the expression of message for liver cytochrome P4501A. Under the conditions of our experiments, we could not detect a significant effect of NO on the expression of mRNA for key P450-associated and P450-independent steroidogenic enzymes. Given the profound inhibition of P450c17 activity with negligible decrease in message, it appears most likely that in the LC, NO interacts directly with the Fe heme of the P450 enzymes and alters their catalytic properties.

The argument was presented above that disease states associated with macrophage activation are often associated with decreased circulating levels of androgen. Bosmann and co-workers (41) recently showed that LPS-induced endotoxemia in mice resulted in a greater than an 80% decrease in circulating androgen when assessed 24 h later. Our studies may be taken to suggest that NO contributes to the hypogonadal state in this model. It is possible that NO released by circulating macrophage/monocytes passing through the testis is the source of this inhibition. It is also possible that these disease states result in activation of testicular macrophages. It is well known that agents that activate peripheral macrophages are capable of exerting similar, but not always identical, effects on macrophages isolated from the rat and mouse testes (5, 42, 43). Consistent with this suggestion are the results reported by Welch and co-workers (28) that L-NAME could increase hCG-stimulated androgen production by an unpurified interstitial preparation from rat testes.

Although our initial view was that macrophages were the source of the NO that acted on LC in vivo, there are other potential sites for testicular production of NO. Cultured Sertoli cells from immature rats express the inducible form of NOS (44), and the constitutive form has been immunohistochemically localized in human Sertoli cells (45). Burnett et al. (25) reported that calcium-dependent NOS activity was confined to the testicular vascular endothelium in the rat, but Davidoff and co-workers (46) localized NOS-1 (the calcium-dependent, brain form of the enzyme) in some, but not all, human LC as well as in mouse MA10 and TM3 LC lines. Localization of endothelial type NOS in the human LC has recently been reported by Zini and co-workers (45). Our data allow the possibility of an autocrine effect of NO produced by the LC on steroidogenesis. Direct assessment of iNOS activity in testicular cells will be required to unequivocally define the source(s) of induced NO production in the testis.

In this report, we established that in vitro activation of peritoneal macrophages or a macrophage cell line was associated with elevated steady state levels of mRNA for iNOS and nitrite accumulation. When such activated cells were cocultured with normal mouse LC, inhibition of LH-stimulated androgen production occurred, and this effect was blocked by inhibition of iNOS activity or blockade of NO action. Finally, we demonstrated that a NO donor can act directly on normal mouse LC to inhibit steroidogenesis at least in part by decreasing the activity of the enzyme 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17/20 lyase. These findings show that NO may be capable of acting within the gonad to regulate androgen production and thus may be viewed as an additional regulator of male fertility and sexual function, especially in disease states associated with immune activation.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank G. Barbe, K. Pershbacher, and M. Adera for assistance in executing these experiments, and Dr. John Wallace (University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada) for suggesting the primer designs used in RT-PCR. Dr. T. G. Kennedy provided advice and materials for the Northern blot analysis. The transfected bacteria used to generate radiolabeled cDNA probes were gifts from Dr. Anita H. Payne.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada (Grant MT-12593) Back

Received July 28, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cutolo M, Balleari E, Giusti M, Monachesi M, Accardo S 1988 Sex hormone status of male patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evidence of low serum concentrations of testosterone at baseline and after human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation. Arthritis Rheum 31:1314–1317[Medline]
  2. Handelsman DJ 1985 Hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal dysfunction in renal failure, dialysis and renal transplantation. Endocr Rev 6:151–182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Morley JE, Melmed S 1979 Gonadal dysfunction in systemic disorders. Metabolism 28:1051–1073 (Review)[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Baker HW, Burger HG, de Kretser DM, Dulmanis A, Hudson B, O’Connor S, Paulsen CA, Purcell N, Rennie GC, Seah CS, Taft HP, Wang C 1976 A study of the endocrine manifestations of hepatic cirrhosis. Q J Med 45:145–178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hales DB 1996 Leydig cell-macrophage interactions: an overview. In: Payne AH, Hardy MP, Russell LD (eds) The Leydig Cell. Cache River Press, Vienna, pp 451–465
  6. Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA 1991 Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 43:109–142[Medline]
  7. Stuehr DJ, Cho HJ, Kwon NS, Weise MF, Nathan CF 1991 Purification and characterization of the cytokine-induced macrophage nitric oxide synthase: an FAD- and FMN-containing flavoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7773–7777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bredt DS, Snyder SH 1994 Nitric oxide: a physiological messenger molecule. Annu Rev Biochem 63:175–195[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Van Voorhis BJ, Dunn MS, Snyder GD, Weiner CP 1994 Nitric oxide: an autocrine regulator of human granulosa-luteal cell steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 135:1799–1806[Abstract]
  10. del Punta K, Charreau EH, Pignataro OP 1996 Nitric oxide inhibits Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 137:5337–5343[Abstract]
  11. Hume DA, Halpin D, Charlton H, Gordon S 1984 The mononuclear phagocyte system of the mouse defined by immunohistochemical localization of antigen F4/80:macrophages of endocrine organs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4174–4177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lorsbach RB, Murphy WJ, Lowenstein CJ, Snyder SH, Russell SW 1993 Expression of the nitric oxide synthase gene in mouse macrophages activated for tumor cell killing. Molecular basis for the synergy between interferon-{gamma} and lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 268:1908–1913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Di Rosa M, Radomski M, Carnuccio R, Moncada S 1990 Glucocorticoids inhibit the induction of nitric oxide synthase in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 172:1246–1252[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  15. Ferraz JGP, Sharkey KA, Reuter BK, Asfaha S, Tigley AW, Brown ML, McKnight W, Wallace JL 1997 Induction of cyclooxgenase 1 and 2 in the rat stomach during endotoxemia: role in resistance to damage. Gastroenterology 113:195–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Browning JY, D’Agata RD, Grotjan Jr HE 1981 Isolation of purified rat Leydig cells using continuous Percoll gradients. Endocrinology 109:667–669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wiebe JP 1976 Steroidogenesis in rat Leydig cells: changes in activity of 5-ane and 5-ene 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases during sexual maturation. Endocrinology 98:505–513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jansz GF, Pomerantz DK 1985 The effect of prenatal treatment with busulfan on in vitro androgen production by testes from rats of various ages. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 63:1155–1158[Medline]
  19. Moncada S, Higgs A 1993 The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med 329:2002–2012 (Review)[Free Full Text]
  20. Maeda H, Akaike T, Yoshida M, Sato K, Noguchi Y 1995 A new nitric oxide scavenger, imidazolineoxyl N-oxide derivative, and its effects in pathophysiology and microbiology. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 196:37–50[Medline]
  21. Sun XR, Risbridger GP 1994 Site of macrophage inhibition of luteinizing hormone-stimulated testosterone production by purified leydig cells. Biol Reprod 50:363–367[Abstract]
  22. Sokal RR, Rohlf RJ 1981 Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco
  23. Xie QW, Cho HJ, Calaycay J, Mumford RA, Swiderek KM, Lee TD, Ding A, Troso T, Nathan C 1992 Cloning and characterization of inducible nitric oxide synthase from mouse macrophages. Science 256:225–228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Meikle AW, Cardoso de Sousa JC, Dacosta N, Bishop DK, Samlowski WE 1992 Direct and indirect effects of murine interleukin-2, gamma interferon, and tumor necrosis factor on testosterone synthesis in mouse Leydig cells. J Androl 13:437–443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Burnett AL, Ricker DD, Chamness SL, Maguire MP, Crone JK, Bredt DS, Snyder SH, Chang TS 1995 Localization of nitric oxide synthase in the reproductive organs of the male rat. Biol Reprod 52:1–7[Abstract]
  26. Burnett AL 1995 Role of nitric oxide in the physiology of erection. Biol Reprod 52:485–489[Abstract]
  27. Adams ML, Meyer ER, Sewing BN, Cicero TJ 1994 Effects of nitric oxide-related agents on rat testicular function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 269:230–237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Welch C, Watson ME, Poth M, Hong T, Francis GL 1995 Evidence to suggest nitric oxide is an interstitial regulator of Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Metabolism 44:234–238[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Deng W, Thiel B, Tannenbaum CS, Hamilton TA, Stuehr DJ 1993 Synergistic cooperation between T cell lymphokines for induction of the nitric oxide synthase gene in murine peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol 151:322–329[Abstract]
  30. Sun X-R, Hedger MP, Risbridger GP 1993 The effect of testicular macrophages and interleukin-1 on testosterone production by purified adult rat Leydig cells cultured under in vitro maintenance conditions. Endocrinology 132:186–192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lombard-Vignon N, Grizard G, Boucher D 1992 Influence of rat testicular macrophages on Leydig cell function in vitro. Int J Androl 15:144–159[Medline]
  32. Stamler JS 1995 S-Nitrosothiols and the bioregulatory actions of nitrogen oxides through reactions with thiol groups. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 196:19–36[Medline]
  33. Akaike T, Yoshida M, Miyamoto Y, Sato K, Kohno M, Sasamoto K, Miyazaki K, Ueda S, Maeda H 1993 Antagonistic action of imidazolineoxyl N-oxides against endothelium-derived relaxing factor/NO through a radical reaction. Biochemistry 32:827–832[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Yoshida M, Akaike T, Wada Y, Sato K, Ikeda K, Ueda S, Maeda H 1994 Therapeutic effects of imidazolineoxyl N-oxide against endotoxin shock through its direct nitric oxide-scavenging activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 202:923–930[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Rubbo H, Radi R, Trujillo M, Telleri R, Kalyanaraman B, Barnes S, Kirk M, Freeman BA 1994 Nitric oxide regulation of superoxide and peroxynitrite-dependent lipid peroxidation. Formation of novel nitrogen-containing oxidized lipid derivatives. J Biol Chem 269:26066–26075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lyengar R, Stuehr DJ, Marletta MA 1987 Macrophage synthesis of nitrite, nitrate, and N-nitrosamines: precursors and role of the respiratory burst. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6369–6373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Haddad EK, Duclos AJ, Baines MG 1995 Early embryo loss is associated with local production of nitric oxide by decidual mononuclear cells. J Exp Med 182:1143–1152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Stamler JS, Singel DJ, Loscalzo J 1992 Biochemistry of nitric oxide and its redox-activated forms. Science 258:1898–1902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Hipkin RW, Moger WH 1991 Interaction between cyclic nucleotide second messenger systems in murine Leydig cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 82:251–257[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Stadler J, Trockfeld J, Schmalix WA, Brill T, Siewert JR, Greim H, Doehmer J 1994 Inhibition of cytochromes P4501A by nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3559–3563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bosmann HB, Hales KH, Li X, Liu Z, Stocco DM, Hales DB 1996 Acute in vivo inhibition of testosterone by endotoxin parallels loss of steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein in Leydig cells. Endocrinology 137:4522–4525[Abstract]
  42. Hutson JC 1994 Testicular macrophages. Int Rev Cytol 149:99–143[Medline]
  43. Kern S, Robertson SA, Mau VJ, Maddocks S 1995 Cytokine secretion by macrophages in the rat testis. Biol Reprod 53:1407–1416[Abstract]
  44. Stéphan J-P, Guillemois C, Jégou B, Bauché F 1995 Nitric oxide production by Sertoli cells in response to cytokines and lipopolysaccharide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 213:218–224[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Zini A, O’Bryan MK, Magid MS, Schlegel PN 1996 Immunohistochemical localization of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in human testis, epididymis, and vas deferens suggests a possible role for nitric oxide in spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, and programmed cell death. Biol Reprod 55:935–941[Abstract]
  46. Davidoff MS, Middendorff R, Mayer B, Holstein AF 1995 Nitric oxide synthase (NOS-I) in Leydig cells of the human testis. Arch Histol Cytol 58:17–30[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Mondillo, R. M. Pagotto, B. Piotrkowski, C. G. Reche, Z. J. Patrignani, C. B. Cymeryng, and O. P. Pignataro
Involvement of Nitric Oxide Synthase in the Mechanism of Histamine-Induced Inhibition of Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis via Histamine Receptor Subtypes in Sprague-Dawley Rats
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 144 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Y. Kondo, T. Ishikawa, K. Yamaguchi, T. Yada, and M. Fujisawa
Oral Administration of Tetrahydrobiopterin Attenuates Testicular Damage by Reducing Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity in a Cryptorchid Mouse Model
J Androl, March 1, 2008; 29(2): 153 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. A. Andric, M. M. Janjic, N. J. Stojkov, and T. S. Kostic
Protein kinase G-mediated stimulation of basal Leydig cell steroidogenesis
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1399 - E1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Herman and C. Rivier
Activation of a Neural Brain-Testicular Pathway Rapidly Lowers Leydig Cell Levels of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein and the Peripheral-Type Benzodiazepine Receptor while Increasing Levels of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 624 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
B. A. Weissman, E. Niu, R. Ge, C. M. Sottas, M. Holmes, J. C. Hutson, and M. P. Hardy
Paracrine Modulation of Androgen Synthesis in Rat Leydig Cells by Nitric Oxide
J Androl, May 1, 2005; 26(3): 369 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. L. Asirvatham and B. C. Bruot
Cell-Cell Interactions in the Testis of Adjuvant-Induced Arthritic Rat
J Androl, July 1, 2002; 23(4): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Wang, D. C. Newton, T. L. Miller, A.-M. Teichert, M. J. Phillips, M. S. Davidoff, and P. A. Marsden
An Alternative Promoter of the Human Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Is Expressed Specifically in Leydig Cells
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2002; 160(1): 369 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. K. Peterson, F. Moran, A. J. Conley, and I. M. Bird
Zonal Expression of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase in Sheep and Rhesus Adrenal Cortex
Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5351 - 5363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. K. O'Bryan, S. Schlatt, O. Gerdprasert, D. J. Phillips, D. M. de Kretser, and M. P. Hedger
Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in the Rat Testis: Evidence for Potential Roles in Both Normal Function and Inflammation-Mediated Infertility
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2000; 63(5): 1285 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. Hanke and W. B. Campbell
Endothelial cell nitric oxide inhibits aldosterone synthesis in zona glomerulosa cells: modulation by oxygen
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2000; 279(4): E846 - E854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. J. Hanke, T. O'Brien, K. A. Pritchard Jr, and W. B. Campbell
Inhibition of Adrenal Cell Aldosterone Synthesis by Endogenous Nitric Oxide Release
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. H. Zwain and S. S. C. Yen
Neurosteroidogenesis in Astrocytes, Oligodendrocytes, and Neurons of Cerebral Cortex of Rat Brain
Endocrinology, August 1, 1999; 140(8): 3843 - 3852.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Xiao, L. Xia-Zhang, and M. Ferin
Stress and the Menstrual Cycle: Short- and Long-Term Response to a Five-Day Endotoxin Challenge during the Luteal Phase in the Rhesus Monkey
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 1999; 84(2): 623 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. H. Zwain and S. S. C. Yen
Dehydroepiandrosterone: Biosynthesis and Metabolism in the Brain
Endocrinology, February 1, 1999; 140(2): 880 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomerantz, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitelka, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomerantz, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitelka, V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals