help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 3 982-992
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Purification of Calcitonin-Like Peptides from Rat Brain and Pituitary1

Joanne M. Hilton, Ken I. Mitchelhill, Gordana Pozvek, Mark Dowton, Maribel Quiza and Patrick M. Sexton2

Neurobiology Unit and John Holt Protein Structure Laboratory, St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Patrick M. Sexton, Neurobiology Unit, St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia. E-mail: pms{at}rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Accumulating evidence supports the existence of nonthyroidal calcitonin (CT)-like peptides, more similar to fish CTs, which may act as endogenous regulators of CT receptors in brain and other tissues. In this study, we have carried out large-scale extractions from Sprague-Dawley rat brain diencephalon and pituitary, and purified a novel, biologically active, CT-like peptide from pituitary. Monitoring of the calcitonin-like activity of the peptides from rat brain and pituitary required different detection systems. While the brain CT cross-reacted with C-terminally directed salmon CT-specific antisera, the pituitary CT did not. However, the pituitary CT was biologically active, exhibiting specific interaction with CT receptors to activate adenylate cyclase. Conventional chromatographic techniques were employed to purify the CT-like peptides. Although the brain CT was not purified to homogeneity, size exclusion chromatography revealed the presence of multiple molecular weight forms of immunoreactive CT. Of these, only the lowest molecular weight form was biologically active. Purification from the pituitary resulted in the isolation of a biologically active peptide with a mass of 3267 Da. This mass differs from the mass of both salmon and thyroid-derived rat CT. Initial amino acid sequencing of the pituitary CT indicated that it was N-terminally blocked. Following aminopeptidase digestion, a unique six amino acid sequence, EKSQSP, was identified. Elucidation of the amino acid composition provided supporting evidence that the peptide was novel and was consistent with a full length peptide of approximately 30 amino acids. These data support the existence of novel, nonthyroidal, CTs which are potential regulators of CT receptor-mediated functions.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE CENTRAL nervous system (CNS) of a variety of species contain abundant calcitonin (CT) receptors, which are responsive to exogenous CT. However, the endogenous ligand that interacts with these receptors is unknown. CT is believed not to cross the blood brain barrier to any significant extent (1), although very low concentrations of the thyroid-derived form of CT have been detected in both hypothalamus and pituitary of humans and rats (2, 3, 4). CT messenger RNA expression is low or undetectable in brain and pituitary (5, 6, 7).

In addition to human CT-like immunoreactivity (hCT-I), salmon CT-like immunoreactivity (sCT-I) occurs in human brain extracts (8). Similarly, a biologically active sCT-like peptide is present in extracts of rat diencephalon (9). A role for a sCT-like peptide as a neurotransmitter/neuromodulator is supported by the presence of sCT-I within the CNS of lower vertebrates. In pigeon (10), the levels and distribution of sCT-I are consistent with our findings in rat brain (9), with the highest amount detected in the hypothalamus, followed by the midbrain, and low levels in brain stem. Immunohistochemical studies in lizard brain localized sCT-I to varicosities and terminals in the diencephalon, although not in other brain regions (11). Furthermore, the rat C1b CT receptor isoform has very little interaction with the thyroid-derived form of CT (12, 13). This receptor isoform is abundant in rat brain, exhibiting an almost parallel distribution to the C1a receptor (14). For this receptor to be physiologically meaningful, a CT-like ligand, distinct from the thyroid-derived form (such as the sCT-I molecule) must exist in rat brain.

Salmon CT-I is also released from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells (15), and intense sCT-I staining occurs in the mouse pituitary carcinoma cell line, {alpha}-TSH (16). Although the physiological significance of CT-like material in the pituitary remains to be fully determined, CT receptors occur in the intermediate pituitary (14, 17) and in {alpha}-TSH cells (18), suggesting a possible paracrine role. Accordingly, Shah et al. (15) demonstrated that anti-sCT serum stimulates PRL release in cultured anterior pituitary cells, suggesting that the sCT-like peptide in the anterior pituitary gland exerts an inhibitory paracrine influence on PRL secretion.

The existence of multiple types of CT within one species is supported by the immunological detection of at least two forms of CT in fish, reptiles, amphibia, mammals and birds (19, 20). The existence of a gene expressing a sCT-like peptide in humans is also supported by hybridization of chicken CT cDNA to Northern blots of human medullary thyroid carcinoma tissue (21).

This paper describes the purification and partial characterization of CT-like activity from rat pituitary and diencephalon.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
sCT, sCT(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32), and hCT were supplied by Bachem (Torrance, CA). AC512 (K11-Bolton-Hunter, R18,N30,Y32 sCT(9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32)) was a gift from Glaxo Wellcome (Research Triangle Park, NC). hCT(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)/sCT(14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) (ACT 20), hCT(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)/sCT(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) (ACT 15), hCT(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21)/sCT(22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) (ACT 19) and sCT(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)/hCT(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) (ACT 27) were a gift from Dr. Eigoro Murayama (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Shizuoka, Japan). BSA was obtained from Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL; Parkville, Victoria, Australia). The cAMP antibody was a gift from Dr. Phil Marley (Department of Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia). Bacitracin, isobutylmethylxanthine, and theophylline were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Na125I was from Amersham (Buckinghamshire, UK). Tissue culture flasks were from Nunc (Roskilde, Denmark), and 12- and 24-well plates were from Becton Dickinson Labware (Lincoln Park, NJ). DMEM, N-2-hydroxyethylpiparazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and geneticin (neomycin antibiotic G418 sulfate) were from GIBCO-BRL Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY). Standard antibiotics used in the media; gentamicin and minocycline were from David Bull Laboratories (Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) and Sigma, respectively. FBS was from Cytosystems Pty. Ltd. (Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) and trypsin from CSL. The Vydac C18 resin (20–30 µm) was purchased from The Separations Group (Hesperia, CA). The SP Sepharose HP (16/10) column and Sephadex G-50 (Superfine) resin were from Pharmacia (Amrad Pharmacia Biotech, New South Wales, Australia). Brownlee reverse-phase 300 C8 columns were from Applied Biosystems, Inc. (Foster City, CA) and Hypersil C18 reverse-phase columns were purchased from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA). The microbore SGE column was from SGE (Ringwood, Victoria, Australia). Bradford protein assay dye was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (360 mg silica) were purchased from Millipore Corporation (Milford, MA). Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) was purchased from Mallinkrodt Speciality Chemicals Co. (Paris, KN). Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was from Auspep (Parkville, Victoria, Australia). Tween-20 detergent, heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA), and triethylamine (TEA) were from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Nonsterile, nylon 0.45-µm filters were from Activon Scientific Product Co. Pty. Ltd. (Pennant Hills, New South Wales, Australia). Phenylmethylsulfonyl-fluoride, pepstatin, benzamidine, leupeptin, aprotinin, and ribonuclease A were purchased from Sigma. Blue Dextran 2000 was obtained from Pharmacia. Sequencing grade Asp-N aminopeptidase and pyroglutamate aminopeptidase were from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). Endoprotease Lys-C was purchased from Wako (Tokyo, Japan) and modified, sequencing grade trypsin from Promega (Madison, WI). All other chemicals were of analytical grade unless otherwise stated.

Cell culture
Human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells and HEK-293 cells stably transfected with either the rat C1a or rat C1b CT receptor were maintained in DMEM containing 5% FBS, 80 mg/liter gentamicin, 1 mg/liter minocycline, and 15 mM HEPES, at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% carbon dioxide in air. The stable C1a CT receptor expressing (D11; ~600,000 receptors/cell; passage 50–60) and C1b CT receptor expressing (B8-H10; ~6,000,000 receptors/cell; passage ~90) cell lines were generated as previously described (13) with selection pressure maintained with 200 µg/ml geneticin.

sCT RIA
Synthetic sCT was iodinated using a modified chloramine-T method as previously described (22) and purified by reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) to a specific activity of 2000 Ci/mmol. The anti-sCT antisera (1464) was raised in rabbits using a synthetic sCT analog R11,18K14 sCT (23) conjugated to BSA as antigen. It was used in the RIA, described below, at a final titer of 1:30,000, with a detection limit of ~10 pg/tube. The antibody is 100% cross-reactive to sCT and less than 0.1% cross-reactive to hCT or rat CT (rCT). During the course of this work, Hanna et al. (16) demonstrated, immunohistochemically, presence of sCT-I in mouse {alpha}-TSH cells (derived from a pituitary carcinoma), using a commercial anti-sCT antibody (Peninsula, Belmont, CA). As a consequence, this antibody (designated PAb) was also used for RIA. PAb was used at a final titer of 1:24,000, with a detection limit of approximately 3 pg/tube. The antibody is reported by the supplier to be 100% cross-reactive with sCT, eel CT, and chicken CT but does not cross-react with hCT, rCT, PDN-21, human and rat amylin, or human CT gene-related peptide. Subsequent analysis of antibody specificity using chimeric sCT/hCT peptides (ACT15, ACT19, ACT20, ACT27) indicated that both antisera were C-terminally directed, with the primary epitope located between residues 22 and 32 (not shown). Before assay, salt or detergent was removed from samples by application to C18 Sep-Pak cartridges, and elution using 3 ml 80% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA. The eluates were frozen on dry ice, lyophilized, and stored at -20 C until assayed.

For RIA, lyophilized samples were reconstituted in RIA buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, containing 0.1% BSA and 0.02% (wt/vol) sodium azide) and were assayed in duplicate. A standard curve for sCT was constructed using 10–100,000 pg sCT. Nonspecific binding tubes contained excess (100 ng) sCT. Tubes containing sample or sCT standard were vortexed and incubated for approximately 16 h at 4 C. 125I-sCT (10,000 ± 2,000 cpm) was then added, the tubes vortexed, and incubated at 4 C overnight. Separation of bound ligand from free was achieved by the addition of 0.5 ml bovine {gamma}-globulin (3.0 mg/ml; Sigma) and 1.5 ml of 20% polyethylene glycol (average molecular weight 8000; Sigma). The tubes were vortexed, and incubated at 4 C for 15 min, before centrifugation for 15 min at 5,000 x g in a Beckman J-6 M/E centrifuge (Palo Alto, CA) at 4 C. Supernatants were aspirated and the pellets counted on a Packard {gamma}-counter (70% efficiency; Packard, Downers Grove, IL).

cAMP assay
Cells in 24-well plates were preincubated for 20 min, at 37 C, in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2, in growth medium containing 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA and 1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (this step was omitted for C1b receptor expressing cells due to their high basal levels of cAMP; 13). Cells were subsequently incubated for 20 min either with increasing concentrations of sCT (sCT standard curve) or with lyophilized samples from chromatography runs that had been reconstituted in the incubation media. Samples were assayed in duplicate. Following incubation, cells were washed with PBS (140 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 8 mM Na2HPO4) and the cAMP extracted with 0.5 ml of absolute ethanol. Levels of cAMP were assayed using a specific RIA as previously described (24).

Peptide purification
For small-scale studies, Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were killed by decapitation and rat pituitaries and rat brain diencephalon (principally hypothalamus) were rapidly removed and frozen by immersion into isopentane cooled with dry ice. For large-scale purification, 3000 fresh frozen rat pituitaries and 4000 rat diencephalons were obtained from Harlan Bioscience Products (Indianapolis, IN). Tissues were stored at -70 C until processing. The procedures used for peptide purification are similar to those developed by Bennett, Browne and Solomon for the purification of pituitary peptides (25, 26).

A number of different extraction media and conditions were examined before selecting a protocol of tissue-homogenisation, at 4 C, in an acid mix media comprising 1 M HCl, containing 5% formic acid, 1% TFA, 1% NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl-fluoride, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM benzamidine and 20 µg/ml leupeptin, as the most efficient. Following homogenization, crude extracts were centrifuged at 30,000 x g for 30 min at 4 C, the supernatant filtered through Miracloth and then lyophilized. This protocol was used for all tissue extractions in this study. Protein levels were monitored by Bradford protein microassay (27) using bovine {gamma}-globulin as the standard. For efficient extraction in large-scale purification, tissue was divided into batches of 500 diencephalon/250 ml or 1000 pituitaries/100 ml of acid mix media and homogenized for approximately 1 min, at 4 C. Following centrifugation, supernatants were pooled and filtered through Miracloth. The supernatant was again divided into aliquots of 250 ml for diencephalon or 100 ml for pituitary, placed in glass 1 liter round-bottom flasks, frozen, and lyophilized.

Preparative chromatography
Vydac C18 chromatography. Vydac C18 resin was swollen in 20% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA and packed into a HR column (16/5) (Pharmacia). This column was used as an initial step in protein purification to desalt the tissue extract. The Vydac C18 column was connected to a fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) system (Pharmacia). Lyophilized sample was reconstituted in buffer A (10% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA), passed through a 0.45-µm filter, and loaded onto the column at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The column was washed with at least 30 ml buffer A at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Batch elution was achieved with 10–20 ml buffer B (90% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA), and eluates were frozen and lyophilized.

Preparative cation exchange (CEX) chromatography was performed using a SP Sepharose HP (16/10) column connected to the FPLC system. Batch elution of tissue extract was performed. The CEX chromatography was performed at pH 5. For large-scale purification, lyophilized sample was reconstituted in buffer A (20 mM ammonium acetate, 40% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA, 0.02% (vol/vol) Tween-20), passed through a 0.45-µm filter, and loaded onto the column at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The column was preequilibrated and washed with 60-ml buffer A at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Sample was batch eluted with at least 30 ml buffer B (buffer A + 1 M guanidinium hydrochloride [GuHCl], pH 5.0) and collected into TFA at a final concentration of 0.5%, to reduce the pH and thus prevent degradation. The eluate was frozen and lyophilized.

Sephadex G-50 size exclusion chromatography
To prevent noncovalent aggregation between CT-like peptides or with other proteins, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed under denaturing conditions, in 6 M GuHCl. Sephadex G-50 resin was swollen in 6 M GuHCl, pH 3, for at least 3 h at room temperature (~22 C). The resin was degassed for 30 min and a glass column (100 x 1.5 cm; Pharmacia) packed, and allowed to settle for 1–2 days at room temperature. Blue Dextran 2000 (2 mg/ml) was applied to the column to determine the void volume and to check the homogeneity of the column bed before sample application. Lyophilized sample was reconstituted in the SEC buffer (6 M GuHCl, pH 3) and glycerol added to a final concentration of 10% (vol/vol). The sample was passed through a 0.45-µm filter before application. For brain extract, an additional step of immersion into a boiling water bath for 10 min and rapid cooling on ice was also included before loading onto the column. The column was run under gravity. Fractions were collected every 30 min into polypropylene tubes.

Preparative C8 reverse-phase HPLC
A Brownlee C8 reverse-phase column (100 x 10 mm) was connected to a Waters 600 series HPLC (Waters, Milford, MA). Samples were reconstituted in buffer A (20% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA), unless otherwise stated, passed through a 0.45-µm filter, and loaded onto the column at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Elution was achieved using a linear gradient of 20–60% acetronitrile/0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 3 ml/min over a period of 60 min. Fractions were collected every minute and lyophilized before assay.

Analytical C8 reverse-phase HPLC
A Brownlee C8 reverse-phase column (250 x 4.6 mm) was connected to the Waters HPLC system. Sample was reconstituted in buffer A (10% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA), passed through a 0.45-µm filter, and loaded onto the column. The flow rate was 1 ml/min. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 20–50% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA over 60 min.

Narrowbore reverse-phase HPLC
Narrowbore columns were connected to a HP1090 series II liquid chromatograph (Hewlett Packard Company, Waldbronn, Germany). Unless otherwise stated, the narrowbore reverse-phase HPLC was performed as follows. Sample was loaded onto the column at a flow rate of 250 µl/min, and elution was achieved using a linear gradient of 0–60% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 100 µl/min. Fractions were collected manually into 1.5 ml polypropylene tubes, frozen and stored at -70 C.

Aminopeptidase digestions
Aliquots of peptide were diluted 1:5 with the appropriate buffer (see below) before addition of enzyme. Trypsin (1.0 µg) digests were performed for 18 h, at 37 C, in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 10% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Asp-N (0.2 µg) digests were performed for 18 h, at 37 C, in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8, containing 10% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Lys-C (1.0 µg) digests were performed for 18 h, at 37 C, in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing 1 mM EDTA and 10% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Glu-C (0.2 µg) digests were performed for 18 h, at 25 C, in 25 mM ammonium carbonate, pH 7.8, containing 5% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Pyroglutamate digestion was performed for 24 h, at 4 C, using 1 µg enzyme, in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 8, containing 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, and 5% (vol/vol) glycerol. Peptide digests were chromatographed using the narrowbore hypersil C18 reverse-phase column, as described above, with fractions manually collected into 1.5 ml polypropylene tubes containing 50 µl 0.2% Tween-20.

Reduction and alkylation of extracts
Small-scale extract was Seppaked and chromatographed on Mono S (CEX), pH 5.0 and active fractions pooled and lyophilized. Half the material was resuspended in 1 M Tris, pH 8.5/6 M GuHCl, containing 100 mM DTT. This sample was incubated at 45 C for 2 h, then alkylated by addition of iodoacetamide (0.3 M) for 1 h at 22 C. The material was acidified to 2% TFA and chromatographed on C8 reverse-phase HPLC. Control material was resuspended in 0.1% TFA.

Peptide analysis
Protein sequencing was performed on reverse-phase HPLC purified peptides which were subjected to pulsed liquid phase protein sequencing on an Applied Biosystems 471A Protein Sequencer (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) or on a Hewlett Packard G1000A Protein Sequencer (Hewlet-Packard, Palo Alto, CA).

For amino acid analysis, the sample was hydrolyzed under vacuum, at 110 C for 24 h in 6 M HCl, containing 0.2% (vol/vol) phenol and 0.2% (vol/vol) thioglycolic acid. Quantitative analysis was performed on a Beckman 6300 amino acid analyzer.

Mass spectrometry was performed on reverse-phase HPLC purified peptides on a PE Sciex (API3+) triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (PE-Sciex, Toronto, Canada) or on a Voyager-DE matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Perspective Biosystems, Framingham, MA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of pituitary extracts
For initial characterization studies, pituitaries were extracted using acid mix media (50 pituitaries/5 ml) and fractionated on a Brownlee C8 reverse-phase column. Fractions were divided into 0.5 ml aliquots, lyophilized and assayed for CT-like activity using RIA with the anti-sCT antisera 1464 or PAb, or in bioassay, measuring cAMP stimulation in HEK-293 cells stably transfected with the cloned rat C1a CT receptor. Untransfected, parental HEK-293 cells were used as a negative control.

While sCT-I was not detected using either of the anti-sCT antisera (not shown), bioactivity was observed in the cAMP accumulation assay with C1a transfected cells (Fig. 1Go, B and C), with the predominant activity peak occurring at approximately 31% acetonitrile. No corresponding activity was seen when material was assayed in untransfected cells, although a minor peak of activity, eluting at approximately 29% acetonitrile, was detected in both cell lines (Fig. 1Go, B and C). To confirm that the activity monitored by the cAMP assay, in C1a expressing cells, was specifically generated by the CT receptor, the material was assayed in the presence and absence of the CT receptor antagonist AC512. Using 10-6 M AC512, the dose-response curve to sCT was shifted approximately 1.5 orders of magnitude to the right (Fig. 1AGo). In the presence of this concentration of antagonist, the major activity peak at 31% acetonitrile was abolished (Fig. 1BGo). However, the minor activity peak, detected in both transfected and untransfected cells, was not blocked by the antagonist (Fig. 1CGo), indicating that stimulation of cAMP, in this case, occurs by activation of unrelated receptors. Throughout the remainder of this paper, the specific CT receptor-mediated activity will be referred to as pituitary CT.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Activity of pituitary CT in the presence of the CT receptor antagonist AC512. To determine the potency of the antagonist, a standard curve was constructed with sCT (A) in the absence (closed circles) and presence (open squares) of 10-6 M AC512. Pituitary extract was fractionated on a preparative C8 column (100 x 10 mm). Fractions were lyophilized and assayed for cAMP production (B) in cells stably transfected with the rat C1a receptor in the absence (closed circles) or presence (open squares) of 10-6 M AC512, or in untransfected HEK-293 cells (open circles). The area at the bottom of (B) has been magnified in (C).

 
Large-scale purification of pituitary CT
Each of the protocols used in the large-scale purification of peptides was validated in a minimum of two separate small-scale experiments. Protocols that increased the purity of the peptide and were reproducible in small-scale were considered viable for large-scale purification procedures (results not shown).

For large-scale purification of pituitary CT, 3000 pituitaries were homogenised in acid mix media, centrifuged and the supernatant filtered through Miracloth and lyophilized as described. The first two steps in the purification involved sequential batch application to and elution from a Vydac C18 (5 x 1 cm) reverse-phase and a SP Sepharose HP (16 x 1 cm) CEX column, respectively. Recoveries are listed in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Recovery of pituitary CT at each purification step

 
Following batch elution from the CEX column, the pituitary extract was resuspended and fractionated on a Sephadex G-50 SEC column. Resuspension of the sample in the running buffer of 6 M GuHCl required a slightly greater volume (~10 ml) than was optimal for the column, due to the combined high concentration of protein and GuHCl. Nonetheless, a significant purification (~36-fold) was achieved (Fig. 2Go; Table 1Go). Active fractions were pooled and diluted 1:1 with dH20, to reduce the GuHCl concentration, and then fractionated on a preparative C8 reverse-phase column. Activity eluted in a single peak, corresponding to approximately 31.5% acetonitrile (Fig. 3Go; Table 1Go). These fractions were then applied to a Hypersil C18 column using HFBA as the ion-pairing agent. Activity corresponded to the peak with a retention time of 34 min, which was well separated from the bulk of the protein (Fig. 4AGo). This peak was subsequently applied to a Hypersil C18 narrowbore column. The activity co-eluted with a single, apparently homogeneous peak, with a retention time of 38.1 min (Fig. 4BGo). An aliquot (40 µl; ~1/10) of the active peak was subjected to N-terminal sequencing by Edman degradation. However, no sequence was obtained, indicating that the peptide was N-terminally blocked. The remaining material was analyzed as described below.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Size exclusion chromatography of large-scale pituitary extract. Pituitary extract was loaded on a Sephadex G-50 column (75 x 1.5 cm). The flow rate was 6.4 ml/h. Fractions were collected every 30 min. A 50-µl aliquot of each fraction was desalted with a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge and lyophilized. Fractions were assayed for cAMP production in HEK-293 cells stably expressing the rat C1a receptor (closed circles) or untransfected HEK-293 cells (open circles). Open diamonds indicate absorbance at 280 nm. The arrow indicates the elution of Blue Dextran 2000.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Preparative C8 reverse-phase HPLC fractionation of pituitary extract. Pituitary extract was chromatographed on a Brownlee C8 reverse-phase column (100 x 10 mm). The protein profile at 280 nm is shown in (A). A 30-µl aliquot of each fraction was lyophilized and assayed for cAMP production (B) in untransfected HEK-293 cells (open circles) and cells stably transfected with the rat C1a receptor (closed circles).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. C18 reverse-phase HPLC fractionation of pituitary extract. A, Separation using HFBA as the ion-pairing agent. Lyophilized pituitary extract was resuspended in 20% acetonitrile/0.13% HFBA, passed through a 0.45-µm filter, and loaded onto a Hypersil C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm). The flow rate was 1 ml/min. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 30–80% acetonitrile/0.13% HFBA. Fractions were collected manually. The protein profile was measured at 280 nm. An aliquot of each fraction (1/100 dilution) was lyophilized and assayed. The black bar indicates the peak containing activity. B, Fractionation by narrowbore HPLC. Lyophilized pituitary extract was resuspended in 1 ml dH20, microfuged for 5 min, and loaded onto a Hypersil C18 reverse-phase column (10 x 2.1 mm) at a flow rate of 250 µl/min. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 4–80% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 100 µl/min. Protein peaks, measured at 214 nm, were collected manually into 1.5-ml tubes containing 50 µl 0.2% Tween-20. An aliquot (1/50 dilution) was lyophilized and assayed. The black bar indicates the peak containing activity.

 
In an attempt to obtain peptide sequence, aliquots of the CT-like peptide were digested with the aminopeptidases trypsin, Asp-N, Glu-C, and Lys-C. Resulting digests were rechromatographed on the narrowbore Hypersil C18 column (Fig. 5Go). No digestion occurred with Asp-N, whereas only partial digestion occurred with Glu-C. Novel, overlapping sequence was obtained from peptide peaks from each of the trypsin [(K/R)S(E/Q)SP], Lys-C [KSQXP] and Glu-C [EKSQXP] digestions. The consensus sequence for this fragment was EKSQSP. In each case, the sequence ended abruptly with the proline residue, independent of the level of peptide in the preceding cycle, consistent with termination of the sequence. Comparison of the sequence with the EMBL, GenBank, and SwissProt databases indicated no exact matches to known protein and peptide sequences. An alignment of the pituitary CT with known sequences for CT, amylin and CT gene-related peptides sequences is present in Fig. 6Go.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Aminopeptidase digestion of pituitary CT-like peptide. An aliquot (40 µl) of pituitary CT-like peptide was subjected to aminopeptidase digestion with (A) trypsin, (B) Asp-N, (C) Glu-C, and (D) Lys-C. Digests were fractionated on a Hypersil C18 column (10 x 2.1 mm). Peptide peaks, measured at 214 nm, were collected manually into 1.5-ml tubes containing 50-µl 0.2% Tween-20. Peaks were subjected to N-terminal protein sequencing. The stars represent peaks from which unique sequence was obtained.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Alignment of the derived pituitary CT sequence with the amino acid sequences of known CT peptides (upper panel) and amylin and CT gene-related peptide sequences (lower panel).

 
To determine whether the N-terminal blockage was caused by cyclization of an N-terminal glutamine to pyroglutamate during extraction, an aliquot of material was also digested with pyroglutamate aminopeptidase. No shift in the HPLC profile of the peptide was found (not shown), suggesting that the N-terminal residue was not pyroglutamate.

To further characterize the pituitary CT, aliquots of material were subjected to amino acid composition and mass spectrometric analyses. Although the amino acid analysis used does not detect cysteine or tryptophan residues (due to degradation) and does not discriminate between aspartic acid/asparagine (Asx) or glutamic acid/glutamine (Glx) residues, the resulting composition revealed a peptide of at least 29 amino acids (Table 2Go). No methionine or histidine residues were present; however, a low level signal for tyrosine (0.45, Table 2Go) was present, and while this was called as absent in Table 2Go, it is possible that one of the remaining residues is a tyrosine. The presence of two residues designated Asx, combined with the observation of lack of digestion by Asp-N, indicated that 2 asparagines were present. A search of the amino acid composition against the SwissProt protein database (http://expasy.hcuge.ch/ch2d/aacompi.html) did not identify any known protein. Electrospray mass spectrometric analysis indicated two molecular weight components: a major component of 3267 Da and a minor component of 3540 Da; however, time-of-flight analysis revealed only a single mass of 3264 Da, suggesting that the minor peak in the electospray analysis may have been a contaminant. Based on the protein concentration determined from the amino acid analysis and the mass of 3267 Da, approximately 1434 ng of peptide was calculated to be present following the initial narrowbore C18 separation. This is three times greater than the level of peptide calculated from the cAMP bioassay, assuming a specific activity equivalent to that of sCT (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Amino acid composition of pituitary CT: comparison with the amino acid composition of rat and salmon CT

 
Although the procedure for amino acid analysis used in the current paper does not detect cysteine residues, reduction and alkylation of partially purified pituitary CT resulted in a decreased retention time of bioactive material, following C8 reverse-phase HPLC (not shown). This is consistent with the presence of cysteines in the sequence, which is an invariant feature of all known CT peptides.

Large-scale purification of sCT-like peptide from rat brain diencephalon
We have previously shown that the rat brain diencephalon contains sCT-I (9). In this study, we have carried out large-scale purification of extracts from 4000 diencephalons. Preliminary analysis of material separated by C8 reverse-phase HPLC, using RIA with either the 1464 or PAb antibodies, indicated that the primary recognition products of the two antibodies differed (not shown). Consequently, fractionated material was assayed for sCT-I using both antibodies.

As with pituitary extracts, extractions were carried out in acid mix media and initial purification used batch application to and elution from the Vydac C18 reverse-phase and SP Sepharose CEX columns. Recoveries for each step in the purification are listed in Table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Recovery of sCT-I from diencephalon extract at each purification step

 
The brain extract was first applied to the preparative C8 reverse-phase HPLC column, where gradient elution resulted in a broad peak of activity in both RIAs (not shown). Active fractions from the C8 reverse-phase analysis were resuspended in 4.5 ml of 6 M GuHCl and fractionated on the Sephadex G-50 column. The majority of the protein eluted as one major peak (Fig. 7Go). Interestingly, the RIA profiles reveal three distinct peaks, with the level of activity in each peak differing markedly depending upon the anti-sCT sera used. The immunoreactivity in the first peak (SEC I) eluted in the void volume of the column (mol wt > 13,700), whereas the immunoreactivity in the second peak (SEC II) eluted just after ribonuclease A (mol wt 13,700), and the immunoreactivity in the third peak (SEC III) eluted just before aprotinin (mol wt 6,500). The 1464 antiserum principally detected the two peaks of higher molecular weight (Fig. 7AGo). The PAb antiserum detected these two peaks and also the lower molecular weight species, SEC III (Fig. 7BGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Size exclusion chromatography of diencephalon extract. Extract was fractionated on a Sephadex G-50 column (75 x 1.5 cm) with a flow rate of 6 ml/h. Fractions were collected every 30 min. A 50-µl aliquot of each fraction was desalted with a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge, lyophilized, and assayed in the sCT RIA with the 1464 (A) or the PAb (B) anti-sCT antisera. The column was calibrated with (1) Blue Dextran 2000, (2) Ribonuclease A, 13,700 Da, and (3) Aprotinin, 6,500 Da. Open circles indicate absorbance at 280 nm. Closed circles indicate sCT-like immunoreactivity measured in RIA.

 
Aliquots of the SEC peaks were assayed for bioactivity with the cAMP stimulation assay using rat C1a and C1b receptor-transfected HEK-293 cells (Fig. 8Go). In C1a receptor-expressing cells, SEC I had no significant activity (Fig. 8AGo), whereas undiluted SEC II appeared to give a small stimulation (Fig. 8BGo). No stimulation was observed in the untransfected cells. However, SEC III stimulated significant cAMP production in C1a receptor-expressing cells, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8CGo). Comparison of the activity levels in the cAMP assay and the RIA, with sCT as standard, indicated approximately three times greater activity in the bioassay (Table 3Go). A small response was also observed in the untransfected cell line. This was most likely due to activity of non-CT peptides, as the extract was still crude at this stage. In the C1b receptor-expressing cells, which exhibit a high basal level of cAMP, the cAMP levels were unaffected. Because the SEC III fraction was biologically active and exhibited greatest separation from contaminating protein, this material was used for subsequent purification, with activity monitored by RIA with the PAb antiserum.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Bioactivity of diencephalon peaks identified with size exclusion chromatography. An aliquot each of SEC I (A), SEC II (B), and SEC III (C), from Fig. 7Go, was desalted with a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge, lyophilized, and assayed for cAMP production in HEK-293 cells stably transfected with either rat C1a receptor (open bars), rat C1b receptor (double hatched bars), or in untransfected HEK-293 cells (single hatched bars). The C1b receptor-expressing cells exhibit high basal levels of cAMP due to constitutive activity of the receptor.

 
Sequential reverse-phase chromatography allowed purification of active material to near homogeneity, following C8 narrowbore chromatography (Table 3Go, Fig. 9Go). However, recoveries were relatively poor, and no sCT-I activity was detected after application of postnarrowbore material to a microbore SGE column (250 x 1 mm) (Table 3Go).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Narrowbore C8 reverse-phase HPLC chromatography of SEC III. Fractions from the C4 reverse-phase run (Table 3Go) were diluted in 1% TFA, centrifuged for 5 min, and fractionated on a Vydac C18 reverse-phase column (250 x 2.1 mm). Peptide peaks, measured at 214 nm, were collected manually. An aliquot (1/15) was lyophilized and assayed. The black bar indicates elution of sCT-I.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The existence of sCT-like peptides in the CNS of a number of species has been previously noted, where it is proposed to play a role as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator (8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 28, 29, 30). Due to the lack of the thyroid-derived form of CT in the CNS, we proposed that an sCT-like peptide may be the endogenous ligand for the central CT receptors (9). In this paper, we describe the purification and partial characterization of CT-like peptides from brain and pituitary. The pituitary peptide was more amenable to purification and, based upon its molecular weight, amino acid composition and unique partial sequence, proved to be a novel peptide. For brain material, a protocol for near homogeneous purification of the activity is described. Both brain and pituitary peptides were biologically active at the cloned rat C1a CT receptor; however, only the brain-derived material exhibited cross-reactivity with C-terminally directed anti-sCT antisera.

Lack of recognition of the pituitary peptide by the anti-sCT antisera was surprising, in particular, because the PAb antibody reveals, immunohistochemically, sCT-I in the mouse pituitary carcinoma cell line {alpha}-TSH (16). The basis for this discrepancy is unclear but may be related to different reactivities in immunohistochemistry vs. RIA. Nonetheless, other anti-sCT sera have detected sCT-I release from anterior pituitary cells (15). Immunohistochemical staining of rat pituitaries with anti-hCT and anti-rCT sera has also been reported, although the pituitary CT cross-reacted with only 2 of 15 anti-hCT/rCT sera (4). Together, the data indicate that, whereas the pituitary CT shares structural epitopes with CT peptides, it is not identical to either sCT or rCT. This was confirmed by the amino acid composition analysis in Table 2Go and by the unique molecular weight of 3267 Da. Recently, Shah et al. (31) reported that the anti-sCT serum used in their studies may recognize the N-terminal region of the sCT molecule containing the disulfide-bridged loop. This suggests that the pituitary CT and sCT may have similar N-terminal residues. As the N-terminus is highly conserved, it may also explain the cross-reactivity of the limited number of antirat/human CT antisera in the early immunohistochemical studies (4). If the principal site of sequence convergence between pituitary CT and sCT-like peptides is in the N-terminus, this would explain the lack of cross-reactivity with the 1464 and Peninsula anti-sCT sera, which are C-terminally directed.

Conservation of sequence in the N-terminus is not surprising as this region of CT is both highly conserved across species and is crucial for the agonist activity of CT peptides (32). Structure-activity studies demonstrate that residues 3–6 of sCT are particularly important for its biological activity (32). In the current study, the pituitary CT activated adenylate cyclase in cell lines with heterologously expressed CT receptors. The specificity of the response was demonstrated by 1) the stimulation of cAMP production in CT receptor-containing cells but not in the CT receptor-negative cells, and 2) abolition of activity by the CT receptor antagonist, AC512. Thus, conservation within the N-terminal region of the peptide is likely. In contrast, considerable divergence in the mid to C-terminus of the peptides can be tolerated without major effect on peptide activity. Most of the amphiphilic core of sCT can be replaced with other residues of similar hydrophobicity without markedly impairing either the biological activity or the ability to bind CT receptors (33). Similarly, AC413, a chimeric analog of sCT(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) and amylin, which is approximately 50% substituted by amylin residues, maintains high affinity for CT receptors (34). Therefore, the lack of cross-reactivity with the C-terminally directed anti-sCT anti-sera used in this study is not necessarily surprising.

Using conventional chromatography, an approximately 900-fold purification of the pituitary CT was achieved. Activity analyzed on the narrowbore reverse-phase HPLC column eluted as a homogenous peak, with a principal mass of 3267 Da. This differs from the molecular mass of both rat CT (3400 Da) and sCT (3432 Da). Based on the assumption that the purified peptide remained fully active, the pituitary CT is approximately 3-fold less potent than sCT. However, minor structural modifications during extraction and purification, which affect biological activity, cannot be ruled out.

The procedure used for the current amino acid analysis was unable to resolve all the component residues. However, based on the existing composition, the 3267-Da mass predicts a 32-amino acid peptide. As cysteine residues are degraded by this procedure, it is likely that the remaining residues include cysteines. Reduction and alkylation of the pituitary CT altered its retention time in reverse-phase HPLC, suggesting that disulfide-bridged cysteines are indeed present. This is consistent with the conservation of the cysteine-bridged N-terminal loop that occurs in all known CT peptides. The abrupt termination of sequence at proline, for each of the protease digestion peaks yielding sequence, implies that this sequence may represent the C-terminal end of the peptide. This would be consistent with the invariant proline at the end (position 32) of all known CTs. In CT, the proline is amidated and is also essential for biological activity (35).

The exact physiological role of endogenous pituitary CT is not resolved. Nonetheless, CT receptors are present in both intermediate pituitary (14) and anterior pituitary (15, 16, 31). Furthermore, release of endogenous CT-like peptides from cultured anterior pituitary cells has been demonstrated (15), and inhibition of PRL release occurs in response to both exogenous and endogenous CTs (15, 31). More recently, Shah and colleagues (31) demonstrated a marked in vivo increase in PRL secretion following injection of specific anti-sCT antisera. This antisera did not cross-react significantly with rat CT, suggesting that the action was mediated by binding to and inhibiting nonthyroidal CTs. Together, as proposed by Shah and colleagues, this data suggests that CT may be a physiological regulator of PRL secretion and that, in this action, endogenous pituitary CT may be acting in a paracrine or autocrine fashion.

Although purification to homogeneity was not achieved for the sCT-like peptide from diencephalon, a number of important observations were made. Diencephalon extract fractionated on a Sephadex G-50 column revealed multiple immunoreactive peaks. The 1464 antisera detected primarily the higher molecular weight peaks (SEC I and SEC II), whereas the PAb anti-sera detected both of the two peaks seen with the 1464 antisera, as well as a third form (SEC III), which had the highest biological activity. Multiple immunoreactive forms of CT also occur in tissue and blood samples, where 2–7 peaks are observed (36, 37, 38, 39, 40). While the number of peaks seen in these studies is dependent on antisera specificity, both antisera used in the current study are C-terminally directed and demonstrate similar general specificity for peptide recognition. The difference between the anti-sCT sera used in this study may relate to the sCT peptide used to raise the antisera as the 1464 was raised against an R11,18K14 modified sCT (23) conjugated to BSA, rather than native sCT. The identities of the higher molecular mass forms are unclear, although it is probable that they derive from precursor forms of the peptide (thyroid-derived procalcitonin is approximately 11,000 Da), or polymers of CT resulting from intermolecular disulfide bridge formation and/or high molecular weight complexes formed by disulfide bridge linkage of the monomer to an unrelated protein (36, 37). It is possible that SEC I and SEC II represent such high molecular mass forms of CT. Consistent with previous studies, the high molecular mass forms of SEC I and SEC II were essentially biologically inactive (36, 37).

Although the brain and pituitary CT-like peptides appear to be different, both are likely released from precursor forms. It is not surprising that high molecular mass forms of CT were not detected in the pituitary as they tend to be biologically inactive. However, bands of molecular mass of approximately 23 and 6.5 Da, along with a band equivalent to monomeric CT of 3.5 Da, were immunoprecipated with anti-sCT and anti-hCT sera from anterior pituitary cell lysates (15). This data suggest that precursor forms of the CT-like peptide also occur in pituitary. Whether or not both peptides derive from a common precursor remains to be resolved and relies on either full sequencing of the brain and pituitary peptides or isolation of their cDNAs.

In summary, conventional chromatography was used to partially purify CT-like peptides from both rat brain and pituitary, during which different assay systems were used to monitor their activity. Although the pituitary CT shares features of commonality with characterized CT peptides, determination of the amino acid composition and molecular weight indicated the purification of a novel peptide which may function as an endogenous regulator of pituitary function.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank Anthony Valentyn for helpful discussions on peptide purification.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and Glaxo Wellcome Australia. Back

2 Research Fellow of the Australian Research Council. Back

Received August 27, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Morimoto S, Nishimura J, Miyauchi A, Takai S-I, Okada Y, Onishi T, Fukuo K, Lee S, Kumahara Y 1982 Calcitonin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from normal subjects and patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma: possible restriction of calcitonin by the blood-brain barrier. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55:594–596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Flynn JJ, Margules DL, Cooper CW 1981 Presence of immunoreactive calcitonin in the hypothalamus and pituitary lobes of rats. Brain Res Bull 6:547–549[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Fischer JA, Tobler PH, Kaufmann M, Born W, Henke H, Cooper PE, Sagar SM, Martin JB 1981 Calcitonin: regional distribution of the hormone and its binding sites in the human brain and pituitary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:7801–7805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cooper CW, Peng T-C, Obie JF, Garner SC 1980 Calcitonin-like immunoreactivity in rat and human pituitary glands: histochemical, in in vitro and in vivo studies. Endocrinology 107:98–107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rosenfeld MG, Mermod JJ, Amara SG, Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale WW, Evans RM 1983 Production of a novel neuropeptide encoded by the calcitonin gene via tissue-specific RNA processing. Nature 304:129–135[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jacobs JW, Goltzman D, Habener JF 1982 Absence of detectable calcitonin synthesis in the pituitary using cloned complementary deoxyribonucleic acid probes. Endocrinology 111:2014–2019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Höppener JW, Steenbergh PH, Moonen PJ, Wagenaar SS, Jansz HS, Lips CJ 1986 Detection of mRNA encoding calcitonin, calcitonin gene related peptide and proopiomelanocortin in human tumors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 47:125–130[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Fischer JA, Tobler PH, Henke H, Tschopp FA 1983 Salmon and human calcitonin-like peptides coexist in the human thyroid and brain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 57:1314–1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sexton PM, Hilton JM 1992 Biologically active salmon calcitonin-like peptide is present in rat brain. Brain Res 596:279–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Galan Galan F, Rogers RM, Girgis SI, MacIntyre I 1981 Immunoreactive calcitonin in the central nervous system of the pigeon. Brain Res 212:59–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. MacInnes DG, Laszlo I, MacIntyre I, Fink G 1982 Salmon calcitonin in lizard brain: a possible neuroendocrine transmitter. Brain Res 251:371–373[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Sexton PM, Houssami S, Hilton JM, O’Keefe LM, Center RJ, Gillespie MT, Darcy P, Findlay DM 1993 Identification of brain isoforms of the rat calcitonin receptor. Mol Endocrinol 7:815–821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Houssami S, Findlay DM, Brady CL, Myers DE, Martin TJ, Sexton PM 1994 Isoforms of the rat calcitonin receptor: consequences for ligand binding and signal transduction. Endocrinology 135:183–190[Abstract]
  14. Hilton JM, Chai SY, Sexton PM 1995 In vitro autoradiographic localisation of the calcitonin receptor isoforms, C1a and C1b, in rat brain. Neuroscience 69:1223–1237[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Shah GV, Deftos LJ, Crowley WR 1993 Synthesis and release of calcitonin-like immunoreactivity by anterior pituitary cells: evidence for a role in paracrine regulation of prolactin secretion. Endocrinology 132:1367–1372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hanna FWF, Smith DM, Johnston CF, Akinsanya KO, Jackson ML, Morgan DGA, Bhogal R, Buchanan KD, Bloom SR 1995 Expression of a novel receptor for the calcitonin peptide gene family and a salmon calcitonin-like peptide in the alpha-thyrotropin thyrotroph cell line. Endocrinology 136:2377–2382[Abstract]
  17. Maurer R, Marbach P, Mousson R 1983 Salmon calcitonin binding sites in rat pituitary. Brain Res 261:346–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Perry KJ, Quiza M, Myers DE, Morfis M, Christopoulos G, Sexton PM 1997 Characterization of amylin and calcitonin receptor binding in the mouse {alpha}-TSH thyrotroph cell line. Endocrinology 138:3486–3496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Perez Cano R, Girgis SI, Galan Galan F, MacIntyre I 1982 Identification of both human and salmon calcitonin-like molecules in birds suggesting the existence of two calcitonin genes. J Endocrinol 92:351–355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Perez Cano R, Girgis SI, MacIntyre I 1982 Further evidence for calcitonin gene duplication: the identification of two different calcitonins in a fish, a reptile and two mammals. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 100:256–261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lasmoles F, Jullienne A, Day F, Minvielle S, Milhaud G, Moukhtar MS 1985 Elucidation of the nucleotide sequence of chicken calcitonin mRNA: direct evidence for the expression of a lower vertebrate calcitonin-like gene in man and rat. EMBO J 4:2603–2607[Medline]
  22. Findlay DM, deLuise M, Michelangeli VP, Ellison M, Martin TJ 1980 Properties of a calcitonin receptor and adenylate cyclase in BEN cells, a human cancer cell line. Cancer Res 40:1311–1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. D’Santos CS, Nicholson GC, Moseley JM, Evans T, Martin TJ, Kemp BE 1988 Biologically active, derivatizable salmon calcitonin analog: design, synthesis, and applications. Endocrinology 123:1483–1488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Houssami S, Findlay DM, Hilton JM, O’Keefe LM, Martin TJ, Sexton PM 1994 Heterogeneity in ligand recognition of calcitonin receptors. Endocr J 2:127–134
  25. Bennett HP, Browne CA, Solomon S 1982 Characterization of eight forms of corticotropin-like intermediary lobe peptide from the rat intermediary pituitary. J Biol Chem 257:10096–10102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bennett HP, Browne CA, Solomon S 1981 Purification of the two major forms of rat pituitary corticotropin using only reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Biochemistry 20:4530–4538[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Galan Galan F, Rogers RM, Girgis SI, Arnett TR, Ravazzola M, Orci L, MacIntyre I 1981 Immunochemical characterization and distribution of calcitonin in the lizard. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 97:427–432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sasayama Y, Katoh A, Oguro C, Kambegawa A, Yoshizawa H 1991 Cells showing immunoreactivity for calcitonin or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the central nervous system of some invertebrates. Gen Comp Endocrinol 83:406–414[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Sasayama Y, Koizumi T, Oguro C, Kambegawa A, Yoshizawa H 1991 Calcitonin-immunoreactive cells are present in the brains of some cyclostomes. Gen Comp Endocrinol 84:284–290[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Shah GV, Pedchenko V, Stanley S, Li Z, Samson WK 1996 Calcitonin is a physiological inhibitor of prolactin secretion in ovariectomized female rats. Endocrinology 137:1814–1822[Abstract]
  32. Feyen JH, Cardinaux F, Gamse R, Bruns C, Azria M, Trechsel U 1992 N-terminal truncation of salmon calcitonin leads to calcitonin antagonists. Structure activity relationship of N-terminally truncated salmon calcitonin fragments in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 187:8–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Moe GR, Kaiser ET 1985 Design, synthesis, and characterization of a model peptide having potent calcitonin-like biological activity: implications for calcitonin structure/activity. Biochemistry 24:1971–1976[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wookey PJ, Tikellis C, Du H-C, Qin H-F, Sexton PM, Cooper ME 1996 Amylin binding in rat renal cortex, stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and activation of plasma renin. Am J Physiol 39:F289–F294
  35. Rittel W, Maier R, Brugger M, Kamber B, Riniker B, Sieber P 1976 Structure-activity relationship of human calcitonin. III. Biological activity of synthetic analogues with shortened or terminally modified peptide chains. Experientia 32:246–248[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Singer FR, Habener JF 1974 Multiple immunoreactive forms of calcitonin in human plasma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 61:710–716[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Goltzman D, Tischler AS 1978 Characterization of the immunochemical forms of calcitonin released by a medullary thyroid carcinoma in tissue culture. J Clin Invest 61:449–458
  38. Becker KL, Snider RH, Silva OL, Moore CF 1978 Calcitonin heterogeneity in lung cancer and medullary thyroid cancer. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 89:89–99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Snider RH, Silva OL, Moore CF, Becker KL 1977 Immunochemical heterogeneity of calcitonin in man: effect on radioimmunoassay. Clin Chim Acta 76:1–14[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Sizemore GW, Heath HI, Larson JM 1975 Immunochemical heterogeneity of calcitonin in plasma of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Invest 55:1111–1118



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Tavares, R. Maldonado, and F. J. Minano
N-Procalcitonin: Central Effects on Feeding and Energy Homeostasis in Rats
Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1891 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Sawada, H. Yamaguchi, T. Shimbara, K. Toshinai, M. S. Mondal, Y. Date, N. Murakami, T. Katafuchi, N. Minamino, H. Nunoi, et al.
Central Effects of Calcitonin Receptor-Stimulating Peptide-1 on Energy Homeostasis in Rats
Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 2043 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Reidelberger, A. C. Haver, U. Arnelo, D. D. Smith, C. S. Schaffert, and J. Permert
Amylin receptor blockade stimulates food intake in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): R568 - R574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Katafuchi, K. Kikumoto, K. Hamano, K. Kangawa, H. Matsuo, and N. Minamino
Calcitonin Receptor-stimulating Peptide, a New Member of the Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Family. ITS ISOLATION FROM PORCINE BRAIN, STRUCTURE, TISSUE DISTRIBUTION, AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12046 - 12054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y.-P. Sun, T. J. Lee, and G. V. Shah
Calcitonin Expression in Rat Anterior Pituitary Gland Is Regulated by Ovarian Steroid Hormones
Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 4056 - 4064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. M. Qian, X. J. Sun, M. H. Tong, X. P. Li, J. Richa, and W.-C. Song
Targeted Disruption of the Mouse Estrogen Sulfotransferase Gene Reveals a Role of Estrogen Metabolism in Intracrine and Paracrine Estrogen Regulation
Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5342 - 5350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Kiriyama, H. Tsuchiya, T. Murakami, K. Satoh, and Y. Tokumitsu
Calcitonin Induces IL-6 Production via Both PKA and PKC Pathways in the Pituitary Folliculo-Stellate Cell Line
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3563 - 3569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W.-C. Song and M. H. Melner
Editorial: Steroid Transformation Enzymes as Critical Regulators of Steroid Action in Vivo
Endocrinology, May 1, 2000; 141(5): 1587 - 1589.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. A. Arbogast, G. V. Shah, and J. L. Voogt
3',5' Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Mediates the Salmon Calcitonin-Induced Increase in Hypothalamic Tyrosine Hydroxylase Activity
Endocrinology, July 1, 1999; 140(7): 3273 - 3281.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y.-m. Qian and W.-C. Song
Regulation of Estrogen Sulfotransferase Expression in Leydig Cells by Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate and Androgen
Endocrinology, March 1, 1999; 140(3): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Reidelberger, L. Kelsey, and D. Heimann
Effects of amylin-related peptides on food intake, meal patterns, and gastric emptying in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1395 - R1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals