help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivier, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivier, C.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 12 5971-5981
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Endotoxin Stimulates Nitric Oxide Production in the Paraventricular Nucleus of the Hypothalamus through Nitric Oxide Synthase I: Correlation with Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activation1

Rosa Maria Uribe2, Soon Lee and Catherine Rivier3

Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute (S.L., C.R.), La Jolla, California 92037

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Catherine Rivier, Ph.D., The Salk Institute, The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037. E-mail: crivier{at}salk.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nitric oxide (NO) is an unstable gas that is produced in brain tissues involved in the control of the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Transcripts for constitutive neuronal NO synthase (NOS I), one of the enzymes responsible for NO formation in the brain, is up-regulated by systemic endotoxin [lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] injection. However, this change is delayed compared with LPS induced-ACTH release, which makes it difficult to determine whether it is functionally important for the hormonal response. To obtain a more resolutive time course of the NO response, we first measured NO in microdialysates of the paraventricular (PVN) nucleus of the hypothalamus. The iv injection of 100 µg/kg LPS induced a rapid and short-lived increase in concentrations of this gas, which corresponded to the initiation of the ACTH response. LPS-induced Ca2+-dependent NOS activity in the PVN as well as the number of PVN cells expressing citrulline (a compound produced stoichiometrically with NO) also increased significantly over a time course that corresponded to ACTH and corticosterone release. Finally, blockade of NO production with the arginine derivative N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine-methylester (L-NAME; 50 mg/kg, sc), which attenuated the ACTH response to LPS, virtually abolished basal NOS activity in the PVN, as well as anterior and neurointermediate lobes of the pituitary, and prevented the appearance of citrulline in the PVN of rats injected with LPS.

Collectively, these results show that LPS-induced activation of the HPA axis correlates with the activation of the PVN NOergic system, and supports a stimulatory role for NO in the modulation of the HPA axis in response to immune challenges.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NITRIC OXIDE (NO) is a highly reactive gas that acts as a diffusible messenger in the brain, where it mediates critical processes such as neurotransmission, immune defense, vasodilatation, and endocrine signaling (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). NO synthesis from L-arginine is catalyzed by a family of enzymes called nitric oxide synthases (NOS), which belong to three subtypes (9, 10, 11, 12). Neurons, endothelial cells, and astrocytes express two isomers of the enzyme (NOS I and III) that produce NO in a rapid and Ca2+-dependent manner (9, 13). The second subtype, called inducible NOS (NOS II), represents the Ca2+-independent form of the enzyme. It is induced in the brain (glial cells and microvascular endothelia) by processes such as inflammation and ischemia (13, 14).

Interest in NO as a putative modulator of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis first stemmed from the discovery that NOS I was present in hypothalamic neurons known to produce two peptides important for ACTH release, namely corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and vasopressin (VP) (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Subsequently, the finding that blockade of NO formation with arginine derivatives significantly altered the ACTH response to homeostatic threats such as inflammation, mild electrofootshocks, water avoidance, and immobilization (see references in Ref. 22) strengthened the concept that NO played an important role in regulating the response of the HPA axis to various stresses. The next step was to show that stresses that stimulated ACTH release through an NO-dependent mechanism augmented NO production in brain areas that were important in controlling the HPA axis. In situ hybridization histochemistry for NOS transcripts was initially used because of the difficulties encountered in measuring the highly reactive NO. Using probes specific for NOS I messenger RNA (mRNA) levels, we and others reported that both immune and nonimmune stimuli were able to up-regulate the gene expression of this enzyme in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). However, these studies indicated that changes in NOS I transcripts were modest relative to the high levels of constitutively expressed NOS I, as well as significantly delayed vis-à-vis changes in plasma ACTH levels. The extent to which stress indeed up-regulates NO formation and possible relationships in the time domain of ACTH and NO release, therefore, remained unresolved issues. What was required were sensitive and quantitative methods to measure acute and discrete changes in NO release as well as concomitant increases in NOS activity.

In the present work, we tested the hypothesis that mild endotoxemia increased NO levels and NOS activity in the PVN and functionally related regions. We chose three approaches to quantify NO production. First, we used the microdialysis hemoglobin-trapping technique, a methodology that provides real-time changes in PVN NO levels in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and is sensitive enough to study NO release in vivo (30, 31). With this approach, we observed a significant, but short-lived, increase in NO production in the PVN in response to the iv injection of 100 µg/kg LPS. We then corroborated changes in NO concentrations with increases in NOS activity by determining the conversion of [14C]arginine to [14C]citrulline in specific brain tissues. We showed that LPS induced a transient, but significant, increase in NO levels and NOS activity in the PVN, but not in the medial basal hypothalamus/median eminence or the pituitary. These changes showed a good correlation with elevated plasma ACTH levels. Thirdly, immunohistochemical detection of citrulline, which is formed stoichiometrically with NO, indicated that LPS up-regulated concentrations of this compound in the PVN. Furthermore, citrulline-producing cells in the PVN were colocalized with NOS I mRNA, providing evidence for the concept that LPS induced NO formation through the isomer Ca2+-dependent NOS I. Finally, we showed that the arginine derivative N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine-methylester (L-NAME), a known inhibitor of NOS activity (see references in Refs. 32, 33), decreased basal NOS levels in all brain areas studied, abolished LPS-induced citrulline production, and blunted the ACTH response to LPS.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Adult male Sprague Dawley (250–270 g) rats were acclimated to standard laboratory conditions (12-h light, 12-h dark cycle, lights on from 0600 h) with free access to rat chow (Harlan-Teklad, Madison, WI) and water unless otherwise indicated. The Salk Institute animal use and care committee approved all procedures described.

Experimental procedures
The rats underwent aseptic insertion of a right jugular venous catheter 48–72 h before the experiment (34). The cannulas served both to deliver LPS and to remove blood samples. LPS was administered iv at 100 µg/kg; control rats were injected with the vehicle. Blood samples (0.3 ml) were taken 0.5, 1, and 6 h after treatment, after which time the rats were killed under nonstress conditions. The medial basal hypothalamus (MBH), containing the median eminence and ventral part of the arcuate nucleus, as well as the anterior lobe (AL) and neurointermediate lobe (NIL) of the pituitary were excised and kept at -80 C; the rest of the brain was immediately frozen in powder dry ice and kept at -80 C. For PVN dissections, a 1.5-mm coronal slice containing the PVN area was cut with razor blades from the frozen brain, and the PVN area was removed from that section using 1-mm diameter neuropunches (Fine Science Tools, Inc., Foster City, CA) as reported by Palkoviths and Brownstein (35). For MBH and PVN, three regions per point were pooled, placed in a microcentrifuge tube, and kept at -80 C until assayed for NOS activity.

Chronic salt-loading experiments
In view of the reported increase in HPA axis activity as well as NOS mRNA levels after salt loading (36, 37), these experiments were aimed at validating the NOS activity measurement used in the present study. A control group was given food and water ad libitum, whereas the experimental group was maintained with rat chow and 2% (wt/vol) NaCl solution as the only source of water for 4 days. Control and experimental animals were then killed, and tissue dissection was performed as described above, except that trunk blood was collected.

Microdialysis and NO measurement by the hemoglobin-trapping technique
Rats were anesthetized with a sc injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg)/acepromazine (4 mg/kg)/xylazine (10 mg/kg) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. With the incisor bar set at -3.3 mm, a guide cannula was implanted at coordinates 0.8 mm lateral, 1.8 mm anterior-posterior, and 7.5 mm dorsal-ventral. Four days after surgery, the rats were equipped with an iv cannula and used 2 and 3 days later in microdialysis experiments. On the experimental day, concentric microdialysis probes (no. 12, CMA, Stockholm, Sweden; length, 1 mm; molecular mass cut-off, 20,000 Da) were introduced into the brain. The probe was perfused for 1–1.5 h with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; 145 mM NaCl, 3.3 mM KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) at a constant flow rate of 5 µl/min using a microsyringe pump (CMA). NO levels were detected by the hemoglobin-trapping technique. Specifically, after an equilibrium period, the aCSF was changed for a freshly prepared 1-µM oxyhemoglobin solution (HbO2). Bovine hemoglobin diluted in aCSF was maintained at 4 C (30, 38). After 2–3 h of perfusion with HbO2 (basal NO levels), the rats were injected with LPS (100 µg/kg, iv) or the vehicle, and the perfusion was continued for 2 h. Microdialysis samples were collected every 20 min in a fraction collector and kept at 4 C until the end of the experiment. Sample absorbency (401 and 421 nM) was recorded using a Beckman Coulter, Inc. DU-30 spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA). NO levels were calculated using measured absorbency difference values at 401 and 421 nM and the HbO2 molar extinction coefficient. We calculated a value of 76 nM (r2 = 0.999) for the extinction molar coefficient of our hemoglobin preparations, and this value was used for the calculation of the NO concentration in the perfusates. The calibration curve for the determination of this extinction coefficient was obtained by quantitative oxidation of increasing amounts of HbO2 (0.25–8 µg) using 10 mM sodium nitroprusside and plotting the measured absorbency differences (401–421 nM) vs. the concentration of HbO2 used.

NOS activity measurement
NOS activity in brain tissues was determined by measuring the conversion of [14C]arginine to [14C]citrulline following the methods of Bredt and Snyder (39) or an NOS detect Assay Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA; catalogue no. 204500). Briefly, frozen tissues (three PVN areas, three MBH, one NIL, or one AL) were homogenized (50 mg tissue/ml homogenization buffer) in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM EGTA, then centrifuged at 8000 x g for 10 min at 4 C. Ten 50 µl of the supernatant (depending on the brain region) were incubated in a 100-µl final volume reaction containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 3 µM tetrahydrobiopterin (Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA), 1 µM flavin adenine dinucleotide, 1 µM flavin mononucleotide, 0.6 mM CaCl2, 1 mM NADPH reduced form, and 0.3 µCi L-[14C]arginine monohydrochloride (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL; >300 mCi/mmol). The reaction was carried out at 37 C, and 45-µl aliquots of the reaction mixture were taken at 4 and 8 min. Four hundred microliters of stop buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 5.5) and 5 mM EDTA] was added immediately. Two hundred microliters of AG50W-X8 resin sodium form (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA), previously equilibrated with stop buffer, were added to each sample and vortexed for 1 min at room temperature. Finally, the mixture was transferred to spin columns (Bio 101, Vista, CA). To recover the eluate, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min. [14C]Citrulline in the eluent was quantified by liquid scintillation (Ecolume, ICN) by a ß-counter scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Inc., model LS 8000), and NOS activity was expressed as picomoles of citrulline formed per mg protein/min. Protein quantification for each sample was performed by the Bradford method using a Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Richmond, CA), protein assay kit.

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
The animals received the vehicle or LPS (100 µg/kg, iv). Blood samples were taken 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after treatment, at which time the rats were deeply anesthetized with 0.8 ml 35% chloral hydrate. They were perfused transcardially with saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by a fix solution (5% glutaraldehyde, 0.5% paraformaldehyde, and 0.2% Na2S2O5 in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4). Brains were removed and postfixed for 2 h in fix solution at room temperature, then cryoprotected for 2 days at 4 C in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), 0.1 M NaCl, and 20% (vol/vol) glycerol. Thirty-micron frozen sections, ranging from the anterior commisura to the mamillaris nuclei, were cut on a HistoSlide microtome (Leica Corp., Rockleigh, NJ). The brain sections were recollected in four series and stored on cryoprotectant at -20 C until processed for histochemistry and double labeling immunocytochemistry-in situ hybridization.

Immunocytochemical detection of citrulline in the brain has been used to monitor NOS activity, because other citrulline-producing enzymes have been considered to be absent from the brain (40, 41). In our experiments, citrulline-positive cells were detected following the protocol reported by Eliasson et al. (42). Briefly, free floating brain sections were reduced for 20 min with 0.5% NaBH4 and 0.2% Na2S2O5 in PBS [10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4) and 0.19 M NaCl], washed for 45 min at room temperature in PBS containing 0.2% Na2S2O5, blocked with 4% normal goat serum for 1 h in the presence of 0.2% Triton X-100, and incubated overnight at 4 C with an anticitrulline antiserum (1:6000 dilution in PBS containing 2% normal goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100) provided by Dr. S. H. Snyder (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) (42). Immunoreactivity was visualized with the Vestatin ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). To test immunohistochemical specificity, brain sections from rats pretreated with L-NAME (50 mg/kg, iv) for 4 days were incubated with the citrulline antiserum, and no signal was detected.

A combined immuno- and in situ hybridization histochemical protocol was performed to detect citrulline immunoreactivity in NOS I-expressing neurons. Briefly, free-floating PVN brain sections were washed twice with sterile PBS for 10 min; reduced for 20 min with 0.5% NaBH4 and 0.2% Na2S2O5 in PBS; washed for 45 min at room temperature in PBS; blocked with 1% BSA (fraction V, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), 0.25% heparin sodium salt (Calbiochem, CA), and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature; and incubated for 36–48 h at 4 C with the citrulline antiserum (1:6000 dilution in PBS 1% BSA, 0.25% heparin sodium salt, and 0.1% of Triton X-100). Immunoreactivity was visualized with the Vestatin ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc.). Thereafter, tissues were rinsed in sterile Krebs PBS, mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, desiccated under vacuum overnight, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and digested with proteinase K [10 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 5 mM EDTA] at 37 C for 30 min. Sections were acetylated with a solution of 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine, pH 8, then dehydrated for 1 min through graded concentrations of alcohol (50%, 70%, 95%, and 100%). After the slides were vacuum dried for a minimum of 2 h, they were covered with 90 µl of a hybridization mixture (107 cpm/ml), sealed under a coverslide with a mixture of distyrene, a plasticizer, and xylene (DPX), and incubated at 60 C overnight (15–20 h) on a slide warmer. The coverslips were then removed, and the slides were rinsed in 4 x SSC solution (1 x SSC = 0.15 M NaCl and 15 mM trisodium citrate, pH 7) at room temperature. Sections were digested with ribonuclease A (20 µg/ml, 37 C for 30 min), rinsed in descending concentrations of SSC (2, 1, and 0.5 x SSC), washed in 0.1 x SSC for 30 min at 65 C, and dehydrated through graded concentrations of alcohol. After being dried under vacuum, the sections were exposed overnight at 4 C to x-ray film (Bio-Max, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), then defatted with xylene and dipped in NTB2 nuclear emulsion (Eastman Kodak Co.; diluted 1:1 with distilled water). The slides were exposed for 2 weeks, then developed with D19 developer (Eastman Kodak Co.) for 3.5 min at 14–15 C, and fixed for 6 min. Thereafter, tissues were rinsed in running distilled water for 1–2 h, dipped through graded concentrations of alcohol, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with DPX.

Quantification of PVN citrulline-positive cells and percentage of colocalization of citrulline-positive cells with NOS I mRNA
One series of brain sections containing five sections of PVN was processed for citrulline immunohistochemistry. The sections were analyzed under the brightfield illumination of a Leitz microscope using a x20 objective. The parvocellular and magnocellular divisions of the PVN were delineated in each section under brightfield at the rostral/caudal level. The counting was performed by eye on a single PVN using a grill that covered all of the PVN area. Citrulline-positive cells were considered to be all of the cells that were dark brown. The total number of PVN citrulline cells corresponds to the sum of all of the positive cells in the five sections of PVN per rat. For colocalization, the sections were analyzed under the brightfield illumination of a Leitz microscope using a x40 objective, and double staining neurons were assessed in the PVN by the presence of both phenotypic markers (brown color for citrulline and dark silver grains for NOS I mRNA). The counting was performed as described for citrulline-positive cells.

Reagents
LPS (Escherichia coli serotype O26:B6, code L-3755, lot 37H4095) and L-NAME were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.. Both were diluted in apyrogenic saline.

ACTH and corticosterone assays
ACTH concentrations were determined by a two-site immunoradiometric assay (Allegro, Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA) using 50 µl plasma. This assay has been previously validated for use in the rat (34). Corticosterone values were measured by RIA with an antiserum provided by Dr. G. Niswender (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO). The characteristics of both assays have been reported previously (34, 43).

Statistical analysis
All of the results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. They were analyzed by factorial ANOVA. When the ANOVA was significant (P < 0.05), post-hoc comparisons (Duncan’s new multiple range test) were made to determine the statistical levels of difference between groups.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of LPS on PVN NO levels measured by microdialysis
These experiments were designed to 1) determine whether iv LPS induced NO release in the PVN, and 2) provide the basis for the correlative experiments that were subsequently performed. PVN NO levels were measured in microdialysates with the hemoglobin-trapping technique, which is a stoichiometric reaction of NO with oxyhemoglobin to produce methemoglobin and nitrate. The rats were perfused (44) with aCSF for 1 h and with oxyhemoglobin for an additional hour before establishment of the baseline NO concentration. Four samples were taken for basal NO level determination, after which the rats were injected iv with saline or LPS. Preliminary data based on a small number of animals indicated that the iv injection of 25 µg/kg LPS caused a significant (P < 0.05), but temporary, increase in NO production measured by microdialysis in the PVN (Barbanel, G., and C. Rivier, unpublished). However, more consistent results were obtained with 100 µg LPS/kg, and these results are illustrated here. In vehicle-injected rats, baseline NO production showed a time-related increase, which was also reported by others (45). LPS induced a fast and transient, but statistically significant (P < 0.05), increase in PVN NO levels 20 min after treatment (Fig. 1Go). NO levels then returned to baseline.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of the vehicle or LPS (100 µg/kg, injected iv at 60 min; arrow) on PVN NO levels, measured by the microdialysis hemoglobin-trapping technique in awake, freely moving rats. NO was measured in microdialysates by the hemoglobin-trapping technique. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of four rats. *, P < 0.05.

 
Effect of LPS on NOS activity levels in the PVN, MBH, NIL, and AL
Having shown that iv LPS induced NO release in the PVN, we then determined whether this gas was also produced in other areas of the HPA axis. In view of the difficult and time-consuming aspect of the microdialysis experiments, these studies were carried out by a different technique, namely the conversion of [14C]arginine to [14C]citrulline (see Materials and Methods). The cytosolic NOS activity from different tissues was determined in duplicate after 4 and 8 min of incubation. For the PVN and MBH, NOS activity measurements were carried out using a pool of three animals (the protein concentrations for these sites were: PVN, 14 ± 0.94 µg; MBH, 19 ± 3 µg; NIL, 4.5 ± 0.3 µg; and AL, 65 ± 8 µg; n = 9). Enzymatic activity was undetectable when 1 mM EDTA or 1 mM L-NAME was added to the reaction mix, which indicates that we measured Ca2+-dependent NOS. LPS induced a fast and transient increase in PVN NOS activity (30% at 0.5 h; P < 0.01; Fig. 2Go). Levels had returned to baseline by 1 h and had significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by 6 h. In contrast, we did not detect any change in NOS activity in the MBH, NIL, or AL at 0.5 and 1 h after treatment (Table 1Go). Plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels showed the expected rises, with peak responses at 0.5–1.0 h for ACTH and levels still rising at 6 h for corticosterone (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time course of PVN NOS activity and plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels in response to LPS (100 µg/kg, iv). NOS activity is reported as a percentage of control values, with vehicle-injected levels taken as 100%. For ACTH and corticosterone levels, basal values were collapsed across time and therefore only represented once. Each bar represents the mean of five replicates ± SEM *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of iv LPS injection on MBH and pituitary NOS activity

 
PVN and NIL NOS activity measurements in rats during chronic salt loading
To validate the NOS activity measurements reported here, we also monitored NOS activity changes during chronic salt-loading experiments. NOS activity was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in both NIL (59%) and PVN (20%). In the NIL, the increase corresponds to the measurements reported by Kadowaki et al. (36).

Time-dependent changes in the number of citrulline-positive cells in the PVN and in plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels after LPS treatment
There was a significant (P < 0.01) increase in the number (Fig. 3Go) and color intensity (Fig. 4Go) of citrulline-positive cells 1 and 3 h, but not 30 min, after LPS treatment. By 6 h, the number of citrulline-producing cells had returned to control levels. Most of the PVN citrulline-positive cells (99 ± 0.45%) were colocalized with NOS I-synthesizing neurons (Fig. 5Go). In general, the response to LPS was stronger in the anterior and medial parvicellular parts of the PVN than in the magnocellular part. However, 3 h after the treatment, we observed an increase in the signal in some of the PVN magnocellular cells. Interestingly, we also observed an important increase in the number of dendrites and axons stained 1 and 3 h after the LPS injection. Although plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels also significantly (P < 0.01) increased in response to LPS, the initial change preceded any measurable up-regulation in PVN citrulline-positive cells.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Time course of changes in the number of citrulline-positive cells, detected by immunocytochemical methodology, in the PVN after LPS treatment (100 µg/kg, iv) and in plasma ACTH and corticosterone. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of four rats. **, P < 0.01 vs. control (vehicle-injected rats).

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Brightfield photomicrograph illustrating a representative sample of the effect of LPS (100 µg/kg, iv) on PVN citrulline-immunoreactive cells. Immunocytochemistry for citrulline was performed in vehicle and at varying intervals after LPS treatment. Magnification, x160.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Colocalization of PVN citrulline-positive cells with NOS I mRNA. Brightfield photomicrograph of a representative rat injected with LPS (100 µg/kg, iv) and killed 1 h later. Immunocytochemistry for citrulline (brown) was performed before in situ hybridization for NOS I (black grains). Arrowheads indicate some of the citrulline-positive cells colocalized with NOS I mRNA. Magnification, x1700 (A) and x4300 (B).

 
Influence of L-NAME pretreatment on NOS levels in brain areas and on the number of PVN citrulline-positive cells
These experiments were designed to determine whether blockade of NO formation would lead to the expected decrease in tissue NOS activity, and consequently citrulline levels, in parallel with changes in plasma ACTH levels. As shown in Table 2Go, acute injection of L-NAME (50 mg/kg, sc) significantly (87–93%; P < 0.01) lowered basal NOS activity in PVN, MBH, NIL, and AL. As expected, LPS (100 µg/kg, iv) produced a marked (P < 0.01) increase in the number of citrulline-positive cells in the PVN (Figs. 6Go and 7Go). L-NAME decreased this number below control levels. L-NAME also partially inhibited the ACTH response to LPS treatment (Fig. 7Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Determination of Ca2+-dependent NOS activity from areas of HPA axis 3 h after an sc injection of L-NAME

 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Brightfield photomicrograph illustrating a representative sample of the effect of prior treatment with L-NAME (50 mg/kg, sc, 3 h) on the response of PVN citrulline-positive cells to LPS (100 µg/kg, iv). III, Third ventricle. Magnification, x310.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of pretreatment with L-NAME (50 mg/kg, sc, 3 h) on the number of citrulline-positive cells in the PVN and the plasma ACTH in response to LPS (100 µg/kg, iv). Measurements were taken 1 h after LPS or its vehicle. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three to eight rats. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The work reported here clearly shows that acute systemic treatment with LPS rapidly and significantly increased NO levels and NOS activity in the PVN of the hypothalamus. We had previously reported an up-regulation of PVN NOS I mRNA levels in rats injected with LPS (23), a finding recently confirmed by others (29). Our present report that cytoplasm NOS activity quantification was calcium dependent, indicates that the changes we detected indeed corresponded to NOS I. LPS has also been shown to stimulate the production of inducible (type II) NOS (46), but these changes normally take place several hours after the induction of endotoxemia and therefore probably have little functional importance for the release of ACTH shown in the present experiments.

The observation that systemic LPS injection significantly increased NO levels in the PVN requires several comments. First, we consistently observed that basal NO levels showed a time-related increase in the afternoon. This suggests the possibility that, like the activity of the HPA axis, NO production may follow a circadian pattern. Indeed, it would be of interest to determine whether blockade of the formation of this gas might interfere with the known increase in PVN CRF production as well as with the ACTH and corticosterone secretion that takes place shortly before lights off (47, 48, 49). Should this be the case, it would provide additional support for our hypothesis that NO exerts a stimulatory effect on the HPA axis under a variety of circumstances. The second comment regards the magnitude of the increase in NO levels. Using measurement of NO metabolites by HPLC, Ishizuka et al. (45) recently reported that the ip injection of a high dose of IL-1ß increased nitrite and nitrate levels in the PVN (45). The magnitude of the change reported by these investigators is comparable to the one we show here, and in both cases it is modest. However, it is important to remember that there are no valid criteria to determine what this magnitude should be to ensure that NO release is temporarily and/or functionally correlated with activation of the HPA axis. For example, the presence of NOS in CRF cell bodies (17, 18) suggests that this gas may influence CRF synthesis in an autocrine fashion. If this is the case, we cannot determine, in a live system, what NO concentrations are necessary to activate CRF transcription pathways. To provide additional support for our hypothesis that LPS-induced NO production was indeed important for the ACTH response, we decided to corroborate data obtained with the microdialysis technique with citrulline production. In these experiments, we took advantage of the fact that the enzymatic reaction that produces NO also generates citrulline in equimolar concentrations. As, in contrast to NO, antibodies against citrulline are available, and detection of citrulline in the brain by immunohistochemistry provides a convenient as well as reliable method to measure changes in levels of this compound. We report here that LPS induced a significant increase in the number of PVN citrulline-positive cells, with a peak response observed at the 1 h point. The time course of these changes is in partial agreement with changes in NOS activity, with differences in peak levels for the enzyme activity and citrulline detection, possibly due to differences in sensitivity of the two assays. These results support our hypothesis that LPS induced NO production in the PVN. Furthermore, the observation that NOS I mRNA expression was found in citrulline-positive cells in the PVN provides evidence that NO was formed via the constitutive isoform of the enzyme.

The third comment pertains to the duration of LPS-induced NO release. In the work of Ishizuka et al. (45), IL-1ß increased nitrite and nitrate levels in the PVN for several hours. However, a direct comparison of our study and theirs is difficult. Although systemic LPS treatment is expected to increase IL-1ß levels in the brain (50), it probably also up-regulates the levels of many other cytokines and related secretagogues, some of which might exert an inhibitory influence on NO production. Indeed, we observed a significant decrease in NOS activity 6 h after LPS treatment. A number of mechanisms might be responsible for this phenomenon, including NOS protein degradation [which has been reported to occur in cell cultures exposed to cytokines (51)], inhibition of the enzyme by NO itself (52, 53, 54), association with regulatory proteins (55, 56), or an inhibitory influence of increased corticosterone release (57). Although some of these mechanisms might be expected to also have played a role in the experiments conducted by Ishizuka et al. (45), it is of interest to note that NO has been reported to specifically inhibit LPS-induced NOS gene expression (54).

A final comment should be made with regard to the potential mechanisms responsible for the effect of LPS on NO. The ability of immune signals to up-regulate NO production through its inducible enzyme is well recognized (58, 59, 60, 61). However, this enzyme is not believed to be important in our system. As levels of constitutive NOS are high in the PVN, it is possible that NO is released from a preformed pool without an acute increase in NOS transcripts. Indeed, our previous work suggested that no changes in nNOS mRNA levels were detected until 3 h after LPS injection (23), which is significantly later than the increase in NO levels and NOS activity that we report here. Several of the mechanisms that might account for the stimulatory effect of LPS on NO have been elegantly discussed previously (62). In general, it is assumed that changes in NOS activity in hypothalamic neurons are linked to changes in the neurochemical and neurosecretory activities of these neurons (63). However, this concept does not address the question of whether increased NOS gene transcription occurs in parallel with, precedes, or results from the activation of other signals in these neurons. Such signals include corticosteroids (57), transcription factors such as c-fos (64), changes in intracellular calcium (65), and the binding of proteins such as PDZ-95 to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (56). Potentially more important for our model is the fact that cytokines increase hypothalamic levels of both NO (45) and norepinephrine (66, 67); this coupled with the observation that abdominal vagotomy blocked both cytokine-induced NO (45) and norepinephrine (68) release in the PVN led to the hypothesis (45) that LPS-induced NO formation might be at least in part mediated by this catecholamine. Another mechanism of interest concerns CRF and/or VP. We previously reported that both peptides significantly up-regulated nNOS gene expression in the PVN (69). In view of the stimulatory effect of LPS on PVN CRF and VP (50, 70), it is tempting to propose that the ability of endotoxemia to increase NO levels in the PVN may also be controlled by CRF and/or VP. Studies conducted with antagonists of these peptides should determine whether this hypothesis is correct.

We found that in our model, LPS did not augment NOS activity in the MBH (which contains the median eminence) or the pituitary. NO is abundantly present in the neural lobe of the rat adenohypophysis (71, 72), where its up-regulation by chronic salt loading parallels its increase in PVN NOS mRNA levels (Ref. 36 and the present work). It is also found in the median eminence (73, 74, 75), where it is thought to regulate the release of GnRH (75). On the basis of our finding that L-NAME augmented the ACTH response to blood-borne cytokines (32, 34), we speculated that NO might act at least in part by altering CRF and/or VP secretion from nerve terminals. As NOS involved in these paradigms was of the constitutive type, the influence of L-NAME does not require new production of the enzyme. The present data therefore do not allow us to determine whether basal NO produced outside the blood-brain barrier played a role in regulating the ACTH response to LPS.

One of the problems previously encountered when trying to correlate increases in plasma ACTH levels with changes in PVN NOS mRNA or protein concentrations, is that many of the methods used did not provide the temporal resolution necessary for this comparison. In the present work, the transient increase in NO or citrulline levels corresponds to the initiation of the ACTH response routinely observed in rats injected with LPS. Although this hormone response typically lasts at least 3 h, changes in NO concentrations were very short-lived. This does not diminish, however, the potential importance of NO in mediating the effect of LPS on the corticotrophs. If, as suggested by previously published work, NO stimulates the neuronal activity of PVN CRF perikarya (76, 77), it is possible that once the early events of signal transduction and nuclear factor activation have been initiated, subsequent gene transcription can proceed independently of additional increases in NO levels. The hypothesis that this gas plays a role in the response of the HPA axis to LPS is further supported by the observation of temporally related increases in the number of citrulline-positive cells and plasma ACTH levels after LPS treatment. However, it must also be noted that the onset of ACTH release preceded detectable changes in citrulline levels. This could be due to methodology difficulties in detecting small increases in concentrations of this compound. It could also mean that NO is not involved in the very early events leading to ACTH secretion, but only becomes functionally significant at a somewhat later time. Regardless of the precise role of NO at the onset of ACTH secretion, our recent observation that microinfusion of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside immediately above the PVN significantly enhanced the ACTH response to iv LPS (Uribe, R. M., and C. Rivier, unpublished) further supports the participation of this gas during the HPA axis response to endotoxemia.

If the hypothesis that NO is important for ACTH release is correct, one would expect that blockade of NO formation with L-NAME would both significantly lower citrulline levels and alter LPS-induced ACTH release. This was indeed the case, and although the present study relied on a maximally effective dose of L-NAME, we know that the effect of the arginine derivative is dose related (32, 78). We have previously reported that L-NAME increased the ACTH response to the systemic injection of single cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, IL-1ß, and IL-6 (32, 34), whereas it decreased it in rats exposed to electroshocks (33, 76). On the basis of these and other results (77), we had proposed, as mentioned above, that NO exerted an inhibitory influence on ACTH secretagogues released in the median eminence and a stimulatory effect within the PVN. Although the precise mechanisms responsible for LPS-induced ACTH secretion remain unclear, they are thought to include both sites and should therefore be under this dual and opposite influence of NO. Work published by others (79, 80) as well as preliminary results from our laboratory (Lee, S., and C. Rivier, in preparation) indeed suggest that doses of LPS such as those used in the present work have an important PVN component that includes activation of CRF neurons and PG production. This central component is under the stimulatory influence of NO, which should therefore prevail. The ability of L-NAME to decrease ACTH release in our paradigm is in agreement with this concept. Some investigators (81), but not others (82), have also suggested that brain interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) might participate in the effect of systemic LPS on the HPA axis (for a more complete discussion, see Ref. 50). Interestingly, however, the ACTH response to the icv injection of this cytokine does not depend on NO (78). Even if central IL-ß participates in the stimulatory action of LPS, it is therefore not expected to be altered by L-NAME.

In summary, we have shown that an immune challenge induced by LPS treatment increased PVN NOergic activity, and that this change was temporally related to ACTH release. Pretreatment with L-NAME, which reduced the ACTH response to LPS, abolished NOS activity and citrulline immunoreactivity. Collectively, our results suggest the presence of a temporal and functional relationship between the response of the HPA axis to LPS, and NO formation in the neurocrine hypothalamus.


    Acknowledgments
 
The technical assistance of Y. Haas, S. Johnson, and C. Arias is gratefully acknowledged. We also express our gratitude to Dr. S. H. Snyder for the gift of the citrulline antibodies, and to Dr. G. Barbanel for allowing us to quote his preliminary results.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grant MH-51774 and the Foundation for Research. Back

2 Financial support was provided by DGAPA-UNAM. Present address: Instituto De Biotechnologia/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, Mexico. Back

3 Foundation Investigator. Back

Received April 22, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Moncada S, Palmer RMJ, Higgs EA 1991 Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 43:109–142[Medline]
  2. Bredt DS, Snyder SH 1994 Nitric oxide: a physiologic messenger molecule. Annu Rev Biochem 63:175–95[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Amir S 1995 Nitric oxide signalling in the hypothalamus. In: Nitric Oxide in the Nervous System. Academic Press, New York, pp 151–162
  4. Brann D, Bhat G, Lamar CA, Mahesh V 1997 Gaseous transmitters and neuroendocrine regulation. Neuroendocrinology 65:385–395[Medline]
  5. Dawson T, Snyder S 1994 Gases as biological messengers: nitric oxide and carbon monoxide in the brain. J Neurosci 14:5147–5159[Abstract]
  6. Schuman E, Madison D 1994 Nitric oxide and synaptic functions. Annu Rev Neurosci 17:153–183[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Moilanen E, Vapaatalo H 1995 Nitric oxide in inflammation and immune responses. Ann Med 27:359–367[Medline]
  8. Snyder SH, Dawson TM 1995 Nitric oxide and related substances as neural messengers. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 609–618
  9. Knowles RG, Moncada S 1994 Nitric oxide synthases in mammals. Biochem J 298:249–258
  10. Nathan C, Xie Q-W 1994 Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls. Cell 78:915–918[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Dawson TM, Dawson VL 1996 Nitric oxide synthase: role as a transmitter/mediator in the brain and endocrine system. Annu Rev Med 47:219–227[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Bredt DS 1995 Molecular characterization of nitric oxide synthase. In: Vincent SR (ed) Nitric Oxide in the Nervous System. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–19.
  13. Nelson R, Kriegsfeld L, Dawson V, Dawson T 1997 Effects of nitric oxide on neuroendocrine function and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 18:463–491[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Chao CC, Hu S, Sheng WS, Bu D, Bukrinsky MI, Peterson PK 1996 Cytokine-stimulated astrocytes damage human neurons via a nitric oxide mechanism. Glia 16:276–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Rodrigo J, Springall DR, Uttenthal O, Bentura ML, Abadia-Molina F, Riveros-Moreno V, Martínez-Murillo R, Polak JM, Moncada S 1994 Localization of nitric oxide synthase in the adult rat brain. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B [Biol Sci] 345:175–221[Medline]
  16. Hökfelt T, Ceccatelli S, Gustafsson L, Hulting A-L, Verge V, Villar M, Xu X-J, Xu Z-Q, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Zhang X 1994 Plasticity of NO synthase expression in the nervous and endocrine systems. Neuropharmacology 33:1221–1227[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Torres G, Lee S, Rivier C 1993 Ontogeny of the rat hypothalamic nitric oxide synthase and colocalization with neuropeptides. Mol Cell Neurosci 4:155–163
  18. Siaud P, Mekaouche M, Ixart G, Balmefrezol M, Givalois L, Barbanel G, Assenmacher I 1994 A subpopulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone neurosecretory cells in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus also contain NADPH-diaphorase. Neurosci Lett 170:51–54[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Arevalo A, Sanchez F, Alonso JR, Carretero J, Vazquez R, Aijon J 1992 NADPH-diaphorase activity in the hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory nuclei of the rat. Brain Res Bull 28:599–603[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Sanchez F, Alonso J, Arevalo R, Blanco E, Aijon J, Vasquez R 1994 Coexistence of NADPH-diaphorase with vasopressin and oxytocin in the hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory nuclei of the rat. Cell Tissue Res 276:31–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Vincent SR 1995 Localization of nitric oxide neurons in the central nervous system. In: Vincent SR (ed) Nitric Oxide in the Nervous System. Academic Press, New York, pp 83–102
  22. Rivier C 1998 Role of nitric oxide and carbon monoxide in modulating the ACTH response to immune and non-immune signals. Neuroimmunomodulation 5:203–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Lee S, Barbanel G, Rivier C 1995 Systemic endotoxin increases steady-state gene expression of hypothalamic nitric oxide synthase: comparison with corticotropin-releasing factor and vasopressin gene transcripts. Brain Res 705:136–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Calzà L, Giardino L, Ceccatelli S 1993 NOS mRNA in the paraventricular nucleus of young and old rats after immobilization stress. Neuroendocrinology 4:627–630
  25. Kishimoto J, Tsuchiya T, Emson PC, Nakayama Y 1996 Immobilization-induced stress activates neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and mRNA and protein in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in rats. Brain Res 720:159–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hatakeyama S, Kawai Y, Ueyama T, Senba E 1996 Nitric oxide synthase-containing magnocellular neurons of the rat hypothalamus synthesize oxytocin and vasopressin and express Fos following stress stimuli. J Chem Neuroanat 11:243–256[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ceccatelli S 1997 Expression and plasticity of NO synthase in the neuroendocrine system. Brain Res Bull 44:533–538[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Krukoff TL, Khalili P 1997 Stress-induced activation of nitric oxide-producing neurons in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 377:509–519[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Harada S, Imaki T, Chikada N, Naruse M, Demura H 1999 Distinct distribution and time-course changes in neuronal nitric oxide synthase and inducible NOS in the paraventricular nucleus following lipopolysaccharide injection. Brain Res 821:322–332[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Zhang Y, Samson F, Nelson S, Pazdernik T 1996 Nitric oxide detection with intracerebral microdialysis: important considerations in the application of the hemoglobin-trapping technique. J Neurosci Methods 68:165–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Balcioglu A, Maher T 1993 Determination of kainic acid-induced release of nitric oxide using a nivel hemoglobin-trapping technique with microdialysis. J Neurochem 61:2311–2313[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Kim CK, Rivier C 1998 Influence of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on the ACTH and cytokine responses to peripheral immune signals. J Neuroendocrinol 10:353–362[Medline]
  33. Turnbull A, Kim C, Lee S, Rivier C 1998 Influence of carbon monoxide, and its interaction with nitric oxide, on the ACTH response of the intact rat to a physico-emotional stress. J Neuroendocrinol 10:793–802[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Rivier C, Shen G 1994 In the rat, endogenous nitric oxide modulates the response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to interleukin-1ß, vasopressin and oxytocin. J Neurosci 14:1985–1993[Abstract]
  35. Palkoviths M, Brownstein MJ 1988 Maps and Guide to Microdissection of the Rat Brain. Elsevier, New York
  36. Kadowaki K, Kishimoto J, Leng G, Emson PC 1994 Up-regulation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene expression together with NOS activity in the rat hypothalamo-hypophysial system after chronic salt loading: evidence of a neuromodulatory role of nitric oxide in arginine vasopressin and oxytocin secretion. Endocrinology 134:1011–1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Villar M, Ceccatelli S, Rönnqvist M, Hökfelt T 1994 Nitric oxide synthase increases in hypothalamic magnocellular neurons after salt loading in the rat. An immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization study. Brain Res 644:273–281[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Williams JA, Vincent SR, Reiner PB 1997 Nitric oxide production in rat thalamus changes with behavioral state, local depolarization, and brainstem stimulation. J Neurosci 17:420–427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Bredt D, Snyder S 1990 Isolation of nitric oxide synthetase, a calmodulin-requiring enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:682–685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Buniatian HC, Davtian MA 1966 Urea synthesis in brain. J Neurochem 13:743–753[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Krebs HA, Henseleit K 1932 Untersuchungen über die Harnstoffildugn im Tierkörper, Hoppe Seyler Z. Physiol Chem 210:33–66
  42. Eliasson M, Blackshaw S, Schell M, Snyder S 1997 Neuronal nitric oxide synthase alternatively spliced forms: prominent functional localizations in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:3396–3401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Rivier C 1993 Female rats release more corticosterone than males in response to alcohol: influence of circulating sex steroids and possible consequences for blood alcohol levels. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 17:854–859[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Kwak SP, Morano MI, Young EA, Watson SJ, Akil H 1993 Diurnal CRH mRNA rhythm in the hypotyhalamus: decreased expression in the evening is not dependent on endogenous glucocorticoid. Neuroendocrinology 57:96–105[Medline]
  45. Ishizuka Y, Ishida Y, Jin Q-H, Shimokawa A, Saita M, Kato K, Kunitake T, Hanamori T, Mitsuyama Y, Kannan H 1998 Abdominal vagotomy attenuates interleukin-1ß-induced nitric oxide release in the paraventricular nucleus region in concious rats. Brain Res 789:157–161[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Wong ML, Rettori V, al-Shekhlee A, Bongiorno PB, Canteros G, McCann SM, Gold PW, Licinio J 1996 Inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression in the brain during systemic inflammation. Nat Med 2:581–584[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Carnes M, Lent S, Feyzi J, Hazel D 1989 Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone in the rat demonstrates three different rhythms within 24 h. Neuroendocrinology 50:17–25[Medline]
  48. Ixart G, Siaud P, Barbanel G, Mekaouche M, Givalois L, Assenmacher I 1994 Circadian variations in the amplitude of corticotropin-releasing hormone 41 (CRH41) episodic release measure in vivo in male rats: correlations with diurnal fluctuations in hypothalamic and mediatian eminence CRH41 contents. J Biol Rhyth 8:297–309
  49. Bagdy G, Chrousos GP, Calogero AE 1991 Circadian pattern of plasma immuoreactive corticotropin, ß-endorphin, corticosterone and prolactin after immunoneutralization of corticotropin-releasing horomone. Neuroendocrinology 53:573–578[Medline]
  50. Turnbull AVT, Rivier CL 1999 Regulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis by cytokines: actions and mechanisms of action. Physiol Rev 79:1–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Zhang J, Patel J, Li Y, Block E 1997 Proinflammatory cytokines downregulate gene expression and activity of constitutive nitric oxide synthase in porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 96:71–87[Medline]
  52. Rengasamy A, Johns RA 1993 Regulation of nitric oxide synthase by nitric oxide. Mol Pharmacol 44:124–128[Abstract]
  53. Assreuy J, Cunha FQ, Liew FY, Moncada S 1993 Feedback inhibition of nitric oxide synthase activity by nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol 108:833–837[Medline]
  54. Colasanti M, Persichini T, Menegazzi M, Mariotto S, Giordano E, Caldarera CM, Sogos V, Lauro GM, Suzuki H 1995 Induction of nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression. J Biol Chem 270:26731–26733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Jaffrey SR, Snyder SH 1996 PIN: an associated protein inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Science 274:774–777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Brenman JE, Chao DS, Gee SH, McGee AW, Craven SE, Santillano DR, Wu Z, Huang F, Xia H, Peters MF, Froehner S, Bredt D 1996 Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 and {alpha}1-syntropin mediated by PDZ domains. Cell 84:757–767[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Lopez-Figueroa M, Itoi K, Watson S 1998 Regulation of nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA expression in the rat hippocampus by glucocorticoids. Neuroscience 87:439–446[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Weisz A, Cicatiello L, Esumi H 1996 Regulation of the mouse inducible-type nitric oxide synthase gene promoter by interferon-{gamma}, bacterial lipopolysaccharide and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. Biochem J 316:209–215
  59. Salkowski CA, Detore G, McNAlly R, van Rooijen N, Vogel SN 1997 Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA expression and nitric oxide production by lipopolysaccharide in vivo. J Immunol 158:905–912[Abstract]
  60. Smith SR, Manfra D, Davies L, Terminelli C, Denhardt G, Donkin J 1997 Elevated levels of NO in both unchallenged and LPS-challenged C. parvum-primed mice are attributable to the activity of a cytokine-inducible isoform of iNOS. J Leukocyte Biol 61:24–32[Abstract]
  61. Aono K, Isobe K-I, Kiuchi K, Fan Z-H, Ito M, Takeuchi A, Miyachi M, Nakashima I, Nimura Y 1997 In vitro and in vivo expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase during experimental endotoxemia: involvement of other cytokines. J Cell Biochem 65:349–358[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Lopez-Figueroa M, Day H, Akil H, Watson S 1998 Nitric oxide in the stress axis. Histol Histopathol 13:1243–1252[Medline]
  63. O’Shea R, Gundlach A 1996 Food or water deprivation modulate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and gene expression in rat hypothalamicneurones: correlation with neurosecrotory activity? J Neuroendocrinol 8:417–425[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Hall A, Antoniou H, Wang Y, Cheung A, Arbus A, Olson S, Lu W, Kau C, Marsden P 1994 Structural organization of the human neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene (NOS1). J Biol Chem 269:33082–33090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Glatt CE, Lowenstein C, Reed RR, Snyder SH 1991 Cloned and expressed nitric oxide synthase structurally resembles cytochrome P-450 reductase. Nature 351:714–718[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Canteros G, Rettori V, Genaro A, Suburo A, Gimeno M, McCann SM 1996 Nitric oxide synthase content of hypothalamic explants: increased by norepinephrine and inactivated by NO and cGMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4246–4250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Dunn A 1992 Endotoxin-induced activation of cerebral catecholamine and serotonin metabolism: comparison with interleukin-1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261:964–969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Ishizuka Y, Ishida Y, Kunitake T, Kato K, Hanamori T, Mitsuyama Y, Kannan H 1997 Effects of area postrema lesion and abdominal vagotomy on interleukin-1ß-induced norepinephrine release in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus region in the rat. Neurosci Lett 223:57–60[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Lee S, Rivier C 1998 Interaction between corticotropin-releasing factor and nitric oxide in mediating the response of the rat hypothalamus to immune and non-immune stimuli. Mol Brain Res 57:54–62[Medline]
  70. Rivier C 1995 Influence of immune signals on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the rodent. Front Neuroendocrinol 16:151–182[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Snyder SH 1990 Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neural role for nitric oxide. Nature 347:768–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Crack PJ, Autelitano DJ, Smith AI 1997 The involvement of nitric oxide in the secretion of ß-endorphin from the pituitary intermediate lobe of the rat. Brain Res 761:113–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Bhat GK, Mahesh VB, Lamar CA, Ping L, Aguan K, Brann DW 1995 Histochemical localization of nitric oxide neurons in the hypothalamus: Association with gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons and co-localization with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Neuroendocrinology 62:187–197[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. Vanhatalo S, Soinila S 1995 Nitric oxide synthase in the hypothalamo-pituitary pathways. J Chem Neuroanat 8:165–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Kawakami S, Ichikawa M, Yokosuka M, Tsukamura H, Maeda K 1998 Glial and neuronal localization of neuronal nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity in the median eminence of female rats. Brain Res 789:322–326[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Rivier C 1994 Endogenous nitric oxide participates in the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by noxious stimuli. Endocr J 2:367–373
  77. Lee S, Rivier C The intracerebroventricular injection of the nitric oxide donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) activates the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, 1998, Los Angeles, CA, p 118
  78. Turnbull AV, Rivier C 1996 Selective inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) implicate a constitutive isoform of NOS in the regulation of interleukin-1-induced ACTH secretion in rats. Endocrine 5:135–140
  79. Lacroix S, Rivest S 1997 Functional circuitry in the brain of immune-challenged rats: partial involvement of prostaglandins. J Comp Neurol 387:307–324[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. Lacroix S, Rivest S 1998 Effect of acute systemic inflammatory response and cytokines on the transcription of the genes encoding cyclooxygenase enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) in the rat brain. Neurochemistry 70:452–466
  81. Kakucska I, Qi Y, Clark BD, Lechan RM 1993 Endotoxin-induced corticotropin-releasing hormone gene expression in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus is mediated centrally by interleukin-1. Endocrinology 133:815–821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Habu S, Watanobe H, Yasujima M, Suda T 1998 Different roles of brain interleukin 1 in the adrenocorticotropin response to central versus peripheral administration of lipopolysaccharide in the rat. Cytokine 10:390–394[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
N Grion, E M Repetto, Y Pomeraniec, C M. Calejman, F Astort, R Sanchez, O P Pignataro, P Arias, and C B Cymeryng
Induction of nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase activities by endotoxin in the rat adrenal cortex: involvement of both signaling systems in the modulation of ACTH-dependent steroid production
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 194(1): 11 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Herman and C. Rivier
Activation of a Neural Brain-Testicular Pathway Rapidly Lowers Leydig Cell Levels of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein and the Peripheral-Type Benzodiazepine Receptor while Increasing Levels of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 624 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. J. Selvage, S. Y. Lee, L. H. Parsons, D. O. Seo, and C. L. Rivier
A Hypothalamic-Testicular Neural Pathway Is Influenced by Brain Catecholamines, But Not Testicular Blood Flow
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1750 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
A K Singh and Y Jiang
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced activation of the immune system in control rats and rats chronically exposed to a low level of the organothiophosphate insecticide, acephate
Toxicology and Industrial Health, March 1, 2003; 19(2-6): 93 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
A. Beishuizen and L. G. Thijs
Review: Endotoxin and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis
Innate Immunity, February 1, 2003; 9(1): 3 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. J. Puder, P. U. Freda, R. S. Goland, and S. L. Wardlaw
Estrogen Modulates the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal and Inflammatory Cytokine Responses to Endotoxin in Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2403 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
V. D. Dixit and N. Parvizi
Pregnancy Stimulates Secretion of Adrenocorticotropin and Nitric Oxide from Peripheral Bovine Lymphocytes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivier, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivier, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals