help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*Genetics Home Reference
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 1 219-227
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Estrogen Induces Adenosine Deaminase Gene Expression in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells: Role of Estrogen Receptor-Sp1 Interactions1

Wen Xie, Renqin Duan and Stephen Safe2

Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Stephen H. Safe, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466. E-mail: ssafe{at}cvm.tamu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene expression is induced by 17ß-estradiol (E2) in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, whereas the antiestrogens 4'-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 182,780 exhibit partial estrogen receptor (ER) agonist/antagonist and antagonist activities, respectively. Previous studies have shown that the -211 to +11 region of the ADA gene promoter contains six GC-rich sites (I–VI) that bind Sp1 protein, and these elements are required for high basal expression. In transient transfection studies with pADA211, which contains the -211 to +11 ADA gene promoter linked to a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter gene, E2 and tamoxifen (but not ICI 182,780) induced CAT activity. Ligand-induced transactivation was observed only in cells cotransfected with expression plasmids for wild-type ER or HE11, which does not contain the DNA-binding domain of the ER. Cotransfection with HE15 and HE19, which contain the DNA-binding domain and activation function-1 (AF-1) and AF-2 of the ER, respectively, did not result in E2-induced activity. Subsequent deletion analysis of the ADA gene promoter showed that Sp1 binding site IV (-79 to -73) was primarily responsible for hormone responsiveness. ER activation of ADA gene expression is another example of an E2-induced gene that is dependent on ER/Sp1 interactions with a site-specific GC-rich motif.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ADENOSINE DEAMINASE (ADA) catalyzes the irreversible deamination of deoxyadenosine and adenosine and thereby plays a role in maintaining cellular pools of these important purine bases. ADA is expressed in all human tissues, and levels are relatively high in thymus (790 nmol/min/mg) and duodenum (570 nmol/min/mg), whereas more than 500-fold lower activity was reported in liver (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Severe combined immunodeficiency is a genetic disorder that is due to failure to express ADA and is characterized by compromised immune function and absence of B and T cells (8, 9). The molecular basis for tissue-specific expression of ADA has been studied by analysis of the ADA gene promoter and interactions of nuclear proteins with enhancer elements (10, 11). Additionally, specific regulatory regions of the ADA gene have also been investigated in transgenic experiments using ADA gene and promoter fragments linked to a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter gene (11, 12, 13, 14). A 232-bp region (-211 to +11) from the ADA gene promoter confers high basal reporter gene (CAT) expression in transient transfection assays in mammalian cells (10). This region of the promoter contains six GC-rich Sp1 protein binding sites and sequential 5'-3' deletion analysis of these sites followed by transient transfection studies in MOLT 4 and Rajii human lymphoid cell lines showed that site IV (-79 to -73) was important for basal CAT activity (10). However, results of internal deletions of overlapping sites I to III (-71 to -34) showed that sites were also important for basal CAT activity, suggesting possible interactions between proteins binding these GC-rich elements.

Hormone responsiveness of ADA has not previously been reported; however, it has been shown that 17ß-estradiol (E2) induces several enzymes involved in purine, pyrimidine, and DNA synthesis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, and this is accompanied by increased [3H]thymidine uptake and cell proliferation (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Results of this study demonstrate that ADA, an enzyme that decreases intracellular pools of adenosine and deoxyadenosine, is E2 responsive in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. This may represent a feedback loop that ultimately inhibits the hormone-induced proliferative response. Analysis of the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter shows that only one of the GC-rich sites (IV) is required for estrogen receptor (ER) activation via formation of an ER/Sp1 complex.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals, Cell Lines, and Oligonucleotides
MCF-7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cells were routinely maintained in MEM with phenol red and supplemented with 10% FBS plus 10 ml antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in an air-carbon dioxide (95:5) atmosphere at 37 C. For transient transfection studies, cells were grown for 1 day in DMEM/F12 medium, without phenol red and 5% FBS, treated with dextran-coated charcoal. The constructs pADA211, pADA81, and pADA56 contained ADA gene promoter inserts linked to a CAT reporter gene and were provided by Dan A. Wiginton (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, OH). The wild-type human ER (hER) expression plasmid was provide by Ming Jer Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). Recombinant ER protein was obtained from PanVera Corp. (Madison, WI), and Sp1 protein was obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). ER deletion mutants HE11, HE15, and HE19 were provided by Pierre Chambon (Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France). Dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) was used as solvent for E2 and the antiestrogens. 4'-Hydroxytamoxifen was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO); ICI 182,780 was provided by Alan Wakeling (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK). ß-Galactosidase activity in cotransfection studies was determined using an assay kit purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). All other chemicals and biochemicals were the highest quality available from commercial sources.

Oligonucleotides derived from the ADA gene promoter and a consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide were synthesized by the Gene Technologies Laboratory, Texas A&M University (College Station, TX). RT-PCR primers were synthesized by Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc. (The Woodlands, TX). Structures of these oligonucleotides (sense strands) are summarized below, and the putative GC-rich sites are underlined. Mutations incorporated in the mutant oligonucleotides are denoted by an asterisk.

Cloning
The inserts encoding the wild-type hER, HE11, HE15, and HE19 ER deletion variants were removed by digesting the appropriate plasmids with EcoRI. The inserts were then religated into pCDNA3-Neo (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), which had been linearized with EcoRI and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The ligation products were transformed into DH5a cells and clones were verified by sequencing. In vitro transcription/translation of these genes was periodically determined using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system and [35S]methione followed by SDS-PAGE and quantitation of radiolabeled proteins by densitometry. Results showed that levels of immunoreactive wild-type and variant ER were not significantly different. The ADA81m oligonucleotide was cloned into the pBLCAT6 vector (ATCC, Manassas, VA) at the HindIII and BamHI site to give the pADA81m. The pBLTATA-CAT plasmid was made by digesting the pBLCAT2 vector with BamHI and XhoI to remove the thymidine kinase promoter; the double stranded E1B oligonucleotide containing complementary 5'-overhangs was then inserted into the corresponding sites. ADASp1.4 and ADASp1.4m oligonucleotides were cloned into the pBLTATA-CAT vector at the HindIII and BamHI sites to give the pADASp1.4, pADASp1.4m constructs, respectively.

RT-PCR
RNA was extracted from the cells treated with dimethylsulfoxide (control) or E2, tamoxifen, ICI 182,780 by using the RNAZol-B kit (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX), and dissolved in nuclease-free water (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). RT-PCR was performed using a GeneAmp, RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Branchburg, NJ). The reaction mixture consisted of 5 mM MgCl2, 2 µl 10x PCR buffer II, ribonuclease (RNase)-free water, deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dATP, deoxythymidine triphosphate, dGTP, and deoxycytidine triphosphate) at a final concentration of 1 mM, 1 U/µl RNase inhibitor, and 2.5 µM murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase in a final volume of 20 µl. After incubation for 10 min at 25 C, the reaction mixture was reverse transcribed at 42 C for 25 min, denatured at 99 C for 5 min, and cooled at 4 C for 5 min. For the PCR reaction MgCl2 was adjusted to 2 mM and PCR buffer. RNase-free water, primer (200 ng), and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase 0.5 µl (2.5 U/100 µl) were added to a final volume of 50 µl. PCR conditions included an initial denaturing for 3 min, and then 25 cycles as follows: denaturing for 1 min at 95 C and anneal-extend for 1 min at 62 C. A final cycle for 10 min at 72 C concluded the PCR. After amplification, products were separated on a 7% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, visualized by autoradiography using Kodak XAR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), and quantitated by densitometry using the Molecular Dynamics, Inc. Zero-D software package (Sunnyvale, CA) and a Sharp JX-330 scanner (Mahwah, NJ). Intensities of ADA transcripts were normalized to the ß-actin internal control.

Transient transfection assay
MCF-7 cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method with 10 µg of ADA gene promoter-derived constructs and 1 µg of wild-type or variant ER expression plasmids; in the absence of cotransfected wild-type ER, no hormone responsiveness was observed, and this was due to overexpression of the ADA promoter-derived constructs. ß-Galactosidase-lacZ plasmid (5.0 µg) obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) was cotransfected in studies determining differences in basal CAT activities with constructs containing ADA gene promoter inserts; activities are corrected for transfection efficiencies. Previous studies have also shown the requirement for cotransfection of hER expression plasmid using other E2-responsive constructs in MCF-7 cells (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). pCDNA3-Neo (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) was used as an empty vector (control) and was also added in some experiments to maintain uniform levels of added DNA. Transfection efficiency was high and no additional shock was required. After 18 h, media were changed and cells were treated with Me2SO (0.2% total volume), E2, tamoxifen, ICI 182,780, or their combinations in Me2SO for 44 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and scraped from the plates. Cell lysates were prepared in 0.15 ml of 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) by three freeze-thaw-sonication cycles (3 min each). Protein concentrations were determined using BSA as a standard, and analysis for CAT activity in cell lysates used a constant amount of protein from each treatment group. Lysates were incubated at 56 C for 7 min to remove endogenous deacetylase activity. CAT activity was determined by incubating aliquots of the cell lysates with 0.2 mCi d-threo-[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol and 4 mM acetyl CoA. Acetylated products were visualized and quantitated using a Betagen Betascope 603 blot analyzer (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA). CAT activity was calculated as fraction of that observed in cells treated with Me2SO alone (arbitrarily set at 100), and results are expressed as means ± SD. At least three separate experiments were carried out for each treatment group.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
Gel electromobility shift assays were performed using Sp1 protein and different amount of ER protein. E2 was added to the reaction at a final concentration of 20 nM and then incubated on ice for 15 min. Sp1 and 32P-labeled oligonucleotides were then added to the reaction mixtures in the presence of 1 µg of poly d(I-C) and incubated for 15 min at 25 C. In competition experiments, different amounts of unlabeled oligonucleotides were also included in the incubation mixture. Aliquots of these mixtures were loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide-bisacrylamide ratio, 30:0.8) and run at 110 V in 0.09 M Tris-0.09 M borate-2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). 32P-Labeled DNA and DNA-protein bands were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry using the Molecular Dynamics, Inc. Zero-D software package and a Sharp JX-330 scanner. For some of these studies, relative band intensities are presented as means ± SD for three separate experiments.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Results summarized in Fig. 1Go show that E2 induced a rapid increase in ADA mRNA levels that was maximal after 6 h (>3.76-fold induction) and persisted for up to 24 h. In a separate experiment, E2 and tamoxifen induced a 3.17- and 1.5-fold increase in ADA mRNA levels, whereas ICI 182,780 decreased mRNA levels. In cells cotreated with E2 plus ICI 182,780, there was a significant decrease in the hormone-induced response; there was also a small decrease in ADA mRNA levels in cells cotreated with tamoxifen plus E2, suggesting that tamoxifen exhibited partial ER agonist and antagonist activities.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of estrogens/antiestrogens on ADA gene expression in MCF-7 cells. A, Time-dependent RT-PCR analysis of mRNA from MCF-7 cells treated with E2. The cells were treated with Me2SO (lane 1) or E2 for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h (lanes 2–6, respectively). Cell extracts were obtained, and total RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Intensity values in lanes 2–6 relative to lane 1 (Me2SO) (arbitrarily set at 100) were 167 ± 63, 212 ± 41, 376 ± 15, 333 ± 27, and 260 ± 23, respectively. mRNA band intensities in lanes 4, 5, and 6 (relative to lane 1) were significantly (P < 0.05) increased. B, RT-PCR analysis of mRNA from MCF-7 cells treated with E2, ICI 182,780, and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen. Cells were treated with Me2SO (lane 1), 10 nM E2 (lane 2); 1 µM ICI 182,780 (lane 3); 10 nM E2 + 1 µM ICI 182,780 (lane 4); 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 5); or 10 nM E2 + 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 6). Cell extracts were obtained, and total RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Intensity values in lanes 2–6 relative to lane 1 (Me2SO) (arbitrarily set at 100) were 317 ± 61, 69 ± 28, 138 ± 43, 151 ± 18, and 157 ± 54, respectively. Band intensity in lane 2 (relative to lane 1) was significantly (P < 0.05) increased. Band intensities in lanes 3 and 4 (relative to lane 2) were significantly (0 < 0.05) decreased. Intensity values for ADA were standardized to ß-actin mRNA, which was used as an internal control in both panels A and B, and results are expressed as means ± SD for at least three separate experiments.

 
Initial studies using pADA211 showed that in transient transfection studies, there was low expression of CAT activity that was not induced by 10 nM E2. In contrast, cotransfection of pADA211 plus 1 or 5 µg hER expression plasmid resulted in an increase in basal CAT activity that was significantly induced (2.5- to 3.5-fold) by 10 nM E2 (data not shown). Similar results have been obtained with other constructs containing E2-responsive gene promoter inserts (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) due to overexpression of these constructs. All subsequent experiments used 1 µg hER in the transient transfection experiments. Figure 2Go summarizes results of experiments that examine the role of GC-rich sites within the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter in mediating basal and E2 responsiveness. Results of initial studies showed that basal CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pADA211 (arbitrarily set at 100), pADA81, pADA56, and pADA81m was 100, 98 ± 11, 56 ± 5.2, and 14 ± 0.9, respectively (Fig. 2AGo). The significant decrease in basal activity of pADA56 vs. pADA81 was previously reported in MOLT-4 and Raji cells (10). These results coupled with the low activity of pADA81m (containing a mutation in site IV) confirms the importance of the site IV GC-rich element for basal activity of the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter in MCF-7 cells. E2 induced a significant 2.35- and 2.36-fold increase in CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pADA211 and pADA81, whereas only a 1.57-fold increase (not significant) was observed for pADA56 (Fig. 2BGo). The importance of GC-rich site IV for E2 responsiveness was confirmed using pADASp1.4 in transfection assays; E2 caused a 2.8-fold induction of CAT activity. In contrast, pADASp1.4m and pADA81m, which contain mutations in site IV, were not E2 responsive (data not shown). Previous studies in this laboratory using E2-responsive constructs containing either a consensus Sp1 insert or GC-rich elements from the c-fos or heat shock protein 27 gene promoter showed that induction of reporter gene activity in breast cancer cells was observed after cotransfection with wild-type hER or variant HE11 (DNA-binding domain-deficient ER) expression plasmids (25, 26, 28). The results in Fig. 3AGo demonstrate that in MCF-7 cells treated with 10 nM E2 and cotransfected with pADA81 and hER or HE11, there was a 4.65- and 3.77-fold increase in CAT activity. In contrast, cotransfection with variant ER expression plasmids containing C-terminal (HE15) or N-terminal (HE19) deletions did not result in induction of CAT activity by E2, and this was consistent with results of previous studies using E2-responsive plasmids containing GC-rich elements (25, 26, 28). The results summarized in Fig. 3BGo demonstrate that in cells transfected with pADA211, the effects of E2, tamoxifen, ICI 182,780, and E2 plus tamoxifen or ICI 182,780 on CAT activity were similar to those observed for gene expression (Fig. 1Go). Both E2 and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen induced CAT activity (4.15- and 3.45-fold, respectively), ICI 182,780 alone did not induce CAT activity but significantly inhibited E2-induced activity. CAT activity in cells cotreated with 4'-hydroxytamoxifen plus E2 was lower than observed after treatment with E2 alone; however, this decrease was not statistically significant, suggesting that 4'-hydroxytamoxifen exhibited minimal ER antagonist activity.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Basal and E2 responsiveness of ADA gene promoter-derived constructs. A, Basal CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pADA211, pADA81, pADA56, or pADA81m. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with pADA211, pADA81, pADA56, or pADA81m and ß-gal-lacZ plasmid. Cells were treated with Me2SO (open bar) and CAT activity (corrected for ß-gal activity) was determined as described in Materials and Methods. B, Effect of E2 on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with constructs containing ADA gene promoter inserts. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pADA211, pADA81, pADA56, or pADASp1.4, and CAT activity was determined. In parallel experiments, induction of CAT activity by E2 was not observed using pADASp1.4m or pADA81m (data not shown). * Indicates that the relative intensity was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in control. Results are expressed as means ± SD for three separate experiments for all treatment groups.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of wild-type and variant ER and antiestrogens on responsiveness of pADA211. A, Effects of wild-type or variant ER on CAT activity induced by E2 in MCF-7 cells cotransfected with pADA211. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with pADA211 + hER, HE11, HE15, HE19, or pCDNA3-neo (as control) (total amount of DNA was kept constant). Transient transfected and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with Me2SO (open bars) or 10 nM E2 (E) (solid bars). B, Effects of E2, ICI 182,780, and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (OH-T) on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pADA211. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and pADA211 constructs. The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with Me2SO (lane 1); 10 nM E2 (lane 2); 1 µM ICI 182,780 (lane 3); 10 nM E2 + 1 µM ICI 182,780 (lane 4); 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 5); or 10 nM E2 + 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (lane 6). * Indicates that the relative intensity was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in control. Results are expressed as means ± SD for three separate experiments for all treatment groups.

 
Results summarized in Fig. 4AGo demonstrate that [32P]Sp1.4 [contains site IV (-86 to -65) GC-rich sequence] and consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotides bind purified Sp1 protein (lanes 2–6) whereas mutant [32P]Sp1.4m did not form a retarded band (lanes 7 and 8). In competition experiments (Fig. 4BGo), [32P]Sp1.4 bound Sp1 protein (lane 2) and competition with excess unlabeled consensus Sp1 (lanes 3 and 4) or unlabeled Sp1.4 (lanes 5–7) oligonucleotides decrease retarded band intensity, whereas competition was not observed for Sp1.4m (lane 8). The effects of ER on Sp1-DNA binding were determined using [32P]Sp1.4 plus Sp1 protein alone (Fig. 4CGo, lane 2) or in combination with 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 pmol ER (lanes 3–5). The results showed that coincubation with ER resulted in a 2.14- to 3.75-fold enhancement of Sp1-[32P]Sp1.4 retarded band intensity; however, supershifted ternary ER/Sp1-DNA complexes were not observed, and similar results using ER and Sp1 protein with other GC-rich elements have previously been reported (25, 26, 28). In a parallel study, it was also shown that [32P]Sp1(1, 2, 3), which contains three Sp1 sites (I–III) in the -60 to -31 region of the ADA gene promoter, also bound Sp1 protein (Fig. 5AGo, lanes 2 and 3), and ER also enhanced intensity (1.76- to 2.15-fold) of the Sp1(1, 2, 3)-DNA retarded band (Fig. 5BGo, lanes 2–5). Thus, although the Sp1(1, 2, 3) sequence containing Sp1 binding sites I–III did not confer E2 inducibility on pADA56 (Fig. 2BGo) or pADA81m, the overlapping GC-rich element bound Sp1 protein and ER enhanced retarded band formation in gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Sp1 interaction with ADASp1.4 promoter oligonucleotides: gel mobility shift assays. A, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled consensus Sp1 and ADASp1.4 promoter oligonucleotide. Gel shift assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and 5–20 ng Sp1 protein were used. B, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled Sp1.4 oligonucleotide (competition study). Gel shift analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and 10 ng Sp1 protein were used. C, Enhanced binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled Sp1.4 oligonucleotide by pure ER protein. Sp1 protein (2 ng) alone or Sp1 protein (2 ng) in combination with recombinant hER (2, 4, or 8 µl of a 100 nM solution) were incubated with [32P]Sp1.4 and analyzed by gel mobility shift assay as described in Materials and Methods. Total protein per incubation was kept constant by addition of BSA. Band intensities in lanes 3–5 (C) relative to lane 2 (Sp1 protein alone, intensity arbitrarily set at 100) were 214, 370, and 375, respectively, and similar results were observed in replicate experiments showing that E2 caused a maximal 3.7-fold enhancement of retarded band formation. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrow) were visualized by autoradiography.

 


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Sp1 interaction with ADASp1 (1 2 3 ) promoter oligonucleotides: gel mobility shift assays. A, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled consensus Sp1 and ADASp1 (1 2 3 ) promoter oligonucleotide. Gel shift assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and 5–20 ng Sp1 protein were used. B, Binding of Sp1 protein to 32P-labeled Sp1 (1 2 3 ) oligonucleotide (competition study). Gel shift analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods and 10 ng Sp1 protein were used. C, Enhanced binding of Sp1 protein to [32P]Sp1 (1 2 3 ) oligonucleotide by recombinant ER protein. Sp1 protein (2 ng) alone or Sp1 protein (2 ng) in combination with recombinant hER (2, 4, or 8 µl of a 100 nM solution) were incubated with [32P]Sp1 (1 2 3 ) and analyzed by gel mobility shift assay as described in Materials and Methods. Total protein per incubation was kept constant by addition of BSA. Relative intensity values in lanes 3–5 (C) relative to lane 2 (arbitrarily set at 100) were 176 ± 13, 202 ± 12, and 215 ± 7, respectively. Intensity values in lanes 3, 4, and 5 were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in lane 2 (results are means ± SD for three separate determinations). The retarded Sp1-DNA bands (A–C) were visualized by autoradiography, and intensity values were determined by densitometry as described in Materials and Methods. All experiments were repeated two or three times, and representative autoradiograms are presented.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ER is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors (29, 30, 31), and ER activation of gene expression is dependent on ligand, cellular, and gene promoter context and receptor isoform (32, 33, 34). MCF-7 human breast cancer cells primarily express ER{alpha}, and this cell line has been extensively used as a model for investigating the effects of estrogens and antiestrogens on cell growth and gene expression (35). E2 induces expression of multiple genes in MCF-7 or other hormone-responsive cells including pS2, progesterone receptor, cathepsin D, retinoic acid receptor, heat shock protein 27, c-fos, myc, mucin 1, and transforming growth factor-{alpha} (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44). Lippman and co-workers previously reported that the mitogenic activity of E2 in breast cancer cells is accompanied by increased DNA synthesis and also increased expression or activity of several genes that are involved in purine, pyrimidine, and DNA synthesis (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). The effects of E2 and tamoxifen/4'-hydroxytamoxifen on genes required for DNA synthesis were somewhat variable and dependent on growth conditions; however, in some studies, it was shown that E2 increased thymidine kinase, dihydrofolate reductase, carbamoylphosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamylase, orotidine pyrophosphorylase, orotidine and thymilidate synthetase gene expression, or enzyme activities (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). In preliminary screening assays designed to identify E2-induced genes associated with DNA synthesis in MCF-7 cells, we observed that ADA mRNA levels were induced by E2 in MCF-7 cells. ADA is primarily a catabolic enzyme in the purine salvage pathway, and hormone responsiveness of this gene was surprising since E2 induces enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). The role of ADA in modulating hormone-induced DNA synthesis is unknown and is currently being investigated. The antiestrogen 4'-hydroxytamoxifen significantly induced ADA mRNA levels (Fig. 1Go) and reporter gene activity (Fig. 3BGo), and the magnitude of the latter response was similar to that observed for E2 alone. In cells cotreated with E2 plus 4'-hydroxytamoxifen, there was a significant decrease in ADA mRNA levels (Fig. 1Go) but not CAT activity (Fig. 3BGo) compared with E2 alone, suggesting the 4'-hydroxytamoxifen was a response-specific ER antagonist. In contrast, ICI 182,780 did not significantly induce ADA mRNA levels or reporter gene activity but inhibited both hormone-induced responses (Figs. 1Go and 3BGo). This profile of ligand-dependent ER activation of ADA is similar to that observed for other E2-regulated genes in MCF-7 cells, and the molecular mechanisms of this response were further investigated by analysis of the ADA gene promoter.

Dusing and Wiginton (10) previously investigated the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter (-211 to +11) and identified six GC-rich elements (I–VI) (see Fig. 2Go) that bound Sp1 protein in gel electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Moreover, in deoxyribonuclease I footprinting using recombinant Sp1 protein or MOLT 4 lymphoid cell extracts, all six Sp1 sites were protected from deoxyribonuclease I digestion. Recent studies in this laboratory have demonstrated that the ER and Sp1 protein physically interact and E2-induced transactivation can be observed by ER/Sp1 binding to GC-rich elements in which only Sp1 protein binds promoter DNA (25, 26, 28). GC-rich elements in the distal region of the c-fos protooncogene promoter were also identified as target sequences for ER activation via ER/Sp1 interactions (28). These results suggested that one or more of the six GC-rich site in the proximal region (-211 to +11) ADA gene promoter may be required for E2 responsiveness. Results of initial studies (Fig. 2AGo) demonstrated that basal CAT activity in MCF-7 cells associated with constructs containing promoter inserts from the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter was strongly associated with site IV, and the results were similar to those reported in MOLT-4 and Raji cells (10). The results in Fig. 2Go demonstrate that in transient transfection studies with pADA211, pADA81, and pADA56, which contain Sp1 sites I-VI, I-IV and I-III, respectively, only the former two constructs were E2 responsive. The differences in E2-induced CAT activity observed for pADA81, pADA81m, and pADA56 suggested that site IV was primarily responsible for ER/Sp1 activation. Moreover, this was supported by the E2 responsiveness of pADASp1.4, which contains the site IV oligonucleotide insert linked to a bacterial CAT reporter gene.

The results in Fig. 3BGo also show that both 4'-hydroxytamoxifen and E2 exhibited ER agonist activity and ICI 182,780 is primarily an antagonist in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pADA211. These results are consistent with effects of the same ligands on ADA mRNA levels (Fig. 1Go) and further support the role of the -211 to +11 promoter sequence in mediating ER action. Previous studies with constructs containing a consensus GC-rich element or GC-rich sites derived from the heat shock protein 27 or c-fos gene promoters showed that E2-dependent induction of reporter gene activities in breast cancer cells was observed only after cotransfection with wild-type hER or HE11 that contains AF1 and AF2, but not the DNA-binding domain of the ER (26, 28). Similar results were also obtained using pADA81 (Fig. 3AGo), suggesting that transactivation is observed without direct binding of ER to specific responsive elements. As reported earlier (25, 26, 27), cotransfection with variant ERs expressing AF-1 (HE15) or AF-2 (HE19) did not result in a hormone-induced response.

It has previously been shown (26) that although both ER and Sp1 physically interact in coimmunoprecipitation and glutathione-S-transferase pulldown assays, ER does not supershift an Sp1-[32P]GC-rich retarded band in gel mobility shift assays. However, ER enhances the intensity of the retarded band by increasing the rate of formation (on rate) of this complex (26). Similar results were also observed in this study using [32P]Sp1.4 (site IV) in gel mobility shift assay. [32P]Sp1.4 specifically binds Sp1 protein (Fig. 4AGo) and competitively decreases binding of Sp1 protein to a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide (Fig. 4BGo). Moreover, coincubation of Sp1 protein, [32P]Sp1.4 with different amounts of ER, resulted in a more than 3.5-fold increase in formation of the retarded band, and this is consistent with results of previous studies using GC-rich oligonucleotides (26, 27). Enhancement of protein DNA-retarded band formation in gel mobility shift assays has been observed with other proteins in studies showing that human T cell leukemia virus type 1, sterol-regulatory element-binding protein, and cyclin D1 enhance bZIP, Sp1, and ER binding to their respective enhancer sequences without forming ternary supershifted complexes (45, 46, 47). Thus, E2-responsive Sp1.4 bound Sp1 protein to form a retarded band, and coincubation with ER enhanced retarded band intensity (Fig. 4Go). However, these in vitro binding properties in gel mobility shift assays were not necessarily diagnostic of functional activity since the Sp1(1, 2, 3) oligonucleotide (contains GC-rich sites I–III) also bound Sp1 protein to form a retarded band (Fig. 5AGo), and coincubation with ER enhanced retarded band intensity (Fig. 5BGo). However, in transactivation assays with constructs containing only sites I–III (pADA56 and pADA81m), E2 did not induce reporter gene activity. In contrast to results observed in this study showing that only one of six GC-rich sites was responsible for ER action in the ADA gene promoter, a recent study showed that all three GC-rich elements in the proximal region of retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1 gene promoter contributed to E2-induced transactivation (48).

Mammalian and viral gene promoters contain multiple GC-rich elements that bind Sp1 protein to play an important role in basal transcription of these genes (49, 50). Activator protein-1 (AP-1) sites are also important promoter elements for gene regulation, and recent studies have now shown that both AP-1 and GC-rich elements in some gene promoters are E2 responsive via ER-AP-1 and ER-Sp1 protein complexes (26, 27, 51, 52). However, since only a small number of mammalian genes are E2 responsive, relatively few AP-1 or GC-rich elements will function as enhancer elements for ER activation. The results of this study demonstrate that in the proximal region of the ADA gene promoter, only one of the six GC-rich elements (site IV) is required for E2 responsiveness. Interestingly, this same element was also important for Sp1-dependent basal activity of the -211 to +11 region of this promoter (Fig. 2AGo) (10). The reasons for selective ER/Sp1 action at site IV could be associated with preferential cell-specific interactions with other nuclear factors such as coactivators or corepressors, and this is currently being investigated.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant CA-76636), the Welch Foundation, and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Back

2 Sid Kyle Professor of Toxicology. Back

Received June 2, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Levi F, La Vecchia C, Lucchini F, Negri E 1995 Cancer mortality in Europe, 1990–92. Eur J Cancer Prev 4:389–417[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Van der Weyden MB, Kelley WN 1976 Human adenosine deaminase. Distribution and properties. J Biol Chem 251:5448–5456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Witte DP, Wiginton DA, Hutton JJ, Aronow BJ 1991 Coordinate developmental regulation of purine catabolic enzyme expression in gastrointestinal and postimplantation reproductive tracts. J Cell Biol 115:179–190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Aronow B, Lattier D, Silbiger R, Dusing M, Hutton J, Jones G, Stock J, McNeish J, Potter S, Witte D 1989 Evidence for a complex regulatory array in the first intron of the human adenosine deaminase gene. Genes Dev 3:1384–1400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chechik BE, Schrader WP, Minowada J 1981 An immunomorphologic study of adenosine deaminase distribution in human thymus tissue, normal lymphocytes, and hematopoietic cell lines. J Immunol 126:1003–1007[Abstract]
  6. Chinsky JM, Ramamurthy V, Fanslow WC, Ingolia DE, Blackburn MR, Shaffer KT, Higley HR, Trentin JJ, Rudolph FB, Knudsen TB, Kellems RE 1990 Developmental expression of adenosine deaminase in the upper alimentary tract of mice. Differentiation 42:172–183[Medline]
  7. Lattier DL, States JC, Hutton JJ, Wiginton DA 1989 Cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of the human adenosine deaminase gene. Nucleic Acids Res 17:1061–1076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Giblett ER, Anderson JE, Cohen F, Pollara B, Meuwissen HJ 1972 Adenosine-deaminase deficiency in two patients with severely impaired cellular immunity. Lancet 2:1067–1069[Medline]
  9. Martin Jr DW, Gelfand EW 1981 Biochemistry of diseases of immunodevelopment. Annu Rev Biochem 50:845–877[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Dusing MR, Wiginton DA 1994 Sp1 is essential for both enhancer-mediated and basal activation of the TATA-less human adenosine deaminase promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 22:669–677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Aronow BJ, Silbiger RN, Dusing MR, Stock JL, Yager KL, Potter SS, Hutton JJ, Wiginton DA 1992 Functional analysis of the human adenosine deaminase gene thymic regulatory region and its ability to generate position-independent transgene expression. Mol Cell Biol 12:4170–4185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Winston JH, Hanten GR, Overbeek PA, Kellems RE 1992 5' flanking sequences of the murine adenosine deaminase gene direct expression of a reporter gene to specific prenatal and postnatal tissues in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem 267:13472–13479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Haynes TL, Thomas MB, Dusing MR, Valerius MT, Potter SS, Wiginton DA 1996 An enhancer LEF-1/TCF-1 site is essential for insertion site-independent transgene expression in thymus. Nucleic Acids Res 24:5034–5044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dusing MR, Brickner AG, Thomas MB, Wiginton DA 1997 Regulation of duodenal specific expression of the human adenosine deaminase gene. J Biol Chem 272:26634–26642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Aitken SC, Lippman ME 1983 Hormonal regulation of de novo pyrimidine synthesis and utilization in human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. Cancer Res 43:4681–4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Aitken SC, Lippman ME, Kasid A, Schoenberg DR 1985 Relationship between the expression of estrogen-regulated genes and estrogen-stimulated proliferation of MCF-7 mammary tumor cells. Cancer Res 45:2608–2615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Aitken SC, Lippman ME 1985 Effect of estrogens and antiestrogens on growth-regulatory enzymes in human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. Cancer Res 45:1611–1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cowan K, Levine R, Aitken S, Goldsmith M, Douglass E, Clendeninn N, Nienhuis A, Lippman ME 1982 Dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification and possible rearrangement in estrogen-responsive methotrexate resistant human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 257:15079–15086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kasid A, Davidson NE, Gelmann EP, Lippman ME 1986 Transcriptional control of thymidine kinase gene expression by estrogens and antiestrogens in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 261:5562–5567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Savouret JF, Bailly A, Misrahi M, Rarch C, Redeuilh G, Chauchereau A, Milgrom E 1991 Characterization of the hormone responsive element involved in the regulation of the progesterone receptor gene. EMBO J 10:1875–1883[Medline]
  21. Cavailles V, Augereau P, Rochefort H 1993 Cathepsin D gene is controlled by a mixed promoter, and estrogens stimulate only TATA-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:203–207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cavailles V, Garcia M, Rochefort H 1989 Regulation of cathepsin D and pS2 gene expression by growth factors in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 3:552–558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zacharewski TR, Bondy KL, McDonell P, Wu ZF 1994 Antiestrogenic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on 17ß-estradiol-induced pS2 expression. Cancer Res 54:2707–2713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Krishnan V, Wang X, Safe S 1994 Estrogen receptor-Sp1 complexes mediate estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 269:15912–15917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Porter W, Wang F, Wang W, Duan R, Safe S 1996 Role of estrogen receptor/Sp1 complexes in estrogen-induced heat shock protein 27 gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 10:1371–1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Porter W, Saville B, Hoivik D, Safe S 1997 Functional synergy between the transcription factor Sp1 and the estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:1569–1580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Duan R, Porter W, Safe S 1998 Estrogen-induced c-fos proto-oncogene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: role of estrogen receptor Sp1 complex formation. Endocrinology 139:1981–1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lupu R, Colomer R, Kannan B, Lippman ME 1992 Characterization of a growth factor that binds exclusively to the erbB-2 receptor and induces cellular responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2287–2291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Perlmann T, Evans RM 1997 Nuclear receptors in Sicily: all in the famiglia. Cancer Res Cell 90:391–397
  30. Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1994 Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu Rev Biochem 63:451–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Truss M, Beato M 1993 Steroid hormone receptors: interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid and transcription factors. Endocr Rev 14:459–479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Katzenellenbogen JA, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS 1996 Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology: interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119–131[Free Full Text]
  33. Horwitz KB, Jackson TA, Bain DL, Richer JK, Takimoto GS, Tung L 1996 Nuclear receptor coactivators corepressors. Mol Endocrinol 10:1167–1177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kuiper GG, Gustafsson JA 1997 The novel estrogen receptor-beta subtype: potential role in the cell- and promoter-specific actions of estrogens and anti-estrogens. FEBS Lett 410:87–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Levenson AS, Jordan VC 1997 MCF-7: the first hormone-responsive breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res 57:3071–3078[Free Full Text]
  36. Masiakowski P, Breathnach R, Bloch J, Gannon F, Krust A, Chambon P 1982 Cloning of cDNA sequences of hormone-regulated genes from the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. Nucleic Acids Res 10:7895–7903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Jakowlew SB, Breathnach R, Jeltsch JM, Masiakowski P, Chambon P 1984 Sequence of the pS2 mRNA induced by estrogen in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Nucleic Acids Res 12:2861–2878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Nunez AM, Jakolew S, Briand JP, Gaire M, Krust A, Rio MC, Chambon P 1987 Characterization of the estrogen-induced pS2 protein secreted by the human breast cancer cell line. Endocrinology 121:1758–1765
  39. Rishi AK, Shao ZM, Baumann RG, Li XS, Sheikh MS, Kimura S, Bashirelahi N, Fontana JA 1995 Estradiol regulation of the human retinoic acid receptor {alpha} gene in human breast carcinoma cells is mediated via an imperfect half-palindromic estrogen response element and Sp1 motifs. Cancer Res 55:4999–5006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Roman SD, Ormandy CJ, Manning DL, Blamey RW, Nicholson RI, Sutherland RL, Clarke CL 1993 Estradiol induction of retinoic acid receptors in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 53:5940–5945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Weisz A, Bresciani F 1993 Estrogen regulation of proto-oncogenes coding for nuclear proteins. Crit Rev Oncogen 4:361–388[Medline]
  42. Dubik D, Shiu RPC 1992 Mechanism of estrogen activation of c-myc oncogene expression. Oncogene 7:1587–1594[Medline]
  43. Gollub EG, Waksman H, Goswami S, Marom Z 1995 Mucin genes are regulated by estrogen and dexamethasone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 217:1006–1014[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Bates SE, Davidson NE, Valverius EM, Freter CE, Dickson RB, Tam JP, Kudlow JE, Lippman ME, Salomon DS 1988 Expression of transforming growth factor-{alpha} and its messenger RNA in human breast cancer: its regulation by estrogen and its possible functional significance. Mol Endocrinol 2:543–555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Wagner SA, Green MR 1993 HTLV-1 Tax protein stimulation of DNA binding of bZIP proteins by enhancing dimerization. Science 266:395–399
  46. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF 1995 Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Zwijsen RM, Wientjens E, Klompmaker R, van der Sman J, Bernards R, Michalides RJ 1997 CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88:405–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Sun G, Porter W, Safe S 1998 Estrogen-induced retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1 gene expression: role of estrogen receptor-Sp1 complex. Mol Endocrinol 12:882–890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Mitchell PJ, Tjian R 1989 Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science 245:371–378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Kadonaga JT, Jones KA, Tjian R 1986 Promoter-specific activation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Sp1. Trends Biochem Sci 11:20–23
  51. Webb P, Lopez GN, Uht RM, Kushner PJ 1995 Tamoxifen activation of the estrogen receptor/AP-1 pathway: potential origin for the cell-specific estrogen-like effects of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 9:443–456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GG, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J, Kushner PJ, Scanlan TS 1997 Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß at AP1 sites. Science 277:1508–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
H.-S. Han, E. Yu, J.-Y. Song, J.-Y. Park, S. J. Jang, and J. Choi
The Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Pathway Induces Oncogenic Wip1 Phosphatase Gene Expression
Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 7(5): 713 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Safe and K. Kim
Non-classical genomic estrogen receptor (ER)/specificity protein and ER/activating protein-1 signaling pathways
J. Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 41(5): 263 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. R. Hawse, M. Subramaniam, D. G. Monroe, A. H. Hemmingsen, J. N. Ingle, S. Khosla, M. J. Oursler, and T. C. Spelsberg
Estrogen Receptor {beta} Isoform-Specific Induction of Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Inducible Early Gene-1 in Human Osteoblast Cells: An Essential Role for the Activation Function 1 Domain
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1579 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Khan, F. Wu, S. Liu, Q. Wu, and S. Safe
Role of specificity protein transcription factors in estrogen-induced gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 39(4): 289 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. Maor, D. Mayer, R. I Yarden, A. V Lee, R. Sarfstein, H. Werner, and M. Z Papa
Estrogen receptor regulates insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in breast tumor cells: involvement of transcription factor Sp1
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 191(3): 605 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. G. Monroe, F. J. Secreto, J. R. Hawse, M. Subramaniam, S. Khosla, and T. C. Spelsberg
Estrogen Receptor Isoform-specific Regulation of the Retinoblastoma-binding Protein 1 (RBBP1) Gene: ROLES OF AF1 AND ENHANCER ELEMENTS
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28596 - 28604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. Eeckhoute, J. S. Carroll, T. R. Geistlinger, M. I. Torres-Arzayus, and M. Brown
A cell-type-specific transcriptional network required for estrogen regulation of cyclin D1 and cell cycle progression in breast cancer
Genes & Dev., September 15, 2006; 20(18): 2513 - 2526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. Higgins, S. Liu, M. Abdelrahim, K. Yoon, K. Vanderlaag, W. Porter, R. P. Metz, and S. Safe
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Expression Is Induced by 17{beta}-Estradiol in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells by Estrogen Receptor {alpha}/Sp Proteins
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3285 - 3295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, R. Barhoumi, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Analysis of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Sp1 Interactions in Breast Cancer Cells by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 19(4): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. R. Schultz, L. N. Petz, and A. M. Nardulli
Cell- and Ligand-specific Regulation of Promoters Containing Activator Protein-1 and Sp1 Sites by Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta}
J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 347 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. O'Lone, M. C. Frith, E. K. Karlsson, and U. Hansen
Genomic Targets of Nuclear Estrogen Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 1859 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Khan, M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Estrogen Receptor/Sp1 Complexes Are Required for Induction of cad Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2325 - 2335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Ngwenya and S. Safe
Cell Context-Dependent Differences in the Induction of E2F-1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 and ZR-75 Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1675 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, N. Thu, B. Saville, and S. Safe
Domains of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) Required for ER{alpha}/Sp1-Mediated Activation of GC-Rich Promoters by Estrogens and Antiestrogens in Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2003; 17(5): 804 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Khosravi and P. C. K. Leung
Differential Regulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)I and GnRHII Messenger Ribonucleic Acid by Gonadal Steroids in Human Granulosa Luteal Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 663 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, R. Smith III, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Small Inhibitory RNA Duplexes for Sp1 mRNA Block Basal and Estrogen-induced Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Progression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28815 - 28822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Ediger, S.-E. Park, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Estrogen Receptor Inducibility of the Human Na+/H+ Exchanger Regulatory Factor/Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin Binding Protein 50 (NHE-RF/EBP50) Gene Involving Multiple Half-Estrogen Response Elements
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2002; 16(8): 1828 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Lopez, M. D. Sanchez, W. Shea-Eaton, and M. P. McLean
Estrogen Activates the High-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene via Binding to Estrogen Response Elements and Interaction with Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein-1A
Endocrinology, June 1, 2002; 143(6): 2155 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. L. Brockman, M. D. Schroeder, and L. A. Schuler
PRL Activates the Cyclin D1 Promoter Via the Jak2/Stat Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2002; 16(4): 774 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Shimada, Y. Suzuki, S.-J. Kim, P.-C. Wang, M. Matsumura, and S. Kojima
Transactivation via RAR/RXR-Sp1 Interaction: Characterization of Binding Between Sp1 and GC Box Motif
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2001; 15(10): 1677 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Samudio, C. Vyhlidal, F. Wang, M. Stoner, I. Chen, M. Kladde, R. Barhoumi, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Polymerase {{alpha}} Gene Expression in MCF-7 Cells by 17{{beta}}-Estradiol
Endocrinology, March 1, 2001; 142(3): 1000 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W. Xie, R. Duan, I. Chen, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Thymidylate Synthase by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2000; 141(7): 2439 - 2449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Salvatori, L. Ravenna, M. P. Felli, M. R. Cardillo, M. A. Russo, L. Frati, A. Gulino, and E. Petrangeli
Identification of an Estrogen-Mediated Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Independent Transactivation Pathway on the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Promoter
Endocrinology, June 1, 2000; 141(6): 2266 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. van den Wijngaard, W. R. Mulder, R. Dijkema, C. J .C. Boersma, S. Mosselman, E. J. J. van Zoelen, and W. Olijve
Antiestrogens Specifically Up-Regulate Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 Promoter Activity in Human Osteoblastic Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2000; 14(5): 623 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Liu, X. Zhong, W. Li, M. G. Brattain, and S. S. Banerji
The Role of Sp1 in the Differential Expression of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Receptor Type II in Human Breast Adenocarcinoma MCF-7 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2000; 275(16): 12231 - 12236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Liu, J. A. Schwartz, and S. C. Brooks
Estrogen Receptor Protects p53 from Deactivation by Human Double Minute-2
Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 60(7): 1810 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Saville, M. Wormke, F. Wang, T. Nguyen, E. Enmark, G. Kuiper, J.-A. Gustafsson, and S. Safe
Ligand-, Cell-, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype (alpha /beta )-dependent Activation at GC-rich (Sp1) Promoter Elements
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2000; 275(8): 5379 - 5387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Inadera, T. Sekiya, T. Yoshimura, and K. Matsushima
Molecular Analysis of the Inhibition of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Gene Expression by Estrogens and Xenoestrogens in MCF-7 Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 50 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Dong, W. Wang, F. Wang, M. Stoner, J. C. Reed, M. Harigai, I. Samudio, M. P. Kladde, C. Vyhlidal, and S. Safe
Mechanisms of Transcriptional Activation of bcl-2 Gene Expression by 17beta -Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 32099 - 32107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Duan, W. Porter, I. Samudio, C. Vyhlidal, M. Kladde, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of c-fos Protooncogene by 17{beta}-Estradiol: Mechanism of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Mediated Inhibition
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 1999; 13(9): 1511 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
W. Wang, L. Dong, B. Saville, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of E2F1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Cells Is Regulated by NF-Y-Sp1/Estrogen Receptor Interactions
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 1999; 13(8): 1373 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Qin, P. Singh, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-4 by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Cells: Role of Estrogen Receptor-Sp1 Complexes
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2501 - 2508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Tanaka, H. Yonekura, S.-i. Yamagishi, H. Fujimori, Y. Yamamoto, and H. Yamamoto
The Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Is Induced by the Glycation Products Themselves and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha through Nuclear Factor-kappa B, and by 17beta -Estradiol through Sp-1 in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25781 - 25790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Stoner, F. Wang, M. Wormke, T. Nguyen, I. Samudio, C. Vyhlidal, D. Marme, G. Finkenzeller, and S. Safe
Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in HEC1A Endometrial Cancer Cells through Interactions of Estrogen Receptor alpha and Sp3 Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 22769 - 22779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. J. Scheidegger, B. Cenni, D. Picard, and P. Delafontaine
Estradiol Decreases IGF-1 and IGF-1 Receptor Expression in Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells. MECHANISMS FOR ITS ATHEROPROTECTIVE EFFECTS
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38921 - 38928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. J. Cram, B. D. Liu, L. F. Bjeldanes, and G. L. Firestone
Indole-3-carbinol Inhibits CDK6 Expression in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells by Disrupting Sp1 Transcription Factor Interactions with a Composite Element in the CDK6 Gene Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22332 - 22340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Castro-Rivera, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Estrogen Regulation of Cyclin D1 Gene Expression in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells Involves Multiple Enhancer Elements
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2001; 276(33): 30853 - 30861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Saville, H. Poukka, M. Wormke, O. A. Janne, J. J. Palvimo, M. Stoner, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Cooperative Coactivation of Estrogen Receptor alpha in ZR-75 Human Breast Cancer Cells by SNURF and TATA-binding Protein
J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2002; 277(4): 2485 - 2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*Genetics Home Reference


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals