help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Huff, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Huff, M. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATORVASTATIN
*CHOLESTEROL
*HEPTANOIC ACID
*PYRROLE
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 11 5293-5302
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The Magnitude of Decrease in Hepatic Very Low Density Lipoprotein Apolipoprotein B Secretion Is Determined by the Extent of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibition in Miniature Pigs1

John R. Burnett2, Lisa J. Wilcox, Dawn E. Telford, Sandra J. Kleinstiver, P. Hugh R. Barrett, Roger S. Newton3 and Murray W. Huff

Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry and The John P. Robarts Research Institute (J.R.B., L.J.W., D.E.T., S.J.K., M.W.H.), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5K8 Canada; Department of Medicine (P.H.R.B.), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6001 Australia; and Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research (R.S.N.), Warner Lambert Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Murray W. Huff, The John P. Robarts Research Institute, 4–16, University of Western Ontario, 100 Perth Drive, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada. E-mail: mhuff{at}julian.uwo.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been postulated that the rate of hepatic very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) apolipoprotein (apo) B secretion is dependent upon the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. To test this hypothesis in vivo, apoB kinetic studies were carried out in miniature pigs before and after 21 days treatment with high-dose (10 mg/kg/day), atorvastatin (A) or simvastatin (S) (n = 5). Pigs were fed a diet containing fat (34% of calories) and cholesterol (400 mg/day; 0.1%). Statin treatment decreased plasma total cholesterol [31 (A) vs. 20% (S)] and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations [42 (A) vs. 24% (S)]. Significant reductions in plasma total triglyceride (46%) and VLDL triglyceride (50%) concentrations were only observed with (A). Autologous [131I]VLDL, [125I]LDL, and [3H]leucine were injected simultaneously, and apoB kinetic parameters were determined by triple-isotope multicompartmental analysis using SAAM II. Statin treatment decreased the VLDL apoB pool size [49 (A) vs. 24% (S)] and the hepatic VLDL apoB secretion rate [50 (A) vs. 33% (S)], with no change in the fractional catabolic rate (FCR). LDL apoB pool size decreased [39 (A) vs. 26% (S)], due to reductions in both the total LDL apoB production rate [30 (A) vs. 21% (S)] and LDL direct synthesis [32 (A) vs. 23% (S)]. A significant increase in the LDL apoB FCR (15%) was only seen with (A). Neither plasma VLDL nor LDL lipoprotein compositions were significantly altered. Hepatic HMG-CoA reductase was inhibited to a greater extent with (A), when compared with (S), as evidenced by 1) a greater induction in hepatic mRNA abundances for HMG-CoA reductase (105%) and the LDL receptor (40%) (both P < 0.05); and 2) a greater decrease in hepatic free (9%) and esterified cholesterol (25%) (both P < 0.05). We conclude that both (A) and (S) decrease hepatic VLDL apoB secretion, in vivo, but that the magnitude is determined by the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
3-HYDROXY-3-METHYLGLUTARYL coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (EC 1.1.1.34) is a resident endoplasmic reticulum (ER) integral membrane protein. HMG-CoA reductase functions as a key enzyme in the mevalonate pathway (1, 2) by catalyzing the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate. Competitive inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase perturb this rate-determining step in cholesterol biosynthesis (3) and significantly decrease plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. Compounds in this class include lovastatin (4), simvastatin (5), pravastatin (6), fluvastatin (7), atorvastatin (8), and cerivastatin (9). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower plasma LDL cholesterol by one or a combination of the following mechanisms: 1) enhanced catabolism by up-regulation of hepatic LDL receptors; 2) production of an LDL particle that is a better ligand for the LDL receptor; 3) reduced production of LDL apolipoprotein (apo) B due to either decreased secretion of LDL directly into the plasma, or decreased conversion of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) to LDL. Decreased conversion may be due to either reduced secretion of hepatic VLDL or increased removal of VLDL [and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL)] from the plasma by up-regulated LDL receptors.

ApoB kinetic studies have demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease LDL apoB production rates (PRs) (10, 11, 12). Furthermore, there is increasing evidence in both experimental animals and humans that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower apoB concentrations by decreasing hepatic VLDL apoB secretion into plasma (10, 11, 12). However, not all studies have been consistent with this concept (10, 11, 12). Although the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have similar chemical structures, they differ in their chemical derivation, solubility, and pharmacokinetic behavior (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14). Therefore, the differences in apoB secretion observed in vivo among reported studies may, in part, pertain to the type and dose of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor administered. However, other factors, including subject variability and study design, methods, and analysis, could contribute to the inconsistent findings.

Although, atorvastatin and simvastatin are both lipophilic compounds, they differ significantly in their elimination half-lives (t1/2). Atorvastatin is a synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor with a mean plasma t1/2 of approximately 14 h (8). Moreover, due to active metabolites, the t1/2 of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor equivalents with atorvastatin treatment extends to 20–30 h. In contrast, simvastatin is an inactive prodrug that is activated to the open acid form in the liver. The plasma t1/2 for simvastatin is 2 h for its active ß-hydroxyacid metabolite (5). Clinical studies, using a reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration as an endpoint, have demonstrated an increased dose efficacy of atorvastatin over simvastatin (15), and other statins (16) within their approved dose ranges in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.

Watts et al. (17) found a direct correlation between cholesterol synthesis and hepatic secretion of VLDL apoB in normolipidemic subjects. However, no significant correlation was observed between plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations and hepatic apoB secretion. Naoumova et al. (18) in subjects heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (including atorvastatin and simvastatin) proposed that the higher the baseline level of plasma mevalonate, the greater the response in terms of LDL cholesterol lowering. However, no significant relationship was observed between LDL cholesterol and plasma mevalonate. Recently, the same investigators (19) demonstrated in heterozygous FH subjects that atorvastatin and simvastatin initially reduce cholesterol synthesis to a similar extent; however, the suppression is extended with atorvastatin treatment. They proposed that the greater efficacy of atorvastatin was a result of more prolonged inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, an effect related to its hepatic selectivity and longer duration of action in the liver.

Plasma lipoprotein distribution, composition, and apoB metabolism in pigs and humans are similar (20, 21). A large portion of LDL, the major cholesterol-containing lipoprotein, is synthesized by the direct pathway in pigs (22), a pathway also observed in humans (23). We have previously shown using apoB kinetic studies in the miniature pig that lovastatin treatment reduced LDL apoB production, primarily direct LDL synthesis (24, 25). No significant changes in VLDL apoB metabolic parameters were observed. Furthermore, in the same animal model, atorvastatin treatment significantly decreased hepatic VLDL apoB secretion into plasma in addition to reducing LDL apoB PRs (26). Although the dose of inhibitor and diet differed between the studies, we postulated that the effect on VLDL apoB secretion may relate to a more sustained inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase with atorvastatin compared with lovastatin treatment.

Hepatic apoB containing lipoprotein secretion into plasma can be regulated by lipid availability (10, 27, 28, 29, 30). HMG-CoA reductase inhibition should limit the availability of free cholesterol and/or cholesteryl ester for incorporation into VLDL and hence reduce VLDL secretion. In the present studies, two potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin, at high dose, were used as probes to test the hypothesis in vivo, that the magnitude of decrease in hepatic VLDL apoB secretion is determined by the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and diets
Miniature pigs weighing 25.78 ± 0.57 kg were obtained from a local supplier (Premier Quality Genetics Inc., West Lorne, Ontario, Canada) and were studied in pairs, with each pair being same-sex litter mates. After being acclimatized for 1 week, animals were maintained on the experimental diet for 21 days before and during (6 days) the control lipoprotein turnover studies. Immediately after the assessment of apoB metabolism during the control period, the pigs began treatment with either atorvastatin or simvastatin (10 mg/kg/day; n = 5). The animals remained on this dose for 21 days before and during the treatment lipoprotein turnover studies. Thus, each animal acted as their own control. One week before each turnover study, an indwelling silicone elastomer (SILASTIC) catheter (1.96-mm internal diameter) was surgically implanted in an external jugular vein (24). Isoflurane USP (Abbott Laboratories, Montréal, Québec, Canada) was used as the anesthetic and ketamine USP (Vetrepharm Canada Inc., London, Ontario, Canada) as the preanesthetic. Catheters, which were kept patent by filling with 7% EDTA-Na2, allowed for ease of sample injection as well as blood sampling throughout each turnover study in unrestrained, unanesthetized animals. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Western Ontario.

Atorvastatin or simvastatin was placed in gelatin capsules and, to ensure ingestion, was administered by hand before the daily feeding. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were given at 0900 h each day. During the control phase pigs received a placebo capsule. Each animal received a 590-g ration of a diet containing fat (34% of calories; polyunsaturated-monounsaturated-saturated fatty acid ratio of 1:1:1) and cholesterol (400 mg/day; 0.1%; 0.2 mg/kcal) (26). Control and treatment lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were measured as described below.

Lipoprotein turnover studies
Lipoprotein turnover studies were performed essentially as described previously (22, 24, 31) with minor modifications (26). In brief, VLDL [density (d) < 1.006 g/ml] and LDL (d = 1.019–1.063 g/ml) were isolated by sequential ultracentrifugation from plasma (100–150 mL) obtained after a 24-h fast and subsequently radiolabeled with 131I and 125I, respectively (24). All labeled lipoproteins were autologous, i.e. each pig was reinjected with its own lipoproteins that were isolated during the control or treatment phase, respectively. Radiolabeling was performed using the iodine monochloride technique (22). Of the total VLDL radioactivity, less than 2% was free iodine, 10–44% was bound to lipid, and 30–57% of the protein-bound label was bound to apoB. Of the total LDL radioactivity, less than 1% was free iodine, 11–31% was bound to lipid, and 77–93% of the protein-bound label was bound to apoB. In the control study, after a 24-h fast, each animal received 20 µCi [131I]VLDL apoB and 15 µCi [125I]LDL apoB given as a bolus by the indwelling catheter. In the treatment study, after a 24-h fast, each animal received 20 µCi [131I]VLDL apoB, 15 µCi [125I]LDL apoB, and 2.5 mCi L-[4,5-3H]leucine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Canada Ltd., Oakville, Ontario, Canada; specific activity 155 Ci/mmol) given as a bolus by the indwelling catheter. Blood sample collection, administration of diet and drugs during the turnover study, lipoprotein isolation, and plasma apoB and plasma leucine determinations were as described previously (26). VLDL, IDL, and LDL apoB concentrations were constant over the sampling time period (24).

Kinetic analysis
The turnover data were analyzed by using the multicompartmental modeling program SAAM II (SAAM Institute, Seattle, WA) running on a Pentium- based personal computer. The model structure, the assumptions made in developing the model, and the constraints applied to the model were essentially those as previously reported (26, 31). This model was simultaneously fit to the sets of tracer data for all lipoprotein fractions. This approach permitted the integration of all tracer data into a single model. Based on the lipoprotein distribution of radioactivity in plasma samples spiked with [131I]VLDL, the initial conditions (the initial amount of radioactivity in each fraction) were incorporated into the compartmental model (26).

Hepatic total and microsomal lipids
Total liver lipids were extracted from 1.0-g sections of liver obtained at killing that had been stored at -80 C (26). Due to the study design we were unable to obtain control liver tissue from the experimental animals. However, control liver tissue was removed from 10 pigs obtained from the same supplier and maintained on the same diet for the study period. Microsomes were isolated from liver homogenates (31), and lipids were extracted from microsomes (1 mg protein) using the method of Folch et al. (32). Total cholesterol, free cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations were quantitated in hepatic total and microsomal lipid extracts (26).

Hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activity
Liver samples obtained at killing were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80 C until analyzed. Microsomes were isolated from tissue homogenates (31), and HMG-CoA reductase activities were determined using a modification of the method of Shapiro et al. (33). In brief, microsomes (35 µg protein/25 µl) were preincubated at 37 C for 30 min (50 mmol/liter KPO4; 10 mmol/liter dithiothreitol; 1 mmol/liter EDTA-Na2; pH 7.4) before incubation with 28 µl of the reaction mixture [final concentrations: 0.037 µCi DL-[3-14C]HMG-CoA, NEN Life Science Products (Mandel, Scientific, Guelph, Ontario, Canada), specific activity, 57.9 mCi/mmol; 16 mmol/liter glucose-6-phosphate; 0.175 U glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; 2.5 mmol/liter NADP; 130 µmol/liter HMG-CoA; 100 mmol/liter KPO4; 5 mmol/liter dithiothreitol; 0.5 mmol/liter EDTA-Na2; pH 7.4]. After 30 min, the reaction was stopped with 24 µl of a HCl/mevalonolactone mixture [25 ml 6 N HCl; 90 µCi RS-[5-3H(N)]mevalonolactone, NEN Life Science Products, 33 Ci/mmol; 800 µg mevalonolactone, Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO); 25 ml deionized H2O]. [3H]mevalonolactone was used as an internal standard to assess recovery. Samples were incubated at 37 C for 30 min to convert the reaction product mevalonate to mevalonolactone and then deproteinized by centrifugation (5 min) in a microfuge (Eppendorf, Brinkman Instruments, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Fifty microliters of the supernatant were applied to Fisherbrand silica gel G TLC plates (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) and developed in acetone-toluene-acetic acid (75:25:1, vol/vol). The plates were dried in air and the spots visualized by I2 vapor. The region containing the lactonized mevalonate (Rf = 0.6–0.9) was scraped from the TLC plates and counted in Aquasol 2 (DuPont NEN, Canberra-Packard, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) using a liquid scintillation counter (LS 3801, Beckman Instruments (Can) Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). HMG-CoA reductase activity was expressed as picomoles of [14C]mevalonate produced/min/mg of microsomal protein.

Oleate incorporation into hepatic cholesteryl ester
Liver samples obtained at killing were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80 C until analyzed. The activity of hepatic acyl coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) in crude homogenates was determined by the rate of incorporation of [1-14C]oleic acid (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) into cholesteryl ester, essentially as described by Gallo et al. (34). ACAT activity was determined in liver homogenates, rather than microsomes, to avoid the loss of inhibitors during microsome preparation.

Ribonuclease (RNase) protection assay for abundance of liver and intestine apoB, LDL receptor, and HMG-CoA reductase mRNA
Liver and small intestine samples obtained at killing were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80 C until analysis (26). Total RNA was isolated, its integrity verified, and content determined. Pig specific cDNAs for apoB and LDL receptor, cloned into Bluescript plasmid (kindly provided by Dr. Alan D. Attie, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI), and a HindIII/PstI fragment of human HMG-CoA reductase (ATCC, Manassas, VA), subcloned into Bluescript plasmid served as templates to synthesize antisense RNA probes. These riboprobes were then used to measure abundandance of hepatic and intestinal apoB, LDL receptor, and HMG-CoA reductase mRNA using an RNase protection solution hybridization assay (26).

Analyses
Fasting blood samples (20 ml) were taken on day 1, 4, and 6 of the turnover study, and plasma concentrations of total cholesterol and triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol and triglyceride, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured (24). VLDL was obtained after ultracentrifugation at d < 1.006 g/ml, and HDL was obtained after precipitation of other lipoproteins by dextran sulfate-magnesium chloride (24). LDL cholesterol was calculated by difference. The concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride, free cholesterol, esterified cholesterol, phospholipid, and protein were measured in the plasma and various lipoprotein fractions as described previously (24). To determine whether either statin altered the size distribution of the lipoproteins and/or if the distribution of cholesterol among the lipoprotein classes was affected by statin treatment, plasma was separated by the high performance gel chromatographic method of Kieft et al. (35). On-line cholesterol content of each fraction was determined, and elution peak retention times were used to compare the relative sizes of the lipoproteins. Tests for statistical significance of differences between control and statin-treated animals were compared by paired t test (36). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on plasma and lipoprotein lipid concentrations are shown in Table 1Go. Atorvastatin treatment significantly reduced total plasma and VLDL triglyceride concentrations by 46% (P = 0.014) and 50% (P = 0.019), respectively. Total plasma cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol were significantly decreased by 31% (P = 0.0008), 30% (P = 0.047), 42% (P = 0.008), and 19% (P = 0.003), respectively. VLDL apoB and LDL apoB were significantly decreased by 49% (P = 0.00007) and 39% (P = 0.015), respectively. In contrast, total plasma and VLDL triglyceride concentrations were nonsignificantly reduced by simvastatin treatment. Total plasma, LDL cholesterol, and LDL apoB concentrations were significantly reduced by 20% (P = 0.021), 24% (P = 0.021), and 26% (P = 0.001), respectively. VLDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and VLDL apoB concentrations were nonsignificantly decreased.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in control, atorvastatin-, and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs

 
Autologous [131I]VLDL and [125I]LDL were simultaneously injected into each control animal, whereas autologous [131I]VLDL and [125I]LDL, in addition to [3H]leucine, were simultaneously injected into each atorvastatin- or simvastatin- treated pig. The kinetic parameters of apoB were determined from the simultaneous analysis of all the specific activity data by using the models described previously (26, 31). The kinetic parameters are summarized in Tables 2Go and 3Go. A fit of the model to the apoB-specific radioactivity curves for [131I]VLDL, [131I]IDL, and [131I]LDL for one representative animal is shown in Fig. 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Metabolic parameters of VLDL apoB metabolism in control, atorvastatin-, and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Metabolic parameters of LDL apoB metabolism in control, atorvastatin-, and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Line graph showing apoB specific activity time curves for VLDL ({triangleup}), IDL (•), and LDL ({blacksquare}) after injection of [131I]VLDL. Data points represent the observed data, and the lines are the best fit generated by the kinetic model. Panel A represents a control pig; panel B, an atorvastatin-treated pig.

 
Atorvastatin treatment decreased the VLDL apoB pool size by 49% (P = 0.00007) (Table 2Go). This was primarily due to a significant 50% (P = 0.0007) reduction in the VLDL apoB PR as the FCR was unchanged. The amount of VLDL apoB converted to LDL apoB was decreased by 22%, and, although not statistically significant (P = 0.061), conversion was reduced in all five animals studied. The flux of apoB cleared directly, without conversion to IDL or LDL, was significantly reduced by 51% (P = 0.0005). Neither the percentage of VLDL apoB flux converted to LDL, nor the percent cleared directly, was affected by atorvastatin treatment. Similarly, simvastatin treatment resulted in an apparent decrease (24%) in VLDL apoB pool size (P = 0.166). This was primarily due to a significant 33% (P = 0.024) reduction in the VLDL apoB PR, as the FCR was unchanged. The amount of VLDL apoB converted to LDL apoB was not affected by simvastatin treatment. The flux of apoB cleared without conversion to IDL or LDL was significantly reduced by 35% (P = 0.042). Neither the percentage of VLDL apoB flux converted to LDL, nor the percent cleared directly, was affected by simvastatin treatment. The FCRs for VLDL apoB direct catabolism [k (0, 1), k (0, 2) and k (0, 3)] and for IDL direct catabolism [k (0, 4) and k (0, 5)] were not significantly affected by either inhibitor (data not shown). No significant changes were observed in the production or flux of VLDL apoB that was converted to LDL without being transported through the plasma IDL pool, or in the amount of VLDL apoB converted to LDL via the IDL fraction (data not shown).

Atorvastatin treatment decreased the LDL apoB pool size by 38% (P = 0.015) (Table 3Go). This was primarily due to a significant 30% (P = 0.037) reduction in the LDL apoB PR, which was accounted for by the combination of a 22% decrease in LDL apoB derived from VLDL apoB catabolism (P = 0.061) and a significant 32% decrease in LDL apoB direct synthesis (P = 0.039). Total apoB production into plasma, calculated as the sum of VLDL apoB production plus LDL apoB direct production, decreased significantly by 48% (P = 0.0003). Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a significant 15% increase in the LDL apoB FCR (P = 0.008). By comparison, simvastatin reduced the LDL apoB pool size to a lesser extent (26%; P = 0.001) (Table 3Go). This was due to a significant 21% (P = 0.002) reduction in the LDL apoB PR, which was accounted for by a 23% decrease in LDL apoB direct synthesis (P = 0.007). Total apoB production into plasma decreased significantly by 32% (P = 0.018). The LDL apoB FCR was unchanged by simvastatin treatment.

VLDL and LDL were analyzed for lipid and protein composition; however, the percent composition was not altered for any of the parameters measured with either atorvastatin or simvastatin treatment (data not shown). Moreover, plasma cholesterol distribution among the lipoprotein classes, as assessed by high performance gel chromatography, showed no major changes with either HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. The elution peak retention times for VLDL, LDL, and HDL were unchanged (data not shown) suggesting no significant effect of statin treatment on particle size.

Approximately 24 h after the last dose of atorvastatin or simvastatin was administered, the pigs were killed and sections of liver and small intestine were removed and stored at -80 C before analyses. Hepatic free and esterified cholesterol concentrations were significantly less in atorvastatin- treated pigs when compared with simvastatin-treated animals (Table 4Go). Furthermore, a trend toward a lower hepatic microsomal free cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations was observed with atorvastatin compared with simvastatin treatment. Hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activity increased (35–46%) in microsomes, and hepatic ACAT actvity decreased (36–56%) in crude liver homogenates with statin treatment when compared with control animals. However, no significant differences were observed between treatments. It is likely that the induction of hepatic reductase activity is underestimated in microsomes from atorvastatin-treated animals. It has been shown in rats that atorvastatin is more tightly bound to hepatic microsomal HMG-CoA reductase than lovastatin and hence more difficult to remove with washing (37). Although hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activities were similar between the two statins, abundance of HMG-CoA reductase mRNA was 105% higher (P = 0.038) and abundance of LDL receptor mRNA was 40% higher (P = 0.047) in atorvastatin-treated pigs, when compared with simvastatin-treated animals (Table 5Go). Abundances of hepatic and intestinal apoB mRNA was unchanged.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Hepatic total and microsomal lipid concentrations and HMG-CoA reductase and ACAT activities in atorvastatin- and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. ApoB, LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase mRNA content in atorvastatin- and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs

 
Figure 2Go summarizes the major apoB kinetic parameters observed in this study for atorvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day, and simvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day. For comparison purposes, apoB kinetic parameters obtained previously in a similar study (26) using atorvastatin, 3 mg/kg/day, are included. In general, the magnitude of effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition in this pig model on VLDL apoB and LDL apoB kinetic parameters was atorvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day > simvastatin 10 mg/kg/day = atorvastatin 3 mg/kg/day.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graphs showing the percent change from control in plasma and lipoprotein lipids (panel A), VLDL apoB kinetic parameters (panel B), and LDL apoB kinetic parameters (panel C) in atorvastatin- and simvastatin-treated miniature pigs. TG, triglyceride; C, cholesterol; PROD., production; and T. PROD., total production.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Two potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin (A) and simvastatin (S), at high dose (10 mg/kg/day) were used to test the hypothesis in vivo, that the magnitude of the decrease in hepatic VLDL apoB secretion is determined by the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase resulted in the following major findings: 1) the VLDL apoB pool size [49 (A) vs. 24% (S)] and the hepatic VLDL apoB secretion rate [50 (A) vs. 33% (S)] were decreased, with no change in the FCR; 2) the LDL apoB pool size decreased [39 (A) vs. 26% (S)], due to reductions in both the total LDL apoB PR [30 (A) vs. 21% (S)] and LDL direct synthesis [32 (A) vs. 23% (S)]; 3) a significant increase in the LDL apoB FCR (15%) was only observed with atorvastatin; 4) hepatic HMG-CoA reductase was inhibited to a greater extent with atorvastatin treatment, when compared with simvastatin, as evidenced by 1) a greater induction in hepatic mRNA abundances for HMG-CoA reductase (105%) and LDL receptor (40%) and 2) a greater decrease in hepatic free (9%) and esterified cholesterol (25%).

The primary effect of atorvastatin and simvastatin on apoB metabolism in miniature pigs fed normal amounts of fat and cholesterol was a reduction in the secretion of hepatic apoB containing lipoproteins into plasma. However, at the 10 mg/kg/day doses used, the decrease with atorvastatin was of greater magnitude than simvastatin. In previous in vivo apoB kinetic studies from this laboratory, using atorvastatin, 3 mg/kg/day (26), a decrease in VLDL apoB secretion into plasma was also a primary mechanism of action, although the effect was less than that observed for atorvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day, and similar to that observed for simvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day. This suggests that the magnitude of reduction in VLDL apoB secretion is related to the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition. Furthermore, these observations are consistent with the concept that the extent of reductase inhibition determines the magnitude of the reduction in the ER regulatory cholesterol pool involved in VLDL assembly and secretion.

Perturbations of free cholesterol concentrations elicit rapid responses in the rates of cholesterol biosynthesis, LDL receptor expression, and cholesterol esterification in cultured cells (38). HMG-CoA reductase inhibition should decrease the hepatic free cholesterol concentration of the ER. In whole liver, when compared with simvastatin-treated animals, significant reductions in both free and esterified cholesterol concentrations were observed with atorvastatin treatment. In contrast, hepatic free or esterified cholesterol concentrations were unaffected by low-dose atorvastatin treatment (26). Trends toward lower hepatic microsomal free cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were observed with atorvastatin compared with simvastatin treatment. Despite significant decreases in apoB secretion, Conde et al. (39), in guinea pigs receiving doses of atorvastatin similar to those used in the present study (10 mg/kg/day), were unable to demonstrate significant reductions in either hepatic free or esterified cholesterol concentrations, whereas, microsomal free cholesterol was significantly decreased by 30%. Taken together, these results would suggest that a putative regulatory pool of microsomal cholesterol (40, 41) is decreased by HMG-CoA reductase treatment, resulting in reduced availability for either lipoprotein surface, or as a substrate for ACAT, thereby, reducing cholesteryl ester availability for lipoprotein core formation. Only when HMG-CoA reductase is inhibited to a large extent are decreases in free and esterified cholesterol concentrations in whole liver apparent.

Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor should cause an overexpression of HMG-CoA reductase as a result of a positive feedback-regulatory mechanism (1, 2). As anticipated, hepatic microsomal HMG-CoA reductase activity was greater for both statins compared with controls with no difference between atorvastatin- and simvastatin-treated pigs. However, when compared with simvastatin-treated animals, atorvastatin resulted in a significant 105% induction of hepatic HMG-CoA reductase gene expression. The changes described for hepatic HMG-CoA reductase mirrored those of LDL receptor gene expression with the induction of LDL receptor expression occurring to a greater extent with atorvastatin treatment. These results are consistent with the lower hepatic free cholesterol content in atorvastatin-treated animals. Collectively, these results suggest that HMG-CoA reductase was inhibited to a greater extent with atorvastatin compared with simvastatin when given at equal doses.

LDL apoB production was significantly decreased by both HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The magnitude of the reduction was greater with atorvastatin than simvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin decreased both LDL apoB direct synthesis and VLDL apoB to LDL apoB conversion. The reduced conversion was due to the marked reduction of VLDL apoB production by atorvastatin. Simvastatin treatment also decreased LDL direct synthesis, but had a lesser effect on reduction of VLDL apoB production and no significant effect on the conversion of VLDL to LDL. When compared with pigs treated with low-dose atorvastatin (3 mg/kg/day) (26), the animals receiving high-dose atorvastatin demonstrated a more marked reduction in LDL apoB production (38 vs. 22%), less effect on the conversion of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB (22 vs. 34%), but a greater decrease in LDL apoB direct synthesis (28 vs. 12%). Major alterations in VLDL composition were not responsible for the decreased conversion observed with atorvastatin. Furthermore, the percentage of total VLDL apoB production converted to LDL apoB, or removed directly, did not change with either statin.

According to current dogma, inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decreases plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations by increasing LDL receptor expression, resulting in increased LDL clearance. Consistent with our previous findings with low-dose atorvastatin (26), no significant effect was seen on LDL apoB FCR in simvastatin-treated animals. The lack of change in LDL FCR was not due to changes in LDL composition or on changes in LDL subfraction distribution. These results are consistent with our observation that abundance of hepatic LDL receptor mRNA was not significantly changed. Thus, these findings support the concept that simvastatin, 10 mg/kg/day, and atorvastatin, 3 mg/kg/day, decrease a newly synthesized pool of cholesterol that is required for lipoprotein assembly, a pool not in complete equilibrium with the LDL receptor-regulatory pool (42). In contrast, we were able to demonstrate a significant 15% increase in LDL apoB FCR with high-dose atorvastatin. Increases in hepatic microsomal LDL receptor number have been reported in guinea pigs treated with 20 mg/kg/day of atorvastatin (39), raising the possibility that increased LDL clearance may become evident at higher atorvastatin doses. Consistent with this finding, significant increases in LDL receptor gene expression were observed in atorvastatin-treated pigs when compared with simvastatin-treated or control animals. No significant effects were noted on percent composition of plasma LDL for any of the parameters measured in animals treated with either inhibitor. Collectively, our results suggest that in this animal model, hepatic apoB secretion is most sensitive to HMG-CoA reductase inhibition and that LDL receptor expression is increased only at higher levels of reductase inhibition.

Clinical studies have demonstrated an increased dose efficacy of atorvastatin over simvastatin (15) and other statins (16) in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Naoumova et al. (19) in FH heterozygotes have recently shown a prolonged inhibition in cholesterol synthesis with high-dose atorvastatin treatment when compared with high-dose simvastatin. Although the initial degrees of suppression were similar, they postulated that the greater efficacy of atorvastatin related to its hepatic selectivity and longer duration of action in the liver. These findings are entirely consistent with the present study.

The mechanisms involved in the regulation of the assembly and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins within the hepatocyte by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors remain incompletely understood (11). We hypothesize that reduced cholesterol synthesis and/or cholesteryl esterification may compromise the ability of apoB to fold appropriately and/or reduce full lipidation and subsequent secretion. In turn, the rates of apoB degradation and/or translocation of apoB across the ER membrane may be affected. Moreover, the apoB translocation and degradation rates can determine the fate of newly synthesized apoB (11). In cultured HepG2 cells, atorvastatin has been shown to decrease apoB secretion (43, 44, 45). Wilcox et al. (45) and Mohammadi et al. (43) demonstrated that atorvastatin increases intracellular apoB degradation rates. In addition, Mohammadi et al. (43) observed that atorvastatin also decreases apoB translocation. Whether increased apoB degradation occurs in the livers of pigs treated with atorvastatin or simvastatin is unknown.

Inhibition of triglyceride (46) and phospholipid synthesis (47) in cultured hepatocytes has been shown to decrease apoB secretion. However, studies from our laboratory in HepG2 cells demonstrated that neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin at concentrations up to 10 µM had any significant effect on triglyceride or phospholipid synthesis (45). Taken together with our observation in the present study that hepatic triglyceride concentrations did not change, we conclude that the decrease in total apoB secretion by both atorvastatin- and simvastatin-treated pigs was not secondary to altered hepatic triglyceride or phospholipid metabolism.

Inhibition of newly synthesized cholesteryl ester catalyzed by ACAT has been shown to decrease apoB secretion in cell culture models and perfused monkey livers as well as in several small animal models (11). ApoB kinetic studies in miniature pigs demonstrated that the ACAT inhibitors, DuP 128 and avasimibe (previously known as CI-1011), significantly decreased hepatic VLDL apoB secretion (31, 48, 49). HMG-CoA reductase inhibition may decrease the ACAT free cholesterol substrate pool, thereby reducing the expression and/or activity of ACAT and hence apoB secretion. The reductions in hepatic ACAT activities observed with both statins in the present study are consistent with this concept and with the findings in atorvastatin-treated guinea pigs (39). Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) is capable of facilitating apoB translocation (50, 51), in addition to its role in mediating delivery of core lipid to nascent apoB (52). Although not measured in the present study, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor-induced reduction in apoB secretion may be mediated, in part, to a decreased MTP expression and/or activity, secondary to reduced cholesterol synthesis.

This study adds further support to the concept that a reduction in the assembly and secretion of apoB synthesis and secretion is an important mechanism whereby HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower the plasma concentration of apoB-containing lipoproteins (11). Atorvastatin and simvastatin decrease both VLDL and LDL apoB PRs in miniature pigs. The reduction in LDL apoB production relates to a marked reduction in VLDL apoB synthesis and a reduction primarily in direct LDL apoB synthesis, i.e. mechanistically the two statins appear similar. However, in this large-animal model, LDL apoB FCRs were increased with atorvastatin, but not with simvastatin treatment. Consistent with this finding, hepatic LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase gene expression were significantly increased and hepatic free and esterified cholesterol concentrations decreased in atorvastatin-treated pigs. We conclude that both atorvastatin and simvastatin decrease hepatic VLDL apoB secretion in vivo, but that magnitude is determined by the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kim Wood for performing the surgeries, Arnold Essenburg for performing the plasma cholesterol lipoprotein distribution analyses, and Jennifer Epstein and Stefanie Bombardier for their technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (T-3371), the National Institutes of Health (Grants NHLBI HL-49110 and NCRR RR-02176), and Parke-Davis. J.R.B. is a recipient of a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Research Fellowship, L.J.W. is a recipient of a Medical Research Council of Canada Studentship, and M.W.H. is a Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Back

2 Current address: Department of Core Clinical Pathology and Biochemistry, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, West Australia, 6001, Australia. Back

3 Current address: Esperion Therapeutics Inc., 3621 South State Street, 695 KMS Place, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108. Back

Received May 26, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Brown MS, Goldstein JL 1986 A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science 232:34–47[Free Full Text]
  2. Hampton R, Dimster-Denk D, Rine J 1996 The biology of HMG-CoA reductase: the pros of contra-regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 21:140–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Davignon J, Montigny M, Dufour R 1992 HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: a look back and a look ahead. Can J Cardiol 8:843–864[Medline]
  4. Henwood JM, Heel RC 1988 Lovastatin. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic use in hyperlipidaemia. Drugs 36:429–454[Medline]
  5. Plosker GL, McTavish D 1995 Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypercholesterolaemia. Drugs 50:334–363[Medline]
  6. Haria M, McTavish D 1997 Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease. Drugs 53:299–336[Medline]
  7. Plosker GL, Wagstaff AJ 1996 Fluvastatin. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia. Drugs 51:433–459[Medline]
  8. Lea AP, McTavish D 1997 Atorvastatin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of hyperlipidaemias. Drugs 53:828–847[Medline]
  9. McClellan KJ, Wiseman LR, McTavish D 1998 Cerivastatin. Drugs 55:415–420[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Thompson GR, Naoumova RP, Watts GF 1996 Role of cholesterol in regulating apolipoprotein B secretion by the liver. J Lipid Res 37:439–447[Abstract]
  11. Huff MW, Burnett JR 1997 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and hepatic apolipoprotein B secretion. Curr Opin Lipidol 8:138–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Aguilar-Salinas CA, Barrett H, Schonfeld G 1998 Metabolic modes of action of the statins in the hyperlipoproteinemias. Atherosclerosis 141:203–207[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Roth BD, Bocan TMA, Blankley CJ, Chucholowski AW, Creger PL, Creswell MW, Ferguson E, Newton RS, O’Brien P, Picard JA, Roark WH, Sekerke CS, Sliskovic DR, Wilson MW 1991 Relationship between tissue selectivity and lipophilicity for inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase. J Med Chem 34:463–466[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Bocan TMA, Ferguson E, McNally W, Uhlendorf PD, Mueller SB, Dehart P, Sliskovic DR, Roth BD, Krause BR, Newton RS 1992 Hepatic and nonhepatic sterol synthesis and tissue distribution following administration of a liver selective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, CI-981: comparison with selected HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1123:133–144[Medline]
  15. Dart A, Jerums G, Nicholson G, d’Emden M, Hamilton-Craig I, Tallis G, Best J, West M, Sullivan D, Bracs P, Black D 1997 A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 80:39–44[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Hunninghake D 1998 Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol 81:582–587[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Watts GF, Naoumova R, Cummings MH, Umpleby AM, Slavin BM, Sönksen PH, Thompson GR 1995 Direct correlation between cholesterol synthesis and hepatic secretion of apolipoprotein B-100 in normolipidemic subjects. Metabolism 44:1052–1057[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Naoumova RP, Marais AD, Mountney J, Firth JC, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Thompson GR 1996 Plasma mevalonic acid, an index of cholesterol synthesis in vivo, and responsiveness to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis 119:203–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Naoumova RP, Dunn S, Rallidis L, Abu-Muhana O, Neuwirth C, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Thompson GR 1997 Prolonged inhibition of cholesterol synthesis explains the efficacy of atorvastatin. J Lipid Res 38:1496–1500[Abstract]
  20. Mahley RW, Weisgraber KH, Innerarity T, Brewer Jr HB, Assmann G 1975 Swine lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. Changes in the plasma lipoproteins and apoproteins induced by cholesterol feeding. Biochemistry 14:2817–2823[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Marcel YL, Nestruck AC, Bergseth M, Bidallier M, Robinson WT, Jeffries D 1978 Low density lipoprotein turnover in swine. Can J Biochem 56:963–967[Medline]
  22. Huff MW, Telford DE 1985 Direct synthesis of low-density lipoprotein apoprotein B in the miniature pig. Metabolism 34:36–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Arad Y, Ramakrishnan R, Ginsberg HN 1990 Lovastatin therapy reduces low density lipoprotein apoB levels in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia by reducing the production of apoB-containing lipoproteins: implications for the pathophysiology of apoB production. J Lipid Res 31:567–582[Abstract]
  24. Huff MW, Telford DE, Woodcroft K, Strong WLP 1985 Mevinolin and cholestyramine inhibit the direct synthesis of low density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B in miniature pigs. J Lipid Res 26:1175–1186[Abstract]
  25. Huff MW, Telford DE 1989 Regulation of low density lipoprotein apoprotein B metabolism by lovastatin and cholestyramine in miniature pigs: effects on LDL composition and synthesis of LDL subfractions. Metabolism 38:256–264[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Burnett JR, Wilcox LJ, Telford DE, Kleinstiver SJ, Barrett PHR, Newton RS, Huff MW 1997 Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by atorvastatin decreases both VLDL and LDL apoB production in miniature pigs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:2589–2600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sniderman AD, Cianflone K 1993 Substrate delivery as a determinant of hepatic apoB secretion. Arterioscler Thromb 13:629–636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sparks JD, Sparks CE 1994 Insulin regulation of triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein synthesis and secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1215:9–32[Medline]
  29. Yao Z, McLeod RS 1994 Synthesis and secretion of hepatic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1212:152–166[Medline]
  30. Ginsberg HN 1995 Synthesis and secretion of apolipoprotein B from cultured liver cells. Curr Opin Lipidol 6:275–280[Medline]
  31. Huff MW, Telford DE, Barrett PHR, Billheimer JT, Gillies PJ 1994 Inhibition of hepatic ACAT decreases apoB secretion in miniature pigs fed a cholesterol-free diet. Arterioscler Thromb 14:1498–1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH 1957 A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497–509[Free Full Text]
  33. Shapiro DJ, Imblum RL, Rodwell VW 1969 Thin-layer chromatographic assay for HMG-CoA reductase and mevalonic acid. Anal Biochem 31:383–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Gallo LL, Wadsworth JA, Vahouny GV 1987 Normal cholesterol absorption in rats deficient in intestinal acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase activity. J Lipid Res 28:381–387[Abstract]
  35. Kieft KA, Bocan TMA, Krause BR 1991 Rapid on-line determination of cholesterol distribution among plasma lipoproteins after high-performance gel filtration chromatography. J Lipid Res 32:859–866[Abstract]
  36. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG 1967 The comparison of two samples. In: Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (eds) Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp 94–97
  37. Ness GC, Chambers CM, Lopez D 1998 Atorvastatin action involves diminished recovery of hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activity. J Lipid Res 39:75–84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Liscum L, Underwood KW 1995 Intracellular cholesterol transport and compartmentation. J Biol Chem 270:15443–15446[Free Full Text]
  39. Conde K, Vergara-Jimenez M, Krause BR, Newton RS, Fernandez ML 1996 Hypocholesterolemic actions of atorvastatin are associated with alterations on hepatic cholesterol metabolism and lipoprotein composition in the guinea pig. J Lipid Res 37:2372–2382[Abstract]
  40. Synouri-Vrettakou S, Mitropoulos KA 1983 Acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase. Transfer of cholesterol to its substrate pool and modulation of activity. Eur J Biochem 133:299–307[Medline]
  41. Billheimer JT, Gillies PJ 1990 Intracellular cholesterol esterification. In: Esfahani M, Swaney JB (eds) Advances in Cholesterol Esterification. The Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ, pp 7–45
  42. Havekes LM, de Wit ECM, Princen HMG 1987 Cellular free cholesterol in HepG2 cells is only partially available for downregulation of low density lipoprotein receptor activity. Biochem J 247:739–746[Medline]
  43. Mohammadi A, Macri J, Newton R, Romain T, Dulay D, Adeli K 1998 Effect of atorvastatin on intracellular stability and secretion of apolipoprotein B in HepG2 cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 18:783–793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bergstrom JD, Bostedor RG, Rew DJ, Geissler WM, Wright SD, Chao Y 1998 Hepatic responses to inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase: a comparison of atorvastatin and simvastatin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1389:213–221[Medline]
  45. Wilcox LJ, Barrett PHR, Huff MW 1999 Differential regulation of apolipoprotein B secretion from HepG2 cells by two HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin. J Lipid Res 40:1078–1089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Wu X, Sakata N, Dixon J, Ginsberg HN 1994 Exogenous VLDL stimulates apolipoprotein B secretion from HepG2 cells by both pre- and post-translational mechanisms. J Lipid Res 35:1200–1210[Abstract]
  47. Fast DG, Vance DE 1995 Nascent VLDL phospholipid composition is altered when phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis is inhibited: evidence for a novel mechanism that regulates VLDL secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1258:159–168[Medline]
  48. Burnett JR, Wilcox LJ, Telford DE, Kleinstiver SJ, Barrett PHR, Huff MW 1998 Inhibition of cholesterol esterification by DuP 128 decreases hepatic apolipoprotein B secretion in vivo: effect of dietary fat and cholesterol. Biochim Biophys Acta 1393:63–79[Medline]
  49. Burnett JR, Wilcox LJ, Telford DE, Kleinstiver SJ, Barrett PHR, Newton RS, Huff MW 1999 Inhibition of ACAT by avasimibe decreases both VLDL and LDL apolipoprotein B production in miniature pigs. J Lipid Res 40:1317–1327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Wang S, McLeod RS, Gordon DA, Yao Z 1996 The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein facilitates assembly and secretion of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and decreases cotranslational degradation of apolipoprotein B in transfected COS-7 cells. J Biol Chem 271:14124–14133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Du EZ, Wang S, Kayden HJ, Sokol R, Curtiss LK, Davis RA 1996 Translocation of apolipoprotein B across the endoplasmic reticulum is blocked in abetalipoproteinemia. J Lipid Res 37:1309–1315[Abstract]
  52. Jamil H, Dickson Jr JK, Chu C, Lago MW, Rinehart JK, Biller SA, Gregg RE, Wetterau JR 1995 Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein. Specificity of lipid binding and transport. J Biol Chem 270:6549–6554[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. E. Telford, B. G. Sutherland, J. Y. Edwards, J. D. Andrews, P. H. R. Barrett, and M. W. Huff
The molecular mechanisms underlying the reduction of LDL apoB-100 by ezetimibe plus simvastatin
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 699 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. N. Ginsberg
REVIEW: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action of Statins in the Treatment of Diabetic Dyslipidemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 383 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. E. Telford, S. M. Lipson, P. H. R. Barrett, B. G. Sutherland, J. Y. Edwards, J. D. Aebi, H. Dehmlow, O. H. Morand, and M. W. Huff
A Novel Inhibitor of Oxidosqualene:Lanosterol Cyclase Inhibits Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB100) Production and Enhances Low-Density Lipoprotein ApoB100 Catabolism Through Marked Reduction in Hepatic Cholesterol Content
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(12): 2608 - 2614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Sahoo, T. C. Trischuk, T. Chan, V. A. B. Drover, S. Ho, G. Chimini, L. B. Agellon, R. Agnihotri, G. A. Francis, and R. Lehner
ABCA1-dependent lipid efflux to apolipoprotein A-I mediates HDL particle formation and decreases VLDL secretion from murine hepatocytes
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1122 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. H. C. M. T. Prinsen, J. A. Romijn, P. H. Bisschop, M. M. J. de Barse, P. H. R. Barrett, M. Ackermans, R. Berger, T. J. Rabelink, and M. G. M. de Sain-van der Velden
Endogenous cholesterol synthesis is associated with VLDL-2 apoB-100 production in healthy humans
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1341 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Ouguerram, T. Magot, Y. Zair, J. S. Marchini, B. Charbonnel, H. Laouenan, and M. Krempf
Effect of Atorvastatin on Apolipoprotein B100 Containing Lipoprotein Metabolism in Type-2 Diabetes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2003; 306(1): 332 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. E. Telford, J. Y. Edwards, S. M. Lipson, B. Sutherland, P. H. R. Barrett, J. R. Burnett, E. S. Krul, B. T. Keller, and M. W. Huff
Inhibition of both the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter and HMG-CoA reductase markedly enhances the clearance of LDL apoB
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 943 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. W. Huff, D. E. Telford, J. Y. Edwards, J. R. Burnett, P. H. R. Barrett, S. R. Rapp, N. Napawan, and B. T. Keller
Inhibition of the Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter Reduces LDL Cholesterol and ApoB by Enhanced Plasma Clearance of LDL ApoB
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2002; 22(11): 1884 - 1891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. L. Dixon, S. Shen, J. P. Vuchetich, E. Wysocka, G. Y. Sun, and M. Sturek
Increased atherosclerosis in diabetic dyslipidemic swine: protection by atorvastatin involves decreased VLDL triglycerides but minimal effects on the lipoprotein profile
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2002; 43(10): 1618 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. Roglans, E. Sanguino, C. Peris, M. Alegret, M. Vazquez, T. Adzet, C. Diaz, G. Hernandez, J. C. Laguna, and R. M. Sanchez
Atorvastatin Treatment Induced Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor alpha Expression and Decreased Plasma Nonesterified Fatty Acids and Liver Triglyceride in Fructose-Fed Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2002; 302(1): 232 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. G. Parhofer, P. H. R. Barrett, and P. Schwandt
Atorvastatin Improves Postprandial Lipoprotein Metabolism in Normolipidemic Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2000; 85(11): 4224 - 4230.
[Abstract] [Full Text]