help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shuttlesworth, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Meistrich, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shuttlesworth, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Meistrich, M. L.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 1 37-49
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Enhancement of A Spermatogonial Proliferation and Differentiation in Irradiated Rats by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Administration1

Gladis A. Shuttlesworth, Dirk G. De Rooij, Ilpo Huhtaniemi, Thomas Reissmann, Lonnie D. Russell, Gunapala Shetty, Gene Wilson and Marvin L. Meistrich

Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.A.S., G.S., G.W., M.L.M.), Houston, Texas 77030; the Department of Cell Biology, University of Utrecht (D.G.R.), 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; the Department of Physiology, University of Turku (I.H.), 20520 Turku, Finland; Central Research and Development ASTA Medica AG. (T.R.), D-60314 Frankfurt Aim Main, Germany; and the Department of Physiology, Southern Illinois University (L.D.R.), Carbondale, Illinois 62901

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gladis A. Shuttlesworth, Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030. E-mail: shuttles{at}utmdacc.mdacc.tmc.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The initial changes in the numbers, proliferation, and differentiation of A spermatogonia in irradiated rats after the administration of a GnRH antagonist, which is known to induce differentiation in this system, were investigated. LBNF1 rats were given 6 Gy of {gamma}-irradiation; some were treated with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix beginning 15 weeks after irradiation. Although the spermatogonia in the irradiated rats without hormone treatment continue to proliferate (labeling and mitotic indexes of 24% and 18%, respectively), they underwent apoptosis (apoptotic indexes of 21% by the terminal transferase-mediated end labeling assay and 9% by nuclear morphology), resulting in a constant number of A spermatogonia. Whole mount analysis of clones of A spermatogonia revealed that larger clones were more likely to undergo apoptosis than mitosis. Hormone administration decreased the intratesticular testosterone concentration to 6% of the level in irradiated rats within 1 week. Concomitantly, there was a decrease in spermatogonial apoptotic indexes to 43% of levels in irradiated-only rats, leading to an increases in their numbers by 150%, their diameters by 11%, and their labeling indexes by 31%. The sizes of the mitotic clones gradually increased, and clones of more than eight cells appeared at week 3 of hormone treatment. A spermatogonial differentiation began at week 4, and by week 6.6, differentiation occurred in 30% of the tubules. Thus, suppression of intratesticular testosterone by the GnRH antagonist may be responsible for the immediate changes in spermatogonial numbers and kinetics, but several additional steps are required before differentiation begins, which did not occur until week 4.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE EFFECTS of irradiation on male gonadal tissue in rats and humans include the elimination of differentiating spermatogonia and the later depletion of more advanced spermatogenic cells. The ability of the testis to recover spermatogenesis depends on the survival of some stem spermatogonia and their ability to repopulate the testis with differentiating cells. Humans show prolonged azoospermia after doses of irradiation as low as 1–6 Gy, and spontaneous recovery of spermatogenesis occurs in some men more than 1 yr after irradiation (1). This demonstrates that although stem cells survive irradiation, their ability to differentiate into spermatozoa is impaired for a long time. Similarly, in studies performed in our laboratory on the LBNF1 rat, spermatogenesis fails to recover for 60 weeks after irradiation with doses as low as 3.5 Gy despite the presence of A spermatogonia, which are likely to be stem cells, in the seminiferous tubules. These A spermatogonia were actively proliferating and dividing, but their numbers remained essentially constant and they did not produce differentiating cells (2).

Further studies in our laboratory demonstrated that the administration of hormones that suppress intratesticular testosterone, GnRH analogs, or testosterone itself after irradiation was effective in stimulating the differentiation of these spermatogonia and resulted in the recovery of spermatogenesis (3). When GnRH agonist was given to rats for 10 weeks immediately after 3.5 Gy irradiation, the percentage of tubules containing differentiating cells increased from 37% to 91%. Spermatogenic recovery was also stimulated when the GnRH agonist treatment was initiated 18 weeks after irradiation with 6 Gy, and the treatment was continued for 10 weeks, at which time the rats were killed.

Because in our previous studies of the stimulation of recovery of spermatogenesis by GnRH analogs, the earliest time point analyzed was 10 weeks after the initiation of hormone administration, in this study we addressed the question of when the initiation of spermatogenesis occurs and the sequence of events involved. We therefore examined the proliferation, clonal size, cell loss, and differentiation of A spermatogonia in irradiated rats within the first few weeks after hormone treatment to determine the time course and the degree of synchrony of initiation.

LBNF1 rats were irradiated with 6 Gy of {gamma}-irradiation, and GnRH analog treatment was initiated at 15 weeks after irradiation, because at this time and dose, A spermatogonia are the only germ cells remaining in the testis (2). A GnRH antagonist was used rather than an agonist primarily because it produces a greater suppression of testosterone and stimulation of spermatogenic recovery (Meistrich, M.L., and G. Wilson, unpublished results).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adult LBNF1 male rats (F1 hybrids between Lewis and Brown-Norway) were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN) at 10 weeks of age. Animals were allowed to acclimatize for 1 week before the initiation of the experiment. They were housed in facilities approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care in groups of two, maintained under conditions of controlled temperature and humidity, and given free access to rat chow and water.

Irradiation
Animals were anesthetized with 0.72 mg ketamine/kg and 0.022 mg acepromazine/kg (im), and then a single 6-Gy dose was delivered to the lower part of the abdomen by a 60Co {gamma}-ray unit (Eldorado 8, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Ottawa, Canada). The radiation field was 20 x 20 cm, and four rats were irradiated simultaneously. Superflab material was placed on top of the rats to ensure depth homogeneity of the delivered dose.

Hormone treatment
The GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix, (Ac-D-Nal(2)1-D-Phe(4Cl)2-D-Pal(3)3-D-Cit6-D-Ala10)LHRH (SB-75), was used in two forms. Cetrorelix acetate has high initial release and short duration due to its high solubility. Cetrorelix pamoate has poor solubility and therefore is slowly released and persists in the circulation for longer periods of time (4). Both compounds were synthesized and provided by ASTA Medica, AG (Frankfurt, Germany).

At 15 weeks after irradiation, animals were given simultaneous (sc) injections of 1.5 mg Cetrorelix pamoate (suspended in carboxymethyl-cellulose and 1% Tween-80)/kg and 1.5 mg Cetrorelix acetate (dissolved in bacteriostatic water)/kg, each at a different site in the upper portion of the dorsal region. Both drugs were freshly prepared before they were used. Irradiated animals injected with diluents were used as controls. A second Cetrorelix pamoate injection was given 3.3 weeks after the first. The doses of the hormone were based on the results in Sprague Dawley rats, in which Cetrorelix pamoate at 1.5 mg/kg produced uniform suppression of testosterone levels for 27 days (4). Cetrorelix pamoate, however, did not appear to suppress testosterone levels rapidly. Hence, an initial bolus of Cetrorelix acetate at 1.5 mg/kg was also given to produce a high initial concentration of Cetrorelix in the serum and rapidly reduce testosterone levels. The serum level of Cetrorelix necessary to completely suppress testosterone in the rat is about 1 ng/ml (Reissmann, T., unpublished results).

Preparation of tissues
Two independent experiments were performed (Exp 1 and 2). Animals (eight rats, Exp 1 and 2) were killed at each of the following times except as noted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.6 (four rats, Exp 2) weeks after hormone injection, which correspond to 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21.6 weeks after irradiation, to measure spermatogonial changes. Irradiated rats (8 rats, Exp 1 and 2) without hormone treatment, were killed at 15 weeks and also at 20 weeks after irradiation. Intermediate time points were not taken because previous studies demonstrated that no changes in testicular histology, repopulation indexes, labeling indexes, and serum hormone levels occurred between 10–30 weeks after irradiation (2). All of these rats were injected ip with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma, St Louis, MO) at a dose of 30 mg/kg 1 h before being killed.

Each testis was weighed with the tunica albuginea intact. They were carefully sliced into two pieces with a fresh, double edged razor blade, using a sawing motion. Half of the left testis was fixed in Bouin’s fluid for histological evaluation, counting of A spermatogonia, and determination of repopulation indexes. The tissue was embedded in plastic (JB4, Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA). The other half portion of the left testis was fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for terminal transferase-mediated end labeling (TUNEL) staining using the ApopTag in situ apoptosis detection kit (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). One fourth of the right testis was fixed in 70% ethanol and embedded in plastic for BrdU immunohistochemistry. In all cases, sections were cut at 4-µm thickness and stained or counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. No compression or distortion of tubules or cells resulting from slicing the tissue was observed. Seminiferous tubules were collected from the remaining three fourths of the right testis; they were isolated under a dissecting microscope and immediately placed in Bouin’s fixative for whole mount preparations (5).

For electron microscopy (6), both testes from one normal and three irradiated (6 Gy, 27 weeks after irradiation) rats were prefixed by vascular perfusion using 5% electron microscopic grade glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) in cacodylate buffer (0.05 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.3–7.4). Then testes were postfixed with osmium tetroxide and embedded in araldite, and thin sections were cut between 50–100 nm and viewed under the electron microscope.

A Spermatogonial numbers and mitoses
A Spermatogonial cells and mitoses were counted in 200 nonrepopulating seminiferous tubular cross-sections of Bouin’s fixed tissue. Sertoli cell nuclei, which were much more numerous, were counted in every tenth seminiferous tubular cross-section, but only when their nucleoli were visible. On the average, 220 A spermatogonia and 330 Sertoli cells were counted per rat. For each animal, the diameters of 10 A spermatogonia nuclei and 20 Sertoli cell nucleoli were measured using a Magiscan Image Analysis System (Joyce-Loebl, Ltd., Dukesway, UK) attached to a Nikon light microscope. The average diameters of spermatogonial nuclei and Sertoli cell nucleoli and the section thickness were used to calculate the Abercrombie correction for bias in the estimation of nuclear numbers in cross-sections (7). The corrected counts were used to calculate the ratio of spermatogonia per 100 Sertoli cells, which is an accepted method to account for tubular shrinkage in the comparison of germ cell counts (8). Previous studies showed that the number of Sertoli cells per tubule cross-section remained constant between 10–30 weeks after irradiation (2) and was unaffected by GnRH antagonists (9).

The mitotic index was calculated by dividing the number of mitotic cells by the sum of A spermatogonia plus mitotic cells. The diameters of the A spermatogonial mitoses were calculated by averaging the width of the widest spread chromosomes and the distance covered by chromosomes in the perpendicular direction to the width. The Abercrombie correction was also used in the evaluation of mitotic index.

Apoptosis of spermatogonia.
Two different measures of apoptosis were used. The numbers of TUNEL-positive cells were scored in 200 round seminiferous tubular cross-sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material. A cell was considered TUNEL positive when the nuclear staining was intense and homogenous. Nuclear diameters of TUNEL-positive A spermatogonia were measured, and the Abercrombie correction was applied. The apoptotic index was calculated by dividing the numbers of TUNEL-positive spermatogonia per Sertoli cell by the numbers of spermatogonia per Sertoli cell obtained from Bouin’s-fixed tissue from the same testis. This was performed because identification of spermatogonia in formalin-fixed tissue was difficult.

In addition, cells that had apoptotic morphology were evaluated in 200 round seminiferous tubular cross-sections in Bouin’s-fixed plastic-embedded material. The criterion for apoptosis was the appearance of dense chromatin bodies distributed in the cell nucleus (10). The diameters of the apoptotic A spermatogonial nuclei were measured. The apoptotic index was calculated by dividing the number of apoptotic A spermatogonia by the total number of A spermatogonia scored in the same tubules after applying the Abercrombie correction.

BrdU labeling index
Ethanol-fixed, plastic-embedded, sectioned tissue was processed for BrdU immunohistochemistry as previously described (2) with a slight modification. Briefly, the section was digested with 0.1% protease (protease, bacterial type XXIV, Sigma) for 15 min at room temperature. Tissue was incubated with a monoclonal antibody against BrdU (clone B44, BrdU Pure, catalogue no. 347580, Becton Dickinson and Co., San Jose, CA) diluted 1:20 in blocking solution (PBS, 5% normal horse serum, 1% BSA, and 0.5% Tween 20). The reaction was developed by the addition of antimouse IgG biotinylated secondary antibody from the Vectastain kit (catalogue no. PK-6102, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). After immunohistochemistry, slides were counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. The labeling index was calculated by dividing the number of A spermatogonial cell nuclei that were positive for BrdU by the total number of A spermatogonia plus mitoses counted in 200 seminiferous tubular cross-sections. There were no differences between the average diameters of BrdU-labeled and unlabeled A spermatogonia; hence there was no need to apply the Abercrombie correction in this case.

Assessment of A spermatogonial differentiation
Spermatogonial differentiation was assessed in Bouin’s-fixed, plastic-embedded tissue by calculating the repopulation index, which is the percentage of tubules showing repopulation, in 200 round seminiferous tubular cross-sections. A tubule was scored as repopulated if it contained 3 or more germ cells that had reached the B spermatogonial stage or later.

Sizes of A spermatogonial clones
The clonal size of the A spermatogonia was determined in tubule whole mounts. Tubules were dissected from irradiated rats (four rats, Exp 1) at the following time points: 15 and 20 weeks after irradiation and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks after initiation of GnRH antagonist treatment starting at 15 weeks after irradiation. Isolated tubules were stained with hematoxylin and mounted on slides (5). Per animal, 15–25 randomly selected fragments, 1–3 cm in length, were studied. All clones encountered along the length of the tubule were evaluated.

The spermatogonial clones were distributed over the basal membrane with a varying cell density. In general, the criterion used is that undifferentiated A spermatogonia lying within 20 µm of each other and showing the same morphology belong to the same clone (11, 12). However, because of the high density of A spermatogonia in the shrunken tubuli, it was often not possible to distinguish the individual clones reliably. The A spermatogonia that belong to the same clone are connected by intercellular bridges, and therefore, the cells comprising a clone will go through the cell cycle in a synchronous fashion. As mitosis is of short duration, neighboring cells simultaneously in mitosis will most likely belong to the same clone. Therefore, the determination of clonal size in the present study was carried out by only scoring clones in mitosis. Spermatogonia were considered to belong to the same clone when they were lying within 20 µm of each other and were synchronously in prophase, metaphase, or anaphase of mitosis.

Apoptotic spermatogonia were characterized by dense condensation of chromatin into peripheral masses or a marginated condensed chromatin. As apoptosis is also a process of short duration, apoptotic cells lying within 20 µm from each other were also considered to belong to the same clone.

Hormone measurements
In addition to the rats used for histological analysis, irradiated animals (4 rats, Exp 1) were killed at 1, 2, 4, and 5 weeks of hormone treatment in all cases, except at 3 weeks of hormone treatment when more animals were used (7 rats, Exp 1 and 2), for preparation of testicular homogenates for intratesticular testosterone analysis. To measure immediate changes in hormone levels, animals (four rats, Exp 2) were killed after 1 and 2 days of Cetrorelix treatment. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture from all irradiated animals used in the experiment (4–15/group) at the time the rats were killed. In addition, 4 unirradiated 13-week-old rats were used as controls. The serum was collected by centrifugation. After removal of the tunica albuginea, the right testis was homogenized in 5 ml deionized water using a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Steinhofhalde, Switzerland).

Serum Cetrorelix concentrations were measured using a double antibody RIA (13). Standards were prepared from a working stock of 4 µg/ml Cetrorelix acetate in RIA buffer [sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 2% BSA, 1% EDTA, and 0.02% Triton X-100] by serial 1:2 dilution steps. The RIA was set up by diluting the samples or standards, iodinated Cetrorelix, and Cetrorelix antiserum in RIA buffer and incubating at 4 C for 2 days. Antibody-bound and nonbound radiolabeled Cetrorelix were separated by precipitation using goat antirabbit IgG, rabbit IgG, and polyethylene glycol, and the pellet (antibody-bound fraction) was counted in a {gamma}-counter. The Cetrorelix concentration in the samples was calculated; the lower limit of detection was 0.24 ng/ml.

Serum LH concentrations were measured by a supersensitive immunofluorometric assay for the rat (14) using NIDDK rLH RP-2 as the standard. FSH concentrations were measured by double antibody RIA using the NIDDK assay kits and rFSH RP-2 as standards (15). The lower limit of detection was 0.04 ng/ml for LH and 5 ng/ml for FSH.

Serum and intratesticular testosterone levels were measured using testosterone antiserum-coated tube RIA kits (catalogue no. DS 4000, Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX) with some modifications from the manufacturer’s instructions. The testosterone standards for serum testosterone measurements were prepared in rat serum stripped with dextran-coated charcoal (catalogue no. 6197, Sigma). Intratesticular testosterone standards were prepared in a solution containing 0.1% gelatin dissolved in PBS.

Statistical analysis
Results were presented as either the mean ± SEM calculated from the untransformed data or as the mean (+SEM, -SEM) calculated from log-transformed data obtained from individual rats.

Data were tested for statistical significance using the SPSS, Inc. statistical computer program (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether differences between groups were significant. If differences were significant (P < 0.05), further analysis were performed. The data for animals receiving irradiation alone and killed at 15 and 20 weeks were compared; their data were pooled if the values were not significantly different at P < 0.05. Dunnett’s pairwise multiple comparison test was then used for post-hoc evaluation of differences between different hormone-treated groups and the control irradiated-only groups. Tukey’s highest significant difference multiple comparison test was used for post-hoc evaluation of differences among GnRH antagonist-treated groups. The significance of the differences was P < 0.05, unless otherwise stated.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results displayed here were from two independent experiments. All trends in each experiment were similar, and the results presented in the paper are pooled data.

Cetrorelix and hormone analysis
Cetrorelix levels in serum at day 1 after hormone administration were extremely high, but they continuously decreased through week 3 before the second injection (Fig. 1AGo). At week 3, Cetrorelix levels averaged 1.6 ng/ml. Five of 11 rats had levels less than 1 ng/ml, and 4 of these had undetectable levels. Hence, the sustained release of pamoate was sometimes, but not always, sufficient to provide enough drug for 3–4 weeks. The second injection (Cetrorelix pamoate alone) at 3.3 weeks (18.3 weeks after irradiation) appeared to increase Cetrorelix levels, which then gradually decreased.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serum Cetrorelix, gonadotropins, and intratesticular testosterone levels in rats after irradiation with 6 Gy and treatment with Cetrorelix, a GnRH antagonist, at 15 weeks after irradiation. Filled square, unirradiated rats; filled circles, irradiated-only rats; open circles, irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rats. Arrows indicate points that were off the scale. Values are the mean ± SEM [n = 4–15 in Exp 1 and 2 (A, B, C) and n = 4–7 in Exp 2 (D)]. Statistical significance of difference compared with irradiated-only rats: *, P < 0.05. A and B indicate significant differences from a and b, respectively, among GnRH antagonist-treated rats.

 
As previously reported (2), serum FSH levels in irradiated-only rats increased by 35% above the levels found in unirradiated rats (Fig. 1BGo). GnRH antagonist administration significantly decreased serum FSH levels to 74% of the levels in irradiated-only animals on day 3. A slight progressive reduction to near the levels in unirradiated rats appear to occur with longer treatment times.

Serum LH levels were increased about 2-fold by irradiation (Fig. 1CGo). GnRH antagonist caused an immediate decrease in LH on day 1 of treatment to about the levels observed in unirradiated rats. Levels fell below the limit of detection at week 6.6 after hormone administration.

An immediate reduction of serum testosterone to 20% of levels in irradiated-only rats was observed on day 1 of Cetrorelix administration (data not shown). Except for a slight increase at 3 weeks, levels progressively decreased to 5% at 5 weeks. In irradiated rats, the intratesticular testosterone concentration (nanograms per g testis) was approximately 3- to 4-fold higher in irradiated than in unirradiated rats (Fig. 1DGo). At 1 day of GnRH antagonist administration, levels of intratesticular testosterone were markedly suppressed to 23% of the values in irradiated-only animals. In general, there appeared to be a steady decline in intratesticular testosterone levels between 1 day and 5 weeks. The transient fluctuation in intratesticular testosterone levels observed at week 3 may have been due to the decline in serum levels of Cetrorelix in some animals below the 1 ng/ml required for suppression of LH and testosterone production. The second injection of Cetrorelix at 3.3 weeks produced an apparent further decline to less than 1% by week 5.

Testicular weight
The weight of this organ in the irradiated-only rats (0.53 g) was 35% of that in unirradiated rats (1.5 g) and did not change significantly between 15 and 20 weeks after irradiation. Administration of GnRH antagonist to the irradiated rats reduced testis weight from 0.51 g at 1 day of treatment to 0.28 g at 6.6 weeks.

Morphological analysis
In normal rats, Sertoli cell nuclei are ovoid, pyramidal, or triangular (Fig. 2AGo). In irradiated rats, Sertoli cell nuclei were more elongated and irregular, had more invaginations, and occasionally appeared twisted or coiled (Fig. 2BGo). These features were confirmed by electron microscopy (not shown). The Sertoli cells had a similar irregular appearance in the irradiated rats after GnRH antagonist administration (Fig. 2CGo). In the irradiated rats, one to three Leydig cells per cross-section were undergoing mitosis (not shown); dividing Leydig cells were not observed in adult unirradiated rats. Administration of GnRH antagonist caused some shrinkage in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the Leydig cells after several weeks. No mitoses of Leydig cells were observed in the rats that received GnRH antagonist.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cross-sections of seminiferous tubules of unirradiated rats and rats after irradiation with 6 Gy with and without GnRH antagonist treatment. A, Unirradiated rat, at stages II-III of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. B, Irradiated-only rat. C, Irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rat (hematoxylin staining). Undifferentiated A spermatogonia are indicated by an arrow. Arrowheads, Sertoli cell nuclei with irregular shape. D, Arrow, TUNEL-stained section from an irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rat (5 weeks of treatment). The cell with nuclear staining is a reddish-brown color. Asterisks, Normal spermatogonium showing blue staining. E, Hematoxylin-stained section from irradiated rats. Arrow, Apoptotic cell showing highly condensed fragmented chromatin. Asterisk, Normal spermatogonium. F, A repopulating seminiferous tubule from an irradiated rat after 5 weeks of GnRH antagonist treatment containing primary spermatocytes (arrow) is shown adjacent to a nonrepopulating tubule marked by an X. Tissue in A, B, C, E, and F were fixed in Bouin’s solution and embedded in plastic; tissue in D was formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. Magnification: A, B, C, D, and E, x1100; F, x250. B, C, D, E, and F are from Exp 1 and 2.

 
The A spermatogonia, which were essentially the only germ cells observed in the irradiated rats, were studied in detail. The A spermatogonia were nearly round (length/width ratio, 1.2; Fig. 2BGo) with fairly granular chromatin dispersed throughout the nucleus. There was little heterochromatin along the nuclear membrane. Nucleoli (usually one or two), which were not as round as those seen in Sertoli cells, appeared just inside the nuclear membrane and/or near the center of the nucleus. The spermatogonia from the irradiated rats were similar to some of the undifferentiated A spermatogonia observed in stages II-III of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of normal rats (Fig. 2AGo), except that they were about 15% larger and were more uniformly round. The morphology of the A spermatogonia in irradiated rats was not changed by the hormone treatment (Fig. 2CGo). However, in ethanol-fixed tissue the diameter of the A spermatogonia significantly increased from 7.8 ± 0.2 µm in the irradiated-only rats to 8.9 ± 0.1 µm in the hormone-treated rats (Fig. 3AGo). This increase in spermatogonial diameter was significant already after only 1 week of GnRH antagonist treatment. Similarly, spermatogonial diameter in Bouin’s-fixed testicular cross-sections increased from 8.6 ± 0.1 µm in irradiated-only animals to 9.2 ± 0.2 µm in the hormone-treated animals, but the differences at individual weeks were significant only at weeks 2 and 5.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of GnRH antagonist on A spermatogonia in nonrepopulating tubules in irradiated rats and irradiated rats treated with GnRH antagonist. GnRH antagonist treatment began 15 weeks after irradiation with 6 Gy. A, Diameter of A spermatogonia. B, Number of A spermatogonia per 100 Sertoli cells. C, BrdU labeling index of the A spermatogonia. D, Mitotic index. Filled circles, Irradiated-only rats; open circles, irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rats. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 4–8 in Exp 1 and 2). A and B indicate significant differences from a and b, respectively, among GnRH antagonist-treated rats.

 
Evaluation of A spermatogonial morphology in the irradiated rats by electron microscopy (Fig. 4AGo) revealed no alteration in cell morphology from control rats (not shown). The cell, as in unirradiated rats, was in contact with the basement membrane and contained a nucleus with dispersed chromatin and a nucleolus adjacent to the nuclear membrane. The cytoplasm had a sparse content of cell organelles, which is typical of these undifferentiated cells. In addition, mitotic A spermatogonia (Fig. 4BGo) were observed in the irradiated rats. The nuclear envelope was absent, and the chromatin was compact and dense as it formed the chromosomes. The mitotic cells remained attached to the basement membrane and showed no degenerative changes.



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Electron micrographs of A spermatogonia in irradiated rats. The basement membrane is indicated (bm). A, Interphase cell with a nucleus (n) showing normal dispersed chromatin and cytoplasm (c) containing cell organelles. B, A mitotic cell showing condensed chromatin (cc) and no nuclear membrane. Magnification, x4680.

 
Sertoli cell and A spermatogonial numbers
The average diameters of Sertoli cell nucleoli in Bouin’s fixed tissue was 1.5 µm in all groups. In the current study the number of Sertoli cells per round tubular cross-section was 12.5 ± 0.4 µm in the irradiated-only animals and 12.7 ± 0.5 in the GnRH-treated irradiated rats, confirming previous studies (2, 9) that there were no significant changes with time over the 15- to 20-week period.

The numbers of A spermatogonia per Sertoli cell were determined in Bouin’s-fixed tissue. The administration of GnRH antagonist significantly increased A spermatogonial numbers (Fig. 3BGo). This increase was readily evident at week 1 after the hormone administration, and the level remained significantly above the values for the irradiated-only animals throughout the duration of the experiment.

Proliferation of A spermatogonia
To determine whether the increases in A spermatogonial numbers were a result of increased cell proliferation, we measured their labeling (Fig. 3CGo) and mitotic indexes (Fig. 3DGo). The BrdU labeling index of A spermatogonia averaged 24% in irradiated-only animals. The GnRH antagonist increased the labeling index to 35% within 1 week of treatment and remained above the value for the irradiated-only animals throughout the course of the GnRH antagonist administration. The diameters of mitoses measured in Bouin’s-fixed material were 9.3 ± 0.1 µm in the irradiated-only groups and 10.0 ± 0.3 µm in the GnRH antagonist-treated groups. The mitotic index of A spermatogonia in irradiated rats was 18%. Because this mitotic index was unexpectedly high, we wondered whether the cells were arrested in mitosis. However, no degenerating or TUNEL-positive mitotic cells were apparent. Electron microscopy confirmed the normal morphology and the absence of degenerative changes in the mitotic cells. In contrast to the labeling index, the mitotic index decreased significantly at the first week of GnRH antagonist treatment, to about 10%. Thereafter, the mitotic index increased to values at or above those in irradiated-only rats, reaching 23% at 6.6 weeks. This value was significantly different from that obtained at week 1 of hormone administration.

Evaluation of cell loss
As changes in numbers of A spermatogonia during the administration of the GnRH antagonist were affected not only by changes in cell proliferation but also by cell loss, we investigated A spermatogonial apoptosis. The nuclear diameters of TUNEL-positive A spermatogonia were 6.8 ± 0.1 µm in the irradiated-only rats and 7.4 ± 0.3 µm in the irradiated GnRH-treated rats. The Sertoli cell nucleolar diameter in this formalin-fixed tissue was 1.5 µm in all groups. Likewise, the diameters of the apoptotic A spermatogonial nuclei were 7.8 ± 0.3 µm for the irradiated rats and 7.6 ± 0.2 µm in the irradiated GnRH-antagonist-treated rats. The levels of apoptosis in the irradiated-only rats as measured by the TUNEL assay (Fig. 2DGo) and nuclear apoptotic morphology (Fig. 2EGo) averaged 31 ± 4% and 8.7 ± 0.3%, respectively (Figs. 5AGo and 5BGo). The quantitative difference (P < 0.01) between these two values may be a result of the different duration of times that an apoptotic cell spends in a stage where it is TUNEL positive (probably an earlier stage of apoptosis) and in a stage where chromatin fragmentation has occurred. It was noted that some cells that had apoptotic nuclear morphology did not show positive staining in the TUNEL reaction and vice versa. All apoptotic cells had round nuclei and basal positions within the seminiferous epithelium, indicating that they were spermatogonia and not Sertoli cells.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Cell loss and differentiation of A spermatogonia in rats irradiated with 6 Gy and given GnRH antagonist at 15 weeks after irradiation. A, The percentage of A spermatogonia that are TUNEL positive. B, The percentage of A spermatogonia that have apoptotic morphology. C, The percentage of seminiferous tubules that showed repopulation. Filled circles, Irradiated-only rats; open circles, irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rats. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 4–8 in Exp 1 and 2). A and B indicate significant differences from a and b, respectively, among GnRH antagonist-treated rats.

 
One week of GnRH antagonist administration significantly reduced the apoptotic index, as measured by the TUNEL assay, from 31 ± 4% to 11.8 ± 2.1% and, as measured by nuclear morphology, from 8.7 ± 0.3% to 3.0 ± 0.6%. Qualitatively, the results obtained by nuclear morphology were in agreement with those obtained by the TUNEL assay, but the former were more consistent within groups of rats.

As GnRH antagonist treatment was continued, the apoptotic index as measured by both methods gradually increased, but generally remained below the values obtained for irradiated-only animals. The increased values obtained at 6.6 weeks by the TUNEL assay (51 ± 15%) and nuclear morphology (8.0 ± 0.7%) were significantly different compared with values at weeks 1 and 2. The increase in the apoptotic index by nuclear morphology from week 1 (3.0 ± 0.6%) to week 3 (6.6 ± 0.8%) was also significant. This increase in apoptosis at week 3 could have been a consequence of the failure to maintain suppression in some animals throughout the entire course of the study, but that does not explain the continued elevation at later times.

Clonal size of A spermatogonia
Whole mounts of seminiferous tubules, in which the topographical arrangement of cells is visible, were used to determine the clonal size of A spermatogonia. Except for rare differentiating clones of intermediate and B spermatogonia and/or spermatocytes, the only germ cells present at 15–20 weeks after irradiation were A spermatogonia. Interphase clones were not counted because of uncertainty in determining whether all cells belonged to a single clone (Fig. 6AGo). A striking feature of the clones of undifferentiated spermatogonia in the irradiated tubules was the occurrence of clumps of A spermatogonia, i.e. more than one nucleus in one cytoplasm (Fig. 6CGo). Sometimes the morphological picture suggested the breaking up of larger clones into smaller groups. Interestingly, clumps containing mitotic nuclei were rare, suggesting that the clumps could not develop further and were doomed to die.



View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Photographs of the cells on the basal membrane of whole mounts of seminiferous tubules in irradiated rats. A, Large group of 16 A spermatogonia (stars). Because of differences in size and form, it is difficult to know whether these cells belong to the same clone of cells interconnected by intercellular bridges. Arrows, Sertoli cell nuclei. B, Apr spermatogonia in mitosis (arrows). C, Group of 12 A spermatogonia (stars), eight of which seem to be clumped pairs (arrows indicate four pairs clumped in common cytoplasm). D, Large group of apoptotic spermatogonia (stars). Arrows indicate large apoptotic bodies, which could have arisen from clumps of spermatogonia that entered apoptosis. A, B, C, and D are from Exp 1.

 
The clonal size of the A spermatogonia were better evaluated in mitotic clones. Although most of the mitotic clones consisted of 2n cells, 11% were odd numbered (not consisting of 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 cells). The great majority of the mitotic clones of A spermatogonia consisted of 1 or 2 cells (Fig. 6BGo). Only about 5% of mitotic clones were larger than 4 cells, and less than 1% were larger than 8 cells (Fig. 7AGo). There were no mitotic clones of 16 cells. These values are much lower than the percentages of interphase clones containing 4, 8, and 16 cells found in the normal rat (16).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Distribution of the sizes of mitotic and apoptotic clones of A spermatogonia in irradiated rats obtained from whole mount preparations at 15 and 20 weeks (values pooled) after irradiation. A, Mitotic clones. B, Apoptotic clones. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 8 in Exp 1).

 
Apoptotic clones were also observed in irradiated rats (Fig. 6DGo). The morphology of the apoptotic cells within a clone varied considerably. The apoptotic clones were primarily composed of 1, 2, 4, and 8 cells, but 2.5% contained 16 cells (Fig. 7BGo). The percentages of apoptotic clones relative to mitotic clones increased as the number of cells in the clone increased; the ratios of the percentages at sizes 1, 2, 4, and 8 were 0.7, 0.6, 4.0, and 14.4, respectively. These results indicate that larger clones are more likely to undergo an apoptotic rather than a mitotic process.

The administration of GnRH antagonist altered the clonal sizes of the spermatogonia. The average size of the mitotic clones increased progressively from a value of 2.1 in the irradiated-only rats to 2.9 after 5 weeks of treatment. The percentage of the mitotic clones consisting of single cells decreased from 41% in the irradiated-only rats to 29% after 5 weeks of hormone treatment (Fig. 8AGo). This trend appeared to begin at week 2. The percentages of mitotic clones consisting of 8 cells in all groups of GnRH antagonist-treated rats were above the values of the irradiated-only animals (Fig. 8BGo). Although values at individual time points were not significantly above control values, the difference became significant when values of irradiated-only and irradiated, hormone-treated animals at different time points were pooled and compared. In addition, there appeared to be a gradual increase in the percentage of mitotic clones containing more than 8 cells beginning at week 3 after GnRH antagonist treatment and reaching 1% at week 5 (Fig. 8CGo). Furthermore, the size of the apoptotic clones was increased by GnRH antagonist treatment from 3.4 cells in the irradiated rats to about 5.4 after 4–5 weeks of treatment. Nevertheless, it was clear that apoptotic clones of all sizes, from single cells up to more than 16 cells, were still present.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Percentages of mitotic clones of different sizes obtained from whole mount preparations after irradiation and GnRH antagonist treatment. A, Single mitosis; B, 8 mitotic cells; C, more than 8 mitotic cells. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 4 in Exp 1). Significant differences between groups among GnRH antagonist-treated rats are indicated by letters in italics (A is significantly different from a).

 
Differentiation of A spermatogonia
The differentiation of A spermatogonia was evaluated by measuring the repopulation index. The germ cell population of irradiated-only animals at 15–21.6 weeks after irradiation consisted of essentially only surviving A spermatogonia; the average repopulation index was only 0.5%. The repopulating index in GnRH antagonist-treated animals began to increase at week 4 (3.3%) and steadily increased to 7.3% at week 5 and to almost 30% at week 6.6 of treatment (Fig. 5CGo). The most advanced cell populations observed in the repopulated tubules at 5 weeks of GnRH antagonist treatment were generally primary spermatocytes (Fig. 2FGo). The initiation of differentiation of spermatogonia did not occur synchronously in all tubules, as some tubules showed initiation at 4 weeks, others not until 6.6 weeks, and 70% of the tubules did not show any differentiation at all in this experiment.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Spermatogonial kinetics in normal vs. irradiated rats
Spermatogonial kinetics in normal rats has been extensively studied by Huckins (16). According to her model of stem cell renewal (Fig. 9AGo), isolated A spermatogonia (As) divide to produce either new As spermatogonia or a pair of A spermatogonia (Apr) joined by an intercellular bridge. Most of these Apr then undergo further divisions to produce aligned spermatogonia (Aal) in chains of 4, 8, 16, and even occasionally 32. These chains enter a long G1 phase of their cell cycle, and at about stage VII of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium morphologically differentiate into A1 spermatogonia. No apoptosis of the undifferentiated spermatogonia has been reported during normal spermatogenesis.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Model comparing spermatogonial self-renewal and differentiation in normal rats (A) (16 ) with that proposed in irradiated rats (B) and irradiated, GnRH antagonist-treated rats (C). In normal rats some of the divisions of the As spermatogonia produce two As cells, whereas other divisions produce an Apr clone. The arrows with A1 at their termini indicate differentiation into A1 spermatogonia. The arrows with D at their termini indicate death by apoptosis. The values of P next to these arrows are the probabilities that the cells will undergo apoptotic death.

 
In the seminiferous tubules from these irradiated rats, A spermatogonia were virtually the only germ cells found. The nature of these A spermatogonia can be deduced from their clonal size. In the normal epithelium, all chains of 8 or 16 Aal spermatogonia and some chains of 4 are able to differentiate into A1 spermatogonia (17, 18). As clonal sizes further double at each subsequent division as intercellular bridges are formed between the daughter cells at each division, chains of A2 spermatogonia consist of at least 8, and mostly 16 or 32, cells. The present results show that in the irradiated rat, A spermatogonial clones of more than 4 cells were rare, indicating that these cells have to be undifferentiated spermatogonia, apparently being unable to develop further.

These cells were actively proliferating, as shown by their high labeling index and mitotic index. Thus, the model of stem cell renewal, in which the undifferentiated A spermatogonia proliferate (16), also applies to the irradiated rat (Fig. 9BGo). The 18% mitotic index is unusually high, even for cells in culture, of which 100% are proliferating. For example, the mitotic index of HeLa cells in exponential growth is 2% (19). The high mitotic index in the irradiated-only animals could be due to either a long mitotic phase (18% of the cycle) or to a block at mitosis, although the latter is unlikely based on the failure to observe degenerating mitotic cells.

Despite this proliferation, the number of A spermatogonia remains constant. This was due to extensive apoptosis of the undifferentiated spermatogonia, which appears to be the major mechanism by which these cells are lost. Hence, in the model proposed in Fig. 9BGo, a probability of apoptosis of the undifferentiated spermatogonia is included. Although we do not know in which phase of the cell cycle this apoptosis occurs, the assumption that it occurs at several phases of the cell cycle, including G1 and G2, is most consistent with the responses seen after GnRH antagonist administration. The probabilities of apoptosis at the various stages were estimated from the ratios of apoptotic index to mitotic index for different clonal sizes and the ratios of numbers of mitotic clones of different sizes. The increase in the probability of apoptosis with increasing clonal size supports the suggestion that these cells are more likely to die as the numbers of cells in the clone increase, and most of the clones of undifferentiated spermatogonia are lost before the mitotic divisions of the Aal (4). The apoptosis observed in the undifferentiated Aal spermatogonia of irradiated rats is in contrast to the situation in normal rats, in which apoptosis occurs primarily in the A2 and A3 spermatogonia (20). Interestingly, apoptosis in A3 spermatogonia was described in rats at long times after exposure to 2,5-hexanedione (21). This toxicant’s effects in testicular tissue are similar to those of irradiation. After exposure to either agent, no cells beyond A spermatogonia are produced, and cell loss occurs primarily by apoptosis.

In these models for both normal and irradiated rats, only clones of size 2n are predicted. In the present study, clones consisting of odd numbers of cells (i.e. not 2n) constituted 11% of the mitotic clones in the irradiated rats. It is not clear whether this is abnormal, as disparate results have been reported for the percentages of odd-numbered clones in normal mice, ranging from less than 1% (22) to 12% (23). On the other hand, Huckins (16) did not report the incidence of odd-numbered clones in normal rats, but stated that clones invariably followed a 2n distribution. The fact that we found odd-numbered clones may have been due to a failure to count all cells in the clone due to their position in the tubule or to some asynchrony of the cells. Alternatively, clonal fragmentation (24) could have occurred. If the odd-numbered apoptotic clones are indeed real, then this could indicate that only part of a clone could undergo apoptosis, leaving behind an odd-numbered clone to undergo the next mitosis.

Hormonal effects of GnRH antagonist treatment
The effects of Cetrorelix were quite rapid, resulting in declines in FSH and LH within 1 day, followed by a steady decrease over the 6.6-week treatment period. The higher values of intratesticular testosterone at 3 weeks were a result of the low serum Cetrorelix concentration in some animals of this group.

However, despite the failure to maintain serum levels of the antagonist throughout the period, its effectiveness in stimulating the recovery of spermatogenesis surpassed that achieved by a GnRH agonist. In this study the repopulation index was 28% after 6.6 weeks of antagonist administration, exceeding the value of 14.5% obtained after 10 weeks of GnRH agonist administration, which was also given in a depot form beginning at 18 weeks after irradiation with 6 Gy (3).

Spermatogonial kinetics after GnRH antagonist treatment
The responses to GnRH antagonist treatment will be discussed in terms of the model for spermatogonial kinetics in the irradiated rat. At week 1 of hormone treatment the reduction of the apoptotic and mitotic indexes as well as the increases in nuclear diameter and the labeling index clearly indicate the immediate effect of hormonal administration on these cells.

We believe that the decrease in the apoptotic index to about 40% of the level in irradiated-only rats within 1 week of GnRH antagonist administration is responsible for subsequent changes. The decline in apoptosis affects all clonal sizes, so we will assume that the values of P for As to Aal (4) spermatogonia are reduced to 40% of those in the irradiated-only rats shown in Fig. 9CGo. This decrease in apoptosis results in an increase in the number of cells, as those cells that would have died survive and accumulate. Three observations suggest that apoptosis was reduced by GnRH antagonist preferentially in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. These are the increase in labeling index when apoptosis is reduced due to a greater proportion of cells entering S phase, the increase in spermatogonial nuclear diameter resulting from further progression through the cell cycle before undergoing apoptosis, and the initial suppression of the mitotic index due to the increase in the number of cells that do not reach mitosis because apoptosis still occurs in G2.

Another change, which was observed beginning at weeks 2 and 3 of GnRH administration, was a decrease in the percentages of mitotic clones that consisted of one cell and an increase in the percentages of clones with eight or more cells. This increase was expected, because the reduction of apoptosis allows the smaller clones to become larger by mitotic division. However, after several weeks of GnRH antagonist administration, the mitotic index and apoptotic index again rise. The rise in the apoptotic index could have been a result of the increase in clonal size, as larger clones are more susceptible to apoptosis in the irradiated testis. If G1 apoptosis is still active in Aal (8) and Aal (16), there will be a restoration of the mitotic index toward the level in the irradiated rat. However, this does not explain why the labeling index and nuclear size do not decrease.

Finally, between weeks 3–4 of GnRH antagonist treatment, the differentiation of spermatogonia was initiated, although in only a small percentage of tubules. It is not known whether the pathway of differentiation completely replaces apoptosis in those tubules. However, if we assume that efficient recruitment to A1 only occurs in the Aal (16) and is competing with G1 apoptosis, this explains why the repopulation index follows the incidence of clones of more than eight cells.

Implications regarding mechanisms of recovery
Although testosterone and, to a lesser degree, FSH are required for survival of the later differentiated germ cells in normal adult rats, spermatogonial numbers are unaffected by GnRH antagonist treatment (9), and the undifferentiated A spermatogonia are only marginally reduced in number by hypophysectomy (25). Thus, these cells do not have a requirement for high levels of FSH and testosterone for survival. However, what is unique about this study is that GnRH antagonist treatment actually stimulates spermatogonial survival and differentiation in the irradiated rat.

Among the various hormonal changes that ensue from GnRH antagonist treatment, we have evidence that it is only the reduction in levels of testosterone (intratesticular testosterone and serum) that is responsible for the recovery of spermatogenesis (Shetty, G., unpublished results). It is interesting to compare the effect of testosterone on the reinitiation of spermatogenesis in the irradiated rat with the initiation of spermatogenesis in normal immature rats, which occurs when testosterone levels are very low. Whereas exogenous testosterone inhibits initiation of spermatogenesis in the irradiated and GnRH analog-treated rat (Shetty, G., unpublished results), it failed to inhibit initiation of spermatogonial development and differentiation in immature rats (26, 27).

In this study we have demonstrated that the administration of Cetrorelix, a GnRH antagonist, to rats beginning 15 weeks after irradiation stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of A spermatogonia. As A spermatogonia do not possess androgen receptors (28), it is assumed that alterations in factors secreted by surrounding androgen-responsive cells as a consequence of the decrease in intratesticular testosterone are responsible for the changes observed in spermatogonia. The Sertoli cell is the most likely candidate because of its proximity to the germ cells and its known production of paracrine factors (29). Changes in the paracrine environment must occur within 1 week (concomitant with the fall in intratesticular testosterone concentration), as changes in spermatogonia were observed at this time. The 4-week time interval before the start of spermatogonial differentiation indicates that slow acting intermediate steps might be required to establish appropriate paracrine environment for this event.

These results demonstrate that even as late as 15 weeks after a dose of radiation (6 Gy) that would produce prolonged azoospermia in humans (30), recovery of spermatogenesis could be stimulated by suppression of testosterone. However, the delay in initiation and the incomplete nature of recovery indicate that treatment times with GnRH analogs longer than 6.6 weeks are necessary in rodents and in potential clinical trials of recovery of spermatogenesis in cancer patients.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mr. Peter Romeis, Department of Biochemistry of ASTA Medica AG, for carrying out the Cetrorelix RIA. The assistance of Mr. Abraham Kuriakose with histological preparations, and that of Mr. Walter Pagel, Department of Scientific Publication at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, with editorial advice are greatly appreciated.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Research Grant ES-08075 from the NIH/NIEHS and Core Grant CA-16672 from the NIH. Back

Received May 25, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hahn EW, Feingold SM, Simpson L, Batata M 1982 Recovery from aspermia induced by low-dose radiation in seminoma patients. Cancer 50:337–340[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kangasniemi M, Huhtaniemi I, Meistrich ML 1996 Failure of spermatogenesis to recover despite the presence of A spermatogonia in the irradiated LBNF1 rat. Biol Reprod 54:1200–1208[Abstract]
  3. Meistrich ML, Kangasniemi M 1997 Hormone treatment after irradiation stimulates recovery of rat spermatogenesis from surviving spermatogonia. J Androl 18:80–87[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Reissmann TH, Klenner TH, Deger W, Hilgard P, McGregor GP, Voigt K, Engel J 1996 Pharmacological studies with Cetrorelix (SB-75), a potent antagonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Eur J Cancer 32A:1574–1579
  5. Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB 1993 Spermatogonial stem cells: assessing their survival and ability to produce differentiated cells. In: Chapin RE, Heindel J (eds) Methods in Toxicology. Academic Press, New York, vol 3A:106–123
  6. Sprando RL 1990 Perfusion of the rat testis through the heart using heparin. In: Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED (eds) Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Cache River Press, Clearwater, pp 277–280
  7. Abercrombie M 1946 Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections. Anat Rec 94:239–247[CrossRef]
  8. Dym M, Clermont Y 1970 Role of spermatogonia in the repair of the seminiferous epithelium following x-irradiation of the rat testis. Am J Anat 128:265–282[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Sinha Hikim AP, Swerdloff RS 1993 Temporal and stage-specific changes in spermatogenesis of rat after gonadotropin deprivation by a potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment. Endocrinology 133:2161–2170[Abstract]
  10. Kerr JFR, Winterford CM, Harmon BV 1994 Apoptosis: its significance in cancer and cancer therapy. Cancer 73:2013–2026[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Huckins C 1971 The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation. Anat Rec 169:533–558[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. de Rooij DG 1973 Spermatogonial stem cell renewal in the mouse I. Normal situation. Cell Tissue Kinet 6:281–287[Medline]
  13. Csernus VJ, Szende B, Groot K, Redding TW, Schally AV 1990 Development of radioimmunoassay for a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist. Drug Res 40:111–118[Medline]
  14. Haavisto A, Pettersson K, Bergendahl M, Perheentupa A, Roser JF, Huhtaniemi I 1993 A supersensitive immunofluorometric assay for rat luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 132:1687–1691[Abstract]
  15. Clayton RN, Bailey LC 1982 Hyperprolactinaemia attenuates the gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor response to gonadectomy in rats. J Endocrinol 95:267–274[Abstract]
  16. Huckins C 1971 The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. II. A radioautographic analysis of their cell cycle properties. Cell Tissue Kinet 4:313–334[Medline]
  17. Lok D, Weenk D, deRooij DG 1982 Morphology, proliferation, and differentiation of undifferentiated spermatogonia in the Chinese hamster and the ram. Anat Rec 203:83–99[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Tegelenbosch RA, de Rooij DG 1993 A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat Res 290:193–200[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nias AHW, Fox M 1971 Synchronization of mammalian cells with respect to the mitotic cycle. Cell Tissue Kinet 4:375–398[Medline]
  20. Huckins C 1978 The morphology and kinetics of spermatogonial degeneration in normal adult rats: an analysis using a simplified classification of the germinal epithelium. Anat Rec 190:905–926[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Allard EK, Boekelheide K 1996 Fate of germ cells in 2,5-hexanedione-induced testicular injury. II. Atrophy persists due to a reduced stem cell mass and ongoing apoptosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 137:149–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. van Beek MEAB, Davids JAG, van de Kant HJG, de Rooij DG 1984 Response to fission neutron irradiation of spermatogonial stem cells in different stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Radiat Res 97:556–569[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Erickson BH 1981 Survival and renewal of murine stem spermatogonia following 60Co {gamma} radiation. Radiat Res 86:34–51[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Erickson BH, Hall GG 1983 Comparison of stem-spermatogonial renewal and mitotic activity in the {gamma}-irradiated mouse and rat. Mutat Res 108:317–335[Medline]
  25. Chowdhury AK 1979 Dependence of testicular germ cells on hormones: a quantitative study in hypophysectomized testosterone-treated rats. J Endocrinol 82:331–340[Abstract]
  26. Steinberger E, Duckett GE 1965 Effect of estrogen or testosterone on initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the rat. Endocrinology 76:1184–1189
  27. Almiron I, Domene H, Chemes HE 1984 The hormonal regulation of premeiotic steps of spermatogenesis in the newborn rat. J Androl 5:235–242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Grootegoed JA, Peters ML, Mulder E, Rommerts FFG, Van der Molen HJ 1977 Absence of a nuclear androgen receptor in isolated germinal cells of rat testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 9:159–167[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Skinner MK 1993 Secretion of growth factors and other regulatory factors. In: Russell LD, Griswold MD (eds) The Sertoli Cell. Cache River Press, Clearwater, pp 238–247
  30. Rowley MJ, Leach DR, Warner GA, Heller CG 1974 Effect of graded doses of ionizing radiation on the human testis. Radiat Res 59:665–678[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, S. H. Shao, and C. C. Y. Weng
p53-Dependent Apoptosis in the Inhibition of Spermatogonial Differentiation in Juvenile Spermatogonial Depletion (Utp14bjsd) Mice
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 2773 - 2781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, C. C. Y. Weng, K. L. Porter, Z. Zhang, P. Pakarinen, T. R. Kumar, and M. L. Meistrich
Spermatogonial Differentiation in Juvenile Spermatogonial Depletion (jsd) Mice with Androgen Receptor or Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Mutations
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3563 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. M. Prabhu, M. L Meistrich, E. A McLaughlin, S. D Roman, S. Warne, S. Mendis, C. Itman, and K. L. Loveland
Expression of c-Kit receptor mRNA and protein in the developing, adult and irradiated rodent testis.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 489 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. L. Porter, G. Shetty, and M. L. Meistrich
Testicular Edema Is Associated with Spermatogonial Arrest in Irradiated Rats
Endocrinology, March 1, 2006; 147(3): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, C. C. Y. Weng, S. J. Meachem, O. U. Bolden-Tiller, Z. Zhang, P. Pakarinen, I. Huhtaniemi, and M. L. Meistrich
Both Testosterone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Independently Inhibit Spermatogonial Differentiation in Irradiated Rats
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 472 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. Honaramooz, E. Behboodi, C. L. Hausler, S. Blash, S. Ayres, C. Azuma, Y. Echelard, and I. Dobrinski
Depletion of Endogenous Germ Cells in Male Pigs and Goats in Preparation for Germ Cell Transplantation
J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. J Meachem, D. M Robertson, N. G Wreford, R. I McLachlan, and P. G Stanton
Oestrogen does not affect the restoration of spermatogenesis in the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-immunised adult rat
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 185(3): 529 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
K. Boekelheide, H. A. Schoenfeld, S. J. Hall, C. C. Weng, G. Shetty, J. Leith, J. Harper, M. Sigman, D. L. Hess, and M. L. Meistrich
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist (Cetrorelix) Therapy Fails to Protect Nonhuman Primates (Macaca arctoides) From Radiation-Induced Spermatogenic Failure
J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 222 - 234.
[Abstract]