help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bronnikov, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nedergaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bronnikov, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nedergaard, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 9 4185-4197
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

ß1 to ß3 Switch in Control of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate during Brown Adipocyte Development Explains Distinct ß-Adrenoceptor Subtype Mediation of Proliferation and Differentiation1

Gennady Bronnikov2,3, Tore Bengtsson, Ludmila Kramarova2, Valeria Golozoubova, Barbara Cannon and Jan Nedergaard

The Wenner-Gren Institute, The Arrhenius Laboratories F3, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jan Nedergaard, The Wenner-Gren Institute, The Arrhenius Laboratories F3, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: jan{at}metabol.su.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To explain the distinctive pharmacological profiles observed for adrenergic stimulation of cell proliferation (ß1) and cell differentiation (ß3), the adrenergic control of cAMP accumulation was investigated during brown adipocyte development. In preadipocytes, norepinephrine (NE) increased cAMP levels but the ß3-agonists BRL-37344 and CGP-12177 did not; in contrast, when the cells had differentiated into mature brown adipocytes, a large cAMP response to the ß3-agonists had emerged and was now double that to NE (although the affinity of NE had increased 10-fold). ß1-messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were high in both pre- and mature brown adipocytes; ß3-mRNA did not appear until maturation but then abruptly. Although ß1-receptors remained detectable by [3H]CGP-12177 binding in the mature brown adipocytes, the cAMP response to NE (based on propranolol inhibitory potency) switched from ß1 to ß3. Even the established ß1-agonist dobutamine acted through ß3-receptors in the mature brown adipocytes. The increases in cAMP levels could adequately explain the increased cell proliferation in NE-stimulated preadipocytes and the NE-induced UCP1 gene expression in mature brown adipocytes. The distinctive adrenergic profiles for stimulation of proliferation and of differentiation were thus not due to the existence of additional pathways but to a switch in the type of ß-receptor mediating the NE response, coordinated with an alteration in the nuclear response to increased cAMP levels. The study implies that full recruitment of brown adipose tissue cannot be induced by exclusive ß3-stimulation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN BROWN ADIPOCYTES, two processes fundamental for tissue development are stimulated by the sympathetic neurotransmittor norepinephrine: cell proliferation and enhanced cellular differentiation (1). Both these processes are primarily mediated through ß-adrenergic receptors, but at least in authentic brown adipocytes, two different subtypes have been implied: ß1 and ß3.

The development of brown adipocytes may be studied in primary culture initiated with precursors freshly isolated from brown adipose tissue (2, 3, 4, 5). In the fibroblast-like brown preadipocytes that have only been 3–4 days in culture, norepinephrine stimulates cell proliferation (6, 7). In these cells, an increase in cellular cAMP level is also able to promote proliferation (6). Concordantly, the adrenergic effect is mediated via ß-receptors, which are of the ß1-subtype (6).

After about 5 days in culture, the brown adipocyte precursor cells spontaneously convert from displaying fibroblast-like morphology to acquiring typical mature brown adipocyte features; this conversion occurs at the time of cellular confluence (2, 3, 4). In these cells, norepinephrine very competently induces the expression of the most specific differentiation marker: the tissue-specific uncoupling protein (UCP1) (5). The response to norepinephrine in this case displays characteristic semibell-shaped kinetics (5, 8). In these cells, an increase in cellular cAMP level is also able to induce this gene expression (5, 8). In agreement with this, the adrenergic effect is mediated via ß-receptors, but of the ß3-subtype.

Thus, during their development, authentic brown adipocytes demonstrate a transition from one stage where ß1-stimulation induces proliferation to a stage where ß3-stimulation enhances cellular differentiation (functionally defined as an induction of UCP1 expression).

This originally clear picture of distinct ß-subtypes controlling distinct responses in authentic brown adipocytes in primary culture has, however, been challenged experimentally by later observations in immortalized brown adipocyte-like cell lines. In such cell lines, UCP1 gene expression was reported to be promiscuously controlled: both ß3- and ß1-stimulation (and even ß2) could induce UCP1 expression (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Further, the physiological relevance of ß3-mediated responses for the induction of UCP1 expression has been questioned, because it has been surmised that ß3-mediated processes display an inherently lower affinity for norepinephrine than do ß1-mediated processes (15). Thus, even if both ß1- and ß3-receptors should be capable of inducing UCP1 expression, in the physiological situation the expression would be stimulated predominantly through the ß1-receptor (14, 15, 16).

For this reason alone, a clear delineation of the receptor-signal coupling process in brown adipocytes during development may be considered a prerequisite for further development in this area. Such a delineation may also be of significance for the development of our ability to influence brown adipose tissue function and capacity in the intact organism (including possibly man).

Further, as two very distinct cellular processes, proliferation and enhanced differentiation, in the primary cell cultures have been demonstrated to be mediated through two different ß-receptor subtypes, a basic question concerning signal mediation may be formulated. Principally, two possibilities may be considered. One is that in addition to their effects on cAMP levels, the two ß-receptor subtypes may convey additional independent and distinct intracellular information to the cell interior that enables the cell to respond differentially—by proliferation or differentiation—to signals emanating from either of the two subtypes, even though both of them would be expected to increase cAMP levels. Such pathways are presently discussed (17, 18). Alternatively, it would be solely through their effect on cAMP levels that the distinctive effect of the two ß-subtypes is mediated. In that case, during cellular development, a switch in the ß-receptor subtype that (dominantly) controls cAMP levels, from ß1 to ß3, must occur in parallel with a switch in the innate response of the cell to an increase in cAMP levels, from proliferation stimulation to differentiation stimulation.

To distinguish between these two possibilities and to establish the nature of the receptor controlling UCP1 expression in authentic brown adipocytes, the subtype of ß-adrenergic receptor controlling cAMP levels was investigated during the development of these cells in culture. We found that during development a switch occurred, such that cAMP levels were ß1-controlled in brown preadipocytes but ß3-controlled in mature brown adipocytes; thus, it was through their regulation of intracellular cAMP levels that the ß-receptor subtypes conveyed their subtype specificity to the cellular responses. The underlying switch in coupled ß-receptor subtype was due to a spontaneously induced expression of ß3-receptors during cell differentiation. In the mature authentic brown adipocytes, there was no detectable contribution to the functional response from the ß1-receptors still existing on the cells, but the ß3-receptors had a functional norepinephrine affinity higher than that of the ß1-receptors that were functionally active in the brown preadipocytes.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell isolation
Brown fat precursor cells were isolated from 3- to 4-week-old male mice of the NMRI strain, principally as described by Néchad et al. (2) and cultured as described earlier (5, 6). The cervical, interscapular, and axillary brown adipose tissue depots were dissected out from each mouse. The tissue was pooled and incubated in the HEPES-buffered solution (pH 7.4, 2 ml/mouse) detailed by Néchad et al. (2), containing 200 U/ml crude collagenase type II (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). The tissue was digested for 20–30 min at 37 C, after which time the tubes were placed on ice for 30 min to allow the mature brown fat cells and lipid droplets to float. The infranatant was then collected and filtered through a 250 µm nylon screen and then through a 25 µm nylon screen. The precursor cells were pelleted by centrifugation, suspended in culture medium and counted in a Bürker chamber.

Cell culture
Cells were cultivated in 6-well or 12-well plates (growth area 9.4 cm2 and 3.83 cm2/well, respectively). An inoculation density of 80–90 x 103 cells/cm2 was used in both types of wells. The cells were cultivated in 2 ml (6-well) or 1 ml (12-well) of a culture medium consisting of DMEM [Flow 1x liquid without glutamine; 4 mM glutamine (Flow) added], supplemented with 10% newborn-calf serum (Flow), 4 nM insulin (Actrapid Human, Novo), 10 mM HEPES (Flow), and with 50 IU penicillin, 50 µg streptomycin and 25 µg sodium ascorbate (Sigma Chemical Co.) (19) per ml, at 37 C in a water-saturated atmosphere of 8% CO2 in air in a Heraeus CO2-auto-zero B5061 incubator. On the next day (day 1), the cultures were first washed with 2 ml prewarmed DMEM and fresh prewarmed medium was then added. If the cultures were analyzed on day 3, no further medium changes were made (Savant Instruments, Inc., Hicksville, NY); otherwise the medium was fully exchanged with fresh prewarmed medium on day 3 (without wash), and similarly on days 6 and 9, where relevant.

cAMP determinations
On the indicated day of culture, 5–10 µl of agonist or antagonist stock solution in DMEM were added into each well and the cultures replaced in the incubator. After the indicated times, the culture medium was aspirated, 0.8 ml 95% ethanol was added to each well, and the cells were scraped off. The wells were then washed with 0.5 ml 70% ethanol, and the combined suspensions were dried in a Speedvac centrifuge. The dried samples were dissolved in 150–500 µl of the Buffer 1 provided with the Cyclic AMP [3H] Assay System from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Solna, Sweden) and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min. Two 50 µl aliquots of the supernatants for every sample were analyzed according to the description in the assay system, and for every concentration of any agonist in each experiment, duplicate wells were used; thus, each value initially obtained was the average of four measurements of cAMP.

In each series of experiments, carried out with the same culture on the same day, the cAMP value was either stated as the mean ± SE based on the number of series, or the level observed with 1 µM (day 3 and 4) or 0.1 µM (day 6 and 8) norepinephrine was set in each series to 100% and mean values ± SE for these normalized values were then calculated.

Determination of messenger RNA (mRNA) levels for ß1- and ß3-adrenoceptors and for UCP1
On the indicated day of culture, the medium was discarded (for UCP1 mRNA determination 4 h after the addition of norepinephrine), the cells were dissolved in 1 ml of an Ultraspec (Biotecx, Houston, TX) solution, and the manufacturer’s procedure for RNA isolation was followed. The final pellet was suspended in 75 µl 10 mM EDTA and the RNA extracted at 70 C for 5 min and thereafter vortexed. The RNA concentration was measured and absence of protein contamination was checked on a Beckman Coulter, Inc. DU 50 spectrophotometer with readings at 260 nm and 280 nm. The ratio of 260/280 nm was routinely higher than 1.7.

The RNA solution was lyophilized in a SpeedVac. The RNA was then dissolved in 18 µl of RNA cocktail consisting of 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 5 mM MOPS and 9% (vol/vol) formaldehyde, and 2 µl of loading buffer consisting of 50% (wt/vol) glycerol and 0.1 mg/ml bromophenol blue. The solution was incubated for 8 min at 70 C and then chilled on ice. The samples were loaded on a gel (1.25% agarose, 10 mM MOPS, 6.2% (vol/vol) formaldehyde and 20 µl 1 mg/ml ethidium bromide). The gel was run in 20 mM MOPS-buffer for 2–3 h at 4–5 V/cm. After electrophoresis, it was verified under UV-light from the intensity of the 18S-28S rRNA bands that all samples were equally loaded and that no degradation was observable.

The RNA was blotted overnight from the gel to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in 20x SSC. Three sheets of Whatman 3MM (Kebo Lab., Spnga, Sweden) soaked in 20 x SSC were placed on top of the Hybond-N membrane. The gel and the Hybond-N membrane were examined under UV light. The RNA was cross-linked to the Hybond-N membrane [UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)] with the auto cross-link program). The Hybond-N membrane was prehybridized with 10 ml of a solution containing 5 x SSC, 5 x Denhardt’s solution, 0.5% SDS, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 50% formamide and 100 µg/ml of degraded DNA from herring sperm (Sigma Chemical Co.) in a hybridization oven (Hybaid, Middlesex, UK) at 45 C for 2 h. After this prehybridization, the Hybond-N membrane was transferred to a similar solution containing the denatured probe (see below) at a final concentration of 1–3 · 4 106 cpm per ml. The hybridization was carried out for at least 16 h at 45 C. The Hybond-N membrane was then washed twice in 2 x SSC, 0.2% SDS at 30 C for 20–30 min each and then twice in 0.1 x SSC, 0.2% SDS at 50 C for 45 min. The membrane was sealed in a plastic envelope and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen. The screens were analyzed on a Molecular Dynamics, Inc. PhosphorImager with the ImageQuant program. When the same membrane was analyzed for several mRNA species, the previous probe was removed by boiling it in 0.1% SDS solution.

The rat ß1-complementary DNA was that previously characterized by Revelli et al. (20). It was cloned in the EcoRI site of the PVZ1 plasmid (size about 2.7 kb). The 1.5-kb fragment obtained by Har 1 digestion was used for the hybridizations. The mouse ß3-probe originated from the A43 probe earlier characterized (21). A fragment of the mouse ß3-adrenoceptor gene was subcloned in pUC18 at the XbaI site. This genomic DNA fragment has a length of 300 bp and corresponds to the 5'-coding region of the ß3-adrenoceptor from ATG to the second transmembranal loop (TM2). To generate the ß3-adrenoceptor probe used here, the plasmid was cut with the restriction enzymes BamHI and SalI to a length of 0.5 kb. The UCP1 probe was that earlier used (5). The probes were labeled with a DNA labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to an activity of 7–10 cpm/µg DNA (10.000–60.000 cpm/µl stock solution).

Cell membrane preparations and equilibrium binding studies
On culture day 7, cells were first rinsed with 1 ml of incubation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, pH 7.4) also containing 0.25 M sucrose and then scraped into incubation buffer (without sucrose). After centrifugation (2 min, 14000 rpm, Eppendorf centrifuge), cells were homogenized in a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer with a Teflon pestle in the incubation buffer without sucrose. The homogenate was filtered through one layer of silk cloth and centrifuged for 30 min at 100,000 x g in a Beckman Coulter, Inc. high-speed ultracentrifuge at +4 C. The pellet was rehomogenized in the same incubation buffer at a protein concentration of about 1 mg/ml and filtered again through silk cloth. Protein was determined by the method of Bradford with fatty-acid-free BSA (fraction V, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as standard. Samples, containing approximately 150 µg protein in a total volume of 0.32 ml assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, pH 7.4) were incubated for 60 min at 30 C with seven concentrations of (-)-[3H] CGP-12177 (0.04–2.4 nM; 52 Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The incubation was stopped with 2 ml ice-cold incubation buffer diluted 10-fold and the samples were filtered through a Whatman GF/C filter on a semiautomatic Skatron cell harvester 7019 (Skatron, Lier, Norway) and washed with 8 ml/well of the incubation buffer (diluted 1/10). The radioactivity was determined in 5 ml scintillation mixture [Emulsifier Scintillator Plus (Packard Instrument Co.)] in a Beckman Coulter, Inc. scintillation counter. The total binding (Btot) was measured as above. The nonspecific binding (Bns) was determined by parallel incubations with 1 µM (-)-alprenolol (Ciba-Geigy, Basel, Switzerland). The specific binding (Bs) was estimated as the difference between Btot and Bns.

Analysis of dose-response curves
For analysis of dose-response curves, the curve-fitting option of the KaleidaGraph 3.0 application was used. Monophasic dose-response data were analyzed with the rearranged Michaelis-Menten equation VA = basal + Vmax/(1+(EC50/[A])h), where h is the Hill coefficient. If h was estimated to be close to 1 in the initial analysis, the data were recalculated with h = 1.

For the analysis of biphasic ("semibell-shaped") dose-response data (observed for norepinephrine, isoprenaline and dobutamine in mature brown adipocytes), a model (22) for the interaction of a ligand with two different receptors, one stimulatory (S) and one inhibitory (I), was used: VA = basal + Vmax(S)/(1+(EC50/[A])h) + Vmax(I)/(1+(IC50/[A])h). IC50 here denotes the EC50 of the inhibitory component. In some calculations, basal was set as a constant to avoid a singular matrix that would make the fitting unsolvable.

Chemicals
Stock solutions (10 mM) of agents used (obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. if not otherwise indicated) were made in 0.05% ascorbic acid (NE, isoprenaline) or in DMEM and stored at -80 C. The following agents were used: norepinephrine ((-)-Arterenol bitartrate), BRL-37344 (gift from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Brentford, UK), isoprenaline ((-)-isoproterenol (+)-bitartrate), CGP-12177 (CGP-12177A, from Ciba-Geigy), D,L-propranolol, yohimbine, dobutamine (Dobutrex from Lilly France S.A., Fegersheim, France).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The switch in ß-receptor coupling during the differentiation of brown adipocytes
As seen in Fig. 1Go, dramatically different profiles for adrenergic regulation of cAMP levels were observed during brown adipocyte development. The responses in the brown preadipocytes were simple to interpret (Fig. 1AGo). The dose-response curve for norepinephrine was monophasic and fulfilled simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics; the EC50 was 450 nM (Table 1Go). There was hardly any response to the ß3-selective agonist BRL-37344. Similarly, the ß3-specific agonist CGP-12177—which is an agonist only on ß3-receptors (23) and does not activate ß1-receptors [it is virtually a full antagonist on this receptor (24, 25)]—was fully devoid of effect. This response pattern is in itself indicative of a dominating ß1-response in the brown preadipocyte stage (but see also below).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The switch in ß-receptor coupling during differentiation of brown adipocytes developing in culture. Dose-response curves for cAMP accumulation were obtained in brown preadipocytes (A) (i.e. precursor cells developed in culture for 3 days) and mature brown adipocytes (B) (developed for 6 days) by stimulation with the indicated concentrations of norepinephrine (NE), CGP-12177 or BRL-37344. In A, the cultures were fixed with ethanol 5 min after agonist addition (see Fig. 2Go), and in each such experiment, the cAMP level obtained with 1 µM norepinephrine was set to 100% and all other data expressed relative to this. The points represent means ± SE (when not visible, the SE was smaller than the size of the symbol) from six separate experiments with norepinephrine (NE); the cAMP level corresponding to 100% was 5 ± 1 pmol per well (12-well plates). The points for CGP-12177 and BRL-37344 are based on four experiments. The curves for NE and BRL-37344 were drawn for simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a Hill coefficient of 1, as described in Materials and Methods. In (B), the cells were fixed 20 min after agonist addition (cf. Fig. 2Go); the cAMP level at 0.1 µM, which was set to 100%, was 31 ± 2 pmol per well. Points are based on 5 experimental series for norepinephrine and 4 for CGP-12177 and BRL-37344. The curves for BRL-37344 and CGP-12177 were drawn for Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a free Hill coefficient (see Table 1Go). The response to norepinephrine in the mature brown adipocytes was analyzed as a two component response, as described in Materials and Methods.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Parameters of the cAMP response of brown adipocytes to adrenergic agonists

 
When the brown preadipocytes had developed into mature brown adipocytes, a very remarkable and dramatic change in response pattern had occurred (Fig. 1BGo). Norepinephrine, which in the proliferating brown preadipocytes was the best of the tested agonists, in the mature brown adipocytes gave the lowest response of the three. Further, the response to norepinephrine did not demonstrate simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics; instead it was now biphasic, with a clear maximal response at 0.1 µM; higher concentrations yielded markedly lower cAMP levels. Notably, the functional affinity had increased: the EC50 had decreased from 450 nM to only 35 nM. In contrast to what was the case in the brown preadipocytes, the two ß3-agonists tested were now both highly potent, maximally inducing nearly double the cAMP level induced by optimal norepinephrine concentrations, and each demonstrating a monophasic response.

There are at least three implications of these dramatically altered characteristics of the response of the brown adipocytes. Firstly, the contrasting responses between the brown preadipocytes and the mature brown adipocytes make it clear that, as a consequence of the spontaneous differentiation of the brown adipocytes, a sudden switch had occurred in the complement of coupled ß-receptors. In that there was a response in the mature brown adipocytes to the ß3-specific agonist CGP-12177 (and to BRL-37344), it is evident that in these cells ß3-receptors existed that were coupled to cAMP production. (Whether it is solely (or at all) through these ß3-receptors that norepinephrine functions in these cells is not in itself demonstrated by this response pattern but will be investigated below.) The existence of a switch in response is principally in agreement with implications from earlier, less detailed single-dose investigations (6, 26).

Secondly, the fact that the maximal cAMP level achieved by the ß3-agonists in the mature brown adipocytes had become higher than that reached by norepinephrine, implies that in the mature brown adipocytes, norepinephrine stimulated inhibitory receptors not stimulated by BRL-37344 or CGP-12177 (see below).

Thirdly, the biphasic nature of the response to norepinephrine raises questions concerning the mechanisms and possible cellular consequences of this unusual receptor response. An analysis of this phenomenon will be presented elsewhere (Bronnikov, G., S.-J. Zhang, B. Cannon, and J. Nedergaard, submitted).

It could be suggested that the apparent switch in ß-receptor subtype could in some way be due to different cAMP accumulation kinetics in the different cell stages. We therefore followed the time course of the response to norepinephrine and CGP-12177 (Fig. 2Go). In the brown preadipocytes, no detectable response to CGP-12177 was observable at any time point after stimulation (Fig. 2AGo), whereas the response to norepinephrine peaked early and then slowly declined; it remained, however, well above control levels even after several hours. In the mature brown adipocytes, the response to CGP-12177 at every time point was higher than (or similar to) the response to norepinephrine (Fig. 2BGo). Thus, altered kinetics could not explain the apparent switch in functional ß-receptor endowment. However, a differentiation-related alteration in the kinetics was observable, in that during continued norepinephrine stimulation, the cAMP level in the brown preadipocytes peaked earlier than in the mature brown adipocytes (Fig. 2CGo).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Kinetics of cAMP accumulation in brown preadipocytes and in mature brown adipocytes. The experiments were performed principally as in Fig. 1Go, except that a fixed concentration of 1 µM norepinephrine (NE) or CGP-12177 was used. The time of addition of agents into different wells was varied, so that all wells in one plate were fixed at the same time. Results in (A) and (B) are each from a single series in 12-well plates in duplicate. In (C), normalized kinetic curves for norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation are presented, based on experiments as those exemplified in (A) and (B). In the brown preadipocytes, the level of norepinephrine-stimulated cAMP accumulation at the 4th min was set to 100% (mean 7 ± 1 pmol/well; 3 series). In the mature brown adipocytes, the level at the 20–24th min was set to 100% (mean 31 ± 4 pmol/well; 4 series). Also the response to CGP-12177 was maximal at {approx}20 min in the mature brown adipocytes (mean of 3 series; not shown).

 
The molecular background for the switch in ß-receptor coupling
It is implied from the above that the ß-receptor subtype governing the increase in cAMP level had switched from ß1 to ß3 during cell development in this culture system. This could be caused by a similar but counterregulated switch in the expression of the relevant ß-receptor genes: i.e. that the ß1-gene would be highly expressed in the brown preadipocytes but this expression would cease on the day of the switch, after which only the ß3-gene would be expressed.

We therefore analyzed the mRNA levels of the ß1- and the ß3-receptors during the spontaneous differentiation process in these cells 2-mRNA was not detectable in unstimulated cells and was only transiently expressed 15–30 min after norepinephrine stimulation [Bengtsson, T., B. Cannon, and J. Nedergaard, submitted)]. As seen in Fig. 3AGo, a single band hybridizing with the probe corresponding to ß1-mRNA was detectable in samples from all stages investigated. The size of the ß1-transcript was 2.6 kb, in agreement with what has been observed in a variety of tissues, including brown adipose tissue (14, 27, 28, 29). In Fig. 3BGo, results from five cell culture series analyzed as in Fig. 3AGo are presented. As seen, the level of ß1-mRNA was stable through the switch period around day 4 and only decreased after day 7, in the period during which the cells tend in general to dedifferentiate [if they are not chronically norepinephrine-treated (30)].



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Expression of ß1- and ß3-adrenoceptor genes during brown adipocyte development in cell culture. RNA was isolated from cell cultures during the spontaneous differentiation process, as described in Materials and Methods. (A) 10 µg RNA isolated from brown adipocyte cell cultures on the indicated days of culture (each day two samples (lanes), from duplicate wells) was electrophoresed on an agarose gel; the top panel shows ethidium bromide staining of the gel, quantifying loading (negative image). The gel was then blotted to Hybond membranes and hybrized with probes corresponding to ß1- and ß3-mRNA, as described in Materials and Methods (lower panels). B and C, Compilation of results from a series of experiments similar to those exemplified in A. In B, the level of ß1-mRNA at day 6 was set to 100%; points are mean ± SE of 5 experiments. In C, the level of ß3-mRNA at day 6 was set to 100%; points are mean of 3 experiments. The stippled line depicts the norepinephrine-induced level of UCP mRNA (also set to 100% at day 6) and is based on data from cell cultures examined under identical conditions in Refs. (5 35 ).

 
A band hybridizing with the probe corresponding to ß3-mRNA was not detectable in the samples from brown preadipocytes, but such a band became prominent in samples from later phases of the spontaneous differentiation process (Fig. 3AGo). The size of 2.4 kb for the major transcript is in good agreement with previous reports for ß3-receptors (21, 31, 32). Only in a few blots could we detect small amounts of ß3-adrenoceptor transcripts with sizes larger than the band of 2.4 kb (not shown), but the occurrence of such bands seemed random. Also in other reports on ß3-expression in mouse, the occurrence of larger transcripts was inconsistently reported, with some groups reporting only one transcript size in mouse tissue (21, 33) and other groups several transcripts (14, 29), also in mouse-derived 3T3-F442A cells (21, 34). It is therefore unclear whether these larger transcripts are authentic products of the transcription process in mouse brown adipose tissue. In Fig. 3CGo, we have compiled data from three cell cultures analyzed as that in Fig. 3AGo; only the band of 2.4 kb was used for this compilation. The ß3-receptor mRNA was hardly detectable in brown preadipocytes (day 3), but the level then abruptly rose, reaching a steady-state value at day 5. In Fig. 3CGo, observations (5, 35) on the ability of norepinephrine to induce expression of UCP1 in this culture system are also included. As seen, these two events were very well coordinated in time.

However, although the switch in receptor subtype mediating cAMP accumulation (Fig. 1Go) was thus parallelled by a sudden induction in the expression of the ß3-receptor, it was not associated with an abrupt decrease in ß1-receptor gene expression; rather, the level of ß1-mRNA decreased only slowly in the mature brown adipocytes. This means that the switch in the ß-receptor mediating the functional response to adrenergic stimulation is not explainable simply at the level of gene expression. Instead, the switch could be due to a selective inhibition of the translation of the mRNA coding for the ß1-receptor, i.e. a possibility would be that even though the ß1-mRNA remained abundant, ß1-receptors were no longer synthesized and the existing ß1-receptors were rapidly turned over and would therefore disappear. To examine this possibility, we investigated with ligand-binding techniques whether ß1-receptors were still found in the mature brown adipocytes. We used the ligand [3H]CGP-12177 which, within the concentration range studied (0.02–2 nM), is expected to bind only to ß12-receptors [it binds to and activates ß3-receptors at much higher concentrations (36)]. Saturable binding was observed (Fig. 4Go), and as seen on the Scatchard plot in the insert, only a single binding site could be detected. The affinity of [3H]CGP-12177 for this binding site ({approx}0.5 nM) was very similar to that observed in membrane preparations from brown adipose tissue (37, 38), where it has been demonstrated to represent ß1-receptor sites (38). There is therefore no doubt that also the mature brown adipocytes investigated here possessed a substantial amount of ß1-receptors, but whether these receptors are capable of mediating the norepinephrine signal (or any other adrenergic signal) is not known (but see below).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. [3H]CGP-12177 binding to membranes isolated from cultured mature brown adipocytes. A, Equilibrium binding curves. A membrane fraction was prepared from brown adipocytes grown in culture for 6–7 days (combined from 15 six-well plates). {blacktriangleup}, Total binding of [3H]CGP-12177; [{triangleup}, nonspecific binding in presence of 1 µM alprenolol; {blacksquare}, specific binding. Lines were drawn for best fit to the equations basal +M ·[L] + Bmax ·[L]/([L] + KD) for total binding, to basal +M ·[L] for nonspecific binding, and to Bmax ·[L]/([L] + KD) for specific binding. The insert (B) is a Scatchard plot of the specific [3H]CGP-12177 binding; the line is drawn for best linear fit. Data from one series of experiments are shown here; mean values from two experimental series: Bmax = 16 ± 1 fmol/mg protein, KD = 0.53 ± 0.28 nM.

 
Is the response to norepinephrine in the mature brown adipocytes mediated only via the ß3-receptors?
The ability of the ß3-agonists BRL-37344 and CGP-12177 to augment cAMP levels in the mature brown adipocytes but not in the brown preadipocytes (Fig. 1Go) demonstrates that the ß3-receptor as such is coupled in the mature brown adipocytes, but it does not necessarily indicate that it is through this receptor that the physiologically relevant response to norepinephrine is mediated. We therefore analyzed through which receptors the norepinephrine effect was mediated. To do this, we used the established pharmacological criterion for ß3-receptors: that the inhibitory potency of propranolol is low (pA2 of 6–7) compared with its potency at ß12-receptors (pA2 of 8–9) (39, 40).

Again, in the brown preadipocytes, the response to norepinephrine demonstrated simple kinetics (Fig. 5AGo), and the presence of as little as 0.1 µM propranolol shifted the dose-response curve more than a decade to the right. The picture was clearly different in the mature brown adipocytes that exhibited the biphasic response described above. In these cells, the same dose of propranolol had almost no effect on the dose-response curve (not shown), and even a 10-fold higher propranolol concentration was only able to shift the curve less than a decade (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of the ß-antagonist propranolol on dose-response curves for norepinephrine. Propranolol was added 5 min before norepinephrine. A and B are examples of propranolol effects in brown preadipocytes (A) and in mature brown adipocytes (B). The apparent EC50 values were calculated from a series of such experiments, with the equations described in Materials and Methods but with only EC50 and basal being free variables and the other variables set to the values obtained in the absence of propranolol. C, Apparent EC50 values obtained from experiments such as those in A and B but performed with different concentrations of propranolol were used to calculate the shift in EC50 value (CR) caused by propranolol and these values were plotted as a function of propranolol concentration (Schild plot). As the calculated slopes of the lines were 0.84 ± 0.06 in brown preadipocytes and 1.16 ± 0.16 in mature brown adipocytes—i.e. not significantly different from 1 in either case—the lines were drawn here for a slope of 1. In the brown preadipocytes, the results are from 1 experiment and the estimated pA2 for propranolol is 8.34 ± 0.04; in the mature brown adipocytes, results are combined from two experiments and the pA2 is 6.89 ± 0.12.

 
When results from several series of such experiments were plotted as Schild plots to establish the pA2 of propranolol (Fig. 5CGo), the points corresponding to the brown preadipocytes and to the mature brown adipocytes distributed as two clearly distinct lines. From these data, it was calculated that in the brown preadipocytes, propranolol was a potent inhibitor with a pA2 of 8.3, but in the mature brown adipocytes, the pA2 was only 6.9. Thus, the response to norepinephrine was mediated via two different receptors in the two cell types—ß1 in the brown preadipocytes and ß3 in the mature brown adipocytes—and had switched as a result of the spontaneous differentiation process. In both cases the slope of the line was very close to 1, indicating that in each cell differentiation stage, propranolol was competitive with only one single class of receptors.

The switch in receptor subtype from ß1 to ß3 was also associated with an increased functional sensitivity to norepinephrine [the EC50 was decreased from 450 nM to 35 nM (Table 1Go)]. This observation is in contrast to the idea that ß3-pathways should be much less sensitive to norepinephrine than are ß1-receptors, and that ß1-receptors should thus be responsible for stimulation under conditions of mild to modest physiological stimulation (15, 16, 41). Clearly, the norepinephrine signal is not transmitted to any appreciable degree through ß1-receptors in these mature brown adipocytes.

Are coupled ß1-receptors detectable in mature brown adipocytes?
The apparent discrepancy between the continued expression of the ß1-receptor gene even after the functional switch during the spontaneous differentiation process—vs. the apparent sudden disappearance of the functional ß1-response at the time of the switch—made it important to attempt to observe indications of coupled ß1-receptors in the mature brown adipocytes. For this, we stimulated the cells with a generally accepted ß1-selective agonist dobutamine to attempt to induce cAMP formation through the ß1-receptors.

In the brown preadipocytes (Fig. 6AGo), dobutamine increased the cAMP level—although not with a higher affinity than norepinephrine and actually only to half the level. In the mature brown adipocytes (Fig. 6BGo), dobutamine had a lower affinity than norepinephrine, albeit higher than that of dobutamine in the preadipocytes (Table 1Go), and the total response was higher than that to norepinephrine. If the generally accepted view that dobutamine is a selective ß1-agonist were uncritically applied here, the enhanced response to dobutamine in the mature brown adipocytes would seem to indicate that ß1-receptors were well-coupled in these cells. However, a Schild plot analysis of the effect of propranolol on these responses (Fig. 6CGo) pointed to another interpretation. Again, the points from the brown preadipocytes and from the mature brown adipocytes did not overlap. In the brown preadipocytes, the pA2 for propranolol was 8.4 and dobutamine therefore (as expected) induced cAMP accumulation via ß1-receptors [although it was apparently only a partial agonist in this system, as has been seen in other ß1-systems (42)]. However, in the mature brown adipocytes, the pA2 for propranolol was only 7.1 and dobutamine therefore induced cAMP accumulation through ß3-receptors (on which it was a full or nearly full agonist). The pA2 value of 7.1 is in good agreement both with that observed above for propranolol inhibition of norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 4CGo) and with that estimated for propranolol inhibition of adrenergically stimulated thermogenesis in freshly isolated hamster brown fat cells (43), a cellular response earlier demonstrated to be ß3-mediated (44).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Dose-response curves for cAMP accumulation in brown preadipocytes and in mature brown adipocytes stimulated with dobutamine or norepinephrine. In A, the effect of 10 µM NE was set to 100% (mean value 5 ± 2 pmol/well; 3 experimental series; 6-well plates). In B, the effect of 0.1 µM NE was set to 100% (mean value 48 ± 6 pmol/well; 3 experimental series; 12-well plates). C, Dobutamine experiments were performed with different propranolol concentrations and the apparent EC50 values were calculated as described in legend to Fig. 5Go. The shifts in EC50 values obtained (CR) were plotted as a function of propranolol concentration (Schild plot) and the lines were drawn for a slope of 1. pA2 for propranolol in brown preadipocytes was 8.4 and in mature brown adipocytes 7.1.

 
Thus, the somewhat unexpected conclusion could be drawn that dobutamine in the present system was functioning not only as expected, as a ß1-agonist (in the brown pre-adipocytes), but also as a ß3-agonist (in the mature brown adipocytes). Therefore, the mere ability of a system to respond well to this "accepted" ß1-agonist is in no way an indication that the response under study is not ß3-adrenergic. It may be understood that dobutamine is regarded as a selective ß1-agonist only because it is a poor ß2-agonist; ß3-receptors were not identified at the time that dobutamine was characterized as a ß1-agonist.

We conclude that we were unable to identify any cAMP response mediated through the ß1-receptors that, according to Fig. 4Go, are present in the mature brown adipocytes. Thus, although we cannot eliminate the possibility that a fraction of the response [below reasonable detection (<10%)] is mediated via these receptors, the functional significance of the ß1-receptors in the mature brown adipocytes must be considered negligible. Therefore, it is through the ß3-receptors that the physiologically significant response is mediated.

cAMP controlled processes
The above experiments demonstrate that during the differentiation process, a switch in the subtype of ß-receptors coupled to the cAMP increase occurs. Although, as mentioned, an increase in cAMP can also induce the same processes (5, 6, 8), this does not, however, necessarily mean that it is the ensuing increase in cAMP level that governs them. A further criterion to be fulfilled is that stimulation of the measured functional parameter (proliferation or differentiation) must be a monophasic function of the corresponding cAMP levels.

In Fig. 7AGo we have therefore plotted the norepinephrine-induced increase in DNA amount per cell culture flask (i.e. cell proliferation) (6) as a function of the corresponding norepinephrine-induced cAMP levels. As seen, the data were compatible with cAMP being the mediating agent, with stimulation of cell proliferation being dependent on cAMP concentration.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Relationship between cAMP levels and resulting cellular response. A, brown preadipocytes. Data on norepinephrine-induced cell proliferation (relative increase in DNA level) (6 ) are plotted as a function of cAMP levels measured on similar 4-day-old cell cultures (two independent experiments in duplicates); numbers (in A and B) represent the concentration of NE used (in µM). B, Mature brown adipocytes. Data on norepinephrine-induced UCP1 expression (mRNA levels) (5 ) (but cf. also Fig. 8CGo) are plotted as a function of the corresponding cAMP levels (from Fig. 1BGo).

 
The norepinephrine-induced expression of UCP1 has earlier been reported to display characteristic, semibell-shaped kinetics, both when followed at the mRNA level (5) and when followed as the amount of UCP1 determined in immunoblots (8). In contrast, UCP1 expression induced by selective agonists such as BRL-37344, salbutamol, prenalterol or clenbuterol displays simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics (45). Until now, no explanation for the unusual kinetics in the response to norepinephrine has been presented. However, it is evident that the semibell-curve shape reported here for norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 1BGo) is qualitatively similar to that earlier reported for norepinephrine-induced UCP1 mRNA and protein levels. In Fig. 7BGo, we have plotted the reported norepinephrine-induced UCP1 mRNA levels as a function of the corresponding norepinephrine-induced cAMP levels. Indeed, a remarkable correlation is found: despite the unusual kinetics of the underlying observations, all points in the correlation fall on a single line. Thus, the unusual kinetics for norepinephrine-induced UCP1 gene expression can readily be explained by the special kinetics for cAMP accumulation reported here.

There was, however, a principal difference between the cAMP response curve for cell proliferation (Fig. 7AGo) and that for UCP gene expression (Fig. 7BGo). Whereas cell proliferation as a function of cAMP level demonstrated saturation, this was clearly not the case for UCP1 gene expression. This should imply that the cells possess a capacity to enhance UCP1 expression further than that induced by norepinephrine, provided that the cAMP level is further increased. It is, however, evident that it is not possible to reach a higher level of cAMP by simply altering the norepinephrine concentration (cf. Fig. 1BGo).

Effect of inhibition of {alpha}2-receptors
As pointed out above, the inherent ability—observed solely in mature brown adipocytes—of ß3-agonists to stimulate cAMP accumulation to a higher level than does norepinephrine (Fig. 1Go) implies that an inhibitory component is activated by norepinephrine but not by the ß3-agonists. A natural candidate for the inhibitory receptor would be the {alpha}2-receptor. We therefore investigated whether the presence of the {alpha}2-antagonist yohimbine would augment the cAMP response to norepinephrine stimulation in these cells.

In the brown preadipocytes, the presence of yohimbine had only a marginal effect on norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 8AGo). However, in the mature brown adipocytes (Fig. 8BGo), the presence of yohimbine had a dramatic effect and led to a doubling of the maximal cAMP level attained. The maximal cAMP levels now reached were similar to those generated by the ß3-agonists BRL-37344 or CGP-12177 (Fig. 1BGo), which are not expected to interact with {alpha}2-receptors. Thus, the lower maximal effect of norepinephrine than of the ß3-agonists (Fig. 1Go) in mature brown adipocytes is apparently due to the presence on these of coupled {alpha}2-receptors (such receptors are thus apparently not functional on the brown preadipocytes). It is, however, equally clear that it was only the maximal level that was increased by the presence of yohimbine; the semibell-shape persisted and could therefore not be ascribed to the action of {alpha}2-receptors (further analysis of these unusual kinetics will be presented elsewhere (Bronnikov, G., S.-J. Zhang, B. Cannon, and J. Nedergaard, submitted).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effect of the {alpha}2-antagonist yohimbine on norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation and cellular response. A and B, Effect of 10 µM yohimbine (added 5 min before norepinephrine) on cellular cAMP accumulation in brown preadipocytes (A) and mature brown adipocytes (B). Results are means from three experiments. In A, the effect of 1 µM NE alone was set to 100%; mean 6 ± 2 pmol/well. In B, the effect of 0.1 µM NE alone was set to 100%; mean 17 ± 5 pmol/well. C, Effect of 10 µM yohimbine on norepinephrine-induced UCP1 mRNA levels in mature brown adipocytes. Mean of 3 experiments in duplicates. D, UCP1 mRNA levels plotted as a function of cAMP levels in yohimbine-treated and in nontreated cells. Data from B and C; values indicate norepinephrine concentrations (in µM).

 
If the level of norepinephrine-induced cAMP in these cells determines the expression level of UCP1, the implication of the above experiment should be that the expression of UCP1 should be augmented by yohimbine. As seen in Fig. 8CGo, this was indeed the case. Furthermore, when the level of UCP1 mRNA was now plotted as a function of the cAMP level, a saturating curve shape was obtained (Fig. 8DGo). It may further be noticed that the elimination of the {alpha}2-component also led to a potentiation of the ability of cAMP to induce UCP1 gene expression (Fig. 8DGo).

Thus, norepinephrine-induced cAMP levels fulfill the criteria for being the intracellular factors governing both cell proliferation and UCP1 expression. When cells are stimulated by norepinephrine, the maximal cAMP levels attained are limiting for the level of UCP1 expression reached.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we have examined whether the observation that the processes of proliferation and differentiation in brown adipocytes are coupled to different ß-receptor subtypes is due to the existence of (additional and) divergent intracellular signalling pathways for these two receptors, or whether the distinctive pharmacology of the two end processes could adequately be explained by assuming that cAMP is the second messenger for them both. We found that during brown adipocyte development, a switch in the ß-receptor subtype that predominantly couples to cAMP accumulation occurs in these cells, from ß1 to ß3. This switch in receptor subtype is evidently temporally linked to a switch in cellular response to cAMP. Thus, in the cells in which the ß1-subtype dominates, an increased cAMP level leads to accelerated proliferation, whereas in the cells in which the ß3-subtype dominates, an increased cAMP level leads to promoted differentiation (UCP1 expression). The coordinated switch that occurs between the brown preadipocyte and mature brown adipocyte with respect to adrenergic receptor endowment and in the cellular interpretation of increased cAMP levels is summarized in a simplified form in Fig. 9Go.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Switch in adrenergic coupling to cAMP production and in cellular effects of cAMP during the development of brown adipocytes. A, In the brown preadipocytes, only the ß1-adrenoceptor is coupled to cAMP production. Increased cAMP levels induce or promote cell proliferation. B, In the mature brown adipocytes, no evidence is found for ß1-coupling; ß3-adrenoceptors have a stimulatory effect on cAMP levels and {alpha}2-adrenoceptors have an inhibitory role. Increased cAMP levels induce or promote UCP1 gene expression and other features of cell differentiation, as well as acute thermogenesis.

 
The switch in coupled adrenergic receptor endowment during brown adipocyte development
One of the characteristics that is shared between the two types (brown and white) of adipose tissues, yet discriminates them both from most other tissues, is that ß3-adrenergic receptors are expressed in the mature adipocytes. It is clear from the present experiments that before this stage is reached, the adipocytes traverse a less differentiated phase in which one of the more ubiquitous ß-receptors (i.e. ß1) is coupled to cAMP accumulation. Thus, the ability to respond to adrenergic stimulation develops before the adipocyte phenotype is reached, but in the mature brown adipocyte, both the proximal (cAMP) and the distal (specific gene expression induction) effects of ß-adrenergic stimulation are fully mediated via ß3-receptors.

In this respect, the results presented here with authentic brown adipocytes, derived from precursors freshly isolated from brown adipose tissue, deviate from those obtained with immortalized brown adipocyte-like cell lines. In such cell lines, expression of ß3-receptors, even in the apparently mature state, is low or absent (and also {alpha}2-adrenergic coupling is absent); to a significant or dominating degree, it is ß1-receptors that mediate the response to adrenergic stimulation (9, 11, 12, 13, 14). Therefore, although such transformed cell lines are undoubtedly very helpful in exploring important features in cell biology, it is clear from the data presented here that such cell lines do not constitute adequate reflections of certain regulatory features of nontransformed brown adipocytes. However, in one white-adipocyte-like cell line, 3T3-F442A, spontaneous expression of ß3-receptors during the differentiation process has also been observed (46, 47).

In the brown adipocytes studied here, the induction of ß3-expression is an innate part of the differentiation program and does not require any additional exogenous stimulation. Thus, to allow for differentiation to proceed, it is not necessary to change from a proliferation medium to a differentiation medium, as routinely done in certain brown adipocyte-like cell lines (HIB 1B and HIB 1B/8 cells) (10, 11, 12), nor is transient treatment with differentiation inducers [as done in HIB cells (10)] necessary. In the brown adipocyte-like B-clones, a full transition through the differentiation program does not occur; as pointed out by the original authors, the clones seem in certain respects to have been caught in a premature state and cannot proceed through to the fully mature state (9, 13, 14) and they therefore do not demonstrate the dominating coupling of ß3-receptors to the adenylyl cyclase observed in the authentic brown adipocytes.

High functional affinity between ß3-receptors and norepinephrine
As the classical ß12-receptors and the ß3-receptors are often coexpressed, at least in the same tissue if not on the same cells, a discussion has been ongoing concerning the physiological significance of the ß3-receptors. The ß3-receptors have been reported to have a low affinity (measured as ligand binding competition) for norepinephrine, and it has therefore repeatedly been suggested that in a situation where both receptors are expressed and functional on the same cell, low (meaning physiologically relevant) norepinephrine concentrations would preferentially stimulate ß1-receptors, whereas the ß3-receptors would only be activated at high, perhaps supraphysiological, norepinephrine levels (14, 15, 16). In the present experiments, we find no support for this tenet; in contrast, the switch in coupled receptor subtype from ß1 to ß3 was parallelled by a more than 10-fold increase in functional affinity, from approximately 450 to approximately 30 nM for norepinephrine. This increase in functional affinity (EC50) is probably explained by alterations in the density of receptors, G proteins, adenylyl cyclases, etc. However, it may also be noted that in a direct comparison, the apparent functional affinity (for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase through ß-receptors ectopically expressed in CHO cells) has been reported to be 0.8 nM for norepinephrine stimulation of ß1-receptors, 6.3 nM for stimulation of ß3-receptors, and 36 nM for ß2-receptors (48). Thus, there is no particularly low functional affinity of the ß3-receptor for norepinephrine, even in the ectopic system.

Coupling in mature brown adipocytes is solely through ß3-receptors
The observation here that in the mature brown adipocytes, cAMP accumulation is under ß3-adrenergic control, with no detectable ß1 effect, is in very good agreement both with observations on cAMP accumulation in isolated, in situ-differentiated, brown fat cells (43) and with observations on the acute thermogenic response in such brown fat cells from hamsters, mice, and rats (44, 49, 50). ß1-Receptors are still present on the mature brown adipocytes studied here [as they also are on mature brown fat cells directly isolated from brown adipose tissue (51)], and they are apparently still in quite high abundance. From the present experiments, we cannot entirely exclude that they are still to some extent coupled to cAMP production, although their contribution is undetectable in our experiments.

Selective ß3-agonists can only stimulate mature brown adipocytes
The present results indicate that during its spontaneous development, the brown adipocyte switches from a state of "ß1-receptors coupled to cell proliferation" to a state of "ß3-receptors coupled to enhanced differentiation." An extrapolation of this scheme would be that it should not be possible to induce brown adipose tissue hyperplasia by ß3-selective stimulation of intact animals. Indeed, treatment of rats with the selective ß3-agonist CL-316,243 increased the total thermogenic capacity of brown adipose tissue but failed to increase the DNA content (52), an observation understandable based on the results of the present study. In those experiments, an increase in the thermogenic capacity of the tissue could be achieved by enhancing the capacity of existing adipocytes, without enhanced cell proliferation. However, under conditions (such as probably in adult man) in which few brown adipocytes are initially present, the ability of a selective ß3-treatment to significantly augment thermogenic capacity may be much more limited. If the same switch that is described here in mouse brown adipocytes occurs during the development of human brown adipocytes, chronic ß3-stimulation in man may therefore not lead to the expected recruitment of brown adipose tissue.

A pivotal switch in the innate differentiation program of brown adipocytes
From the observations presented here, in combination with earlier analyses of the brown adipocyte differentiation process (5, 6, 7, 8), it is clear that a pivotal switch occurs during the development of the brown adipocyte: before the switch, only ß1-receptors are coupled, and stimulation of the cAMP pathway results in accelerated cell proliferation; after the switch, ß3- (and {alpha}2-) receptors are coupled and stimulation of the cAMP pathway now results in promoted cell differentiation (notably UCP1 gene expression). Observations on the expression of G proteins (Bourova, L., J. Novotny, Z. Pesanova, T. Bengtsson, B. Cannon, J. Nedergaard, and P. Svoboda, submitted) and of the transcription factor C/EBP{alpha} (53) also indicate a qualitative switch occurring at this differentiation point. Thus, the appearance of the mature phenotype is not a gradual phenomenon, with the successive appearance of an array of differentiation markers. Rather, the data are indicative of a coordinated process in which a master controller within a short time alters the entire character of the cell, including the nuclear interpretation of the cAMP signal. The nature of this (brown) adipocyte determinative factor remains unknown, but the ß3-gene is clearly one of its targets.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Birgitta Leksell for technical assistance, Hirendra Biswas for preliminary experiments, and Drs. J.-P. Giacobino (Genève) and A. D. Strosberg (Paris) for the kind gifts of the ß1- and the ß3-clones, respectively.


    Footnotes
 
1 This investigation was supported by grants from the Swedish Natural Science Research Council and the Swedish Cancer Society. Back

2 Recipients of grants from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Back

3 On leave from The Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142 292 Pushchino, Russia. Back

Received February 1, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Nedergaard J, Herron D, Jacobsson A, Rehnmark S, Cannon B 1995 Norepinephrine as a morphogen? - Its unique interaction with brown adipose tissue. Int J Dev Biol 39:827–837[Medline]
  2. Néchad M, Kuusela P, Carneheim C, Björntorp P, Nedergaard J, Cannon B 1983 Development of brown fat cells in monolayer culture. I. Morphological and biochemical distinction from white fat cells in culture. Exp Cell Res 149:105–118[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Néchad M 1983 Development of brown fat cells in monolayer culture. II. Ultrastructural characterization of precursors, differentiating adipocytes and their mitochondria. Exp Cell Res 149:119–127[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rehnmark S, Kopecky J, Jacobsson A, Néchad M, Herron D, Nelson BD, Obregon MJ, Nedergaard J, Cannon B 1989 Brown adipocytes differentiated in-vitro can express the gene for the uncoupling protein thermogenin. Effects of hypothyroidism and norepinephrine. Exp Cell Res 182:75–83[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Rehnmark S, Néchad M, Herron D, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1990 {alpha}- and ß-Adrenergic induction of the expression of the uncoupling protein thermogenin in brown adipocytes differentiated in culture. J Biol Chem 265:16464–16471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bronnikov G, Houstek J, Nedergaard J 1992 ß-Adrenergic, cAMP-mediated stimulation of proliferation of brown fat cells in primary culture. Mediation via ß1 but not via ß3 receptors. J Biol Chem 267:2006–2013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yamashita H, Sato N, Kizaki T, Oh-ishi S, Segawa M, Saitoh D, Ohira Y, Ohno H 1995 Norepinephrine stimulates the expression of fibroblast growth factor 2 in rat brown adipocyte primary culture. Cell Growth Differ 6:1457–1462[Abstract]
  8. Kopecky J, Baudysová M, Zanotti F, Janíková D, Pavelka S, Houstek J 1990 Synthesis of mitochondrial uncoupling protein in brown adipocytes differentiated in cell culture. J Biol Chem 265:22204–22209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kozak UC, Held W, Kreutter D, Kozak LP 1992 Adrenergic regulation of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein gene in brown fat tumor cells. Mol Endocrinol 6:763–772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ross SR, Choy L, Graves RA, Fox N, Solevjeva V, Klaus S, Ricquier D, Spiegelman BM 1992 Hibernoma formation in transgenic mice and isolation of a brown adipocyte cell line expressing the uncoupling protein gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:7561–7565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Klaus S, Choy L, Champigny O, Cassard-Doulcier A-M, Ross S, Spiegelman B, Ricquier D 1994 Characterization of the novel brown adipocyte cell line HIB 1B. Adrenergic pathways involved in regulation of uncoupling protein gene expression. J Cell Sci 107:313–319[Abstract]
  12. Klaus S, Champigny O, Cassard-Doulcier A-M, Choy L, Spiegelman B, Ricquier D 1994 Cell lines derived from brown fat tumour of transgenic mice: new tools for the study of brown adipocyte development. In: Ditschuneit H, Gries FA, Hauner H, Schusdziarra V, Wechsler JG (eds) Obesity in Europe 1993. John Libbey, London, pp 65–72
  13. Kozak UC, Kozak LP 1994 Norepinephrine-dependent selection of brown adipocyte cell lines. Endocrinology 134:906–913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rohlfs EM, Daniel KW, Premont RT, Kozak LP, Collins S 1995 Regulation of the uncoupling protein gene (Ucp) by ß1, ß2, and ß3-adrenergic receptor subtypes in immortalized brown adipose cell lines. J Biol Chem 270:10723–10732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Galitsky J, Carpéné C, Bousquet-Melou A, Berlan M, Lafontan M 1995 Differential activation of ß1-, ß2- and ß3-adrenoceptors by catecholamines in white and brown adipocytes. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 9:324–331[Medline]
  16. Granneman JG, Lahners KN, Chaudhry A 1991 Molecular cloning and expression of the rat ß3-adrenergic receptor. Mol Pharmacol 40:895–899[Abstract]
  17. Hall RA, Ostedgaard LS, Premont RT, Blitzer JT, Rahman N, Welsh MJ, Lefkowitz RJ 1998 A C-terminal motif found in the ß2-adrenergic receptor, P2Y1 receptor and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator determines binding to the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor family of PDZ proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8496–8501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hall RA, Premont RT, Chow CW, Blitzer JT, Pitcher JA, Claing A, Stoffel RH, Barak LS, Shenolikar S, Weinman EJ, Grinstein S, Lefkowitz RJ 1998 The ß2-adrenergic receptor interacts with the Na+/H+-exchanger regulatory factor to control Na+/H+ exchange. Nature 392:626–630[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Néchad M, Nedergaard J, Cannon B 1987 Noradrenergic stimulation of mitochondriogenesis in brown adipocytes differentiating in culture. Am J Physiol 253:C889–C894
  20. Revelli J-P, Muzzin P, Giacobino J-P 1992 Modulation in vivo of ß-adrenergic-receptor subtypes in rat brown adipose tissue by the thermogenic agonist Ro 16–8714. Biochem J 286:743–746
  21. Nahmias C, Blin N, Elalouf J-M, Mattei MG, Strosberg AD, Emorine LJ 1991 Molecular characterization of the mouse ß3-adrenergic receptor: relationship with the atypical receptor of adipocytes. EMBO J 10:3721–3727[Medline]
  22. Rovati GE, Nicosia S 1994 Lower efficacy: interaction with an inhibitory receptor or partial agonism? Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:140–144[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Mohell N, Dicker A 1989 The ß-adrenergic radioligand [3H]CGP-12177, generally classified as an antagonist, is a thermogenic agonist in brown adipose tissue. Biochem J 261:401–405[Medline]
  24. Staehelin M, Simons P, Jaeggi K, Wigger N 1983 CGP-12177. A hydrophilic ß-adrenergic receptor radioligand reveals high affinity binding of agonists to intact cells. J Biol Chem 258:3496–3502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pak MD, Fishman PH 1996 Anamalous behavior of CGP 12177A on ß 1-adrenergic receptors. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 16:1–23[Medline]
  26. Nisoli E, Tonello C, Landi M, Carruba MO 1996 Functional studies of the first selective ß3-adrenergic receptor antagonist SR 59230A in rat brown adipocytes. Mol Pharmacol 49:7–14[Abstract]
  27. Frielle T, Collins S, Daniel KW, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Kobilka BK 1987 Cloning of the cDNA for the human ß1-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7920–7924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Fève B, Emorine LJ, Briend-Sutren MM, Lasnier F, Strosberg AD, Pairault J 1990 Differential regulation of ß1- and ß2-adrenergic receptor protein and mRNA levels by glucocorticoids during 3T3–F442A adipose differentiation. J Biol Chem 265:16343–16349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Collins S, Daniel KW, Rohlfs EM, Ramkumar V, Taylor IL, Gettys TW 1994 Impaired expression and functional activity of the ß3- and ß1-adrenergic receptors in adipose tissues of congenitally obese (C57BL/6J ob/ob) mice. Mol Endocrinol 8:518–527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Puigserver P, Herron D, Gianotti M, Palou A, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1992 Induction and degradation of the uncoupling protein thermogenin in brown adipocytes in-vitro and in-vivo. Evidence for a rapidly degradable pool. Biochem J 284:393–398
  31. Fève B, Piétri-Rouxel F, El Hadri K, Drumare MF, Strosberg AD 1995 Long-term phorbol ester treatment down-regulates the ß3-adrenergic receptor in 3T3–F442A adipocytes. J Biol Chem 270:10952–10959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bengtsson T, Redegren K, Strosberg AD, Nedergaard J, Cannon B 1996 Down-regulation of ß3-adrenoreceptor gene expression in brown fat cells is transient and recovery is dependent upon a short-lived protein factor. J Biol Chem 271:33366–33375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Susulic VS, Frederich RC, Lawitts J, Tozzo E, Kahn BB, Harper M-E, Himms-Hagen J, Flier JS, Lowell BB 1995 Targeted disruption of the ß3-adrenergic receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:29483–29492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fève B, Emorine LJ, Lasnier F, Blin N, Baude B, Nahmias C, Strosberg AD, Pairault J 1991 Atypical ß-adrenergic receptor in 3T3–F442A adipocytes. Pharmacological and molecular relationship with the human ß3-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem 266:20329–20336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kuusela P, Jacobsson A, Klingenspor M, Rehnmark S, Heldmaier G, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1997 Contrasting adrenergic effects on lipoprotein lipase gene expression in the brown adipose tissue of intact mice and in cultured brown adipocytes from mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1345:327–337[Medline]
  36. Muzzin P, Revelli J-P, Fraser CM, Giacobino J-P 1992 Radioligand binding studies of the atypical ß3-adrenergic receptor in rat brown adipose tissue using [3H]CGP 12177. FEBS Lett 298:162–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Raasmaja A, York DA 1988 {alpha}1- and ß-adrenergic receptors in brown adipose tissue of lean (Fa/?) and obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats. Effects of cold-acclimation, sucrose feeding and adrenalectomy. Biochem J 249:831–838[Medline]
  38. Mohell N, Nedergaard J 1989 Comparison of the pharmacological profiles of adrenergic drugs (including BRL-agonists) at [3H]prazosin and [3H]CGP-12177 binding sites in brown adipose tissue. Comp Biochem Physiol 94C:229–233
  39. Arch JRS 1989 The brown adipocyte ß-adrenoceptor. Proc Nutr Soc 48:215–223[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Arch JRS, Kaumann AJ 1993 ß3 and atypical ß-adrenoceptors. Med Res Rev 13:663–729[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Atgié C, D’Allaire F, Bukowiecki LJ 1997 Role of ß1- and ß3-adrenoceptors in the regulation of lipolysis and thermogenesis in rat brown adipocytes. Am J Physiol 273:C1136–C1142
  42. Palmer GC, Palmer SJ 1983 Adenylate cyclase sensitivity to catecholamines and forskolin in rat pia-arachnoid and cerebral microvessel. Neuropharmacology 22:213–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Zhao J, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1997 {alpha}1-Adrenergic stimulation potentiates the thermogenic action of ß3-adrenoceptor-generated cAMP in brown fat cells. J Biol Chem 272:32847–32856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Zhao J, Unelius L, Bengtsson T, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1994 Coexisting ß-adrenoceptor subtypes: significance for thermogenic process in brown fat cells. Am J Physiol 267:C969–C979
  45. Puigserver P, Picó C, Stock MJ, Palou A 1996 Effect of selective ß-adrenoceptor stimulation on UCP synthesis in primary cultures of brown adipocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 117:7–16[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Thomas RF, Holt BD, Schwinn DA, Liggett SB 1992 Long-term agonist exposure induces upregulation of ß3-adrenergic receptor expression via multiple cAMP response elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4490–4494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. El Hadri K, Fève B, Pairault J 1996 Developmental expression and functional activity of ß1- and ß3-adrenoceptors in murine 3T3–F442A differentiating adipocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 297:107–119[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Tate KM, Briend-Sutren M-M, Emorine LJ, Delavier-Klutchko C, Marullo S, Strosberg AD 1991 Expression of three human ß-adrenergic-receptor subtypes in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Eur J Biochem 196:357–361[Medline]
  49. Zhao J, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1998 Carteolol is a weak partial agonist on ß3-adrenergic receptors in brown adipocytes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 76:428–433[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Zhao J, Cannon B, Nedergaard J 1998 Thermogenesis is ß3- but not ß1-adrenergically mediated in rat brown fat cells, even after cold acclimation. Am J Physiol 275:R2002–R2011
  51. Svoboda P, Svartengren J, Snochowski M, Houstek J, Cannon B 1979 High number of high-affinity binding sites for (-)-(3H)dihydroalprenolol on isolated hamster brown-fat cells. A study of the ß-adrenergic receptors. Eur J Biochem 102:203–210[Medline]
  52. Ghorbani M, Himms-Hagen J 1997 Appearance of brown adipocytes in white adipose tissue during CL 316,243-induced reversal of obesity and diabetes in Zucker fa/fa rats. Int J Obes 21:465–475[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Rehnmark S, Antonson P, Xanthopoulos KG, Jacobsson A 1993 Differential adrenergic regulation of C/EBP{alpha} and C/EBPß in brown adipose tissue. FEBS Lett 318:235–241[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Kou and T. Michel
Epinephrine Regulation of the Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase: ROLES OF RAC1 AND beta3-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS IN ENDOTHELIAL NO SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 32719 - 32729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
O. S. Dallner, E. Chernogubova, K. A. Brolinson, and T. Bengtsson
{beta}3-Adrenergic Receptors Stimulate Glucose Uptake in Brown Adipocytes by Two Mechanisms Independently of Glucose Transporter 4 Translocation
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5730 - 5739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Chernogubova, D. S. Hutchinson, J. Nedergaard, and T. Bengtsson
{alpha}1- and {beta}1-Adrenoceptor Signaling Fully Compensates for {beta}3-Adrenoceptor Deficiency in Brown Adipocyte Norepinephrine-Stimulated Glucose Uptake
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2271 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
R. Martinez-deMena and M.-J. Obregon
Insulin increases the adrenergic stimulation of 5' deiodinase activity and mRNA expression in rat brown adipocytes; role of MAPK and PI3K
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 139 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
X. Wang, Y. Cui, X. Tong, H. Ye, and S. Li
Effects of the Trp64Arg Polymorphism in the {beta}3-Adrenergic Receptor Gene on Insulin Sensitivity in Small for Gestational Age Neonates
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 4981 - 4985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. Golozoubova, H. Gullberg, A. Matthias, B. Cannon, B. Vennstrom, and J. Nedergaard
Depressed Thermogenesis but Competent Brown Adipose Tissue Recruitment in Mice Devoid of All Hormone-Binding Thyroid Hormone Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2004; 18(2): 384 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. CANNON and J. NEDERGAARD
Brown Adipose Tissue: Function and Physiological Significance
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 277 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Chernogubova, B. Cannon, and T. Bengtsson
Norepinephrine Increases Glucose Transport in Brown Adipocytes via {beta}3-Adrenoceptors through a cAMP, PKA, and PI3-Kinase-Dependent Pathway Stimulating Conventional and Novel PKCs
Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 269 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
E. S. Bachman, H. Dhillon, C.-Y. Zhang, S. Cinti, A. C. Bianco, B. K. Kobilka, and B. B. Lowell
beta AR Signaling Required for Diet-Induced Thermogenesis and Obesity Resistance
Science, August 2, 2002; 297(5582): 843 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. Himms-Hagen, A. Melnyk, M. C. Zingaretti, E. Ceresi, G. Barbatelli, and S. Cinti
Multilocular fat cells in WAT of CL-316243-treated rats derive directly from white adipocytes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): C670 - C681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Fredriksson, J. M. Lindquist, G. E. Bronnikov, and J. Nedergaard
Norepinephrine Induces Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression in Brown Adipocytes through a beta -Adrenoreceptor/cAMP/Protein Kinase A Pathway Involving Src but Independently of Erk1/2
J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2000; 275(18): 13802 - 13811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. E. Bronnikov, S.-J. Zhang, B. Cannon, and J. Nedergaard
A Dual Component Analysis Explains the Distinctive Kinetics of cAMP Accumulation in Brown Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 1999; 274(53): 37770 - 37780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Lindquist, J. M. Fredriksson, S. Rehnmark, B. Cannon, and J. Nedergaard
beta 3- and alpha 1-Adrenergic Erk1/2 Activation Is Src- but Not Gi-mediated in Brown Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 22670 - 22677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
E. V. Leaver and P. A. Pappone
beta -Adrenergic potentiation of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in brown fat cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): C1016 - C1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bronnikov, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nedergaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bronnikov, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nedergaard, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals