| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.L.A.), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5 Canada; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (D.K.G.) and Vollum Institute (M.A.K., M.J.L.) Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97210
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Sylvia L. Asa, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5. E-mail: sasa{at}mtsinai.on.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is only limited evidence for a direct role of tuberoinfundibular dopamine acting on D2 receptors in normal adenohypophysial cells other than lactotrophs. Dopamine can directly stimulate GH release from cultured rat primary pituitary cultures, an effect apparently mediated by D1 receptors (6, 7). Human tumor cells derived from GH-producing adenomas often exhibit decreased GH release in response to dopamine; this effect is mimicked by D2R agonists and blocked by D2R antagonists (8). Concomitant elevation of serum PRL in patients with acromegaly and mixed GH- and PRL-producing adenomas predicts a more robust reduction of GH by D2R agonists (9). These findings may be explained by the expression of classical D2R pharmacological responses in mammosomatotrophs but not pure tumoral somatotrophs derived from cultured human adenomas (10). Moreover, the rat mammosomatotroph GH3 cell line can be induced to express D2R binding sites by treatment of the cells with nerve growth factor (11). Together these studies suggest that D2R expression in somatotroph adenomas, in contrast to lactotroph adenomas, is secondary to tumor induction or indicative of the tumor origin from a precursor mammosomatotroph cell.
To better understand the relationship between functionally reduced dopamine inhibition of pituitary function and the development of pituitary tumors, we studied mutant mice with a targeted disruption of the gene encoding the D2R. D2R-deficient mice exhibit hyperprolactinemia due to derepression of the adenohypophysial target cells of dopamine (12). Using this animal model, we studied the effect of primary D2R gene underexpression and the consequent protracted lack of dopamine signaling by the D2R. In a previous study, we suggested that a lack of dopaminergic inhibition resulted in lactotroph hyperplasia in female mice studied at one year of age (12). We now report the consistent development of pituitary adenomas in mice of both sexes at 17 to 20 months of age. These tumors are composed only of lactotrophs with no detectable mammosomatotroph component. These results provide strong evidence that sustained lack of dopamine neurohormonal inhibition promotes the development of neoplasia in the pituitary.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aged mice used for these studies included both F2 hybrid animals on a mixed genetic background (129/Sv, C57BL/6) and N5 incipient congenic animals generated by backcrossing the mutant allele on the C57BL/6J background for five consecutive generations (13). F2 and N5 D2R +/+ siblings from the mutant colonies, wild-type 129/SvEvTac mice (Taconic Farms, Inc. Germantown, NY) and wild-type C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory) served as controls. Mice were separated by sex, housed in groups of 4 to 5 with mixed genotypes, and had ad libitum access to water and standard rodent chow. The experimental protocols were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Morphologic methods
D2R-deficient mice, 12 females and 6 males aged 17 to 20 months
of age, and age- and sex-matched controls were killed by decapitation.
At autopsy, the pituitaries were removed and weighed; the other organs
were carefully inspected.
For light microscopy, portions of each pituitary were fixed in buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin; sections 45 µm thick were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with the Gordon-Sweet silver method to demonstrate the reticulin fiber network.
Immunocytochemical stains to localize adenohypophysial hormones were
performed using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique.
Primary antisera directed against rat pituitary hormones were used at
the specified dilutions with overnight incubations: GH 1:2500, PRL
1:2500, ß-TSH 1:3000, ß-FSH 1:600, ß-LH 1:2500 (National Hormone
and Pituitary Program, Rockville, MD) and ACTH prediluted preparation
further diluted 1:20 (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA). The
reaction products were visualized with the Ultrastreptavidin kit
(Signet Laboratories, Inc., Dedham, MA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine
(DAB). Rabbit polyclonal antisera directed against Pit-1 (Berkeley
Antibody Co., Richmond, CA) and SF-1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY), both diluted 1:400, and a monoclonal
antibody against ER
(clone 6F11, Novocastra, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne,
UK) diluted 1:70 were applied for 60 min after microwave antigen
retrieval and the reaction was detected with the ABC Elite kit
(Vector Laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA) and DAB.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Pathological features of the adenohypophyses were the same in F2 hybrid and N5 congenic D2R-deficient mice so no further distinction is presented here.
Histologic findings
In all 12 D2R-deficient females aged, 17 to 18 months, histologic
examination showed markedly abnormal adenohypophysial morphology with
histologic evidence of pituitary tumors (Fig. 1b
). The posterior lobes
were identified as normal neurohypophyses, and the intact intermediate
lobes were of normal size and architecture. In contrast, the anterior
lobes were grossly enlarged and somewhat nodular with marked peliosis,
characterized by pools of extravasated blood cells that lacked
endothelial lining (Fig. 1c
). At the periphery and between nodules, the
tissue was similar to that seen previously in 9- to 12-month-old mice
as reported elsewhere (12); the acinar structure was slightly enlarged,
and there was less prominent peliosis. The large nodules were lobulated
tumors that had the appearance of multifocal neoplasms. They were
composed of sheets and cords of monomorphous cells with occasional
binucleate cells (Fig. 1d
) and scattered mitotic figures. Some tumors
showed marked nuclear pleomorphism (Fig. 1e
). The tumor cells were
polygonal with chromophobic cytoplasm that sometimes harbored pale
juxtanuclear globular structures. The Gordon-Sweet silver stain
documented the presence of a distorted reticulin network at the
periphery of the adenomas with absence of reticulin fibers within the
tumors (Fig. 1f
). These features fulfilled the criteria for the
diagnosis of adenoma (14).
All six male D2R-deficient mice aged 1720 months had small multifocal
nodules (Fig. 2a
) with breakdown of the
reticulin fiber network (Fig. 2b
), indicating the development of
multiple adenomas.
|
(ER) (Fig. 3c
|
The pituitaries of the six male D2R-deficient mice had microscopic foci
of lactotroph adenomas with juxtanuclear PRL staining (Fig. 2c
) and
nuclear Pit-1 (Fig. 2d
) and ER reactivity (2e). The nodules were
interspersed within otherwise unremarkable adenohypophysis that had the
usual distribution of cells containing GH, ACTH, ß-TSH, ß-FSH, and
ß-LH (not shown).
Control animals
Sibling D2R+/+ mice from the mutant colonies, wild-type
129/SvEvTac mice and C57BL/6J mice served as controls in this study; in
all control mice aged 1718 months, there was no evidence of
adenohypophysial hyperplasia or neoplasia on examination by histology
and immunohistochemistry (not shown). There was no evidence of peliosis
in the pituitaries of these animals.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathogenesis of lactotroph adenomas may involve defective inhibition by hypothalamic dopamine or excessive stimulation by a putative PRL-releasing factor such as TRH, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) (17), or other novel peptides (18, 19). Lactotroph proliferation during pregnancy (3, 20) has been attributed to estrogen which, in rodents, causes pituitary lactotroph hyperplasia and adenoma (21). Recent evidence in galanin knockout mice suggests that lactotroph-derived galanin is necessary for the proliferative response to estrogen (22). Oral contraceptives have been implicated in growth of some lactotroph adenomas (23) and were thought to be responsible for an increase in the incidence of lactotroph adenomas in the late 1970s; however, it is more likely that the increased incidence reflects awareness of the entity due to the discovery of PRL. Although high doses of estrogen undoubtedly stimulate lactotrophs, and a few lactotroph adenomas may grow during pregnancy (24), these tumors are not more numerous or larger during gestation (20) and there is little evidence that low dose oral contraceptives play a significant role in pituitary tumor development.
Because lactotrophs are regulated by tonic dopaminergic inhibition mediated predominantly by the D2R (25, 26), loss or reduction of hypothalamic inhibition is a plausible etiologic factor in the development of lactotroph adenomas. Activation of the D2R results in altered cAMP production, potassium and calcium channel fluxes, phosphatidyl inositol turnover, and intracellular calcium concentrations (27). While most tumors can be functionally suppressed and reduced in size by dopamine (23, 24), the dopaminergic resistance that is found in some of these tumors may implicate absent dopamine receptors or altered receptor-coupled signal transduction as an etiological factor (28, 29). Thus far, however, investigation of the D2R gene has revealed it to be structurally intact in human lactotroph adenomas (30). More detailed characterization of the D2R and associated second messenger pathways in tumors from patients with variable dopamine sensitivity is required to resolve this matter.
A role of dopamine in the proliferation of lactotrophs has previously been investigated pharmacologically using D2R antagonists in the estrogen-sensitive Wistar rat. Acute treatment with either sulpiride or estradiol alone caused small increases in the mitotic index of lactotrophs, whereas the same treatments in combination produced a synergistic effect (31). Sulpirides action on mitotic index was blocked by an antiestrogen, whereas the estrogen effect was blocked with a dopaminergic agonist, suggesting that both an inhibition of D2R function and estrogen actions are important for stimulating lactotroph proliferation. Similar short-term effects have been reported (32) while the combined treatment of rats with a neuroleptic and estrogen for 60 days was similar to estrogen alone (33). These and similar studies have not determined a cellular mechanism to explain the interaction between dopamine and estrogen effects on lactotroph mitogenesis, and to our knowledge, there are no published reports of chronic neuroleptic treatment in rats causing the hyperplasia/neoplasia sequence that we have observed in the D2R-deficient mice.
Dopamine may also be important in the regulation of GH, TSH, and even gonadotropins (25). A proportion of patients with GH-producing adenomas respond to therapy with dopaminergic agonists (34). Thyrotroph adenomas has been shown to have abnormal but highly variable responses to dopamine (35, 36). However, there is no evidence of alterations in the D2R gene in adenomas that secrete GH or TSH (30). Gonadotroph adenomas may also respond to dopaminergic inhibition (37, 38, 39). It appears, however, that dopamine is not critical for the regulation of these adenohypophysial cell types because our animals have no detectable morphologic alterations of somatotrophs, thyrotrophs, or gonadotrophs.
Hormonal stimulation may play a role in the development of several neoplasms (40) including carcinomas of breast, endometrium, and prostate (41, 42, 43). Among endocrine organs, thyroid tumors are thought to be TSH dependent (44), some tumors of adrenal cortex are thought to be dependent on ACTH stimulation (45), and chronic overstimulation has been implicated in the formation and growth of gonadal neoplasms (46, 47). Loss of feedback inhibition may account for the development of parathyroid adenomas in tertiary hyperparathyroidism (48) and of some pituitary adenomas composed of corticotrophs, thyrotrophs, or gonadotrophs (14); the complex regulation of these cells raises the possibility that their proliferation is also modulated by sustained hormonal stimulation.
The present study provides the first evidence that disruption of a single neurohormone receptor gene leads to tumor formation; it is also the first demonstration that loss of hormonal inhibition alone can result in frank tumor formation. It should be stressed, however, that other pathogenetic factors are almost certainly necessary for neoplastic transformation in these animals. According to the multistep theory of carcinogenesis (49), an irreversible initiating event is required to permanently alter the genome of a cell and predispose it to the neoplastic phenotype, whereas promotion, long-term stimulation of cell proliferation, is necessary for an initiated cell to express the transformed phenotype. Lack of the D2R likely encourages or permits the development of tumors by increasing the population of proliferating cells that are susceptible to oncogenic factors or mutation. This proliferation may be mediated by other factors, such as various growth factors that are known to exist in the anterior pituitary (1). This and previous models of hormone- or growth factor-mediated tumorigenesis in the pituitary (15, 16, 50) all have in common the development of multifocal neoplasms in older animals after prolonged hyperplasia. In the human, the situation is probably analogous in that the majority of pituitary adenomas develop from transformed cells that are dependent on hormonal and/or growth factor stimulation for tumor progression (1). The evidence for the tumorigenic potential of hormones and growth factors in humans and in these animal models indicates that they stimulate hyperplasia and, after prolonged exposure, true adenoma development occurs. This is readily interpreted as the result of genetic alteration of cells in a fertile environment; proliferating cells would be at increased risk of genetic alteration during mitosis and manifestation of genetic alterations would be precipitated by the growth stimulus. However, the identity of the gene(s) responsible for transformation remains uncertain (1), and further analyses of these tumors may yield information in this regard.
The absence of associated lactotroph hyperplasia in aged male mice with microscopic adenomas raises the possibility that a different series of cellular and genetic events occur secondary to the loss of D2R signaling in male and female mice, but both pathways eventually result in neoplasia. Alternatively, because the age of onset of histopathologically identified adenomas is similar in males and females, the hyperplastic lesion of lactotrophs present only in females could be due to gender-specific hormonal and growth factor responses that are actually independent of the events causing adenomas. Future studies should also distinguish between these models of pituitary neoplasia in the D2R-deficient mice.
| Note Added in Proof |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 20, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit-secreting pituitary tumor
treated with bromocriptine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 61:580584[Abstract]
-subunit secretion
and messenger ribonucleic acid levels in
-secreting pituitary
tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:96102[Abstract]
expression to
pituitary lactotrophs in transgenic mice results in selective
lactotroph proliferation and adenomas. Endocrinology 136:44794488[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. I. Holt Medical causes and consequences of hyperprolactinaemia. A context for psychiatrists J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2008; 22(2_suppl): 28 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans? Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yin, L. Williams-Simons, A. F. Parlow, S. Asa, and L. S. Kirschner Pituitary-Specific Knockout of the Carney Complex Gene Prkar1a Leads to Pituitary Tumorigenesis Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cristina, G. Diaz-Torga, A. Gongora, M. C. Guida, M. I. Perez-Millan, A. Baldi, and D. Becu-Villalobos Fibroblast growth factor-2 in hyperplastic pituitaries of D2R knockout female mice Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1341 - E1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bontempi, C. Fiorentini, C. Busi, N. Guerra, P. Spano, and C. Missale Identification and Characterization of Two Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Sites in the Regulatory Region of the Dopamine D2 Receptor Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2563 - 2570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Garcia-Tornadu, M. Rubinstein, B. D Gaylinn, D. Hill, E. Arany, M. J Low, G. Diaz-Torga, and D. Becu-Villalobos GH in the dwarf dopaminergic D2 receptor knockout mouse: somatotrope population, GH release, and responsiveness to GH-releasing factors and somatostatin. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 611 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Sarkar, K. Chaturvedi, S. Oomizu, N. I. Boyadjieva, and C. P. Chen Dopamine, Dopamine D2 Receptor Short Isoform, Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-{beta}1, and TGF-{beta} Type II Receptor Interact to Inhibit the Growth of Pituitary Lactotropes Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4179 - 4188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cristina, G. Diaz-Torga, A. Baldi, A. Gongora, M. Rubinstein, M. J. Low, and D. Becu-Villalobos Increased Pituitary Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A in Dopaminergic D2 Receptor Knockout Female Mice Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 2952 - 2962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Kippin, S. Kapur, and D. van der Kooy Dopamine Specifically Inhibits Forebrain Neural Stem Cell Proliferation, Suggesting a Novel Effect of Antipsychotic Drugs J. Neurosci., June 15, 2005; 25(24): 5815 - 5823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Mohammad, D. D. Seachrist, C. C. Quirk, and J. H. Nilson Reexpression of p8 Contributes to Tumorigenic Properties of Pituitary Cells and Appears in a Subset of Prolactinomas in Transgenic Mice that Hypersecrete Luteinizing Hormone Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2583 - 2593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Simpson, A. M. McNicol, D. C. Murray, A. Bahar, H. E. Turner, J. A. H. Wass, M. M. Esiri, R. N. Clayton, and W. E. Farrell Molecular Pathology Shows p16 Methylation in Nonadenomatous Pituitaries from Patients with Cushing's Disease Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1780 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lania, G. Mantovani, and A. Spada Genetics of Pituitary Tumors: Focus on G-Protein Mutations Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2003; 228(9): 1004 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Mohammad, R. A. Abbud, A. F. Parlow, J. S. Lewin, and J. H. Nilson Targeted Overexpression of Luteinizing Hormone Causes Ovary-Dependent Functional Adenomas Restricted to Cells of the Pit-1 Lineage Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4626 - 4636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paez-Pereda, D. Giacomini, D. Refojo, A. C. Nagashima, U. Hopfner, Y. Grubler, A. Chervin, V. Goldberg, R. Goya, S. T. Hentges, et al. Involvement of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in pituitary prolactinoma pathogenesis through a Smad/estrogen receptor crosstalk PNAS, February 4, 2003; 100(3): 1034 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Hentges and M. J. Low Ovarian Dependence for Pituitary Tumorigenesis in D2 Dopamine Receptor-Deficient Mice Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4536 - 4543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Iaccarino, T. A. Samad, C. Mathis, H. Kercret, R. Picetti, and E. Borrelli Control of lactotrop proliferation by dopamine: Essential role of signaling through D2 receptors and ERKs PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14530 - 14535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Rulli, A. Kuorelahti, O. Karaer, L. J. Pelliniemi, M. Poutanen, and I. Huhtaniemi Reproductive Disturbances, Pituitary Lactotrope Adenomas, and Mammary Gland Tumors in Transgenic Female Mice Producing High Levels of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 4084 - 4095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Banihashemi and P. R. Albert Dopamine-D2S Receptor Inhibition of Calcium Influx, Adenylyl Cyclase, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Pituitary Cells: Distinct G{alpha} and G{beta}{gamma} Requirements Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2002; 16(10): 2393 - 2404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Liu, R. E. Baker, C. Sun, V. C. Sundmark, and H. P. Elsholtz Activation of Go-coupled Dopamine D2 Receptors Inhibits ERK1/ERK2 in Pituitary Cells. A KEY STEP IN THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL SUPPRESSION OF THE PROLACTIN GENE J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 35819 - 35825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ozawa, M. Yamada, T. Satoh, T. Monden, K. Hashimoto, H. Kohga, Y. Hashiba, T. Sasaki, and M. Mori Transcriptional Regulation of the Human PRL-Releasing Peptide (PrRP) Receptor Gene by a Dopamine 2 Receptor Agonist: Cloning and Characterization of the Human PrRP Receptor Gene and Its Promoter Region Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2002; 16(4): 785 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Diaz-Torga, C. Feierstein, C. Libertun, D. Gelman, M. A. Kelly, M. J. Low, M. Rubinstein, and D. Becu-Villalobos Disruption of the D2 Dopamine Receptor Alters GH and IGF-I Secretion and Causes Dwarfism in Male Mice Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1270 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Albert Editorial: Dopamine-D2-Mediated Inhibition of TRH-Induced PLC Activation in Pituitary Cells--Direct or Indirect? Endocrinology, March 1,&nbs |