help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prins, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prins, G. S.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 6 2801-2813
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Neonatal Estrogen Exposure Alters the Transforming Growth Factor-ß Signaling System in the Developing Rat Prostate and Blocks the Transient p21cip1/waf1 Expression Associated with Epithelial Differentiation1

William Y. Chang, Lynn Birch, Carl Woodham, Leslie I. Gold and Gail S. Prins

Departments of Urology (W.Y.C., L.B., C.W., G.S.P.) and Physiology and Biophysics (G.S.P.), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612; and New York University Medical School (L.I.G.), New York, New York 10016

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gail S. Prins, Ph.D., Department of Urology, M/C 955, 820 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: gprins{at}uic.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exposure of male rats to estrogens during the neonatal period retards prostate branching morphogenesis, blocks epithelial differentiation, and predisposes the adult prostate to hyperplasia and dysplasia. The mechanism of neonatal estrogenization is not well understood. The present study evaluated transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) in the neonatally estrogenized ventral prostate to determine whether this paracrine/autocrine factor may in part mediate the effects of estrogen on the developing prostate gland. Immunocytochemistry using antibodies against active TGFß1 and its latency-associated peptide localized this molecule to the periductal smooth muscle cells in the developing prostate. Although neonatal estrogenization increased the accumulation of total and active TGFß1 in the smooth muscle layer as early as day 6 of life, it was physically separated from the epithelial ducts by a proliferating layer of fibroblasts surrounding the basement membrane. RT-PCR demonstrated that alterations in TGFß1 levels were not due to alterations in TGFß1 transcription. TGFß2 and TGFß3 were primarily immunolocalized to differentiating epithelial cells in developing prostates, and this was markedly dampened between days 10–30 after neonatal estrogen exposure. Immunocytochemistry for TGFß signaling components revealed that neonatal estrogenization transiently reduced TGFß type I receptor levels in the prostate epithelium, but not in stroma, between days 6–15, whereas there was no effect on TGFß type II receptor. Levels of the intracellular signal Smad2 (52 kDa) were detected in epithelial cells but were not altered after estrogenization. To analyze the functional status of the TGFß signaling pathway, immunocytochemistry was performed for p21cip-1/waf-1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that is inducible by TGFß1 in the prostate. Transient nuclear localization of p21cip-1/waf-1 was normally observed in epithelial cells between days 6–15 and was associated with entry of cells into a terminal differentiation pathway. Neonatal estrogenization prevented this transient expression of p21cip-1/waf-1. The present findings demonstrate that the TGFß signaling system is perturbed at several levels in the estrogenized prostate, which may in part account for the epithelial cell differentiation blockade as well as the proliferation of periductal fibroblasts in this model.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
EXPOSURE of rats to estrogens during the neonatal period has been shown to retard prostate growth, branching morphogenesis, and epithelial differentiation during development and to permanently alter secretory function and activational response to androgens during adulthood (1, 2, 3, 4). This process, referred to as neonatal imprinting or developmental estrogenization, is associated with an increased incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and hyperplasia with aging (5, 6, 7). Accordingly, the rodent model is used to evaluate the role of early exogenous and endogenous estrogen exposure as a potential predisposing factor for prostatic disease later in life. A fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of this phenomenon require knowledge of the immediate cellular changes induced by estrogens that, in turn, alter the course of prostatic development long after withdrawal of estrogens. We have previously shown that the neonatal estrogen imprint of the prostate can be related in part to a permanent decrease in androgen receptor (AR) expression within smooth muscle and epithelial cells (6). As this directly correlates with elevated numbers of basal cells and secretory defects of the epithelium, the results suggest that neonatal estrogen exposure blocks certain epithelial cells from entering a normal differentiation pathway. In addition, we have recently shown that neonatal estrogens stimulate the proliferation of a zone of fibroblasts beneath the basement membrane that may impede ductal branching and cell-cell interactions between smooth muscle and epithelial cells (8).

Estrogen action is mediated through estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and ERß in the prostate gland. In the normal developing prostate, ER{alpha} expression is confined to periductal mesenchymal cells surrounding the proximal ducts, whereas ERß is expressed in low levels in the undifferentiated epithelial cells (9, 10). Although neonatal estrogen exposure did not initially alter the expression of ERß (10), there was an immediate up-regulation of ER{alpha} expression within periductal stromal cells along the length of the developing ducts, which allows for amplification of estrogenic effects in those cells (9). Thus, although some of the effects of neonatal estrogens on the developing prostatic epithelium may be directly mediated through low levels of ERß, careful consideration must be given to perturbations in stromal-derived paracrine factors mediated through elevated ER{alpha} levels in those cells.

An important family of growth factors that may in part mediate estrogen’s effects on the developing prostate gland is transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß). In a variety of systems, TGFßs have been shown to inhibit epithelial cell proliferation, alter cell differentiation, and stimulate fibroblast growth, all of which are prostatic responses to neonatal estrogen exposure (11, 12). TGFß1 has also been shown to be a critical factor in determining branching morphogenesis of the mammary gland and lung (13, 14). Although the developing rodent prostate has been shown to express TGFß1, -ß2, and -ß3 messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in a developmentally specific and cell-specific manner (15, 16, 17, 18), its role during prostate morphogenesis has not been clearly defined. In addition, although the adult rat prostate has been shown to express the TGFß receptors type I (RI) and type II (RII) (19, 20, 21), their localization in the developing prostate gland has not been characterized.

There are three isoforms of TGFß (TGFß1, -ß2, and –ß3) identified in mammalian tissues, and all possess similar biological activities (22, 23, 24). Each TGFß isoform is secreted as a homodimer bound noncovalently to ß1-, ß2-, or ß3-specific latency-associated peptide (LAP) and is biologically inactive. Activation of TGFß takes place extracellularly and is believed to occur through proteolytic dissociation of LAP from TGFß (25, 26). Transduction of the TGFß signal requires coordination between two transmembrane serine-threonine kinase receptors, designated TGFß-RI and -RII (27). Upon ligand binding, TGFß-RII binds to and transphosphorylates TGFß-RI, which, in turn, phosphorylates the Smad2 and -3 transcription factors. Phosphorylated Smad2/3 associate with Smad4, and the complex translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with specific response elements on regulated genes (28).

Neonatal estrogen exposure could affect TGFß signaling by augmenting or interfering with TGFß production or its signaling molecules at one or several sites in the TGFß mechanism of action and thereby permanently alter prostate growth and differentiation. To determine whether this occurs, we initially characterized the ontogeny of latent and active TGFß1, total TGFß2, total TGFß3, TGFß-RI and -RII, and Smad2/3 in the developing rat prostate gland using immunocytochemical techniques. Alterations in these TGFß signaling molecules were then examined in the developing prostate after neonatal exposure to estradiol benzoate. We observed that both TGFß isoform production as well as TGFß receptors are altered by estrogen exposure and provide evidence that this interrupts TGFß-driven differentiation pathways in the developing prostate gland.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
All rats were handled in accordance with the principles and procedures of the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animal Research. Timed pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from Zivic-Miller Laboratories, Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA) and housed individually in a temperature (21 C)- and light (14 h of light, 10 h of darkness)-controlled room. Rats were fed Purina rat chow (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO) ad libitum. They were monitored daily for delivery of pups, and the day of birth was designated day 0. Pups were sexed according to ano-genital distance, and female pups were removed. All males from a single mother were assigned to one of two treatment groups given sc injections of either 25 µg estradiol benzoate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in 25 µl sesame oil or oil alone on neonatal days 1, 3, and 5. Pups from both treatment groups were killed by decapitation on days 1–6, 10, 15, 30, and 45. Accessory sex gland complexes were quickly removed and placed in ice-cold PBS. Prostatic complexes or individual lobes were microdissected at 4 C under a dissecting microscope. Tissues designated for biochemical studies were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For immunocytochemistry with frozen sections, tissues were arranged on a nylon square, covered with OCT compound (Miles Laboratories, Elkhart, IN), frozen in liquefied propane, and subsequently stored in liquid nitrogen.

Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was performed according to previously published methods (29). Briefly, frozen prostatic complexes or individual lobes were mounted on precooled chucks (-20 C) in a Reichert-Jung cryostat (Leica, Inc., Deerfield, IL), and sections (6 µm) were thaw-mounted on gelatin-coated glass slides. Whenever possible, individual lobes were sectioned longitudinally to reveal the proximal-distal orientation. At 4 C, the sections were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, rinsed, incubated with appropriate 2% blocking serum (goat or horse), and subsequently incubated overnight with primary antibody. The specific antibodies, sources, and concentrations used are presented in Table 1Go. The primary antibody was reacted with biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA), and biotin was detected with an avidin-biotin peroxidase kit (ABC-Elite, Vector Laboratories, Inc.), using diaminobenzidine tetrachloride as a chromagen. The sections were stained with Gill’s no. 3 hematoxylin (1:4) as a blue nuclear counterstain. As a final step, the sections were dehydrated gradually with alcohol, cleared with xylene, and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher Scientific, Itasca, IL). For AR, a fluorescein (cy3)-labeled antirabbit secondary antibody was used. The slides were mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) to visualize nuclei. Photographs of diaminobenzidine tetrachloride-stained slides were taken with an Olympus microscope system (Olympus Corp., New Hyde Park, NY) using Kodak Ektachrome Elite 100 film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Photographs of the fluorescein-labeled slides were taken using a Zeiss Axioskop (Carl Zeiss, New York, NY) and a Princeton Instruments Microview digital camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Various antibodies used for immunocytochemistry

 
As negative controls, rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) or normal mouse ascites fluid (Sigma Chemical Co.) was substituted for primary antibody. To determine specificity, the primary antibody was preincubated with a 10- to 500-fold molar excess of the corresponding antigenic peptide for 1 h at room temperature. This preabsorbed antibody was used in place of primary antibody while an adjacent section was incubated with the primary antibody alone. Comparison of staining between the two sections was used to confirm staining specificity. For comparative studies, tissues from rats of different days of age as well as from control and estrogenized rats were always run in parallel to reduce discrepancies related to interassay variability in staining intensity. In most instances, photographs comparing treatments and days were taken from tissues processed on the same glass slide. Tissues from a minimum of three animals at each age and treatment were evaluated to ensure the reproducibility of results.

RT-PCR
TGFß1 and RPL19, a ubiquitous ribosomal RNA, were reverse transcribed and coamplified to obtain semiquantitative results. Total RNA was isolated from prostate tissue using guanidium thiocyanate-chloroform extraction (RNA STAT-60, Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX). Two micrograms of total RNA were reverse transcribed at 48 C for 50 min in 100 µl PCR reaction buffer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT) with 10 mM deoxy-NTPs and 25 mM MgCl2 through use of the reverse primers (see below) and 400 U murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The forward primers (see below), 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer), and 10 µCi[{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP (Amersham) were added to the reaction mix, and the sample was overlaid with light mineral oil. Amplification was carried out for 30 cycles by incubation at 94 C for 1 min, 55 C for 2 min, and 72 C for 3 min, with a final extension at 72 C for 4 min in a Perkin Elmer 9600 thermal cycler. The radiolabeled complementary DNAs were separated on a 4% NuSieve/agarose (3:1) gel (FMC, Rockland, ME), and specific radioactive bands were quantitated on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) after transfer of emitted radioactivity on a phosphor plate. The intensity of the TGFß1 signal was normalized to that of the ribosomal protein RPL19 internal control.

For TGFß1, the forward primer (TGFß1 5'-primer, 5'-CTTCAGCTCCACAGAGAAGAACTGC-3') and reverse primer (TGFß1 3'-primer, CACGATCATGTTGGACAACTGCTCC-3') produced a 298-bp product corresponding to nucleotides +1267 to +1564 (30). For RPL19, the forward primer (RPL19 5'-primer, 5'-CTGAAGGTCAAAGGGAATGTG-3') and reverse primer (RPL19 3'-primer, 5'-GGACAGAGTCTTGATGATCTC-3') produced a 195-bp product corresponding to nucleotides +401 to +595 (31). It was determined for each product that amplification for 30 cycles fell within the linear range with respect to the amount of input RNA.

RT-PCR was performed on ventral prostate tissue from days 6 and 30 from oil control and estrogen-treated rats in five to eight replicates. Comparisons between oil and estrogen treatments were performed in parallel. The mean ± SEM of the relative values of TGFß1 mRNA (normalized to RPL19) were obtained for each time point and treatment, and ANOVA followed by the Schiff test was used to determine statistical significance.

Western blotting
Cellular proteins (cytoplasmic and nuclear) were isolated by homogenizing ventral prostates in a high salt buffer containing protease inhibitors [10 mM Tris-HCl and 400 mM NaCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM leupeptin, 1 trypsin inhibitor unit/ml aprotinin, and 2 mM phenyl-methylsulfonylfluoride]. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4 C, and proteins were denatured by boiling in SDS sample buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 0.005% bromophenol blue]. The protein concentration was quantified by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Proteins (50 µg each) were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane as previously described (29). The membrane was immunoblotted with an antibody that recognized both Smad2 and -3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Biotinylated antigoat secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) was detected using a peroxidase kit (ABC-Elite, Vector Laboratories, Inc.) and the Vector TMB substrate kit.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TGFß1
The ontogeny of active TGFß1 was examined in the developing control and estrogenized prostates by immunocytochemistry using antibody CC 1–30 on frozen sections, which specifically recognizes the extracellular activated form of TGFß1 (32, 33, 34). Prostates from control rats were examined beginning on postnatal day 1, and active TGFß1 was first observed within the periductal extracellular matrix (ECM) of the ventral lobe around day 3 (Fig. 1AGo). Labeling of adjacent sections with antibody against {alpha}-actin revealed that the appearance of TGFß1 immunostain in the ECM was coincident with the initiation of smooth muscle differentiation from the periductal mesenchyme as revealed by the appearance of {alpha}-actin (Fig. 1BGo). By day 5, differentiating smooth muscle cells surrounded the length of the prostatic ducts, and the associated ECM stained weakly to moderately for active TGFß1 (Fig. 1Go, C and D). On day 10, the periductal stain for active TGFß1 was strong and extended from the proximal to the distal ducts with no apparent gradient in staining intensity (Fig. 1EGo). However, the periductal smooth muscle layer and the TGFß1-stained region were thicker around the proximal ducts than around the distal ducts. By day 15, the TGFß1 stain surrounding the central and distal ducts thinned considerably and became discontinuous around the lumenized ducts (Fig. 1GGo). This pattern correlated with the periductal smooth muscle layer, which had thinned to a one- to two-cell thickness (Fig. 1HGo). In the proximal portions of the day 15 ducts, the periductal TGFß1 immunostain was thick and continuous, which also directly correlated with the thickness of the smooth muscle in that region. The day 25–30 prostates exhibited weak to moderate TGFß1 stain in a discontinuous pattern associated with the smooth muscle cells surrounding the ducts. The immunostain for active TGFß1 was weaker on day 45. The overall temporal staining pattern was similar in the dorsal and lateral lobes, except that it was delayed by 3–4 days.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunocytochemical analysis of active TGFß1 (A, C, E, and G) and, on adjacent sections, {alpha}-actin (B, D, F, and H) in the developing rat ventral prostate. Prostates were removed from day 3 (A and B), day 5 (C and D), day 10 (E and F), and day 15 (G and H) rats. In the day 3 prostate, active TGFß1 immunostaining was not apparent in the stromal cells (A) when the periductal cells began differentiation into smooth muscle cells, as determined by the initial appearance of {alpha}-actin (B). By day 5, active TGFß1 immunolocalized to the periductal ECM (C, arrowhead) coincident with completion of periductal cell differentiation into smooth muscle (D). The inset in C shows negative control staining with normal rabbit IgG in place of primary antibody. Immunostaining intensity for active TGFß1 associated with smooth muscle cells/ECM was greatest on day 10 (E and F). By day 15 (G and H), the intensity of active TGFß1 immunostaining declined, and its pattern was thin and discontinuous (arrowhead), as was the smooth muscle layer to which active TGFß1 localized. The asterisk denotes the distal tips of the developing epithelial ducts. All sections shown are from a single immunocytochemical experiment to allow comparison of staining intensity. Light hematoxylin counterstain was used. Magnification, x133.

 
The temporal staining pattern for active TGFß1 was altered after neonatal estrogen exposure (Fig. 2Go). On day 6, estrogenized prostates showed a marked increase in staining intensity for ECM-associated active TGFß1 when prostate sections were stained side by side with control tissues (Fig. 2Go, A and B). However, this stain was confined to the periductal smooth muscle layer, which was separated from the basement membrane and epithelial ducts by a multicell layer of fibroblasts as previously described for estrogenized prostates (10) (Fig. 2Go, C and D). The ECM associated with the periductal fibroblasts immediately adjacent to the basement membrane was negative for active TGFß1. Similar findings were observed in the day 10 prostates. In contrast to the control prostates where TGFß1 declined with ductal development, active TGFß1 associated with the thickened periductal smooth muscle layer remained strong through day 30 in estrogenized prostates (Fig. 2Go, E–G). Thus, estrogen treatment resulted in both an increased TGFß1 immunostain and an extension of the temporal pattern normally observed in the developing prostate.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Ventral prostates of control and neonatally estrogenized rats immunocytochemically stained for active TGFß1 (A–C and E–G), {alpha}-actin (D), and TGFß1 LAP (H–M). A and B, Day 6 proximal ducts from control (A) and neonatally estrogenized (B) rats immunostained with CC1–30 antibody against active TGFß1. On day 6, the estrogenized prostate, which was stained on the same glass slide as the control, exhibited greater staining intensity for active TGFß1 in the smooth muscle layer (arrowheads). The prominent periductal fibroblast layer associated with estrogenization was immunonegative for active TGFß1 (B, arrow). C and D, Adjacent sections of a day 6 prostate from an estrogenized rat immunolabeled for active TGFß1 (C) and {alpha}-actin (D). Active TGFß1 was localized to the smooth muscle layer (arrowhead) and was absent in the periductal fibroblast layer (arrow). E–G, Day 6 (E), day 10 (F), and day 15 (G) distal ducts from estrogenized rats immunostained for active TGFß1. Smooth muscle immunostaining for active TGFß1 did not decline during ductal development in the estrogenized rat prostate. The prostates were stained on the same glass slide. H–J, Day 6 (H), day 10 (I), and day 30 (J) prostates from control rats immunostained on the same glass slide for TGFß1-LAP. TGFß1-LAP immunostaining was weak in periductal stromal cells of the day 6 prostate (H, arrowhead), peaked in the smooth muscle layer by day 10 (I), and declined by day 30 (J). K–M, Day 6 (K), day 10 (L), and day 30 (M) prostates from estrogenized rats immunostained for TGFß1-LAP. Smooth muscle immunostaining was greater in day 6 prostate than in the control, and its intensity did not change during development. TGFß1-LAP localized to the smooth muscle (K, arrowhead) and not to the periductal fibroblasts (K, arrow) in estrogenized prostates. Light hematoxylin counterstain was used. Magnification, x100 (A, B, and E–M) and x50 (C and D).

 
To determine whether the altered pattern of active TGFß1 immunostain in the estrogenized prostates was due to an increase in the levels of total TGFß1 (latent and active) or an increase in TGFß1 activation, prostates were immunostained for total TGFß1 using an antibody specific to TGFß1-LAP (35). All TGFß1 is initially secreted in association with LAP, which is cleaved extracellularly. As the antibody used recognizes the TGFß1-LAP complex as well as free LAP after extracellular cleavage, the level of LAP immunostain should reflect total TGFß1. To test this, serial sections of day 6 prostates were acid activated and immunostained for active TGFß1 (CC 1–30) and TGFß1-LAP. The level of active TGFß1 immunostain was markedly increased by acid activation, whereas LAP immunostain intensity was unaffected, indicating that LAP stain reflects total TGFß1 levels (data not shown). When day 6–30 prostates from control and estrogenized rats were immunostained for TGFß1-LAP, the results were similar to those observed for active TGFß1. TGFß1-LAP was weak in the periductal ECM of control prostates on day 6, peaked in intensity on day 10, and declined thereafter (Fig. 2Go, H–J). In the estrogenized prostates, the immunostain for LAP was stronger than that in the control tissue on day 6 (in a side by side comparison), and the peak extracellular intensity did not decline between days 10–30 (Fig. 2Go, K—M). These data indicate that the increase in active TGFß1 observed in estrogenized prostates reflects increased production and/or secretion of TGFß1 by smooth muscle cells.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to determine whether increased TGFß1 in the estrogenized prostates was due to increased levels of TGFß1 mRNA. No differences in TGFß1 mRNA levels were observed on either day 6 or day 30 between the control and estrogenized prostates (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of TGFß1 mRNA in day 6 and day 30 control and estrogenized rat ventral prostates. Top, A representative phosphorimage of a gel containing 32P-labeled TGFß1 (289 bp) and RPL-19 (194 bp) complementary DNA products from day 6 control (oil) and estrogenized (neoEB) ventral prostates. Duplicate reactions were performed on the gel. Bottom, Graphic representation of relative TGFß1 mRNA quantities in ventral prostates of controls (oil) and neonatally estrogenized rats (neoEB) on days 6 and 30. A PhosphorImager system was used to quantitate radioactivity within each lane of the agarose gel, and TGFß1 signal was normalized to RPL-19 signal. The bar represents the mean ± SEM of four to six separate reactions.

 
TGFß2 and TGFß3
The ontogeny of TGFß2 and TGFß3 in the developing prostates of control and estrogenized rats was examined by immunocytochemistry using specific rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the carboxyl-terminus of each growth factor. These antibodies do not discriminate between the latent and active forms; thus, immunostain represents total growth factor levels. TGFß2 signal was weak on day 6 and was localized to the periductal stromal cells. Epithelial localization was first observed on day 10 in ducts that had begun to lumenize. By day 15, TGFß2 stain in the epithelium was intense and concentrated in the supranuclear clear zone, which suggests that it may be a secreted protein (Fig. 4AGo). Stromal cells continued to stain positively, but not to the degree observed in the epithelium. By day 30, the apical stain remained strong in the cytoplasm of the luminal epithelium, but overall appeared decreased compared with that in day 15 prostates on side by side comparison. Competition studies with immunogenic peptide eliminated all signal in the epithelial and stromal cells (Fig. 4CGo). TGFß3 immunostain was restricted to the epithelial cells in the developing prostate. On day 6, TGFß3 signal was weak, and epithelial immunostain increased markedly as cells differentiated and ducts lumenized between days 10–15 (Fig. 4DGo). Day 30 epithelial cells retained strong TGFß3 signal localized to the supranuclear clear zone and the apical border. Competition studies with immunogenic peptide eliminated all signal in the epithelial cells (Fig. 4FGo).



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Ventral prostates of control (A, D, G, and J) and neonatally estrogenized rats (B, E, H, and K) immunostained for TGFß2 (A–C), TGFß3 (D–F), TGFß receptor type I (G–I), and TGFß receptor type II (J–L). In a day 15 control prostate, TGFß2 localized to stromal cells (A, arrow) and apical aspects of luminal epithelial cells (A, arrowhead). Immunostaining was weak in epithelial cells (B, arrowhead) of a day 15 estrogenized rat prostate, but remained strong in periductal stromal cells (B, arrow). TGFß3 immunolocalized to the apical regions of luminal epithelial cells in a day 15 control prostate (D, arrowhead). The TGFß3 epithelial staining was markedly reduced on day 15 by neonatal estrogenization (E, arrowheads). TGFß-RI immunolocalized to stromal cells (G, open arrowhead), epithelial nuclei (G, arrowhead), and apical regions of luminal epithelial cells (G, arrow) in a day 10 control prostate. Neonatal estrogenization greatly reduced TGFß-RI in the epithelial cells (H, arrowheads) and periductal fibroblasts (H, arrow) of the day 10 prostate, whereas smooth muscle cell staining did not decline (H, open arrowhead). TGFß-RII immunolocalized to periductal stromal cells (J, open arrowhead), basal epithelial cells (J, arrowhead), and apical regions of luminal epithelial cells (J, arrow) in the day 10 control prostates. Neonatal estrogenization did not alter immunostaining intensity for TGFß-RII (K). Specificity for antibody staining was determined on corresponding tissues by preincubating antibodies with a 10-fold molar excess of antigenic peptide (C, F, I, and L). Light hematoxylin counterstain was used. Magnification, x133.

 
Neonatal estrogen treatment resulted in a marked reduction of epithelial TGFß2 and TGFß3 signal between days 6–15 (Fig. 4Go, B and E). By day 30, signal for both growth factors had returned to near-control levels in the central to distal regions of the glands, whereas the proximal duct epithelium remained negative.

TGFß receptors
The ontogeny and cell localization of TGFß-RI and TGFß-RII were examined in control and estrogenized developing prostates by immunocytochemistry using specific antibodies to each receptor. In day 6 control prostates, many, but not all, epithelial cell nuclei were darkly stained for TGFß-RI in addition to weaker cytoplasmic signal. The periductal stromal cells also showed moderate staining for TGFß-RI, whereas the interductal fibroblasts were negative. As the prostates developed, the epithelial nuclear signal declined to approximately 20% frequency by day 10 (Fig. 4GGo) and was only sporadic by day 15. During this time, the cytoplasmic signal in epithelial cells markedly increased. Both cytoplasmic and nuclear signals were eliminated at these time points by competition with excess antigenic peptide, indicating specificity for TGFß-RI (Fig. 4IGo).

In day 6 control prostates, epithelial cells were weakly positive for TGFß-RII in the distal aspects of the developing gland, whereas the proximal duct epithelium was negative. An increase in epithelial cytoplasmic stain was observed as ducts began to lumenize between days 10–15 (Fig. 4JGo, arrow). In the proximal ducts, basal cells stood out with a dark specific stain (arrowhead). Periductal smooth muscle cells exhibited specific stain for RII (open arrowhead), whereas fibroblasts were negative. This pattern of stain remained through day 30. Specificity of stain was confirmed with competition experiments where all signal was absent in the presence of a 10-fold excess of antigenic peptide (Fig. 4LGo).

In estrogen-exposed rats, TGFß-RI was weak or absent in epithelial cells and fibroblasts, but was present in periductal smooth muscle on days 6 and 10 (Fig. 4HGo). By days 15–30, the epithelial cytoplasmic signal was comparable to that in oil-treated control prostates, indicating that the estrogen effect on TGFß-RI was transient. In contrast, estrogen exposure had no effect on the TGFß-RII staining pattern (Fig. 4KGo).

Smad2
The expression of Smad2, the intracellular signal transducer of TGFß-RI, was examined by immunocytochemistry and Western analysis. Western blots stained with an antibody that recognizes both Smad2 and -3 indicated by mol wt that only Smad2 (52 kDa) was present in the developing prostates on day 10 (Fig. 5CGo). Immunocytochemical staining revealed that on day 10, the basally located epithelial cells exhibited strong cytoplasmic stain for Smad2 (Fig. 5AGo, arrowhead). In nonlumenized ducts where all cells express basal cell cytokeratins 5/15 (36), only those in contact with the basement membrane were positive for Smad2. This dark basal cell stain persisted throughout development up to day 30. As epithelial cells began to differentiate, luminal cells began to stain positively for Smad2 (Fig. 5AGo, arrow). On day 15, this was weak, but the stain was stronger on day 30, when it was concentrated in the supranuclear clear zone. Exposure to neonatal estrogen had no effect on the staining pattern or quantity of Smad2 in the ventral prostate (Fig. 5BGo). The slight increase in the density of the 52-kDa Smad2 band of the estrogenized day 10 prostate compared with that of the control lane (Fig. 5BGo) is due to the relative increase in basal cells in the estrogenized prostates at that time (36).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunocytochemical (A and B) and Western (C) analyses for Smad2/3 in control and neonatally estrogenized rat ventral prostates. Immunocytochemistry using an antibody that recognizes Smad2 and -3 reveals strong staining in basal epithelial cells (arrowhead) and the apical aspects of luminal epithelial cells (arrows) of both control (A) and estrogenized (B) prostates. Magnification, x133. Using the same antibody, Western analysis (C) of total cellular protein detected a 52-kDa Smad protein in both control (oil) and estrogenized (neoEB) prostates, which corresponds with the molecular mass of Smad2.

 
p21waf-1/cip-1
The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21waf-1/cip1, has been shown to be a downstream target of TGFß1 action in human prostate cells, where it is up-regulated in response to this growth factor (37). To determine whether TGFß action was interrupted in the developing rat prostate by neonatal exposure to estrogens, we examined the expression pattern of p21waf-1/cip-1 in the developing control and estrogenized prostates by immunocytochemistry. A transient pattern of expression was observed in the control developing ventral prostates. On day 6, p21 signal was limited to a small number of epithelial cell nuclei scattered about the gland (Fig. 6AGo). By day 10, the incidence of epithelial cell nuclei positive for p21 signal had increased to about 50% and was most frequent in ducts that had begun to lumenize (Fig. 6BGo). p21 signal peaked on day 15 when most all epithelial cells were positive (Fig. 6CGo). By day 30, little or no p21 signal remained in the epithelial cell nuclei (Fig. 6DGo). In rats exposed to neonatal estrogens, transient expression of p21 was not observed. Rather, the ventral prostate glands were negative for p21 on days 6, 10, 15, and 30 (Fig. 6Go, E–H). This finding was repeated in three sets of tissues at each time point.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Transient expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21waf-1/cip1 in control (A–D) and neonatally estrogenized (E–H) ventral prostates. Nuclear p21 immunostaining (arrowheads) was sporadically localized to a few epithelial cells in the day 6 control prostate (A). On day 10 (B), approximately 50% of epithelial cells stained for p21, and by day 15 (C), almost all prostatic epithelial cells were immunopositive. Thereafter, p21 staining rapidly declined, and on day 30 (D), nuclear p21 immunolabeling was evident in few cells. Neonatally estrogenized prostates were immunonegative for p21 at all time points examined: day 6 (E), day 10 (F), day 15 (G), and day 30 (H). Background staining is due to Gill’s hematoxylin, which was used as a counterstain. Magnification, x133.

 
AR
It has recently been shown that TGFß1 redistributes AR from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in rat prostate stromal cells, but not in epithelial cells (38). To assess whether the elevated active TGFß1 in the periductal smooth muscle cell region observed in estrogenized prostates may directly affect stromal cells, we examined the AR distribution in day 6 control and estrogenized prostates using immunofluorescence. In control rats, AR was localized to the nucleus of epithelial and periductal smooth muscle cells (Fig. 7AGo). In rats exposed to neonatal estrogens, AR was down-regulated to low or absent levels in epithelial cells, as previously reported (36). However, in periductal stromal cells, AR was primarily localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 7BGo).



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Immunofluorescent localization of AR in day 6 control (A) and neonatally estrogenized (B) rat ventral prostates. In the control prostate (A), AR intensely localized to the nuclei of periductal stromal cells (St), whereas nuclear staining in epithelial cells (Ep) exhibited moderate intensity. Cytoplasmic stain was confined to the perinuclear region in both cell types and was weak by comparison. In the estrogenized prostate (B), AR immunostaining was abolished in epithelial cells, whereas AR localization in stromal cells was partially shifted from the nucleus into the cytoplasm. Periductal stromal cells were diffusely labeled throughout the cytoplasm; therefore, there were no distinct boundaries between adjacent cells in the estrogenized prostate. Immunofluorescent labeling on both samples was performed on the same slide. Magnification, x100.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Overall, the present data document and characterize the presence of a functioning TGFß system within the developing rat prostate gland and demonstrate that exposure to neonatal estrogens alters this growth factor system at several sites. To begin with, the present findings illustrate that the three mammalian isoforms of TGFß differ in their ontogeny and cellular localization in the developing prostate gland. Latent and active TGFß1 appeared in periductal mesenchymal cells and ECM at the time that these cells differentiated into smooth muscle between days 3–5. Adjacent sections stained for active TGFß1 and {alpha}-actin showed that TGFß1 always colocalized to the smooth muscle cells and its associated ECM, which supports the previous findings that the smooth muscle cells are the source of TGFß1 in the rat prostate gland (15, 17). Interestingly, a temporal expression pattern for latent and active TGFß1 was observed whereby levels were initially low, peaked on day 10 of development, and declined thereafter to a weak and discontinuous stain. As both total as well as active TGFß1 exhibited this temporal pattern, the data suggest that it is related to increased production of this growth factor. As recently shown by Itoh et al. (16), TGFß1 mRNA levels in the present study did not change over this period, indicating that changes in production levels are mediated posttranscriptionally.

TGFß2 was initially observed in periductal smooth muscle cells by day 5 of development; however, in contrast to TGFß1, the immunostain levels did not change over time. TGFß2 and TGFß3 immunostain appeared in epithelial cells as they began to differentiate into secretory cells, and their primary localization in the supranuclear clear zone suggests that they are secreted products. Previously, TGFß3 mRNA was shown to increase between days 1 and 20 in the rat ventral prostate, which corresponds to the increased protein levels observed herein (16). However, the observed developmental decrease in TGFß2 mRNA (16) was not observed at the protein level in this study, which indicates that there may not be a direct relationship between mRNA and protein levels for TGFß2.

Exposure to estradiol during the neonatal period differentially altered the levels of the TGFß isoforms in the developing prostate. Estrogens altered the temporal expression pattern of TGFß1, such that levels were increased compared with control levels as early as day 4 of life and did not decline over time until after day 30. As results with TGFß1-LAP revealed that total as well as active TGFß1 increased, they suggest that estrogens increased the production and/or secretion of TGFß1 and did not act merely by increasing activation of the latent form. As these changes were not reflected at the mRNA level, it appears that the estrogen-induced alterations are posttranscriptional in nature. Previous reports have shown that estrogens can alter TGFß1 expression in other systems; however, the specific effect may depend on cell type and context (39, 40, 41).

Epithelial expression of TGFß2 and TGFß3 was significantly delayed by early exposure to estrogen. When these factors appeared in estrogenized prostates on day 30, they were confined to the distal regions of the prostatic ducts, which is consistent with our previous work demonstrating that estrogenization leads to permanent differentiation defects of the epithelium in the proximal and central ducts (4, 36). As TGFß2 and TGFß3 appear to be secretory products of a differentiated epithelium, their delay in expression could be viewed as a result of developmental estrogenization rather than a cause of the phenomenon.

In the present study, both TGFß-RI and TGFß-RII were present in the developing prostate epithelial cells as well as the periductal smooth muscle, indicating that both cell types are potential targets of TGFß action. The type of intracellular staining observed in these cells was similar to what has been previously described in adult rat and human prostate (20, 21, 42). In contrast to the adult rat prostate where estrogen treatment had no effect on receptor expression (21), neonatal estrogen exposure was found to transiently decrease TGFß-RI in the epithelial cells between days 6–15, whereas TGFß-RII appeared unchanged. As the TGFß mechanism of action requires the coordinate expression and action of TGFß-RI and TGFß-RII, transient loss of TGFß-RI would lead to loss of TGFß action within epithelial cells during this critical developmental period.

Recently, Smads have been identified as the intracellular molecules that mediate TGFß action (28). In the present study, we identified the presence of Smad2 in the developing prostate epithelium, further indicating that these cells are targets of TGFß action during development. Neonatal estrogen did not alter the levels of Smad2 in the prostate gland, which indicates that Smad regulation is not a target for estrogen action. That the smooth muscle cells did not immunostain for Smad2 or -3 suggests either that those cells cannot respond to TGFß or that the levels are lower than the sensitivity of this technique. Evidence that the periductal smooth muscle cells are, in fact, responding to TGFß comes from the observation that AR was localized to the cytoplasm of periductal stromal cells in the day 6 estrogenized prostate. This observation is significant because it was recently reported that TGFß1 is capable of redistributing AR from its normal nuclear location to the cytoplasm in rat prostate stromal cells specifically (38). That we observed this phenomenon in the present study suggests that the elevated TGFß1 produced by smooth muscle cells in estrogenized prostates may have a direct autocrine effect on those cells. In this context, it is important to note that TGFß-RI did not decline in the smooth muscle after neonatal estrogen exposure; therefore, TGFß signaling was intact in those cells.

One of the known genes that is regulated by TGFß1 is p21waf-1/cip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of cyclin E/cdk2 (43). Elevation in p21 levels induced by TGFß1 inhibits the passage of cells from G1 to S in the cell cycle, thus restricting cell proliferation. This system has recently been shown to be intact in human prostate cells, where it is thought to mediate the negative growth effects of TGFß1 by arresting cells in G1 and driving them into an apoptotic pathway (37). We chose to use p21waf-1/cip1 as a potential marker of TGFß1 activity in the developing prostate and followed its expression over time. In control rats, transient expression of p21 was observed in epithelial nuclei between days 10–15, which directly coincides with the temporal expression pattern of TGFß1 by periductal smooth muscle cells. Importantly, this transient expression of p21 also temporally coincides with terminal differentiation of prostatic stem cells into basal and luminal epithelial cells as previously determined with differentiation markers (36, 44). The expression of p21waf-1/cip1 has been found to correlate with terminal differentiation of multiple cell lineages, leading to the proposal that it contributes to cell cycle exit and differentiation during development (45, 46, 47). More recently, it was shown that elevated expression of p21waf-1/cip1 correlated with the onset of the terminally differentiated phenotype in mouse keratinocytes and that a subsequent drop in p21 levels permitted progression of these cells to the late stages of differentiation (48). These researchers hypothesized that in addition to playing a positive role in the commitment to differentiate, decreased expression of p21 is necessary for terminal differentiation. Taken together, we propose that transiently expressed TGFß1 by smooth muscle cells in the developing prostate acts as a paracrine factor that transiently induces p21 expression in the adjacent epithelial cells. In so doing, TGFß1 plays a role in stimulating the entry of epithelial cells into a differentiation pathway. The subsequent decrease in epithelial p21, perhaps related to decreased TGFß1 from smooth muscle cells, would allow the prostatic epithelium to terminally differentiate. This sequence of events would normally occur during a discreet window of opportunity, and an interruption in these events could result in permanent developmental defects of the prostate gland.

This theory receives support from the developmental events observed in the estrogenized prostates. In those tissues, p21waf-1/cip1 expression was absent at all time points examined, which would account for the differentiation defects observed in the prostatic epithelium throughout the life of these animals (4, 5, 6, 36). The data presented herein indicate that the absence of p21 in the developing epithelium of estrogenized rats is related to an interruption in TGFß signaling. There are several, not mutually exclusive, mechanisms by which the TGFß signal may be interrupted in the estrogenized prostate. Although there is an early increase and extension of TGFß1 production by smooth muscle cells, the proliferation of a thick layer of fibroblasts adjacent to the basement membrane after estrogen exposure may act as a physical barrier that blocks TGFß1 paracrine communication between smooth muscle and epithelial cells (8). Indeed, immunostaining shows that ECM in the fibroblast zone is negative for active TGFß1 in estrogenized prostates and that the TGFß1 located in the smooth muscle/ECM does not make contact with the epithelium. Secondly, there is a transient decrease in TGFß-RI in the estrogenized epithelium, which would temporarily block transduction of TGFß signals in those cells. Finally, it is possible that epithelial TGFß2 and TGFß3 function as autocrine factors that are involved with epithelial cell differentiation. As neonatal estrogens delay the early expression of epithelial TGFß2 and TGFß3, TGFß signaling may be interrupted at this level. The TGFß mechanism described herein may explain how early exposure to estrogens sets into motion the accumulation of undifferentiated stem cells or those with differentiation defects that can serve as precursors cells for dysplastic foci and tumor formation in the aging prostate (5, 49, 50). This is highly significant in view of the basal/stem cell theory of tumor biology, which proposes that carcinomas arise from arrested differentiation of tissue-determined stem cells (51).

We have consistently observed a marked retardation in prostatic ductal branching in the estrogenized prostate (5) which may be a consequence of the observed elevation in active TGFß1 levels. TGFß1 has been shown to inhibit branching morphogenesis in the developing lung and mammary gland (13, 14). Importantly, a biphasic effect of TGFß1 on mammary epithelium has been demonstrated by which low concentrations induced ductal elongation and branching and high concentrations were inhibitory (52). In a recent study, surfactant protein C-TGFß1 transgenic mice were generated, which targets high expression of TGFß1 to the developing lung (53). An abnormal distribution of {alpha}-actin/myofibroblasts was observed around the leading edges of lung epithelial tubes, which resulted in arrest of lung morphogenesis at the pseudoglandular stage of development. Those researchers proposed that the abnormal stromal cells that accumulated around the epithelium in response to TGFß1 may tether the distal airways and inhibit expansion of the terminal lung buds. This is highly significant in light of our recent demonstration that neonatal estrogen stimulates the proliferation of a layer of fibroblasts between the basement membrane of prostatic buds and the periductal smooth muscle cells (8). We propose that this thick fibroblast zone may act as a physical barrier that constrains branching morphogenesis. As formation of this fibroblast zone temporally coincides with the precocious increase in TGFß1 levels in the periductal smooth muscle layer, it is possible that the fibroblast proliferation is mediated by TGFß1, which is known to stimulate fibroblast proliferation in several other systems (54).

In conclusion, the present study has shown that the developing rat prostate gland has all the necessary signaling molecules for TGFß action, which implicates a specific role for this growth factor in prostate morphogenesis. Evidence has been presented here which suggests that TGFß is involved in the commitment of the prostatic epithelium to a differentiation pathway during prostatic development. Early exposure to estrogens, by interfering with TGFß isoform and receptor levels, may interrupt this delicate balance and ultimately predispose the prostate gland toward a dysplastic state as the animals age.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Kathleen Flanders (NCI, Bethesda, MD) for the generous supply of CC1–30 antibody.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grants DK-40890 (to G.S.P.), DK-09873 (to W.Y.C.), DK-09653 (to C.W.), and CA-49507 (to L.I.G.) and the American Foundation for Urological Disease/American Urological Association Research Scholarship Program and Dornier Medical Systems (to W.Y.C.). Back

Received October 1, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rajfer J, Coffey DS 1978 Sex steroid imprinting of the immature prostate. Invest Urol 16:186–190[Medline]
  2. Chung LWK, MacFadden DK 1980 Sex steroid imprinting and prostatic growth. Invest Urol 17:337–342[Medline]
  3. Gaytan F, Bellido C, Aguilar R, Lucena MC 1986 Morphometric analysis of the rat ventral prostate and seminal vesicles during prepubertal development: effects of neonatal treatment with estrogen. Biol Reprod 35:219–225[Abstract]
  4. Prins GS, Woodham C, Lepinske M, Birch L 1993 Effects of neonatal estrogen exposure on prostatic secretory genes and their correlation with androgen receptor expression in the separate prostate lobes of the adult rat. Endocrinology 132:2387–2398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Prins GS 1997 Developmental estrogenization of the prostate gland. In: Naz RK (ed) Prostate: Basic and Clinical Aspects. CRC Press, New York, vol chapt 10:247–265
  6. Prins GS 1992 Neonatal estrogen exposure induces lobe-specific alterations in adult rat prostate androgen receptor expression. Endocrinology 130:3703–3714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pylkkanen L, Makela S, Valve E, Harkonen P, Toikkanen S, Santti R 1993 Prostatic dysplasia associated with increased expression of c-myc in neonatally estrogenized mice. J Urol 149:1593–1601[Medline]
  8. Chang W, Wilson M, Birch L, Prins G 1999 Neonatal estrogen stimulates proliferation of periductal fibroblasts and alters the extracellular matrix composition in the rat prostate. Endocrinology 140:405–415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Prins G, Birch L 1997 Neonatal estrogen exposure up-regulates estrogen receptor expression in the developing and adult rat prostate lobes. Endocrinology 138:1801–1809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Prins G, Marmer M, Woodham C, Chang W, ]Kuiper G, Gustafsson J, Birch L 1998 Estrogen receptor-ß messenger ribonucleic acid ontogeny in the prostate of normal and neonatally estrogenized rats. Endocrinology 139:874–883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Barnrd J, Lyons R, Moses H 1990 The cell biology of tranforming growth factor ß. Biochim Biophys Acta 1032:79–87[Medline]
  12. Roberts A, Sporn M 1990 The transforming growth factor-ßs. In: Sporn R (ed) Peptide Growth Factors and Their Receptors. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 419–472
  13. Silberstein G, Daniel C 1987 Reversible inhibition of mammary gland growth by transforming growth factor-ß. Science 237:291–293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shiratori M, Oshika E, Ung L, Singh G, Shinozukea H, Warburton D, Michalopoulos G, Katyal S 1996 Keratinocyte growth factor and embryonic rat lung morphogenesis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 15:328–338[Abstract]
  15. Timme TL, Truong LD, Merz VW, Krebs T, Kadmon D, Flanders KC, Park SH, Thompson TC 1994 Mesenchymal-epithelial interactions and transforming growth factor-ß expression during mouse prostate morphogenesis. Endocrinology 134:1039–1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Itoh N, Patel U, Cupp A, Skinner M 1998 Developmental and hormonal regulation of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGFß1), -2, and -3 gene expression in isolated prostatic epithelial and stromal cells: epidermal growth factor and TGFß interactions. Endocrinology 139:1378–1388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nemeth J, Sensibar J, White R, Zelner D, Kim I, Lee C 1997 Prostatic ductal system in rats: tissue-specific expression and regional variation in stromal distribution of transforming growth factor-ß1. Prostate 33:64–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Haughney P, Hayward S, Dahiya R, Cunha G 1998 Species-specific detection of growth factor gene expression in developing murine prostatic tissue. Biol Reprod 59:93–99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kryprianou N, Isaacs J 1988 Identification of a cellular receptor for transforming growth factor-ß in rat ventral prostate and its negative regulation by androgens. Endocrinology 123:2124–2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kim I, Ahn H, Zelner D, Park L, Sensibar J, Lee C 1996 Expression and localization of transforming growth factor-ß receptors type I and type II in the rat ventral prostate during regression. Mol Endocrinol 10:107–115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wilstrom P, Bergh A, Damber J 1997 Expression of transforming growth factor-ß receptor type I and type II in rat ventral prostate and Dunning R3327 PAP adenocarcinoma in response to castration and oestrogen treatment. Urol Res 25:103–111[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Derynck R, Linquist P, Lee A, Wen D, Tamm J, Grayear J, Rhee L, Mason A, Miller D, Coffey R, Moses H, Chen E 1988 A new type of transforming growth factor-ß, TGF-ß3. EMBO J 7:3737–3743[Medline]
  23. Madisen L, Webb N, Rose T, Marquardt H, Ikeda T, Twardzik D, Seyedin S, Purchio A 1988 Transforming growth factor-ß2, cDNA cloning and sequence analysis. DNA 7:1–8[Medline]
  24. Story M, Hopp K, Kotter M 1996 Expression of transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1), -ß2, and -ß3 by cultured human prostate cells. J Cell Physiol 169:97–107[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Barcellos-Hoff M 1996 Latency and activation in the control of TGF-ß. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1:351–361
  26. Steiner M 1995 Transforming growth factor-beta and prostate cancer. World J Urol 13:329–336[Medline]
  27. Wrana J, Attisano L, Carcamo J, Zentella A, Doody J, Laiho M, Wang X, Massague J 1992 TGF-ß signals through a heteromeric protein kinase receptor complex. Cell 7:1003–1014
  28. Kretzschmar M, Massague J 1998 SMADS: mediators and regulators of TGFß signaling. Curr Opin Gen Dev 8:103–111[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Prins GS, Birch L, Greene GL 1991 Androgen receptor localization in different cell types of the adult rat prostate. Endocrinology 129:3187–3199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Qian S, Kondaiah P, Roberts A, Sporn M 1990 cDNA cloning by PCR of rat transforming growth factor ß-1. Nucleic Acids Res 18:3059[Free Full Text]
  31. Chan Y-L, Lin A, McNally J, Pelleg D, Meyuhos O, Wool I 1987 The primary structure of rat ribosomal protein L19. J Biol Chem 262:1111–1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Flanders K, Thompson N, Cissel D, Van Obberghern-Schilling E, Baker C, Kass M, Ellingsworth L, Roberts A, Sporn M 1989 Transforming growth factor-ß1: histochemical localization with antibodies to different epitopes. J Cell Biol 108:653–660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Barcellos-Hoff M, Ehrhart E, Kalia M, Jirtle R, Flanders K, Tsang M 1995 Immunohistochemical detetion of active transforming growth factor-ß in situ using engineered tissue. Am J Pathol 147:1228–1237[Abstract]
  34. Barcellos-Hoff M, Derynck R, Tsang M, Weatherbee J 1994 Transforming growth factor-ß activation in irradiated murine mammary gland. J Clin Invest 93:892–899
  35. McMullen H, Longaker M, Cabrera R, Sung J, Canete J, Siebert J, Lorenz H, Gold L 1995 Analysis of TGFß1, TGFß2 and TGFß3 immunoreactivity during ovine wound repair. Wound Repair Regen 3:156
  36. Prins GS, Birch L 1995 The developmental pattern of androgen receptor expression in rat prostate lobes is altered after neonatal exposure to estrogen. Endocrinology 136:1303–1314[Abstract]
  37. Guo Y, Kyprianou N 1998 Overexpression of transforming growth factor (TGF) ß1 type II receptor restores TGF-ß1 sensitivity and signaling in human prostate cancer cells. Cell Growth Diff 9:1–9[Abstract]
  38. Gerdes M, Dang T, Larsen M, Rowley D 1998 Transforming growth factor-ß1 induces nuclear to cytoplasmic distribution of androgen receptor and inhibits androgen response in prostate smooth muscle ells. Endocrinology 139:3569–3577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Komm B, Terpening C, Benz D, Greme K, Gallegos A, Korc M, Greene G, O’Malley B, Haussler M 1988 Estrogen binding, receptor mRNA, and biologic response in osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells. Science 241:81–84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Burns G, Sarkar D 1993 Transforming growth factor-ß1-like immunoreactivity in the pituitary gland of the rat: effect of estrogen. Endocrinology 133:1444–1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Knabbe C, Lippman M, Wakefield L, Flanders K, Kasid A, Derynchk R, Dickson R 1987 Evidence that transforming growth factor-ß is a hormonally regulated negtive growth factor in human breast cancer cells. Cell 48:417–428[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Guo Y, Jacobs S, Kyrianou N 1997 Down-regulation of protein and mRNA expression for transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß1) type I and type II receptors in human prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 71:573–579[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Reynisdottir I, Polyak K, Iavarone A, Massague J 1995 Kip/Cip and Ink4 Cdk inhibitors cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest in response to TGF-ß. Genes Dev 9:1831–1845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hayward SW, Baskin LS, Haughney PC, Foster BA, Prins GS, Dahiya R, Cunha GR 1996 Epithelial development in the rat ventral prostate, anterior prostate and seminal vesicle. Acta Anat 155:81–93[Medline]
  45. Poluha W, Poluha D, Chang B, Crosbie N, Schnonhoff C, Kilpatirck D, Ross A 1996 The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21waf-1 is required for survival of differentiating neuroblastoma cells. Mol Cell Biol 16:1335–1341[Abstract]
  46. Deng C, Zhang P, Harper J, Elledge S, Leder P 1995 Mice lacking p21cip-1/waf-1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control. Cell 82:675–684[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Parker S, Eichele G, Zhang P, Rawls A, Sands A, Bradley A, Olson E, Harper J, Elledge S 1995 p53-indenpendent expression of p21cip-1 in muscle and other terminally differentiating cell. Science 267:1024–1027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Di Cunto F, Topley G, Caautti E, Hsiao J, ong L, Seth P, Paolo Dott G 1998 Inhibitory function of p21cip-1/waf-1 in differentiation of primary mouse keratinocytes independent of cell cycle control. Science 280:1069–1072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Arai Y, Chen CY, Nishizuka Y 1978 Cancer development in male reproductive tract in rats given diethylstilbestrol at neonatal age. Gann 69:861–862[Medline]
  50. Pylkkanen L, Santti R, Newbold R, McLachlan J 1991 Regional differences in the prostate of the neonatally estrogenized mouse. Prostate 18:117–129[Medline]
  51. Sell S, Pierce G 1994 Maturation arrest of stem cell differentiation is a common pathway for the cellular origin of teratocarcinomas and epithelial cancers. Lab Invest 70:6–22[Medline]
  52. Soriano J, Orci L, Montesano R 1996 TGFß1 induces morphogenesis of branching cords by clones mammary epithelial cells at subpicomolar concentrations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 220:879–885[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Zhou L, Dey C, Wert S, Whitsett J 1996 Arrested lung morphogenesis in transgenic mice bearing an SP-C-TGF-ß1 chimeric gene. Dev Biol 175:227–238[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Massague J 1990 The transforming growth factor-ß family. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:597–641[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Mukai, Q. Dong, M. P. Hardy, H. Kiyokawa, R. E. Peterson, and P. S. Cooke
Altered Prostatic Epithelial Proliferation and Apoptosis, Prostatic Development, and Serum Testosterone in Mice Lacking Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 951 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
N. Atanassova, C. McKinnell, J. Fisher, and R. M Sharpe
Neonatal treatment of rats with diethylstilboestrol (DES) induces stromal-epithelial abnormalities of the vas deferens and cauda epididymis in adulthood following delayed basal cell development
Reproduction, May 1, 2005; 129(5): 589 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Woodham, L. Birch, and G. S. Prins
Neonatal Estrogen Down-Regulates Prostatic Androgen Receptor through a Proteosome-Mediated Protein Degradation Pathway
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4841 - 4850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O. Putz, C. B. Schwartz, S. Kim, G. A. LeBlanc, R. L. Cooper, and G. S. Prins
Neonatal Low- and High-Dose Exposure to Estradiol Benzoate in the Male Rat: I. Effects on the Prostate Gland
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1496 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Nilsson, S. Makela, E. Treuter, M. Tujague, J. Thomsen, G. Andersson, E. Enmark, K. Pettersson, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson
Mechanisms of Estrogen Action
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1535 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. S. Prins, L. Birch, J. F. Couse, I. Choi, B. Katzenellenbogen, and K. S. Korach
Estrogen Imprinting of the Developing Prostate Gland Is Mediated through Stromal Estrogen Receptor {alpha}: Studies with {alpha}ERKO and {beta}ERKO Mice
Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(16): 6089 - 6097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Habermann, W. Y. Chang, L. Birch, P. Mehta, and G. S. Prins
Developmental Exposure to Estrogens Alters Epithelial Cell Adhesion and Gap Junction Proteins in the Adult Rat Prostate
Endocrinology, January 1, 2001; 142(1): 359 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
H. M. Theobald, B. L. Roman, T.-M. Lin, S. Ohtani, S.-W. Chen, and R. E. Peterson
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Inhibits Luminal Cell Differentiation and Androgen Responsiveness of the Ventral Prostate without Inhibiting Prostatic 5{alpha}-Dihydrotestosterone Formation or Testicular Androgen Production in Rat Offspring
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2000; 58(2): 324 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Goddard, M. Bouras, M. Keramidas, J. C. Hendrick, J. J. Feige, and M. Benahmed
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor Types I and II in Cultured Porcine Leydig Cells: Expression and Hormonal Regulation
Endocrinology, June 1, 2000; 141(6): 2068 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prins, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prins, G. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals