help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehls, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehls, O.
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 7 3296-3305
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Dexamethasone Impairs Growth Hormone (GH)-Stimulated Growth by Suppression of Local Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I Production and Expression of GH- and IGF-I-Receptor in Cultured Rat Chondrocytes1

Christian Jux2, Kathrin Leiber, Ulrike Hügel, Werner Blum, Claes Ohlsson, Günter Klaus and Otto Mehls

From the Departments of Pediatrics (C.J., K.L., U.H., O.M.), University Children’s Hospitals, Heidelberg, D-69120 Giessen (W.B.), D-35392, Marburg (G.K.), D-35033, Germany; and Research Center of Endocrinology and Metabolism (C.O.), Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden S-41345

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Dr. O. Mehls, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children’s Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 150, D-69120 Germany.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Growth depression as a side effect of glucocorticoid therapy in childhood is partially mediated by alterations of the somatotropic hormone axis. The mechanisms of interaction between glucocorticoids and somatotropic hormones on the cellular and molecular level are poorly understood.

In an experimental model of primary cultured rat growth plate chondrocytes, basal as well as GH (40 ng/ml) or insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I (60 ng/ml)-stimulated growth was suppressed dose dependently (10-12–10-7 M) by dexamethasone (Dexa). An IGF-I antibody specifically and dose dependently inhibited the GH- but not the basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-stimulated cell proliferation. GH increased the IGF-I concentration in conditioned serum-free culture medium; this was reversed by concomitant Dexa. Dexa time dependently suppressed the transcription of GH receptor (GHR) messenger RNA (mRNA) and down-regulated the basal and GH-stimulated expression of GHR. Whereas no suppressive effect on basal type I IGF-receptor (IGFR) was observed, Dexa blocked the IGF-I induced increase of IGF binding. These results were confirmed by GHR and IGFR immunostaining.

We conclude that Dexa impairs the GH-induced stimulation of local secretion and paracrine action of IGF-I and reduces the homologous increase of IGFR and GHR expression. The above experiments give further insight on the interaction between GH and glucocorticoids on the cellular and molecular level of growth plate chondrocytes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IMPAIRMENT of growth has been a well-known side effect of long-term high-dose glucocorticoid medication in childhood since its introduction as antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive therapy (1). More recent evidence indicates that this side effect is partially mediated by multiple alterations of the somatotropic hormone axis (for review, see Ref. 2). Long-term high-dose glucocorticoids alter GH pulsatility and decrease GH secretion from the hypophysis through an elevation of hypothalamic somatostatin tone in both experimental animals (3) and humans (4). In the liver, GHR expression is diminished with glucocorticoids as evidenced by GHR mRNA and GH binding studies in rats (5) and GH-binding protein (GHBP) activity in corticosteroid-treated patients (6). While there is convincing experimental evidence that Dexamethasone (Dexa) treatment reduces GH-dependent IGF-I mRNA levels in the liver (7), the influence of glucocorticoids on circulating IGF-I is less consistent. In fact, plasma IGF-I levels were found normal or slightly elevated in glucocorticoid-treated patients and in those with endogenous glucocorticoid excess (8, 9).

Longitudinal bone and total body growth is based on chondrocyte proliferation and subsequent enchondral ossification in the epiphyseal growth plates. Dexa has been shown to act locally to inhibit longitudinal bone growth (10). The finding that some children with growth failure due to chronic glucocorticoid therapy have normal GH and IGF-I levels points at the possibility of end-organ insensitivity for GH and IGF-I. This is in line with the therapeutic strategy to overcome local somatotropic insensitivity with GH in supraphysiological doses as proven in animal experiments and defined clinical settings (2, 3, 8, 11, 12).

It is, however, difficult to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms of interaction between glucocorticoids and somatotropic hormones in vivo. The aim of this study was to describe and further investigate the phenomenon of glucocorticoid-induced growth depression and its underlying mechanisms at the cellular level of the growth cartilage using an in vitro approach with cultured rat growth plate chondrocytes.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recombinant human (rh) GH was kindly provided by Pharmacia & Upjohn (Stockholm, Sweden); rhIGF-I, the polyclonal antibody against IGF-I (Ab-1/anti-hl-hIGF-I rabbit, antiserum AS 79; 250 µg/ml, final concentration 1.25 µg/ml medium) and radiolabeled IGFR-monoclonal antibody (mAb) ([125I]-{alpha}IR3) were purchased from Immundiagnostik (Bensheim, Germany); [125I]-hGH was a gift from Novo Nordisk (Gentofte, Denmark), [3H]-thymidine (25 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Buchler (Braunschweig, Germany); Dexa, BSA, and ovine PRL (oPRL) were from Sigma Chemical Co. (Munich, Germany), clostridium collagenase (EC 3.4.24.3), Deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I (EC 3.1.21.1) and trypan blue from Boehringer (Mannheim, Germany); the GHR-mAb (mAb 263) was purchased from Amgen (Brisbaine, Australia); standard low and low gel temperature (LGT) agarose were from Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA); FCS, PBS, HEPES, penicillin-streptomycin, Ham’s F-12 and DMEM were obtained from Seromed (Berlin, Germany), charcoal from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany), and Ultroser G from Life Technologies (Paisley, UK). Ultroser is a biochemically defined serum substitute containing various growth factors, nucleosides, vitamins, and lipids in BSA. It contained neither Dexa nor GH (Seromed, personal communication and own determinations). It contained IGF-I in a low concentration leading to a final concentration of 0.52 ng/ml in the incubation medium. Insulin was measured using a human ELISA with high bovine cross-reactivity (no. K6219, Dako A/S, Denmark) at concentrations of 0.55 mU/liter or less in various preparations of culture medium.

IGFR antibody, {alpha}IR3, and GHR antibody, mAb 263, are monoclonal mouse antibodies reactive against rabbit, rat, human and other species and characterized elsewhere (13, 14).

Cell culture
Isolation of chondrocytes.Epiphyseal chondrocytes from 60- to 80-g Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River, Kieslegg, Germany) were isolated and cultured as described previously (15). Pooled microscopically dissected epiphyses of 5–10 animals were digested for 3 h at 37 C by clostridial collagenase (0.12% wt/vol) and 0.02% (wt/vol) bacterial DNase in F-12 medium. Viability, determined after isolation and at the end of each experiment by the trypan blue exclusion technique, always exceeded 90%. Dissociated cells were counted using a Neubauer chamber (Scheik, Hofheim, Germany).

Monolayer cultures.Cells were cultured as described earlier (15, 16, 17) in 35-mm plastic dishes (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) for growth curves and determination of local IGF-I synthesis, in 96-well plates for proliferation assays and in 24-well plates (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) for binding studies. The F-12/DMEM:1/1 medium contained a nominal calcium concentration of 1.2 mM, measured by ion-sensitive electrode (Fresenius EH-F, Oberursel, Germany); it was supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% FCS at 37 C, and was gassed in humidified air with 5% CO2. In previous studies using the same culture system, we demonstrated maintenance of cellular differentiation state under these conditions. With prolonged culture periods, cells differentiated and mineralization of the matrix occurred (18). Medium and added hormones or vehicles were changed every other day unless indicated otherwise. Peptide hormones were dissolved in PBS, Dexa in ethanol (0.05% final concentration).

Agarose-stabilized suspension cultures.Cells were cultured in agarose according to Benya and Schaffer (16) as described earlier (15, 16, 17) in 35-mm dishes (Falcon Plastics). Dishes precoated with 1% standard low agarose in water were filled with cell suspension (40,000 cells/ml in 0.5% low gel temperature agarose) and kept at 37 C for 10 min before gelation at 4 C (10 min). Subsequently, 1 ml of F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA, 0.3% UltroserG, and hormones or solvents as indicated were added. The serum substitute Ultroser had to be used because no colony formation was achieved despite maintained vitality of the cells when chondrocytes were cultured in serum-free medium, i.e. in the absence of growth factors. Medium was changed every other day, and cells were cultured for 3 weeks. Cultures were screened for clusters of more than three cells. No such clusters were seen at the start of culture in any experiment.

Assays of chondrocyte growth and proliferation in monolayer cultures
Growth curves.Cells were seeded at 5000 cells/cm2 in parallel cultures and starved in serum-free medium (F-12/DMEM) for 24 h. On day 1, medium was changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and 0.3% UltroserG for experiments employing GH or IGF-I. Cells were counted on day 1 and every 2–3 days thereafter. Charcoal-stripped FCS (Ch-FCS) at a concentration of 10% was used for dose-response experiments with Dexa. According to our measurements, cortisol concentration in FCS (50 pg/ml) was reliably reduced to below 10 pg/ml (detection limit) by charcoal absorption (Ch-FCS).

Clonal assay.Suspension cultures were terminated after 21 days by fixation in 4% buffered formaldehyde and methanol. Colonies were counted under the microscope in 100 squares (2-mm grid) for each dish. A cell colony was defined as a cluster of four cells or more with matrix stained by alcian blue as previously described (15, 20).

[3H]-thymidine assay.Incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA was determined in parallel cultures as uptake of radioactivity in trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material as described previously (15, 16). Before the experiment, cells were starved in serum-free F-12/DMEM for 24 h. Synchronization of cell cycle was proven by flow cytometric analysis (FACS) as described previously (15). Medium was changed to F-12/DMEM with 0.2% BSA, and hormones and solvents were added as indicated for 48 h. For the last 3 h, cultures were coincubated with 2 µCi of [3H]-thymidine.

IGF-I RIA. IGF-I concentrations were measured in conditioned medium of subconfluent, synchronized serum-free cultures (0.2% BSA) using a highly sensitive (0.02 ng/ml), specific IGF binding protein (IGFBP) blocked RIA (21). In brief, the culture medium (100 µl/tube) was acidified with 10 µl of 0.5 mol/liter phosphoric acid to dissociate IGFs from IGFBPs. The first antibody (rabbit-antihuman IGF-I) was dissolved in a 0.1 mol/liter sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.8, capable of reneutralizing the acidified sample. In addition, this solution contained a large excess of hIGF-II to preoccupy the binding proteins. Thus, IGF-I can readily be measured by conventional RIA without interference from the IGFBPs.

Receptor binding studies
GH- and IGF-I-binding.rhGH and mAb {alpha}IR3 were radiolabeled using an iodogen method (22) to specific activities between 2.6 and 3.1 MBq/µg ([125I]-hGH) and 1.25 MBq/µg for [125I]-{alpha}IR3, respectively, purified by PAGE (23) immediately after iodination and again 1 day before the experiments by gel filtration (G-25) on a PD-10 column (Pharmacia). Confluent cultures were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Hormones or solvents were added in medium supplemented with 0.2% BSA for 24 or 48 h as indicated. Thereafter, cells were washed with PBS containing 1% BSA (pH 7.38) and then incubated with increasing amounts of [125I]-hGH (0.2 to 1.2 nmol/liter) or [125I]-{alpha}IR3 (0.05 to 1.5 nmol/liter) in PBS containing 1% BSA for 4 h at 24 C (GHR) or 1 h at 4 C (IGFR). After the incubation period, cells were washed three times thoroughly with ice-cold PBS and then solubilized in 1 N NaOH for determination of radioactivity. Saturation analysis was performed according to Scatchard (24). Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total binding in the absence and unspecific binding in the presence of 800-fold molar excess of unlabeled GH or 50-fold molar excess of {alpha}IR3, respectively. All determinations were carried out in duplicate or triplicate as indicated.

Immunocytochemistry.Cells were cultured on glass slides in parallel and under the same conditions as for the binding studies (25). After incubating for 48 h with hormones or solvent as indicated, cultures were rinsed thoroughly three times with PBS and fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyd (10 min at 4 C), methanol (3 min at -20 C), and acetone/3% H2O2 (1 min at -20 C). Slides were preincubated with diluted horse serum (1:100 in PBS for 30 min), followed by incubation after three washes in PBS with the primary antibodies ({alpha}IR3; mg/ml diluted 1:200 in PBS-1%BSA) or mAb 263 (mg/ml diluted 1:200) for 24 h at 4 C in a humidified chamber with or without 40-fold molar excess of unlabeled hormone. The following steps were performed at room temperature. After rinsing three times in PBS-1%BSA, the fixed cells were incubated for staining with a biotinylated rabbit antimouse secondary antibody (1:400, no. E0413, DAKO A/S, Denmark) for 30 min. After further washing steps, an incubation for 1 h with streptavidine (1:400 in PBS-1%BSA, no. P0397, DAKO A/S, Denmark) followed. Finally, after another wash DAB 0.05% (wt/vol) + 0.1% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxidase in PBS (Sigma, no. D5905, Deisenhofen, Germany) was added for 20 min and cell cultures were mounted in aquatex (Merck, no. 8562, Darmstadt, Germany). In part of the experiments, nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 min. Negative controls showed no specific staining when the primary antibody was omitted or replaced by unspecific mouse IgG.

Ribonuclease (RNase)-protection solution-hybridization assay. Total nucleic acid (TNA) for the RNase-protection solution-hybridization assay was prepared by briefly homogenizing harvested cells with a sonifier (Branson Cell Disrupter B 15, Danbury, CT) in a buffer containing 1% (wt/vol) SDS, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 4 mM EDTA. Then, the homogenate was digested by an overnight proteinase-K treatment, and the TNA was prepared by a subsequent phenol-chloroform extraction according to Durnam and Palmiter (26).

The RNase-protection solution-hybridization assay was carried out according to the protocol described by Methews et al. (27). An antisense GHR [35S]-UTP-labeled RNA was synthesized from an EcoRI linearized pT7T3 18U plasmid carrying a 560 bp BamHI fragment of the rat GHR complementary DNA (28). The GHR complementary DNA fragment corresponds to a part of the extracellular domain of the GHR. Protected hybrids were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, collected on glassfiber filters, and counted in a scintillation counter. The signal was compared with a standard curve obtained by hybridization to known amounts of GHR mRNA. The intraassay coefficient of variation was less than 10% in the range of 50–2500 amol RNA standard. The results were correlated to the DNA content as measured according to the method of Labarca and Paigen (29).

Statistics
Data are given as mean ± SE unless stated otherwise. In each analysis, the distribution mode was evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For comparison of two normally distributed groups, two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t tests and for more than two groups one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise multiple comparison (Student-Newman-Keuls method) were performed. For nonparametrically distributed data, Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by all pairwise comparisons (Dunn’s method) were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNA synthesis and cell growth (Figs. 1Go and 2Go; Table 1Go)
The effects and interaction of Dexa and GH as well as IGF-I on [3H]-thymidine incorporation are shown in Table 1Go. Due to baseline variations in the data representing 8 individual experiments, results are expressed in percentage over solvent control in serum-free medium. GH at 40 ng/ml and IGF-I at 60 ng/ml, respectively, were determined as maximal stimulatory hormone concentrations in preliminary dose-response studies (data not shown) and used in all subsequent experiments if not indicated otherwise. While Dexa 10-7 M significantly reduced basal thymidine incorporation to 80 ± 5% (P < 0.02), GH and IGF-I stimulated DNA synthesis to a similar extent. Given concomitantly, Dexa significantly reduced the effects of GH and IGF-I in comparison to solvent control by 45 ± 3% and 54 ± 3%, respectively (P < 0.001) (Table 1AGo). When GH was added concomitantly to a constant concentration of Dexa (10-7 M), the negative effect of Dexa on DNA synthesis was dose dependently compensated (Table 1BGo).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of Dexa, GH, and IGF-I or their combinations on chondrocyte growth curves. Cells were seeded in 35-mm dishes and starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and 0.3% Ultroser plus hormones and solvent as indicated. Medium and effectors were changed every other day. Cell counts were determined using a Neubauer chamber on day 1 after synchronization and at the timepoints indicated thereafter. Data are mean ± SE of four parallel dishes per group and day. Statistics (pertain to endpoints) by ANOVA. *, P < 0.001 vs. control, **, P < 0.001 vs. Dexa and GH; ***, P < 0.001 vs. control, Dexa and IGF-I alone.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. IGF-I polyclonal antibody (Ab) inhibits GH-stimulated cell proliferation. a, [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Subconfluent chondrocytes were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and hormones or solvent ± IGF-I Ab (1.25 µg/ml) were added for 48 h as indicated. [3H]-thymidine incorporation was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are mean ± SE of 10 parallel dishes per group. Statistics by ANOVA. *, P < 0.001 vs. GH alone; **, P < 0.001 vs. control, n.s. = not significant vs. hormone or control alone, respectively. b, Dose-response growth curves. Cells were seeded in 35-mm dishes and starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and 0.3% Ultroser plus hormones and IGF-I Ab or solvent as indicated. Medium and effectors were changed every other day. Cell counts were determined using a Neubauer chamber on day 1 after synchronization and at the timepoints indicated thereafter. Data are mean ± SE of four parallel dishes per group and day. Statistics (pertain to endpoints) by ANOVA. *, P < 0.02 vs. control; **, P < 0.001 vs. control; n.s. = not significant vs. control

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of dexamethasone, GH, and IGF-I or their combinations on [3H]thymidine incorporation

 
These short-term effects were paralleled by cell growth curves over two weeks. Dexa reduced growth of the chondrocytes dose dependently when grown in Ch-FCS [control 788 ± 45 x 103 cells/dish ( = 100%); Dexa (10-12 M) 84 ± 7% (P < 0.001); Dexa (10-9 M) 63 ± 1%; Dexa (10-7 M) 43 ± 2%]. It is of note that, even under the high dosage of Dexa, chondrocytes maintained viability, continued to grow, and did not exhibit any increase in morphological signs of apoptosis as shown by electron microscopy of parallel cultures (data not given).

When using serum-free BSA medium supplemented with 0.3% Ultroser, GH (40 ng/ml) substantially increased the number of growth plate chondrocytes (Fig. 1aGo). Coincubation with Dexa (10-7 M) prevented this increase. Likewise, IGF-I (60 ng/ml) increased significantly the number of cells after 2 weeks (Fig. 1bGo). Again, coincubation with Dexa reduced this effect. In each set of experiments, the extent of growth inhibition caused by Dexa was comparable, regardless of whether it was added to a control or a group stimulated by GH or IGF-I.

Experiments with suspension cultures confirmed the described interaction of Dexa with IGF-I and GH on chondrocyte proliferation. The number of colonies containing four or more cells was elevated after 3 weeks under GH (40 ng/ml) and IGF-I (60 ng/ml) to 332 ± 14% and 632 ± 30%, respectively, of the control group (100 ± 16%, P < 0.001) but was significantly lower when coincubated with Dexa (10-7 M): 212 ± 28% of solvent control (GH + Dexa) and 500 ± 8% (IGF-I + Dexa), respectively (P < 0.005 vs. GH or IGF-I alone).

To examine a possible role of local IGF-I production in the GH-stimulated chondrocyte cultures, [3H]-thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation was studied in the presence of a polyclonal IGF-I antibody, Ab-1, which had no intrinsic influence on basal [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Ab-1 (1.25 µg/ml) completely blocked the GH stimulated DNA-synthesis (Fig. 2aGo), and when added in concentrations of 0.3–3 µg/ml, the IGF-I antibody dose dependently reduced GH-driven cell proliferation to control levels (Fig. 2bGo). This effect was specific for both GH and the Ab-1 because an unspecific mouse Ab did not interfere with GH driven cell proliferation, nor did the Ab-1 inhibit the basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) stimulated DNA synthesis (Fig. 2aGo).

Local IGF-I secretion (Fig. 3Go)
Local IGF-I concentration was measured in the supernatant of serum-free culture medium using a specific IGFBP-blocked RIA (Fig. 3Go). Incubation with GH was followed by an increase in local IGF-I concentration to 140 ± 1% of baseline levels after 24 h. While GH led to a further increase of 191 ± 13% after 48 h (control 100 ± 18% = 2.5–3.5 ng/ml in various assays, P < 0.05), this increase was totally blocked by Dexa 10-7 M (84 ± 5% vs. control). Dexa also inhibited basal IGF-I production (77 ± 3%, P < 0.001).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Influence of GH and Dexa on local IGF-I secretion. (Specific IGF-I RIA measurements in cell culture supernatants). Subconfluent cultures were washed thoroughly three times and starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and hormones or solvents for 24 or 48 h as indicated. IGF-I was determined in the supernatant thereafter using a specific RIA as described in Materials and Methods. Data are mean ± SE of three parallel dishes per group. Statistics by ANOVA. *, P < 0.05 vs. control; **, P < 0.001 vs. control; ***, P < 0.05 vs. Dexa and P < 0.001 vs. GH alone.

 
Regulation of GH and IGF-I receptors (Figs. 4Go, 5Go, and 6Go; Tables 2Go and 3Go)
GH (40 ng/ml) led to an increased expression of its own receptor to 179% of the control levels. Incubation of cultures with IGF-I (60 ng/ml) did not influence GH binding, nor did the IGF-I antibody prevent the GH stimulated rise of GH binding (data not given).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Regulation of GH receptor by GH and Dexa. The experiment was conducted as described in the legend of Table 2Go and in Materials and Methods. Binding curves (left), Saturation of specific binding as a function of free [125I]GH. Scatchard plot (right), Dexa counteracts the up-regulation of specific binding capacity Nmax. (intercept on the abscissa) seen with GH treatment. No change in receptor binding affinity KD (slope).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Regulation of type I IGF receptor by IGF-I and Dexa. The experiment was conducted as described in the legend of Table 3Go and in Materials and Methods. Binding curves (left), Saturation of specific binding as a function of free [125I] {alpha}IR3. Scatchard plot (right), Dexa inhibited the up-regulation of specific binding capacity Nmax (intercept on the abscissa) seen with IGF-I treatment but showed no effect on basal IGF-I binding. No change in receptor binding affinity KD (slope).

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunocytochemical demonstration of GH receptor. Regulation by GH (40 ng/ml) and Dexa (10-7 M). Intensive staining of GHR induced by GH was prevented by concomitant incubation with Dexa. Cell were cultured on glass slides and under the same conditions employed for binding studies. Confluent chondrocytes were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and hormones and solvent were added for 48 h as indicated. Cells were rinsed thoroughly thereafter, fixed, and immunostained as described in Materials and Methods using the monoclonal GH receptor antibody, mAb 263.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Regulation of GH receptor by GH and dexamethasone

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Regulation of type I IGF receptor by IGF and dexamethasone, dependence on transcription

 
High-dose Dexa (10-7 M) suppressed the GH receptor number as determined by [125I]-GH binding studies (Table 2Go). Furthermore, Dexa counteracted the GH stimulated rise when added concomitantly and decreased the GH stimulated amount of binding by 52% (Fig. 4Go). The apparent dissociation constants (KD) were comparable in all groups. In contrast to an excess of unlabeled GH, which depressed total radioligand binding to around 18% (unspecific binding), oPRL in the same molar excess displaced only less than 10% of GH binding.

IGF-I treatment of chondrocyte cultures resulted in a 3-fold increase of [125I]-{alpha}IR3-binding. As shown in Table 3Go, actinomycin D (2 µg/ml), which did not affect basal IGFR expression, obliterated the increase in Nmax seen with IGF-I treatment. Dexa (10-7 M) had no influence on IGFR binding on its own but completely blocked the IGF-I-stimulated rise in IGFR (Fig. 5Go).

Immunocytochemical staining confirmed these regulatory mechanisms. The pattern of immunostaining between the groups indicated an increase of the fraction of IGFR-positive cells (i.e. proportion of receptor-positive cells per culture) by IGF-I and a rise of receptor number per positive cell (i.e. higher intensity of staining on cells). GH (40 ng/ml) induced higher intensitiy of GHR staining compared with controls. Again, coincubation with Dexa decreased the GH-induced GHR staining (Fig. 6Go).

Regulation of GH receptor gene transcription (Fig. 7Go)
The time dependence of the Dexa (10-7 M) mediated decrease of GHR mRNA is shown in Fig. 7Go. A significant reduction of GHR mRNA was observed after 4 h (68 ± 2% vs. a control value of 100 ± 10% in controls, P < 0.005) and decreased further after 24 h of incubation (31 ± 1% of control). In a separate set of experiments, GHR mRNA transcription increased nearly 4-fold in cultures treated with GH for 24 h (5.14 ± 0.06 amol/µg DNA vs. a control value of 1.33 ± 0.06 amol/µg DNA, P < 0.001). Concomitant incubation with GH and Dexa for the same period of time slowed down the GHR mRNA transcription rate to 4.45 ± 0.11 amol/µg DNA (P < 0.002 vs. GH alone).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. RNase-protection solution-hybridization assay. Time-dependent down-regulation of GH receptor mRNA by Dexa (10-7 M). Confluent chondrocytes were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h. Medium was then changed to F-12/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA and Dexa 10-7 M or solvent were added for the time indicated. Thereafter, TNA was prepared and mRNA levels encoding the GH receptor were quantified using a solution-hybridization RNAse-protection assay as described in Materials and Methods. Results are mean ± SE and are expressed as amol/µg DNA of two pooled experiments with data points in triplicates. Statistics by ANOVA. *, P < 0.005 vs. all treatment groups.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we demonstrate that Dexa down-regulates in a dose- and time-dependent manner the GH receptor mRNA expression and binding capacity in growth plate chondrocytes and inhibits the homologously induced increase of both, GHR and IGFR expression. Moreover, Dexa decreases the local production of IGF-I. These mechanisms may explain further our understanding of how glucocorticoids interfere with the physiological stimulation of epiphyseal chondrocyte proliferation exerted by GH and IGF-I.

In the present experiments, GH had a maximal effect on DNA synthesis and cell proliferation at a concentration of 40 ng/ml. GH induced a marked increase of local IGF-I production. Immunocytochemical staining for IGF-I exhibited clusters of pericellular IGF-I immunoreactivity, which was most intense in areas where chondrocytes grew particularly dense (unpublished observation). This observation provides evidence that GH, at least in our culture system, stimulates chondrocyte growth primarily via endogenous IGF-I synthesis. GH was shown to stimulate undifferentiated chondrocytes in the reserve zone of rat epiphyseal plates (30) and to induce IGF-I mRNA in the proliferative zone (31, 32). In our cell system, most chondrocytes correspond to proliferative chondrocytes (18), paralleling the effect in the above in vivo studies.

The production of IGF-I in growth plate chondrocytes has been questioned until recently (33, 34). As evidenced by both specific dose-dependent blockage of GH-driven cell proliferation with an IGF-I Ab and direct measurements of IGF-I secreted into the supernatant of GH conditioned serum-free cultures, our results clearly argue against these reports and correspond to findings in human fibroblasts (35), rat skeletal cells (36), and to work by Brenner et al. (37) in which the proliferative action of GH on cultured fetal costal and articular chondrocytes was completely blocked by a type I IGFR mAb. IGF-I concentrations in the intercellular space of growth plate cartilage have not yet been determined. Given the fact that the measured IGF-I concentrations in conditioned serum-free medium of chondrocyte monolayers corresponded to 5–20% of the usual IGF-I serum concentration of prepubertal children (38), the locally synthesized amounts may well be of physiological relevance.

Dexa dose dependently reduced DNA synthesis and proliferation as shown by short-term [3H]-thymidine incorporation, cell growth curves in monolayer cultures (12 days) and agarose suspension cultures (3 weeks), which preserve the morphological character and three-dimensional structure of cartilage particularly well (19, 21, 39). Furthermore, high-dose Dexa (10-7 M) reduced the GH or IGF-I stimulated cell proliferation. The observed marked inhibition of local IGF-I production by Dexa after GH stimulation in serum-free cultures provides a possible mechanism by which Dexa impairs GH stimulated cell proliferation. This view is in line with the observation that cortisol decreased IGF-I mRNA in human osteoblast-like cells (40).

GH stimulated the expression of the GHR within 48 h. We could largely exclude the possibility that the GH induced increase of GHR is mediated via IGF-I as reported by Leung et al. for osteoblasts (41) because incubation of cultures with IGF-I did not influence GH binding, nor did the Ab-1 prevent the GH stimulated increase of GHR (unpublished observation). Divergent results have also been reported regarding homologous GHR regulation. Short-term (hours) GH treatment resulted in an acute decrease of GH binding in both cell culture (42, 43, 44) and in vivo experiments (45) of various tissues, most likely through endocytotic receptor internalization (46, 47). In contrast, an up-regulating effect has been shown for mid- and long-term GH treatment in rats, pigs, sheep, and other species (for review see Ref. 48). This phenomenon can be mimicked in vitro as reported for cultured hepatocytes (49), adipocytes (50), and in the present study for chondrocytes.

Heterologous (across species) binding studies, like the ones presented in our study, must principally be interpreted with caution because human GH ([125I]-rhGH) binds to both somatogenic and lactogenic binding sites in subprimate species. Nondisplacibility (<10%) of GH binding with excess oPRL as seen in all above described GHR assays served as control for the somatogenic origin of binding sites. The fact that no changes in binding affinity constants (KD) were observed indicates a single class of high affinity receptors and suggests that changes in binding capacity are due to an alteration of the average receptor number per cell rather than to a change in receptor affinity. Scatchard analysis cannot discriminate between the changing expression of the number of binding sites per cell and the changing number of cells expressing the receptor. However, immunocytochemistry of the GHR suggests that the regulation of binding is primarily due to a change of binding sites per cell.

Dexa exerted a dose-response effect in our experimental model. Incubation with low-dose Dexa (10-12 M) tended to increase the GHR number, suggesting that low (physiological) doses of glucocorticoids are required to maintain basal GHR expression, whereas (pharmacological) concentrations above 10-10 M decreased them. Furthermore, Dexa (10-7 M) reduced the positive effect of GH on GHR expression, but the number of binding sites remained above untreated control levels.

The influence of Dexa and GH on GHR status is obviously cell type specific and dependent on the respective culture conditions (e.g. pretreatment of cells, incubation periods, temperature at binding assay). Dexa has been reported to increase GH binding in human osteoblast cells (51) and osteosarcoma cells (52). In the latter study, the cells underwent binding to [125I]GH at room temperature over 24 h, certainly leading to internalization of a considerable amount of tracer, making it difficult to distinguish whether binding to cell surface receptors or receptor turnover was actually measured. Using serum-free incubation medium, our results showing a reduced expression of GHR under high-dose Dexa are consistent with a recent study performed on cultured fibroblasts (53). Similarly, in in vivo studies, Dexa induced a decrease of GHR expression in rat liver tissue (5).

In the present study, homologous increase of GHR expression was preceded by an increase of the GHR mRNA expression. The high transcriptional level of GHR mRNA (= 386% of control) in comparison to GHR protein binding (= 179% of control) may partially be explained by the fact that in the rat contrary to human physiology not all mRNA is translated to GH receptor protein, but GH-binding protein (GHBP) is also derived from alternative splicing of a common GHR/GHBP gene and mRNA precursor (54).

Dexa (10-7 M) time dependently reduced GHR gene transcription. Heinrichs et al. (55) reported in their in vivo experiments a biphasic dose-response on GHR mRNA levels with Dexa treatment. They found an increase of GHR mRNA in the liver and growth plates of young rabbits with low-dose but not with high-dose Dexa. Because GHR was not determined on the protein level, it remains unclear why the high dose of glucocorticoids did not result in reduced GHR mRNA transcription. In a detailed animal study, Gabrielsson et al. (5) could show that glucocorticoids (methylprednisolone 0.4 mg/day or Dexa 0.01 and 0.1 mg/day) over 12 days clearly decreased GHR mRNA levels and GH binding in both intact rats and in animals where the endogenous source of glucocorticoid production was removed by adrenalectomy (a model perhaps more comparable to our serum-free cell culture conditions).

Finally, we described the IGFR as a target of opposing interaction between Dexa and somatotropic stimulation. Dexa, which had no significant intrinsic influence on the IGFR, completely abolished the IGF-I induced expression of IGFR. While the first finding parallels an observation made recently by Conover et al. (56) in human fibroblasts, the latter adds an important element toward the aim to clarify the complex mechanisms of cellular interaction between glucocorticoids and somatotropic hormones.

All discussed experiments demonstrate that the action of GH is impaired by Dexa on the cellular level. It is of major interest to ask whether GH may be vice versa able to counterbalance the antiproliferative effects of Dexa. Most of the interaction experiments were performed with maximally effective doses of GH and Dexa; the results (for instance growth curves in Fig. 1Go) can be interpreted in both ways. When added to a fixed concentration of Dexa (10-7 M), GH dose dependently antagonized the glucocorticoid induced suppression of DNA synthesis (Table 1BGo). On the other hand, concomitant incubation with maximally effective doses of Dexa and GH did not result in a major increase of IGF-I concentration in the supernatant compared with incubation experiments with Dexa alone (Fig. 3Go). However, when GH was added to lower concentrations of Dexa (10-8 M–10-9 M), an increase of IGF-I concentration of about 50% of Dexa control was observed (data not given). These results are in line with observations in in vivo studies. In healthy and in uremic animals (3), the glucocorticoid induced growth failure was dose dependently and fully compensated by concomitant treatment with GH. Furthermore, in glucocorticoid-treated children with renal transplants and near normal renal function, growth failure was alleviated by concomitant treatment with rhGH (8).

In conclusion, we have described several mechanisms of interaction between GH and Dexa for growth cartilage cells. These mechanisms might explain how glucocorticoids impair the growth-stimulating effects of GH. The results may also stimulate further research on GH treatment of glucocorticoid induced growth failure.


    Acknowledgments
 
GH (rhGH) was kindly provided by Pharmacia & Upjohn (Stockholm, Sweden). Radioiodine labeled GH ([125I]-hGH) was a gift of Novo Nordisk (Gentofte, Denmark). We thank Dr. J. Grulich-Henn (University Children’s Hospital Heidelberg) for technical cooperation and Dr. J. Reichrath (Department of Dermatology, Saar University Homburg) for advice in immunocytochemistry.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-Kl-630/5–1). It was presented in part at the 10th International Congress of Endocrinology, June 12–15, 1996, San Francisco, California. Back

2 Recipient of a scholarship granted by the Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft (DFG). Back

Received November 18, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Blodgett FM, Burgin I, Iezzoni D, Gribetz D, Talbot NB 1956 Effects of prolonged cortisone therapy on the statual growth, skeletal maturation and metabolic status of children. N Engl J Med 254:636–641
  2. Tönshoff B, Jux C, Mehls O 1996 Glucocorticoids and growth. In: Kelnar CJH (ed) Baillière’s Clinical Paediatrics - International Practice and Research. WB Saunders, London, 4:2:309–332
  3. Kovacs G, Fine RF, Worgall S, Schaefer F, Hunzicker EB, Skottner-Lindun A, Mehls O 1991 Growth hormone prevents steroid-induced growth depression in health and uremia. Kidney Int 40:1032–1040[Medline]
  4. Wehrenberg WB, Janowski BA, Piering AW, Culler F, Jones KL 1990 Glucocorticoids: potent inhibitors and stimulators of growth hormone secretion. Endocrinology 126:3200–3203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gabrielsson BG, Carmignac DF, Flavell DM, Robinson ICAF 1995 Steroid regulation of growth hormone (GH) receptor and GH-binding protein messenger ribonucleic acids in the rat. Endocrinology 136:209–217[Abstract]
  6. Tönshoff B, Mehls O 1994 Use of rhGH post transplantation. In: Tejani AH, Fine RN (eds) Pediatric Renal Transplantation. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 441–459
  7. Luo J, Murphy LJ 1989 Dexamethasone inhibits growth hormone induction of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in hypophysectomized rats and reduces IGF-I abundance in the intact rat. Endocrinology 125:165–171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tönshoff B, Haffner D, Mehls O, Dietz M, Ruder H, Blum WF, Heinrich U, Stöver B 1993 Efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in short children with renal allografts: three year experience. Kidney Int 44:199–207[Medline]
  9. Bang P, Degerblad M, Thoren M, Schwander J, Blum W, Hall K 1993 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I and II and IGF binding protein (IGFBP) 1,2 and 3 in serum from patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 128:397–404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Baron J, Huang Z, Oerter KE, Bacher JD, Cutler GC 1992 Dexamethasone acts locally to inhibit longitudinal bone growth in rabbits. Am J Physiol 263:E489–E492
  11. Allen DB, Goldberg BD 1992 Stimulation of collagen synthesis and linear growth by growth hormone in glucocorticoid-treated children. Pediatrics 89:416–421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Butenandt O 1979 Rheumatoid arthritis and growth retardation in children: treatment with human growth hormone. Eur J Pediatr 130:15–28[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kull FC, Jacobs S, Su Y-S, Svoboda ME, vanWyk JJ, Cuatrecasas P 1983 Monoclonal antibodies to receptors for insulin and somatomedin-C. J Biol Chem 258:6561–6566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Barnard R, Bundesen PG, Rylatt DB, Waters MJ 1985 Evidence from the use of monoclonal antibody probes for structural heterogeneity of the GH receptor. Biochem J 231:459–468[Medline]
  15. Klaus G, von Eichel B, May T, Hügel U, Meyer H, Ritz E, Mehls O 1994 Synergistic effects of parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on proliferation and vitamin D receptor expression of rat growth cartilage cells. Endocrinology 135:1307–1315[Abstract]
  16. Klaus G, Merke J, Eing H, Hügel U, Milde P, Reichel H, Ritz E, Mehls O 1991 1,25(OH)2D3 receptor regulation and 1,25(OH)2D3 effects in primary cultures of growth cartilage cells of the rat. Calcif Tissue Int 49:340–348[Medline]
  17. Klaus G, May T, Hügel U, von Eichel B, Rodriguez J, Fernandez J, Reichrath J, Ritz E, Mehls O 1997 Parathyroid hormone prevents 1,25(OH)2D3 induced down-regulation of the vitamin D receptor in growth plate chondrocytes in vitro. Kidney Int 51:45–51
  18. Balmain N, von Eichel B, Toury R, Belquasmi F, Hauchecorne M, Klaus G, Mehls O, Ritz E 1995 Calbindins-D28k and –D9k and 1,25(OH)2vitamin D3 receptors immunolocalization and mineralisation induction in long term primary cultures of rat epiphyseal chondrocytes. Bone 51:37–45[CrossRef]
  19. Benya PD, Shaffer JD 1982 Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gel. Cell 30:215–224[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lindahl A, Isgaard J, Carlsson L, Isaksson OGP 1987 Differential effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 on colony formation of epiphyseal chondrocytes in suspension cultures in rats of different ages. Endocrinology 121:1061–1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Blum WF, Breier BH 1994 Radioimmunoassays for IGFs and IGFBPs. Growth Regul 4:11–19
  22. Kappelgaard AM, Billestrup N, Nilsson A Preparation of stable 125I-growth hormone tracers for radioimmunoassay. XIV. Acta Endocrinologica Congress, Stockholm, 1983 (Abstract Tu-260)
  23. Linde S, Hansen B, Lernmark A 1980 Stable iodinated polypeptide hormones prepared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem 107:165–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Scatchard G 1949 The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51:660–671[CrossRef]
  25. Nilsson A, Lindahl A, Edén S, Isaksson OGP 1989 Demonstration of growth hormone receptors on cultured rat epiphyseal chondrocytes by specific binding of growth hormone and immunochemistry. J Endocrinol 122:69–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Durnam DM, Palmiter RD 1983 A practical approach for quantitating specific mRNAs by solution hybridization. Anal Biochem 131:385–393[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Mathews LS, Norstedt G, Palmiter RD 1986 Regulation by insulin-like growth factor I gene expression by growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9343–9347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mathews LS, Enberg B, Norstedt G 1989 Regulation of rat growth hormone gene expression. J Biol Chem 264:9905–9910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Labarca C, Paigen K 1980 A simple, rapid and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 102:344–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Ohlsson C, Nilsson A, Isaksson O, Lindahl A 1992 Growth hormone induces multiplication of the slowly cycling germinal cells of the rat tibial growth plate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9826–9830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Isgaard J, Möller C, Isaksson OGP, Nilsson A, Mathews LS, Norstedt G 1988 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid in rat growth plate by growth hormone. Endocrinology 122:1515–1520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nilsson A, Carlsson B, Isgaard J, Isaksson OGP, Rymo L 1989 Regulation by GH of insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA expression in rat epiphyseal growth plate as studied with in-situ hybridisation. J Endocrinol 125:67–73[CrossRef]
  33. Shinar DM, Endo N, Halperin D, Rodan GA, Weinreb M 1993 Differential expression of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-II messenger ribonucleic acid in growing rat bone. Endocrinology 132:1158–1167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wang E, Wang J, Chin E, Zhou J, Bondy CA 1995 Cellular patterns of insulin-like growth factor system gene expression in murine chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Endocrinology 136:2741–2751[Abstract]
  35. Cook JJ, Haynes KM, Werther GA 1988 Mitogenic effects of growth hormone in cultured human fibroblasts. Evidence for action via local insulin-like growth factor I production. J Clin Invest 81:206–212
  36. McCarthy TL, Centrella M, Canalis E 1990 Cortisol inhibits the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor-I in skeletal cells. Endocrinology 126:1569–1575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Brenner RE, Nerlich A, Heinze E, Vetter U, Teller WM 1993 Different regulation of clonal growth by transforming growth factor-ß1 in human fetal articular and costal chondrocytes. Pediatr Res 33:390–393[Medline]
  38. Blum WF 1992 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins. In: Ranke MB (ed) Functional Endocrinologic Diagnostics in Children and Adolescence. J&J Verlag, Mannheim, pp 102–117
  39. Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Isaksson OGP 1987 Effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 on colony formation of rabbit epiphyseal chondrocytes at different stages of maturation. J Endocrinol 115:263–271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Swolin D, Brantsing C, Matejka G, Ohlsson C 1996 Cortisol decreases IGF-I mRNA levels in human osteoblast-like cells. J Endocrinol 149:497–403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Leung K-C, Rajkovic IA, Reters E, Markus I, vanWyk JJ, Ho KY 1996 Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin down-regulate growth hormone (GH) receptors in rat osteoblasts: evidence for a peripheral feedback loop regulating GH action. Endocrinology 137:2694–2702[Abstract]
  42. Lesniak MA, Roth J 1976 Regulation of receptor concentration by homologous hormone. Effect of human growth hormone on its receptor in IM-9 lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 251:3720–3729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Murphy LJ, Lazarus L 1984 The mouse fibroblast growth hormone receptor. Ligand processing and receptor modulation and turnover. Endocrinology 115:1625–1632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ilondo MM, Damholt AB, Cunningham BA, Wells JA, deMeyts P, Shymko RM 1994 Receptor dimerisation determines the effects of growth hormone in primary rat adipocytes and cultured human IM-9 lymphocytes. Endocrinology 134:2397–2403
  45. Maiter D, Underwood LE, Maes M, Ketelslegers JM 1988 Acute down-regulation of the somatotropic receptors in rat liver by a single injection of growth hormone. Endocrinology 122:1291–1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Roupas P, Herington AC 1987 Receptor-mediated endocytosis and degradative processing of growth hormone by rat adipocytes in primary culture. Endocrinology 120:2158–2165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Saito Y, Teshima R, Yamazaki T, Ikebuchi H, Sawada J-C 1994 Ligand-induced internalisation and phosphorylation-dependant degradation of growth hormone receptor in human IM-9 cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 106:67–74[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Gluckman PD, Breier BH, Sauerwein H 1990 Regulation of cell surface growth hormone receptor. Acta Paediatr Scand [Suppl] 366:73.78[Medline]
  49. Barash I, Posner BI 1989 Homologous induction of growth hormone receptors in cultured rat hepatocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 62:281–286[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Grichting G, Goodman HM 1986 Growth hormone maintains its own receptor in rat adipocytes. Endocrinology 119:847–854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Swolin-Eide D, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C 1998 Cortisol increases growth hormone receptor expression in human osteoblast-like cells. J Endocrinol 156:99–105[Abstract]
  52. Salles JP, deVries CP, Netelenbos JC, Slootweg MC 1994 Dexamethasone increases and serum decreases growth hormone receptor binding to UMR-106.01 rat osteosarcoma cells. Endocrinology 134:1455–1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. King APJ, Carter-Su C 1995 Dexamethasone-induced antagonism of growth hormone (GH) action by down-regulation of GH binding in 3T3–F442A fibroblasts. Endocrinology 136:4796–4803[Abstract]
  54. Baumbach WR, Horner DL, Logan JS 1989 The growth hormone-binding protein in rat serum is an alternatively spliced form of the rat growth hormone receptor. Genes Dev 3:1199–1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Heinrichs C, Yanovski JA, Roth AH, Yu YM, Domené HM, Yano K, Cutler GB, Baron J 1994 Dexamethasone increases growth hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels in liver and growth plate. Endocrinology 135:113–1118[Abstract]
  56. Conover CA, Hintz RL, Johnson BF 1995 Differential effects of glucocorticoids on insulin-like growth factor I action in cultured human fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol 163:615–622[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. Giustina, G. Mazziotti, and E. Canalis
Growth Hormone, Insulin-Like Growth Factors, and the Skeleton
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2008; 29(5): 535 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. C. Owen, S. J. Roberts, S. F. Ahmed, and C. Farquharson
Dexamethasone-induced expression of the glucocorticoid response gene lipocalin 2 in chondrocytes
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2008; 294(6): E1023 - E1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Simon, A.-M. Prieur, P. Quartier, J. Charles Ruiz, and P. Czernichow
Early Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Treatment in Glucocorticoid-Treated Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A 3-Year Randomized Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2567 - 2573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. R. Hutchison, M. H. Bassett, and P. C. White
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and Fibroblast Growth Factor, But Not Growth Hormone, Affect Growth Plate Chondrocyte Proliferation
Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3122 - 3130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P Tynjala, P Lahdenne, P Vahasalo, H Kautiainen, and V Honkanen
Impact of anti-TNF treatment on growth in severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2006; 65(8): 1044 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S Shaikh, F H Bloomfield, M K Bauer, H H Phua, R S Gilmour, and J E Harding
Amniotic IGF-I supplementation of growth-restricted fetal sheep alters IGF-I and IGF receptor type 1 mRNA and protein levels in placental and fetal tissues
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. R. Edmondson, S. P. Thumiger, G. A. Werther, and C. J. Wraight
Epidermal Homeostasis: The Role of the Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Systems
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 737 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
E. Laplantine, F. Rossi, M. Sahni, C. Basilico, and D. Cobrinik
FGF signaling targets the pRb-related p107 and p130 proteins to induce chondrocyte growth arrest
J. Cell Biol., August 19, 2002; 158(4): 741 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
T Mushtaq and S F Ahmed
The impact of corticosteroids on growth and bone health
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2002; 87(2): 93 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. R. Kritsch, S. Murali, M. L. Adamo, and D. M. Ney
Dexamethasone decreases serum and liver IGF-I and maintains liver IGF-I mRNA in parenterally fed rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): R528 - R536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. KIEPE, D. L. ANDRESS, S. MOHAN, L. STANDKER, T. ULINSKI, R. HIMMELE, O. MEHLS, and B. TONSHOFF
Intact IGF-Binding Protein-4 and -5 and Their Respective Fragments Isolated from Chronic Renal Failure Serum Differentially Modulate IGF-I Actions in Cultured Growth Plate Chondrocytes
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2001; 12(11): 2400 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. K. Miller, M. G. Valerio, M. V. Pino, J. L. Larson, A. Viau, N. Hamelin, R. Labbe, and C. M. Banks
Chronic Effects of the Novel Glucocorticosteroid RPR 106541 Administered to Beagle Dogs by Inhalation
Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 226 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Okazaki, S. Jingushi, T. Ikenoue, K. Urabe, H. Sakai, A. Ohtsuru, K. Akino, S. Yamashita, S. Nomura, and Y. Iwamoto
Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Developing Osteophytes in Murine Experimental Osteoarthritis and in Rats Inoculated with Growth Hormone-Secreting Tumor
Endocrinology, October 1, 1999; 140(10): 4821 - 4830.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H. Robson
Bone growth mechanisms and the effects of cytotoxic drugs
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 1999; 81(4): 360 - 364.
[Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Kobayashi, C. K. Boyd, C. J. Bracken, W. R. Lamberson, D. H. Keisler, and M. C. Lucy
Reduced Growth Hormone Receptor (GHR) Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Liver of Periparturient Cattle Is Caused by a Specific Down-Regulation of GHR 1A That Is Associated with Decreased Insulin-Like Growth Factor I
Endocrinology, September 1, 1999; 140(9): 3947 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Tollet-Egnell, A. Flores-Morales, A. Stavréus-Evers, L. Sahlin, and G. Norstedt
Growth Hormone Regulation of SOCS-2, SOCS-3, and CIS Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in the Rat
Endocrinology, August 1, 1999; 140(8): 3693 - 3704.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Umayahara, J. Billiard, C. Ji, M. Centrella, T. L. McCarthy, and P. Rotwein
CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein delta  Is a Critical Regulator of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Gene Transcription in Osteoblasts
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 1999; 274(15): 10609 - 10617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Jiang, C. S. Okamura, and M. C. Lucy
Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Promoter for the Bovine Growth Hormone Receptor Gene
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 7893 - 7900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Canalis
Editorial: Inhibitory Actions of Glucocorticoids on Skeletal Growth. Is Local Insulin-Like Growth Factor I to Blame?
Endocrinology, July 1, 1998; 139(7): 3041 - 3042.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehls, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehls, O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals