help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayadev, S.
Right arrow Articles by Catt, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jayadev, S.
Right arrow Articles by Catt, K. J.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 5 2010-2017
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

N-Linked Glycosylation Is Required for Optimal AT1a Angiotensin Receptor Expression in COS-7 Cells

Suman Jayadev1, Roger D. Smith, Gowraganahalli Jagadeesh, Albert J. Baukal, LÁszló Hunyady2 and Kevin J. Catt

Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch (S.J., R.D.S., A.J.B., K.J.C.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Division of Cardio-Renal Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20857 (G.J.); and Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University of Medicine, H-1088, Budapest, Hungary (L.H.)

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. K. J. Catt, Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Building 49, Room 6A-36, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4510. E-mail: catt{at}helix.nih.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The nature and role of glycosylation in AT1 angiotensin receptor (AT1-R) function were investigated by expressing glycosylation-deficient influenza hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged rat AT1a-Rs (HA-AT1a-Rs) in COS-7 cells. All three asparagine residues (Asn4, Asn176, Asn188) contained within consensus sites for N-linked glycosylation could be glycosylated in Cos-7 cells and appeared to be glycosylated on the endogenous AT1-R in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells. Heterogeneity of glycosylation at each site accounted for the broad migration pattern of the AT1-R in SDS-PAGE. Mutation at each glycosylation site, either alone or in combination, had little effect on ligand binding parameters (although the N4K mutant had higher affinity) or signaling activity. However, an increasing number of mutated glycosylation sites was associated with decreasing cell surface receptor expression, which was minimal for the unglycosylated N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor. Decreased surface expression of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs was correlated with decreased total cell receptor content as revealed by immunoblotting with an anti-HA antibody. These findings suggest that glycosylation enhances receptor stability, possibly by protecting nascent receptors from proteolytic degradation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ANGIOTENSIN II (Ang II), the active component of the renin-angiotensin system, plays a major role in the physiology of the cardiovascular system. The octapeptide hormone maintains blood pressure and promotes salt and water retention by acting on a wide range of target tissues including the adrenal cortex (to stimulate aldosterone release), vascular smooth muscle (to stimulate vasoconstriction), and kidney (to promote sodium resorption) (1). The major physiological actions of Ang II in target cells are mediated by the widely distributed AT1 angiotensin receptor (AT1-R), which is a member of the seven-transmembrane domain superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Although the signaling events activated by the AT1-R have been well characterized (2), several other aspects of the receptor’s structure and function are still poorly understood. For example, although many GPCRs are known to be subject to post-translational modifications such as lipidation (3), phosphorylation (4), and glycosylation (5), the lipidation status of the AT1-R is unknown, and phosphorylation of endogenous (6) and expressed (7) AT1-Rs has only recently been demonstrated. Similarly, although the glycosylation status of several GPCRs has been investigated (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), there have been no systematic studies of the nature and role of glycosylation in AT1-R function.

Each of the cloned mammalian AT1-Rs contains three putative Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr consensus sequences (20) for glycosylation on asparagine residues. One potential site (Asn4) is situated near the N terminus of the receptor, while the other two sites (Asn176 and Asn188) are located on the second extracellular loop. However, it is not known which (if any) of these sites are glycosylated in vivo, and what role (if any) such putative glycosylation plays in AT1-R function. We therefore mutated the Asn4, Asn176, and Asn188 residues of an influenza hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged rat AT1a-R (HA-AT1a-R) in various combinations (to lysine, glutamine, and glutamine, respectively) to generate three single-point mutant receptors (N4K, N176Q, and N188Q), three double-point mutant receptors (N4K/N176Q, N4K/N188Q, and N176Q/N188Q), and a triple-point mutant receptor (N4K/N176Q/N188Q). We then investigated the binding parameters, signaling capability, migration pattern, and immunoblotting signal in SDS-PAGE of each receptor transiently expressed in COS-7 cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
DMEM, FBS, and antibiotic solutions were from Biofluids (Rockville, MD). Angiotensin II was from Peninsula Laboratories, Inc. (Belmont, CA). 125I-Ang II, 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II, and 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II were from Covance Laboratories, Inc. (Vienna, VA), and myo-[2-3H]inositol was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Arlington Heights, IL). Protein A-Sepharose was from Oncogene Research Products (Cambridge, MA), and the hemagglutinin 11 (HA.11) mouse monoclonal antibody was from BAbCo (Berkeley, CA). OptiMEM and LipofectAMINE were from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Primary cultures of bovine adrenal glomerulosa (BAG) cells were prepared and cultured as previously described (21).

Mutagenesis and transient expression of the rat AT1a receptor
The influenza hemagglutinin (HA) epitope (YPYDVPDYA) was inserted after the codons of the amino-terminal first two amino acids (MA) into the complementary DNA (cDNA) of the rat AT1a receptor subcloned into pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) as previously described (6). Mutant HA-AT1a-Rs were created using the Mutagene kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) and verified by dideoxy sequencing using Thermosequenase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

COS-7 cells were seeded at 106 cells per 10 cm dish or 5 x 104 cells per 24-well culture plate in DMEM containing 10% (vol/vol) FBS, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 IU/ml penicillin (COS-7 cell medium) and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37 C for 3 days before use. Cells were transfected using 0.5 ml (24-well plate) or 5 ml (10-cm dish) of OptiMEM containing 10 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and the required DNA (1 µg/ml) for 6 h at 37 C. After changing to fresh COS-7 cell medium, the cells were cultured for an additional 2 days before use.

Photoaffinity labeling of AT1-Rs
Cells in 10-cm dishes were incubated overnight at 4 C with the high-affinity photoaffinity ligand, 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II (22) (~107 cpm/dish). After washing, cells were exposed to UV light for 10 sec. Noncovalently bound 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II was removed by incubating the cells for 10 min in ice-cold 150 mM NaCl containing 50 mM acetic acid. After additional washes in ice-cold PBS, dishes were drained and the cells were scraped into lysis buffer (LB-: 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 µg/ml benzamidine, 1 mM AEBSF) and probe-sonicated (Sonifier Cell Disruptor: Heat Systems Ultrasonics, Plainview, NY) for 45 sec. After removal of nuclei by centrifugation for 10 min at 750 x g, membranes were collected by centrifugation for 45 min at 200,000 x g.

Immunoprecipitation of AT1-Rs
Membrane pellets from BAG cells or HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were solubilized in ice-cold LB+ [LB- supplemented with 1% (vol/vol) NP 40, 1% (wt/vol) Na deoxycholate, and 0.1% (wt/vol) SDS] by Dounce homogenization. After clarification for 10 min at 10,000 x g, 1 µl of the HA.11 antibody (for HA-AT1a-Rs) or 5 µl of an anti-AT1-R antibody (6) (for endogenous AT1-Rs), together with 2% (vol/vol) protein A Sepharose, were added to the supernatants overnight at 4 C with tumbling. Immune complexes were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with ice-cold LB+ lacking protease inhibitors. After the final wash, immune complexes were eluted into sample buffer (23) for 1 h at 48 C. After resolution by SDS-PAGE, photoaffinity-labeled AT1-Rs were visualized using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).

Immunoblotting of HA-AT1a-Rs
Membrane pellets from HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were solubilized into sample buffer (23) and heated to 48 C for 1 h, and constituent proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. After transfer, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween-20 and 5% (wt/vol) dried milk protein (TBST/5% milk). Blocked membranes were then incubated with the HA.11 antibody (1 in 1000) in TBST/5% milk for 1 h, washed for 30 min in TBST, and then incubated in TBST/5% milk containing peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) at 1 in 5000 for 30 min. After a final 30-min wash in TBST, immune complexes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories).

Radioligand binding assays
HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells in 24-well plates were incubated in DMEM/25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) containing 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II for 3 h at room temperature. After two washes with ice-cold PBS, cells were harvested in 0.5 N NaOH/0.05% SDS, and radioactivity was measured by {gamma}-spectrometry. Scatchard analysis of binding competition data was performed using the LIGAND program. Membranes prepared from HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were subjected to kinetic 125I-Ang II binding assays as previously described (24). Kinetic data were analyzed by the PRISM program (Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).

Inositol phosphate production
Transfected COS-7 cells in 24-well plates were labeled by overnight incubation in inositol-free DMEM containing 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA, 2.5% (vol/vol) FBS, antibiotics, and 20 µCi/ml myo-[2-3H]inositol. After washing and preincubation at 37 C with 10 mM LiCl for 30 min, 100 nM Ang II was added for an additional 20 min. Inositol phosphates were extracted as described (24) and applied to AG 1-X8 columns (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). After washing three times with water and twice with 0.2 M ammonium formate, the combined inositol bisphosphate + inositol trisphosphate fractions were eluted with 1 M ammonium formate in 0.1 M formic acid, and radioactivities were determined by liquid scintillation counting.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Photoaffinity labeling of AT1-Rs
To determine the effects of glycosylation on the migration pattern of the AT1-R in SDS-PAGE, membranes prepared from 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II photoaffinity-labeled COS-7 cells transiently expressing mutant or wild-type HA-AT1a-Rs were solubilized and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-HA antibody. The specificity of the photoaffinity ligand for AT1-Rs was evident from its failure to bind untransfected COS-7 cells (data not shown), and the specificity of the anti-HA antibody was demonstrated by its failure to immunoprecipitate photoaffinity-labeled receptors after preincubation with an excess of HA peptide (data not shown).

Immunoprecipitation of HA-AT1a-Rs (Figs. 1Go and 2Go) gave better resolution than was achieved when solubilized membranes were resolved by SDS-PAGE (Figs. 2Go and 4AGo). It is apparent from Fig. 1Go that the photoaffinity-labeled wild-type HA-AT1a-R migrates as a very broad band with an apparent Mr of 100,000 to 200,000. Since the deduced molecular mass of the rat AT1a-R protein is only 41 kDa (25), the additional apparent Mr of the receptor is presumably attributable to post-translational glycosylation. This was confirmed when the photoaffinity-labeled triple-point mutant receptor, N4K/N176Q/N188Q (which lacks any N-linked glycosylation sites), was found to migrate as a doublet with an approximate Mr of 40,000 (Fig. 1Go), which is consistent with the deduced size (41 kDa) (25) of the AT1a-R protein. Similarly, enzymatic deglycosylation of the photoaffinity-labeled HA-AT1a-R with peptide-N-glycosidase-F [PNGase F; which cleaves N-linked carbohydrate from protein (26)] also gave rise to a doublet with an Mr of approximately 40,000. A similar doublet was also present in immunoblots of the deglycosylated receptor (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photoaffinity labeling of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs. COS-7 cells expressing the indicated HA-AT1a-Rs were labeled with 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II as described in Materials and Methods. Membranes were prepared, solubilized, and subjected to immunoprecipitation with the anti-HA antibody. Photoaffinity-labeled receptors were resolved by SDS-PAGE using an 8–16% resolving gel. Similar amounts of radioactivity were loaded onto each lane except for the N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor (which received ~20% of the counts per min loaded onto the other lanes). The data are representative of three independent experiments.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Enzymatic deglycosylation of endogenous and expressed AT1-Rs. In the left panel, 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II photoaffinity-labeled membranes prepared from BAG cells or HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were incubated overnight at 37 C in the presence (P) or absence (C) of 10 U/ml PNGase F as indicated before immunoprecipitation with an anti-AT1-R antibody or with the anti-HA antibody, respectively. In the right panel, control (C) or PNGase F-treated (P) photoaffinity-labeled membranes from HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were resolved by SDS-PAGE using a 8–16% gradient gel and transferred to PVDF. After exposure in the PhosphorImager (Azido), the membrane was subsequently probed with the anti-HA antibody (Blot).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunoblotting of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs. 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II photoaffinity-labeled membranes prepared from COS-7 cells expressing the indicated HA-AT1a-Rs were resolved by SDS-PAGE using an 8–16% gradient gel and transferred to PVDF. After visualization of photoaffinity-labeled (cell surface) receptors in the PhosphorImager (panel A), the blot was subsequently probed with the anti-HA antibody to detect total cell receptor expression (panel B). An equal amount of membrane protein was loaded onto each lane. The data are representative of three independent experiments.

 
These results indicate that the HA-AT1a-R expressed in COS-7 cells is glycosylated exclusively at one or more of the asparagine residues that are contained within consensus sequences for N-linked glycosylation (Asn4, Asn176, and Asn188), and also that the receptor is not subject to any O-linked glycosylation. The latter deduction was confirmed by the lack of effect of the enzyme, endo-{alpha}-N-acetylgalactosaminidase [which cleaves O-linked carbohydrate moieties from protein (27)], on the migration of the photoaffinity-labeled HA-AT1a-R in SDS-PAGE (data not shown). However, since the endogenous AT1-R from BAG cells migrates as a relatively discrete band of Mr 60,000–65,000, but (like the expressed HA-AT1a-R) also runs as a doublet with an Mr of approximately 40,000 after deglycosylation (Figs. 2Go and 3Go), it is also apparent that the expressed receptor is glycosylated to a greater extent in COS-7 cells than is the endogenous receptor in BAG cells. Furthermore, the very broad migration pattern of the expressed (compared with the endogenous) receptor indicates a greater degree of variability in the nature and/or extent of glycosylation of the former (compared with the latter) receptor.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Photoaffinity labeling of endogenous AT1-Rs. Membranes prepared from 125I-[Sar1(4-N3)Phe8]Ang II photoaffinity-labeled BAG cells were subjected to deglycosylation at 37 C with the indicated concentrations of PNGase F for 40 min or with 10 U/ml of PNGase F for the indicated times and resolved by SDS-PAGE using a 10% gel. The migration positions of the fully glycosylated (G), fully deglycosylated (deG), and the fast and slow partially deglycosylated intermediates are indicated. A similar result was obtained in a second experiment.

 
To determine whether the glycosylation machinery in COS-7 cells is able to couple carbohydrate moieties to each of the three putative glycosylation sites (Asn4, Asn176, and Asn188) of the HA-AT1a-R, we photoaffinity labeled three double-point mutant receptors (N4K/N176Q, N4K/N188Q, and N176Q/N188Q), each of which contain only a single potential glycosylation site. Each of these receptors exhibited decreased mobility in SDS-PAGE compared with the N4K/N176Q/N188Q triple-point mutant receptor, indicating that each of the putative sites can be glycosylated in COS-7 cells. To determine whether each of these sites is glycosylated on the wild-type HA-AT1a-R in Cos-7 cells, we attempted to detect the expected partially deglycosylated intermediates that would appear in SDS-PAGE after incomplete deglycosylation of the photoaffinity-labeled receptor with PNGase F. However, this treatment produced a smeared signal between the fully glycosylated and fully deglycosylated receptors which, although implying their presence, made the unequivocal detection of discrete intermediates impossible (data not shown). In view of the broad migration patterns of the wild-type and glycosylation-deficient mutant HA-AT1a-Rs (Fig. 1Go), this smearing probably resulted from the presence of similarly migrating (and overlapping) partially deglycosylated intermediates.

We therefore attempted to demonstrate partially deglycosylated intermediates using the endogenous AT1-R in BAG cells, since this receptor runs more discretely in SDS-PAGE (Figs. 2Go and 3Go). Membranes prepared from photoaffinity-labeled BAG cells were incubated for 1–40 min with 10 U/ml PNGase F, or for 40 min with 0.1–10 U/ml of PNGase F. Like the nonglycosylated N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor in COS-7 cells, complete deglycosylation of the BAG cell AT1-R gave rise to a doublet with an Mr of approximately 40,000, although the use of a 10% linear resolving gel in the experiment shown in Fig. 3Go produced greater separation of the doublet’s component bands than was seen for the expressed receptor using 8–16% gradient gels (Figs. 1Go and 2Go). Incomplete deglycosylation of the BAG cell AT1-R with PNGase F revealed two (slow and fast) migrating partially deglycosylated intermediate species with approximate Mrs of 50,000–55,000 and 43,000–45,000, respectively. Since PNGase F completely removes the entire carbohydrate moiety from glycosylated asparagine residues (27), the time- and concentration-dependent progression from the fully glycosylated receptor, through slow and (subsequently) fast migrating intermediates, to the fully deglycosylated doublet (Fig. 3Go) indicates the sequential removal of carbohydrate from each of three sites. All three of the potential sites therefore appear to be glycosylated in BAG cell AT1-Rs. The relatively broad migration pattern of the faster intermediate (which, presumably, contains receptors glycosylated at only one site) also indicates some heterogeneity in the nature and/or extent of glycosylation at individual sites of the endogenous AT1-R in BAG cells, although to a lesser extent than for the expressed HA-AT1a-R in COS-7 cells (Fig. 1Go).

Immunoblotting of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs
We evaluated the relative amounts of each mutant HA-AT1a-R by employing the HA epitope tag to detect total cell receptor in immunoblots of membranes prepared from photoaffinity-labeled COS-7 cells. After detection of cell surface photoaffinity-labeled HA-AT1a-Rs in the PhosphorImager, the membrane was probed with the anti-HA antibody to detect total (cell surface + intracellular) receptor. No receptor was detected in cytosol prepared from HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells (data not shown). It is apparent from Fig. 4AGo that the amounts of photoaffinity-labeled receptor varied widely between the mutant receptors.

Immunoblotting with the anti-HA antibody (Fig. 4BGo) confirmed that the very broad migration pattern of the HA-AT1a-R and its mutants in SDS-PAGE was due to the presence of multiple bands that comigrated with the photoaffinity-labeled receptor (Fig. 4AGo). The identity of these bands as the receptor was confirmed by the absence of immunoreactive bands in membranes prepared from (non-HA-tagged) AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells (Fig. 4BGo). In addition, treatment of solubilized membranes with PNGase F before immunoblotting resulted in the disappearance the multiple bands and the appearance of a doublet with an Mr of approximately 40,000 (Fig. 2Go). There was, in general, a correlation between the relative intensities of immunoreactive receptors and their relative intensities of photoaffinity labeling. In addition, an increasing number of mutated glycosylation sites correlated (in general) with decreasing expression, such that the triple-point mutant receptor gave no discernible signal in either immunoblotting or photoaffinity labeling.

However, there was a marked discrepancy between the intensity of photoaffinity labeling for the N4K and N176Q single-point mutant receptors and their signal intensities in immunoblotting. Whereas the intensity of photoaffinity labeling for the N4K receptor was greater than for the N176Q receptor (Fig. 4AGo), the immunoblotting signal of the N176Q receptor was greater than that of the N4K receptor (Fig. 4BGo). This unexpected finding prompted us to investigate the binding characteristics of the mutant HA-AT1a-Rs.

Binding characteristics of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs
The specific binding of the peptide antagonist, 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II, to each of the mutant HA-AT1a-Rs was less than to the wild-type receptor, and its binding to the double-point mutant receptors (31%, 21%, and 36% of wild-type for the N176Q/N188Q, N4K/N176Q, and N4K/N188Q receptors, respectively) was generally lower than to the single-point mutant receptors (30%, 47%, and 60% of wild-type for the N4K, N176Q, and N188Q receptors, respectively) (Fig. 5Go). Specific binding to the triple-point mutant receptor, N4K/N176Q/N188Q, was very low (4% of wild-type). The magnitude of specific 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding generally correlated with the amount of immunoreactive receptor and was consistent with the results of Scatchard analysis (not shown) of 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding competition data, which showed a lower number of receptors [but no significant differences in dissociation constant (KD) values] for the N176Q and N188Q receptors compared with wild-type. However, the binding data for the N4K mutant receptor did not transform to linearity in Scatchard analysis (data not shown). Therefore, to compare the binding affinity of the N4K mutant receptor with that of the wild-type receptor, we measured the rates of association and dissociation of 125I-Ang II to membranes prepared from COS-7 cells expressing each receptor.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Binding of 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II to mutant HA-AT1a-Rs. COS-7 cells expressing the indicated HA-AT1a-Rs were incubated for 3 h at 20 C with 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II (30 pM) in the presence or absence of an excess (10 µM) of unlabeled [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II. After washing, mean (±SEM) specific 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding was determined. The data are representative of three independent experiments.

 
This experiment revealed not only that 125I-Ang II associated more rapidly with the N4K mutant receptor than with the wild-type receptor (Fig. 6AGo), but also that it dissociated more slowly from the N4K mutant receptor than it did from the wild-type receptor (Fig. 6BGo). Further analysis of this kinetic binding data revealed that the rates of 125I-Ang II association and dissociation at the N4K mutant receptor were approximately twice and half, respectively, of those at the wild-type receptor. These data suggest that the binding affinity of the N4K mutant receptor for agonist ligands is approximately 4-fold greater than that of the wild-type receptor. Similar results were obtained when an S6A mutant HA-AT1a-R, containing a mutation to alanine at Ser6 (which forms part of the consensus sequence for glycosylation at Asn4), was used in place of the N4K mutant receptor (data not shown). Hence, the apparently higher affinity of the N4K mutant receptor probably explains its relatively greater photoaffinity labeling compared with the wild-type receptor (Fig. 3AGo), despite its lower expression level (Fig. 3BGo). Conversely, in view of its unchanged binding affinity compared with the wild-type receptor, the relatively low photoaffinity labeling of the N176Q receptor compared with its signal intensity in immunoblotting suggests that glycosylation at this site may play a permissive role in the delivery of HA-AT1a-Rs to the plasma membrane.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Kinetics of 125I-Ang II binding to the N4K mutant HA-AT1a-R. In panel A, membranes prepared from wild-type ({circ}) or N4K mutant (•) HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cells were incubated with 125I-Ang II in the presence or absence of an excess (10 µM) of unlabeled [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II for the indicated times at 25 C. At each time point, membranes were collected and specific 125I-Ang II binding was determined. In panel B, membranes were incubated with 125I-Ang II for 60 min at 25 C before the addition of an excess (10 µM) of unlabeled [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II. Specific 125I-Ang II binding to wild-type ({circ}) or N4K mutant (•) HA-AT1a-R-expressing COS-7 cell membranes was then determined at the indicated times. Each point represents the average (±range) of two independent experiments performed in duplicate.

 
Inositol phosphate production by mutant HA-AT1a-Rs
To determine whether mutation of its glycosylation sites also affects the function of the HA-AT1a-R, we evaluated the ability of each receptor to stimulate inositol phosphate production. Although each of the mutant receptors was able to stimulate the production of inositol phosphates (Fig. 7Go), the magnitude of the maximal response for the single- and double-point mutant receptors was, in general, less than that of the wild-type receptor, and the maximal response of the triple-point mutant receptor was small (Fig. 7BGo). However, when data were normalized to B0 values derived from 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]AngII binding to replicate cells, it was apparent that each mutant receptor stimulated similar or greater inositol phosphate production than the wild-type receptor (Fig. 7CGo). When the concentration dependency of Ang II-stimulated inositol production was examined, the EC50 values for inositol phosphates production were unaffected by mutation of the putative glycosylation sites (Fig. 7AGo).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. [3H]Inositol phosphate production by mutant HA-AT1a-Rs. COS-7 cells expressing the indicated HA-AT1a-Rs were labeled for 16 h with [3H]inositol before stimulation for 20 min with 100 nM Ang II in the presence of 10 mM LiCl. [3H]Inositol phosphates were extracted and measured as described in Materials and Methods. The concentration-dependent increase in [3H]inositol phosphates production for the wild-type ({circ}), N4K ({triangleup}), N176Q ({square}), and N188Q (•) mutant HA-AT1a-Rs is shown in panel A. Maximal production of [3H]inositol phosphates for the double- and triple-point mutant HA-AT1a-Rs is shown in panel B. Maximal data for [3H]inositol phosphates normalized to an equal number of receptors are shown in panel C. Data represent the mean (± SEM) from three independent experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although Yamano et al. (28) reported that individual mutations of each of the three AT1-R glycosylation sites reduced surface receptor expression levels in COS-7 cells, there have been no systematic studies of the nature or role of glycosylation in AT1-R function. Our results indicate that glycosylation status has relatively little effect on the ligand binding or signaling capabilities of the HA-AT1a-R, but exerts a major influence on the receptor’s expression in COS-7 cells. In general, the more glycosylation sites that were mutated, the greater was the reduction in receptor expression, such that the nonglycosylated N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor was expressed at a very low level compared with the wild-type receptor. However, those mutant receptors that reached the cell surface bound ligand and were able to mediate signaling responses that were no less in magnitude (when normalized to an equal number of receptors) than that of the wild-type receptor.

The role of N-linked glycosylation has been investigated for a number of GPCRs including the H2 histamine (8), LH (9), ß-adrenergic (10), m2 muscarinic (11), calcium (12), V2 vasopressin (13), TSH (14), GnRH (15), PTH (16), platelet-activating factor (17), vasoactive intestinal peptide (18), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (19) receptors. In most cases, impaired glycosylation (by site-directed mutagenesis or treatment of cells with tunicamycin) caused a reduction in cell surface receptor expression but had little effect on ligand binding or signaling ability. Notable exceptions were the glycosylation-deficient receptors for calcium (12) and the glycoprotein hormones, GLP-1 (19), LH (9), and TSH (14), which, in addition to reduced surface expression, also displayed impaired ligand binding and signaling abilities. However, for most GPCRs, impaired glycosylation is associated with reduced cell surface expression of otherwise normal receptors.

In only two studies did the authors compare the reduced cell surface expression of receptor with the total amount of receptor in the cell, or with the rate of receptor synthesis. Thus, reduced surface expression of the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor was associated with its sequestration in the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (18), and the reduced surface expression of the platelet-activating factor receptor was associated with a normal rate of receptor synthesis (17). Our use of the HA epitope tag to detect total (cell surface + intracellular) receptor in immunoblots, which enabled us to make a comparison between the amount of total and cell surface receptor, indicated that reduced cell surface expression of glycosylation-deficient HA-AT1a-Rs correlates with a reduction in the total amount of receptor in the cell and is not due to any intracellular sequestration of receptors. However, our attempts to assess the rate of receptor synthesis by immunoprecipitation of mutant HA-AT1a-Rs from 35S-methionine pulse-labeled cells were unsuccessful, largely due to low incorporation of the radiolabel. Reduced expression of glycosylation-deficient HA-AT1a-Rs must result either from reduced receptor synthesis and/or from enhanced receptor degradation. However, since nascent membrane proteins are glycosylated cotranslationally by enzymes located in the lumen of the ER (5, 20), whereas protein synthesis occurs on ribosomes tethered to the cytoplasmic side of the ER, it is difficult to envisage how impaired glycosylation of nascent HA-AT1a-Rs in the lumen could exert an inhibitory effect on receptor translation on the ribosome.

In view of the known protection from degradation that glycosylation confers on circulating glycoproteins (20), it seems reasonable to assume that glycosylation protects nascent and/or mature HA-AT1a-Rs from proteolytic degradation in the ER. Although single-site glycosylation at Asn4, Asn176, or Asn188 is sufficient to confer some protection from degradation (compared with the nonglycosylated N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor), further protection is provided by glycosylation at one or two additional sites. The mechanism(s) of such putative degradation of glycosylation-deficient HA-AT1a-Rs, and the exact site(s) at which it may occur, are unknown. However, since no N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptors (and little of the double-point mutant receptors) were detectable in immunoblots, it is likely that proteolysis occurs rapidly after receptor synthesis. In contrast, our findings also indicate that glycosylation is not required for the normal membrane insertion and folding of the HA-AT1a-R, for its trafficking and delivery to the plasma membrane, or for ligand binding and signaling.

The very broad migration pattern of the expressed HA-AT1a-R in SDS-PAGE (compared with the endogenous BAG cell AT1-R) was due to a greater degree of glycosylation of the former (compared with the latter) receptor, although the reason(s) for this difference is unclear. Although only 5–10% of cells in a COS-7 culture express the HA-AT1a-R (6), those that do so express the receptor at a high level that is probably 10- to 30-fold greater than that of the endogenous AT1-R in individual BAG cells. It is possible, therefore, that overexpression of the receptor in individual COS-7 cells results in the saturation of one or more of the enzymes involved in the glycosylation of HA-AT1a-Rs. After their initial N-linked attachment to nascent membrane proteins in the ER, carbohydrates are subsequently modified and trimmed to produce mature glycoproteins (5, 20). Saturation of the trimming enzymes by overexpressed HA-AT1a-Rs in COS-7 cells might therefore result in retention of the larger immature carbohydrates on the expressed receptor compared with the smaller, fully mature carbohydrates on the endogenous receptor.

For the same reason, a mixed population of HA-AT1a-Rs bearing either modified or unmodified carbohydrate moieties at one, two, or three sites might account for the greater heterogeneity (and broader migration pattern) of the expressed, compared with the endogenous, receptor. In support of this hypothesis, each double-point mutant receptor migrated as a broad band with an approximate Mr of 55,000–110,000, indicating considerable variability in the nature and/or extent of glycosylation at each site. However, the broad migration patterns of the partially deglcosylated BAG cell AT1-R intermediates also indicate some heterogeneity in the nature and/or extent of glycosylation of the endogenous receptor.

Interestingly, the deglycosylated photoaffinity-labeled HA-AT1a-R ran as a doublet in SDS-PAGE, as did the deglycosylated receptor in immunoblotting. Since cells were transfected with a single DNA species, it is unclear why the deglycosylated HA-AT1a-R migrates as a doublet, although it is possible that the two bands result from a (nonglycosylation) post-translational processing event, such as lipidation, of a subset of receptors. However, this seems unlikely since the only potential attachment site of a lipid anchor to the HA-AT1a-R (at Cys355) is absent from a mutant receptor truncated at Ser335, yet this receptor also runs as a doublet in SDS-PAGE (data not shown).

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the HA-AT1a-R can be glycosylated at all three of its putative N-linked glycosylation sites when expressed in COS-7 cells, and that all three sites appear to be glycosylated on the endogenous AT1-R in BAG cells. Heterogeneity in the nature and/or extent of glycosylation, which is greater for the expressed receptor compared with the endogenous receptor, accounts for the broad migration patterns of AT1-Rs in SDS-PAGE. An increasing number of mutated glycosylation sites was associated with decreasing cell surface receptor expression, which was very low for the unglycosylated N4K/N176Q/N188Q receptor. In general, the degree of cell surface receptor expression was correlated with the total amount of cell receptor, suggesting that glycosylation may protect nascent receptors from intracellular proteolytic degradation. However, those glycosylation-deficient receptors that appeared on the plasma membrane functioned normally, indicating that glycosylation is not necessary for normal receptor-ligand binding and signaling and is not a prerequisite for the normal delivery of HA-AT1a-Rs to the plasma membrane. Future studies will endeavor to determine the mechanism(s) and site(s) of degradation of glycosylation-deficient HA-AT1a-Rs.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Tamas Balla for many fruitful discussions and Yue Zhang for excellent technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported in part by an Alpha Omega Alpha Student Fellowship. Back

2 Supported in part by an International Research Scholar’s Award (HHMI 75195–541702) from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

Received October 9, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Peach MJ 1977 Renin-angiotensin system: biochemistry and mechanisms of action. Physiol Rev 57:313–370[Free Full Text]
  2. Catt KJ, Sandberg K, Balla T 1993 Angiotensin II receptors and signal transduction mechanisms. In: Raizada MK, Phillips MI, Sumners C (eds) Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Renin-Angiotensin System. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 307–356
  3. Casey PJ 1995 Protein lipidation in cell signaling. Science 268:221–225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lefkowitz RJ 1993 G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Cell 74:409–412[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Helenius A 1994 How N-linked oligosaccharides affect folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 5:253–265[Medline]
  6. Smith RD, Baukal AJ, Zolyomi A, Gaborik Z, Hunyady L, Sun L, Zhang M, Chen H-C, Catt KJ 1998 Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the endogenous AT1 angiotensin receptor in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 12:634–644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Smith RD, Hunyady L, Olivares-Reyes J-A, Mihalik B, Jayadev S, Catt KJ 1998 Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the angiotensin AT1 receptor localizes to a serine/threonine-rich region of its cytoplasmic tail. Mol Pharmacol 54:935–941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fukushima Y, Oka Y, Saitoh T, Katagiri H, Asano T, Matsuhashi N, Takata K, van Breda E, Yazaki Y, Sugano K 1995 Structural and functional analysis of the canine histamine H2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis: N-glycosylation is not vital for its action. Biochem J 310:553–558
  9. Zhang R, Cai H, Fatima N, Buczko E, Dufau ML 1995 Functional glycosylation of the rat luteinizing hormone receptor required for ligand binding. J Biol Chem 270:21722–21728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rands E, Candelore MR, Cheung AH, Hill WS, Strader CD, Dixon RA 1990 Mutational analysis of beta-adrenergic receptor glycosylation. J Biol Chem 265:10759–10764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. van Koppen CJ, Nathanson NM 1990 Site-directed mutagenesis of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Analysis of the role of N-glycosylation in receptor expression and function. J Biol Chem 265:20887–20892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fan G, Goldsmith PK, Collins R, Dunn CK, Krapcho KJ, Rogers KV, Spiegel AM 1997 N-linked glycosylation of the human Ca2+ receptor is essential for its expression at the cell surface. Endocrinology 138:1916–1922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Innamorati G, Sadeghi H, Birnbaumer M 1996 A fully active nonglycosylated V2 vasopressin receptor. Mol Pharmacol 50:467–473[Abstract]
  14. Russo D, Chazenbalk GD, Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Rapoport B 1991 Site-directed mutagenesis of the human thyrotropin receptor: role of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides in the expression of a functional receptor. Mol Endocrinol 5:29–33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Davidson JS, Flanagan CA, Zhou W, Becker II, Elario R, Emeran W, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 1995 Identification of N-glycosylation sites in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor: role in receptor expression but not ligand binding. Mol Cell Endocrinol 107:241–245[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Bisello A, Greenberg Z, Behar V, Rosenblatt M, Suva LJ, Chorev M 1996 Role of glycosylation in expression and function of the human parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor. Biochemistry 35:15890–15895[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Garcia Rodriguez C, Cundell DR, Tuomanen EI, Kolakowski LF, Gerard C, Gerard NP 1995 The role of N-glycosylation for functional expression of the human platelet-activating factor receptor. J Biol Chem 270:25178–25184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Couvineau A, Fabre C, Gaudin P, Maoret J-J, Laburthe M 1996 Mutagenesis of N-glycosylation sites in the human vasoactive intestinal peptide 1 receptor. Evidence that asparagine 58 or 69 is crucial for correct delivery of the receptor to plasma membrane. Biochemistry 35:1745–1752[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Goke R, Just R, Lankat-Buttgereit B, Goke B 1994 Glycosylation of the GLP-1 receptor is a prerequisite for regular receptor function. Peptides 15:675–681[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kornfeld R, Kornfeld S 1985 Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. Annu Rev Biochem 54:631–634[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Guillemette G, Baukal AJ, Balla T, Catt KJ 1987 Angiotensin-induced formation and metabolism of inositol polyphosphates in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 142:15–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Carson MC, Leach Harper CM, Baukal AJ, Aguilera G, Catt KJ 1987 Physi-cochemical characterization of photoaffinity-labeled angiotensin II receptors. Mol Endocrinol 1:147–153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural head proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Hunyady L, Ji H, Jagadeesh G, Zhang M, Gaborik Z, Mihalik B, Catt KJ 1998 Dependence of AT1 angiotensin receptor function on adjacent asparagine residues in the seventh transmembrane helix. Mol Pharmacol 54:427–434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Murphy TJ, Alexander RW, Griendling KK, Runge MS, Bernstein KE 1991 Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Nature 351:233–236[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Lemp D, Haselbeck A, Klebl F 1990 Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of N-glycosidase F from Flavobacterium meningosepticum. J Biol Chem 265:15606–15610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Takasata S, Kobata A 1976 Purification and characterization of an endo-beta-galactosidase produced by Diplococcus pneumoniae. J Biol Chem 251:3603–3609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yamano Y, Ohyama K, Chaki S, Guo D, Inagami T 1992 Identification of amino acid residues of rat angiotensin II receptor for ligand binding by site directed mutagenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 187:1426–1431[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
G. T. Nagami, J. A. Chang, M. E. Plato, and R. Santamaria
Acid loading in vivo and low pH in culture increase angiotensin receptor expression: enhanced ammoniagenic response to angiotensin II
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1864 - F1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. M. Allen, J. K. Dosanjh, M. Erac, S. Dassanayake, R. D. Hannan, and W. G. Thomas
Expression of Constitutively Active Angiotensin Receptors in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Increases Blood Pressure
Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1054 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Duvernay, F. Zhou, and G. Wu
A Conserved Motif for the Transport of G Protein-coupled Receptors from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Cell Surface
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30741 - 30750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Wu, G. Zhao, and Y. He
Distinct Pathways for the Trafficking of Angiotensin II and Adrenergic Receptors from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Cell Surface: Rab1-INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT OF A G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 47062 - 47069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. A. Olivares-Reyes, S. Jayadev, L. Hunyady, K. J. Catt, and R. D. Smith
Homologous and Heterologous Phosphorylation of the AT2 Angiotensin Receptor by Protein Kinase C
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 1156 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. Nagayama, E. Nishihara, H. Namba, S. Yamashita, and M. Niwa
Identification of the Sites of Asparagine-Linked Glycosylation on the Human Thyrotropin Receptor and Studies on Their Role in Receptor Function and Expression
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 404 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and Th. Unger
International Union of Pharmacology. XXIII. The Angiotensin II Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 415 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayadev, S.
Right arrow Articles by Catt, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jayadev, S.
Right arrow Articles by Catt, K. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals