help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by McEwen, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by McEwen, B. S.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 10 4459-4469
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Pharmacological Characterization of Central and Peripheral Type I and Type II Adrenal Steroid Receptors in the Prairie Vole, a Glucocorticoid-Resistant Rodent1

Nicholas B. Hastings, Miles Orchinik, Maryse V. Aubourg and Bruce S. McEwen

Department of Zoology, Arizona State University (M.O.), Tempe, Arizona 85287; and the Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Rockefeller University (M.V.A., B.S.M.), New York, New York 10021

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nicholas B. Hastings, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, Washington Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08544. E-mail: hastings{at}princeton.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) has recently been shown to be glucocorticoid resistant; that is, the prairie vole adrenal axis is refractory to dexamethasone challenge, and highly elevated basal corticosterone titers occur without apparent pathophysiology. This study investigates the physiological correlates of glucocorticoid resistance in the prairie vole. We provide a detailed pharmacological characterization of intracellular type I and type II adrenal steroid receptors in peripheral tissues and the hippocampus of the prairie vole and the Sprague Dawley rat, a corticosensitive rodent. Adrenalectomy markedly reduces, but does not eliminate, circulating glucocorticoids in the prairie vole. Nonetheless, molecular, cellular, and physiological assays indicate adrenal insufficiency; salt appetite and dentate gyrus granule cell death are increased after adrenalectomy, suggesting vacancy of the high affinity type I subtype of central adrenal steroid receptor. Analysis of adrenal steroid receptor binding constants and selectivity for endogenous and synthetic steroids in the vole and rat indicated that the vole type I receptor is nearly identical to that of the rat in brain and periphery. However, voles demonstrated a 2-fold lower type I receptor binding density in colon and hippocampus compared with that in rats. The vole type II receptor bound the endogenous glucocorticoid corticosterone with an 8- to 10-fold lower affinity than the rat type II receptor and was expressed in lower densities in thymus and hippocampus. These data indicate physiological adaptations in the prairie vole adrenal axis consistent with other glucocorticoid-resistant species, such as the guinea pig and squirrel monkey.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GLUCOCORTICOIDS are adrenal steroids that are secreted in response to a variety of physiological and psychological challenges or stressors and play a critical role in mediating homeostatic adaptation to stress (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). However, there is ample evidence that chronic overactivity of the adrenal axis, as might occur under conditions of prolonged and severe stress, may have maladaptive consequences, particularly for the central nervous, immune, and reproductive systems (3, 4, 6, 7).

Given its well documented role in the etiology of various human and animal pathologies, it is surprising to find a number of species, including the guinea pig, the prairie vole, and several New World monkeys, in which glucocorticoid hypersecretion occurs under basal conditions (8, 9, 10). These animals are termed glucocorticoid resistant, in that they display attenuated end-organ responses to endogenous or exogenous glucocorticoid challenge (8, 9, 10, 11). Instances of end-organ glucocorticoid resistance occur in humans as well (11, 12, 13), but are often associated with pathology of the cardiovascular and renal systems, such as hypertension and hypokalemic acidosis (12, 13). Thus, naturally glucocorticoid-resistant species, in which adrenal steroid hypersecretion occurs without apparent pathology, raise interesting questions regarding the underlying mechanisms of resistance.

Adrenal steroids act by binding to and transforming specific intracellular receptors that then direct the transcriptional regulation of specific target genes (14, 15). Two intracellular adrenal steroid receptor subtypes, termed type I and type II, have been identified in mammals (16, 17). The type I receptor binds the endogenous adrenocorticoids aldosterone (ALDO), corticosterone (CORT), cortisol, and the sex steroid progesterone with high (Kd, {cong}1.0 nM) and nearly equal affinity (16, 18). Binding specificity for this receptor subtype is thus a function of extrinsic mechanisms, including most notably the glucocorticoid-inactivating actions of the enzyme 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßHSD), rather than of its intrinsic pharmacological characteristics (19). The type I receptor and 11ßHSD are coexpressed in high concentrations in the kidney and colon, tissues in which mineralocorticoids regulate ion equilibrium and blood volume (20, 21), and in discrete regions of the central nervous system, where they mediate cardiovascular and blood pressure regulation and salt appetite (22). Type I receptors are also expressed in high density in the hippocampus (HC), where, in the absence of 11ßHSD, they function as high affinity receptors for glucocorticoids. In contrast to the type I receptor, the type II receptor displays a lower binding affinity (Kd, {cong}10.0 nM) but higher intrinsic selectivity for glucocorticoids (16). The pharmacological profile of the type II receptor is therefore consistent with that of a specific glucocorticoid receptor. The type II receptor displays a widespread pattern of expression in brain and periphery, with a particularly dense expression in thymus and HC, and mediates glucocorticoid-specific physiological actions.

Attenuated end-organ responses to glucocorticoids are typical of both pathophysiological and natural occurrences of glucocorticoid resistance and are usually associated with the reduced affinity and/or abnormal tissue expression of type II receptor isoforms (9, 10, 11, 13, 23, 24). Surprisingly, this is not consistently true of the higher affinity type I receptor, where high affinity and low specificity for adrenocorticoids is conserved across even hypercortisolemic species (25, 26). Transcortin and 11ßHSD, which allow mineralocorticoid specificity in peripheral tissues such as kidney and colon (19), are compromised during conditions of glucocorticoid hypersecretion. This allows circulating glucocorticoids to avidly bind to and activate type I receptors, leading to constituitive mineralocorticoid-like actions in these organs.

Field and laboratory studies have established that monogamy is the predominant social system employed by the prairie vole (27). In separate studies, it has recently been demonstrated that adrenal steroids regulate pair-bonding behavior in this monogamous rodent (28, 29, 30, 31). It is presently unknown whether the unique adrenal physiology and behavioral features of this rodent are interrelated, but in addition to presenting a novel model of glucocorticoid resistance, the prairie vole presents a unique experimental model for investigating a possible mechanism by which the adrenal axis might regulate social structure. However, testing specific hypotheses regarding the role of the adrenal axis in regulating the monogamous social structure in the prairie vole awaits an understanding of the adrenal axis of this species and the development of experimental paradigms that allow the detailed analysis of adrenal steroid actions. In this regard, the present study has the following objectives: 1) to provide functional evidence for the efficacy of adrenalectomy in the prairie vole, and 2) to investigate the pharmacological characteristics of the intracellular type I and type II adrenal steroid receptors in the glucocorticoid-resistant prairie vole as they compare to a typical, glucocorticoid-sensitive laboratory rodent, the Sprague Dawley rat.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Prairie voles were derived from wild-caught stock obtained from Illinois and bred for several generations at the University of Maryland. Prairie voles used as breeders to establish a colony at The Rockefeller University were supplied by Dr. C. Sue Carter (University of Maryland, College Park, MD). Voles used in all experiments were sibling group-housed adult males, weighing 35–50 g. Water and food (Purina HF rabbit pellets, Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO) were provided ad libitum. Adult (250–300 g) male Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA), and also group housed with water and food (Purina rat chow) available ad libitum. All animals were maintained and killed (by decapitation) in strict accordance with NIH and university guidelines.

Steroids
[3H]Dexamethasone ([3H]DEX; SA, 36.5 Ci/mmol) and [3H]ALDO (SA, 77.8 Ci/mmol) were purchased from NEN Life Science Products (Boston, MA). The type II adrenal steroid receptor agonist RU28362 [11ß,17ß-dihydroxy-6-methyl-17{alpha}-(1-propynyl)androstan-1,4,6-triene-3-one] (32) was a gift from Roussel-UCLAF (Romainville, France), and the type I adrenal steroid receptor antagonist ZK91587 (7{alpha}-methoxycarbonyl-15ß,16ß-methylene-3-oxo-17{alpha}-pregn-4-ene-21,17-carbolactone) (33) was a gift from Schering AG (Berlin, Germany). All other nonradioactive steroids and additional reagents were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Surgical procedures
Animals were bilaterally adrenalectomized (ADX) under ketamine-acepromazine (1 mg ketamine and 5 µg acepromazine/10 g BW, ip) and methoxyflurane anesthesia. Adrenalectomy was performed with a surgical instrument similar in form to the intestinal forceps used previously in our laboratory to adrenalectomize rats, but sized appropriately for the removal of the vole adrenal gland. In initial characterizations of vole ADX, the removed gland was examined under a dissecting microscope to confirm its complete structural integrity. Rats were ADX via the standard dorsal approach under similar anesthesia. Postmortem examination of the perirenal area at survival times up to 14 days was performed to confirm that regeneration of the adrenal gland had not occurred. After ADX, animals were maintained on 0.9% saline (choice of saline or tap water) before being killed. At the time of death, tissues were dissected and frozen on dry ice, and trunk blood was collected into heparinized tubes (unless otherwise noted) for RIA of plasma steroid hormone levels.

CORT and ALDO assays
CORT and ALDO content in heparinized plasma were assayed using a RIA kit from Diagnostic Products (Los Angeles, CA). The CORT antibody sensitively (maximum sensitivity, 0.57 µg/dl) and selectively (maximum cross-reactivity, 2.9% with 11-deoxycorticosterone, <1% other steroids) binds both free and transcortin-bound CORT. For the ALDO antibody, the highest cross-reactivity was noted by the manufacturer as 0.033% with 18-hydroxycorticosterone. Both assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s specifications, except that vole serum was diluted 10-fold in 0.1 M PBS for the CORT assay only, due to high basal levels of this steroid. The validity of this modification was confirmed using ADX plasma samples, similarly diluted, containing known concentrations of cold CORT. Standards containing known concentrations of CORT in 0.1 M PBS, including true blanks comprised of charcoal-stripped plasma, were included in each assay. Interassay variance was routinely less than 10% for both assays, and both assays were performed in duplicate. Data were analyzed with reference to a standard curve fit by linear regression, and rat and vole samples were processed together in the same assay.

ADX and CORT clearance kinetics
Fifteen voles were ADX, and 5 were sham operated (SHAM). Serial periorbital blood samples were collected from 10 ADX voles 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h after surgery with animals under methoxyflurane inhalant anesthesia using heparinized capillary tubes. The remaining 5 ADX and the 5 SHAM animals were serially sampled 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Heparinized plasma was isolated from all blood samples and assayed for CORT.

Efficacy of adrenalectomy
Experiments were conducted to determine whether ADX animals exhibited predicted signs (34, 35, 36) of adrenal insufficiency, such as increased salt appetite, ACTH secretion, hypothalamic arginine vasopressin (AVP) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, and dentate gyrus granule cell death. These experiments are described below.

Measurement of saline intake. Twelve voles were housed in mouse-sized metabolic cages for 3 days before experimental manipulation to acclimate the animals to the cages. After acclimation, six voles were ADX (the remainder were sham operated), and all animals were returned to the cages. Fluid intake, a choice of tap water or 3.0% saline, was measured every 24 h for 3 days. Food was allowed ad libitum during acclimation and testing.

ACTH assay. Plasma ACTH was determined by RIA using an iodinated kit from INCSTAR Corp. (Stillwater, MN). Voles were either ADX (n = 9) or sham operated (n = 9), and trunk blood was collected 24 h later into ice-cold, nonheparinized tubes and immediately centrifuged to isolate plasma. Plasma was assayed for CORT and ACTH in parallel. According to the manufacturer’s specifications, the sensitivity was 20 pg/ml, and maximum cross-reactivity with a variety of structurally related peptides, including other POMC-derived peptides, was reported by the manufacturer to be less than 0.01%. Assays were conducted as suggested by the manufacturer.

Analyses of hypothalamic AVP mRNA synthesis
As a secretagogue of ACTH, it is well established that levels of hypothalamic messenger RNA encoding AVP are sensitive to concentrations of circulating glucocorticoid (36, 37). We used Northern analysis to initially confirm this effect in the prairie vole and to validate the probe used in in situ hybridization studies. Later, we used the same probe to confirm, by in situ hybridization, type II adrenal steroid receptor specificity in mediating this effect (36, 37).

Northern blot analysis of AVP mRNA: Six voles were ADX, and six were sham operated. Twenty-four hours after surgery, animals were killed, and hypothalami were removed and frozen on dry ice. Total RNA from each group was isolated in duplicate (n = 3 hypothalami/isolation) using standard guanidine thiocyanate methodology. Ten micrograms of RNA from each isolation were size fractionated on a formaldehyde denaturing gel in the presence of ethidium bromide. The integrity and size of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNAs were checked by UV illumination before capillary transfer of RNA to nylon membranes. RNA was fixed to the membrane by baking at 80 C in a vacuum oven for 2 h. Membranes were prehybridized for 2 h at 68 C in hybridization solution [6 x SSC (standard saline citrate), 2 x Denhardt’s reagent, and 0.1% SDS] and probed in the same solution overnight at 68 C using a 32P-labeled antisense oligonucleotide corresponding to mRNA encoding amino acids 110–118 of rat prepro-8-arginine-neurophysin II (38). Blots were washed twice for 30 min each time in 0.1 x SSC at 68 C, air-dried, and apposed to x-ray film for 48 h. After exposure to radioactive blots, x-ray film was developed, and the resulting image was captured, digitized, and quantified using image analysis software from Imaging Research, Inc. (St. Catherine’s, Canada).

Analysis of hypothalamic AVP mRNA content by in situ hybridization histochemistry after adrenalectomy and replacement with selective adrenal steroid hormone receptor ligands: Twenty-one adult male prairie voles were ADX, allowed 24 h to recover from surgery and to clear endogenous adrenal steroids, and then randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 7 each). Voles received either the type I adrenal steroid receptor agonist ALDO [400 µg/kg BW delivered once per day, sc, in polypropylene glycol vehicle (0.01 cc/10 g BW)], the type II receptor agonist RU28362 [4000 µg/kg BW delivered once per day, sc, in vehicle (0.01 cc/10 g BW)], or vehicle alone (delivered once per day, sc, 0.01 cc/10 g BW). A total of three injections was given, with the last occurring 2 h before death. Steroid treatment doses were chosen based upon replacement paradigms previously used in our laboratory (39), with the RU28362 dose adjusted upward for the vole based upon our initial binding results. After death, brains were quickly excised from the cranium and snap-frozen on dry ice.

For in situ hybridization, 16-µm frozen sections through the level of the paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei of the hypothalamus were collected using a cryostat. In addition, 16-µm sections were collected through the level of the middle dentate gyrus for assay of granule cell pyknosis (see below).

Sections were washed in 1 x PBS, fixed in 4.0% paraformaldehyde, acetylated in 0.1 M triethanolamine containing 0.25% acetic anhydride, dehydrated in ethanol, delipidated in chloroform, and then rehydrated and briefly air-dried before application of hybridization mixture. The 27-mer anti-AVP mRNA probe described above was labeled using 100 U terminal deoxytransferase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) and 100 pmol [{alpha}-35S]deoxy (d)-ATP (NEN Life Science Products) in 5 x terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase buffer and 1.67 mM CoCl2. Incorporation efficiency, as assayed by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, was typically 50%. After labeling, probes were purified away from unincorporated nucleotide by size exclusion chromatography and stored in TE buffer at -20 C until use.

Sections were hybridized in a mixture consisting of 50.0% formamide, 600 mM NaCl, 80 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 4 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate, 0.2% SDS, 0.2 mg/ml sodium heparin, 10% dextran sulfate, 100 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 x 106 incorporated dpm probe/ml hybridization solution. After application of 100 µl hybridization solution/slide, sections were sealed with glass coverslips and incubated for 16 h at 42 C.

To remove nonspecific binding, slides were decoverslipped, washed for 15 min in 1 x SSC (at room temperature), then washed twice for 15 min each time in 0.5 x SSC at 55 C. Sections were air-dried, placed in light-tight x-ray cassettes against Kodak XAR-5 x-ray film for 2–4 days, and subsequently dipped in Kodak NTB-2 nuclear track emulsion (7- to 10-day exposure). Autoradiographic films and dipped slides were analyzed using computer-assisted densitometry or grain counting, respectively. For grain counting, a distinction was made between the parvocellular and magnocellular divisions of the PVN based on cell size and anatomic (ventromedial and periventricular for parvocellular division and laterodorsal for magnocellular division) criteria. These selection methods have been used previously in other species (37).

Assay of apoptotic dentate gyrus granule cells after ADX and replacement with adrenal steroid receptor ligands. ADX results in the programmed death (apoptosis) of dentate gyrus granule cells (40, 41). Cell loss can be reversed by the administration of CORT (42) or ALDO (39), suggesting that activation of HC type I adrenal steroid receptors is sufficient to maintain this population of cells. In the present study, we assessed whether adrenalectomy of the prairie vole would be sufficient to induce granule cell apoptosis by use of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL). Analysis was performed on anatomically matched sections. Cells were only scored as apoptotic if, in addition to positive TUNEL staining, they exhibited appropriate pyknotic morphology as indicated by Nissl staining (41). Data are presented in terms of relative numbers of apoptotic cells.

Cytosolic adrenal steroid hormone receptor assays
[3H]ALDO and [3H]DEX were used in combination with the unlabeled selective adrenal steroid receptor ligand RU28362 or ZK91587, respectively, to obtain single site binding. Our preliminary data indicated the presence of residual CORT in the plasma of ADX prairie voles. We tested the possibility that residual, unbound CORT in tissue cytosol could affect the estimation of binding affinity in our assays by performing an experiment in which saturation analysis was performed in steroid-stripped vs. nonsteroid stripped colon cytosol. We passed aliquots of colon cytosol over Sephadex LH-20 columns and performed saturation analysis using [3H]ALDO as described below. The efficacy of steroid stripping was confirmed in parallel by spiking cytosol aliquots with [3H]CORT and counting the eluate. The effect of residual unbound CORT was negligible, in that Kd estimates did not statistically differ between stripped and unstripped cytosol (data not shown).

Saturation and competition binding data were fit using iterative least squares regression techniques (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA), and the fit was tested under the null hypothesis that binding could be modeled as a simple bimolecular reaction. All data presented satisfy the null hypothesis, as indicated by nonsignificant runs tests (results not shown). Binding parameters presented in the text are reported with the SEM derived from at least two representative, individual experiments.

Type II adrenal steroid receptor binding assay. Animals were ADX, allowed 24 h to recover, and killed. The thymus and HC, tissues in which type II receptors are highly expressed, were dissected and frozen on dry ice. Crude cytosols were obtained by homogenizing the pooled tissue samples (from 6–10 voles and 4–6 rats) in 2–3 vol (wt/vol) TEGM (10 mM Tris-Cl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM molybdic acid, and 10% glycerin, pH 7.4, at 4 C) and 20 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), followed by centrifugation for 1 h at 105,000 x g, 4 C. Cytosolic proteins were determined by the method of Bradford (43) and adjusted to 2 mg/ml (1 mg/ml, final concentration) for both saturation and competition analyses. For equilibrium saturation analyses, 150 µl cytosol were incubated with 0.1–60 nM [3H]DEX in 75 µl TEGM and 75 µl TEGM with or without 1 µM nonradioactive CORT to define total and nonspecific binding. For competition studies, 150 µl cytosol were incubated with 3.0 nM [3H]DEX in 75 µl TEGM and 75 µl TEGM containing unlabeled steroid. For HC cytosol, incubation was performed in the presence of 50 nM of the specific type I receptor antagonist ZK91587. In all cases, equilibrium was obtained by incubation for 16–20 h at 4 C. Bound steroid was separated from free steroid in 80 µl triplicates by size fractionation through LH-20/TEGM and 10 mM DTT columns at 4 C. Incubates were applied to the column and washed into the Sephadex matrix with 200 µl cold TEGM and 10 mM DTT. After 30 min, bound steroid was eluted in 500 µl cold TEGM and 10 mM DTT and counted by standard scintillation spectrophotometry. Specific binding was routinely 90% or greater.

Type I adrenal steroid receptor binding assay. Procedures were similar to those above, except that colon or HC cytosol was used at a final concentration of 1.5–2.0 mg/ml, [3H]ALDO was the radioligand, and bound [3H]ALDO was separated from free by exposure to activated charcoal (44, 45). For both HC and colon cytosol, incubation proceeded in the presence of 100 nM of the specific type II adrenal steroid receptor ligand, RU28362. For separation of bound steroid from free, triplicate 80-µl aliquots were exposed to 200 µl activated charcoal [1.0% fine charcoal (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.1% T70 dextran (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) in 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, at 4 C] for 10 min, with vortexing every 2 min, at 4 C. After incubation, charcoal was pelleted by centrifugation at 7000 x g for 15 min at 4 C. Two hundred microliters of the resulting supernatant were counted in 5 ml scintillation fluid. Specific binding in this assay was routinely 70% or greater.

Statistical analysis
For CORT clearance studies, data were compared via a repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis (Scheffe’s F test) as appropriate. To determine rate of clearance of CORT over time, the first derivative of the clearance curve was plotted and fit by nonlinear regression assuming Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Raw data collected on 3.0% saline and water ingested by experimental subjects were transformed to a ratio [saline (ml) ÷ water (ml)], and each ratio was averaged to derive a group mean. The variances in the ratios between the ADX and SHAM groups measured 1, 2, and 3 days after surgical manipulation were compared using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis with Scheffe’s F test. Data obtained from the in situ hybridization assay appear as the mean relative OD units ± SEM and were tested by means of a one-way ANOVA. Different regions were tested separately, and Scheffe’s F test analysis was performed. Data from the TUNEL assay were also tested in this manner. In all cases, differences were regarded as significant if P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Kinetics of CORT clearance and evidence for replacement of endogenous glucocorticoids from nonadrenal tissue after adrenalectomy
Bilateral adrenalectomy of prairie voles resulted in a dramatic and rapid decrease (t1/2, 4 h) in serum CORT levels. CORT titers were significantly lower than baseline 4 h after surgery (F4,1 = 34.2; P < 0.001; Fig. 1AGo), and the rate of clearance of CORT reached a minimum at 24 h (Fig. 1AGo, inset). The baseline CORT values depicted in Fig. 1AGo are most likely the result of methoxyflurane stress. CORT values obtained from nonsurvival methodologies more accurately reflect true basal CORT levels (Fig. 1BGo). ALDO levels were undetectable in plasma obtained from ADX prairie voles.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Adrenalectomy, CORT clearance kinetics, and evidence for endogenous replacement of glucocorticoids after ADX in the vole. A, Plasma CORT determined in serial periorbital blood samples taken 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h after ADX under methoxyflurane inhalant anesthesia (n = 10). Note that time zero represents stress levels of CORT in male voles, most likely due to the mode of anesthesia. The asterisk indicates that the mean is significantly different from baseline (P < 0.05). Inset, Plot of the first derivative of the fitted equation for CORT titer vs. time to determine clearance rate. B, Plasma CORT determined in serial periorbital blood samples taken 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 days after ADX (n = 5) or SHAM surgery (n = 5). In ADX voles, plasma CORT remains at the nadir noted in the above experiment, but shows a significant rise at 7 days. Bars designated with the letter a are statistically different (P < 0.05) from bars designated with the letter b.

 
Long term examination of CORT profiles from ADX voles (Fig. 1BGo) showed that CORT titers remained minimal for 3 days after complete bilateral removal of the encapsulated adrenal, but were significantly elevated after 7 days (t4 = -12.4; P < 0.05). Hence, subjects in subsequent experiments were examined no later than 48 h after surgery. Plasma CORT was cleared to a minimum of approximately 30 µg/dl. In an attempt to further reduce CORT levels, metyrapone (an 11ß-hydroxylase inhibitor) and the P450 scc enzyme inhibitor aminoglutethimide (46) were administered in varying doses and found to be ineffective in reducing CORT titers below those obtained with surgical methods alone (data not shown). Metyrapone and aminoglutethimide administration at higher doses had toxic side-effects in the prairie vole.

Efficacy of ADX in the prairie vole
The presence of residual endogenous CORT necessitated a further investigation of the efficacy of ADX in voles to induce physiological indications of adrenal insufficiency. Three days after surgery, ADX voles showed increased consumption of 3.0% saline (Fig. 2AGo; t10 = 2.26; P < 0.05), and as early as 24 h after surgery, ADX voles showed marked thymic hypertrophy (data not shown) and an increase in ACTH secretion (Fig. 2BGo; t16 = -6.64; P = 0.0001). Northern analysis indicated that the anti-AVP mRNA oligoprobe used in the present study recognized a single band ({cong}520 bp) that approximates the size of AVP mRNA reported in other species (47, 48). Northern analysis also demonstrated a marked increase in hypothalamic AVP mRNA synthesis (Fig. 3AGo; t2 = -4.53; P < 0.05) after adrenalectomy compared with that in SHAM controls.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Efficacy of adrenalectomy (ADX) in the prairie vole. A, Saline (3.0%) and water intake was monitored every 24 h for 3 days in six ADX and six SHAM animals. Data are presented as a ratio of 3.0% saline vs. water intake and indicated that ADX voles drank less saline than water until day 3 postsurgery, when they drank significantly more 3.0% saline than water (P < 0.05). B, Plasma isolated from ADX (n = 9) or SHAM (n = 9) animals 48 h after surgery was assayed for CORT and ACTH. ADX resulted in a dramatic decrease in CORT and concomitant increase in ACTH. The asterisk indicates that group means are significantly different (P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Sensitivity of hypothalamic AVP mRNA and of dentate gyrus granule cells to adrenalectomy and glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid replacement in the ADX prairie vole. A, Hypothalamic total RNA was isolated 24 h after ADX or SHAM surgery. Ten micrograms per lane of total RNA obtained from pooled ADX vole hypothalami (A; lanes 1 and 3; n = 3 hypothalami/lane) or sham-operated controls (S; lanes 2 and 4; n = 3 hypothalami/lane) were size fractionated on a denaturing formaldehyde gel and probed with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe complementary to prepro-8-AVP-neurophysin II (AVP) mRNA. The probe recognizes a single band (520 bp) corresponding in size to that of AVP mRNA reported in other species. ADX resulted in a dramatic increase in hypothalamic AVP mRNA (P < 0.05). B, In situ hybridization of 16-µm coronal sections through the PVN and SON of the prairie vole hypothalamus using an anti-AVP mRNA oligoprobe (see A and text). Film autoradiography revealed that ADX prairie voles replaced with 4000 µg/kg BW (once per day, sc; n = 7) of the type II adrenal steroid receptor agonist RU28362 showed lower levels of probe binding in the PVN (but not the SON) compared with either vehicle-replaced (n = 7) or ALDO-replaced (400 µg/kg BW, sc; n = 7) animals. At cellular resolution (inset) it was clear that only the parvocellular division of the PVN was regulated by RU28362. *, P < 0.05. C, TUNEL and Nissl staining indicated a modest number of granule cells undergoing apoptosis in the ADX prairie vole dentate gyrus. Apoptosis was prevented by replacing ADX voles with ALDO (once per day of 400 µg/kg BW, sc; n = 7), but not by replacing with either vehicle (n = 7) or RU28362 (n = 7). *, P < 0.05.

 
In situ hybridization studies revealed that AVP mRNA levels were sensitive to glucocorticoids in the prairie vole. At film autoradiographic resolution (Fig. 3BGo), a main effect of treatment was noted on levels of AVP mRNA (F17,2 = 9.85; P = 0.001). The relative OD was lower in the PVN of ADX voles receiving RU28362 compared with that in ADX voles receiving either ALDO replacement or vehicle alone. A significant difference in AVP mRNA expression was not noted in the SON. Furthermore, single cell analysis (Fig. 3BGo, inset) of in situ hybridization revealed a main effect of treatment for the parvocellular division (F18,2 = 21.9; P = 0.001), but not the magnocellular division, of the PVN. Post-hoc analysis indicated that RU28362-treated ADX animals were significantly different from vehicle- and ALDO-treated, ADX animals.

Lastly, because granule cells of the dentate gyrus of rats undergo cell death in the absence of type I adrenal steroid receptor activation (39), we used this as an index of ADX efficacy. TUNEL staining (Fig. 3CGo) indicated a main effect of treatment on the number of pyknotic cells within the dentate gyrus granule cell layer of the prairie vole (F16,2 = 6.07; P = 0.01). Post-hoc analysis revealed a modest, but significant, increase in pyknotic cells after ADX compared with ADX animals receiving ALDO. ADX animals receiving either vehicle alone or RU28362 did not significantly differ, suggesting that RU28362 replacement failed to significantly prevent ADX-induced granule cell death.

Characterization of peripheral and HC adrenal steroid receptors in the rat and prairie vole
Equilibrium saturation curves of [3H]DEX binding to rat and vole thymus cytosol were best fit by a one-site model (Fig. 4Go, A and C). In the vole, [3H]DEX bound with a 5- to 6-fold lower affinity than in the rat and with an apparent density that was 2-fold lower in the vole thymus compared with that in the rat. In contrast to thymus, the data for equilibrium saturation binding of [3H]DEX to HC and [3H]ALDO to both HC and colon were best fit by two-site models, suggestive of a heterogeneous receptor population in these tissues (data not shown).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Equilibrium saturation analyses of [3H]DEX or [3H]ALDO binding to rat or vole colon or thymus cytosol. Equilibrium saturation analysis of [3H]DEX binding to rat (A) and vole (C) thymus cytosol in the presence of 50 nM nonradioactive ZK91587. [3H]DEX binding was best fit with a single site model, and Scatchard replots (insets) were linear. The vole type II receptor has a 6- to 7-fold lower affinity for [3H]DEX than the rat type II receptor. Rat thymus cytosol expresses approximately twice as many type II binding sites per mg cytosolic protein than vole thymus cytosol. Equilibrium saturation analyses of [3H]ALDO binding to rat (B) or vole (D) colon cytosol in the presence of 100 nM nonradioactive RU28362. Binding was best fit by a one-site model, and Scatchard replots (inset) were linear. Binding affinity of the type I receptor in both species was nearly identical. Rat colon appears to express approximately twice as many binding sites per mg cytosolic protein compared with vole colon. Each value is the mean specific binding expressed as femtomoles of radioligand bound per mg cytosolic protein, and error bars represent the SEM of triplicate determinations within a given experiment. Transformed values (insets) are expressed as the mean without error bars.

 
In the presence of RU28362, [3H]ALDO bound to a single class of high affinity sites in rat (Fig. 4BGo) and vole (Fig. 4DGo) colon cytosol and in rat (Fig. 5BGo) and vole (Fig. 5DGo) HC cytosol. However, the apparent density of the type I adrenal steroid receptor in both rat colon and HC cytosol was approximately 2-fold greater than that in vole colon and HC cytosol. [3H]DEX binding to HC cytosol of both species was unimodal in the presence of ZK91587 (Fig. 5Go, A and C). Similar to the type II adrenal steroid receptor in thymic cytosol, the rat HC type II receptor displayed a higher affinity and binding density than that of the vole.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Equilibrium saturation analyses of [3H]DEX or [3H]ALDO binding to rat or vole HC cytosol. Equilibrium saturation analysis of [3H]DEX binding to rat (A) and vole (C) HC cytosol in the presence of 50 nM nonradioactive ZK91587. [3H]DEX binding was best fit with a single site model, and Scatchard replots (insets) were linear. The vole type II receptor has a 6- to 7-fold lower affinity for [3H]DEX than the rat type II receptor. Rat HC cytosol expresses approximately twice as many binding sites per mg cytosolic protein than that of vole. Equilibrium saturation analyses of [3H]ALDO binding to rat (B) or vole (D) HC cytosol in the presence of 100 nM nonradioactive RU28362. Binding was best fit by a one-site model, and Scatchard replots (inset) were linear. Binding affinity of the type I receptor in both species was nearly identical. Rat HC appears to express approximately twice as many binding sites per mg cytosolic protein compared with vole. Each value is the mean specific binding expressed as femtomoles of radioligand bound per mg cytosolic protein, and error bars represent the SEM of triplicate determinations within a given experiment. Transformed values (insets) are expressed as the mean without error bars.

 
Competition studies: rat and vole HC type I and type II adrenal steroid receptor specificity
Inhibition of [3H]DEX and [3H]ALDO binding to HC cytosol by various steroid ligands was examined to determine whether species differences exist in the steroid binding profile of the vole and rat adrenal steroid hormone receptors. The pharmacological profiles of the rat and vole adrenal steroid receptors were similar with regard to receptor specificity. In both species, progesterone, CORT, and ALDO potently inhibited [3H]ALDO binding (Ki, {cong}1.0 nM), whereas the specific type II receptor agonist RU28362 was a poor competitor (Fig. 6Go, A and B, and Table 1A). Binding to HC type II receptors proved similarly selective in both species examined. The rank order of potency of the steroids tested to inhibit [3H]DEX binding to type II adrenal steroid receptors in rat and vole HC cytosol was as follows: RU28362 > dexamethasone > CORT >> ZK91587 (Fig. 6Go, C and D, and Table 1B). Notably, the efficacy of these steroids to inhibit [3H]DEX binding tends to be greater in the rat than in the vole. Although the Ki for CORT binding to the rat type II receptor is 6–10 nM, the Ki for CORT binding to the vole type II adrenal receptor is 82–109 nM.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Inhibition of [3H]ALDO or [3H]DEX binding to rat or vole binding to HC adrenal steroid hormone receptors by various steroids. Inhibition of [3H]ALDO (A and B) or [3H]DEX (C and D) binding to rat (A and C) or vole (B and D) HC adrenal steroid receptors was examined in parallel. As with saturation analyses, nonradioactive competitors were included to differentiate between receptor subtypes (see Materials and Methods). Inhibitors were type I receptor antagonist ZK91587, the endogenous mineralocorticoid ALDO, the luteal sex steroid progesterone, the endogenous glucocorticoid CORT, the type II receptor agonist DEX and the type II receptor agonist RU28362. Self-displacement of the tracer has been included as an internal control for each set of inhibition curves. In these cases, the Cheng-Prusoff-derived Ki agrees well with the Kd derived in saturation analyses. *, Values are normalized relative to binding of radioligand in the absence of competitor. Estimation of binding parameters could not be resolved from fits represented by a dashed line (RU28362 inhibition of [3H]ALDO binding).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adrenalectomy of the prairie vole
Basal CORT titers in the prairie vole are approximately 10-fold greater than those in the rat and mouse and appear to be supported by elevated basal levels of ACTH. Bilateral ADX reduces circulating levels of the main glucocorticoid, CORT, by approximately 90% in the prairie vole, but does not result in its complete elimination. Because of the high specificity of the RIA, it is unlikely that the residual corticosteroid signal in ADX voles represents a steroid other than CORT.

One possibility that might account for residual CORT is incomplete removal of the adrenal gland and regeneration of residual adrenocortical tissue released during the surgical procedure. However, we have verified the structural integrity of adrenal glands removed from prairie voles using our surgical techniques, and postmortem examination after long term survival failed to reveal evidence of regenerated adrenal tissue. Furthermore, the failure to detect plasma ALDO in ADX voles supports the completeness of our surgical technique. This suggests an alternative source of CORT production in the prairie vole, a conclusion not without precedent among glucocorticoid-hypersecreting animals (50, 51), which often have endogenous accessory adrenal tissue. However, nonadrenal steroidogenic tissues such as the testes, liver, and even brain, which contain steroid biosynthetic enzymes, cannot be ruled out as possible sources for residual CORT in the prairie vole at the present time.

Functional correlates of adrenal insufficiency in the prairie vole
Although it was not possible to completely eliminate circulating glucocorticoids in the prairie vole, increases in AVP mRNA, plasma ACTH, and thymus weight observed in the current study suggest type II adrenal steroid receptor vacancy after bilateral ADX. These results are also observed after ADX of the rat (35, 36, 37). For example, the expression of AVP mRNA is negatively regulated in the parvocellular portion of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus by type II adrenal steroid receptor activation (37). Also in the rat, ADX results in the selective apoptosis of dentate gyrus granule neurons (39, 40, 41), whereas activation of type I adrenal steroid receptors with either the mineralocorticoid ALDO (39) or low concentrations of CORT (42) prevents this effect. After ADX of the prairie vole, we observed a significant increase in granule cell apoptosis that was also reversible by ALDO-mediated type I receptor activation, but was not appreciably reversed by the selective type II receptor agonist RU28362. Further, we observed increases in salt appetite after ADX of the vole, a behavior known to be regulated by the type I receptor and reversed by type I receptor activation (34, 52). Collectively, these results argue that ADX results in complete adrenal insufficiency, that is, the vacancy of both the type I and type II adrenal steroid receptors in the prairie vole.

Comparative pharmacology of intracellular adrenal steroid receptors in the prairie vole and Sprague Dawley rat
The results of the present study confirm and extend earlier observations suggesting that the prairie vole is glucocorticoid resistant (10). Hypersecretion of glucocorticoids relative to other rodent species occurs without apparent pathophysiology in the prairie vole and is accompanied by compensatory alterations in glucocorticoid binding to the type II adrenal steroid receptor (10). [3H]DEX is bound by the type II receptor with a 5- to 6-fold lower affinity in the vole vs. the rat, and CORT is 10-fold less effective in the vole compared with the rat in displacing [3H]DEX from the type II receptor. Additionally, estimates of type II adrenal steroid density in thymus and HC (this study) as well as in hypothalamus and amygdala (unpublished observations) are nearly 2-fold lower in the vole than in the rat.

In contrast to the type II receptor, the Kd estimate for [3H]ALDO binding as well as the specificity of ligand binding to the vole type I receptor are in close accord with those obtained in parallel in the rat. As in the case of the type II receptor, apparent binding densities were 2-fold lower in both vole colon and HC vs. the same tissues in the rat. A similar decrease in the density of available [3H]ALDO-binding sites in colon and HC has been reported in the adrenalectomized guinea pig (25).

Given that activated adrenal steroid receptors cannot rebind ligand (53), it is possible that the data underestimate the binding capacity due to the presence of residual hormone in the ADX animal; in fact, this possibility cannot be ruled out. Conversely, in preliminary studies, we ruled out the possibility that residual unbound cytosolic CORT results in the underestimation of binding affinity.

Atypical adrenal steroid receptor function and/or expression, particularly of the type II adrenal steroid receptor, is a common feature among glucocorticoid-resistant animals. In the guinea pig (23, 54), the prairie vole (10), and several species of New World primates (11, 55), the type II receptor shows relatively low affinity for glucocorticoids and, albeit less consistently, lower expression of type II receptor in brain and periphery compared with corticosensitive species (9). As there is significant evidence for glucocorticoid cytotoxicity, particularly in the brain, lower binding affinity and expression of the type II receptor may represent adaptations serving to protect the brain and other tissues from glucocorticoid-mediated damage.

Somewhat paradoxically, the affinity and specificity of the high affinity type I receptor appear to be taxonomically conserved, even among species in which glucocorticoid titers are very high (18, 25). In the current study, we documented basal CORT concentrations in the adrenal intact vole which, even accounting for vole transcortin (56), were 20- to 80-fold higher than the affinity estimate of the type II receptor and greater than 1000-fold higher than that of the type I receptor. Even after ADX, the relatively low, but measurable, concentrations of residual CORT observed would be expected to fully occupy type I adrenal steroid receptors and a significant fraction of type II receptors in the vole central nervous system. However, the predicted occupancy of HC type I receptors, which should have been manifested by eliminating the binding of [3H]ALDO (in the presence of RU28362) in a cytosolic adrenal steroid receptor assay, was not observed. In addition, both ADX-induced salt appetite and dentate granule cell death, phenomena that are reversible by low level type I adrenal steroid receptor occupancy (39, 52), were nonetheless clearly evident in the ADX vole.

Conclusions
The ability to detect vacant type I adrenal steroid receptors in the prairie vole suggests that the means by which this receptor retains specificity for mineralocorticoids in this rodent are not likely to reflect the pharmacological properties of the receptor per se, but, rather, the actions of receptor-extrinsic mechanisms (19). Functional alteration of the binding affinity and tissue expression of the type II receptor, on the other hand, suggests both the origin of ACTH and CORT hypersecretion and a conserved adaptive strategy for coping with the potentially cytotoxic levels of circulating glucocorticoids (6, 57). Collectively, the results suggest that the reduced expression of the type I adrenal steroid receptor and the actions of receptor-extrinsic mechanisms that regulate their activation combined with alterations in receptor affinity and expression of the type II adrenal steroid receptor are likely to play a coordinated role in mediating the function of adrenal axis in the prairie vole.

The role that the unique adrenal physiology of the prairie vole plays in regulating the normal physiology and behavior of this animal remains to be elucidated. However, testing specific hypotheses regarding the function of adrenal hormones in the vole relies on the implementation of an appropriate experimental system. The present study demonstrates at the cellular/molecular level the functional consequences of ADX and glucocorticoid manipulations in the vole and, along with the characterization of prairie vole intracellular adrenal hormone receptors, represents a critical step in designing physiologically relevant paradigms of adrenocorticoid manipulation in this species.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Inhibition of [3H]aldosterone or [3H]dexamethasone binding to adrenalectomized rat or vole hippocampal cytosol by various adrenal steroid receptor ligands

 

    Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Robert Spencer and Patima Tanapat, and the critical reading of an earlier version of the manuscript by Drs. Stephen Alves, Helen M. Chao, Louis Lucas, and Larry Reagan.


    Footnotes
 
1 Preliminary portions of this manuscript have appeared elsewhere. This work was supported by a predoctoral NIH training grant (to N.B.H.; GM-07524) and NIH Grant MH-41256 (to B.S.M.). Back

Received December 8, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Munck A, Guyre PM, Holbrook NJ 1984 Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr Rev 5:25–44[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Reul JM, Sutanto W, van Eekelen JA, Rothuizen J, de Kloet ER 1990 Central action of adrenal steroids during stress and adaptation. Adv Exp Med Biol 274:243–256[Medline]
  3. McEwen BS 1998 Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann NY Acad Sci 840:33–44[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Selye H 1946 The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 6:117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ingle DJ 1952 The role of the adrenal cortex in homeostasis. Endocrinology 8:23
  6. Sapolsky RM, Uno H, Rebert CS, Finch CE 1990 Hippocampal damage associated with prolonged glucocorticoid exposure in primates. J Neurosci 10:2897–2902[Abstract]
  7. Rabin D, Gold PW, Margioris AN, Chrousos GP 1988 Stress and reproduction: physiologic and pathophysiologic interactions between the stress and reproductive axes. Adv Exp Med Biol 245:377–387[Medline]
  8. Keightley MC, Fuller PJ 1995 Cortisol resistance and the guinea pig glucocorticoid receptor. Steroids 60:87–92[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Chrousos GP, Renquist D, Brandon D, Eil C, Pugeat M, Vigersky R, Cutler Jr GB, Loriaux DL, Lipsett MB 1982 Glucocorticoid hormone resistance during primate evolution: receptor-mediated mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2036–2040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Taymans SE, DeVries AC, DeVries MB, Nelson RJ, Friedman TC, Castro M, Detera-Wadleigh S, Carter CS, Chrousos GP 1997 The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): evidence for target tissue glucocorticoid resistance. Gen Comp Endocrinol 106:48–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Brandon DD, Markwick AJ, Flores M, Dixon K, Albertson BD, Loriaux DL 1991 Genetic variation of the glucocorticoid receptor from a steroid-resistant primate. J Mol Endocrinol 7:89–96[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Karl M, Chrousos GP 1993 Familial glucocorticoid resistance: an overview. Exp Clin Endocrinol 101:30–35[Medline]
  13. Iida S, Gomi M, Moriwaki K, Itoh Y, Hirobe K, Matsuzawa Y, Katagiri S, Yonezawa T, Tarui S 1985 Primary cortisol resistance accompanied by a reduction in glucocorticoid receptors in two members of the same family. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:967–971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. de Kloet ER 1984 Function of steroid receptor systems in the central nervous system. Clin Neuropharmacol 7:272–280[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. McEwen BS, de Kloet ER, Rostene W 1986 Adrenal steroid receptors and actions in the nervous system. Physiol Rev 66:1121–1188[Free Full Text]
  16. Veldhuis HD, Van Koppen C, Van Ittersum M, de Kloet ER 1982 Specificity of the adrenal steroid receptor system in rat hippocampus. Endocrinology 110:2044–2051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. de Kloet ER, Oitzl MS, Joels M 1993 Functional implications of brain corticosteroid receptor diversity. Cell Mol Neurobiol 13:433–455[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Rupprecht R, Reul JM, van Steensel B, Spengler D, Soder M, Berning B, Holsboer F, Damm K 1993 Pharmacological and functional characterization of human mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor ligands. Eur J Pharmacol 247:145–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Funder JW, Pearce PT, Smith R, Smith AI 1988 Mineralocorticoid action: target tissue specificity is enzyme, not receptor, mediated. Science 242:583–585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Edwards CR, Stewart PM, Burt D, Brett L, McIntyre MA, Sutanto WS, de Kloet ER, Monder C 1988 Localisation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase–tissue specific protector of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Lancet 2:986–989[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Stewart PM, Whorwood CB, Barber P, Gregory J, Monder C, Franklyn JA, Sheppard MC 1991 Localization of renal 11ß-dehydrogenase by in situ hybridization: autocrine not paracrine protector of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 128:2129–2135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Roland BL, Li KX, Funder JW 1995 Hybridization histochemical localization of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in rat brain. Endocrinology 136:4697–4700[Abstract]
  23. Hodgson AJ, Funder JW 1978 Glucocorticoid receptors in the guinea pig. Am J Physiol 235:R115–R120
  24. Leung DYM, Hamid Q, Vottero A, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Minshall E, Chrousos GP, Klemm DJ 1997 Association of glucocorticoid insensitivity with increased expression of glucocorticoid receptor ß. J Exp Med 186:1567–1574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Myles K, Funder JW 1994 Type I (mineralocorticoid) receptors in the guinea pig. Am J Physiol 267:E268–E272
  26. Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Brandon D, Shull J, Renquist D, Hogan W, Tomita M, Lipsett MB 1984 Adaptation of the mineralocorticoid target tissues to the high circulating cortisol and progesterone plasma levels in the squirrel monkey. Endocrinology 115:25–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Getz LL, Carter CS, Gavish L 1981 The mating system of the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster: field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:189–194
  28. Carter CS, DeVries AC, Taymans S, Roberts RL, Williams JR, Chrousos GP 1995 Adrenocorticoid hormones and the development and expression of mammalian monogamy. Ann NY Acad Sci 771:82–91[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. DeVries AC, DeVries MB, Taymans SE, Carter CS 1996 The effects of stress on social preferences are sexually dimorphic in prairie voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11980–11984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. DeVries AC, DeVries MB, Taymans S, Carter CS 1995 Modulation of pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by corticosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7744–7748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. DeVries AC, Taymans SE, Carter CS 1997 Social modulation of corticosteroid responses in male prairie voles. Ann NY Acad Sci 807:494–497[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Philibert D, Moguilewsky M RU 28362, a useful tool for the characterization of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors. 65th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Antonio TX, 1983, p 335
  33. Nickisch K, Bittler D, Laurent H, Losert W, Nishino Y, Schillinger E, Wiechert R 1990 Aldosterone antagonists. III. Synthesis and activities of steroidal 7{alpha}-(alkoxycarbonyl)-15:16-methylene spirolactones. J Med Chem 33:509–513[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Epstein AN, Stellar E 1955 The control of salt preferences in adrenalectomized rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 46:152–167[CrossRef]
  35. Dallman MF, Jones MT, Vernikos-Danellis J, Ganong WF 1972 Corticosteroid feedback control of ACTH secretion: rapid effects of bilateral adrenalectomy on plasma ACTH in the rat. Endocrinology 91:961–968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Davis LG, Arentzen R, Reid JM, Manning RW, Wolfson B, Lawrence KL, Baldino Jr F 1986 Glucocorticoid sensitivity of vasopressin mRNA levels in the paraventricular nucleus of the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1145–1149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Albeck DS, Hastings NB, McEwen BS 1994 Effects of adrenalectomy and type I or type II glucocorticoid receptor activation on AVP and CRH mRNA in the rat hypothalamus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 26:129–134[Medline]
  38. Schmale H, Heinsohn S, Richter D 1983 Structural organization of the rat gene for the arginine vasopressin-neurophysin precursor. EMBO J 2:763–767[Medline]
  39. Woolley CS, Gould E, Sakai RR, Spencer RL, McEwen BS 1991 Effects of aldosterone or RU28362 treatment on adrenalectomy-induced cell death in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. Brain Res 554:312–315[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Sloviter RS, Valiquette G, Abrams GM, Ronk EC, Sollas AL, Paul LA, Neubort S 1989 Selective loss of hippocampal granule cells in the mature rat brain after adrenalectomy. Science 243:535–538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sloviter RS, Dean E, Neubort S 1993 Electron microscopic analysis of adrenalectomy-induced hippocampal granule cell degeneration in the rat: apoptosis in the adult central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 330:337–351[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Gould E, Woolley CS, McEwen BS 1990 Short-term glucocorticoid manipulations affect neuronal morphology and survival in the adult dentate gyrus. Neuroscience 37:367–375[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Beaumont K, Fanestil DD 1983 Characterization of rat brain aldosterone receptors reveals high affinity for corticosterone. Endocrinology 113:2043–2051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Korenman SG, Rao BR 1968 Reversible disaggregation of the cytosol-estrogen binding protein of uterine cytosol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 61:1028–1033[Free Full Text]
  46. Plotsky PM, Sawchenko PE 1987 Hypophysial-portal plasma levels, median eminence content, and immunohistochemical staining of corticotropin-releasing factor, arginine vasopressin, and oxytocin after pharmacological adrenalectomy. Endocrinology 120:1361–1369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Rehbein M, Hillers M, Mohr E, Ivell R, Morley S, Schmale H, Richter D 1986 The neurohypophyseal hormones vasopressin and oxytocin. Precursor structure, synthesis and regulation. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 367:695–704[Medline]
  48. Hara Y, Battey J, Gainer H 1990 Structure of mouse vasopressin and oxytocin genes. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 8:319–324[Medline]
  49. Martin MJ, McClelland AE, Funder JW 1980 The pituitary-adrenal axis in the guinea-pig: studies on ACTH secretion. Clin Exp Pharm Physiol 7:46–47
  50. Chaffee WR, Moses AM, Lloyd CW, Rogers LS 1963 Cushing’s syndrome with accessory adrenocortical tissue. JAMA 186:799–801
  51. Kemink L, Hermus A, Pieters G, Benraad T, Smals A, Kloppenborg P 1992 Residual adrenocortical function after bilateral adrenalectomy for pituitary-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1211–1214[Abstract]
  52. McEwen BS, Lambdin LT, Rainbow TC, De Nicola AF 1986 Aldosterone effects on salt appetite in adrenalectomized rats. Neuroendocrinology 43:38–43[Medline]
  53. Chou YC, Luttge WG 1988 Activated type II receptors in brain cannot rebind glucocorticoids: relationship to progesterone’s antiglucocorticoid actions. Brain Res 440:67–78[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Kraft N, Hodgson AJ, Funder JW 1979 Glucocorticoid receptor and effector mechanisms: a comparison of the corticosensitive mouse with the corticoresistant guinea pig. Endocrinology 104:344–349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Bamberger CM, Schulte HM, Chrousos GP 1996 Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor function and tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev 17:245–261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Orchinik M, Hastings N, Witt D, McEwen BS 1997 High-affinity binding of corticosterone to mammalian neuronal membranes: possible role of corticosteroid binding globulin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 60:229–236[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Sapolsky RM, Krey LC, McEwen BS 1985 Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure reduces hippocampal neuron number: implications for aging. J Neurosci 5:1222–1227[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by McEwen, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by McEwen, B. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals