Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 1 72-80
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society
Role of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone as an Autocrine Growth Factor in Human Ovarian Surface Epithelium1
Sung Keun Kang,
Kyung-Chul Choi,
Kwai Wa Cheng,
Parimal S. Nathwani,
Nelly Auersperg and
Peter C. K. Leung
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V5
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Peter C. K. Leung, Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, 2H-30, 4490 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V5. E-mail: peleung{at}interchange.ubc.ca
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Epithelial ovarian cancer, which accounts for 8090% of all ovarian
cancers, is the most common cause of death from gynecological
malignancies and is believed to originate from the ovarian surface
epithelium. In the present study we investigated the expression of GnRH
and its receptor in human ovarian surface epithelial (hOSE) cells and
provided novel evidence that GnRH may have antiproliferative effects in
this tissue. Using RT-PCR and Southern blot analysis, we cloned the
GnRH and GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in hOSE cells. Sequence analysis
revealed that GnRH and its receptor have sequences identical to those
found in the hypothalamus and pituitary, respectively. To address
whether GnRH regulates its own and receptor messenger RNA (mRNA), the
cells were treated with different concentrations of the GnRH agonist
(D-Ala6)-GnRH. Expression levels of GnRH and
its receptor were investigated using quantitative and competitive
RT-PCR, respectively. Interestingly, a biphasic effect was observed for
the GnRH and GnRHR mRNA levels. High concentrations of the GnRH agonist
(10-7 and 10-9 M) decreased GnRH
and GnRHR mRNA levels, whereas a low concentration (10-11
M) resulted in up-regulation of GnRH and receptor mRNA
levels. Treatment with the GnRH antagonist, antide, prevented the
biphasic effects of the GnRH agonist in hOSE cells, confirming the
specificity of the response. Furthermore, to investigate the
physiological significance, we studied receptor-mediated growth
regulatory effects of GnRH in human ovarian surface epithelial cells.
The cells were treated with GnRH analogs, and the proliferative index
of cells was measured using a [3H]thymidine incorporation
assay. (D-Ala6)-GnRH had a direct inhibitory
effect on the growth of hOSE cells in a time- and dose-dependent
manner. This antiproliferative effect of the GnRH agonist was receptor
mediated, as cotreatment of hOSE cells with antide abolished the growth
inhibitory effects of the GnRH agonist. The results strongly suggest
that GnRH can act as an autocrine/paracrine regulator in hOSE cells.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
EPITHELIAL OVARIAN cancer, which accounts
for 8090% of all ovarian cancers, is the most common cause of death
from gynecological malignancies and is believed to originate from the
ovarian surface epithelium (1). Regardless of its inconspicuous
appearance, it has been demonstrated that the ovarian surface
epithelium (OSE) plays an important role in normal ovarian physiology.
OSE cells participate in the ovulation process as they remodel the
ovarian cortex and secrete proteolytic enzymes (2, 3). Furthermore,
these cells are involved in the repair process that follows follicular
rupture at ovulation as they proliferate and migrate over the ovulatory
site and secrete extracellular matrix (3). Considering the integral
role of OSE cells in normal ovarian physiology, understanding their
growth regulation appears to be very important. Intraovarian regulators
such as insulin-like growth factors, transforming growth factors
(TGFs), epidermal growth factor, and GnRH act through
autocrine/paracrine mechanisms to modulate ovarian functions and growth
of ovarian cells (4).
In addition to its well documented role in the regulation of
gonadotropin synthesis and secretion, GnRH has direct effects on the
gonads. In the ovary, GnRH modulates both basal and
gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis (5, 6) and induces
transcription of several genes involved in follicular maturation and
ovulation (7, 8). Furthermore, GnRH and its synthetic analogs have
direct growth inhibitory effects on hormone-sensitive tumors, including
carcinomas of the ovary, breast, endometrium, and prostate (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In
view of role of GnRH in modulating ovarian functions, GnRH may be
implicated in the functions of OSE cell physiology. However, the role
of GnRH in OSE cells has not been reported.
The presence of an autocrine/paracrine regulatory system based on GnRH
in normal and malignant reproductive tissues suggests that GnRH and its
receptor may be regulated in these extrapituitary tissues similarly to
those in the hypothalamus and pituitary. In the hypothalamus, numerous
hormones regulate the synthesis and release of GnRH either directly,
involving GnRH neurons, or indirectly, involving neurons that
communicate with GnRH neurons (14). GnRH has been shown to regulate its
own synthesis in a biphasic manner in immortalized GT17 neurons (15).
It is well documented that the number of GnRH receptors is both up- and
down-regulated by its homologous ligand in the pituitary of many
mammalian species (16, 17). Stimulation with physiological
concentrations of GnRH in vitro results in a biphasic
pattern of changes in receptor numbers. Initially, a down-regulation of
receptors is associated with a desensitization of the gonadotropes to
GnRH, followed by up-regulation (5, 18, 19).
In the present study, to examine the potential role of GnRH as an
autocrine regulator in human OSE (hOSE), we first investigated the
expression and homologous regulation of GnRH and its receptor gene.
Furthermore, to investigate the physiological significance, we studied
the direct receptor-mediated growth regulatory effects of GnRH on hOSE
cells. Elucidation of the regulation and function of GnRH and its
receptor in the ovarian surface epithelium will contribute to a better
understanding of normal ovarian physiology and the role of OSE in
ovarian carcinogenesis.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cell culture and treatments
hOSE cells were scraped from the ovarian surface during
laparoscopies for nonmalignant disorders and were cultured as described
previously (3) in medium 199:MCDB 105 (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Canada) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml
penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere
of 5% CO2-95% air and passaged with 0.06%
trypsin (1:250)/0.01% EDTA in
Mg2+/Ca2+-free HBSS when
confluent. The human ovarian epithelial carcinoma cell line, OVCAR-3
(provided by Dr. T.C. Hamilton, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia,
PA), was cultured in medium 199 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100
U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Primary ovarian tumors
(n = 3) were obtained and cultured as described previously (20).
Briefly, the minced tissues were dissociated in medium 199 containing 4
mg/ml collagenase type III (Roche Molecular Biochemicals,
Laval, Canada) and 0.1 mg/ml bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease
I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 1 h in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air. The
cells were passed through a fine mesh and centrifuged on Ficoll-Paque
(Pharmacia Biotech, Morgan, Canada; 1000 x
g) to remove red blood cells. To obtain pure cancer cells
and remove fibroblasts and mesothelial cells, cell suspensions were
placed on 100-mm plastic culture dishes in 10 ml medium 199
supplemented with 20% FBS for 24 h. The supernatant containing
unattached tumor cells was collected and subsequently placed on 100-mm
culture dishes. The tumor cells were maintained in the presence of
medium 199 supplemented with 20% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100
µg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2-95% air. To study the homologous regulation
of GnRH and GnRH receptor (GnRHR) messenger RNA (mRNA) by a GnRH
agonist, 2 x 105 hOSE cells (n = 3;
passage 2) were plated onto 35-mm culture dishes in 2 ml medium
199:MCDB 105 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100
µg/ml streptomycin. After a preincubation of 48 h, the cells
were treated with
(D-Ala6)-GnRH
(Sigma-Aldrich Corp., Oakville, Canada) at
concentrations of 10-7,
10-9, and 10-11
M for 24 h. To confirm the specificity of
the GnRH agonist, the cells were treated with different concentrations
of (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-11, 10-9, or
10-7 M) plus the GnRH
antagonist (antide; 10-9 or
10-7 M) for 24 h.
Control cultures were treated with vehicle.
RT-PCR amplification of GnRH and GnRHR mRNA
Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells using the RNaid kit
(Bio/Can Scientific, Mississauga, Canada) according to the
manufacturers suggested procedure. The RNA concentration was measured
based on absorbance at 260 nm, and its integrity was confirmed by
agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis. Total RNA (2.5 µg) was
reverse transcribed into first strand complementary DNA (cDNA;
Pharmacia Biotech, Morgan, Canada), following the
manufacturers procedure. To clone GnRH mRNA, one set of primers was
designed based on the published sequence of human hypothalamic GnRH
(21). Primers for GnRH were: sense, 5'-ATTCTACTGACTTGGTGCGTG-3' (F1);
and antisense, 5'-GGAATATGTGCAACTTGGTGT-3' (R1). One set of primers for
GnRHR was designed to clone GnRHR mRNA based on the human pituitary
GnRHR cDNA sequence (22). Primers for GnRHR were: sense,
5'-AATATGGCAAACAGTGCCTCT-3' (P482F); and antisense,
5'-GGATATTTTTCTCTGTGATTG-3' (P48R). The cDNA was amplified in a 50-µl
PCR reaction containing 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.) and its buffer, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM deoxy-NTP, and
50 pmol specific primers. PCR amplification was carried out for 33
cycles, with denaturing for 1 min at 94 C, annealing for 35 sec at
5060 C depending on the primers employed, extension for 90 sec at 72
C, and a final extension for 15 min at 72 C. Primers for ß-actin were
designed based on published sequences (23), as previously described
(24). PCR for ß-actin was performed to rule out the possibility of
RNA degradation and was used to control the variation in mRNA
concentration in the RT reaction, as previously described (24).
Amplified PCR products were subjected to Southern blot analysis. Ten
microliters of PCR products were fractionated on a 1.5% agarose gel,
stained with ethidium bromide. The PCR products were transferred to a
nylon membrane and hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probe for
human GnRH, GnRHR, and ß-actin (24, 25, 26) following the manufacturers
recommended procedure (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
After washing, the membranes were exposed to Kodak Omat
x-ray film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). PCR
products isolated from gel were cloned into pCRII vector using the TA
Cloning Kit and were sequenced by the dideoxy nucleotide chain
termination method using the T7 DNA polymerase sequencing kit
(Pharmacia Biotech, Morgan, Canada).
Construction of the native (target) and mutant (competitive) cDNA
for GnRHR
Using internal primers for human GnRHR, a 347-bp fragment of
native GnRHR-cDNA (the target) was obtained from PCR amplification of a
760-bp human pituitary cDNA as a template (25). The primers employed
were: sense, 5'-GTATGCTGGAGAGTTACTCTGCA-3' (P44F); and antisense,
5'-GGATGATGAAGAGGCAGCTGAAG-3' (P45R). The PCR product was visualized by
agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide and was
confirmed by Southern blot analysis. The PCR product was extracted from
the gel, purified with an agarose gel extraction kit
(QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and cloned into pCRII
cloning vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Sequence
analysis was performed to further confirm the identity of the expected
sequence and amplified cDNA. After sequence confirmation, the cloned
fragment was subcloned into pBSKII (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) at
SacI and XhoI sites for cloning purposes. To
generate a mutant (the competitor) cDNA, the subcloned fragment was
digested with HindIII and StyI and subsequently
self-ligated. This step resulted in a cDNA fragment of 247 bp with a
120-bp deletion compared with the target cDNA, but with identical
primer amplification sites (P44F and P45R).
Quantification of GnRH and GnRHR mRNA
To compare different expression levels for GnRH and GnRHR mRNA,
quantitative and competitive PCRs were performed, respectively. PCR
amplification for GnRH was carried out with denaturing for 1 min at 94
C, annealing for 35 sec at 53 C, extension for 90 sec at 72 C, and a
final extension for 15 min at 72 C for 26 cycles. For GnRHR, 2 µl of
the first cDNA were coamplified with 0.002 pg competitor (mutant GnRHR)
cDNA. The PCR for GnRHR was carried out in a 50-µl PCR reaction
containing 2.5 U Taq polymerase, its buffer, 1.5
mM MgCl2, 2
mM deoxy-NTP, and 50 pmol specific primers (P44F
and P45R), with denaturing for 1 min at 94 C, annealing for 35 sec at
60 C, extension for 90 sec at 72 C, and a final extension for 15 min at
72 C for 33 cycles. Amplified PCR products were quantified using a
computerized visual light densitometer (model 620, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA) after Southern blot
analysis.
[3H]thymidine incorporation assay
To investigate the role of GnRH in growth regulation of
hOSE cells, a [3H]thymidine incorporation assay
was performed as previously described (27). hOSE cells (n = 3;
passage 2) were plated in 24-well plates at 2 x
104 cells/well in 0.5 ml medium 199:MCDB 105
supplemented with 5% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin. After a preincubation period of 24 h, the cells were
incubated with medium containing 1 µCi
[3H]thymidine (5.0 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Canada), collected after
24 h, and served as day 0 controls. On the day of treatment, the
cells were treated with different concentrations
(10-11, 10-9, or
10-7 M) of the GnRH agonist,
(D-Ala6)-GnRH for 2, 4, and 6 days.
To block the effect of the GnRH agonist, the cells were treated with
the (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-7 M; GnRHa), antide
(10-7 M), and
(D-Ala6)-GnRH plus antide at
equimolar concentration for 2, 4, and 6 days. Control cultures were
treated with vehicle. Before the day of collection, the cells were
incubated with medium containing the hormone and 1 µCi
[3H]thymidine. After 24 h incubation, the
culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with
PBS and precipitated with 0.5 ml 10% trichloroacetic acid for 15 min
at 4 C. After a methanol wash, the precipitate was solubilized in 0.5
ml 1 N sodium hydroxide, and the incorporated radioactivity
was measured in a 1217 Rackbeta liquid scintillation counter
(LKB Wallac, Inc., Turku, Finland). Each
experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples.
Data analysis
GnRH mRNA levels were expressed as the ratio of GnRH to
ß-actin. The amount of GnRHR transcript was calculated from the ratio
of the target to competitive cDNA. Expression levels of GnRH and GnRHR
mRNA are expressed as the percent change from the control value. Data
are shown as the means of three individual experiments with duplicate
samples and are presented as the mean ± SD. In the
proliferation study, values are expressed as the percentage of growth
compared with the control value and are the mean ± SD
of three individual experiments with triplicate samples. The data were
analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukeys multiple comparison
test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Expression of GnRH and GnRHR mRNA in hOSE cells
To investigate the expression of GnRH mRNA in hOSE cells, two
primers derived from human hypothalamic GnRH cDNA were designed (Fig. 1A
), and RT-PCR was performed. Using primers
F1 and R1, a 380-bp DNA fragment was obtained from the hOSE cells, a
primary culture of ovarian carcinoma, and the OVCAR-3 cell line and
were validated as GnRH by hybridization with a specific probe for GnRH
cDNA (Fig. 1B
). To investigate the expression of GnRHR mRNA, one set of
primers was designed based on the human pituitary GnRHR cDNA sequence
(Fig. 2A
). As shown in Fig. 2B
, the predicted
PCR products were obtained in hOSE cells, primary culture of ovarian
carcinoma, and the OVCAR-3 cell line and were confirmed as GnRHR by
hybridization with a GnRHR cDNA probe. The possibility of genomic DNA
or cross-contamination was ruled out, because no PCR products were
observed and detected in negative controls (without template and
without reverse transcriptase in the RT reaction) by ethidium bromide
staining and Southern blot analysis, respectively (Figs. 1B
and 2B
). In
addition, the authenticity of the PCR products was further confirmed,
because no PCR products were obtained from human embryonic kidney
(HEK-293) cDNA (data not shown). Sequence analysis revealed that GnRH
and its receptor have sequences identical to those found in the
hypothalamus and pituitary, respectively (data not shown).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Detection of GnRH mRNA by RT-PCR amplification.
The locations of the primers (F1 and R1) employed are indicated (A).
Primer F1 is located in the second exon and corresponds to a specific
region of the signal peptide; primer R1 is complementary to a segment a
of 3'-untranslated region that is encoded by exon 4. First strand cDNAs
from the hOSE cells (OSE), primary culture of ovarian carcinoma (PCO),
and the OVCAR-3 cell line (OV-3) were amplified using one set of PCR
primers derived from human hypothalamic GnRH cDNA (21 ). The expected
products were observed on an ethidium bromide-stained gel (B,
top panel). The PCR products were transferred onto a
nylon membrane and hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled 380-bp hGnRH
cDNA probe (B, bottom panel). The possibility of genomic
DNA or cross-contamination was ruled out, because no PCR products were
observed or detected in negative controls (without template [Tm(-)]
and without reverse transcriptase [RT(-)] in the RT reaction) by
ethidium bromide staining and Southern blot analysis. The PCR products
were gel purified, cloned, and sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed
that GnRH mRNA from the hOSE cells, primary culture of ovarian
carcinoma, and the OVCAR-3 cell line had a nucleotide sequence
identical to that found in the hypothalamus (data not shown).
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Detection of GnRHR mRNA by RT-PCR amplification.
The locations of the primers employed (P482F and P48R) are indicated
(A). The primers are located in different exons to clone the complete
coding region of the hGnRHR gene. First strand cDNAs from hOSE cells
(OSE), primary culture of ovarian carcinoma (PCO), and the OVCAR-3 cell
line (OV-3) were amplified using the primers derived from human GnRHR
cDNA (22 ). The expected products were observed on an ethidium
bromide-stained gel (B, top panel). The PCR products
were transferred onto a nylon membrane and hybridized with a
digoxigenin-labeled 364-bp hGnRHR cDNA probe (B, bottom
panel). The possibility of genomic DNA or cross-contamination
was ruled out, because no PCR products were observed or detected
in negative controls (without template [Tm(-)] and without reverse
transcriptase [RT(-)] in the RT reaction) by ethidium bromide
staining and Southern blot analysis. The PCR products were gel
purified, cloned, and sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed that the
complete coding region of GnRHR mRNA from the hOSE cells, primary
culture of ovarian carcinoma, and OVCAR-3 cell line had a nucleotide
sequence identical to that found in the human pituitary gland (data not
shown).
|
|
Validation of PCR for GnRH and GnRHR transcript
To determine the conditions under which PCR amplification for GnRH
and ß-actin mRNA were in the logarithmic phase, 2.5 µg total RNA
were reverse transcribed, and aliquots (2 µl) were amplified using
different numbers of cycles. PCR for ß-actin was amplified to rule
out the possibility of RNA degradation and was used to control the
variation in mRNA concentrations in the RT reaction. A linear
relationship between PCR products and amplification cycles was observed
in both GnRH (Fig. 3
) and ß-actin mRNA
(data not shown). Twenty-six cycles for GnRH and 18 cycles for
ß-actin were employed for quantification. For competitive PCR for
GnRHR, mutant GnRHR cDNA was generated (Fig. 4A
). The standard curve for GnRHR was
constructed by coamplification of a fixed amount of competitive cDNA
(mutant GnRHR) with adding serial dilutions of the target cDNA
(native GnRHR). The amounts of target and competitive cDNA added to
each PCR are shown in Fig. 4B
. As increasing amounts of target cDNA was
added, decreased amplification of competitive cDNA was observed. When
plotted, a linear relationship was found between the native and mutant
GnRHR cDNA (Fig. 4B
). To titrate the amount of competitor, a fixed
amount of first strand cDNA from hOSE cells (2 µl from 2.5 µg RNA)
was coamplified with serial dilutions of competitive cDNA. Increasing
the amount of mutant cDNA resulted in decreased amplification of the
native GnRHR from the sample cDNA. A similar degree of amplification
was observed when 0.002 pg mutant cDNA was added (Fig. 4C
). This
concentration was employed for competitive PCR for GnRHR
transcript.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Validation of quantitative RT-PCR for GnRH. hOSE
cells were cultured in 35-mm culture dishes at 2 x
105 cells in 2 ml medium 199:MCDB 105 supplemented with
10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Total
RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed, and aliquots were amplified
using different number of PCR cycles as described in Materials
and Methods. A linear relationship was observed between PCR
products and amplification cycles when plotted.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Construction of native (target) and mutant
(competitive) cDNA and validation of competitive RT-PCR for GnRHR
transcript. Using internal primers (P44F and P45R) for hGnRHR, a 347-bp
fragment of native GnRHR-cDNA (the target) was obtained by PCR
amplification from a 760-bp human pituitary cDNA as a template (25 ).
The cloned fragment was subcloned into pBSKII (Stratagene)
at SacI and XhoI sites for cloning
purposes. To generate mutant (the competitor) cDNA, the subcloned
fragment was digested with HindIII and
StyI and subsequently self-ligated (A). This step
resulted in a cDNA fragment of 247 bp with 120-bp deletion compared
with the target cDNA, but with the identical primer amplification sites
(P44F and P45R). The standard curve for GnRHR was constructed by a
coamplification of a fixed amount of competitive cDNA (mutant GnRHR)
and a serial dilution of the target cDNA (native GnRHR). As increasing
amounts of target cDNA was added, decreased amplification of
competitive cDNA was observed. A linear relationship between the native
and mutant GnRHR cDNAs was observed when plotted (B). To titrate the
amount of competitive cDNA for competitive PCR, a fixed amount of first
strand cDNA from hOSE cells (2 µl from 2.5 µg RNA) was coamplified
with serial dilutions of competitive cDNA. Increasing the amount of
mutant cDNA resulted in decreased amplification of native GnRHR from
the sample cDNA. A similar degree of amplification was observed when
0.002 pg mutant cDNA was added (C).
|
|
Homologous regulation of GnRH and GnRHR mRNA
Treatment with the GnRH agonist induced a biphasic regulation
pattern for GnRH and GnRHR mRNA levels. High concentrations of
(D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-7 and 10-9
M) decreased GnRH and GnRHR mRNA levels, whereas a low
concentration (10-11 M) resulted in
up-regulation of GnRH and its receptor (Fig. 5
, A and B). To confirm the specificity of
the biphasic effect by the GnRH agonist, the cells were treated with
different concentrations of the GnRH agonist together with the GnRH
antagonist, antide. Treatment with antide abolished the biphasic
response in the hOSE cells (Fig. 5B
).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Effect of GnRH on GnRH mRNA (A) and GnRHR mRNA (B)
in hOSE cells. hOSE cells were cultured in 35-mm culture dishes at
2 x 105 cells in 2 ml medium 199: MCDB 105
supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin. After a preincubation period of 48 h, the cells were
treated with different concentrations of
(D-Ala6)-GnRH for 24 h. To confirm the
specificity of the GnRH agonist, the cells were cotreated with
different concentrations of (D-Ala6)-GnRH and
the GnRH antagonist, antide. The cells were incubated with medium
containing (D-Ala6)-GnRH (10-11
M) plus antide (10-9 M),
(D-Ala6)-GnRH (10-9 M)
plus antide (10-7 M),
(D-Ala6)-GnRH (10-7 M)
plus antide (10-7 M) for 24 h. Control
cultures were treated with vehicle. GnRH and GnRHR mRNA levels were
measured by quantitative and competitive RT-PCR, as described in
Materials and Methods, respectively. Treatment with the
GnRH agonist induced a biphasic regulation pattern for GnRH and GnRHR
mRNA levels. Cotreatment with antide abolished the biphasic response in
the hOSE cells. Data are shown as the means of three individual
experiments with duplicate samples and are presented as the mean
± SD. a, P < 0.05 vs.
control; b, P < 0.05 vs.
10-11 M (D-Ala6)-GnRH.
|
|
[3H]thymidine incorporation assay
To evaluate the functional role of GnRH in hOSE, the cells were
treated with different concentrations (10-11,
10-9, or 10-7
M) of the GnRH agonist,
(D-Ala6)-GnRH for 2, 4, and 6 days,
and thymidine incorporation assays were performed. As shown in Fig. 6A
, (D-Ala6)-GnRH inhibited the growth of
hOSE cells in a dose-dependent manner. A significant inhibition of
proliferation was detected as early as the second day of treatment at
concentrations of 10-7 and
10-9 M. At a lower concentration
(10-11 M), reduction of cell growth
on day 2 was insignificant. The antiproliferative effect of
(D-Ala6)-GnRH was also time dependent
as the growth inhibitory effect increased with time of treatment.
Inhibition of growth continued through to the fourth day and was
further evident on the sixth day of treatment. On day 6, a high
concentration of (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-7 M) had reduced cell
proliferation to 68% of the control value, and a low concentration of
10-11 M reduced growth to 76% of
the control level. To block the effect of the GnRH agonist, the cells
were treated with (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-7 M; GnRHa), antide
(10-7 M), and
(D-Ala6)-GnRH plus antide at
equimolar concentrations for 2, 4, and 6 days. The antiproliferative
effect of the GnRH agonist appeared to be receptor mediated, as
cotreatment with antide abolished the effects of the agonist (Fig. 6B
).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Effect of (D-Ala6)-GnRH
and cotreatment of antide on growth of hOSE cells. hOSE cells were
plated in 24-well plates at 2 x 104 cells/well in 0.5
ml medium 199:MCDB 105 supplemented with 5% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin
G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. After a preincubation period of
24 h, the cells were incubated with medium containing 1 µCi
[3H]thymidine (5.0 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), collected after 24 h, and served as day 0
controls. On the day of treatments, the cells were treated with
different concentrations of (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(10-11, 10-9, or 10-7
M) of the GnRH agonist,
(D-Ala6)-GnRH for 2, 4, and 6 days. To block
the effect of the GnRH agonist, the cells were treated with
(D-Ala6)-GnRH (10-7 M;
GnRHa), antide (10-7 M), and
(D-Ala6)-GnRH plus antide at equimolar
concentration for 2, 4, and 6 days. Control cultures were treated with
vehicle. Before the day of collection, the cells were incubated with
medium containing the hormone and 1 µCi [3H]thymidine.
After 24 h incubation, the cells were collected, and the amount of
labeled DNA was measured using the [3H]thymidine
incorporation assay as described in Materials and
Methods. (D-Ala6)-GnRH inhibited the
growth of hOSE cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. A
significant reduction in growth vs. control was found on
day 2 for (D-Ala6)-GnRH of 10-7
and 10-9 M and on days 4 and 6 for all
concentrations (A). Cotreatment with antide abolished the
antiproliferative effects of the (D-Ala6)-GnRH
(B). Data are shown as the means of three individual experiments with
triplicate samples and are presented as the mean ±
SD. *, P < 0.05 vs.
control.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Even though GnRH is primarily known for its role in the regulation
of gonadotropin secretion from the pituitary, it is also thought to be
an autocrine/paracrine regulator of ovarian functions. The presence of
GnRH and its binding sites in the granulosa-luteal cells suggests that
GnRH exerts its actions in an autocrine/paracrine manner to modulate
both basal and gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis,
folliculogenesis, and luteolysis (6, 26). The present study
demonstrates for the first time that GnRH and GnRHR mRNA are expressed
in hOSE cells. In addition, GnRH and its receptor are homologously
regulated in a biphasic pattern. Functionally, a GnRH analog has a
direct receptor-mediated growth inhibitory effect on hOSE cells. The
ovarian surface epithelium is a simple mesothelium covering of the
ovary and is believed to be the source of most human ovarian carcinomas
(28, 29). It has been demonstrated that this epithelium plays an
important role in ovarian functions such as ovulation and the
subsequent repair process. A diverse range of regulatory molecules are
known to be involved in these critical processes of normal ovarian
function (4). Several growth factors and cytokines have been shown to
be localized and produced by OSE cells as well as granulosa or thecal
cells (4, 30, 31, 32). In particular, OSE-derived regulatory factors are
involved in growth stimulation or inhibition of OSE cells. For example,
TGF
stimulates the growth of OSE cells, whereas TGFß inhibits cell
growth (31, 32). In this study, we demonstrated that GnRH might be a
novel regulatory agent of OSE cells in the human. Using RT-PCR and
Southern blot analysis, we demonstrated that hOSE cells express GnRH
and GnRHR mRNA. Sequence analysis indicated that GnRH and GnRHR in hOSE
cells have a nucleotide sequence identical to that of GnRH and the
receptor found in the hypothalamus and pituitary, respectively.
Furthermore, the presence of GnRH and its receptor in hOSE cells as
well as in primary culture of ovarian carcinomas and the established
ovarian cancer cell line, OVCAR-3, indicate that the local regulatory
system based on GnRH in hOSE cells is a normal component of the cells,
not one that is newly acquired in the course of neoplastic
transformation.
One of the interesting findings of the present study is the
demonstration that GnRH gene expression is regulated by GnRH itself in
normal epithelial cells as in the hypothalamus. It has been
demonstrated that GnRH regulates its own synthesis and release through
an ultrashort loop feedback mechanism in the rat hypothalamus (33, 34, 35).
In addition, GnRH has been shown to exert biphasic effects on GnRH
secretion from immortalized and normal hypothalamic neurons depending
on the concentration and duration of treatment (15, 36). As well, it
has been documented that GnRH-binding sites are both up- and
down-regulated by GnRH in the pituitary of various species (5, 17). In
general, low doses or pulsatile treatment of GnRH up-regulate its
receptor, whereas high doses or continuous treatment down-regulate the
receptor numbers. Changes in the GnRHR mRNA level have been explained
as at least part of the mechanisms underlying up- and down-regulation
of GnRHR receptor numbers. Pulsatile treatment with 10 nM
GnRH induced a decrease in GnRHR mRNA levels in rat pituitary cells
(37), whereas continuous treatment with the same concentration of GnRH
for 48 h decreased levels of the receptor mRNA in cultured sheep
pituitary cells (38). Recently, a biphasic regulation pattern of GnRHR
mRNA levels has been reported in human ovarian granulosa-luteal cells
(26). In the present study, a low dose of GnRH agonist (10
pM) increased GnRHR mRNA levels. In contrast, higher doses
(1 and 100 nM) of the GnRH agonist induced a statistically
significant decrease in GnRHR mRNA levels. This regulation appears to
be receptor mediated, as cotreatment with a competitive GnRH
antagonist, antide (39), blocked the biphasic effect of GnRH. Our
results suggest that similar to the pituitary GnRHR, alterations in
GnRHR mRNA levels are involved in the regulation of responsiveness to
GnRH in hOSE cells. Taken together, our studies strongly indicate the
presence of an autocrine/paracrine regulatory system based on GnRH in
normal ovarian epithelial cells.
GnRH has been suggested to regulate cell growth and proliferation
through its receptor in extrapituitary tissues. GnRH analogs have been
used and proven to be efficient in treating GnRHR-bearing tumors,
including carcinomas of the ovary, breast, and endometrium (9, 10, 11, 12, 13).
Using thymidine incorporation assays, we demonstrated in the present
study that a GnRH analog inhibits growth of the normal ovarian surface
epithelial cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This growth
inhibitory effect of the GnRH agonist appears to be receptor mediated,
such that cotreatment with antide abolished the effect of the GnRH
agonist. The exact mechanism of the growth inhibitory effects of GnRH
analogs in hOSE cells at the receptor level is unclear. The putative
endogenous ligand may stimulate proliferation of the cells through the
receptor, which might be down-regulated by continuous treatment with a
potent GnRH agonist. The findings in this study that continuous
treatment with the GnRH agonist, which is thought to induce receptor
down-regulation, inhibits cell growth, and that this effect was
abolished by cotreatment with a specific antagonist uphold this view.
Alternatively, the receptor might mediate direct antiproliferative
effects of GnRH analogs. This idea is supported by the finding in this
study that the agonist, not the antagonistic analog, which does not
trigger receptor activation, induces growth inhibition of the cells.
Recently, it has been suggested that the well established GnRHR
signaling mechanism via activation of phospholipase C and protein
kinase C is probably not involved in GnRH effects in tumor cells (40).
Rather, GnRH binding in cancer cells could activate a downstream
phosphotyrosine phosphatase in GnRHR-bearing tumors, thereby
counteracting the effects of growth factors that function through
tyrosine kinase (41, 42). It has been reported that analogs of GnRH
reverse the growth stimulatory effect of epidermal growth factor-
and insulin-like growth factor in cancer cells, including carcinoma of
the ovary (43, 44, 45). Interference by GnRH analogs with growth factor
receptors may activate intracellular signaling pathways that partially
account for the growth inhibitory effects of GnRH agonist seen in hOSE
cells. At the moment, it is not known whether the GnRH analog in hOSE
cells exerts its antiproliferative effect at the cellular level. It has
been demonstrated that GnRH analogs reduce cell proliferation by
increasing the portion of cells in the resting phase,
G0-G1 (46), or induce cell
death or apoptosis in the ovarian cells (47, 48). Further studies will
be warranted to elucidate the exact mechanisms of the antiproliferative
effect of GnRH analogs in hOSE cells.
In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that both GnRH and
GnRHR mRNAs are expressed in hOSE cells. The levels of GnRH and GnRHR
gene expression are autoregulated in a biphasic manner by the GnRH
agonist in a dose-related manner. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a
GnRH analog has a direct growth inhibitory effect that is mediated
through the GnRHR in hOSE cells. Our findings strongly suggest that
GnRH is an integral part of the intraovarian regulatory complexes that
modulate the physiology of normal ovarian surface epithelium and may
have a role in ovarian carcinogenesis.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We express our gratitude to Clara Salamanca for providing hOSE
cells, and to Drs. T. Ehlen, J. Pike, M. Bertrand, and D. Miller for
providing primary ovarian tumors.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council
of Canada. 
Received July 30, 1999.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Dietl J, Marzusch K 1993 Ovarian surface
epithelium and human ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 35:129135[Medline]
-
Kruk PA, Auersperg N 1992 Human ovarian epithelial
cells are capable of physically restructuring extracellular matrix.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:14371443[Medline]
-
Kruk PA, Uitto V-J, Firth JD, Dedhar S, Auersperg
N 1994 Reciprocal interactions between human ovarian surface
epithelium cells and adjacent extracellular matrix. Exp Cell Res 215:97108[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Adashi EY, Rohan RM 1992 Intraovarian regulation.
Peptidergic signaling systems. Trends Endocrinol Metab 3:243248
-
Conn PM 1994 The molecular mechanism of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone action in the pituitary. In: Knobil E,
Neill JD (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York,
pp 18151826
-
Leung PC, Steele GL 1992 Intracellular signaling
in the gonads. Endocr Rev 13:476498[Abstract]
-
Ny T, Liu YX, Ohlsson M, Jones PB, Hsueh AJ 1987 Regulation of tissue-type plasminogen activator activity and messenger
RNA levels by gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene in cultured rat
granulosa cells and cumulus-oocyte complexes. J Biol Chem 262:1179011793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong WY, Richards JS 1992 Induction of
prostaglandin H synthase in rat preovulatory follicles by
gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 130:35123521[Abstract]
-
Emons G, Ortmann O, Becker M, Irmer G, Springer B, Laun
R, Holzel F, Schultz KD, Schally AV 1993 High affinity binding and
direct antiproliferative effects of LHRH analogues in human ovarian
cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 53:54395446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yano T, Pinski J, Radulovic S, Schally AV 1994 Inhibition of human epithelial ovarian cancer cell growth in
vitro by agonistic and antagonistic analogues of luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:17011705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harris NC, Dutlow C, Eiden KA, Dong KW, Roberts JL,
Millar RP 1991 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression in
MDA-MB-231 and ZR-751 breast carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 51:25772581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Emons G, Schroder B, Ortmann O, Westphalen W, Schulz KD,
Schally AV 1993 High affinity binding and direct antiproliferative
effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs in human
endometrial cancer cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:14581464[Abstract]
-
Qayum A, Gullick W, Clayton RC, Sikora, K, Waxman J 1990 The effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor analogues
in prostate cancer cell are mediated through specific tumor receptor.
Br J Cancer 62:9699[Medline]
-
Kalra SP, Kalra PS 1983 Neural regulation of
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone secretion in the rat. Endocr Rev 4:311351[Medline]
-
Krsamanovic LZ, Stojilkovic SS, Mertz AM, Tomic M, Catt
KJ 1993 Expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors and
autocrine regulation of neuropeptide release in immortalized
hypothalamic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:39083912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Braden TD, Conn PM 1993 GnRH and its mechanism of
action. In: Leung PC, Hsueh AJW, Friesen HG (eds) Molecular Basis of
Reproductive Endocrinology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 1238
-
Kaiser UB, Conn PM, Chin WW 1997 Studies of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone action using gonadotropin-releasing
hormone receptor expressing pituitary cell lines. Endocr Rev 18:4670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Loumay E, Catt KJ 1982 Homologous regulation of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor in culture pituitary cells.
Science 215:983985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Umemura T, Yanagisawa T, Shirasu K, Matsuyama A,
Minaguchi H 1992 Mechanisms involved in the pituitary
desensitization induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:283291[Medline]
-
Crickard K, Crickard U, Yoonessi M 1983 Human
ovarian carcinoma cells maintained on extracellular matrix versus
plastic. Cancer Res 43:27622767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adelman JP, Mason AJ, Hayflick JS, Seeburg PH 1986 Isolation of the gene and hypothalamic cDNA for the common precursor of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prolactin release-inhibiting factor
in human and rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:179183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kakar SS, Murgrove LC, Devor DC, Sellers JC, Neill
JD 1992 Cloning, sequencing and expression of human
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:289295[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ng SY, Gunning P, Eddy R, Ponte P, Leavitt J, Shows T,
Kedes L 1985 Evolution of the functional human ß-actin gene and
its multi-pseudogene family: conservation of noncoding regions and
chromosomal dispersion of pseudogenes. Mol Cell Biol 5:27202732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peng C, Huang J, Jeung EB, Donaldson CJ, Vale WW, Leung
PC 1993 Expression of the type II activin receptor gene in the
human placenta. Endocrinology 133:30463049[Abstract]
-
Fan NC, Jeung EB, Peng C, Olofsson JI, Krisinger J,
Leung PC 1994 The human gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH)
receptor gene: cloning, genomic organization and chromosomal
assignment. Mol Cell Endocrinol 103:R1R6
-
Peng C, Fan NC, Ligier M, Vännänen J, Leung
PC 1994 Expression and regulation of gonadotropin-releasing
hormone(GnRH) and GnRH receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in human
granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 135:17401746[Abstract]
-
Wang QF, Tilly KI, Tilly JL, Preffer F, Schneyer AL,
Crowley WF, Sluss PM 1996 Activin inhibits basal and
androgen-stimulated proliferation and induces apoptosis in the human
prostatic cancer cell line, LNCaP. Endocrinology 137:54765483[Abstract]
-
Auersperg N, Maines-Bandiera SL, Kruk PA 1995 Human
ovarian surface epithelium: growth patterns and differentiation. In:
Sharp F, Mason P, Blacket T, Berek J (eds) Ovarian Cancer 3. Champman &
Hall, London, pp 157169
-
Godwin AK, Testa JR, Hamilton TC 1995 The biology
of ovarian cancer development. Cancer 71:530536
-
Ziltener HJ, Maines-Bandiera S, Scharder JW, Auersperg
N 1993 Secretion of bioactive interlukin-1, interleukin-6, and
colony-stimulating factors by human ovarian surface epithelium. Biol
Reprod 49:635641[Abstract]
-
Berchuck A, Rodriguez G, Olt G, Whitaker R, Boente MP,
Arrick BA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Bast Jr RC 1992 Regulation of growth
of normal ovarian epithelial cells, and ovarian cancer cell lines by
transforming growth factor ß. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:676684[Medline]
-
Jindal SK, Snoey DM, Lobb DK, Dorrington JH 1994 Transforming growth factor
localization and role in surface
epithelium of normal ovaries and in ovarian carcinoma cells. Gynecol
Oncol 53:1723[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Bedran de Castro JC, Khorram O, McCann SM 1985 Possible negative ultra-short loop feedback of luteinizing hormone
releasing hormone(LHRH) in the ovariectomized rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol
Med 179:132135[Abstract]
-
Valenca MM, Johnston CA, Ching M, Negro-Vilar A 1987 Evidence for a negative ultrashort loop feedback mechanism
operating on the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neuronal system.
Endocrinology 121:22562259[Abstract]
-
Depaolo LV, King RA, Carrillo AJ 1987 In
vivo and in vitro examination of an autoregulatory
mechanism for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 120:272279[Abstract]
-
Krsamanovic LZ, Arora KK, Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ
Autocrine regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH) secretion
via GnRH receptor expressed in cultured hypothalamic cells. 76th Annual
Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Anaheim, CA, 1994, p 520
(Abstract)
-
Kaiser UB, Jakubowiak A, Steinberger A, Chin WW 1993 Regulation of rat pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone
receptor mRNA levels in vivo and in vitro.
Endocrinology 133:931934[Abstract]
-
Wu JC, Sealfon SC, Miller WL 1994 Gonadal hormones
and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) alter messenger ribonucleic
acid levels for GnRH receptor in sheep. Endocrinology 134:18461850[Abstract]
-
Legal JA, Gordon K, Williams RF, Danforth DR, Roh SI,
Hodgen GD 1989 Probing studies on multiple dose effects of
antide(Nal-Lys)GnRH antagonist in ovariectomized monkeys. Contraception 40:623633[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Emons G, Müller V, Ortmann O, Schulz KD 1998 Effects of LHRH-analogues on mitogenic signal transduction in cancer
cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 65:199206[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lee MT, Liebow C, Kramer AR, Schally AV 1991 Effects of epidermal growth factor and analogues of luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin on phosphorylation and
dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues of specific protein substrates
in various tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:16561660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Imai A, Takagi H, Furui T, Horibe S, Fuseya T, Tamaya
T 1996 Evidence for coupling for phosphotyrosine phosphatase to
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor in ovarian carcinoma membrane.
Cancer 77:132137[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Emons G, Müller V, Ortmann O, Grossmann G,
Trautner U, Stuckrad B, Schulz KD, Schally AV 1996 Luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone agonist triptorelin antagonizes signal
transduction and mitogenic activity of epidermal growth factor in human
ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines. Int J Oncol 9:11291137
-
Hershkovitz E, Marbach M, Bosin E, Joseph L, Roberts CT,
Leroith D, Schally AV, Sharoni Y 1993 Luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone antagonists interfere with autocrine and
paracrine growth stimulation of MCF-7 mammary cancer cells by
insulin-like growth factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:963968[Abstract]
-
Marelli MM, Moretti RM, Dondi D, Motta M, Limonta P 1999 Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists interfere with the
mitogenic activity of the insulin-like growth factor system in
androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Endocrinology 140:329334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thomson MA, Adelson MP, Kaufman LM 1991 Lupron
retards proliferation of ovarian epithelial tumor cells cultured in
serum free medium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:10361041[Abstract]
-
Sridaran R, Hisheh S, Dharmarajan AM 1998 Induction
of apoptosis by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during early
pregnancy in the rat. Aptotosis 3:5157
-
Motomura S 1998 Induction of apoptosis in ovarian
carcinoma cell line by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Kurume
Med J 45:2732[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary
Reproductive Sciences,
December 1, 2007;
14(8):
737 - 749.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Choi, A. S. T. Wong, H.-F. Huang, and P. C. K. Leung
Gonadotropins and Ovarian Cancer
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 2007;
28(4):
440 - 461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Singh, A. Krishna, and R. Sridaran
Localization of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone I, bradykinin and their receptors in the ovaries of non-mammalian vertebrates
Reproduction,
May 1, 2007;
133(5):
969 - 981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Irusta, F. Parborell, and M. Tesone
Inhibition of cytochrome P-450 C17 enzyme by a GnRH agonist in ovarian follicles from gonadotropin-stimulated rats
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
May 1, 2007;
292(5):
E1456 - E1464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C.K. Leung and J.-H. Choi
Endocrine signaling in ovarian surface epithelium and cancer
Hum. Reprod. Update,
March 1, 2007;
13(2):
143 - 162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Baldwin, I. N. Wegorzewska, M. Flora, and T. J. Wu
Regulation of Type II Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH-II) Gene Expression by the Processed Peptide of LHRH-I, LHRH-(1-5) in Endometrial Cells
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
January 1, 2007;
232(1):
146 - 155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W.T. Cheung, P. C.K. Leung, and A. S.T. Wong
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Promotes Ovarian Cancer Cell Invasiveness through c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase-Mediated Activation of Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9.
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2006;
66(22):
10902 - 10910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Choi, C. B. Gilks, N. Auersperg, and P. C. K. Leung
Immunolocalization of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-I, GnRH-II, and Type I GnRH Receptor during Follicular Development in the Human Ovary
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
November 1, 2006;
91(11):
4562 - 4570.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. S. Choi, S.-Y. Ku, B.-C. Jee, C.-S. Suh, Y. M. Choi, J. G. Kim, S. Y. Moon, and S. H. Kim
Comparison of follicular fluid IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-4 and PAPP-A concentrations and their ratios between GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF-embryo transfer patients
Hum. Reprod.,
August 1, 2006;
21(8):
2015 - 2021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Choi, N. Auersperg, and P. C K Leung
Differential regulation of two forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone messenger ribonucleic acid by gonadotropins in human immortalized ovarian surface epithelium and ovarian cancer cells.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2006;
13(2):
641 - 651.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Choi, N. Auersperg, and P. C K Leung
Gonadotropins upregulate the epidermal growth factor receptor through activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase in human ovarian surface epithelial cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2005;
12(2):
407 - 421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Cheng and P. C. K. Leung
Molecular Biology of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-I, GnRH-II, and Their Receptors in Humans
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2005;
26(2):
283 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Choi, N. Auersperg, and P. C. K. Leung
Overexpression of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Activates Oncogenic Pathways in Preneoplastic Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
November 1, 2004;
89(11):
5508 - 5516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Maudsley, L. Davidson, A. J. Pawson, R. Chan, R. L. de Maturana, and R. P. Millar
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonists Promote Proapoptotic Signaling in Peripheral Reproductive Tumor Cells by Activating a G{alpha}i-Coupling State of the Type I GnRH Receptor
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2004;
64(20):
7533 - 7544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M T Rae, D Niven, A Ross, T Forster, R Lathe, H O D Critchley, P Ghazal, and S G Hillier
Steroid signalling in human ovarian surface epithelial cells: the response to interleukin-1{alpha} determined by microarray analysis
J. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2004;
183(1):
19 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Finch, L. Green, J. N. Hislop, E. Kelly, and C. A. McArdle
Signaling and Antiproliferative Effects of Type I and II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2004;
89(4):
1823 - 1832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chamson-Reig, E. M. Sorianello, P. N. Catalano, M. O. Fernandez, O. P. Pignataro, C. Libertun, and V. A. R. Lux-Lantos
Gonadotropin-Releasi |