help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarkar, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghasemzadeh, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarkar, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghasemzadeh, M. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 8 3620-3628
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Role of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-ß Type I and TGF-ß Type II Receptors in the TGF-ß1-Regulated Gene Expression in Pituitary Prolactin-Secreting Lactotropes1

Dipak K. Sarkar, Martine Pastorcic, Alok De, Mike Engel, Harold Moses and M. Behnam Ghasemzadeh

Department of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy (D.K.S., M.P., A.D., M.B.G.), Pharmacology and Physiology, Center for Reproductive Biology (D.K.S.), Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6520; and Department of Cell Biology (M.E., H.M.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Dipak K. Sarkar, Professor, Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6520. E-mail: sarkar{at}vetmed.wsu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) inhibits pituitary lactotrope proliferation and secretion of PRL in an autocrine/paracrine manner. In this study, the role of TGF-ß1 type I (TßR-I) and TGF-ß type II (TßR-II) receptors in TGF-ß1-regulated gene expression in lactotropes was determined using anterior pituitary cells known to be responsive to TGF-ß1 growth inhibition and using a transformed PR1 cell line known to be nonresponsive to TGF-ß1 growth inhibition. Treatment with TGF-ß1 inhibited cell proliferation and decreased PRL mRNA levels in anterior pituitary cells, but in PR-1 cells, the treatment caused only decreased PRL mRNA levels. Affinity labeling of TGF-ß binding proteins indicated that anterior pituitary cells contain several TGF-ß-binding protein complexes, including the 65 kDa size TßR-I and 95 kDa size TßR-II. In the PR1 cells, the major complex found was similar to the 65 kDa size of TßR-I. Immunocytochemistry identified TßR-I and TßR-II receptor proteins in lactotropes but detected primarily TßR-I receptor protein in PR1 cells. RT-PCR detection of TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA identified both receptor mRNA transcripts in anterior pituitary cells and in PR1 cells but the levels of TßR-II and TßR-I mRNA transcripts in PR1 cells was much lower than that in anterior pituitary cells. Determination of the TGF-ß1 gene responses in PR1 cells following TßR-I and TßR-II gene transfection indicated that PR1 cells transactivate transcription of the TGF-ß-responsive p3TP-Lux reporter in the absence of cotransfected TßR-II receptor. The introduction of the TßR-II receptor alone or in combination with TßR-I confer ligand-independent reporter transactivation in these cells. When only TßR-I was introduced along with reporter, a ligand-dependent transactivation was observed. These data suggest for the first time that the TGF-ß1-mediated transcriptional activation response can be distinguished from the growth response in lactotropes. Furthermore, the TGF-ß1 gene-transcription response is less dependent on TßR-II receptor expression than is the TGF-ß1 growth-inhibitory response.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TRANSFORMING growth factor ß (TGF-ß) is a polypeptide of 25 kDa and has three isoforms (TGF-ß1–3) in mammals. There is a 60–80% amino acid homology between the three peptides and they each are highly conserved (~100%) between species. Many cells express one or more of the three isoforms. These isoforms of TGF-ß inhibit or stimulate the growth and/or gene transcription of a variety of cell types including epithelial, endothelial, lymphoid, myeloid, and mesenchymal cells (1, 2, 3). The pituitary gland is also a site where TGF-ß isoforms are produced and act locally to control cell growth and function. Within the pituitary gland, melanotropes of the intermediate lobe of the pituitary and lactotropes of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland produce TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 (4, 5, 6). While the effects of TGF-ß3 on pituitary lactotropes are not well characterized, several reports suggest an inhibitory action of TGF-ß1 on PRL secretion, PRL gene expression and lactotropic cell proliferation (4, 7, 8, 9, 10). In lactotropes, a wide dose range (pg to ng/ml) of TGF-ß1 inhibits cell proliferation and PRL secretion (4, 7, 9, 10), although very low doses of TGF-ß1 (<pg/ml) stimulate cell proliferation (9). Because lactotropes are the primary source of TGF-ß1 production and action in the pituitary, the polypeptide may act on lactotropes by an autocrine and/or paracrine mechanism (5). Using F344 rats, we have shown that the levels of TGF-ß1 protein and mRNA decrease during anterior pituitary tumorigenesis (11). The reduction in the amounts of TGF-ß1 protein and mRNA in the anterior pituitary during tumorigenesis correlate with the low levels of TGF-ß1 mRNA and protein observed in tumor cell lines. Furthermore, the growth inhibitory response of TGF-ß1 is reduced in pituitary tumor cell lines (11, 12). A reduction in the PRL-inhibitory response of TGF-ß1 is also observed in the aged rat pituitary that produces and secretes increased amounts of PRL (9). Hence, it appears that TGF-ß1 may be a physiological regulator of lactotropic cell growth and secretion.

The role of cell surface proteins that mediate TGF-ß1 actions on lactotropes is not well understood. In many cell types, three binding protein complexes, known as types I-III, have been identified as TGF-ß-binding proteins (13, 14, 15). The TGF-ß type I (TßR-I) and TGF-ß type II (TßR-II) receptors have been shown to be transmembrane proteins containing cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase domains. The heteromeric interaction of TßR-I and TßR-II is thought to mediate the action of TGF-ß1, whereas the TGF-ß type III-binding protein binds and presents TGF-ß1 to the TßR-II receptor. It has been shown that lactotropes are the major cell type in the anterior pituitary expressing TßR-II mRNA and protein, and that the level of TßR-II mRNA decreases in parallel with the levels of TGF-ß1 mRNA in the anterior pituitary of ovariectomized F344 rats following estrogen administration (16). Hence, it appears that TßR-II receptors may be involved in mediating the TGF-ß1 growth-inhibiting action on lactotropes. However, it is not known whether lactotropes express TßR-I and whether heteromeric interaction between TßR-I and TßR-II mediates ligand-dependent gene expression in these cells. In the present work, we determined the PRL-inhibitory response to TGF-ß1 in normal lactotropic cells and transformed lactotropic cells (PR1 cells; 11) that had no growth inhibitory response to TGF-ß1. The cell surface expression and the mRNA levels of TßR-I and TßR-II in primary lactotropes and in PR1 cells were compared. Additionally, TßR-I and TßR-II interaction in PR1 cells was investigated using a reporter assay. In this report, we provide evidence that TGF-ß1-regulated gene expression in lactotropes is mediated by the heteromeric interaction of TßR-I and TßR-II receptors. Furthermore, evidence is provided to support the notion that differential expression of TßR-I and TßR-II levels may cause variable biological responses.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Fischer 344 female rats of 180–250 g body weight were obtained from Simonsen Laboratory (Gilroy, CA), housed in a controlled environment (temperature 22 C, lights on 0500–1900 h) and provided with certified rodent chow meal (Purina Mills, Inc., St. Louis, MO) and water ad libitum. The animals were anesthetized using halothane vapor and underwent bilateral ovariectomy followed by surgical implantation of an estradiol-17ß-laden 1 cm, sc, SILASTIC brand capsule (7) (Dow Corning, Midland, MI). At 7–10 days after surgery, animals were killed by rapid decapitation and anterior pituitary tissues were obtained for preparation of cell cultures.

Primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells
The methods for preparing anterior pituitary cell cultures were previously described (11). Anterior pituitaries of estrogen-treated rats were used to enrich lactotropes in cultures (7). Briefly, anterior pituitary cells were enzymatically dissociated, suspended into DMEM:F12 (1:1; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 200 µM ascorbic acid, 1 mg/ml BSA and 10% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT) and seeded on poly-L-lysin-coated 24-well (2.5 x 105) or 6-well plates (5–10 x 105). Cultures used for BrdUrd incorporation were seeded on poly-L-lysin-coated coverslips in a 24-well plate. Cultures were maintained at 37 C in 7.5% CO2. On day 2, cultures received 2.5% FCS for 2 days and then were maintained in serum supplement (human transferrin, 100 µM; insulin, 5 µM; and putrescine, 1 µM) until experimentation.

PR1 cell lines
This cell line was derived from a pituitary tumor of an F344 ovariectomized rat treated with estrogen for 3 months (11). The tumor cells were grown in culture for 28 generations and a population of cells showing PRL immunostaining and a similar shape was isolated. These cells were maintained in DMEM:F12 with 2.5% FCS for 42–51 generations and used in this study.

Treatment of PR1 cells and primary pituitary cell cultures with TGF-ß1
Experiments dealing with the measurement of PRL mRNA levels in pituitary cells and PR1 cells were maintained in cultures for 5 days at a 6 x 105/4 ml/plate cell density. On day 6, at the onset of the experiment, cells were washed 3 times with 3 ml DMEM:F12 containing 1 mg/ml BSA, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 200 µM ascorbic acid, and plates were filled with 3 ml of the serum-free medium. The 4 µg/ml stock of TGF-ß1 from porcine platelets (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was diluted into 1 mg/ml BSA, 4 mM HCl, and 30 µl of each of the 1/10 serial dilutions were added to the plates. Control plates received 30 µl BSA-HCl buffer. Cells were incubated with TGF-ß1 for 24 h. At the end of incubation time, the medium was removed, the cells were washed 3 times with 3 ml PBS, harvested and homogenized in guanidinium isothiocyanate-phenol solution, and total cellular RNA was isolated (17).

Experiments involving the measurement of TGF-ß1 effects on cell growth were conducted with primary cultures of pituitary cells or PR1 cells (2.5 x 105) plated on poly-L-lysin-coated coverslips and maintained at 37 C in the presence of 7.5% CO2. On day 5, at the onset of experiment, cells were washed and then incubated with serum-free medium containing serum supplement. Cultures were treated with medium only, 10 nM estradiol 17ß and 10 µl BSA-HCl buffer or 10 nM estradiol 17ß and various doses of TGF-ß1. These treatments were repeated twice at 48-h intervals. At the end of the experiments, cells were harvested for determination of lactotropic cell proliferation.

Lactotropic cell proliferation
Lactotropes proliferation was determined by identifying the cells with both bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) and PRL immunoreactivities, assuming that PRL cells that undergo DNA synthesis incorporate BrdUrd (18, 19). The methods for double staining with BrdUrd and PRL were as described by us previously (12). Briefly, cultures were treated with 30 µg/ml BrdUrd 2 h before harvesting, then fixed with 99% ethanol and incubated at 4 C overnight in a humid chamber with BrdUrd monoclonal mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) at a concentration of 1:200 in PBS or as a negative control with 3% normal serum from the host species. The BrdUrd immunoreactivity was stained using biotinylated goat antimouse IgG as second antibody and diaminobenzidine as chromagen supplied by Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Incorporated, Burlingame, CA). After DAB precipitation, the slides were immersed in 3% normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4 C with the PRL antibody (PRL-S9; a gift of NIDDK) at a concentration of 1:100,000 in PBS. The PRL immunoreactivity in cells was stained using Biogenex supersensitive kit (Bigenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA) containing antirabbit biotinylated secondary antibody and fast red/nepthol phosphate chromogen. Two investigators independently performed cell counts, which involved counting five separate areas in each coverslip and 500 cells/area.

Affinity-labeling of TGF-ß binding proteins in pituitary lactotropes
Affinity labeling was performed as described by Takahashi et al. (20). Assays were performed with 100 cm2 confluent plates containing monolayers of PR1 cell lines or primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells (0.25–1 x 106 cells/ml). Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated at 37 C in binding buffer containing 125 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgSO4, 5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and 1% BSA to allow the dissociation of endogenously bound TGF-ß. The cells were washed with cold binding buffer and placed at 4 C. The 125I-TGF-ß1 solution was diluted appropriately just before addition to the cultures. Binding reaction was for 4 h at 4 C with shaking at 120 rpm in binding buffer containing 45 pM 125I-TGF-ß1 (100 µCi/ml; R&D) in the absence or presence of a 100-fold excess of TGF-ß1 as a competitive inhibitor of receptor binding. Additionally, we examined competition by TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3, as well as inhibin, another member of the TGF-ß superfamily. The receptor-bound ligand was cross-linked with bis-(sulfosuccinimidyl)-suberate (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) in a total volume of 400 µl for 20 min at 22 C and followed by termination through the addition of excess glycine (28 mM) for 5 min. The receptors were solubilized by homogenization (Brinkmann polytron, setting 5, 30 sec) in 10 mM 2-(4-hydroxymethyl) propane-sulfonic acid (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 100 Kallekrein units (KU) aprotonin and centrifugation at 40,000 rpm at 4 C to remove insoluble cell debris. The supernatants were collected and protein contents were assayed using BCA protein reagents (Pierce). The 125I-TGF-ß1-labeled cellular protein (200 µg/sample) and molecular weight protein markers (Sigma) were separated by 6% SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 to detect proteins, dried and exposed to Kodak XAR film with enhancing screens. The results were analyzed by autoradiography.

PRL mRNA quantification: RNase protection assay
Total cellular RNA from anterior pituitary cells and PR1 cells was prepared and hybridized for 16–20 h with labeled antisense RNA probes for PRL (5 x 104 cpm) and cyclophilin (CYC) mRNA (2 x 105 cpm) together in conditions described previously (11). The PRL probe was synthesized from PRL/KS, which includes the entire PRL cDNA. The plasmid was linearized using the unique BglII site present within the PRL coding sequence. Transcription from the T3 promoter yielded a 305-nucleotide (nt) full-length probe that included 185-nt PRL antisense sequence. The CYC probe was transcribed from prPXCYC/BS linearized with EcoRI. T7 RNA polymerase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) produced a 170 nt full-length probe including 111 nt cyclophilin antisense sequence. Hybridization mixtures (30 µl) contained 60% deionized formamide, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 600 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and transfer RNA to equalize the total amount of RNA to 20 µg in all samples. Hybridizations were carried out at 56 C for 16–20 h. Nonhybridized RNA was digested with 2.5 µg/ml RNase A as described previously (21). After phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation, samples were analyzed on 5% polyacrylamide-7 M urea gels. RNA was quantified by laser scanning of the autoradiograms. In this assay, the protected PRL fragment was a 185-nt fragment hybridized product of PRL mRNA and PRL probe, whereas the protected cyclophilin mRNA hybridized fragment corresponded to the 117-nt fragment (see arrow in Fig. 2Go). The faint band seen at 170 nt corresponds to full-length cyclophilin probe protected by very small amounts of the plasmid DNA template used to synthesize the probe in vitro. The intensity of this fragment appears to remain constant in all samples and is not scanned.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Comparison of the PRL mRNA-inhibitory effect of TGF-ß1 in normal lactotropes and PR1 cells. Cultures of anterior pituitary cells and PR1 cells were prepared and treated with various doses of TGF-ß1 for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated and PRL gene transcripts were quantified by the RNase protection assay. Total RNA (2.5 µg) from each sample was analyzed for PR1 cells and 5 µg RNA for primary cultures. Cyclophilin RNA was monitored as an internal control. Representative autoradiograms showing the changes of PRL mRNA levels in PR1 cells following treatment with various doses of TGF-ß1 (0–20 ng/ml) are shown at the bottom. PRL transcripts are represented by a protected fragment 185 nt long (PRL), and cyclophilin RNA appears at 111 nt (C). Mean ± SE PRL mRNA levels in primary pituitary cells (A) and PR1 cells (B) after treatment with TGF-ß1 are shown on the top and middle figures. PRL mRNA levels were quantified by laser scanning of autoradiograms. The ratio of the transcripts PRL/CYC was calculated before determining percentage of control value for each treatment group. The means ± SE (n = 6) are represented in the histogram. a, P < 0.05 compared with TGF-ß1 (0–0.002 ng/ml)-treated groups. b, P < 0.05 compared with TGF-ß1 (0–0.2 ng/ml)-treated groups.

 
Transfection assay
PR1 cells maintained in 100-mm dishes in Ham’s F12 + 2.5% FBS and 10% horse serum were transiently transfected with 5 µg of receptor expression plasmid, as well as TGF-ß inducible reporter p3TP-Lux constitutive pRSV-ß-gal reporter and equal amounts of sheared salmon sperm by calcium phosphate coprecipitation (22) for 24 h, followed by glycerol shock and 4 h recovery in fresh medium. The heterologous reporter p3TP-lux has been widely used to assess TGF-ß mediated transcriptional activation responses. The reporter consists of the TGF-ß responsive region of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) promoter and three concatamerized TPA response elements (TRE) from the human collagenase promoter. PR1 cells were transiently transfected with p3TP-lux, as well as TßR-I and TßR-II cDNAs in the combinations shown (see Fig. 6Go). Subsequently, cells were maintained in fresh media for 42 h in the presence or absence of 400 pM TGF-ß1. Cells were washed extensively with 1 x PBS and lysed at 4 C with agitation for 15 min in luciferase lysis buffer (100 mM Na2H2 (PO4), 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.8). Crude lysates were subjected to pulse sonication on ice and subsequently clarified by microcentrifugation (1 min at 15,000 rpm, 4 C). Luciferase activity in duplicate lysates was determined in 30 mM tricine, 3 mM ATP, 15 mM MgSO4, 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.8, after injection of 1 mM luciferin. ß-glactosidase activity was determined using a galacton-Plus Kit assay as described by the manufacturer (Tropix, Bedford, MA) Both assays were performed using an Analytical Luminescence Laboratories Monolight 2010 luminometer. Luciferase results were normalized to ß-glactosidase output (Tropix) to control for transfection efficiency. Mammalian expression plasmids [pCMV5-TßR-I:HA, pRK5-TßR-II:flag and p3TP-Luciferase; gifts of Drs. J Massagué (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) and R. Derynck (University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA)] were used.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Ligand-dependent and ligand-independent reporter transactivation in transformed lactotropes (PR1 cells) overexpressing TGF-ß-type I receptor and TGF-ß-type II receptors, respectively. Subconfluent cultures of PR1 cells were used for transient transfection using a calcium-phosphate precipitation method and mammalian expression plasmids. The responsiveness to TGF-ß1 was measured by a p3TP-luciferase reporter output. All the data were corrected for transfection efficiency by an RSVß-gal reporter. Values are mean ± SEM obtained from N = 4.

 
RT-PCR
Primer design. The PCR primers for RI and II mRNAs were: RI forward primer, 5'-ACGTTCATGGTTCCGAGAGG-3'; RI reverse primer, 5'-TCGCAAAGCTGTCAGCCTAG-3'; RII forward primer, 5'-AAGTCTTGCATGAGCAACTGC-3'; RII reverse primer, 5'-GATGTCAGAGAAGATGTCC-3' (24). The primers for the pAW 109 control RNA were: 5'-CCAGCCATCCTTCGAGATTTCT-3' (sense), 5'-GTTGTTCCTCCA-GTTCTTTCTCACC-3'(antisense) (25). All the primers were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Grand Island, NY). Hot-start RT-PCR methods were employed as previously described (25). Briefly, total tissue RNA (0.7 µg) and 5 x 105 copies of control RNA pAW 109 in a final volume of 20 µl were subjected to reverse transcription reaction using random hexanucleotide primers at 42 C for 60 min, followed by 15 min at 75 C to inactivate the enzyme. The PCR mix contained 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Life Technology Inc., Grand Island, NY) and 0.5 µM of each primer. All PCR reagents were combined in tubes (50 µl) and heated to 95 C for 5 min and had MgCl2 added to Hot Start the amplification reaction. The amplification protocols were as follows: 28 cycles of 94 C for 1.5 min, 60 C for 1.5 min, 72 C for 1 min, and a final extension time of 15 min at 72 C. The linear range for amplification was within 24–36 cycles and for RNA was 0.4 to 1.5 µg.

PCR product detection and quantification. A 15-µl aliquot of PCR reaction was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and documented with black and white instant Polaroid film 665. The negative was used to measure band intensities using a laser scanning densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). RT-PCR was calibrated by reverse transcription of different amounts of tissue RNA in the presence of 5 x 105 copies of control RNA pAW 109 RNA. The ratio of the intensity of the TßR-I or TßR-II band to the PAW109 band was used as a relative measure for mRNA abundance. RT- (-) and RNAse-treated control reactions were also performed to ensure that the amplified fragments originated from RNA rather than contaminant DNA.

Immunocytochemical method
Anterior pituitary cell cultures and PR1 cell cultures were double stained for PRL and TßR-I or TßR-II using the double-immunocytochemical methods as described previously (12, 16). Briefly, cultures grown on coverslips were fixed with 99% ethanol, treated with hydrogen peroxide and normal goat serum to block nonspecific bindings, and then incubated at 4 C overnight with a polyclonal primary antibody directed against either TßR-II receptor or TßR-I receptor (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY; 5 µg/ml; these antibodies are specific for each antigen and do not cross-react with other known TGF-ß receptors according to the manufacturer’s specifications). Negative control cultures, incubated with normal serum from the host species, were also run in parallel. Additional control experiments involving preincubation of the antisera with excess antigens TßR-II or TßR-I (10–50 µg; UBI) were also conducted. After overnight incubation, cultures were copiously rinsed in PBS and stained using Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Incorporated, Burlingame, CA). To confirm the colocalization of TßR-I or TßR-II and PRL, a double-labeling technique was employed. After DAB precipitation, the cultures were immersed in 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The cultures were then incubated overnight at 4 C with the PRL antiserum (PRL-S9; 1:100,000). Cultures were copiously rinsed in PBS and incubated with goat antirabbit biotinylated secondary antibody (Biogenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA), then with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Biogenex), followed by immersion in fast red/nephthol phosphate chromogen (Biogenex). Finally, the cultures were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted with crystal mount.

Statistics
The data shown in the figures and text are mean ± SE. The PRL mRNA data obtained from the RNase protection assay varied between experiments. We approached the problem of the between-experiment variability by transforming the data to a percentage of control value. We found that the percentage change normalization yield data fit the normality assumption, whereas the raw data did not. Additionally, normalization effectively minimized the between-experiment variability. All the data presented were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Posthoc test involved Student-Newmann-Keuls test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TGF-ß1 actions on cell proliferation and on PRL mRNA levels in normal and transformed lactotropes
We have previously shown that TGF-ß1 inhibits lactotrope proliferation (as determined by the cell number and 3H-thymidine incorporation) in primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells (4). We have also shown that TGF-ß1 failed to inhibit the proliferation (as determined by the cell number), of PR1 cells that were derived from estrogen-induced PRLomas from a female rat (11). These cell growth-controlling effects of TGF-ß1 on lactotropes and PR1 cells were verified by using a BrdUrd incorporation assay that identifies positive cells with both BrdUrd and PRL immunoreactivities and assumes that PRL cells that undergo DNA synthesis incorporate BrdUrd (7, 12, 18). Figure 1Go shows that TGF-ß1 markedly inhibited lactotropic cell proliferation in primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells, but it failed to inhibit proliferation of transformed lactotropes (PR1 cells). However, TGF-ß1 inhibited PRL mRNA levels both in anterior pituitary cell cultures and PR1 cell cultures (Fig. 2Go). The minimum effective dose of TGF-ß1 that inhibited PRL mRNA levels in PR1 cells (0.2 ng/ml) was 10-fold lower than that in primary pituitary cells (2 ng/ml). Hence, it appears that PR1 cells that show no growth-inhibitory response to TGF-ß1 show marked PRL mRNA-inhibitory response to TGF-ß1.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of the cell growth-inhibitory effect of TGF-ß1 on normal lactotropes and PR1 cells. Primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells and PR1 cells were plated on coverslips at a density of 2–5 x 105/ml. Cells were plated in culture for 4 days and then were incubated with or without 10 nM of estradiol for an additional 4 days in serum-free defined medium. Estradiol-treated cultures additionally received various doses of TGF-ß1 (1 pg/ml-10 ng/ml) or vehicle. The DNA synthesis in lactotropes was determined by colocalizing BrdUrd and PRL in a single cell using a double-labeling technique. Histograms show the changes in cell proliferation in primary pituitary cultures (A) and PR1 cells (B) after treatment with various doses of TGF-ß1. The means ± SE (n = 6) are represented in the histogram. a, P < 0.05 compared with no estrogen. b, P < 0.05 compared with 0-dose control. c, P < 0.05 compared with TGF-ß1 (0.001–0.1 ng/ml)-treated groups.

 
TßR-I and TßR-II receptor proteins and mRNA levels in primary pituitary cells and in PRL-secreting PR1 cells
The majority of studies has indicated that a heteromeric interaction between TßR-I and TßR-II receptors on the cell surface mediates TGF-ß1 actions (13, 14). Because PR1 cells and lactotropes appear to respond differently to TGF-ß1, we examined whether these two cell types have differential expression of TßR-I and TßR-II receptors. To examine this, TGF-ß receptor subtypes present in primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells were characterized by: 1) affinity labeling of TGF-ß-binding proteins; 2) immunocytochemically localizing TßR-I and TßR-II protein immunoreactivities; and 3) measuring TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA levels using a RT-PCR assay.

Affinity labeling studies indicated that anterior pituitary cells in primary cultures contain several TGF-ß-binding protein complexes; two major complexes are identified as 65 kDa size TßR-I and 95 kDa size TßR-II. Both of these protein complexes competed efficiently with TGF-ß1 and to a lesser extent with TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3 (Fig. 3AGo). These complexes did not compete efficiently with inhibin (not shown). In contrast to the pituitary primary cells, PR1 cells contained primarily a 65-kDa size protein complex, which was a size similar to the TßR-I receptor complex (Fig. 3BGo).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. TGF-ß-binding proteins in primary pituitary cells and in PR1 cells as determined by affinity labeling. Anterior pituitary cells (2 x 106 cells/60-mm plates) or PR1 cells (2.5 x 106 cells/60-mm plates) were affinity labeled with [125I] TGF-ß1 (129 µCi/µg; DuPont NEN, Boston, MA). Cells were incubated 4 h at 4 C with 45 pM [125I] TGF-ß1 alone or with various doses of unlabeled TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2, or TGF-ß3, as indicated above the lanes. Complexes formed were cross-linked and were analyzed on 6% polyacrylamide gels containing SDS in the presence of dithiothreitiol. The [125I] TGF-ß1 binding proteins in primary pituitary cells (A) and PR1 cells (B) are shown in autoradiograms. The molecular weight marker size (kDa) is shown alongside the gel on the right. The three binding protein complexes with sizes similar to those of TßR-I (~65–75 kDa), TßR-II (~90–95 kDa), and TßR-III (>200 kDa) are shown by lines on the left. The nonradiolabeled ligand TGF-ß1 competed well with the radiolabeled ligand, whereas TGF-ß2 and TGßF-ß3 competed to a lesser extent with the radiolabeled ligand for binding to the receptor subtypes. PR1 cells appear to express only type I receptor isoforms in abundance.

 
Immunocytochemical procedures also identified TßR-I and TßR-II protein immunoreactivity in primary lactotropes (Fig. 4Go) and primarily TßR-I protein immunoreactivity in PR1 cells, although a very faint RII protein immunoreactivity was noted in PR1 cells. The TßR-I and TßR-II staining in PR1 cells was inhibited by excess antigen, suggesting that the immunoreactivity for TßR-I and TßR-II receptor proteins is specific for each antigen.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Colocalization of TßR-I receptor protein and PRL immunoreactivity and TßR-II receptor protein and PRL immunoreactivity in primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells. Primary pituitary cell cultures (A) and PR1 cell cultures (B) were grown on coverslips, treated with 10 ng of TGF-ß1 for 6 h (to activate receptors), fixed, and processed for immunocytochemical localization of PRL, TßR-I, or TßR-II receptors. Single immunostaining procedures using DAB as chromogen (which gave dark brown color) was employed to stain pituitary cell cultures for control (treated with PRL antibodies preincubated with excess antigen; Aa), PRL (Ab), TßR-I (Ac), and TßR-II (Ad). Some of the pituitary cell cultures were double stained using DAB as chromogen to stain for PRL and using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium as chromogen (which gave blue color and black color when overlapped with brown) to stain for TßR-I (Ae) and TßR-II (Af). All the PR1 cell cultures were stained by single immunostaining procedures using DAB as chromogen and antibodies for TßR-I (Bb) and TßR-II (Bd). Control coverslips containing PR1 cells were treated with TßR-I (Ba) or TßR-II (Bc) antibodies preincubated with excess respective antigen. Blue nuclear stain represent hematoxylin stain. Some of the positive immunostained cells are indicated by arrows. Bar, 20 µm.

 
Measurement of TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA levels using RT-PCR revealed that both TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA transcripts were present in primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells (Fig. 5Go). Within each cell type, the relative abundance of TßR-I mRNA was higher than the TßR-II mRNA. Between cell types, TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA levels in PR1 cells were respectively 21% and 47% lower than the levels of mRNA in pituitary primary cells.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Determination of TßR-I and TßR-II receptor mRNA levels in the primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells using a RT-PCR technique. On the top is the ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel showing TßR-I or TßR-II and PAW 109 amplified cDNA bands of the template RNA obtained from primary pituitary cell cultures (pituitary) and PR1 cells. Five micrograms of template RNA from primary pituitary cell cultures and PR1 cells and a constant amount of PAW 109 RNA (500,000 copies) were used in this assay. The TßR-I- and TßR-II-amplified cDNA bands are 745 bp and 698 bp, respectively. The standard pAW 109 band is 149 bp. Bottom figures show the mean ± SEM ratio of TßR/Std amplified bands derived after scanning the gels using a laser scanner densitometer. *, P < 0.05 compared with pituitary cells. N = 5.

 
Determination of PR1 cell responsiveness to TGF-ß1 following transient transfection with TßR-I and TßR-II receptor cDNAs
PR1 cells were transiently transfected with p3TP-lux, as well as TßR-I and TßR-II cDNAs in the combinations shown (Fig. 6Go). PR1 cells displayed TGF-ß-dependent reporter transactivation in the absence of cotransfected type I or type II receptors. Consistent with results described above, these data suggest that PR1 cells retain TGF-ß-mediated transcriptional responses but lose their growth responses. Introduction of the type II receptor confers ligand-independent reporter transactivation in these cells. TßR-I alone had no potentiating effect on p3TP-lux activity. When TßR-I and TßR-II were introduced concurrently, ligand-independent transactivation was again observed, which was further enhanced by TGF-ß.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent studies have indicated that TGF-ß1 is produced in PRL-secreting pituitary lactotropes and controls the secretion and proliferation of these cells in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Data presented here suggest that, unlike normal lactotropes, transformed PRL-secreting PR1 cells have lost the TGF-ß1-growth inhibitory response but have maintained the TGF-ß1-PRL mRNA-inhibitory response. The differential responses of the primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells appeared to be related to the nonneoplastic and neoplastic nature of these cells, rather than to previous exposure of the primary pituitary cells to estrogen. Previously, it has been shown that both primary cultures of pituitary cells of estrogen-treated (4, 11) and of pituitary cells of nonestrogen-treated Fischer-344 rats (9, 10) have siginificant growth-inhibitory and PRL-reducing action toTGF-ß1. Furthermore, both primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells had previous exposure to estrogen. Primary cultures of pituitary lactotropes were prepared using pituitaries (nontumor) from animals treated with estrogen for 7–10 days, whereas the PR1 cell line was derived from a pituitary (tumor) of a rat treated with estrogen for 3 months. Additionally, both primary pituitary cells and PR1 cells were similarly treated with estrogen or vehicle before determination of TGF-ß1 effects on cell proliferation and gene expression. Because both of these cells had similar treatment protocols during culture, it appears that the differential responses of these cells are related to the nonneoplastic and neoplastic nature of these cells.

Because of the loss of the growth- but not the gene-regulating response of TGF-ß1 in PR1 cells, one question that arose was whether growth- and gene-regulating responses of lactotropes were regulated by different types of transmembrane TGF-ß receptors. Determination of TGF-ß receptor complexes using affinity labeling with 125I-TGF-ß1 indicated that the pituitary tissue contains three major TGF-ß-binding protein complexes similar to the 65-kDa size of TßR-I, 95 kDa size of TßR-II and approximately 200 kDa size of type III. In many other cell types, TßR-I and TßR-II receptors have been shown to be cell surface receptors. Like other cells, lactotropes also appear to express TßR-I and TßR-II receptors. These are documented by the observation that lactotropes showed immunoreactive TßR-I and TßR-II proteins. TßR-I and TßR-II mRNA transcripts were detectable in the anterior pituitary cells. Additionally, 125I-TGF-ß1 binding (as determined by autoradiography) and TßR-II mRNA transcripts (as determined by double immuno-in situ hybridization techniques), have been identified in lactotropes of the anterior pituitary (16). Hence, TßR-I and TßR-II receptors are present on the lactotropes in the pituitary. A protein complex similar to type III receptor is identified by affinity labeling with 125I-TGF-ß1 in the mixed pituitary cell cultures. The expression of this protein in lactotropes is not characterized because TßR-III is a betaglycan and its role in cell signaling is not established (13, 14, 15). In PR1 cells, the three major TGF-ß-binding protein complexes were not identified by affinity labeling with 125I-TGF-ß1. These cells produced a primarily TßR-I protein complex following affinity labeling with 125I-TGF-ß1. However, very low levels of immunoreactive TßR-II protein and TßR-II mRNA transcript were detected in these cells. Hence, it appears that PR1 cells have TßR-I receptors and express a very low amount, if any, of functional TßR-II or TßR-III receptors.

In many cell types, TßR-I and TßR-II have been shown to be transmembrane proteins containing cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase domains, and the heteromeric interaction of these transmembrane proteins is thought to mediate the action of TGF-ß1 (13, 14, 23). Because lactotropes appear to produce both TßR-I and TßR-II receptor proteins, the possibility was raised that the heteromeric interaction of these transmembrane proteins may also be involved in mediation of TGF-ß1 signaling in lactotropes. Indeed, data of reporter assays support that TGF-ß-regulated gene expression in transformed lactotropes is mediated by the heteromeric interaction of TßR-I and TßR-II receptors (Fig. 6Go). In the reporter assay, when PR1 cells were transfected with TßR-I alone, the gene transactivation could be initiated by the ligand. When PR1 cells were transfected with both TßR-I and TßR-II, a ligand-independent gene transactivation was observed. Hence it appears that even in low expression of TßR-II receptor proteins, TGF-ß1 can activate gene transcription in lactotropes.

In PR1 cells, TGF-ß1 inhibited PRL mRNA levels and activated gene transactivation but failed to affect lactotropic cell proliferation. PR1 cells have low expression of TßR-II receptor proteins. Like PR1 cells, tumor pituitary lactotropes, which are under the influence of reduced TGF-ß1-growth inhibition, also show reduced production of TßR-II receptors (6, 11). Hence, it is possible that the TGF-ß1 growth response is more dependent on the amount of TßR-II receptor expression than it is on the TGF-ß1-PRL response.

There are several proposed mechanisms that could explain the differential regulation of lactotropic cell functions by TßR-I and TßR-II receptors. It has been suggested that variable ratios of TßR-I and TßR-II expression cause differential binding of TGF-ß ligands, thus causing variable biological responses (26). Chen et al. (27) have proposed that type I and type II receptors either work together to signal, or type I receptors signal independently without signaling through type II receptors. This dual signaling pathway produces distinct cellular events. Finally, receptor and ligand-receptor interactions can be regulated by association with other proteins in the extracellular matrix or at the cellular membrane (28, 29). These examples provide a possible scenario for the multiple actions of TGF-ß1 through TßR-I and TßR-II receptor interaction.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank NIDDK and Pituitary Hormones and Antiserum Center for providing the PRL RIA kit, and Ms. Jeanne Jensen for editorial assistance. Animal surgery and care were in accordance with institutional guidelines and complied with the NIH policy governed by The Principles for Use of Animals and The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.


    Footnotes
 
1 This investigation was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants CA-56056, AA-11591, and AA-00220 (to D.K.S.). Back

Received December 12, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Moses HL, Yang EY, Pietenpol JA 1990 TGF-ß stimulation and inhibition of cell proliferation: new mechanistic insights. Cell 63:245–247[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Roberts AB, Sporn MB 1990 Peptide growth factors and their receptors. In: Sporn MB, Roberts AB (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, vol 95, pp 419–472
  3. Massague J 1990 The TGF-ß family. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:597–641[CrossRef]
  4. Sarkar DK, Kim KH, Minami S 1992 Transforming growth factor-ß1 mRNA and protein expression in the pituitary gland and its action on PRL secretion and lactotropic growth. Mol Endocrinol 6:1825–1833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Burns G, Sarkar DK 1993 Transforming growth factor-ß1-like immunoreactivity in the pituitary gland of the rat: effect of estrogen. Endocrinology 133:1444–1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pastorcic M, Sarkar DK Evidence that both transforming growth factor ß1 and transforming growth factor ß3 are present in the pituitary lactotropes and control lactotropic function. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Anaheim, CA, 1994 (Abstract 1379)
  7. Minami S, Sarkar DK 1997 Transforming growth factor-ß1 inhibits prolactin secretion and lactotropic cell proliferation in the pituitary of estrogen-treated Fischer 344 rats. Neurochem Int 30:499–506[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Delidow BC, Billis WM, Agarwal P, White BA 1991 Inhibition of prolactin gene transcription by transforming growth factor-ß in GH3 cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:1716–1722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Qian X, Jin L, Grande JP, Lloyd RV 1996 Transforming growth factor-beta and p27 expression in pituitary cells. Endocrinology 137:3051–3060[Abstract]
  10. Tan SK, Wang FF, Pu HF, Liu T-C 1997 Differential effects of age on transforming growth factor-ß1 inhibition of prolactin gene expression vs. secretion in rat anterior pituitary cells. Endocrinology 138:878–885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pastorcic M, De A, Boyadjieva N, Vale W, Sarkar DK 1995 Reduction in the expression and action of transforming growth factor ß1 on lactotropes during estrogen-induced tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 55:4892–4898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. De A, Boyadjieva N, Pastorcic M, Sarkar DK 1995 Potentiation of estrogen’s mitogenic effect on the pituitary gland by alcohol consumption. Int J Oncol 7:643–648
  13. Massague J 1992 Receptors for the TGF-ß family. Cell 69:1067–1070[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Derynck R 1994 TGF-ß-receptor-mediated signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 19:548–553[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Newman MJ 1993 Transforming growth factor beta and the cell surface receptor in tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev 12:239–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. De A, Morgan TE, Speth RC, Boyadjieva N, Pastorcic M, Sarkar DK 1996 Pituitary lactotrope expresses TGF-ß type II receptor mRNA and protein and contains [125I]TGF-ß1-binding sites. J Endocrinol 149:19–27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single step method for RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  18. Ward JM, Hagiwara A, Anderson LM, Lindsey K, Diwan BA 1993 The chronic hepatic or renal toxicity of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, acetaminophen, sodium barbital and pentobarbital in male B6C3F1 mice: autoradiographic, immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence for levels of DNA synthesis not associated with carcinogenesis or tumor promotion. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 96:494–506[CrossRef]
  19. Pardee AB 1989 G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation. Science 246:603–608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Takahashi T, Eitzman B, Bossert NL, Walmer D, Sparrow K, Flanders KC, McLachlan J, Nelson KG 1994 Transforming growth factor ß1, ß2 and ß3 messenger RNA and protein expression in mouse uterus and vagina during estrogen-induced growth: a comparison to other estrogen-regulated genes. Cell Growth Differ 5:919–935[Abstract]
  21. Pastorcic M, Wang H, Elbrecht A, Tsai MJ, Malley BWO 1986 Control of transcription initiation in vitro requires binding of a transcription factor to the distal promoter of the ovalbumin gene. Mol Cell Biol 6:2784–2791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chen CA, Okayama H 1988 Calcium phosphate-mediated gene transfer: a highly efficient transfection system for stably transforming cells with plasmid DNA. BioTechniques 6:622–638
  23. Chen RH, Moses HL, Maruoka M, Derynck R, Kawabata M 1995 Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of the cytoplasmic domains of the type I and type II transforming growth factor-ß receptors. J Biol Chem 270:12235–12241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kim IYI, Ahn H-J, Zeiner DJ, Park L, Sensibar JA, Lee C 1996 Expression and localization of transforming growth factor-ß receptor type I and type II in the rat ventral prostrate during regression. Mol Endocrinol 10:107–115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Somogyi R, Wen X, Ma W, Barker JL 1995 Developmental kinetics of GAD family mRNA{alpha} parallel neurogenesis in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 15:2575–2591[Abstract]
  26. Ebner R, Chen RH, Shum L, Lawler S, Zioncheck TF, Lee A, Lopez AR, Derynck R 1993 Cloning of a type I TGF-ß receptor and its effect on TGF-ß binding to the type II receptor. Science 260:1344–1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chen RH, Ebner R, Derynck R 1993 Inactivation of the type II receptor reveals two receptor pathways for the diverse TGF-ß activities. Science 260:1335–1338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Butzow R, Fukushima D, Twardzik DR, Ruoslahti E 1993 A 60-kD protein mediates the binding of transforming growth factor-ß to cell surface and extracellular matrix proteoglycans. J Cell Biol 122:721–727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ruoslahti E, Yamaguchi Y 1991 Proteoglycans as modulators of growth factor activities. Cell 64:867–869[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. Giacomini, M. Paez-Pereda, J. Stalla, G. K. Stalla, and E. Arzt
Molecular Interaction of BMP-4, TGF-{beta}, and Estrogens in Lactotrophs: Impact on the PRL Promoter
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2009; 23(7): 1102 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J.-F. Ethier, P. G. Farnworth, J. K. Findlay, and G. T. Ooi
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Modulates Inhibin A Bioactivity in the L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cell Line by Competing for Binding to Betaglycan
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2002; 16(12): 2754 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. M. Bilezikjian, A. Z. Corrigan, A. L. Blount, Y. Chen, and W. W. Vale
Regulation and Actions of Smad7 in the Modulation of Activin, Inhibin, and Transforming Growth Factor-{{beta}} Signaling in Anterior Pituitary Cells
Endocrinology, March 1, 2001; 142(3): 1065 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. J. Watters, T.-Y. Chun, Y.-N. Kim, P. J. Bertics, and J. Gorski
Estrogen Modulation of Prolactin Gene Expression Requires an Intact Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signal Transduction Pathway in Cultured Rat Pituitary Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2000; 14(11): 1872 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Freeman, B. Kanyicska, A. Lerant, and G. Nagy
Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1523 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. N. Rao, L. Li, B. L. Bass, and J.-Y. Wang
Expression of the TGF-beta receptor gene and sensitivity to growth inhibition following polyamine depletion
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): C1034 - C1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Hentges, M. Pastorcic, A. De, N. Boyadjieva, and D. K. Sarkar
Opposing Actions of Two Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Isoforms on Pituitary Lactotropic Cell Proliferation
Endocrinology, April 1, 2000; 141(4): 1528 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Hentges, N. Boyadjieva, and D. K. Sarkar
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}3 Stimulates Lactotrope Cell Growth by Increasing Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor from Folliculo-Stellate Cells
Endocrinology, March 1, 2000; 141(3): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. H. Stahl, S. K. Kendall, M. L. Brinkmeier, T. L. Greco, D. E. Watkins-Chow, A. Campos-Barros, R. V. Lloyd, and S. A. Camper
Thyroid Hormone Is Essential for Pituitary Somatotropes and Lactotropes
Endocrinology, April 1, 1999; 140(4): 1884 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarkar, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghasemzadeh, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarkar, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghasemzadeh, M. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals