help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Hefnawy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Hefnawy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 1 247-255
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Progesterone Action in a Murine Leydig Tumor Cell Line (mLTC-1), Possibly through a Nonclassical Receptor Type1

Talal El-Hefnawy, Pulak R. Manna, Michaela Luconi, Elizabetta Baldi, J. Peter Slotte and Ilpo Huhtaniemi

Department of Physiology, University of Turku (T.E.-H., P.R.M., I.H.), and Biokemi och Farmaci, Åbo Akademi University (J.P.S.), FIN-20520 Turku, Finland; and Unità di Andrologia, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Università di Firenze (M.L., E.B.), 50139 Firenze, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ilpo Huhtaniemi, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. E-mail: ilpo.huhtaniemi{at}utu.fi


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a recent report we demonstrated that a high (micromolar) concentration of progesterone (P) specifically down-regulates LH receptor (R) expression and function in murine Leydig tumor cells. The aim of the present study was to characterize further the putative novel R, mediating these P effects in the murine Leydig tumor cell line, mLTC-1. The binding of [3H]P to these cells revealed a high (Kd, ~9.3 nmol/liter) and a low affinity (Kd, ~284 nmol/liter) component, and the binding displayed with specificity (P > dehydroepiandrosterone > 17-OHP). The binding was apparently different from that of the classical nuclear PR in the following ways. 1) The P/glucocorticoid antagonist RU 486 did not compete with [3H]P binding to the mLTC-1 cells. 2) No expression of the classical PR messenger RNA was detected, despite clear P binding to these cells, by Northern hybridization or RT-PCR. 3) An antibody against the C-terminal end of the classical PR ({alpha}c-262) revealed in mLTC-1 cells several molecular size protein bands between 45–57 kDa on Western hybridization, whereas these immunoreactive proteins were faintly recognized by another antibody ({alpha}-PR) directed toward the NH2-terminal region of the classical PR. The sizes of the immunoreactive molecules were relatively similar to those detected using the same antibodies in human sperm lysates, but were at variance with the classical PR (120, 94, and 60 kDa), detected with these antibodies in human uterus. The immunoreactive proteins bound peroxidase-labeled-P, which could be displaced in the presence of a 10-fold excess of free P. 4) An immediate increase in the intracellular free calcium level was observed after P treatment in cultured mLTC-1 cells, whereas it also increased the 45Ca2+ entry within 15 min in these cells. 5) Increasing doses of P (0.1–10 µmol/liter) demonstrated significant inhibition of LH receptor messenger RNA levels in a dose-dependent manner in mLTC-1 cells. In conclusion, a nonclassical PR is expressed and functional in these cells, and it is clearly distinct from the classical nuclear PR. It is apparent that recently reported inhibitory effects of P on LH receptor gene expression and function are mediated through this novel type PR in mouse Leydig cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE CLASSICAL PATHWAY of progesterone (P) actions involves binding of the hormone in target cells to a specific nuclear receptor (R). The ligand-activated PR, thereafter, acting as a transcription factor, binds to specific regulatory sequences of responsive target genes, resulting in their transcriptional regulation (1). Previous studies demonstrate the existence of alternative forms of PR that differ in structure and mechanisms of action from the classical nuclear receptor (2, 3, 4). One nonclassical form of PR has been characterized in the cytoplasmic membranes of human sperm (3). The action of these R apparently involves opening of calcium channels in the mitochondrial and cellular membranes (5, 6, 7).

The expression of the two forms of PR, i.e. the nuclear and nonclassical forms, has been demonstrated in the ovary, particularly in granulosa cells (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In the ovary, the level of PR expression is under hormonal regulation throughout the menstrual cycle by steroids and LH (8, 13, 14, 15, 16). This R is suggested to play a key role in follicular development and maintenance of the corpus luteum (17, 18, 19). On the other hand, a recent study demonstrated the expression of an unusual PR in porcine granulosa cells, which mediates its actions through mobilization of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum through activation of phospholipase C (20). Adult female mice with disrupted classical PR displayed significant defects in reproductive functions, including anovulation and uterine hyperplasia and inflammation (21). In contrast, adult mutant male mice showed no impairment of fertility, indicating that, unlike in the female, nuclear PR is not essential for male reproduction. Studies of possible PR expression in the testis are scanty (22, 23), and there are no detailed studies on putative effects of PR on Leydig cell function. Only one report exists demonstrating P binding to the cytosol of rat Leydig cells (24).

Recently, we demonstrated the inhibitory effect of high P levels on LH receptor (LHR)expression and function in Leydig cells (25). The aim of the present study was to study further the mechanisms of the documented P actions on Leydig cells and to explore whether evidence could be obtained for the presence of classical or nonclassical PR to explain the functional responses detected. In this report we demonstrate the presence and function of a R in murine Leydig tumor cell line (mLTC-1) (26), which is distinct from the classical nuclear PR.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Mouse tissues were obtained from adult NMR-1 mice kept under standard conditions and diet. The studies were approved by the Turku University committee of ethics for animal experimentation.

Ligand binding assays
The mLTC-1 cells were grown in HEPES-buffered Waymouth’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland), as previously described (27). For the binding experiments, 7 x 104 cells/well were plated on 24-well culture dishes (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), and 24 h later the binding experiments were performed on the living cells. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 C in serum-free Waymouth’s medium with 2.2 nmol/liter [1,2,6,7-3H]progesterone ([1,2,6,7-3H]P; 4.40 tetrabecquerels/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Aylesbury, UK) in the presence or absence of 0.1–10 µmol/liter of one of the following nonlabeled steroids: P, cortisol, testosterone, estradiol, 17{alpha}-hydroxy-P, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), pregnanediol (5ß-pregnane-3{alpha}, 20{alpha}-diol), pregnanolone (5ß-pregnen-3{alpha}-ol-20-one; all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or antiprogestin RU 486 (RU 38484, Roussel UCLAF, France).

For Scatchard analysis, the binding experiments were performed in the presence of 86 µmol/liter aminoglutethimide (AMG; Sigma) to block the endogenous steroidogenesis and in the presence or absence of excess cold P (50 µmol/liter) with increasing concentrations of [3H]P (up to 30 nmol/liter). Cells were preincubated for 2 h with 86 µmol/liter AMG, and then the incubations for P binding were carried out in the presence or absence of 1 µmol/liter cortisol, to reduce nonspecific binding, as endogenous production of P was blocked by AMG. After a 1-h incubation with [3H]P, the media were removed, and cells were washed with PBS, pH 7.4 (Life Technologies, Inc.) and lysed in 1% SDS containing 0.3 N NaOH solution. The lysates were transferred into scintillation vials, and the radioactivity was measured in a ß-counter after addition of 1.5 ml scintillation liquid (Optiphase, Wallac, Inc. OY, Turku, Finland).

Isolation of RNA
The single step method (28) was used to isolate total RNA from control and treated samples for Northern hybridization analysis. Cells were stimulated in six-well culture dishes for 6 h in the presence or absence of 50 µg/liter hCG (CR-121; 13,500 IU/mg by bioassay; NICHHD, Bethesda, MD) and with or without 86 µmol/liter AMG or 10 µmol/liter of the selected steroids (see below). The tissues (testes, uterus, and spleen) were snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -70 C until isolation of RNA, and RT-PCR was carried out using RNA of high purity (29).

RT-PCR and Southern hybridization
The oligonucleotide primers used were designed according to the published complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence of the murine classical nuclear PR (30). The sense primer, 5'-CTAAATGAGCAGAGG ATGAAGGAG-3', corresponding to nucleotides 2320–2343, and the antisense primer, 5'-TGGGGCAACTGGGGCAGCAATAAC-3', corresponding to nucleotides 2725–2704, were used to amplify a 406-bp DNA fragment encoding the conserved steroid-binding domain of the classical PR. The RT and PCR reactions were performed sequentially in the same assay tube. Three micrograms of total RNA were used for all samples except the uterus, where 0.3 µg was used. RNA was reverse transcribed using the avian myeloblastosis RT (Finnzymes Oy, Espoo, Finland) and the above oligonucleotides as primers. The cDNAs generated were then amplified by PCR using the same primers as those described above in a mixture containing 1 nmol/liter of each primer, 200 µmol/liter deoxy-NTPs, 20 U ribonuclease inhibitor (RNasin, Promega Corp., Madison, WI), 12.5 U avian myeloblastosis RT, and 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The reaction was started at 50 C for 10 min, followed by 3 min at 97 C, and then ran for 39 PCR cycles (97 C for 1 min, 55 C for 2 min, 72 C for 2 min, and final extension for 5 min at 72 C). An aliquot of the PCR products was analyzed on gel electrophoresis, and molecular sizes of the amplified products were determined by mol wt markers run in parallel with RT-PCR products.

The cDNA fragments generated from RT-PCR were resolved in 1.2% agarose gel and transferred onto nylon membranes (Hybond, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL). The membranes were prehybridized for 4 h in 5 x SSP (0.18 mol/liter NaCl, 0.01 mol/liter sodium phosphate, and 1 mmol/liter EDTA, pH 7.7), 5 x Denhardt’s solution [0.02% BSA, 0.02% (wt/vol) Ficoll, and 0.2% (wt/vol) polyvinylpyrrolidone], 0.5% SDS, and heat-denatured sonicated calf thymus DNA (20 mg/liter). The hybridizations were performed overnight at 42 C using a 32P end-labeled nested oligonucleotide probe, 5'-TCGACAGCTTGCATGATCTTG-3', corresponding to bases 2601–2621 of the classical PR cDNA. The membranes were washed twice for 10 min each time with 2 x SSPE-0.1% SDS at room temperature and then exposed to Kodak x-ray films (Kodak XAR-5, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) for 4 days at -50 C. The molecular sizes of the RT-PCR amplicons were determined by comparison with molecular size markers.

Assessment of the RT-PCR products and Northern hybridization
The PR fragment produced by RT-PCR from adult mouse uterus was eluted from the agarose gel, and its identity was confirmed with the EcoRI restriction endonuclease digestion, which provided 100- and 306-bp fragments. The 406 PCR fragment was then directly cloned into a plasmid vector (T-vector, Promega Corp.), and its identity corresponded to the classical mouse PR sequence (30). T7 polymerase was used to generate a 32P-labeled antisense complementary RNA (cRNA) probe using the cloned cDNA as template. Prehybridization and hybridization were carried out as previously described (31), and the membranes were washed in decreasing concentrations of SSC containing 0.1% SDS at 64 C and treated for 5 min at room temperature with 2 x SSC (1 x SSC = 0.15 mol/liter NaCl and 15 mmol/liter sodium citrate, pH 7.0) in the presence of ribonuclease-A (2 mg/liter), followed by two washes in 0.1 x SSC and 0.1% SDS at 64 C. The membranes were exposed to Kodak x-ray films for 5 days at -50 C before and after the ribonuclease treatment.

Western and ligand blot analysis
The mLTC-1 cells from six-well culture plates were scraped off into PBS under ice, washed, and lysed in 50 µl buffer [20 mmol/liter Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 0.25% Nonidet P-40, 1 mmol/liter Na3VO4, and 1 mmol/liter PMSF]. The proteins were measured in the cell lysates using a Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., kit (Hercules, CA), and 50 µg protein were diluted in an equal volume of 2 x Laemmli’s reducing sample buffer. The samples were vortexed, incubated at 95 C for 5 min, and then loaded onto 10% polyacrylamide-bisacrylamide midigels. After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Sigma). The lysates of human sperm from healthy donors were used as controls. The transferred nitrocellulose membranes were blocked for 3 h at room temperature in TTBS (0.1% Tween-20, 20 mmol/liter Tris, and 150 mmol/liter NaCl) containing 5% BSA. Thereafter, the membranes were washed repeatedly in TTBS and incubated for 2 h in 2% BSA-TTBS containing a 1:400 dilution of the {alpha}c-262 PR antibody directed against the C-terminal region of the classical PR (32). Another antibody ({alpha}-PR, at a 1:100 dilution) was also used, which recognizes the N-terminal region of the classical PR. After washing, the membranes were incubated with goat antimouse IgG-POD (1:5000 in 2% BSA-TTBS). The membranes were then washed several times in TTBS, and immunoreactive proteins were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Alternatively, for the ligand blot analysis, the nitrocellulose membranes were incubated for 30 min in 3% Nonidet P-40/0.1% BSA, then for 2 h in 0.3% BSA/0.1% Tween-20/PBS, followed by 10 min in 0.1% Tween-20/PBS, and finally overnight in 0.3% BSA/0.1% Tween-20/PBS with or without a 10-fold concentration of P containing 1 µmol/liter peroxidase-conjugated P (P-POD; Sigma). Peroxidase was conjugated to P by carboxymethyl oxime at position 3 [progesterone 3-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime-6-amino caproic acid-POD type IV]. After several washes in 0.1% Tween-20/PBS, the protein bands binding P were visualized by ECL Western blotting kit.

Intracellular free Ca2+ measurements
To test the P actions on intracellular free Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) concentrations, mLTC-1 cells were plated on glass coverslips at a density of 3 x 104 cells/cm2. Cells were loaded with 2 µmol/liter fura-2/AM (Sigma) at 37 C for 30 min in serum-free culture medium. The cells were incubated further for 10 min with serum-free medium to wash off the unincorporated fura-2/AM. The coverslips were taken into assay buffer (137 mmol/liter NaCl, 5 mmol/liter KCl, 0.44 mmol/liter KH2PO4, 4.2 mmol/liter NaHCO3, 1.2 mmol/liter MgCl2, 20 mmol/liter HEPES, 1 mmol/liter CaCl2, and 10 mmol/liter glucose, pH 7.0) on ice until [Ca2+]i measurements were performed using the Hitachi F-2000 double wavelength fluorometer (Hitachi, San Jose, CA). Calibration for the measurements was performed using 0.2% (wt/vol) digitonin (Sigma) and 3 µmol/liter EGTA. The concentration of P (1 µmol/liter) was used for ([Ca2+]i) determination. Alternatively, mLTC-1 cells were trypsinized, centrifuged, and loaded with fura-2/AM at 37 C for 30 min, followed by ([Ca2+]i) measurement in the suspension, as described above.

The immediate action of P on the Ca2+ entry was studied in mLTC-1 cells plated on 24-well dishes at a density of 6 x 104 cells/well. Twenty-four hours later, cells were washed once with Ca2+-free medium (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 500 µl Ca2+-free medium containing 5 µCi/ml 45Ca2+ isotope (Ca45, NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) were added to each well in the presence or absence of varied doses of P (0.1–10 µmol/liter). The mLTC-1 cells were incubated for 15 min at 37 C, washed, and lysed in 500 µl 1% SDS containing 0.3 N NaOH. The lysates were counted in a ß-spectrometer (Rack ß, Wallac, Inc., Turku, Finland) after adding 1 ml scintillation liquid.

Steroid regulation of LHR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression
The mLTC-1 cells (7 x 105/well in six-well plates) were cultured for 6 h in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/liter P, cortisol, testosterone, estradiol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), DHEA, pregnanediol, pregnanolone, or the antiprogestin RU 486. In additional experiments, cells were also treated for 48 h with increasing concentrations of P (0.1–10 µmol/liter). Fifteen to 20 µg total RNA were analyzed by Northern hybridization using an antisense 32P-labeled cRNA probe corresponding to bases 441–849 of extracellular domain of the rat LHR cDNA (33). The hybridized membranes were exposed to x-ray films (Kodak) for 5 days at -70 C. The intensities of the specific mRNA species were quantified using the Tina software (Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany) and normalized according to the intensities of the 18S ribosomal RNA bands in the gels stained with ethidium bromide.

[125I]Iodo-hCG binding
Radioiodination of hCG (CR-121, NIDDK) was carried out with Na[125I]iodide (IMS 300, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), using a solid phase lactoperoxidase method (34). The specific activity of the labeled hormone was 30 µCi/µg, and hCG binding studies were conducted under optimized conditions, as described previously (25). Briefly, mLTC-1 cells were treated for 48 h in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/liter of one of the steroids, and 3 x 105 cells were incubated with [125I]iodo-hCG (~105 cpm/incubation) in the absence (total) or presence (nonspecific) of 50 IU unlabeled hCG (Pregnyl, Organon, Oss, The Netherlands). The reaction was terminated after overnight incubation in 3 ml ice-cold Dulbecco’s-PBS containing 0.1% BSA. After centrifugation, supernatant was discarded by careful aspiration, and pellet was counted in a {gamma}-spectrometer (1260 Multigamma II, Wallac, Inc.).

Statistics
All results presented are from two to four independent experiments (unless otherwise specified). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan’s new multiple range test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results shown in the figures represent the mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
P binding studies
The Scatchard analysis (Fig. 1AGo) revealed that cultured mLTC-1 cells bound [3H]P with a high and a low affinity component, the former having a Kd of 9.3 ± 4.6 nmol/liter and the latter having a Kd of 284 ± 12.8 nmol/liter, in the presence of 1 µmol/liter cortisol, to exclude the confounding effect of glucocorticoid receptors. Determinations of the affinities of P in the absence of cortisol or binding carried out in ice provided similar results (data not shown). In ligand displacement assays, the [3H]P binding was displaced by increasing concentrations of P, 17-OHP, and DHEA in the incubation medium. Other steroids studied, including the antiprogestin RU 486, cortisol, and testosterone, failed to displace P binding (Fig. 1Go, B and C). On the other hand, a 2-h incubation with AMG increased the specific P binding of mLTC-1 cells (Fig. 1DGo).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Scatchard analysis of P binding to the mLTC-1 cells (A) and P ligand displacement assays (B-D). For the Scatchard analysis, a constant number of cells were incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations (1–30 nmol/liter) of [3H]P together with constant amount of excess cold P (50 µmol/liter) to determine nonspecific binding in the presence of 1 µmol/liter cortisol. In B and C, the mLTC-1 cells (7 x 104/well) were incubated with 2.2 nmol/liter [3H]P in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations (0.1–10 µmol/liter) of P (solid triangles), 17-OHP (solid inverted triangles), DHEA (solid circles), cortisol (open squares), estradiol (open triangles), RU 486 (open inverted triangles), testosterone (open circles), pregnanolone (open diamonds), or pregnanediol (solid stars). The results are presented as a percentage of total binding in the absence of cold ligand. The [3H]P binding to mLTC-1 cells is shown in D after a 2-h incubation with 10 µmol/liter P (P10) or 86 µmol/liter AMG. C, Control. The results are the mean ± SEM of 8–20 replicates from 2–5 individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 
PR mRNA detection by RT-PCR and Southern hybridization
The results of RT-PCR analysis revealed a cDNA amplicon of approximately 400 bp size in mouse uterus, testis, and mLTC-1 cells, but not in mouse spleen (Fig. 2Go). However, the cDNA fragment from the uterine RNA was the only one that was confirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion using EcoRI to be cleaved into the expected 100- and 300-bp fragments (data not shown). In accordance, Southern hybridization using a 32P end-labeled nested oligonucleotide probe revealed strong positive hybridization to the uterine sample and weak signal to the testis, but no hybridization was found to the spleen or mLTC-1 cell lysates. The RT-PCR products of testis and mLTC-1 cells were subcloned into the T-vector (Promega Corp.), and their sequencing revealed homology to phospholipase A2 (result not shown). In contrast, restriction endonuclease digestion and sequencing of the uterine amplicons revealed identity with the classical murine PR (30), and the cDNA was later used as a template for PR cRNA in Northern hybridization (see below).



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RT-PCR amplification (upper panel), followed by Southern hybridization (lower panel), of nuclear PR mRNA in adult mouse uterus (U), testis (T), spleen (S), or mLTC-1 cells in the presence (L+) or absence (L) of 50 µmol/liter 8-bromo-cAMP for 6 h before RNA isolation. The RT-PCR reaction was also performed on a buffer-only sample (B), and by omitting reverse transcriptase from the reactions (small letters). M, Mol wt markers. The upper panel shows the gel stained with ethidium bromide, and the lower panel shows the Southern hybridization x-ray image using a nested oligonucleotide probe for the samples of the upper panel after transfer onto a Nylon membrane. The arrow shows the mobility of a cDNA band of the expected 400 bp size.

 
Northern hybridization for the classical nuclear PR
To confirm that the classical PR is not expressed in the mLTC-1 cells, we performed Northern hybridization analysis using the cDNA obtained from the RT-PCR amplification of the uterus samples as template after confirming its sequence identity. The mLTC-1 cells were treated for 6 h in the presence or absence of 86 µmol/liter AMG or/and 50 µg/liter hCG with or without 5 µmol/liter P to investigate the possible regulatory pattern of the nuclear PR after different hormonal stimulations. However, in agreement with the RT-PCR data, no specific PR mRNA signal was observed in these cells, with or without hormonal treatment (data not shown), or in mouse spleen; only the adult mouse uterus RNA, used as a positive control, displayed a clear hybridization signal (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Northern hybridization of the nuclear PR mRNA in samples from adult mouse uterus (U), spleen (S), and mLTC-1 cells (L). The arrows on the left indicate the expected sizes of the PR transcripts in the uterus (7.5, 4.4, and 2.4 kb); migration of the 18S and 28S ribosomal RNAs is shown on the right. The lower panel shows ethidium bromide staining of the gel as indicator of RNA loading.

 
Identification of P-binding proteins in mLTC-1 cells
As mLTC-1 cells did not express the classical PR gene at the mRNA levels, our hypothesis was that these cells might possess a PR form immunologically related to that recently discovered in human sperm (6). The amino acid structure of the C-terminal region of the classical PR is supposed to be conserved also in the sperm membrane PR (32). Therefore, we compared the PR immunoreactivity in mLTC-1 cells and human sperm lysates by Western blot analysis using an antibody ({alpha}c-262) known to recognize the C-terminal region of the classical nuclear PR. This antibody is known to recognize all species of PR, including the cell membrane PR in human sperm (35).

In sperm lysates, we observed several immunoreactive bands between 45 and 66 kDa, and proteins with 54 and 66 kDa sizes gave the strongest signals. We also tested another antibody ({alpha}-PR), which is directed against the N-terminal domain of the classical PR. This antibody has recently been shown to recognize a 66-kDa protein in human sperm lysates (35). However, we observed that the {alpha}c-262 antibody detected in mLTC-1 cell lysates similar immunoreactive protein bands between 45 and 57 kDa, whereas the {alpha}-PR antibody faintly recognized proteins of the same sizes (Fig. 4AGo). In addition, both antibodies identified two additional bands of similar intensities at 35 kDa, which were absent in sperm lysates and may be nonspecific. Importantly, using either antibody, the mLTC-1 cells did not clearly show the 66-kDa band, but had similar immunoreactive proteins at 45–57 kDa (Fig. 4AGo). Ligand blot analysis was then performed using P-POD as probe to reveal which proteins in the lysates can specifically bind to P. In both sperm and mLTC-1 cell lysates, P-POD bound largely to the same proteins revealed by the {alpha}c-262 and {alpha}-PR antibodies, and most of the bands were displaced with a 10-fold excess of free P, except for a 50-kDa band in the sperm lysates (Fig. 4BGo).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Western hybridization (A) and ligand blot assays (B) for PR in protein lysates from human sperm and mLTC-1 cells. The immunoreactive proteins were detected after transfer onto cellulose membranes, using {alpha}c-262 (c262) or {alpha}-PR (PR) antibody. B shows the proteins binding to P-POD in the absence or presence (+P) of a 10-fold excess of P (10 µmol/liter).

 
P regulation of intracellular free Ca2+[I] in mLTC-1 cells
A P concentration of 1 µmol/liter induced an immediate increase in the ([Ca2+]i) levels in mLTC-1 cells cultured on glass chips and loaded with fura-2/AM. The effect was comparable with the maximal signal obtained after permeabilization of the cell membranes by digitonin (Fig. 5AGo). In addition, 0.1–3 µmol/liter P increased 45Ca2+ entry into mLTC-1 cells after a 15-min incubation. The 45Ca2+ entry returned to normal levels at the high (10 µmol/liter) concentrations of P (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Measurement of intracellular free Ca2+ using the fura-2/AM method in mLTC-1 cells cultured on coverslips (A). Cells were stimulated with 1 µmol/liter P or with 0.2% digitonin (to yield the maximum response). The graph presents one of three independent experiments with similar results. B shows 45Ca2+ entry into mLTC-1 cells on 24-well plates after 15-min incubation with 0.1–10 µmol/liter P. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of eight replicates from two independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 vs. control.

 
Steroid regulation of LHR expression
We next examined the specificity of P action on the steady state levels of LHR mRNA. After a 6-h treatment with 10 µmol/liter P or cortisol, we observed down-regulation of LHR mRNA expression (Fig. 6Go). In addition, DHEA and 17-OHP displayed moderate, but significant, inhibition of the LHR mRNA signal. The effect was confined to these steroids, as no effects were found after 6-h treatment with the other steroids tested (Fig. 6Go), including the antiprogestin RU 486. The effects of the selected steroids on [125I]iodo-hCG binding to the mLTC-1 cells were qualitatively similar after 48-h treatment at 10 µmol/liter concentrations of the steroids (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Northern hybridization analysis of the effects of selected steroids on LHR mRNA in mLTC-1 cells. Cells were cultured for 6 h in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/liter P, cortisol, DHEA, RU 486, testosterone (T), estradiol (E), 17-OHP, pregnanolone (P-one), or pregnanediol (P-diol; the last four steroids are not shown in the x-ray image). The upper panel shows an example of the Northern hybridizations. A specific cRNA probe for the extracellular part of the LHR (nucleotides 441–849) was used. The locations of the 28S and 18S ribosomal RNAs are indicated on the right. The arrows on the left indicate the positions of the different LHR mRNA splice variants (7.7, 4.0, 2.7, and 1.8 kb) on the x-ray films. Below the x-ray image, the ribosomal RNA bands are shown in the gel stained with ethidium bromide. The lower panel shows the densitometric quantification of the longest (~7.7 kb) LHR mRNA transcript related to the density of the 18S ribosomal RNA band from the ethidium bromide-stained image. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM from one to four independent experiments, and the number of replicates is indicated at the bottom of each bar. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (vs. control).

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of different steroid hormones on [125I]iodo-hCG binding. The mLTC-1 cells were stimulated for 48 h in the absence (C) or presence of 10 µmol/liter of each hormone, and [125I]iodo-hCG binding was assessed with fixed amount of labeled hCG (~105 cpm/tube), as described in Materials and Methods. The results are the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (vs. control).

 
To further ascertain the observed inhibitory effect of P on LHR expression, we next measured the effect of increasing concentrations of P (0.1–10 µmol/liter) on LHR mRNA levels. The results presented in Fig. 8Go show dose-dependent inhibition of LHR mRNA content with increasing P concentrations. These results further confirmed the previous data regarding involvement of P in the down-regulation of LHR mRNA.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Dose response of the P effect on LHR mRNA expression in mLTC-1 cells by Northern blot analysis. Cells were treated without (C) or with increasing concentrations of P (0.1–10 µmol/liter). Total RNA was extracted from different treatment groups and subjected to determination of LHR mRNA levels, as described in Materials and Methods and Fig. 6Go. A representative autoradiogram is shown, and the approximate positions of the 18S and 28S ribosomal RNAs are indicated on the right, whereas the different LHR mRNA splice variants (7.7, 4.0, 2.7, and 1.8 kb) are shown by arrows on the left (upper panel). The ethidium bromide staining of ribosomal RNAs demonstrate equal RNA loading (lower panel). Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of the classical nuclear PR mRNA was not observed in mLTC-1 cells, even using the sensitive RT-PCR method. The adult mouse testis, however, showed weak expression of the nuclear PR mRNA, and it might be expressed in other testicular cell types than the Leydig cells.

The results of Western blot demonstrated several PR-like immunoreactive proteins between 45–57 kDa in the mLTC-1 cell lysates. These bands were especially observed when an antibody raised against the steroid-binding domain of the classical nuclear PR ({alpha}c-262) was used. This antibody is able to detect the classical PR in breast cancer cells (32), human uterus (36), and insect cells transfected with the A form of PR (35); however, the sizes of those reactive bands are 120, 94, and 60 kDa (35, 36). The mouse uterus PR species are also similar in size, ranging between 66–115 kDa (30). The {alpha}c-262 has been shown to prevent P-mediated calcium influx into human sperm when added to the incubation medium (36). Using this antibody we were able to show that mLTC-1 cells only expressed shorter forms of PR that were close in size to those observed in human sperm lysates (36).

The immunoreactive P-binding proteins in sperm and mLTC-1 cell lysates were also faintly detected by another antibody ({alpha}-PR) that is directed toward the N-terminal domain of the classical nuclear PR. They apparently represented minimal cross-reactivity and suggested the specificity toward the C-terminal region. These findings together with the fact that no expression of the nuclear PR mRNA was observed in mLTC-1 cells indicated that these cells may express an unusual form of PR. Moreover, the pattern of steroid binding suggested different ligand specificity for the R. Interestingly, a recent study (37) demonstrated that P binds to the specific proteins purified from porcine liver with two binding affinities (Kd, 11 and 286 nmol/liter). The Scatchard analyses of P binding in the mLTC-1 cells appear to have two different affinity components at similar ranges of Kd values, i.e. 9.3 ± 4.6 and 284 ± 12.8 nmol/liter. In ligand blot assays, only some bands completely disappeared in the presence of a 10-fold excess of cold P, whereas others were only decreased in intensity. Although the antibody used did not clearly recognize the 60-kDa band in the mLTC-1 cell lysate, a protein of similar size was revealed using P-POD as the detection system. It is suggested that some forms of PR in mLTC-1 cells are similar, yet not identical, to the sperm membrane PR, which may be due to differences in the structure and function of the two cell types, as spermatozoa are terminally differentiated cells whereas mLTC-1 cells are immortalized Leydig tumor cells. Subsequently, Western and ligand blot analyses also confirmed the absence of classical nuclear PR in mLTC-1 cells. As the gene of the nonclassical sperm PR is not yet known, we are currently unable to study whether the apparent differences in the sperm and mLTC-1 cell PR-representing molecules are products of different genes or due to alternative splicing or posttranslational modification of the same gene.

Similar to its reported actions in granulosa cells (20) and human sperm (3), P also induced a rapid increase in [Ca2+]i in mLTC-1 cells. Nonspecific interaction of P in increasing [Ca2+]i can be ruled out, as the ethanol concentration (0.01%) used for P dilution was without effect (data not shown). Ca2+ is a known regulator of many enzymes, including protein kinase C (PKC), where it is known to participate in its translocation to the cytoplasmic leaflet of the cell membrane (38), to be activated there by diacylglycerol. The activated PKC, in turn, serves as an interacting signal in the regulation of gene expression. In accordance, the induction of PKC is known to down-regulate LHR expression and function in Leydig tumor cells (39). The classical pathway for the nuclear PR in the regulation of LHR expression is unlikely, as the murine LHR promoter does not contain a complete P response element within appropriate distance from the transcription initiation site (40). The P-mediated increase in [Ca2+]i was observed in mLTC-1 cells cultured on coverslips, but not in trypsinized cells. This may point out that the observed P effect is mediated through a plasma membrane PR, which is disturbed after trypsinization of these cells or that other signaling pathways important for Ca2+ immobilization/influx are disturbed after this procedure. In the ovary, PR is down-regulated by elevated concentrations of P or its metabolites (41). The decrease in P binding and action upon Ca2+ entry, when measured in cells plated for 48 h, might be due to down-regulation by the accumulated high basal production of P or its metabolites.

The affinity of the mLTC-1 cell PR for its ligand may be different in cytosolic extract and whole cell preparation. The P actions on Leydig cells require high, i.e. micromolar, concentrations of this steroid, also indicating that mouse Leydig tumor cells express a special form of PR. This is logical in view of the fact that PR in Leydig cells needs elevated ligand concentrations to reach the activation threshold. The P concentration in the testis in basal in vivo conditions is far higher than that in the blood, and it reaches up to 0.3–3 µmol/liter in testes when adult rats are treated with a high (600 IU/kg) down-regulating dose of hCG (42). Therefore, despite the apparently high levels of P that are needed to elicit an effect on Leydig cells, this regulatory system can well be physiological, acting at the site of P synthesis, where very high hormone levels are attained. In this respect, the nonclassical PR in mLTC-1 cells is relatively similar to the receptor characterized in human sperm, as in both cases, P acutely increases the Ca2+ flux. Noteworthy, nonclassical binding sites for P have been demonstrated in bovine follicular and luteal membranes, whether they have been suggested to be involved in autocrine/paracrine regulation of follicular function (43, 44). We recently showed that P regulates LHR function in primary cultures of adult mouse Leydig cells (25). In addition, involvement of P inhibits LHR mRNA levels in mLTC-1 cells in a dose-response manner. Thus, our present results may not only be confined to a specific tumor cell, but also to normal Leydig cells. We also investigated the effects of selected steroids in the regulation of LHR function in mLTC-1 cells by quantitative [125I]iodo-hCG binding studies, and the pattern of effects was similar to their actions on LHR mRNA in primary adult Leydig cells (El-Hefnawy, T., unpublished observations).

Although cortisol displayed an inhibitory effect on LHR mRNA and binding [in agreement with our recent report (25)], the competition assay for P binding to mLTC-1 cells showed that cortisol does not compete with P for binding to the same R. As the glucocorticoid receptor is expressed in Leydig cells (45, 46, 47), the cortisol effects on cultured Leydig cells are apparently mediated through its own receptor and/or by an pathway independent from that of P action. Another difference between the two steroids is that corticosterone affects testicular function in an endocrine fashion originating from the adrenal gland, whereas the effect of P on Leydig cells seems to be of an autocrine nature.

In conclusion, our study sheds more light on direct P effects on Leydig tumor cells. The P binding detected in Leydig cells is different from the classical nuclear PR, but probably structurally and functionally related to the membrane variant of PR that has recently been characterized in human sperm. The signaling pathway of this R involves increased [Ca2+]i levels, through which P may regulate LHR gene regulation in Leydig cells, possibly through PKC and other Ca2+-dependent pathways. Further studies of the physiological significance will clarify the novel P actions as well as other signaling pathways involved in Leydig cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
Special thanks are due to Dr. Kati Jakobsson for her help with the RT-PCR method.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation. Back

Received March 1, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gronemeyer H 1992 Control of transcription activation by steroid hormone receptors. FASEB J 6:2524–2529[Abstract]
  2. Demura T, Driscoll WJ, Strott CA 1989 Nuclear progesterone-binding protein in the guinea pig adrenal cortex: distinction from the classical progesterone receptor. Endocrinology 124:2200–2207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Blackmore PF, Lattanzio FA 1991 Cell surface localization of a novel non-genomic progesterone receptor on the head of human sperm. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181:331–336[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Liu Z, Patino R 1993 High-affinity binding of progesterone to the plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes: characterization of binding and hormonal and developmental control. Biol Reprod 49:980–988[Abstract]
  5. Baldi E, Casano R, Falsetti C, Krausz C, Maggi M, Forti G 1991 Intracellular calcium accumulation and responsiveness to progesterone in capacitating human spermatozoa. J Androl 12:323–330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Blackmore, PF 1993 Rapid non-genomic actions of progesterone stimulate Ca2+ influx and the acrosome reaction in human sperm. Cell Signalling 5:531–538[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shimizu Y, Nord EP, Bronson RA 1993 Progesterone-evoked increases in sperm [Ca2+]i correlate with the egg penetrating ability of sperm from fertile but not infertile men. Fertil Steril 60:526–532[Medline]
  8. Korte JM, Isola JJ 1988 An immunocytochemical study of the progesterone receptor in rabbit ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 58:93–101[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Schreiber JR, Erickson GF 1979 Progesterone receptor in the rat ovary: further characterization and localization in the granulosa cell. Steroids 34:459–469[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Schreiber JR, Hsueh JW 1979 Progesterone "receptor" in rat ovary. Endocrinology 105:915–919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Menzies GS, Bramley TA 1994 Specific binding sites for progesterone in subcellular fractions of the porcine corpus luteum. J Endocrinol 142:101–110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chandrasekher YA, Melner MH, Nagalla SR, Stouffer RL 1994 Progesterone receptor, but not estradiol receptor, messenger ribonucleic acid is expressed in luteinizing granulosa cells and the corpus luteum in rhesus monkeys. Endocrinology 135:307–314[Abstract]
  13. Duffy DM, Stouffer RL 1995 Progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the primate corpus luteum during the menstrual cycle: possible regulation by progesterone. Endocrinology 136:1869–1876[Abstract]
  14. Park Sarge OK, Mayo KE 1994 Regulation of the progesterone receptor gene by gonadotropins and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 134:709–718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Young LJ, Nag PK, Crews D 1995 Regulation of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid by estrogen in the brain of the whiptail lizard (Cnemidophorus uniparens). J Neuroendocrinol 7:119–125[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Iwai M, Yasuda K, Fukuoka M, Iwai T, Takakura K, Taii S, Nakanishi S, Mori T 1991 Luteinizing hormone induces progesterone receptor gene expression in cultured porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 129:1621–1627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kohda H, Mori T, Ezaki Y, Nishimura T, Kambegawa A 1980 A progesterone-dependent step in ovulation induced by chorionic gonadotrophin in immature rats primed with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin. J Endocrinol 87:105–107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Swanson RJ, Lipner H 1977 Mechanism of ovulation: effect of intrafollicular progesterone antiserum. Fed Proc 36:390
  19. Singh G, Singh MM, Maitra SC, Elger W, Kalra V, Upadhyay SN, Chowdhury SR, Kamboj VP 1988 Luteolytic action of two antiprogestational agents (RU-38486 and ZK-98734) in the rat. J Reprod Fertil 83:73–83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Machelon V, Nome F, Grosse B, Lieberherr M 1996 Progesterone triggers rapid transmembrane calcium influx and/or calcium mobilization from endoplasmic reticulum, via a pertussis-insensitive G-protein in granulosa cells in relation to luteinization process. J Cell Biochem 61:619–628[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Lydon PJ, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery Jr CA, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O’Malley BW 1995 Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 9:2266–2278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Heikinheimo O, Mahony MC, Gordon K, Hsiu JG, Hodgen GD, Gibbons WE 1995 Estrogen and progesterone receptor mRNA are expressed in distinct pattern in male primate reproductive organs. J Assist Reprod Genet 12:198–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Dube JY, Tremblay RR 1979 Search for progesterone receptors in testes from various animal species. Mol Cell Endocrinol 16:39–44[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Piño AM, Valladares LE 1988 Evidence for a Leydig cell progesterone receptor in the rat. J Steroid Biochem 29:709–714[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. El-Hefnawy T, Huhtaniemi I 1998 Progesterone can participate in down-regulation of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene expression and function in cultured murine Leydig cells. Mol Cell Enocrinol 137:127–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Rebois RV 1982 Establishment of gonadotropin-responsive Leydig tumor cell line. J Cell Biol 94:70–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. El-Hefnawy T, Krawczyk Z, Nikula H, Viherä I, Huhtaniemi I 1996 Regulation of function of the murine luteinizing hormone receptor promoter by cis- and trans-acting elements in mouse Leydig tumor cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 119:207–217[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  29. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor
  30. Schott DR, Shyamala G, Schneider W, Parry G 1991 Molecular cloning, sequence analyses, and expression of complementary DNA encoding murine progesterone receptor. Biochemistry 30:7014–7020[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Tena-Sempere M, Zhang FP, Huhtaniemi I 1994 Persistent expression of a truncated form of the luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat testis after selective Leydig cell destruction by ethylene dimethane sulfonate. Endocrinology 135:1018–1024[Abstract]
  32. Weigel NL, Beck CA, Estes PA, Prendergast P, Altmann M, Christensen K, Edwards DP 1992 Ligands induce conformational changes in the carboxyl-terminus of progesterone receptors which are detected by a site-directed antipeptide monoclonal antibody. Mol Endocrinol 6:1585–1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Tsai-Morris CH, Buczko E, Wang W, Xie XZ, Dufau ML 1991 Structural organization of the rat luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor gene. J Biol Chem 266:11355–11359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Karonen S, Mörsky P, Siren M, Söderling U 1975 An enzymatic solid-phase method for trace iodination of proteins and peptides with 125I-iodine. Anal Biochem 67:1–10[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Sabeur K, Edwards DP, Meizel S 1996 Human sperm plasma membrane progesterone receptor(s) and the acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 54:993–1001[Abstract]
  36. Luconi M, Bonaccorsi L, Maggi M, Pecchioli P, Krausz CS, Forti G, Baldi E 1998 Identification and characterization of functional nongenomic progesterone receptors on human sperm membrane. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:877–885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Meyer C, Schmid R, Scriba PC, Wheling M 1996 Purification and partial sequensing of high-affinity progesterone-binding site(s) from porcine liver membranes. Eur J Biochem 239:726–731[Medline]
  38. Wolf M, LeVine H, May WS, Cuatrecasas P, Sahayoun N 1985 A model for intracellular translocation of protein kinase C involving synergism between Ca+2 and phorbol esters. Nature 317:546–549[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Nelson S, Ascoli M 1992 Epidermal growth factor, a phorbol ester, and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate decrease the transcription of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene in MA-10 Leydig tumor cells. Endocrinology 131:615–620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Huhtaniemi IT, Eskola V, Pakarinen P, Matikainen T, Sprengel R 1992 The murine luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor genes: transcription initiation sites, putative promoter sequences and promoter activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 88:55–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Duffy DM, Molskness TA, Stouffer RL 1996 Progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in luteinized granulosa cells of rhesus monkeys are regulated in vitro by gonadotropins and steroids. Biol Reprod 54:888–895[Abstract]
  42. Huhtaniemi I, Bergh A, Nikula H, Damber JE 1984 Differences in the regulation of steroidogenesis and tropic hormone receptors between the scrotal and abdominal testes of unilaterally cryptorchid adult rats. Endocrinology 115:550–555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Rae MT, Menzies GS, Bramley TA 1998 Bovine ovarian non-genomic progesterone binding sites: presence in follicular and luteal cell membranes. J Endocrinol 159:413–427[Abstract]
  44. Rae MT, Menzies GS, McNeilly AS, Woad K, Webb R, Bramley TA 1998 Specific non-genomic, membrane-localized binding sites for progesterone in the bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 58:1394–1406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Schultz R, Isola J, Parvinen M, Honkaniemi J, Wikstrsm AC, Gustafsson JÅ, Pelto-Huikko M 1993 Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in testis and accessory sexual organs of male rat. Mol Cell Endocrinol 95:115–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Stalker A, Hermo L, Antakly T 1989 Covalent affinity labeling, radioautography, and immunocytochemistry localize the glucocorticoid receptor in rat testicular Leydig cells. Am J Anat 186:369–377[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Stalker A, Hermo L, Antakly T 1991 Subcellular distribution of [3H]-dexamethasone mesylate binding sites in Leydig cells using electron microscope radioautography. Am J Anat 190:19–30[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Y. Han, H. L. Feng, J. I. Sandlow, and C. J. Haines
Comparing Expression of Progesterone and Estrogen Receptors in Testicular Tissue From Men With Obstructive and Nonobstructive Azoospermia
J Androl, March 1, 2009; 30(2): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. A. L. Bayne, T. Forster, S. T. G. Burgess, M. Craigon, M. J. Walton, D. T. Baird, P. Ghazal, and R. A. Anderson
Molecular Profiling of the Human Testis Reveals Stringent Pathway-Specific Regulation of RNA Expression Following Gonadotropin Suppression and Progestogen Treatment
J Androl, July 1, 2008; 29(4): 389 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S. Vuorenoja, A. Rivero-Muller, A. J Ziecik, I. Huhtaniemi, J. Toppari, and N. A Rahman
Targeted therapy for adrenocortical tumors in transgenic mice through their LH receptor by Hecate-human chorionic gonadotropin {beta} conjugate
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2008; 15(2): 635 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Wang, Y.-G. Cui, X.-H. Wang, Y. Jia, A. Sinha Hikim, Y.-H. Lue, J.-S. Tong, L.-X. Qian, J.-H. Sha, Z.-M. Zhou, et al.
Transient Scrotal Hyperthermia and Levonorgestrel Enhance Testosterone-Induced Spermatogenesis Suppression in Men through Increased Germ Cell Apoptosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 3292 - 3304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Cheng, S. C. Watkins, and W. H. Walker
Testosterone Activates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase via Src Kinase and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Sertoli Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2066 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Groyer, B. Eychenne, C. Girard, K. Rajkowski, M. Schumacher, and F. Cadepond
Expression and Functional State of the Corticosteroid Receptors and 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in Schwann Cells
Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4339 - 4350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. Walton, R. A. L. Bayne, I. Wallace, D. T. Baird, and R. A. Anderson
Direct Effect of Progestogen on Gene Expression in the Testis during Gonadotropin Withdrawal and Early Suppression of Spermatogenesis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2526 - 2533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Wang, L. Zhou, A. Gupta, R. R. Vethanayagam, Y. Zhang, J. D. Unadkat, and Q. Mao
Regulation of BCRP/ABCG2 expression by progesterone and 17beta-estradiol in human placental BeWo cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2006; 290(5): E798 - E807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B.M. Brady, J.K. Amory, A. Perheentupa, M. Zitzmann, C.J. Hay, D. Apter, R.A. Anderson, W.J. Bremner, P. Pollanen, E. Nieschlag, et al.
A multicentre study investigating subcutaneous etonogestrel implants with injectable testosterone decanoate as a potential long-acting male contraceptive
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. P. Ly, P. Y. Liu, and D. J. Handelsman
Rates of suppression and recovery of human sperm output in testosterone-based hormonal contraceptive regimens
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1733 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Youn, Y. Koo, I. Ji, and T. H. Ji
An Upstream Initiator-Like Element Suppresses Transcription of the Rat Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 19(5): 1318 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Goldman, A. Weiss, I. Almalah, and E. Shalev
Progesterone receptor expression in human decidua and fetal membranes before and after contractions: possible mechanism for functional progesterone withdrawal
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 11(4): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B.M. Brady, M. Walton, N. Hollow, A.T. Kicman, D.T. Baird, and R.A. Anderson
Depot testosterone with etonogestrel implants result in induction of azoospermia in all men for long-term contraception
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2658 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, C. C. Y. Weng, O. U. Bolden-Tiller, I. Huhtaniemi, D. J. Handelsman, and M. L. Meistrich
Effects of Medroxyprogesterone and Estradiol on the Recovery of Spermatogenesis in Irradiated Rats
Endocrinology, October 1, 2004; 145(10): 4461 - 4469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Fix, C. Jordan, P. Cano, and W. H. Walker
Testosterone activates mitogen-activated protein kinase and the cAMP response element binding protein transcription factor in Sertoli cells
PNAS, July 27, 2004; 101(30): 10919 - 10924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, G. Fernandez, and C. A. Wu
Involvement of an Unnamed Protein, RDA288, in the Mechanism through which Progesterone Mediates Its Antiapoptotic Action in Spontaneously Immortalized Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 3014 - 3022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
H. Schwarzenbach, G. Chakrabarti, H. J. Paust, and A. K. Mukhopadhyay
Gonadotropin-Mediated Regulation of the Murine VEGF Expression in MA-10 Leydig Cells
J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 128 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. M. LOSEL, E. FALKENSTEIN, M. FEURING, A. SCHULTZ, H.-C. TILLMANN, K. ROSSOL-HASEROTH, and M. WEHLING
Nongenomic Steroid Action: Controversies, Questions, and Answers
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 965 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Schwarzenbach, P. R. Manna, D. M. Stocco, G. Chakrabarti, and A. K. Mukhopadhyay
Stimulatory Effect of Progesterone on the Expression of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in MA-10 Leydig Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 1054 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. A. Anderson and D. T. Baird
Male Contraception
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 735 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and B.A. White
Characterization of a Putative Membrane Receptor for Progesterone in Rat Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Hefnawy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Hefnawy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals