| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Reproductive Sciences and Medicine, Division of Pediatrics, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom W12 ONN
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jan Brosens, Department of Reproductive Sciences and Medicine, Division of Pediatrics, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, United Kingdom W12 ONN. E-mail: jbrosens{at}rpms.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cellular responses to progesterone are predominantly mediated by the progesterone receptor (PR), a member of the superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors, which also include the receptors for other steroid hormones, retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, vitamins A and D, and a large subfamily of orphan nuclear receptors (8, 9, 10). In the absence of ligand, PR is maintained in an inactive complex containing heat shock proteins (HSPs) (11). Ligand binding results in a distinct conformational change in the receptor, dissociation of the HSPs, dimerization, and binding to specific palindromic glucocorticoid/progesterone response elements (PREs) in the promoter region of target genes. All steroid receptors share the same modular structure consisting of a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD), a C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD), and an N-terminal trans-activation domain (AF-1). The LBD of PR also contains a second transcriptional activation domain, AF-2, as well as signals for receptor dimerization, nuclear localization, and HSP binding (8, 9, 10). In the human, as in most species, two isoforms of the PR exist, hPR-A and hPR-B, which arise from different promoter usage in a single gene (12). PR-B differs from PR-A only in that it contains an additional 164 amino acids at the N-terminus [B upstream sequence (BUS)]. The two PR isoforms display indistinguishable hormone- and DNA-binding properties and can heterodimerize with each other. However, several studies have shown that, depending on the cell and promoter context, PR-A and PR-B display remarkably different transcriptional activities, suggesting that they may have distinct physiological functions (13, 14, 15). In general, the hPR-A isoform is transcriptionally less active and can function as a dominant inhibitor of transcription by human (h) PR-B and various other steroid receptors. The functional differences between both isoforms are partially explained by the presence of a third trans-activation domain, AF-3, located in the unique N-terminal segment of the hPR-B (16). On the other hand, a repressor domain has been mapped to the first 140 amino acids of the PR-A that is thought to mediate hPR-A trans-repression of hPR-B-induced gene transcription. In the hPR-B, this trans-repression function is itself inhibited by BUS (17).
A growing number of cofactors have been identified that mediate initiation (coactivators) or repression (corepressors) of target gene transcription by nuclear receptors (18, 19, 20). Coactivators such as steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), transcription intermediary factor-2, receptor-associated coactivator 3, cAMP response element-binding protein, and p300, not only function as bridging proteins between the agonist-bound nuclear receptor and components of the preinitiation complex, but also display histone acetyltransferase activity. Acetylation of histones is thought to remodel the chromatin, stabilize the preinitiation complex, and hence facilitate transcription. In contrast, antagonist-bound steroid receptors have been shown to recruit corepressors such as silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone and nuclear receptor corepressor. The receptor-corepressor complex is thought to recruit Sin3 and histone deacetylases, which results in compaction of the chromatin and inhibition of gene transcription (21, 22).
Cell surface signal transduction pathways have been shown to modulate the activity of steroid hormone receptors on target genes. The spatial and temporal expression of progesterone-dependent genes in the endometrium suggests indeed that PR function is coordinated by locally produced factors. PRL, a widely used marker of decidual transformation, is first detectable in the superficial endometrial stromal compartment approximately 10 days after the postovulatory rise in circulating progesterone levels. The expression of PRL by differentiating endometrial stromal (ES) cells in vitro is a model of the interactions between PR and cytoplasmatic signaling pathways (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29).
Several studies have shown that the expression of PRL is dependent upon activation of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway (23, 24, 25, 26). Decidualization in vivo coincides indeed with the release of several factors by the endometrium (CRF, relaxin, and PGE2), ovary (relaxin), and pituitary (gonadotropins), which are all capable of inducing PRL in ES cells in vitro through sustained elevation of intracytoplasmic cAMP levels (25, 26, 27, 28, 29). In contrast, progestins are very weak inducers of decidual PRL expression in ES cells and require at least 810 days of stimulation. However, progestins have been shown to play an important role in amplifying the decidual response, as demonstrated by their ability to synergistically enhance cAMP-induced PRL expression (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29).
Here we demonstrate that the maintenance of cellular PR levels is inhibitory to PRL gene expression and that synergy with progestin becomes apparent only in cAMP-sensitized cells in which PR is down-regulated. Sensitization of ES cells by cAMP can be mimicked by transient expression of SRC-1, suggesting that modulation of the activity of this PR coactivator is integral to full activity of the decidual PRL promoter.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary endometrial cell culture
The ES cells from normal proliferative endometrial tissues were
isolated from cycling women by endometrial biopsy at the time of
diagnostic laparoscopy. The study was approved by Hammersmith and Queen
Charlottes Hospital research and ethics committee, and patient
consent was obtained before biopsy. Samples were collected in Earles
Buffered Saline containing 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin. The tissues were washed twice in DMEM/F12, finely minced,
and enzymatically digested with collagenase (134 U/ml) and
deoxyribonuclease type 1 (156 U/ml) for 1 h at 37 C. After
centrifugation at 400 x g for 4 min, the pellet was
resuspended in maintenance medium, a mixture of DMEM/F12, 10% FBS, 2%
penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% L-glutamine. ES
cells were separated from epithelial cells and passed into culture as
described previously (23). Proliferating ES cells were cultured in
maintenance medium until confluence. Confluent monolayers were treated
in phenol red-free DMEM/F12 containing 2% dextran-coated
charcoal-treated FBS (DCC-FBS) with 0.5 mM
8-bromo-cAMP, 10-6 M MPA, or
10-5 M of the type 1 antiprogestin ZK98.299
(onapristone). All experiments were carried out before the fourth cell
passage.
PRL and DNA assays
PRL levels in supernatant were measured by microparticle enzyme
immunoassay (AxSYM system, Abbott Laboratories, North
Chicago, IL). The coefficient of variation within assays was 23%,
and that between assays was 68%. DMEM/F12 supplemented with DCC-FBS
did not have measurable PRL concentrations. PRL levels were normalized
to the DNA content of each culture flask at the end of the treatment
period.
DNA content was measured by quantitative fluorometric analysis at room temperature. Cells were solubilized with 0.02% SDS. Aliquots were then mixed with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33258 in 1 x SSC (standard saline citrate), and fluorescence was measured in a fluorometer at excitation 344 nm and emission 460 nm. Calf thymus DNA was used as standard.
SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and immunodetection
Whole cell protein extraction was performed in high salt buffer
[0.4 M KCl, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1
mM dithiothreitol, and 20% glycerol] containing a
cocktail of protease inhibitors (0.5 mg/ml bacitracin, 40 mg/ml
phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 5 mg/ml pepstatin A, and 5 mg/ml
leupeptin). Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hemel Hempstead, UK). Equal
amounts of total protein (200 µg) were separated on a 7.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel before electrotransfer at 80 V onto
nitro-cellulose membrane. Equivalent protein loading was confirmed by
Ponceau S staining. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked in 5%
nonfat dry milk in 0.1% PBS-Tween. Subsequently, the blot was
incubated overnight at 4 C with primary monoclonal antibody to human PR
that recognizes both PR isoforms (NCL-PGR, Novacastra Laboratories
Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). After 1-h incubation with a secondary
peroxidase-labeled antibody, protein bands were visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence. Antibody-antigen complexes were removed by
incubation at 55 C in stripping buffer (100 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7),
and the membranes were reprobed with antiserum to human tissue factor
(TF; a gift from Dr. John McVeigh, London, UK) or actin (BioGenex Laboratories, Inc., San Ramon, CA).
RT-PCR
The SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega Corp.)
was used to extract total RNA from ES cells. One microgram of total RNA
was reverse transcribed and amplified in a single reaction with Access
RT-PCR System (Promega Corp.) according to the
manufacturers instruction. Simultaneous amplification of SRC-1a and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) complementary DNAs
(cDNAs) was performed by adding 10 pmol each of the following
oligonucleotides to one reaction: SRC-1a-sense (corresponding to
positions 42884308 of both SRC isoforms cDNAs), SRC-1a-antisense
(antisense to positions 46144634 of the unique SRC-1a 3'-UTR),
GAPDH-5' (corresponding to positions 212232), and GAPDH-3' (antisense
to positions 790810). The same GAPDH primer set was used for
simultaneous amplification of SRC-1e and GAPDH. The SRC-1e
oligonucleotides were SRC-1e-sense (corresponding to positions
38443864 of SRC-1a and SRC-1e cDNA) and SRC-1e-antisense (antisense
to positions 44744494 of the unique SRC-1e 3'-UTR). The GAPDH cDNA,
representing a nonregulated gene, served as an internal control. The
negative control sample consisted of reaction mix and primers without
RNA template. The reaction was allowed to continue for 29 cycles, which
was within the exponential phase of the amplification reaction as
determined by cycle profiling. Southern blots of the PCR products were
successively hybridized with an internal 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide common to both SRC isoforms (positions 43114341)
followed by a 32P-labeled GAPDH-5' oligonucleotide. pGEM
markers were used for size determination.
Plasmid constructs
Complementary DNAs hPR-A and hPR-B cloned into pSG5 expression
vector were gifts from Dr. Pierre Chambon (Strasbourg, France). The
hPR-B phosphorylation mutants (M1, M3, M9, MH, and Bck
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)), containing various sets of serine to alanine
substitutions; the hPR-B DNA-binding mutant (hPR-B/DBM) in which
cystine 587 was mutated to alanine; and the BUS-DBD-NLS, a mutant in
which the B upstream segment is fused to the DBD and nuclear
localization signal, were gifts from Dr. Kathryn Horwitz (Denver, CO).
The hPR-B ligand-binding mutant (hPRB-B/LBM) was created by linearizing
hPR-B at position 2427 with HindIII, and a frame shift was
introduced by subcloning a 125-bp fragment, obtained by
HindIII digestion of
DNA (NBL, Hitchin, UK), into this
site. The plasmid pGFP-C1/hPR-B (GFP, green fluorescent protein) was
created by subcloning, in-frame, a BamHI/XbaI
fragment from the hPR-B expression vector into pGFP-C1 linearized with
BamHI. The reporter vectors dPRL-3000/Luc, carrying 3000 bp
of 5'-flanking DNA to the decidua-specific promoter of the hPRL gene,
and pMSG/Luc, containing the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long
terminal repeat, were provided by Dr. Birgit Gellersen (Hamburg,
Germany). Plasmid pRSV-C
, encoding the PKA
catalytic subunit,
was a gift from Dr. Richard Maurer (Portland, OR). Expression vectors
for human SRC-1a and SRC-1e were obtained from Dr. Malcolm Parker
(London, UK). pCH110, a ß-galactosidase expression vector, was
purchased from Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ).
Transient transfections
ES cells were plated at a density of 5 x 105
cells/well in 12-well plates. Transfections were performed by the
calcium phosphate precipitation method in medium supplemented with 2%
DCC-FBS. Details of the transfection protocol and treatments are
indicated in each figure legend. Cell extracts were harvested, and
luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were determined as
previously described (23). The ß-galactosidase measurements were used
to ensure that the transfection efficiencies were comparable when
different combinations of expression vectors were used in a given
experiment.
Stable transfection and microscopic analysis
Unpassaged ES cells, transfected in 6-well plates (Nunc, Inc.,
Copenhagen, Denmark) with 1 µg GFP or GFP-hPR, were selected
for G-418 sulfate (1 mg/ml) resistance. Untransfected cells were used
to assess the efficiency of antibiotic selection. Cells surviving G-418
sulfate treatment were pooled, plated in 24-well plates, and allowed to
reach confluence. The cultures were assessed using phase contrast and
fluorescence microscopy (Diaphot 300, Nikon, Kingston, UK)
with a GFP filter (Nikon). Subcellular localization of GFP
and GFP-hPR was assessed in untreated cells and after treatment with
8-bromo-cAMP, MPA, or their com-bination.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MPA potentiates decidual PRL promoter activity in response to
cAMP
Previously, we reported that the synergy between cAMP and MPA on
PRL protein expression was mimicked at the messenger RNA (mRNA) level,
but we failed to demonstrate such an effect on decidual PRL promoter
activity (23). However, these initial transient transfection studies
were carried out in medium containing 10% DCC-FBS, in contrast to the
2% DCC-FBS used for protein and mRNA analysis. Subsequently, we found
that the presence of 10% serum greatly inhibited PRL protein
expression in response to cAMP treatment and almost abolished the
synergy between MPA and cAMP (data not shown). Promoter analysis
studies were therefore performed with ES cells that had been maintained
in 2% DCC-FBS and primed with 8-bromo-cAMP, MPA or a combination of
these, for 48 h. Figure 2
shows that
pretreatment with cAMP markedly enhanced the promoter activity in
response to subsequent cAMP treatment. Priming of ES cells with MPA
plus cAMP further increased the reporter gene response to subsequent
cAMP treatment. Pretreatment with MPA alone had no discernible effect
on subsequent promoter activity.
|
PR expression in differentiating ES cells
There is considerable evidence that cAMP not only enhances PR
trans-activation of model reporter constructs, but also
induces PR expression in uterine and ovarian cells (30, 31, 32). Hence, we
studied the expression of PR protein in differentiating ES cells during
the period of sensitization of the decidual PRL promoter to MPA. When
ES cells were maintained in phenol red-free medium containing 2%
DCC-FBS for 48 h before treatment, only the PR-A isoform was
detected by immunoblotting (Fig. 3A
).
Activation of PKA resulted initially in rapid up-regulation of the
receptor with the appearance of multiple species, attributable to
receptor phosphorylation (33, 34). Subsequently, PR-A levels declined
in response to cAMP, and this process was consistently found to be
accelerated by the addition of MPA.
|
The induction of TF, a decidual marker (3), correlated inversely with cellular PR levels. This reciprocal relationship between PR levels and expression of the decidual phenotype was further confirmed at the cellular level using confocal laser microscopy and double labeling for PR and TF (Li, X.-F., J. Brosens, and J. White, unpublished observations).
Expression of PR in differentiated ES cells inhibits decidual PRL
promoter activity
To establish whether the decline in cellular PR levels was an
obligate component of the decidualization process, the effect of
reexpression of PR was investigated. cAMP-primed ES cells were
therefore transfected with hPR-B expression vector (400 ng
plasmid/well) and the reporter construct dPRL-3000/Luc, and the
response to treatment was compared with that of cells transfected with
dPRL-3000/Luc and the empty control vector pSG5. In the absence of
overexpressed hPR-B, addition of MPA to cAMP treatment markedly
enhanced promoter activation (Fig. 4A
).
However, in the presence of hPR-B there was a dramatic repression of
cAMP-induced reporter gene transcription in the absence and presence of
MPA. Expression of the catalytic
-subunit (C
-subunit) of the PKA
holoenzyme was sufficient to induce dPRL-3000/Luc activation (Fig. 4B
),
and coexpression of hPR-B (200 ng plasmid/well) inhibited promoter
activity in response to C
-subunit in the absence of ligand. However,
at these lower PR expression vector input levels, addition of MPA or
ZK98.299 further enhanced the inhibition of reporter gene transcription
(Fig. 4B
).
|
|
-subunit of PKA (pRSV-C
).
In addition, hPR-A or hPR-B was coexpressed. As expected, the presence
of the C
-subunit of the PKA holoenzyme markedly enhanced the
transcriptional activation of ligand-occupied PR receptor, and this
effect was more pronounced for the hPR-B than the hPR-A isoform (Fig. 6
-subunit
did not, however, result in PR trans-activation of the MMTV
promoter in the absence of ligand (Fig. 6
|
PR domains required for repression of decidual PRL
transcription
As none of the major phosphorylation sites in PR was implicated in
its repression function, we further investigated the domains of the
receptor necessary for inhibition of the decidual PRL promoter. The PR
mutants tested included a LBD mutant (hPR-B/LBD-M), a deletion
construct in the LBD region of the receptor at position 809, a DBD
mutant (hPR-B/DBD-M), a point mutant containing a cystine to alanine
substitution in the base of the first zinc finger (C587A), and the
BUS-DBD-NLS construct in which the B upstream segment of hPR-B is fused
to the DBD and the nuclear localization signal. Table 1
shows that deletion of the LBD or
disruption of the DNA-binding activity of the receptor prevents its
repression of cAMP-mediated decidual PRL promoter activation.
Interestingly, the BUS-DBD-nuclear localization signal construct, which
lacks the LBD, was as capable of suppressing decidual PRL gene
transcription, suggesting that cooperation between these minimal
regions of the receptor is sufficient to confer repression of the
decidual PRL promoter. The trans-activation domains of PR
(AF-1, located in the N-terminus of PR-A; AF-2, located in the
C-terminus; and AF-3, located in the BUS region of PR-B) appear not to
be essential for inhibition of decidual PRL transcription.
|
(hER
),
hPR-A, hPR-B, or the control vector pSG5. Subsequently, the cells were
maintained in the presence or absence of 8-bromo-cAMP for 40 h
before analysis of promoter activity. In the absence of ligand only,
PR-A and PR-B, but not ER
, GR, or AR, inhibited decidual PRL
transcription in response to PKA activation, emphasizing the unique
role of PR in regulating the onset of expression of this
decidualization marker.
|
When overexpressed in undifferentiated ES cells (no cAMP priming),
SRC-1e, but not SRC-1a, significantly enhanced decidual promoter
activity in response to 8-bromo-cAMP (Fig. 8A
). In addition, in the presence of
SRC-1e, decidual PRL gene transcription in response to 8-bromo-cAMP was
now potently increased by MPA. Therefore, the expression of SRC-1e
mimicked in unprimed ES cells the effects of cAMP pretreatment.
However, ES cell differentiation in response to cAMP or cAMP plus MPA
did not result in altered expression levels of the mRNA of either SRC
isoform (Fig. 8B
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit of PKA holoenzyme to activate the decidual PRL
promoter in a manner inhibitable by ZK98.299 provides additional
evidence in support of a role for unliganded PR in regulating PRL gene
expression. Antiprogestin inhibition of cAMP-induced PRL secretion was
a delayed response, becoming apparent after a lag period of 24 days.
Similarly, MPA enhanced the decidual PRL promoter activity in response
to PKA activation, but only if the decidualization process had been
initiated through pretreatment of the cultures with cAMP for
approximately 48 h. These observations imply that activation of
the PKA pathway sensitizes ES cells to the actions of progestins and
antiprogestins through induction or modulation of an essential
intermediate factor(s) or through loss of a repressor function. The expression of decidual-specific genes, such as TF and PRL, correlated inversely with cellular PR levels and suggested, surprisingly, PR as a candidate repressor. Under culture conditions that allowed an optimal decidualization response (2% DCC-FBS), only the PR-A isoform was detected on Western blotting. Activation of the PKA pathway resulted initially in rapid up-regulation and apparent phosphorylation of PR-A followed by a progressive decline in receptor levels. The observations that PR-A is the predominant PR isoform during decidualization in vitro and that down-regulation of this receptor to new steady state levels is an integral component of this process are in agreement with in vivo studies. In human endometrium, both PR isoforms are expressed in the glandular and stromal compartments during the proliferative phase of the cycle (42, 43, 44). After ovulation the expression of both isoforms decreases dramatically in the glandular compartment, but PR-A levels are relatively maintained throughout the cycle in stromal cells (43). However, the stromal compartment is characterized by considerable cellular heterogeneity. Colocalization studies, using double labeling for PR and PRL, have shown that there is a subpopulation of stromal cells in the decidua that retain high nuclear PR expression levels, but stain very weakly for PRL. In contrast, those cells that secrete PRL not only have the characteristic decidual morphology, but also display low immunoreactivity for PR (44). Our unpublished confocal microscopy studies show that these disparate cellular responses to a decidualizing stimulus are maintained in culture (Li, X.-F., J. Brosens, and J. White, unpublished observations).
Down-regulation of PR may reflect a homeostatic mechanism to limit the cellular response to progestins or represents the progressive loss of a repressor function. To test the hypothesis that low cellular PR levels are an essential prerequisite for a full decidual response, we expressed PR in ES cells in which endogenous PR would have been down-regulated by priming with cAMP for 48 h. Transient expression of hPR-B or hPR-A markedly inhibited decidual PRL promoter-reporter activity in response to cAMP treatment independently of the presence or absence of ligand. Furthermore, PR repression of the endogenous genomic decidual PRL gene in response to cAMP was demonstrated by the markedly reduced PRL secretion of ES cells constitutively expressing GFP-hPR. Negative effects of PR on decidual gene expression are not without precedent, as Gao and Tseng (45) demonstrated that PR can also inhibit insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) gene induction in uterine cells, suggesting that PR may have a general role in limiting expression of the decidual phenotype.
Mechanism of PR inhibition of decidual PRL expression
It appears unlikely that PR acquires its ability to inhibit the
decidual PRL gene in response to PKA-dependent phosphorylation.
Phosphotryptic peptide mapping has identified at least nine
phosphorylation sites in hPR-B, seven of which have been sequenced to
date (36, 37, 38). Although cAMP treatment of ES cells maintained in low
serum conditions did result in apparent phosphorylation of the
receptor, reflected by altered mobility upon gel electrophoresis, none
of the PR phosphomutants tested in this study, which covered all of the
sequenced authentic phosphorylation sites except for Ser294
and Ser400, were important for inhibition of the decidual
PRL promoter. Takimoto and co-workers (34) demonstrated that these
mutants have also only subtle effects on the
trans-activation potential of the receptor on simple or
complex PR-responsive promoters. Hence, the role of PR phosphorylation
sites in modulating function remains unresolved.
PR inhibition of the decidual PRL promoter activity in response to
elevated cAMP levels could be caused by several mechanisms. The first
possibility is that PR is able to bind to a cognate DNA element in the
promoter. However, the absence of consensus PREs in the promoter region
tend to argue against the presence of high affinity binding sites for
PR (24). A second possibility is that PR could exert its inhibition
through the induction of a repressor molecule. Although PR inhibition
did not require ligand, there was no evidence that the receptor could
activate a model progesterone-responsive promoter in the absence of
progestins. The lack of generalized transcriptional competence of the
receptor in response to cAMP argues against, but does not exclude, the
induction of a PR-dependent repressor during decidualization. Finally,
PR could directly interfere with a cAMP-dependent transcription
factor(s) that binds to the decidual PRL promoter. We demonstrated that
PR repressor function was minimally dependent upon a functional DBD,
but also that within the context of the wild-type receptor the LBD
contributed to inhibition of decidual PRL gene. Multiple examples exist
in the literature where nuclear receptors repress promoter activity
through direct physical interaction with other transcription factors,
and often these protein-protein interactions are dependent upon
functional DBD and LBD of the receptor. This is the case in AR
repression of the gene that encodes for the
-subunit of the
pituitary glycoprotein hormones LH and FSH (46), repression of
activating protein-1 by GR (45), ER inhibition of interleukin-6
promoter by interacting with nuclear factor-
B and
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-ß (C/EBPß) (47), and GR
repression of trans-activation by RelA(p65) subunit of
nuclear factor-
B (48). PR also represses RelA activity, and the
mechanism involved appears very similar to that of PR inhibition of
decidual PRL promoter (49). In both cases inhibition of gene
transcription was independent of the PR isoform and occurred in the
absence of ligand, but could be enhanced by both progestins and
antiprogestins and was dependent only on a functional DBD of PR.
Finally, PR has also been shown to repress IGFBP-1 expression in
uterine cells by a mechanism involving protein-protein interaction.
Interestingly, analysis of PR repression of the IGFBP-1 promoter
activity in HEC-1B cells, an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line,
showed that it is ligand dependent and involves both transcription
activation domains of PR (AF-1 and AF-2), but not the DBD (50). Whether
PR inhibits IGFBP-1 expression in differentiating ES cells through a
similar mechanism remains to be determined.
The role of SRC-1 in enhancing decidual PRL promoter
activity
It appears plausible that MPA modestly enhances cAMP-induced PRL
secretion in the early stages of ES differentiation through accelerated
down-regulation of cellular PR levels. However, the marked synergistic
effect of MPA and cAMP on PRL protein expression seen in long term
cultures (610 days) is unlikely to be accounted for solely by
declining levels of PR. We speculated that activation of the PKA
pathway in ES cells may induce the expression of a specific PR
coactivator(s), which, in concert with declining PR levels, may account
for the switch from PR repression to activation of the decidual PRL
gene. Evidence in favor of such a hypothesis is provided by the
observation that disruption of the steroid hormone coactivator gene
SRC-1 in mice markedly reduces the decidualization reaction in response
to progesterone treatment and mechanical traumatization (51). There are
two human isoforms of SRC-1, SRC-1a and SRC-1e, that differ in their
C-termini. Although SRC-1a contains an additional nuclear
receptor-binding motif (LXXLL motif), it is less effective than SRC-1e
in enhancing ER-dependent gene transcription (40). Expression of either
SRC-1 isoform in undifferentiated ES cells did not induce decidual PRL
promoter activity in the presence or absence of progestins. However, in
the presence of activated PKA, SRC-1e, but not SRC-1a, markedly
enhanced transcriptional activity in response to MPA, mimicking the
synergy seen in decidualized cells. There was no evidence of regulation
of SRC1 mRNA by cAMP or MPA in ES cells, but we cannot exclude that
decidualization is associated with postranscriptional regulation of
SRC-1 function.
The mechanism by which SRC-1e mediates progesterone-dependent enhancement of the decidual PRL promoter activity is unknown. An attractive hypothesis is that during ES differentiation, PR and SRC-1e are integrated in a multiprotein complex that confers the progestin effect on decidual PRL expression through protein-protein interactions or through binding to the multiple degenerate PRE half-sites in the promoter region. Two alternative explanations for the progestin effect on PRL expression in long term cultures should be considered. First, it is possible that nongenomic progesterone effects are revealed during ES differentiation. However, the absence of a decidualization response in PR deficient mice tends to argue against this (52). Second, the cellular heterogeneity in PR expression in the decidua could indicate that paracrine interactions confer the progestin effect. In this model, the subpopulation of ES cells that fail to down-regulate PR, and hence are resistant to differentiation, would secrete a PR-dependent signal(s) to those ES cells that have acquired susceptibility to decidual transformation by lowering their cellular PR levels. ES cell differentiation in vivo is likely to be further regulated by interaction with epithelial and local immune cells (53).
In conclusion, this study revealed that maintenance of elevated PR levels inhibits initiation of decidualization. This may be an important mechanism in preventing illicit activation of decidual genes and may contribute to the highly coordinated timing of the expression of the decidual phenotype in the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Sustained PKA activation is required for induction of ES cell differentiation and not only results in down-regulation of cellular PR levels but also sensitizes ES cells to the actions of progesterone. If pregnancy occurs, elevated progesterone levels will maintain and enhance the decidual response. Although the mechanism by which this is achieved remains unresolved, our study suggests that steroid hormone receptor coactivators such as SRC-1 play an integral role in this process.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama
Medical Center, Saitama Medical School, 1981 Kamoda Kawagoe, Saitama
350, Japan. ![]()
Received February 26, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in three-dimensional spheroid cultures
of human endometrial epithelial cells. Hum Reprod 8:182192
-subunit functions synergistically with
progesterone to stimulate differentiation of cultured human endometrial
stromal cells to decidualized cells: a novel role for free
-subunit
in reproduction. Endocrinology 137:13321339[Abstract]
-subunit gene by androgen receptor
occurs independently of DNA binding but requires the DNA-binding and
ligand-binding domains of the receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:14971506
B and
C/EBPß. Mol Cel Biol 15:49714979[Abstract]
B subunit are required for negative cross-talk and
direct interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 272:2227822284
B
and progesterone receptor. J Biol Chem 271:62176224
inhibits the synthesis and release of human decidual
prolactin. Endocrinology 134:353357[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Cloke, K. Huhtinen, L. Fusi, T. Kajihara, M. Yliheikkila, K.-K. Ho, G. Teklenburg, S. Lavery, M. C. Jones, G. Trew, et al. The Androgen and Progesterone Receptors Regulate Distinct Gene Networks and Cellular Functions in Decidualizing Endometrium Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4462 - 4474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|