help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaVoie, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaVoie, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 1 178-186
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Concerted Regulation of Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene Expression by Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Porcine Granulosa Cells: Promoter Activation, Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Stability, and Sterol Feedback1

Holly A. LaVoie, James C. Garmey, Richard N. Day and Johannes D. Veldhuis

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (H.A.L., J.C.G., R.N.D., J.D.V.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine (H.A.L.), Orono, Maine 04469


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and the gonadotropin, FSH, can synergize to stimulate progesterone production in primary cultures of maturing granulosa cells. These trophic hormones increase low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor binding and internalization, and the utilization of LDL-borne cholesterol by granulosa cells. To determine whether and how IGF-I and FSH control the genomic expression of the LDL receptor, we evaluated their individual and concerted effects on LDL receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) accumulation, stability, and gene promoter activity in first passage monolayer (serum-free) cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Ribonuclease protection assays revealed that LDL receptor mRNA accumulation was increased by human recombinant IGF-I (100 ng/ml), FSH (25 ng/ml NIDDK oFSH-20), or their combination by 2.2-, 2.6-, and 4.6-fold, respectively (P < 0.01). Hormonally stimulated LDL receptor mRNA accumulation was suppressed by 54–75% by the concurrent addition of LDL substrate (50 µg/ml). The combination of FSH and IGF-I significantly prolonged the message half-life, even in the presence of LDL. Using a combination of rapid amplification of cDNA 5'-ends, PCR with adapter-ligated genomic DNA, Southern hybridization, and DNA sequencing, we isolated 1076 bp of the porcine LDL receptor gene upstream of the coding region. In transient transfection assays, with a pLDLR1076/luciferase plasmid construct, FSH, FSH plus IGF-I, or 8-bromo-cAMP (1 mM) treatment (but not IGF-I alone) increased luciferase reporter gene activity by 10- to 23-fold in porcine granulosa cells. Over time in serum-free culture, the basal activity of the LDL receptor gene promoter increased and eventually surpassed hormone-stimulated effects, but was suppressed by LDL substrate (by 75%) at 24 h. The foregoing stimulatory hormone effects and sterol repression were localized to a 116-bp region in the porcine promoter between -255 and -139 upstream of the translational start site. We conclude that the combination of FSH and IGF-I can induce accumulation of LDL receptor mRNA in cultured granulosa cells even in the presence of sterol negative feedback and can do so mechanistically by a combination of promoter activation and increased mRNA stability.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE BIOSYNTHESIS of ovarian steroids is directly dependent on the availability of free cholesterol within the cell. Cholesterol must be obtained by the cell and transported to the inner mitochondrial membrane, the site of the rate-limiting enzymatic step in steroidogenesis, viz. cleavage of the cholesterol side-chain by the cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) complex (1). In species such as the pig and human, the major supply of extraovarian cholesterol for steroidogenesis derives from plasma low density lipoproteins (LDL) (2). When available, LDL-borne cholesterol is acquired by binding to steroidogenic cells via specific membrane receptors, followed by internalization by receptor-mediated endocytosis (3).

In cultured maturing (porcine) granulosa cells, FSH stimulates progesterone biosynthesis; this trophic effect is augmented markedly by the intrafollicular peptide insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) (4, 5, 6). Supplying LDL to granulosa cells significantly increases trophic hormone-stimulated progesterone production (4). In addition, IGF-I and FSH both increase the number of LDL surface receptors, the cellular uptake and degradation of LDL, and cholesterol’s utilization in steroidogenesis (4, 7). In single cell studies, FSH is able to increase the population of cells capable of accumulating LDL, possibly due to an increase in LDL receptor synthesis (8). Previous nonquantitative studies suggested that FSH might also stimulate the accumulation of LDL receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) (9).

Studies in nongonadal cells have shown that LDL receptor mRNA regulation occurs at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels and is subject to sterol negative feedback suppression (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Human luteinized granulosa cells also exhibit sterol-induced feedback suppression of LDL receptor gene expression that is partially overridden by treatment with human CG or a cAMP analog (15).

Here, we investigated whether and how FSH and/or IGF-I individually and jointly regulate the expression of the LDL receptor gene as an extension of their previously reported effects on the receptor protein in ovarian cells. In the current study, we tested whether FSH and IGF-I alone or in combination can increase granulosa cell LDL receptor mRNA accumulation, and whether this hormone-facilitated expression is sensitive to LDL feedback suppression. To evaluate posttranscriptional control, the stability of the LDL receptor mRNA in granulosa cells was assessed in control vs. hormone-treated cells. We then cloned a 1076-bp fragment upstream of the translational start site of the porcine LDL receptor gene for use in transient transfection studies to further evaluate hormone and sterol regulation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents
Ovine FSH (NIDDK oFSH-20) was obtained from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program, NIH (Bethesda, MD); human recombinant IGF-I was obtained from Bachem (Torrance, CA); Amphotericin, nystatin, 5,6-dichloro-1ß-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB), and 8-bromo- cAMP (8-Br-cAMP) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO); [32P]UTP was obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL); human LDL (density, 1.019–1.063 g/ml) and lipoprotein-deficient FBS (LDS) were obtained from PerImmune, Inc. (Rockville, MD); Eagle’s MEM, penicillin/streptomycin, FCS, and lipofectamine reagent were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Lyophilized IGF-I was reconstituted in sterile distilled water plus 10 mM glacial acetic acid and 1 mg/ml BSA, fraction V (Sigma Chemical Co.). The IGF-I diluent was used as vehicle in place of IGF-I. FSH was dissolved in sterile Dulbecco’s PBS.

Cell culture
Granulosa cells were isolated from small and medium-sized (1–5 mm) follicles of immature swine by fine needle aspiration, as previously described (16). Cells were plated in bicarbonate-buffered MEM with antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin, Amphotericin, and nystatin) supplemented initially with 3% FCS to permit cell anchorage. For mRNA accumulation studies, approximately 4–5 x 107 viable granulosa cells were plated in 10-cm culture dishes (Corning, Corning, NY). Granulosa cells were allowed to attach to culture dishes at 37 C and 5% CO2 for 16–18 h. After the attachment period, cells were maintained in serum-free MEM with the indicated treatments or vehicle.

mRNA stability studies
mRNA half-life studies employed the RNA polymerase II inhibitor, DRB (17). Attached granulosa cells were treated with vehicle or FSH plus IGF-I in serum-free MEM for an initial 48 h. After this initial treatment period, spent medium was replaced with fresh medium containing vehicle or FSH plus IGF-I with either 100 µM DRB or an equivalent amount of DMSO (vehicle). DRB (100 µM) or vehicle was then added to cultures every 6 h. Consistent with other studies (18), our parallel experiments using [3H]uridine incorporation showed that repeated addition of DRB was necessary to effectively suppress RNA synthesis. Total RNA was isolated after 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, and/or 24 h and analyzed by ribonuclease (RNase) protection assays.

RNA isolation and RNase protection assays
Granulosa cells from two or three culture dishes were pooled for RNA isolation for each treatment in each experiment. Total RNA was isolated with Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). RNase protection assays were performed with either 10 µg granulosa cell total RNA or nontarget yeast RNA and saturating amounts of antisense porcine LDL receptor and human 18S ribosomal RNA riboprobes as previously described (9, 19).

Porcine LDL receptor promoter cloning
The porcine LDL receptor promoter region was cloned using PCR techniques. An oligonucleotide primer corresponding to sequence within the partially cloned porcine LDL receptor complementary DNA (cDNA) for exon 17 (9) was synthesized (5'-GTGGTCTTCTGGTAGACAGGGTTG-3') and used as a downstream primer with rapid amplification of cDNA 5'-ends (5'-RACE; Clontech Marathon cDNA amplification kit, Palo Alto, CA). The RNA for cDNA synthesis was derived from healthy porcine corpus luteum. This strategy yielded initial sequence information in the 5'-end of the LDL receptor mRNA. Several DNA libraries were constructed by digesting aliquots of genomic porcine DNA with different restriction enzymes (SspI, ScaI, or PvuII). The DNA restriction fragments were ligated to adapters that served as a template for an upstream oligonucleotide primer (Clontech Marathon cDNA kit). Two downstream oligonucleotide primers for PCR were designed corresponding to the sequence of the LDL receptor gene (exon 1) as elucidated from 5'-RACE. Genomic PCR products were subjected to Southern hybridization with LDL receptor cDNA sequences, and positive bands were subcloned and sequenced. LDL receptor promoter sequences were identified by LDL receptor cDNA sequence overlap and comparison of the sequence homology with published promoter sequences for the LDL receptor (human, hamster, rat, mouse) (20, 21, 22). The longest isolated LDL receptor promoter fragment spans 1076 bp upstream of the translational start site and 11 bases into the coding region of exon 1. Both strands were fully sequenced at least twice, and the sequence has been submitted to GenBank (accession no. AF022657). Additional oligonucleotide primers were also used with two other batches of porcine genomic DNA to verify that the same fragment(s) could be amplified from nonadapter-ligated DNA. DNA was sequenced manually and/or by an automated ABI model DNA sequencer (Biomolecular Research Facility, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA) and an ABI stretch model sequencer (DNA Sequencing Facility, University of Maine, Orono, ME).

The promoterless luciferase vector contains a gene for firefly luciferase that targets to the cytoplasm (Luc IAV, Promega Corp., Madison, WI) followed by a polyadenylation tract (TK poly A, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). LDL receptor promoter 5'-deletional fragments were prepared by PCR. All oligonucleotide primers contained engineered restriction enzyme digestion sites to allow for directional cloning upstream of the start codon for the luciferase gene. Promoter DNA fragments included -1076, -753, -455, -255, and -139 bp upstream through +11 bp downstream of the LDL receptor translational start site. Porcine LDL receptor promoter luciferase reporter gene constructs are denoted pLDLR/luciferase. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

Transfection of porcine granulosa cells
Granulosa cells were plated in bicarbonate-buffered MEM plus antibiotics supplemented with 3% FCS (or LDS as indicated) to permit cell anchorage. For transfection studies, 8 x 106 viable cells were allowed to attach to culture dishes (3.5 cm) at 37 C and 5% CO2 for 39–43 h, with a medium change after the first 24 h. This longer attachment period compared with mRNA studies was found to increase cell retention on culture dishes during and after the transfection period. Transfection medium (1 ml/well) was prepared in serum-free MEM without antibiotics using 2 µg total plasmid DNA and 12 µl lipofectamine. After a 6-h transfection period, the medium was replaced with serum-free MEM containing antibiotics and the indicated hormone treatment or vehicle. At the end of the treatment period (indicated in figures), cells were rinsed with D-PBS, lysed, and stored at -70 C until assayed. Light production by lysates was measured using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and a Turner TD-20e luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Protein concentrations from lysate supernatants were measured using Bio-Rad protein dye reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). As previously reported, porcine granulosa cells do not express most viral promoters (23); therefore, results were normalized to protein concentrations. Studies with 5'-deletional fragments were performed using equimolar concentrations of pLDLR/luciferase constructs adjusted to a total of 2 µg DNA using the promoterless luciferase construct.

Progesterone measurements
Progesterone concentrations in culture medium were measured by RIA using antibody-coated tubes manufactured by ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa Mesa, CA). The RIA has a sensitivity of 0.15 ng/ml and less than 1% cross-reactivity with other relevant steroid hormones (16).

Statistics
Individual experiments were performed using separate batches of 200–300 ovaries and were performed at least 3 times unless indicated. For transfection studies, duplicate wells were used to generate a mean value for each treatment in each experiment. To adjust for nonhomogeneous variances in the LDL receptor mRNA and transfection data, raw values were transformed by multiplying by a factor of 10 and converting each to its natural logarithm value. Progesterone concentrations were transformed directly to natural logarithm values. Transformed values were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s highest significant difference multiple comparison test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. mRNA stability data were also transformed before analysis. Data for 0 h of DRB treatment were normalized to the average control or average FSH plus IGF-I value to adjust for different starting mRNA levels and were then transformed to their natural logarithm. Linear regression was performed on the transformed data from five experiments (no LDL) or three experiments (plus LDL). Half-life ranges were estimated by the equation t1/2 = 0.693/(Kd ± SE) (24). All statistical comparisons were performed using Systat software version 7.0 (Systat, Inc., Evanston, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As shown in Fig. 1Go, LDL receptor mRNA accumulation in swine granulosa cells was significantly stimulated by 48-h treatment with FSH (25 ng/ml), IGF-I (100 ng/ml), or their combination (P < 0.01 vs. control, no LDL). These hormone concentrations yield maximal progesterone production in culture (9) (Jayes, F. L., and J. D. Veldhuis, unpublished). Incubation of cells with LDL (50 µg/ml) substantially suppressed basal and hormone-stimulated LDL receptor mRNA accumulation relative to the same treatment without LDL (P < 0.05; reduction range, 54–75%). In the presence of LDL, the combination of FSH and IGF-I was the only treatment able to significantly increase LDL receptor mRNA accumulation above basal levels (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations from the cultures in Fig. 1Go are shown in Table 1Go and confirm hormone efficacy. In the absence of LDL, corresponding mRNA and progesterone concentrations followed the same pattern of increase. In the presence of LDL substrate, progesterone significantly increased in all hormone treatments, whereas mRNA, which is sensitive to sterol feedback repression, only increased with the combination of FSH and IGF-I.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of FSH, IGF-I, or their combination with and without LDL on LDL receptor mRNA accumulation. After an overnight attachment period, granulosa cells were treated in serum-free medium for 48 h with vehicle (C), FSH (25 ng/ml), IGF-I (100 ng/ml), or FSH plus IGF-I with or without 50 µg/ml human LDL. Ten micrograms of total cellular RNA were subjected to RNase protection assay followed by autoradiography. Data represent the mean ± SEM optical density units of LDL receptor mRNA normalized for 18S ribosomal RNA and expressed as fold increases relative to control (vehicle, no LDL) for three or four experiments. a, Treatment significantly greater than control, P < 0.01; b, treatment significantly lower than same hormone treatment without LDL, P < 0.05; c, treatment greater than all other treatments with LDL, P < 0.05 (by ANOVA and Tukey’s highest significant difference post-hoc analysis).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Progesterone accumulation in serum-free cultures of porcine granulosa cells from mRNA studies in Fig. 1Go expressed as fold increases relative to vehicle control

 
In time-course studies, 48 h was found to be maximal for granulosa cell LDL receptor mRNA accumulation for all treatments; however, increases in accumulation were observed with shorter treatment periods. In two time-course experiments, FSH treatment for 6, 12, and 24 h increased LDL receptor mRNA accumulation by 1.78 ± 0.04-, 1.62 ± 0.18-, and 1.64 ± 0.04-fold relative to the control value, respectively. LDL receptor mRNA accumulation was the same as the control value with IGF-I treatment for 6 h, but did increase at 12 and 24 h by 1.51 ± 0.12- and 1.61 ± 0.04-fold, respectively. FSH combined with IGF-I exhibited maximal stimulation at all time points, increasing mRNA accumulation by 2.13 ± 0.02-, 2.20 ± 0.19-, and 2.74 ± 0.21-fold at 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively.

To examine the contribution of transcription to the observed changes in the LDL receptor mRNA levels, we cloned and sequenced a region of the porcine LDL receptor gene promoter. Figure 2Go shows the cloned nucleotide sequence for 1076 bases of the 5'-region of the LDL receptor gene upstream of the translational start site denoted +1. The transcriptional start site(s) is estimated from 5'-RACE products to be at or near nucleotide -114. Two regions of high homology between the porcine sequence and the human sequence were identified. Included in the more 3'-homologous region was a TATA-like element and 3 repetitive sequences needed for regulated expression of the human promoter (25). One notable difference between the pig and the human was the lack of 1 nucleotide in repeat 2 (the sterol regulatory element) of the porcine sequence at -148 to -149. Manual and automated sequencing of both DNA strands from multiple fragments generated by PCR using three different pools of porcine genomic DNA showed only 15 instead of the 16 nucleotides observed in the human and rodents (20, 21, 22). The second region of high homology (bases -565 to -599) contains a putative serum response element in the human promoter (26). Immediately before repeat 1 in the porcine sequence is an additional motif that resembles repeats 1 and 3.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Nucleotide sequence of the 5'-flanking region and a portion of exon 1 of the porcine LDL receptor gene and comparison with the human promoter. Sequences were compared using the gapped BLAST program (51 ). Capital letters represent the porcine nucleotide sequence. The dashes represent base homology with the human LDL receptor promoter, and lowercase letters indicate base differences in these regions. Porcine sequences similar to human promoter repeats 1–3 are noted in italics and at beginning of each repeat. The porcine sequence identical to the human TATA-like element is boxed. The coding region of exon 1 is shown in bold letters. The beginning of the coding region is designated +1. The underlined sequence indicates a motif similar to repeat 1 and 3. Arrows indicate the start of 5'-deletional fragments. The asterisk represents the lack of a nucleotide within the porcine sequence found to be critical for sterol regulation in the human promoter.

 
FSH and/or IGF-I regulation of the porcine LDL receptor promoter clone was investigated by transient transfection in primary cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Four-hour treatment was found to be optimal in time-course studies for the relative effects of FSH and FSH plus IGF-I on the LDL receptor promoter-driven reporter gene activity, and thus was used in most experiments. Figure 3Go shows the effects of FSH and IGF-I on transcription initiated from the -1076-bp promoter fragment as measured by luciferase reporter gene activity normalized for protein and expressed relative to vehicle control. Figure 3Go, a and b, shows that FSH stimulates reporter gene activity in a dose-dependent manner. IGF-I had no significant effect on promoter activity at any time point sampled. In Fig. 3aGo, cells were initially cultured in 3% FCS for 39–43 h, then changed to serum-free medium for transfection and treatment. In Fig. 3bGo, granulosa cells were initiated in 3% LDS before transfection to determine whether hormone-stimulated increases in promoter activation observed at 4 h were due to lipoprotein withdrawal when cells were changed to serum-free medium. After the attachment period, these cells were treated identically to those allowed to attach in the presence of FCS. The basal reporter gene activity was lower in cells attaching in the presence of LDS (0.04–0.19 arbitrary light units (alu)/10 µg protein) compared with cells in FCS (0.15–6.19 alu/10 µg protein). In LDS and FCS cultures, the relative stimulations by FSH were similar, as was IGF-I’s augmentation of (5 and 25 ng/ml) FSH-stimulated promoter activity (163% and 146%, respectively, for LDS and 163% and 144%, respectively for FCS).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of FSH and IGF-I on expression of the pLDLR1076/luciferase construct in granulosa cells: comparison of unmodified (3% FCS) and LDS. A, Cells were plated and incubated in MEM plus 3% FCS for 39–43 h before transfection and treatment in serum-free MEM. Data are the mean ± SEM for five to nine separate experiments, each performed with duplicate wells. Transformed data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. FSH treatment (5 and 25 ng/ml) was administered alone or combined with IGF-I (100 ng/ml) to stimulate LDL receptor promoter-driven luciferase activity over 4 h (*, P < 0.001). B, Cells were plated and incubated in MEM and 3% LDS for 39–43 h before transfection and treatment in serum-free MEM. Data are the mean ± SEM for three independent experiments, each performed with duplicate wells. Transformed data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. FSH treatment (5 and 25 ng/ml) with or without IGF-I (100 ng/ml) for 4 h also stimulated LDL receptor promoter-driven luciferase activity (*, P < 0.001) when cells were allowed to attach in 3% LDS and MEM.

 
We next examined the cAMP responsiveness of the promoter under the same conditions as those described in Fig. 3aGo. The cAMP analog, 8-Br-cAMP (1 mM), alone stimulated the pLDLR1076/luciferase reporter gene activity by 23 ± 6.5-fold at 4 h (P = 0.001 vs. control; n = 3), similar to maximal stimulation with (25 ng/ml) FSH plus IGF-I (19 ± 2.0-fold). There was no consistent effect of IGF-I on this 8-Br-cAMP stimulation at this time point.

As granulosa cell LDL receptor mRNA is sensitive to sterol feedback repression (27), as is the human LDL receptor promoter (28), experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of sterol feedback on the porcine promoter. Figure 4Go shows the results of granulosa cells transfected with the pLDLR1076/luciferase construct and treated with vehicle or hormones, with or without 50 µg/ml LDL. These time-course experiments reveal the temporal patterns of basal activity, hormone stimulation, and LDL responsiveness of the porcine promoter. Relative hormonal stimulation was optimal at 4 h and decreased over time. This decrease in hormone stimulation was apparently due to an increase in basal (vehicle control, no LDL) promoter activity over time that eventually surpassed hormone effects (Fig. 4Go, inset). Basal activity (raw values, alu per 10 µg protein) in the control (no LDL) at 8, 16, and 24 h increased, on the average, 4.7-, 58.8-, and 74.1-fold vs. the 4 h control value, respectively. Although no relative stimulation was observed by IGF-I at any time point over basal (including 48-h treatment; data not shown), luciferase activity (alu per 10 µg protein) in IGF-I-treated cells increased at 8, 16, and 24 h by 2.0-, 17.2-, and 18.0-fold vs. that at 4 h, respectively. Relative FSH-stimulated responses decreased over time, whereas the absolute luciferase activity (alu per 10 µg protein) increased at 8, 16, and 24 h by 1.4-, 6.2-, and 5.3-fold vs. that to the 4-h treatment, respectively. In contrast, FSH- plus IGF-I-treated cells maintained a fairly constant luciferase activity at 8, 16, and 24 h, with 1.0-, 1.2-, and 1.2-fold changes vs. that at 4 h, respectively.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Time courses of hormonal stimulatory and sterol-repressive effects on the pLDLR1076/luciferase construct activation. Granulosa cells were plated and incubated in MEM plus 3% FCS for 39–43 h before transfection in serum-free MEM. After transfection, medium was replaced with serum-free MEM containing vehicle or treatments with or without 50 µg/ml LDL (0 h). C, I, F, and FI represent vehicle control, IGF-I (100 ng/ml), FSH (25 ng/ml), and FSH plus IGF-I, respectively. Data are shown as the fold increase relative to the control value (no LDL) at the same time point and represent the mean ± SEM of three experiments, each performed with duplicate wells. Inset, Absolute promoter activity data for vehicle control with and without LDL. Basal activation of the promoter increased over time and was suppressed by 75% at 24 h by the addition of 50 µg/ml LDL.

 
To identify the general region of hormone-sensitive DNA regulatory elements in the promoter, four deletional constructs (-753, -455, -255, -139 bp) of the porcine LDL receptor promoter were made and assessed along with the full-length (-1076 bp) construct and the promoterless luciferase vector (0 bp) in transient transfections of granulosa cells (Fig. 5aGo). All basal and hormone-stimulated promoter activities were localized to a 116-bp region between -255 and -139 bp upstream of the translational start site. LDL-mediated repression of the basal activity of the promoter assayed at 24 h also resided in the -255 bp fragment (Fig. 5bGo).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Deletional analysis of the LDL receptor promoter activity. A, Equimolar quantities of 5'-deletional fragments of the LDL receptor promoter were transfected into granulosa cells, which were then treated for 4 h with FSH (5 ng/ml) with or without IGF-I (100 ng/ml). The data from each experiment were normalized to the pLDLR1076/luciferase construct control to adjust for varying basal activity among experiments. Data represent the mean ± SEM for three independent experiments performed with duplicate wells. Basal and hormone-stimulated activities were localized to the region between -255 and -139 bp upstream of the translational start site. B, The -255-bp fragment contains the sterol-responsive region. Granulosa cells were transfected with equimolar amounts of the pLDLR1076/luciferase or the deletional pLDLR255/luciferase construct. Cells were then treated with vehicle with or without 50 µg/ml LDL in serum-free MEM for 24 h. Data represent the mean ± SEM for three separate experiments, each performed with duplicate wells. Transformed data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, P < 0.002.

 
As our data (Fig. 1Go) suggested that a maximal stimulus by FSH plus IGF-I could partially overcome the LDL suppression of mRNA accumulation at 48 h in granulosa cell cultures, we tested whether LDL receptor mRNA was stabilized by this hormone combination and whether LDL affected mRNA half-life. First granulosa cells were treated with vehicle or FSH plus IGF-I for 48 h, as described in Fig. 1Go, to hormonally up-regulate the LDL receptor mRNA. After this initial period, cells were treated with the RNA polymerase II inhibitor, DRB, at 0 h and again every 6 h to stop transcription. As shown in the top panel of Fig. 6Go, the absolute half-life range with FSH plus IGF-I (16–25 h) was longer than that of the vehicle control (4.9–6.1 h). The bottom panel of Fig. 6Go shows that the addition of 50 µg/ml LDL did not alter the half-lives of FSH- plus IGF-I-treated (11–25 h) cells or control cells (4.9–6.2 h). Dimethylsulfoxide-treated cultures not receiving DRB were also carried through experiments. Dimethylsulfoxide-treated cultures collected at 24 h (n = 2) showed that control and FSH- plus IGF-I-treated cultures averaged 81% and 95% of 0 h values, respectively, whereas cultures treated with LDL averaged 10% and 68% of 0 h values, respectively. This observation also supports the idea that LDL receptor mRNA accumulation in FSH- plus IGF-I-treated cells is more resistant to sterol repression than that in vehicle-treated granulosa cells. In two other experiments with IGF-I alone, IGF-I increased the LDL receptor mRNA half-life by 1.3 to 3.2 h compared with the vehicle control value.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. LDL receptor mRNA is stabilized by maximal hormone treatment even in the presence of LDL. After a 16- to 18-h attachment period in 3% FCS, granulosa cells were treated with vehicle or FSH (25 ng/ml) plus IGF-I (100 ng/ml) in serum-free MEM for an initial 48 h. Medium was then replaced with fresh MEM containing vehicle or hormones with or without 50 µg/ml LDL and 100 µM DRB. •, Vehicle control; {blacksquare}, FSH plus IGF-I. The mRNA half-life (t1/2) ranges are shown. Hormone treatment increased the LDL receptor half-life, whereas LDL did not affect stability.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF-I and FSH stimulate LDL receptor mRNA accumulation in porcine granulosa cells, which is repressed by exogenous LDL. Analogous to earlier studies with hCG in human luteinized granulosa cells (15, 29), the combination of FSH and IGF-I could partially overcome sterol suppression in swine granulosa cells. This may be due in part to the ability of cells treated with both FSH and IGF-I to use LDL-borne substrate for progesterone biosynthesis at higher rates than either treatment alone (4), thus reducing intracellular sterol accumulation, which mediates feedback suppression. Sterol repression was observed at the level of LDL receptor promoter trans-activation, but it did not affect mRNA stability. In contrast, maximal hormonal stimulation by the concerted actions of FSH and IGF-I increased mRNA half-life up to 4-fold compared with the control value. The average 2.3-h increase in the mRNA half-life of IGF-I-treated cells in the absence of a relative increase in transcriptional activity, probably accounts for the net increase mRNA accumulation observed in RNase protections assays. The combined effects of FSH and IGF-I on mRNA accumulation can be explained by increases in LDL receptor promoter activity and mRNA stability.

The kinetics of the sensitive luciferase reporter system may not necessarily parallel LDL receptor mRNA accumulation, as the latter depends on transcription and mRNA stability. The half-lives of the luciferase polyadenylated mRNA and protein in eukaryotic cells are relatively short, being approximately 2 and 3 h, respectively (30, 31), whereas the LDL receptor mRNA half-life was at least 5 h. In addition, transfected plasmid DNA may be more structurally accessible to regulatory proteins than endogenous chromosomal DNA facilitating transcription (32). Despite these concerns, important points can be derived from this reporter gene system in these untransformed cells. FSH with or without IGF-I can stimulate transcription of the LDL receptor promoter. Early promoter stimulation is observed even in the presence of exogenous LDL. Hormone activation and sterol responsiveness are localized to regions with known transcriptional regulation.

FSH and IGF-I interact to induce progestin biosynthesis in maturing human, rat, and pig granulosa cells in vitro (4, 33, 34). Although in vivo progesterone is not a major product of nonluteinized granulosa cells, progesterone production in culture is an indicator of cytodifferentiation and luteinization (35). Our cultured granulosa cells represent a model for the early stages of hormonally driven luteinization. In vivo, multiple trophic hormones, including FSH and IGF-I, coordinate changes in granulosa cell development over the course of the entire follicular phase. The terminal luteinization process results from the gonadotropin surge and subsequent follicle rupture. Thus, we speculate that LH, rather than FSH, may play a significant role in maintaining LDL receptor mRNA concentrations in fully luteinized cells.

Unlike other tissues, the ovarian follicle represents a unique environment with respect to LDL availability. Before the LH surge, the basement membrane between the thecal and granulosa cell layers prevents the large LDL molecule (~2.2 million Da) from entering the follicular fluid (2), and thus LDL is not readily available to granulosa cells for steroidogenesis. Despite this lack of access to LDL substrate, LDL binding and uptake occur in freshly isolated granulosa cells from (mammalian) ovarian follicles before ovulation (36, 37). Recent in vivo studies in PMSG-stimulated gilts show that LDL receptor mRNA is increased in preovulatory follicles compared with that in unstimulated follicles even before a hCG injection that mimics the LH surge (19). Given these observations, we postulate that LDL receptor mRNA expression is up-regulated in granulosa cells before ovulation in an LDL-deficient environment in anticipation of later steroidogenic needs. The LDL receptor mRNA could subsequently be stabilized further at high levels by trophic hormones (FSH, IGF-I, and/or, most likely, LH).

cAMP analogs increase granulosa cell LDL receptor mRNA accumulation in culture (27, 38). Our porcine granulosa cell luciferase-reported transfection studies also reveal potent cAMP analog stimulation of homologous LDL receptor promoter expression. In other transfection studies with human LDL receptor promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs, steroidogenic JEG-3 cells exhibited LDL feedback suppression (28), but not cAMP responsiveness (39). A contrast between the latter clonal cells and our primary culture cells may reflect a cell-specific transcription factor found in ovarian granulosa cells and/or the use of a more sensitive luciferase reporter system (10).

In nongonadal cells, sterol repression of human LDL receptor promoter trans-activation has been localized to a regulatory sequence designated the sterol regulatory element-I (SRE-I) (11, 40). SRE-I acts as a conditional enhancer that promotes LDL receptor gene expression in the absence of sterols, but suppresses transcription in the presence of sterols. Other known regulatory elements in the human promoter include one essential TATA box-like sequence and three 16-bp GC-rich imperfect repeats (41). With respect to the repeats, the SRE-I lies within repeat 2, whereas repeats 1 and 3 can bind the transcription factor Sp1. The SRE-binding protein can associate with the SRE-I and cooperates with Sp1 bound to repeat 3 to induce transcription in nongonadal cells (42). SRE-binding protein is regulated by sterols. Recent evidence suggests that repeat 3 may act independently of the SRE-I to induce transcription as well (43). We identified similar sequence elements within the porcine LDL receptor promoter -255-bp fragment. Indeed, all basal and hormone (FSH plus IGF-I)-stimulated activity in porcine granulosa cells was localized to the region between -255 and -139 containing the three repetitive sequences. Sterol repression of the promoter in granulosa cells was also represented within the same -255-bp fragment of the porcine promoter. Future studies will address which specific DNA elements are involved in FSH/IGF-I responses in this 116-bp region and whether the transcription factor Sp1 mediates trans- activation.

FSH or cAMP analogs can trans-activate the cytochrome P450scc gene promoter (23, 44, 45). In porcine granulosa cells, FSH and IGF-I trans-activation is mediated by a 30-bp GC-rich region of the porcine cytochrome P450scc promoter. IGF-I appears to involve Sp1 binding and a second unknown transcription factor, designated P2 (23, 46). Although our porcine LDL receptor promoter did not respond to IGF-I alone, IGF-I consistently augmented FSH-stimulated effects. Thus, it is plausible that the interaction between these two trophic factors involves cooperation between one or more trans-acting factors regulated by FSH or IGF-I.

Our estimation of the unstimulated LDL receptor mRNA half-life (4.9–6.1 h) in granulosa cells was longer than the approximately 1–3 h reported for nongonadal cells (10, 14, 47). The difference in half-life may be due to our use of the less toxic RNA polymerase II inhibitor, DRB, rather than actinomycin compounds in earlier studies (24), to different culture conditions, or to intrinsic differences between granulosa and nonsteroidogenic cells.

The intrafollicular IGF-I system amplifies gonadotropic hormone action in granulosa cells at multiple end points, including steroid production and follicular survival (48, 49). IGF-I alone or combined with FSH can induce steroidogenic enzyme activity, mRNA accumulation, and promoter trans-activation in cultured granulosa cells (4, 23, 50). We extend these finding to include IGF-I’s modulation of basal and FSH-stimulated LDL receptor gene expression. IGF-I alone stimulates LDL receptor mRNA accumulation and interacts with FSH to promote the accumulation and stability of specific message in the presence of repressive sterol substrate. IGF-I also augments FSH-stimulated LDL receptor promoter activity. Further characterization of DNA elements and cell-specific proteins regulating this FSH/IGF-I interaction will probably provide new insights into how multiple genes are coordinated by trophic factors in preovulatory follicles.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Valerie Long for her excellent technical assistance in performing the progesterone RIAs.


    Footnotes
 
Address requests for reprints to: Dr. Johannes D. Veldhuis, Department of Internal Medicine, Box 202 Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908.

Current address: Dr. Holly A. LaVoie, Box 5751 Murray Hall, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469.

1 This work was supported by the Lalor Foundation, NIH National Research Service Awards HD-07382 and HD-08019 (to H.A.L.), NIH Grants HD-16393 and HD-16806 (to J.D.V.), and NIH Grant P30-HD-28934 (to the Center for Cellular and Molecular Reproduction). Back

Received April 10, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Miller WL 1988 Molecular biology of steroid hormone synthesis. Endocr Rev 9:295–318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Grummer RR, Carroll DJ 1988 A review of lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism: importance to ovarian function. J Anim Sci 66:3160–3173
  3. Brown MS, Goldstein JL 1985 The LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase–two membrane molecules that regulate cholesterol homeostasis. Curr Top Cell Regul 26:3–15[Medline]
  4. Veldhuis JD, Rodgers RJ 1987 Mechanisms subserving the steroidogenic synergism between follicle-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor I (somatomedin C). Alterations in cellular sterol metabolism in swine granulosa cells. J Biol Chem 262:7658–7664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Adashi EY, Resnick CE, Hernandez ER, May JV, Knecht M, Svoboda ME, Van Wyk JJ 1988 Insulin-like growth factor-I as an amplifier of follicle-stimulating hormone action: studies on mechanism(s) and site(s) of action in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 122:1583–1591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McArdle CA, Kohl C, Rieger K, Groner I, Wehrenberg U 1991 Effects of gonadotropins, insulin and insulin-like growth factor I on ovarian oxytocin and progesterone production. Mol Cell Endo 78:211–220[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Veldhuis JD 1988 Follicle-stimulating hormone regulates low density lipoprotein metabolism by swine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 123:1660–1667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Foster JD, Strauss III JF, Paavola LG 1993 Cellular events involved in hormonal control of receptor-mediated endocytosis: regulation occurs at multiple sites in the low density lipoprotein pathway, including steps beyond the receptor. Endocrinology 132:337–350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Garmey JC, Day RN, Day KH, Veldhuis JD 1993 Mechanisms of regulation of ovarian sterol metabolism by insulin- like growth factor type II (IGF-II): in vitro studies with swine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 133:800–808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stopeck AT, Nicholson AC, Mancini FP, Hajjar DP 1993 Cytokine regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene transcription in HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem 268:17489–17494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sudhof TC, Russell DW, Brown MS, Goldstein JL 1987 42 bp element from LDL receptor gene confers end-product repression by sterols when inserted into viral TK promoter. Cell 48:1061–1069[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Srivastava RA 1996 Regulation of the apolipoprotein E by dietary lipids occurs by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Mol Cell Biochem 155:153–162[Medline]
  13. Srivastava RA, Jiao S, Tang JJ, Pfleger BA, Kitchens RT, Schonfeld G 1991 In vivo regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B gene expressions by dietary fat and cholesterol in inbred strains of mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1086:29–43[Medline]
  14. Wilson GM, Roberts EA, Deeley RG 1997 Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models. J Lipid Res 38:437–446[Abstract]
  15. Golos TG, Strauss III JF 1985 Regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor synthesis in cultured luteinized human granulosa cells by human chorionic gonadotropin and 8-bromo-cyclic AMP. J Biol Chem 260:14399–14402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Urban RJ, Garmey JC, Shupnik MA, Veldhuis JD 1990 Insulin-like growth factor type I increases concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in primary cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 127:2481–2488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zandomeni R, Bunick D, Ackerman S, Mittleman B, Weinmann R 1983 Mechanism of action of DRB III. Effect on specific in vitro initiation of transcription. J Mol Biol 167:561–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Martus NS, Farin CE 1994 Effectiveness of DRB for inhibiting germinal vesicle breakdown in bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 42:1295–1302[CrossRef]
  19. LaVoie HA, Benoit AM, Garmey JC, Dailey RA, Wright DJ, Veldhuis JD 1997 Coordinate developmental expression of genes regulating sterol economy and cholesterol side-chain cleavage in the porcine ovary. Biol Reprod 57:402–407[Abstract]
  20. Sudhof TC, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Russell DW 1985 The LDL receptor gene: a mosaic of exons shared with different proteins. Science 228:815–822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hoffer MJ, van Eck MM, Petrij F, van der Zee A, de Wit E, Meijer D, Grosveld G, Havekes LM, Hofker MH, Frants RR 1993 The mouse low density lipoprotein receptor gene: cDNA sequence and exon-intron structure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 191:880–886[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Bishop RW 1992 Structure of the hamster low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Lipid Res 33:549–557[Abstract]
  23. Urban RJ, Shupnik MA, Bodenburg YH 1994 Insulin-like growth factor-I increases expression of the porcine P-450 cholesterol side chain cleavage gene through a GC-rich domain. J Biol Chem 269:25761–25769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ross J 1995 mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Microbiol Rev 59:423–450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sudhof TC, van der Westhuyzen DR, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Russell DW 1987 Three direct repeats and a TATA-like sequence are required for regulated expression of the human low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 262:10773–10779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pak YK 1996 Serum response element-like sequences of the human low density lipoprotein receptor promoter: possible regulation sites for sterol-independent transcriptional activation. Biochem Mol Biol Int 38:31–36[Medline]
  27. Golos TG, Strauss III JF 1987 Regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene expression in cultured human granulosa cells: roles of human chorionic gonadotropin, 8-bromo-3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate, and protein synthesis. Mol Endocrinol 1:321–326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Takagi K, Alvarez JG, Favata MF, Trzaskos JM, Strauss III JF 1989 Control of low density lipoprotein receptor gene promoter activity. Ketoconazole inhibits serum lipoprotein but not oxysterol suppression of gene transcription. J Biol Chem 264:12352–12357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Takagi K, Strauss III JF 1989 Control of low density lipoprotein receptor gene expression in steroidogenic cells. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 67:968–973[Medline]
  30. Gallie DR, Feder JN, Schimke RT, Walbot V 1991 Post-transcriptional regulation in higher eukaryotes: the role of the reporter gene in controlling expression. Mol Gen Genet 228:258–264[Medline]
  31. Thompson JF, Hayes LS, Lloyd DB 1991 Modulation of firefly luciferase stability and impact on studies of gene regulation. Gene 103:171–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Kornberg RD, Lorch Y 1992 Chromatin structure and transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol 8:563–587[CrossRef]
  33. Erickson GF, Garzo VG, Magoffin DA 1991 Progesterone production by human granulosa cells cultured in serum free medium: effects of gonadotrophins and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Hum Reprod 6:1074–1081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Adashi EY, Resnick CE, Brodie AM, Svoboda ME, Van WJ 1985 Somatomedin-C-mediated potentiation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced aromatase activity of cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 117:2313–2320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Osteen KG, Loeken MR, Channing CP 1982 Intraovarian control of granulosa cell luteinization. Endocrinol Expir 16:301–309
  36. Bramley TA, Stirling D, Swanston IA, Menzies GS, McNeilly AS, Baird DT 1987 Specific binding sites for gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, LH/chorionic gonadotrophin, low-density lipoprotein, prolactin and FSH in homogenates of human corpus luteum. II. Concentrations throughout the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. J Endocrinol 113:317–327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Brannian JD, Shiigi SM, Straka MS 1992 Gonadotropin surge increases fluorescent-tagged low density lipoprotein uptake by macaque granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles. Biol Reprod 47:355–360[Abstract]
  38. Reaven E, Tsai L, Spicher M, Shilo L, Philip M, Cooper AD, Azhar S 1994 Enhanced expression of granulosa cell low density lipoprotein receptor activity in response to in vitro culture conditions. J Cell Physiol 161:449–462[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Takagi K, Hoffman EK, Strauss III JF 1988 The upstream promoter of the human LDL receptor gene does not contain a cyclic AMP response element. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 152:143–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Dawson PA, Hofmann SL, van der Westhuyzen DR, Sudhof TC, Brown MS, Goldstein JL 1988 Sterol-dependent repression of low density lipoprotein receptor promoter mediated by 16-base pair sequence adjacent to binding site for transcription factor Sp1. J Biol Chem 263:3372–3379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Smith JR, Osborne TF, Goldstein JL, Brown MS 1990 Identification of nucleotides responsible for enhancer activity of sterol regulatory element in low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 265:2306–2310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF 1995 Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Liu J, Streiff R, Zhang YL, Vestal RE, Spence MJ, Briggs MR 1997 Novel mechanism of transcriptional activation of hepatic LDL receptor by oncostatin M. J Lipid Res 38:2035–2048[Abstract]
  44. Inoue H, Higashi Y, Morohashi K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y 1988 The 5'-flanking region of the human P-450(SCC) gene shows responsiveness to cAMP-dependent regulation in a transient gene-expression system of Y-1 adrenal tumor cells. Eur J Biochem 171:435–440[Medline]
  45. Lauber ME, Picton HM, Begeot M, Momoi K, Waterman MR, Simpson ER 1993 Regulation of CYP11A gene expression in bovine ovarian granulosa cells in primary culture by cAMP and phorbol esters is conferred by a common cis-acting element. Mol Cell Endocrinol 94:235–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Urban RJ, and Bodenburg Y 1996 Transcriptional activation of the porcine P450 11A insulin-like growth factor response element in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 271:31695–31698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hamanaka R, Kohno K, Seguchi T, Okamura K, Morimoto A, Ono M, Ogata J, and Kuwano M 1992 Induction of low density lipoprotein receptor and a transcription factor SP-1 by tumor necrosis factor in human microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 267:13160–13165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Chun SY, Billig H, Tilly JL, Furuta I, Tsafriri A, Hsueh AJ 1994 Gonadotropin suppression of apoptosis in cultured preovulatory follicles: mediatory role of endogenous insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology 135:1845–1853[Abstract]
  49. Adashi EY, Resnick CE, Hernandez ER, Hurwitz A, Roberts CT, LeRoith D, Rosenfeld R 1991 Insulin-like growth factor I as an intraovarian regulator: basic and clinical implications. Ann NY Acad Sci 626:161–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. deMoura MD, Choi D, Adashi EY, Payne DW 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-I-mediated amplification of follicle- stimulating hormone-supported progesterone accumulation by cultured rat granulosa cells: enhancement of steroidogenic enzyme activity and expression. Biol Reprod 56:946–953[Abstract]
  51. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ 1997 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Grado-Ahuir, P. Y. Aad, G. Ranzenigo, F. Caloni, F. Cremonesi, and L. J. Spicer
Microarray analysis of insulin-like growth factor-I-induced changes in messenger ribonucleic acid expression in cultured porcine granulosa cells: Possible role of insulin-like growth factor-I in angiogenesis
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1921 - 1933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Perlman, T. Bouquin, B. van den Hazel, T.H. Jensen, H.T. Schambye, S. Knudsen, and J.S. Okkels
Transcriptome analysis of FSH and FSH variant stimulation in granulosa cells from IVM patients reveals novel regulated genes
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 135 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Natesampillai, M. E. Fernandez-Zapico, R. Urrutia, and J. D. Veldhuis
A Novel Functional Interaction between the Sp1-like Protein KLF13 and SREBP-Sp1 Activation Complex Underlies Regulation of Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Promoter Function
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3040 - 3047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. Sowers, K. A. Matthews, M. Jannausch, J. F. Randolph, D. McConnell, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, R. Little, B. Lasley, and R. Pasternak
Hemostatic Factors and Estrogen during the Menopausal Transition
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5942 - 5948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Gillio-Meina, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
Expression of CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins Alpha and Beta in the Porcine Ovary and Regulation in Primary Cultures of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1194 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Rusovici, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Inhibition of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-Stimulated StAR Gene Expression in Porcine Granulosa Cells Is Associated with Reduced Histone H3 Acetylation
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 862 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Argov, U. Moallem, and D. Sklan
Lipid Transport in the Developing Bovine Follicle: Messenger RNA Expression Increases for Selective Uptake Receptors and Decreases for Endocytosis Receptors
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Sekar and J. D. Veldhuis
Involvement of Sp1 and SREBP-1a in transcriptional activation of the LDL receptor gene by insulin and LH in cultured porcine granulosa-luteal cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2004; 287(1): E128 - E135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Fayad, V. Levesque, J. Sirois, D. W. Silversides, and J. G. Lussier
Gene Expression Profiling of Differentially Expressed Genes in Granulosa Cells of Bovine Dominant Follicles Using Suppression Subtractive Hybridization
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 523 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Devaux, V. Soula, C. Sifer, M. Branger, M. Naouri, R. Porcher, C. Poncelet, A. Neuraz, S. Alvarez, J.L. Benifla, et al.
Hepatitis C virus detection in follicular fluid and culture media from HCV+ women, and viral risk during IVF procedures
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2342 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Gillio-Meina, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
GATA-4 and GATA-6 Transcription Factors: Expression, Immunohistochemical Localization, and Possible Function in the Porcine Ovary
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 412 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Sekar and J. D. Veldhuis
Concerted Transcriptional Activation of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene by Insulin and Luteinizing Hormone in Cultured Porcine Granulosa-Luteal Cells: Possible Convergence of Protein Kinase A, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways
Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 2921 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. F. Palter, A. B. Tavares, A. Hourvitz, J. D. Veldhuis, and E. Y. Adashi
Are Estrogens of Import to Primate/Human Ovarian Folliculogenesis?
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2001; 22(3): 389 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Zhang, J. C. Garmey, and J. D. Veldhuis
Interactive Stimulation by Luteinizing Hormone and Insulin of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory (StAR) Protein and 17{alpha}-Hydroxylase/17, 20-Lyase (CYP17) Genes in Porcine Theca Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2000; 141(8): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. C. L. Jayes, R. N. Day, J. C. Garmey, R. J. Urban, G. Zhang, and J. D. Veldhuis
Calcium Ions Positively Modulate Follicle-Stimulating Hormone- and Exogenous Cyclic 3',5'-Adenosine Monophosphate-Driven Transcription of the P450scc Gene in Porcine Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2000; 141(7): 2377 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. Devoto, L. K. Christenson, J. M. McAllister, A. Makrigiannakis, and J. F. Strauss III
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I and- II modulate human granulosa-lutein cell steroidogenesis: enhancement of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 5(11): 1003 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. F. Strauss III and A. Dunaif
Molecular Mysteries of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 1999; 13(6): 800 - 805.
[Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. A. LaVoie, J. C. Garmey, and J. D. Veldhuis
Mechanisms of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Augmentation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-Induced Porcine Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene Promoter Activity in Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 1999; 140(1): 146 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaVoie, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaVoie, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals