help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*MENOTROPINS
*RU-486
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 5 2223-2228
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Antiprogestins Suppress Basal and Activin-Stimulated Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion in an Estrogen-Dependent Manner1

Marta Szabo, Signe M. Kilen, Sara Saberi, Sonia J. Ringstrom and Neena B. Schwartz

Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Marta Szabo, Ph.D., Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, 2153 North Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3520. E-mail: msz729{at}nwu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous studies from our laboratory, demonstrating that suppression of serum FSH by RU486 requires a high estrogen (E) background, suggested that E-inducible progesterone receptors play a role in the regulation of FSH secretion. We demonstrated further that the type II antiprogestin RU486 and the type I antiprogestin ZK98299 both suppressed the elevated serum FSH and FSHß messenger RNA levels similarly on the evening of proestrus, but had divergent effects on the morning of estrus, when only RU486, but not ZK98299, lowered the elevated serum FSH level (secondary FSH surge). In the present work we used primary anterior pituitary cell culture to examine whether RU486 caused direct, E-dependent suppression of basal and recombinant human activin A (activin)-induced FSH secretion in the gonadotrope and to compare this direct effect, if any, with that of ZK98299. Primary cell cultures were prepared from anterior pituitaries collected from cycling female rats either on metestrous or proestrous morning and cultured in DMEM, supplemented with charcoal-stripped serum without or with 10 nM estradiol (E2) for 96 h; exposure to test agents occurred during the last 48 h of culture. FSH released into the medium and intracellular FSH content were determined by RIA. In cells from the anterior pituitary of metestrous rats cultured in E2-free medium, neither antiprogestin (10 nM) affected FSH release; in contrast, when cells were cultured in medium to which E2 had been added, both antiprogestins caused profound suppression of both basal and activin (10 ng/ml)-stimulated FSH release. In cell cultures from proestrous rats, both antiprogestins caused a slight, but significant, suppression of basal FSH release even in the absence of added E2; activin-stimulated FSH release, however, was not affected. Upon exposure of the cells from proestrous rats to E2, the antiprogestins potently suppressed both basal and activin-stimulated FSH secretion. Because the foregoing incubations were performed in culture medium devoid of progesterone (P4), the actions of the antiprogestins on FSH secretion were independent of the natural ligand. Addition of P4 (10 nM) to the cell cultures stimulated basal and activin-induced FSH release more in the presence than in the absence of E2. The FSH response to P4 was completely blocked by both antiprogestins in both the absence and presence of E2. Finally, both RU486 and ZK98299 blocked the stimulatory effect of corticosterone (1 µM) on FSH secretion. The observed effects of P4 and antiprogestins were specific for FSH secretion; LH secretion was not similarly suppressed by either antiprogestin, but was, in fact, stimulated by ZK98299 in E2-treated cells. We conclude that 1) E2-inducible progesterone receptors interact with activin-mediated signal transduction to regulate FSH secretion, and 2) unlike on the morning of estrus in vivo, RU486 and ZK98299 affect FSH secretion similarly in the gonadotrope in vitro.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE SECRETION of FSH is controlled, in addition to GnRH and gonadal steroids, by the specific regulatory proteins inhibin, activin, and follistatin, isolated originally from the gonads (1), but shown subsequently to be widely distributed in various tissues, including the pituitary (2, 3). Activin, in particular, has been identified as a key physiological regulator of FSH secretion by virtue of its ability to activate transcription of the FSHß gene (4, 5) and, together with follistatin, mediate the effects of pulsatile GnRH administration (6). An additional level of regulation was suggested by previous in vivo studies from our laboratory, which demonstrated an ability of the antiprogestin/antiglucocorticoid RU486 to selectively lower serum FSH (7) in an estrous cycle stage- and estrogen (E)-dependent manner (8). These data suggested that activation of progesterone receptors (PR) is a key component of the specific regulatory mechanism that governs the synthesis and release of FSH. More recently, we compared the effects of RU486 (a type II P antagonist) on FSH secretion in vivo with those of the type I antiprogestin ZK98299; the results indicated that the two antiprogestins, which block PR through different molecular mechanisms (9), have differential effects on serum FSH on the morning of estrus (10). The objective of the present work was to explore in primary pituitary cell culture whether the antiprogestins RU486 and ZK98299 can suppress FSH secretion directly at the level of the gonadotrope, and whether the two antiprogestins can affect FSH secretion differentially in this in vitro system. We investigated the drugs’ effects on FSH secretion in the absence and presence of E2, under both basal conditions and during stimulation with activin and glucocorticoids, to gain insight into a possible interaction between PR- and activin receptor-mediated signaling in the gonadotrope. The results demonstrate equal, direct, estradiol (E2)-dependent suppression of basal and activin-stimulated FSH secretion by both antiprogestins and suggest that under certain physiological conditions, E-inducible PR interact with activin-mediated signaling to stimulate the synthesis and release of FSH.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents
RU486 (Roussel-UCLAF, Romainville, France), ZK98299 (Schering, Berlin, Germany), E2, progesterone (P4), and corticosterone (B; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were dissolved in absolute ethanol at 1000 times the desired final concentration; the corresponding concentration of ethanol (0.1%) was used as the vehicle. Recombinant human activin A (activin), provided by Dr. Teresa Woodruff, Northwestern University (Evanston, IL), for the initial experiments, and by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program for subsequent ones, was diluted with 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-0.15 M NaCl from a 0.73 µg/ml stock. Media, sera, and all other reagents for cell culture were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY).

Animals
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (55–60 days old) were obtained from Charles River (Portage, MI). Animals were housed under a 14-h light, 10-h dark schedule, with lights on at 0500 h, and were provided with standard rat chow and tap water ad libitum. Estrous cycles were monitored by daily vaginal cytology; only rats that exhibited at least two consecutive 4-day estrous cycles were used. Protocols were approved by the animal care and use committee of Northwestern University.

Cell dissociation and culture
Anterior pituitaries were collected from 6–14 rats at 0900–1000 h on the specified day of the estrous cycle (usually metestrus) and dissociated enzymatically as previously described (11). The final pellet was suspended in DMEM containing 10% charcoal-stripped FBS and 10 nM E2 as indicated. Cells were plated in 24-well culture plates at a density of 3–5 x 105 cells/2-cm2 well and were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 94% air-6% CO2 at 37 C for 48 h. Media were collected, fresh media containing the test agents were then added, and incubation was continued for an additional 48 h. Incubation with each test agent was performed in quadruplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least once for confirmation.

FSH and LH release and cell content
Culture media were sampled for FSH and LH release at 48 and 96 h. At the end of the incubation (96 h), cell monolayers were lysed in 1 ml Dulbecco’s PBS containing 0.3% BSA and 1% each of Triton X-100 and sodium deoxycholate for determination of intracellular hormone content. All media and lysates were stored at -20 C until RIA.

Hormone assays
Gonadotropins released into the culture media and their content in the cell lysates were determined by double antibody RIA (7) with reagents supplied by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program.

Statistical analysis
All data presented are the mean ± SE of quadruplicate incubations from a single representative experiment. Each experiment was repeated once or twice to ensure reproducibility of the results. The significance of differences between the vehicle- and E2-treated cells was assessed by t test. Significant differences among multiple treatment groups were evaluated by multifactor ANOVA (Crisp Program, Crunch Software Corporation, San Francisco, CA). Post-hoc comparisons of the effects of test agents were performed using the Newman-Keuls test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
E2-dependent suppression of basal FSH secretion by RU486 and ZK98299
Preliminary experiments testing the requirement for E2 in the culture medium for suppression of FSH secretion by RU486 yielded inconsistent results; these experiments were performed with anterior pituitary cells from rats at random stages of the estrous cycle. Based on this finding and on previous reports demonstrating the importance of the estrous cycle stage in determining the in vitro hormone secretory response to secretagogues (12, 13), we used primary cell cultures prepared from anterior pituitaries collected on metestrous morning when the ambient estrogen background is low. In Exp 1, we examined the effects of the antiprogestins RU486 and ZK98299 (10 nM), added to the primary pituitary cell cultures during the second half of a 96-h incubation, on FSH release into the culture medium (Fig. 1AGo) and on the intracellular content of FSH (Fig. 1BGo) upon exposure for various times to 10 nM E2. In the absence of E2 throughout the 96-h incubation, neither antiprogestin (10 nM) had a significant effect on FSH release. Addition of E2 to the medium during either the first or the second half of the incubation (i.e. before or during the exposure to the antiprogestins) or throughout the entire 96-h incubation did not significantly affect basal FSH release, but enabled the antiprogestins to cause marked suppression of FSH release. The effects of E2 and antiprogestins on intracellular FSH content were qualitatively similar, but of a lesser magnitude. Because the order and duration of exposure to E2 had no influence on antiprogestin-induced suppression of basal FSH secretion, a protocol in which E2 was added throughout the 96-h culture was adopted in all subsequent experiments.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of treatment with 10 nM RU486 (RU) or ZK98299 (ZK) on FSH release during 48–96 h (A) and intracellular FSH content at 96 h (B) in anterior pituitary cell cultures exposed to vehicle or 10 nM E2 for 48 or 96 h. Pituitaries were collected on the morning of metestrus. Each bar is the mean, and the error bar is the SEM of four observations. In the presence of E2, during the first or second 48-h incubation or both, the effects of the antiprogestins on FSH release were highly significant (P < 0.0001).

 
E2-dependent suppression of basal and activin-stimulated FSH secretion by RU486 and ZK98299: influence of estrous cycle stage
In Exp 2, we tested the effects of RU486 and ZK98299 on FSH release and cell content in the absence and presence of activin (10 ng/ml) in cultured cells from either metestrous or proestrous rats. As in Exp 1, in cells from metestrous rats cultured in steroid-depleted medium (Fig. 2AGo, left set of bars), the antiprogestins had no effect on basal FSH release. Addition of activin caused a robust increase in FSH release, which was also unaffected by the concurrent addition of the antiprogestins. In contrast, when cells from metestrous rats were cultured in medium supplemented with E2 (Fig. 2AGo, right), both antiprogestins elicited marked suppression of basal and activin-stimulated FSH release; E2 enhanced the effects of both activin alone and the antiprogestins on activin-induced FSH release. During the first 48 h of incubation without test agents, addition of E2 to the cell cultures caused a small, but highly significant (P < 0.0001), increase in FSH released from 21.4 ± 0.53 to 25.1 ± 0.32 ng/ml (data not shown). In cells prepared from pituitaries collected on proestrous morning, i.e. cells derived from a high ambient estrogen environment, the antiprogestins suppressed basal FSH release even in the absence of added E2 (Fig. 2CGo, left). It should be noted, however, that the antiprogestins suppressed only basal, but not activin-stimulated, FSH release in these cultures. Addition of E2 to the medium in which cells from proestrous rats were cultured enhanced the FSH response to both activin (stimulation) and the antiprogestins (suppression; Fig. 2CGo, right). In contrast to cultured cells from metestrous rats, basal release of FSH was unaffected by addition of E2 to the culture medium during the first 48-h incubation (46.4 ± 1.2 vs.. 47.6 ± 1.2 ng/ml FSH released in the absence and presence of 10 nM E2, respectively; data not shown). In cell cultures from both metestrous and proestrous rats, the effects of activin and the antiprogestins on intracellular FSH content were qualitatively similar to those on medium FSH, although of a lesser magnitude (Fig. 2Go, B and D). The in vitro effects of activin and the antiprogestins were concentration dependent (data not shown); the 10 ng/ml activin and 10 nM antiprogestins used in the above studies represent submaximal stimulatory and inhibitory concentrations of the drugs. The in vitro potency of ZK98299 was slightly, but significantly (P < 0.01), greater than that of RU486 in this and several other experiments, including one in which cells had been prepared from pituitaries collected on estrous morning.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of treatment with 10 nM RU486 (RU) or ZK98299 (ZK) on basal and recombinant human activin (Act; 10 ng/ml)-stimulated FSH release during 48–96 h (A and C) and on intracellular FSH content at 96 h (B and D) in anterior pituitary cell cultures from metestrous (A and B) and proestrous (C and D) rats exposed to vehicle or 10 nM E2 throughout the 96-h incubation. Each bar is the mean, and the error bar the SEM of four observations. In cultured cells from metestrous rats, addition of E2 increased the effect of activin (P = 0.01) and the antiprogestins on activin-induced FSH release (P = 0.02). In the presence of E2, the effect of the antiprogestins on FSH release was highly significant overall (P < 0.0001). In cells prepared from pituitaries collected on proestrous morning, the antiprogestins suppressed basal, but not activin-stimulated, FSH release even in the absence of added E2 (P = 0.0005). In the presence of E2 added to the cultures, antiprogestins potently suppressed both basal and activin-stimulated FSH release (P < 0.0001).

 
Agonist/antagonist relationship between P4 and antiprogestins
To investigate the possibility that RU486 and ZK98299 affected FSH secretion in cultured anterior pituitary cells through an agonist-like action, as has been reported in other in vitro systems (14, 15), in Exp 3, we compared the effects of the antiprogestins on FSH release with those of the natural agonist, P4, in cultured cells from metestrous rats (Fig. 3AGo). In the absence of E2, 10 nM P4 significantly increased FSH release; this increase was completely reversed by both antiprogestins. The small additional FSH response to P4 above that induced by activin alone was similarly blocked by the antiprogestins. Addition of E2 to the cell cultures increased the effects of P4 on both basal and activin-stimulated FSH release and strongly enhanced the suppressive effects of the antiprogestins. P4 did not have a significant effect on intracellular FSH content in the absence of E2, but increased this parameter significantly in E2-treated cells both under basal conditions and in combination with activin (Fig. 3BGo).



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of treatment with 10 nM progesterone (P4) without or with 10 nM RU486 (RU) or ZK98299 (ZK) on basal and recombinant human activin (Act; 10 ng/ml)-stimulated FSH release during 48–96 h (A) and intracellular FSH content at 96 h (B) in anterior pituitary cell cultures from metestrous rats exposed to vehicle or 10 nM E2 throughout the 96-h incubation. Each bar is the mean, and the error bar the SEM of four observations. Addition of E2 to the cell cultures increased the effects of P4 on both basal and Act-stimulated FSH release and enhanced the suppressive effects of the antiprogestins (P = 0.004 for the effect of E2 overall). The effect of P4 on intracellular FSH content was not significant in the absence of E2, but was highly significant (P < 0.0001) in cells incubated with E2 under both basal conditions and in combination with Act.

 
Suppression of B-stimulated FSH secretion by the antiprogestins
Because previous work from our laboratory identified glucocorticoids as potent direct secretagogues for FSH (11, 16), and because RU486 (17), but not ZK98299 (18), is an antiglucocorticoid as well as an antiprogestin, in Exp 4 we investigated whether the antiprogestins could suppress B-stimulated FSH secretion differentially or similarly. The effective concentration of B used in the previous studies ranged from 0.17–1.7 µM; the concentration of the antiprogestins added to the culture medium was, therefore, increased to 1 µM to match that of B used in the present study. As depicted in Fig. 4Go, in E2-treated cells from metestrous rats, RU486 and ZK98299 induced similar suppression of both basal and B-stimulated secretion of FSH (P < 0.0001 overall); the magnitude of this suppression of FSH release by ZK98299 was slightly, but significantly (P = 0.01), greater than that by RU486.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of treatment with 1 µM RU486 (RU) or ZK98299 (ZK) on basal and B (1 µM)-stimulated FSH release during 48–96 h (A) and intracellular FSH content at 96 h (B) in anterior pituitary cell cultures from metestrous rats exposed to 10 nM E2 throughout the 96-h incubation. Each bar is the mean, and the error bar the SEM of eight observations. RU486 and ZK98299 induced similar suppression of both basal and B-stimulated secretion of FSH (P < 0.0001 overall); the magnitude of this suppression of FSH release by ZK98299 was slightly, but significantly (P = 0.01), greater than that by RU486.

 
Differential responsiveness of FSH and LH to antiprogestins in vitro
The observed effects of the antiprogestins were highly specific for FSH. In no experiment could we demonstrate suppression of LH secretion by the antiprogestins; on the contrary, in several experiments in which LH was measured, ZK98299, but not RU486, significantly increased LH release in an E2-dependent manner. LH release measured in the same experiment for which FSH measurements are depicted in Fig. 1Go, is shown in Table 1Go. LH release, but not intracellular LH content, was selectively stimulated by ZK98299.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of antiprogestins on LH release in anterior pituitary cell culture

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This is the first report demonstrating that the effects of activin on FSH secretion can be antagonized by antiprogestins. Our data clearly indicate that both type I (ZK98299) and type II (RU486) antiprogestins are capable of causing profound suppression of FSH secretion only in gonadotropes that had been primed with E2. The present findings are consistent with our earlier demonstration of an E requirement for RU486 to lower serum FSH in vivo and implicate E-inducible PR as mediators of this suppression. In E2-primed anterior pituitary cells, the antiprogestins induced profound, specific suppression of both basal and activin- or glucocorticoid-stimulated FSH secretion.

Previous work from our laboratory and others demonstrated that RU486 is capable of suppressing FSH secretion in in vitro systems after prior in vivo administration of the drug to the pituitary donor animals (19) or upon direct addition to primary anterior pituitary cell culture (20). It is likely, however, that because of accumulation of locally produced activin (21) in the static cultures used in the latter study as well as in the present work, basal FSH secretion may, in fact, represent secretion stimulated by the autocrine or paracrine actions of endogenous activin (6). Moreover, the effect of glucocorticoids may also be mediated by endogenous activin production; thus, all of the observed effects of the antiprogestins may have been on activin-stimulated FSH secretion.

The in vitro effects of the two antiprogestins on FSH secretion were qualitatively and quantitatively similar under virtually all experimental conditions; ZK98299 exhibited slightly, but significantly, greater biopotency than RU486 despite reports that the latter binds PR with 5- or 10-fold higher affinity (22, 23). It is of interest to note that the only differential action of the two drugs observed in the present study was on LH release in E2-primed cells: only ZK98299, not RU486, increased LH release. Thus, the present results do not provide insight into the mechanism underlying the differential in vivo effects of the two antiprogestins on serum FSH on estrous morning. More recently, we performed an experiment (Szabo, M., S. M. Kilen, and N. B. Schwartz, unpublished) to investigate the possibility that the failure of ZK98299, administered on proestrus, to suppress serum FSH on the morning of estrus was due to its more rapid metabolic clearance than that of RU486. Administration of a second dose of ZK98299 6 h before blood collection resulted in suppression of serum FSH on estrous morning comparable to that induced by a single injection of RU486 on proestrus, lending support to the assumption that ZK98299 is, indeed, cleared more rapidly from the circulation.

Suppression of FSH secretion by the antiprogestins was demonstrated in the absence of the natural ligand for PR, P4, in the pituitary cell culture. It is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that ligand-independent activation of PR may interact with activin receptor-mediated signal transduction in activating the transcription of genes that are required for synthesis of the FSHß subunit and FSH biosynthesis and release. Such hypothetical, ligand-independent activation of PR-mediated processes by peptide hormone-mediated signaling is analogous to the GnRH self-priming phenomenon described by Turgeon and Waring (24). These researchers demonstrated that a pulse of GnRH administered to pituitary cells cultured in the presence of E2, but in the absence of P4, potentiated the LH secretory response to subsequent pulses of GnRH or cAMP analog. Potentiation could be blocked by RU486, prompting the researchers to propose cross-communication between a GnRH receptor-activated protein kinase A pathway and PR. That ligand-independent activation of PR contributes to the primary and secondary surges of FSH was also suggested, but not proven conclusively, by our previous demonstration that RU486 is capable of attenuating the preovulatory and secondary FSH surges under conditions where circulating P4 is virtually eradicated by aminoglutethimide administration (25).

It is well established that RU486 can act as an agonist when cAMP-mediated signaling is activated (14, 26, 27), and P4 itself has been reported to have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on FSH secretion (28). Based on this evidence, we considered the possibility that the in vitro suppression of FSH secretion by the antiprogestins may have been due to agonist-like effects of the drugs. That this was not the case was clearly indicated by the finding that P4 induced potent, concentration-dependent stimulation of FSH secretion, enhanced by priming with E2, in agreement with earlier reports by Drouin and Labrie (29) and Krey and co-workers (20). Both antiprogestins added at a low concentration antagonized this action of P4 independent of E2. Thus, the antiprogestins clearly affected FSH secretion through blockade of PR rather than through their activation.

In conclusion, we demonstrated E2-dependent suppression of activin-induced FSH secretion by RU486 and ZK98299 in primary anterior pituitary cell culture in vitro. The data suggest that E-inducible PR play a role as a regulator of FSH secretion through interaction with activin-mediated signal transduction pathways.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Roussel-UCLAF (Romainville, France) and to Dr. K. Stoeckemann of Schering (Berlin, Germany) for the supply of RU486 and ZK98299 used in this study. We thank Brigitte Mann and Stephanie Kluge for performance of the RIAs.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grants R01-HD-07504, P01-HD-21921, and P30-HD-28048. Presented in part at the 79th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Minneapolis, MN (Abstract P3-341). Back

Received November 18, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ying S-Y 1988 Inhibins, activins, and follistatins: gonadal proteins modulating the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocr Rev 9:267–293[Abstract]
  2. Meunier H, Rivier C, Evans RM, Vale W 1988 Gonadal and extragonadal expression of inhibin {alpha}, ßA, and ßB subunits in various tissues predicts diverse functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:247–251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kaiser UB, Lee BL, Carroll RS, Unabia G, Chin WW, Childs GV 1992 Follistatin gene expression in the pituitary: localization in gonadotropes and folliculostellate cells in diestrous rats. Endocrinology 130:3048–3056[Abstract]
  4. Carroll RS, Corrigan AZ, Gharib SD, Vale W, Chin WW 1989 Inhibin, activin, and follistatin: regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone messenger ribonucleic acid levels. Mol Endocrinol 3:1969–1976[Abstract]
  5. Weiss J, Guendner MJ, Halvorson LM, Jameson JL 1995 Transcriptional activation of the follicle-stimulating hormone beta-subunit gene by activin. Endocrinology 136:1885–1891[Abstract]
  6. Besecke LM, Guendner MJ, Schneyer AL, Bauer-Dantoin AC, Jameson JL, Weiss J 1996 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone regulates follicle-stimulating hormone-ß gene expression through an activin/follistatin autocrine or paracrine loop. Endocrinology 137:3667–3673[Abstract]
  7. Knox KL, Schwartz NB 1992 RU486 blocks the secondary surge of follicle-stimulating hormone in the rat without blocking the drop in serum inhibin. Biol Reprod 46:220–225[Abstract]
  8. Knox KL, Ringstrom SJ, Szabo M, Perlyn CA, Sutandi S, Schwartz NB 1996 RU486 on an estrogen background blocks the rise in serum follicle-stimulating hormone induced by antiserum to inhibin or ovariectomy. Endocrinology 137:1226–1232[Abstract]
  9. Horwitz K 1992 The molecular biology of RU486. Is there a role for antiprogestins in the treatment of breast cancer? Endocr Rev 13:146–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Ringstrom SJ, Szabo M, Kilen SM, Saberi S, Knox KL, Schwartz NB 1997 The antiprogestins RU486 and ZK98299 affect follicle stimulating hormone secretion differentially on estrus, but not on proestrus. Endocrinology 138:2286–2290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kilen SM, Szabo M, Strasser GA, McAndrews JM, Ringstrom SJ, Schwartz NB 1996 Corticosterone selectively increases FSHß subunit mRNA in primary anterior pituitary cell culture without affecting its half-life. Endocrinology 137:3802–3807[Abstract]
  12. Fallest PC, Schwartz NB 1991 Acute inhibitory effects of 17ß-estradiol are observed on gonadotropin secretion from perifused pituitary fragments of metestrous, but not proestrous, rats. Endocrinology 128:273–279[Abstract]
  13. Fitch CA, Freeman ME 1996 Effects of the estrous cycle stage in the prolactin secretory response to dopamine in vitro. Endocrine 4:59–63
  14. Beck CA, Weigel NL, Moyer ML, Nordeen SK, Edwards DP 1993 The progesterone antagonist RU486 acquires agonist activity upon stimulation of cAMP signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4441–4445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tung L, Mohamed MK, Hoeffler JP, Takimoto GS, Horwitz KB 1993 Antagonist-occupied human progesterone B-receptors activate transcription without binding to progesterone response elements and are dominantly inhibited by A-receptors. Mol Endocrinol 7:1256–1265[Abstract]
  16. Suter DE, Schwartz NB 1985 Effects of glucocorticoids on secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone by female rat pituitary cells in vitro. Endocrinology 117:849–854[Abstract]
  17. Baulieu E-E 1991 The antisteroid RU486. Its cellular and molecular mode of action. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2:233–239
  18. Elger W, Beier S, Chwalisz K, Fahnrich M, Hasan SH, Henderson D, Neef G, Rohde R 1986 Studies on the mechanisms of action of progesterone antagonists. J Steroid Biochem 25:835–845[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Knox KL, Schwartz NB 1993 Pituitary in vitro LH and FSH secretion after administration of the antiprogesterone RU486 in vivo. Recent Prog Horm Res 48:523–530
  20. Krey LC, Padmanabhan V, Beitins IZ 1993 Progesterone modulation of gondadotropin secretion by dispersed rat pituitary cells in culture. IV. Follicle-stimulating hormone synthesis and release. Mol Cell Endocrinol 91:13–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Corrigan AZ, Bilezikjian LM, Carroll RS, Bald LN, Schmelzer CH, Fendly BM, Mason AJ, Chin WW, Schwall RH, Vale W 1991 Evidence for an autocrine role of activin B within rat anterior pituitary cultures. Endocrinology 128:1682–1684[Abstract]
  22. McDonnell DP, Goldman ME 1994 RU486 exerts antiestrogenic activities through a novel progesterone receptor A form-mediated mechanism. J Biol Chem 269:11945–11949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Delabre K, Guiochon-Mantel A, Milgrom E 1993 In vivo evidence against the existence of antiprogestins disrupting receptor binding to DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4421–4425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Turgeon JL, Waring DW 1994 Activation of the progesterone receptor by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone self-priming signaling pathway. Mol Endocrinol 8:860–869[Abstract]
  25. Szabo M, Knox KL, Ringstrom SJ, Perlyn CA, Sutandi S, Schwartz NB 1996 Mechanism of the inhibitory action of RU486 on the secondary follicle-stimulating hormone surge. Endocrinology 137:85–89[Abstract]
  26. Nordeen SK, Bona BJ, Moyer ML 1993 Latent agonist activity of the steroid antagonist, RU486, is unmasked in cells treated with activators of protein kinase A. Mol Endocrinol 7:731–742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sartorius CA, Tung L, Takimoto GS, Horwitz KB 1993 Antagonist-occupied human progesterone receptors bound to DNA are functionally switched to transcriptional agonists by cAMP. J Biol Chem 268:9262–9266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lesoon LA, Mahesh VB 1992 Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of progesterone on FSH secretion by the anterior pituitary. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 42:479–491[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Drouin J, Labrie F 1981 Interactions between 17ß-estradiol and progesterone in the control of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone release in rat anterior pituitary cells in culture. Endocrinology 108:52–57[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. Sasson, S. H. Luu, V. G. Thackray, and P. L. Mellon
Glucocorticoids Induce Human Glycoprotein Hormone {alpha}-Subunit Gene Expression in the Gonadotrope
Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3643 - 3655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. G. Thackray, S. M. McGillivray, and P. L. Mellon
Androgens, Progestins, and Glucocorticoids Induce Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta}-Subunit Gene Expression at the Level of the Gonadotrope
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 20(9): 2062 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
C M Gomes, C Raineki, P R. de Paula, G S Severino, C V V Helena, J A Anselmo-Franci, C R Franci, G L Sanvitto, and A B Lucion
Neonatal handling and reproductive function in female rats
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 435 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. L. Bohnsack, M. Szabo, S. M. Kilen, D. H.Y. Tam, and N. B. Schwartz
Follistatin Suppresses Steroid-Enhanced Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Release In Vitro in Rats
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2000; 62(3): 636 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Szabo, S. M. Kilen, S. J. Nho, and N. B. Schwartz
Progesterone Receptor A and B Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in the Anterior Pituitary of Rats Are Regulated by Estrogen
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2000; 62(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*MENOTROPINS
*RU-486


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals