| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4130
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. S. Wray, Lab of Neurochemistry, National Institutes of Health, Building 36, Rm 4D-12 Bethesda, Maryland 20892. E-mail: swray{at}codon.nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) as the major
negative regulator of postnatal LHRH neuronal activity. Changes in LHRH
messenger RNA (mRNA) levels after alterations of GABAergic activity
have been reported in vivo. However, the extent to which
GABA acts directly on LHRH neurons to effect LHRH mRNA levels has been
difficult to ascertain. The present work evaluates the effect of
GABAergic activity, via GABAA receptors, on LHRH
neuropeptide gene expression in LHRH neurons maintained in olfactory
explants generated from E11.5 mouse embryos. These explants maintain
large numbers of primary LHRH neurons that migrate from bilateral
olfactory pits in a directed manner. Using in situ
hybridization histochemistry and single cell analysis, we report
dramatic alterations in LHRH mRNA levels. Inhibition of spontaneous
synaptic activity by GABAA antagonists, bicuculline
(10-5 M) or picrotoxin (10-4
M), or of electrical activity by tetrodotoxin (TTX,
10-6 M) significantly increased LHRH mRNA
levels. In contrast, LHRH mRNA levels decreased in explants cultured
with the GABAA receptor agonist, muscimol
(10-4 M), or KCl (50 mM). The
observed responses suggest that LHRH neurons possess functional
pathways linking GABAA receptors to repression of
neuropeptide gene expression and indicate that gene expression in
embryonic LHRH neurons, outside the CNS, is highly responsive to
alterations in neuronal activity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminobutyric acid (GABA; 14). The mechanism underlying the
effect(s) of GABA on LHRH neurons is still poorly understood. GABA
and/or experimental manipulations of GABAergic receptors can regulate
neuropeptide activity by altering the level of neuropeptide
transcription (5, 6, 7) and/or neuropeptide biosynthesis (8, 9, 10). This is
certainly true in adult LHRH neurons where GABAergic input has been
shown to regulate gene expression (11, 12, 13, 14, 15) as well as LHRH release
(1, 2, 3, 4, 16, 17). However, both enhanced (3, 11, 18) and suppressed (3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) LHRH responses have been documented. Certainly the disparate
responses reported could reflect activation of either direct (19, 20)
and/or indirect (21) inputs to LHRH neurons, with those activated being
directly linked to the experimental paradigm chosen. To minimize many of the complexities encountered in vivo, our laboratory has developed two in vitro systems in which large numbers of primary LHRH neurons are maintained: one from CNS tissue containing postnatal LHRH neurons (22, 23, 24, 25) and one from olfactory tissue (26, 27) containing prenatal LHRH neurons. Both models maintain approximately 25% of the primary LHRH neuronal population (22, 26). However, in the CNS slice explants, LHRH neurons are maintained in different anatomical regions, within approximately four slice explants (22), whereas in the olfactory explants, the LHRH neuronal population is maintained in one explant. Both models exhibit characteristics that make them powerful alternatives to in vivo studies: in CNS slice explants, the LHRH neurons are exposed to different interneuronal environments (22), whereas LHRH neurons in olfactory explants are devoid of CNS influences (26).
In olfactory explants, LHRH neurons can be identified in situ. This important aspect of olfactory explants led to studies that revealed that prenatally, LHRH cells exhibit spontaneous activity and display a variety of ion channels characteristic of mature neurons, including functional GABAA receptors (27). The presence of large numbers of primary LHRH neurons in a single culture, maintained in an environment outside the CNS, and exhibiting function GABAA receptors, provided an unique opportunity to study the mechanisms underlying GABAergic regulation of this critical neuroendocrine cell population. Thus, using this in vitro system, we examined whether GABAergic signals could directly alter LHRH gene expression. LHRH neurons maintained in cultures treated with GABAA receptor antagonists showed increased LHRH messenger RNA (mRNA) levels, whereas treatment with the GABAA receptor agonist, muscimol, dramatically decreased LHRH mRNA levels. Similar increases in LHRH mRNA levels vs. decreases in LHRH mRNA levels were seen in cultures treated with TTX or KCl, respectively, indicating that LHRH gene expression, outside the CNS, is highly susceptible to the state of LHRH neuronal activity. The observed neurotransmitter-specific responses suggest that LHRH neurons possess functional pathways linking GABAA receptors to down-regulation of neuropeptide gene expression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Explants in experimental groups were maintained in SFM containing agents that 1) block spontaneous synaptic GABAergic activity [bicuculline (bicuculline methochloride, 10-5 M) and picrotoxin (10-4 M), both obtained from Sigma)], or 2) activate GABAA receptors [muscimol (10-4 M, Sigma). Potassium (KCl, 50 mM) and KCl + tetrodotoxin (TTX; 50 mM, 10-6 M, respectively), was used as a general depolarizing agent, while TTX (10-6 M), either alone or with muscimol (muscimol + TTX; 10-4 M, 10-6 M, respectively) was used as a general inhibitor of electrical activity (28, 29), including that generated via GABAergic input. Drug concentrations were based on effectiveness in prior electrophysiological studies (27). Chronic treatments were initiated at 1 day in vitro (div), before the emergence of LHRH cells from the olfactory pits (26) and replenished at 3 and 6 div. Control cultures were maintained in SFM that was changed, as in the treatment groups, at 1, 3 and 6 div. After 7 div, cultures were processed for in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH).
Probes and ISHH
ISHH was performed using a synthetic antisense oligonucleotide
probe, 48 nucleotides in length, complementary to the coding region of
the mouse LHRH complementary DNA (cDNA), covering bases 16531700
(30). Explant cultures were processed for ISHH by modifying a procedure
previously described (30). Cultures were fixed (30 min, 4%
formaldehyde), rinsed in PBS (2 x 5 min), acetylated (10 min, 0.1
M triethanolamine hydrochloride-0.9% NaCl, pH 8.0,
containing 0.25% acetic anhydride), rinsed in 2 x SSC (sodium
chloride, sodium citrate, 2 x 1.5 min), sequentially dehydrated
in ethanol, and delipidated in chloroform (7 min). The cultures were
then rehydrated to 95% ethanol, air dried, and hybridized with a
[35S]dATP-labeled probe.
The radiolabeled probe (5 pmol) was 3'-end labeled in a final volume of 1015 µl by incubation (37 C, 10 min) with [35S]dATP (1 mM; 1, 300 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) and terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase (TdT, 100U; BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) to a specific activity of 7,00015,000 Ci/mmol (30). Isotopic probe (5 x 105 cpm) was applied to individual cultures in 10 µl of hybridization buffer (30). Cultures were coverslipped and hybridized for 16 h at 37 C.
The following day, parafilm coverslips were removed in 1 x SSC containing 75 mM dithiothreitol. Cultures were washed (4 x 15 min) in 2 x SSC/50% formamide containing 75 mM DTT at 40 C, and rinsed at room temp in 1 x SSC (3 x 10 min), H2O (2 x 1 min), 70% EtOH (2 min), 95% EtOH (5 min) and then allowed to air dry. After drying, the coverslips were dipped in NTB3 emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and exposed for appropriate times. Frozen adult mouse brain sections were used as positive controls, and these were treated by identical ISHH procedures on the same day.
Immunocytochemistry
A polyclonal antibody against pro-LHRH [SW-1 (1:2500), 22] was
used to detect LHRH. Single label immunocytochemistry was performed as
previously described (30). Briefly, cultures were fixed (4%
formaldehyde), rinsed in PBS and blocked by incubating in 10% normal
goat serum (NGS)/0.3% Triton X-100. Following two PBS washes, cultures
were incubated in primary antiserum overnight at 4 C; negative controls
were incubated in 10% NGS without primary antibody. On day 2, cultures
were rinsed, incubated in biotinylated secondary antibody (1:500,
Vector, Burlingame, CA) followed by avidin-biotin-conjugated
horseradish peroxidase complex (1:600, Vectastain Elite ABC-peroxidase;
Vector). Staining was visualized using 3'3-diaminobenzidine (DAB,
Sigma) and glucose oxidase. Cultures were counterstained with 0.05%
methyl green, dehydrated, cleared with xylene, and mounted in Permount
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA).
Statistical analysis
Quantitation of mRNA was performed as previously described (24).
Briefly, LHRH mRNA levels within single cells were examined by
obtaining integrated densities of areas of silver grains over
individual labeled cells, and the cell areas enclosing these grains,
using an image analysis system (NIH Image). Silver grains were
digitized under brightfield microscopy and mean optical density (OD)
measurements (15% above background) per cell area, expressed as
OD/µm2, were calculated for single cells and local
background. The value was then multiplied by the highlighted cell area
to obtain a total LHRH mRNA level per cell (OD/cell). Local background,
multiplied by the measured background area, was subtracted from each
cell measurement to obtain a corrected LHRH mRNA level per single
cell:
![]() |
Statistical analysis of the OD values from the seven treatment groups was made using two approaches. In the first approach, a single mean OD/cell value was obtained for each culture by averaging the OD/cell of all the cells in that culture. The mean OD/cell values of an experimental group were then averaged to give a mean OD/cell value per treatment. A one-way ANOVA was applied to the data and N equals the number of cultures in each treatment group (i.e. control, bicuculline, picrotoxin, etc.) and not the number of cells analyzed. This approach allowed analysis of variation among cultures (both within and between treatment groups). However, in this approach data are lost because individual values (up to 200 cells/culture) are pooled. Thus, the second approach used all of the OD/cell values, and N equals the total number of cells in an experimental group, irrespective of the number of explant cultures in which these cells were located. In this analysis, all values were treated independently, grouped according to treatment, and analyzed using the nonparametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test (a significance level of P < 0.001 was chosen). For diagramatic purposes, the OD/cell data were divided into 10 equal bins covering the entire range of measured OD/cell values (mRNA levels) and frequency histograms were generated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Down-regulation of LHRH gene expression is augmented by
KCl
GABAergic input was shown to cause depolarization of prenatal LHRH
neurons, in vitro, via functional GABAA
receptors (27). To determine whether the repression of LHRH mRNA levels
by GABA was a direct result of depolarization, per se,
explant cultures were treated with the general depolarizing agent, KCl.
The results of a one-way ANOVA are shown in Table 1
(F = 24.363;
P < 0.0001). Depolarization with KCl ± TTX
(analysis indicated that no significant difference existed between
cultures treated with KCl ± TTX; thus, these two groups were
combined for subsequent analysis) produced a dramatic decrease in LHRH
mRNA levels, depressing the mean OD/cell to 9507 ± 360.
Consistent with the ANOVA, the KS test indicated that KCl-induced
depolarization significantly decreased the proportion of neurons
exhibiting intense labeling with respect to controls (MD = 0.46
for n1 = 1550 and n2 = 1287 P
< 0.0001). Although the effect of the two depolarizing stimuli was
similar, LHRH mRNA levels in the KCl group were significantly lower
than those of the muscimol group (MD = 0.20 for n1 =
1287 and n2 = 367; P < 0.0001).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibition of LHRH mRNA levels in olfactory explants
Inhibition of electrical activity by TTX increased LHRH mRNA
levels (14.4% above control mean value), indicating that LHRH gene
expression, in vitro, is repressed. GABAergic neurons,
hypothesized to supply the major inhibitory input to mature LHRH
neurons (2), are also present during prenatal development in nasal
regions in vivo (27, 32) and in nasal explants in
vitro (27). However, whether GABAergic activity is coupled to
down-regulation of LHRH gene expression in embryonic LHRH neurons, and
thus could account for the change in LHRH mRNA levels recorded after
TTX treatment, was unknown. In this report, increases in LHRH mRNA
levels (21% above control mean value) were found after treatment of
embryonic olfactory explants with the GABAA receptor
antagonists, bicuculline or picrotoxin. Statistically, although the
overall frequency distributions of the TTX-treated group and
antagonist-treated groups were different, the mean mRNA OD levels were
not. These results indicate that down-regulation of LHRH mRNA levels in
LHRH neurons maintained in control is likely to be due to GABAergic
signals. Consistent with this premise, muscimol treatment reduced LHRH
mRNA levels; exogenous application of muscimol significantly reduced
LHRH mRNA levels from those measured in LHRH neurons in cultures grown
in SFM alone (21% below control mean value).
GABAergic modulation of LHRH mRNA levels
In the current study, muscimol treatment resulted in a
decrease in LHRH mRNA levels, a response that might have been predicted
for postnatal LHRH neurons, where GABA appears inhibitory. On mature
LHRH neurons, GABAergic synapses are present (19, 20) and inhibitory
responses to GABA have been observed at both the level of LHRH mRNA
(12, 13, 14, 15) and LHRH secretion (for review, see Ref. 4; 2, 16, 17).
However, prenatally GABA can cause excitation of a postsynaptic cell
due to an immature chloride equilibrium (27, 33, 34, 35). Indeed, in nasal
explants, GABA is known to depolarize LHRH neurons (27). Terasawa
et al. (36) have shown that depolarization triggers LHRH
secretion from LHRH neurons in olfactory explants. Certainly, the
secretory rate of a neuroendocrine peptide is generally coordinated
with its biosynthetic rate in a positive manner (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 37). Thus, an
agent responsible for depolarization and, presumably, neuropeptide
release may initiate a compensatory mechanism to replenish depleted
supplies of peptide, e.g. increased transcription and/or
translation. This was not observed in olfactory explants following
muscimol treatment. Thus, the alterations in LHRH mRNA levels observed
after perturbation of GABAergic signals may have resulted from 1) an
autocrine mechanism, whereby secretion from LHRH neurons down-regulates
LHRH mRNA and/or 2) a mature GABA receptor intracellular signaling
pathway(s) that is linked to LHRH gene expression/mRNA turnover.
Secretion-coupled mechanisms
To examine the interplay between depolarization/secretion and mRNA
levels in LHRH neurons, cultures were treated with the general
depolarizing agent, KCl. KCl treatment, like muscimol treatment,
depressed LHRH mRNA levels. Thus, a second depolarizing agent produced
a down-regulation of LHRH mRNA levels, though the decrease observed
after KCl treatment was greater than that measured after muscimol
treatment (26% below muscimol mean value; 38% lower than control
values). Although a strong stimulus, it is unlikely that KCl
depolarization augmented GABA release and increased the endogenous GABA
concentration beyond that which was obtained by exogenous application
of muscimol. Several other possibilities exist for the observed
augmented decrease in LHRH mRNA levels after KCl treatment.
KCl treatment may have caused an autocrine response via release of: 1) LHRH, which negatively regulates its own gene expression, and/or 2) another modulatory neuropeptide coexpressed in LHRH neurons, which through feedback mechanisms results in down-regulation of LHRH gene expression. In support of the possibility that LHRH transcription is down-regulated (or degradation of LHRH mRNA altered) as a consequence of LHRH secretion, it has been shown that GT1 cells express autoreceptors (38). Upon exposure to LHRH agonist, these cells exhibit a transient elevation of LHRH release, followed by suppressed basal secretion (38). In addition, in immortalized LHRH cells, rapid stimulation of LHRH release by secretagogues (forskolin, ionomycin and PMA) depresses LHRH mRNA (39), suggesting that negative feedback in these cells occurs, at least in part, at the level of transcription and/or posttranscriptional modification. During development, primary LHRH neurons may regulate a secretory response using a similar mechanism; autoregulation would result in repression/down-regulation of LHRH gene expression and possibly, an inhibition of additional secretion. However, an obstacle to the acceptance of negative autoregulation as an explanation for mRNA repression is that the presence of LHRH receptor mRNA in primary LHRH neurons has yet to be documented (personal observation, S. Wray).
Certainly, release of other modulatory neuropeptide(s) from LHRH neurons could feedback to inhibit LHRH transcription. To date, only a few substances have been colocalized in LHRH neurons; including delta sleep-inducing peptide (40, 41), GABA (32), NPY (42), and galanin (43, 44). Of these three substances, only galanin is known to be colocalized in LHRH neurons in nasal regions (45) and in CNS (43, 44). Whether galanin (or another colocalized substance) participates in the regulation of LHRH gene expression in prenatal LHRH neurons is currently unknown.
In addition to secretion from LHRH neurons, KCl treatment may have
caused release of an unidentified molecule from non-LHRH neurons, or
may have resulted in desensitization of LHRH neurons, either of which
could have down-regulated LHRH gene expression. Alternatively, KCl
depolarization may have induced changes in GABAA receptor
subunit composition or expression level in LHRH neurons. KCl
depolarization up-regulates acetylcholine receptor subunits in
sympathetic neurons, resulting in more ligand binding sites (46), and
increases transcription of genes encoding NMDAR2A subunit mRNA (47), as
well as
1 and
5 GABAA receptor subunits (48) in
cerebellar granular cells. Further studies are needed to determine
whether a similar phenomenon occurs with respect to a GABAA
receptor subunit(s) in LHRH neurons. However, changes in the
GABAA receptor subunit composition or expression level,
together with KCl-induced release of GABA, could appear as an increased
activation of GABAA receptors/GABA concentration and thus
an enhanced response (lower LHRH mRNA levels) as compared with
muscimol.
Mature GABAA receptor signaling-coupled mechanisms
Although excitatory (causing depolarization), the action of
GABA on embryonic LHRH mRNA levels is negative, similar to the response
predicted for mature LHRH neurons. This suggests that the signal
transduction mechanism for the GABAA receptor may be
appropriately coupled to transcriptional/RNA stability regulation
shortly after differentiation of the LHRH neuronal phenotype. It is
clear that the molecular and pharmacological properties of
GABAA receptors vary with receptor subunit composition.
Relatively few subunit combinations make up a large fraction of the
GABAA receptors found in the CNS; one of the prevalent
combinations appears to be composed of
1, ß2/3 and
2 (49).
While studies by Petersen et al. (50) demonstrated that
postnatal LHRH neurons have the capacity to synthesize ß3
GABAA receptor subunit, they were unable to demonstrate the
1 or ß2 receptor subunit in postnatal LHRH cells, suggesting a
rather unique subunit combination. To date, the GABAA
receptor subunit composition in prenatal LHRH cells is unknown.
However, our laboratory has not detected the presence of the
1
subunit in LHRH neurons maintained in nasal explants (personal
observation, S. Wray), a result that is in agreement with that reported
for postnatal LHRH neurons. Thus, although far from complete, the
composition the GABAA receptor in prenatal LHRH neurons is
consistent with the premise that this receptor, its signal transduction
machinery and transcriptional/RNA stability regulation are
appropriately coupled early in LHRH neuronal development.
The importance of altering LHRH neuropeptide levels in neurons outside the CNS remains to be determined. Recently, it was shown that modifying GABAergic activity alters the distance LHRH neurons migrate in mouse olfactory explants, with the GABAA receptor agonist, muscimol, inhibiting LHRH cell movement (51). No differences were observed in LHRH cell survival or morphology. It was proposed (51) that GABAergic signals provided a migratory stop signal for LHRH neurons, thereby regulating their entrance into the CNS. The results of the present study provide evidence that GABA also represses LHRH mRNA levels. Thus, it appears that developmentally, LHRH transcription/RNA stability may be linked to migratory behavior via functional GABAA receptors.
In summary, this study demonstrates that embryonic LHRH neurons outside of the CNS are competent to regulate gene expression in response to neuronal activity, with GABAergic signaling, via GABAA receptors, inducing down-regulation of LHRH gene expression. In addition, the studies described in this investigation indicate that nasal explants provide an alternative model in which, isolated from many of the complexities encountered in the postnatal in vivo milieu, gene expression in primary LHRH neurons can be examined.
Received December 3, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Aminobutyric acid is an inhibitory neurotransmitter restricting the
release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone before the onset of
puberty. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:395399
-o120-one on gonadotrophin-releasing
hormone gene expression in the male rat. Eur J Pharm 260:157162[CrossRef][Medline]
7 by membrane
depolarization through a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
kinase pathway. J Neurosci 15:79667978[Abstract]
1 and
5 GABAA receptor
subunits. Mol Brain Res 28:338342[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Terasawa and D. L. Fernandez Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Onset of Puberty in Primates Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2001; 22(1): 111 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Moore Jr. and S. Wray Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Biosynthesis and Secretion in Embryonic LHRH Neurons Endocrinology, December 1, 2000; 141(12): 4486 - 4495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Kramer, R. Krishnamurthy, P. J. Mitchell, and S. Wray Transcription Factor Activator Protein-2 Is Required for Continued Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Expression in the Forebrain of Developing Mice Endocrinology, May 1, 2000; 141(5): 1823 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Terasawa, K. L. Keen, K. Mogi, and P. Claude Pulsatile Release of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) in Cultured LHRH Neurons Derived from the Embryonic Olfactory Placode of the Rhesus Monkey Endocrinology, March 1, 1999; 140(3): 1432 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |