help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 6 2819-2827
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Müllerian-Inhibiting Substance Type II Receptor Expression and Function in Purified Rat Leydig Cells1

Mary M. Lee, Ching Ching Seah2, Peter T. Masiakos, Chantal M. Sottas, Frederic I. Preffer, Patricia K. Donahoe, David T. MacLaughlin and Matthew P. Hardy

The Pediatric Endocrine Unit (M.M.L., C.C.S.), Pediatric Surgical Research Laboratory (P.T.M., P.K.D., D.T.M.) and Department of Pathology (F.I.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and The Population Council and The Rockefeller University (C.M.S., M.P.H.), New York, New York 10021

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mary M. Lee, M.D., Pediatric Endocrine Unit, Bartlett Hall Extension 410, 55 Fruit Street, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. E-mail: mlee{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Müllerian-inhibiting substance (MIS), a gonadal hormone in the transforming growth factor-ß superfamily, induces Müllerian duct involution during male sexual differentiation. Mice with null mutations of the MIS ligand or receptor develop Leydig cell hyperplasia and neoplasia in addition to retained Müllerian ducts, whereas MIS-overexpressing transgenic mice have decreased testosterone concentrations and Leydig cell numbers. We hypothesized that MIS directly modulates Leydig cell proliferation and differentiated function in the maturing testis. Therefore, highly purified rat Leydig and Sertoli cells were isolated to examine cell-specific expression, binding, and function of the MIS type II receptor. These studies revealed that this receptor is expressed abundantly in progenitor (21-day) and immature (35-day) Leydig cells as well as in Sertoli cells. Prepubertal progenitor Leydig cells exhibit high affinity (Kd = 15 nM), saturable binding of MIS. No binding, however, is detected with either peripubertal immature Leydig cells or Sertoli cells at either age. Moreover, progenitor, but not immature Leydig cells, respond to MIS by decreasing DNA synthesis. These data demonstrate that functional MIS type II receptors are expressed in progenitor Leydig cells and support the hypothesis that MIS has a direct role in the regulation of postnatal testicular development.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MÜLLERIAN-INHIBITING SUBSTANCE (MIS), a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß family of growth and differentiation factors, induces regression of the Müllerian ducts, the anlagen of the female internal reproductive tracts during male sexual differentiation (1). MIS secreted by fetal Sertoli cells causes degeneration of the ipsilateral Müllerian duct by signaling through a receptor complex composed of structurally related transmembrane serine-threonine kinase receptors, designated type I (signal transducing) and type II (specific ligand binding) (2, 3, 4). Because both MIS and its receptor are expressed postnatally in the testis beyond the time when Müllerian duct regression is complete, (4, 5, 6, 7, 8), other functions have been proposed for this glycoprotein (9, 10). Mice with null mutations of the genes for MIS, and/or its receptor, retain Müllerian ducts as expected, but surprisingly, also develop Leydig cell hyperplasia and neoplasia by 10 weeks of age (11, 12). Conversely, adult transgenic male mice that overexpress MIS have reduced serum testosterone levels and Leydig cell numbers as compared with wild-type animals (13, 14). These studies raised the possibility of a paracrine role for MIS in the regulation of Leydig cell proliferation and steroidogenesis.

Leydig cells are believed to arise as two discrete populations. Fetal Leydig cells are discernable soon after testicular determination and remain steroidogenically active until birth (15). The majority of these cells are believed to dedifferentiate or undergo apoptotic cell death after birth (16, 17, 18). The few fetal Leydig cells that persist postnatally do not divide and have a negligible contribution to steroidogenesis. Postnatal Leydig cells are first recognizable in the prepubertal testis as progenitor Leydig cells (PLCs) that arise from undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells and acquire steroidogenic capacity (19, 20). PLCs, which account for the majority of the Leydig cells in the prepubertal rat, undergo active cell division to establish the adult Leydig cell population (21, 22). During early sexual maturation, these cells differentiate into pubertal immature Leydig cells (ILCs) that are characterized by a much lower proliferative rate and higher steroidogenic capacity. By late puberty, the quiescent, highly steroidogenic adult Leydig cells that are characteristic of the sexually mature testis comprise the majority of the Leydig cell population.

Both MIS and its type II receptor are expressed in the peripubertal and early pubertal testis; thereafter, MIS receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts remain abundant (2, 4), whereas MIS expression progressively declines except for a transient modest rise peripubertally (5, 6, 23). The persistent expression of MIS and its receptor in the postnatal testis raised the possibility of additional roles for this hormone in male reproductive development. Initial studies localized the MIS receptor to Sertoli cells in the seminiferous tubule compartment of the testis (3, 4, 7), suggesting an indirect action of MIS upon the Leydig cells. These studies, however, focused on fetal and young postnatal testis, rather than sexually maturing testis. More recently, MIS receptor mRNA has been detected by RT-PCR in adult murine Leydig cells (24), and MIS has been shown to decrease net testosterone production in both fetal and adult primary Leydig cells (24, 25). We hypothesized that MIS acts directly upon Leydig cells via receptor mediated events to regulate their proliferation and steroidogenesis during testicular development. We speculated that this function of MIS occurs during the differentiation of Leydig cells from an undifferentiated stem cell to a pubertal phenotype with attainment of steroidogenic capacity. To test the hypothesis that MIS has direct actions in maturing Leydig cells, we developed a cell culture model using highly purified Leydig cells at different maturational ages. We then examined cell specific mRNA expression of the MIS type II receptor in the testis and characterized the binding and function of MIS in PLCs (21 day) and ILCs (35 day).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Male Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Inc.) were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation for collection of testes for RNA extraction or for isolation of primary Leydig and Sertoli cells. All animal studies were done in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, with the approval of the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Accession Number 97–4118).

Cell isolation and culture
PLCs and ILCs were isolated from testes collected at 21 and 35 days after birth, respectively, by Percoll density gradient centrifugation as described previously (26, 27). Previous studies showed that the majority of cells isolated at these two ages are representative of the PLC and ILC maturational stages (19, 21). Sertoli cell-enriched cultures were prepared at the same ages using the seminiferous tubule fraction of cells collected during an early step of the Leydig cell isolation protocol. Sertoli cells were isolated by glycine treatment followed by sequential collagenase/hyaluronidase digestion and filtration steps as described previously (28).

Cellular homogeneity and absence of germ cells were used as initial criteria for purity of the primary Leydig cell preparations, which was further confirmed by examination of Leydig cell specific 3ß-hydroxy-steroid dehydrogenase (3ßHSD) expression (29). The purity of the cultures was also assessed by Northern analysis of cell-type specific genes. Androgen binding protein (ABP) (gift of Dr. David Joseph, Biotechnology Development Institute at the University of Florida, Alachua, FL) (30), MIS (31), and the FSH receptor (gift of Dr. Michael Griswold, Washington State University, Pullman, WA) (32) were selected as genes specific to Sertoli cells, and the LH receptor (gift of Dr. Deborah Segaloff, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA) (33) as a Leydig cell-specific gene.

Primary Leydig cells were cultured in serum-free DMEM/F12 (1:1) media supplemented with 15 mM HEPES, 26 mM sodium bicarbonate, 0.1% BSA, 100 mg/ml bovine lipoprotein (Sigma Chemical Co.), and 12 µg/ml gentamycin, in a reduced oxygen incubator (5%Co2/5% O2) (Nuaire TS Autoflow Co2/O2 incubator) (26, 27). The highly purified PLCs and ILCs were seeded at 2 x 106 cells/well in 6-well plates or 1 x 106 cells/well in 12-well plates and cultured overnight before addition of hormones. The cultures were treated with buffer or recombinant human MIS (3.5 to 172 nM) for 24–48 h, in the presence and absence of low doses of LH (1 ng/ml) (NIDDK-oLH-26, National Hormone and Pituitary Program).

Recombinant human MIS was purified by immunoaffinity chromatography from conditioned media of CHO cells stably transfected with a full-length genomic clone (34, 35). Because the MIS gene is conserved across species, it retains cross-species bioactivity (31, 36). The immunoaffinity-purified MIS was quantitated by ELISA and tested in a rat urogenital ridge organ culture assay for its bioactivity (37, 38). Recombinant human MIS, at doses of 0–5 µg, causes zero to complete regression in this rat bioassay (35).

The Leydig cells were labeled with 1 µCi/well [3H]thymidine (DuPont NEN, Boston, MA) during the last 4 h of hormonal treatment. After washing with Dulbecco’s PBS, the cells were harvested by gentle scraping and lysed in 0.5 ml hyamine hydroxide (ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine, CA), then counted in a liquid scintillation counter.

For individual experiments, mean thymidine incorporation for each condition was calculated from the triplicate wells. The results for each MIS dose were compared with that of buffer-treated controls and expressed as thymidine incorporation as a percent of mean uptake in the control wells. The results were then pooled as the mean of four to seven experiments for each experimental condition. The data were normalized and analyzed using one-way ANOVA to determine the overall effect of MIS treatment on thymidine incorporation. Tukey’s test was then used to evaluate all pair-wise comparisons, with unequal n’s adjusted using a Tukey-Kramer adjustment.

Northern analysis
Total RNA was isolated from freshly harvested testes or purified cells by guanidinium-isothiocyanate homogenization and centrifugation through a cesium chloride cushion (39). The RNAs were electrophoresed on 1% 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid-formaldehyde agarose gels with 10 µg total RNA loaded per lane. To verify lack of Sertoli cell contamination in the Leydig cell fractions, less Sertoli cell RNA (1–2 µg) was loaded on some Northerns to allow overexposure of membranes hybridized with the androgen-binding protein probe. Northern transfer and hybridization were performed as previously described (5) using a full-length rat MIS type II receptor riboprobe (4). The membranes were also hybridized with probes for androgen-binding protein (30) and LH (33) and FSH receptors (32). To control for sample loading and transfer, the gels and membranes were stained with ethidium bromide and rehybridized with GAPDH (40). Densitometric analysis of the autoradiograms was performed using NIH Image software. To better characterize the changes in MIS expression during pubertal maturation of the testis, Northern analysis was performed with total RNA extracted from 14- to 60-day rat testes and hybridized with an MIS complementary DNA probe (31).

Flow cytometric analysis of MIS binding
Flow cytometry studies were conducted with biotinylated recombinant human MIS. Immunoaffinity purified MIS was conjugated with biotin using a 40-fold molar excess of NHS-LC biotin (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) in PBS on ice for 30 min at neutral pH. Unreacted biotin was quenched with 100 mM Tris buffer. The biotinylated MIS was separated from unconjugated MIS on a 5-ml avidin affinity column (Ultralink, Pierce Chemical Co.) by washing with 10 ml of 0.02 M Tris buffer pH 7.4, then eluted in Tris buffer containing 20 mM biotin. The biotinylated MIS was desalted and reconcentrated, then quantitated by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and ELISA (41) and tested for retention of bioactivity in the rat urogenital ridge assay (37). The degree of biotinylation of MIS was measured as a function of dye binding (42). The biotinylated MIS was also examined by Western analysis using streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Renaissance, NEN Life Sciences Products, Inc., Boston, MA) to ensure that it remained intact.

Flow studies were conducted with either freshly isolated Leydig or Sertoli cells, or cells that had been maintained overnight at 4 C in Leydig cell culture media. All incubations and washes were performed at 4 C or on ice to avoid receptor internalization. The cells were resuspended at 106 cells/ml in either binding buffer (0.5% BSA, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) or Leydig cell media, then incubated with the appropriate concentration of biotinylated MIS, or buffer alone for 1 h. The cells were washed in binding buffer or Leydig cell media, then resuspended in PBS and incubated with 7 µg avidin phycoerythrin conjugate (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) for 30 min in the dark. Unbound avidin phycoerythrin was washed off with PBS before the cells were resuspended in 250 µl PBS for flow analysis, using a Becton Dickinson and Co. FACScan flow cytometer. For competition experiments, either nonbiotinylated MIS (10-fold excess) or TGF-ß1 (Promega Corp.; up to 40 nM) were coincubated with the biotinylated MIS at select concentrations. Competition was not performed at all MIS doses to conserve the limited supplies of recombinant human MIS.

Before analysis, the FACScan flow cytometer was calibrated for fluorescence and light scatter sensitivity with Calibright beads and AutoComp software (Becton Dickinson and Co.) to ensure day-to-day analytic consistency. Calibright beads were run with BD Autocomp software using the photomultiplier, compensation, and sensitivity software options. Forward and side angle light scatter settings were optimized and standardized for Leydig and Sertoli cells. Stained cells were applied to the flow cytometer, with LYSYS II acquisition and analysis software. Forward vs. side angle scatter gating and propidium iodide exclusion was used to identify viable cells from dead cells and debris, with 10,000 events collected in list mode over 1024 channels/parameter for each sample. Once the machine was calibrated for the day, no further adjustments were made during subsequent analyses performed on that day.

Mean and median fluorescence per cell were plotted against the MIS concentration to generate saturation binding curves, which were fitted by a polynomial regression algorithm. The dissociation constant of the MIS-receptor complex was calculated as the concentration of biotinylated MIS needed for 50% saturation of binding sites. Nonspecific binding was determined by the amount of binding remaining in the presence of 750 nM nonbiotinylated MIS. Nonspecific binding was subtracted from total binding to estimate specific binding.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Leydig cell cultures
The Leydig cell preparations consistently contained less than 1 germ cell per high power field (<1%) and appeared homogeneous microscopically. Greater than 95% of the cells were positive for Leydig cell specific 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, although staining was faint in PLCs (Fig. 1AGo) and increased in more mature ILCs (Fig. 1BGo), as previously observed (19). The Sertoli cell enriched fractions contained 0.5–1% germ cells that failed to attach after overnight culture in serum-free media and were removed with a media change. The Sertoli cells did not stain for 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. To further assess the purity of each cellular fraction, Northern analysis was performed with cell-type specific probes using replicate RNAs isolated from different cell preparations (n = 3–8). These confirmed that LH receptor mRNA was present only in Leydig cells and total testis, whereas Sertoli cell-specific MIS, FSH receptor, and androgen binding protein mRNAs were detected primarily in Sertoli cells and total testis, but not in Leydig cells (Table 1Go).



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Histochemistry of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Primary cultures of PLCs from day 21 (A) and ILCs from day 35 (B) Sprague Dawley rats appeared homogenous under light microscopy. A high percentage of the freshly isolated Leydig cells stained for 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, confirming the purity of these preparations. PLCs (A) exhibited a low level of enzyme activity in contrast to ILCs (B), as observed previously (19 ) (125x magnification).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Relative mRNA expression of cell-type specific genes

 
MIS and MIS type II receptor expression in Leydig and Sertoli cells
The MIS type II receptor mRNA was expressed abundantly in highly purified Leydig cells and Sertoli cells by Northern analysis (Fig. 2Go). At both 21 and 35 days of age, the Leydig cells predominantly expressed a shorter MIS type II receptor transcript, in contrast to the Sertoli cells, which also expressed the longer transcript present in whole testis. The steady-state mRNA levels of the MIS type II receptor in Sertoli cells were more abundant on day 21 than day 35, when the signals were normalized for GAPDH by densitometry (Table 2Go). In contrast, the abundance of the receptor transcripts in Leydig cells was comparable at day 21 (PLCs) and 35 (ILCs).



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Northern analysis of the MIS type II receptor and androgen binding protein. A, The MIS type II receptor was expressed abundantly in PLCs and ILCs as well as in Sertoli cells and total testis. The Sertoli cells contained both of the MIS type II receptor transcripts that are present in total testis, whereas the Leydig cells predominantly expressed the shorter transcript. B, Androgen binding protein, a Sertoli cell specific gene, was present in the total testis and Sertoli cell lanes, but not in the Leydig cell lanes. No signal was detected in PLCs or ILCs even with overexposure of the autoradiogram. C, Rehybridization of the Northern blot with a GAPDH probe confirmed that all lanes contained comparable amounts of RNA (less than 2-fold variation), except for the two Sertoli cell lanes, which were initially loaded with only 2 µg (day 21) and 1 µg (day 35) total RNA. Densitometry of the GAPDH signal revealed that the 21-day Sertoli cell lane had 5-fold less and the 35-day Sertoli cell lane had 30-fold less RNA than the other lanes.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Relative expression of the MIS type II receptor and ABP

 
To verify that the MIS type II mRNAs in the Leydig cell preparations were not due to contaminating Sertoli cells, the membranes were rehybridized with an ABP probe. This confirmed that neither PLCs nor ILCs expressed this Sertoli cell-specific gene (Fig. 2Go and Table 2Go). Decreasing the amount of Sertoli cell RNA loaded enabled a longer exposure to be obtained without obscuring the Leydig cell lanes and confirmed the absence of ABP signal in PLCs and ILCs.

Rehybridization with GAPDH, a ubiquitous gene, demonstrated that the total testis and Leydig cell lanes contained comparable amounts of RNA (Fig. 2Go). Quantitation of the autoradiograms by densitometry indicated that the abundance of GAPDH varied by less than 2-fold in all lanes (998 to 1865 arbitrary units) except for the two Sertoli cell lanes. The film intensity signal of the 21-day-old Sertoli cell lane was about 5-fold less (237 arbitrary units) and that of the 35-day Sertoli cell lane was about 30-fold less (32 U) than the other lanes.

Steady-state MIS mRNA levels in whole testis declined postnatally but were transiently induced in the peripubertal rat testis from days 14 to 20 (data not shown), coincident with induction of MIS type II receptor expression in the postnatal testis. By day 24, MIS mRNA levels had again declined and continued to decrease in the maturing testis. This was consistent with previously published data showing a transient increase in MIS immunoreactivity in the 20 day rat testis (23).

MIS binding to Leydig cells
PLCs bound biotinylated MIS specifically as measured by an increase in mean and median fluorescence per cell (of 10,000 events recorded per condition) in the presence of increasing concentrations of MIS (Fig. 3AGo). A series of ten individual flow studies conducted with different PLC preparations consistently demonstrated shifts in fluorescence with biotinylated MIS. At 30 nM, the increase in mean fluorescence per cell ranged from 15–100% above baseline. Ten-fold excess nonbiotinylated MIS specifically competed for binding and shifted the increased fluorescence with 30 nM biotinylated MIS back to baseline. Similar competition was seen at 75 nM MIS with excess nonbiotinylated MIS (750 nM).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Histogram of MIS binding to PLCs and Sertoli cells. Histograms of a typical flow study with 10,000 events per condition recorded. A, The mean fluorescence per cell (x-axis) of PLCs shifted progressively when incubated with increasing concentrations of MIS and decreased to baseline with 10-fold excess nonbiotinylated MIS. B, Prepubertal Sertoli cells (day 21) studied simultaneously exhibited no change in mean fluorescence per cell with added MIS and excess nonbiotinylated MIS had no effect.

 
In contrast, the mean fluorescence of Sertoli cells from postnatal day 21 rats did not change when incubated with 30 to 150 nM biotinylated MIS, and the addition of excess nonbiotinylated MIS had no effect (Fig. 3BGo). At 35 days of age, neither ILCs nor Sertoli cells exhibited a shift in mean fluorescence in the presence of increasing doses of biotinylated MIS (data not shown).

The binding visualized by flow cytometry was concentration dependent from 10 to 150 nM and saturable (Fig. 4Go). The concentration of MIS required to reach half saturation was approximately 15 nM, a measure of the dissociation constant of the MIS-receptor complex. Nonspecific binding determined by competition with nonbiotinylated MIS at selected doses accounted for about 30–40% of the total binding. To ascertain that MIS was not binding to the TGF-ß receptor, the cells were coincubated with TGF-ß at 1,000 to 10,000-fold molar excess of its ED50 (0.4–40 nM). Excess TGF-ß did not compete for binding, indicating that MIS was binding to its own receptor rather than to the TGF-ß receptor (Fig. 4Go). The saturation binding curve and dissociation constant of PLCs were similar to that seen in flow studies with several transformed ovarian cancer cell lines that express the MIS type II receptor (Masiakos, P. T., D. T. MacLaughlin, J. T. Teixeira, S. Maheswaran, P. C. Shah, D. J. Kehas, M. K. Kenneally, D. M. Dombkowski, T. U. Ha, F. I. Preffer, and P. K. Donahoe, submitted).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Saturation binding curve (PLCs). Total binding of biotinylated MIS at concentrations ranging from 0 to 150 nM. The binding of biotinylated MIS to PLCs was concentration dependent and saturable with a dissociation constant of 15 nM. In the presence of excess TGF-ß ({blacktriangleup}), the mean fluorescence per cell did not change significantly.

 
A comparison of the mean fluorescence per cell of PLCs, day 21 Sertoli cells, and COS cells (a cell line that does not express the MIS type II receptor [Masiakos, P. T., D. T. MacLaughlin, F. I. Preffer, P. K. Donahoe, unpublished data]) is shown in Figure 5Go. With increasing concentrations of MIS, PLCs exhibit a progressive increase in the mean fluorescence per cell, whereas neither primary Sertoli cells nor COS cells show any shift. Again, competition with excess nonbiotinylated MIS decreased the mean fluorescence of PLCs back to baseline, but had no effect in the Sertoli cells. Because no fluorescent shift was demonstrated with COS cells, competition was not performed.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Comparison of MIS binding to PLCs, Sertoli cells, and COS cells. Mean fluorescence per cell increased in a dose-dependent fashion in PLCs as contrasted with either Sertoli or COS cells. Competition with excess nonbiotinylated MIS decreased the fluorescent shift of the PLCs back to baseline and had no effect in Sertoli cells.

 
MIS effects on DNA synthesis
Incubation of cultured PLCs with recombinant human MIS caused a decrease in thymidine incorporation compared with the buffer control (Fig. 6Go). In the absence of LH, only the highest MIS concentration of 43 nM significantly decreased thymidine incorporation from a mean cpm/million cells of 818 to 433 (P < 0.05, n = 4). The decrease in thymidine incorporation to 73% of control with 14 nM MIS was not statistically significant. Addition of low dose LH (1 ng/ml) to the culture media enhanced the basal incorporation of thymidine in the buffer control wells from 1.5- to 5-fold in individual experiments (mean basal cpm/million cells increased from 818 to 2146) and potentiated the effect of lower concentrations of MIS. In the presence of LH, 3.5 to 43 nM MIS caused inhibition of thymidine incorporation that varied from 50–64% of control (P < 0.001, n = 7). Within this concentration range, no dose effects were detectable by Tukey analysis.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of MIS on PLC DNA synthesis. Thymidine incorporation of PLCs expressed as the percent of buffer-treated controls. MIS decreased thymidine incorporation of PLCs. The addition of LH (1 ng/ml) enhanced the basal thymidine incorporation and potentiated the effects of MIS at lower doses. *, P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001 (compared with control).

 
In contrast, thymidine incorporation by ILCs was unaffected by MIS treatment regardless of the concentration (n = 5) (Fig. 7Go). The apparent increased thymidine incorporation with added MIS by ILCs cultured in the absence of LH was not statistically significant. The addition of low dose LH did not confer responsiveness to MIS (n = 5).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of MIS on ILC DNA synthesis. Thymidine incorporation of ILCs expressed as the percent of buffer treated controls. MIS did not alter thymidine uptake in ILCs in the presence or absence of LH.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have shown that the MIS type II receptor is expressed abundantly in highly purified cultures of Leydig cells from prepubertal (21 days of age) and pubertal (35 days) rats. The Northern analysis data confirms previous RT-PCR evidence that the type II receptor is present in Leydig cells (24) rather than being restricted to Sertoli cells, as initially believed from in situ hybridization studies (3, 4, 7). We also demonstrated by flow cytometric analysis that the MIS type II receptor mRNA is translated and functional in PLCs as measured by specific binding of biotinylated MIS and inhibition of DNA synthesis. In contrast, in more mature and differentiated ILCs, MIS type II receptor mRNA is present, but MIS did not bind to these cells and had no effect on their thymidine incorporation. Thus, in Leydig cells, binding of MIS correlates with its biological activity and differs at the two maturational stages examined. The action of MIS in the peripubertal testis might be developmentally regulated via translational or posttranslational modification of its cell-surface receptor. Alternatively, if the type I receptor is necessary for binding and signal transduction of MIS, modulation of type I receptor expression might account for the variability in MIS binding and action at different stages of Leydig cell development.

The lack of binding of MIS to Sertoli cells despite abundant MIS type II receptor mRNA is consistent with transgenic and knock-out models of MIS that have no readily discernable Sertoli cell phenotype (12, 13). Additional studies to further characterize developmental changes in the expression and signaling of MIS receptors in Sertoli cells are necessary to determine whether MIS has an unrecognized physiologic function in the Sertoli cell.

These findings support our hypothesis that MIS has a direct role in the control of testicular development. Prepubertally, MIS is present, but its receptor expression is low or negligible in the testis (4), enabling the mesenchymal Leydig cell precursors to proliferate. By day 21, the mesenchymal stem cells attain the progenitor stage of differentiation and start to express steroidogenic enzymes and to decrease their rate of proliferation (19, 21). At this stage of development, MIS transcription appears to be transiently induced in Sertoli cells, and the type II receptor is readily detected in the PLCs. Thus, perhaps MIS serves to limit the proliferation of PLCs and to promote their differentiation and maturation into more steroidogenically active cells. By day 35, PLCs have differentiated into ILCs that only undergo one more cycle of cell division (19, 21). The differentiated state and low proliferative index of ILCs may obviate the need for the antiproliferative effects of MIS at this stage of Leydig cell maturation. In the absence of MIS, as exemplified in mice with null deletions of the MIS ligand and/or its receptor, the Leydig cells become hyperplastic and develop foci of neoplasia (11, 12).

Leydig cell proliferation and steroidogenesis are under the regulation of diverse hormones and growth factors (43, 44). Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), thyroid hormone, LH, and Sertoli cell paracrine factors are all proliferative stimuli for PLCs and ILCs (22, 44, 45, 46). The same panel of hormones and growth factors can promote differentiation and enhance steroidogenic capacity of Leydig cells, with LH playing a predominant role in stimulating testosterone biosynthesis (20, 21, 47, 48). MIS may be a previously unrecognized player in the regulation of Leydig cell maturation and differentiaton by limiting the proliferation of PLCs. Moreover, this antiproliferative effect of MIS appears to be occurring independently of LH, as the expression of LH and its receptor are unchanged in mice with null deletions of the MIS gene (24). Although this study has demonstrated that MIS decreases DNA synthesis in the Leydig cells, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Future studies will focus on clarifying the molecular basis of this inhibitory effect to determine whether MIS is causing cell cycle arrest or increasing apoptotic cell death of the PLCs.

MIS decreases net testosterone production (24, 25) by down-regulating steady-state mRNA levels of steroidogenic enzymes in testes from 2-month-old mice (24) and in R2C and MA-10 cell lines of Leydig cell origin (Teixeira, J., A. H. Payne, and P. K. Donahoe, unpublished data). MIS also inhibits activity of a P450c17/luciferase transgene in MA-10 cells, suggesting that MIS may be affecting transcription of this gene to regulate testosterone synthesis (Teixeira, J., A. H. Payne, and P. K. Donahoe, unpublished data). Determinants of testicular testosterone production, however, include both the steroidogenic capacity of individual Leydig cells and the total number of Leydig cells per testis. Our data indicate that MIS limits Leydig cell number in addition to its reported effects on steroidogenesis. This action of MIS would help prevent unregulated expansion of the Leydig cell population and control excessive androgen production during early puberty to achieve a normal progression of puberty.

Negative growth regulators are increasingly being recognized as having critical roles in balancing cell proliferation and cell death. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanism by which MIS prevents hyperplastic growth and neoplastic transformation of Leydig cells will offer additional insights into the regulation of testicular development and tumorigenesis. Mice with targeted deletions of the MIS ligand or receptor develop neoplasms that resemble human Leydig cell tumors (11, 12). These tumors secrete either testosterone, causing isosexual precocity (49), or other atypical sex steroids, including estrogens, causing prepubertal gynecomastia or discordant (feminizing) secondary sexual characteristics at puberty (50). The secretion of excessive sex steroids not only produces sexual precocity but also causes early skeletal fusion and compromises linear growth. The treatment of these tumors by orchidectomy results in further morbidity, impairing secondary sexual maturation, future fertility, and sexual functioning. The elucidation of a role for MIS in the prevention of testicular tumorigenesis may potentially yield alternative therapeutic modalities for the management of these patients.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Michael Thwing for technical assistance, Dr. Robert Gensure for help with statistical analysis, and Drs. David Rhoads and James K. T. Wang for helpful discussions.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by a Charles H. Hood Foundation Research Grant, an American Cancer Society Insitutional Research Grant, and NICHD R29-HD/CA36768 (to M.M.L.), NCI-T32/CA71345, and an American College of Surgeons Resident Research Scholarship (to P.T.M.), NIH/HD-32112, and CA-17393 (to P.K.D. and D.T.M.), a March of Dimes Research Grant (to P.K.D.), and NIH Grant R29/HD-32588 (to M.P.H.). This work was presented in part as an abstract at the 80th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society in New Orleans, Louisiana, 1998. Back

2 Currently a Ph.D. student in the Department of Pathology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Back

Received October 23, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jost A 1972 A new look at the mechanisms controlling sex differentiation in mammals. J Hopkins Med J 130:38–53
  2. Baarends WM, van Helmond MJ, Post M, van der Schoot P, Hoogerbrugge JW, de Winter J, Uilenbroek JT, Karels B, Wilming LG, Carel Meijers JH, Themmon A, Grootegoed J 1994 A novel member of the transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptor family is specifically expressed in the gonads and in mesenchymal cells adjacent to the Müllerian duct. Development 120:189–197[Abstract]
  3. di Clemente N, Wilson C, Faure E, Boussin L, Carmillo P, Tizard R, Picard JY, Vigier B, Josso N, Cate R 1994 Cloning, expression, and alternative splicing of the receptor for anti-Müllerian hormone. Mol Endocrinol 8:1006–1020[Abstract]
  4. Teixeira J, He WW, Shah PC, Morikawa N, Lee MM, Catlin EA, Hudson PL, Wing J, Maclaughlin DT, Donahoe PK 1996 Developmental expression of a candidate Müllerian inhibiting substance type II receptor. Endocrinology 137:160–165[Abstract]
  5. Lee MM, Cate RL, Donahoe PK, Waneck GL 1992 Developmentally regulated polyadenylation of two discrete messenger ribonucleic acids for Müllerian inhibiting substance. Endocrinology 130:847–853[Abstract]
  6. Munsterberg A, Lovell-Badge R 1991 Expression of the mouse anti-Müllerian hormone gene suggests a role in both male and female sexual differentiation. Development 113:613–624[Abstract]
  7. Baarends WM, Hoogerbrugge JW, Post M, Visser JA, De Rooij D, Parvinen M, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA 1995 Anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression during postnatal testis development and in the adult testis of the rat. Endocrinology 136:5614–5622[Abstract]
  8. Tran D, Picard JY, Campargue J, Josso N 1987 Immunocytochemical detection of anti-Müllerian hormone in Sertoli cells of various mammalian species including human. J Histochem Cytochem 35:733–743[Abstract]
  9. Cate R, Wilson C 1993 Müllerian inhibiting substance. In: Gwatkin R (ed) Genes in Mammalian Reproduction, Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, pp 185–205
  10. Lee MM, Donahoe PK 1993 Müllerian-inhibiting substance: a gonadal hormone with multiple functions. Endocr Rev 14:152–164[Abstract]
  11. Mishina Y, Rey R, Finegold MJ, Matzuk MM, Josso N, Cate RL, Behringer RL 1996 Genetic analysis of the Müllerian-inhibiting substance signal transduction pathway in mammalian sexual differentiation. Genes Dev 10:2577–2587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Behringer RR, Finegold MJ, Cate RL 1994 Müllerian inhibiting substance function during mammalian sexual development. Cell 79:415–425[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Behringer RR, Cate RL, Froelick GJ, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL 1990 Abnormal sexual development in transgenic mice chronically expressing Müllerian inhibiting substance. Nature 345:167–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Lyet L, Louis F, Forest MG, Josso N, Behringer RR, Vigier B 1995 Ontogeny of reproductive abnormalities induced by deregulation of anti-Müllerian hormone expression in transgenic mice. Biol Reprod 52:444–454[Abstract]
  15. Byskov AG 1986 Differentiation of mammalian embryonic gonad. Physiol Rev 66:71–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kerr JB, Knell CM 1988 The fate of fetal Leydig cells during the development of the fetal and postnatal rat testis. Development 103:535–544[Abstract]
  17. Tapanainen J, Kuopio T, Pelliniemi LJ, Huhtaniemi I 1984 Rat testicular endogenous steroids and the number of Leydig cells between the fetal period and sexual maturity. Biol Reprod 31:1027–1035[Abstract]
  18. Yokoi H, Yamama Y, Tsuruo Y, Kawarada Y, Miura N, Sugiyama T, Ishimura K 1998 Leydig cells undergoing apoptosis in the perinatal rat testis. Acta Histochem Cytochem 31:355–361
  19. Ge RS, Shan LX, Hardy MP 1996 Pubertal Development of Leydig Cells. In: Payne AH, Hardy, MP, Russell, LD (eds) The Leydig Cell , pp 159–174, Cache River Press, Vienna
  20. Ewing LL, Keeney DS 1993 Leydig cells: structure and function. In: (Desjardins C, Ewing, LL (eds) Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis, pp 137–165, Oxford University Press, New York
  21. Benton L, Shan LX, Hardy MP 1995 Differentiation of adult Leydig cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53:61–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Hardy MP, Gelber SJ, Zhou ZF, Penning TM, Ricigliano JW, Ganjam VK, Nonneman D, Ewing LL 1991 Hormonal control of Leydig cell differentiation. Ann NY Acad Sci 637:152–163[Abstract]
  23. Kuroda T, Lee MM, Haqq CM, Powell DM, Manganaro TF, Donahoe PK 1990 Müllerian inhibiting substance ontogeny and its modulation by follicle-stimulating hormone in the rat testes. Endocrinology 127:1825–1832[Abstract]
  24. Racine C, Rey R, Forest M, Louis F, Ferre A, Huhtaniemi I, Josso N, di Clemente N 1998 Receptors for anti-Müllerian hormone on Leydig cells are responsible for its effects on steroidogenesis and cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:594–599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rouiller-Fabre V, Carmona S, Abou Merhi R, Cate R, Habert R, Vigier B 1998 Effect of anti-Müllerian hormone on Sertoli and Leydig cell functions in fetal and immature rats. Endocrinology 139:1213–1220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Klinefelter GR, Kelce WR, Hardy MP 1993 Isolation and culture of Leydig cells from adult rats. Methods Toxicol 3:166–181
  27. Shan L, Hardy M 1992 Developmental changes in levels of luteinizing hormone receptor and androgen receptor in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 131:1107–1114[Abstract]
  28. Mather J, Phillips DM 1984 Primary culture of testicular somatic cells. In: Methods for Serum-Free Culture of Cells of the Endocrine System, pp 29–45, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York
  29. Payne AH, Downing JR, Wong KL 1980 Luteinizing hormone receptors and testosterone synthesis in two distinct populations of Leydig cells. Endocrinology 106:1424–1429[Abstract]
  30. Joseph D, Hall S, French F 1987 Rat androgen-binding protein: evidence for identical subunits and amino acid sequence homology with human sex hormone-binding globulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:339–343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Haqq CM, Lee MM, Tizard R, Wysk M, Demarinis J, Donahoe PK, Cate RL 1992 Isolation of the rat gene for Müllerian inhibiting substance. Genomics 12:665–669[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Heckert L, Griswold M 1991 Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor mRNA in rat testes and Sertoli cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:670–677[Abstract]
  33. MacFarland K, Sprengel R, Phillips H, Kohler M, Rosemblit N, Nikolics K, Segaloff D, Seeburg P 1989 Lutropin-choriogonadotropin receptor: an unusual member of the G protein-coupled receptor family. Science 245:494–499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ragin RC, Donahoe PK, Kenneally MK, Ahmad MF, MacLaughlin DT 1992 Human Müllerian inhibiting substance: enhanced purification imparts biochemical stability and restores antiproliferative effects. Protein Expr Purif 3:236–245[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. MacLaughlin DT, Epstein J, Donahoe PK 1991 Bioassay, purification, cloning, and expression of Müllerian inhibiting substance. Methods Enzymol 198:358–369[Medline]
  36. Cate RL, Mattaliano RJ, Hession C, Tizard R, Farber NM, Cheung A, Ninfa EG, Frey AZ, Gash DJ, Chow EP, Fisher RA, Bertonis JM, Torres G, Wallner BP, Ramachandran KL, Ragin RC, Manganaro TF, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK 1986 Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Müllerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells. Cell 45:685–698[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Donahoe PK, Ito Y, Hendren WH 1977 A graded organ culture assay for the detection of Müllerian inhibiting substance. J Surg Res 23:141–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Picon R 1969 Action du testicule foetal sur le developpment in vitro des canaux de Muller chez le rat. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 58:1–19[Medline]
  39. Chirgwin J, Przybyla A, MacDonald R, Rutter W 1979 Isolation of biolgically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:5294–5299[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Ercolani L, Florence B, Denaro M, Alexander-Bridges M 1988 Isolation and complete sequence of a functional human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene. J Biol Chem 263:15335–15341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hudson PL, Dougas I, Donahoe PK, Cate RL, Epstein J, Pepinsky RB, MacLaughlin DT 1990 An immunoassay to detect human Müllerian inhibiting substance in males and females during normal development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:16–22[Abstract]
  42. Green NM 1965 A spectrophotometric assay for avidin and biotin based on binding of dyes by avidin. Biochem J 94:23c–24c
  43. Ackland JF, Schwartz NB, Mayo KE, Dodson RE 1992 Nonsteroidal signals originating in the gonads. Physiol Rev 72:731–787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Saez JM 1994 Leydig cells: Endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine regulation. Endocr Rev 15:574–626[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Skinner MK 1991 Cell-cell interactions in the testis. Endocr Rev 12:45–77[Medline]
  46. Vergouwen R, Jacobs S, Huiskamp R, Davids J, de Rooj D 1991 Proliferative activity of gonocytes, Sertoli cells and interstitial cells during testicular development in mice. J Reprod Fertil 93:233–243[Abstract]
  47. Payne A, Youngblood G 1995 Regulation of expression of steroidogenic enzymes in Leydig cells. Biol Reprod 52:217–225[Abstract]
  48. Shan L, Hardy DO, Catterall JF, Hardy MP 1995 Effects of luteinizing hormone (LH) and androgen on steady state levels of messenger ribonucleic acid for LH receptors, androgen receptors, and steroidogenic enzymes in rat Leydig cell progenitors in vivo. Endocrinology 136:1686–1693[Abstract]
  49. Criscuolo T, Sinisi AA, Perrone L, Graziani A, Bellastella A, Faggiano M 1986 Isosexual pseudoprecocious puberty secondary to a testosterone-secreting Leydig cell testicular tumor: true isosexual precocity early after surgery. Andrologia 18:175–183[Medline]
  50. Kim I, Young RH, Scully RE 1985 Leydig cell tumors of the testis. A clinicopathological analysis of 40 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 9:177–192[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. Itman, S. Mendis, B. Barakat, and K. L. Loveland
All in the family: TGF-{beta} family action in testis development.
Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 233 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Wu, R. Arumugam, S. P. Baker, and M. M. Lee
Pubertal and Adult Leydig Cell Function in Mullerian Inhibiting Substance-Deficient Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. L. Britt, P. K. Saunders, S. J. McPherson, M. L. Misso, E. R. Simpson, and J. K. Findlay
Estrogen Actions on Follicle Formation and Early Follicle Development
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1712 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Salva, M. P. Hardy, X.-f. Wu, C. M. Sottas, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and M. M. Lee
Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance Inhibits Rat Leydig Cell Regeneration after Ethylene Dimethanesulphonate Ablation
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 600 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. Hirakawa and M. Ascoli
The Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor-Induced Phosphorylation of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases in Leydig Cells Is Mediated by a Protein Kinase A-Dependent Activation of Ras
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2003; 17(11): 2189 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Misra, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and M. M. Lee
The Role of Mullerian Inhibiting Substance in the Evaluation of Phenotypic Female Patients with Mild Degrees of Virilization
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. M. Laurich, A. M. Trbovich, F. H. O'Neill, C. P. Houk, P. M. Sluss, A. H. Payne, P. K. Donahoe, and J. Teixeira
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Blocks the Protein Kinase A-Induced Expression of Cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-Hydroxylase/C17-20 Lyase mRNA in a Mouse Leydig Cell Line Independent of cAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein Phosphorylation
Endocrinology, September 1, 2002; 143(9): 3351 - 3360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Misra, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and M. M. Lee
Measurement of Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Facilitates Management of Boys with Microphallus and Cryptorchidism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3598 - 3602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Ikeda, A. Nagai, M.-a. Ikeda, and S. Hayashi
Increased Expression of Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance Correlates with Inhibition of Follicular Growth in the Developing Ovary of Rats Treated with E2 Benzoate
Endocrinology, January 1, 2002; 143(1): 304 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Teixeira, S. Maheswaran, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance: An Instructive Developmental Hormone with Diagnostic and Possible Therapeutic Applications
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2001; 22(5): 657 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Dutertre, L. Gouedard, F. Xavier, W.-Q. Long, N. di Clemente, J.-Y. Picard, and R. Rey
Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors Express a Functional Membrane Receptor for Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Transgenic Mice
Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 4040 - 4046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Clarke, Y. Hoshiya, S. E. Yi, X. Liu, K. M. Lyons, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Signaling Uses a Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP)-Like Pathway Mediated by ALK2 and Induces Smad6 Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2001; 15(6): 946 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Goddard, M. Bouras, M. Keramidas, J. C. Hendrick, J. J. Feige, and M. Benahmed
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor Types I and II in Cultured Porcine Leydig Cells: Expression and Hormonal Regulation
Endocrinology, June 1, 2000; 141(6): 2068 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Gouedard, Y.-G. Chen, L. Thevenet, C. Racine, S. Borie, I. Lamarre, N. Josso, J. Massague, and N. di Clemente
Engagement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Type IB Receptor and Smad1 Signaling by Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Its Type II Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 27973 - 27978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal