help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harandian, F.
Right arrow Articles by Farookhi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harandian, F.
Right arrow Articles by Farookhi, R.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 4 1700-1707
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Contact-Dependent Cell Interactions Determine Hormone Responsiveness and Desensitization in Rat Granulosa Cells1

Fereidoun Harandian and Riaz Farookhi

Departments of Physiology (F.H., R.F.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (R.F.), McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 1A1

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Riaz Farookhi, F3.44 Women’s Pavilion, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 1A1. E-mail: rfarookh{at}rvhob2.lan.mcgill.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The maintenance of associations between granulosa cells (GCs) is necessary for FSH-stimulated induction of LH receptors. In cultures in which these associations have been disrupted, FSH fails to induce LH receptors. As FSH exerts its action in GCs via cAMP, we have examined if the aggregation state of GCs plays a role in modulating FSH-stimulated cAMP production.

GCs were obtained from the ovaries of diethylstilbestrol-primed immature rats. Cells were prepared as aggregate or dispersed populations by isolating GCs in either the presence or absence of Ca2+. Nonviable cells were removed by a brief exposure to trypsin. We have shown previously that trypsin treatment in the absence of Ca2+ removes a class of cell adhesion molecules, termed cadherins, from the plasma membranes of GCs. Hence, the dispersed GCs are incapable of reaggregating. Dispersed or aggregate GC preparations were incubated with different doses of human FSH (0–1 µg) for 0–60 min in the presence of isobutylmethylxanthine, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Incubations were terminated, and the cAMP accumulated was measured using a specific RIA. As desensitization to hormonal stimuli is a characteristic property of many G protein-coupled response systems, cAMP production of cell aggregates and dispersed cells in response to a repeated stimulation with FSH was assessed.

Our results indicate that aggregate GCs have a significantly attenuated cAMP response to all doses of FSH compared with dispersed GC preparations. Changing cell densities did not alter the nature of these responses, indicating that nonspecific cell interactions were not responsible for this difference. The number of FSH receptors and their affinity were unaltered in the two cell preparations. Cholera toxin- and forskolin-stimulated cAMP production were similar in the two preparations, demonstrating that the changes in responsiveness did not arise from alterations in G protein activation or adenylate cyclase activity. Only the aggregate GCs could be desensitized. The dispersed cells displayed undiminished cAMP responsiveness to a second FSH stimulation. Finally, culture of the GC preparations with cholera toxin induced LH receptors in GC aggregates only. LH receptor induction in dispersed cell cultures required the addition of estradiol.

These results indicate that contact-dependent cell interactions can modulate GC cAMP production in response to FSH. cAMP responses, however, were not the sole determinant of cell differentiation, as assessed by LH receptor induction. We speculate that cell-cell interactions within the follicular epithelium are important determinants for cell differentiation leading to follicle selection for ovulation or atresia.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CONTACT-DEPENDENT cell-cell interactions appear to be crucial for aspects of ovarian cell responses and differentiation (1, 2, 3). For instance, FSH-stimulated LH receptor induction in ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) in vitro occurs only in cell aggregates, but not in dispersed cells (1, 2). FSH-induced aromatase expression is also attenuated in dispersed cell preparations (2). FSH can induce LH receptors in dispersed GCs, but this requires treatment with estradiol (2). Estradiol stimulates the expression of Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecules, known as cadherins, in GCs, thus facilitating their aggregation (2, 4). Blocking cadherin-mediated adhesion with specific antisera blocks LH receptor induction in aggregating GCs (3). The specific cadherin expressed by GCs is N (neural)-cadherin (5, 6). Recently, we have shown that the estradiol-mediated increase in N-cadherin messenger RNA expression in rat GCs is also dependent on the aggregational state of the cells (5); only dissociated GCs show an increase in N-cadherin messenger RNA in response to estradiol. Taken together, these results demonstrate that cadherin-mediated cell interactions are an important component of GC differentiation and follicular development.

GCs also interact with one another through gap junctions. Gap junctions are aggregates of transmembrane channels through which small molecules (<1000–2000 daltons) can pass from the cytoplasm of one cell to a neighboring cell (7). The basic structural unit of the gap junction is termed a connexon and consists of an oligomer of gap junction proteins termed connexins. The apposition of two connexons, each contributed by an adjacent cell, form the gap junction channel. The oocyte, cumulus cells, and mural GCs in ovarian follicles are interconnected to one another by an array of gap junctional complexes. The role of these gap junctions in follicular function is not well understood. These junctions are involved, however, in the metabolic cooperation between the oocyte and the surrounding cumulus cells and in the maintenance of meiotic arrest of the oocyte within the follicle (8). Whether gap junctions play a role in GC differentiation is presently not clear. Intercellular coupling has been implicated in growth regulation and differentiation in cell lines and in a number of developmental systems (9–12; reviewed in Ref.13). A role for gap junction-dependent cell communication in tissue patterning has been suggested (14, 15, 16).

FSH exerts its action on GCs by stimulating increased levels of intracellular cAMP (17, 18). The FSH receptor is a member of the G protein-coupled serpentine (seven-transmembrane domain) receptor superfamily (19). GCs in all growing follicles in the rat ovary have been shown to express FSH receptors (20).

FSH stimulates LH receptor expression in rat GCs in vivo (21) and in vitro (22). Sanders and Midgley (23) have shown that cAMP can stimulate LH receptor expression in primary cultures of rat GCs. Our observation that FSH-stimulated LH receptor induction requires direct cell interactions raises the question of whether cAMP production is altered in aggregate vs. dispersed GCs. Hence, we examined whether the aggregation state of freshly isolated rat GCs affects FSH-stimulated cAMP production in vitro. Aggregate and dispersed GCs were prepared from the ovaries of diethylstilbestrol (DES)-primed immature rats and were stimulated with various doses of FSH in vitro. As receptor desensitization is an important aspect of G protein-coupled receptor responses in general (24) and of GC responsiveness to gonadotropins in particular (25), we examined cAMP production by the two types of cell preparations in response to repeated stimuli with FSH. Finally, to determine whether differences in cAMP production are important for GC differentiation, we examined whether FSH-independent elevation of cAMP allows LH receptor induction in these cell preparations.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animal treatment and GC preparation
All animal care and treatments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and were approved by the animal care committee of the Royal Victoria Hospital. Immature (21-day-old) Sprague-Dawley female rats were purchased from Charles River Canada (St. Constant, Canada). Each rat was implanted on day 22 of age with a 3-cm SILASTIC brand implant (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) packed with DES. The implants were prepared as described previously (23). DES priming provides an ovary that is dominated by large preantral/early antral follicles (23). Animals were killed by decapitation 3 days after implant insertion. Dispersed and aggregated GCs were prepared from the ovaries of DES-primed animals as described previously (2, 26). A critical step in this procedure is the trypsinization of the cell preparations in either the presence (yielding GC aggregates) or the absence (yielding monodispersed GCs) of Ca2+. We have shown that inclusion of Ca2+ during trypsinization maintains cadherins on the cell surface (3). These manipulations do not affect FSH receptor levels on these cells (2, 26) (see Results). The two cell preparations were washed and resuspended at a final density of 3 x 106 cells/ml in culture medium (Ham’s F-12-DMEM, 1:1). Cell densities were estimated by obtaining a cell count (using a hemocytometer) and by an initial DNA determination on an aliquot of cells. The latter determination was considered more reliable because the number of cells in some of the aggregates exceeded 100. The cell viability of the preparations was routinely greater than 90%.

FSH receptor level and affinity characteristics
Receptor levels in preparations of dispersed and aggregate (nondispersed) GCs were determined as described previously (2, 26). FSH binding affinity was assessed by competition of [125I]FSH binding to the cells with increasing amounts of unlabeled FSH (27). FSH was labeled with 125I by the lactoperoxidase method (21). The highly purified human (h) FSH (AFP-4822B) used in the binding assays was a gift from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (NHPP), NIDDK (Bethesda, MD).

Cell incubation and cAMP stimulation
cAMP stimulation by gonadotropins and other agents (forskolin or cholera toxin) in the two preparations of GCs was assessed as described previously (2, 26). Briefly, 0.1 ml cell suspension (3 x 106 cells/ml medium) was aliquoted into 12 x 75-mm polypropylene tubes (Sarstedt, Montreal, Canada). Then, in order, 0.1 ml 1.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and 0.1 ml of various doses of FSH [0–1000 ng ovine (o) FSH-17, NHPP, NIDDK], hCG (0–10 IU CR-121; 13,450 IU/mg; NHPP, NIDDK), cholera toxin (0–1000 ng/ml; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), or forskolin (0–100 µM; ICN, Cleveland OH) were added, giving a final incubation volume of 0.3 ml. All additions were in Ham’s F-12-DMEM. IBMX was added to inhibit endogenous phosphodiesterase activity and prevent cAMP metabolism. The oFSH preparation used has a biological potency of 20 U/mg and negligible (<0.04 x NIH LH-S1) LH bioactivity. Tubes were incubated for 0–120 min at 37 C in a Dubnoff shaker (10 oscillations/min) in 95% air-5% CO2 (28). At the end of the incubation periods, 0.7 ml boiling distilled water was added to each tube, and the tubes were incubated for a further 10 min in a boiling water bath. The tubes were allowed to cool to room temperature, after which they were centrifuged (3000 x g for 30 min). The supernatants were removed and frozen for cAMP analyses. The pellets were analyzed for DNA content using the fluorescence assay of LaBarca and Paigen (29).

To assess the partitioning of the cAMP produced between the extracellular and intracellular compartments, the incubations were terminated by rapid centrifugation (200 x g for 5 min). The supernatant media were removed, and immediately boiled and stored. The cell pellets were washed with medium and then lysed with boiling distilled water. The lysates were centrifuged, and the supernatants were saved for cAMP determinations. The pellets were used for DNA determination.

Desensitization of GCs
Cells (3 x 106/ml) were aliquoted (0.1 ml/tube) to polypropylene tubes as described above. After the addition of IBMX, cells were incubated with various doses of FSH as described previously. After a 60- to 240-min incubation period, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (200 x g for 5 min), and the supernatants were removed. The supernatants were heat inactivated and stored at -40 C for later assay of cAMP. The pelleted cells were washed twice with 1 ml Ham’s F-12-DMEM, after which they were resuspended in 0.3 ml medium containing 0.5 mM IBMX and 500 ng oFSH and incubated for an additional 30 min. At the end of the incubation period, the tubes were processed as described above.

cAMP assay
cAMP was measured using an RIA as described previously (2, 26). The cAMP antibody was purchased from Biomedical Technologies (Stoughton, MA). The tyrosine methyl ester derivative of cAMP (Sigma Chemical Co.) was iodinated and purified as described by Brooker et al. (30). The assay sensitivity was 8 fmol cAMP. Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were less than 10%.

LH receptor induction
LH receptor induction in aggregate or dispersed GC cultures was assessed using 125I-labeled hCG as the ligand. These procedures were described previously (2).

Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated at least twice, with at least three replicates per treatment. Data are presented as the arithmetic mean with associated SEM and were analyzed by ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made using the least significance difference test. Differences were considered significant for P <= 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aggregate and dispersed GCs display an equal number of FSH receptors with similar affinities
To ensure that the procedures for preparing the aggregate and dispersed cell suspensions had not adversely affected the FSH receptor, characteristics of FSH binding to the cells were evaluated. Both the number of receptors (Fig. 1AGo) and their affinity (Fig. 1BGo) appeared to be unaffected by the procedures involved in cell preparation.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, FSH receptors in aggregate (open bars) and dispersed (solid bars) preparations of rat GCs. Receptors were assessed by determining the binding of 125I-labeled hFSH in the absence or presence of a 1000-fold excess of unlabeled hFSH. Cell DNA was measured in the washed pellet. The mean ± SEM for nine separate preparations are shown. B, FSH binding affinity in aggregate (open squares) or dispersed (solid squares) preparations of rat GCs. Cells were incubated with 125I-labeled hFSH and the indicated amounts (in moles) of unlabeled hFSH. After an overnight incubation, the cells were washed, and the radiolabeled FSH associated with the cells was measured. Binding in the absence of unlabeled FSH was considered to be 100%.

 
Dispersed GCs are more responsive to FSH than aggregate GCs
Figure 2AGo illustrates the temporal response of dispersed and aggregate GCs to a single stimulation with 100 ng FSH. Both cell preparations displayed a rapid increase in cAMP levels by the first time interval examined (15 min), with the dispersed cell preparations showing a significantly higher cAMP level than the aggregate cells. The difference in cAMP levels persisted over the entire time interval examined (120 min). Both preparations appeared to have attained steady state levels of cAMP by 30–60 min, although the dispersed cell preparations seemed to maintain a steady increase in cAMP levels over the 30- to 120-min interval examined. This observation, although not appreciated at the time, was an indication that desensitization had not occurred in these cell preparations (see below). To ensure that the differences in responsiveness were not a dose-dependent phenomenon, cAMP production in response to different FSH doses was evaluated at 60 min (Fig. 2BGo). cAMP levels were significantly higher (~2-fold) in the dispersed cell preparations compared with those in the cell aggregates at all of the FSH doses considered. Maximal levels of cAMP were attained in the dispersed cell preparations with FSH doses of 30 ng or more. In contrast, maximal levels of cAMP were observed for FSH doses of 500 ng or more in the aggregate cells. Nonetheless, even at the higher FSH doses (>=500 ng), cAMP accumulation was significantly higher in the dispersed cells than in the cell aggregates. No response, in terms of cAMP elevation, was seen when the cells were stimulated with hCG, indicating that this response was specific for FSH and resulted from interaction with the FSH receptor (data not shown). Furthermore, the latter observation indicates that thecal cell contamination in the GC preparations was minimal. In the absence of FSH stimulation, a small, but similar, amount of cAMP was accumulated in both preparations of cells (<=0.1 pmol/µg DNA) by 60 min.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Time course of cAMP produced in aggregate (open squares) or dispersed (solid squares) GC preparations. Cell preparations were incubated with 100 ng oFSH and 0.5 mM IBMX in a final volume of 300 µl medium for the indicated times. Incubations were terminated by the addition of 700 µl boiling distilled water. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated three times with different preparations of GCs. B, Responses of aggregate (white bars) and dispersed (solid bars) cell preparations to different doses of oFSH. Cell preparations were incubated with the indicated doses of oFSH and 0.5 mM IBMX in a final volume of 300 µl medium for 60 min. Incubations were terminated by the addition of 700 µl boiling distilled water. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 
The possibility that the differences in responsiveness to FSH were the result of nonspecific effects of cell density was examined. Different cell densities of dispersed and aggregate GCs (0.1–1 x 106 cells/0.1 ml) were stimulated with 100 ng FSH for 60 min. Figure 3Go illustrates the linear regression lines obtained for the cAMP levels attained in the cell preparations as a function of DNA measured in the cell pellet. Both the dispersed and aggregate preparations showed a highly linear correlation (r2 = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively) of cAMP production with cell number, as reflected by DNA. The slopes of the two regression lines reflect the increased responsiveness of the dispersed cell preparations compared with that of the aggregate cells (30 vs. 19 pmol/µg DNA, respectively) and agree with the levels obtained in the dose-response studies (Fig. 2AGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. cAMP responses in aggregate (open squares) and dispersed (closed squares) GC cell preparations. Cell preparations of different densities were added to tubes containing 100 ng FSH and 0.5 mM IBMX. The final incubation volume was 300 µl. Incubations were terminated after 60 min by the addition of 700 µl boiling water. The total cAMP produced was measured in the supernatant. The DNA content of the pellet was assessed. Linear regression lines were generated to fit the data and gave correlation coefficients (r2 = 0.99 and 0.98 for the aggregate and dispersed preparations, respectively). The slopes of the two regression lines were significantly different, with values of 19 ± 0.4 and 30 ± 1, respectively.

 
The differential responses of the cell preparations were not due to changes in G protein or adenylate cyclase
To determine whether the differences in FSH responsiveness between the two GC preparations were a result of changes in either G protein or adenylate cyclase, the response to either cholera toxin or forskolin was evaluated (Fig. 4Go). Both cholera toxin (Fig. 4AGo), which activates Gs by ADP ribosylation (31), or the diterpene forskolin (Fig. 4BGo), which activates adenylate cyclase directly (32), were fully capable of stimulating comparable levels of cAMP in both cell preparations. As cholera toxin requires a prolonged incubation period of 120 min to exert its maximal effect on rat GCs (data not shown), the incubations with both of these agents were conducted for 120 min. Forskolin produced a more robust response than cholera toxin. A similar difference in cholera toxin vs. forskolin responses has been reported for pig GCs (33).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, Responses of aggregate (white squares) and dispersed (solid squares) cell preparations to different doses of forskolin. Cell preparations were incubated with the indicated doses of forskolin and 0.5 mM IBMX in a final volume of 300 µl medium for 120 min. Incubations were terminated by the addition of 700 µl boiling distilled water. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs. B, Responses of aggregate (open bars) and dispersed (solid bars) cell preparations to different doses of cholera toxin. Cell preparations were incubated with the indicated doses of cholera toxin and 0.5 mM IBMX in a final volume of 300 µl medium for 120 min. Incubations were terminated by the addition of 700 µl boiling distilled water. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 
Differences in FSH-stimulated responses are not due to altered partitioning of cAMP to extracellular and intracellular pools
As our studies to this point had examined the total cAMP levels attained in incubations, it was possible that the differences seen were the result of differential partitioning of the cAMP produced between the extracellular and the intracellular compartments. cAMP is secreted by cells, but it is presumed that it is the intracellular cAMP that exerts an effect through its activation of protein kinase A (34). To examine the partitioning of cAMP, the cell preparations were stimulated with FSH (0–500 ng) for 60 min. At the end of this time interval, incubation media and cells were separated by centrifugation, the cells were washed, and cAMP in the cells and that in the incubation medium were assessed separately. As illustrated in Fig. 5Go, with the exception of the 30-ng dose, both cell preparations showed a similar distribution of extra- vs. intracellular cAMP. Interestingly, the distribution showed dose dependency. Maximal amounts of intracellular cAMP were seen for the 10-ng FSH dose, whereas at higher doses, cAMP appeared to be partitioned equally between the two compartments.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. cAMP distribution between incubation medium and cells. Cell preparations were incubated with the indicated doses of FSH and 0.5 mM IBMX in a final volume of 300 µl medium for 60 min. Incubations were terminated by the centrifugation of the incubations and removal of the medium. Boiling water was added to both the medium and the cell pellet. Aggregate cells are indicated by open bars, and dispersed cells are shown by solid bars. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 
Aggregate GCs can be desensitized to FSH, but dispersed cells cannot
A characteristic feature of G protein-coupled receptors is the phenomenon of desensitization. Desensitization in GCs is characterized by refractoriness to stimulation with gonadotropin after an initial gonadotropin stimulation (25). This phenomenon is both dose and time dependent and can be demonstrated in vivo and in vitro (24, 25). To assess the time and dose dependency of this phenomenon in our system, preliminary studies with repeated FSH stimulation of aggregate GCs were conducted. Figure 6Go illustrates the result of one such experiment in which GCs were stimulated initially with various doses of FSH (shown on the abscissa in Fig. 6Go), followed 60 min later by stimulation with 500 ng FSH for 30 min. As shown in Fig. 6Go, an initial stimulation with 100-1000 ng FSH almost completely abolished the response to the second stimulation with 500 ng FSH. If the initial stimulation period were prolonged (to 240 min), lower initial doses (10–30 ng FSH) also desensitized the cells (data not shown). Prolonged incubations, however, can also lead to receptor down-regulation (24). Hence, we examined the responses of the aggregate and dispersed cell preparations to this desensitization paradigm using 500 ng FSH and a 1-h initial stimulation period followed by restimulation with 500 ng FSH. As shown in Fig. 7Go, only the aggregate GCs display desensitization. The dispersed GCs, in contrast, maintain a robust response to the second stimulus, with levels of cAMP equivalent to those seen in the primary response. The desensitization is exerted at the level of the FSH receptor, as responses to forskolin were not affected in either the FSH-treated aggregate or dispersed cell preparations (Fig. 8Go, A and B; second stimulation with forskolin, open bars). The effect of initial stimulation with forskolin followed by acute (30-min) stimulation with FSH was also assessed (Fig. 8Go, A and B, second stimulation with FSH, solid bars). In this case, responses to FSH were maintained, demonstrating that desensitization did not result solely from an elevation in cAMP levels, but also required FSH occupation of its receptor.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Induction of desensitization in GC aggregates. The open bars indicate the cAMP responses after stimulation with the different doses of oFSH for 60 min. At that time, medium was removed for cAMP assay, and the cell pellets were washed and then restimulated with 500 ng oFSH for 30 min (solid bars). Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Maintained responsiveness (absence of desensitization) in the dispersed cell preparations (Disp) compared with the GC aggregates (Agg). Both preparations were stimulated initially (open bars) with 500 ng oFSH for 60 min. After removal of the incubation medium and washing, the cells were restimulated with 500 ng FSH for 30 min (solid bars). Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Responses, after 30 min, of GC aggregates (A) and dispersed cell preparations (B) to a second stimulation with FSH (500 ng) or forskolin (50 µM). Cells were stimulated initially for 60 min with either FSH (open bars) or 50 µM forskolin (solid bars). Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate incubations. This experiment was repeated twice with different preparations of GCs.

 
FSH-independent elevation of cAMP induces LH receptors in aggregate GCs: induction in dispersed cells requires estradiol
We have shown previously that FSH can stimulate the induction of LH receptors in GC aggregates, but receptor induction in dispersed cells requires concomitant treatment with estradiol (2). The observations reported here suggest that these differences may arise from the changes in FSH-stimulated cAMP production. As cholera toxin appeared to stimulate comparable levels of cAMP in the two cell preparations, we examined whether this agent could induce LH receptor expression in monolayer cultures of the cells. Figure 9Go shows that although cholera toxin can induce LH receptors in cultures of GC aggregates, it fails to induce these receptors in dispersed cell cultures. Including estradiol in dispersed cell cultures, however, permits cholera toxin induction of LH receptors.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. LH receptor induction in dispersed cell preparations. Dispersed GCs were cultured for 48 h with either FSH (open bars) or 100 ng/ml cholera toxin (solid bars) in the absence or presence of 30 nM estradiol. LH receptors were assessed by the determination of specific [125I]hCG binding. Receptor content is expressed as a percentage of the receptor content in parallel cultures of aggregated cells subjected to the same incubation conditions. Each data point is the mean ± SEM for three separate cultures.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results demonstrate that GC ensembles exhibit responses to hormonal stimuli that are different from those seen with an equivalent number of individualized GCs. This effect is manifest at the level of second messenger responses and extends to a fundamental property of many hormone-responsive systems; namely, the ability to desensitize or become refractory to repeated stimulation. Alterations in second messenger responses, however, do not provide an explanation for the failure of dispersed GCs to express LH receptors. Clearly, post-cAMP-stimulated events are altered by changes in cell associations. The approach used in these studies considered only the two extremes of cell associations, i.e. cell aggregates or disaggregates. The situation in vivo is undoubtedly more complex where GC division, migration, and associations are undergoing changes over the course of follicular development (35, 36).

Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that cell cooperativity is required for GC differentiation. We have shown that FSH-stimulated induction of LH receptors and aromatase activity requires cell adhesion (2, 3). Other investigators have shown that the addition of cAMP analogs or adenylate cyclase activators to GC cultures can mimic the actions of FSH (23). Thus, the hormone-mediated elevation in intracellular cAMP levels in GCs is an important aspect of follicular cell differentiation. It should be noted, however, that the expression of LH receptors and aromatase is not uniform throughout the follicle. Expression of both the receptors and aromatase is most pronounced in mural GCs and appears to display a gradient within the follicle, where the highest expression levels are in the cells closest to the basement membrane and the lowest levels are in the cumulus cells (37). How this patterning is produced is not known. We suspect, however, that the cell adhesion and/or connectivity between GCs may play a role in this process. Cadherins and gap junctions have been shown to be important in tissue morphogenesis and patterning (15, 16, 38).

Christ et al. (39) suggested that gap junctions act to amplify the effects of local receptor activation by spreading second messengers to adjacent cells that are not directly activated by agonist. It is equally possible that inhibitory influences can be transmitted to or activated in adjacent cells. Our finding that desensitization only occurs in cell aggregates would be compatible with this idea.

Our expectation was that disaggregated GCs would show diminished cAMP production. Vander Molen et al. (40) have shown that uncoupled osteoblastic cells have reduced cAMP responses to PTH. These uncoupled cells were developed by stable transfection with complementary DNA antisense to connexin-43, the predominant connexin isoform expressed by these cells. In GCs, however, the disruption of coupling and cell associations resulted in an elevation in cAMP production, suggesting that cellular aggregation had an attenuating, rather than an amplifying, influence. Our experimental design, however, does not allow us to distinguish whether these effects are due to the loss of uncoupling or the loss of cadherin-mediated adhesion. Cadherin expression and gap junction coupling have been shown to be related (41, 42).

A possible explanation for the enhanced cAMP production in disaggregated GCs could be an alteration in FSH receptor number or affinity. Disruption of cell aggregates may disclose cryptic receptors or allow access to previously inaccessible receptors. It is unlikely that new receptor synthesis occurs over the brief time intervals used in our studies. Our findings that both types of cell preparations had similar receptor levels with similar affinity characteristics demonstrate that receptor changes are not responsible for the increased responsiveness. We did note, however, the small, but significant, increases in cAMP response to the higher doses of FSH in cell aggregates. This finding shows that responsiveness of the receptors in cell aggregates, although lower than that in dispersed cells, can be increased if the stimulus is increased. One possible explanation for this, which would also explain the lower responsiveness of aggregates, is if the cAMP generated affects the responsiveness of the FSH receptor. Evidence for phosphorylation-dependent desensitization of peptide receptors, including FSH and LH receptors, has been reported (43). Furthermore, if the cAMP generated in one cell is transmitted rapidly to the adjoining coupled cells via gap junctions, then desensitization of FSH receptors before their activation may occur. This scenario would be consistent with the FSH responses seen in the two cell preparations, as the disaggregated cells would respond as individual units and not as coupled cells. The elevation of cAMP, however, cannot be the only determinant of this receptor nonresponsiveness, because both cell preparations respond similarly if the receptor is bypassed by stimulation with either cholera toxin or forskolin. It has been shown that phosphorylation of peptide receptors requires occupation of the ligand-binding site (19). Hence, a scenario involving transferred cAMP may be operative if the kinetics of phosphorylation are more rapid than the ligand-induced activation of adenylate cyclase. The transmission of cAMP between cells has been demonstrated (7). In fact, Lawrence et al. (44) have shown that GCs can couple to cardiac cells and transmit cAMP, as assessed by changes in the beat rate of the cardiac cells in response to FSH and changes in progesterone secretion in response to isoproterenol in cocultures of these cells.

Cadherin-mediated adhesion may be responsible for the changes in responsiveness. There is increasing evidence that cadherins can act as signaling molecules (45). Cadherins have been shown to associate with the actin cytoskeleton through linker proteins termed catenins (46). Changes in the actin cytoskeleton have been shown to affect GC function (47, 48). Cote et al. (49) have shown that disruption of the cytoskeleton attenuates ACTH-stimulated cAMP production in rat adrenal cells. Modulation of N-cadherin-mediated adhesion in rat cardiomyocytes, using dominant negative mutants of N-cadherin, has been shown to cause gap junction retraction (50). Similar observations were reported for endothelial cells when VE-cadherin was altered (51).

The similarity in responses of the two cell preparations to cholera toxin and forskolin indicate that neither G protein coupling nor adenylate cyclase activity are affected by the cell preparation procedures. Furthermore, as cell density had no effect on the nature of these responses, nonspecific cell contacts do not provide an explanation. We also confirmed that these differences were not the result of changes in the distribution of cAMP between the intracellular and extracellular compartments. With respect to cAMP distribution, it is noteworthy that at low FSH doses, the major proportion of cAMP generated is retained within the cell. At higher doses and correspondingly higher levels of cAMP generated, approximately half of the cAMP is found in the incubation medium. This suggests that mechanisms for cAMP removal by these cells are sensitive to the intracellular level of cAMP. It should be noted, however, that phosphodiesterase activity was inhibited in these cells, and this may be responsible for the profiles of cAMP secretion observed. In a limited series of studies conducted in the absence of IBMX, however, we noted that the differences in FSH-stimulated cAMP production were maintained (data not shown). If phosphodiesterases play a role in regulating intracellular cAMP levels in GCs, this is not apparent over the short time periods of our studies.

It is possible that the cell preparation procedures lead to the selection of different populations of GCs. We have shown that GCs from DES-primed rats are heterogeneous with respect to size and lectin-binding characteristics (36). If these populations also have differences in their FSH responsiveness, but not in their FSH-binding capabilities, the observed differences in cAMP production could occur. Truncated receptors, lacking the ability to stimulate cAMP but retaining binding capability, have been reported (20). Although we cannot discount the possibility that we may be dealing with different cell populations, the fact that dispersed cells are capable of expressing LH receptors in response to cholera toxin, albeit in the presence of estradiol, makes population differences unlikely. This possibility, however, needs to be investigated before it can be ruled out conclusively.

The physiological relevance of the different behaviors of cell aggregates and dispersed cells is not apparent. Aharoni et al. (52) have shown that the maintenance of elevated levels of cAMP in GCs from preovulatory follicles is detrimental and directs these cells toward apoptosis. These authors have suggested that the desensitization mechanism in these cells may act as a protective preservation response. Peluso et al. (6) have shown that single GCs show an increased probability for apoptosis compared with aggregate cells. Studies in our laboratory agree with these findings. We have shown that dispersed GCs are more susceptible to a serum-mediated cell deletion effect than are estrogen-treated cells, where aggregation is promoted (53). Wiesen and Midgley (54) have reported the loss of connexin-43 in follicles undergoing atresia. The loss of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions has been implicated in tissue apoptosis. As FSH secretion in mammals is pulsatile, and a large discharge of FSH is seen coincident with the ovulatory surge of LH, changes in cell-cell connectivity may be an important determinant of whether particular follicles continue to develop or undergo atresia.

In summary, we have shown that cell contact is an important determinant of hormone responsiveness in GCs. Our experimental design does not allow us to identify whether cell adhesion, gap junction connectivity, or both are the reasons for the altered responses to FSH. Studies using blocking antibodies and peptides that would allow us to make these distinctions are in progress.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank the NHPP, NIDDK (Bethesda, MD), for providing the preparations of FSH and hCG used in these studies.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada (to R.F.) and a studentship from the Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University (to F.H.). Back

Received August 11, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Amsterdam A, Knecht M, Catt KJ 1981 Hormonal regulation of cytodifferentiation and intercellular communication in cultured granulosa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3000–3004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Farookhi R, Desjardins J 1986 Luteinizing hormone receptor induction in dispersed granulosa cells requires estrogen. Mol Cell Endocrinol 47:13–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Farookhi R, Blaschuk OW 1991 Cadherins and ovarian follicular development. In: Gibori G (ed) Signalling Mechanisms and Gene Expression in the Ovary. Serono Symposia, Springer Verlag, New York, pp 254–260
  4. Blaschuk OW, Farookhi R 1989 Estradiol stimulates cadherin expression in rat granulosa cells. Dev Biol 136:564–567[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Farookhi R, Geng C-S, MacCalman CD, Blaschuk OW Hormonal regulation of N-cadherin mRNA levels in rat granulosa cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 816:165–172
  6. Peluso JJ, Pappalardo A, Trolice MP 1996 N-Cadherin-mediated cell contact inhibits granulosa cell apoptosis in a progesterone-independent manner. Endocrinology 137:1196–1996[Abstract]
  7. Stagg RB, Fletcher WH 1990 The hormone-induced regulation of contact-dependent cell-cell communication by phosphorylation. Endocr Rev 11:302–325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Downs SM 1995 The influence of glucose, cumulus cells and metabolic coupling on ATP levels and meiotic control in isolated mouse oocyte. Dev Biol 167:502–512[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ruch RJ, Guan X, Sigler K 1995 Inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication and enhancement of growth in BALB/c 3T3 cells treated with connexin43 antisense oligonucleotides. Mol Carcinogen 14:269–274[Medline]
  10. Lowenstein WR, Rose B 1992 The cell-cell channel in the control of growth. Semin Cell Biol 3:59–79[Medline]
  11. Giaume C, Venance L 1995 Gap junctions in brain glial cells and development. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 2:335–345[Medline]
  12. Watson AJ 1992 The cell biology of blastocyst development. Mol Reprod Dev 33:492–504[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Paul DL 1995 New functions for gap junctions. Curr Biol 7:665–672[CrossRef]
  14. Baldwin KM, Hakim RS, Stanton GB 1993 Cell-cell communication correlates with pattern formation in molting Manduca midgut epithelium. Dev Dynam 197:239–423[Medline]
  15. Minkoff R, Rundus VR, Parker SB, Beyer EC, Hertzberg EL 1993 Connexin expression in the developing avian cardiovascular system. Circ Res 73:71–78[Abstract]
  16. Warner A 1992 Gap junctions in development–a perspective. Semin Cell Biol 3:81–91[Medline]
  17. Richards JS, Midgley Jr AR 1976 Protein hormone action: a key to understanding ovarian follicular development, and luteal cell development. Biol Reprod 14:82–94[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Richards JS, Jahnsen T, Hedin L, Lifka J, Ratoosh S, Durica JM, Goldring NB 1987 Ovarian follicular development: from physiology to molecular biology. Recent Prog Horm Res 43:231–276
  19. Dohlman HG, Thorner J, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1991 Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 60:653–88[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Rannikki AS, Zhang FP, Huhtaniemi IT 1995 Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene expression in the rat testis and ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 107:199–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Richards JS, Ireland JJ, Rao MC, Bernath GA, Midgley Jr AR, Reichert Jr LE 1976 Ovarian follicular development in the rat: hormone regulation by estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 99:1562–1570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Erickson GF, Wang C, Hsueh AJ 1979 FSH induction of functional LH receptors in granulosa cells cultured in a chemically defined medium. Nature 279:336–338[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Sanders MM, Midgley AR 1983 Cyclic nucleotides can induce luteinizing hormone receptor in cultured granulosa cells. Endocrinology 112:1382–1388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lefkowitz RJ, Hausdorff WP, Caron MG 1990 Role of phosphorylation in desensitization of the ß-adrenoceptor. Trends Pharm Sci 11:190–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Jonassen JA, Bose K, Richards JS 1982 Enhancement and desensitization of hormone-responsive adenylate cyclase in granulosa cells of preantral and antral ovarian follicles: effects of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 111:74–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Farookhi R 1982 Granulosa cell fusion allows heterologous receptor stimulation of adenylate cyclase and progesterone accumulation. Endocrinology 110:1061–1063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nimrod A, Erickson GF, Ryan KJ 1976 A specific FSH receptor in rat granulosa cells: properties of binding in vitro. Endocrinology 98:56–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Richards JS, Jonassen JA, Rolfes AI, Kersey K, Reichert Jr LE 1979 Adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate, luteinizing-hormone receptor, and progesterone during granulosa cell differentiation: effect of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 104:765–773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. LaBarca C, Paigen K 1980 A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 102:344–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Brooker G, Harper JF, Terasaki WL, Moylan RD 1979 Radioimmunoassay of cyclic AMP and Cyclic GMP. Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Res 10:1–33[Medline]
  31. Gill DM, Meren R 1978 ADP-ribosylation of membrane proteins catalyzed by cholera toxin: basis for the activation of adenylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3050–3054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Daly JW 1984 Forskolin, adenylate cyclase, and cell physiology: an overview. Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Protein Phosphoryl Res 17:81–89[Medline]
  33. Hunzicker-Dunn M, LaBarbera AR 1986 Unique properties of the follicle-stimulating hormone- and cholera toxin-sensitive adenylyl cyclase of immature granulosa cells. Endocrinology 118:302–311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kraiem Z, Sadeh O, Sobel E 1988 Triiodothyronine and 3',5'-cyclic AMP secretion by cultured human thyroid cells in response to thyrotropin and thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 119:493–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hirshfield AN 1991 Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol 124:43–101[Medline]
  36. Kerketze K, Blaschuk OW, Farookhi R 1996 Cellular heterogeneity in the membrana granulosa of developing rat follicles: assessment by flow cytometry and lectin binding. Endocrinology 137:3089–3100[Abstract]
  37. Amsterdam A, Koch Y, Lieberman ME, Lindner HR 1975 Distribution of binding sites for human chorionic gonadotropin in the preovulatory follicle of the rat. J Cell Biol 67:894–900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Takeichi M 1991 Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251:1451–1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Christ GJ, Brink PR, Zhao W, Moss J, Gondre CM, Roy C, Spray DC 1993 Gap junctions modulate tissue contractility and {alpha}-1 adrenergic agonist efficacy in isolated rat aorta. J Pharmcol Exp Ther 266:1054–1065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Vander Molen MA, Rubin CT, McLeod KJ, McCauley LK, Donahue HJ 1996 Gap junctional intercellular communication contributes to hormonal responsiveness in osteoblastic networks. J Biol Chem 271:12165–12171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Mege R-M, Matsuzaki F, Gallin WJ, Goldberg JI, Cunningham BA, Edelman GM 1988 Construction of epitheliod sheets by transfection of mouse sarcoma cells with cDNAs for chicken cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7274–7278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Jongen WMF, Fitzgerald DJ, Asamoto M, Piccoli C, Slaga TJ, Gros D, Takeichi M, Yamasaki H 1991 Regulation of connexin 43-mediated gap junctional intercellular communication by Ca2+ in mouse epidermal cells is controlled by E-cadherin. J Cell Biol 114:545–555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Ascoli M, Segaloff DL 1989 On the structure of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor. Endocr Rev 10:27–44[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Lawrence TS, Beers WH, Gilula NB 1978 Transmission of hormonal stimulation by cell-to-cell communication. Nature 272:501–506[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Behrens J, von Kries JP, Kuhl M, Bruhn L, Wedlich D, Grosschedl R, Birchmeir W 1996 Functional interaction of ß-catenin with the transcriptional factor LEF-1. Nature 382:639–642
  46. Knudsen KA, Soler AP, Johnson KR, Wheelock MJ 1995 Interaction of {alpha}-catenin with the cadherin-catenin cell-cell adhesion complex via {alpha}-catenin. J Cell Biol 130:67–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Amsterdam A, Rotmensch S 1987 Structure-function relationships during granulosa cell differentiation. Endocr Rev 8:309–337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Aharoni D, Dantes A, Amsterdam A 1993 Cross-talk between adenylate cyclase activation and tyrosine phosphorylation leads to modulation of the actin cytoskeleton and to acute progesterone secretion in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 133:1426–1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Cote M, Payet MD, Gallo-Payet N 1997 Association of {alpha}s-subunit of the Gs protein with microfilaments and microtubules: implication during ACTH stimulation in rat adrenal glomerulosa cells. Endocrinology 138:69–78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Hertig CM, Eppenbergr-Eberhardt M, Koch S, Eppenberger HM 1996 N-Cadherin in adult rat cardiomyocytes in culture. I. Functional role of N-cadherin and impairment of cell-cell contact by a truncated N-cadherin mutant. J Cell Sci 109:1–10[Abstract]
  51. Navarro P, Caveda L, Brevario F, Mandoteanui I, Lampugnani M-G, Dejana E 1995 Catenin-dependent and -independent functions of vascular endothelial cadherin. J Biol Chem 270:30965–30972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Aharoni D, Dantes A, Oren M, Amsterdam A 1995 cAMP-mediated signals as determinants for apoptosis in primary granulosa cells. Exp Cell Res 218:271–282[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Lowsky R, Farookhi R 1989 A granulosa cell differentiation-stage specific cytotoxic activity in bovine and rat sera. Biol Reprod 40:1265–1273[Abstract]
  54. Wiesen JF, Midgley Jr AR 1993 Changes in expression of connexin 43 gap junction messenger ribonucleic acid and protein during ovarian follicular growth. Endocrinology 133:741–746[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Y. L. Pon and A. S. T. Wong
Gonadotropin-Induced Apoptosis in Human Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells Is Associated with Cyclooxygenase-2 Up-Regulation via the {beta}-Catenin/T-Cell Factor Signaling Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3336 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Zygmunt, F. Herr, S. Keller-Schoenwetter, K. Kunzi-Rapp, K. Munstedt, C. V. Rao, U. Lang, and K. T. Preissner
Characterization of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin as a Novel Angiogenic Factor
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2002; 87(11): 5290 - 5296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Ricken*, P. Lochhead, M. Kontogiannea, and R. Farookhi
Wnt Signaling in the Ovary: Identification and Compartmentalized Expression of wnt-2, wnt-2b, and Frizzled-4 mRNAs
Endocrinology, July 1, 2002; 143(7): 2741 - 2749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, and G. Fernandez
E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell Contact Prevents Apoptosis of Spontaneously Immortalized Granulosa Cells by Regulating Akt Kinase Activity
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2001; 64(4): 1183 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. A. Grieshaber, S. Boitano, I. Ji, J. P. Mather, and T. H. Ji
Differentiation of Granulosa Cell Line: Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Induces Formation of Lamellipodia and Filopodia via the Adenylyl Cyclase/Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Signal
Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3461 - 3470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. H. Machell, O. W. Blaschuk, and R. Farookhi
Developmental Expression and Distribution of N- and E-Cadherin in the Rat Ovary
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2000; 63(3): 797 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harandian, F.
Right arrow Articles by Farookhi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harandian, F.
Right arrow Articles by Farookhi, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals