help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosolowsky, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosolowsky, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, W. B.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 10 4411-4418
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Adrenal Capillary Endothelial Cells Stimulate Aldosterone Release through a Protein That Is Distinct from Endothelin1

Lori J. Rosolowsky, Craig J. Hanke and William B. Campbell

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226; and the Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. William B. Campbell, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226. E-mail: wbcamp{at}mcw.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We tested the possibility that bovine adrenal capillary endothelial cells (ECs) stimulate aldosterone secretion from bovine zona glomerulosa (ZG) cells by the release of a transferable factor. In coincubations of ZG cells and ECs in serum-free medium, aldosterone release was stimulated approximately 17-fold, and the stimulation was related to the concentration of ECs. The maximal stimulation by ECs was 75% of the maximal response to ACTH. In contrast, adrenal pericytes and fibroblasts were without effect. ECs incubated alone without ZG cells did not produce aldosterone. Conditioned medium from ECs (EC-CM), but not adrenal fibroblasts, stimulated aldosterone release approximately 3-fold. The stimulation increased with the concentration of EC-CM and the duration of conditioning time. Steroidogenic activity in EC-CM was abolished by pronase treatment, indicating that the active factor was a protein. However, the activity in EC-CM was distinct from that of endothelin-1 (ET-1), an endothelial peptide that also stimulates aldosterone secretion, as it was not blocked by the ETB receptor antagonist PD-145065, it did not alter [125I]ET-1 binding to ZG cells, and its release occurred before the release of ET-1. Neither ECs nor EC-CM stimulated the production of cortisol from zona fasciculata cells. The activity of EC-CM was not blocked by an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist or a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist. EC-CM stimulated increased intracellular calcium in fura-2-loaded ZG cells, but did not increase the production of cAMP. Using gel filtration, this peptide had an approximate molecular mass of 3000 Da and migrated earlier than ET-1. This study demonstrates that ECs in vitro alter steroidogenesis through the release of a transferable substance and suggests the existence of an endothelium-derived steroidogenic factor that is produced by adrenal capillary ECs. This endothelium-derived steroidogenic factor may function in the adrenal gland as a paracrine regulator of aldosterone secretion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE CLOSE ANATOMICAL association of endothelial cells (ECs) with smooth muscle cells and the formed elements of the blood permits interactions between these cells. It is now recognized that ECs release a variety of soluble mediators that affect vascular tone, platelet aggregation, and leukocyte function (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Some of these compounds include prostacyclin, endothelium-derived relaxing factor or nitric oxide, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and endothelin (ET). We considered an analogous situation in the capillary vasculature in which the smooth muscle cell layer is not present and the capillary endothelium is in close anatomical contact with other cells that compose the tissue. The adrenal gland is highly vascularized with capillaries that form irregular configurations around clusters of steroidogenic cells (7, 8). In the zona fasciculata, the capillaries enlarge and are designated sinusoids. The close association between capillary and sinusoidal ECs and steroidogenic cells suggested that ECs may be involved in the regulation of steroidogenesis. Support for this hypothesis was provided by data suggesting that there is an intraadrenal regulator of steroidogenesis (9) and that changes in adrenal blood flow promote steroid release (7). Campbell found that increasing zona glomerulosa (ZG) cell number increased basal and stimulated aldosterone release per cell (10). After excluding various known mediators of aldosterone release, he speculated that a novel aldosterone-stimulating factor mediated the positive effect of cell density on aldosterone release. Hinson and co-workers reported that ACTH and angiotensin II increase adrenal blood flow, dilate adrenal vessels, and increase steroidogenesis (11). Histamine is thought to mediate the increase in adrenal blood flow (12); however, the mediator of flow-induced steroidogenesis is unknown. ECs respond to flow and shear stress by releasing nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and ET (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Two of these products, prostacyclin and ET, stimulate aldosterone release (19, 20, 21), whereas nitric oxide inhibits aldosterone production (22, 23). As ECs release vasoactive mediators in response to flow and shear stress, they may be the source of the mediator of flow-induced steroidogenesis. The hypothesis that capillary ECs produce an endothelium-derived steroidogenic factor (EDSF) was tested in vitro using cultured bovine adrenal capillary ECs and bovine adrenal ZG and zona fasciculata (ZF) cells. These studies indicate that adrenal ECs produce a protein that stimulates aldosterone production.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture methods
Bovine adrenal ZG cells were cultured as previously described (24). Cells were plated in Primaria 24-well culture dishes (Becton Dickinson and Co., Lincoln Park, NJ) at a density of 2–4 x 105 cells/well. Cell viability was approximately 60% at the time of plating as measured by exclusion of trypan blue. Nonviable cells did not adhere and were removed when the medium was replaced. Cells were maintained at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. The growth medium was replaced every 24 h with medium containing 2% FCS. Cells were used upon reaching confluence, usually 3–5 days, and cell viability was greater than 95% at that time. Adrenal ZF cells were cultured as described by Rainey et al. (25). Fasciculata cells were plated in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium containing FBS (5%), ITS+ premix (insulin, transferrin, selenium, and BSA; 1%), and antibiotic-antimycotic solution (1%). Plating density was approximately 0.75–1.0 x 106 cells/well in Primaria or Corning, Inc. (Houston, TX), 24-well culture plates. The cells were fed daily with fresh growth medium containing 2% FBS and were used upon reaching confluence.

Bovine adrenal capillary ECs were isolated as described by Gospodarowicz et al. (26). Tissue fragments from the cortical zone were incubated at 37 C in 0.5% collagenase in PBS. The supernatant containing the dispersed cells was collected, and the cells were washed three times with DMEM containing glucose (4.5 g/liter), calf serum (10%), and gentamicin (50 µg/ml; plating medium). The cells were plated on 60-mm gelatin-coated petri dishes in PBS and incubated at 37 C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. After 30 min and again at 2 h, cells that did not adhere were removed, and plating medium was added. After 1 day, colonies of ECs appeared as groups of loosely connected cells growing in swirls. The cells were subsequently grown in DMEM containing glucose (4.5 g/liter), calf serum (10%), endothelial mitogen (25 ng/ml), and basic fibroblast growth factor (5 ng/ml; endothelial cell growth medium). The medium was changed every 2–3 days. The purity of endothelial cell cultures was assessed as greater than 95% by their uniform cobblestone morphology as well as positive staining for (1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethyl indocarbocyanine) diI-acetylated low density lipoprotein (diI-Ac LDL) and factor VIII antigen and negative staining for smooth muscle {alpha}-actin by immunofluorescence. Furthermore, EC cultures did not produce detectable amounts of aldosterone or cortisol. Cells were transferred nonenzymatically by incubation in Puck’s/EDTA medium or by allowing them to migrate to microcarrier beads (see below). Cells from passages 2–6 were used.

Pericytes were present in some early passage cultures of adrenal ECs. These cells were identified by a unique morphology with longitudinal and circumferential processes (27). Mixed cultures were separated and enriched by exposing them to a Puck’s/EDTA solution. ECs detached in this medium and were replated in bovine adrenal endothelial cell growth medium. The adherent pericytes were then incubated in Puck’s/EDTA with trypsin (0.08%) and plated in DMEM containing bovine calf serum (10%) and antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (1%), but without endothelial mitogen or basic fibroblast growth factor (pericyte growth medium). Enriched cultures of pericytes were characterized by their morphology, slow (10- to 14-day) doubling time, and lack of staining with diI-Ac-LDL. Cells from passages 3–6 were used.

Adrenal fibroblasts sometimes appeared in overgrown cultures of adrenal capillary ECs. These cells exhibited typical fibroblast morphology and a lack of contact inhibition at confluence. The same method used to enrich pericyte populations was used in isolating fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were also grown in DMEM containing bovine calf serum (10%) and antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (1%; fibroblast growth medium). Subsequent passages of these cells were characterized by morphology and lack of staining with diI-Ac-LDL. Cells from passages 3–5 were used for these studies.

EC-ZG cell interaction
For cell-cell interaction experiments, sterilized Cytodex 3 microcarrier beads were suspended in the appropriate cell growth medium and added to confluent cell monolayers of ECs, fibroblasts, or pericytes at a concentration of 1–2 mg beads/ml culture medium (28). Typically, cells migrated onto and divided on the beads so that the beads were 80–100% covered with cells after 24 h. Confluent cultures of beads were used to seed new cultures onto tissue culture dishes or for ZG cell incubations as described below. Before an experiment, confluent ZG cells were washed twice with 1 ml modified F-12 medium containing 1 mg/ml BSA (buffer 1) and allowed to incubate for 2 h in this medium. Before the start of the experiment, cells growing on microcarrier beads were dislodged from the underlying cell monolayer by spraying culture medium over the surface of the dish with a pipette. The beads were collected in a plastic centrifuge tube and allowed to settle. The culture medium was then removed and replaced with buffer 1. After two washes in buffer 1, cells were resuspended in an appropriate volume of F-12 containing 2 mg/ml BSA and 1.8 mM calcium chloride (buffer 2) to give a final concentration of 1–10 mg beads/ml. Cell-free beads that had been preincubated in culture medium were rinsed and resuspended in the same manner. For the concentration-response experiment, suspensions of endothelial cell-covered beads (5 mg/ml) or cell-free beads were diluted with increasing volumes of buffer 2. The ZG cells were incubated at 37 C for 1 or 2 h with 1 ml/well of the various dilutions. The medium was then removed and stored at -40 C until assayed for aldosterone. ZF cells were handled in the same manner, and the medium was assayed for cortisol.

Studies with EC-conditioned medium (EC-CM)
In experiments using CM, microcarrier beads coated with adrenal ECs, adrenal fibroblasts, or cell-free beads were collected in a plastic conical tube and washed, and the tube was incubated horizontally in buffer 2 at 37 C to maximize contact between beads and medium. In some experiments, the incubation time of the beads with buffer 2 was varied to determine the effect of conditioning time on steroidogenic activity. The conditioning time varied from 0.5–3 h. At the end of the conditioning period, the tubes were placed vertically to allow the beads to settle. The CM was removed from the beads, and 1 ml of the CM was transferred to ZG cells that had been washed and prepared as described above. In some experiments, the EC- or fibroblast-CM was diluted with various amounts of CM from cell-free beads. One milliliter of each of the dilutions was added to ZG cells or ZF cells. The cells were then incubated for 2 h at 37 C, and the buffer was removed and stored at -40 C until assayed for aldosterone or cortisol.

In other experiments, cell free or EC-CM was collected, various antagonists were added, and the medium was transferred to ZG cells that had been pretreated with the corresponding antagonists. The ZG cells were then incubated at 37 C for 2 h. The medium was removed and stored at -40 C until assayed for aldosterone. The antagonists included the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (10-5 M), the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist D-Arg-[Hyp8,Thy5,8,D-Phe7]bradykinin (10-5 M), and the endothelin ETB receptor antagonist PD-145065 (10-5 M).

The protease sensitivity of cell free and EC-CM was tested by incubating CM with pronase immobilized on agarose (pronase-CB). The pronase gel was washed twice with buffer 1 before use. After a 2-h incubation with CM (0.4 U pronase/ml CM) in a shaking 37 C water bath, samples were centrifuged to pellet the pronase, and the supernatant was transferred to ZG cells. ZG cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 C, and the medium was stored frozen at -40 C until assayed for aldosterone.

The proteins contained in EC-CM were separated by gel filtration chromatography on a Pharmacia Superose 12 HR 10/30 column (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). EC-CM was lyophilized and resuspended in 0.15 M ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.8, at 10-fold the original concentration. After the injection of 500 µl of this concentrate, the column was eluted with ammonium bicarbonate buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Fractions were collected in 1-ml volumes, and fractions from 6–35 ml were assayed for steroidogenic activity. The assay was conducted by adding 0.1 ml of each fraction to 1 ml ZG cell incubation medium. ZG cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 C, and the medium was removed and stored frozen at -40 C until assayed for aldosterone.

Binding of [125I]ET-1 to ZG cells
Binding of [125I]ET-1 to ZG cells was based on the method of Cozza et al. (29). Cells were cultured for 4 or 5 days in 12-well plates at a density of 200,000 cells/well. The cells were washed twice in buffer 1 and allowed to incubate for 2 h at 37 C. The buffer was then removed and replaced with modified Ham’s F-12 containing 0.1% BSA, pepstatin (10 µg/ml), and bacitracin (100 µg/ml). [125I]ET-1 was added to the ZG cells at 5 x 105 cpm/well along with increasing concentrations of unlabeled ET-1 or EC-CM. The EC-CM was conditioned for 2 h and subsequently diluted with cell-free CM. ZG cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 C followed by a series of four washes with 1 ml/well ice-cold PBS. ZG cells were solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH. The resulting suspension was transferred to 12 x 75-mm culture tubes and passed through a Brandel cell harvester (Bethesda, MD). The radioactivity bound to the cell harvester filter membranes was measured by {gamma}-scintillation spectrometry.

Intracellular calcium measurement
Experiments determining intracellular calcium release in ZG cells were performed as described by Csukas et al. with slight modifications (30). Briefly, ZG cells were loaded with fura-2/AM in 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 155 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM potassium chloride, 1.8 mM calcium chloride, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 5.5 mM glucose, and 1 mg/ml BSA (HEPES buffer). Fura-2/AM was diluted in HEPES buffer containing 1.25 mg/ml BSA and 0.5% dimethylsulfoxide to a final concentration of 5 µM. ZG cells were loaded with fura-2/AM for 1 h at room temperature. After loading, the cells were washed four times with HEPES buffer and transferred to a Photon Technologies, Inc. (Princeton, NJ), dual excitation fluorescence microscope. ZG cells were stimulated with angiotensin II (1 µM) and EC-CM.

RIAs
Aldosterone was measured by RIA as described by Gomez-Sanchez et al. (31). Cortisol was measured as described by Rosolowsky and Campbell (24). ET-1 was measured in EC-CM by RIA as described by Hieda and Gomez-Sanchez (32). The ET-1 standards, [125I]ET-1, and anti-ET-1 serum were diluted in an assay buffer consisting of 0.05 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% BSA, 0.05 M sodium chloride, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM EDTA. For the assay, 0.1 ml ET-1 standard or EC-CM was added to 12 x 75-mm culture tubes containing 0.1 ml anti-ET-1 serum diluted 1:4000 and 0.1 ml [125I]ET-1 containing 6000 counts/min. This mixture was incubated for 18 h at 4 C. After the addition of 0.1 ml goat antirabbit antibody diluted 1:20 and 0.3 ml 16.6% polyethylene glycol, the samples were incubated for 18 h at 4 C. The antibody-bound counts were removed by centrifugation, the supernatant was decanted, and radioactivity was measured using a {gamma}-scintillation spectrometer. cAMP was measured as described by Callahan et al. (33) and Csukas et al. (30).

Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA for concentration-response experiments with more than one treatment, followed by multiple comparisons tests when differences were found to be significant. A Bonferroni adjustment was used at an overall significance level of P < 0.05. Otherwise, Student’s t test was used. Data represent averages of multiple incubations from at least two cell preparations or are a representative experiment from multiple preparations.

Materials
Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution, horse serum, and antibiotics (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY); FBS (HyClone Laboratories, Inc. Logan, UT); collagenase and dispase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN); basic fibroblast growth factor (R\|[amp ]\|D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); and endothelial mitogen (Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Stoughton, MA) were obtained from commercial sources. Primaria culture plates were purchased from Becton Dickinson and Co. (Lincoln Park, NJ), and Cytodex 3 beads were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Other cell culture plasticware was purchased from Corning, Inc. (Houston, TX). ET-1 was obtained from Peptides International (Louisville, KY), Losartan from DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (Wilmington, DE), PD-145065 from Parke-Davis (Detroit, MI), and D-Arg-[Hyp8,Thy5,8,D-Phe7]bradykinin from Peninsula Laboratories, Inc. (Belmont, CA). Fura-2/AM dye was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). [125I]ET-1 and [3H]aldosterone were obtained from NEN Life Science Products (Boston, MA). The antialdosterone antiserum was a gift from the Pituitary Hormone Distribution Program of the NIH. The anti-ET-1 and anti-cortisol antibodies were gifts from Dr. Celso Gomez-Sanchez, University of Missouri (Columbia, MO).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Incubation of ZG cells with adrenal capillary EC-coated beads stimulated the release of aldosterone (Fig. 1Go). Aldosterone release in EC/ZG cell coincubations was significantly greater than the release from ZG cells coincubated with cell-free beads. The effect was related to the number of EC-coated beads added. At EC/ZG cell ratios of 0.08 and 0.4, aldosterone synthesis was increased by 2.9-fold (P < 0.0001) and 17.5-fold (P < 0.0001), respectively, over that in the corresponding cell-free bead controls. Aldosterone production was not detectable from cell free- or EC-covered beads incubated alone without ZG cells (data not shown). ZG cells incubated with a maximal concentration of ACTH (3.5 x 10-8 M) produced 7.61 ± 0.69 pg aldosterone/µg protein·2 h. Thus, the stimulation of ZG aldosterone release by the highest number of ECs tested was approximately 75% of the maximal aldosterone released by ACTH. ZG cells incubated with adrenal fibroblasts or pericytes did not increase aldosterone release compared with those incubated with cell-free beads (P < 0.0001), and there was no relationship between numbers of fibroblasts or pericytes and the release of aldosterone. Aldosterone production by adrenal fibroblasts and pericytes incubated without ZG cells was undetectable.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of adrenal capillary ECs, pericytes, or fibroblasts on aldosterone release from cultured bovine adrenal ZG cells. ZG cells were incubated for 2 h with increasing concentrations of cell-free microcarrier beads (open circles) or beads cultured with capillary ECs (open squares), fibroblasts (solid squares), or pericytes (solid triangles) from bovine adrenal gland. Incubation medium was removed and assayed for aldosterone by RIA. ZG cells that were incubated with 3.5 x 10-8 M ACTH as a positive control produced 7.61 ± 0.69 pg aldosterone/µg protein·2 h. In blank incubations without ZG cells, adrenal ECs, fibroblasts, and pericytes did not produce detectable amounts of aldosterone. Results are the mean ± SEM for six determinations.

 
EC-CM stimulated aldosterone release in a concentration-related manner (Fig. 2Go). Incubation of ZG cells with cell-free CM containing 25% EC-CM increased aldosterone production by 1.6-fold compared with that by ZG cells incubated with cell free-CM (P < 0.02). One hundred percent EC-CM stimulated aldosterone production by 3.3-fold (P < 0.0001). The stimulation of aldosterone release by 100% EC-CM was equal to 25% of the effect of a maximal ACTH stimulus (18.2 ± 2.7 pg aldosterone/µg protein·h; data not shown). CM from adrenal fibroblasts did not stimulate aldosterone release at any concentration. The CM from ECs or fibroblasts did not contain detectable concentrations of aldosterone.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of varying concentrations of CM from adrenal endothelial cells or fibroblasts on aldosterone release. CM from ECs and fibroblasts were added to different sets of ZG cells. The ZG cells were incubated with CM for 1 h, and the medium was assayed for aldosterone. Aldosterone production with a maximal stimulus of ACTH (3.5 x 10-8 M) was 18.2 ± 2.7 pg/µg protein·h. Results are the mean ± SEM for six determinations.

 
To determine the time course of stimulatory activity, ECs were conditioned for 5–120 min, and the CM was tested for the ability to stimulate aldosterone (Fig. 3Go, top). Stimulatory activity could be detected at 15 min (P < 0.003 vs. cell free-CM) and reached a maximum at 30 min, after which it appeared to plateau. Medium that was conditioned by adrenal fibroblasts for up to 4 h did not stimulate aldosterone release (Fig. 3Go, bottom). These data indicate that adrenal ECs release a soluble factor that stimulates aldosterone release, which we termed EDSF.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of conditioning time of adrenal EC or fibroblasts on aldosterone release. Medium from adrenal ECs (solid circles, top), adrenal fibroblasts (solid squares, bottom), or cell-free beads (open circles) were conditioned for increasing time periods and transferred to ZG cells. CM were incubated with ZG cells for 2 h, and the medium was assayed for aldosterone. Results are the mean ± SEM for five determinations.

 
To determine the nature of EDSF, we tested the effect of protease treatment on EDSF activity. The sensitivity of EDSF to proteolytic degradation was determined by exposing CM to pronase immobilized on agarose. Untreated EC-CM stimulated aldosterone release by 7-fold compared with cell-free CM (Fig. 4Go). Treatment with pronase completely eliminated the stimulatory activity of EC-CM. The aldosterone release with cell-free CM was not altered by pronase treatment. These data indicate that EDSF is a protein or peptide and led us to compare the steroidogenic activity of EDSF to those of the commonly known steroidogenic peptide agonists, ACTH, angiotensin II, ET-1, and bradykinin.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of pronase exposure on aldosterone stimulatory activity of EC-CM. EC-CM and cell-free CM were treated with agarose-immobilized pronase for 2 h. Pronase was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was added to ZG cells for a 2-h incubation. Medium was assayed for aldosterone. Results are the mean ± SEM for four determinations.

 
ACTH is a potent stimulator of cortisol synthesis by ZF cells (34). We examined the effect of ECs on cortisol synthesis from ZF cells as an indicator of ACTH activity. Incubation of cultured ZF cells with increasing concentrations of ECs did not increase cortisol production (data not shown). Similarly, incubation with increasing concentrations of EC-CM did not stimulate ZF cortisol synthesis (data not shown). Stimulation of ZF cells with ACTH (3.5 pM) resulted in a 190-fold increase in cortisol production compared with that by the cell-free bead control.

Angiotensin II (10 nM) stimulated a 5-fold increase in aldosterone release compared with the control value (P < 0.01; Fig. 5Go, middle). The angiotensin II stimulation was inhibited by pretreatment with the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan (10 µM). EC-CM-stimulated aldosterone release was approximately 6-fold greater than that stimulated by cell-free CM, but was not inhibited by losartan pretreatment. A similar study was performed with bradykinin and the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist D-Arg-[Hyp8,Thy5,8,D-Phe7]bradykinin (35). Bradykinin (100 nM)-stimulated aldosterone release was 2.3-fold greater than control release (P < 0.01; Fig. 5Go, top). Pretreatment with the bradykinin antagonist inhibited the stimulation by bradykinin. EC-CM-stimulated aldosterone release was 2.2-fold greater than cell-free CM, but this stimulation was not inhibited by the bradykinin antagonist. Aldosterone release with cell-free CM was not altered by the bradykinin antagonist.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of antagonists on EC-CM-stimulated aldosterone release. ZG cells were pretreated with 10-5 M concentrations of antagonists to angiotensin II, bradykinin, and ET-1 or their corresponding vehicle controls. CM or the peptide agonist was then added and tested for its ability to stimulate aldosterone in the presence of the antagonists. ZG cells were incubated with CM and antagonists or vehicle for 2 h, and the medium was assayed for aldosterone. Results are the mean ± SEM for four to six determinations. {dagger}, P < 0.02 compared with CF-CM; {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 compared with CF-CM; *, P < 0.01 compared with control.

 
Previous studies indicate that ET-1 also stimulates the release of aldosterone through an ETB receptor (36). We therefore compared the stimulatory activity of EDSF to that of ET-1 using the ETB receptor antagonist PD-145065 (Fig. 5Go, bottom). ET-1 (100 nM) stimulated a 2-fold increase in aldosterone release (P < 0.02), which was blocked by PD-145065 (P < 0.01). EC-CM stimulated a 9.5-fold increase in aldosterone release, which was not significantly reduced by the presence of the ET antagonist. To further determine the role of ET-1, ECs were conditioned for 0–24 h to examine the time course of ET-1 release. A detectable increase in ET-1 release was not measured until after 3 h of conditioning (37 ± 1 pg/ml at 0 h vs. 173 ± 28 pg/ml at 3 h; data not shown). ET-1 release was maximal at 12 h (2023 ± 162 pg/ml) and appeared to plateau. In comparison, the release of EDSF was near maximal at 30–60 min (Fig. 3Go, top). EDSF release was significantly reduced at 12 h and showed no stimulation above basal values at 24 h (data not shown). In ligand binding studies with radiolabeled [125I]ET-1, EC-CM was examined for its ability to displace [125I]ET-1 from the ET receptor on ZG cells. Unlabeled ET-1 inhibited the binding of [125I]ET-1 to ZG cells with an IC50 of 2.5 nM. ET-1 displaced 90% of the bound [125I]ET-1 at a concentration of 100 nM (data not shown). There was no significant displacement of [125I]ET-1 by EC-CM (data not shown).

EC-CM increased intracellular calcium in ZG cells loaded with fura-2 dye. Angiotensin II (1 µM) increased ZG intracellular calcium with a characteristic spike, followed by an elevated plateau phase (Fig. 6BGo). EC-CM stimulation did not result in a calcium spike, but caused a sustained elevation of intracellular calcium to concentrations comparable to those found during the plateau phase of angiotensin II (Fig. 6AGo). When summarized, both angiotensin II and EC-CM caused sustained elevation of intracellular calcium concentrations within ZG cells, but only angiotensin II resulted in a rapid calcium spike (Fig. 6CGo). Treatment of ZG cells with EC-CM did not increase the production of cAMP. Accumulation of cAMP was unchanged from 5–120 min in ZG cells treated with cell-free CM or EC-CM (Table 1Go). Maximal stimulation with 35 nM ACTH resulted in cAMP production of 167 ± 6 pg/µg protein at 120 min.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Stimulation of intracellular calcium concentration by EC-CM and angiotensin II. EC-CM was conditioned for 3 h in HEPES buffer. ZG cells were allowed to equilibrate in 500 µl HEPES buffer for 5 min or until a stable baseline was obtained. Angiotensin II (1 µM) or EC-CM (500 µl) was then added. A and B are typical tracings of calcium concentration changes after stimulation with EC-CM and angiotensin II, respectively. C is a summary of basal, peak, and plateau calcium concentrations. The results in C are the mean ± SEM for four determinations. *, P < 0.0001 compared with basal.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of EC-CM and CF-CM on cAMP accumulation in ZG cells

 
Gel filtration chromatography of EC-CM indicated that steroidogenic activity eluted in a volume of 18 ml (Fig. 7Go). This elution volume corresponds to an approximate molecular mass of 3000 Da. The arrow in Fig. 7Go indicates the elution volume of ET-1 standards analyzed under identical conditions. EDSF and ET-1 eluted in different fractions.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Resolution of aldosterone-stimulating activity in lyophilized EC-CM by gel filtration chromatography. Lyophilized EC-CM was concentrated 10-fold and injected onto a Pharmacia Superose 12 HR column. The column was eluted with 0.15 M ammonium bicarbonate buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Fractions were assayed for aldosterone stimulatory activity by diluting them 1:10 in SM2 buffer and incubating them for 2 h. Samples were assayed for aldosterone.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous studies have demonstrated that cultured bovine coronary artery ECs release an endothelium-derived factor that stimulates aldosterone synthesis (28). This factor was called EDSF. The close proximity of adrenal ZG cells and adrenal capillary ECs suggested that adrenal EC production of EDSF might be a local regulator of aldosterone synthesis. The EDSF released by bovine coronary artery ECs appeared to be a protein based on its sensitivity to proteases, stability at 37 C, and resistance to temperature extremes (28). Adrenal capillary ECs also produce an EDSF with similar sensitivity to pronase and distinct from ACTH, angiotensin II, bradykinin, and ET-1. Furthermore, it had an approximate molecular mass of 3000 Da.

The current data indicate that bovine adrenal capillary ECs, but not adrenal fibroblasts or pericytes, stimulate aldosterone release from bovine ZG cells. This effect was concentration dependent either by varying the number of ECs during direct coincubations with ZG cells or by the transfer of varying concentrations of EC-CM to ZG cells. As the direct coincubation of ECs with ZG cells was not required to stimulate aldosterone synthesis, ECs did not modify a precursor from ZG cells to produce aldosterone. The ability of EC-CM to stimulate aldosterone release indicates that the effect is mediated by a soluble factor that is released during EC conditioning. The time course of EDSF release is relatively rapid. The stimulatory factor in adrenal EC-CM was detectable within 15 min of conditioning, peaked at 30 min, and appeared to plateau. Extended conditioning periods indicated that EDSF activity was decreased after 12 h, and no activity was evident after 24 h. In comparison, endothelial release of ET-1 reached a maximum at 12 h and remained at maximal concentrations after 24 h. Therefore, the release of ET-1 does not correlate with EDSF release.

We have demonstrated that EDSF and ET-1 do not compete for a common receptor site, as indicated by the inability of EC-CM to displace the binding of [125I]ET-1 to ZG cells. The ET-1 antagonist, PD145065, decreased EC-CM stimulated aldosterone release only slightly, whereas it was capable of completely inhibiting ET-1-induced aldosterone release. Based on these data, EDSF cannot be ET-1.

The effect of EDSF can be distinguished from other known stimulators of aldosterone release. ACTH stimulated cortisol production from ZF cells at a concentration of 3.5 pM. However, the failure of ECs and EC-CM to stimulate cortisol synthesis from ZF cells indicates that ACTH is not released from ECs. Therefore, EDSF cannot be ACTH. EDSF can also be differentiated from angiotensin II and bradykinin through the use of specific receptor antagonists. Previous studies have demonstrated that the stimulation of aldosterone by angiotensin II is mediated by the AT1 receptor subtype (37). In support of this, the specific AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, completely inhibited the angiotensin II-stimulated release of aldosterone. However, losartan pretreatment did not inhibit EC-CM-stimulated aldosterone release, indicating that EDSF does not function through the angiotensin AT1 receptor. Bradykinin stimulation of aldosterone was completely inhibited by the B2 receptor antagonist D-Arg-[Hyp8,Thy5,8,D-Phe7]bradykinin (35). However, EC-CM-stimulated aldosterone release was not inhibited by pretreatment with the antagonist. Therefore, EDSF stimulation can also be distinguished from bradykinin.

EC-CM signaling pathways appear to be through increased intracellular calcium and are not dependent on the production of cAMP. The calcium concentrations achieved with EC-CM stimulation are comparable to the plateau phase of a high concentration of angiotensin II. However, angiotensin II responses are characterized by an immediate calcium spike, which is not seen with EC-CM stimulations. This difference in the shapes of the calcium response curves may indicate that the early phase of the angiotensin II response is not stimulated by EDSF. Similar to angiotensin II, EC-CM appears to act only through the calcium pathway and does not involve the accumulation of cAMP.

The separation of lyophilized EC-CM by gel filtration chromatography indicated that the aldosterone-stimulating activity eluted with a retention time corresponding to a molecular mass of approximately 3000 Da based on the elution of molecular mass standards. Its elution volume was less than that of ET-1. These data indicate that EDSF is not a known steroidogenic peptide, so it is either a novel peptide or a known endothelial peptide not previously reported to affect aldosterone release.

The mechanisms regulating EDSF production within the adrenal gland are currently unknown. The immediate and relatively short term release of EDSF suggests that the purpose of this peptide may be the intraadrenal modulation of aldosterone release. The role of the endothelium in the regulation of aldosterone production has been attributed to the production of eicosanoids, ET-1, and, more recently, nitric oxide (19, 22, 23, 38). The production of EDSF by the adrenal endothelium indicates a potent new mechanism for the interaction of the adrenal endothelium and steroidogenic cells. The present study indicates that ECs may alter hormone release via a paracrine mechanism, analogous to their effects on vascular tone.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Ms. Gretchen Barg for her secretarial assistance, and Ms. Martha Williams for her technical assistance. The antialdosterone serum was generously provided by the Hormone Distribution Program of the NIH.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the NHLBI (HL-21066 and HL-52159). Back

Received February 2, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Moncada S, Vane JR 1979 Pharmacology and endogenous roles of prostaglandin endoperoxides, thromboxane A2, and prostacyclin. Pharmacol Rev 30:293–331[Medline]
  2. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV 1980 The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288:373–376[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Palmer RMJ, Ashton DS, Moncada S 1988 Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature 333:664–666[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Myers PR, Guerra R,Jr., Harrison DG 1989 Release of NO and EDRF from cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 256:H1030–H1037
  5. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T 1988 A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 332:411–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Campbell WB, Gebremedin D, Pratt PF, Harder DR 1996 Identification of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Circ Res 78:415–423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Vinson GP, Pudney JA, Whitehouse BJ 1985 The mammalian adrenal circulation and the relationship between adrenal blood flow and steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 105:285–294[CrossRef]
  8. Dobbie JW, Symington T 1991 The human adrenal gland with special reference to the vasculature. J Endocrinol 34:479–489[CrossRef]
  9. Shier DN, Kusano E, Stoner GD, Franco-Saenz R, Mulrow PJ 1989 Production of renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone by adrenal explant cultures: response to potassium and converting enzyme inhibition. Endocrinology 125:486–491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Campbell DJ 1982 Increased steroidogenesis by rat zona glomerulosa cells with increased cell concentration in vitro: evidence for a novel aldosterone-stimulating factor and implications regarding aldosterone biosynthesis. J Endocrinol 94:225–241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hinson JP, Vinson GP, Whitehouse BJ 1986 The relationship between perfusion medium flow rate and steroid secretion in the isolated perfused rat adrenal gland in situ. J Endocrinol 111:391–396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Aikawa T, Matsumoto I, Hirose T, Morikawa T, Tsujimoto Y 1986 H1 action of histamine on aldosterone and cortisol secretion by perfused dog adrenal. Am J Physiol 250:E523–E529
  13. Frangos JA, Eskin SG, McIntire LV, Ives CL 1985 Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 227:1477–1479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vanhoutte PM, Boulanger CM, Mombouli JV 1995 Endothelium-derived relaxing factors and converting enzyme inhibition. Am J Cardiol 76:3E–12E[CrossRef]
  15. Malek A, Izumo S 1992 Physiologic fluid shear stress causes downregulation of endothelin-1 mRNA in bovine aortic endothelium. Am J Physiol 263:C389–C396
  16. Uematsu M, Ohara Y, Navas JP, Nishida K, Murphy TJ, Alexander RW, Nerem RM, Harrison DG 1995 Regulation of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression by shear stress. Am J Physiol 169:C1371–C1378
  17. Tsao PS, Buitrago R, Chan JR, Cooke JP 1996 Fluid flow inhibits endothelial adhesiveness. Nitric oxide and transcriptional regulation of VCAM-1. Circ 94:1682–1689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Golledge J, Turner RJ, Harley SL, Springall DR, Powell JT 1997 Circumferential deformation and shear stress induce differential responses in saphenous vein endothelium exposed to arterial flow. J Clin Invest 99:2719–2726[Medline]
  19. Campbell WB, Gomez-Sanchez CE 1985 Absence of prostacyclin involvement in angiotensin-induced aldosterone secretion in rat adrenal cells. Endocrinology 117:279–286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morishita R, Higaki J, Ogihara T 1989 Endothelin stimulates aldosterone biosynthesis by dispersed rabbit adreno-capsular cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 160:628–632[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Delarue C, Delton I, Fiorini F, Homo-Delarche F, Fasolo A, Braquet P, Vaudry H 1990 Endothelin stimulates steroid secretion from adrenal gland in vitro: evidence for the involvement of prostaglandins and extracellular calcium in the mechanism of action of endothelin. Endocrinology 127:2001–2008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Natarajan R, Lanting L, Bai W, Bravo EL, Nadler J 1997 The role of nitric oxide in the regulation of aldosterone synthesis by adrenal glomerulosa cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 61:47–53[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Hanke CJ, Drewett JG, Myers CR, Campbell WB 1998 Nitric oxide inhibits aldosterone synthesis by a guanylyl cyclase-independent effect. Endocrinology 139:4053–4060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rosolowsky LJ, Campbell WB 1990 Endothelin enhances adrenocorticotropin-stimulated aldosterone release from cultured bovine adrenal cells. Endocrinology 126:1860–1866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rainey WE, Viard I, Saez JM 1989 Transforming growth factor ß treatment decreases ACTH receptors on ovine adrenocortical cells. J Biol Chem 264:21474–21477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gospodarowicz D, Massoglia, Cheng J, Fujii DK 1986 Effect of fibroblast growth factor and lipoproteins on the proliferation of endothelial cells derived from bovine adrenal cortex, brain cortex, and corpus luteum capillaries. J Cell Physiol 127:121–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Antolelli-Orlidge A, Saunders KB, Smith SR, D’Amore PA 1989 An activated form of transforming growth factor beta is produced by cocultures of endothelial cells and pericytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:4544–4548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Rosolowsky LJ, Campbell WB 1994 Endothelial cells stimulate aldosterone release from bovine adrenal zona glomerulosa cells. Am J Physiol 266:E107–E117
  29. Cozza EN, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Foecking MF, Chiou S 1989 Endothelin binding to cultured calf adrenal zona glomerulosa cells and stimulation of aldosterone secretion. J Clin Invest 84:1032–1035
  30. Csukas S, Hanke CJ, Rewolinski D, Campbell WB 1998 Prostaglandin E2-induced aldosterone release from bovine zona glomerulosa cells is mediated by an EP2 receptor. Hypertension 31:575–581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Gomez-Sanchez C, Kem DC, Kaplan NM 1973 A radioimmunoassay for plasma aldosterone by immunologic purification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 36:795–790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hieda HS, Gomez-Sanchez CE 1990 Hypoxia increases endothelin release in bovine endothelial cells in culture, but epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, histamine and angiotensin II do not. Life Sci 47:247–251[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Callahan KS, Johnson AR, Campbell WB 1985 Enhancement of the antiaggregatory activity of prostacyclin by propranolol in human platelets. Circulation 17:1237–1246
  34. Gill GN 1976 ACTH regulation of the adrenal cortex. Pharmacol Ther 2:313–338
  35. Rosolowsky LJ, Campbell WB 1992 Bradykinin stimulates aldosterone release from cultured bovine adrenocortical cells through bradykinin B2 receptors. Endocrinology 130:2067–2075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gomez-Sanchez CE, Cozza EN, Foecking MF, Chiou S, Ferris MW 1990 Endothelin receptor subtypes and stimulation of aldosterone secretion. Hypertension 15:744–747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Penhoat A, Jaillard C, Crozat A, Saez JM 1988 Regulation of angiotensin II receptors and steroidogenic responsiveness in cultured bovine fasciculata and glomerulosa adrenal cells. Eur J Biochem 172:247–254[Medline]
  38. Hinson JP, Kapas S, Teja R, Vinson GP 1991 Effect of the endothelins on aldosterone secretion by rat zona glomerulosa cells in vitro. J Steroid Biochem 40:1–3



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. X. Zhang, K. M. Gauthier, J. R. Falck, A. Siddam, and W. B. Campbell
Steroid-Producing Cells Regulate Arterial Tone of Adrenal Cortical Arteries
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3569 - 3576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. J. Hanke, B. B. Holmes, Y. Xu, K. Nithipatikom, and W. B. Campbell
Endothelium-Derived Steroidogenic Factor Enhances Angiotensin II-Stimulated Aldosterone Release by Bovine Zona Glomerulosa Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 317 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Nithipatikom, B. B. Holmes, M. J. McCoy, C. J. Hillard, and W. B. Campbell
Chronic administration of nitric oxide reduces angiotensin II receptor type 1 expression and aldosterone synthesis in zona glomerulosa cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2004; 287(5): E820 - E827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. X. Zhang, K. M. Gauthier, and W. B. Campbell
Acetylcholine-Induced Relaxation and Hyperpolarization in Small Bovine Adrenal Cortical Arteries: Role of Cytochrome P450 Metabolites
Endocrinology, October 1, 2004; 145(10): 4532 - 4539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. X. Zhang, K. M. Gauthier, and W. B. Campbell
Characterization of Vasoconstrictor Responses in Small Bovine Adrenal Cortical Arteries in Vitro
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1571 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. Hanke and W. B. Campbell
Endothelial cell nitric oxide inhibits aldosterone synthesis in zona glomerulosa cells: modulation by oxygen
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2000; 279(4): E846 - E854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosolowsky, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosolowsky, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, W. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals