help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. S.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 11 5382-5390
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Morphological Evidence for Direct Interaction between Arcuate Nucleus Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Neurons and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons and the Possible Involvement of NPY Y1 Receptors1

Chien Li, Peilin Chen and M. Susan Smith

Division of Neuroscience, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Beaverton, Oregon 97006

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. M. Susan Smith, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, Oregon 97006. E-mail: smithsu{at}ohsu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH) have been shown to play an important role in modulating LH secretion. One mechanism by which the ARH NPY system may regulate LH secretion is by modulating GnRH neuronal function. Thus, the present study examined whether the ARH NPY system provided direct input to GnRH cell bodies in the preoptic area (POA), as well as to their nerve terminals in the median eminence (ME). The possible involvement of the NPY Y1 receptor subtype in mediating the effects of NPY was also investigated. Lactating rats were used in these studies because they have increased hypothalamic NPY content, especially in the ARH/ME areas, making it easier to detect NPY fibers and terminals. The anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L), was iontophoresed into the ARH of lactating rats; and triple-label immunofluorescence was performed, with the aid of confocal microscopy, to visualize NPY, PHA-L, and GnRH. GnRH cell bodies were found scattered throughout the organum vasculosum laminae terminalis (OVLT)/POA region, and NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers were found in very close proximity to numerous GnRH perikarya. In the ME, double-labeled NPY/PHA-L fibers were found in the inner and external zones, and they were found in close proximity to GnRH neuronal fibers. Using a NPY Y1 specific antibody, double-label immunofluorescence was performed to examine whether the Y1 receptor subtype was expressed in GnRH neurons. No convincing Y1-positive staining was found in GnRH cell bodies in the OVLT/POA region. However, abundant Y1-positive fiber and cell staining were observed throughout the region, and Y1-positive fibers were found in close apposition to GnRH cell bodies. In contrast, numerous GnRH nerve fibers and terminals in both the OVLT and ME were colocalized with Y1-positive staining. The results of this study suggest that ARH NPY neurons come in close contact with GnRH neurons and may provide direct input to both GnRH cell bodies in the POA region and to their nerve terminals in the ME. The Y1 receptor subtype may be directly involved in NPY modulation of GnRH secretion from its nerve terminals.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NEUROPEPTIDE Y (NPY) neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH) have been shown to play an important role in modulating female reproductive function by acting on several different levels of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis (1, 2). One possible mechanism by which the ARH NPY system may regulate LH secretion, and subsequently reproductive function, is to directly modulate GnRH neuronal activity in the preoptic area (POA). Anatomically, NPY terminals have been shown to make synaptic contacts with GnRH neurons in POA (3, 4, 5), although the specific origin of NPY inputs is unknown. NPY neuronal projections to the POA have been demonstrated from the ARH and brain stem (6, 7, 8). In addition, NPY can modulate GnRH secretion from the median eminence (ME) under both in vitro and in vivo conditions (9, 10, 11), suggesting that NPY reaches the ME to modulate GnRH secretion from its nerve terminals. The origin of the NPY fibers in the ME has not been examined in detail.

Another important unanswered question regarding the possible effects of NPY on GnRH neurons is the receptor subtypes that may be important in mediating the potential effects of NPY. Pharmacological studies have suggested that NPY Y1 receptors are involved in the central effect of NPY in mediating LH secretion (12, 13). In addition, Y1 receptor is expressed in the GnRH-like tumor cell line, GT1–1 cells (14). Thus, these results suggest that Y1 receptors may be expressed in endogenous GnRH neurons to mediate the effects of NPY.

To provide an anatomical basis for the potential direct effect of ARH NPY on GnRH neurons, morphological studies were conducted in lactating rats. This animal model was chosen because several studies have shown that the activity of the ARH NPY neurons is significantly elevated during lactation (15, 16, 17), resulting in a significant increase in NPY content, thus making it easier to detect NPY fibers and nerve terminals. In addition, a reduced GnRH neuronal activity and/or secretion has been postulated to account, in part, for the suppression of LH secretion that is characteristic of lactation (18, 19, 20). One possible candidate that may be involved in the suppression of LH secretion is NPY. Furthermore, during lactation, NPY immunostaining in ME is greatly enhanced, compared with the nonlactating rat (21, 22), implying that during lactation, NPY input in the ME may have greater impact on GnRH secretion from its terminals. Thus, the possible direct interaction between the ARH NPY system and GnRH neurons has relevance to an understanding of the regulation of cyclic reproductive function during lactation.

The present studies first used the anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin, PHA-L (23), combined with multiple immunofluorescent staining, to examine whether, in lactating rats, NPY neuronal fibers from the ARH make close appositions to GnRH perikarya, as well as to its nerve terminals. In the second experiment, the presence of NPY Y1 receptor expression on GnRH neurons was examined by double-label immunostaining.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Day 18–19 pregnant Sprague Dawley rats (B & K Universal Inc., Kent, WA) were housed individually and were maintained under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle (lights on at 0700 h) and constant temperature (23 ± 2 C). Food and water were provided ad libitum. The pregnant rats were checked for the birth of the pups every morning; the day of delivery was considered as day 0 postpartum. Lactating rats were used in these studies because of the increase in NPY content in the ARH/ME areas, making it easier to detect NPY fibers and terminals (15, 17). All the animal procedures were approved by the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Anterograde tracer injection
Lactating animals suckling eight pups received the tracer injection on day 1 postpartum. Animals were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (20 mg/100 g BW) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. A glass micropipette with tip diameter of 10–20 µm was filled with the anterograde tracer, PHA-L (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame , CA; 2.5% wt/vol, in filtered phosphate buffer), and inserted into the region of the ARH. Injection coordinates were 3.0–3.3 mm caudal, 0.2 mm lateral to the bregma, and 9.35 mm below the dura for the caudal portion of the ARH, according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (24). The caudal portion of the ARH was chosen because increased NPY activity is restricted to this area during lactation 15, 17). PHA-L was injected by iontophoresis with 5 µA current, pulsed at 7-sec intervals for 20 min. The glass pipette was left in situ for an additional 5 min before retrieving. After the injection, the animals were returned to their pups.

Perfusion and tissue sectioning
Ten to 12 days post injection, lactating animals were anesthetized with an overdose of pentobarbital (125 mg/kg BW, ip) and perfused transcardially with 150 ml of 2% sodium nitrite in saline, followed by 350 ml 3.8% of borax in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 9.5). The brain was removed and immersed in 25% sucrose at 4 C for 6 h. Coronal sections for the whole brain (25 µm) were cut on a sliding microtome and collected in a one-in-four series. The tissue sections were stored at -20 C in multiwell tissue culture plates containing cryoprotectant until use.

Immunocytochemistry procedures
Verification of injection site. Tissue sections containing the ARH were rinsed in 0.05 M potassium PBS (KPBS) several times and incubated in rabbit anti-PHA-L antibody (1:500; DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) in KPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 1 h. After the incubation, the tissue was rinsed with KPBS and incubated in fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) for 1 h. After incubation, the sections were rinsed, mounted on glass slides, air dried, and coverslipped with buffered glycerol. The staining was examined under an epifluorescent microscope. Five animals with injection sites centered in the ARH were used in the following studies.

Multiple label immunofluorescence. For GnRH, NPY, and PHA-L triple labeling, the tissue sections were incubated in a mixture of rabbit anti-PHA-L antibody (1:1000), goat anti-NPY antiserum (1:4000, provided by Dr. Philip J. Larsen at Novo Nordisk A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), and the mouse anti-GnRH antibody (1:600, provided by Dr. Henryk Urbanski at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center) in KPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 5% nonfat milk at room temperature for 1 h, followed by 4 C for 48 h. After several washes with KPBS, the sections were incubated in a mixture of affinity purified secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.): donkey antirabbit IgG conjugated with biotin (1:600), donkey antigoat IgG conjugated with tetramethyl rhodamine (1:300), and donkey antimouse IgG conjugated with indodicarbocyanine (Cy5, 1:300) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation in avidin-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:1000) for 1 h. After the incubation, the sections were rinsed, mounted with buffered glycerol, and coverslipped.

For GnRH and NPY Y1 receptor double labeling, tissue sections were incubated in the antibody mixture containing rabbit anti-Y1 receptor antiserum (1:7000, provided by the CURE/Gastroenteric Biology Center, Antibody/RIA Core, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA) and mouse anti-GnRH antibody (1:1000). The specificity of the anti-Y1 receptor antiserum has been evaluated in earlier studies (25, 26). In the present studies, the specificity was further confirmed by preabsorbing the antibody with the Y1 receptor fragment used to generate the antibody. The secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) used were donkey antirabbit IgG conjugated with biotin (1:600) and donkey antimouse IgG conjugated with cy5 (1:400). Y1-immunoreactive signal was further amplified with tyramide signal amplification-indirect technology using a commercial kit (tyramide signal amplification-indirect kit; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) and was visualized with Cy2-conjugated streptavidin (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.).

Image analysis
The triple-labeling results were analyzed with the aid of confocal laser scanning microscopy. The Leica Corp. (Germany) TSC NT confocal system consisted of a Leica Corp. RBE inverted microscope equipped with a Ar laser producing light at 467 nm and 488 nm, a Kr laser for 568 nm, and a HeNe laser for 647 nm light. Various objectives (25x/NA 0.75, 40x/NA 1.25, and 100x/NA 1.4) were used to scan the images. A series of continuous optical sections, at 0.78-µm intervals along the z-axis of a tissue section, were scanned for all 3 fluorescent signals. The signals obtained for each fluorophore on one series of optical sections were stored separately as a series of 512 x 512 pixel images. The images were then processed with the MetaMorph Imaging System (Universal Imaging Corporation, West Chester, PA). The confocal images are presented as projections (a maximum value projection is a series of 32 individual optical planes covering 25 µm, or as single optical planes. PHA-L and NPY single-labeled images were first combined together to obtain the NPY fibers that also stained positively for PHA-L. The NPY/PHA-L double-labeled images were then combined with GnRH-stained images to analyze for the presence of close appositions between the NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers and GnRH-positive neurons in POA and GnRH terminals in ME. Similar procedures were used for analyzing the GnRH/Y1 double- labeling results.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Validation of PHA-L injection site in the ARH
The injection site for each animal was verified by the quick-staining process. Only animals (n = 5) with injection sites centered around the ARH (Fig. 1Go) were used for the multiple-labeling studies. When PHA-L fibers were examined under dark field, dense tracer-labeled fibers were found mainly in the hypothalamus, including the medial POA (mPOA), periventricular POA, the parvocellular portion of the paraventricular nucleus, dorsomedial nucleus, the ARH, and the ME (data not shown). Outside the hypothalamus, PHA-L fibers were found mainly in the ventral part of the lateral septum and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. It should be pointed out that one PHA-L injection labels only a small number of neurons surrounding the injection site (23). Thus, the PHA-L/NPY double-labeled fibers observed in the present study represent only a small percentage of NPY fibers from the ARH. Because only a small portion of ARH NPY neurons are labeled after one PHA-L injection, it is not possible to quantify the portion of NPY input to GnRH neurons that is derived from the ARH.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative fluorescent photomicrograph showing the PHA-L injection site (arrow) in the ARH. Dotted lines outline the boundary of the third ventricle and the base of the hypothalamus. 3V, Third ventricle; scale bar, 20 µm.

 
Triple-labeling for GnRH, NPY, and PHA-L in the organum vasculosum laminae terminalus (OVLT) and rostral POA
Using multiple immunostaining, with the aid of confocal microscopy, GnRH neurons and NPY fibers from ARH NPY neurons in the POA and ME were examined for possible close appositions. As shown in Fig. 2Go, a–c, NPY and PHA-L single-labeled images were combined to identify NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers. GnRH-positive neurons (Fig. 2dGo, green) were found scattered in the OVLT and the rostral end of the POA. NPY single-labeled fibers (white), as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange), which represent the NPY fibers from the ARH NPY neurons, were also found (Fig. 2Go). When multiple staining signals were examined at higher magnification, NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers made close appositions on GnRH-positive neurons in the OVLT area (Fig. 3Go). An examination of 0.78-µm single optical sections through each GnRH neuron demonstrated that the double-labeled fibers did make contact with the cell bodies. Although these results did not permit an assessment of the portion of NPY input to GnRH neurons that was derived from the ARH, some quantitative evaluation could be made. In general, each 25-µm tissue section of the OVLT/POA contained, on average, approximately 20 GnRH cell bodies, and almost all cell bodies were surrounded by NPY fibers. Nearly 50% of the GnRH cell bodies showed close appositions with NPY neurons, and about one-fifth of those close appositions represented NPY neurons from the ARH.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pseudocolor confocal image projection showing the immunofluorescent labeling of NPY (a, white color), PHA-L (b, blue color), and NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (c, orange color) in the OVLT area. Examples of double- labeled fibers are indicated by empty arrowheads. d, Pseudocolor confocal image projection showing the presence of NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange) in the vicinity of GnRH neurons (green) in the OVLT area. One double-labeled fiber (arrowheads) was found to be very close (indicated by yellow) to the GnRH cell body. NPY single-labeled fibers (white) were also found in this area. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Four examples of higher magnification confocal image projections showing the relationship between NPY single-labeled (white), as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange fibers) and GnRH-positive neurons (green) in the OVLT area. The close appositions of NPY single-labeled fibers (white color, arrows), as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (yellow, empty arrowheads) on GnRH neurons were observed in this area. The close appositions were confirmed after examining the individual images in a series of 0.78-µm optical sections. Scale bar, 10 µm.

 
In the mPOA region, GnRH neurons were found mostly in the ventrolateral part of the mPOA, whereas the majority of ARH-NPY fibers were observed in the medial part of the mPOA, as well as in the periventricular POA. Thus, no close appositions were found between ARH-NPY fibers and GnRH cell bodies in the mPOA region (data not shown).

Triple labeling for GnRH, NPY, and PHA-L in the ME
In the ME, procedures similar to those described above were used to identify NPY and PHA-L single-labeled fibers, as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers. The GnRH-positive fibers and nerve terminals in the ME were concentrated in the external layers, whereas NPY-positive fibers were found mainly in the internal layers (Fig. 4Go). Nonetheless, many NPY-positive, as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers, were observed in the external layers, which were in the vicinity of the GnRH fibers and nerve terminals. About 30% of the NPY fibers were double labeled with PHA-L. At higher magnification (Fig. 5Go), numerous double-labeled fibers could be seen making very close appositions (within 0.78 µm) on GnRH terminals.



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative confocal image projection showing the immunofluorescent labeling of NPY (white), NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange), and GnRH nerve terminals (green) in the ME. The image shows the presence of NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange) in the vicinity of GnRH nerve terminals (green) in the caudal ME. The majority of the GnRH staining was localized in the external zone of the ME. In the external zone, NPY single- labeled (white, arrows), as well as the double-labeled fibers (yellow, arrowheads) were observed in the proximity of the GnRH terminals. Scale bar, 25 µm.

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. a, Higher magnification pseudo- color confocal image projection showing the relationship between NPY single-labeled (white), as well as NPY/PHA-L double-labeled fibers (orange) and GnRH-positive fibers (green) in the ME area. Close appositions (yellow) between the double-labeled and GnRH nerve fibers were observed throughout the area. b–d, Four single optical sections (0.78 µm in thickness) to illustrate the close apposition (yellow, arrowheads) between the double-labeled fibers and the GnRH fibers in the boxed areas 1–4 in a. Scale bar, 10 µm.

 
Double labeling for GnRH and NPY Y1 receptors
To validate the specificity of the Y1 receptor antibody, some brain sections were incubated with Y1 receptor antibody that had been preabsorbed for 3 h with the peptide fragment used to generate the antibody. As shown in Fig. 6Go, control peptide preabsorption completely eliminated Y1 staining from the brain sections. The Y1 immunostaining pattern obtained was identical to previously reported studies (25, 26) and included labeling of both cell bodies and nerve fibers (data not shown). The GnRH and Y1 double-label staining was examined with confocal microscopy. In the OVLT/POA area, where the GnRH cell bodies are located, intensive Y1 receptor staining was observed (Fig. 7Go). Most of the Y1 staining resembled neuronal fibers, but occasional cell body staining was also found. When GnRH and Y1 staining were visualized simultaneously, most GnRH cell bodies were found surrounded by Y1-positive fiber staining, but no convincing colocalization between GnRH-positive and Y1-positive cells could be found (Fig. 7Go). Some Y1-positive fibers were found in close apposition to the GnRH cell bodies (Fig. 7).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Fluorescent photomicrographs showing Y1 receptor immunostaining in the ARH area with (a) or without (b) the preabsorption of control peptide. The white lines in panel a outline the boundary of the third ventricle and the base of the brain. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. a, Pseudocolor confocal image projection showing the fluorescent staining of Y1 receptor (green) and GnRH neurons (red) in the OVLT area; b, higher magnification of the boxed area in panel a. When the Y1 receptor (c, green) and GnRH (d, red) staining in b were viewed separately, no GnRH neurons were found to be Y1-receptor positive. Only a GnRH fiber (empty arrowheads, b–d) was stained positively for Y1 receptor. However, several Y1-positive fibers were found to make close appositions on the GnRH cell bodies (solid arrowheads, b–d). Scale bar, 50 µm in a and 10 µm in d.

 
In the OVLT (Fig. 8Go) and ME (Fig. 9Go), where intensive GnRH neuronal fibers and nerve terminals are located, strong Y1-positive fibers were also observed. In addition, Y1 immunostaining was found in the vasculature outside the brain (Figs. 8Go and 9Go). When GnRH and Y1 staining in the ME were viewed simultaneously under higher magnification, many Y1-positive fibers were also GnRH-positive (Fig. 9Go, b–d). In addition, some close appositions between GnRH and Y1-positive fibers were found in the same area (Fig. 9Go, b–d).



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Confocal image projection showing the immunofluorescent staining of Y1 receptor (green) and GnRH fibers and nerve terminals (red) in the OVLT. Many GnRH fibers and nerve terminals were found to colocalize Y1 receptor (yellow, representative examples are indicated by arrowheads). Positive Y1 vasculature staining was also noticed (arrows). Scale bar, 25 µm.

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. a, Confocal image projection showing the immunofluorescent staining of Y1 receptor (green) and GnRH fibers (red) in the ARH and ME. Many Y1 receptor-positive neurons were observed in the ARH (empty arrowheads). In the ME, intensive GnRH fiber staining was found in the lateral part of the ME, where many GnRH fibers were colocalized with Y1 receptor (yellow). Positive Y1 vasculature staining was also noticed (arrow). b, Higher magnification (100x) of boxed area from a. The colocalization or close apposition between Y1 (green) and GnRH (red) neural fibers are shown as yellow (examples of colocalization are indicated by the arrowheads; examples of close apposition are indicated by the empty arrows). c and d, Y1 receptor (c, green) and GnRH (d, red) images in b viewed separately. The positions of arrowheads and empty arrows in c and d correspond to the positions shown in b. Scale bars, 50 µm in a and 10 µm in b.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been postulated that ARH NPY neurons may affect female reproductive function by directly modulating the GnRH system in the hypothalamus (1, 2, 15). To provide an anatomical framework for the proposed hypothesis, PHA-L anterograde tracing, combined with multiple immunofluorescent staining, was used in the lactating rat. The increased NPY content in the hypothalamus of lactating animals made it possible to easily detect NPY fibers and terminals in the POA and ME. The present study demonstrates that ARH NPY neurons make close contact with GnRH neurons in the POA and may provide direct input. Because only a small number of ARH NPY neurons are labeled with a single injection of PHA-L, it is not possible to quantify ARH NPY contacts on GnRH cell bodies. However, based on the frequency of ARH NPY close contacts on GnRH cell bodies that was observed in this study, it is reasonable to speculate that ARH NPY direct input to GnRH cell bodies may be quite abundant. Other sources of direct NPY input to GnRH cell bodies have not been identified, although brain stem NPY neurons have also been shown to project to areas containing GnRH cell bodies and, therefore, are candidates for direct input (8).

In addition, the present study also showed that ARH NPY fibers are present in the ME and make close appositions on GnRH fibers. This result suggests that ARH NPY input may modulate GnRH secretion from its nerve terminals in the ME. It has been shown that NPY suppresses LH secretion when the steroid hormone levels are low, such as during lactation (12), whereas under conditions when steroid hormone levels are elevated, such as during proestrus of the estrous cycle, NPY can stimulate GnRH secretion from the ME (12). Thus, it is reasonable to speculate, based on the morphological data provided by these studies, that the ARH NPY input to GnRH terminals in the ME may play a role in the regulation of GnRH secretion during different reproductive states when steroid hormone secretion is altered. However, more studies are needed to further elucidate this issue. In addition, it has been well established that NPY is released into the hypophysial portal vasculature (27, 28). The presence of ARH NPY in the ME, particular the external layer, suggests that the ARH is a source of NPY in the portal system. Thus, ARH NPY may also be having direct effects at the pituitary level, because NPY has been shown to modulate the secretion of several hormones from the anterior pituitary (12, 29, 30, 31, 32).

To begin to assess the receptor subtypes expressed on GnRH neurons that may mediate the effects of ARH NPY input, the present study demonstrated the expression of Y1 receptor on GnRH neurons, using an antibody specific to the Y1 receptor. The specificity of the antibody has been evaluated in several earlier studies (26, 27). In addition, the amino acid sequence to which the antibody was raised is specific to the Y1 receptor. Furthermore, in the present study, the complete absence of staining after the antibody was preabsorbed with the Y1 receptor fragment used to generate the antibody further confirmed that the antibody was specific to the Y1 receptor peptide. The present study showed that Y1 staining in GnRH neurons was predominantly in axons, rarely was it found in cell bodies. The lack of Y1 staining in GnRH cell bodies could not be attributed to the inability of the antibody to stain cell bodies, because numerous Y1-positive cell bodies were observed throughout the hypothalamus, including the POA. However, the demonstration of possible direct ARH NPY input to the GnRH neurons in the POA implies that there may be additional NPY receptors, other than Y1, expressed on the perikarya to mediate the effect of ARH NPY input.

Although no convincing Y1 staining was found in GnRH cell bodies, Y1-positive fibers made close appositions on GnRH cell bodies in the OVLT and rostral end of the POA. This observation suggests that in these areas, NPY may be able to indirectly modulate GnRH neuronal activity by synapsing on the Y1-positive fibers to modulate the secretion of neurotransmitters or modulators from the nerve terminals of the Y1-positive fibers. The released substrates would then regulate GnRH neuronal activity. This notion is supported by a recent study in which NPY was shown to modulate CRF neuronal activity in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus by a presynaptic mechanism to modulate GABA release from the presynaptic terminals (Roger D. Cone, personal communication).

The demonstration of Y1 receptor on GnRH axons suggests that Y1 receptor may function as a presynaptic receptor to mediate the possible effect of NPY on GnRH secretion from its nerve terminals. Several studies have demonstrated that the Y1 receptor in several brain areas (such as the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the nucleus accumbens, and the ARH) is expressed presynaptically (33, 34, 35), even though the Y1 receptor has been considered, in general, as a postsynaptic receptor (34, 36). Functionally, the activation of presynaptic Y1 receptors has been shown to be associated with the suppression of transmitter release primarily through inhibition of Ca2+ channels (37, 38, 39, 40). Thus, it is possible that during lactation, increased amounts of NPY in the ME may bind to presynaptic Y1 receptors to suppress GnRH secretion from its nerve terminals.

On the other hand, it has been shown that NPY can also stimulate GnRH release from ME fragments obtained from proestrus rats (41), and a study by Leupen et al. (13) suggested that the stimulatory effect of NPY may be mediated by the Y1 receptor. Thus, more studies are needed to further elucidate the function of Y1 receptors on GnRH nerve terminals under conditions when it is exposed to different patterns and levels of NPY in the ME. The present study does not rule out the involvement of other receptor subtypes in mediating the effect of NPY in the ME. In fact, a pharmacological study by Barker-Gibb et al. (42) suggested that Y2 receptor may also be involved in the presynaptic action of NPY on GnRH nerve terminals in the ewe.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that ARH NPY neurons come in close contact with GnRH neurons in the POA and with their nerve terminals in the ME. Therefore, ARH NPY neurons may directly regulate GnRH neuronal function. GnRH and NPY Y1 receptor double-label studies demonstrated that the Y1 receptor is expressed on GnRH fibers and nerve terminals but is rarely found in GnRH cell bodies. These results raise the possibility that Y1 receptor in the ME may mediate the effects of NPY to modulate GnRH secretion from nerve terminals.


    Acknowledgments
 
We wish to thank Drs. Anda Cornea, Kevin Grove, and Richard Simerly for their comments about the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Philip J. Larsen at Novo Nordisk A/S, Glostrup, Denmark, and to Dr. Henryk Urbanski at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center for supplying us with antisera to NPY and GnRH.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grants HD-14643 and HD-18185 and the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center Grant RR-00163. Antibody NPY1R, raised against rabbits, was provided by CURE/Gastroenteric Biology Center, Antibody/RIA Core, NIH Grant DK-41301. Back

Received April 7, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kalra SP, Crowley WR 1992 Neuropeptide Y: a novel neuroendocrine peptide in the control of pituitary hormone secretion, and its relation to luteinizing hormone. Front Neuroendocrinol 13:1–46[Medline]
  2. Kalra SP, Kalra PS 1996 Nutritional infertility: the role of the interconnected hypothalamic neuropeptide Y-galanin-opioid network. Front Neuroendocrinol 17:371–401[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Norgren Jr RB, Lehman MN 1989 A double-label pre-embedding immunoperoxidase technique for electron microscopy using diaminobenzidine and tetramethylbenzidine as markers. J Histochem Cytochem 37:1283–1289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tillet Y, Caldani M, Batailler M 1989 Anatomical relationships of monoaminergic and neuropeptide Y-containing fibers with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone systems in the preoptic area of the sheep brain: immunohistochemical studies. J Chem Neuroanat 2:319–326[Medline]
  5. Tsuruo Y, Kawano H, Kagotani Y, Hisano S, Daikoku S, Chihara K, Zhang T, Yanaihara N 1990 Morphological evidence for neuronal regulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-containing neurons by neuropeptide Y in the rat septo-preoptic area. Neurosci Lett 110:261–266[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Sahu A, Kalra PS, Crowley WR, Kalra SP 1988 Functional heterogeneity in neuropeptide-Y-producing cells in the rat brain as revealed by testosterone action. Endocrinology 127:2307–2312[Abstract]
  7. De Quidt ME, Kiyama H, Emson PC 1990 Pancreatic polypeptide, neuropeptide Y and peptide YY in central neurons. In: Bjorklund A, Hokfelt T, Kuhar MJ (eds) Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Neuropeptides in the CNS, part II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol 9:287–358
  8. Sawchenko PE, Swanson LW, Grzanna R, Howe PRC, Bloom SR, Polak JM 1985 Colocalization of neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity in brainstem catecholaminergic neurons that project to the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 241:138–153[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. McDonald JK 1990 Role of neuropeptide Y in reproductive function. Ann NY Acad Sci 611:258–272[Abstract]
  10. Woller MJ, Terasawa E 1991 Infusion of neuropeptide Y into the stalk-median eminence stimulates in vivo release of luteinizing hormone-release hormone in gonadectomized rhesus monkeys. Endocrinology 128:1144–1150[Abstract]
  11. Contijoch AM, Malamed S, McDonald JK, Advis JP 1993 Neuropeptide Y regulation of LHRH release in the median eminence: immunocytochemical and physiological evidence in hens. Neuroendocrinology 57:135–145[Medline]
  12. Kalra SP, Fuentes M, Fournier A, Parker SL, Crowley WR 1992 Involvement of the Y-1 receptor subtype in the regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion by neuropeptide Y in rats. Endocrinology 130:3323–3330[Abstract]
  13. Leupen SM, Besecke LM, Levine JE 1997 Neuropeptide Y Y1-receptor stimulation is required for physiological amplification of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges. Endocrinology 138:2735–2739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Besecke LM, Wolfe AM, Pierce ME, Takahashi JS, Levine JE 1994 Neuropeptide Y stimulates luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release from superfused hypothalamic GT1–7 cells. Endocrinology 135:1621–1627[Abstract]
  15. Smith MS 1993 Lactation alters neuropeptide-Y and proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the rat. Endocrinology 133:1258–1265[Abstract]
  16. Pape J-R, Tramu G 1996 Suckling-induced changes in neuropeptide Y and proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the rat: evaluation of a putative intervention of prolactin. Neuroendocrinology 63:540–549[Medline]
  17. Li C, Chen P, Smith MS 1998 The acute suckling stimulus induces expression of Neuropeptide Y (NPY) in cells in the dorsomedial hypothalamus and Increase NPY expression in the arcuate nucleus. Endocrinology. 139:1645–1652
  18. McNeilly AS 1994 Suckling and the control of gonadotropin secretion. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, vol 2:1179–1212
  19. Fox SR, Smith MS 1984 The suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion during lactation in the rat. Endocrinology 115:2045–2051[Abstract]
  20. Lee LR, Paul SJ, Smith MS 1989 Dose response effects of pulsatile GnRH administration on restoration of pituitary GnRH receptors and pulsatile LH secretion during lactation. Neuroendocrinology 49:664–668[Medline]
  21. Ciofi P, Fallon JH, Croix D, Polak JM, Tramu G 1991 Expression of neuropeptide Y precursor-immunoreactivity in the hypothalamic dopaminergic tubero-infundibular system during lactation in rodents. Endocrinology 128:823–834[Abstract]
  22. Ciofi P, Crowley WR, Pillez A, Schmued LL, Tramus G, Mazzuca M 1993 Plasticity in expression of immunoreactivity for neuropeptide Y, enkephalins and neurotensin in the hypothalamic tubero-infundibular dopaminergic system during lactation in mice. J Neuroendocrinol 5:599–602[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Gerfen CR, Sawchenko PE 1984 AN anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: immunohistochemical localization of an axonally transported plant lectin, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Brain Res 290:219–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Paxinos G, Waston C 1986 The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, ed 4. Academic Press, New York
  25. Broberger C, Landry M, Wong H, Walsh JN, Hokfelt T 1997 Subtypes Y1 and Y2 of the neuropeptide Y receptor are respectively expressed in pro-opiomelanocortin- and neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons of the rat hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. Neuroendocrinology 66:393–408[Medline]
  26. Caberlotto L, Tinner B, Bunnemann B, Agnati L, Fuxe K 1998 On the relationship of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-immunoreactive neuronal structures to the neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive nerve terminal networks. A double immunolabelling analysis in the rat brain. Neuroscience 86:827–845[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. McDonald JK, Koenig JI, Gibbs DM, Collins P, Noe BD 1987 High concentrations of neuropeptide Y in pituitary portal blood of rats. Neuroendocrinology 46:538–541[Medline]
  28. Sahu A, Phelps CP, White JD, Crowley WR, Kalra SP, Kalra PS 1992 Steroidal regulation of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y release and gene expression. Endocrinology 130:3331–3336[Abstract]
  29. McDonald JK, Lumpkin MD, Samson WK, McCann SM 1985 Neuropeptide Y affects secretion of luteinizing hormone and growth hormone in ovariectomized rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:561–564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Koenig JI 1990 Regulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis by neuropeptide Y. Ann NY Acad Sci 611:317–328[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Catzeflis C, Pierroz DD, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Rivier JE, Sizonenko PC, Aubert ML 1993 Neuropeptide Y administered chronically into the lateral ventricle profoundly inhibits both the gonadotropic and the somatotropic axis in intact adult female rats. Endocrinology 132:224–234[Abstract]
  32. Pierroz DD, Catzeflis C, Aebi AC, Rivier JE, Aubert ML 1996 Chronic administration of neuropeptide Y into the lateral ventricle inhibits both the pituitary-testicular axis and growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion in intact adult male rats. Endocrinology 137:3–12[Abstract]
  33. Pickel VM, Beck-Sickinger AG, Chan J, Weiland HA 1998 Y1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens: ultrastructural localization and association with neuropeptide Y. J Neurosci Res 52:54–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Rhim H, Kinney GA, Emmerson PJ, Miller RJ 1997 Regulation of neurotransmission in the arcuate nucleus of the rat by different neuropeptide Y receptors. J Neurosci 17:2980–2989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. van den Pol AN, Obrietan K, Chen G, Belousov AB 1996 Neuropeptide Y-mediated long-term depression of excitatory activity in suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. J Neurosci 16:5883–5895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wahlestedt C, Yanaihara N, H{alpha}kanson R 1986 Evidence for different pre and post junctional receptors for neuropeptide Y and related peptides. Regul Pept 13:207–218[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Toth PT, Bindokas D, Bleakman WF, Colmers WF, Miller RJ 1993 Presynaptic inhibition by neuropeptide Y is mediated by reduced Ca influx at sympathetic nerve terminals. Nature 364:635–639[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Colmers WF, Bleakman D 1994 Effects of neuropeptide Y on the electrical properties of neurons. Trends Neurosci 17:373–379[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Chen G, van den Pol AN 1996 Multiple NPY receptors coexist in pre- and postsynaptic sites: inhibition of GABA release in isolated self-innervating SCN neurons. J Neurosci 16:7711–7724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. McQuiston AR, Petrozzino JJ, Connor JA, Colmers WF 1996 Neuropeptide Y1 receptors inhibit N type calcium currents and reduce transient calcium increases in rat dentate granule cells. J Neurosci 166:1422–1429
  41. Besecke LM, Levine JE 1994 Acute increase in responsiveness of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone nerve terminals to neuropeptide-Y stimulation before the preovulatory LH surge. Endocrinology 135:63–66[Abstract]
  42. Barker-Gibb ML, Scott CJ, Boublik JH, Clarke IJ 1995 The role of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the control of LH secretion in the ewe with respect to season, NPY receptor subtype and the site of action in the hypothalamus. J Endocrinol 147:565–579[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Gonzalez-Martinez, C. De Mees, Q. Douhard, C. Szpirer, and J. Bakker
Absence of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone 1 and Kiss1 Activation in {alpha}-Fetoprotein Knockout Mice: Prenatal Estrogens Defeminize the Potential to Show Preovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surges
Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2333 - 2340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. T. Phillips and R. D. Palmiter
Role of Agouti-Related Protein-Expressing Neurons in Lactation
Endocrinology, February 1, 2008; 149(2): 544 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Lin, E.-J. D. Lin, D. Boey, N. J. Lee, K. Slack, M. J. During, A. Sainsbury, and H. Herzog
Fasting Inhibits the Growth and Reproductive Axes via Distinct Y2 and Y4 Receptor-Mediated Pathways
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2056 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
T. Komatsu, T. Chiba, H. Yamaza, K. To, H. Toyama, Y. Higami, and I. Shimokawa
Effect of leptin on hypothalamic gene expression in calorie-restricted rats.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2006; 61(9): 890 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, and C. Y. Bowers
Somatotropic and Gonadotropic Axes Linkages in Infancy, Childhood, and the Puberty-Adult Transition
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 101 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Q. Xiao, K. L. Grove, S. Y. Lau, S. McWeeney, and M. S. Smith
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Microarray Analysis of Gene Expression Pattern in the Arcuate Nucleus/Ventromedial Nucleus of Hypothalamus during Lactation
Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4391 - 4398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. J P Ebling
The neuroendocrine timing of puberty
Reproduction, June 1, 2005; 129(6): 675 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. J. Clarke, K. Backholer, and A. J. Tilbrook
Y2 Receptor-Selective Agonist Delays the Estrogen-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Ovariectomized Ewes, but Y1-Receptor-Selective Agonist Stimulates Voluntary Food Intake
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 769 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Chen, S. M. Williams, K. L. Grove, and M. S. Smith
Melanocortin 4 Receptor-Mediated Hyperphagia and Activation of Neuropeptide Y Expression in the Dorsomedial Hypothalamus during Lactation
J. Neurosci., June 2, 2004; 24(22): 5091 - 5100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. M. Escobar, S. J. Krajewski, T. Sandoval-Guzman, M. L. Voytko, and N. E. Rance
Neuropeptide Y Gene Expression Is Increased in the Hypothalamus of Older Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2338 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Gonzalez-Martinez, T. Madigou, E. Mananos, J. M. Cerda-Reverter, S. Zanuy, O. Kah, and J. A. Munoz-Cueto
Cloning and Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in the Brain and Pituitary of the European Sea Bass: An In Situ Hybridization Study
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1380 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Chen and M. S. Smith
Regulation of Hypothalamic Neuropeptide Y Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression during Lactation: Role of Prolactin
Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 823 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. H. Mills, R. K. Sohn, and P. E Micevych
Estrogen-Induced {micro}-Opioid Receptor Internalization in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Is Mediated via Neuropeptide Y-Y1 Receptor Activation in the Arcuate Nucleus of Female Rats
J. Neurosci., January 28, 2004; 24(4): 947 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. F. Turi, Z. Liposits, S. M. Moenter, C. Fekete, and E. Hrabovszky
Origin of Neuropeptide Y-Containing Afferents to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons in Male Mice
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4967 - 4974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. W. Hill and J. E. Levine
Abnormal Response of the Neuropeptide Y-Deficient Mouse Reproductive Axis to Food Deprivation But Not Lactation
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1780 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. E. Campbell, K. L. Grove, and M. S. Smith
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons Coexpress Orexin 1 Receptor Immunoreactivity and Receive Direct Contacts by Orexin Fibers
Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1542 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. E. Campbell, M. S. Smith, S. E. Allen, B. E. Grayson, J. M. H. ffrench-Mullen, and K. L. Grove
Orexin Neurons Express a Functional Pancreatic Polypeptide Y4 Receptor
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1487 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H.-W. Tsai and S. J. Legan
Loss of Luteinizing Hormone Surges Induced by Chronic Estradiol Is Associated with Decreased Activation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. P. Goldstone, U. A. Unmehopa, S. R. Bloom, and D. F. Swaab
Hypothalamic NPY and Agouti-Related Protein Are Increased in Human Illness But Not in Prader-Willi Syndrome and Other Obese Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 927 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Knauf, V. Prevot, G. B. Stefano, G. Mortreux, J.-C. Beauvillain, and D. Croix
Evidence for a Spontaneous Nitric Oxide Release from the Rat Median Eminence: Influence on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Release
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2343 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Ichimaru, Y. Mori, and H. Okamura
A Possible Role of Neuropeptide Y as a Mediator of Undernutrition to the Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator in Goats
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2489 - 2498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]