help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, M. E.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 1 366-374
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Dopamine Transporters Participate in the Physiological Regulation of Prolactin1

Jamie E. DeMaria, György M. Nagy, Anna A. Lerant2, Márton I. E. Fekete, Cathy W. Levenson and Marc E. Freeman

Department of Biological Science (J.E.D., A.A.L., M.E.F.) and Department of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences (C.W.L.), Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4340; Neuroendocrine Research Laboratory (G.M.N.), Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Semmelweis Medical University, Budapest, Hungary; and Institute of Experimental Medicine (M.I.E.F.), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Marc E. Freeman, Ph.D., 208 Biomedical Research Facility, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4340. E-mail: freeman{at}neuro.fsu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Three populations of hypothalamic neuroendocrine dopaminergic (NEDA) neurons, arising from the arcuate and periventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus release dopamine (DA) that acts at the pituitary gland to regulate the secretion of PRL. It is generally accepted that NEDA neurons lack functional DA transporters (DATs), which are responsible for uptake of DA from the synaptic cleft into the presynaptic axon terminal. This study localized DATs to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis and evaluated the effect of DAT blockade on the hypothalamo-pituitary regulation of PRL. After 7 days of treatment with cocaine (a nonspecific amine transporter blocker) or mazindol (a specific DAT blocker), the relative abundance of PRL messenger RNA (mRNA) in the anterior lobe (AL) of OVX rats was significantly decreased, whereas the relative abundance of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA in the hypothalamus was significantly increased. The effect of cocaine or mazindol administration on DA turnover and serum PRL concentration was examined in estradiol (E2)- treated OVX rats. E2 administration (iv) resulted in a significant increase in serum PRL within 4 h; however, cocaine or mazindol administration abolished the E2-induced increase of PRL. Cocaine or mazindol significantly increased the concentration of DA at the site of the axon terminals within the median eminence (ME), intermediate lobe (IL) and neural lobe (NL), indicating blockade of uptake. Because formation of DOPAC requires uptake of DA, concentrations of DOPAC in the ME, IL and NL decreased following treatment with either cocaine or mazindol. These data, together with the presence of immunopositive DAT in the ME, pituitary stalk, IL, and NL, suggest that a functional DAT system is present within all three populations of NEDA neurons. Moreover, similarity between the effects of cocaine and mazindol treatment indicate that blockade of the DAT, but not other amine transporters, is responsible for suppression of PRL gene expression and secretion. Blockade of DATs prevent uptake of DA into NEDA neurons and consequently increases the amount of DA that diffuses into the portal vasculature and reaches the AL. These data provide evidence that DATs play a physiological role in the regulation of DA release from and TH expression in NEDA neurons and consequently PRL secretion and PRL gene expression and further support our previous observation that the regulation of PRL secretion involves all three populations of NEDA neurons.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THREE POPULATIONS of neurons contribute dopamine (DA), the physiological inhibitor of the secretion of PRL (1), to the pituitary gland to regulate the secretion of PRL (2). Tuberoinfundibular DAergic (TIDA) neurons arising from the arcuate nucleus (ARN) terminate in the median eminence (ME) (3) and release DA that is subsequently delivered through long portal vessels to lactotrophs in the anterior lobe (AL) of the pituitary gland. Tuberohypophysial DAergic (THDA) neurons originate in the rostral ARN and terminate in both the intermediate (IL) and neural (NL) lobes of the pituitary gland (4). Periventricular-hypophysial DAergic (PHDA) neurons arise from the periventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and terminate exclusively in the IL (5, 6). DA released to the IL and NL is delivered to the AL through short portal vessels (SPV). Based on their termination on portal vessels, these are known collectively as neuroendocrine dopaminergic (NEDA) neurons.

The rate-limiting step of DA synthesis is the formation of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), from tyrosine catalyzed by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). L-DOPA is further metabolized by L-amino acid decarboxylase into DA. DA is packaged into vesicles and released through a calcium-mediated vesicle docking process (7). Once released from the neuron, DA either acts at its target (i.e. DA receptors) or is taken up into the presynaptic neuron by dopamine transporters (DATs) and oxidized by mitochondrial monoamine oxidase to produce 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) (8). DA not packaged in secretory granules is also oxidized to produce DOPAC (9).

The DAT is a 12-transmembrane domain transporter belonging to a larger family of sodium/chloride-dependent transporters (10). Expression of DAT is regulated by ovarian steroids both at transcriptional and posttranslational levels (11, 12). Also, phosphorylation of DAT proteins has been shown to regulate DA transport activity (13, 14). DAT messenger RNA (mRNA) has been localized in several regions within the rat brain, including the arcuate (15, 16, 17) and periventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (17, 18). Distribution of DAT mRNA and TH mRNA had been comparatively mapped throughout the brain (19). Although numerous immunocytochemical studies were performed on localization of DAT in the central nervous system, most of them were single label studies (17, 18). Studies detecting both DAT and TH proteins focused mostly on the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal systems (20, 21, 22). Previous reports suggested that TIDA and THDA neurons lack functional DAT systems (23, 24, 25). However, immunodetectable DAT is present in the ME and in its continuation, the pituitary stalk (26). Moreover, administration of DAT blockers was shown to inhibit the secretion of PRL and disrupt the estrous cycle of the rat (27). Relatively little is known about the distribution and function of DAT in the neuroendocrine DAergic neurons and in their target areas.

The aim of the present study was to visualize DAT in the cell bodies and terminal areas of the neuroendocrine DAergic neurons by using double label immunocytochemistry as well as to elucidate the contribution of DATs to the hypothalamo-pituitary regulation of expression and secretion of PRL.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Identification of dopamine transporter in the hypothalamo-hypophysial dopaminergic system
Female Sprague Dawley rats were housed two per cage in a climate-controlled environment under 12 h of illumination (lights on from 0600 h) with water and rat chow provided ad libitum. Animals were bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) under Halothane anesthesia. Ten days after OVX, rats were killed at 1100–1200 h by an overdose of sodium-pentobarbital and transcardially perfused with 50 ml ice-cold 0.1 M PBS followed by 100 ml ice-cold fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4). After cryoprotection (20% sucrose-PBS for 24 h), brains and pituitary glands were cut into 20-µm coronal sections with a cryostat (Microm, Carl Zeiss, Walldorf, Germany). Brain sections between 3600–4400 µm post bregma and serial sections of the pituitary gland were thaw mounted onto gelatin-subbed glass microscope slides.

After rinsing three times in PBS, sections were background-blocked with 10% normal horse serum (in PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100) for 20 min, then successively incubated at 4 C with antibodies to DAT, TH, and PRL as described in Table 1Go. All antibodies were diluted in Triton-PBS, containing 2% normal horse serum (Intergen Co., Purchase, NY). Three 5-min washes (in PBS) were applied between steps. After immunocytochemistry (ICC), the sections were rinsed in distilled water and cover slips were fixed with Gelmount (Fisher Scientific, Atlanta, GA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Steps of the double label immunocytochemistry performed in this study

 
Confocal images were obtained with a Carl Zeiss LSM410 laser-scanning microscope equipped with two external Ar/Kr lasers and an internal He/Ne laser. The excitation and emission spectra of the fluorescent dyes as well as the characteristics of the lasers and filters used are described in Table 2Go. Sections were scanned under identical acquisition parameters. The images were acquired with a Plan-Neofluar 63/1.4 objective lens using the LSM410 invert basic program version 3.8. The same program was used to assess colocalization of DAT and TH immunoreactivity. Briefly, a scattergram was derived from the overlaid red-green-blue (RGB) images (green, DAT; red, TH). Each pixel was compared with an absolute intensity scale and plotted according to its intensity in red (x-axis) and in green (y-axis). The upper left 25% of the scattergram, containing pixels with high intensity in both colors, was marked by a constant square and considered as colocalization.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of the fluorescent labels and detection systems used in this study

 
Effects of short-term DAT blockade on DA turnover (DOPAC/DA ratio) and PRL secretion
Female Sprague Dawley rats were housed individually in a climate controlled environment under 12 h of illumination (lights on from 0600 h) with water and rat chow provided ad libitum. Animals were bilaterally OVX under ether anesthesia. Eight days after OVX, a cannula was inserted into the jugular vein. The following day, a sample of venous blood was collected at 0845 h, followed by an iv injection of water soluble cyclodextrin-encapsulated estradiol (E2, 20 µg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Sixty minutes later, another blood sample was taken, and an ip injection of either saline (SAL, control, 200 µl), cocaine (COC, a nonspecific amine transporter blocker, 10 mg/kg; RBI), or mazindol (MAZ, a specific DAT blocker, 5 mg/kg; RBI) was administered. Animals were rapidly decapitated every hour for the next 4 h. Trunk blood was collected, allowed to clot, centrifuged and serum removed and stored at -40 C. Brains were removed and the ME, AL, IL, and NL excised, isolated and stored at -40 C in homogenization buffer as previously described (2, 28, 29, 30). The concentration of PRL in serum was measured by RIA (31), which has a sensitivity of 1 ng/ml with inter and intra assay coefficient of variations 10% and 5%, respectively. The concentration of DA and DOPAC in the ME, IL, NL, and the concentration of DA in the AL were measured using HPLC coupled to electrochemical detection (2, 28, 29, 30). The sensitivity of the assay was 30 pg of DA and 33 pg of DOPAC.

Effects of long-term DAT blockade on PRL and TH gene expression
Female Sprague Dawley rats were housed five per box in a climate controlled environment under 12 h of illumination (lights on from 0600 h) with water and rat chow provided ad libitum. Rats were bilaterally OVX under ether anesthesia. The day following OVX, rats were divided into three groups and received daily injections (ip) of either SAL, cocaine (2.5 mg/kg), or mazindol (2.5 mg/kg) for seven days. On the seventh day of injections, rats were decapitated and the AL and hypothalamus were excised. Total cellular RNA was immediately extracted using the guanidine-phenol-chloroform method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (32) and 20 µg separated on a 1% agarose gel (1 x MOPS, 0.66 M formaldehyde). Integrity of the RNA was confirmed by UV visualization of ethidium bromide stained RNA. RNA was transferred overnight by capillary action to Gene Screen (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) and cross-linked under UV light for 3 min. Blots were then hybridized overnight (65 C) with 32P-labeled complementary DNA (cDNA) probes specific for rat PRL mRNA (lactotrophs), or TH mRNA (hypothalamus), and ß-Actin (control for loading). Probes were labeled using a RadPrime DNA labeling kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and 32P {alpha}dATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Blots were exposed to Kodak X-OMAT AR film at -80 C. Relative abundance of bound cDNA probe was determined by computer evaluated densitometry (Quantity One quantification program, Protein and DNA Imaging, PDI, Boston, MA) and expressed as a function of ß-actin mRNA abundance.

Statistical analysis
Mean concentrations of DA, DOPAC, PRL, PRL mRNA, TH mRNA, or DOPAC/DA ratio were analyzed for each time point using a two-way ANOVA. Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used as a posthoc test for comparisons between saline and cocaine- or mazindol-treated animals and between cocaine and mazindol-treated animals. Values are considered significant at P < 0.01.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Distribution of immunoreactive DAT in the brain
TH immunoreactive fibers in the caudate putamen contained DAT labeling that appeared as fine, punctate staining. DAT, colocalized with TH in nigrostriatal DAergic terminals of the caudate putamen was used as a positive control (Fig. 1Go). Compared with the caudate putamen and the median eminence, only scarce DAT staining and no colocalization was observed in the tuberoinfundibular DAergic neurons in the dorsomedial part of the middle arcuate nucleus adjacent to the third ventricle (Fig. 1Go). DAT was abundant in the external layer of the ME (Fig. 1Go), where TIDA neurons terminate, and the pituitary stalk (Fig. 1Go), through which the THDA and PHDA axons course to reach the pituitary gland. Dense, punctate DAT staining colocalized with TH immunoreactivity in TIDA axon terminals (Fig. 1Go), as well as with the NEDA neuronal axons and terminals in the pituitary stalk (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of immunoreactive DAT in the caudate putamen (CPu), dorsomedial part of the arcuate nucleus (DMARN), median eminence (ME), and pituitary stalk (PS). The first two columns show confocal images obtained from coronal sections of the rat brain immuno-labeled for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) and dopamine transporter (DAT, green). White quadrangles circumscribe the area shown of higher magnification in the third and fourth columns. The third column shows the red and green images overlayed (TH/DAT), whereas the fourth column demonstrates the individual pixels exhibiting the greatest intensity in both red and green (Colocalization). Bar, 25 µm.

 
Distribution of immunoreactive DAT in the pituitary gland
DAT was present in both fibers and axon terminals of the rostral NL of the pituitary gland (Fig. 2Go). However, both TH and DAT labeling were sparse in the caudal aspect of the NL (data not shown). Interestingly, some intense DAT labeling appeared in large axon terminals (Herring bodies), which were not intensely stained with the TH antibody. This may have been a result of autofluorescence of large oxytocin or arginine-vasopressin-containing Herring bodies, or dominance of phosphorylated isoform (Ser40) of TH, which was not detected by the TH antibody used. A fine network of dopaminergic fibers was observed in the IL (Fig. 2Go), and colocalization of DAT and TH was present along membranes of cells in the IL. Neither TH nor DAT immunoreactivity was detected in the anterior lobe (Fig. 2Go), as the intensity of fluorescence in the anterior lobe cells was lower than the autofluorescence of red blood cells in the sinusoid capillaries. However, numerous PRL immunoreactive cells attested to the success of the immunocytochemical labeling in the AL. In addition, TH immunoreactive fibers were detected at the interface of the anterior and intermediate lobes (Fig 2Go).



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Distribution of immunoreactive DAT in the neural lobe (NL), intermediate lobe (IL), and anterior lobe (AL) of the pituitary gland. IL and NL: The first two columns show confocal images obtained from coronal sections of the rat pituitary gland immuno-labeled for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) and dopamine transporter (DAT, green). White quadrangles circumscribes the area shown of higher magnification in the third and fourth columns. The third column shows the red and green images overlayed (TH/DAT), whereas the fourth column demonstrates the individual pixels exhibiting the greatest intensity in both red and green (Colocalization). AL: The first two columns show confocal images obtained from coronal sections of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland immuno-labeled for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) and dopamine transporter (DAT, green). Note the lack of specific TH and DAT label, only nonspecific background and autofluorescence of red blood cells in the sinusoid capillaries. The third image shows PRL immunoreactivity of anterior lobe lactotrophs (blue) in the same section, whereas the fourth image is the result of the overlay of all three labels (red, green, and blue). Bar, 25 µm.

 
DAT blockade inhibits E2-induced secretion of PRL
Figure 3Go shows the concentration of PRL in serum following DAT blockade. Before iv injection of water-soluble E2 (0-time), there was no significant difference between the concentration of PRL in serum. Moreover, 60 min after injection of E2 and before DAT blockade, there was no significant difference in the concentration of PRL in serum. The concentration of PRL in serum of saline-treated animals significantly increased 2 h after E2 injection, peaked 3 h after E2 injection, and returned to low levels by 5 h post E2 injection. However, treatment with either cocaine or mazindol completely blocked the E2-induced increase of PRL in serum (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of DAT inhibitors on the concentration of PRL in serum. Concentration of PRL in serum from estradiol-treated rats following saline (-•-), cocaine (—{square}—), or mazindol (—{blacksquare}—) treatment. Ten days following ovariectomy, rats were injected iv with water-soluble estradiol at time zero. Sixty minutes following estradiol injection, either saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg, COC), or mazindol (5 mg/kg, MAZ) was administered iv. Venous blood samples were taken before both injections. Animals were killed every hour for 4 h following the drug injection. Each point represents the mean ± SE concentration of PRL from four rats/time point/treatment group. *, P < 0.01 for control vs. cocaine- or mazindol-treated rats at each time point.

 
DAT blockade inhibits uptake of DA in the ME
Figure 4Go shows the DOPAC/DA ratio (A), the concentration of DOPAC (B), and DA (C) in the ME. The turnover of DA in the ME of E2-treated rats injected with saline increased concomitant with increased PRL secretion (Fig. 4AGo). Moreover, the turnover of DA remained elevated 4–5 h after E2 injection (Fig. 4AGo). Cocaine or mazindol treatment significantly decreased the turnover of DA in the ME, except at 5 h after E2 injection, when the turnover of DA in cocaine- and mazindol-treated rats was increased. Cocaine- and mazindol-treated rats had significantly higher concentrations of DA in the ME than saline-treated rats 2–4 h after E2 injection (Fig. 4CGo), but significantly lower DOPAC concentrations (Fig. 4BGo) 3–4 h after E2 injection.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Inhibition of DAT alters dopamine turnover in the median eminence. Concentration of DA (C), DOPAC (B), and the DOPAC/DA ratio (A) in the ME from estradiol-treated rats following saline (-•-), cocaine (—{square}—), or mazindol (—{blacksquare}—) treatment. Ten days following ovariectomy rats were injected iv with water-soluble estradiol at time zero. Sixty minutes following estradiol injection, either saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg, COC), or mazindol (5 mg/kg, MAZ) was administered iv. Animals were killed every hour for 4 h following the drug injection. Each point represents the mean ± SE concentration of PRL from 4 rats/time point/treatment group. *, P < 0.01 for control vs. cocaine- or mazindol-treated rats at each time point. a, P < 0.01 for cocaine-treated vs. mazindol-treated rats.

 
DAT blockade modifies THDA and PHDA neuronal activity and DA uptake
DA turnover in the IL was significantly depressed following DAT blockade (Fig. 5AGo). The concentration of DOPAC in the IL was significantly decreased after administration of cocaine or mazindol (Fig. 5BGo); however, the absolute concentration of DA in the IL significantly increased 1–3 h after administration of cocaine or mazindol (Fig. 5CGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Inhibition of DAT alters dopamine turnover in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary gland. Concentration of DA (C), DOPAC (B), and the DOPAC/DA ratio (A) in the IL from estradiol-treated rats following saline (-•-), cocaine (—{square}—), or mazindol (—{blacksquare}—) treatment. For details of legend, see Fig. 4Go.

 
DA turnover in the NL was also significantly depressed after administration of DAT blockers (Fig. 6AGo). Similar to the IL, the concentration of DOPAC (Fig. 6BGo) in the NL decreased and the concentration of DA (Fig. 6CGo) in the NL increased after treatment with either cocaine or mazindol.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Inhibition of DAT alters dopamine turnover in the neural lobe of the pituitary gland. Concentration of DA (C), DOPAC (B), and the DOPAC/DA ratio (A) in the NL from estradiol-treated rats following saline (-•-), cocaine (—{square}—), or mazindol (—{blacksquare}—) treatment. For details of legend, see Fig. 4Go.

 
DAT blockade increases the concentration of DA in the AL
The concentration of DA in the AL (Fig. 7Go) was significantly increased following treatment with cocaine or mazindol.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Inhibition of DAT alters dopamine turnover in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Concentration of DA in the AL from estradiol-treated rats following saline (-•-), cocaine (—{square}—), or mazindol (—{blacksquare}—) treatment. For details of legend, see Fig. 4Go.

 
Long-term DAT blockade alters PRL and TH gene expression
After 7 days of treatment with either cocaine or mazindol, the relative abundance of PRL mRNA in the AL (Fig. 8AGo) was decreased, whereas the relative abundance of TH mRNA in the hypothalamus (Fig. 8BGo) was increased. There were no significant differences in the relative abundance of PRL mRNA (Fig. 8AGo) or TH mRNA (Fig. 8BGo) between cocaine and mazindol treated animals.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Inhibition of DAT alters gene expression in the NEDA neurons and in lactotroph. Relative abundance of PRL mRNA in the AL (A) and TH mRNA in the hypothalamus (B) following long-term treatment DAT blockers. Rats were injected ip with either saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg), or mazindol (5 mg/kg) for 6 days following ovariectomy. Eight days post OVX, rats were decapitated and total RNA was isolated from the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus. Each bar represents the mean ± SE concentration of PRL from 5 rats/time point/treatment group. Inset on A shows a representative Northern of anterior lobe PRL mRNA and ß-Actin mRNA in saline- and cocaine-treated conditions. *, P < 0.01 for control vs. cocaine- or mazindol-treated rats at each time point.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DATs belong to a larger class of Na+/Cl- transporters that also includes transporters for serotonin (5HT) and norepinephrine (NE) (10). Different classes of drugs nonselectively inhibit all three transporters (e.g. cocaine) or specifically inhibit DAT (e.g. mazindol). Given the clinical significance of cocaine addiction, the effects of cocaine on central DAergic systems are widely studied. However, because cocaine nonselectively blocks DAT as well as NE- and 5HT- transporters, both cocaine and mazindol are used in these experiments to verify that effects elicited by cocaine are indeed specific to the DAT. DATs play a role in the regulation of DAergic neurons in other areas of the brain (10); however, the regulatory role of DATs on NEDA neurons has not been fully appreciated (23, 24, 25).

Three populations of hypothalamic NEDA neurons contribute to the regulation of the secretion of PRL (3, 4, 5, 6). While DA released from TIDA neurons has been considered the primary source of DA inhibiting the secretion of PRL (1), it is evident that DA released to the IL and NL also plays a critical role in the regulation of the secretion of PRL (2). It has been demonstrated that acute treatment with cocaine inhibits the secretion of PRL (27, 33), alters the activity of TIDA neurons (33), disrupts the estrous cycle of the rat (27), and increases the amount of DA released in vitro (34). Previously, using the rat as a model, other studies have suggested that hypothalamic NEDA neurons involved in the hypothalamo-pituitary regulation of PRL lack functional high-affinity DAT (23, 24, 25). Through the experiments presented here we demonstrate: 1) DAT transporters are present in the terminal areas of NEDA neurons; 2) Acute DAT blockade inhibits the secretion of PRL; 3) Acute DAT blockade alters all three populations of NEDA neurons; and 4) Long-term DAT blockade decreases PRL gene expression, but increases TH gene expression.

Figures 1Go and 2Go show positive staining for DAT and colocalization of DAT and TH in the terminal area of TIDA neurons (external zone of the ME, Fig. 1Go), and absence of DAT label in the cell bodies of TIDA neurons of the dorsomedial part of the arcuate nucleus. Although DAT mRNA has been detected in great abundance in the dorsomedial part of the arcuate nucleus (19, 35), DAT immunoreactivity was not found in the hypothalamic DAergic neurons (A11–15 cell groups) in previous studies (17, 36). One can hypothesize that while the perikaryon is the site of translation of DAT mRNA, the DAT protein is being quickly transported to its destination, the plasma membrane of axon terminals. Thus, immunodetectable amounts of the mature DAT protein may not be present in the perikaryon that is expressing DAT.

We also found DAT staining in the pituitary stalk through which fibers of THDA and PHDA neurons course (Fig. 1Go) and in the IL and the NL where these fibers terminate (Fig. 2Go). Previously, DATs were localized in the external zone of the ME (26), but not in the IL nor the NL. Considerable amounts of single labeling (DAT, no TH) can be observed in the posterior and intermediate lobes of the pituitary gland. Although this finding may seem controversial, both in situ hybridization (19) and immunocytochemical studies (36) indicate that localization of TH and DAT mRNA do not overlap completely in certain areas. One of the possible explanations may be that the dominant form of TH present is phosphorylated at ser40, a form which is not recognized by the antibody used in this study. The lack of DAT in the AL is not surprising as there are no DAergic nerve terminals in the AL. However, the presence of PRL in the AL (Fig. 2Go) confirms that the ICC is valid. Acute administration of either cocaine or mazindol prevented the E2-induced increase of PRL in serum (Fig. 3Go), indicating that the DAT plays a functional role in the secretion of PRL. These results are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that cocaine inhibited the secretion of PRL in rats (27), rhesus monkeys (37), and humans (38). Moreover, the effects of cocaine and mazindol were equivalent, suggesting that the mechanism of cocaine’s action are most likely mediated by DAT and not NE- or 5HT- transporters.

The dopamine uptake mechanism in the ME, IL and NL is less robust than in other brain regions (23, 24, 25). However, the fact that administration of 6-hydroxydopamine (a neurotoxin requiring uptake through transporters) diminishes the concentration of DA and the presence of DAergic nerve terminals in the ME, IL, and NL suggests the presence of DAT in these terminal areas (39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44).

The DOPAC/DA ratio as been shown to be an effective method for monitoring the activity of NEDA neurons (9, 45). However, the absolute concentrations of DA and DOPAC must be presented to reflect the basis for the ratio. Blockade of DAT inhibits the DA uptake mechanism on NEDA neurons thus increasing the concentration of DA in the perivascular space, the consequence of which is enhanced diffusion into the portal vessels to diminish secretion of PRL from the pituitary gland. Because uptake of DA is essential for formation of DOPAC (9), the blockade of a functional uptake mechanism decreases the concentration of DOPAC in the terminal area. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that DAT blockade decreases the concentration of DOPAC in DAergic terminals of other areas of the rat brain (46).

An acute increase in the concentration of DA, while an effective inhibitor of the secretion of PRL from the AL (1), has no effect on the relative abundance of PRL mRNA in the AL (47). Conversely, chronic treatment with DA or DA agonists significantly decreases the relative abundance of PRL mRNA in the AL (47). DA, acting through G protein-coupled D2 inhibitory receptors (48, 49), down regulates adenylate cyclase, inhibiting the formation of cAMP and blocking the transcription of the PRL gene (50). Blockade of DAT prevents uptake of DA into the neurons, significantly increasing the amount of DA available for transport to the AL (Fig. 7Go). Thus, long-term treatment with either cocaine or mazindol equally decreases the relative abundance of PRL mRNA in the AL (Fig. 8AGo). A decrease in PRL transcription caused by long-term cocaine use, can lead to the depression of several physiological processes mediated by PRL, such as immune function (51), osmoregulation (52, 53), stress response (54), reproduction (55), and milk production in nursing mothers (56). These data provide new insights into the potential problems induced by long-term cocaine use.

Previously, it has been shown that cocaine administration up-regulated TH activity in the hypothalamus (57, 58). Long-term blockade of DAT, by either cocaine or mazindol, equally increased the relative abundance of TH mRNA in the hypothalamus (Fig. 8BGo). Long-term DAT blockade induces a decrease in positive immunostaining for TH (59) and an increase in the activity of TH (58, 60). Though we lack experimental evidence to explain this result, long-term cocaine exposure may lead to removal of end-point inhibition of TH activity in neurons, which results in a compensatory increase in the transcription of TH.

The DAT system in the ME and pituitary gland is less efficient than DAT in areas of the brain where DA acts as a neurotransmitter rather than a neurohormone (23, 24, 25). However, this does not diminish the physiological importance of DAT because DAT knockout mice display anterior pituitary hypoplasia, decreased PRL mRNA, and decreased PRL content of the pituitary gland (61). Thus, our results, coupled with data obtained from DAT knockout mice (61), indicate that the DAT system plays a prominent role in the development and regulation of PRL in the pituitary gland.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to thank Dr. Richard Maurer for the PRL cDNA plasmid, Dr. Karen O’Malley for the tyrosine hydroxylase cDNA plasmid, Dr. Albert Parlow and the National Pituitary Hormone Program for RIA supplies, Ms. Mária Mészáros for her technical assistance, and Leigh Ann Clark for critical review of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by NIH Grants DK-43200 (to M.E.F.) and DK-50472 (to C.W.L.) and OTKA 20916 (to G.M.N.). Back

2 Present Address: Department of Anatomy, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi 39216. Back

Received August 11, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ben-Jonathan N 1985 Dopamine: a prolactin-inhibiting hormone. Endocr Rev 6:564–589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. DeMaria JE, Zelena D, Vecsernyés M, Nagy GM, Freeman ME 1998 The effect of neurointermediate lobe denervation on hypothalamic neuroendocrine dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res 806:89–94[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Bjorklund A, Moore RY, Nobin A, Stenevi U 1973 The organization of tubero-hypophyseal and reticulo-infundibular catecholamine neuron systems in the rat brain. Brain Res 51:171–191[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Fuxe K 1964 Cellular localization of monoamines in the median eminence and in the infundibular stem of some mammals. Acta Physiol Scand 58:383–384
  5. Goudreau JL, Falls WM, Lookingland KJ, Moore KE 1995 Periventricular-hypophysial dopaminergic neurons innervate the intermediate but not the neural lobe of the rat pituitary gland. Neuroendocrinology 62:147–154[Medline]
  6. Goudreau JL, Lindley SE, Lookingland KJ, Moore KE 1992 Evidence that hypothalamic periventricular dopamine neurons innervate the intermediate lobe of the rat pituitary. Neuroendocrinology 56:100–105[Medline]
  7. Arbuthnott GW, Fairbrother IS, Butcher SP 1990 Brain microdialysis studies on the control of dopamine release and metabolism in vivo. J Neurosci Methods 34:73–81[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Giros B, Caron MG 1993 Molecular characterization of the dopamine transporter. Trends Pharmacol Sci 14:43–49[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lookingland K, Jarry HD, Moore KE 1987 The metabolism of dopamine in the median eminence reflects the activity of tuberinfundibular neurons. Brain Res 419:303–310[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Amara SG, Kuhar MJ 1993 Neurotransmitter transporters: recent progress. Annu Rev Neurosci 16:73–93[Medline]
  11. Bossé R, Rivest R, Di Paolo T 1997 Ovariectomy and estradiol treatment affect the dopamine transporter and its gene expression in the rat brain. Mol Brain Res 46:343–346[Medline]
  12. Disshon KA, Boja JW, Dluzen DE 1998 Inhibition of striatal dopamine transporter activity by 17ß-estradiol. Eur J Pharmacol 345:207–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Tian Y, Kapatos G, Granneman JG, Bannon MJ 1994 Dopamine and {gamma}-aminobutyric acid transporters: differential regulation by agents that promote phosphorylation. Neurosci Lett 173:143–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Zhang L, Coffey LL, Reith ME 1997 Regulation of the functional activity of the human dopamine transporter by protein kinase C. Biochem Pharmacol 53:677–688[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Cerruti C, Walther D, Kuhar MJ, Uhl GR 1993 Dopamine transporter mRNA expression is intense in rat brain neurons and modest outside midbrain. Mol Pharmacol 18:181–186
  16. Lorang D, Amara SG, Simerly RB 1994 Cell-type specific expression of catecholamine transporters in the rat brain. J Neurosci 14:4903–4914[Abstract]
  17. Hoffman BJ, Hansson SR, Mezey E, Palkovits M 1998 Localization and dynamic regulation of biogenic amine transporters in the mammalian central nervous system. Front Neuroendocrinol 19:187–231[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Freed C, Revay R, Vaughan RA, Kriek E, Grant S, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ 1995 Dopamine transporter immunoreactivity in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 359:340–349[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Hoffman BJ, Palkovits M, Pacak K, Hansson SR, Mezey E 1998 Regulation of dopamine transporter mRNA levels in the central nervous system. Adv Pharmacol 42:202–206
  20. Jansson A, Goldstein M, Tinner B, Zoli M, Meador-Woodruff JH, Lew JY, Levey AI, Watson S, Agnati LF, Fuxe K 1999 On the distribution patterns of D1, D2, tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter immunoreactivities in the ventral striatum of the rat. Neuroscience 89:473–489[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Nirenberg MJ, Vaughan RA, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ, Pickel VM 1996 The dopamine transporter is localized to dendritic and axonal plasma membranes of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci 16:436–447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nirenberg MJ, Chan J, Pohorille A, Vaughan RA, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ, Pickel VM 1997 The dopamine transporter: comparative ultrastructure of dopaminergic axons in limbic and motor compartments of the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 17:6899–6907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Demarest KT, Moore KE 1979 Lack of a high affinity transport system for dopamine in the median eminence and posterior pituitary. Brain Res 171:545–551[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Annunziato L, Leblanc P, Kordon C, Weiner RI 1980 Differences in the kinetics of dopamine uptake in synaptosome preparations of the median eminence relative to other dopaminergically innervated brain regions. Neuroendocrinology 31:316–320[Medline]
  25. Annunziato L, Weiner RI 1980 Characteristics of dopamine uptake and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) formation in the dopaminergic terminals of the neurointermediate lobe of the pituitary gland. Neuroendocrinology 31:8–12[Medline]
  26. Revay R, Vaughan R, Grant S, Kuhar MJ 1996 Dopamine transporter immunohistochemistry in median eminence, amygdala, and other areas of the rat brain. Synapse 22:93–99[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. King TS, Schenken RS, Kang IS, Javors MA, Riehl RM 1990 Cocaine disrupts estrous cyclicity and alters the reproductive neuroendocrine axis in the rat. Neuroendocrinology 51:15–22[Medline]
  28. DeMaria JE, Livingstone JD, Freeman ME 1998 Characterization of the dopaminergic input to the pituitary gland throughout the estrous cycle of the rat. Neuroendocrinology 67:377–383[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Nagy GM, DeMaria JE, Freeman ME 1998 Changes in the local metabolism of dopamine in the anterior and neural lobes but not in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary gland during nursing. Brain Res 790:315–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. DeMaria JE, Lerant A, Freeman ME 1999 Prolactin activates all three populations of hypothalamic neuroendocrine dopaminergic neurons in ovariectomized rats. Brain Res 837:236–241[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Freeman ME, Sterman JR 1978 Ovarian steroid modulation of prolactin surges in cervically-stimulated ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 102:1915–1920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  33. Baumann MH, Rothman RB 1993 Effects of acute and chronic cocaine on the activity of tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons in the rat. Brain Res 608:175–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Garris PA, Ben-Jonathan N 1991 Effects of reuptake inhibitors on dopamine release from the stalk-median eminence and posterior pituitary in vitro. Brain Res 556:123–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Meister B, Elde R 1993 Dopamine transporter mRNA in neurons of the rat hypothalamus. Neuroendocrinology 58:388–395[Medline]
  36. Ciliax BJ, Heilman C, Demchyshyn LL, Pristupa ZB, Ince E, Hersch SM, Niznik HB, Levey AI 1995 The dopamine transporter: immunochemical characterization and localization in brain. J Neurosci 15:1714–1723[Abstract]
  37. Mello NK, Mendelson JH, Drieze J, Kelly M 1990 Acute effects of cocaine on prolactin and gonadotropins in female rhesus monkey during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254:815–823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Mello NK, Mendelson JH 1997 Cocaine’s effects on neuroendocrine systems: Clinical and preclinical studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:571–599[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Smith GC, Helme RD 1974 Ultrastructural and fluorescence histochemical studies on the effects of 6-hydroxydopamine on the rat median eminence. Cell Tissue Res 152:493–512[Medline]
  40. Smith GC, Sheward WJ, Fink G 1982 Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the median eminence and neurointermediate lobe on the secretion of pituitary hormones in the male rat. Brain Res 246:330–333[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Lin JY, Mai LM, Pan JT 1993 Effects of systemic administration of 6-hydroxydopamine, 6-hydroxydopa and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydroxypyridine (MPTP) on tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons in the rat. Brain Res 624:126–130[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Day TA, Jervois PM, Menadue MF, Willoughby JO 1982 Catecholamine mechanisms in medio-basal hypothalamus influence prolactin but not growth hormone secretion. Brain Res 253:213–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Sheward WJ, Watts AG, Fink G, Smith GC 1985 Effects of intravenously administered 6-hydroxydopamine on the content of monoamines in the median eminence and neurointermediate lobe of the rat. Neurosci Lett 55:141–144[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Smith GC, Courtney PG, Wreford NG, Walker MM 1982 Further studies on the effects of intravenously administered 6-hydroxydopamine on the median eminence of the rat. Brain Res 234:101–110[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Lindley SE, Gunnet JW, Lookingland KJ, Moore KE 1990 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid concentrations in the intermediate lobe and neural lobe of the posterior pituitary gland as an index of tuberohypophysial dopaminergic neuronal activity. Brain Res 506:133–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Karoum F, Chrapusta SJ, Brinjak R, Hitri A, Wyatt RJ 1994 Regional effects of amphetamine, cocaine, nomifensine, and GBR 12909 on the dynamics of dopamine release and metabolism in the rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 113:1391–1399[Medline]
  47. Shin SH, Elce JS 1992 The effects of dopamine on prolactin mRNA levels in rat pituitary cells in culture. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 70:403–407[Medline]
  48. Castro SW, Strange PG 1993 Coupling of D2 and D3 dopamine receptors to G-proteins. FEBS Lett 315:223–226[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Montmayeur J-P, Guiramand J, Borrelli E 1993 Preferential coupling between dopamine D2 receptors and G-proteins. Mol Endocrinol 7:161–170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Montmayeur J-P, Borrelli E 1991 Transcription mediated by a cAMP-responsive promotor element is reduced upon activation of dopamine D2 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3135–3139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Gala RR 1991 Prolactin and growth hormone in the regulation of the immune system. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 198:513–527[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Bern HA 1975 Prolactin and osmoregulation. Am Zool 15:937–949
  53. Tyson JE 1982 The evolutionary role of prolactin in mammalian osmoregulation: effects on fetoplacental hydromineral transport. Semin Perinatol 6:216–228[Medline]
  54. Dutt A, Kaplitt MG, Kow L-M, Pfaff DW 1994 Prolactin, central nervous system and behavior: a critical review. Neuroendocrinology 59:413–419[Medline]
  55. Curlewis JD 1992 Seasonal prolactin secretion and its role in seasonal reproduction: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 4:1–23[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Leong DA, Frawley LS, Neill JD 1983 Neuroendocrine control of prolactin secretion. Annu Rev Physiol 45:109–127[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Zakusov VV, Mineeva-Vialykh MF 1976 Effect of cocaine on the tyrosine hydroxylase of rat hypothalamus. Biull Eksp Biol Med 82:1071–1073[Medline]
  58. Vrana SL, Vrana KE, Koves TR, Smith JE, Dworkin SI 1993 Chronic cocaine administration increases CNS tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme activity and mRNA levels and tryptophan hydroxylase enzyme activity levels. J Neurochem 61:2262–2268[Medline]
  59. Trulson ME, Joe JC, Babb S, Raese JD 1987 Chronic cocaine administration depletes tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the meso-limbic dopamine system in rat brain: quantitative light microscopic studies. Brain Res Bull 19:39–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Masserano JM, Baker I, Natsukari N, Wyatt RJ 1996 Chronic cocaine administration increases tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the ventral tegmental area through glutaminergic- and dopaminergic D2-receptor mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 217:73–76[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Bossé R, Fumagalli F, Jaber M, Giros B, Gainetdinov RR, Wetsel WC, Missale C, Caron MG 1997 Anterior pituitary hypoplasia and dwarfism in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Neuron 19:127–138[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. B. Patisaul, A. E. Fortino, and E. K. Polston
Sex Differences in Serotonergic But Not {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acidergic (GABA) Projections to the Rat Ventromedial Nucleus of the Hypothalamus
Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 397 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Jaubert, G. Drutel, T. Leste-Lasserre, F. Ichas, and L. Bresson-Bepoldin
Tyrosine Hydroxylase and Dopamine Transporter Expression in Lactotrophs from Postlactating Rats: Involvement in Dopamine-Induced Apoptosis
Endocrinology, June 1, 2007; 148(6): 2698 - 2707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. K. Mello, J. H. Mendelson, S. S. Negus, and M. Kelly
Ovarian Steroid Hormone Modulation of the Acute Effects of Cocaine on Luteinizing Hormone and Prolactin Levels in Ovariectomized Rhesus Monkeys
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 156 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan and R. Hnasko
Dopamine as a Prolactin (PRL) Inhibitor
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 724 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Z. B. Andrews, I. C. Kokay, and D. R. Grattan
Dissociation of Prolactin Secretion from Tuberoinfundibular Dopamine Activity in Late Pregnant Rats
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2719 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Freeman, B. Kanyicska, A. Lerant, and G. Nagy
Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1523 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, M. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals