help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Garderen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schalken, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Garderen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schalken, J. A.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 12 5907-5914
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Expression and Molecular Characterization of the Growth Hormone Receptor in Canine Mammary Tissue and Mammary Tumors

Evert van Garderen, Hein J. A. van der Poel, Joost F. Swennenhuis, Esther H. J. Wissink1, Gerard R. Rutteman, Eva Hellmén, Jan A. Mol and Jack A. Schalken

Department of Pathology (E.v.G., H.J.A.d.P., J.F.S., E.H.J.W., J.A.S.), and Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals (G.R.R., J.A.M., J.A.S.), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands; and Department of Anatomy and Histology (E.H.), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, SLU, S75007 Uppsala, Sweden

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: E. van Garderen, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.158, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: e.vangarderen{at}vet.uu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GH synthesis has been documented in canine mammary tissue and mammary tumors. In the present report, the characteristics of the GH receptor (GHR) are studied in these tissues. First, using immunohistochemistry, GHR was found to be present throughout normal and tumorous mammary tissues, being localized in epithelial and myoepithelial/spindle cell components and in the activated fibroblasts of desmoplastic tumor stroma. GHR expression seemed to be down-regulated only in terminally differentiated alveoli in normal tissue. GHR immunoreactivity in particular mammary (adeno)carcinomas was heterogenous.

Second, the canine GHR was characterized at the molecular level. Northern blot analysis revealed a major GHR transcript of approximately 4.2 kb. The coding sequence of the canine GHR shows extensive homology with the GHR of several species. Seminested RT-PCR (using primers annealing in exons 4–5, exon 6, and exon 9) generated, next to the primary product, four different products in mammary tissues and the canine mammary tumor cell line CMT-U335, which seemed to be alternative GHR transcripts. These alternative GHR transcripts were characterized by exon 8 skipping, exon 7 skipping, and use of alternative splice donor and acceptor sites. Especially, the transcript that is missing exon 8 may encode a GH binding protein. In most malignant mammary samples, only the primary transcript was present; and alternative transcripts could not be detected. The absence of alternative GHR transcripts in mammary carcinomas, and thus putative inhibitors of GH-induced signal transduction, may contribute to enhanced sensitivity of malignant tumors to GH.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE GH receptor (GHR) is a member of the cytokine/hematopoietin receptor superfamily. This superfamily includes, in addition to the GHR, the receptors for PRL; the interleukins-2 through -7, -9, -11 through -13, and -15; the interferons; and receptors for several growth factors, such as ciliary neurotropic factor, erythropoietin, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M (1, 2). Structurally, the GHR is a single transmembrane protein consisting of an extracellular ligand-binding part, a small membranous part, and a large cytoplasmic tail, which is involved in signal transduction. Upon binding GH, the receptor dimerizes and activates cytosolic tyrosine kinases of the Janus kinases (Jak) family. In most species examined, including the dog, a GH binding protein (GHBP) has been detected in sera that is homologous to the extracellular part of the GHR (3, 4). Initially, GHBP was thought to result exclusively from proteolysis of the receptor; but recently, alternative GHR transcripts have been detected in rats, mice, humans, and monkeys that can encode these GHBPs (4).

Whereas in various species (rabbit, human, mouse, rat, sheep, cow, chicken, pig, and monkey) (4), the GHR has been studied, there are no reports addressing the canine GHR. Recently, research from our group has identified the progesterone or progestin-exposed canine mammary gland as a major site of extrapituitary GH production (5, 6, 7). In addition, GH expression was found in benign and malignant mammary tumors, which may indicate that locally produced GH can have a pathobiological role both in organogenesis and tumorigenesis of the mammary gland. Because GH does not bind to the PRL receptor (PRLR) in the dog (8), locally produced GH can only be effective in the presence of the GHR. Therefore, to further substantiate the importance of the GH/GHR axis in mammary tissue, we began investigations to evaluate the presence and the characteristics of the GHR in canine mammary tissue, canine mammary tumors, and canine mammary tumor cell lines. In addition, we investigated the tissues and cell lines for the presence of alternative GHR transcripts, which, if present, may indicate that there is a molecular basis for the generation of GHBPs in the dog.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunohistochemistry
From our diagnostic archives, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were selected. Cases included 18 nontumorous mammary tissues in different development stages, ranging from hyperplastic glandular tissue to atrophic tissue. Tumorous tissues included 12 benign complex mammary tumors and 7 malignant simple-type mammary tumors.

From the selected tissues, 5-µm-thick sections were cut and collected onto poly-L-lysin-coated slides (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO). After this, slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Immunostaining was performed using the avidin-biotin peroxidase method. For antigen retrieval, sections were immersed in trypsin (0.1% trypsin in 0.1% CaCl2 in distilled water, pH 7.4) for 20 min at room temperature. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with 1% H2O2 in methanol 100% for 30 min. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked by preincubation with 10% normal horse serum for 15 min at room temperature. The primary antibodies used were a commercial monoclonal antibody against the rat/rabbit GHR (Mab 263, Agen Biomedical Ltd, Queensland, Australia), which recognizes a GH-binding site with high affinity (9, 10). In addition, a GHR-unrelated monoclonal antibody, raised against human melanomas (HMB 45, DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) and of the same isotype (IgGlk) as Mab 263, was used as a control for aspecific binding of IgG1k to the tissue. After blocking endogenous peroxidase activity, sections were sequentially treated with Mab 263, used at a concentration of 25 µg/ml in PBS, overnight, with biotinylated horse antimouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 30 min (diluted 1:125 in PBS) and with ABC solution for 30 min, each in a moist chamber at room temperature. Immunoreactivity was visualized using 0.3% H2O2 and 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Sigma) diluted in 0.05 M Tris-HCI, pH 7.6, for 10 min at room temperature. In between steps, sections were washed three times in PBS/Tween and once in PBS. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 1 min, dehydrated with ascending ethanol series and xylene, and mounted with glass coverslips using Eukitt. The specificity of immunoreactivity was verified by absence of immunostaining when primary and secondary antibodies were omitted and when Mab 263 was substituted with HMB45 in the same dilution as Mab 263.

RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from frozen mammary tissues and mammary tumor cell lines using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY). RNA concentrations were determined by UV spectrophotometry. Two micrograms of isolated RNA was separated on a 1% agarose gel to assess the quality by the presence of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA. The quality of RNA isolated from all samples was satisfactory.

Mammary tissue was obtained from canine patients that were referred to the Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals for the evaluation of mammary nodules. Postsurgically, a section of the nodular tissue was fresh-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 C until use. The remaining sections of the nodules were used for histopathological diagnosis. Total RNA was isolated from 23 tissues, including 12 nontumorous mammary samples in different stages of glandular development, 1 benign mammary tumor, 7 malignant mammary tumors, and 3 lymph node metastases.

Canine mammary tumor cell lines that were examined for the presence of GHR messenger RNA (mRNA) were the CMT-U335 (isolated in the laboratory of Dr. Hellmén), the SH3 (11), the SH15, the SH27, and the P95/168 (all three isolated in our laboratory).

Complementary DNA (cDNA) cloning
First, a canine mammary cDNA library was made. Total RNA from normal canine mammary tissue was used to construct this library with the Smart PCR cDNA synthesis kit (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). This kit preferentially enriches the cDNA library for full-length cDNAs and overcomes the general problem of previous methods in which the 5'-ends of the genes tended to be underrepresented in the library. One microliter of the library was subjected to PCR to amplify the cDNA encoding the full-length canine GHR, using the primer combination GHRcds5'/GHRcds3' (see Table 1Go). These primers are deduced from the coding sequence of the full-length human GHR. The specificity of the resulting PCR product was confirmed by Southern blot analysis and was cloned into pBluescript (Stratagene GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). To prepare for sequencing, the product was digested by EcoRI, HindIII, and BamHI into smaller fragments, which were then subcloned in pGEM-T easy (Promega Corp., Madison, WI).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Sequence and annealing site of primers used in RT- PCR

 
RT-PCR analysis. Seminested PCR was used to find evidence for the presence of different GHR transcripts that encode the area adjacent to the membranous part (exon 8) of the GHR. In the first step, 1 µg of total RNA of each sample was subjected to RT-PCR using the primer combination GHR4–5a/GHR9b. This reaction was performed in a one-tube-based system (Access RT-PCR System, Promega Corp.), in which only one primer set is used for both the RT and the PCR amplification. Secondly, 1 µl of the resulting product was diluted 100 times in water (Milli-Q, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and was subjected to seminested amplification using the primer combination GHR6a/GHR9b.

In the first reaction, the thermal cycle consisted of a single RT step of 45 min at 50 C, followed by 5 min at 95 C. Further amplification of the cDNA products was obtained in 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec at 94 C, annealing for 30 sec at 50 C, and extension for 30 sec at 72 C. Samples were kept at 72 C for 10 min after the last cycle.

Southern blot analysis
Five percent of the (seminested) PCR product was separated on a 1% agarose gel and was transferred to Hybond-N+ (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK) by capillary blotting. DNA was cross-linked to the membrane using UV light (UV Stratalinker 1800, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), followed by washing the blot twice in 2x SSC. Then, the blot was prehybridized for 2 h at 65 C in 100 ml PEG Hybmix (0.25 M NaPi, 0.25 M NaCl, 7% SDS, 10% PEG 6000, 1 mM EDTA), containing 10 mg herring sperm DNA. During prehybridization, the probe was radioactively labeled ({alpha}-[32P]deoxy-ATP) by random prime labeling. This probe was a GHR-specific cDNA fragment of 471 bp, which was produced in our laboratory using canine liver tissue. This fragment was validated by sequencing and had 86% homology, compared with the human GHR sequence in exons 6–9. Hybridization was performed overnight at 65 C. After this, the blot was washed in 3x SSC, 1x SSC, and 0.2x SSC. Hybridization was visualized on film, during 4 h of exposure at room temperature.

Northern blot analysis
From each sample, poly A+ mRNA was isolated using the Oligotex mRNA Midi kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Five micrograms of poly A+ mRNA was glyoxalated and separated on a 1% agarose gel in 20 mM phosphate buffer and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane by capillary blotting. {lambda}-DNA, cut with HindIII, was glyoxylated and used as a marker. The GHR probe, also used in the Southern blot analysis, was radioactively labeled with {alpha}-[32P]deoxy-ATP by random prime labeling. Hybridizations were performed as described before (12), and autoradiographs were produced by exposure of the membrane to film (Hyperfilm MP, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 72 h using intensifying screens. Then, the blot was stripped and rehybridized with a ß-actin probe as a control for the amounts of RNA loaded.

Cycle sequencing
First, the PCR product was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN Inc.). Sixty nanograms of purified PCR product was used as template for the cycle sequencing reaction with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster, CA) using the GHR6a or the GHR9b primer (Table 1Go). The cycle sequence conditions were: 5 min at 94 C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec at 94 C, annealing for 30 sec at 50 C, and extension for 4 min at 60 C. The sequence was determined using the ABI PRISM system (Perkin-Elmer Corp.).

Alignment of sequences. Alignment of sequences was performed with the computer software Lasergene (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GHR/GHBP immunoreactivity in canine mammary tissue
Mab 263 is directed against an epitope shared by both the GHR and the GHBP (13, 14). Accordingly, every reference to GHR immunoreactivity in our study also includes GHBP. The specificity of immunoreactivity was verified by absence of immunostaining in all negative controls (Fig. 1EGo, see also Materials and Methods).



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunoreactive GHR/GHBP in canine mammary tissue and mammary tumors. The bar represents 50 µm. A, High-power magnification of a duct in atrophic mammary tissue. Immunoreactivity is located in both the epithelial and the myoepithelial layers of the duct (x415). B, Mammary tissue in the proliferation phase, characterized by ductal budding structures. Cells in these buds are homogenously immunoreactive (x200). C, Mammary tissue in the differentiation phase. Note that, in terminally differentiated alveoli at the left-hand side of the picture, the immunoreactivity is strongly diminished or absent (x200). D, Canine complex adenoma. GHR/GHBP immunoreactivity is present in both the spindle cell (*) and the epithelial component (arrow) of the tumor (x200). E, Canine complex adenoma. Negative control. Mab 263 is replaced by the unrelated HMB45 monoclonal antibody of the same isotype (IgG1k) (x200). F, Canine solid mammary carcinoma. Immunoreactivity is clearly heterogenous: immunopositive and immunonegative areas are present in the tumor (x200). G, High-power magnification of a canine solid mammary carcinoma. Several carcinoma cells demonstrate nuclear immunoreactivity (arrow) (x400).

 
Nontumorous mammary tissue. Nontumorous mammary tissues (n = 18) in histologically different stages of glandular development were examined. It is generally accepted that these stages reflect either the phase of the ovarian cycle or the effect of synthetic progestins administered to prevent estrus (15, 16).

In atrophic glandular tissue (n = 2), typical for anestrus, predominantly ductal structures were present. The epithelium of these ducts displayed diffuse immunoreactivity. Also, the myoepithelial cells that underly the ductal epithelium were diffusely immunopositive (Fig. 1AGo).

In the proliferation phase of the glandular tissue, reflecting early- and middiestrus (n = 7), the tissue is characterized primarily by the presence of ductal budding structures and by further elongation and branching of the ductal system. Ductal epithelial cells, including the epithelial cells in ductal buds, were diffusely immunopositive (Fig. 1BGo). Immunoreactivity was also extensively found in the myoepithelial cell population in this tissue. Columnar epithelial cells of nonsecreting alveoli were generally immunopositive, but occasionally single cells in alveoli were immunonegative.

In the differentiation phase (n = 9), occurring in late diestrus, the tissue is characterized by the presence of lobuloalveolar structures, in which secretion may occur. Both ductal epithelium and myoepithelial cells of inter- and intralobular ducts displayed diffuse immunostaining. Alveolar epithelial cells, however, demonstrated heterogenous immunoreactivity. Here, columnar nonsecretory epithelium was, in general, immunopositive; whereas in the flattened epithelial cells of alveoli filled with secretum, the cells were either weakly immunoreactive or were immunonegative (Fig. 1CGo).

Tumorous mammary tissue. Of tumorous mammary tissue, 12 benign tumors and 7 malignant tumors were examined. Tumors were classified according to the World Health Organization classification (17). The benign tumors were comprised of complex tumors and 1 fibroadenoma. In the dog, complex adenomas are the most frequently occurring benign mammary tumors and consist of both epithelial and spindle cell proliferations. The spindle cell component probably has a myoepithelial origin. In these complex tumors, immunostaining was observed in both the epithelial and the spindle cell components (Fig. 1DGo). The epithelial component showed, in general, a more prominent and homogeneous immunoreactivity. In chondroid metaplasia that occurred in one complex/mixed adenoma, chondroblast-like cells displayed intense immunoreactivity.

The malignant mammary tumors comprised only simple-type tumors, including four solid carcinomas, two tubular adenocarcinomas, and one anaplastic carcinoma. Obviously, carcinoma cells were heterogeneously immunostained (Fig. 1FGo). In the adenocarcinomas particularly and in one case of solid carcinoma, immunonegative areas alternated with clusters of immunopositive cells. Metastatic tumor cells in lymphatic vessels were also immunopositive. Interestingly, in carcinomas, a nuclear immunostaining was sometimes observed in tumor cells (Fig. 1GGo). Also, in the anaplastic carcinoma, tumor cells were intensely immunoreactive. Desmoplastic changes in tumor stroma present in the adenocarcinomas showed that the activated fibroblasts were also immunopositive.

Molecular characterization of the GHR
Full-length GHR. The PCR product, using as template the canine mammary cDNA library and the primers GHRcds5'/GHRcds3', was 1946 bp and hybridized with the canine GHR probe. After sequencing, the canine GHR coding sequence could be aligned with the sequence of the human, porcine, and rabbit GHR without any insertions or deletions. To analyze the canine sequence, we numbered the exons corresponding to the homologous exons in the human GHR. In the human GHR gene, there are 9 coding exons (exons 2–10). Exon 1 is noncoding. Exon 2 encodes the final 11 bp of the 5'-untranslated regio (UTR), the 18-amino acid signal sequence, and the first 5 aminoacids of the extracellular hormone-binding domain. Exons 3–7 together encode the majority of the extracellular hormone-binding domain. Exon 8 encodes the final 3 amino acids of the hormone-binding domain, the 24-amino-acid hydrophobic transmembrane domain, and the first 4 amino acids of the intracellular domain. Exons 9 and 10 together encode the remaining 346 cytoplasmic amino acids. The remaining part of exon 10 is noncoding (approximately 2-kb) (4).

The ATG startcodon in the canine sequence is located at position 12, and the stopcodon is found at position 1926 in the PCR product, resulting in a coding sequence of 1914 bp. This encodes a protein of 638 amino acids. This is consistent with the characteristics of the human GHR described above, including the GHR signal peptide of 18 amino acid residues and 620 residues in the human plasma membrane GHR. Also compared with the rabbit and porcine GHR sequence, the canine GHR has extensive homology, both on nucleotide and on amino acid levels. The coding sequence of the canine full-length GHR has been submitted to GenBank (accession number AF133835).

The translated canine GHR features six extracellular cysteines, which are linked by disulfide bonds in the human GHR. The first of these disulfide bonds is required for GH binding and also contains the epitope for Mab 263 (18). The YGEFS motif, another important site for the binding of GH (19), is present in both the human and the translated canine GHR. This motif is located just proximal to the membranous part of the GHR.

Primary and alternative GHR transcripts in exons 6–9. Because exon 8 encodes the membranous part of the protein, alternative transcription in exons 6–9 may result in the generation of proteins that are unable to anchor in the membrane, yet retain the ability to bind GH, giving rise to GHBPs. To investigate whether these alternative GHR transcripts were present, a seminested PCR was performed. In all normal and tumorous mammary tissues and in the mammary tumor cell lines CMT-U335, SH3, SH27, and P95/168, a predominant PCR product of 471 bp was amplified, which corresponds to the primary, normal-spliced GHR transcript. The SH15 cell line, however, was negative for any of the GHR transcripts. In addition to this primary product, in nontumorous mammary tissue and in the benign tumor, additional PCR products were present of 380 bp and 305 bp, which showed a positive hybridization in the Southern blot analysis, indicating that these were alternative GHR transcripts. Also, in CMT-U335 cells, there was a primary 471-bp product and three different transcripts of 316 bp, 305 bp, and 277 bp (see Fig. 2Go). Remarkably, in nearly all malignant mammary samples, including the lymph node metastases, only the primary 471-bp product was present. Only in one carcinoma, there was an additional PCR product that comigrated with the 380-bp product (not shown).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Southern blot analysis of GHR transcripts obtained after seminested (RT-)PCR using primers annealing in exon 6 and exon 9. Hybridization was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Lanes 1–4, Normal canine mammary tissues; lane 5, canine mammary fibroadenoma; lanes 6–9, canine mammary carcinomas; lane 10, CMT-U335 cell line; lane 11, P95/168 cell line; lane 12, SH15 cell line; lane 13, SH27cell line; lane 14, negative control. Except for the SH15 cell line, in all samples, a GHR-cDNA fragment of 471 bp was amplified, representing the normally spliced RNA. The 380-bp and 305-bp GHR-cDNA fragments, representing alternatively spliced RNAs, could be amplified only from normal mammary tissues and a benign mammary tumor (fibroadenoma). In most malignant mammary samples, only the GHR-cDNA fragment of 471 bp was amplified. In CMT-U335 tumor cells, three cDNA fragments (of 316-, 305-, and 277-bp) were found, representing alternatively spliced GHR transcripts (the additional PCR products, of approximately 220 and 180 bp, seemed to be caused by aspecific annealing of primer GHR9b).

 
After sequencing and alignment with the human and canine full-length receptor sequence, it seemed in the 380-bp product that exon 8 was skipped, resulting in a frame shift and introduction of a premature stopcodon at position 12 in exon 9 (position 887 of the canine full-length receptor). Translated into the reading frame, this product features the YGEFS motif, which is important for GH binding. The 305-bp products generated from nontumorous mammary tissue and the CMT-U335 cell line were identical. In this product, exon 7 was skipped, resulting in a frame shift and introduction of a stopcodon at position 619 of the sequence of the canine full-length GHR. The 316-bp product from CMT-U335 cells can be explained by the usage of an alternative splice donor and acceptor site, resulting in the elimination of the greater part of exon 6 and the beginning of exon 7. Finally, the 277-bp product from CMT-U335 cells can be a consequence of the use of an alternative splice donor site, resulting in the elimination of a part of exon 7 and the entire exon 8. As in the 305-bp product, these alternative splicing events introduced a frame shift in the 316-bp and in the 277-bp products, resulting in the absence of YGEFS motifs and the introduction of premature stopcodons. The molecular data have been summarized in Fig. 3Go.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Canine GHR transcripts and (putative) translated proteins. A, Schematic representation of the canine full-length GHR transcript. Exons 2–10 are numbered corresponding to the homologous exons in the human GHR. In addition, four different alternative processings of the transcript between exons 6–9 were found in canine mammary tissues and CMT-U335 canine mammary tumor cells (transcripts A–D). B, Schematic representation of the putative translated proteins. At the left-hand side, the structure of the canine full-length GHR is presented. The proteins A–D correspond to the transcripts A–D. Of these proteins, only protein A has the YGEFS domain. Because of alternative splicings and frame shifts, the proteins A–D all have a unique protein tail, replacing the membranous and cytoplasmic parts. The boxed areas of proteins A–D represent the part likely to be coded by exons proximal to exon 6.

 
Northern blot analysis of normal canine mammary tissue and canine mammary tumor cell lines
Northern blot analysis was performed to evaluate GHR gene transcription and to determine the size of the GHR transcripts in normal mammary tissue and the mammary tumor cell lines. A normal tissue sample was obtained from a dog with mammary tissue in the proliferation phase. As can be seen in Fig. 4Go, in normal canine mammary tissue and the mammary tumor cell lines CMT-U335, P95/168, SH27, and SH3, a GHR transcript that comigrated with the marker at approximately 4.2 kb was detected. The SH15 cell line, however, was negative. In the normal mammary tissue sample and the CMT-U335 cell line, an additional transcript seemed to be present at approximately 4.1 kb. In the normal mammary sample, this band may represent the alternative transcript characterized by exon 8 skipping; especially this transcript, which was identified in the RT-PCR experiments, will be approximately 4.1 kb. No additional transcripts of the size that have been found in the rat and mouse (1.2 kb), specifically coding GHBPs in these rodents, were found.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Northern blot analysis of polyadenylated mRNA obtained from normal canine mammary tissue and canine mammary tumor cell lines. A, The blot was hybridized with a canine GHR probe. A transcript of approximately 4.2 kb was detected in normal mammary tissue and in canine mammary tumor cell lines, with the exception of the SH15 cell line. An additional transcript of approximately 4.1 kb was detected in normal mammary tissue and CMT-U 335 cells (arrowhead). B, The same blot was dehybridized and rehybridized with a ß-actin probe as a control for the amounts of mRNA loaded on gel. Lane 1, Normal mammary tissue; lane 2, CMT-U 335 cell line; lane 3, P95/168 cell line; lane 4, SH15 cell line; lane 5, SH27 cell line; lane 6, SH3 cell line.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the dog, the mammary gland is characterized by a striking variation in histological appearances, depending on the stage of the ovarian cycle. In the anestrous phase of the ovarian cyle, the glandular tissue is inactive, and microscopically, only ductal structures and remnants of lobules are encountered. In the diestrus or the luteal phase, after ovulation, there is a nodular epithelial proliferation, resulting in ductal buds, that parallels the high endogenous progesterone concentration in dogs. A similar proliferation of these epithelial cells can be caused by exogenously administered progestins. Compared with most other species, in the dog, the diestrus phase of the ovarian cycle is characterized by prolonged elevation of progesterone levels in plasma, irrespective of pregnancy (20). During this longstanding progesterone-dominated phase, epithelial cells in budding structures further proliferate and finally differentiate into lobuloalveolar structures, fully equipped for milk synthesis. In the past, we documented that in these ductal epithelial buds especially, GH was produced, probably mediating the local proliferation of epithelial cells. GH expression was strongly diminished in differentiated lobuloalveolar glandular tissue and in the inactive anestrous phase of the ovarian cycle (7). Whereas in primates, GH can bind both to the GHR and the PRLR, in nonprimate mammals (such as the dog), GH can be effective only in the presence of its specific receptor, the GHR. For detecting GHR immunohistochemically, Mab 263 is a widely used and extensively validated specific monoclonal antibody against the GHR in different tissues and species (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30). Until now, reactivity against the canine GHR had not been documented. It has been shown that Mab 263 reacts against an epitope located within the first disulphide loop of the rat and rabbit GHR (18). The amino acid sequence of this loop (–CRSPELETFSC-) seems to be highly conserved among the different species (14), explaining the cross-species reactivity of this antibody. In our study, we cloned and sequenced the canine GHR. We found in the translated canine GHR that the amino acid sequence of this loop and, therefore, the epitope for Mab 263, is identical to the sequence in the rat and rabbit, indicating that Mab 263 can react against the canine GHR. In none of the species investigated has Mab 263 been reported to cross-react with the PRLR. This despite the fact that the PRLR does contain an area that resembles this first disulphide loop of the GHR (14), which would theoretically give potential for cross-reactivity of Mab 263 against the PRLR. We determined the nucleotide sequence of this component of the canine PRLR, and it seems that the translated product of this region is identical in sequence to that of the rabbit PRLR (E. van Garderen, unpublished results). Because Mab 263 does not cross-react with the rabbit PRLR (Ref. 10 , information supplied by Agen Biomedical Ltd.), we deduce that Mab 263 does not cross-react with the canine PRLR. Therefore, we conclude that immunoreactivity obtained with Mab 263, combined with the absence of staining in the negative controls, reflects the presence of the canine GHR.

The immunohistochemical results in the present study, obtained with Mab 263 in canine mammary tissues, are in agreement with findings that have been reported for rat mammary tissues (28) and human mammary tissues (30). In canine nontumorous mammary tissue, myoepithelial and epithelial cells of inter- and intralobular ducts, including ductal budding structures, were diffusely immunoreactive in all stages of glandular development. Alveolar epithelium present in the later stage of the luteal phase showed a heterogenous immunoreactivity; nonsecreting columnar alveolar epithelium was generally immunopositive, whereas low cuboidal epithelium of alveoli, filled with secretum, displayed a strongly diminished or absent GHR expression. These findings are consistent with data reported in rat mammary tissue (28), including a markedly reduced level of immunoreactivity in alveolar cells during lactation, particularly in the later stages. Therefore, we conclude that whereas GH expression in canine mammary tissue is found in epithelial cells in the early- and midluteal phases of the ovarian cycle (7), GHR expression seems only to be down-regulated in completely differentiated alveolar epithelial cells at the end of the diestrus phase.

The findings in canine mammary tumors are in agreement with GHR expression found in benign and malignant human breast tissues (30). Also, in canine mammary tumors, we found extensive GHR immunoreactivity, both in benign and malignant samples, that was irrespective of the histopathological subtype. However, GHR expression in carcinomas was heterogenous, characterized by the presence of both immunopositive and immunonegative tumor cells. As in canine normal mammary tissue, the presence of GHR in canine mammary tumors is an important finding, in view of the frequently observed GH production by such tumors. Though GH expression in canine mammary tumors of the complex type was found to be restricted to the epithelial component, with virtual absence of reactivity in the spindle cell component (7), we now find that, in complex mammary tumors, GHR is expressed both by the epithelial and the spindle cell part. Consequently, locally produced GH might function both as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor.

In addition to the membranous and cytoplasmic GHR immunoreactivity, we sometimes observed a nuclear immunostaining of cells, which has also been frequently reported by others (21, 22, 24, 29). This nuclear translocation of the GHR indicates that GH might have a direct nuclear effect, in addition to ligand-dependent activation of cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways.

The molecular characterization of the canine full-length GHR in mammary tissue revealed extensive homology with the GHR sequence of several species, including the human GHR, the rabbit GHR, and the porcine GHR. In the present study, the 5'-UTR of the canine GHR, including a putative exon 1, has not been analyzed. It is now well documented that the 5'-UTRs of the GHR gene in several species is characterized by a marked heterogeneity. For example, eight different 5'-UTRs have been detected in the human gene, and five 5'-UTRs were found in the rat gene (for a review on 5'-UTR heterogeneity, see Ref. 4). The significance of multiple 5'-UTRs is not clear, but it is suggested that 5'-UTR exons are associated with unique promoters.

In addition to the primary product, we also found evidence for the presence of alternative GHR transcripts, which had resulted from alternative splicing between exons 6–9. In one of these, exon 8 was skipped. This alternative transcript particularly might encode a GHBP, because the transmembrane domain is missing, whereas the YGEFS motif is conserved. All other alternative transcripts, however, lack this motif. At the moment, it is not clear whether these alternative transcripts are translated into GHBPs. Although we found CMT-U335 cells positive for GHR/GHBP in immunocytochemistry (picture not shown), we were not able to demonstrate either GHR protein or GHBPs in cell lysate and supernatants of CMT-U335 in Western blot analysis. This, however, is probably caused by technical failure, because Mab 263 is not suited for Western blot analysis.

Northern blot analysis of polyadenylated mRNA of normal mammary tissue and most of the investigated canine mammary tumor cell lines revealed the presence of a GHR transcript of approximately 4.2 kb, which is in the range of sizes of the GHR transcripts described in other species (4). The additional transcripts of approximately 4.1 kb in normal mammary tissue and in CMT-U335 cells may be related to the alternative processings of the GHR gene that were identified in the RT-PCR experiments. We also conclude from our Northern blot analysis that, during routine cell culture, significant amounts of mRNA coding the GHR can be present in canine mammary tumor cell lines. This correlates well with recent results in our laboratory in which we found that a GH-induced signal transduction path, indicating the presence of a functional GHR, could be detected in CMT-U335 cells (manuscript in preparation).

The significance of the alternative GHR transcripts is not known at the moment. Although it is concluded from the Northern blot analysis that the amount of alternative transcripts in normal mammary tissue seems to be low, it is an interesting observation that we could not detect these alternative GHR transcripts in most malignant mammary tumors by seminested RT-PCR. Recently, it was reported that similar alternative GHR transcripts found in nonmammary human IM9 cells, encoded proteins that negatively influenced the full-length GHR when transfected and expressed in 293 cells (31). Consequently, absence of alternative GHR transcripts in canine mammary carcinomas might result in increased signaling of the full-length GHR and transcriptional activities in mammary carcinomas, compared with nontumorous mammary tissue. In view of the reported GH production in normal and malignant canine mammary tissue, the difference in alternative GHR processing in these tissues may be of relevance.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Marion Bussemakers and Frank Smit for their valuable technical assistance. The critical reading of the manuscript by Dr. Rosemary Newton is highly appreciated.


    Footnotes
 
1 Former student participating in Excellent Tract Program. Back

Received March 24, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cosman D, Lyman SD, Idzerda RL, Beckmann MP, Park LS, Goodwin RG, March CJ 1990 A new cytokine receptor superfamily. Trends Biochem Sci 15:265–270[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Finidori J, Kelly PA 1995 Cytokine receptor signalling through two novel families of transducer molecules: Janus kinases, and signal transducers and activators of transcription. J Endocrinol 147:11–23[Medline]
  3. Amit T, Hochberg Z, Waters MJ, Barkey RJ 1992 Growth hormone- and prolactin-binding proteins is mammalian serum. Endocrinology 131:1793–1803[Abstract]
  4. Edens A, Talamantes F 1998 Alternative processing of growth hormone receptor transcripts. Endocr Rev 19:559–582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Selman PJ, Mol JA, Rutteman GR, van Garderen E, Rijnberk A 1994 Progestin-induced growth hormone excess in the dog originates in the mammary gland. Endocrinology 134:287–292[Abstract]
  6. Mol JA, Van Garderen E, Selman PJ, Wolfswinkel J, Rijnberk A, Rutteman GR 1995 Growth hormone mRNA in mammary gland tumors of dogs and cats. J Clin Invest 95:2028–2034
  7. Van Garderen E, De Wit M, Voorhout WF, Rutteman GR, Mol JA, Nederbragt H, Misdorp W 1997 Expression of growth hormone in canine mammary tissue and mammary tumors. Evidence for a potential autocrine/paracrine stimulatory loop. Am J Pathol 150:1037–1047[Abstract]
  8. Rutteman GR, Willekes-Koolschijn N, Bevers MM, van der Gugten AA, Misdorp W 1986 Prolactin binding in benign and malignant mammary tissue of female dogs. Anticancer Res 6:829–835[Medline]
  9. Barnard R, Bundesen PG, Rylatt DB, Waters MJ 1984 Monoclonal antibodies to the rabbit liver growth hormone receptor: production and characterization. Endocrinology 115:1805–1813[Abstract]
  10. Barnard R, Bundesen PG, Rylatt DB, Waters MJ 1985 Evidence from the use of monoclonal antibody probes for structural heterogeneity of the growth hormone receptor. Biochem J 231:459–468[Medline]
  11. Van der Burg B, Van Selm-Miltenburg AJP, Van Maurik P, Rutteman GR, Misdorp W, De Laat SW, Van Zoelen EJJ 1989 Isolation of autonomously growing dog mammary tumor cell lines using medium supplemented with serum treated to inactivate growth factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1545–1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bussemakers MJG, Van de Ven WJ, Debruyne FM, Schalken JA 1991 Identification of High Mobility Group protein I(Y) as potential progression marker for prostate cancer by differential display analysis. Cancer Res 51:606–611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Barnard R, Quirk P, Waters MJ 1989 Characterization of the growth hormone-binding protein of human serum using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. J Endocrinol 123:327–332[Abstract]
  14. Kelly PA, Djiane J, Postel-Vinay MC, Edery M 1991 The prolactin/growth hormone receptor family. Endocr Rev 12:235–251[Abstract]
  15. Nelson LW, Kelly WA 1974 Changes in canine mammary gland histology during the estrous cycle. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 27:113–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Nelson LW, Kelly WA 1976 Progestogen-related gross and microscopic changes in female beagles. Vet Pathol 13:143–156[Abstract]
  17. Hampe JF, Misdorp W 1974 Tumours and dysplasias of the mammary gland. Bull World Health Organ 50:111–133[Medline]
  18. Gobius KS, Rowlinson SW, Barnard R, Mattick JS, Waters MJ 1992 The first disulphide loop of the rabbit growth hormone receptor is required for binding to the hormone. J Mol Endocrinol 9:213–220[Abstract]
  19. Baumgartner JW, Wells CA, Chen CM, Waters MJ 1994 The role of the WSXWS equivalent motif in growth hormone receptor function. J Biol Chem 269:29094–29101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Concannon PW, Hansel W, Visek WJ 1975 The ovarian cycle of the bitch: plasma estrogen, LH and progesterone. Biol Reprod 13:112–121[Abstract]
  21. Lobie PE, Garcia-Aragon J, Wang BS, Baumbach WR, Waters MJ 1992 Cellular localization of the growth hormone binding protein in the rat. Endocrinology 130:3057–3065[Abstract]
  22. Lobie PE, Breipohl W, Garcia-Aragon J, Waters MJ 1990 Cellular localization of the growth hormone receptor/binding protein in the male and female reproductive systems. Endocrinology 126:2214–2221[Abstract]
  23. Lobie PE, Breipohl W, Lincoln DT, Garcia-Aragon J, Waters MJ 1990 Localization of the growth hormone receptor/binding protein in skin. J Endocrinol 126:467–472[Abstract]
  24. Lobie PE, Breipohl W, Waters MJ 1990c Growth hormone receptor expression in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Endocrinology 126:299–306
  25. Tamura M, Sasano H, Suzuki T, Fukaya T, Watanabe T, Aoki H, Nagura H, Yajima A 1994 Immunohistochemical localization of growth hormone receptor in cyclic human ovaries. Hum Reprod 9:2259–2262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Oakes SR, Haynes KM, Waters MJ, Herington AC, Werther GA 1990 Demonstration and localization of growth hormone receptor in human skin and skin fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1368–1373[Abstract]
  27. Hill DJ, Riley SC, Bassett NS, Waters MJ 1992 Localization of the growth hormone receptor, identified by immunocytochemistry, in second trimester human fetal tissues and in placenta throughout gestation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:646–650[Abstract]
  28. Lincoln DT, Waters MJ, Breipohl W, Sinowatz F, Lobie PE 1990 Growth hormone receptors expression in the proliferating rat mammary gland. Acta Histochem Suppl 40:47–49[Medline]
  29. Mertani HC, Pechoux C, Garcia-Caballero T, Waters MJ, Morel G 1995 Cellular localization of the growth hormone receptor/binding protein in the human anterior pituitary gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3361–3367[Abstract]
  30. Mertani HC, Garcia-Caballero T, Lambert A, Gerard F, Palayer C, Boutin JM, Vonderhaar BK, Waters MJ, Lobie PE, Morel G 1998 Cellular expression of growth hormone and prolactin receptors in human breast disorders. Int J Cancer 79:202–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Ross RJM, Esposito N, Shen XY, Von Laue S, Chew SL, Dobson PRM, Postel-Vinay MC, Finidori J 1997 A short isoform of the human growth hormone receptor functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length receptor and generates large amounts of binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 11:265–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. LeBaron, T. J. Ahonen, M. T. Nevalainen, and H. Rui
In Vivo Response-Based Identification of Direct Hormone Target Cell Populations Using High-Density Tissue Arrays
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 989 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Garderen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schalken, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Garderen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schalken, J. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals