| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Urology (E.B.P., R.H., Z.W.), Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry (Z.W.), and The Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center (Z.W.), Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Zhou Wang, Department of Urology, Tarry 11715, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60611-3009. E-mail: wangz{at}nwu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AM is a pluripotent 52-amino acid peptide hormone, first
isolated from a pheochromocytoma using its ability to elevate cAMP in
platelets as an assay (3). The AM gene, represented by a single copy on
chromosome 11 in the human (4), is translated into a 185-amino acid
preprohormone that undergoes posttranslational modification, creating
AM and pro-ADM N-terminal 20 peptide (5, 6, 7). Both AM and pro-ADM
N-terminal 20 peptide are
-amidated peptides. AM possesses a single
intramolecular disulfide cysteine-to-cysteine bond, forming a
six-membered ring. Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) has an
analogous ring structure, has C-terminal amidation, and shares an
overall 27% similarity with AM (5). In fact, AM can bind to the CGRP
receptor, and the activity of AM can be blocked by the specific CGRP
receptor antagonist CGRP 837 in a subpopulation of tissues (8, 9).
However, a specific receptor for AM, not antagonized by CGRP 837, has
been identified and cloned from rat lung; the gene encodes for a
peptide sequence indicative of a member of the G protein-coupled
receptor super family (10). The involvement of a G protein in the
AM-signaling pathway is supported by studies in vascular smooth muscle,
demonstrating that the ability of AM to elevate cAMP is augmented by
GTP, abrogated by cholera toxin, and not affected by pertusis toxin
(11). Although AM was first isolated on the basis of its ability to
raise cAMP, there is evidence suggesting that AM may also activate
alternate second-messenger systems, e.g. intracellular
calcium, nitric oxide, and PG synthesis (5).
Diverse biological functions for AM have been described (5). It can function as a hypotensive vasodilatory agent, a growth factor, even as an antimicrobial (12). It has been suggested that AM plays a role during embryogenesis in the control of growth, differentiation, and invasion (13). It has been shown to modulate the levels of other growth factors and hormones. It can modulate thirst when injected intracranially. Serum levels are elevated in sepsis, renal insufficiency, pregnancy (14), acute myocardial infarction, and hypertension. It is found at high levels in amniotic fluid (12). It is expressed in the tall columnar ciliated cells of the respiratory epithelium and is likely secreted (15). It has been shown to have bronchodilatory activity (16). It has recently been shown to act as an autocrine/paracrine survival factor preventing endothelial cells from undergoing apoptosis in response to serum withdrawal (17).
Regulation of AM expression has been investigated in vascular
epithelial and smooth-muscle cells (18, 19, 20). The level of AM expression
is stimulated, most strikingly, by TNF
, TNFß, IL-1
, IL-1ß,
and lipopolysaccharide, whereas forskolin and cAMP were shown to
down-regulate expression, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism. The
steroid hormones aldosterone, hydrocortisone, and thyroid hormone also
stimulate AM expression. However, estradiol and testosterone
demonstrated no effect on AM expression in these cells.
In the present study, we characterize androgen regulation of AM expression in the rat ventral prostate as a first step in understanding its biological role in the prostate.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-32P-deoxycytidine
triphosphate (22). Two different templates were used in the probe
labeling reaction. The first one, a short complementary DNA (cDNA)
fragment, isolated during the gene expression screen, is 356 bp in
length, spanning 322678 bp of the published sequence for the rat AM
full-length cDNA (23). This short cDNA fragment was cloned into the
EcoRI site of pBluescript (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA). The second was the full-length cDNA isolated from a
ZAP
cDNA phage library constructed from normal rat ventral prostate mRNA.
The full-length AM cDNA is approximately 1.4 kb in length, and the 500
bases at the 5' end of the cDNA insert were confirmed by sequence
analysis. Northern blot hybridization was performed overnight at 42 C
in a buffer containing 5 x SSPE, 2 x Denhardts solution,
0.1% SDS, 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 50% formamide.
Blots were washed at 65 C, three times, for 30 min, with an excess of
wash buffer consisting of 0.2 x saline-sodium citrate (SSC) and
0.1% SDS.
Organ culture
The ventral prostate was harvested from 7-day castrate young
adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250350 g, from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Indianapolis, IN). The prostates were minced with
a scalpel to create uniform fragments, 1 mm in all dimensions. The
minces were then scattered on lens paper supported at the media-air
interface with a stainless steel screen in a 100-mm culture plate and
incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 C. Care was taken to ensure that
the minces were in good contact with the media but not submerged. The
media consists of M-199 (with Earles salts, L-glutamine,
and 2.2 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, without phenol red, from
Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), with the addition of 10%
charcoal-stripped FBS, penicillin G sodium at 200 U/ml, and
streptomycin sulfate at 0.2 mg/ml, in the presence or absence of
cycloheximide (50 µg/ml) and anisomycin (80 µg/ml). After
treatment, the minces were harvested and frozen immediately in liquid
N2, and the RNA was isolated by the guanidinium/CsCl
gradient method.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was carried out essentially as
previously described (24). Tissue was harvested and fixed overnight in
4% paraformaldehyde in SPB (3% sucrose, 0.15 mM
CaCl2, in 0.06 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) at 4
C. The tissue was then rinsed in 10% sucrose in SPB and incubated
overnight at 4 C in 30% sucrose in SPB. The tissue was cryosectioned
and placed on ProbeOn plus microscope slides (Fisher Biotech, Pittsburgh, PA). Before hybridization, the slides were
washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, digested with
proteinase K at 20 µg/ml in PBS, refixed in 4% paraformaldehyde,
rewashed in PBS, and then acetylated in 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1
M triethanolamine, pH 8.0.
The full-length AM cDNA, inserted into EcoRI and XhoI site between T3 and T7 promoters in pBluescript II SK plasmid vector, was used for in situ probe synthesis. The plasmid, purified by CsCl double banding, was linearized with EcoRI or XhoI and proteinase K treated. The purified linear DNA templates were used in the synthesis of both sense and antisense digoxygenin-labeled riboprobes using either T3 or T7 RNA polymerase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) as previous described (25). The size of the riboprobes was reduced to approximately 250 bp using limited alkaline hydrolysis (26).
For hybridization, the probe was diluted in hybridization solution (5 x SSC, 1 x Denhardts, 100 µg/ml salmon testis DNA, 50% formamide, and 250 µg/ml yeast transfer RNA), and the slides were hybridized overnight at 67 C in a sealed chamber humidified with 5 x SSC/50% formamide. The coverslips were removed, and the slides were washed in 0.2 x SSC at 72 C for 1 h. After washing in buffer B1 (0.1 M Tris (pH 7.6), 0.15 M NaCl), the slides were blocked in 10% horse serum in B1 at room temperature for 1 h. The slides were then incubated overnight at 4 C with a 2,000-fold dilution of antidigoxigenin-AP Fab fragments (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) in B1 1% horse serum. After washing, the slides were developed with nitro blue tetrazolium (2.25 µl/ml) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate, 4-toluidine salt (0.6 µg/ml) in alkaline phosphatase buffer (0.1 M Tris (pH 9.5), 0.05 M MgCl2, 0.1 M NaCl).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Steroid hormone regulation of AM expression has been investigated in two other studies, and androgen was found not to effect AM expression (18, 19). The cell types studied were vascular epithelial and endothelial cells isolated from the rat thoracic aorta. Our tissue survey also showed no androgen regulation outside the prostate. In the seminal vesicles, a secondary sex organ, there is a relative increase in AM expression 7 days after castration. This is likely caused by the dramatic involution that the tissue undergoes in response to castration and the enrichment of AM-expressing cells in the tissue. However, the seminal vesicles from the 7-day castrate rat did not show an increase in expression after 2 days of androgen replacement, conditions that resulted in an increase greater than 25-fold in the ventral prostate. During the first 2 days of androgen replacement, there is no significant change in cell number in either tissue, to contribute to the difference in expression. This suggests prostate-specific androgen regulation of AM expression.
The organ culture experiment is consistent with the previous studies (18, 19) that demonstrated superinduction of AM at the message level in the presence of cycloheximide. It was suggested that cycloheximide stabilizes AM mRNA by inhibiting the synthesis of a labile AU-binding protein responsible for AM mRNA degradation (18). In addition, androgen was able to further stimulate AM expression in prostate organ culture when the tissue was pretreated with cycloheximide, suggesting that androgen is capable of stimulating AM expression directly. Taken together, the lack of androgen regulation outside the prostate and the ability of androgen to stimulate expression in the absence of protein synthesis in the prostate, make likely the existence of a prostate-specific transcription factor that works in concert with the androgen receptor. As more direct androgen response genes are identified from the prostate and their promoter regions are sequenced, the nature of prostate specific androgen-dependent gene activation will be further illuminated.
These studies focus at the expression level. What happens at the protein and functional level in the prostate is yet to be investigated. However, some corollaries can be drawn with the function of AM described in other tissues. AM is expressed at high levels in the epithelial cells in the prostate, and it is likely that it is secreted. AM is similar to the defensin family of proteins with antimicrobial activity (12). AM has also been shown to be produced by the bladder epithelium and is measurable in the urine. Prostate secretion of AM may work in concert with bladder epithelial secretion to combat urinary tract infection.
In many tissues, AM function seems to be mediated through cAMP. The proliferative response of the tissue is likely to be dictated by the relative abundance of type I and type II regulatory subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. In the rat ventral prostate, type I enzymatic activity is inhibited by castration, whereas type II is unchanged (28). The proliferative response to AM in the prostate may depend on the level of androgen in the tissue.
Tissue homeostasis in the prostate is a balance between cell proliferation and programmed cell death. Recently, AM has been shown to abrogate serum-deprivation-induced apoptosis in vascular smooth-muscle cell culture, through an autocrine/paracrine mechanism, independent of cAMP elevation (17). This suggests that a tonic level of AM production, maintained by androgen in the prostatic epithelial cells, has the potential to act, through an autocrine/paracrine mechanism, to mediate androgen-dependent tissue homeostasis.
AM may play a role in the adenocarcinoma of the prostate. It has the potential to act as an autocrine growth factor, as was shown in several other tumor cell lines (29). Expression of AM and its receptor has been identified in the androgen-independent prostatic tumor cell line DU-145 (29). In addition, AM has the potential to act as an angiogenesis factor, a vasodilatory factor, and a stimulator of endogenous metalloproteinases; all these properties could enhance the tumorigenicity of the cell line that produces it.
AM is a direct androgen-response gene, expressed in the rat ventral prostate epithelium, and the level of expression in the prostate is much higher than in the adrenal gland and cardiac atria. Although its functional role in the prostate is unclear at this time, it is likely that it functions as an antimicrobial and has the potential to play a crucial part in mediating the effects of androgen on growth and/or differentiation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 A Pfizer, Inc. Research Fellow of the American
Foundation for Urologic Disease. ![]()
3 Recipient of a Junior Faculty Research Award from The American
Cancer Society. ![]()
Received August 20, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-F. Chan, W.-S. O, and F. Tang Adrenomedullin in the Rat Testis. I: Its Production, Actions on Testosterone Secretion, Regulation by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, and Its Interaction with Endothelin 1 in the Leydig Cell Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 773 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Li, W.-S. O, and F. Tang Effect of Aging on the Expression of Adrenomedullin and Its Receptor Component Proteins in the Male Reproductive System of the Rat J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2007; 62(12): 1346 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Cochrane, Z. Wang, M. Muramaki, M. E. Gleave, and C. C. Nelson Differential Regulation of Clusterin and Its Isoforms by Androgens in Prostate Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2007; 282(4): 2278 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Li, I. S.-S. Hwang, W.-S. O, and F. Tang Adrenomedullin Peptide: Gene Expression of Adrenomedullin, its Receptors and Receptor Activity Modifying Proteins, and Receptor Binding in Rat Testis--Actions on Testosterone Secretion Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Asirvatham, M. Schmidt, B. Gao, and J. Chaudhary Androgens Regulate the Immune/Inflammatory Response and Cell Survival Pathways in Rat Ventral Prostate Epithelial Cells Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 257 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S.S. Hwang, D. J. Autelitano, P. Y.D. Wong, G. P.H. Leung, and F. Tang Co-Expression of Adrenomedullin and Adrenomedullin Receptors in Rat Epididymis: Distinct Physiological Actions on Anion Transport Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2005 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, R. Haleem, X. Cai, and Z. Wang Identification and Characterization of a Novel Testosterone-Regulated Prominin-Like Gene in the Rat Ventral Prostate Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4788 - 4796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Hinson, S. Kapas, and D. M. Smith Adrenomedullin, a Multifunctional Regulatory Peptide Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2000; 21(2): 138 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |