help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 4 1981-1990
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Estrogen-Induced c-fos Protooncogene Expression in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells: Role of Estrogen Receptor Sp1 Complex Formation1

Renqin Duan, Weston Porter and Stephen Safe2

Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Stephen Safe, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466. E-mail: ssafe{at}cvm.tamu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
17ß-Estradiol (E2) induces c-fos protooncogene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, and previous studies in HeLa cells identified an imperfect palindromic estrogen-responsive element (-1212 to -1200) that was required for trans-activation. In contrast, the estrogen-responsive element was not required for E2 responsiveness in MCF-7 cells, and using a series of constructs containing wild-type (pF1) and mutant 5'-flanking sequences (-1220 to -1155) from the c-fos protooncogene promoter in transient transfection assays, it was shown that a GC-rich motif (5'-GGGGCGTGG) containing an imperfect Sp1-binding site was required for hormone-induced activity. This sequence also bound Sp1 protein in gel mobility shift assays, and coincubation with the estrogen receptor (ER) enhanced Sp1-DNA binding. E2 and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen, but not ICI 164,384, induced reporter gene activity in cells transiently transfected with pF1. E2 induced reporter gene activity in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells transiently cotransfected with pF1 and wild-type ER or variant ER in which the DNA-binding domain was deleted (HE11); plasmids expressing N-terminal or C-terminal domains of the ER containing activator function-1 or -2, respectively, were inactive in these assays. In contrast, only wild-type ER mediated 4'-hydroxytamoxifen-induced activity. Induction of c-fos protooncogene expression by E2 in MCF-7 cells is dependent on the formation of a transcriptionally active ER/Sp1 complex that binds to a GC-rich enhancer element.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE PROTOONCOGENE c-fos plays an important role in the regulation of normal cell growth and cellular transformation processes (1, 2, 3, 4). c-fos is a prototypical immediate-early gene that is rapidly induced in cells/tissues in response to diverse extracellular stimuli, including various mitogens and the steroid hormone 17ß-estradiol (E2) (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20).The protooncogene c-fos encodes a nuclear protein that interacts with c-jun to form the heterodimeric activating protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor complex (1, 2, 3, 4). AP-1 sites have been widely identified in mammalian gene promoters, and interaction of Fos-Jun heterodimers with AP-1 sites and other proteins can result in increased or decreased gene expression that is dependent on cellular and promoter context and interacting proteins. For example, overexpression of Fos and Jun inhibits estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated trans-activation in several different cell lines (21, 22, 23). In contrast, some promoter-reporter constructs containing AP-1 sites are activated by the ER, and induced gene expression is dependent not only on promoter and cell context, but also on specific ER domains and ligand structure (24, 25, 26). For example, tamoxifen induces AP-1-dependent activity in endometrial, but not breast cancer, cell lines, and the induction response requires the expression of activator function-1 (AF-1), AF-2, and the DNA-binding domain of the ER (26). E2-induced trans-activation was less cell specific than reported for tamoxifen, and both wild-type ER and a truncated form of ER lacking the DNA-binding domain were functional (26). Thus, interplay among Jun, Fos, the ER, and various ER ligands can modulate gene expression from promoter sequences that bind ER or AP-1.

c-fos protooncogene expression is induced by E2 alone or in combination with insulin and other mitogenic polypeptides (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). A 2.25-kilobase human c-fos gene promoter sequence linked to a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene was E2 responsive in transient transfection assays in HeLa cells, and hormone inducibility was localized to a 240-bp region (-1300 to -1060) (27). Sequence analysis identified an imperfect palindromic estrogen-reponsive element (ERE) within this region (5'-CGGCAGCGTGACC-3') that bound the ER in gel mobility shift assays. However, insertion of a single copy of this sequence in the promoter-reporter construct did not result in the induction of reporter gene activity by E2 in HeLa cells, and hormone-induced trans-activation was observed only with a promoter containing multiple (n = 3) EREs (27).

Initial studies in this laboratory showed that E2 induced CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with a construct containing 1.4 kilobases from the c-fos gene promoter linked to a CAT reporter gene. Induction was not observed using a construct containing the imperfect palindromic ERE (-1212 to -1200), and this paralleled results obtained in HeLa cells (27). A recent study in this laboratory showed that ER and Sp1 physically interact, and E2-induced trans-activation was observed using constructs containing only a GC-rich oligonucleotide insert (28). The results were in contrast to studies with constructs containing cathepsin D gene promoter inserts in which E2 responsiveness was associated with the formation of an ER/Sp1 complex that bound to an Sp1(N)23ERE half-site motif (29, 30). A GC-rich motif was identified downstream from the imperfect palindromic ERE in the fos gene promoter at -1168 to -1161, and the E2 responsiveness of the -1220 to -1155 region was investigated using promoter-TATA-CAT constructs in transient transfection assays in MCF-7 cells. E2 induced trans-activation of fos gene promoter-reporter constructs that do not contain the imperfect palindromic ERE (-1212 to -1200), and the enhancer element required for induction by E2 was the GC-rich sequence (5'-GGGGCGTGG-3') that bound the nuclear protein Sp1 and formed a transcriptionally active ER/Sp1 protein complex. Hormone-induced trans-activation did not require the ER DNA-binding domain, suggesting that ER acts directly on the Sp1 protein and increases transcriptional activity through enhanced binding of Sp1 to its cognate GC-rich site.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals, cell lines, and oligonucleotides
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Cells were routinely maintained in MEM with phenol red and supplemented with 10% FBS plus 10 ml antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in an air-carbon dioxide (95:5) atmosphere at 37 C. For transient transfection studies, cells were grown for 1 day in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium without phenol red and 5% FBS treated with dextran-coated charcoal. The wild-type human ER (hER) expression plasmid was provided by Ming Jer Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). Recombinant ER was obtained from PanVera Corp. (Madison, WI). The ER deletion mutants HE11, HE15, and HE19 were provided by Pierre Chambon (CNRS, Strasbourg, France). Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used as solvent for E2 and the antiestrogens. 4'-Hydroxytamoxifen was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.; ICI 164,384 was provided by Alan Wakeling (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK). All other chemicals and biochemicals were the highest quality available from commercial sources.

Oligonucleotides derived from the c-fos protooncogene promoter and a consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide were synthesized by the Gene Technologies Laboratory, Texas A&M University (College Station, TX). The structures of these oligonucleotides are summarized below, and the putative GC-rich Sp1 and ERE sites are underlined. Mutations incorporated in the mutant oligonucleotides are denoted by an asterisk: fos1 (-1220/-1155), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GCT GAG CCG GCA GCG TGA CCC CGG CTG TCC TAC GCA GCA GGG CAG GAG ATT GGG GGG CGT GGC ACG-3'; fos2 (-1220/-1171), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GCT GAG CCG GCA GCG TGA CCC CGG CTG TCC TAC GCA GCA GGG CAG GAG AG-3'; fos3 (-1222/-1197), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GCT GAG CCG GCA GCG TGA CCC CGG CG-3'; fos4 (-1175/-1153), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GAG ATT GGG GGG CGT GGC ACA CG-3'; fos1-m1 (-1220/-1155), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GCT GAG CCG GCA GCG TGA CCC CGG CTG TCC TAC GCA GCA GGG CAG GAG ATT GGG T1T1A1 A1GT GGC ACG-3' (mutation of Sp1 site); fos1-m3 (-1220/-1155), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTG GCT GAG CCA1 T1A1T1 GCG TA1G1 A1C1C CGG CTG TCC TAC GCA GCA T1A1G1 A1T1G GAG ATT GGG GGG CGT GGC ACG - 3' (mutation of three ERE half-sites); and Sp1 (consensus), sense strand, 5'-AGC TTA TTC GAT CGG GGC GGG GCG AGC G-3'.

Cloning
The inserts encoding the wild-type hER, HE11, HE15, and HE19 ER deletion variants were removed by digesting the appropriate plasmids with EcoRI. The inserts were then religated into pcDNA3-neo (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) that had been linearized with EcoRI and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The ligation products were transformed into DH5a cells, and clones were verified by sequencing. The in vitro translation efficiency for these plasmids was determined by 35S labeling experiments followed by separation of radiolabeled wild-type and variant ER by electrophoresis. The levels of wild-type and variant ER protein expressed were comparable based on radiolabeled band intensities (corrected for methionine content in the individual proteins). The pBLTATA-CAT plasmid was made by digesting the pBLCAT2 vector with BamHI and XhoI to remove the thymidine kinase promoter; the double stranded E1B oligonucleotide (28) containing complementary 5'-overhangs was then inserted into the corresponding sites. The fos1, fos2, fos3, fos4, and fos1.m3 oligonucleotides were cloned into the pBLTATA-CAT vector at the HindIII and BamHI sites to give the pF1, pF2, pF3, pF4, and pF1.m3 constructs, respectively, as previously described (28).

Transient transfection assay
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method with 10 µg c-fos gene promoter-derived constructs and 1 µg (MCF-7 cells) or 5 µg (MDA-MB-231 cells) wild-type or variant ER expression plasmids; this was due to overexpression of these constructs. Previous studies have also shown the requirement for cotransfection of hER expression plasmid using other E2-responsive constructs (27, 28, 29, 30). E2 responsiveness was observed only after cotransfection with ER expression plasmids. pcDNA3-neo (Invitrogen) was used as an empty vector (control) and was also added in some experiments to maintain uniform levels of added DNA. Transfection efficiency was high, and no additional shock was required. After 18 h, the medium was changed, and the cells were treated with DMSO (0.2% total volume), E2, 4'-hydroxy-tamoxifen, ICI 164,384, or their combinations in DMSO for 44 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and scraped from the plates. Cell lysates were prepared in 0.15 ml 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) by three freeze-thaw-sonication cycles (3 min each). Protein concentrations were determined using BSA as a standard, and analysis for CAT activity in cell lysates used a constant amount of protein from each treatment group. Lysates were incubated at 56 C for 7 min to remove endogenous deacetylase activity. CAT activity was determined by incubating aliquots of the cell lysates with 0.2 mCi d-threo-[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol and 4 mM acetyl coenzyme A. Acetylation was allowed to proceed to less than 20–25% completion (linear range), and acetylated metabolites were analyzed by TLC. After TLC, acetylated products were visualized and quantitated using a Betagen Betascope 603 blot analyzer (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA). CAT activity was calculated as a fraction of that observed in cells treated with DMSO alone (arbitrarily set at 100), and results are expressed as the mean ± SD. The experiments were carried out at least in triplicate.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
Pure Sp1 protein was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Expression plasmids for wild-type ER, HE11, HE15, and HE19 were used to in vitro transcribe and translate the corresponding proteins in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega). Gel electromobility shift assays were performed using Sp1 protein and in vitro translated proteins in 1 x binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5% glycerol, 100 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM magnesium chloride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM EDTA in a final volume of 25 µl). E2 was added to the reaction at a final concentration of 20 nM and then incubated on ice for 15 min. Sp1 and 32P-labeled oligonucleotides were then added to the reaction mixtures in the presence of 1 µg poly(dI-dC) and incubated for 15 min at 25 C. In competition experiments, different amounts of unlabeled oligonucleotides were also included in the incubation mixtures. Aliquots of these mixtures were loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio, 30:0.8) and run at 110 V in 0.09 M Tris-0.09 M borate-2 mM EDTA (pH 8.3). 32P-Labeled DNA and DNA-protein bands were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry using the Molecular Dynamics Zero-D software package (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and a Sharp JX-330 scanner (Mahwah, NJ).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous studies demonstrated that an imperfect palindromic ERE (-1212 to -1200), which bound ER protein in gel mobility shift assays, was contained within a 240-bp (-1300 to -1060) E2-responsive region of the c-fos protooncogene promoter (27). One copy of the c-fos ERE cloned into pBL-CAT2 upstream from a thymidine kinase promoter did not confer E2 responsiveness on the resulting construct; however, a sequence containing three copies of the ERE was E2 responsive in transient transfection studies in HeLa cells (27). A series of TATA-CAT plasmids containing -1220 to -1155 (pF1), -1220 to -1171 (pF2), -1222 to -1197 (pF3), and -1175 to -1153 (pF4) sequences from the c-fos gene promoter was transiently transfected into MCF-7 cells and treated with 10 nM E2, and CAT activity was determined. In cells transiently transfected with pF1, there was a 4-fold induction of CAT activity by E2; in contrast, the truncated constructs pF2 and pF3 and the plasmid containing only the TATA promoter exhibited minimal activity and hormone responsiveness (Fig. 1AGo). Results of transient transfection studies using pF1-m2 (containing the -1220/-1155 insert mutated in the perfect ERE half-site) also showed that this construct was E2 responsive (data not shown). These results suggested that the -1171 to -1153 region of the promoter containing a GC-rich site (GGGGCGTGG) was required for E2 responsiveness, and in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pF4, E2 caused a 3.2-fold increase in CAT activity (Fig. 1BGo); similar results were obtained using pF1 (5.5-fold induction) and pF1-m3 (4.7-fold induction) in which the three ERE half-sites were mutated. The results (Fig. 1Go) indicate that E2 responsiveness of pF1 is associated with the GC-rich region of the c-fos gene promoter (-1220 to -1155).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. E2 responsiveness of constructs derived from the c-fos gene promoter. A, Effect of E2 on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pF1, pF2, or pF3. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pF1 (lanes 1 and 2), pF2 (lanes 3 and 4), pF3 (lanes 5 and 6), or TATA-CAT vector alone (lanes 7 and 8). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (C; lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or 10 nM E2 (E; lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). The relative intensities of acetylated products in lanes 2, 4, and 6 compared with those of control (C) bands (lanes 1, 3, and 5; arbitrarily set at 100) were 403 ± 142, 166 ± 78, and 273 ± 60, respectively. Significant induction (P < 0.01) was only observed for pF1; basal activities were significantly lower for pF2, pF3, and TATA-CAT, and no significant induction by E2 was observed (results are the mean ± SD for three separate determinations). B, Effect of E2 on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pF1, pF4, or pF1-m3. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pF1 (lanes 1 and 2), pF1-m3 (lanes 3 and 4), pF4 (lanes 5 and 6), or TATA-CAT vector alone (lanes 7 and 8). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (C; lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or 10 nM E2 (E; lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). The relative intensities of acetylated products in lanes 2, 4, and 6 compared with those of control (C) bands (lanes 1, 3, and 5; arbitrarily set at 100) were 552 ± 30, 471 ± 36, and 317 ± 17, respectively. Relative intensities in lanes 2, 4, and 6 were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in control cells (lanes 1, 3, and 5; results are the mean ± SD for three separate determinations). No significant induction by E2 was observed for the TATA-CAT vector (lane 8). In a separate experiment using pF1-m1, no significant induction by E2 was observed (data not shown).

 
The fos1 oligonucleotide contains a GC-rich site and three ERE half-sites; therefore, there are at least three possible Sp1(N)xERE (half-site) motifs within this region of the promoter. Previous studies have demonstrated that functional Sp1(N)xERE (half-site) elements within the Hsp27 and cathepsin D gene promoters bind nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells to form ER/Sp1-DNA complexes (29, 30, 31). In contrast, incubation of [32P]fos1 with nuclear extracts did not give a retarded band associated with the formation of this complex (data not shown). Therefore, the interaction of Sp1 protein with the GC-rich site in the c-fos promoter was investigated in both direct and indirect binding studies (Fig. 2Go, A and B). Sp1 protein bound to [32P]Sp1 (containing a consensus Sp1 sequence) to form a retarded band (Fig. 2AGo, lane 2) that exhibited less mobility than Sp1 complexes with fos gene promoter-derived oligonucleotides; [32P]fos1 and [32P]fos1-m3 also bound Sp1 to form retarded bands (lanes 3, 4, and 6), whereas [32P]fos1-m1 with mutations in the GC-rich site did not form a complex with Sp1 (lane 5). Formation of the retarded band associated with the [32P]fos1-m3 complex (Fig. 2BGo, lane 1) was competitively inhibited after coincubation with a 400-fold excess of unlabeled Sp1 (lane 2) or fos1-m3 (lane 3) oligonucleotides, whereas competition with the fos1-m1 oligonucleotide, which is mutated in the GC-rich site, did not decrease formation of the retarded band (lane 4). These results demonstrate that Sp1 protein interacts with the same GC-rich sequence (-1175 to -1153) required for E2 responsiveness in transient transfection assays (Fig. 1Go). [32P]fos1-m3 bound Sp1 to form a specifically bound retarded band (Fig. 3BGo, lanes 2–4), and coincubation of Sp1 (3 ng) (lane 6) with different concentrations of recombinant ER (lanes 7–9) resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in the intensity of the retarded band. Previous studies using a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide also showed that wild-type ER or HE11 enhanced [32P]Sp1-Sp1 (protein) binding without forming a ternary complex (28). Similar results were observed for the Sp1-[32P]fos1-m3 complex (Fig. 3BGo, lane 2) in which coincubation with wild-type hER caused a 2-fold increase in the intensity of the Sp1-[32P]fos1-m3 retarded band, and increased retarded band intensity was also observed after coincubation with HE11 (lane 6), an ER variant in which the DNA-binding domain has been deleted. In contrast, coincubation with HE15 (containing AF-1) or HE19 (containing AF-2; lanes 8 and 10, respectively) did not enhance formation of the retarded band. Similar results were previously reported after coincubation of Sp1 plus full-length or variant ER protein with consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide (28).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Sp1 interactions with fos gene promoter oligonucleotides: gel mobility shift assay. A, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled consensus Sp1 and fos gene promoter oligonucleotides. Gel shift analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and 10 ng Sp1 protein were used. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrows) were visualized by autoradiography. B, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled fos-m3 oligonucleotide (competition study). Gel shift analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and 20 ng Sp1 protein were used. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrows) were visualized by autoradiography. [32P]Fos4 also bound Sp1 protein to give a retarded band that was competitively decreased by unlabeled consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide (data not shown).

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Enhanced binding of Sp1 protein to [32P]fos1-m3 oligonucleotide by pure ER protein or in vitro translated wild-type or variant ER. A, Enhanced Sp1 binding in the presence of the ER. Sp1 protein (3–12 ng) alone (lanes 2–4) or Sp1 protein (3 ng) in combination with recombinant human ER (2, 4, or 8 µl of a 100-nM solution) was incubated with [32P]fos1-m3 and analyzed by gel mobility shift assay as described in Materials and Methods. Total protein per incubation was kept constant by the addition of BSA. The relative intensity values in lanes 3–5 relative to that in lane 2 (arbitrarily set at 100) were 187 ± 17, 283 ± 51, and 43 ± 13, respectively. The relative intensities in lanes 7–10 relative to that in lane 6 (arbitrarily set at 100) were 153 ± 8, 248 ± 34, 321 ± 3, and 29 ± 0.5, respectively. Band intensities in lanes 3 and 4 (relative to that in lane 2) and lanes 7–9 (relative to that in lane 6) were significantly (P < 0.05) increased. Results are the mean ± SD for three separate determinations. B, Effect of wild-type and variant ER. In vitro translated proteins were obtained, and gel shift analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods using 5 ng Sp1 protein and 1 µl of the reticulocyte lysate preparation. The intensities of lanes 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 relative to that of the control band (lane 2; 100 ± 13) were 214 ± 11, 262 ± 41, 119 ± 6, 110 ± 13, and 95 ± 6. The intensities in lanes 4 and 6 were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that in lane 2 (results are the mean ± SD for three separate determinations).

 
The effects of both E2 and antiestrogens on trans-activation were also investigated in MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells cotransfected with pF1 or pF1-m3 constructs and full-length or variant ER expression plasmids ( Figs. 4–7GoGoGoGo). The pure antiestrogen ICI 164,384 did not induce CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pF1 (Fig. 4AGo, lane 3); however, in cells cotreated with E2 plus ICI 164,384, the hormone-induced response was decreased by 79% (lane 4). In contrast, 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen did not exhibit antiestrogenic activity (lane 6), but was active as an ER agonist and induced CAT activity (4.2-fold; lane 5). Similar results were obtained in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pF1-m3, which contains the -1220 to -1155 region of the fos promoter in which the GC-rich site is intact and all three ERE sites are mutated (Fig. 4BGo). E2 and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen induced CAT activity (2.6- and 2.1-fold, respectively; lanes 2 and 5), whereas ICI 164,384 was not an ER agonist (lane 3). In cells cotreated with both antiestrogens (lanes 4 and 6), only ICI 164,384 inhibited E2-induced CAT activity. The results summarized in Figs. 5Go and 6Go show that CAT activity is induced by E2 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell cotransfected with pF1 or pF1-m3 and hER or HE11 expression plasmids. Induction was not observed in cells cotransfected with HE15 or HE19 expression plasmids or with a control vector (pcDNA3-neo) that does not contain an E2-responsive promoter insert. 4'-Hydroxytamoxifen also induced CAT activity in MDA-MB-231 cells transiently cotransfected with pF1 and full-length ER expression plasmid (Fig. 7Go); in contrast, CAT activity was not induced in cells cotransfected with variant HE11, HE15, or HE19 ER expression plasmids. These results demonstrate that E2 activates HE11/Sp1 or ER/Sp1 complexes (Figs. 5Go and 6Go), whereas 4'-hydroxytamoxifen activates only the ER/Sp1 complex (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Induction of CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pF1 or pF1-m3 and treated with estrogens or antiestrogens. A, Effects of E2, ICI 164,384, and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (OH-T) on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pF1. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pF1-TATA-CAT constructs. The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (C; lane 1), 10 nM E2 (E; lane 2); 1 µM ICI 164,384 (lane 3), 10 nM E2 plus 1 µM ICI 164,384 (lane 4), 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 5), or 10 nM E2 plus 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 6). The relative intensities of acetylated products in lanes 2–6 compared with the control (C) value (lane 1, 100 ± 9) were 607 ± 91, 119 ± 22, 126 ± 28, 423 ± 32, and 586 ± 81, respectively. The relative intensities in lanes 2, 5, and 6 were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that in control cells (results are the mean [plsumn] SD for three separate determinations). B, Effects of E2, ICI 164,384, and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pF1-m3. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pF1-m3-TATA-CAT constructs. The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (C; lane 1), 10 nM E2 (E; lane 2), 1 µM ICI 164,384 (lane 3), 10 nM E2 plus 1 µM ICI 164,384 (lane 4), 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 5), or 10 nM E2 plus 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 6). The relative intensities of acetylated products in lanes 2–6 compared with the control (C) value (lane 1, 100 ± 13), were 256 ± 35, 115 ± 22, 111 ± 16, 212 ± 5, and 217 ± 27. The relative intensities in lanes 2, 5, and 6 were significantly higher (P < 0.005) than that in control cells (results are the mean ± SD for three separate determinations).

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of wild-type or variant ER on CAT activity induced by E2 in MCF-7 cells cotransfected with pF1 or pF1-m3. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with pF1 (A) or pF1 · m3 (B) plus hER, HE11, HE15, HE19, or pcDNA3-neo (as a control; the total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (dark bars) or 10 nM E2 (E; light bars). *, The relative intensity was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the control value.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of wild-type or variant ER on CAT activity induced by E2 in MDA-MBA-231 cells cotransfected with pF1 or pF1-m3. MDA-MB-231 cells were cotransfected with pF1 (A) or pF1-m3 (B) plus hER, HE11, HE15, HE19, or pcDNA3-neo (as a control; the total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (dark bars) or 10 nM E2 (E; light bars). *, The relative intensity was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the control value.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of wild-type or variant ER on CAT activity induced by 4'-hydroxytamoxifen in MDA-MB-231 cells cotransfected with pF1 plus hER, HE11, HE15, HE19, or pcDNA3-neo (as a control; the total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO (dark bars) or 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (light bars). *, The relative intensity was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the control value.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The c-fos protooncogene is induced by E2, mitogenic peptides, and insulin in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). Molecular analysis of the c-fos protooncogene promoter identified an imperfect palindromic ERE (-1212 to -1200) that bound the ER in a gel mobility shift assay but in HeLa cells did not confer E2 responsiveness on a promoter-reporter construct containing a single copy of the ERE sequence (27). Inducibility was only observed using plasmids containing three copies of the fos-ERE, and this was consistent with the reported synergistic ER-mediated activation of constructs containing multiple tandem responsive elements (32). Re-cent studies have shown that ER/Sp1 complexes that bind directly to GC-rich Sp1-binding sites mediate hormone-induced trans-activation (28). Moreover, functional interactions between ER and Sp1 proteins are accompanied by physical interactions between the two transcription factors (28).

An Sp1-like motif was identified (-1168 to -1161) 3' to the palindromic ERE in the fos gene promoter, and the results of transient transfection studies using a construct (pF1) that contained the -1220 to -1155 region of the fos gene promoter showed that E2 induced CAT activity (Fig. 1Go). In contrast, Weisz and Rosales (27) previously reported that a construct containing the imperfect palindromic ERE (-1212 to -1200) was not E2 responsive. This confirmed that downstream sequences (-1200 to -1155) were required for E2 responsiveness, and the identities of these elements were further investigated using a series of wild-type (pF1-pF4) and mutant (pF1·m3) constructs containing fos gene promoter sequences.

The fos gene promoter sequence inserted in pF1 (-1220 to -1155) contains two ERE half-sites that include the imperfect palindromic ERE, a third ERE half-site, and a GC-rich sequence (-1168 to -1161) that is a putative binding site for the nuclear Sp1 protein. Previous studies have shown that Sp1(N)xERE half-site motifs within the cathepsin D, heat shock protein-27, c-myc, creatine kinase B, and retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} gene promoters bind ER/Sp1 complexes and confer E2 inducibility on their corresponding promoter-reporter constructs (30, 31, 33, 34, 35). The -1120 to -1155 region of the fos gene promoter insert in pF1 contains three potential Sp1(N)xERE half-site motifs; however, incubation of [32P]fos1 with nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells did not give an ER/Sp1-retarded band (data not shown). Therefore, the functionality of fos gene promoter sequences was further investigated. The results illustrated in Fig. 1Go show that pF1, which contains both the GC-rich and ERE sequences, was E2 responsive, and deletion of the GC-rich region (pF2 and pF3) within the promoter resulted in the loss of hormone-induced trans-activation. These data showed that the GC-rich site was necessary for E2 responsiveness, but did not exclude a role for a functional Sp1(N)xERE half-site. However, transient transfection studies using a plasmid containing mutations in the three ERE half-sites (pF1-m3) or a construct containing the GC-rich site alone (pF4; -1175 to -1153) demonstrated that the GC elements were both necessary and sufficient for E2-induced trans-activation.

The E2-responsive -1175 to -1153 region of the c-fos protooncogene promoter contains a potential nonconsensus Sp1 element (5'-GGGGCGTGG-3'), and the result show that, like [32P]Sp1, both wild-type [32P]fos1, and mutant [32P]fos1-m3 oligonucleotides bind Sp1 protein to form retarded bands that are competitively decreased only after coincubation with unlabeled oligonucleotides containing intact Sp1-binding sites. Miltenberger and co-workers (36) have previously identified a GGGGCGTGG sequence in the multidrug-resistant gene promoter that also binds Sp1 protein and plays an important role in basal expression of this gene. A comparison of the results obtained with pF1, pF2, pF3, and pF4 indicates that basal CAT activity was markedly decreased using plasmids that did not contain the GC-rich site (i.e. pF2 and pF3), suggesting that Sp1 binding may also be required for optimal basal expression of c-fos.

Recent studies in this laboratory have shown that GC-rich sites that bind the Sp1 transcription factor mediated E2-induced trans-activation (28). For example, E2 induced CAT activity in transient transfection studies in MCF-7 cells (cotransfected with hER) using a plasmid containing a consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide insert. Moreover, in gel mobility shift assays using the same consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide, coincubation with ER increased the overall rate and levels of Sp1-[32P]Sp1 complex formation, and in parallel studies using wild-type and ER variant (HE11, HE15, and HE19) expression plasmids, only hER and HE11 enhanced Sp1-[32P]Sp1 binding (28). The results illustrated in Fig. 3Go using the [32P]fos1-m3 oligonucleotide demonstrate that wild-type hER and HE11 (DNA-binding domain deficient) also enhanced (>2-fold) formation of the Sp1-[32P]fos1-m3 complex, whereas HE15 and HE19, which express AF1 and AF2, respectively, did not enhance retarded band formation. Although ER and Sp1 physically interact (28), a ternary ER-Sp1-DNA complex was not observed in this study or a previous report (28). The observation that a protein (i.e. ER homodimer) enhanced the binding of another protein (i.e. Sp1) to its cognate sequence without forming a ternary complex in a gel mobility shift assay has been observed in other studies showing that human T cell leukemia virus type-1 Tax, sterol regulatory element-binding protein, and cyclin D1 enhanced bZIP, Sp1 and ER binding to their respective DNA enhancer sequences (37, 38, 39).

c-fos proto-oncogene expression is induced by both E2 and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen in MCF-7 cells, whereas ICI 164,384 exhibits ER antagonist activity (19, 40). The activities of these ligands as ER agonists/antagonists were comparable in MCF-7 cells cotransfected with hER and pF1 or pF1-m3, thus confirming that ER/Sp1 binding to the GC-rich motif (-1168 to -1161) plays an important role in E2-mediated trans-activation of this gene. Transcriptionally active ER-protein complexes have also been observed with the AP-1 Fos-Jun complex, and the effects of ER-AP-1 trans-activation through AP-1 sites are dependent on the cell and promoter context and on the ligand (i.e. estrogens vs. antiestrogens) (24, 25, 26). For example, ER binds to Jun (but not Fos), E2 activates AP-1-dependent activity in transient transfection assays, and trans-activation is observed with both wild-type ER and HE11 in both MCF-7 and Ishikawa (endometrial) cell lines. The results summarized in Figs. 5Go and 6Go demonstrate that E2-mediated induction of CAT activity in MCF-7 or MDA-MBA-231 breast cancer cells transfected with pF1 or pF1-m3 is also dependent on cotransfection with wild-type hER or HE11. In contrast, tamoxifen-induced CAT activity in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with pF1 was observed only in cells cotransfected with wild-type hER. Thus, important ligand-dependent (E2 vs. tamoxifen) differences were observed for ER/Sp1-mediated trans-activation. These data also illustrate important ligand-dependent differences in trans-activation by ER/Sp1 and ER-AP-1 complexes, as ER-AP-1 was not activated by tamoxifen in human breast cancer cells (26). Interestingly, Weisz and Rosales (27) previously reported [32P]fos3 binds both the ER and AP-1 transcription factors in a gel mobility shift assay. In contrast, the corresponding plasmid containing the fos3 (-1222 to -1997) insert was not E2 responsive in transient transfection assays in HeLa cells (cotransfected with wild-type ER). Thus, the AP-1 site in the c-fos gene promoter was not responsive to E2 in HeLa cells or breast cancer cells, and these results further emphasize the importance of both promoter and cellular context for hormone-induced activation (26).

In summary, the results of this study show that the induction of fos protooncogene expression by E2 in MCF-7 cells is regulated through interaction of an ER/Sp1 protein complex binding to a GC-rich (Sp1) region in the promoter (-1168 to -1161), and this represents the first example of an E2-responsive gene regulated by this complex interacting with a GC-rich motif. These data are in contrast to a report by Weisz and Rosales (27), who identified an imperfect palindromic ERE that was required for E2-induced trans-activation in HeLa cells. The results of preliminary studies in this laboratory using HeLa cells were not in conflict with the previous report (27), and the 5'-GGGGCGTGG-3' sequence was not required for E2 responsiveness in HeLa cells (data not shown). Thus, genomic Sp1-binding sites may play an important role in the E2 responsiveness of some genes and also influence cell- and promoter/gene-specific differences in hormone-induced trans-activation (41). Current research in this laboratory is focused on studying functional Sp1 sites in other E2-responsive genes that play a role in ER-mediated trans-activation in diverse mammalian cell lines.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the NIH (ES-04176), the Welch Foundation, and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Back

2 Sid Kyle Professor of Toxicology. Back

Received September 19, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Curran T 1988 The fos oncogene. In: Reddy EP, Skalka AM, Curran T (eds) The Oncogene Handbook. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 307–325
  2. Muller R 1986 Cellular and viral fos genes: structure, regulation of expression and biological properties of their encoded products. Biochim Biophys Acta 823:207–225[Medline]
  3. Cohen DR, Curran T 1989 The structure and function of the fos proto-oncogene. Crit Rev Oncogen 1:65–88[Medline]
  4. Curran T, Franza Jr BR 1988 Fos and jun: the AP-1 connection. Cell 55:395–397[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ginty DD, Bonni A, Greenberg ME 1994 Nerve growth factor activates a ras-dependent protein kinase that stimulates c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of CREB. Cell 77:713–725[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rivera VM, Greenberg ME 1990 Growth factor-induced gene expression: the ups and downs of c-fos regulation. New Biol 2:751–758[Medline]
  7. Rivera VM, Sheng M, Greenberg ME 1990 The inner core of the serum response element mediates both the rapid induction and subsequent repression of c-fos transcription following serum stimulation. Genes Dev 4:255–268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fisch TM, Prywes R, Roeder RG 1987 c-fos sequence necessary for basal expression and induction by epidermal growth factor, 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate and the calcium ionophore. Mol Cell Biol 7:3490–3502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Shaw PE, Schroter H, Nordheim A 1989 The ability of a ternary complex to form over the serum response element correlates with serum inducibility of the human c-fos promoter. Cell 56:563–572[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Treisman R 1986 Identification of a protein-binding site that mediates transcriptional response of the c-fos gene to serum factors. Cell 46:567–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Candeliere GA, Prud’homme J, St-Arnaud R 1991 Differential stimulation of Fos and Jun family members by calcitriol in osteoblastic cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:1780–1788[Abstract]
  12. Lee K, Deeds JD, Chiba S, Un-No M, Bond AT, Segre GV 1994 Parathyroid hormone induces sequential c-fos expression in bone cells in vivo: in situ localization of its receptor and c-fos messenger ribonucleic acids. Endocrinology 134:441–450[Abstract]
  13. McDonnell SE, Kerr LD, Matrisian LM 1990 Epidermal growth factor stimulation of stromelysin mRNA in rat fibroblasts requires induction of proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun and activation of protein kinase C. Mol Cell Biol 10:4284–4293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hill CS, Treisman R 1995 Differential activation of c-fos promoter elements by serum, lysophosphatidic acid, G proteins and polypeptide growth factors. EMBO J 14:5037–5047[Medline]
  15. Wilding G, Lippman ME, Gelmann EP 1988 Effects of steroid hormones and peptide growth factors on protooncogene c-fos expression in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 48:802–805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Weisz A, Bresciani F 1993 Estrogen regulation of proto-oncogenes coding for nuclear proteins. Crit Rev Oncog 4:361–388[Medline]
  17. Van der Burg B, De Groot RP, Isbrücker L, Kruijer W, De Laat SW 1990 Stimulation of TPA-responsive element activity by a cooperative action of insulin and estrogen in human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 4:1720–1726[Abstract]
  18. Van der Burg B, Van Selm-Miltenburg AJP, De Laat SW, Van Zoelen EJJ 1989 Direct effects of estrogen on c-fos and c-myc protooncogene expression and cellular proliferation in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 64:223–228[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bonapace IM, Addeo R, Altucci L, Cicatiello L, Bifulco M, Laezza C, Salzano S, Sica V, Bresciani F, Weisz A 1996 17ß-Estradiol overcomes a G1 block induced by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fosters cell cycle progression without inducing ERK-1 and -2 MAP kinases activation. Oncogene 12:753–763[Medline]
  20. Van der Burg B, De Groot RP, Isbrucker L, Kruijer W, De Laat SW 1991 Oestrogen directly stimulates growth factor signal transduction pathways in human breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 40:215–221[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Doucas V, Spyrou G, Yaniv M 1991 Unregulated expression of c-Jun and c-Fos proteins but not Jun D inhibits oestrogen receptor activity in human breast cancer-derived cells. EMBO J 10:2237–2245[Medline]
  22. Shemshedini L, Knauthe R, Sassone-Corsi P, Pornon A, Gronemeyer H 1991 Cell-specific inhibitory and stimulatory effects of Fos and Jun on transcription activation by nuclear receptors. EMBO J 10:3839–3849[Medline]
  23. Tzukerman M, Zhang X, Pfahl M 1991 Inhibition of estrogen receptor activity by the tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanylphorbol-13-acetate: a molecular analysis. Mol Endocrinol 5:1983–1992[Abstract]
  24. Gaub M, Bellard M, Scheuer I, Chambon P, Sassone-Corsi P 1990 Activation of the ovalbumin gene by the estrogen receptor involves the Fos-Jun complex. Cell 63:1267–1276[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Umayahara Y, Kawamori R, Watada H, Imano E, Iwama N, Morishima T, Yamasaki Y, Kajimoto Y, Kamada T 1994 Estrogen regulation of the insulin-like growth factor I gene transcription involves an AP-1 enhancer. J Biol Chem 269:16433–16442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Webb P, Lopez GN, Uht RM, Kuchner PJ 1995 Tamoxifen activation of the estrogen receptor/AP-1 pathway: potential origin for the cell-specific estrogen-like effects of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 9:443–456[Abstract]
  27. Weisz A, Rosales R 1990 Identification of an estrogen response element upstream of the human c-fos gene that binds the estrogen receptor and the AP-1 transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5097–5106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Porter W, Saville B, Hoivik D, Safe S 1997 Functional synergy between the transcription factor Sp1 and the estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:1569–1580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Krishnan V, Porter W, Santostefano M, Wang X, Safe S 1995 Molecular mechanism of inhibition of estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cell Biol 15:6710–6719[Abstract]
  30. Krishnan V, Wang X, Safe S 1994 Estrogen receptor-Sp1 complexes mediate estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 269:15912–15917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Porter W, Wang F, Wang W, Duan R, Safe S 1996 Role of estrogen receptor/Sp1 complexes in estrogen-induced heat shock protein 27 gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 10:1371–1378[Abstract]
  32. Ponglikitmongkol M, White JH, Chambon P 1990 Synergistic activation of transcription by the human estrogen receptor bound to tandem responsive elements. EMBO J 9:2221–2231[Medline]
  33. Dubik D, Shiu RPC 1992 Mechanism of estrogen activation of c-myc oncogene expression. Oncogene 7:1587–1594[Medline]
  34. Wu-Peng XS, Pugliese TE, Dickerson HW, Pentecost BT 1992 Delineation of sites mediating estrogen regulation of the rat creatine kinase B gene. Mol Endocrinol 6:231–240[Abstract]
  35. Rishi AK, Shao ZM, Baumann RG, Li XS, Sheikh MS, Kimura S, Bashirelahi N, Fontana JA 1995 Estradiol regulation of the human retinoic acid receptor a gene in human breast carcinoma cells is mediated via an imperfect half-palindromic estrogen response element and Sp1 motifs. Cancer Res 55:4999–5006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Miltenberger RJ, Farnham RJ, Smith DE, Stommel JM, Cornwell MM 1995 v-Raf activates transcription of growth-responsive promoters via GC-rich sequences that bind the transcription factor Sp1. Cell Growth Differ 6:549–556[Abstract]
  37. Wagner SA, Green MR 1993 HTLV-1 Tax protein stimulation of DNA binding of bZIP proteins by enhancing dimerization. Science 266:395–399
  38. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF 1995 Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Zwijsen RM, Wientjens E, Klompmaker R, van der Sman J, Bernards R, Michalides RJ 1997 CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88:405–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Maas RA, Bruning PF, Top B, Breedijk AJ, Peterse HL 1995 Growth arrest associated changes of mRNA levels in breast cancer cells measured by semi-quantitative RT-PCR: potential early indicators of treatment response. Cancer Lett 97:107–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Katzenellenbogen JA, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS 1996 Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology: interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119–131[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Titolo, C. M. Mayer, S. S. Dhillon, F. Cai, and D. D. Belsham
Estrogen Facilitates both Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt and ERK1/2 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Membrane Signaling Required for Long-Term Neuropeptide Y Transcriptional Regulation in Clonal, Immortalized Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 18, 2008; 28(25): 6473 - 6482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
X. Li, S. L Nott, Y. Huang, R. Hilf, R. A Bambara, X. Qiu, A. Yakovlev, S. Welle, and M. Muyan
Gene expression profiling reveals that the regulation of estrogen-responsive element-independent genes by 17{beta}-estradiol-estrogen receptor {beta} is uncoupled from the induction of phenotypic changes in cell models
J. Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 40(5): 211 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Bagamasbad, K. L. Howdeshell, L. M. Sachs, B. A. Demeneix, and R. J. Denver
A Role for Basic Transcription Element-binding Protein 1 (BTEB1) in the Autoinduction of Thyroid Hormone Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2275 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. Zhu and U. Hansen
HMGN1 Modulates Estrogen-Mediated Transcriptional Activation through Interactions with Specific DNA-Binding Transcription Factors
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8859 - 8873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Khan, F. Wu, S. Liu, Q. Wu, and S. Safe
Role of specificity protein transcription factors in estrogen-induced gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 39(4): 289 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Steiner, W. H.M. Peters, E. P. Gallagher, P. Magee, I. Rowland, and B. L. Pool-Zobel
Genistein protects human mammary epithelial cells from benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal genotoxicity by modulating the glutathione/glutathione S-transferase system
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. Maor, D. Mayer, R. I Yarden, A. V Lee, R. Sarfstein, H. Werner, and M. Z Papa
Estrogen receptor regulates insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in breast tumor cells: involvement of transcription factor Sp1
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 191(3): 605 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Vivacqua, D. Bonofiglio, L. Albanito, A. Madeo, V. Rago, A. Carpino, A. M. Musti, D. Picard, S. Ando, and M. Maggiolini
17beta-Estradiol, Genistein, and 4-Hydroxytamoxifen Induce the Proliferation of Thyroid Cancer Cells through the G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR30
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1414 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. Higgins, S. Liu, M. Abdelrahim, K. Yoon, K. Vanderlaag, W. Porter, R. P. Metz, and S. Safe
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Expression Is Induced by 17{beta}-Estradiol in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells by Estrogen Receptor {alpha}/Sp Proteins
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3285 - 3295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. M. McClung, J. M. Davis, M. A. Wilson, E. C. Goldsmith, and J. A. Carson
Estrogen status and skeletal muscle recovery from disuse atrophy
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 2012 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Almeida, L. Han, C. A. O'Brien, S. Kousteni, and S. C. Manolagas
Classical Genotropic Versus Kinase-Initiated Regulation of Gene Transcription by the Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1986 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Vivacqua, D. Bonofiglio, A. G. Recchia, A. M. Musti, D. Picard, S. Ando, and M. Maggiolini
The G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR30 Mediates the Proliferative Effects Induced by 17{beta}-Estradiol and Hydroxytamoxifen in Endometrial Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 20(3): 631 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Matthews, B. Wihlen, M. Tujague, J. Wan, A. Strom, and J.-A. Gustafsson
Estrogen Receptor (ER) {beta} Modulates ER{alpha}-Mediated Transcriptional Activation by Altering the Recruitment of c-Fos and c-Jun to Estrogen-Responsive Promoters
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 20(3): 534 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Penot, C. Le Peron, Y. Merot, E. Grimaud-Fanouillere, F. Ferriere, N. Boujrad, O. Kah, C. Saligaut, B. Ducouret, R. Metivier, et al.
The Human Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Isoform hER{alpha}46 Antagonizes the Proliferative Influence of hER{alpha}66 in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5474 - 5484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. H. Gutzman, S. E. Nikolai, D. E. Rugowski, J. J. Watters, and L. A. Schuler
Prolactin and Estrogen Enhance the Activity of Activating Protein 1 in Breast Cancer Cells: Role of Extracellularly Regulated Kinase 1/2-Mediated Signals to c-fos
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 19(7): 1765 - 1778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page